WEBVTT - US Government Shutdown Looms 

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.200 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple Car, play in

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 2>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App, Listen on demand

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 2>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Intelligence Radio. Let me set the stage

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 3>for you. So if you're a political commentator, as if

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 3>yesterday you're like cool, I'm like really close to being

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 3>on vac Like I'm just going to get through the seat.

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 3>The Continuing Resolution is going to happen. The Government's not

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 3>going to shut down Friday. I'm going to get to

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 3>go and go to a beach and hang out and

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 3>have a little drink with umbrellas. And then yesterday after

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:45.480
<v Speaker 3>four o'clock that dream gets dashed because at President Donald

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Trump is now elect is now opposing House Speaker Mike

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 3>Johnson's plan to avoid that government shutdown instead now calling

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 3>for a new approach that includes raising the debt ceiling,

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 3>making it very complicated as to what that road is

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 3>us as Henry to Trace, managing partner and director of

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:05.039
<v Speaker 3>Economic Policy at Beta Partners, not sipping on her little

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 3>umbrella drink, Henrietta.

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Why, Alex I feel very triggered by that entire introduction.

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 4>I appreciated all, but that you're exactly right.

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that this is an incredibly smart move for

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the incoming Trump team. They have no skin in the

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 1>game right now, he's not the president. And what's going

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to happen next year, as we've been discussing with clients

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 1>for months now, is that they're going to have to

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>face perpetual risks of government shutdown and then in July

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>a debt ceiling negotiation with Democrats.

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 4>And let's just think about the numbers here.

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>In twenty twenty three, seventy one Republicans voted against increasing

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the debt ceiling.

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 4>There's only ten blue dogs.

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Of the Democratic Conference of Moderates who might cross the

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:56.639
<v Speaker 1>aisle and vote for a debt ceiling hike sometime this week.

0:01:56.880 --> 0:02:00.120
<v Speaker 1>So basically, the math just does not add up for

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to get sixty votes in the Senate and two

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred and eighteen votes in the House to increase the

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>debt ceiling in the next forty eight hours. But it's

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>incredibly intelligent of Trump to try to get it out

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of the way because it is going to be a

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:15.240
<v Speaker 1>massive impediment to the Republican agenda in twenty twenty five

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>if it's not cleared early.

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:19.799
<v Speaker 5>If there's a government shutdown, won't the blame be placed

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 5>upon the Republican Party? And if so, how does that

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 5>calculus work?

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 4>Right? It always is.

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>The blame is always always placed on the Republican Conference.

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>They are the ones who instigate government shutdowns, going as

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>far back as Ted Cruz and what was that twenty eleven,

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirteen. You know, it's playing to the American voter

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>that Republicans are to blame. But there's a disproportionate amount

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:45.679
<v Speaker 1>of Democrats who care about a government shutdown versus Republicans

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>who don't see it as too much of a big deal.

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:49.920
<v Speaker 4>The optics are obviously atrocious. You're going to.

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Send federal employees home during the holidays over Christmas without

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>a paycheck in the next two weeks. You're going to

0:02:57.320 --> 0:03:00.639
<v Speaker 1>shut all the national parks where Americans are travel at

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty high rates right now over the holidays. So it's

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>definitely not good optics. It makes Congress looks dysfunctional, But

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:11.080
<v Speaker 1>what it's really showing us and the Christmas present for

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:13.360
<v Speaker 1>investors right now is that this is a precursor of

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:15.919
<v Speaker 1>just how dysfunctional Republicans are going to be next year.

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 1>They have not had the votes for government funding bills

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>for a decade, and usually it's Democrats to bail them out.

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 1>And right now Kee Jefferies and Chuck Schumer are holding

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:28.800
<v Speaker 1>their party together to say, look, this is your mess.

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:30.240
<v Speaker 4>You bail yourself out of this.

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:30.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 3>I feel like I use that with my daughter sometimes too.

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 3>But the dead ceiling issue, right like moving forward the

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 3>dead ceialing issue. So Trump won't have to deal with

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 3>it in the summer, but instead that we'll come under

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 3>Biden's watch. He said to NBC that he'd like to

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 3>get rid of the debt ceiling all together. How do

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 3>you think that particular part plays out.

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean that's very expected from Trump.

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>He has famously said, let's just see what happens if

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>you default, So I think his position on this is

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>very clear. It's a nightmare for any present to have

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to increase the debt ceiling because you need to negotiate

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:06.119
<v Speaker 1>with the other party. The difference here is that you can,

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>in fact increase the debt ceiling be a reconciliation. So

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 1>if Republicans do not want to negotiate with Democrats. They

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>all they have to do is include a debt ceiling

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:18.359
<v Speaker 1>hike in the next reconciliation bill, which the Senate Budget

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Committee is hoping to mark up as early as the

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 1>first week of January. So there is an alternative here

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>and Democrats know that. So if Republicans really do want

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 1>it off the table, they have a path forward that

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>they just need to carry the votes. They just need

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>to find two hundred and seventeen, and there have never

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>been two hundred and seventeen Republican votes for the debt sealing.

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 5>Henrietta, are you surprised that we have heard relatively little,

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 5>if anything from the Biden administration. It's President elect Trump

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 5>and his representatives taken all the auction in out of

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 5>room about this topic.

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely.

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:50.279
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a really important dynamic to all this.

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:54.479
<v Speaker 1>We know that Joe Biden, as president and even a Senator,

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>has always preferred sort of the diplomatic, negotiated solution. Democrats

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 1>generally believe the government phone for a purpose, and I

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:05.920
<v Speaker 1>think if Biden wanted to insert himself into this process,

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>he could, but you're absolutely correct, he's been completely off

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:12.679
<v Speaker 1>the radar in this entire conversation, which admittedly only popped

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>up in the last twenty four hours.

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:16.160
<v Speaker 3>So what do we think happens?

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Like?

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Are we extending programming on television and radio on Friday

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 3>to cover the weekend?

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Like?

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 3>What are we think in here?

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:24.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, my odds of a shutdown are about twenty percent

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>right now, which is admittedly very high for me. I'm

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>usually in this zero to five percent range from a shutdown,

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 1>so I'm much higher than I usually am. But I

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:34.159
<v Speaker 1>don't think a shutdown is guaranteed. I think that Speaker

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Johnson and indeed President elect Trump should want the government

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 1>to stay open so that on January third, they can

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>get the ball rolling, they can elect their speaker, they

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>can start passing if this fill your twenty twenty five budget,

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:48.040
<v Speaker 1>paving the way for a reconciliation bill on border and

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>then a future package on the tax package next year.

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 1>That is, you know, investors should take away one thing today.

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 1>It's that the tax bill it's going to take all year.

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be very hard to write, and there's

0:05:57.240 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>some very strong chance that Republicans have to negotiate with

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Democrats on it, and that odds are growing as this

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 1>debt ceiling, A c our fight is exhibiting in real time,

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think we'll shut down. I think a

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:10.600
<v Speaker 1>very short term, maybe two weeks stopgap bill is what

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:12.840
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see probably tomorrow morning.

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:13.600
<v Speaker 6>Interesting.

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:15.159
<v Speaker 5>Henrietta, thank you so much for joining us. I know

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 5>you're super busy when all this news breaking here. Henrietta

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:20.360
<v Speaker 5>trez Manage, your partner and director of economic policy for

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 5>Vida Partners. She has safely asconced down there in New Orleans.

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:25.160
<v Speaker 5>She's like, I'm not going to Washington or New York

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 5>any that's silliness.

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but she's probably not getting the umbrella drink either.

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:29.920
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, she's not in there. She spent the work.

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 4>A little wind there is.

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 2>That you're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 2>live weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business. You can also listen

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:46.160
<v Speaker 2>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty, Alex.

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 5>Steel, Paul Sweeney. We're live here in on our Bloomberg

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 5>Interactive Broker Studio. We're streaming live on YouTube as well,

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:57.599
<v Speaker 5>also ahead over YouTube dot com search Bloomberg Podcast, and

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 5>that's where you will find us again. Yesterday, the market

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 5>really surprised, let's put it that way, on the messaging

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 5>coming out of the Fed here as it relates to

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 5>potential cuts. In twenty twenty five, we had the S

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 5>and P off two and a half percent, the Nastack

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 5>off three and a half percent. Yesterday, big, big volume

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 5>across the board, a little bit of a rebound here

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 5>this morning. Let's see where we go from here. David

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 5>Kodla joins US founder, chief executive officer, and chief investment

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 5>strategist at Mainstay Capital Management, Troy, Michigan, A great town,

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:30.680
<v Speaker 5>by the way, been there, Hey, David, talk to us about,

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 5>you know, kind of how you saw the market action

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 5>yesterday afternoon and then maybe today kind of what's the

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:39.119
<v Speaker 5>market telling me about the how it views this federal reserve.

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I think that the Good morning Paul per your

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 7>lead into the segment. I think the markets and investors

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 7>were surprised, and I think also confused. I think the

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 7>presser was quite confusing. Jay Powell, you know, if I

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 7>heard all that and here.

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Talking about why why.

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 7>He was hiking rates a quarter point would have been

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 7>a good explanation, but they're not right. They're cutting a

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 7>quarter point. So there's some real confusion about you know,

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 7>where where the FED is headed. Are they making another

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 7>policy mistake as we speak, And as far as the

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 7>FED is concerned, you know, they're their their problem is uncertainty.

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 7>You know, we have a saying in our industry, right

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 7>the markets hate uncertainty. Well, the FED hates uncertainty too.

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 7>And they really don't know what to expect for inflation

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 7>next year with Trump policies still not being fully known,

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 7>how they'll get rolled out, when they'll get rolled out. Uh,

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 7>some of those very potentially very inflationary. They don't know

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 7>how much inflation will be fighting next year. But the

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 7>presser was more about the labor market, you know, the

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:49.080
<v Speaker 7>other side of the mandate.

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:51.199
<v Speaker 2>So, uh, the.

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 7>Market was just confused in the face of that. I

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 7>think it was you know, shoot now asked questions later.

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:01.319
<v Speaker 3>I guess the question that rose yes to many economists

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 3>is that the FED is at a risk of making

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:07.559
<v Speaker 3>a policy mistake in that they're going to fight and

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 3>inflation that they don't necessarily need to fight at the

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:13.079
<v Speaker 3>expense of the labor market. That was one narrative that

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 3>some economists were putting out there.

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 7>What do you think of that, Well, good morning, Alex.

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 7>I think that I think they're focused on the I

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 7>think they're focused on the wrong thing. I think that

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 7>twenty twenty five is going to be the year of

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 7>the stubborn inflation battle. Whether it's the massive federal deficit,

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:39.679
<v Speaker 7>spending that's going to happen, tax cuts, all these things

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:44.959
<v Speaker 7>that are good for the economy, but in tariffs especially

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 7>that could cause a rise in inflation. It's that area

0:09:52.160 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 7>that is more of the problem, I think than labor,

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 7>and that's where you're seeing on the long end of

0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 7>the curve. Look what's happened since September eight teenth. Over

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 7>the past three months, the Fed has cut one hundred

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 7>basis points. The ten year yield has gone up nearly

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 7>one hundred basis points. That is not the normal reaction

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:14.199
<v Speaker 7>function that we expect. In fact, we usually the ten

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 7>year follows by some degree to what the Fed is doing.

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 7>So that's the bond vigilantes. At Yard Denny's coin term

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 7>back in the nineties, it's a bond vigilantes that are

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 7>fighting the FED. And so there's just a lot of

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:30.559
<v Speaker 7>confusion out there. I think uncertainly on the part of

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 7>the FED. That's why the press or seem confused. And

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:36.680
<v Speaker 7>I think there's they need to be looking more towards

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:38.679
<v Speaker 7>inflation than labor right now in my opinion.

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 5>David, you've been in these markets many years. You've seen

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 5>all kinds of cycles and news events, and it looks

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 5>like we may have another government shutdown. As an investor,

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 5>how does that factor in, if at all, to your outlook?

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 7>You know, and back in the mid nineties when we

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 7>had this first government shut down pending, it was armageddon

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:06.680
<v Speaker 7>and the markets reacted violently to it. As years have

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:10.680
<v Speaker 7>gone by, we've seen that investors in the markets kind

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 7>of shrug off the antics in Washington, d C. More

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 7>and more. And for many of these types of events,

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 7>we might get volatility for a day, maybe two days,

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 7>but it passes. I think the markets investors have learned

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 7>to largely ignore it or have just chosen to, you know,

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 7>and look at fundamentals. So, you know, whether we get

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 7>a continuing resolution passed tomorrow, it doesn't come till Monday,

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 7>there'll be some volatility in the markets potentially because of it,

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 7>but then we'll move on.

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 3>What do you make of the fact that the earnings

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 3>picture is TBD for next year and that the consensus

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 3>and then what the S and P is implying is

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 3>pretty strong, and then you wind up having this uncertainty

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 3>about the FED. Now, some might say it's okay because

0:11:57.480 --> 0:11:59.479
<v Speaker 3>earnings are going to be really good, we're gonna have deregulation,

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 3>and we're going to lower taxes, so yeah, we can

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:03.839
<v Speaker 3>justify that. But the other side is, we just don't know,

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 3>and if rates stay stickier, as you say, that inflation

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 3>actually increases a little bit, that that consensus might need

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 3>to come down. Where do you stand on.

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 7>That it might need to come down? But if we

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 7>look at Trump's policies, deficit spending, deregulation, which will be

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 7>good for US corporations across the board. Tariffs will be

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 7>good for some bad for others, depending on if they're

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 7>a multinational conglomerate bringing products in or whether it's even

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:38.559
<v Speaker 7>smaller mid cap companies where their input costs will be impacted.

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 7>But I think net net, we're still looking for a

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 7>good earning for good earnings growth next year, and that

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 7>Trump policies net net will probably only benefit that.

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 3>All right, thanks a lot, David, really appreciate. David Kudlah,

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 3>founder's CEO and chief investment strategist at Mainstay Capital Management Intinent.

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg and te podcast. Catch us

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:04.559
<v Speaker 2>live weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple car Play

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 2>and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App, Listen on

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 2>demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 2>on YouTube.

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:14.839
<v Speaker 3>All right, Nathan Dean was here yesterday and now he's

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:17.320
<v Speaker 3>back in DC. I can't I can't keep dragged on

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 3>that the wholesali Thank yeah.

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 6>All right.

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 3>Nathan Dean, Bloomberg Intelligence and your policy analyst, joins us

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 3>now from DC. And we had a totally different conversation

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 3>yesterday and when it came to politics, and then today

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 3>it's like, oh wait, maybe there will be a shutdown

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 3>on Friday. Oh wait, maybe the debt ceiling is in

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:35.839
<v Speaker 3>play now rather than in the summer. What is your

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 3>take and consensus someone's going to happen.

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, So yesterday I said there was a twenty percent

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 8>chance of a government shutdown. I'm only going to go

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 8>to forty percent. So I think I'm out of consensus here.

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 8>But what I'm saying is that I think we're going

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:48.440
<v Speaker 8>to have a forty percent chance of a government shutdown

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 8>by Monday, so tomorrow night. Obviously, the government shuts down

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 8>at midnight unless it continuing resolution has been passed. But

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:57.080
<v Speaker 8>we've seen in the past before Congress sometimes takes the

0:13:57.080 --> 0:13:59.560
<v Speaker 8>weekend to figure out a deal. And I think despite

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 8>all the blome and the political prosting you're seeing at

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 8>the moment, I think a deal can be made for

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 8>clean CR plus, disaster AD plus potentially the one year

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:11.200
<v Speaker 8>extension of the farm bill because if something doesn't happen,

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 8>that farm bill and the impact on farmers is going

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 8>to be substantial in twenty twenty five if the government

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 8>shuts down, and I think that's going to be what

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 8>finally gets this deal over the edge. But like you said,

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 8>the debt ceilings now involved, and there's going to be

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 8>a lot more political hiccups to come, certainly over the

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 8>next few weeks and months.

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 5>All right, From my perspective, the politics and that people

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 5>involved seem a little squirrely to me. I've got a

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 5>president elect and I got some civilian dude really weighing

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 5>in on this issue in a big way and moving markets.

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 5>Yet I have a president who's actually sitting in the

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 5>chair and I don't hear anything. What's going on in

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 5>debt Washington? What are you guys doing down there?

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so essentially what the Democrats are doing right now

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 8>essentially letting the Republicans try and figure out what is

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 8>the base case scenario. All these negotiations that you may

0:14:56.880 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 8>know are taking place in the House with Speaker of

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 8>the House Mike Johnson, and he was the one that

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 8>negotiated a deal that Elon Musk and then later President

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 8>Trump came in and said, no, we're not comfortable with.

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 8>So what you need right now is the Republicans to

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 8>come on board with an idea of a bill.

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 6>That will pass the House.

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 8>And we've even seen Senator Majority Leader Chuck Schumer say,

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 8>you look, from the Senate perspective, we're just gonna let

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 8>the House figure it out first and then we'll deal

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 8>with it. And that's where the dead ceiling eventually comes in,

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 8>because look, you can't really get a dead ceiling deal.

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 8>I don't think within another like say, twenty four hours.

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 8>These usually take weeks and months to hash out. And

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 8>if the Republicans decided to move forward with a two

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 8>year extension of the debt ceiling. More often than not,

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 8>Republicans also insist on cuts as a result of that.

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 8>So I think what will happen here is the Democrats

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 8>sort of way back and they say, Okay, Speaker of

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 8>the House, Michael Mike Johnson, you figure it out, you

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 8>come up with a plan, you get this plan through

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 8>the House, and then if that's the case, then we'll

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 8>move forward and we'll deal with it on the Senate side.

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 8>Because for everything you're talking about, just remember this has

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 8>to be bipartisan because you need seven Democrats. I'm sorry,

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 8>you're gonna need a lot of Democrats to come forth

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 8>and get this through on the Senate side.

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Is the debt ceiling really in play?

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 1>You know?

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 6>Obviously?

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 8>I think President Trump when he made the statement earlier

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 8>today that they should abolish the debt ceiling, that's something

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 8>the Democrats would actually welcome. We saw Senator Elizabeth Warren

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 8>even say that she would support President Trump on that matter.

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 8>I think that was also a way for President Trump

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 8>potentially to give Speaker Johnson a way out, saying, look,

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 8>if we can't get the debt ceiling done. But from

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 8>the market perspective, what I would say, is the deadline

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 8>is not December thirty. First, that's only the date in

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 8>which Treasury can use extraordinary measures to keep her funding.

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 8>The actual X date, if you will, is sometime next summer.

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 8>So from the market perspective or in terms of government

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 8>shutdowns and debt ceilings and so forth, we're not seeing much.

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 6>Impact from all this political posturing at the moment.

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 5>What's the feeling in Washington and Nathan about the status

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 5>of Speaker Johnson because it feels like he's really under

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 5>the gun here from all side.

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, you know, if we had had this conversation last week,

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 8>I'd say it's fairly comfortable of his position, but today

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 8>it's not. Senator Ran Paul even floated the idea of

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 8>potentially having Elon Musk to be the Speaker of the House,

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 8>because you don't have to be a member of the

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 8>House of Representatives to be the Speaker. Now, I don't

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 8>think that's going to happen, but a lot of the

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:14.920
<v Speaker 8>Johnson allies, if you have been sort of questioning whether

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 8>or not he has the chops for the job early

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 8>next year, and you know that election is going to

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 8>take place on January third.

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 6>So I'm not exactly.

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:24.880
<v Speaker 8>Sure, I'd be comfortable if I was in Speaker Johnson's position,

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 8>But that being said, I don't know anybody else who

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 8>wants the job.

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:30.120
<v Speaker 3>Wait, but let's get back to the Elon Muslin because

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't think I think I knew that, but then

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 3>I think I forgot it, and then now I know

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:35.360
<v Speaker 3>it again. So just walk me through. So anyone can

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 3>be Speaker of the House, like my mom could be

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 3>Speaker of the House if she gets enough votes.

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, you know, if Paul wants to get back again

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:42.920
<v Speaker 8>at the government service, we can have Paul be Speaker

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 8>of the House.

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:46.680
<v Speaker 8>Essentially, it's something that goes back to obviously through the

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 8>Constitution days and so forth.

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 6>But there's been a.

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:51.399
<v Speaker 8>Lot of talk over the last few years about potentially

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 8>having President Trump become Speaker of the House. During the

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 8>Biden administration, obviously that didn't go anywhere. But the reason

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:58.680
<v Speaker 8>why Elon Musk would not want to be Speaker of

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 8>the House is because, yes, you get to use the

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:02.679
<v Speaker 8>bully pulpit and you get to decide what's on the floor,

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:04.919
<v Speaker 8>but you also have to get into the nitty gritty

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:08.400
<v Speaker 8>and manage all two hundred and twenty Republican members next

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 8>year when you only have a majority of five, and

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 8>that is an extremely difficult position when you have to

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 8>make tough choices like am I going to shut the

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:18.399
<v Speaker 8>government down? Or am I going to extend the farm

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 8>bill one year and have provide all this relief to

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:22.119
<v Speaker 8>the American farmer base.

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 6>That's a tough choice.

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 8>And that's why I don't think the elon musk rumor,

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 8>if you will, is a serious one.

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 5>Okay, Okay, we're still processing.

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 3>We're still processing. I also just feel like, I mean,

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:37.440
<v Speaker 3>can you imagine like running the house, running Spear, or

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 3>being part of SpaceX, running your AI company, running Tesla,

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 3>and there's a lot going on there. Okay, so give

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 3>me some well, I guesually, let's go back and talk

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 3>about playbook. So we have learned what maybe a Trump

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 3>playbook for twenty twenty five then looks like is this

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 3>what we can start expecting?

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 3>Like the Congress does something and then musk Ramaswami and

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:01.879
<v Speaker 3>Trump kind of weigh in in different ways, and then

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:03.720
<v Speaker 3>that affects policy. Is this going to be the state

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 3>of play I.

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 8>Think so, I mean, obviously, you know, a lot has

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 8>to happen but I think you know, one of the

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:12.680
<v Speaker 8>biggest issues, if you will, is if they do continue

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 8>to if they pass a continuing resolution that kicks this

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 8>into March. Now you've got a funding fight within the

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 8>first one hundred days of President Trump's presidency.

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 6>And it's usually when presidents.

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 8>Don't want to deal with funding because they want to

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:28.400
<v Speaker 8>use their political capital on things like immigration, border potentially

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 8>in this case, a reconciliation package for tax extensions.

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 6>But if this government funding fight kicks the.

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:36.360
<v Speaker 8>Canda March, now, you're going to have Elon Musk tweeting

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 8>out there saying, look, we need to delete the CFBB

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 8>or get rid of the Department of Education. And at

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:43.920
<v Speaker 8>that point you are going to need seven Democrats in

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 8>the Senate to agree. You most likely won't, and now

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:49.119
<v Speaker 8>you're going to have a government shutdown. Is that a

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:51.640
<v Speaker 8>fight that President Trump wants to have within the first

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 8>one hundred days of his presidency.

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:53.919
<v Speaker 6>We really don't know.

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 8>It just depends on the politics per se. But I

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 8>will say is is that we do think a prolonged shutdown,

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 8>whether it's in March or September of next year, I

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:04.879
<v Speaker 8>would bet on September a prolonged shutdown of two to

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 8>three four wy five weeks potentially could happen, because right

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 8>now both parties are saying, look, you know, we're seeing

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:13.879
<v Speaker 8>pretty we're sitting pretty comfortable with the positions that we have.

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 5>All right, let's go to what was a front page

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 5>topic a matter of week ago, a week or two ago.

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 5>Which are some of these nominations that have to get

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:28.199
<v Speaker 5>sentate confirmation in January? Any update on some of the

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:33.159
<v Speaker 5>more contentious ones, mister Hegseth, Tulsa Gabbard, RFK Junior, just

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 5>to name a few.

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:36.720
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so they're making the rounds on Capitol Hill as

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 8>we speak. I mean Senator Fetterman from Pennsylvania met with

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 8>Pete Hegseth last week, sorry, earlier this week, and rf

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 8>K Junior is making the rounds today. You know, I

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:48.119
<v Speaker 8>would just say that, you know, I think right now

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:49.959
<v Speaker 8>and for the rest of December, it's really just going

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:52.399
<v Speaker 8>to be more of these like photo meet and greeps

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 8>and so forth like that. We're not seeing a ton

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 8>of pushback on Pete Hegseth like we saw a week ago.

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 8>But I think a lot of the far our works

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:02.719
<v Speaker 8>will come down to these committee hearings and obviously these

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:05.439
<v Speaker 8>nomination hearings because a lot of the tough questions are

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 8>going to be asked, and these are going to be

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:09.679
<v Speaker 8>asked from both Republicans and Democrats, and so for somebody

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 8>like Tulca Gabbard, if the senior Democrat begins to really

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 8>question on some of those positions, things could potentially unravel.

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 6>But I will say, remember.

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 8>The Republicans are going to have fifty three in the

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 8>Senate next year, which means you can afford to lose four,

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:25.400
<v Speaker 8>and so you know, many of these cases, I think

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 8>it's going to be pressure for them to withdraw because

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 8>the votes may be there for them to get across

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:29.919
<v Speaker 8>the line.

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 3>Amazing. It's going to be fascinating to sort of watch

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 3>how all of this winds up playing out. We also

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:38.640
<v Speaker 3>heard over the last well we heard it yesterday, we've

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:40.439
<v Speaker 3>had about twenty four hours to digest, is that the

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 3>Supreme Court is going to take up that TikTok version.

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 3>What do we make of that? Like, how do you

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 3>think that's going to play out in DC?

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, So my colleague Matt Schattennelman and I were talking

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:54.359
<v Speaker 8>about this yesterday and I really raked his head on this.

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 8>You know, This is a question of you know, this

0:21:56.960 --> 0:22:00.159
<v Speaker 8>law was scheduled to go into effect January nineteenth, one

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 8>day before the inauguration, and there wasn't really I mean,

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 8>just remember we're talking about a law here, and so

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 8>if you want to undo the law, you either need

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:09.480
<v Speaker 8>the courts to come in and say it's no constitutional

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 8>or Congress has to pass a new law. And so

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:14.919
<v Speaker 8>there isn't really much of a magic wand that President

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 8>Trump could do on day one, unless the Supreme Court

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 8>were to give that magic wand to him. He could

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 8>certainly say the Department of Justice, yes, you don't have

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 8>to enforce this. But from the Apple perspective or any

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:27.359
<v Speaker 8>other company that offers it on their app store, you know,

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:30.200
<v Speaker 8>that's actually not a very comfortable position because you want

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:32.920
<v Speaker 8>to essentially be able to say that President Trump can't

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 8>change his mind three months from now, or a new

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:38.400
<v Speaker 8>Democratic administration four years now could say to Apple, look,

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 8>we understand that you know you've been operating against the law.

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 6>Here's a multi billion dollar enforcement action for your problems.

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:46.400
<v Speaker 8>So the Supreme Court case is going to be extremely

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 8>key to whether or not Apple gets any of this

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 8>clarity going forward, and what essentially the law details.

0:22:52.680 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 5>All right, Nathan, thank you so much for joining us.

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 5>Nathan Dean, He's our go to person don in Washington,

0:22:56.960 --> 0:23:00.479
<v Speaker 5>d C. As it pertains to all that policy stuff there,

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 5>and I think we're gonna be talking a lot to

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 5>him in the coming days, weeks, and months and maybe

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:07.159
<v Speaker 5>the next four years. Nathan Deane, Senior Policy alis for

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg Intelligence. He is based in our Washington DC bureau.

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:15.480
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on apples, Spotify,

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you will get your podcasts. Listen live

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 2>each weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 2>b iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 2>and always on the Bloomberg terminal.