WEBVTT - 'Missing Inflation' Is Seen In Asset Prices: Shalett

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penl Podcast. I'm Paul swing you,

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>along with my co host Lisa Brahma wits. Each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.959
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. Well, after that big sell off yesterday,

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing markets rebound pretty strongly here with the the

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>SNP up about one percent. We had some good, very

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:31.159
<v Speaker 1>good consumer confidence day to come out this morning, so

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that's clearly supporting the market. To get a sense of

0:00:33.000 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of where we are right now, we welcome at

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:38.159
<v Speaker 1>Lisa Chalotte. She's a chief investment officer Wealth Management and

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:41.559
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Stanley. They got like a gazillion dollars under management

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:44.840
<v Speaker 1>two point for eight trillion to be more precise. Lisa,

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:46.919
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us on our Bloomberg Interactive

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Broker studio. So how do you put yesterday in today

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of in context? Because folks out there driving around

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>there saying, wow, yesterday was really ugly, but what's costing

0:00:56.600 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>today's bounce? Back. Yeah, So yesterday was very much about

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 1>out a classical global growth scare UH. And we get

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>these every now and then, UH, and they very often

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>lead to market sell offs. And you know, the idea,

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>UH is basically that UH, the nascent rebound that we

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:21.760
<v Speaker 1>have potentially we're beginning to see might get curtailed by

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the spread of coronavirus and and the idea that the

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>rebound that may have begun in China gets stalled. And

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's really what the markets were obsessed

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>with yesterday. All that being said, when the dust settles

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>and the markets, UM, you know, sold off. I think

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of investors who believe, UH rightfully

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>that the US is disconnected in many ways from the

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>global economy is kind of UH in oasis. Only nine

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>percent of net GDP, of net trade UH is related

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>UH do DP is related to trade UH, And so

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>in many ways, the US is very much a domestic

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:08.359
<v Speaker 1>oriented economy. And so you come into today UH with

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>ample liquidity UM still extraordinary sentiment and positioning people wanting

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>to be long this market. UH, and you get a

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:19.800
<v Speaker 1>little piece of data that says the US consumer, which

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>is of the mix, is UM still feeling good. Uh,

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and people are willing to say, yeah, we're gonna weather

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 1>this storm to yeah, this storm being a one point

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 1>six percent decline yesterday and today we're up almost a percent.

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>So uh, these these huge moves are are sort of

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>infantestable and historical perspective, But nowadays, I guess volatility has

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>been killed. But I am curious. Right now we're seeing uh,

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>financial conditions at all time the easiest ever based on

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:50.119
<v Speaker 1>a Chicago FED and St. Louis FED measures coming out

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>in the past few weeks. Capex, though continuing to trend lower.

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>US GDP growth still only two percent. I'm trying to

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>square the idea of relatively slow ish growth, lack of

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>wage inflation, lack of capital expenditures on the part of companies,

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>with this incredibly strong job confidence and and just really

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>low jobless rates. What am I missing? These pieces don't

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:17.519
<v Speaker 1>seem to go together. Yes, they don't. UM. And so

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>you know what we have very often said is, look,

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:22.919
<v Speaker 1>the lack of inflation in the real economy UM has

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>completely shown up in financial asset markets. UM. We know

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>that for the past eleven years we've been in a

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty profound bowl market UM where U s docks have

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>compounded at about four which is two times normal. UM.

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>We think a lot of the provision of FED liquidity,

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and you noted financial conditions among the easiest they've ever been. UM.

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:48.839
<v Speaker 1>That liquidity has found its way to financial assets UH

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and been recycled not into fundamental capital spending and fundamental

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>capital formation, but into share repurchases and a return of

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>capital UH to UH to shareholders. So there's been the

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 1>huge wealth transfer UH and many of our clients and

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>certainly investors in the stock markets have benefited from that.

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>But that's where the inflation is UM. In the real economy. UH.

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>The real economy itself has really been struggling over this

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 1>last decade with UM reasonably weak UH working age population

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 1>growth UM and reasonably weak productivity growth UH. And so

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>we've kind of been bouncing around this two to three

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:32.239
<v Speaker 1>percent UH. And even though we have UM low unemployment UM,

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>we have not seen wage pressures UH. And so as

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 1>a result, UM, we haven't seen the classical capital for

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:46.279
<v Speaker 1>labor substitution effects that you typically get UH end of cycle.

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>What we've seen is companies saying, hey, I can get

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>away with hiring people. I don't really pay them anything.

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't give them wage increases. UM. So I'll just

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'll hold them in there as long as

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 1>as the cycle holds up as good enough. And that's

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>what we've been this good enough. So I'm looking at

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>your tactical asset allocation UH, and the global equities underweight

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the US but overweight emerging markets international. What's your thoughts

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>behind that? So look, our our thoughts there are really

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>around relative valuation. You know, we've been in at this

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:19.239
<v Speaker 1>period as we talked about for the last eleven years

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 1>where US markets have profound the outperformed um the other regions,

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>and as a result, we have a very very strong

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 1>US dollar UM. So as we look at relative valuations today, UM,

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, we see the US and and really the

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:37.720
<v Speaker 1>top decile of p ratios for the last hundred years,

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:41.040
<v Speaker 1>it's it's getting to be an expensive market. UM. We

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:44.479
<v Speaker 1>know that on an equity risk premium basis or adjusted

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:48.480
<v Speaker 1>for low interest rates, you know, evaluations are not yet extreme.

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 1>But in terms of nominal ps UM, the US market

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>is really um, you know, getting expensive at at nine

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:58.159
<v Speaker 1>times at nineteen times forward. So our view is that

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>as we look into t any the improvement in global

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:05.280
<v Speaker 1>growth that we thought was going to come both cyclically

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 1>and from the trade deal. Really we think has the

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>highest beta outside the US. We just talked about the

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>fact that the US is kind of an isolated economy. Um, well,

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you can't have it both ways. You can't say, oh,

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 1>global growth and global trade are gonna pick up and

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the US is gonna benefit. Um when you just said, hey,

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:26.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, the US is its own um story. So, Um,

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>we have favored non US markets this year basically believing

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 1>that there's more operating leverage and better valuations. How long

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>can this disconnect continue where the inflation really is in

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 1>assets and not in the real economy. Um. So I

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:43.119
<v Speaker 1>think we're starting to approach, um, the point of pain,

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and and that's where you know, valuations start um, you know,

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>begging uh um, you know belief uh and and our

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 1>senses were starting to see examples of that. Um. We

0:06:56.240 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>think you know that the history books are gonna reflect um,

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>you know that we work debacle as maybe you know

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:09.479
<v Speaker 1>an example of valuations becoming disconnected. And certainly a lot

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>of folks have said, oh no, no, no, that's just

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>an idiosyncratic situation. But we see examples of it, whether

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at um valuations in VC or we're looking

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>at valuations some of the valuations that are being paid

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>in the private equity markets, etcetera. That's fascinating. This is

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>really really interesting, Lisa Chellette, thank you. Apple shares up

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>more than two percent ahead of reporting earnings after the

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>bell today. A lot of questions about just how robust

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>their growth has been, whether it can justify the tremendous

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>rally that we saw last year and some of the

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 1>estimates that analysts have across Wall Street. But I want

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>to turn our focus to what actually is going on

0:07:57.640 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 1>right now and help us do that. As John Butler,

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Senior tell Services and Equipment analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence, and

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:06.679
<v Speaker 1>that is the effect of the coronavirus on its supply chain,

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>which may or may not be in the front and

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>center today as the report earnings. But you think it

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 1>could be potentially substantial, right I do. I want to

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>stress I view it sort of as a near term risk.

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 1>So Bloomberg did a great piece last night on m

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Live blog where they talked about epidemics and the typical

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 1>bell curve that goes with that. So uh from beginning

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 1>to peak, it's typically ten weeks, call it two and

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>a half months, and that's sort of the before the

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>number of cases begins to decline. And so my thought

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 1>in reading that was that that's the risk, that's the

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>window where Beijing could remain proactive about closing down factories,

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:59.839
<v Speaker 1>restricting travel and in general doing the right thing, but

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:03.319
<v Speaker 1>putting measures in place that could threaten the Apple supply chain.

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 1>So looking ahead to the coming year for Apple, they

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 1>reportedly are set to launch a lower cost replacement to

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the old iPhone. See if you remember that, So it's

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>a lower cost iPhone sort of positioned at the high

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>end of the mid price market, which is a big segment.

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 1>But if you're gonna launch that in March, you got

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to start building it in February at the latest. So

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 1>in my mind, that sets up a near term risk

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 1>for them. It could lead to a push out of

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the introduction of that phone, and god, if this whole

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>scenario plays out longer than that ten week peak, then

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>ultimately it could may even threaten the September refresh, although

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to be clear, I don't see that happening. Um. I

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>think this whole scenario with coronavirus is probably going to

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 1>play out over a typical bell curve. So John is,

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:04.840
<v Speaker 1>as Apple or any other technology companies that have a

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 1>big president in China, they talked about any supply chain disruptions.

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>They have not, and so I think a lot of

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 1>people are going to be coming into tonight's Apple report

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and the earnings call anxious to hear something. I would

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:23.839
<v Speaker 1>be amazed if they didn't address it already in China.

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the retail store base, they have

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>limited the number of hours those stores are open across

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 1>all of China. So clearly it's on Apple's mind and

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>they're already taking measures to address the the thread of

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>this virus. All right, So let's get to the big,

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the big kuna here, which is the earnings, right, the

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>first two trillion dollar company, right. Yeah, it's interesting they're

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 1>set up for this great year. You know, the iPhone tennis,

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>which sold throughout last year, did not really resonate well

0:10:55.960 --> 0:11:00.079
<v Speaker 1>with people, and every quarter last year they booked to

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 1>a double digit decline in iPhone sales. So we have

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>very low hurdle set up for this year. Every quarter

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>this year, and the iPhone eleven that they introduced in

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 1>September last year has done really well, um by any measure.

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're hearing from third party researchers as well

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>as the tech community. Uh, just in general. I'm seeing

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:27.199
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it out there, a lot of iPhone

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>elevens in in people's hands. What I think they got

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>so right is they introduced a new camera system. So

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>you've got sort of a hit on your hands, some

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>new devices coming to market and a lot of selfies.

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 1>He likes the filters, he likes the multiple cameras. I

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>looked at Tom Keene. Tom Keine posts some amazing photos

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter from his phone eleven, so he's really been efficient.

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I just point and pushed a little point. He spends

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 1>He spends entire radio segments filming said videos. You know,

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>it is interesting though, and it's just the idea of

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 1>phone camera. I mean, that's essentially what's happening. Cameras have

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>become digital digital. I'm sorry, today's smartphones are digital cameras

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 1>with a phone app basically, and so the phone is

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:20.559
<v Speaker 1>honestly no all kidding aside is it's the most important

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 1>feature on any smartphone. And I really think Apple did

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:27.839
<v Speaker 1>a lights out job with the iPhone eleven. And they

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:31.959
<v Speaker 1>lowered the starting price by fifty dollars. So it just

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 1>has done very well and I think we're gonna hear

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 1>that tonight and it sets them up for a great

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 1>year where you have this low bar set from how

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>we performance. How important is that five G story to Apple?

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>A lot of bulls are out there saying this is

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the next major refresh cycle. I think I think they're right,

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's going to play out over a

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>longer period of time than they think. People don't upgrade

0:12:56.920 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>immediately to the new technology, so if you look at

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>four G, it was sort of a multi year ramp

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to the point where sat uh not saturation penetration levels

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 1>in the US we're really meaningful. So I think we'll

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:14.560
<v Speaker 1>see the same thing happened this year, where we have

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:18.719
<v Speaker 1>a decent year of early adopters. The iPhone five G

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:21.080
<v Speaker 1>coming out in September, I think is going to be

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 1>a popular device, but it will take a couple of

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 1>years to really get out there, so to speak. I

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:29.560
<v Speaker 1>feel like sociologists are going to look at this period

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 1>of time where it's no longer about the conversation, it's

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:35.200
<v Speaker 1>just about how you look. I mean, honestly, I do

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>think that this is going to be a transformation that people,

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, just want to see themselves others, but they

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 1>don't actually want to have and conversations have gone to

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>texting yes for the most guilty. By the way, John Butler,

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. John Butler, Senior Telecom

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Services and Equipment Annals also is the ace on Apple

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Intelligence. There is a big question right now

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>as US equity is rebound after yesterday sell off, how

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 1>will China's market respond in the wake of the closure

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>of the Wuhan City How how big it is it

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 1>accounts for one point six percent of the total GDP

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 1>of China, as well as the potential ramifications for JN

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>paying the president of the country. Christopher Balton joining us

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 1>now Associate professor at Fullbright University, Vietnam. Also a Bloomberg

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Opinion columnist, joining us from Saigon in Vietnam. Christopher, can

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 1>you give us just a sense, uh, first of all,

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>just what the response has been like on the ground

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 1>where you are right now. Um, what we're basically seeing

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 1>is is that even though it's a typically busy time

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 1>when people are out in restaurants with families, enjoying Chinese

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>New Year. What we're really seeing is people saying indoors

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and ordering lots of food and grocery. We're actually seeing

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 1>reports of heavy buying in in grocery stores UM, and

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>cities working to make sure that they can guarantee residents

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 1>that they continue to have enough food. People are stocking up,

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>But we're not seeing panic buying from from the people

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I've been talking to. So it seems that even though

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the impact on the economy is basically going to be

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 1>even though people might not be eating at restaurants, they

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>seem to be making sure that they're getting a lot

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 1>of food UH and doing a lot of online shopping elsewhere. So, Christopher,

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>how important is it for presidents she here to get

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, to handle this successfully, to get it out

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 1>in front of it? What's the risk for President g

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 1>with the coronavirus there, there's a lot of risk. And

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's no coincidence that that President Lee was

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>actually appointed to lead the working group on on this

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 1>issue primarily because it's it's she is does not want

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to be seen as as in charge of this UH debacle. UM.

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think what you're seeing inside of China right now,

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and everything that that you're hearing is is that there's

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>deep frustration at the level of competence in handling and

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>really getting out and addressing this um. There was a

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>there was a something that's gone viral on Leach had

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>a very important event where the mayor of Wuhan is

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 1>holding this UH press conference and he's talking about their

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 1>their capacity to to make face masks, and he starts

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 1>off saying, well, we can make one point eight billion,

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and then it's like, no, it's it's one point uh.

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 1>It's it's one point zero eight, and then it's uh,

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and then it goes to an even lower number. And

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>so I think there's this sense among the Chinese public

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 1>that that their their government is not nearly as competent,

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot of very deep frustration of the

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 1>government because over the years they have a a history

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of not handling public health crisis well. And so there's

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of this mounting frustration going to connect the idea

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>that in the US and elsewhere there seems to be

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:07.679
<v Speaker 1>a complacency about China's response, and there's been kind of

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 1>a theme where people say, well, it's so much better

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 1>than two thousand three when Stars was spreading this seems

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to actually be proactive. Where where well can you explain

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:21.440
<v Speaker 1>that disconnect? Well, it's it's difficult to say because you

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 1>get so many conflicting responses about what the actual nature

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 1>of preparedness and China's ability to act. They're clearly acting,

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't necessarily mean that they're acting well in in

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:38.439
<v Speaker 1>solving the problem. Um, you know, there's there's videos that

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and and I want to emphasize videos that you see

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 1>on things like we chat or or other social media platforms.

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>We don't always know how accurate they are, so it's

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>difficult to say, well, are are they acting? You know,

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 1>there's this there's this video of there's China has made

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>a great fanfare that they're building a new hospital. Well,

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:00.879
<v Speaker 1>these types of the construction form that they're using is

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:05.680
<v Speaker 1>basically a type of reinforced heavy duty plastic cardboard. Uh,

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 1>and they use these on Chinese construction sites. And so

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not really like a quality construction. There's not gonna

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:14.880
<v Speaker 1>be air filtering and sanitation standards and things like that.

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:18.679
<v Speaker 1>But they've clearly gone to the trouble of building something

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:21.159
<v Speaker 1>that they can put people in. So it's very very

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:25.719
<v Speaker 1>difficult to disentangle what is actually helping uh with regards

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>to what China is doing and what is just action

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>for the sake of appearing busy. Christopher, is it worthwhile

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 1>making the analogy two stars as it relates to the

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:39.200
<v Speaker 1>potential impact on the Chinese economy which was material at

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the time? Um, I think it's still in a way

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:48.160
<v Speaker 1>very early, too early to to say with with significance.

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:50.679
<v Speaker 1>I think the first crack that we've really seen in

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 1>how big an impact it's going to have on the

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>economy is China has announced that they're actually pushing back

0:18:57.040 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the return to return to work date by one week.

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>At the moment, um, I wouldn't be surprised if that

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:06.640
<v Speaker 1>flips another week or two. Um So, I think it's

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:10.199
<v Speaker 1>still really too early to just start making solid comparisons

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 1>to stars or really anything else, because this is just

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:16.880
<v Speaker 1>so unprecedented at the moment. There's also an idea that

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Wuhana is a very big city, but it only accounts

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>for one point six percent of China's entire GDP. Is

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the potential impact on the economy much greater Based on

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Wuhan's rule in terms of a node of transportation and

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:35.680
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing and a part of supply chains of companies both

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 1>locally and internationally. Yes, absolutely, it's it's it's kind of

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>like right in the middle in the center of China.

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a big rail hub, lots of manufacturing. And

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 1>so what you've really seen is you've seen these you know,

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>as people leave. And so when when this happened, right

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 1>as people were leaving for Chinese New Year and so on,

0:19:56.520 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>on some days, there were estimates that more than a

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 1>million people we're leaving the city of Wuhan in a

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:04.919
<v Speaker 1>specific day. And if you've ever been in a city,

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a major Chinese city during Chinese New Year, you can

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:10.639
<v Speaker 1>have these cities that you know, of a fifteen million

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:13.440
<v Speaker 1>people that will literally you know, fifty in the population

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 1>will leave. Um. That that's not that's not a crazy number.

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:20.199
<v Speaker 1>And imagine if Manhattan was suddenly fifty smaller by population

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>um and dispersed all over the Eastern seaboard. That's kind

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of what we're talking about with Wuhan. And so all

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, the risk that that virus gets transported

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 1>all over the Eastern Seaboard, or in this case, all

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:36.959
<v Speaker 1>over China is much much greater and a very real possibility. Christopher,

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 1>you're on the ground in Saigon in Vietnam right now.

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 1>What's the feeling there. Um, there's absolutely lots of precautions

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 1>being taken. I was actually at a health facility today

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:50.199
<v Speaker 1>on an on an unrelated matter, UM, and they had

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 1>actually set up a tent outside of the facility where

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>they were checking people. Everybody was given a mask and

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:00.919
<v Speaker 1>it was mandatory. UM. There was of course all types

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:06.440
<v Speaker 1>of all nature of sanitation available to people around. UM.

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>They're absolutely tracking uh, any travelers that have been to

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 1>China recently. UM. It's absolutely a lot of concern, but

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I think they're they're absolutely on top of things and

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 1>tracking people that need to be tracked. Christopher Balding, thanks

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:22.639
<v Speaker 1>so much for that on the ground UH commentary. We

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 1>really appreciated. Chris Balding, Associate Professor Fulbright University in Saigon, Vietnam.

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 1>He's also Bloomberg Opinion Commism. Let's take a look at

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the coronavirus and how it relates to the global energy markets.

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>We saw let's sell off in oil over the last

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 1>several sessions and really off from the peak of early January.

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Here w T I today just to quote that that's

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>actually staging a little bit of a rebound today up

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 1>about one per cent. Do you get a sense of

0:21:57.320 --> 0:22:00.159
<v Speaker 1>kind of global oil markets and the driver's on the

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:03.160
<v Speaker 1>supply and demand side. We welcome John killed Off, founding

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>partner of Again Capital. So, John, how are you thinking

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:10.680
<v Speaker 1>about global oil markets given some of these issues as

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 1>it relates to the coronavirus as well as some other

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:16.119
<v Speaker 1>geopolitical issues globally, well on the demand side of the

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 1>equation right now, there's just a tremendous fragility as a

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:23.680
<v Speaker 1>result of this outbreak of the coronavirus. UM. You know,

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:26.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of us were dusting off the charts from

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 1>two thousand three when the stars epidemic hit and oil

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:31.879
<v Speaker 1>took quite a hit. Then oil prices were basically just

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 1>about cut in half UM from about thirty eight dollars

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:38.159
<v Speaker 1>a barrel danto almost five, So quite a bit of

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:40.199
<v Speaker 1>a sell off because you know, when I talk to

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>you guys about the price dynamic, it's always Asia, Asia,

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Asia and China in particular. UM. You know, there was

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:49.679
<v Speaker 1>had been some hope that they were getting back on

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 1>their feed economically after the at least the partial resolution

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 1>of the U S. China trade war and now this

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>hits and it's just uh, you know, skewing the demand

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 1>growth back to down to flat, if not down on

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the year, because this is still early days. If you

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 1>ask me, I don't quite understand the rush to say

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the oil clear has been sounded. Here what we're seeing

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:13.399
<v Speaker 1>in the stock market today and and even oil to

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a degree, We've got a long way to go on this,

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:16.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, I want to pick up on that, because

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing a rally in equities almost completely erasing

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:23.880
<v Speaker 1>yesterday's declines at this point if it continues throughout the day.

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>But oil it's just flat, I mean essentially, I mean

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a little up. We're not seeing that big

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 1>of a price gain. What's going to tip the scales

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 1>one way another? It's one percent, but still after losing

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:37.400
<v Speaker 1>what more than ten dollars in the past month. This

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 1>is this is not um massive what will tip the

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:44.120
<v Speaker 1>scales one way or another in order to determine whether

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 1>there's another substantial like lower the price of oil. Yeah,

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:49.360
<v Speaker 1>and then at least, if you think about it, we've

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 1>actually retraced or so of the of the gains from

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the October lows. That got it that we saw, we

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:57.440
<v Speaker 1>got as high as sixty dollars on the on the

0:23:57.480 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 1>most intense ran fears. Um, what's going to tip us

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to the downside here is if it is that we

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 1>don't get another further response out of OPEC and Russia. Uh.

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>They were already been on the wires that this has

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:13.879
<v Speaker 1>gotten their attention. I can tell you that they've been

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about it already about potentially extending their current deal

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 1>to June. At least they're gonna have to go longer

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>than that, and they're gonna have to cut more if

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>they want to support this price. The big line in

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the stand, the first line of the stand here and

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>we saw it yesterday get tested was down around was below,

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>but really fifty dollars if you go back several years,

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>that has been the number that has held up. Um.

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 1>There's a tendency to think it will hold up again

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:40.639
<v Speaker 1>because you will get a response from some of the producers.

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 1>But if we break that, then you're you're looking at

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:46.919
<v Speaker 1>significant uh more downside to the low forties uh in

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty rapid fashion. So, Jeff, what's the thinking as it

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:52.160
<v Speaker 1>relates to OPEC and it relates to the supply side

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of the equation, is there a growing determination to support

0:24:57.000 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>global oil prices or we just don't have that coordination

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 1>in than opaque and OPEC. Plus you know, it's it's

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 1>aspirational on their part. I can tell you that, particularly

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Saudi's who you know, you finally got that a ramco

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I p O out the door. They've been watching that

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 1>stock price come down as the price of oil comes down.

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:17.160
<v Speaker 1>So I just want to remind people if you're looking

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to buy into that at some point or in some shape, way,

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:23.959
<v Speaker 1>shape or form, you've got tremendous exposure to the crude commodity,

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 1>So be careful with that. There's no silver bullet there

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 1>with that company. And um so they're they're gonna try.

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean that they were on the wires all weekend,

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 1>uh making noise about about addressing this this slide, and

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 1>even actually by chastising the analyst community for being overreactive

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and too aggressive on the on the on the demand

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 1>outlook cuts, which which is impacting the price. So I

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>thought that was an interesting thing on their part that

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:51.879
<v Speaker 1>shows you how and engage they are with the price

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 1>of the commodity these days. So, but there's a sense

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 1>in the market that it's just beyond their grasp. There's

0:25:57.080 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 1>too much US soil, there's too much US exports, and

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:02.880
<v Speaker 1>is even moril coming on from different spots that's also

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>helping to keep these global markets rather well supplied. John Kilduff,

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:09.720
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for the perspective. John Kilduff is

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 1>uh the founding partner of Again Capital. Thanks for listening

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>pt Sweeney. I'm Lisa Abram Woyds. I'm on Twitter at

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:27.119
<v Speaker 1>Lisa Abram Woyds. One. Before the podcast, you can always

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:29.200
<v Speaker 1>catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio