WEBVTT - Nvidia Surges and Coinbase Launches Blockchain

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm Caroline Hyde in New York from Bloomberg's world headquarters,

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and I'med Ludlow in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Technology

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>in video. It surges, shares climb as much as fifteen

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>percent after the AI computing push, Trouvietz strong outlook. We'll

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>chip away and the details and we'll have the latest

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:32.920
<v Speaker 1>in the world of crypto is sam Bank. Then Freed

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 1>faces new charges and coin Base launches a blockchain. We'll

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:40.240
<v Speaker 1>discuss with Chris Lahane of Horn Ventures. Class Gorman Sacks

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>offering its wealthiest clients access to a fundraising round for Stripe.

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:46.840
<v Speaker 1>That's as the payment's giant seeks to raise four billion

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>dollars from a wide range of investors. The best performer

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>in the SMP five hundred and as that one hundred

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>in video shares surging essentially because they give a strong

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>outlook for revenue. That kind of indicated to investors that

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>they're foura into artificial intelligence is helping boost them at

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>a time where PC demand is slowing and data center

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 1>demand slowing as well. Shares up forwarding percent, the biggest

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>jump since November. At one point up by even more

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:13.759
<v Speaker 1>than that in the biggest jump since March of twenty twenty,

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and I want to stick with this story and get

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the investor perspective. Joining us now for more over is

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Curtis, Franklin Equity Group, Director of Portfolio Management, Franklin

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Equity Group. Nearly one hundred and twenty billion dollars of

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:28.559
<v Speaker 1>assets under management of Jonathan. You hold in video stock

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 1>in your funds? Is this chart on my screen? Is

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:37.680
<v Speaker 1>this equity response justified? Is the height justified around this name? Well,

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>certainly Nvidios had a strong movie or to date here,

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 1>but certainly we think that the opportunity for artificial intelligence

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>is really just beginning in Nvidia said it's in a

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>very very strong position to capitalize on some of the

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>recent break views we've had with computers being able to

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>actually understand and generate both speech and an image content

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>now an Nvidia's right in the center of that. We

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>think that today's move was certainly exciting, but when you

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>look over the long term, Nvidia offers really solid return

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>potential floor investors. Jonathan talk us through how they are

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>so best placed to leverage artificial intelligence. Sure, so, Nvidia

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>makes graphics processors which have at their core the ability

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:24.240
<v Speaker 1>to do vector math, which is right at the center

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 1>of how a lot of these artificial intelligence models operate.

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>The chat GPT three and a half has more than

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and seventy billion parameters in that model, and

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>NVIDIAs processors are great at building up the models that

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>understand language and then ultimately allow it to be reproduced.

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Similar technologies or techniques are used in generating images, and

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>NVIDIAs in the pole position for that. Not only were

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the semiconductors they build, but then the software that they

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:57.959
<v Speaker 1>build that really helps to augment and accelerate the usage

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of their processors. But Invidios the only player in this category,

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of other players in this category

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>that we also own and are also very exciting in

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>that case, Jonathan, is in Vidia the best position name

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that you're tracking or is there another in particular that

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>you're excited about that you think actually can grow a

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>business around the momentum and AI? Yeah, well so, certainly

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>in Vidia is the one that is best position. About

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>a third of their revenue, it's gonna be fifty percent

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:27.399
<v Speaker 1>of their revenue, Almost sixty percent of their revenue comes

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>out of the data center and a large portion of

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>that comes out of cloud service providers, and a lot

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:34.639
<v Speaker 1>of the growth that we think is going to come

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>in the years ahead is going to come on AI

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>in the building of these large language models. That said,

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>there are other players in the semiconductor ecosystem that are

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>also well positioned. AMD with its zilings acquisition a latt

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>of semiconductor certainly a TSMC where a lot of these

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>advantage chips are manufactured. Then in electronic design automation the

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>building of new chips, companies like Synopsis and Cadence are

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>very well positioned. The cloud providers are also extremely well

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 1>positioned because that's where a lot of the building and

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the running of these models is going to occur. So

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a many ways to play this. In video is

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>probably the best position in the semi space, though, Jonathan

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>across Franklin's different funds and portfolios, I think you hold

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 1>zero point five percent of Nvidia, so a serious stakeholder,

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and there's always hype around this company. I remember they

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>were going to be big in crypto because of all

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the compute that was needed for mining. They've going to

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:32.599
<v Speaker 1>be big in previous cycles and trends. Why are you

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 1>so convinced that this time around, with what we're seeing

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:38.600
<v Speaker 1>in AI, it is in Nvidia that's right to take

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>on what's available in the market. Well, I think investors

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:45.040
<v Speaker 1>were right to bed own and Video over a long term.

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 1>They've done very very well. With the rise of gaming,

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>they've done very very well, and the rise of the

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>cloud and now AI is a big opportunity. I think

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:57.040
<v Speaker 1>they're very well positioned because of the combination of their

0:04:57.120 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 1>capabilities in semiconductors and a software they wrap around it.

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:03.720
<v Speaker 1>But there are many other companies that are going to

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 1>do well here. But I think the bigger idea is this,

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:08.840
<v Speaker 1>if you, as a knowledge worker had the ability to

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 1>have a partner sitting alongside of you, helping you in

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>your day to day work and being creative, of course

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you would take that. And that is precisely what companies

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>like Nvidia and these large language models and generative AI

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 1>businesses are going to be enabling. They're going to allow

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>knowledge workers to be dramatically more productive. We've just met

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>last week with Sachi Adella Microsoft and he indicated that

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:35.279
<v Speaker 1>the product that he was most proud of was the

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>GitHub Copilot offering that allows software developers to generate nearly

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 1>half of the code they are writing now with a

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>copilot model, we think that same type of power is

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>coming to the general knowledge worker that has to work

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>across hundreds of emails every day, many many documents every day,

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 1>ultimately empowering knowledge workers to be dramatically more productive. I

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 1>think enterprises are going to pay for that, and if

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:02.360
<v Speaker 1>they don't, they're going to fall behind. And then all

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>leads back to the infrastructure vendors like an video there

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 1>are going to enable that they're painting a vision and

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>total addressable market that's enormous, I'm sure, Jonathan Franklin Equity Groups.

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:16.279
<v Speaker 1>So great to have some time with you really to

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 1>discuss all of this. And we do have some breaking

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>news at the moment regarding one is once again some

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 1>news around the DOJ preparing a suit to block Adobe's

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty billion dollar deal for Figma, now notable acquisition one

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>that many an investor was questioning the absolute valuation that

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:34.920
<v Speaker 1>this company was parting with four Figma. We understand that

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:37.479
<v Speaker 1>the antitrust lawsuit could be filed as soon as next month,

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and we know it's one of the biggest takeovers of

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:43.359
<v Speaker 1>a software startup out there. Really, this comes at a

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:46.280
<v Speaker 1>time that we see more and more discussion of M

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>and A within technology. Of course, the focus on Microsoft's

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:52.799
<v Speaker 1>deal of acquisition of Activision Blizzard at sixty nine billion

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>dollar deal really the US administration ramping up oversight. Yeah,

0:06:57.880 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>and every time we see a big piece of M

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and A and it does happen, this is the first

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 1>question we ask. We're surprised to see it. In Adobe's case,

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:06.600
<v Speaker 1>there's questions about why they would do this deal based

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>on their business fundamentals, but you know clearly the regulators

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>coming in and we thought that might happen. There's a

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of exciting things going on, but there's a lot

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of reason for us to be concerned. People want regulation

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>for AI. They want to feel safe. We think about

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence as this kind of separate consciousness that is

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>going to emerge as this thing of science fiction. The

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 1>fact that they have this machine speaking with the first

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 1>person is problematic because that really encourages people to see

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>it as an entity, as a mind, when it's not

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>like any technology. It definitely has its limitation. So we

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 1>actually liked anything that you implement, we know its limitations.

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>We've seen the move fast and break things attitude before.

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 1>We have to get governments to think about how best

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>to regulate this new, very fast emerging industry. I think

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that that chatbuts are not what we need for search.

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>It could be helpful, it could help human flourishing. These

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:15.679
<v Speaker 1>were just some of our recent guests expressing their concerns

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>around the rapid rise of generative AI, from ethical concerns

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to regulatory ones. There's another one cybersecurity concerns. And in fact,

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 1>of course JP Morgan just restricted its staff use of

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 1>chat chypt. They say it's part of normal controls around

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 1>third party software. So just what are the vulnerabilities that

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 1>perhaps artificial intelligence injects? Got the perfect guest, francois Local Donu,

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>his president, CEO and member of the board of directors

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>over at cybersecurity company F five, with a pretty fantastic

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>backdrop as well. Francois, welcome to the show. And just

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:51.680
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to your expertise of cybersecurity, does artificial intelligence,

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>particularly generative AI, what sort of risks does it induce? Well,

0:08:56.920 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 1>thank you for having me. There are a number of

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:03.839
<v Speaker 1>no risks that happened with generative AIM. But if we

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 1>step back a little bit, what we've seen over the

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>last you know, several years, is the number of cyber

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>attacks on companies and applications have increased dramatically, to the

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>point where cyber attacks are costing you know, roughly six

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:20.320
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars a year around the globe. Part of the

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>reason for that is that as we move from the

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 1>early stages of web experience to more digital, advanced digital,

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:32.839
<v Speaker 1>and dynamic experiences that we're all enjoying today, security in

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>all of that movement was an afterthought, and so the

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:39.560
<v Speaker 1>attack surface for attackers increased and they were able to

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>increasingly attack applications and monetize those attacks. Well, now we

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 1>are at another inflection point where you know, generative AI

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>is going to be an accelerator for humans, both for

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>bad humans and for good humans, and we really have

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that security is not an afterthought and

0:09:57.160 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that organizations prepare themselves upfront for the new risks that

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 1>come with that acceleration. Those new risks include, of course,

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, attackers being able to impersonate chat bots to

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>take your personal information, or you know, being able to

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:18.479
<v Speaker 1>write scripts much faster that attack vulnerabilities in existing applications,

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and today most organizations are not prepared for that. Okay,

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>so let's talk about hardness. We can all update our

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:28.439
<v Speaker 1>the way in which we train ourselves to avoid phishing emails.

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 1>We can all understand them, phaps, the spelling mistakes aren't

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be there anymore. But front, well, what are

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>you now training companies to look out for? We're training

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 1>so first of all, we're asking companies to take the

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 1>threats seriously. What I think we've seen in the past

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>is that oftentimes which we underestimate the sophistication of attackers.

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 1>And because of that, you know, we use half hazard

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>tools or try to just put a team of engineers

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>in a room to try and deal with the attackers.

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>But they are now organized, they have access to a

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of tools, and this generality I is doing to

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 1>make very sophisticate and fine tuned attacks available to frankly

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the least sophisticated attackers. So we're asking companies to get

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>prepared to enhance their monitoring of their applications and the

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 1>scanning of their codes and vulnerabilities. We're asking companies to

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>train their users constantly. You just mentioned phishing emails. Phishing

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 1>emails are getting are going to get way more sophisticated

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>and harder to detect, and it requires training of users

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 1>on a very regular basis. Frans Far, a month ago

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>when you reported earnings, he talked about your customers slowing

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>down in terms of renewals. There was a little bit

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 1>worry about the outlook. You think about the hype cycle

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>around AI. Has your situation changed in the last four

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 1>weeks in other words, are your customers actually becoming more

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>alive to these AI related risks and therefore engaging with

0:11:55.960 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>you about doing more work with your platforms in the

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 1>area of security. And we're we're seeing our customers are

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>engaging with us on that. Just to give you a

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:13.320
<v Speaker 1>sense and around it. You know, today we protect over

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 1>two billion fraudulent logins into applications every single day, and

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 1>we protect over four and a half billion transactions web

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>transactions every single day with our large enterprise customers. And

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the way we do that is by leveraging AI to

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>stop sophisticated and automated attacks. And we're seeing our customers,

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of course have a strong interest in these solutions. And

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 1>over the last four weeks we have continued to see

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>that happened. Friends, how we just have thirty seconds, but

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 1>what is your technological assessment of what the likes of

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 1>open ai are doing. Do you see them as a

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 1>long term threat to your business? No, Actually, I think

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:59.560
<v Speaker 1>open ai is going to be enabler for my business

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and the businesses because there's a lot of fantastic things

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 1>that it can do and allow us to move our

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 1>people to other tasks that perhaps are repetitive today. So

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I see it pm mearly as an enabler of our business,

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>but I also see it as a threat to all

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>companies around the world around securing their digital experiences, and

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:21.959
<v Speaker 1>that's why we're going to continue to invest in AI

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:27.840
<v Speaker 1>to help our customers. Francois local Do New five President

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>and CEO. Thank you very much, Caroline. Great conversation. I mean,

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>actually ed if you take a look a little bit

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>more at Generative AI over in China, the rally in

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Chinese AI stocks, they're actually kind of cooling off of late.

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 1>That's after some media started reporting that local apps and

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 1>local websites have been ordered to terminate services that allow

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>you so chat GBT now. Open ais chatbot isn't officially

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>available in China, but has been accessible via virtual private networks.

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Coming up. Goalman it's offering clients a special way to

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 1>invest in Unicorn Stripe or bringing the details. Next, this

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>is Blomberg. Oh, everyone was reading about it today. Goldman

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Sachs offering its wealthiest customers access to a fundraising round

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>for the payment's Giant Stripe and the bank will set

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>up a special purpose vehicle for private wealth clients to

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>invest in the company as it seeks to raise four

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars for more. Let's bringing Blomberg straight out, Nadarajan,

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 1>and you're one of the key components of breaking this story.

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Remind us why they need the money. It's kind of

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 1>rather arduous around tax. Yeah, I mean, there are a

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of longstanding employees at the film. They want to

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 1>cash out their restricted stock units, and part of that

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>move will involve a looming tax bill, and that is,

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 1>in effect one of the reasons why they are raising

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 1>this much. They are trying to raise about four billion dollars,

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>which is a pretty high sum. But again, we're talking

0:14:56.600 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 1>about a company that went from a valuation one hundred

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 1>million just to decade ago to almost one hundred billion

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>dollars in twenty twenty one. It has come down significantly.

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about around where they could be valued at

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 1>fifty five billion dollars. But if you think about that,

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>I think about the fact that we're talking about a

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>fintech firm that is in the position to report positive

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 1>free cash flow. That makes it an exciting name. And

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 1>when the valuation has come down this much, you can

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>be guaranteed the lot of wealthy clients, a lot of

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>big institutional investors would want to poke around and see

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 1>if this is the right time to jump in, particularly

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>as everyone's still talking about certain list of names that

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>could co public as and when the markets reopen, valuations

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>become boy in a little bit more. Just just talk

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 1>to us a little bit about how it could be structured.

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>What It's not just Goldman in on the deal, right, No,

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>So Goldman and JP Morgan are the two banks of

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>being mandated. Were trying to raise this money, and they're

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>going to a wide swath of investors that includes you know,

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 1>big names and finance and the tech world VC firms.

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>There is a quite a big spectrum that they've gone

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>now too. But equally important and what we found interesting

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 1>was Goldman Sacks, for instance, opening it up to their

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 1>high net worth clients Previously The biggest draw if you're

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 1>a client in one of these banks was we can

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>bring you in closer to the IPO. Now with private

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 1>companies wanting to say private for longer, this is a

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>way to augment your offerings. Goldman can go out there

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and say, let's create a special vehicle where all of

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>you can pull in your cash and we will write

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>one big check and hand it over to Stripe. Why

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>would you not want to take that opportunity? Remind us

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>when this has been done before, because it's sort of

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 1>got echoes of what happened with the right. The Uber

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>is one example that comes to mind that was a

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>big deal. It was in twenty fifteen Goldman Sacks to

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the one point six one point seven billion dollars convertible

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 1>note deal. At that time, that was driven by their

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>high networth clients. But equally important, even if you look

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 1>at recent examples, when a big venture capital firm like

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Tiger Global wants to raise a new fund, banks see

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity to create vehicles and go to their rich clients,

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, people who are worth more than twenty five

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>million dollars perhaps and telling them that this is a

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>way for you to get in on a big name,

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:09.360
<v Speaker 1>which in the bus was only available to institutional investors.

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:13.199
<v Speaker 1>Interesting the way in which people still want diversification. Street up,

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 1>great reporting me. Thank you Sharjan there, and you got

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:19.640
<v Speaker 1>some time for talking to tech. Yeah, thank you time

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:22.400
<v Speaker 1>now indeed for talking tech. Let's go over to Europe,

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>where the European Commission suspended staff from using TikTok over

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:31.639
<v Speaker 1>security concerns related to the social media apps data collection practices.

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Staff were ordered to delete the app from mobile phones

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 1>and corporate devices, which includes personal devices that use Commission apps.

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 1>That's according to a spokesperson. The move comes among growing

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:44.959
<v Speaker 1>scrucity both here in the US but also in Europe

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>over the apps potential national security risks. In China, Ant

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Group's profit fell eighty three percent after China's regulatory crackdown

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and a drop in valuation for overseas equity investments. Still

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 1>A contributed a billion one or one hundred and forty

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:01.920
<v Speaker 1>five million dollars to its pair in Ali Barber, whose

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:05.399
<v Speaker 1>own profit jumped sixty nine percent after the e commerce

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 1>giant reigned in its spending and narrowed losses abroad to

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:11.119
<v Speaker 1>make up for, of course, anemic growth because of COVID

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 1>nineteen and benefiting also from reduced spending is Grab, which

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>brought its profitability target forward after posting a narrower quarterly loss.

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:22.959
<v Speaker 1>The food delivery provider among money losing Southeast Asian internet

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 1>giants to have shifted strategies to focus on achieving profitability

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 1>instead of spending on growth. Caroline great global round up there,

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 1>and now let's get you back to the US. Let's

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 1>get you to a stop to watch after hours because

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:38.119
<v Speaker 1>it's Block of course, the artists formerly known as Square,

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 1>they've currently been for some fluctuation, but we're now decidedly higher,

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:43.400
<v Speaker 1>up six and a half percent. After hours look grows.

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Payment volumes did climb fifteen percent year on year. It

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>was slightly blow expectations, but net revenue looks solid up

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:52.440
<v Speaker 1>fourteen percent, and particularly are seeing sort of record setting

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 1>revenue for the fourth quarter and the full year when

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>it comes to subscriptions and services. They're also posting towards

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three guidance that were slightly ahead of expectations,

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>so they're in the payment side of things ed, it

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 1>looks as though we got a bit of a solid beat.

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 1>It was interesting also the bitcoin side of the equation

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 1>also looking relatively solid. It's interesting the pledge from block

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 1>is efficiency. Right in other ways, they're reigning and spending,

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and after what we saw from a firm PayPal, other

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 1>thin tech players, that's kind of been the theme of

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 1>this earning season. As volumes drop, then you need to

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>tighten the belt a little. I think that's the play. Yeah,

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 1>it was notable that they're really trying to get costs

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:32.399
<v Speaker 1>under control. We note how wasn't that much an illustrative

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:34.200
<v Speaker 1>of how they're going to be doing that, but people

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 1>sort of noted that the number was below where they

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 1>had thought. And yeah, as you say, tightening your belt particularly,

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 1>keep on selling out there and continuing to try and

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:44.640
<v Speaker 1>find some expansion bitcoin revenue. As I said, we're down

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:47.400
<v Speaker 1>six and a half percent year on year, but overall

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 1>it was ahead of expectations. Welcome back to blobog Technology.

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 1>I can and heard in New York and Almed Ludlow

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco. We're going to get back to that

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 1>breaking Adobe news. Caroline shares down around four and a

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 1>half percent in after hours after Bloomberg broke the story

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:13.359
<v Speaker 1>that the DOJ is preparing a suit to block Adobe's

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty billion dollar deal to buy Figma that according to sources,

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and one source saying carrow could come as soon as

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 1>next month. I mean, really, Adobe such a dominant force

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:25.440
<v Speaker 1>in terms of software, Photoshoppy, Destrator, you know it. But

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>when they announced that deal to acquire Figment, many you know,

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 1>were kind of amazed by the price point that they

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 1>were willing to spend really where they thought this would

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:37.160
<v Speaker 1>be a creative. They're trying to introduce less expensive products

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, but notably, just time and time again,

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 1>this is an administration that is willing to go there

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to tackle M and A, to worry about competition and

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 1>in this space, and really does feel as though, well

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg reporting getting ahead of that antitrust news and

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:53.719
<v Speaker 1>the filing. Of course, I think it's all because Adobe

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:56.120
<v Speaker 1>was actually in front and a meeting with ADJ which

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 1>is often the case before we get this in announcement,

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:02.439
<v Speaker 1>consistent with what we've seen right from the DJA. Our

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg intelligence analysts do point out though that in this

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>case it probably came sooner than expected, although it was

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of expected based on the actions DJ's taken in

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 1>M and A. So far, we'll pivot Caroline, but we'll

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 1>stick across the story as more headlines break. Coin Base,

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:20.879
<v Speaker 1>the largest US crypto exchange, is now launching a blockchain,

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>expanding its reach deeper into the worlds of DeFi and NFTs.

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:27.679
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about this all with who else Bloomberg Scenali

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Basset out in New York, Shenali blockchain. Why this is

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>very interesting. Remember, this is a centralized exchange if you will,

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>looking at decentralization. When we spoke to a coin based executive,

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:41.639
<v Speaker 1>our colleague Moyo Shan reports that this is really a

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:45.360
<v Speaker 1>bet on the community. This is a layer two network

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 1>here where decentralized apps can be built and it will

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 1>be a home for the chain products that will be

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 1>built in conjunction with this network that is being shepherded

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:58.400
<v Speaker 1>by coin Base. Now let's use some of Brian Armstrong's

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 1>all words, because he said this is to improve the

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:05.880
<v Speaker 1>scaleability and usability of crypto, plus he wanted to get

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 1>in on the builder energy ed. That is what he said.

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I also want to point out here that if you

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 1>look at the initial tweets from build on base here,

0:22:13.560 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of the Twitter handle of base, which

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:19.160
<v Speaker 1>is project is known as Hello world is how it starts,

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 1>which of course is a very intimate term and for

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the developer community here. So let's see how much this

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>starts to take off. I think it's a very interesting concept,

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 1>of course, to see in exchange like this get closer

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:36.400
<v Speaker 1>to the decentralized world. The other headline is what coin

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:38.440
<v Speaker 1>base does not plan to do, which is to not

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 1>issue a native token. Another point of discussion, Shali, stay

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 1>with us, Caroline. We're tracking a lot of stories today,

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:47.160
<v Speaker 1>we are, and it all debtails nicely into a conversation

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:50.400
<v Speaker 1>around the future regulation around crypto, the future of innovation

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and around crypto. And well, we've got one person who's

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of at the heart of that conversation, Chris Lahane's

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 1>chief strategy officer, han Vinchas, of course, still with us

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>a Shinali bassecond, Chris, I'm going to Austin only to

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 1>take it away with the first sort of questions because

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>we want to dig in a little bit more to

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:06.359
<v Speaker 1>coin based us. Yeah, Chris, I'm really curious about your

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 1>thoughts here about coin bass efforts to get into the

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 1>decentralized world when they're facing so many questions really about

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the centralized world when it comes to US regulators, what

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:20.640
<v Speaker 1>is and what ISN'TO security? What kind of questions does

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:24.400
<v Speaker 1>this open up now that they're embracing decentralization so much

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:27.119
<v Speaker 1>as well? Yeah, well, first, thanks for having me. I

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 1>think really two points on the coin based announcement. The

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 1>first is, I do think it reflects what's really going

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 1>on in the crypto space right now, which is enormous

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:39.400
<v Speaker 1>progress in development what you call the infrastructure level where

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 1>those developers are working at. And then more broadly, when

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 1>you ask about the policy question, I think there's a

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 1>really interesting I called tale of two companies. Right you

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:54.120
<v Speaker 1>had an FTX company that was based offshore, in my view,

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 1>really more of a centralized financed financial entity that committed,

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 1>at least based on what we've seen them been reported,

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of fraud, but the type of fraud that

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:07.159
<v Speaker 1>you've historically seen in centralized finance over human history. And

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:09.919
<v Speaker 1>then you have a company like coin base. Brian Armstrong,

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 1>who you referenced earlier, made a really interesting decision seven

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:16.680
<v Speaker 1>eight nine years ago to base his company here in

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the United States, to push the frontiers of innovation, to

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 1>create more economic freedom, more economic opportunity, but to do

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:27.880
<v Speaker 1>it within an existing legal system, and particularly a set

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:32.159
<v Speaker 1>of laws that were actually created before computers even existed.

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:34.880
<v Speaker 1>So I think coin Base is actually a really interesting

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:37.399
<v Speaker 1>example of how you can actually push innovation in this

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:40.639
<v Speaker 1>space while operating within the paradigm there a stale, very

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:43.200
<v Speaker 1>much old school Chris. Of course, the company you work

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:45.200
<v Speaker 1>at now is one of the hottest venture launches in

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the crypto space recently. When you're thinking about centralization versus decentralization,

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:54.480
<v Speaker 1>within the parameters of the existing laws that exist around

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the crypto community, what are you more comfortable when it

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:01.400
<v Speaker 1>comes to putting money to work with Well, first of all,

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, we raise one point five billion almost a

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:07.359
<v Speaker 1>year ago to the date, and for us, we're really

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:10.920
<v Speaker 1>focused on investments that will play out over multiple years.

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 1>This goes back to something I was just touching on.

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 1>We see enormous opportunity what I would call it infrastructure area,

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:21.880
<v Speaker 1>where you're getting technology that deals with scaling, deals with interoperability,

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:25.120
<v Speaker 1>basically in layman's terms or lay person's terms, the type

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 1>of technology that you're ultimately going to need for this

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to be consumer facing, in for everyday consumers to be

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:33.440
<v Speaker 1>able to use. Now to this specific question, about the

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:39.440
<v Speaker 1>decentralization versus the centralization. I mean, by definition, within crypto,

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>it is a decentralized space. That's ultimately how you democratize

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>aspects of capitalism, particularly online. Within that, there can be

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:50.159
<v Speaker 1>a spectrum of issues and ideas. But we spend a

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of time with with our portfolio companies, and even

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the potential projects that we may or ultimately may not

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 1>invest in is a is the what's the quality of

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:01.119
<v Speaker 1>the team, what's the quality of the technology? Do they

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 1>understand that there's going to be a complex regulatory map

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 1>out there. They don't necessarily have to have all the

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:08.919
<v Speaker 1>answers from day one, but they have to reflect an

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 1>understanding that they're going to need to navigate this and

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 1>navigate it in a responsible way. So that's amongst the

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:16.160
<v Speaker 1>things that we think about when we pursue our investments.

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I can I have to tell you, like, we're incredibly

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 1>excited about the types of founders we're seeing, particularly in

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 1>those early stages where they're really beginning to think about, Okay,

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 1>here's where the world is, Here's some of the regulatory

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff we need to navigate. But we have incredibly powerful

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:32.160
<v Speaker 1>ideas about how we can scale and make this technology

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:36.159
<v Speaker 1>really consumer facing. Chris, You're so powerful with hard ventures

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 1>because of the expertise you can lend the portfolio companies,

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:41.760
<v Speaker 1>some of them that we're just seeing there. Your passion

0:26:41.840 --> 0:26:45.119
<v Speaker 1>around Web three I've had firsthand from you, but I

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:48.239
<v Speaker 1>mean before we're helping advise companies such as Airbnb as

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:50.880
<v Speaker 1>they were scaling. You're someone who knows Washington the way

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 1>it works so intimately from your background, what do you

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:56.400
<v Speaker 1>make on the way in which the SEC is by

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>some terms of phrase our guests have said, look basically

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:02.960
<v Speaker 1>regulating by enforcement rather than setting rules of the road. Yeah,

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:05.399
<v Speaker 1>I've called it an enforcement only approach. I mean, if

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:08.440
<v Speaker 1>you take a step back a year ago, almost to

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the day, I maybe off for a week or two,

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the Biden and White House put out an executive order.

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 1>It was sort of a high water mark up to

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:19.160
<v Speaker 1>this point in time in Web three crypto regulations because

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:22.399
<v Speaker 1>it really expressed a desire and interest to foster and

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:26.959
<v Speaker 1>facilitate responsible innovation. You fast forward to where we are

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 1>today and there really has not been any coherent strategy

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:34.439
<v Speaker 1>coming at the federal level in terms of actually, how

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 1>do you support and advance that type of a holistic approach,

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and what you've basically defaulted to is policy through enforcement.

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:43.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a little bit like if we had just invented

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 1>cars and there were roads out there, and you basically

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:47.919
<v Speaker 1>had to figure out the speed limit based on who

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 1>was arresting you at what speed, and then how the

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 1>courts ultimately would interpret that. That's no way to create

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:55.879
<v Speaker 1>a coherent policy. I'm old enough to have gone back

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:58.120
<v Speaker 1>to the nineties. I was working in the Clinton administration.

0:27:58.600 --> 0:28:01.720
<v Speaker 1>We passed the nineteen ninety Telco Act, worked with a

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:05.639
<v Speaker 1>divided Congress Democrats and Republicans, that put the US on

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the path to being the digital center of the world.

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 1>That translated into enormous economic power, enormous national security power.

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 1>At one point in time, I think the five largest

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 1>companies by market cap in the world were somewhere between

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco and Seattle, right, and then you look at

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:24.200
<v Speaker 1>what's going on today. But the history of the US

0:28:24.280 --> 0:28:28.679
<v Speaker 1>has always been a country since its founding that embraces innovation,

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 1>with government, public and private sector working together. Interestingly, with

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 1>this enforcement only approach, it is actually seeding its leadership role.

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, as we speak in your native UK, we

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 1>have activity, right now to potentially pass legislation by the

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 1>end of this year, which could be amongst the most

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 1>farthest reaching in terms of defining a regulatory framework for

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 1>crypto to make the UK a crypto hub. Chris Will

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 1>companies leave. I think that I look, I literally just

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 1>had a meeting a couple days ago. These weren't Han

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 1>venture companies, these were some others and they had reached

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 1>out to actually really try to understand where could we

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 1>potentially be looking at the world, And each and every

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 1>one of them was looking at places like the UK,

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 1>even looking at Europe. And you know, as someone that

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 1>get who came up in the US, the idea that

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Europe is actually ahead of the US and thinking about

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 1>regulatory frameworks is just something that I had never really

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 1>seen before. And so I do think you're going to

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 1>get to a place where companies, projects, protocols, initiatives, founders,

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>entrepreneurs are going to begin to look around the world

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 1>about where they want to base themselves. Some may do

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the US and something else, some may only do something else,

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Some may spread their developers into these different places. But

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>ultimately this technology is happening, right this is the next

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 1>wave of the Internet. You see it with other private

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 1>sector entities wanting to engage with this technology. You see

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:50.160
<v Speaker 1>other governments. And the question for the US is do

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 1>we want to maintain our historic leadership role or are

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:56.480
<v Speaker 1>we going to give up on that fat Chris la

0:29:56.520 --> 0:30:00.479
<v Speaker 1>Hang comebacks saying we have chief strategy officer at home benches. Meanwhile,

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:02.600
<v Speaker 1>shan Ali Bassett, we thank you so much for having

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 1>us bring that interview. Now let's get onto some other

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:07.720
<v Speaker 1>key crypto news, because look, there's from fresh charges that've

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 1>been brought against FTX co founder Sam ban Winfried, including

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 1>references to a pair of co conspirators. The US says

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:16.520
<v Speaker 1>we're involved in illegally seeking to influence the regulation of

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 1>digital assets. The campaign cash from him and other top

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 1>FDx executives has a potential to be the biggest infusion

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of illegal money into the US politics in decades. And

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 1>what else we've got coming up? Yeah, a big exclusive

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 1>interview with job CEO on earnings and how soon we

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 1>can expect them, Sorry for this one car to take

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 1>off everything ev told next jokes. I love in fact

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 1>from our point of view, when it comes to Tesla Autonomous,

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 1>are their autonomous strategy autonomous taxi platforms is much more

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 1>important than their electric vehicle strategy. In our view, our

0:31:09.840 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 1>fifteen hundred dollars price target for Tesla, it's roughlo it's

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:16.680
<v Speaker 1>a little over two hundred dollars now, but our fifteen

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollar price target in five years is two thirds

0:31:21.560 --> 0:31:26.360
<v Speaker 1>because of autonomous And when we listen to BYD, we

0:31:26.560 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 1>do not hear autonomous as a strategy. That was Kafe

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 1>would of course, founder and CEO of our investments Carrow,

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:39.400
<v Speaker 1>showing how optimistic she is about Tesla's robotaxi strategy. It's

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 1>a big part of their price target long term. We

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 1>asked our audience do you think Tesla wins the robotaxi race?

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 1>The answers kind of speak for themselves, but the idea

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 1>is Tesla's got more data than anyone. Do you think

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 1>they'll win? Carrow? It's a hard one to call because

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:56.480
<v Speaker 1>everything seems so nascent still at the moment. What you

0:31:56.600 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 1>see cruise on the roads, I'm seeing weymo now and

0:32:00.320 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 1>then powering down where you are in San Francisco. How

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 1>many are you seeing that are of Tesla? How real

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 1>can that be in five years? The difference, I think

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:11.080
<v Speaker 1>is that Tesla has all these vehicles that drivers are

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 1>using in all kinds of markets jurisdictions, whereas Cruz WAYMO,

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:16.600
<v Speaker 1>they're just here in the Bay Area, right And I

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 1>think that's the problem going forward that analysts are struggling

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 1>to see when they prefer Tesla as the lead candidate.

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:24.960
<v Speaker 1>We'll continue to track it. We do on a daily basis. Now.

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Shares of ev toll maker job jumped on Thursday after

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the company gave updates on its key milestones during earnings.

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:35.160
<v Speaker 1>The company's first aircraft is expected to roll off a

0:32:35.200 --> 0:32:38.640
<v Speaker 1>pilot manufacturing line and fly within the next few months,

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and the electric aircraft maker says it's getting closer on

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 1>those FA certifications, opening the door to commercialization. Joining us

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 1>now JOEB CEO joe Ben Bevertt is making progress, Joe Ben.

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Analysts are still concerned about how far away commercialization is.

0:32:55.080 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Answer their concerns. So we have been making remarkable progress.

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Twenty twenty two is a fantastic year and we are

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 1>are really leaning in and the progress in twenty twenty

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:14.440
<v Speaker 1>three is really accelerating. We're now two we've completed two

0:33:14.480 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 1>of the five stages of our certification process, and we're

0:33:18.440 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 1>making remarkable progress on third stage. As you mentioned, our

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:28.760
<v Speaker 1>first company, conforming Aircraft is has the parts have rolled

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:32.360
<v Speaker 1>off the pilot production line and we're beginning final assembly

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 1>and we'll be flying that in the months to come.

0:33:35.400 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 1>FAA certification is kind of the key bit, right because

0:33:39.240 --> 0:33:44.080
<v Speaker 1>to get those vehicles electric aircraft in the skies that

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:48.280
<v Speaker 1>needs to be done. Are we talking months, years, decades

0:33:48.400 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 1>before the FAA does that because it's a slow moving organization. Yeah.

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 1>As I said, we've got really unprecedented momentum, both on

0:33:57.040 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the joby side and on the FA side, with huge

0:34:02.960 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 1>progress that's been made over the past few months, and

0:34:07.160 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 1>we're just knocking down a milestone after milestone, and so

0:34:12.360 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the momentum is really there, and we're very grateful for

0:34:15.160 --> 0:34:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the FA and the resources that they're putting into this

0:34:19.280 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 1>exciting new industry. Job And I was reading some of

0:34:22.640 --> 0:34:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the analyst reaction to what you had to say twenty

0:34:25.480 --> 0:34:28.239
<v Speaker 1>four hours ago, and the sort of more bullish name

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:31.040
<v Speaker 1>see you as the kind of proof point for an

0:34:31.200 --> 0:34:34.720
<v Speaker 1>entire industry. You're leading the way. But the big concern

0:34:34.800 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 1>they have is that the FAA has to come up

0:34:36.840 --> 0:34:40.520
<v Speaker 1>with rules for a whole new category of aircraft. How

0:34:41.360 --> 0:34:43.880
<v Speaker 1>much evidence do you see that the FAA has the

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:47.880
<v Speaker 1>competence and energy to do that. Well, the exciting thing

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:51.600
<v Speaker 1>for us is that that process is now behind us,

0:34:51.760 --> 0:34:55.520
<v Speaker 1>as we've completed those first two stages and the stage

0:34:55.560 --> 0:35:01.319
<v Speaker 1>that we're rendering is completing our the last of area

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 1>specific certification plans. So we've had the FA approved five

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:09.719
<v Speaker 1>of the thirteen, we've submitted an additional three, and we're

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 1>expecting to submit all thirteen of those in the first

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:15.759
<v Speaker 1>half of the year. So and again the means of

0:35:15.840 --> 0:35:21.360
<v Speaker 1>compliance are now behind us and we're really focused on

0:35:21.400 --> 0:35:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the future. This year is going to be a lot

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:28.399
<v Speaker 1>about testing, and that's what makes aviation our safest mode

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:32.919
<v Speaker 1>of transportation is the rigor with which we build every

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 1>single component and then test every single component on the aircraft. Jovann,

0:35:37.719 --> 0:35:40.280
<v Speaker 1>You also have this relationship with the Department of Defense.

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:43.400
<v Speaker 1>In long term, I want to understand what proportion of

0:35:43.480 --> 0:35:46.680
<v Speaker 1>your business, your commercial business will be based on government

0:35:46.719 --> 0:35:51.359
<v Speaker 1>and military contracts and what will be a consumer facing business. Well,

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:56.960
<v Speaker 1>that's something that we're going to learn over the overcoming years.

0:35:57.560 --> 0:36:00.920
<v Speaker 1>But what's really exciting today is the momentum we have

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:06.440
<v Speaker 1>with the Department. Department of Defense. We have now have

0:36:07.280 --> 0:36:10.920
<v Speaker 1>a seventy five million dollar contract with the DoD to

0:36:13.520 --> 0:36:16.440
<v Speaker 1>mature the development of our aircraft, and we're in discussions

0:36:16.480 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 1>with them on being able to bring our aircraft on

0:36:20.719 --> 0:36:25.000
<v Speaker 1>base and provide really useful operations here in the US

0:36:25.680 --> 0:36:30.160
<v Speaker 1>for our government partners, and we're excited to be beginning

0:36:30.239 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 1>that on base operations will which will give us both

0:36:33.200 --> 0:36:37.719
<v Speaker 1>revenue and even more importantly, allow us to streamline and

0:36:37.840 --> 0:36:43.320
<v Speaker 1>optimize our optimization our operations prior to commercial launch to

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:45.960
<v Speaker 1>be Aviation found at Joe Benbevett. Thank you so much

0:36:46.000 --> 0:36:47.320
<v Speaker 1>for you the time on the show. It's great to

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 1>have you. Um. Netflix is trying to grow internationally and

0:36:58.760 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 1>so it is slash the cost of some subscriptions in

0:37:01.719 --> 0:37:04.839
<v Speaker 1>more than one hundred different countries. But I'm afraid if

0:37:04.880 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 1>you're like me in the US, it's not gonna be

0:37:06.280 --> 0:37:09.880
<v Speaker 1>helping me here. And in developed world they're trying to

0:37:10.160 --> 0:37:12.760
<v Speaker 1>well make us pay our ways stop on that password

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:15.160
<v Speaker 1>sharing we've all been doing. But it's all about the

0:37:15.200 --> 0:37:19.600
<v Speaker 1>focus on the developing markets. So think Asia, the America's

0:37:19.680 --> 0:37:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Middle East, in countries that they haven't managed to build

0:37:22.680 --> 0:37:26.360
<v Speaker 1>up so many subscribers, so countries like Vietnam, Thailand, and

0:37:26.400 --> 0:37:29.719
<v Speaker 1>Adonesia could be seen subscriptions and the cost cut by

0:37:29.800 --> 0:37:33.279
<v Speaker 1>almost fifty percent. According to some analysis, this should help

0:37:33.440 --> 0:37:36.880
<v Speaker 1>boost perhaps the overall global user passed that two hundred

0:37:36.880 --> 0:37:41.240
<v Speaker 1>and thirty one million number they're already at. Today's going viral.

0:37:41.440 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's get back to some of that news that crossed

0:37:43.120 --> 0:37:46.439
<v Speaker 1>this hour. The Justice Department preparing an antitrust lawsuits seeking

0:37:46.480 --> 0:37:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to block Adova's twenty billion dollar acquisition of the startup Figma. Now,

0:37:50.040 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 1>according to people familiar, no matter, our cases expect to

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:54.960
<v Speaker 1>be found as soon as next month. We're very pleased

0:37:54.960 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to say immediately with us as Anna A. Grana Is

0:37:57.160 --> 0:38:00.800
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Intelligence, why is it stop four when everyone

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:04.279
<v Speaker 1>hated this deal to begin with. I'm as confused as

0:38:04.320 --> 0:38:06.000
<v Speaker 1>you are on this one. You know, we'll find out

0:38:06.000 --> 0:38:08.800
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow morning what happens. But you know, frankly speaking, we

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:12.759
<v Speaker 1>had expected that. Our anti trust stannel is generally basically said,

0:38:13.000 --> 0:38:14.919
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be difficult to get this thing done

0:38:15.000 --> 0:38:18.839
<v Speaker 1>because of so much scrutiny on large tech firms trying

0:38:18.840 --> 0:38:22.239
<v Speaker 1>to buy smaller incumbents that are threatening their business. So

0:38:22.360 --> 0:38:24.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what that happens. But you know, I'm also

0:38:25.000 --> 0:38:28.560
<v Speaker 1>surprised that the starts down right now. And I the

0:38:28.640 --> 0:38:32.600
<v Speaker 1>other surprising you've outlining your Bloomberg Intelligence reacts dead is

0:38:32.640 --> 0:38:35.839
<v Speaker 1>how soon this came about. I think the market expected

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:38.680
<v Speaker 1>regulatory bodies around the world to look at it, but

0:38:38.760 --> 0:38:42.919
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, actually, action is happening sooner than we thought. Yeah,

0:38:43.000 --> 0:38:45.640
<v Speaker 1>And I'm to be honest with you, with Jendre's work,

0:38:45.800 --> 0:38:48.799
<v Speaker 1>that is, I'm quoting very basically, I depend on her

0:38:48.880 --> 0:38:51.759
<v Speaker 1>for all of these expert opinions, and you know, she

0:38:51.920 --> 0:38:55.120
<v Speaker 1>thinks it is much sooner than what she was expecting.

0:38:55.200 --> 0:38:57.520
<v Speaker 1>And the reason is that I think there is so

0:38:57.760 --> 0:39:00.640
<v Speaker 1>much I mean, every major tech deal is looked under

0:39:00.680 --> 0:39:02.840
<v Speaker 1>a microscope right now, and they want to make a

0:39:02.920 --> 0:39:04.680
<v Speaker 1>point that they are not going to, let you know,

0:39:04.800 --> 0:39:08.200
<v Speaker 1>something like a Facebook buying Instagram again, um, you know

0:39:08.320 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 1>out there. So let's see how this turns out. But

0:39:11.120 --> 0:39:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think in the long run, if they

0:39:12.640 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 1>are forced not to buy it, it maybe not. It

0:39:15.160 --> 0:39:17.000
<v Speaker 1>may not be that bad of a thing for Adobe.

0:39:17.280 --> 0:39:19.680
<v Speaker 1>They can deploy that cast somewhere else and try to

0:39:19.760 --> 0:39:23.160
<v Speaker 1>do this organically. Okay, interesting, it would probably be pretty

0:39:23.160 --> 0:39:26.000
<v Speaker 1>awful for Figma. In some ways one might imagine just

0:39:26.600 --> 0:39:30.719
<v Speaker 1>how much would this be coordinated elsewhere as well. I

0:39:30.800 --> 0:39:32.759
<v Speaker 1>think one of the things that we have seen that

0:39:32.920 --> 0:39:36.160
<v Speaker 1>once they've got a whip, that US organized authorities are

0:39:36.239 --> 0:39:38.520
<v Speaker 1>really strict about some of this stuff. We have seen

0:39:38.600 --> 0:39:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Europe already, you know, trying to break up you know,

0:39:42.280 --> 0:39:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft Activision with basically saying you know, you've got to

0:39:45.360 --> 0:39:47.319
<v Speaker 1>get rid of a game. I mean that it's it's

0:39:47.360 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like, you know, I would say this

0:39:49.800 --> 0:39:52.719
<v Speaker 1>is very common across the globe right now, where most

0:39:52.760 --> 0:39:56.400
<v Speaker 1>of the authorities are pretty pretty against large tech companies

0:39:56.440 --> 0:40:00.399
<v Speaker 1>buying anything right now. It's the same Anaragrana. We thank

0:40:00.440 --> 0:40:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you for jumping in from Bloomberg Intelligence bringing us the expertise. Yeah,

0:40:05.680 --> 0:40:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that does it for this edition, Carroc of Bloomberg Technology.

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:10.319
<v Speaker 1>What a week has been so far, just one day

0:40:10.360 --> 0:40:13.040
<v Speaker 1>to go and so much to digest tomorrow on our

0:40:13.080 --> 0:40:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Twitter spaces we do it every Friday. Thanks to you,

0:40:15.160 --> 0:40:17.120
<v Speaker 1>we're driving the force of what we're going to be

0:40:17.160 --> 0:40:20.719
<v Speaker 1>discussing at twelve pm New York Times nine am San Francisco.

0:40:20.880 --> 0:40:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Tune in on the Twitter spaces to see if we've

0:40:23.200 --> 0:40:25.040
<v Speaker 1>got some news breaking across it like we have done

0:40:25.080 --> 0:40:28.240
<v Speaker 1>in previous weeks. Hey yeah, and there's also that huge

0:40:28.320 --> 0:40:31.879
<v Speaker 1>story from German on Apple glucose and the Apple Watch.

0:40:31.920 --> 0:40:33.839
<v Speaker 1>We've got a recam. It's the biggest one of the week.

0:40:34.760 --> 0:40:37.360
<v Speaker 1>From New York. From San Francisco, this is Bloomberg.