WEBVTT - Sam Bankman-Fried and Matt Levine on How to Make Money in Crypto

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wish and I'm Tracy Allowaite Tracy the coins.

0:00:19.440 --> 0:00:22.599
<v Speaker 1>Time's time to talk about the coins again. The coins

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>you mean, like you know, fiat coins, right, No, the

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>electronic digital coins? People are you know what? It feels

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:35.199
<v Speaker 1>like It's been a while, isn't it. Well, so this

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>is the crazy thing. This is my like, what what

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>what makes the crypto difficult for me? Which is that

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 1>if you like, and I've said maybe you said this before,

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:44.919
<v Speaker 1>but if you step away for like a month, then

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:47.560
<v Speaker 1>you like some other stuff like the price of corn

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>or wheat or oil or something, Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Yeah,

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:52.919
<v Speaker 1>and then you come back to crypto and it's like

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the entire narrative has completely changed. It's all this new terminology,

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>new tokens that you've never heard of, Like you can't

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>step away from for a minute, let alone a month,

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and feel like you have any sort of hope of

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:07.679
<v Speaker 1>understand what's going on. It does feel like it requires

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>a certain intensity to make it in crypto. And then

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>after that month, it's like, well, I'm already so behind,

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to come back and actually, you know,

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you're like fore or four months behind, so we have

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>to reverse it. We can catch back up with what's going. Yeah,

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 1>we need to reverse that. I mean, I am vaguely

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>aware of some of the big picture stuff that has

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:27.039
<v Speaker 1>been happening. So I'm looking at the price of bitcoin

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:31.559
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, it's just under forty thousand. It is weird,

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think he wrote about this, It is kind

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>of strange that in this environment bitcoin hasn't been doing better.

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I know. So you know, here's what I've been thinking about,

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>which is that the prices of especially the big ones.

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:45.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's always tokens going to the moon, but

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the prices of like the big ones overall market cab

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>rough year kind of gone sideways in the last year

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>or more down. But um, the interest in the space

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>continues to be on debated and it feels like every

0:01:57.320 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 1>day someone is leaving a big bang, big fund to

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 1>do something new in crypto, crypto hedge fund, crypto VC.

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Interest in investing in the space does not seem to

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:11.919
<v Speaker 1>have abated at all, even with the price of big

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 1>coins out of going sideways to down. No, absolutely, And

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:17.679
<v Speaker 1>also the other thing that's sort of happened is rather

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>than crypto going off and being its own ecosystem, which

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>if you think back to bitcoin and its origins, that

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>was really kind of the point of the whole thing.

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>But it feels like crypto as a whole is becoming

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:32.239
<v Speaker 1>more and more integrated with the existing financial system, or

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>at least with Wall Street. Uh. And so you know,

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>you see people who are collecting n f T s

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and now they're talking about the bond market in interest rates,

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of funny, but you're right, we haven't

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>spoken about it for a while, and we should definitely

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>rectify that. So I want to know basically what all

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>this new money entering the space is doing. Something I've

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 1>been thinking about is that you could make a fortune

0:02:55.360 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 1>essentially just buying bitcoin or maybe buying bitcoin in the US.

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 1>And still I get in Japan because the market was

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>so inefficient that there were like multiple prices around the world,

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>and you can make a ton of money doing that.

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>These days, I suspect that the market is vastly more

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 1>efficient than it was back then. On the flip side,

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I also get the impression that, compared to trad fied

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>that the spreads are still a mile wide and that

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>there's still big opportunities for all this money coming into

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the space. So I'm very let's have a conversation about

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>how to make money in crypto? All right, I'm really excited.

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna be bringing back into his third time on

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the show, the one and only Sam Bankman Fried SPF.

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>He's the co founder of f t X, And we're

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 1>also going to be joined by Matt Levine, Bloomberg opinion columnist.

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>We had them both on last fall. Everyone liked hearing

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>them discuss the state of the markets together, so we

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>figured let's have them both back on. So Sam and Matt,

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>thanks to both of you for coming back on odd

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>lots of course, thanks for having me back absolutely So, uh, Sam,

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>let's start with you. Actually, you guys have a big

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>conference coming up at the end of April, the FTX

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Salt Conference Crypto Bahamas, the Bahamas being your new your

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>new corporate home, which sounds pretty nice, am I am?

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:18.559
<v Speaker 1>I basically right that there is a sort of still

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:22.479
<v Speaker 1>this huge essential tidal wave of money coming into the space,

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Like well, how would you characterize very big picture the

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 1>all the interest right now in crypto, There is a

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:32.719
<v Speaker 1>huge tidal wave of money trying to come into the space,

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>is what I would say, just sort of you know,

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>gobs and gobs of it that that sort of has

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>been desperately you know, sort of like trying to to

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:45.159
<v Speaker 1>to like find its way in over the last few years.

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Every month another sort of like nice little pile of

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>that of that you know, larger gob nags to make

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:56.360
<v Speaker 1>it in. So one thing I saw recently is that

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>you took a stake in i X, which I think

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people will recognize as the firm that

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>was founded by Brad katsu Yama, who's the guy who

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 1>was written about in Michael Lewis's book Flashboys, all about

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:13.479
<v Speaker 1>the evils of high frequency trading and stuff like that.

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>What exactly is the thinking there? And you know, I

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>guess I understand some of the maybe the ideological alignment

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>or the stated ideological alignment there, But what exactly are

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>you going to be doing together? Yeah, and you know,

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>obviously we'll have to see what happened, because is you know,

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>highly regulatorily dependent space. But the core of it is

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>like some digital assets are our securities. Different people might

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>give different quotes for exactly attraction of them are, but

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 1>but certainly some fraction of them are. Let's say that

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>you want to offer trading in a digital asset security,

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:55.480
<v Speaker 1>what would you do right now? This is not a

0:05:55.520 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>problem that people have really confident, regular right solutions for.

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>It's something that there's certainly a lot of thought going

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>into from the regulatory perspective, you know, at its core,

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 1>like we're experts in in you know, things to do

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>with with tokens and offering trading and tokens I x

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 1>er know, experts in offering trading insecurities and more generally,

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>they're also really good at being creative and sort of

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>building out new market structures that might not be exactly

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the same as what they're sort of used to doing.

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's exactly what we need to do right now,

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>is to build out a new market structure that is

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:35.840
<v Speaker 1>consistent with our existing rules and regulations in coordination with

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the SEC and other regulators for digital docity securities, and

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:42.239
<v Speaker 1>that is our big goal with them. It's something you said,

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Sam in your first answer I thought is really interesting.

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:49.480
<v Speaker 1>You said there's always some money and it tries to

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:51.800
<v Speaker 1>get into this space, which I sort of took as

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:54.479
<v Speaker 1>to me, and there's like some constraint or that it's

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 1>not easy, it's easy to just sort of jump into

0:06:57.600 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 1>crypto as perhaps people imagine, what is the country, Why

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>why is it that the money is just trying to

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>get in? Yeah, I mean it's a really good question

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and the answer is a little bit different for different

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 1>lots of money. But the high level structure if it

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>looks somewhat you know, similar, which is basically your let's

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>say a big bank, right, and all of your clients

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:20.119
<v Speaker 1>are asking you, can you please get into the digital

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>assets space. We want to invest and we want to

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>access token through you, and all of your traders are saying, hey,

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>we want to be trading crypto, you know, as for

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the prop desk for the firm, and you know, random

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>employees are are coming up to you, the strategy person

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 1>or or whatever at this bank every day and think, hey,

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 1>why aren't we doing the crypto thing yet? And um,

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>And so you go to compliance basically and you say, hey,

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>we'd really like to do with the crypto thing, like

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I know, last time we asked you sort of groaned, well,

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 1>like could you give you know, maybe give us a

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit more than a grown right, like like put

0:07:55.880 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 1>some words that grown and it's sort of like growing

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>really loudly, and they say, can you tell me what

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>regulatory framework are we going to be under? You know,

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Compliance comes back and says, well, okay, like you want

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>to have this conversation, sure we'll have it. Talk to

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 1>me about why you think we are allowed to do this? Right,

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, at its heart, people are sort

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of like, oh boy, like you know what, why are

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 1>we allowed to do this? Well, people bush track and say, well,

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>what regulation are we breaking? And Compliance is like, you

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 1>know what, understand like we're the first ones who are

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:32.559
<v Speaker 1>going to get sued if there's anyone who's gonna get

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>sued here by a regulator. We can't point to a

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>regulation we're breaking here. We need to know what regulatory

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>framework are we a part of? What licenses are necessary

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>to play different roles in this space? Right and and

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>and the answer is as it is right now basically

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>like we're working on it right from like as a country,

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>like as as as a global society, we're working on it.

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>That's not that's not a great answer. And that's like

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 1>roughly where the money gets trapped. So when you say money,

0:08:59.880 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>is that like I mean what you're describing sounds like

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the sort of regulatory environment that a bank lives in.

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm less convinced that's like what an asset manager lives in.

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Like do you mean, do you mean mostly banks are

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 1>like sort of everyone in trad fun Well, yeah, it's

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>a good question. It certainly isn't everyone in trad by

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and and in particular, the closer that you get to

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:24.840
<v Speaker 1>something that looks like proprietarily owned and controlled money, the

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 1>more you are able to do something here, right. And

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 1>so when you look at, for instance, a prop trading

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 1>firm that is trading I mean on wine extreame, you know,

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:35.599
<v Speaker 1>take one, this trade entirely for its own book, so

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't even have customers, doesn't have LPs, does not

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>have anything right from their perspective, this is this is

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot clear right from their perspective, The answer is

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot closer to like, oh, well, you know, here's

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:50.319
<v Speaker 1>our deal, Like we trade things, that's what we do.

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>We're going to trade this other asset class. And the

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 1>often see of themselves is like, look, we're not showing

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>this customers or anything. We're not sort of in the

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>line of fire here. So that is the area that

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 1>we've seen sort of most come in early to the space,

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 1>but if you sort of take a step back, actually

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>even a lot of other money managers end up in

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:13.679
<v Speaker 1>the more concerned bucket. Shall we say, take a look

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:16.560
<v Speaker 1>at like a giant et F company, right, Like, that's

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:19.680
<v Speaker 1>an example of like an asset manager. A lot of

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>assets are in our in our in ets and other

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:25.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of similar funds. How many ETFs currently have cryptocurrencies

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 1>in them? Well, the answer is like two or something

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>like that. And again you're getting back to questions of well,

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:35.199
<v Speaker 1>what are these are these commodities? Are these securities under

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>which statute are we putting them in the fund? Do

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 1>we need to register them? They're having active conversations with

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 1>regulators about this, and and there's obviously been a lot

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>of back and forth about attempts to have a bit

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:50.319
<v Speaker 1>poin ETF which have only sort of come together so far.

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>There are now big when futures ets which or something,

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>but they're certainly this is not a solved problem. Even

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>if if you sort of like allied the specific you know,

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 1>registered creation requirements around a publicly listed et F and

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>you look at sort of like private mutual funds for

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>high net worth individuals. Most of those are sort of

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 1>sitting there thinking, like, are we going to get in

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>trouble somehow for this compliance to somewhat on, you know,

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>uncertain and nervous about it. And so I think they're

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're you're still in a pretty messy situation

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 1>all things consider. The thing you're describing sounds like incredibly

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 1>bullish for like the prices of crypto assets, because basically

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, there's a title wave of trillions of dollars

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 1>of institutional money that they all own up at ten

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:37.720
<v Speaker 1>percent into crypto and they can't but they'll figure it out,

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and then like crypto assets will expect Like is that

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the right way to read it? Or is there like

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like the counter narrative would be like you know,

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the sort of prop traders and and like retail speculators

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>have gotten so far ahead of that trend that like

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>prices already reflect that demand. How do you think about it?

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:54.319
<v Speaker 1>I think those two sides are the right way to

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>think about it. And I do think this is the

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 1>thing that makes me the bullish about like crypto asset

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 1>pricing is just the amount of money that isn't able

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 1>to access it today or able to that that isn't

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 1>accessing it today, you know, one way or another, but

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 1>directly could be and very well might start doing so

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>over the next few years. That that is I think

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the most bullish trend going on in the space. And

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>on the flip side, right there's this question of will

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 1>has that already been priced in? And that can only

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 1>be the narrative in some sense for like so many

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 1>years in a row before at some point you have

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>to start saying, well, the way, isn't that why people

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>were buying last year and holding you know, anticipation of this.

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in the end, it's messy, like there's lots

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>of reasons that people would be and I don't think

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:37.719
<v Speaker 1>that there's a very clean tally of this, and I

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>think I'm still not bullish because of it, but I

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 1>definitely do think this has already been prepositioned for a

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>decent amount. Now there's a limit to how prepositioned it

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 1>could be, right because if you think about it, the

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:51.440
<v Speaker 1>scale of what could roll into crypto. If you think

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 1>that a few trillion dollars of actual capital is what

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 1>could happen, that's the entire market cap ofcrypto right now.

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 1>If a few trillion dollars rolled into crypto, I'm guessing

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 1>it would ten x in price roughly speaking from where

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:05.440
<v Speaker 1>it is. And so if you think that the odds

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:08.440
<v Speaker 1>of that are at least ten percent, that alone can

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of justify And it's sort of like an argument

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 1>that it sort of probably hasn't been fully prepositioned for

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>by the world, which I think, I like, roughly believe

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:21.080
<v Speaker 1>in expected value terms also like in median terms, what

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>are the odds crypto will go up or down versus

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:25.960
<v Speaker 1>like how much we'll go up or down? You know,

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I certainly don't think it's like anything close to conclusive

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>argument that like it's you know, very likely to go

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:35.560
<v Speaker 1>off you say crypto, Like, I mean, my impression of

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>like giant institutional interest is like the idea of having

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 1>some portion of your portfolio in bitcoin is very attractive.

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>My impression is that there's a sort of like sharp

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 1>falloff where like they're not sort of thinking about the

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>difference between other black chains and like how to you know,

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 1>yield farm and stuff like that. Because that your impression

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 1>as well, or do you think that a lot of

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>this institutional money is like you know, wants to actively

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>trade lots of different cryptocurrencies. Yeah, I don't think they've

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:04.840
<v Speaker 1>decided is the real answer, right, Like, I think the

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 1>real answer is that, like, you know, if you ask them,

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 1>they would say something like I don't know, you know,

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>if you like what you mean by crypto, like what crypto?

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I think they're honest answers like I don't know, you know,

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the crypto thing, right, like there's bitcoin, Like yeah, they're

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 1>more like yeah, totally there are more like are you

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, intending to trade more? You know, I don't know,

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Like I certainly want to consider that, you know, down

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the road, Like right now, our focuses on finding a

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 1>way to get bitcoin access and maybe ethereum access to

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 1>users like you know, but like absolutely, you know, we considered,

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, would be we'd be potentially interested in offering more.

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a sort of like messy confused answer

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 1>that that you would here in practice, which is just

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>another example of like, you know, things are not very

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>orderly right now in in sort of like money looking

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 1>at the space just on this point, and Joe kind

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 1>of touched on it in the intro, but I guess

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 1>this is sort of an existential question, but it feels

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 1>like the market is in the process of maturing, And

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 1>it also seems like f t x's whole purpose is

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to improve liquidity and crypto trading, and some of that

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 1>should happen naturally as more money comes in, but some

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of it is you making a conscious effort to do so.

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:21.760
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, it seems like a lot

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 1>of the opportunity in crypto has historically been from illiquidity

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and frictions and fragmentation in the market. Is there attention there, like,

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>does the attractiveness of the crypto world start to ebb

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>away as the market actually matures. It depends on how

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>mature is in theory, and this this might not happen,

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 1>but certainly I think you would ask most of the

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 1>traders in the market what they think. What they would

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 1>say would be something like, well, yeah, we do think

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>that pian l in basis points you know portrayed will

0:15:56.520 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 1>will sort of like go down over time, but we

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>also think volume will go up, and that that certainly

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 1>has been what we've seen so far. Work you compare

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 1>today to right. You know, I was busy trying to

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>to make money arbitraging bitcoins here versus Japan, and those

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 1>trades were good by many per cent um. But you know,

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a billion dollars a day of volume going on

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>in each side, which is a whole lot if you're

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>making many percent on it. But you know, what do

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>things look like today, Well, there's one or two hundred

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars a day of volume that are trading in crypto,

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and so I think volumes are probably up like fifty

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 1>x or so since then spreads on the other hand,

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>or down, and they're down sort of a comparable you know, ratio,

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that's so far like the story

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 1>of crypto has sort of been like spreads are coming

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 1>in and at the same time volumes are going up

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>such that actually the arbitrageures are making about as much

0:16:56.640 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 1>as they always did, although it's it's maybe harder than

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 1>it was before. And you can imagine the future that

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:05.440
<v Speaker 1>like that continues, that that things continue to get more efficient.

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>But that as part of you know, the asset class

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 1>getting more institutionalized, like you know, volume and liquidity goes

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>up a therapy which increases the sort of like scale

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>of activity people can have. That being said, and and

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>part of me doesn't believe that, but but not all

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>of me, because it is also the case that like,

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 1>at least as of today, we are probably over indexed

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 1>on you know, volume relative to liquidity. And I think

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 1>one way to look at that is just looking out

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 1>ratio daily trading volume to market cap they're trading, you know,

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 1>comparable amounts to how much US stocks trade each day,

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 1>but you know, have the market cap of Amazon. But

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:47.159
<v Speaker 1>I would definitely guess on the margin that like we

0:17:47.240 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>are going to see compression in that Rob people who

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:06.399
<v Speaker 1>haven't listened to last April was the first time we

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 1>had you and Sam, and we talked a lot about

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that trade whereas like really difficult sort of operationally to execute,

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 1>but just these crazy spreads between the price of bitcoin

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>in the US and Japan four or five years ago,

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 1>and how you could just you know, how simple that

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:24.680
<v Speaker 1>that sort of opportunity was once you found a way

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 1>to make that trade. As you've described, volumes way up,

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 1>spreads way down. Where are you know? And you mentioned

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:33.959
<v Speaker 1>too that there's like a range of sophistications. So there

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:36.360
<v Speaker 1>are some entities that I just want to have Bitcoin exposure,

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to have etherorum exposure, and then there's other

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 1>tread five that's clearly way more sophisticated, like entities like

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:44.480
<v Speaker 1>jump trading or doing all kinds of wild stuff. And

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:46.400
<v Speaker 1>we had their head of crypto on the podcast last

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:49.880
<v Speaker 1>year kind of Korea. But what you know, like where

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 1>are the current frictions as you see them or the

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>arbitrarge ores entering this market are seeing, like what kind

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:00.959
<v Speaker 1>of things? Obviously it's gonna be way morephisticated than just

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 1>by USL Japan. Like where are the existing inefficiencies sort

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 1>of broadly in crypto right now? Yeah, I mean they're

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 1>a little all over the place, although obviously way smaller

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 1>in particular. I think it's a lot less well you

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:17.120
<v Speaker 1>buy on this echanges on that exchange. As you said,

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a lot less identifiable in some sense, is

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>what it is? So what is it if it's not that?

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, some of this is just traditionally jef T stuff.

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:27.719
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's a hundred fifty billion dollars a day

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 1>of volume that traded. It's trading on a bunch of

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>different order books. And when you say how efficient is it, right,

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 1>like how much price might be order books be? Well,

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, take two bitcoin or bitcoin futures order

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:41.919
<v Speaker 1>books right now, they probably each have these of a

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 1>couple of basis points and a spread of a basis

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 1>point or you know, some fraction of basis point or

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:50.439
<v Speaker 1>something like that. And you know, given sort of like

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the funding rates and the premiums of futures and things

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:55.880
<v Speaker 1>like that, and the time and costed to do one

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>of these ARBs, they can absolutely be a few BIPs,

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, out of line with each other. And so

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 1>in theory you can sort of do out the math.

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's say that you know, you made one basis point

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 1>on each side, which would be a lot and would

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:13.440
<v Speaker 1>be like, you know, an impressive amount to make on

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>on the third volume, on fifty of volume in crypto,

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 1>giving the extreme of like you were the arbit charger,

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:23.199
<v Speaker 1>you're the h f T firm, then you know, how

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:26.119
<v Speaker 1>much is that a day will a bip on you know,

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 1>fifty billion dollars of volume is five million dollars of

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:32.439
<v Speaker 1>profit a day, which is you know, what what a

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:35.359
<v Speaker 1>billion and a half a year, And so that gets

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:38.399
<v Speaker 1>some sense for and again obviously I'm sort of like

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:40.400
<v Speaker 1>putting a lot of corners in that, like I don't

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>want to sort of imply that that's like you know

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that is the amount that could be made. But but whatever,

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe that gives some sense for like what the available

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 1>scale here is of arbor charge profit in the space,

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and it is like substantial, and so that's part of

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing. You know what other things are there? Well,

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:04.160
<v Speaker 1>farming is actually probably I hesitate to say that it's

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 1>been the biggest source of but it might be like

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't be shocked if you added up all the

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 1>civicate firms together and said, like, over the last couple

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 1>of years, have they made more from farming or trading?

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:18.920
<v Speaker 1>The answer might be farmed. Can you give me an

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>intuitive understanding or farming? I mean, like, to me, farming

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 1>is like you sell some structured puts and collect premium.

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 1>But perhaps there's a more sophisticated understanding than that. Let

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 1>me give you sort of like a really a toy

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 1>model of it, which I actually think has a surprising

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>amount of legitimacy for what farming could mean. You know,

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:41.199
<v Speaker 1>where do you start. You start with a company that

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 1>builds a box, and in practice this box they probably

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:48.959
<v Speaker 1>dress it up to look like a life changing, world

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:52.479
<v Speaker 1>altering protocol that's gonna replace all the big banks in

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:55.919
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight days or whatever. Maybe for now actually ignore

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 1>what it does or pretend it does literally nothing. It's

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 1>just a box. So what this protocol is, It's called

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 1>protocol X. It's a box that you can take a token,

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 1>you can take a theory, and you can put it

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:08.440
<v Speaker 1>in the box and take it out of the box

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:10.479
<v Speaker 1>like you put it in the box, and you get like,

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, an IOU for for having to put it

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 1>in the box, and then you can redeem that IOW

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 1>you back out for the token. So so far, what

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 1>we've described is the world's dumbest e t F or

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:22.879
<v Speaker 1>a d R or something like that. It's a It

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't do anything but let you put things in it

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:28.440
<v Speaker 1>if you so chose. And then this protocol issues a

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 1>token we'll call it whatever X token, and X token

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 1>promises that anything cool that happens because of this box

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 1>is gonna ultimately be usable by you know, governance vote

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 1>of holders of the X tokens. They can vote on

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 1>what to do with any proceeds or other cool things

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:51.880
<v Speaker 1>that happened from this box. And of course, so far

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:55.159
<v Speaker 1>we haven't exactly given a compelling reason for why there

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 1>ever would be any proceeds from this box, but I

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know, you know, maybe maybe there will be. So

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of where you start. And then you say,

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:06.879
<v Speaker 1>all right, well yeah, this box and yeat X token,

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 1>and the box for a call declares or or maybe

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:15.199
<v Speaker 1>votes byonunting governance or you know something like that. That

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:18.920
<v Speaker 1>what they're gonna do is they are going to take

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:21.920
<v Speaker 1>half of all the X tokens that will as remnted,

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe two thirds of two thirds well ever X tokens,

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to give them away for free to

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 1>everyone uses the box. So anyone who goes takes some

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 1>money puts in the box. Each day they're gonna air drop,

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:37.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, one percent of the X tokens pro rata

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:40.960
<v Speaker 1>among sephron who's put money in the box. That's for now,

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:44.199
<v Speaker 1>what X token does. It gets given away to the

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:48.439
<v Speaker 1>box people. And now what happens, Well, X token has

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:51.879
<v Speaker 1>some market cap, right, it's it's probably not zero, but

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 1>let's say it's you know, twenty million dollar market cap

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and a bunch of arbitreasures from from like first principles

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 1>that should be zerre But okay, sure, okay, I completely

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 1>resmall comments like I mean, like that's not quite true.

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 1>But it like, when you describe it in this totally

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>cynical way, it sounds like it'd beasier. But go describe

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:12.879
<v Speaker 1>it this way. You might think, for instance, that in

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 1>like five minutes with an Internet connection, you can create

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:17.879
<v Speaker 1>such a box in such a token, and that it

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>should reflects like, you know, it should be worth like

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a hundred eighty dollars or something market cap for like that,

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:26.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, that effort that you put into it. In

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the world that we're in, if you do this, everyone's

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna be like box token. Maybe it's cool if you

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:33.919
<v Speaker 1>got in box token, you know, that's gonna appear on

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and all have a twenty million dollar market cap.

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 1>And of course one thing that you could do is

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you could like make the float very low and whatever.

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, maybe maybe there haven't been twenty million dollars

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 1>that flowed into it yet. Maybe that's sort of like

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 1>is it's you know, mark to market fully diluted valuation

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:52.640
<v Speaker 1>or something. But I acknowledge that it's not totally clear

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that this thing should have market cap, but but empirically

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I claim it would have market cap. Agree it should

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 1>any series, but that's right, So and obviously already we're

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:08.440
<v Speaker 1>start of hiding some of the magic in that, right,

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Like some of the magic is in like how do

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 1>you get that market gap to start with? But you know, whatever,

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:14.879
<v Speaker 1>we're what We're going to move on from that for

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 1>a second. So you know X tokens being given out

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>each day all these like sophisticated firms, Like that's interesting,

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Like if the total amount of money in the box

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 1>is a hundred million dollars, then it's gonna yield sixteen

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 1>million dollars this year in X tokens being given out

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:34.400
<v Speaker 1>for it. That's a sixteen percent return. That's pretty good.

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>We'll put a little bit more in, right, and and

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe that that happens until there are two million dollars

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 1>in the box. So you know, sophisticated traders and or

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:46.119
<v Speaker 1>people on crypto Twitter or or other sort of similar

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 1>parties go and put two hundred million dollars in the

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:52.360
<v Speaker 1>box collectively, and they start getting these ex tokens for it, right,

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 1>And now all of a sudden, he's like, wow, people

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:57.439
<v Speaker 1>just decided to put two hundred million dollars in the box.

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:00.680
<v Speaker 1>This is a pretty cool box, right, Like this this

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:04.920
<v Speaker 1>is a valuable box as demonstrated by all the money

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 1>that people have apparently decided should be in the box.

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:11.439
<v Speaker 1>And who are we to say that they're wrong about that? Like,

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is I mean, boxes can be great.

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Look I love boxes as much as the next guy, right,

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 1>And so what happens now all of a sudden people

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 1>are kind of recalibrating, like, well, twenty million dollars, that's it,

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:28.160
<v Speaker 1>like that market cap for this box and it's been

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>like forty eight hours and it already has two hundred

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:34.159
<v Speaker 1>million dollars, including from like sophisticated players in it, Like

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:36.879
<v Speaker 1>come on, that's too late, right, like, and and they

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 1>look at these ratio TVL total value walked in the box,

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:42.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, as a ratio to market cap of the

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>boxes token, and they're like ten x. That's insane. One

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:48.639
<v Speaker 1>x is the norm. And so then you know, X

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:51.120
<v Speaker 1>token price goes way up and now it's a hundred

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:54.119
<v Speaker 1>thirty million dollar market cap token because of you know

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the bullishness of people's usage of the box. And now

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, of course, the smart money it's

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:02.399
<v Speaker 1>like go wow, like this thing is now yielding like

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:05.199
<v Speaker 1>sixty year in next tokens. Of course, I'll take my

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:08.199
<v Speaker 1>sixty percent yield, right, so they go they were another

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 1>three million dollars in the box, and you get a

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:12.639
<v Speaker 1>site and then it goes to infinity and then everyone

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 1>makes money. I think of myself as like a fairly

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 1>cynical person, and yep, that was so much more cynical. Yes,

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I described farming like you're just like, well, I'm in

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the ponzi business and it's pretty good. And did any

0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>of this require any sort of like economic case is

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 1>just like other people get money in the box and

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 1>so I'm going to two and then it's more valuable,

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:37.439
<v Speaker 1>so they're gonna put more money in. And at no

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:39.680
<v Speaker 1>point in the cycle did it seem to like describe

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 1>any sort of like economic purpose. So, on the one hand,

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a pretty reasonable response. But let me

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:48.720
<v Speaker 1>play around with this a little bit, right, because that's

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 1>one framing of this, and I think there's like a

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 1>a sort of depressing amount of ablidity. Can you can

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:58.719
<v Speaker 1>you comment on the sustainability of that, like, because like

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:00.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, on the one and you're like, well, in

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:02.120
<v Speaker 1>dollars money is going to come into a pit ground.

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:04.399
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, you're like, basically there are a

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of ponzis that have done really well, right, so

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 1>let me okay, cool, I'll sail on the cynical route,

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:15.440
<v Speaker 1>think about, like cynically what could happen here? Well, okay,

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 1>so you've got things boxes kind of dumb, but like

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 1>what's the end game? Right? Because boxes where zero obviously,

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and like that, you know, you can't like keep this

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 1>market cap or something like the other hand, if everyone

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of now thinks that this box token is worth

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:33.959
<v Speaker 1>about a billion dollar market cap, that's when people are

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:35.920
<v Speaker 1>pricing it at and sort of has that market cap,

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 1>everyone's gonna market to market. In fact, you can even

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:41.880
<v Speaker 1>finance this, right, and you put x token in a

0:28:41.920 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 1>borrow lending protocol and borrowed dollars with it. If you

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 1>think it's worth like less than two thirds of that,

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 1>you you can even just like put some in there,

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:52.480
<v Speaker 1>take the dollars out never never, you know, give the

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 1>dollars back and get liquidated eventually. And it is sort

0:28:56.120 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 1>of like real monetize herbal stuff in some senses. And

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, at some point, like if the world never

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 1>decides that we were wrong about this in like a

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 1>coordinated way, right, Like you're kind of a guy calling

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 1>bullshit and saying no, this thing is actually worthless. But

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:15.960
<v Speaker 1>in what sense are you right? Sorry? Can I just

0:29:16.000 --> 0:29:18.560
<v Speaker 1>ask on this point? I mean, so, are you saying

0:29:18.560 --> 0:29:22.600
<v Speaker 1>that the value has to derive from everyone agreeing that

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:25.240
<v Speaker 1>it's worth something? And I know, like, on the one hand,

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 1>that seems like a simple point about crypto, but on

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, throughout crypto's history there have been these

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 1>different arguments about how it actually gets value. You know,

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 1>use cases for the underlying technology for blockchain, Everyone's going

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 1>to start migrating stuff on blockchain and then you're going

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 1>to have a real economic use attached to these assets,

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's where the value is going to come from.

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 1>But are you saying that it depends more on everyone

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 1>just agreeing that these are worth something? So really, what

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 1>I'd say is that it could come in theory from

0:29:56.400 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 1>either you can sort of get a market cap either

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 1>because of cash show right, and then like Warren Buffets

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 1>like fun this, like I'm going to buy this if

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 1>it's at too cheaper price, result just buy it and

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 1>own it and get cash flor from it and that's great.

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Or you could see something get market cap in the

0:30:12.440 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>way that I don't know, Dodge point or ship coin

0:30:15.520 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 1>have right where people just kind of like ha ha,

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and then they buy it and if you're like that's dumb,

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>it has no cash flow, I'm gonna short sell it.

0:30:23.680 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 1>You lose all your money, and h you know that

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:30.480
<v Speaker 1>those like at least like over the last few years,

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:32.920
<v Speaker 1>those are booth in ways that like assets have gotten

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 1>market cap, and I I sort of like, I think

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that this starts to hint at like at least some

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 1>interesting angles on this, because like it's not just cryptocurrencies

0:30:46.400 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that have had this dynamic, right, Like how about like

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, a m C or hurts or game stop

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 1>or meme. Stocks in general have like a very similar

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 1>pattern to this, And and the sort of like concept

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 1>of like maybe people will pay something for it even

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 1>though it doesn't seem traditionally valuable is not a crypto

0:31:08.200 --> 0:31:12.719
<v Speaker 1>specific concept, although it certainly has become Like I mean,

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I've seen game stuff though it's like usually that's the

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 1>perception and I'm not judging, but the perception is that

0:31:20.040 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 1>that it's sort of like a perversion of what the

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>whole point of like the stock market is as opposed

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:28.640
<v Speaker 1>to like this is going to be like the basis

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:32.880
<v Speaker 1>of this yeah, I've written that sort of thing before,

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Like I would have I would have sort of drawn

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the causality the other way, like I would I've said that, like,

0:31:38.360 --> 0:31:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, the rise of bitcoin allowed for things like

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:42.480
<v Speaker 1>game stop at AMC. But I also think that like

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a difference between something like bitcoin where people are like, well,

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 1>this thing is the story of value, and enough people

0:31:47.920 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 1>accept that that it becomes a story of value and

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the box that you're describing, where like, like no one

0:31:54.280 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 1>has an emotional attachment to the box in your description,

0:31:57.040 --> 0:32:00.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think also empirically, like what they have is

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and and an a p y number, right, what they

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 1>have is they're like, oh, this box is paying us

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money, so we're gonna stay in it.

0:32:07.040 --> 0:32:10.000
<v Speaker 1>And so there's like with bitcoin, you know, you can

0:32:10.040 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of say there's a sustainable value because of like

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 1>just sort of like a broad social acceptance. But like

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I feel like with a lot of this like farming

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:23.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff like the kid his box act, like no one

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 1>knows the name from day to day. It's just like

0:32:25.120 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 1>this is the box that is yielding the most today,

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:28.880
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna put money in and I'm sort of

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 1>curious about the sustainability of that. Yeah, so certainly some

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 1>of them are unsustainable and some of them are, you know,

0:32:35.200 --> 0:32:37.960
<v Speaker 1>many of them by number, and exactly the way you

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 1>think that they work, right, Like the way these end

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:43.000
<v Speaker 1>is that like eventually people decide that this is no

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 1>longer today's school box, this is yesterday's lane box, and

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 1>they go down a lot in price, and then people

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>start move on to box number two. And if everyone

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:54.960
<v Speaker 1>did a careful accounting of where they ended up, I

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know, you know, what they've made money? Would they not?

0:32:56.920 --> 0:32:58.760
<v Speaker 1>If it's a whole unclear like some people would have,

0:32:58.800 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 1>some people wouldn't have. It's a messy And that's like,

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:06.720
<v Speaker 1>certainly how some of these quickly end up, but it's

0:33:06.720 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 1>not how all of them do. And in particularly, let's

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:13.760
<v Speaker 1>let's be revisit one of the earliest assumptions about this, right,

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the point where I said, this is a box that

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:19.280
<v Speaker 1>does nothing but be a box, right, And that was like,

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I think a little facetious er, although I do think

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 1>it's like an important way to understand part of what's

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:27.120
<v Speaker 1>going on. But it's not really the case that the

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:29.800
<v Speaker 1>biggest of these claimed to be a box that is

0:33:29.880 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 1>nothing but a box. They claim to be a bit

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 1>more than that. And you know, you can query how

0:33:35.240 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 1>much you believe the story that their value at its

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:44.320
<v Speaker 1>heart is coming from them being more than just a box.

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 1>But people certainly perceive them to be more than that.

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 1>And you know examples of this, right I Well, let's say,

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, what are some of the most popular steaking programs.

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 1>They're like, you know, historically unite swap of a compound.

0:33:59.600 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 1>These are various boxes that have an actual product tied

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:05.880
<v Speaker 1>to them that has like a narrative about why it

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:09.439
<v Speaker 1>might become the world's next big thing. You know, maybe

0:34:09.480 --> 0:34:12.200
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be like the preeminent depths. You know, maybe

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:14.959
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be the preeminent borrow lending protocol and chain.

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:18.280
<v Speaker 1>And it's like you know, weird box sticking things starts

0:34:18.280 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 1>out is just this sort of like side show. So

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the bigger story of we're going to change the world

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:27.279
<v Speaker 1>with the protocol that we just built. Now, sometimes that

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:32.080
<v Speaker 1>side show becomes the main show itself because sometimes you know,

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:34.960
<v Speaker 1>in the end, what really happens is that like the

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:39.879
<v Speaker 1>box plus yield nature of it becomes more popular than

0:34:40.680 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the original use case of it. But it makes it

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:46.359
<v Speaker 1>at least seem a bit less dumb and a bit

0:34:46.440 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 1>less circular and a bit more like, you know, there's

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:53.239
<v Speaker 1>something real that many of these are drawing on and

0:34:53.280 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 1>a real hope that it's going to become itself a

0:34:56.080 --> 0:35:01.479
<v Speaker 1>valuable protocol. So obviously, okay, maybe defied crypto will become

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:04.360
<v Speaker 1>very important, but I'm still just sort of like curious,

0:35:04.440 --> 0:35:07.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, just the sort of pure making money side

0:35:07.760 --> 0:35:11.040
<v Speaker 1>of this. You estimated that sort of the arbitrage market

0:35:11.080 --> 0:35:13.720
<v Speaker 1>for bitcoin, maybe there's potential one and a half billion

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 1>dollars and profits out there for the taking. Like how

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:19.880
<v Speaker 1>big is the farming industry when you talk about like

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 1>this is a news besides trading? This is the other

0:35:22.040 --> 0:35:24.960
<v Speaker 1>big way. How big is the putting money in a

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:28.759
<v Speaker 1>box industry getting? And I'm also curious, Like, you know,

0:35:28.840 --> 0:35:30.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that people in this space talk

0:35:30.719 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 1>about is you can, thanks to ft x specifically and

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:37.160
<v Speaker 1>thanks to the perpetual futures that it lists for so

0:35:37.200 --> 0:35:41.240
<v Speaker 1>many coins, I could buy the coin farm it short

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the future on ft X so that I don't even

0:35:43.600 --> 0:35:45.840
<v Speaker 1>have to take a directional position on the coin itself

0:35:46.239 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and just sort of milk the farming yield. So can

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:51.560
<v Speaker 1>you just describe like how big is this sort of

0:35:51.600 --> 0:35:55.720
<v Speaker 1>like ecosystem, and how sophisticated are the trades getting beyond

0:35:55.800 --> 0:35:58.120
<v Speaker 1>just sort of like the naive or simple like CREWD

0:35:58.239 --> 0:36:01.120
<v Speaker 1>put money in the box trade. Well, let's do like

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:06.080
<v Speaker 1>some rough ballparking. There's something two billion dollars of quote

0:36:06.120 --> 0:36:11.359
<v Speaker 1>unquote TVL quote value locked on chain, and now a

0:36:11.400 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of that is basically irrelevantly lost on chain, and

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you can sort of ignore. Maybe a hundred billion is

0:36:17.600 --> 0:36:19.279
<v Speaker 1>sort of like the real number or something a little

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:21.920
<v Speaker 1>bit less than that. Yields are certainly down a fair bit,

0:36:22.000 --> 0:36:24.319
<v Speaker 1>but I think we're looking at like, you know, mid

0:36:24.360 --> 0:36:27.160
<v Speaker 1>to high single digit percents on average or something like that.

0:36:27.760 --> 0:36:30.399
<v Speaker 1>And so I don't know, you know, mid to high

0:36:30.440 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 1>single digit billions of dollars a year of quote unquote

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 1>profit that that are being made by farmers actually doesn't

0:36:36.480 --> 0:36:38.560
<v Speaker 1>sound insane to me as as a ball park of this,

0:36:39.040 --> 0:36:41.400
<v Speaker 1>which that's a big number to the extent that this

0:36:41.440 --> 0:36:44.719
<v Speaker 1>is real profit, it's you know, we might be talking

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:46.680
<v Speaker 1>five billion a year that sort of like traders are

0:36:46.719 --> 0:36:49.680
<v Speaker 1>making from farming. So yeah, that the numbers are not

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 1>are not tiny, and and they're plausibly bigger, probably bigger

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and aggreeate than treading returns and group im not. I

0:36:56.880 --> 0:36:59.239
<v Speaker 1>don't want to like a hundred percent square by that comparison,

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:03.120
<v Speaker 1>but I am might be right, is not out of

0:37:03.200 --> 0:37:06.560
<v Speaker 1>line with like my my sort of instincts and prior

0:37:06.600 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and and did some pieces of knowledge I have here?

0:37:09.160 --> 0:37:13.839
<v Speaker 1>So it's a lot one I think one thing which

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:18.880
<v Speaker 1>is worth noting here, right. One parallel is well, okay,

0:37:18.960 --> 0:37:21.560
<v Speaker 1>let's say that you have a company, right, and this

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:25.239
<v Speaker 1>company delivers food. Right, what it does is it it

0:37:25.560 --> 0:37:27.759
<v Speaker 1>goes to restaurants and picks up food and takes it

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to houses and puts the food there. And there's a

0:37:31.200 --> 0:37:34.640
<v Speaker 1>few of these, right, what would be like how you

0:37:34.640 --> 0:37:36.920
<v Speaker 1>would think this company would do during a pandemic? You

0:37:37.239 --> 0:37:40.640
<v Speaker 1>think spectacular? Right? In fact, the pandemic was a very

0:37:40.680 --> 0:37:44.040
<v Speaker 1>trying period for some food delivery companies because their unit

0:37:44.040 --> 0:37:47.879
<v Speaker 1>economics were negative, like they were. They were running out

0:37:47.880 --> 0:37:50.200
<v Speaker 1>of loss and it had been for years, and the

0:37:50.239 --> 0:37:53.959
<v Speaker 1>pandemic meant more business, which meant more loss for them,

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:58.920
<v Speaker 1>so paradoxically it was negative. And how did that happen? Well,

0:37:58.920 --> 0:38:01.560
<v Speaker 1>what's the actual whole well a funds there if you

0:38:01.640 --> 0:38:04.400
<v Speaker 1>take a step back, Well, the company, why are they

0:38:04.480 --> 0:38:08.000
<v Speaker 1>running out a loss? Well, vcs keep funding them, right,

0:38:08.120 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 1>People keep putting money into the company here, and the

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:18.120
<v Speaker 1>company then has stock price goes up because this metric

0:38:18.280 --> 0:38:22.520
<v Speaker 1>business revenue, a metric that isn't actually profit, goes up.

0:38:23.160 --> 0:38:25.600
<v Speaker 1>And you know, as long as sort of like that

0:38:25.680 --> 0:38:28.319
<v Speaker 1>keeps happening, right, people keep putting more and more money

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:32.200
<v Speaker 1>into the box. And the associated security in this case

0:38:32.400 --> 0:38:34.640
<v Speaker 1>is because it is tied to the ultimate profit or

0:38:34.840 --> 0:38:37.879
<v Speaker 1>something like that of this company goes up and up,

0:38:38.520 --> 0:38:41.839
<v Speaker 1>and you know, it keeps spending more money than it's

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:44.239
<v Speaker 1>making on things that are causing it to make that

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:46.880
<v Speaker 1>money in the first place, like negative unit economics or

0:38:47.040 --> 0:38:49.799
<v Speaker 1>or just hip tons of advertising or something like that.

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:51.719
<v Speaker 1>And and then it gets more and more business. And

0:38:51.719 --> 0:38:53.960
<v Speaker 1>because it gets more business, people like, that's great, using

0:38:54.000 --> 0:38:56.440
<v Speaker 1>even more money, bigger numbers. Let's put more money in

0:38:56.880 --> 0:38:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the goal here being collect all the money in your box,

0:39:00.480 --> 0:39:02.239
<v Speaker 1>you look a lot bigger than your competitors, and they

0:39:02.239 --> 0:39:04.520
<v Speaker 1>started give up, and you win, and then in the

0:39:04.600 --> 0:39:07.080
<v Speaker 1>end you get all the real business and and and

0:39:07.080 --> 0:39:10.279
<v Speaker 1>and basically it's all an advertising budget, right, as much

0:39:10.280 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 1>as anything else This is all a way for like,

0:39:12.800 --> 0:39:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, your box to get more notoriety and ultimately

0:39:16.840 --> 0:39:19.640
<v Speaker 1>end up getting real business six years later because of that.

0:39:19.640 --> 0:39:22.440
<v Speaker 1>That's sort of like standard operating procedure frankly for startups

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:25.280
<v Speaker 1>right now. And it's very similar to what we're talking

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:44.960
<v Speaker 1>about in some ways with these high verticals. Can I ask,

0:39:45.280 --> 0:39:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what we're talking about here is basically circularity

0:39:48.480 --> 0:39:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and the circularity of defy And there's one other aspect

0:39:53.440 --> 0:39:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of it that I've been thinking a lot about lately,

0:39:56.760 --> 0:39:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and I'm trying to think how to phrase this, But

0:39:59.200 --> 0:40:01.920
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty clear in crypto that you want to avoid

0:40:02.040 --> 0:40:05.920
<v Speaker 1>dealing with FIAT currencies as much as possible. So onboarding

0:40:06.000 --> 0:40:08.520
<v Speaker 1>is tough, or there are tax reasons to avoid doing

0:40:08.520 --> 0:40:11.040
<v Speaker 1>that or whatever. So the way everyone gets around that

0:40:11.160 --> 0:40:14.759
<v Speaker 1>is through stable coins. But stable coins are basically just

0:40:14.760 --> 0:40:17.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to replicate the dollar for the most part, right

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:19.799
<v Speaker 1>So you're not really getting away from FIAT, You're just

0:40:20.000 --> 0:40:24.320
<v Speaker 1>replicating it in a way that fits into the crypto ecosystem.

0:40:24.560 --> 0:40:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Is is that a problem for crypto or like, at

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:33.680
<v Speaker 1>some point conceptually should stable coins go away? What I

0:40:33.680 --> 0:40:35.200
<v Speaker 1>guess the question is, like, what is the point of

0:40:35.200 --> 0:40:39.280
<v Speaker 1>crypto if everything is eventually underpinned by the dollar anyway,

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:43.160
<v Speaker 1>there is an interesting question of, like what happens to

0:40:43.239 --> 0:40:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the price of bitcoin and other digital assets in the

0:40:49.000 --> 0:40:52.400
<v Speaker 1>face of stable coins if they obviate they need to

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:56.799
<v Speaker 1>have an actual asset that is not tied to the

0:40:56.840 --> 0:41:00.440
<v Speaker 1>dollar in the first place, right if just like dollarization

0:41:00.920 --> 0:41:03.120
<v Speaker 1>takes over service fool Like, I think that's sort of

0:41:03.120 --> 0:41:05.520
<v Speaker 1>an interesting question. I think when you look at well,

0:41:05.680 --> 0:41:07.239
<v Speaker 1>is it bad to have a dollar like guess in

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the system? I think no, I think it's super powerful.

0:41:09.520 --> 0:41:11.399
<v Speaker 1>And I think what I'd say is like, I'll try

0:41:11.480 --> 0:41:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and send a hundred thousand dollars to the guy saying

0:41:14.239 --> 0:41:17.040
<v Speaker 1>next to me, um or is the woman saying next

0:41:17.080 --> 0:41:18.640
<v Speaker 1>to me? And you know, you'll try and send a

0:41:18.680 --> 0:41:21.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand dollars the person sitting next to you. And

0:41:21.160 --> 0:41:23.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll have a race. And I'm going to use USDC

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and you're gonna use USDC or USD rather. And I

0:41:26.920 --> 0:41:28.600
<v Speaker 1>have a guess as to who's gonna win that race.

0:41:28.640 --> 0:41:30.239
<v Speaker 1>I have a guest as to whose money is going

0:41:30.280 --> 0:41:32.279
<v Speaker 1>to get there first. And if we want to do

0:41:32.360 --> 0:41:36.120
<v Speaker 1>some you know, a race to someone who's sitting in Nigeria. Boy,

0:41:36.160 --> 0:41:38.439
<v Speaker 1>do have a strong guest about you know, whose money

0:41:38.480 --> 0:41:39.920
<v Speaker 1>is going to get there first and who's gonna have

0:41:39.960 --> 0:41:42.239
<v Speaker 1>spent more doing it? And so I think that to

0:41:42.360 --> 0:41:44.880
<v Speaker 1>some extent right away you can see this is can

0:41:44.920 --> 0:41:47.319
<v Speaker 1>you unpack that a little? Like when you get the

0:41:47.440 --> 0:41:50.000
<v Speaker 1>u s DC to the guy in Nigeria and then

0:41:50.040 --> 0:41:53.000
<v Speaker 1>he wants to buy a sandwich with it, what happens right,

0:41:53.120 --> 0:41:56.759
<v Speaker 1>So right now there's a sense in which it doesn't

0:41:56.760 --> 0:41:59.239
<v Speaker 1>accomplish all that much if the next thing he has

0:41:59.280 --> 0:42:02.040
<v Speaker 1>to do is CD to cash out USDC for a

0:42:02.160 --> 0:42:05.840
<v Speaker 1>USD wire transfer anyway, right, and then like by the

0:42:05.840 --> 0:42:08.520
<v Speaker 1>time he's bought the sandwich, you know your crypto transfer

0:42:08.600 --> 0:42:12.160
<v Speaker 1>did nothing because it all bottomed out in the same place. Anyway.

0:42:12.200 --> 0:42:14.960
<v Speaker 1>That being said, I think there's like two reasons that

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that I don't fully buy that response, one of which is,

0:42:19.080 --> 0:42:21.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, eventually you can imagine a world where the

0:42:21.080 --> 0:42:24.960
<v Speaker 1>sandwich guy accepts USDC, right, and what's the sandwich guy

0:42:25.000 --> 0:42:28.640
<v Speaker 1>accepts it, then he actually never needs to go into

0:42:29.120 --> 0:42:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, into fat directly, right? Can you just stay

0:42:32.680 --> 0:42:35.680
<v Speaker 1>in in cryptoland the whole time? And I think that

0:42:35.719 --> 0:42:38.600
<v Speaker 1>it is in some ways actually just more efficient. So

0:42:38.640 --> 0:42:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that's that's one answer to your question. But another answer

0:42:42.480 --> 0:42:46.279
<v Speaker 1>to your question is, you know there are services of

0:42:46.440 --> 0:42:49.680
<v Speaker 1>text is one of them that can convert easily between

0:42:49.680 --> 0:42:52.600
<v Speaker 1>dollars and currencies and connect as you know, point of

0:42:52.640 --> 0:42:56.960
<v Speaker 1>sale converters there, so that people could go to a

0:42:57.920 --> 0:43:01.360
<v Speaker 1>sandwich store and like, hey with so, but the Sandward

0:43:01.400 --> 0:43:05.560
<v Speaker 1>store receives local fiat currency, and there still does have

0:43:05.600 --> 0:43:07.879
<v Speaker 1>to be a conversion involved. But now what we're saying

0:43:07.960 --> 0:43:10.439
<v Speaker 1>is that like one, a few companies have to figure

0:43:10.480 --> 0:43:13.760
<v Speaker 1>out how to do that conversion in large bulk size,

0:43:14.280 --> 0:43:16.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, netting it all out somewhat efficiently, which is

0:43:16.960 --> 0:43:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot easier than if you're trying to live in

0:43:20.000 --> 0:43:24.239
<v Speaker 1>a world where like person had to figure out how

0:43:24.280 --> 0:43:26.359
<v Speaker 1>to do this in order to send money to like

0:43:26.600 --> 0:43:29.600
<v Speaker 1>their aunt back home. And you can still end up

0:43:29.600 --> 0:43:32.200
<v Speaker 1>in a world where, like, for almost everyone, this system

0:43:32.239 --> 0:43:34.480
<v Speaker 1>is extremely easy, and like, there are a few points

0:43:34.520 --> 0:43:37.160
<v Speaker 1>that deal with the converting back and forth, but like

0:43:37.520 --> 0:43:41.880
<v Speaker 1>removes eight of difficult parts that would have needed to happen.

0:43:42.120 --> 0:43:46.080
<v Speaker 1>What's your take on the rise of either algorithmic or

0:43:46.160 --> 0:43:49.960
<v Speaker 1>partially algorithmic partially backed stable clients One of the most

0:43:50.040 --> 0:43:54.280
<v Speaker 1>interesting phenomenons happening right now is the rise of Luna

0:43:54.560 --> 0:43:58.279
<v Speaker 1>and Ust. And Luna has this treasury reserve consisting of

0:43:58.280 --> 0:44:00.439
<v Speaker 1>a lot of bitcoin, which seems a little you see,

0:44:00.760 --> 0:44:03.239
<v Speaker 1>But some people say, any idea of like an algorithmic

0:44:03.280 --> 0:44:06.080
<v Speaker 1>back stable coin is a perpetual motion machine. It's only

0:44:06.080 --> 0:44:08.719
<v Speaker 1>a matter of time before it fails. Like do you

0:44:08.760 --> 0:44:10.520
<v Speaker 1>believe there can be like a truly sort of like

0:44:10.600 --> 0:44:15.160
<v Speaker 1>decentralized stable coin, Like what do you make of these

0:44:15.360 --> 0:44:19.239
<v Speaker 1>these projects? I think they're really cool. I do have

0:44:19.320 --> 0:44:22.560
<v Speaker 1>some sympathy to the perpetual motion machine crowd here they

0:44:22.560 --> 0:44:25.239
<v Speaker 1>consider some useful purposes. But if you do zoom out

0:44:25.360 --> 0:44:28.040
<v Speaker 1>right and you say, this is a stable coin backed

0:44:28.080 --> 0:44:31.080
<v Speaker 1>by volatile assets, what's going to happen in a big

0:44:31.120 --> 0:44:33.719
<v Speaker 1>market move right? Like you know how this plays out?

0:44:33.960 --> 0:44:37.680
<v Speaker 1>It certainly seems like that's only asking for trouble eventually.

0:44:37.719 --> 0:44:41.920
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I think that's I think that's right now. Again,

0:44:41.960 --> 0:44:43.839
<v Speaker 1>you could say, like, look, we want like this on

0:44:43.920 --> 0:44:47.000
<v Speaker 1>chain algorithmic coin for these reasons and like the goals

0:44:47.000 --> 0:44:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and for someone to sit there and hold it for

0:44:48.560 --> 0:44:51.120
<v Speaker 1>five years. The goals start to use briefly for like

0:44:51.440 --> 0:44:54.600
<v Speaker 1>transactions on chain, and they created and redeemed on chain

0:44:54.760 --> 0:44:58.200
<v Speaker 1>really frequently, and I think answers like that can can

0:44:58.360 --> 0:45:00.759
<v Speaker 1>make sense. I think there's all of versions of quote

0:45:00.800 --> 0:45:03.759
<v Speaker 1>unquote algorithm makes stable points that do have risk in them,

0:45:03.760 --> 0:45:07.719
<v Speaker 1>but that also have massively enhanced yield because they're they're

0:45:07.719 --> 0:45:09.760
<v Speaker 1>taking that risk on in order to do a trade

0:45:09.800 --> 0:45:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that makes money effectively. Right there, They're almost like money

0:45:12.600 --> 0:45:15.200
<v Speaker 1>market funds in some sense, you know, that cross of them,

0:45:15.400 --> 0:45:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and that can make sense as well from sort of

0:45:17.560 --> 0:45:21.040
<v Speaker 1>like an economic perspective. But but I am skeptical of,

0:45:21.160 --> 0:45:23.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, thinking that like a typical person is going

0:45:23.960 --> 0:45:27.400
<v Speaker 1>to want to for long periods of time hold a

0:45:27.800 --> 0:45:31.920
<v Speaker 1>typical algorithmic stable coin that isn't paying interest because it's

0:45:31.960 --> 0:45:34.839
<v Speaker 1>just like you know, someone said, hey, great, it's it's

0:45:34.880 --> 0:45:36.359
<v Speaker 1>new things kind of like a bank, and put your

0:45:36.360 --> 0:45:38.920
<v Speaker 1>money on it. But every four years it might go

0:45:39.000 --> 0:45:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to zero. And that's the difference. It's not it's not

0:45:42.920 --> 0:45:47.720
<v Speaker 1>super compelling. So we've covered straightforward h F two arbitrage

0:45:47.800 --> 0:45:51.160
<v Speaker 1>type stuff, covered yield farming. If you ask how people

0:45:51.200 --> 0:45:53.640
<v Speaker 1>are making money in equities, right, like one of those

0:45:53.680 --> 0:45:55.480
<v Speaker 1>things that is true anyway, But then like a lot

0:45:55.520 --> 0:45:58.279
<v Speaker 1>of it is options and structured products and like kind

0:45:58.320 --> 0:46:01.239
<v Speaker 1>of packaging stuff in weird ways. Where are we in

0:46:01.280 --> 0:46:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that part of the ecosystem and crypto? I know there's

0:46:03.560 --> 0:46:05.960
<v Speaker 1>things where like people are doing like kind of defy

0:46:06.080 --> 0:46:08.440
<v Speaker 1>structured products where like you can like kind of put

0:46:08.440 --> 0:46:10.680
<v Speaker 1>your money into butt and sell options. How should I

0:46:10.680 --> 0:46:13.960
<v Speaker 1>think about that as being part of the ecosystem. Yeah,

0:46:14.000 --> 0:46:17.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a good question, and I think the answer here

0:46:18.000 --> 0:46:20.920
<v Speaker 1>is actually a little bit weird and surprising given everything

0:46:20.960 --> 0:46:25.279
<v Speaker 1>else that's going on, which is not that much Like

0:46:25.880 --> 0:46:27.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not that surprising when you like listen to the

0:46:28.000 --> 0:46:32.279
<v Speaker 1>description of field farming. But okay, right, I didn't thinking

0:46:32.280 --> 0:46:36.720
<v Speaker 1>about mechanically does clarify a little bit why options haven't

0:46:36.719 --> 0:46:39.160
<v Speaker 1>taken off, But they really haven't. Volume and options is

0:46:39.600 --> 0:46:42.840
<v Speaker 1>very small compared to volume in futures. I you know,

0:46:42.840 --> 0:46:45.319
<v Speaker 1>when you look at most these defy primitives that have

0:46:45.400 --> 0:46:48.719
<v Speaker 1>taken off, most of them are way simpler than a

0:46:48.760 --> 0:46:52.680
<v Speaker 1>typical launch options contract would be. By and large. I

0:46:52.719 --> 0:46:54.520
<v Speaker 1>do think it's the case right now in crypto that

0:46:54.680 --> 0:46:58.480
<v Speaker 1>like sort of more complex structured products are just are

0:46:58.520 --> 0:47:01.560
<v Speaker 1>not that big compared are to this sort of like

0:47:01.640 --> 0:47:05.799
<v Speaker 1>simplest pseudo perpetual motion machine you put vision Because you

0:47:05.840 --> 0:47:09.200
<v Speaker 1>read all these stories about like Goldman doing OTC options trades,

0:47:09.280 --> 0:47:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is that like kind of oh no volume?

0:47:11.760 --> 0:47:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, I don't move for sure, but I

0:47:15.920 --> 0:47:18.759
<v Speaker 1>strongly suspect that where that's coming from. You know, I

0:47:18.800 --> 0:47:22.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think that that's coming from Goldman sitting there and

0:47:22.560 --> 0:47:26.320
<v Speaker 1>saying we're gonna go like, do OTC options in crypto,

0:47:26.360 --> 0:47:28.759
<v Speaker 1>because that's where all the money is. Like, everyone's just

0:47:28.880 --> 0:47:33.360
<v Speaker 1>printing money doing OTC options in crypto. Why are they

0:47:33.400 --> 0:47:36.640
<v Speaker 1>doing OTC options in crypto? What's the actual reason that

0:47:36.800 --> 0:47:40.279
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing they're doing? In advertising? Can I guess, yeah,

0:47:40.400 --> 0:47:43.920
<v Speaker 1>go for it. My guess is that someone at Goldman

0:47:44.040 --> 0:47:46.719
<v Speaker 1>was like, let's put money into a box. That's a

0:47:46.800 --> 0:47:49.759
<v Speaker 1>Ponzi scheme, and someone else at Goldman is like, We're

0:47:49.760 --> 0:47:51.759
<v Speaker 1>absolutely not going to put money in a box. It's

0:47:51.760 --> 0:47:54.200
<v Speaker 1>a Ponzi scheme. And then someone the Goldman was like,

0:47:54.400 --> 0:47:57.200
<v Speaker 1>what's our comparative advantage? Well, is this with a bunch

0:47:57.200 --> 0:48:00.400
<v Speaker 1>of hedge funds, we uh, you know, we can present option.

0:48:00.840 --> 0:48:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's try to like, you know, rub some sticks

0:48:03.800 --> 0:48:06.239
<v Speaker 1>together and drum up an OTC options business, because then

0:48:06.239 --> 0:48:08.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll have we'll have, you know, have customers for that,

0:48:08.920 --> 0:48:12.759
<v Speaker 1>whereas like the actual money making place is a little

0:48:12.800 --> 0:48:17.040
<v Speaker 1>too insane for for our kind of regulated, uh somewhat

0:48:17.120 --> 0:48:21.160
<v Speaker 1>risk averse situation. So that's absolute a lot of it,

0:48:21.320 --> 0:48:23.000
<v Speaker 1>But at the end you touched upon a key part

0:48:23.040 --> 0:48:25.640
<v Speaker 1>of it, which which is regulation. Right, if you're a

0:48:25.680 --> 0:48:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Goldman and you're trying to think, like what crypto things

0:48:28.719 --> 0:48:32.279
<v Speaker 1>can I definitely do? What will my compliance department just

0:48:32.400 --> 0:48:35.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of stammer if they try to object to, like

0:48:35.120 --> 0:48:37.360
<v Speaker 1>what do they just not have a case on? The

0:48:37.440 --> 0:48:45.360
<v Speaker 1>answer is, well, CFTC listed cash settled products where I

0:48:45.480 --> 0:48:51.040
<v Speaker 1>never ever ever have to have the physical where I

0:48:51.200 --> 0:48:56.439
<v Speaker 1>never have to actually have on me any cryptocurrencies. And

0:48:56.640 --> 0:48:58.960
<v Speaker 1>why is that important that you never have to have

0:48:58.960 --> 0:49:03.319
<v Speaker 1>any cryptocurrencies on you? Well, it's because if you need

0:49:03.400 --> 0:49:06.479
<v Speaker 1>to actually hold a cryptocurrency, you start thinking about things

0:49:06.480 --> 0:49:10.279
<v Speaker 1>like Bossel's capital requirements right and other sort of like

0:49:10.360 --> 0:49:13.160
<v Speaker 1>fun notions like that, and it becomes a ship show

0:49:13.280 --> 0:49:16.840
<v Speaker 1>really fast. But if you do nothing but cash settle derivatives,

0:49:16.840 --> 0:49:18.480
<v Speaker 1>you never have to touch physical, you don't have to

0:49:18.480 --> 0:49:20.239
<v Speaker 1>figure out the security of it. You don't have to

0:49:20.280 --> 0:49:22.480
<v Speaker 1>figure out capital requirements, you don't have to figure out

0:49:22.520 --> 0:49:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the regulation of doing that. And like SEEFTC structured products

0:49:28.120 --> 0:49:30.640
<v Speaker 1>which are cash settled. I mean, there's the exchange side

0:49:30.680 --> 0:49:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that you can trade, but also there's a well developed

0:49:32.960 --> 0:49:39.680
<v Speaker 1>regulatory framework for OTC cash settled derivatives, contracts for institutional counterparties,

0:49:39.719 --> 0:49:43.200
<v Speaker 1>training with other institutional counterparties, using is to that sort

0:49:43.239 --> 0:49:47.520
<v Speaker 1>of like is another well understood, really clean operational concept

0:49:47.600 --> 0:49:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to do. And so it's lamp posting as much as

0:49:50.400 --> 0:49:52.960
<v Speaker 1>anything else, right, it's them saying, like, what is the

0:49:53.000 --> 0:49:57.520
<v Speaker 1>one thing regulatorially that we feel comfortable doing in this space,

0:49:57.800 --> 0:50:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's go do that on the top of making money.

0:50:01.000 --> 0:50:03.640
<v Speaker 1>The other obvious thing that's sort of like from the

0:50:03.680 --> 0:50:06.680
<v Speaker 1>beginning of crypto and we talked about arbitrage and farming

0:50:06.800 --> 0:50:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and all this is obviously they're still smaller tokens all

0:50:10.080 --> 0:50:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the time flying, and so I'm just curious, like, what

0:50:12.560 --> 0:50:16.719
<v Speaker 1>are the different approaches essentially that either institutional money or

0:50:16.719 --> 0:50:19.000
<v Speaker 1>a closet I sort of like VC money is taking

0:50:19.120 --> 0:50:21.759
<v Speaker 1>to essentially like find the next big thing. How do

0:50:21.800 --> 0:50:24.080
<v Speaker 1>you like people know, Like I mean, at this point,

0:50:24.120 --> 0:50:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I think I want to sort of like hume out

0:50:25.719 --> 0:50:29.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit and say, what, let's even put crypto

0:50:29.440 --> 0:50:33.120
<v Speaker 1>aside for a second. How do vcs find the next

0:50:33.880 --> 0:50:36.480
<v Speaker 1>anything that they're going to invest in? Right? Like, how

0:50:36.480 --> 0:50:38.920
<v Speaker 1>did they find the next company they're going to invest in?

0:50:39.560 --> 0:50:43.239
<v Speaker 1>And I think am I answered that is like when

0:50:43.239 --> 0:50:47.120
<v Speaker 1>you break it down mechanically to what's happening, you get

0:50:47.160 --> 0:50:50.080
<v Speaker 1>a bizarre fucking process, Like you get something that does

0:50:50.120 --> 0:50:52.880
<v Speaker 1>not look like the paragon of efficient markets that you

0:50:52.920 --> 0:50:55.880
<v Speaker 1>might expect, where it's like, what was mechanically happening? Well,

0:50:56.160 --> 0:50:59.000
<v Speaker 1>they like see what all their friends are chattering about, right,

0:50:59.040 --> 0:51:00.880
<v Speaker 1>And their friends keep talking about this company or this

0:51:00.960 --> 0:51:03.759
<v Speaker 1>token or something, and they start foe mowing And then

0:51:03.760 --> 0:51:05.880
<v Speaker 1>their LPs are like, yo, have you made us a

0:51:05.920 --> 0:51:08.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of money off of this company or token yet?

0:51:08.280 --> 0:51:10.160
<v Speaker 1>And you're you're kind of like the answers, No, we

0:51:10.239 --> 0:51:12.880
<v Speaker 1>haven't invested in it, but you know that's not a

0:51:12.920 --> 0:51:15.880
<v Speaker 1>good answer given what question your LPs just asked. Instead,

0:51:15.920 --> 0:51:18.440
<v Speaker 1>you're like, oh boy, you're gonna be excited about what

0:51:18.480 --> 0:51:21.400
<v Speaker 1>we have done and or will do. And then you

0:51:21.400 --> 0:51:24.120
<v Speaker 1>find a way to get into that token and or company,

0:51:24.200 --> 0:51:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and all the while you're like, how do we justify

0:51:27.160 --> 0:51:29.719
<v Speaker 1>is this a good investment? Like all the models are

0:51:29.760 --> 0:51:31.839
<v Speaker 1>made up right, like things are currently being valued off

0:51:31.840 --> 0:51:36.319
<v Speaker 1>of right, but it's not yet. It's sort of like

0:51:36.320 --> 0:51:40.200
<v Speaker 1>an interesting property of trying to value things off right.

0:51:40.320 --> 0:51:42.520
<v Speaker 1>You're buying them off of a model built by a

0:51:42.600 --> 0:51:45.279
<v Speaker 1>person who owns the thing that's being sold. So like,

0:51:45.360 --> 0:51:47.040
<v Speaker 1>of course the numbers you can go off between now

0:51:47.040 --> 0:51:50.319
<v Speaker 1>and right, it's gonna go up an arbitrary amount, and

0:51:50.400 --> 0:51:53.759
<v Speaker 1>you can justify anything by just like you know, backgraft

0:51:53.800 --> 0:51:57.480
<v Speaker 1>goes up and off and eventually like holy shit, LPs, boy,

0:51:57.480 --> 0:51:59.520
<v Speaker 1>are you gonna be excited about the stuff that we're

0:51:59.520 --> 0:52:03.759
<v Speaker 1>buying on your behalf? It's like bizarre processes like that

0:52:04.320 --> 0:52:09.759
<v Speaker 1>ultimately that are like shaping VCS investment decisions, both in

0:52:09.880 --> 0:52:13.959
<v Speaker 1>traditional equities, uh and in in cryptic currencies. Well, there's

0:52:14.000 --> 0:52:16.120
<v Speaker 1>tons more to talk about, but we're gonna have to

0:52:16.160 --> 0:52:18.439
<v Speaker 1>pick it back up. Sam and Matt thank you both

0:52:18.560 --> 0:52:23.120
<v Speaker 1>so much for coming on novel. Yeah, that was great.

0:52:23.120 --> 0:52:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Thanks thanks so much, guys. That was that was great, Yeah, Tracy,

0:52:45.239 --> 0:52:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I love that the best. The highlight was definitely Sam's

0:52:48.920 --> 0:52:51.840
<v Speaker 1>description of yield farming that even the sort of crypto

0:52:51.880 --> 0:52:55.240
<v Speaker 1>synic is a magic box that you put money into

0:52:55.320 --> 0:52:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and more money comes out. And even Matt Levine was like,

0:52:57.880 --> 0:52:59.719
<v Speaker 1>I would have never described it this way because I

0:52:59.760 --> 0:53:03.520
<v Speaker 1>thought to be too cynical. Yeah, I don't really know

0:53:03.560 --> 0:53:06.799
<v Speaker 1>what to say about that. That was a little bit surprising. Um,

0:53:06.800 --> 0:53:08.520
<v Speaker 1>but it does, I mean, it does clear up a

0:53:08.520 --> 0:53:11.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of questions that I had about D five. He's

0:53:11.040 --> 0:53:14.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of hinted at this idea of like the value

0:53:14.200 --> 0:53:18.640
<v Speaker 1>either coming from actual economics and use cases versus everyone

0:53:18.719 --> 0:53:21.680
<v Speaker 1>just agreeing. And I think, honestly, one thing we've seen,

0:53:22.080 --> 0:53:24.360
<v Speaker 1>one thing we've learned over the past ten years is

0:53:24.360 --> 0:53:29.480
<v Speaker 1>that everyone just agreeing something is valuable sometimes it works. Um,

0:53:29.520 --> 0:53:32.400
<v Speaker 1>And like I wouldn't necessarily say that it's going to

0:53:32.520 --> 0:53:36.040
<v Speaker 1>work for all the coins in existence, but the fact

0:53:36.080 --> 0:53:39.640
<v Speaker 1>that it's been working for so long certainly has surprised

0:53:39.640 --> 0:53:42.640
<v Speaker 1>many people, myself included. Yeah. No, there's the thing like

0:53:42.719 --> 0:53:45.640
<v Speaker 1>it's like, oh, this is ridiculous. There's a perpetual motion machine,

0:53:45.680 --> 0:53:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and yet here we are in twenty two in the industry,

0:53:48.080 --> 0:53:52.000
<v Speaker 1>troops going, machines are still going. So the way defy

0:53:52.120 --> 0:53:54.360
<v Speaker 1>works is you put in a money in a box

0:53:54.400 --> 0:53:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that you think more people will put money into the box.

0:53:56.680 --> 0:54:00.000
<v Speaker 1>And the way VC works is you hear what you're

0:54:00.160 --> 0:54:04.320
<v Speaker 1>friends in the industry are investing in based on seven numbers,

0:54:04.600 --> 0:54:06.319
<v Speaker 1>and then you also want to get on that. So

0:54:06.560 --> 0:54:08.880
<v Speaker 1>it's really just all the way down. Well, so here's

0:54:08.880 --> 0:54:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the other thing I would say, and Matt kind of

0:54:11.200 --> 0:54:15.480
<v Speaker 1>touched on this too, But the idea of momentum trading

0:54:15.800 --> 0:54:20.640
<v Speaker 1>is not you know, that is not entirely unknown in finance.

0:54:20.640 --> 0:54:23.680
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it has been a very profitable strategy, arguably

0:54:23.719 --> 0:54:27.880
<v Speaker 1>since two thousand eight and the financial crisis. So I

0:54:28.239 --> 0:54:30.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know how to feel about it. I feel weird.

0:54:31.280 --> 0:54:33.719
<v Speaker 1>We all feel weird. Well, I mean, one thing is clear,

0:54:33.800 --> 0:54:35.520
<v Speaker 1>which is there is just a lot going on in

0:54:35.560 --> 0:54:37.719
<v Speaker 1>the space. But in the meantime, shall we leave it there?

0:54:37.800 --> 0:54:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's leave it there? Okay. This has been another episode

0:54:40.560 --> 0:54:42.960
<v Speaker 1>of the All Thoughts podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway. You can

0:54:42.960 --> 0:54:45.799
<v Speaker 1>follow me on Twitter at Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe

0:54:45.840 --> 0:54:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Why Isn't Thought? You can follow me on Twitter at

0:54:48.280 --> 0:54:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the Stalwart. Follow our guests Sam Bankman Freed He's at

0:54:52.160 --> 0:54:55.719
<v Speaker 1>SBF Underscore f t X, and Matt Levine He's at

0:54:55.719 --> 0:55:00.799
<v Speaker 1>Matt Underscore Levine, follow our producer Carmen Rodriguez at Harmon Arman,

0:55:00.920 --> 0:55:05.040
<v Speaker 1>followed the Bloomberg head of podcast Francesca Levi at Francisco Today,

0:55:05.160 --> 0:55:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and check out all of our podcasts at Bloomberg under

0:55:08.120 --> 0:55:13.719
<v Speaker 1>the handle at podcasts. Thanks for listening. Hey, there are

0:55:13.719 --> 0:55:16.880
<v Speaker 1>add Thoughts listeners. We are very excited to let you

0:55:16.920 --> 0:55:20.480
<v Speaker 1>know that Odd Thoughts is nominated for a Webby Award.

0:55:21.080 --> 0:55:24.759
<v Speaker 1>You know, Tracy, I'm not normally like a big awards

0:55:24.840 --> 0:55:27.680
<v Speaker 1>person or get excited about that, but now that I

0:55:27.719 --> 0:55:31.000
<v Speaker 1>saw that we were nominated for the Webby for Best

0:55:31.040 --> 0:55:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Business Podcast, suddenly I'm feeling very competitive and I want

0:55:34.080 --> 0:55:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to win. You really want it? Yeah? Okay, Well, on

0:55:36.680 --> 0:55:39.719
<v Speaker 1>that note, listeners, if you enjoy Add Lots, if you

0:55:39.760 --> 0:55:42.120
<v Speaker 1>like what we do, we would really appreciate it. If

0:55:42.160 --> 0:55:44.479
<v Speaker 1>you take two minutes of your time and head over

0:55:44.560 --> 0:55:48.320
<v Speaker 1>to vote dot Webby Awards dot com. You can find

0:55:48.400 --> 0:55:52.839
<v Speaker 1>Odd Lots in the Business Podcast category. Thanks so much

0:56:00.360 --> 0:56:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to