WEBVTT - Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend: Eco Data, Jobs and Inflation

0:00:03.480 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend, our global look at

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the top stories in the coming week from our Daybreak

0:00:08.480 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 1>anchors all around the world. And straight ahead on the

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:14.320
<v Speaker 1>program Inflation. I'm Tom Busby in New York.

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm Kallen Hepga in London, where we're looking at the

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 2>UK jobs market puzzle.

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm dek Krisner. Leaders at the Aussion Summit will consider

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 3>the relationship between Japan and China.

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 4>We get the Biden administration's takeaways from the latest jobs report.

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm Joe Matthew in Washington.

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 5>That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on Bloomberg

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 5>E Loove Them Free own New York, Bloomberg in ninety

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 5>nine to one, Washington, DC, Bloomberg one O six one, Boston,

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg nine sixty, San Francisco, DAB Digital Radio, London, Sirius

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 5>XM one nineteen and around the world on Bloomberg Radio

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 5>dot com and via the Bloomberg Business App.

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 6>Good day to you.

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:04.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Busby, and we begin today's program with the

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 1>state of the US economy and what it means for

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve when the FMC gets together later this month,

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 1>and joining us to talk about. That is Bloomberg's International

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Economic and Policy correspondent Michael McKee.

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 6>Michael, thanks for being here.

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about that better than forecasts, but still rather

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Fed friendly August jobs report that we got this past week.

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 7>It probably means that there's not going to be a

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 7>rate increase in September twentieth at the next FED meeting.

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 7>They can hold off. No reason in these latest numbers

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 7>that they need to tighten, and there's a faction on

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:40.559
<v Speaker 7>the FED that thinks that they've done enough, so they'll

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 7>probably do a pause and wait and see what happens

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:47.320
<v Speaker 7>between now and November first, when the meeting after that

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 7>takes place. The jobs report you put it well, because

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 7>it's in a sense mixed news. The hiring has slowed.

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 7>The number four June was for July rather was revised

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 7>down significantly, and maybe August will be too, we don't

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 7>know yet. But and the unemployment rate went up to

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:10.799
<v Speaker 7>three point eight percent, but that's all within the scope

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 7>of what the FED is expecting because they have raised

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 7>interest rates. They were thinking this would slow demand and

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 7>that would slow the labor market, and they had predicted

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 7>four point one percent unemployment by the end of the year.

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:26.639
<v Speaker 7>That was thought to be kind of out of reach

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 7>and that they might have to adjust that forecast, but

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 7>now looks like it is certainly possible if we get

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 7>a couple more months, like August.

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Three notches higher from three point five to three point

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>eight percent. Now part of that though, maybe more people

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>looking for a job, and also that bankruptcy filing by Yellow.

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's tens of thousands of jobs.

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 7>Yellow was a big contributor, thirty seven thousand jobs taken

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 7>off the top line because they went out of business.

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 7>Now a lot of that will reverse. From what I understand,

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 7>a lot of the Yellow drivers have found new work

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:01.519
<v Speaker 7>because other companies were looking for drivers. So we'll see

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 7>what that looks like when we get to the September

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 7>employment report, the SAG after Obviously, with a strike, you

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 7>have sort of a volatile situation where employees can come

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 7>and go off payrolls depending on when things are settled.

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 7>Interesting that it took this long for that to show

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:21.919
<v Speaker 7>up in the data, But one of the big reasons

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 7>for that is most of those people are essentially freelancers,

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:28.800
<v Speaker 7>and the way the Bureau of Labor Statistics looks at

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 7>payrolls as they see whether you get paid in the

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 7>pay period, including the twelfth of the month, So a

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 7>lot of those people probably didn't get paid in those

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 7>time periods, or they got their residual checks or something

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 7>outside that window, so they weren't counted until now.

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Also, the Fed's preferred measure of inflation.

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 7>The PCEE. The important number there is not the slight

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 7>rise in the year over year headlining core, but the

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 7>fact that headlining core rose on a month over a

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 7>month basis by two tenths of a percent for the

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 7>second month in a row, because it shows the FED

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 7>on a sequential basis that we are making progress against inflation.

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 6>And if you.

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 7>Annualize those numbers, like the year over year numbers, then

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 7>you come out with about two point four percent for

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 7>a number if that's what happens the rest of the year.

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:21.599
<v Speaker 7>So it shows that the FED is getting closer to

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 7>what it's looking for, which is something around three percent

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 7>or a little below by.

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 6>The end of the year.

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>And the Fed's going to have more data between now

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:31.839
<v Speaker 1>and their meeting in September.

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:34.919
<v Speaker 7>Normally, the week after payrolls is kind of empty of

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 7>significant indicators, but because the way the calendar fell this time.

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:42.919
<v Speaker 7>With the jobs report coming on the first of the month,

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 7>there are a couple of indicators that people are going

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 7>to be watching. One as ISM services. Now we would

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:51.720
<v Speaker 7>have been looking at that for guidance on hiring, but

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 7>now we know what the hiring was. The question is

0:04:54.920 --> 0:05:00.160
<v Speaker 7>going to be after today's slightly better than expected the

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 7>the ISM manufacturing report. That would suggest that maybe if

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 7>Tim Fiori, who runs that report, is correct about it

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:15.159
<v Speaker 7>being that we were in the trough for manufacturing, we

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 7>might see us in the trough for services too, and

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 7>the number could come in slightly better than expected, which

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 7>is something that makes the soft landing argument.

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:28.920
<v Speaker 1>And the week after that CPI for August retail sales

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>for that same month.

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:33.599
<v Speaker 7>The sales number for retail sales last month and for

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 7>spend in the spending report this past week were higher

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 7>than anticipated, And the question is do Americans still want

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 7>to keep spending at that same rate because most of

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 7>their savings from the pandemic checks they got is gone.

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 7>The savings rate went down last month, so it'll be

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:56.479
<v Speaker 7>interesting to see what kind of numbers we get in

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 7>terms of back to school spending. Normally, a month where

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 7>you'd see a boost, so we'll look at that, but

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 7>it's also CPI is going to be what everybody's watching.

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 7>It'll be the next indicator. It's more timely in terms

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 7>of when it comes out than the PCE, So if

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 7>it shows continued progress, I'll just put a nail in

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 7>the coffin of a September rate increase. And I think

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 7>what you'll start to see is if it comes in

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 7>lower than expected or at a reasonable level, then that'll

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 7>cause people to back off the idea of a November

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 7>rate increase as well.

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:33.720
<v Speaker 6>So CPI a little uneven.

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 1>We did you know a last meeting there was a

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty five basis points increase, But it's heading in the

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 1>right direction.

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 7>Right, We're heading in the right direction, and the FAT

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:46.040
<v Speaker 7>is clearly close to ending. The debate has been about

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:48.719
<v Speaker 7>whether they need to do one more increase or not.

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 7>And at this point, maybe twenty five basis points doesn't

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 7>do a whole lot to crimp borrowing, but it might

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 7>be sending a signal, So there's the question do you

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 7>need to send that signal or not. The argument of

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 7>those who think the FED should finish is that they

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 7>still have lagged impacts coming from their previous rate increases

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 7>that are really starting to hit the economy now, and

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 7>they make a good case in that the hiring has

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 7>slowed and other parts of the economy have slowed. Americans

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 7>are still spending, but you can maybe see the darkness

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 7>at the end of the tunnel to reverse that. And

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 7>so we'll see if they see any reason in the

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 7>data right now.

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't look like it now, Mike, you were at

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Jackson Hole and Chairman Powell acknowledge the economic backdrop right

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>now a little more favorable than it was a year ago.

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>He made clear though, the Bank is prepared to raise

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>interest rates if it determines more hikes are needed, noting

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that a resilient economy comes with risks that inflation could reaccelerate.

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 6>So there's still a chance.

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 7>There's still a chance, and there are signs that the

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 7>economy is still doing well and is growing faster than anticipated.

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 7>So if that's the case, does that create additional demand

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 7>that puts us out of whack with supply and leads

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 7>to some inflation. So far, it looks like the odds

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 7>are that it doesn't, but the Fed has to make

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 7>sure and they don't want to get in a situation

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 7>where they're leading the markets astray by letting people think

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 7>that they're done and then maybe having to come back in.

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 7>That happened to the Reserve Bank of Australia, it happened

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 7>to the Bank of Canada, and they don't want to

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 7>repeat that, so they will keep their options open and

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:40.559
<v Speaker 7>tell people we're still maybe thinking about raising grades, probably

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 7>into twenty twenty four.

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:44.599
<v Speaker 1>Oh boy, now this week you're going to get a

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 1>chance to talk to New York Federal Reserve Bank President

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>John Williams, maybe talk about monetary policy, the economic outlook

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:55.079
<v Speaker 1>and all that tell me about Bloomberg's Market Forum FX

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:56.199
<v Speaker 1>in focus event.

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 7>Well, certainly everybody's concerned about what's happening with the dollar.

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 7>Is it going up still, is it going to start

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 7>backing off? And so that's the focus of the conference.

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 7>But with John Williams, we have one of the most

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 7>important decision makers on the Fed. He is the vice

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 7>chairman of the Open Market Committee, the group that sets

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 7>interest rates, and he has a permanent vote on the committee,

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 7>and he is seen as one of the people closest

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:24.840
<v Speaker 7>to Jay Powell, the chairman. So if you kind of

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 7>know what John Williams is thinking, You'll have a pretty

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 7>good idea of what Jay Powell is thinking, and so

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 7>that makes him a really important and interesting guest for us.

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Exciting week ahead, Michael, thank you so much for being

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 1>here and coming up on Bloomberg Daybreak weekend. Some big

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 1>economic data coming out this week in the UK. We'll

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>get a preview. I'm Tom Busby and this is Bloomberg.

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:58.440
<v Speaker 8>This is the Bloomberg Black Business Beat. About ten years ago,

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 8>longtime health industry executive Derek Miles was frustrated. He felt

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 8>boxed in by the company he worked for. So when

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:08.319
<v Speaker 8>his company was looking to trim headcount, he took a

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 8>leap of faith.

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 9>I raised my hand and said, hey, I'll take these

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 9>seven packaging to come an entrepreneur.

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 8>First, he created a medical delivery service.

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 10>What we did was taken the philosophy or the platform.

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 8>For blouber Left and grub Lub and brought it into healthcare.

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 10>We actually launched a company and we started delivering prescriptions

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 10>and vitamins and CBD all the people's homes.

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 8>From there, the ideas kept coming, and today Miles is

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 8>founder and CEO of a successful concierge health company called

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 8>Cormed with an impressive list of business partners.

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 9>Here we are today providing concit health and wellness services

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 9>for bulk bracket banks, family offices, high network individuals.

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 8>And he's using his position as an entrepreneur of color

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:51.559
<v Speaker 8>to elevate more diverse voices. I'm Bloomberg's Justin Milliner. I'm

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:52.559
<v Speaker 8>the Black Business Speed.

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg day Break weekend, our global look ahead

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>at the top stories for ves in the coming week.

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Busby in New York. Up later in our

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 1>program a trip to Jakarta to preview the Assion Business

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and Investment Summit twenty twenty three. But first, the UK

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 1>has the worst inflation problem in the G seven, but

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>there are signs things are improving. The latest food price

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 1>data shows the pace of price increases is slowing, and

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>in the coming days we'll get a key update on

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the jobs market, including wage growth. That's the metric policy

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:30.679
<v Speaker 1>makers at the Bank of England are most worried about.

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>And for more, let's head to London and bring in

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Daybreak Europe ankers Caroline Hepgar and Stephen Carroll.

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 9>Tom.

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 2>The UK has had a very tight labor market combined

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:45.440
<v Speaker 2>with sky high inflation. Bloomberg's Jobs report with the Recruitment Firm,

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 2>read next week, could give us a valuable early insight

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:51.839
<v Speaker 2>into the jobs market in the UK and whether things

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 2>are improving. Recent data's offered something of a puzzle. You've

0:11:55.640 --> 0:12:01.199
<v Speaker 2>got rising unemployment and falling vacancies, but wages have actually

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 2>still been going up. Blomberg Economics thinks that the unemployment

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 2>rate might reach five percent by the middle of next year,

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 2>but private sector pay growth for the three months to

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 2>June was running at a staggering eight point two percent.

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 2>To unpack all of this, I've been speaking to Bloemberg

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 2>economist Anna Andrade and Economics report Lucy White about the

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 2>jobs picture in the UK and the dilemma it poses

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 2>for the Bank of England.

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:30.679
<v Speaker 9>So I think it's fair to say for the last

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:36.560
<v Speaker 9>two months now that the UK jobs market is calling.

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:38.560
<v Speaker 9>I think we can say that with a bit more

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 9>confidence than probably at the start of the year, and

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:46.079
<v Speaker 9>that's because more indicators are moving in the right direction.

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 9>So we've had these kind of declining vacancies for a while,

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:51.440
<v Speaker 9>but in the last two months you really got this

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:56.719
<v Speaker 9>kind of increase in unemployment. Now, the problem is that

0:12:56.800 --> 0:13:00.160
<v Speaker 9>if you look historically, you know, the libor market is

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:03.080
<v Speaker 9>still tight, and we've created this charge that kind of

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:06.559
<v Speaker 9>measures supply versus demand. And because this kind of imbalance

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:10.959
<v Speaker 9>has been what's kind of keeping inflationary pressures high. And

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 9>when you look at that, you see that the mismatch

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:16.719
<v Speaker 9>has eased a bit, but it's still far higher than

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 9>anything you've seen historically. So it's cooling. The liberal market

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 9>is calling. But the starting point was just an incredibly

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 9>red hot jobs market. So you know, for the BOE

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:28.679
<v Speaker 9>that might mean, you know that more is needed.

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Lucy, how do you see the employment market at the moment?

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:37.079
<v Speaker 2>Cooling but from a very very difficult spot, and obviously

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:39.959
<v Speaker 2>part of that is also the migration story. But how

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 2>do you see the labor market picture in the UK exactly?

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:44.960
<v Speaker 11>I mean, we are starting, as I said, we are

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 11>starting to see that cooling. You know, anecdotally, I'm hearing

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 11>more about you know, people being made redundant and stuff,

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 11>although that is you know, kind of at a much

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 11>lower level than it has been historically. But at the

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 11>same time, you know, we came from, as I said,

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 11>such a high point. We're having to you know, we've

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 11>still got a skilled shortage in the UK. Many businesses

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 11>are saying that, you know, whether it be you know,

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 11>the very sort of high tech jobs that are in

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:14.199
<v Speaker 11>demand in the economy right now, or whether they're kind

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:18.199
<v Speaker 11>of high skilled manual jobs, you know, for example, worlders,

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 11>you know, construction workers, as we're still importing huge numbers

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 11>of people from abroad to help out with that skills gap.

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 2>And where do you see the unemployment rate going then

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 2>over the next six or twelve months, because obviously the

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 2>campaign of interest rate hikes that we've seen from the

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Bank of England, part of that is to bring down

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 2>wadge gains and employment. So what what's the forecast you

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 2>think for the next six months.

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 9>So in our forecast, essentially this kind of increase in

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 9>unemployment that you've had over the past two months is

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 9>just the beginning of a more sustained increase. We see

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 9>the unemployment rate pecking at five percent by the middle

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 9>of next year. And that's a very different outlook or

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 9>sidely different outlook than the BOE. So we're a bit

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 9>more downbeat. The BEE at its latest forecast, of course

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 9>this was prior to the latest job jobs market data,

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 9>but it saw the unemployment rate hovering close to four

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 9>percent by the middle of next year. So that's a

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 9>one percentage point difference, which is quite significant. And I

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 9>think the difference between our forecast especially reflects the difference

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 9>in our views on how the economy is going to evolve.

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 9>We kind of see the economy tipping into recession, and

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 9>as you said, because of you know, it's a monetary

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 9>policy induced recession, and so we don't have a view

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 9>that there will be a soft a soft landing. It's

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 9>kind of that view. For you to believe in that view,

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 9>you really need to think that interest rates kind of

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 9>lost older power, and that's not what we're seeing in

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 9>deliber market, in residential construction, so we're already seeing signs.

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, and that Goldilock sort of view of the economy,

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 2>which is dominated in the US but has also kind

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 2>of fed into the thinking in the UK, that does

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 2>seem to have faded. It seemed to be something that

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 2>was largely earlier this year. But the Bank of England's

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 2>yet to be convinced.

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I guess, so, I mean, we'll we'll we'll have

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 9>we'll have more data, and I think they have They

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 9>do think that the kind of the bounce back that

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 9>you're seeing in real wages and the drop in energy

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 9>prices that that's going to kind of I mean, and

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 9>those are important factors right now that can kind of

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 9>support the economy. But in the opposite direction, you have

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 9>interest rates and in the PMI, you know, so many

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 9>more businesses are quoting interest rates, so that's that's already

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 9>having kind of an impact.

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Lucy. What sectors of the economy have held up sort

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 2>of best in terms of jobs demand and again, what's

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 2>the outlook over the next few months.

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 11>Well, we've been doing some really interesting work with read

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 11>Recruitment on this. They're one of the UK's biggest jobs

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 11>platforms in terms of you know, vacancies and job vacancies

0:16:56.760 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 11>and job offerings, and they have given us access to

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 11>all of the job postings that they've been putting on

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 11>their site since twenty eighteen. And there's some really interesting,

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:09.439
<v Speaker 11>you know, kind of hot spots in terms of the

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 11>sectors that are doing well at the moment, where vacancies

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:14.880
<v Speaker 11>are high, where wages are high, and some of those

0:17:14.920 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 11>are areas like the energy sector. Obviously, you know we've

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:23.919
<v Speaker 11>been seeing you know, huge price increases in energy bills,

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 11>but that's in some ways translating into jobs as well. Also,

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 11>the consulting sector is you know, as London's the London

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 11>bubble always does particularly well in these times, So consulting

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 11>is doing well. And there are other kind of you know,

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 11>high skilled areas that are you know, particularly in demand

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 11>right now.

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 2>How much do you think that mandating work in office

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 2>as opposed to work for hope is going to change

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 2>and we talk about high end jobs GOLDM. Sachs for example,

0:17:56.160 --> 0:18:00.680
<v Speaker 2>mandating a full return to you in person work. What

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:02.239
<v Speaker 2>sort of impact do you think that's going to have

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 2>on the labor market. Is that such a big story

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:04.880
<v Speaker 2>here in the UK.

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 11>Well, it's interesting because you know, we're coming from somewhere

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 11>where a few months ago, the big theme was that

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 11>the power was now in the hands of the workers.

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:14.919
<v Speaker 11>You know, there was such demand for workers that essentially

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 11>people could negotiate the terms of their own employment. You know,

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 11>everyone was demanding working from home, flexible working, and that

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 11>is starting to shift. I think as we see the

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 11>labor market calling you know, as you say, we're seeing

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 11>several firms sort of saying, you know, we want you

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:30.920
<v Speaker 11>in at least three days, four days, sometimes even five

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 11>days a week, and workers now don't quite have the

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:39.159
<v Speaker 11>same power, especially with inflation so high and you know,

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 11>the worry that a recession might be coming. Workers don't

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 11>quite have the same negotiating power to be able to

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:49.880
<v Speaker 11>fight that. And again, you know, the impact that we're

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 11>going to see on different types of people in the

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 11>labor market. You know, for example, since the pandemic ended,

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:57.239
<v Speaker 11>we've seen a huge rise in women's working hours, and

0:18:57.280 --> 0:19:00.439
<v Speaker 11>I've been speaking to several experts on that. Many of

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 11>them have said it is due to this rise in

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 11>hybrid working, the fact that women who have typically tended

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 11>to take on more care responsibilities are now able to

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 11>work more of the hours that they want to because

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 11>of this hybrid working, you know, if they're looking after children,

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 11>and so the impact that we might see on that,

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 11>you know, whether we s see women's hours reverting to

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 11>pre pandemic levels remains to be seen.

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 2>My thanks to Bloomberg Economics reporter Lucy White there and

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:28.440
<v Speaker 2>our economists Anna and ra Day speaking to me ahead

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 2>of the Bloomberg Read Jobs report that comes out in

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 2>the next few days. I'm Caroline hepget here in London.

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:37.639
<v Speaker 2>You can catch us every weekday morning for Bloomberg Daybreak

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 2>you're at beginning at six am in London. That's one

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 2>am on Wall Street.

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 6>Tom, thank you, Steven and Caroline.

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:46.639
<v Speaker 1>Coming up on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend, we head to Asia

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:49.439
<v Speaker 1>and a look at the upcoming as Yon Business and

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:50.399
<v Speaker 1>Investment Summit.

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 6>I'm Tom Busby and this is Bloomberg.

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:07.920
<v Speaker 5>Broadcasting live from the Bloomberg it a active brokers studio

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:10.919
<v Speaker 5>in New York. Bloomberg e Lemon free oh to Washington,

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 5>d C, Bloomberg ninety nine one to Boston, Bloomberg one

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 5>oh six one to San Francisco, Bloomberg nine sixty to

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:20.880
<v Speaker 5>the country, Sirius XM channel one to nineteen to London

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 5>DAB Digital Radio, and around the globe the Bloomberg Business

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 5>app in Bloomberg Radio dot Com. This is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend.

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Hight top Us be in New York with your global

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 1>look ahead of the top stories for investors in the

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>coming week. And this week in Jakarta, it's the Assion

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 1>Business and Investment Summit, and for more, let's go to

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong and Bloomberg Daybreak Asia host Ryan Curtis and

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>his colleague Doug Krisner.

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 3>Tom In the coming week, Indonesia will be hosting the

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:57.679
<v Speaker 3>forty third Ossion Leader Summit in Jakarta. This is going

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 3>to be an opportunity to outline a long term vision

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:03.679
<v Speaker 3>for the group, but it will be difficult to ignore

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 3>what has been happening north of the region, the growing

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 3>tension between Japan and China. How concerned should these assion

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 3>nations be over Tokyo's hardening stance against Beijing. Let's take

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:18.679
<v Speaker 3>a closer look now with Bloomberg's Isabelle Reynolds, Bloomberg Asia

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 3>Government reporter, joining us from our studios in Tokyo. Isabelle,

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:24.719
<v Speaker 3>It's always a pleasure. It seems as though we have

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:27.200
<v Speaker 3>to begin with, and this may seem a little strange,

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 3>the Chinese reaction to the move by Japan to release

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 3>that radioactive wastewater from the Fukushima reactor. How will this

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 3>or how has this impacted relation so far?

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 12>Right well, despite Japan's best efforts to explain the releases

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:48.920
<v Speaker 12>as something that's safe, that's routine, despite having the endorsement

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 12>of the IAEA, the nuclear body in international nuclear body,

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 12>China has really reacted in an extremely negative fashion. That's

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 12>been not just from the government, but from the public

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:04.680
<v Speaker 12>at large. So we've seen China slap a ban on

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 12>Japanese seafood, and we've seen a sort of social media

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:13.640
<v Speaker 12>campaigns against Japan. We've seen a campaign of phone calls

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 12>made from China to Japan to all sorts of organizations

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 12>and individuals that are not even connected to this release.

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:24.399
<v Speaker 12>So it's created a whole lot of extremely negative emotion

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 12>in both countries, which is going to be quite hard

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:27.920
<v Speaker 12>to get over it.

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:30.159
<v Speaker 3>This may seem like a bit of an odd pivot,

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 3>but I'm wondering at the same time whether Japan's reputation

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 3>has been tarnished enough to deter Chinese tourists because there

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 3>has been such a trend that's been holding up for

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:45.360
<v Speaker 3>such a long time. It seems like that we're Chinese

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:48.360
<v Speaker 3>tourists have been flocking to Japan. Is there some risk

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:50.919
<v Speaker 3>that that could weaken now? Would it be maybe a

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 3>longer term concern?

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 12>That could be a concern I think in the coming months,

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:57.280
<v Speaker 12>But whether it will actually last a long time, I

0:22:57.280 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 12>think is less certain. We actually have a bi I

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 12>report out on this, and looking back at the numbers

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 12>and previous spats that have existed between the two countries.

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 12>We've seen a dip or quite a sharp fall for

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:12.679
<v Speaker 12>a few months, but it soon bounces back. So I

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 12>think Japan might be relatively confident that although there will

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 12>be a temporary effect, the Chinese tourists will come back

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 12>in the end. Yet, the timing is a bit unfortunate

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 12>because China had just sort of lifted the ban on

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:29.359
<v Speaker 12>group tours to a lot of countries, including Japan. So

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 12>Prime Minister Kishada even had said that he hoped to

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:35.160
<v Speaker 12>see larger numbers of Chinese tourists in the coming months

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:38.200
<v Speaker 12>and years. So from that point of view, it's unfortunate

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:40.640
<v Speaker 12>for the tourism industry, but I don't think it will

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 12>be necessarily a very long term effect.

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:45.880
<v Speaker 3>Recently, the Prime Minister, and I'm speaking here of Keisha,

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:51.160
<v Speaker 3>he labeled China as it's Japan's greatest strategic challenge. I'm

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 3>wondering when you hear a statement like that, how it

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 3>might reverberate across osion and whether it's brought maybe a

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 3>little bit more anxiety to the region situation where if

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:02.919
<v Speaker 3>you're a leader of an Asian nation, you may be

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:06.159
<v Speaker 3>feeling some pressure to take sides right now to have

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:09.120
<v Speaker 3>to choose between the world second and the world's third

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 3>largest economy.

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:14.399
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I think that the choice in Asian now is

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 12>really much more between China and the US. Japan is

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:20.880
<v Speaker 12>sort of very much a second string at the moment

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 12>and a sort of a very close ally and increasingly

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:26.639
<v Speaker 12>close ally of the US. So I think that the

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 12>bigger issue on that front will be the fact that

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 12>Joe Biden is not taking part in the Asian summits

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 12>this time around, and that may be seen negatively by

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 12>some countries or leaders within the region.

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 3>Although Vice President Kamala Harris will attend, and I'm wondering

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 3>whether or not that's going to offer kind of a

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:46.640
<v Speaker 3>positive tone somewhat.

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:49.199
<v Speaker 12>Yes, I mean I think not to send anybody, or

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:52.119
<v Speaker 12>to send somebody much more junior would have been far worse.

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 12>But on the other hand, I mean, for the President

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 12>of Indonesia, he would very much want to have this

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 12>sort of global attention and the glamour of hosting the

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 12>US president, and quite frankly, the vice president isn't quite

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:08.159
<v Speaker 12>the same. So although Kamala Harris, we understand, we'll be

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:10.639
<v Speaker 12>making a huge effort to reach out to local people

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 12>and she'll be having a very busy schedule with a

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 12>lot of events. It just isn't quite the same if

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:18.399
<v Speaker 12>you don't have the president on the ground. Having said that,

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:21.159
<v Speaker 12>I think on arguing from the other side that this

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 12>may not be a significant move by the US. They

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:27.200
<v Speaker 12>may not be intending any insult by this. President Biden

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 12>has very much reached out to a lot of Southeast

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 12>Asian countries, including the Philippines. He's made a great effort

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:38.160
<v Speaker 12>to restore ties there. He hosted the Singaporean Premiere last year,

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 12>and then he indeed held a US especial, the first

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:44.160
<v Speaker 12>Special US Asian Summit at the White House last year.

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 12>So I think from that point of view, they would

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 12>argue that they have been trying to strengthen Asian ties.

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 3>Nonetheless, I think we can agree that the global order

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 3>is changing quite dramatically. In recent weeks, we saw China

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 3>assert itself as a power behind the Brick Summit in Johannesburg.

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 3>How is that being viewed in Japan right now, that

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:04.479
<v Speaker 3>China seems to be aggregating more of its authority, more

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:05.159
<v Speaker 3>of its power.

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 12>Yes, I think that is something of a concern for Japan,

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 12>which has always tried to sort of maintain strong ties

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:14.440
<v Speaker 12>with the Middle East because Japan doesn't have a lot

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:17.400
<v Speaker 12>of its own sort of natural resources and so has

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:20.200
<v Speaker 12>been very heavily reliant, of of course, on the Middle

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:24.200
<v Speaker 12>East for oil and so on. So to have those

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:27.159
<v Speaker 12>countries sort of move slightly out of its orbit and

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:30.400
<v Speaker 12>towards the kind of bricks and China side, I think

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 12>is somewhat unnerving and is something that they will want

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 12>to sort of tackle and try to balance out in

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:38.159
<v Speaker 12>the coming months. So it'll be interesting to see what

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 12>they do to try to achieve that.

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm wondering from the Japanese perspective whether the summit in

0:26:44.040 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 3>Jakarta presents an opportunity for Prime Minister a Kichi to

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 3>perhaps get a boost in his approval rating. Do you

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:51.920
<v Speaker 3>think that's possible.

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:55.400
<v Speaker 12>I think there could be a possible boost on the margins.

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:59.680
<v Speaker 12>I don't think diplomatic efforts generally have a huge effect

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 12>on public approval. The Japanese public is generally much more

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:06.920
<v Speaker 12>fixated on the bread and butter issues like probably most

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 12>voters around the world, and his support at the moment

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:13.879
<v Speaker 12>is near its lows since he took office two years ago,

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 12>and one of the main reasons for that is rising

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:20.359
<v Speaker 12>prices for things like gasoline and food, which are extremely

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 12>concerning for many people in Japan. Having said that, if

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 12>he is seen to be sort of standing up directly

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 12>to China against these accusations that this water release from

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 12>the Fakushima plant is dangerous, I think that will improve

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:37.639
<v Speaker 12>his image somewhat in the eyes of the Japanese people.

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 3>So to that point, I'm wondering the Premier Liu Chung

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 3>in China may be somewhat confrontational in that. Would that

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 3>be your expectation that there is the potential for a

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 3>bit of embarrassment here or the attempt to embarrass that.

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:54.199
<v Speaker 12>Could certainly potentially happen. One of the traditional events that

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:56.679
<v Speaker 12>we have at Asian is what's called the Asian plus

0:27:56.720 --> 0:27:59.840
<v Speaker 12>three event, where you have not just the Asian leaders

0:27:59.840 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 12>but also Japan, South Korea and China. And if China

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:06.880
<v Speaker 12>takes the opportunity of that event to sort of try

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 12>and berate Japan over the Fakushima water release, that would

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:13.879
<v Speaker 12>be a rather unpleasant and uncomfortable situation, of course for

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 12>the Japanese, and they will try to rebut that and

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:20.400
<v Speaker 12>put forward their own views on how this release is going.

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 3>So we talked a moment ago about the possibility that

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:25.439
<v Speaker 3>this could maybe, maybe in a minor way, move the

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:29.920
<v Speaker 3>dial when it comes to kind of public sentiment with

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 3>regard to the Japanese Prime minister. But I'm wondering how

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 3>he is being seen right now within the government within

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:37.399
<v Speaker 3>his own party.

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 12>He's never been a sort of hugely popular figure within

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 12>his own party, but now that is also reflected in

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 12>the among the general public as well, so he'll be

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 12>He's planning, we believe, to reshuffle his cabinet next month

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 12>in an effort to improve his standing, and he'll have

0:28:57.240 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 12>to look carefully at which factions within his party are

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 12>represented in the cabinet and so on to maintain his

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 12>position until the party leadership election, which is just over

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 12>a year away at the moment.

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 3>What about the government's communication with China right now? Would

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 3>that be something that the Prime Minister is really working

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 3>to improve.

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 12>I think he very much wants to improve communications with China,

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 12>despite having called it a risk to Japan's security.

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 3>I'll be looking forward to reading your coverage of the

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 3>Ossion leader's summit on the Bloomberg terminal. Isabelle, thanks so

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:30.720
<v Speaker 3>much for being with us, sharing your insight. Bloomberg's Isabelle Reynolds,

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 3>a Bloomberg Asia government reporter, joining from Tokyo. I'm Doug Krisner.

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:38.520
<v Speaker 3>You can join Brian Curtison myself for Bloomberg Daybreak Asia

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 3>weekdays beginning at six am in Hong Kong, six pm

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:44.479
<v Speaker 3>on Wall Street, Tom.

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 1>And coming up here on Bloomberg day Break Weekend, we

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 1>head to DC for the Biden administration's takeaways from the

0:29:49.840 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 1>August jobs Report.

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 6>I'm Tom Busby, and this is Bloomberg.

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend, our global look ahead

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 1>at the top stories for investors in the coming week.

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Busby in New York. Now, on Friday, we

0:30:12.600 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 1>got the August Jobs report, showing a labor market undergoing

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 1>a controlled cooling, punctuated by solid hiring, slower earnings growth,

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and more people returning to the workforce. For more, let's

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 1>head to our Bloomberg ninety nine one newsroom in Washington

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg Sound On host Joe Matthew.

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:32.920
<v Speaker 4>That's on the impact of the jobs report. We'll surely

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 4>stick with us through the holiday weekend. After the report

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:37.959
<v Speaker 4>dropped Friday, I caught up with Julie Sue, the acting

0:30:38.040 --> 0:30:41.160
<v Speaker 4>Labor Secretary, for what the Biden administration is taking away

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 4>from these numbers.

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 13>So the slight uptick in unemployment was due entirely to

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:50.080
<v Speaker 13>more people coming into labor market. I think that is

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 13>also a sign of optimism, right. It's a sign of

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 13>the strength of our economy. It was also a very

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:58.480
<v Speaker 13>small uptick, so that the overall unemployment rate remains under

0:30:58.520 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 13>four percent for the longest since the nineteen sixties.

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:04.720
<v Speaker 10>What do you think as we walk into this labor

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:07.960
<v Speaker 10>day when you see Wall Street rally on the idea

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 10>of rising unemployment.

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 13>I think that these are all signs that the president's

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 13>economic agenda, what we call Bidenomics, is investing in America, right.

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 13>The idea that if we do our jobs well, we

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 13>can have a tight labor market where workers share in prosperity,

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 13>where we recover from the economic catastrophe of the global

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 13>pandemic to a point where we have steady and stable growth.

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 13>That all this is not only possible, but it's actually happening.

0:31:36.880 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 10>You've been asked a lot about union actions lately with

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 10>regard to the UAW. What's going on in Hollywood right now?

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 10>There could be flight attendants involved. This could go beyond that.

0:31:47.600 --> 0:31:49.840
<v Speaker 10>I'm not going to ask you if you're getting involved yet,

0:31:49.840 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 10>because I know you're waiting to be asked if that happens,

0:31:52.120 --> 0:31:54.239
<v Speaker 10>to make a decision at some point. But what are

0:31:54.240 --> 0:31:56.880
<v Speaker 10>your models telling you if all of these strikes were

0:31:56.880 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 10>to coincide in the fall, what what that means for

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:00.120
<v Speaker 10>our economy?

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 13>So let's put all this in the context of the

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 13>job's day numbers that we're talking about. This is an

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 13>economy that has defied all expectations in terms of its recovery,

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 13>both the rapid pace of it and the and how

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 13>broadly shared it is. This is Bidenomics in action. Part

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 13>of the President's commitment is to empowering workers, making sure

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 13>that workers get their fair share and do well. And

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 13>part of that has meant that unions have more ability

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 13>power to demand changes at the bargaining table. We've seen

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 13>some really good results from that. Right the teamsters and

0:32:33.680 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 13>ups resolved their issues. People wrung their hands about that

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 13>too and wondered expected that not to happen. It not

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:43.560
<v Speaker 13>only happened, but they ratified a contract with some eighty

0:32:44.040 --> 0:32:48.360
<v Speaker 13>six percent of members. The West Coast Ports twenty nine

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 13>ports resolved issues that were really complicated as well, and

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:56.479
<v Speaker 13>have a multi year contract. These are what happens.

0:32:56.520 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 5>Do you see this resolving itself?

0:32:58.160 --> 0:33:00.239
<v Speaker 13>I mean, I'm not going to make a pretiction about that,

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 13>but I do think that the process requires that we

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:06.640
<v Speaker 13>respect the party's ability and their continued commitment to bargaining

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:07.240
<v Speaker 13>at the table.

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:08.680
<v Speaker 10>I have to ask you about Taylor Swift.

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you saw Taylor Swift.

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 10>When she came to town, but we're hearing that the

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 10>impact the Federal Reserve. You even mentioned this of her tour,

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:17.760
<v Speaker 10>and even Beyonce's tour to some extent, helped to paper

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 10>over some weakness that might have otherwise emerged in this

0:33:20.680 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 10>job's report. What's it going to look like when everyone

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 10>comes off tour after the summer.

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:27.280
<v Speaker 13>So I'm going to say something about women in general. Right,

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 13>women are powering this economic recovery. We can talk about Beyonce,

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 13>we can about Taylor Swift. I want to talk about

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 13>the record numbers of women in the job market.

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 9>Now.

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 13>Remember during the pandemic, women were pushed out of the

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 13>labor market through things like our lack of paid leave,

0:33:43.240 --> 0:33:46.720
<v Speaker 13>difficulty with accessing childcare. Those women are now back in

0:33:46.720 --> 0:33:50.240
<v Speaker 13>the labor market. We have the fifth month of historic

0:33:50.920 --> 0:33:53.400
<v Speaker 13>percentage of women in jobs, and I think we should

0:33:53.400 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 13>continue that effort to create good jobs, create good union jobs,

0:33:57.400 --> 0:33:58.959
<v Speaker 13>and make sure that everybody has access to them.

0:33:59.000 --> 0:34:01.680
<v Speaker 4>It's acting Labor secret carry. Julie, Sue and Tom will see,

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 4>of course, how the FED reacts to these jobs numbers

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:05.800
<v Speaker 4>just a couple of weeks at the next FED meeting

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 4>in Washington.

0:34:06.800 --> 0:34:08.959
<v Speaker 6>I'm Joe Matthew. Thanks Joe.

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:11.480
<v Speaker 1>That was Bloomberg Sound On host Joe Matthew reporting from

0:34:11.520 --> 0:34:14.840
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg ninety nine to one newsroom in Washington. And

0:34:14.880 --> 0:34:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you can hear sound on weekdays one to three pm

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:21.319
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio, and starting Tuesday, you can watch the

0:34:21.360 --> 0:34:25.440
<v Speaker 1>show live on YouTube. Just search for Bloomberg Global News

0:34:25.680 --> 0:34:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and that does it for this edition of Bloomberg day

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Break Weekend. Join us again Monday morning at five am

0:34:30.160 --> 0:34:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Time for the latest on markets overseas and

0:34:33.120 --> 0:34:34.759
<v Speaker 1>the news you need to start your day.

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 6>I'm Tom Buzby. Stay with us.

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Top stories and global business headlines are coming up right now.