WEBVTT - Hour 3 – TNF Preview, Nick Wright 0:00:00.710 --> 0:00:03.570 You are listening to the Dan Patrick show on Fox 0:00:03.610 --> 0:00:04.530 Sports Radio. 0:00:04.550 --> 0:00:07.800 Remember, there was a baseball player named Pete Lecoq from 0:00:07.820 --> 0:00:11.780 the Royals. I think, yeah, the Royals and maybe the Cubs, 0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:18.120 Pete Lecoq. And wasn't his dad a TV host, like 0:00:18.160 --> 0:00:22.210 a game show host? Maybe he changed his name. 0:00:23.930 --> 0:00:24.410 Yes, Dylan. 0:00:25.070 --> 0:00:27.630 It says he's the son of the Hollywood Squares host, 0:00:27.730 --> 0:00:28.510 Peter Marshall. 0:00:28.790 --> 0:00:34.130 Okay, so Peter Marshall was Pete LeCocq. Circle gets the square. 0:00:40.460 --> 0:00:44.400 So Pete LeCocq was a first baseman, I believe, and 0:00:45.820 --> 0:00:49.650 he's the son of Peter Marshall from Hollywood Squares. 0:00:50.460 --> 0:00:50.640 Yes. 0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:52.600 How did you know that? That's impressive. That's a great 0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:53.200 little nugget. 0:00:53.300 --> 0:00:55.330 No, it's depressing that I know that. 0:00:55.410 --> 0:00:57.070 I think it's fabulous that you knew it had a 0:00:57.090 --> 0:00:59.130 connection with that. I never knew that. 0:00:59.530 --> 0:01:02.760 But these are things that you remember, but then they 0:01:02.820 --> 0:01:06.840 probably are never like there's no reason to remember that. 0:01:07.530 --> 0:01:09.810 I mean, it's kind of like, OK, hey, that's kind 0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:12.440 of weird that you knew that. But usually doesn't help 0:01:12.459 --> 0:01:16.060 you in life if you go, hey, you know, bad 0:01:16.100 --> 0:01:18.459 day at the office. But you know what I said, hon? 0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:22.500 I remember Pete LeCocq and his dad is Peter Marshall 0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:25.000 from Hollywood Squares. Yes, Marvin. 0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:28.730 That's why I have an attitude of gratitude, because what 0:01:28.890 --> 0:01:31.170 once was useful, useless. 0:01:30.770 --> 0:01:31.729 Information for me. 0:01:31.750 --> 0:01:36.230 I get paid to know just the most ridiculous random facts. 0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:39.140 Yeah, well, we lead the league in that. 0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:40.040 Oh, for sure. 0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:40.580 That's for sure. 0:01:40.620 --> 0:01:40.959 Yes, Todd. 0:01:40.980 --> 0:01:42.620 It's probably not a pickup line that you knew that 0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:43.380 little piece of information. 0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:45.819 Yeah, I don't know if you say Pete LeCocq, and 0:01:46.100 --> 0:01:47.340 that's going to help you with your pickup line. 0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:48.610 Yeah, the bouncer usually steps in. 0:01:48.660 --> 0:01:51.220 Yeah, it's like, what did you say to her? No, 0:01:51.260 --> 0:01:53.780 I just mentioned Pete LeCocq played for the... Wait, what? 0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:55.750 I have to ask you to leave, too. You said 0:01:55.770 --> 0:01:56.470 get to first base. 0:01:56.530 --> 0:02:01.150 I mean... He was on first base. Look at you 0:02:01.170 --> 0:02:01.809 bringing it around. 0:02:01.990 --> 0:02:02.250 Yeah. 0:02:02.710 --> 0:02:04.270 I think Pete LeCocq, first baseman? 0:02:04.610 --> 0:02:05.490 Sounds right. I'm checking, though. 0:02:06.220 --> 0:02:08.050 That sounds right on checking. 0:02:08.710 --> 0:02:10.250 I know all about the 70s and 80s. I should 0:02:10.270 --> 0:02:10.750 have that right. 0:02:11.550 --> 0:02:14.669 I think he was more defensive minded first baseman. I 0:02:14.690 --> 0:02:17.910 don't know if he was an offensive weapon there. Yes, Dylan. 0:02:18.450 --> 0:02:22.210 So it actually gets better. So Peter Marshall, his dad's 0:02:22.410 --> 0:02:24.430 real name was Ralph Pierre Lecoq. 0:02:24.990 --> 0:02:26.889 That's pretty all time. How do you not keep that? 0:02:29.580 --> 0:02:31.660 Not many people nowadays get the name Ralph. 0:02:31.900 --> 0:02:32.700 No, it's like Todd. 0:02:34.030 --> 0:02:34.370 Yes, Todd. 0:02:34.380 --> 0:02:36.330 Making a shot. Pete LeCocq, first base and outfield. 0:02:36.630 --> 0:02:36.870 Yeah. 0:02:36.910 --> 0:02:37.270 There you go. 0:02:37.750 --> 0:02:40.030 But I don't think he was a power hitter. Usually 0:02:40.070 --> 0:02:41.650 your power hitter is at first base. 0:02:42.330 --> 0:02:42.730 Yes, Todd. 0:02:43.150 --> 0:02:46.070 A career of 27 home runs would probably not make 0:02:46.110 --> 0:02:46.670 him a power hitter. 0:02:46.690 --> 0:02:50.370 Thank you, Todd. All righty. We somehow stumbled to the 0:02:50.410 --> 0:02:53.690 final hour on this Monday. We'll talk to Nick Wright 0:02:53.870 --> 0:02:57.690 on loan from Fox Sports First Things First. Dylan, poll 0:02:57.750 --> 0:02:59.829 question results, and what are we going to go with 0:02:59.870 --> 0:03:00.790 final hour of the program? 0:03:02.060 --> 0:03:04.710 Who do you got tonight, Dan? Bears or Seahawks? 0:03:04.990 --> 0:03:08.370 It's holding pretty steady, 60% Seahawks. Okay. 0:03:09.110 --> 0:03:11.250 For the final hour, we kind of talked about it 0:03:11.270 --> 0:03:11.829 with Ross. 0:03:11.630 --> 0:03:14.390 A little bit, but the MVP so far of the NFL, 0:03:15.230 --> 0:03:16.530 I'm just going with the top four. 0:03:16.570 --> 0:03:19.650 So Josh Allen, Joe Burrow, Brock Purdy, or Trevor Lawrence. 0:03:19.690 --> 0:03:21.400 And then there's a bit of a drop-off after that. 0:03:21.460 --> 0:03:23.440 But who thus far is your MVP? 0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:27.360 Well, I would put Josh Allen tops there, but I 0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:31.810 would give strong consideration to Trevor Lawrence. I think if 0:03:31.889 --> 0:03:35.770 he played in a different city, then I think people 0:03:35.830 --> 0:03:39.110 would probably talk more about him. Now, they did talk 0:03:39.170 --> 0:03:43.270 a lot of negative things about him prior to this year, 0:03:43.710 --> 0:03:46.370 but they have played well, and they played well last year. 0:03:48.450 --> 0:03:52.220 So I would probably put him in there. I don't 0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:54.190 know if I could put him above Brock Purdy, but 0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:57.780 I would say Josh Allen, Brock Purdy. And I think 0:03:57.820 --> 0:03:59.240 Joe Burrow at the end of the year is going 0:03:59.260 --> 0:04:01.320 to factor into this greatly. Yes, Mark. 0:04:02.050 --> 0:04:04.170 Do you think it's more of the franchise and not 0:04:04.210 --> 0:04:07.010 the city? Because the NFL is the one sport where 0:04:07.710 --> 0:04:10.309 market size really doesn't matter because the Green Bay Packers 0:04:10.710 --> 0:04:12.570 are as popular as any team. So do you think 0:04:12.610 --> 0:04:16.240 it's more the Jaguars than being actually in Jacksonville? 0:04:16.690 --> 0:04:18.920 Well, yeah, because Green Bay does have a history of, 0:04:19.070 --> 0:04:21.700 you can go back to Bart Starr and Lombardi, and 0:04:22.180 --> 0:04:25.300 we fell in love with the Green Bay Packers in 0:04:25.339 --> 0:04:28.070 the first two Super Bowls, yes. They certainly got a 0:04:28.089 --> 0:04:32.210 head start on most franchises. Jacksonville had that one moment 0:04:32.230 --> 0:04:34.310 where they could have gone to the Super Bowl when 0:04:34.330 --> 0:04:38.520 they lost to the Patriots. Jacksonville did have a win 0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:40.580 in Denver in a playoff game. 0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:41.799 Really? 0:04:41.820 --> 0:04:42.440 You're going to do that? 0:04:42.460 --> 0:04:42.840 Thank you. 0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:44.040 Mark Brunel. 0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:47.240 Yeah. Hey, big win yesterday for your Broncos, though. 0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:50.070 I know, but that Jacksonville-Denver game destroyed me. I was 0:04:50.130 --> 0:04:51.690 at my uncle's house, and it was just not good. 0:04:51.710 --> 0:04:53.790 I almost broke some things at my uncle and aunt's house. 0:04:54.100 --> 0:04:54.680 Did you cry? 0:04:54.700 --> 0:04:57.039 I did cry, actually. That was a game Denver with 0:04:57.060 --> 0:04:58.760 the L.A. was supposed to. That was like the easy 0:04:58.820 --> 0:05:00.880 win to get to the next round, and they lost, 0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:01.980 and I could not believe it. 0:05:02.460 --> 0:05:04.340 Yes, Dylan. 0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:06.940 I think Liam Cohen hasn't gotten enough credit for the 0:05:06.990 --> 0:05:08.320 turnaround in Jacksonville. 0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:11.330 He came in, he had the Duval. 0:05:10.470 --> 0:05:11.950 Thing, and everyone was like, oh, this is going to 0:05:11.970 --> 0:05:14.830 be a disaster. But he has done really well in 0:05:14.870 --> 0:05:15.870 his time there so far. 0:05:16.490 --> 0:05:21.809 Bears getting three in Seattle tonight over under 46-and-a-half. Super 0:05:21.850 --> 0:05:25.540 Bowl odds as of this morning. The Niners have the 0:05:25.580 --> 0:05:30.640 best odds, followed by the Bills. Then the Chiefs, Seahawks, 0:05:30.700 --> 0:05:34.940 and Jags tied at plus 1,000. As far as MVP, 0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:39.660 it's Josh Allen, Joe Burrow. Joe Burrow and Brock Purdy 0:05:39.700 --> 0:05:43.580 are tied. Then it's Trevor Lawrence, Patrick Mahomes, Drake May, 0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:47.920 and Caleb Williams. Mahomes, May, and Williams all tied at 0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:51.930 plus 1,400. A couple more phone calls in here. 0:05:51.940 --> 0:05:52.310 877-3DP-SHOW. 0:05:54.529 --> 0:05:59.310 The Ashton Gentry experiment with the Raiders. I think it 0:05:59.350 --> 0:06:02.229 came to an end right before our very eyes. He 0:06:02.250 --> 0:06:04.950 got two carries against the Jets. This after he was 0:06:05.029 --> 0:06:08.620 talking about the Jets' defense, and then you get two carries. 0:06:09.190 --> 0:06:16.020 But I'm looking at the 2025 running back class. This season, Gentry, 0:06:16.020 --> 0:06:18.740 3.1 yards per carry. O'Marion Hampton, 3.5 yards per carry. 0:06:22.670 --> 0:06:28.020 Quinn Sean Junkins, 3.4 yards per carry. Travion Henderson, 3.9 0:06:28.020 --> 0:06:28.500 yards per carry. 0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:28.580 R.J. 0:06:28.620 --> 0:06:29.870 Harvey, 3.6 yards per carry. 0:06:35.470 --> 0:06:39.240 Brought to you by Panini America. I didn't watch the 0:06:39.310 --> 0:06:42.720 game last night, but saw the highlights with Luka. Luka 0:06:42.740 --> 0:06:45.880 went off again, and he's had a five-game stretch. 0:06:46.920 --> 0:07:05.020 Where he's averaging over 40 points per game. But he 0:07:05.060 --> 0:07:10.060 also had like 15 rebounds. You can't lean on, it's 0:07:10.140 --> 0:07:12.350 one of those where you watch and you go, he 0:07:12.450 --> 0:07:15.770 shouldn't have to do this. And it feels like he 0:07:15.850 --> 0:07:20.930 has to do this. It's not sustainable. But he said, 0:07:20.970 --> 0:07:22.730 you know, he went out, he wanted to be a 0:07:22.750 --> 0:07:26.130 better defensive player, wanted to get in better shape, and 0:07:26.170 --> 0:07:29.130 now this is his team with LeBron moving on. But, 0:07:29.650 --> 0:07:34.620 I mean, five steals for Luka? That's pretty good. Yes, Marvin. 0:07:35.330 --> 0:07:39.830 Also, first place in the Western Conference, your Memphis Grizzlies. 0:07:39.970 --> 0:07:42.630 Of course. 6-0. Of course. They got Boozer. 0:07:42.770 --> 0:07:43.350 Yeah, they do. 0:07:43.510 --> 0:07:44.870 Carlos Boozer Jr. 0:07:44.890 --> 0:07:45.350 III. 0:07:45.410 --> 0:07:46.050 Yes, Dylan. 0:07:46.310 --> 0:07:47.910 He's running away with the Rookie of the Year at 0:07:47.930 --> 0:07:48.650 the moment, too. 0:07:50.010 --> 0:07:53.180 Is there anybody else? Well, no. Darius Acuff Jr. 0:07:53.190 --> 0:07:53.310 III. 0:07:53.380 --> 0:07:59.160 What are you talking about? Just betting-wise. I would probably 0:07:59.220 --> 0:08:03.200 say Yaxel right now. He had 37 last night. Steph 0:08:03.220 --> 0:08:10.190 didn't play. 37 for the rookie. And Darius Acuff plays 0:08:10.210 --> 0:08:13.750 for Sacramento, by the way. He's going to shoot. He's 0:08:13.790 --> 0:08:16.110 going to get at least 20 shots every single night. 0:08:16.630 --> 0:08:18.790 He'll put up some numbers. And he has so far. 0:08:19.970 --> 0:08:20.350 Yes, Dylan. 0:08:21.230 --> 0:08:21.610 Two things. 0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:24.110 For one, Acuff was definitely the guy from the tournament 0:08:24.150 --> 0:08:26.290 last year who was sort of the one who stood 0:08:26.310 --> 0:08:27.550 out where you're like, this guy's going to be a 0:08:27.590 --> 0:08:30.510 problem in the NBA. Maybe like people hadn't heard of before. 0:08:30.850 --> 0:08:33.650 But rookie of the year-wise, Cameron Boozer's got the best 0:08:33.750 --> 0:08:37.890 odds at plus 200. Then Yaxel Lindenberg at plus 300. 0:08:37.890 --> 0:08:41.370 Then Caleb Wilson plus 400. And then your guy, Darius Acuff, 0:08:41.410 --> 0:08:41.990 plus 500. 0:08:41.990 --> 0:08:45.270 Okay. But I watch Sacramento basketball. 0:08:45.410 --> 0:08:45.750 You do? 0:08:45.790 --> 0:08:50.890 Yes, I do. And I have watched Memphis basketball as well. 0:08:52.190 --> 0:08:52.530 I know. 0:08:52.550 --> 0:08:55.330 I know. Your wife did the right thing by taking 0:08:55.370 --> 0:08:56.010 you to the movies. 0:08:56.890 --> 0:08:59.190 Well, that was during the afternoon that I went to 0:08:59.250 --> 0:09:01.510 see Wicker. It was in the afternoon, so I wouldn't 0:09:01.530 --> 0:09:05.590 miss out on my random sporting events that I watch. Yes, Marv. 0:09:06.210 --> 0:09:07.870 Also, do you see any trailers that you liked? 0:09:08.650 --> 0:09:14.280 The Rocky movie, I Play Rocky, looks like it's going 0:09:14.300 --> 0:09:18.740 to be good. That one was fantastic. you know, it's 0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:21.580 behind the scenes of, you know, when Sylvester Stallone, like 0:09:21.620 --> 0:09:26.380 they offered him $ 25, 000 for the script. And he goes, Nope, 50. 0:09:26.380 --> 0:09:26.559 Nope. 0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:31.540 Offering 250. Nope. I won't sell it for a million. 0:09:32.580 --> 0:09:35.840 And he said, I want to play Rocky. And when 0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:39.199 you think about it, and I'm sure that they probably 0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:41.640 put it out there to De Niro and, you know, 0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:44.559 some of these other actors that could play the role 0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:49.630 of a fighter, a boxer, but, Thinking back, there's nobody 0:09:49.670 --> 0:09:51.760 else who could have done it the way Stallone did 0:09:51.780 --> 0:09:55.260 it because Stallone was an underdog. He was an underdog 0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:58.969 in life. I think the story goes, and once again, 0:09:59.010 --> 0:10:02.699 this is another random thing. He was so poor, he 0:10:02.820 --> 0:10:06.360 sold his dog. And I think he sold his dog 0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:10.380 for 50 bucks because he didn't have food. He became 0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:13.520 a star and he bought the dog back for $ 15, 000. 0:10:13.380 --> 0:10:13.760 Yes, Dylan. 0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:20.460 How are they going to find anyone else to go? 0:10:20.660 --> 0:10:23.020 Well, no, the guy that they have playing Stallone in 0:10:23.059 --> 0:10:25.080 this movie looks and sounds like him. 0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:25.520 He does. 0:10:25.580 --> 0:10:27.209 I saw the clip for it. Is this sort of 0:10:27.230 --> 0:10:30.150 like a disaster artist for Rocky? Like, did you ever 0:10:30.170 --> 0:10:31.150 see the disaster artist? 0:10:33.190 --> 0:10:35.570 Was that the Tommy? 0:10:35.630 --> 0:10:39.740 We saw a movie, the making of the room that no, no, 0:10:39.940 --> 0:10:41.760 it's sort of like the making of the. 0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:42.600 Yeah. 0:10:42.940 --> 0:10:43.060 Yeah. 0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:45.679 Yeah, it's all behind the scenes with everything. 0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:46.220 Yes, Todd? 0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:48.990 I Play Rocky comes out the Friday before Thanksgiving at 0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:49.610 a theater near you. 0:10:49.750 --> 0:10:49.950 Yeah. 0:10:50.470 --> 0:10:54.330 Yeah, I was curious about it. What's the football movie? 0:10:55.410 --> 0:10:59.210 The guy who plays for the Giants? The inspirational story? 0:11:01.030 --> 0:11:05.930 What's his last name? Like Tuggle or something? You haven't 0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:13.580 seen the premiere? The John Madden movie is... That's not 0:11:14.100 --> 0:11:18.000 not getting good reviews right now. And I think people 0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:21.850 are just going off the trailer where Nicolas Cage portraying 0:11:21.970 --> 0:11:24.850 John Madden. But what is what is the movie with 0:11:24.870 --> 0:11:28.209 the Giants like Mr. Irrelevant? Is that the name of 0:11:28.230 --> 0:11:28.929 the movie, Marvin? 0:11:29.030 --> 0:11:31.010 That is correct. About John Tuggle. 0:11:31.130 --> 0:11:31.410 Yeah. 0:11:32.650 --> 0:11:36.530 And yeah, so it's an inspirational movie. 0:11:37.290 --> 0:11:37.730 Yes, Todd. 0:11:37.830 --> 0:11:39.309 Comes out Christmas Day at a theater near you. 0:11:39.370 --> 0:11:39.929 Thank you, Todd. 0:11:40.570 --> 0:11:41.070 Yes, Dylan. 0:11:41.940 --> 0:11:44.679 Speaking of inspirational NFL movies, the Ravens could actually take 0:11:44.700 --> 0:11:48.210 the playbook from the Eagles and do their own invincible thing, 0:11:48.270 --> 0:11:50.450 the Vince Papali thing, but in real life again. 0:11:51.950 --> 0:11:53.230 They could use Mark Wahlberg. 0:11:53.350 --> 0:11:53.770 They could. 0:11:55.210 --> 0:11:58.110 Special teams. David in Ohio. Good morning, David. What do 0:11:58.130 --> 0:11:58.870 you have for me today? 0:12:00.260 --> 0:12:00.939 Hey, what's up, Ben? 0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:03.300 Got a best of the weekend like my associate Gus 0:12:03.340 --> 0:12:07.040 in L.A. The Steelers absolutely terrorized Deshaun Watson and the 0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:10.100 Cleveland Browns, recording eight sacks while holding the Browns to 0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:10.860 just six points. 0:12:11.260 --> 0:12:11.760 That's right. 0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:12.500 We had more. 0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:14.540 Sacks than the Browns have points. At the end of 0:12:14.580 --> 0:12:19.160 the day, the last notable comparison came on December 17, 2023, 0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:21.610 when the New Orleans Saints recorded seven sacks against the 0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:24.470 New York Giants, who also managed just six points. 0:12:24.790 --> 0:12:25.070 Thank you. 0:12:25.550 --> 0:12:26.130 Thank you, David. 0:12:27.550 --> 0:12:28.309 Adam in Michigan. 0:12:28.330 --> 0:12:28.920 Hi, Adam. 0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:29.980 What do you have for me today? 0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:34.620 Hey, thanks for bringing me back. My phone got dropped earlier. 0:12:34.660 --> 0:12:38.320 I was on a walkie-talkie. Just wanted to call in. 0:12:38.260 --> 0:12:40.460 To my favorite movie review show. 0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:45.170 My wife and I went to a matinee yesterday, 10.20 a.m. 0:12:45.470 --> 0:12:49.970 East Coast time, to see You Can See Everything. It's 0:12:50.030 --> 0:12:53.170 good like nothing I've ever seen before. Dan, you're eliminated. 0:12:53.250 --> 0:12:55.429 It's three hours. You don't have the attention span if 0:12:55.450 --> 0:12:57.730 you can't get through the Matrix, but the rest of 0:12:57.770 --> 0:13:01.459 you guys... It's amazing. I don't really know how to 0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:04.020 liken it other than what I thought about was like, 0:13:04.059 --> 0:13:06.070 if you go to like a restaurant, like a really 0:13:06.150 --> 0:13:09.450 cool one that maybe your friends recommended, call the 824 0:13:09.450 --> 0:13:12.290 and the waiter just says, get the chef special. And 0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:13.100 you're like, what is it? 0:13:13.140 --> 0:13:14.270 And I can't tell you. 0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:16.520 And you eat it. You still don't even know what 0:13:16.540 --> 0:13:19.060 you're eating. And you think you like it. You're not 0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:22.060 quite sure. You finish the whole thing. You're like, man, 0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:24.920 I think I really liked it. And a couple hours later, 0:13:24.940 --> 0:13:27.809 it's still on your palate. And you're just thinking about it. 0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:29.970 And you can't stop thinking about it. And you still 0:13:30.010 --> 0:13:33.000 have no idea what that was. I highly recommend it. 0:13:34.250 --> 0:13:38.949 Thank you, Adam. I think he got around to what 0:13:38.990 --> 0:13:41.730 he was going to make a final decision on that. Yeah, 0:13:41.770 --> 0:13:45.559 I went to see Wicker an afternoon ago. Love a 0:13:45.620 --> 0:13:49.210 matinee movie. We were the only ones in the theater. 0:13:51.050 --> 0:13:51.650 That's the best. 0:13:52.150 --> 0:13:54.809 Well, makes you wonder about the movie when you walk 0:13:54.929 --> 0:13:59.750 in and there was nobody there. And I, you know, 0:14:00.290 --> 0:14:03.329 you could take out your phone. You could chat. You know, 0:14:03.590 --> 0:14:04.870 nobody was going to say anything. 0:14:06.350 --> 0:14:07.450 You can take a phone call. 0:14:08.210 --> 0:14:08.590 Sure. 0:14:09.030 --> 0:14:09.290 Yeah. 0:14:09.610 --> 0:14:13.830 But I was actually reading reviews of the movie during 0:14:13.850 --> 0:14:19.910 the movie. And nobody's saying, Hey, put your phone away. Uh, 0:14:20.150 --> 0:14:21.370 Sam and Desmone. 0:14:21.450 --> 0:14:21.950 Hi, Sam. 0:14:23.490 --> 0:14:26.300 Dan, Dan, love the show. Thanks for having me on, uh, 0:14:26.750 --> 0:14:29.520 worst of the week by far for us out here 0:14:29.540 --> 0:14:32.700 in the great state of Iowa was the, the Jack Campbell, uh, 0:14:32.820 --> 0:14:36.820 play an injury yesterday. Uh, thoughts go out to him 0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:40.840 and his family. He, he is such a beloved figure, uh, 0:14:40.860 --> 0:14:41.880 in the state of Iowa. 0:14:41.900 --> 0:14:43.920 Um, uh, Best of the week. 0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:49.670 Hawkeyes resounding 30-0 victory against Bucky the Badger, and also 0:14:49.910 --> 0:14:52.250 Dan Dennis. I don't know if you watched the fourth quarter, 0:14:52.290 --> 0:14:54.090 but it just looked like the Lions were going to. 0:14:54.550 --> 0:14:56.410 Will a win there. 0:14:56.470 --> 0:15:00.090 So a huge Bears guy, but that's why we love sports, 0:15:00.590 --> 0:15:05.110 rooting for a division foe and rival to win the 0:15:05.130 --> 0:15:07.290 game against the Vikings. So thanks for all. 0:15:07.230 --> 0:15:07.750 You do, guys. 0:15:08.090 --> 0:15:11.770 Thank you, Sam. Iowa is 5-0 against Wisconsin in their 0:15:11.820 --> 0:15:19.010 last five meetings. They've outscored Wisconsin 148-26 in those five games. 0:15:19.870 --> 0:15:21.650 Start of the day. 0:15:21.770 --> 0:15:26.970 Start of the day. We love your start. 0:15:26.490 --> 0:15:27.109 Of the day. 0:15:27.890 --> 0:15:29.510 Start of the day. 0:15:29.790 --> 0:15:31.050 Start of the day. 0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:33.780 Stat of the Day brought to you by Panini America. 0:15:34.060 --> 0:15:37.010 Thank you, Pandora. We'll take a break. The talented Nick 0:15:37.090 --> 0:15:40.210 Wright on loan from Fox Sports 1 after this. 0:15:41.110 --> 0:15:43.290 Be sure to catch the live edition of the Dan 0:15:43.330 --> 0:15:47.080 Patrick Show weekdays at 9 a.m. Eastern, 6 a.m. Pacific 0:15:47.270 --> 0:15:50.080 on Fox Sports Radio and the iHeartRadio app. 0:15:54.490 --> 0:15:57.850 Hey, it's Clay Travis. Animal Thunderdome is back, and now 0:15:57.910 --> 0:16:00.980 it's a weekly podcast. What started as a fan favorite 0:16:01.100 --> 0:16:04.900 on Fox Sports Radio, now available as its own show. 0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:08.120 From vicious animal attacks to humans getting too close to 0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:11.540 wildlife to wild encounters caught on video, we're bringing you 0:16:11.850 --> 0:16:14.790 the craziest stories from the animal kingdom. 0:16:15.070 --> 0:16:15.430 Join me. 0:16:15.830 --> 0:16:18.590 And Danny G, every week as we break down the madness, 0:16:18.630 --> 0:16:20.490 the mayhem, the moments you have to hear to believe, 0:16:20.950 --> 0:16:23.870 listen to Animal Thunderdome with Clay Travis and Danny G 0:16:24.310 --> 0:16:28.720 on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get 0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:29.820 your podcasts. 0:16:30.460 --> 0:16:32.760 He's Nick Wright, host of First Things First on Fox 0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:36.640 Sports 1. Also, What's Right with Nick Wright on YouTube, 0:16:36.740 --> 0:16:40.250 wherever you get your podcast, and host of No Gamble, 0:16:40.670 --> 0:16:45.680 No Future for Poker Go. Where did your Chiefs go 0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:46.620 wrong yesterday? 0:16:48.070 --> 0:16:50.030 Before I answer that, may I say something? 0:16:51.750 --> 0:16:51.950 Yes. 0:16:53.050 --> 0:17:00.490 Congrats, Fritzy, and your stupid, round, bald head. I'm sure 0:17:00.590 --> 0:17:06.580 just ensconced in orange and blue. There it is. Congrats, buddy. 0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:12.060 Thank you. I don't know if you deserve it, but 0:17:12.100 --> 0:17:17.850 you have it. So, you know, congratulations, my friend. I'm 0:17:17.890 --> 0:17:20.410 not happy for you. I'm quite angry for you. But 0:17:20.490 --> 0:17:24.950 you know what? You guys won. Now, to answer your question, Dan, 0:17:27.109 --> 0:17:31.230 the Kansas City Chiefs, in not 100, but about 10 0:17:31.230 --> 0:17:36.090 different ways, deserved to lose that game. They did the 0:17:36.190 --> 0:17:40.850 things teams do to find a way to lose a 0:17:41.390 --> 0:17:48.500 to a good but inferior opponent, and the ripple effect 0:17:48.540 --> 0:17:56.760 of that is absolutely massive. Had they simply finished that game, 0:17:57.480 --> 0:18:00.459 the division is a wrap, and they are fighting for 0:18:00.510 --> 0:18:02.929 the one seed the rest of the year with Jacksonville 0:18:02.970 --> 0:18:08.010 and Buffalo. Instead, they now are a coin flip to 0:18:08.050 --> 0:18:12.170 win the division. And the road to potentially getting to 0:18:12.210 --> 0:18:15.750 another Super Bowl gets that much harder where you are. Well, 0:18:15.790 --> 0:18:17.590 people know you're on the road. You don't have a buy, 0:18:17.650 --> 0:18:20.770 all these different things. And they have only themselves to blame. 0:18:20.890 --> 0:18:24.490 And this is what the Chiefs have to figure out 0:18:24.510 --> 0:18:27.850 in the last half of the season. Like, they have 0:18:27.950 --> 0:18:34.530 some hallmarks right now of what underachieving teams do. There 0:18:34.570 --> 0:18:38.310 was very, very shaky game management there. by one of 0:18:38.350 --> 0:18:40.560 the greatest coaches ever, Andy Reid, in the fourth quarter. 0:18:40.890 --> 0:18:44.340 They have had bad special teams for two years now. 0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:48.540 A very important player when your left tackle is already 0:18:48.619 --> 0:18:52.850 mysteriously injured for the whole season so far. Your left 0:18:52.910 --> 0:18:56.090 guard for the second time in seven games has been 0:18:56.150 --> 0:19:02.760 a game-day scratch for... Professional reasons, like for disciplinary reasons. 0:19:03.140 --> 0:19:09.320 Those things get you beat. And they were highly penalized yesterday. 0:19:09.340 --> 0:19:13.660 Those things get you beat. The Chiefs that won all 0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:17.159 the close games for six years, it was not because 0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:20.520 of officiating. It was because they were the most buttoned up, 0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:26.440 well coached, best executing team. And they weren't that last night. 0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:29.119 And they lost essentially two games because of it. 0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:33.090 I know it's a limited sample size. The Chiefs are 5-2. 0:19:34.060 --> 0:19:37.730 You beat Denver week one, but you've beaten, what, Colts, Dolphins, Raiders? 0:19:37.850 --> 0:19:40.950 Let's do that with every— this is such a dumb game. 0:19:41.109 --> 0:19:44.570 I hate that game. Yes, they beat bad teams. I 0:19:44.590 --> 0:19:46.790 didn't mean to dismiss you. I apologize, Dan. That was rude. 0:19:47.109 --> 0:19:49.189 But I knew where you were going. They have beaten— 0:19:49.910 --> 0:19:54.760 I mean, the Raiders are like an average team, right? 0:19:54.820 --> 0:19:58.000 They are literally an average team. The Colts are terrible. 0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:01.820 The Dolphins are terrible. And there's one other terrible team 0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:05.160 we beat. I've now forgotten. Oh, the Chargers, who was 0:20:05.220 --> 0:20:09.419 everyone's AFC championship pick, but of course they're terrible. Whooped 0:20:09.500 --> 0:20:13.220 the Broncos once. I think played them a second time 0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:16.300 and were the better team, except for when it matters, 0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:22.080 and got annihilated by Seattle. I think that the strength 0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:26.850