Speaker 1: Well that was fast. Within just days of Elon Musk
Speaker 1: announcing his intention to buy Twitter to give conservatives a
Speaker 1: little more freedom to speak our minds on just one
Speaker 1: of the big tech platforms, the Biden administration has announced
Speaker 1: the creation of a Disinformation Governance BORT, a brand new
Speaker 1: Ministry of Truth to make sure that misinformation, disinformation, malinformation,
Speaker 1: really anything that you and I want to say is
Speaker 1: not allowed to be said. Big Sister is watching. This
Speaker 1: is Verdict with Ted Cruz. Mother's Day is right around
Speaker 1: the corner, and our dear friends at genu Cell have
Speaker 1: a special offer for all of those special ladies in
Speaker 1: our lives right now. For a limited time, you can
Speaker 1: get fifty percent off if you go to genicell dot
Speaker 1: com slash cactus. This includes many products, but especially their
Speaker 1: ultra retinal and for a limited time let me share
Speaker 1: this product it All qualifying orders will come with this.
Speaker 1: Then new and improved immediate effects too, which is phenomenal
Speaker 1: because it works in as little as twelve hours now.
Speaker 1: The ultra retinal cream is remarkable because it is powered
Speaker 1: by Genuesell's proprietary technology, which combines the anti aging effects
Speaker 1: of the metal foam flower with the moisturizing effects of
Speaker 1: hyaluronic acid. So Genuesell promises that you will look five years,
Speaker 1: ten years, even fifteen years younger guaranteed or your money back.
Speaker 1: Imagine how happy that is going to make the special
Speaker 1: mother in your life. Make this mother's day one that
Speaker 1: she will always remember. Go to genuicell dot com slash
Speaker 1: cactus to get fifty percent off genuicell dot com slash
Speaker 1: cactus for a special gift for your mom that she
Speaker 1: will always remember. Genuicell dot com slash cactus, Happy Mother's Day.
Speaker 1: This episode, A Verdict with Ted Cruz is brought to
Speaker 1: you by American Hartford Goal. Now, the new inflation numbers
Speaker 1: are out, and I think we can all agree they
Speaker 1: are incredibly depressing. The gas is way up, the price
Speaker 1: of housing is up, the US national debt is way
Speaker 1: way way up. And unfortunately, given the way that our
Speaker 1: current administration prints money and spends money, experts don't see
Speaker 1: this going away, This inflation going away anytime soon. So
Speaker 1: how do you protect your money, your savings, your retirement
Speaker 1: from inflation. Well, when times are turbulent, Americans like you
Speaker 1: turn to physical gold and silver and American Hartford Gold
Speaker 1: can show you how to headge your hard earned savings
Speaker 1: against inflation by diversifying a portion of your portfolio into
Speaker 1: physical gold and silver. It's really easy to get started.
Speaker 1: All it takes is a short phone call and they
Speaker 1: will have physical gold and silver delivered right to your door.
Speaker 1: Or if you prefer inside your four O n K
Speaker 1: or your IRA, they make it easy. If you call
Speaker 1: them right now, then they will give you up to
Speaker 1: fifteen hundred dollars of free silver on your first order.
Speaker 1: So don't wait, call them right now. Call eight five
Speaker 1: five seven six eight one eight eight three. Or if
Speaker 1: you prefer texting, you can text the word cactus to
Speaker 1: six five five three two. Again, the phone number is
Speaker 1: seven sixty eight one eight eight three, or text the
Speaker 1: word tactus to sixty five five three two. Today's episode
Speaker 1: of Verdict with Ted Cruz is brought to you by
Speaker 1: ip vanish. Did you know that browsing online using incognito
Speaker 1: mode doesn't actually protect your privacy? Without added security, you
Speaker 1: might as well give all your private data way to hackers, advertisers,
Speaker 1: your internet service provider, and who knows who else. Ip
Speaker 1: vanish helps you securely and privately browse the Internet by
Speaker 1: encrypting one hundred percent of your data. This means that
Speaker 1: your private messages, passwords, emails, browsing history, and other information
Speaker 1: will be completely protected from falling into the wrong hands.
Speaker 1: Ip vanish makes you virtually invisible online. It's that simple.
Speaker 1: Just for Verdict listeners, ip vanish is offering an insane
Speaker 1: seventy percent off their annual plan. That's like getting nine
Speaker 1: months for free. You have to go directly to ip
Speaker 1: vanish dot com slash tactus to get this seventy percent
Speaker 1: off discount. Ip vanish is super easy to use. Just
Speaker 1: tap one button and you're instantly protected. You won't even
Speaker 1: know it's on. You can use ip vanish on your computers, tablets,
Speaker 1: and phones, whether you're at home or in public. Don't
Speaker 1: go online without using ip vanish. Don't forget. Verdict listeners
Speaker 1: get seventy percent off the ip vanish annual plan. Just
Speaker 1: go to ip vanished dot com slash cactus to claim
Speaker 1: your discount and secure your online life. That's ip va
Speaker 1: nish dot com slash cactus. Welcome back to Verdict with
Speaker 1: Ted Cruz for now until the Disinformation Governance Board gets
Speaker 1: its way. You can subscribe to Verdict over an Apple podcast, Spotify, Stitcher,
Speaker 1: Google Play, YouTube, wherever you get your podcast. For now, Senator,
Speaker 1: how much time do we have left? Well, I don't know,
Speaker 1: but I just got an order from Big Cis that
Speaker 1: from now on, this podcast must be done entirely by
Speaker 1: singing Broadway show tunes. Oh is that is a fate
Speaker 1: worse than cancelation, Big Cis, I suspect you're referring to
Speaker 1: is Nina Jankowitz, the Biden pick to lead the Disinformation
Speaker 1: Governance Board, about whom I know only two things. One
Speaker 1: she spread misinformation about the Hunter Biden laptop, and two
Speaker 1: she loves singing show tunes on camera. And to a credit,
Speaker 1: she's actually a pretty good singer. It's a little bizarre
Speaker 1: and creepy what she sings, but she I don't know
Speaker 1: as a professional or semi professional singer. But she's this
Speaker 1: hard knee jerk leftist. And you know watching number one
Speaker 1: Secretary may orchis who has presided over the most lawless
Speaker 1: cabinet agency in the history of our country, which the
Speaker 1: Department of Homeland Security has decided we don't enforce the border.
Speaker 1: We let two million illegal aliens come in. The law
Speaker 1: means nothing to US. So now he's created this misinformation
Speaker 1: board in charge of fighting misinformation, and you know you
Speaker 1: pointed out he did it literally within hours of Elon
Speaker 1: Musk's buying Twitter. It is stunning. Listen, the left ideas
Speaker 1: are crap. They cannot defend them. They don't want to
Speaker 1: defend them. They want to silence everyone who disagrees. I mean,
Speaker 1: let's show you something amazing about Elon buying Twitter, which
Speaker 1: is Twitter accepted Elon Musk's offer to buy Twitter on
Speaker 1: April twenty fifth. The very next day, literally the next day,
Speaker 1: April twenty sixth, my new Twitter followers skyrocket. So I'm
Speaker 1: just gonna read you the daily count of it, because
Speaker 1: it's stunning. So on April nineteenth, I gained one seventeen
Speaker 1: hundred and thirteen followers. April twenty fourth, one four hundred
Speaker 1: and eighty six. April twenty fifth, the day Twitter says
Speaker 1: yes to Elon Musk one thousand, two hundred and fourteen.
Speaker 1: So consistently, day after day, I'm between a thousand and
Speaker 1: two thousand new followers the next day. What's your guest
Speaker 1: is to how many new followers I got the next day,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna say it doubled at least on April twenty
Speaker 1: twenty sixth fifty one thousand, four hundred and five, April
Speaker 1: twenty seventh, sixty one thousand, two hundred and fifty one,
Speaker 1: on April twenty eighth, seventy thousand, five hundred and eighty four.
Speaker 1: The level of shadow banning, it's as if And by
Speaker 1: the way, this is true for conservatives across the board
Speaker 1: that they're seeing their numbers. Mine literally went from one
Speaker 1: to two thousand a day to fifty sixty seventy thousand.
Speaker 1: I've gone from four point eight million followers to five
Speaker 1: point one million followers in a week, and all it
Speaker 1: took was Elon buying it. This is the same thing
Speaker 1: has happened with me. I am not a United States senator,
Speaker 1: I have not run for president. I am but a
Speaker 1: humble podcaster. I've gained at least one hundred thousand followers
Speaker 1: in the what is a week since Elon took over,
Speaker 1: It's been something like a clip of twenty thousand per day.
Speaker 1: So either that means that they've unleashed the bots, which
Speaker 1: I don't think it is, by the way, because my
Speaker 1: engagement on Twitter is up. I'm seeing new people new
Speaker 1: blue checkmark people who are ostensibly verified human beings. It
Speaker 1: seems as though because don't forget, this deal hasn't even
Speaker 1: gone through yet, so it's just the threat that Elan
Speaker 1: is going to buy it. It seems as though this
Speaker 1: has lifted a major shadow banning of conservatives. You know,
Speaker 1: it's like they're sitting there running the shredders, going oh crap,
Speaker 1: they're going to find out all the stuff we've done
Speaker 1: shred at all, turned the algorithm off, and then within
Speaker 1: hours the Biden administration announces we have a new board
Speaker 1: to fight misinformation. I gotta tell you I had so
Speaker 1: this week. I've had two hearings where I've asked Biden
Speaker 1: officials about this. First of all, I had a Foreign
Speaker 1: Relations Committee hearing with the Deputy Secretary of State. Okay,
Speaker 1: so ma Orchus got popped on Sunday about this, and
Speaker 1: he says, no, no no, no, this is not to go
Speaker 1: after American speech. This is all about foreign speech. This
Speaker 1: is foreign disinformation only. Now, mind you, this office is
Speaker 1: not at the US Department of State, It's at the
Speaker 1: Department of Homeland Security. It's directed at Americans in the homeland.
Speaker 1: But their talking point is no no, no, this is
Speaker 1: only foreign disinformation. So I asked the Department of State today,
Speaker 1: the Deputy Secretary of State, I said, it so happens.
Speaker 1: There actually is a long standing office at the State
Speaker 1: Department whose statutory mission is to fight disinformation abroad from
Speaker 1: foreign governments, and it's funded. Congress just funded them one
Speaker 1: hundred and fifty million dollars. It's statutory mission is exactly
Speaker 1: what these clowns are claiming the new office is going
Speaker 1: to do. So I asked the State Department, gush, did
Speaker 1: anybody talk to you about this? No? Do you know
Speaker 1: anything about it? No? I have no idea. Is it
Speaker 1: concerning to you that they've announced a new office that
Speaker 1: they're claiming is doing the same thing your existing office
Speaker 1: is doing. I have no idea. Nobody consulted us. We
Speaker 1: know nothing. So that was lie number one. Number two.
Speaker 1: We also had Pete boodhag Edge, the Secretary of Transportation,
Speaker 1: testifying before the Senate today, and I asked him about this,
Speaker 1: and I said, look, I read a quote from the
Speaker 1: presidential campaign where he gave he waxed poetically about free
Speaker 1: speech is wonderful, it's incredible, It's what makes America America.
Speaker 1: I value free speech. When I was a soldier fighting
Speaker 1: for America, the flag on my shoulder, it represented free speech.
Speaker 1: It was you know, he's a pretty eloquent guy. And
Speaker 1: I read the whole quote. I said, you know, gosh,
Speaker 1: I agree with every word of that. That's beautifully stated.
Speaker 1: Do you still agree with that? Do you still agree
Speaker 1: with free speech? Yes? Well, then why did the Biden
Speaker 1: administration announce an office, the Ministry of Truth to silence
Speaker 1: people who disagree with you? And he immediately backtracks. He's like, well, well, well,
Speaker 1: I don't know. I don't know. Like, well, come on,
Speaker 1: I mean, you're you're aware of this, right, And he's like, well, well, well,
Speaker 1: I don't know. But it's to stop disinformation, to stop
Speaker 1: Russian disinformation. I said, really, like Hunter Biden's laptop. Is
Speaker 1: that what you mean by disinformation? He's like, well, I
Speaker 1: don't know anything about Hunter Biden's laptop. It's like, oh, really,
Speaker 1: nobody seems to know anything about Hunter Biden's laptop, do they. Well,
Speaker 1: and in this case, the woman who's going to be
Speaker 1: running the Ministry of truthier for Biden, used that specific example,
Speaker 1: so this is not just a hypothetical. She said, the
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden laptop was a case of Russian disinformation, and
Speaker 1: so presumably this board would have completely wiped away that
Speaker 1: news story, had Big Tech and the the establishment media
Speaker 1: not already done that for them two years ago. Now
Speaker 1: that's exactly right. And as you know, the talking point,
Speaker 1: there were fifty former leaders from the intelligence community community
Speaker 1: that put out a letter when Hunter Biden's laptop broke
Speaker 1: that said, this has all the classic signs of Russian disinformation,
Speaker 1: which we've learned now is code for this is really
Speaker 1: bad for the Democratic presidential nominee. But we now know
Speaker 1: that letter was an outright blatant lie. We know the
Speaker 1: talking point that that that I don't know whether we
Speaker 1: should call Nina the Minister of Truth or the commissary.
Speaker 1: I'm kind of on the fence as to what her
Speaker 1: tatalitarian titles should be. But she was out there pushing
Speaker 1: this is Russian disinformation, and that's an uttered lie. And
Speaker 1: leftists define as disinformation anything that is inconvenient for them,
Speaker 1: anything they disagree with, and especially anything that is politically
Speaker 1: damaging they call disinformation. And this is the Biden administration
Speaker 1: nakedly getting getting caught with their hand in the cookie
Speaker 1: jar to mix my metaphors pretty badly. I'm going to
Speaker 1: upset my Yale colleague here with with that rather mangled illusion.
Speaker 1: That is exactly the kind of thing that the new
Speaker 1: censorship board is going to censor, the mixing of metaphors.
Speaker 1: And that's that's a wonderful thing. There's a little silver
Speaker 1: lining in that storm cloud, Senator. The White House has
Speaker 1: given two examples of the kind of thing that the
Speaker 1: board is going to shut down. That is calls to
Speaker 1: violent extremism and as you say, foreign disinformation, specifically Russian disinformation.
Speaker 1: And the problem it would seem to me is that
Speaker 1: the White House accuses everything that Republicans say of being
Speaker 1: a called to violent extremism or Russian disinformation. So we're
Speaker 1: joking about it. It's absurd, and it's funny to make
Speaker 1: fun of this, this power hungry lady and the whole
Speaker 1: bind administration. But what are they going to do? And
Speaker 1: what are we going to do about it? Look, it
Speaker 1: is so bad that this week Jake Tapper from CNN
Speaker 1: was forced to go on TV and acknowledge, Yeah, she
Speaker 1: does really seem to be a partisan where she echoes
Speaker 1: the Democratic talking points and she's skeptical of everything Republicans say,
Speaker 1: and there's a clear political bias in her take on things.
Speaker 1: Now when Jake Tapper, who has become a mouthpiece for
Speaker 1: the hard left, he didn't used to be, but he's
Speaker 1: become that. When even he says that, like, holy cow,
Speaker 1: So what are we going to do about it? Listen?
Speaker 1: I think one thing we're doing about it, we're doing
Speaker 1: right now, which is just shining enough of a light
Speaker 1: on it that it prevents them from going forward. I
Speaker 1: do think you're seeing the Biden administration backpedaling. There's been
Speaker 1: enough of a blowpack. I actually think labeling it the
Speaker 1: Ministry of Truth is really powerful, because look, obviously there
Speaker 1: are communist regimes that have ministries of truth and and
Speaker 1: that throw you in the gulag for daring to speak
Speaker 1: other than than the government line and calling this out
Speaker 1: for what it is. My hope is that that that we,
Speaker 1: you know, cut it off right at the beginning. If not,
Speaker 1: then there's a reason why I asked about it twice
Speaker 1: this week to two different Biden officials, because I want
Speaker 1: to keep the pressure on. I want to keep the
Speaker 1: light on. I want to force them to defend this,
Speaker 1: this ridiculous abuse of power. And if they continue to
Speaker 1: try to go forward with it next year, I believe
Speaker 1: we're going to have majorities in both the House and
Speaker 1: send it. We had to use the majorities in the
Speaker 1: House and send it to cut off the funding and
Speaker 1: to shut it down because the government has no business
Speaker 1: silencing what the American people say. I don't think the
Speaker 1: timing is coincidental. It's just too perfect, right after we've
Speaker 1: been joking about it. But I think I think it's legit.
Speaker 1: Right after Elon Musk announces this, you get the announcement
Speaker 1: from the White House. So then turning to Musk, do
Speaker 1: you think this deal is going to go through? One?
Speaker 1: And two? What does that mean for conservatives on social media?
Speaker 1: Whether we're talking about how the other big tech platforms
Speaker 1: are going to react, or whether we're talking about how
Speaker 1: the government is going to react. Joe Biden is already
Speaker 1: talking about clamping down on Twitter the minute they free
Speaker 1: up speech for conservatives. Yeah. And by the way, the
Speaker 1: European Union is rattling its swords and reminding Twitter we
Speaker 1: have rules to follow. Look, I think the deal is
Speaker 1: going to go through. I don't know for sure. I
Speaker 1: don't know the inside details of the deal. But Elon
Speaker 1: seems very committed and certainly vocally committed. The board has
Speaker 1: accepted it. According to the public reporting, he had financing lockdown.
Speaker 1: The financing may change in terms of the mix of
Speaker 1: debt and equity. That wouldn't surprise me. But it certainly
Speaker 1: seems like it's going forward. You know, I will say
Speaker 1: there is an irony that Elon Mosque has suddenly become
Speaker 1: the champion and the defender of conservatives. Elon vocally supported
Speaker 1: and voted for Barack Obama not once, but twice. You know,
Speaker 1: Joe Rogan the other person who has become that They
Speaker 1: may be the two most important people concerning free speech
Speaker 1: in the entire country, Joe Rogan and Dorris Bernie Sanders.
Speaker 1: So neither one of them meets the standard definition of
Speaker 1: a conservative, but they both appreciate liberty. They both value
Speaker 1: free speech. You know, it's spoke volumes. I don't know
Speaker 1: if you saw last week a journalist at Time magazine
Speaker 1: and I put journalists in scare quotes, said that free
Speaker 1: speech is an obsession of rich white guys like the
Speaker 1: today's corporate media wants to silence everybody except themselves. They
Speaker 1: want to have a monopoly on speech, only the corporate
Speaker 1: media and only big tech. And I know you've seen
Speaker 1: the meme that that Elon tweeted out, which I think
Speaker 1: is incredibly accurate, that it showed him previously where you
Speaker 1: had the right, the left, the center, and it had
Speaker 1: him left of center, and then what it showed was
Speaker 1: the left running full speed to the left, and suddenly
Speaker 1: the center moved, so he was right of center. But
Speaker 1: in the meme he hadn't moved an end. Shit's just
Speaker 1: the crazies had taken over the Democratic Party. By the way,
Speaker 1: Bill Maher's in the same boat, where these are old
Speaker 1: school liberals that just happened to believe in actual liberty,
Speaker 1: and that in today's Democratic Party that is not only
Speaker 1: not the mainstream anymore, that is a heretical view that
Speaker 1: must be demonized and quashed. What do you think the
Speaker 1: electoral politics of this look like. Do you think that
Speaker 1: this plays for Democrats? Do you think this ministry of
Speaker 1: truth is going to help them in the mid terms,
Speaker 1: whether through the operation of the agency or just through
Speaker 1: the public perception of it. Or are they stepping on
Speaker 1: a rake here? I think they're stepping on a rake.
Speaker 1: But a word you use there that is important and
Speaker 1: that we don't know yet is operation like whether this
Speaker 1: board will actually have any legal power or authority if
Speaker 1: they engage how they intend to engage, if it's just
Speaker 1: a look an example, an example we've talked about early
Speaker 1: on when it happened on this podcast was doctor Fauci
Speaker 1: in emails asking Mark Zuckerberg to silence and censor any
Speaker 1: discussions of the origins of COVID nineteen, and in particular
Speaker 1: discussions that it had escaped from a Chinese government lab
Speaker 1: in Wohan. And we talked about two years ago. This
Speaker 1: podcast walked through exhaustively the evidence that suggests and suggest
Speaker 1: overwhelmingly that COVID nineteen escape from a Chinese government lab
Speaker 1: in Wuhan. Zuckerberg was more than happy to comply. He said, yes,
Speaker 1: we will censor it, we will keep it silent. I
Speaker 1: could see this board playing a similar role and for example,
Speaker 1: emailing Zuckerberg and and Facebook going along. I don't know
Speaker 1: whether there are media outlets that will go along. I
Speaker 1: feel confident Elon Musk won't go along. And it's why
Speaker 1: his buying Twitter is so important, because it creates a
Speaker 1: significant avenue by the way, one thing people may not
Speaker 1: realize as to why Twitter matters so much. So so
Speaker 1: a tiny percentage of Americans actually listen follow Twitter, and
Speaker 1: those that do skew pretty heavily left. If the world
Speaker 1: were the Twitter sphere, we'd all be screwed. It would
Speaker 1: be sunk. Yeah, you know, AOC would be president. So
Speaker 1: I'm glad that the world is not the Twitter sphere. Now,
Speaker 1: some of that is is amplified by the shadow banning
Speaker 1: and practices, so we may find out that the Twitter
Speaker 1: sphere is not as left as it appears. But most
Speaker 1: normal Americans are not on Twitter. The reason it matters,
Speaker 1: One of the reasons it matters so much is every
Speaker 1: reporter in the universe is on Twitter. And so I
Speaker 1: could tell you in politics, frankly, the way you get
Speaker 1: out a statement and get it out quickly as you
Speaker 1: go to Twitter and you put it out, and it's
Speaker 1: an amazing thing. Look, Donald Trump pioneered this in twenty sixteen,
Speaker 1: and I was on the opposing side, and he captured
Speaker 1: how to use Twitter and just dominate the news within instances.
Speaker 1: And it is a wild thing that I will pull
Speaker 1: out my phone and I'll send a tweet and within
Speaker 1: minutes I can turn on the TV and see my
Speaker 1: tweet on the news, driving the news and driving messaging.
Speaker 1: That's part of why free speech on Twitter matters, because
Speaker 1: it influences everyone that has outlets of communication that is
Speaker 1: potent for the overall public discourse. Right. I agree, it
Speaker 1: does set the news in a way that Facebook and
Speaker 1: YouTube and Google don't. I think that's why they are
Speaker 1: absolutely losing it that Elon is promising conservatives a little
Speaker 1: more freedom on this question of political speech. I am
Speaker 1: ashamed to say that I have neglected our Verdict listeners,
Speaker 1: but I will do that no more. There's a question
Speaker 1: I really want to get to here in the mail bag.
Speaker 1: You of course can join Verdict plus over on locals,
Speaker 1: the Verdict plus community, and you can subscribe to Verdict
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. This question comes to us
Speaker 1: from Al who says, Senator Cruz, how do you think
Speaker 1: the court will rule on Ted Cruz versus fec A
Speaker 1: question not only about political speech, but about a case
Speaker 1: that you are heavily involved in. Yeah. No, it's a
Speaker 1: case I care a great deal about. It is a
Speaker 1: case challenging, and I'm the name plainiff. I brought the lawsuit.
Speaker 1: It is challenging an element of McCain finegold, which is
Speaker 1: the big campaign finance law. It's a terrible law. One
Speaker 1: element of the law limits the ability of a political
Speaker 1: candidate to pay themselves back for loans they make to
Speaker 1: their campaign. And so it caps it at paying yourself
Speaker 1: back at two hundred and fifty thousand dollars is the
Speaker 1: most you can pay yourself back from funds received after
Speaker 1: the campaign. And so you know, you have lots of
Speaker 1: candidates who put their life savings into into a campaign,
Speaker 1: and they may put five hundred thousand or more into
Speaker 1: a campaign, and McCain finegold says, well, tough, you're not
Speaker 1: allowed to pay yourself back. You've just basically given a
Speaker 1: gift to democracy. And doesn't it suck to be you?
Speaker 1: And by the way, the reason that Congress passed it,
Speaker 1: if you go look at the debates, it's an incumbent
Speaker 1: protection plan because one of the ways incumbents avoid being
Speaker 1: beat is their challengers raise any money and they don't
Speaker 1: have the name idea to raise money. And so what
Speaker 1: happens often as someone will invest their own money into
Speaker 1: the race, and it is how challengers get the initial
Speaker 1: oxygen to get their message out, well, if you make
Speaker 1: it that. You know, Michael, you put your money into
Speaker 1: the race, and even if you win, you can't get
Speaker 1: it back, and it's going to cost you. You might
Speaker 1: be willing to do it, but a lot of people
Speaker 1: are not. And so it's designed to protect incumbents from
Speaker 1: challengers taking them on. So I brought a constitutional challenge
Speaker 1: to this provision. I want a unanimous decision in the
Speaker 1: lower courts. So a three judge district courts struck down
Speaker 1: this provision of McCain fine Gold. The appeal is pending
Speaker 1: at the Supreme Court. It's been briefed, it's been argued.
Speaker 1: We're waiting on the decision. I think the decision will
Speaker 1: be very soon. It could literally be any day now.
Speaker 1: I think we're in the sweet spot of when the
Speaker 1: decision is going to come down. I am cautiously optimistic.
Speaker 1: I think the chances are good that we prevail if
Speaker 1: the court addresses the merits. In other words, if the
Speaker 1: court answers the question is this provision of law unconstitutional?
Speaker 1: I think the odds are extremely high we win. I
Speaker 1: think it is on the merits we are very very
Speaker 1: likely to win. There is some chance that we lose
Speaker 1: on a procedural ground. That Biden Justice Department had a
Speaker 1: procedural ground that was a technicality that was based on
Speaker 1: a factual mistake. But I will say it the oral argument,
Speaker 1: it sure seemed like John Roberts was fishing around trying
Speaker 1: to get some justices to basically throw the lawsuit out
Speaker 1: on the procedural ground. I don't know if he will
Speaker 1: succeed with that or not, but that's how the argument
Speaker 1: came across. So if they get to the merits, we
Speaker 1: are very very likely to win, but there's some chance
Speaker 1: they punted and avoid the merits altogether. Perhaps I will
Speaker 1: be nicer to Chief Justice Roberts on this show for
Speaker 1: just the next couple of weeks to make sure this
Speaker 1: thing doesn't get thrown out on dural grounds, because that
Speaker 1: would be an interesting free speech case and we'll look
Speaker 1: forward to seeing it. Last question also has to do
Speaker 1: with the court. This is from Michael, who says, how
Speaker 1: do you believe the leak of the Alito opinion in
Speaker 1: the Dobbs case? How do you believe the Supreme Court
Speaker 1: leak will affect the midterm elections? And he has two hashtags.
Speaker 1: He says, hashtag verdict hashtag cruise twenty twenty four, just
Speaker 1: reading the whole message. So I don't know that the
Speaker 1: league itself has a significant impact on the midterms. I
Speaker 1: do think the League is a manifestation of how the
Speaker 1: Democrats are destroying our institutions, trying to burn them down,
Speaker 1: and in particular the degree to which the leftists are
Speaker 1: cheering it on and literally saying burn it down. I
Speaker 1: think that is beneficial for the midterms, and in terms
Speaker 1: of people realizing the radicals really are in charge of
Speaker 1: this party. It's it's not unlike the Antifa riots ins
Speaker 1: of just showing that these guys are extreme and crazy.
Speaker 1: In terms of the underlying decision, I think what is
Speaker 1: likely to be more consequential in the midterm is the
Speaker 1: decision itself and if the majority opinion continues to be
Speaker 1: the majority opinion, and if the outcome is that the
Speaker 1: Court does strike down roversus Wade. I can tell you
Speaker 1: Democrats in Washington are holding onto that as their Hail
Speaker 1: Mary chance to save the midterms. They believe that people
Speaker 1: will be horrified and that'll help them win. And I
Speaker 1: gotta tell you more than a few Republican senators are nervous.
Speaker 1: That's the case. There are several of us who are
Speaker 1: conservatives who've been trying to make the case to the
Speaker 1: nervous nellies in our conference It'll be okay, this is
Speaker 1: going to be fine. And I actually think it probably
Speaker 1: will not have much of an effect on the midterms,
Speaker 1: and to the extent it has an effect, it will
Speaker 1: be a positive effect. Here's why I think it will
Speaker 1: have less of an effect than the democratic strategist think
Speaker 1: because the people who are most dismayed about that are
Speaker 1: hard leftists that are clustered in bright blue states like
Speaker 1: New York California. Nothing's going to change in those states,
Speaker 1: at least for the immediate term. California is going to
Speaker 1: continue to allow unlimited abortion on demand. ROVERSUS weight is
Speaker 1: if it's struck down, California ain't changing their laws until
Speaker 1: we get new elected officials in California. And so I
Speaker 1: think the kind of angry leftists, many of whom are
Speaker 1: pretty ignorant and don't even know what overturning Row means.
Speaker 1: I think a month afterwards, are going to be surprised. Wait,
Speaker 1: nothing about my life changed in other parts of the
Speaker 1: country that are not bright blue and redder states, In
Speaker 1: states like Tennessee states like Texas, you're going to see
Speaker 1: some meaningful restrictions on abortion, and it's going to vary
Speaker 1: state by state how extensive those restrictions are. That is
Speaker 1: the Framer's view in the Constitution is to let the
Speaker 1: rules in each state reflect the values of the citizens
Speaker 1: of those states. But in the redder states, there are
Speaker 1: fewer people that are going to be horrified by that.
Speaker 1: And I think you're going to have a positive effect
Speaker 1: of people in the pro life community who have been
Speaker 1: fighting for this for fifty years being energized. And I
Speaker 1: am hopeful that that being energized is going to cause
Speaker 1: them to turn out and vote at the polls, and
Speaker 1: I think that could lead to an even bigger majority
Speaker 1: in the House and the Senate next year. Right. That's
Speaker 1: a great point because not only is nothing going to
Speaker 1: change in terms of abortion law in the most pro
Speaker 1: abortion places, but even if something did change and the
Speaker 1: Democrats were irate and steamwork coming out of their ears,
Speaker 1: nothing's going to change about whom they're electing, and nothing's
Speaker 1: going to change about the members of Congress or the
Speaker 1: Senators or anything else. That is a hopeful note to
Speaker 1: end on Senator that this case might not only come
Speaker 1: out with a good end for the pro life movement,
Speaker 1: but also might not hurt us at the pulse. Frankly,
Speaker 1: it might even might even help us. Before we go,
Speaker 1: we've got to bring on our friend Liz Wheeler, because
Speaker 1: you're not done yet, sir. We've finished our episode, but
Speaker 1: you've got an episode of cloak Room coming up. Liz,
Speaker 1: what are you going to talk about? Hi, Michael High,
Speaker 1: Senator Cruz, I know that we've been talking about this
Speaker 1: leaked draft majority opinion from the Supreme Court overturning Rovwade,
Speaker 1: or at leasted it does in this draft opinion. You
Speaker 1: guys have talked about it a lot, We've heard about
Speaker 1: it a lot, but there are more details that need
Speaker 1: to be discussed. So we are going to do a
Speaker 1: little investigative dive into who exactly might have leaked this opinion,
Speaker 1: how this might have happened, and whether the Supreme Court
Speaker 1: actually will overturn Roe v. Wade. So join us on
Speaker 1: the cloak Room on Verdict Plus. You can go to
Speaker 1: Verdict with Ted Cruise dot com slash plus. If you
Speaker 1: use my promo code, which as always is cloak Room,
Speaker 1: you can watch for free for a month on your
Speaker 1: annual subscription that is Verdict with Ted Cruise dot com
Speaker 1: slash Plus and your promo code is Cloakroom. It's going
Speaker 1: to be quite the discussion. I hope you'll join us, So, Michael, yes, Senator,
Speaker 1: in honor of Big Ciss, will you close us on
Speaker 1: a show tune? Senator? I absolutely will? And do you
Speaker 1: know why? Because I feel pretty and I feel witty.
Speaker 1: I feel pretty and witty and gay, and I pity
Speaker 1: any podcaster who isn't me today, I'm Michael Knowles. This
Speaker 1: is Verdict with Ted Cruz. This episode of Verdict with
Speaker 1: Ted Cruise is being brought to you by Jobs, Freedom
Speaker 1: and Security Pack, a political action committee dedicated to supporting
Speaker 1: conservative causes, organizations, and candidates across the country. In twenty
Speaker 1: twenty two, Job's Freedom and Security Pack plans to donate
Speaker 1: to conservative candidates running for Congress and help the Republican
Speaker 1: Party across the nation.