WEBVTT - NASA's Wild Aeronautics Ideas

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:14.319
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking. Hey there we went, and welcome to Forward Thinking,

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the podcast that looks at the future and says I said, doctor,

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Mr m D. Can't you tell me what's ailing me?

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jonathan Strickland, I'm Lauren Bulkabon, and I'm Joe McCormick.

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:26.799
<v Speaker 1>And for the second time this week, we're gonna be

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:31.479
<v Speaker 1>touching on an aviation related theme. Yeah, we apparently have

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:34.959
<v Speaker 1>airplanes on the brain. Yeah. So have you all been

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:39.200
<v Speaker 1>on an airplane lately? Uh? Yeah, actually not long ago

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 1>in May? Yeah, for me, it was earlier this month.

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Where did you fly Outer Banks? Well, technically I flew

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>into Norfolk, Virginia. Then we rented a car and went

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to the Outer Banks. Nice. Yeah, sunny, sunny Fort Lauderdale.

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I haven't been on a plane since last year. I'm

0:00:57.040 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>just wondering. Was there anything remarkable lead different in your

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>experience of flying as far as the actual like technology

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>of flight was concerned when you went on that flight

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>compared to the one before it. Uh nope, nope, not yeah,

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>not for me either. I Mean the most remarkable thing

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 1>was that Delta had once again updated their safety video,

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:20.959
<v Speaker 1>which now includes Oh no, no, actually, I really like

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:24.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm very fond of the kind of cheesy Delta safety videos.

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm I really like them. They started with the the

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 1>flight attendant who would would wag her finger, right, so

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:38.959
<v Speaker 1>they so she kind of started it off, and then

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 1>they sort of took that ball and ran with it.

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Sort of took an inspiration from some of the commercials

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>out there that have been very silly. The reason why

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I even asked this, you know, I've gotten off in

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>this weird tangent, is that I wanted to talk about

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>a recent news item about the possibility that aviation could

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 1>see some rap bid changes in technology and and uh

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 1>engineering due to a project at NASA. Huh. Now, we've

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>talked about the possibilities in the future of aviation on

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the podcast before, but yeah, today we wanted to talk

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>about a specific call for R and D. Yeah, yeah, Now,

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 1>we have talked also about NASA having some pretty you know,

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>far out there R and D branches already. There's of

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 1>course Eagle Works, right, which is associated with the M drive,

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>which we discussed in our episode. I think it was

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>probably called the M drive, or probably had the word

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>m drive in there. You can look it up. Yeah,

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>they're they're all about they're all about long shot propulsion

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>physics ideas that probably won't work, but if they do work,

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:53.639
<v Speaker 1>it would be awesome. And and it's there specifically put

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>together to say, hey, you know, let's go on the

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>fringe for this stuff, because if it works, it's the

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.919
<v Speaker 1>benefits are outstanding. And if it doesn't, well then maybe

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll learn stuff in the process. It's kind only playing

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the lottery. You're not likely to win, but if you

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:12.640
<v Speaker 1>do awesome, right exactly, I assume that's the way you

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:15.919
<v Speaker 1>were thinking of either and either way you might learn,

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and either way you might learn something about math in

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the processes you and I hope learned something about math.

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:26.919
<v Speaker 1>So the one we're going to talk about now is

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>is a project called the Convergent Aeronautics Solutions Project or

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:33.920
<v Speaker 1>c a S. All right, because Eagle Works is certainly

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>not the only branch of NASA that does research and development,

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's not even the only one that does, you know,

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty far out their ideas. NASA has several areas, several

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>several divisions or projects that are all about uh inspiring

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>and welcoming some revolutionary approaches to technology to really advance aeronautics. Yeah,

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>we often forget what that first A and NASA stands for.

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 1>We tend to think of NASA as the space organization,

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and you know, space is probably cooler than airplanes, so

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 1>it's easier to remember. But yeah, they deal with aeronautics. Yeah,

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 1>so c A s that that Convergent Aeronautics Solutions Project

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:19.719
<v Speaker 1>I just mentioned. Is itself a branch of the Transformative

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Aeronautics Concepts Program or t A c P within NASA. Yes,

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>so the t A c P is its purposes to

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 1>cultivate multidisciplinary revolutionary concepts to enable aviation transformation. That's straight

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:39.840
<v Speaker 1>from their web page over at NASA. And in other words,

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>it's all about experimentation and rapid development of technologies that

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>could advance our aeronautics technology. Now, the t A c

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:52.719
<v Speaker 1>P is itself a branch of NASA's Aeronautics Research Mission

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Directorate or Armed but not Dangerous But not dangerous, I

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>guess you know aeronautics. I guess there's an element of

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 1>danger that comes with the territory. This director. It recognizes

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the impacts that aviation has on the economy and infrastructure

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>of our nation and aims to develop ever more efficient

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 1>aviation technology. You know, like cheaper, better, stronger, faster, more green.

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that a daft punk thing? Cheaper, better, stronger, faster,

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>more green thing must speak think of a different song.

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 1>It's just a joke. Better, faster, strong, never mind, I understand. Okay,

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm waiting for you to proceed. I see you're allowed,

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>but I can't do it. So there are three programs

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:45.040
<v Speaker 1>encompassed by the T A c P. That's a C

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 1>A S which we're talking about today, along with Transformational

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Tools and Technologies or T T T, which is a

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 1>software development program and Leading Edge Arrow research for NASA,

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 1>or LEARN, which is a program that awards grants to

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>external universities in law for aeronautics research. We will talk

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:05.040
<v Speaker 1>more about those later, ye, just to give a kind

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 1>of wrap up to the whole Like what is this

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>whole section of NASA all about? Okay, but what's the

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:13.719
<v Speaker 1>deal with C A S. Well, they're dedicated to conducting

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>short duration activities to establish early stage concepts and technology

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>feasibility for high potential solutions. Those are not my words,

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:25.679
<v Speaker 1>those are NASA's words, that sounds like a mission statement.

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:29.480
<v Speaker 1>What does that actually mean? Well, it's it's all about

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>this idea of let's let's try and invest in projects

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:41.279
<v Speaker 1>that have the potential to advance aeronautics dramatically, um even

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:46.040
<v Speaker 1>if we aren't completely convinced that they will succeed. Right,

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:50.599
<v Speaker 1>it's asking, it's taking projects from within NASA, carried out

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>by NASA employees that are these weird experimental, high risk,

0:06:56.600 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 1>high reward kind of things, right, and so they the

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:04.600
<v Speaker 1>teams at c A S. Whenever they're working on a project,

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:08.920
<v Speaker 1>they're specifically supposed to conduct experiments, they're supposed to learn

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>from their failures, and supposed to be an environment where

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you can take these these risks, not knowing if it's

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>going to succeed or fail, and there's not repercussions. If

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 1>you do fail, you're just expected to learn from those failures,

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully you would you would be able to learn

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 1>ways of carrying out the experiment successfully. But if it

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>turns out there is no way of succeeding, you're still

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>going to learn in the process. You're also supposed to

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:37.240
<v Speaker 1>continue conducting those experiments and you repeat this until you

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>reach the end of the research cycle, which maybe two

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to two and a half years, and at that point, uh,

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the team's performance and work is reviewed to determine if

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the solutions that were developed by the team actually address

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the issue and meet the pre established goals for that project.

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Whatever they might be. Now they have to be. They don't.

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not that they have to work, just that they

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>have to work. They do. But beyond having to work,

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 1>they have to be feasible ideas, so in other words,

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>like real world feasible, like not like theoretically right right

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>where you're like laboratory feasible Exactly. It can't be something

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>where in the lab if we pour in four cities

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 1>worth of electricity into this thing, then we can get

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it to float an inch off the ground. That's not

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 1>a success. Even if you achieve we open a black

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 1>hole inside the engine and it goes really far, Yeah,

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:31.119
<v Speaker 1>we go to a totally different place. Uh No, that

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>that would not. That would also not because there's a

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 1>success that would be catastrophic. So the promising solutions, the

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 1>ones that NASA feels, you know, the various people who

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>are reviewing these projects, the ones that they feel are

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>feasible and beneficial, would then be pursued by moving that

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:52.679
<v Speaker 1>project over to a different arm of NASA or a

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:56.839
<v Speaker 1>direct transfer of knowledge to the aviation community to say, hey,

0:08:57.040 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>we did this experiment where we designed an air craft

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:02.960
<v Speaker 1>wing in this way and found that it generates much

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>more left in this manner, We're giving that information out

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to everybody so that everyone can benefit from it. That's

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:14.079
<v Speaker 1>the idea behind it. So um it's also very similar

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to what we've set on Forward Thinking many many times,

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the idea that it's all right if you pursue a

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:24.839
<v Speaker 1>line of research and you ultimately find that it's not

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 1>viable because you learn that, you learn that it's not viable,

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and you maybe even learn why and can apply that

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to future projects which might become feasible. Yeah, it's it's

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 1>impossible to anticipate everything that you will learn. Whenever you

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>are pursuing any given line of research, right, you might

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 1>learn something that is not germane to the specific goal

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that you have been assigned, but could be very interesting

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 1>for other applications. So there there's real value to research,

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's something that NASA is really promoting within the

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 1>organization itself, and it's something that we on Forward Thinking

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 1>have promoted quite a few times, so specifically we wanted

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 1>to talk about. There was an article, several articles actually,

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>it was reported all over the science news sphere that

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the c A S Project was entertaining six wild aviation

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 1>ideas well. First of all, each team there were several

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:21.560
<v Speaker 1>things that had a competition. It was a competition. It

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>was actually, uh, they were inviting people to pitch ideas

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:28.560
<v Speaker 1>to the c A S Project. So they were like,

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>bring us your weirdest ideas for how to make airplanes

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 1>much better. Kind of They had a little bit more

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>of a guideline than that, but though not by a

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>whole lot. They they told each team they would have

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to explain their idea and approach and uh, what they

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:44.680
<v Speaker 1>were going to do. They would have to justify it

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 1>to a panel made up of NASA managers. So it

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>almost comes across like one of those shows like Shark

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Tank where the team, you know, an entrepreneur has to

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 1>has to present their business model and try and defend

0:10:55.920 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>it from experts who are either enchanted by it or

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>just you know, they're perplexed, they don't know what or

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:06.959
<v Speaker 1>or they just aren't impressed at all. Yeah, we should

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 1>make airplanes. They doublest food drugs. Yeah, that would that

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 1>would probably uh not make it through to the next round.

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Um So the play for themselves, Yeah, I think they've

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 1>already learned that lesson from the way that airlines are

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 1>handling food. Now. Every team had to have a membership

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>made up of experts from multiple disciplines and have members

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>from more than one NASA Aeronautics Center. There are three

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 1>or four of those, as I recall, uh, And the

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:36.959
<v Speaker 1>teams had to come up with an answer, a potential

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:39.560
<v Speaker 1>answer to one of two big questions. Their their study

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 1>that they want to conduct is supposed to address one

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:47.320
<v Speaker 1>of two big ones, the first big question, and it's

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 1>an or and either or not a they have to

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>answer both questions. Um So. The first one was can

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 1>we demonstrate an aviation system with maximum efficiency and minimal

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>environmental impact? Which can be interpreted in many different ways,

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:03.959
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, we'll see from some of the selected

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>projects how those interpretations were made. The second one was

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 1>demonstrate the feasibility for urgent medical transportation from the wilderness

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>of Alaska to the Mayo clinic without human interaction. That's

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:19.439
<v Speaker 1>a very different kind of requirement, right, And and they

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 1>specifically said, like, yes, the way we framed this was

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>so that you would have specific parameters to work within

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>to design your approach, but the solution would be applicable

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 1>across the world and all sorts of different scenarios. They

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 1>just specifically framed it in this way, just just to

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:38.320
<v Speaker 1>give you something to work towards. Was the idea, Not

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that we're planning on having a lot of medical disasters

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to Alaska that need to go to Mayo Clinic. No, sure,

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>it seems kind of like the Darker Robotics challenge, right.

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:50.559
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's a specific scenario, but it's designed so

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>that you can test what can be done and applied

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:56.839
<v Speaker 1>to many scenarios. It's very apt. Yes, that's exactly right. So,

0:12:57.360 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 1>out of the seventeen teams that pitched ideas, six were

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 1>selected for study. They would be the wild and or

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:08.560
<v Speaker 1>crazy ideas we have mentioned before, and the study cycle

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:10.320
<v Speaker 1>will last between two and two and a half years,

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>depending upon the individual studies. And here are the six. Okay,

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the first one, Yeah, there's a problem with electric vehicles.

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>They got batteries. Batteries terrible, They're gigantic, they're big, they

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 1>take up a lot of space, and they they contribute weight. Yeah, aircraft,

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 1>by the way, weight not something you want to add

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 1>to an aircraft if you can help it, because then

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>you need more energy to keep the aircraft aloft. And

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 1>if you're using more energy, then it's not so green now,

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>is it. Or maybe you have decreased the amount of

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>time it can spend in the air and perhaps it's

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 1>not a practical solution. Need a bigger battery, which makes

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you need to use more energy, which makes you need

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>a bigger battery. Which. Yeah, So we when we talked

0:13:55.760 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>about the solar powered aircraft and how it's it's designed. Um,

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the one that's slowly making its way around the world.

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>It uh you know, that was the solar Impulse to

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 1>solar impulse to it. Their design was such that they

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 1>were trying to maximize the effectiveness of batteries while minimizing

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 1>their weight because obviously, if you're using electricity to propel

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>your your aircraft, um, you want to cut back on

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that weight as much as you can. So how can

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>you do that? Well, the first one we're talking about

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 1>is the Multi Functional Structures with Energy Storage project, which

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>is pretty catchy. They're actually looking at making batteries, so

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that the batteries themselves form the shape of the vehicle. Yeah,

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 1>they're they're they're the that's the casing. It's the actual

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>material that thee Yeah. So basically the plane is the battery.

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 1>To have all this like structural material there and then

0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>put a battery in it, you just have the structure

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>of the plane and be a battery. Right. The walls

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>of the structure are our batteries. They're not. The batteries

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>aren't added to an already existing infrastructure. They are the infrastructure.

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Which is really a cool idea. It's not unique to

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the aeronautics industry. In fact, the automotive industry has been

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 1>looking at this where Yeah, I've read about battery designs

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 1>for electric vehicles that would work this way. Yeah, they

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 1>would be incorporated in the roof of the car or

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the walls of the car, so that you know, you

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 1>don't have this large space. It also adds the carrying capacity,

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, to the vehicle where you can you can

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 1>use the space that would have been you know, filled

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 1>up with batteries to hold other stuff. Now, I remember

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 1>one problem that went along with this when I was

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>reading about it in cars was that it sort of

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>made it a problem if you have a collision, right, right,

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 1>I would I would imagine that would be a difficult

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 1>point of of when the body of the thing can

0:15:56.920 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>catch directly on fire. Usually the body of vehicles is

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>made specifically to not catch on fire, but batteries are

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty notoriously flammable. Yeah, it's it seems like it would

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>also be a problem just that you would hurt the

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>reusability of the car and its recoverability from even the

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>small accident if just like damaging you know, one of

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the sides of the car or something, actually damage the

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>power source. Yeah, you would probably have to have it replaced.

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>It would make it. It would make the maintenance or

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 1>at least the repairs much more expensive potentially anyway. Uh,

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sure those will be some of the things

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 1>that the study will have to look at too to

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>measure that risk versus payoff. Like, yes, it makes sense,

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 1>does it. That's part of the real world challenge, right, Yeah,

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's an interesting question. Other teams are also looking

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>at how the batteries and motors of of these systems

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 1>can be improved. Yeah. The high voltage hybrid electric propulsion

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 1>system is one of number two. This is number two,

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and they are looking at two different things. One is

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 1>they were looking at a way of cutting back on

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:10.400
<v Speaker 1>that expense of if your power transmission system is damaged,

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>how can you how can you address that? So they're

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:18.359
<v Speaker 1>looking at self healing materials their high voltage system. This

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 1>is so delightful to me. It's the kind of stuff

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:25.399
<v Speaker 1>that that the insulation of their electrical systems would be

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 1>made of stuff if they can find such stuff that that,

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 1>upon receiving damage, would be prompted to like like like

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the the damage that it receives in the form of

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 1>physical or electric uh punch would cause it to heal

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:48.199
<v Speaker 1>over that damage. Essentially, the electricity passing through this the

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:51.359
<v Speaker 1>chemicals that are bonded to that insulation would prompt it

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 1>to to expand and close those wounds. Uh. And the

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:58.200
<v Speaker 1>cool thing about this is that it would really cut

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>back on maintenance costs. It would also allow the aircraft

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 1>to automatically address any sort of emergency situation that involved

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the damage to the power system without requiring an emergency landing.

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>It would do it all automatically and there's no like,

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 1>there's no switch to throw or anything. It's because of

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the chemical It's material science, right, it's chemistry, material science

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 1>that uh that allowed this to happen. At least that's

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:27.640
<v Speaker 1>what they're hoping to to study and and develop. Keep

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 1>in mind, these are all proposals. This is not stuff

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:35.920
<v Speaker 1>that necessarily exists right now. Concept. Yeah. So the second

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:39.679
<v Speaker 1>part of their approach is that, uh, they want to

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>explore ways to make the electric system practical for aircraft.

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>So they want to make electrical systems that will have

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 1>a reasonable size and weight, very similar to the battery issue,

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:54.120
<v Speaker 1>not just batteries, but the electric motors, all the all

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the infrastructure that would come with an electrical power system

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:00.640
<v Speaker 1>in order to make it feasible, and they to explore

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:04.119
<v Speaker 1>options in high voltage. Variable frequency drives and v f

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:07.400
<v Speaker 1>d s are sort of control systems for engines. They

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:10.720
<v Speaker 1>can really save energy by changing an engine speed and

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:14.119
<v Speaker 1>torque as needed, kind of on the fly, literally on

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the fly in this case, because airplanes. Uh sorry, anyway,

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:22.879
<v Speaker 1>I ever apologize for a pun Embrace them? Oh No,

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't like embracing them. They're all sticky.

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>The dark side. Um vfd s are currently used in

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:33.880
<v Speaker 1>industrial manufacturing and ships. But but there are these big, old,

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:37.360
<v Speaker 1>clunky mechanical things controlled by big old clunky computers, and

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:40.639
<v Speaker 1>so they're they're not as of yet practical for airplanes.

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:43.239
<v Speaker 1>So I'm excited to see what this project winds up

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 1>looking at. Yeah, that that should also be interesting. And

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>remember all of these have the potential to revolutionize aeronautics

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 1>in some way or another, right, that's the whole reason

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:57.200
<v Speaker 1>why they were selected. Number three is Mission Adaptive Digital

0:19:57.240 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Composite Aerostructure Technologies, And this is one of the ones

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 1>that I'm really excited about. It's a material science one

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 1>and super cool stuff so one. This is another kind

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 1>of two parter um. They want to combine two different

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:15.200
<v Speaker 1>lines of research into a new approach, and in aeronautics,

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 1>one of those is a material science in the form

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:22.160
<v Speaker 1>of composite materials. And now composite materials can be incredibly

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 1>light and incredibly strong. We have talked about compositive composite

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:27.720
<v Speaker 1>materials on this show before. Yeah. For example, if you

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:32.159
<v Speaker 1>wanted to create an actually feasible flying car, one of

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:33.919
<v Speaker 1>the things we've talked about is that you might be

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 1>able to redesign the cars structure with lightweight composite materials.

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 1>So that it might be edging closer to reasonability that

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 1>this could take off and land with some kind of

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:48.479
<v Speaker 1>electric motor, right, because you're lowering the weight, but you're

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>not compromising the strength of the structure. Now, the second

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 1>line of research that they want to combine with that

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 1>first one is looking at materials that would be capable

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of changing their shape to adapt to flight conditions. So

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 1>this would be like and there have been aircraft that

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:10.199
<v Speaker 1>can do this where they can they have wings that

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 1>can change shape during flight in order to give um

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 1>different effects, like to increase or reduce drag. This is

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>in large part to reduce the need for things like

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 1>flaps on an aircraft, so it actually can reduce weight,

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 1>it can reduce complexity of the aircraft a fewere little

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>mechanical bits to get broken. Yeah, So if you could

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 1>do both, if you could create a composite material that

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:40.879
<v Speaker 1>also had this shape changing adaptation technology built into it,

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:43.919
<v Speaker 1>then you could have an aircraft that is able to

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 1>be very effective and much greener because it's it's lighter,

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:51.920
<v Speaker 1>so it doesn't need um as much power to remain aloft,

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:56.639
<v Speaker 1>whether that's electric or fuel or whatever. Um and it

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 1>has fewer parts so it doesn't have to it doesn't

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 1>need as much main's it's pretty cool. Yeah, yeah, So

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:05.639
<v Speaker 1>those are all of the kind of hardware studies that

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>are going on. The last three are more on the

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>software end, right. So the first one is the autonomy

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>operating system for u A v s. And we've seen

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 1>autonomous u a v s. They're pretty nifty, you know,

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:20.399
<v Speaker 1>the ones that can follow simple instructions. A lot of

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:22.680
<v Speaker 1>u a v s are under direct human control, it's

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a remote control, but some are autonomously operated. But in

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>general U a v s are not great at reacting

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 1>to changing dynamic situations. I know I'm being redundant there,

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:38.479
<v Speaker 1>but still they're not being They're not able to react

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the way a human pilot can. Sure. Well, I mean

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 1>this is the reason we don't just have autonomous airplanes

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty much, right, I Mean, we have autopilot that works

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 1>just fine, but you want a human pilot there who

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:54.399
<v Speaker 1>can react if something goes wrong, right, right, So you know,

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 1>if you command a a U a V to travel

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:00.439
<v Speaker 1>from point A to point B and has a pre

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:05.440
<v Speaker 1>programmed flight path and everything is fine, then as long

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 1>as everything's working properly on the U A V you

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 1>have a reasonable expectation that's going to arrive at point B. Again,

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 1>also assuming that has enough energy to get there. You know,

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 1>all those assumptions aside. It should get to its destination.

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 1>But if conditions change, the U A V may not

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:22.920
<v Speaker 1>be able to detect it, or if it can detect

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:24.399
<v Speaker 1>it, it it may not be able to react to it.

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 1>So something like whether yeah, sure, sure if there's a

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 1>thunderstorm that was unexpected in the area and the U

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:33.439
<v Speaker 1>A V needs to change course, yeah, exactly, or that

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>there is what if a monkey jumps out of the

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:38.200
<v Speaker 1>top of a tree right after it takes off, grabs

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 1>hold of the U A V and then is holding on.

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>That's could happen. What if? What if what if the

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:48.439
<v Speaker 1>U A V? What if a flock of birds flies

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:50.200
<v Speaker 1>in the U A V's path? I mean, there are

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 1>lots of different situations that could potentially have What if

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 1>a flock of monkeys flies you know, actually was the

0:23:56.520 --> 0:24:00.159
<v Speaker 1>banded flock of seagulls is playing while the V I

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:02.879
<v Speaker 1>think runs run so far away? I think a flock

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 1>of birds is what happened to that that aircraft that

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:11.360
<v Speaker 1>had to land in the Hudson Rivers after Captain Selley, Right, yeah,

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 1>is what happened. So, and there was a case where

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 1>you really needed a human pilot who knew what to

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>do when something went wrong, everyone lauded the pilot's efforts

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to to land the plane or to crash land the

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 1>plane safely. UM, same sort of thing here. The u

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>a V s generally lack the ability to make these

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:35.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of assessments and and change plans spontaneously. They're very

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:39.639
<v Speaker 1>good at following specific instructions and and following a simple

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>series of steps because because their robots, that's what that's

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>what robots do. But creating an AI that allows them

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 1>the ability to to change in changing conditions is something

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:56.399
<v Speaker 1>that this project would specifically be exploring. So they'll be

0:24:56.440 --> 0:25:00.040
<v Speaker 1>looking into recent developments of AI and seeing how to

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 1>apply them so that a ua V would be able

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:05.959
<v Speaker 1>to do an emergency medical lift from Alaska and fly

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>to the Mayo clinic even if conditions are not stable

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 1>between the two. So that's that's pretty cool. The next

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 1>one is learn to fly. Now, this study is all

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:21.679
<v Speaker 1>about looking into the possibility of getting rid of that

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 1>pesky testing phase that we have with aircraft. UM. This

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:29.440
<v Speaker 1>may be more of an industry problem. Yeah, this one,

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:31.440
<v Speaker 1>This one is a little this one is a little

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 1>weird for me to think of because I don't know

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 1>how I feel about this. I mean, I understand the concept,

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the concept being we know a lot about aeronautics. We've

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of experience in it. We have very

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated computer models that can simulate conditions. That all goes

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 1>into the process when anyone is designing anything new with aeronautics,

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>testing anything out, there's always computer simulation that precedes any prototype.

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh sure, it's a lot cheaper to to simulate building

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 1>a giant metal thing that it needs to actually do

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:08.879
<v Speaker 1>it and go like, well this fly, let's just take it.

0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's just throw it off a cliff and find out. Yeah,

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>especially if if you find out that it does not fly.

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>It's much cheaper to do that in a computer then

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>to find out in real life. So the Learn to

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:22.439
<v Speaker 1>Fly program is a study to look into do we

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 1>know enough at this point where if we create a design,

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:29.679
<v Speaker 1>we can run it through computer simulations to test that

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:33.440
<v Speaker 1>design thoroughly enough so that we can go straight from

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>design to building. The whatever that change in aeronautics happens

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 1>to be and implementing it directly and skipping that that

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>ground test period where you would typically build a test

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 1>vehicle and then do several test flights to make sure

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 1>everything was working. The question is can we skip that

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>step at this point? Do we know enough to be

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:58.119
<v Speaker 1>able to skip that step? That's what that study is

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 1>specifically going to look at. And if that is true,

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 1>if we can do that, it means that we can

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>move into an era where there's much more rapid prototyping

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and development, where the things that we are designing can

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:16.400
<v Speaker 1>be incorporated without that long period of testing. But that's

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:17.919
<v Speaker 1>what the study is going to look at. What is

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>that actually reality? Could that really be us? Are we

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:23.640
<v Speaker 1>at that point yet? Are do we just need to

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:27.360
<v Speaker 1>go poke stuff? Yeah? Yeah, exactly? And which is it's

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:29.400
<v Speaker 1>it's good to hold a study to figure that out

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:32.120
<v Speaker 1>rather than just say, hey, guys, let's try something now.

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:35.360
<v Speaker 1>The final one is kind of interesting too. It's called

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 1>digital twin. I liked this idea. I thought this was interesting.

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 1>So the idea here is that they would study the

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 1>feasibility of building a virtual model of an airplane of

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 1>a real existing airplane. Would it's twin throughout its life

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:54.919
<v Speaker 1>and then every time anything happens to the real airplane,

0:27:55.200 --> 0:27:59.680
<v Speaker 1>you update the virtual airplane to match it. And yeah,

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and also can see the effects of aging because the

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the virtual airplane will age the same way the actual

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 1>one does. I assume you could even accelerate the aging

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:13.400
<v Speaker 1>just to see at what point is this one particular

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 1>component going to need to be replaced. Sure, I think

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:20.240
<v Speaker 1>that's a really interesting and smart idea, because I've often

0:28:20.320 --> 0:28:23.399
<v Speaker 1>wondered this, like, Okay, we have a lot of fairly

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 1>old airplanes out there that are still in operation. This

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 1>seemed to be doing fine, but how long until they're

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 1>not doing fine? And how are we gonna know? Yeah,

0:28:33.160 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 1>do we have to wait for something to break in

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:37.640
<v Speaker 1>order to or is it? Like is it I'm sure

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that there's systems out there, you know, like my car

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 1>where they go you know, well, it's a hundred thousand miles.

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 1>You should really take it in for a transmission job

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 1>something like that. Ladies and gentlemen, I have just been

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 1>informed that the check engine light has come on the

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>control panel, So we're going to have air traffic Control

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>come out and check that. Yeah, I mean it's it's

0:28:57.800 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 1>it's true. We do first of all, aircraft have lots

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>of different uh, notification systems on them to let you

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 1>know if something is not working, but sometimes those fail.

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 1>They're also regular maintenance checks obviously of aircraft, but this

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 1>would be a way of getting a heads up before

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 1>something becomes a problem where it needs to be repaired.

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Like you could say, all right, according to the model,

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 1>these five components of this aircraft are going to need

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 1>to be replaced next month. Let's do it now before

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 1>anything gets to a point where it gets critical. Yeah, yeah, no,

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I I love this idea. I'm actually vaguely surprised that

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 1>that it's not already in operation. I also just I

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:40.479
<v Speaker 1>really want them to call it the picture of Dorian

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 1>gray As long as long as this graphics file exists,

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 1>this plane will not deteriorate in any way. But the

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 1>plane and the graphics file gets more and more decrepit

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 1>as time goes on. Look at the long gray Beard

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 1>and this plane. That'd be weird. Uh what kind of

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 1>airplane would Oscar Wild create? It would be a fabulous Yeah,

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 1>we're on the same page on that one, all right.

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 1>So that those are the six ideas. Now we don't

0:30:11.120 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 1>have a whole lot more information because these these projects

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 1>have just gotten the green lights, so they're going to

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:21.360
<v Speaker 1>start seriously looking into the stuff. They get some funding.

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 1>The funding depends upon the project. I think it's between

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 1>one and five million dollars a year or something like that,

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 1>which is a significant amount. Yeah, the projects are going

0:30:28.800 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 1>to last between two and two and a half years.

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 1>They were just announced yesterday as of the recording of

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 1>this podcast on June twenty second. So uh yeah, I'm

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 1>excited to see what news develops, right and to talk

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:45.680
<v Speaker 1>about those other two parts anti a c P. Just

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 1>to close this out, Lauren mentioned the Transformational Tools and

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Technology or t t T. That's all about advancing computational

0:30:53.280 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and experimental tools used by NASA and aviation applications. So

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 1>they look into developing advances in technology will help analyze, understand,

0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and predict performance in various aviation concepts. So the cool

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 1>thing about this his T T T is innovating in

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 1>a way to make the tools to help judge how

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 1>effective the other stuff being developed by the various branches

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:19.720
<v Speaker 1>of T A c P. You know, how effective are

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 1>those and so it's it's uh, you know, sometimes you

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 1>have to actually develop new tools to measure things to

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 1>make sure that whatever the um the hoped for effect

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 1>is is actually being achieved. So that's pretty cool. It's

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 1>all about developing those ideas that make other ideas uh,

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, we can judge whether or not they're really working.

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:42.160
<v Speaker 1>And then the leading edge arrow research for NASSA or

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:45.640
<v Speaker 1>LEARN is all about looking to creating totally new next

0:31:45.640 --> 0:31:51.479
<v Speaker 1>generation capabilities and aeronautics research. So again kind of looking

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:55.720
<v Speaker 1>for the next huge leap um. Keeping in mind that

0:31:55.840 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 1>usually advances and engineering come in lots of little steps, right.

0:31:59.840 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>We get, we learned things, we implement them, We make

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 1>incremental improvements to the stuff that we build. We don't

0:32:07.440 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 1>typically have enormous jumps. Although that those are very popular stories.

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Everyone loves the story of someone who comes up with

0:32:14.800 --> 0:32:17.640
<v Speaker 1>a brand new, innovative idea that makes a huge difference.

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:21.120
<v Speaker 1>We just have to remember that's the exception, not the rule.

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 1>The rule is we tend to make gradual improvements over time,

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 1>which is fine, um, And nothing should be taken away

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 1>from the thousands of people who have contributed to those

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 1>small increments. Those are things that have had a measurable impact.

0:32:38.520 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, definitely, and that's why. Yeah, it's it's really

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 1>nice that that NASA helps support independent universities and research

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 1>teams that are working on that kind of thing. Right,

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 1>those are the ones that specifically are participating in the

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Learn project. So yeah, really exciting stuff. I can't wait

0:32:55.920 --> 0:32:57.800
<v Speaker 1>to find out in two to two and a half

0:32:57.880 --> 0:33:00.520
<v Speaker 1>years which of these studies are going to tribute to

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>real changes in aviation. Again, we may end up in

0:33:04.160 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the process learning things that were never anticipated at the

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:10.640
<v Speaker 1>beginning of these projects. So it's hard to say. If

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 1>you make a virtual twin of an aircraft, apparently it's

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:16.800
<v Speaker 1>always an evil twin. So all of them have gotes

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 1>which then developed into the long beards we've already discussed,

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:24.280
<v Speaker 1>or possibly we learned that the digital twin feels all

0:33:24.280 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the pain the original airplane fields. Who knows. There's all

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 1>these sort of things that we could learn and and

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and fun knowledge that will be handy in pub trivia

0:33:32.840 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 1>and years to come. So uh, this was a This

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 1>was a blast to cover. If you guys have suggestions

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 1>for future topics that we can cover on this podcast

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 1>or in the video series, I welcome you to right

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to us and let us know what your ideas are.

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Our email address is fw thinking at how stuff Works

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:53.560
<v Speaker 1>dot com, or drop us a line on Twitter, Facebook

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 1>or Google Plus. At Twitter and Google Plus, we are

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 1>FW thinking on Facebook. Just search fw thinking in the

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 1>search bar will pop right up. You can leave us

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:03.280
<v Speaker 1>a message there. We read all of them, and you'll

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:10.759
<v Speaker 1>hear from us again. Really sin For more on this

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:13.840
<v Speaker 1>topic in the future of technology, I visit Forward Thinking

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 1>dot com h brought to you by Toyota. Let's Go Places,