WEBVTT - How Screwed Are We?

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:04.600
<v Speaker 1>The greatest part of this show is hearing from you,

0:00:05.240 --> 0:00:08.400
<v Speaker 1>hearing your questions from all the wonderful people who have

0:00:08.440 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>subscribed and left five star reviews and made this one

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest podcasts out there. And regularly I squander

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that excellent aspect of this show because I just want

0:00:21.000 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to ask all of my questions and we just really

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 1>get into it. So I am so excited to say

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>this episode all mail bag. So please thank you so

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>much for sending your questions in. We've got a lot.

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Some of them are brilliant, some of them are funny,

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 1>some of them are extremely irreverent, and we will hit

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:42.519
<v Speaker 1>all of those questions. Please be sure to like and

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>subscribe before the overlords in Big Tech take us all out.

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>For now, I am Michael Knowles. This is Verdict with

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Ted Cruise. Welcome back to Verdict with Ted Cruz. I'm

0:00:58.360 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>going to jump right in. I'm not going to allow

0:00:59.880 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>myself to say one extra word from Eddie. First question, Senator,

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>what was your least favorite part of Joe Biden's terrible

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>State of the Union speech? Well, it disturbed my nap.

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:19.040
<v Speaker 1>That was irritating, but but look the part I hated

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the boast was a line that he had where he

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 1>said we the people and then he said that's us,

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:32.119
<v Speaker 1>that's the government, and that just pissed me off because

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, that is utter and complete crap. That. Look,

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I know that Joe Biden was not a very good

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:42.320
<v Speaker 1>law student, but he needs to go back and take

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 1>con law again, because we the people, which is how

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the Constitution begins, means us the people. Damn it, It's

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>not government. It's the opposite of government. And you know,

0:01:56.240 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 1>this is Joe Biden being a totalitarian and like justifying

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>massive government power by saying, you know, I am we

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the people. I mean, you know, it reminded me of

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Louis the fourteenth LAMI LETI okay, And you did actually

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:15.679
<v Speaker 1>get me to to to mangle French on the podcast.

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>So we I've been hanging around with Gayle's too much.

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:22.359
<v Speaker 1>It's clearly clearly a problem. It's far into But but

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, Joe Biden thinks he's the sun God. I mean,

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:31.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it is the arrogance and ignorance of that statement,

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and it is what big government democrats believe. But I

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:38.359
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people think this, Senator, and I

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 1>will try to refrain from ascribing to malice that which

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 1>is equally explained by stupidity. True enough, Barack Obama said this.

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Do you remember Barack Obama said, the government, that's that's

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:50.519
<v Speaker 1>what we do together, That's that is us. It was

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>what Joe Biden said was basically a plagiarized line from

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Obama and Joe Biden. Biden. Biden would never plagiarized. No

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>could come on. Joe would not do that, not him,

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>not him. What do you say to people who say, look, yeah,

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the government is when we all get together, you know,

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 1>we the people get together, and then the thing that

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:12.359
<v Speaker 1>we do that expresses our unity together is the government.

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>And you you're just some crazy conservative who has an

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>irrational fear of government. So we the people is the

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 1>boss of government. Look, for most of human history, government

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 1>was the monarch, was the ruler, and the power of

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>government came from God Almighty and and and it was

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 1>a top down vision. And when the Framers rested sovereignty

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>with the people and the people lent government power to

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>officeholders for a temporary period of time, that transformed the

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>face of the planet. I mean that was a revolutionary idea.

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>You know. Thomas Jefferson put it really well when he

0:03:56.800 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>said that the Constitution serves as chains to bind the

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>mischief of government. Yeah, it's all about restraining government. Now.

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>We want a government strong enough to defend the nation,

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>to do the essential functions that the government needs to do.

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>But the Constitution and Bill of Bright are all about

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>protecting we the people from the Joe Biden's of the

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>world that want to take our freedom's away. And there

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>seems to be this total blurring of the distinction between

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:30.719
<v Speaker 1>the different parts of the government. I'm no con law expert,

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:32.720
<v Speaker 1>but I have read the document once or twice, and

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:35.359
<v Speaker 1>it seems to me you have the people, and you

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 1>have the states, and you have the federal government, and

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you have a separation of powers, and you have checks

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and balances, and you have federalism. And yet when you

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:47.600
<v Speaker 1>hear Joe Biden talk about it, it's all just kind

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>of the same blob. And we got to do whatever

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>it tells us to do. Yeah. Look, the modern left,

0:04:55.600 --> 0:05:01.479
<v Speaker 1>it is openly socialist. The people driving the agenda in

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administration are Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren an AOC.

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Bernie an AOC explicitly or socialists, and Warren is not

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:14.039
<v Speaker 1>too far behind that, and that means they believe their

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:19.280
<v Speaker 1>solution to everything is government and government power. Now, one

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of the consequences, I will say, the Biden guys, they

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:25.159
<v Speaker 1>came in on January twentieth. They immediately fire everyone connected

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 1>with the Trump administration. They immediately start rescinding rules. And

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>they are frankly much more effective at doing this, yeah,

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>than Republicans are. But but for them, this is religion.

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Government is religion, it is faith, It is what they do.

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:47.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, too often Republicans treat treat politics like a

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>game of croquet at the back lawn, and the differential

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and seriousness is it's a problem. So speaking of the

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>differential and seriousness between the Republicans and the Democrats, this

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 1>question comes from Jonathan Caitlyn twenty twenty one. Are you

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>with her? Um? Look, I think it will be interesting

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to see see how California resolves that. UM. I find

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:24.280
<v Speaker 1>it wonderfully beautiful that Gavin Newsom is getting recalled. UM.

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean it. You know, karma has a way of

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>coming back on you. You know, it says something that

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>his shut everything down policies were so extreme that even

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the people California said enough of this nonsense. Um, that's good,

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 1>that's good. That's actually good for hope in America. So

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:48.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't know Caitlyn. I I met Caitlin back oh

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirteen. I think it was when I came out

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to LA to speak to the Friends of ABE, the

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>conservative group in Hollywood, and and then Caitlyn was Bruce,

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:04.559
<v Speaker 1>and Bruce Jenner was openly conservative, which was a really

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 1>risky position to take in Hollywood. People don't know this,

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 1>but but Bruce Jenner would go to conservative events. It's

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 1>not exactly hiding this sort of thing. It Bruce had

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>demonstrated real courage. Now Caitlyn is running. You know, in

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen, when I was running for president, Caitlyn Jenner

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 1>publicly said that she wanted to be my trans ambassador,

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the trans ambassador for Ted Cruz, which which caused a

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of the LBGT world to lose their minds that

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that Caitlyn said such a thing listen to. I don't know.

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know who all's going to run and what's

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>going to happen, but but I think it's great. Democracy

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>is all about standing up for what you believe in.

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>And if the people of California choose anybody who is

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 1>more protective of liberty than Gavin Newsom. That's a step

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 1>in the right direction. There is a real world because

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 1>obviously it would raise lots of questions about and just

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the pronouns. What pronouns do you use? What does this

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>mean for these broader issues of gender and sex? But

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 1>it may simply be the case that in California that's

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>about as conservative as you get. And so yes, I

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>suppose we all have to wait and see a lot

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>of other people are going to be part of this

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>race as well. We have a question, Senator, that is

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 1>that just cuts right to the point from the Panda

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Tribune when no one is watching or any members of

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Congress actually productive public servants, Yeah, I would say there

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>there are. Look, there are actually a number of members

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>of Congress who work pretty hard. It varies, and there's

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a wide variance. You know. I remember when I was

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 1>first elected to the Senate's probably I don't know, twenty thirteen,

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty fourteen, first couple of years I'm up there, and

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I went out to dinner with John McCain and John

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 1>McCain he and I had a famously combative relationship. Was

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that the time he I believe he called you a

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>wacko bird. That was that the phrase he did. He

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 1>publicly called me a wacco bird. And actually when he

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 1>called me a wacco bird, I went to the Senate

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 1>floor and I gave a speech praising John McCain. And

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>it so happened. It was the fortieth anniversary of his

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>release from the Hanoi Hilton, and so I gave a

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:25.079
<v Speaker 1>speech just unambiguously praising him. He served our nation, he

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>was shot down, he was a prisoner of war, and

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>most incredibly, he was offered early release, and he said

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 1>no because he thought it would be dishonorable. And I said,

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:39.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, genuinely and from the heart, that I admire

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and revere that service and sacrifice. I hope in the

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:46.199
<v Speaker 1>same situation I would do the same thing. Ye, But

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 1>you and I we've never been tortured, we've never been

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 1>in prisoned. I don't know what I would do in

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>that circumstance. And so every word I said praising him

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>in that speech was heartfelt. I didn't praise him for

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the terrible liberal policies he supports. There's lots of things

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>John McCain did that I and like, but I praised

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 1>him for that, which was praiseworthy. But I also meant

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>it to be a statement that if you go low road,

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>if you go nasty and personal and in the gutter, yeah,

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to respond in kind. And so I didn't.

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:17.320
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, the story I was going to tell, because

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>this is a digression from the very good question. Some

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 1>months later, John and I went out and had had

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 1>dinner and we're talking just about the Senate, and he

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>made a point to me. Then he said, you know,

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>in the Senate, like in most places in life, the

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 1>eighty twenty rule applies, which is that eighty percent of

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the work is done by twenty percent of the people.

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>That the Senate is a place where if you really

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:42.599
<v Speaker 1>want to roll up your sleeves and you want to

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 1>lead and you want to engage, that you can and

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you can very quickly lead. You don't have to. You know,

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the House can be tougher. The House. Seniority matters a lot.

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>They're four hundred and thirty five members. Take it can

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 1>take a while to have an impact in the House.

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, in the Senate there only one hundred senators.

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not that big a place. Right now, they're fifty Republicans.

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 1>If you care about an issue, you can stand up

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and lead and make a difference. So there are number

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>of Senators that make a big difference. Mike Lee. I

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:17.679
<v Speaker 1>adore Mike Lee. He is a constitutionalist, he is passionate,

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 1>he works hard. You know someone who had just retired,

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Alexander. Lamar a lot more moderate than I am.

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>But actually Lamar and I got along very well. He

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:34.319
<v Speaker 1>was a hard working, He delved into details, he delved

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 1>into substance, and he would drive a legislative agenda. There

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>are other Senators that frankly just go to cocktail parties. Yeah,

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:47.680
<v Speaker 1>like it is a job. I mean, the eighty twenty

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 1>rule means also that eighty percent of the folks are

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>not working that hard. But you know what, that's true.

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:57.319
<v Speaker 1>That's true most places you go. That's true in most companies.

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 1>And if you resolve. So when I'm talking to potential

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:05.559
<v Speaker 1>candidates who are thinking of running for Senate, and I

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>talked to a fair number of peopleho are looking at

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:10.679
<v Speaker 1>Senate seats, and they'll ask They'll be like, well, can

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:12.679
<v Speaker 1>you make a difference in the Senate? Can you do anything?

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>And with the right person, I'm very encouraging because I say, look,

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 1>if you want to, if you're willing to do the work,

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>this is to a significant part self directed. How many

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:26.440
<v Speaker 1>issues are you going to lead on? What are you

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>going to do? Are you gonna you know, how hard

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 1>are you going to work? But if you're willing to

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>work and lead and you've got courage, can you can

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 1>make a big difference? Yes? And I actually can attest

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 1>to your complement of Senator Alexander because just about a

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 1>month ago, my newborn son was baptized in Lamar Alexander's

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 1>punch bowl. This was a very strange circumstance. It said

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Alexander, Businessman of the Year nineteen eighty or something.

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Somehow a Catholic church in Nashville fell into this sort

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>of thing. And so Lamar Alexander is still doing good work,

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 1>including bringing my son into the body of Christ that

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm almost speechless on that. I will say, Lamar owns

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 1>something that that is a unique connection between your new

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:14.319
<v Speaker 1>home and my longtime home, which is that Lamar has

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 1>a walking stick that was owned by Sam Houston. And

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Sam Houston was governor of Tennessee and was governor of Texas.

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 1>The only person in US history to be governor of

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>two different states. And so it's a very cool walking

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 1>stick that Sam Houston had. By the way, on the

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>question of senators doing things productive, I'll give you an

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>example that might surprise folks, which is a Democrat. Okay,

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Kirston Gillibrand. So I like Kirston. She and I are friends,

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>We get along and and actually just today I did

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a press conference with Kirston Gillibrand on an issue that

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:56.079
<v Speaker 1>she has been relentlessly leading on and that I've been

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:59.560
<v Speaker 1>working with her for about eight years. And it's sexual

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>assault the military. It's a real problem. The numbers are

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>very discouraging that far too many servicewomen and even some

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 1>servicemen are subjected to sexual assault in the military. And

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, I twenty thirteen I started on the Senate

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Armed Services Committee. She was on it, and she's passionate her.

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>She has legislation that would move the decision about whether

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>to prosecute sexual assault from the commanding officer to a

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 1>military prosecutor who is outside the chain of command. And

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the top brass that the Pentagon hate this idea and

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>they argue vehemently against it. And so I'm brand new

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 1>on the Armed Services Committee and I go to a

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>hearing and you know, sometimes you think, well, debate doesn't

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 1>make a difference, that's all just play acting and everyone

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>knows what they think. Yeah. Well, I went into that

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 1>hearing genuinely not knowing what I thought and wanting to

0:14:55.480 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 1>listen to the arguments on both sides, and the brass say, well,

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 1>moving the prosecuting decision out of the chain of command,

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 1>it would undermine good order and discipline. It would make

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>it harder for the commanders to lead their troops. Kirsten

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 1>came back with a number of facts, one of which

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>is that multiple of our allies have done exactly this reform.

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>So Canada has done it, the United Kingdom has done it,

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Israel has done it, and they studied it and it

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>has not had an effective undermining good order and discipline.

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 1>And the real challenge is that the rates of reporting

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 1>in the military are very very low, that when someone

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>is a victim of assault, they are far too frequently

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 1>unwilling to come forward and report it. And one of

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the biggest reasons is they don't believe the commanding officer

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 1>will be fired and partial that they're worried that the

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 1>commanding officer may be buddies with the guy who committed

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the assault and will be reluctant to bring charges. And

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>so I listened to those arguments and was persuaded by them,

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and so back in twenty thirteen signed I signed up

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and co sponsored the legislation with Kirsten and have been fighting.

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>And she's been fighting for eight years and I've been fighting.

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 1>And so we sit down with whiplists, where she goes

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and looks for Democrats to support it, I go and

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 1>look for Republicans to support it. We just did a

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>press conference this morning. I think the bill is likely

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to pass in the next two years, that we're seeing

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 1>really growing momentum. But I use that as an example

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>where she has, I mean just tirelessly bird dogged this issue.

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think if we can reduce the incidents of

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>sexual assault in the military and do a better job

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 1>protecting our servicemen and women, that's very worthwhile. Certainly, next

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>question comes from Pancake Robot. I assume this is mister

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Robot's Christian name after Saint Pancake of Alexandria. Question is

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to hear Senator Cruz's take on the paradox

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of Republican power. We elect Republicans to make the federal

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 1>government less powerful, but in practice that just means that

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Republicans are reluctant to wield power to achieve that objective.

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a very insightful question. How do we resolve that?

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:21.399
<v Speaker 1>I think there are a couple of things that drive

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 1>at one we mentioned just just earlier in the pod.

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Democrats are ruthlessly serious. Government is life or death to them.

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 1>They spend every waking moment thinking about how to be effective.

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Republicans often politics, if they do it it's a hobby,

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:46.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not It doesn't have the same seriousness. So when

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:49.679
<v Speaker 1>it comes to wielding power, you don't get people that

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:55.679
<v Speaker 1>are nearly as serious about moving a policy agenda because

0:17:55.680 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 1>they don't necessarily have the same passion to it. There

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 1>are a couple full of different challenges. Let me only

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:04.200
<v Speaker 1>up break this down a couple of ways. Number one,

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>how do you run a federal agency? And so a

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 1>challenge that Republican appointees having an agency is if you're

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 1>in an agency that you think should be abolished, that

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>can be a real problem for running it. You know,

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 1>you remember Rick Perry famously at the debate, you know,

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:23.120
<v Speaker 1>forgot one of the agencies that he wanted to abolish

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 1>and said, oops, the irony is the agency he forgot

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:29.760
<v Speaker 1>was the Department of Energy, which he later became Trump's

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Secretary of Energy. So he literally led the department that

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>he forgot that he wanted to abolish, undermining it from within.

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:41.119
<v Speaker 1>One of my first jobs in politics was in the

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:44.160
<v Speaker 1>George W. Bush administration, where I was at the Federal

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Trade Commission. And my boss was a guy named Tim Muris,

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 1>who was the chairman of the FTCs of brilliant guys

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the lawyers would economist, and he recruited me in to

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 1>be the head of policy at the FTC. And this

0:18:57.000 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>is two thousand, two thousand one to two thousand and three.

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>And what Tim understood if you go into an agency

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>as a Republican political appointee and you tell every person

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:12.680
<v Speaker 1>at the agency your job is meaningless. Everything you've done

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:15.159
<v Speaker 1>with your life is worthless. I hate the mission of

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 1>this agency and you suck. Now follow me. They're going

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:22.160
<v Speaker 1>to fight back. They're going to resist you at every turn.

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 1>What Tim understood instead, a government bureaucracy is like a fire,

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and you can direct the fire in a positive direction.

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:33.199
<v Speaker 1>But if you if you just try to kill it,

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 1>it will try to kill you. And so, for example,

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:42.680
<v Speaker 1>at the FTC, my office, the FTEC is charged by

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:47.400
<v Speaker 1>statute with defending competition and defending consumers. They're seventy five

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 1>PhD economist at the FTC. And so one of the

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>things that I led is something called competition advocacy where

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:57.959
<v Speaker 1>we would study a state legislature or a state regulatory

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>body would request our views on particular and a competitive

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>bill they were considering that was typically restricting competition, favoring

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 1>big business and hurting consumers, and we would study it.

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:14.200
<v Speaker 1>The PhD economists would study it, and then we would

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:18.880
<v Speaker 1>go and provide testimony or provide expert guidance on if

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:24.960
<v Speaker 1>you do this, prices will rise twenty percent for consumers.

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:28.639
<v Speaker 1>And the competition advocacy people were eager to do it.

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>It was beneficial, but it was expanding freedom and it

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>was reducing the footprint of government. Another example class action lawsuits.

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 1>There were plaintiffs lawyers that were bringing abusive class action

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:47.400
<v Speaker 1>lawsuits where they'd have a big class, they'd negotiate what's

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:50.880
<v Speaker 1>called a coupon settlement, which is you know, anyone who

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 1>ever bought a bag of Doritos gets a coupon for

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 1>ten cents off Doritos. And but you know, as fifty

0:20:57.119 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>million people, so everyone gets a ten cent coupon, and

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the lawyers take home seventy million dollars. And the coupon settlements, frankly,

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:08.919
<v Speaker 1>are a croc many times because they're designed to make

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:14.160
<v Speaker 1>lawyers fees and not actually to help the ostensible clients.

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:16.879
<v Speaker 1>And so what we did in the FTC is we

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:22.359
<v Speaker 1>began intervening in cases that involved coupon settlements and arguing

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 1>to the judge that the judge ought to chop down

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the lawyer's fees and give the money to the consumers.

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 1>And you know, Michael, on the question of the Republican paradox,

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:35.399
<v Speaker 1>I like that the way that was put it also

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:39.639
<v Speaker 1>sometimes is a conservative paradox. And I'll give an example.

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Many times moderates in government have been much better than

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the conservatives. They've been better prepared, they've taken it more seriously,

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and they've won bureaucratic battle. So I'll give an example.

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 1>One of my favorite books in politics is Jim Baker's

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:02.920
<v Speaker 1>book his autobiography, and it's called work, hard, study, and

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>stat of politics, which was actually the advice his grandfather

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:10.159
<v Speaker 1>gave him. And you know, you think about it. So

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Baker was the campaign manager of five presidential campaigns, I mean,

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 1>pause and like you know, Secretary of the Treasury, Secretary

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 1>of State. I mean, the guy had an extraordinary career.

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:24.439
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen eighty, Baker was the campaign manager of George

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Herbert Walker Bush's campaign running against Ronald Reagan. And that

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 1>was a bitter primary. That's where Bush accused Reagan of

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:36.400
<v Speaker 1>voodoo economics. I mean, they were pounding the heck out

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of each other. Reagan wins, and Jim Baker becomes Reagan's

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:47.399
<v Speaker 1>chief of staff in the White House. I mean that's

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know of any other circumstance where the campaign

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 1>manager for your primary opponent becomes your chief of staff

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 1>when you win. That that is an extraordinary thing. And

0:22:57.560 --> 0:23:00.400
<v Speaker 1>so Baker recounts in his book, right at the beginning

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of the Reagan White House, he sits down with Ed Meese. Now,

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Ed mess is someone who's a dear friend. He was

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:10.400
<v Speaker 1>a longtime confident of Reagan's. It's this principal conservative. When

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I first ran for Senate, Ed Meese was the chairman

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>of my national leadership team. He's an extraordinary guy. Baker

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 1>recounts how he sat down with Mee to divide responsibilities

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 1>in the White House, and he pulls out a yellow

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:26.679
<v Speaker 1>notepad and he draws a line down the middle and

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 1>so on, and he says, all right, Ed, let's let's

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 1>divide responsibilities. And he says, look, Ed, you've been with

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the president for so long. You have his trust, you

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 1>have his confidence, you know his heart. Ed, you need

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>to drive the substance. You need to drive the meat.

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 1>You need to drive really the important stuff that we're doing.

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 1>So you need to lead the Domestic Policy Council, you

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:51.439
<v Speaker 1>need to lead the National Economic Council. All of the

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:56.160
<v Speaker 1>substance you should be in charge of. And Baker says, look,

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll just do the admin stuff. And he said, I'll

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 1>tell the schedule, and I'll take personnel, and I'll take budget,

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:08.159
<v Speaker 1>and I'll take ledge affairs and so Actually, in his

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 1>book he reproduces he has a xerox copy of the

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 1>actual yellow pad that says Ed and Jim, and it

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:18.640
<v Speaker 1>has that on there. And in his autobiography Baker admits

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 1>he says, look, I knew I was eating niece's lunch. Because,

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 1>all right, if he controls the schedule, he controls every

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:34.400
<v Speaker 1>minute of the president's time. That's a big deal. If

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:37.880
<v Speaker 1>you decide how the president spends every day, all day long.

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:41.159
<v Speaker 1>If he controls personnel, there's an old saying that I

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 1>think is very true that personnel is policy. If Baker

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:48.879
<v Speaker 1>is picking the people that are throughout the administration, he

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 1>controls the administration. On budget, everything that happens in government

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:59.640
<v Speaker 1>happens through budget. If he controls budget, the dollars drive

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the substance. And then finally on ledge affairs. The way

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 1>he put it, he said, listen, if I'm the one

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 1>sitting in the room with the Senate Majority leader and

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the Speaker of the House, and I'm negotiating the bill,

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:15.160
<v Speaker 1>ed can have whatever he wants and his cute little

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:17.879
<v Speaker 1>policy counsel, and they can write as many white papers

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 1>as they want, but I get to decide what gets done.

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:26.159
<v Speaker 1>And Jim Baker extraordinarily capable guy, but not a conservative,

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:30.399
<v Speaker 1>very much a moderate, and conservatives suffered because he was

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 1>so good. Dick Darman, who worked for Baker, likewise not

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 1>a conservative, but ruthlessly effective, really understood the machinery of government.

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>And I'm a big believer that conservatives need to be

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:48.360
<v Speaker 1>just as effective as the other guys. That we need

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>conservatives who are as good as Jim Baker, who understand

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 1>how to drive an agenda and actually get it accomplished.

0:25:55.800 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, there is a lot to be said for

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the philosophical debate among conservatives. You can throw a hundred

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:04.639
<v Speaker 1>conservatives into a room. They would somehow find a way

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:07.360
<v Speaker 1>to disagree with every single other one and how much

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:09.679
<v Speaker 1>they've read, and how much they think, No, they wouldn't, No,

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:14.680
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't and there. But you know, actually you've proven

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 1>this too, not just the philosophical aspect. There is a

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:24.399
<v Speaker 1>basic competence question here to politics as well. And you

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 1>have gotten things done. There have been conservatives who haven't

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:29.880
<v Speaker 1>gotten things done. You have why because it's not enough

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to just sit in the Freshman bull session, Yeah, and

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:34.959
<v Speaker 1>argue about philosophy all day. You actually have to know

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 1>how to wield the levers of power and accomplish the

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 1>tangible aspect of the job. No, that's exactly right. And

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 1>if you want to change the trajectory of the country,

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:48.399
<v Speaker 1>you look at Ronald Reagan did a phenomenal job of

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:52.160
<v Speaker 1>it because he understood, he understood the power of vision,

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>he understood the power of personnel, and and he understood

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 1>how to drive that vision throughout. And so you know,

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Reagan ran on winning the Cold War, defeating the Soviet Union.

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 1>He ran on cutting taxes and bringing the economy back,

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 1>and he ran on cutting government spending. He achieved two

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>of those three. So he was successful in winning the

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:19.359
<v Speaker 1>Cold War, defeating the Soviet Union. He rebuilt the military

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and bankrupted the Soviet Union. No one thought that was possible.

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 1>He was successful in cutting taxes and reducing regulations that

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 1>produced enormous economic growth. Where he wasn't successful was reigning

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 1>in government spending. And frankly, his own party fought him

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:38.880
<v Speaker 1>on that. Democrats fought him on that, and he at

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 1>times slowed the rate of growth of spending. But that

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 1>was about it. Yeah, not two out of three ain't

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 1>so bad. Let's say, you know, it could be we

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:49.120
<v Speaker 1>could we could try to get the rest now, which

0:27:49.160 --> 0:27:52.720
<v Speaker 1>actually leads into my final question, A quick question in

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 1>our last moments here. This is from Ben. How screwed

0:27:56.800 --> 0:28:05.960
<v Speaker 1>are we very very, very very But I believe not

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 1>permanently And let me break into a couple of things.

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Taxes are going up. They're going up a ton every tax,

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 1>every tax is going up by trillions of dollars, and

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing Republicans can do to stop it because they

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:26.400
<v Speaker 1>will use budget reconciliation that can't be filibustered to raise taxes.

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>The only question is how massive will the tax increase be,

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 1>and that will be decided by the fifty Democrats in

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:37.119
<v Speaker 1>the Senate. They won't talk to Republicans, they won't care

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 1>what we have to say, and it's going to be

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:42.959
<v Speaker 1>in the trillions. The only question is how big. Regulations

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 1>are going to be horrific. They're going to be terrible.

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>They're going to kill jobs, They're gonna be really harmful.

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Foreign policy, I think, is going to be a mess.

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Biden is going to kiss up to our enemies and

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 1>alienate and antagonize our friends. This is the worst motivational

0:28:57.440 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>speech I've ever heard. But no, go on, I want

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the truth. I want the truth. Looks it's bad. There

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 1>there are consequences when you elect Biden, Pelosian Schumer and

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:11.160
<v Speaker 1>you give the Democrats control of all three of the

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 1>elected parts of government. Really bad Stuff's gonna happen. We're

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna see some terrible judges put on the bench, terrible

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>judges who are radical leftist, who will consistently vote to

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 1>undermine our constitutional rights. All of that's going to happen.

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 1>The big unknown to me is whether they end the filibuster.

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:40.719
<v Speaker 1>If they end the filibuster, we might be permanently screwed.

0:29:41.560 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 1>That's actually what frightens me. If they end the filibuster

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and they have forty eight votes that there are two

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Democrats who say they won't don't, won't end the filibuster

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Joe Mansion from West Virginia Kirsten Cinema from Arizona. If

0:29:56.240 --> 0:30:00.320
<v Speaker 1>they hold the line, everything I just said there is bad,

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 1>but it can be undone. It can be undone when

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:06.000
<v Speaker 1>we win the next elections and take over. If they

0:30:06.080 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 1>end the filibuster, what they will try to do as

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 1>structural changes to make it so you can never unwind it.

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>So if they end the filibuster, they'll add DC as

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 1>a state, and they'll add Puerto Rico as a state.

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 1>They believe that will elect four new Democratic senators. DC

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 1>certainly will Puerto Rico might. The Democrats believe it definitely

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 1>will actually think Republicans could compete in Puerto Rico, but

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:33.040
<v Speaker 1>at a minimum its two new Democratic senators from DC.

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 1>If they end the filibuster, they will pass hr one,

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the Corrupt Politicians Act, that will federalize elections, that will

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:45.520
<v Speaker 1>massively expand voter fraud, that will register millions of elial

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 1>aliens and felons. That's designed that will weaponize the Federal

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Election Commission to target Republicans. That's designed to keep Democrats

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 1>in power for a hundred years. And if they end

0:30:56.920 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the filibuster, they'll pack the Supreme Court. They'll grow the

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Supreme courts from nine justices to thirteen justices. That is

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the greatest threat to our constitutional liberties we're facing. So

0:31:11.120 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 1>on the question of how screwed we are it the

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 1>biggest thing that hinges on that, in my mind, is

0:31:17.240 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 1>whether the filibuster goes or not. I'm worried. I think

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the filibuster they might end it. But if you're a

0:31:23.880 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 1>person of faith, pray for spinal fortitude for mansion and cinema.

0:31:29.800 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 1>But let me you know, you said this was a

0:31:31.920 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 1>lousy pep talk, so let me try to take it around.

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually very optimistic. The crazier they get politics always

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 1>has a pendulum to it. When one side gets in

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 1>power and they go too far, the country moves back

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the other direction. These guys are bat crap crazy like

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 1>like they are. They're not just going left, They're going

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 1>off the charts extreme left. Every time they do something

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 1>like that, I think that makes it more likely that

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:03.280
<v Speaker 1>we have a very good election in twenty twenty two

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 1>and a very good election in twenty twenty four. And

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the analogy that I draw often is it took Jimmy

0:32:08.840 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Carter to give us Reagan, and I think Biden going

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 1>radically left sets us up to move back in the

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:17.880
<v Speaker 1>direction of freedom, back in the direction of the Constitution

0:32:18.240 --> 0:32:20.920
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty two and in twenty twenty four. Senator,

0:32:20.960 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm relieved to hear that, because when you said that

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 1>you had some hope and you said I'm an optimist,

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I feared you were going to say, I'm an optimist.

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I think things can get much much worse than they

0:32:30.920 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 1>are right now. You know, I think I absolutely do.

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 1>So I'm pleased to hear a little glimmer of hope.

0:32:35.640 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Many more questions to get too. We will have to

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:40.720
<v Speaker 1>hold them until the next episode of Verdict. I'm Michael Knowles.

0:32:40.800 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 1>This is Verdict with Ted Cruz. This episode of Verdict

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:55.680
<v Speaker 1>with Ted Cruz is being brought to you by Jobs,

0:32:55.720 --> 0:32:59.479
<v Speaker 1>Freedom and Security Pack, a political action committee dedicated to

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 1>supporting conservative causes, organizations, and candidates across the country. In

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two, Jobs Freedom and Security Pack plans to

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:10.960
<v Speaker 1>donate to conservative candidates running for Congress and help the

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Republican Party across the nation.