WEBVTT - 'Cheap' Banks Group Poised For 2021 Rebound: CFRA's Leon

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, along

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news. Kind the Bloomberg Markets

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:21.600
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com. Let's bring in Ken Leon,

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Global Director of Industry and Equity Research at c f

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>r A Research. Ken, we're pretty much through the bank

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>earnings already. It's been quite the mixed result. Talked to

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:34.519
<v Speaker 1>us about your overall impression and how much these banks

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>are differentiating one from the other these days. That's a

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>great question. And the gloom and doom from March to

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>to really the summer seems to be over, so the

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>level of provision for loan loss and reserve seems to

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>have been stabilized. The increases for it's much much smaller

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 1>in the third quarter. But it's really a tale of

0:00:56.440 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>two stories. We're excited about the capital markets for the

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>pure plays like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stowing Tomorrow. They're

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:07.320
<v Speaker 1>gaining wallets share and they're also disruptors in the traditional

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>banking area for the main street type banks consumer and commercial,

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>they're facing still risk as it relates to how do

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 1>you get volume going again for credit card and for

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>consumer lending um and it all seems to be a

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 1>steph function of the COVID nineteen. Will there be a

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 1>stimulus bill and will that sprinkle into the economy, you know,

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:35.479
<v Speaker 1>more activity, you know, US economy seventy consumer And that's

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 1>why Bank America stocks down today as well as some pressure, yes,

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:43.400
<v Speaker 1>they with JP Morgan and City. How much are these

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:46.680
<v Speaker 1>banks chasing investors right now and how much are they

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>just trying to stabilize themselves until perhaps they can give

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>out dividends again or you know, earn some money some

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>other way. Well, they have a dominant position. So looking

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>at the u US banking industry, they are gaining deposits

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and the assets size, but they are learning their lessons

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:11.520
<v Speaker 1>from the last recession and crisis. You know, credit quality

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 1>really matters, and they're letting on a lot of the

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>lower qualified homeowners for for mortgages or other areas like

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>or to go somewhere else in the shadow bank. You know,

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>so there is a quality story and you know, I

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:27.679
<v Speaker 1>think for investors. When you look at these stocks, the

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 1>broad bank stocks, the FED says, you can't raise dividends,

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>you can't buy backstock. We're going to tell you where

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:36.839
<v Speaker 1>we are at the end of this year. So there's

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>enormous capital being built up, which is why the return

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 1>on equity ratios and regulatory ratios are so great. So

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>next year it creates pent up return of capital to

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 1>shareholders with an economy that's probably gonna be better at

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>some point. In all of this means that this is

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a cheap group. You know, you know, got City trading

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 1>at less than fift of that tangible book value, which

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 1>is crazy. We also see that relative to the rest

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 1>of the financial sector, investors are avoiding banks today, but

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>don't forget what this could look like six to twelve

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:17.359
<v Speaker 1>months down down the line. And that's I think this

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:20.080
<v Speaker 1>quarter is a pivot from the dark days that we

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>saw since March to trying to figure out what next

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>year will be. Yeah, how much does that depend on

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:31.679
<v Speaker 1>stimulus and how soon it comes. I think stimulus is important.

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>So going back to the traditional banks, the consumer bank,

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>which is loans and credit cards. Unless we see the stimulus,

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to raise consumer confidence levels for those

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>who work, and it's not going to add to relief

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>for those who are forbearance on thaying their credit cards.

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a big problem. Twelve million out of work. I

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 1>think the question the market is not sure is the

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>election stimulus after the election or in January. This is

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the wild card. So that's why the banks box really

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>aren't moving much this week. You know, can over the years,

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>you've covered them all. You've covered the big banks, You've

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>covered the boutique banks, you've covered the exchanges, you have

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 1>covered you know, everything that I can and can think

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:22.039
<v Speaker 1>of when it comes to the financial sector. What is

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>standing out to you as the most value right now?

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:29.359
<v Speaker 1>What's your your strongest by let's say so in our team.

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:32.840
<v Speaker 1>So I covered just the large banks right now. The

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:36.280
<v Speaker 1>rest of it, the rest of the team, names like Visa,

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:40.480
<v Speaker 1>master Card just beautifully positioned, you know, for that rebound

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:44.280
<v Speaker 1>in terms of consumer and credit card and their platforms

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 1>um you know, so I think that's the area. You know,

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:51.279
<v Speaker 1>Acid Management is consolidating, we like black Stone, and that

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 1>will continue, you know. Morgan Stanley, I thought it was

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>a great deal. They paid a premium um, but you

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 1>know what they got with eating dances that a global platform.

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>So we're seeing consolidation and asset management, uh, and that

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:09.920
<v Speaker 1>will continue as well. Are the likes of Visa master Card,

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:12.359
<v Speaker 1>as you say, the perfectly positioned for the consumer. But

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:15.480
<v Speaker 1>are they under any threat at all from the more

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:20.159
<v Speaker 1>fintech E type companies out there? It's a good question.

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 1>So for you and I as consumers, we think of

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 1>Visa or master Card just the credit card in our wallet,

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 1>but it's not. They really have a clearinghouse platform for

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>transactions and they really have less risk in terms of

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 1>some of the startups you know in the card area.

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>You know. So it's a complex business, but where these

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Visa and master Card are situated is really in a

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>great position. And of course American Express has some of

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>that with their own private system, um, but you know,

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>they have a big travel business and we know what

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Covid has done to that. Yeah for now, that's for sure. Ken.

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Are you dipping at all into these fin techs and

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and these different payment type companies and seeing which of

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 1>them is likely to survive the longer term? So we

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>are watching them, and mostly what we cover are the

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:16.239
<v Speaker 1>large incontents, which are also heavily and dusting, and actually, Ken,

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry we'll have to continue this another day, but

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 1>an extraordinary conversation with Ken Leon there of c f

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>R A, and we really appreciate his time. Now we

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 1>want to go to the Economic Club of New York.

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>President Trump is addressing the e C n Y excited

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:35.919
<v Speaker 1>to have with us. Now leading labor economist Danny Blanche Flower,

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>pro pressor of economics at Dartmouth College, former Bank of

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 1>England policymaker, and really, Danny, there are so many places

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:45.840
<v Speaker 1>where we could start. I definitely want Have we got

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:48.720
<v Speaker 1>an hour and a half, right, we need to make

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>this extra long. Well, let's get straight to it then,

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>because we will talk breaks it in Boris Johnson and

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 1>coronavirus in Britain in a moment. But let's start with stimulus.

0:06:57.279 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 1>There is a little bit of head scratching I think

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>as to why how speaker Nancy Pelosi is holding firm

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:06.839
<v Speaker 1>and not accepting the one point a trillion dollars. And

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I want you to explain why it might be better

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>for people who are suffering right now if Nancy Pelosi

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't accept it. If that's what you believe, well, I mean,

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 1>obviously there are There are arguments, strong arguments to suggest

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>that the Republicans should have gone out for a stimulus

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>expect especially in areas where their candidates are in trouble,

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to boost how well people are feeling. UM. Stimulus in

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 1>this economy is needed because people are struggling. Um, they're furlowed.

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Even if they have jobs, many of them have less

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>hours than they would like, so they have less spending

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and that feeds through to the economy as a whole

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and has a negative impact on the economy. So what

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>happened in earlier in the year when the economy tank

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>we went into lockdown, stimulus came that prevented things from

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>being a lot worse. Now, obviously, I think everyone's playing

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>political games um in a sense that if checks show

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>up prior to the election, perhaps that will boost the Republicans.

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>So this is in a sense, these of political games.

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>In terms of the economy, we need to get stimulus

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 1>in there, and we need to get it in there now,

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>especially as we're starting to see slowing down of the

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 1>economy and the virus spreading. So this is head scratching stuff.

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>People are playing politics with people's lives, and it's time

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to go and get busy, as the old phrase said.

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 1>But Danny, there's stimulus, and there's stimulus, and I know

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>that there's an argument forgetting people, you know, cash immediately

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 1>because there are so many suffering out there. And we'll

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:46.680
<v Speaker 1>talk about the labor market in a moment, But is

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:48.680
<v Speaker 1>it the right thing to do just to send out

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:54.200
<v Speaker 1>once again and maybe give some targeted aid to airlines

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:56.839
<v Speaker 1>or whatever? You know, you know what targeted dates an

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:59.719
<v Speaker 1>important thing. I mean, I mean, what we know at

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:03.839
<v Speaker 1>the moment is that people who are especially struggling need help.

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:06.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm a labor economist. I have never seen

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>this phenomenon which I've seen in the last month or two,

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 1>which is all of a sudden, wage growth in a

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 1>recession has gone from two percent to seven percent. Well,

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:20.200
<v Speaker 1>why is that wage growth is rising? Well, actually the

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:23.840
<v Speaker 1>reason is at the bottom fifteen percent of so of

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the wage distribution has dropped out. So it's like a

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:31.559
<v Speaker 1>baseball team's average improves because the two worst players drop out.

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean sucess. These people are worse, but these

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 1>are these are people at the lower end with low earning.

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 1>So so these folks have dropped out of the wage distribution.

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:42.839
<v Speaker 1>They need help to the economy. The great thing about

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 1>these folks is if you give them money, they spend

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 1>it and that has a very positive effect. So what's

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:52.559
<v Speaker 1>happening in the labor market, what's happening to people's consumption

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 1>is a really big deal. Yeah, down the road, you

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 1>probably want to ensure that there are airlines out there.

0:09:57.520 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's a great phrase, you want to ensure

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the commanding heights of the economy. But I think you're right,

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>we need to target it to people who have limited income.

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not big and they're not working. They're not out

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:10.960
<v Speaker 1>of work because they're lazy. They're out of work because

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>there isn't demand for people. And especially the evidence this

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>week is actually the job losses and the labor force

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 1>drops have actually disproportionately hit women because you know, it's

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 1>in the industries that they particularly working in restaurants and

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:27.320
<v Speaker 1>and so on. So so I think this is a

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>really big deal. And it's interesting as a labor economist

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to watch people dizzering when they should be acting, that's

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 1>for sure. And Danny a story that just came out,

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>and because it's in your wheelhouse most recently, I do

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>want to mention it Here, we've found out that the

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 1>number of Americans dying from drug overdoses hit a record

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>in the twelve month period ending March seventy almost seventy

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:52.080
<v Speaker 1>four thousand drug overdose deaths reporting in the twelve months

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:55.199
<v Speaker 1>through March, and they increased significantly at the start of

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. And I know that you've written a lot

0:10:57.160 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>about this, Yes, so of say you know that there's

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're not we know this. They're suffering out there, Danny.

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 1>What happens with the labor market. Let's say that stimulus

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>is stalled for now and right, well, I mean we've

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:12.559
<v Speaker 1>done a lot of work, and Case and Deaton have

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:14.680
<v Speaker 1>done all this work. And what they call death of despair,

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I've been writing about distress. Well, let's just connect all

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:22.679
<v Speaker 1>of this together. That the deaths of despair and overdose

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>death disproportionately occur amongst prime age less educated white were

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>more increasingly amongst minorities, but particularly amongst that group. So

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 1>distress is that which is the group that's crying out

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 1>for help, um, the prime age less educate particularly you

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 1>look who's going to Trump rallies. These folks are have

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>been left behind and are hurting, and no other country

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>in the world has an opioid epidemic like this. No

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>other country has had this huge set of prescriptions from

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>doctors of opioids that really haven't worked. And the crucial

0:11:57.160 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 1>thing to look back and now at is that America

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 1>has a crisis of pain. So even though these opioids

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>have been prescribed, they don't work, they don't solve pain.

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:09.079
<v Speaker 1>So Americans are in pain. One in four visits to

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 1>a doctor people report they're in chronic pain. And that's

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:19.319
<v Speaker 1>before the COVID virus hit. So there's vulnerable people, vulnerable communities,

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>and we have issues of suicide and overdoses. What are

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:25.959
<v Speaker 1>people doing? I mean, we need money to help communities.

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>And what's happened in the last decade with lots of

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 1>spending cups in in in public spending cups, we made

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>communities vulnerable and these folks have nowhere to turn. So

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I think this is really terrible. American needs to try

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>and understand this in a state of where where Dartmouth is,

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>New Hampshire is one of these states which has unbelievably

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:47.959
<v Speaker 1>high opioid death rates. So this is something I think

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that the American public needs to be aware of seventy

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 1>people dying from opioid overdoses. I mean there's others dying

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>from drug overdoses and suicides. So so this is a

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 1>real crisis that we're doing nothing about, and a stimulus

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>should focus on that, should focus on communities, to focus

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:07.679
<v Speaker 1>on trying to help mental health. And the idea that

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 1>you would remove healthcare for people who are hurting not

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 1>just physically, not just from COVID, but from from this

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 1>deep mental health crisis is hard to understand. Well, there's

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot that's hard to understand about the current environment, Danny.

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Let me ask you in the just little literally thirty

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>seconds that we've left. Unfortunately Boris Johnson, I mean, what's

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>his plan? Does he have one? No, hasn't got a plan.

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean the cabinet is actually the cabinet of incompetence.

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>They're actually there because they all have views about Brexit,

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 1>but not not actually very competent. We're seeing disarray. I

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 1>mean even before COVID, I think I said on to

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you and many times on Blumber, these guys don't know

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing. Continuously mug by reality. They're supposed to

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 1>have a plan out there tomorrow, and the only I

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:54.679
<v Speaker 1>think the only question now is how big an impact

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 1>is this going to be? And we had a poll

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:59.719
<v Speaker 1>out yesterday which now says that fifty eight percent of

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>if the Scotts want independence, So it's splitting the community islands.

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>It's upset. It's just a disaster. Danny, thank you again.

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll have you on again soon to talk more about this.

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Dannie Blanche for our leading neighbor economist of course at

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Dartmouth College, professor and former bo E policymaker. Let's get

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>an opinion now on some retail with Sarah Holzag, numer

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Opinion consumer columnist. Sarah, we're in the middle of Amazon

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Primes festivities. Let's put it that way. It started as

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Prime Day and now it really is Prime Days. So

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>over several days, Amazon gives out deals. How is it

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>going this year? So we don't have any information from

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Amazon yet on how is this on how it's going,

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 1>but indications are people are participating in large numbers. Some

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 1>third party data suggest that the hit items so far

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 1>are Amazon's own items, So it's Echo Dot smart speaker,

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 1>fire TV sticks, and Amazon gift cards. Yeah, no surprise

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 1>because those seem to be the products that Amazon pushes

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>all the time. You know, I spend a little bit

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 1>of time every now and then on Amazon's website, and

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>even when you watch a Prime video, the ads in

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the video are for Amazon products. I guess it's it's

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 1>not illegal, and why wouldn't Amazon do it? But does

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 1>it to suggest that customers are just being pushed towards

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 1>certain items that you know, they're not chopping maybe as

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>discerning lee as they would otherwise. I mean, Amazon does

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>certainly give really permanent play to these devices on its

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>home page, and you can see the reasons why they

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>would do that. It's all part of creating this very

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>sticky ecosystem where consumers have Amazon in all different parts

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of their lives. So perhaps if you buy a Fire

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 1>TV stick, you're more likely to watch Amazon's video streaming programming.

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Then your Prime membership feels more valuable to you, and

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 1>you're likely to redo it next year, and the fly

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 1>wheel kind of keeps going in that way. Um So

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>that's clearly a big reason I Amazon is pushing those

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>products today and will continue to do so throughout the

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 1>holiday season. It doesn't even seem that long ago when

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 1>analysts were speculating if Amazon would start its own sort

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>of in house brand, remember, and now suddenly it's all Amazon.

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>The other thing is that many of these products are

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>fulfilled by Do we know what kind of margin Amazon

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>gets on the products that are fulfilled by other merchants.

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I think some of that is not terribly clear, but

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that you know, marketplace orders are clearly a

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 1>big part of this as well. Uh. They really tried

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to make a big push this year in their press

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>release and such, emphasizing that small businesses we're going to

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 1>be uh you know, part of Amazon Prime Day, and

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 1>that they were going to try to create certain incentives.

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>I think some sort of like ten dollar credit or

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>something if he spent with a small business on Amazon

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Prime Day. So trying to make this a rewarding day

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>in some ways for folks who use their film, that

0:16:56.760 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>services and such too. You point out a great insight

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 1>in today's column. Prime Day is a bigger threat than

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:05.720
<v Speaker 1>ever for rivals, and I'd urge everybody to read it

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:09.640
<v Speaker 1>that this year, you know, well we usually see Prime

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 1>Day in July. This year Amazon is using it as

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>a sort of a holiday kickoff retail extravaganza. I mean,

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>we're pretty much passed back to school, or maybe we're

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 1>right in the middle of it. But Amazon certainly trying

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>to take advantage of the calendar this year too, Yes,

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 1>they are, and that could have really big implications for

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 1>its competitors. So estimates are that Amazon is going to

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:34.359
<v Speaker 1>have about six billion in online sales take place on

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:38.159
<v Speaker 1>its website during Prime Day. For context, last year, on

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Black Friday, the entire retail industry so a seven point

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 1>four billion dollars in online sales, and in a typical

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>day during the holiday season, the entire retail industry sees

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 1>about two point three billion dollars in online sales. So

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:55.880
<v Speaker 1>if Amazon rakes in six billion dollars in sales during

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>this period, that certainly would seem to be changing the

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:02.400
<v Speaker 1>entire rhythm of the holiday season this year and pulling

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:04.919
<v Speaker 1>forwards some of those sales that would have happened on

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 1>marquee days like Black Friday and Cyber Monday. You know,

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:15.639
<v Speaker 1>it's particularly sort of um something to see when you

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:17.919
<v Speaker 1>see on the other side of the ocean a sauce

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>which started out a little bit like Amazon. It was

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 1>as seen on screen, and it was where you went

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of to get your mail order a quick fix

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:28.639
<v Speaker 1>of clothing and other items. It could face a twenty

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>five million pound hit from taras in the event of

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>an odeal brexit. So obviously a sauce is not really

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:36.479
<v Speaker 1>a competitor to Amazon right now. It has other problems

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 1>to worry about. What are the main competitors to Amazon?

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>So Walmart and Target I think are the key ones.

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Both of them have really made major investments in their

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>online infrastructure, expanding their assortment online and expanding their ability

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:54.440
<v Speaker 1>to get things to you quickly. I think that two

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 1>days shipping promise used to be Amazon's key differentiator, and

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 1>now a lot of items they're premising one day shipping.

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:04.359
<v Speaker 1>Walmart and Target are really racing to keep up with that.

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Um Also, Walmart and Target are really going big on

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 1>curbside pickup, which Amazon crewy does not have as many

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 1>outposts to be able to offer that, and a lot

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:17.400
<v Speaker 1>of shoppers really like curbside pickup and they can get

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 1>the items same day and they in that way, you

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 1>can get it more quickly than if they waited for

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>it to come to their doorstep. So those are the

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 1>folks that are going to be really trying to duke

0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:30.680
<v Speaker 1>it out with the Amazon this holiday season most directly. Yeah,

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 1>that data is proving a real eye opener, the curb

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 1>side pick up part of things. I you know, not

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:37.640
<v Speaker 1>that I know anything, but I probably would have thought

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>that it wouldn't be as popular as it is. But

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I guess for all the reasons you said, it is

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 1>actually more popular than you might expect. Now, will Amazon

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>ever upgrade it's consumer facing experience? I was looking to

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:52.920
<v Speaker 1>perhaps buy a gift card on Amazon the other day,

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and honestly, it was just it was really difficult to

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>find how to how to do that. Now, maybe I'm

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 1>just not computer savvy. It does seem that Amazon is

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:06.919
<v Speaker 1>not putting much into its consumer experience. I completely agree

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.440
<v Speaker 1>with that, Vonnie. To me, it's just such a strange

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>thing that Amazon is the online drug or not that

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>it is, and that its website is as hard to

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 1>sort through as it is. I think what Amazon is

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>really good at is when you know exactly what you want,

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 1>when you just want to refill the same laundry detergent

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you always buy, or buy the same pack of diapers

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 1>you always buy. Amazon makes it very easy to run

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:30.160
<v Speaker 1>an errand on the Internet. What Amazon is not good

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 1>at is discovery type purchasing. So when you know you

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:36.159
<v Speaker 1>want addressed, but you don't know exactly which one do

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:37.640
<v Speaker 1>you want things? Do you want blue? Do you want long?

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you want short? It's not very good at that.

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 1>You know you want earrings, but none exactly which ones.

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:46.880
<v Speaker 1>It's very very difficult place to that, and I think

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 1>they have a lot of work to do to fix

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>that experience. Sarah hol Zac always spot on our consumer

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:56.919
<v Speaker 1>reck opinion columnists, Thank you. President Trump. Speaking to the

0:20:56.960 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Economic Club of New York and various economic clubs across

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the dream, he had questioning from Cindy O'Connell of the

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Economic Club of Florida, David Rubinstein of d C, and

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Mike O'Neill of New York. We have Michael McKee with

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:12.120
<v Speaker 1>us now are chief correspondent for all things economic, both

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:16.160
<v Speaker 1>national and international, and Michael a very serious conversation here.

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 1>The President putting out some ideas, a couple of inflammatory statements,

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 1>like how a Joe Biden presidency would be a socialist

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>dream in American nightmare. But at the end he was

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:29.159
<v Speaker 1>asked about things like infrastructure, stimulus, national debt. Did we

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>hear anything new from the President? No, but we haven't

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>been hearing much new from him throughout this campaign. It's

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 1>he mostly talks about what happened in the previous three

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>or four years, and he talks a lot about, of course,

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 1>what happened out of the Obama administration. UM the questions

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:52.159
<v Speaker 1>he was asked about infrastructure spending, he didn't answer. He

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>said what he always says about many different things, that

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 1>he has a plan, but there's never any plan. They

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 1>were coming close to a deal on infrastructure, at least

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Democrats in the House and the President when the President

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 1>got upset with Nancy Pelosi and broke off the talks.

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 1>And that was two years ago, and nothing's been done

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>on infrastructure since. The House and Senate have a very

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:18.159
<v Speaker 1>big differences about how you would pay for infrastructure and

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 1>how you'd structure the program. He said today the Wall

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:25.639
<v Speaker 1>is one of the biggest infrastructure projects. Ever, that's not true. Um.

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>He did shut down the border under the guys of

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>pandemic protection, so that part of what he said about

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the wall was correct. He was asked about the deficit

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and has somebody else says quite often about this. This

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:43.399
<v Speaker 1>is one of those um up is down down his

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:46.919
<v Speaker 1>up Trump statements. He said the deficit was falling and

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 1>we were going to pay off interest costs and start

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:52.920
<v Speaker 1>paying down principle on the deficit before the pandemic hit.

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 1>That's one hund degrees opposite from what was happening. The

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 1>deficit was rising significantly be for the pandemic because of

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the tax cuts. So um, it's hard to know exactly

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>what he was trying to do other than insult Joe

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Biden and stir up his base. Yes, absolutely, and I

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:15.360
<v Speaker 1>think that's probably what we can expect from him as

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:18.639
<v Speaker 1>we approach the election. Is only what three weeks left,

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:21.639
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to get you know, viewers questions, you know,

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 1>at some point tomorrow night, um and tonight in fact,

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:26.919
<v Speaker 1>as we will be hearing a lot more from the

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 1>president on economic matters and so on. But really nothing

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 1>moves the needle until we get some more idea of

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>what happens with stimulus. And certainly Nancy Polosi doesn't look

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:38.199
<v Speaker 1>like she's about too given to to President Tom's requests

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:41.640
<v Speaker 1>or whatever Republicans are requesting. Not that that's clear. Now. Well,

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:44.120
<v Speaker 1>even here's the thing. We have to remember that even

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:47.399
<v Speaker 1>if the Speaker of the House and the Secretary of

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury agree on some kind of deal, it would

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 1>have to pass the Senate as well as the House.

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 1>A number of House members have already suggested. House Democrats

0:23:56.600 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 1>have suggested they would vote against it because they don't

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:03.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's big enough. And the question then becomes how

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 1>many Republicans would vote for it. If it's not considered

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 1>big enough, then in the Senate you don't have fifty

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:12.879
<v Speaker 1>senators who approve of it. The Democrats pretty united against it,

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:16.679
<v Speaker 1>and half of the Republican senators say they don't want

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 1>to spend anything. So at this point, there's a lot

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 1>of focus on Wall Street about the talks talks in

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 1>quotation marks between Nancy Pelosi and Stephen Manuchen. But the

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:30.959
<v Speaker 1>odds of something actually happening, particularly before election day, are

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 1>very very small. Yes, and for some reason, and she

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:36.920
<v Speaker 1>wasn't quite clear about it yesterday when she was speaking

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 1>with wolf Blitzer. Non say, Pelosi is not willing to

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>even consider this one point a trillion dollar stimulus. What

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:46.400
<v Speaker 1>is it in there? Michael? Can you decipher that she's

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:49.120
<v Speaker 1>so against She was actually quite angry with the two

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:52.119
<v Speaker 1>Democrats that said that they should be accepting this. H

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>The part of the plan. Part of it is the

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:57.359
<v Speaker 1>way the money is distributed. Part of it is the

0:24:57.400 --> 0:25:00.880
<v Speaker 1>amount of money for states and localities is not enough,

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:05.159
<v Speaker 1>they believe, And part of it, obviously is politics. They

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:08.680
<v Speaker 1>don't want to give Donald Trump any kind of victory

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>before the election. You remember the last time when the

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Care's Act was passed and was going out for those

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 1>who got it in check form, Trump held up distribution

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 1>of the checks until he could have his name printed

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 1>on it. And last thing Nancy Pelosi wants is for

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 1>voters to be opening their mail the day before the

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>election and seeing Donald Trump giving them two Yes, that

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 1>is true, I'm sure, and also presumably that machine is

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:34.919
<v Speaker 1>up and running now, so there may not be so

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 1>much of a delay this time around. But there is

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:39.879
<v Speaker 1>an argument to suggest that people need cash now, no

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 1>matter how it comes and no matter who gets the credit,

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:45.400
<v Speaker 1>right Michael be Danny Blanchflower on earlier saying this country

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:49.159
<v Speaker 1>is in trouble. There is particularly because pore people are

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 1>losing their jobs now as we're finding more companies go

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:54.399
<v Speaker 1>out of business, and the airlines are a perfect example,

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 1>not going out of business, but laying off tens of

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 1>thousands of people because they don't have any business to

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 1>do at this point, and that was one of the

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>hopes of the stimulus bills that they could get aid

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:08.360
<v Speaker 1>to the airlines in the short term. But another interesting

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 1>statistic came out from the New York Fed yesterday. Of

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the people who got the stimulus checks the first time around,

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 1>average of about dollars each either saved the money or

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>paid down debt, and they have money in the bank.

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:29.120
<v Speaker 1>And so if this rebound continued to go faster than expected,

0:26:29.160 --> 0:26:31.879
<v Speaker 1>we might have a tailwind and we might need less

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of the stimulus checks. I think the biggest difference now

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 1>is that there are going to be people who didn't

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 1>save or don't have the money, who are losing jobs

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 1>permanently who may need something. Yeah. I found that phenomenal

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 1>as well, when you consider just how many people are

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 1>at food banks and food lines as well who were

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 1>once you know, happily employed, or all of the people

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 1>around Orlando that are living in motels because they lost

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:56.199
<v Speaker 1>their job at Disney, for example, and they have to

0:26:56.240 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 1>move every two weeks otherwise they risk you know, uh,

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:03.399
<v Speaker 1>being a problem for the motel owner because after two

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:05.679
<v Speaker 1>weeks you can't you know, get evicted. Normally you have

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:07.679
<v Speaker 1>to go through the court process. I mean, there were

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:10.879
<v Speaker 1>in an array of stories out there about people suffering Michael.

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>What should we be concentrating on over the next couple

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:15.160
<v Speaker 1>of days. It feels like Joe Biden needs to get

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:18.680
<v Speaker 1>more of an economic message out there. Actually, Biden probably

0:27:18.760 --> 0:27:21.919
<v Speaker 1>needs to publicize it. Joe Biden, if you look on

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 1>their website, has a very extensive economic plan that involves taxes, infrastructure, UM,

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 1>various pandemic recovery ideas. And Donald Trump UM. And I'm

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 1>not saying this to be part of Donald Trump has nothing.

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:43.120
<v Speaker 1>If you go to his website, there are literally no

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 1>proposals for a second term, and so it's kind of

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:52.479
<v Speaker 1>hard to know, uh what he would do, and Biden

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 1>perhaps wants to make that case a little bit more.

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:59.679
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump talk today about UM Biden plans, but if

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you're not us, in his speech, he didn't say what

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 1>he would do. He talked a lot about how bad

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the Biden and the Democrats are. And that's one of

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the problems people have suggested that we're seeing with Trump's

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 1>poll numbers is that at this point he is talking

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 1>about the previous four years and a lot of people

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:19.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't like what happened in the previous four years outside

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:22.399
<v Speaker 1>of the tax cut, and he's not talking about what

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 1>happens in the next four years or even in the

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 1>next year, and that makes it hard to make a

0:28:27.600 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 1>case for your reelection. Yeah, it's it's it's a phenomenal

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 1>time and and you know a lot of people pointing

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 1>out now that if we don't get something before the election,

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be January before we're even able to

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:41.959
<v Speaker 1>do more stimulus. Michael, thank you. We really appreciate your

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 1>input and listening to that for us. That's Michael McKee,

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 1>International Economics and Policy correspondent. Thanks for listening to Boomberg

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews at

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Bonnie Quinn,

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter on equin and I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.