1 00:00:05,120 --> 00:00:09,200 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane. Along 2 00:00:09,200 --> 00:00:13,200 Speaker 1: with Jonathan Farrell and Lisa Abramowitz. Daily we bring you 3 00:00:13,280 --> 00:00:18,600 Speaker 1: insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and international relations. 4 00:00:18,840 --> 00:00:23,320 Speaker 1: To find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple podcast, sun Cloud, Bloomberg 5 00:00:23,360 --> 00:00:29,320 Speaker 1: dot Com and of course on the Bloomberg terminal. Right now, 6 00:00:29,360 --> 00:00:31,360 Speaker 1: a joy as we will speak to Dr Dudley, the 7 00:00:31,400 --> 00:00:34,200 Speaker 1: SEFTONEI in Ductor, Larry and other worthies on the FED. 8 00:00:34,320 --> 00:00:38,040 Speaker 1: We start strong with Edward Hyman. He is founder and chairman, 9 00:00:38,120 --> 00:00:41,040 Speaker 1: head of economic research at Evercore I S A I 10 00:00:41,479 --> 00:00:45,760 Speaker 1: s I s I. He reports to Julian Emmanuel on 11 00:00:45,760 --> 00:00:48,200 Speaker 1: on what earnings are doing. We're thrilled to dead Himan 12 00:00:48,240 --> 00:00:52,000 Speaker 1: could join us uh this morning. Add your research note 13 00:00:52,200 --> 00:00:56,400 Speaker 1: is classic Himan today and it is of things rolling 14 00:00:56,600 --> 00:00:59,920 Speaker 1: over and you. Hearken back to C. J. Lawrence when 15 00:01:00,040 --> 00:01:05,360 Speaker 1: I read you like Gospel M two is absolutely plunging. 16 00:01:05,920 --> 00:01:09,200 Speaker 1: It seems out of another time and place. Explain the 17 00:01:09,280 --> 00:01:14,959 Speaker 1: importance that M too. The monetary aggregate is plunging straight 18 00:01:15,000 --> 00:01:20,399 Speaker 1: down back near zero. Well, the growth is plunging, But boy, Tom, 19 00:01:20,440 --> 00:01:22,480 Speaker 1: you're right to pick up on this, and I like 20 00:01:22,560 --> 00:01:26,959 Speaker 1: to keep on it. Last year money growth was almost 21 00:01:28,120 --> 00:01:30,520 Speaker 1: and that's I think who inflation picked up so much. 22 00:01:30,880 --> 00:01:32,520 Speaker 1: You can put in different ways, like we've got the 23 00:01:32,520 --> 00:01:38,320 Speaker 1: stimulus checks UH and quantitative easing and the bottlenecks, but 24 00:01:38,480 --> 00:01:41,320 Speaker 1: you could just go to a Milton Freeman cut at it. 25 00:01:41,680 --> 00:01:45,960 Speaker 1: But now that's come way down UH, and that I 26 00:01:46,000 --> 00:01:49,000 Speaker 1: think explains why inflation is slowing. So right now we 27 00:01:49,040 --> 00:01:55,080 Speaker 1: have a race about three months before the funds rate 28 00:01:55,120 --> 00:01:58,760 Speaker 1: will be over the bond yield UH, which would be 29 00:01:58,880 --> 00:02:01,360 Speaker 1: a classic inverted yeal curve. You already have the two 30 00:02:01,360 --> 00:02:07,280 Speaker 1: ten as you mentioned, inverted UH. And so it looks 31 00:02:07,280 --> 00:02:10,280 Speaker 1: to me as though the economy is doing fine now, 32 00:02:10,320 --> 00:02:13,480 Speaker 1: but it's gonna slow and inflation is gonna slow significantly. 33 00:02:13,680 --> 00:02:17,120 Speaker 1: There is both ANNIGFIC. There is a divided hime in 34 00:02:17,200 --> 00:02:20,880 Speaker 1: between Let's say Mohammad oh Arian and Bill Dudley and 35 00:02:20,960 --> 00:02:24,840 Speaker 1: Lawrence Summer suggesting we need an aggressive FED to get 36 00:02:24,919 --> 00:02:28,880 Speaker 1: us anchored again in our price change, and others saying 37 00:02:28,919 --> 00:02:31,359 Speaker 1: calm down. Edyard Denny was on the other day, your 38 00:02:31,400 --> 00:02:35,240 Speaker 1: former colleague at CJ. Lawrence, and you're Denny. Has everybody 39 00:02:35,360 --> 00:02:38,440 Speaker 1: calmed down? They're gonna move and look at the data. 40 00:02:39,120 --> 00:02:43,600 Speaker 1: If Powell moves after this meeting and he observes the data, 41 00:02:43,680 --> 00:02:47,800 Speaker 1: what's he gonna see in six months. It's really three 42 00:02:47,800 --> 00:02:50,720 Speaker 1: months that I'm focused on, But six months is okay too. 43 00:02:51,480 --> 00:02:54,639 Speaker 1: I think the comedy is gonna look slower. Un'mplument is 44 00:02:54,639 --> 00:02:56,640 Speaker 1: going to be four percent or a little bit higher. 45 00:02:56,960 --> 00:03:01,000 Speaker 1: But most importantly, inflation is coming in a lot slower 46 00:03:01,040 --> 00:03:05,760 Speaker 1: than I've been expecting. Not the headline numbers yet, but 47 00:03:05,960 --> 00:03:10,240 Speaker 1: commodity prices, for example, anecdotal is coming in every day. 48 00:03:10,280 --> 00:03:14,040 Speaker 1: I'm getting evidence that there is a slowdown. There's an 49 00:03:14,120 --> 00:03:18,360 Speaker 1: article today, uh that air fares are back below three 50 00:03:17,840 --> 00:03:22,360 Speaker 1: dollars h. So in three months, which is when the 51 00:03:22,360 --> 00:03:23,919 Speaker 1: fan is going to have the fund rate at three, 52 00:03:25,360 --> 00:03:28,639 Speaker 1: I think that they'll be seeing quite a bit slower inflation. 53 00:03:28,720 --> 00:03:32,680 Speaker 1: The issue is going to be, uh, for our shop 54 00:03:32,880 --> 00:03:36,600 Speaker 1: or for Bill Dudley? Is there enough progress to slow 55 00:03:36,640 --> 00:03:41,040 Speaker 1: down the rate of increase in the funds rate? Have 56 00:03:41,120 --> 00:03:43,800 Speaker 1: we already seen the shock and financial markets among all 57 00:03:43,800 --> 00:03:46,560 Speaker 1: amid all of this gloominess, amid all of this negativity, 58 00:03:46,600 --> 00:03:49,480 Speaker 1: as we've seen for this earning season, that stocks advantage 59 00:03:49,520 --> 00:03:54,920 Speaker 1: to rally even with not screamingly amazing returns and earnings. Sure, 60 00:03:55,160 --> 00:03:58,720 Speaker 1: the first off, the FIT has gotten a lot of 61 00:03:58,800 --> 00:04:01,800 Speaker 1: bang for their buck, one of which is that the 62 00:04:01,880 --> 00:04:05,480 Speaker 1: drop in stock market has pushed down consumer net worth, 63 00:04:06,280 --> 00:04:10,120 Speaker 1: which puts a drag on consumer spending. But there's a 64 00:04:10,120 --> 00:04:15,520 Speaker 1: pretty good chance, like you're implying correctly, they said that 65 00:04:15,800 --> 00:04:20,000 Speaker 1: this has already been discounted. I'm scared to go too 66 00:04:20,000 --> 00:04:23,000 Speaker 1: far down that road because the FIT is gonna tighten. 67 00:04:23,120 --> 00:04:25,480 Speaker 1: And the question today is whether that they give a 68 00:04:25,560 --> 00:04:29,400 Speaker 1: little bit of room to tighten, to slow down the 69 00:04:29,480 --> 00:04:33,480 Speaker 1: tightening in the next few meetings. So what's the variable 70 00:04:33,560 --> 00:04:35,800 Speaker 1: right now? That would mean that that we have not 71 00:04:35,920 --> 00:04:38,600 Speaker 1: yet seen the financial shock, that it hasn't been baked in. 72 00:04:38,680 --> 00:04:40,960 Speaker 1: Because if people are looking at a slowdown and earnings 73 00:04:41,000 --> 00:04:44,120 Speaker 1: to slow down in consumer spending, a FED that tightens 74 00:04:44,160 --> 00:04:46,480 Speaker 1: too much and then retraces a lot of that has 75 00:04:46,480 --> 00:04:49,159 Speaker 1: been pricing. That's what people say, and we get these results, 76 00:04:49,160 --> 00:04:51,960 Speaker 1: they're okay, and people rally. At what point do we 77 00:04:52,080 --> 00:04:56,200 Speaker 1: think maybe the narrative is different? So I think in 78 00:04:56,240 --> 00:05:00,160 Speaker 1: thrim three in three months, we're on a track here 79 00:05:00,320 --> 00:05:03,200 Speaker 1: that's gonna end when funds get to three and we'll 80 00:05:03,240 --> 00:05:06,919 Speaker 1: look around and see if there's a change. Now, the 81 00:05:06,920 --> 00:05:09,640 Speaker 1: economy has been stronger than I think the people realize. 82 00:05:10,000 --> 00:05:13,200 Speaker 1: Earnings in the first quarter, we're up about it almost 83 00:05:13,200 --> 00:05:16,400 Speaker 1: a temper cent annual rate. And working with Julian Emmanuel, 84 00:05:16,600 --> 00:05:19,719 Speaker 1: like you mentioned, Tom looks at they'll be up something 85 00:05:19,720 --> 00:05:23,120 Speaker 1: close to five quarter to quarter annual rate in the 86 00:05:23,200 --> 00:05:27,440 Speaker 1: second quarter. And uh, you're dressed at tires is very 87 00:05:27,440 --> 00:05:30,880 Speaker 1: good for the summer. Uh, the summer session here, I 88 00:05:30,880 --> 00:05:33,240 Speaker 1: know you wearing flip flops this morning. For those of 89 00:05:33,240 --> 00:05:37,320 Speaker 1: you on radio. Behind Ed Hyman is a spectacular boat model, 90 00:05:37,360 --> 00:05:42,120 Speaker 1: which looks like the endeavor of to me. And you're 91 00:05:42,160 --> 00:05:44,359 Speaker 1: out in the Hampton's in the bottom line, as you 92 00:05:44,440 --> 00:05:48,240 Speaker 1: note in your research note, the Hampton's rental market is 93 00:05:48,360 --> 00:05:53,960 Speaker 1: absolutely tanked. What does that symbolize to you? I could 94 00:05:54,000 --> 00:05:57,719 Speaker 1: go on about twenty five examples like that, Tom, and 95 00:05:58,000 --> 00:06:01,880 Speaker 1: I'm big on putting the dost together. And I think 96 00:06:01,960 --> 00:06:06,120 Speaker 1: the tanking and the real market in the Hamptons in 97 00:06:06,160 --> 00:06:10,240 Speaker 1: August is just one sign that we need to take 98 00:06:10,279 --> 00:06:14,200 Speaker 1: into account that the FED tightening so far, and the 99 00:06:14,240 --> 00:06:16,760 Speaker 1: story and the money supplied and the increase in the 100 00:06:16,800 --> 00:06:19,960 Speaker 1: mortgage rates and the decline in consuming at Worth is 101 00:06:20,000 --> 00:06:23,640 Speaker 1: all having an impact. We can't complain when prices erupt 102 00:06:23,680 --> 00:06:26,279 Speaker 1: some and then complain when they're down. It's great news 103 00:06:26,320 --> 00:06:28,599 Speaker 1: that rental price in the Hamptons of town because Tom, 104 00:06:28,640 --> 00:06:34,920 Speaker 1: they were obscene scene for so long. That's true. For 105 00:06:35,000 --> 00:06:37,800 Speaker 1: the record, I'm not I'm not in the happens you know. 106 00:06:37,920 --> 00:06:40,960 Speaker 1: I mean, thanks for clarifying. I'm trying to want you 107 00:06:41,040 --> 00:06:43,520 Speaker 1: up there on Yeah, my my metric, John is a 108 00:06:43,520 --> 00:06:46,159 Speaker 1: cup of coffee at Provision out in Saga Harbor and 109 00:06:46,160 --> 00:06:48,600 Speaker 1: it's just outrageous and himen of a core I sight, 110 00:06:48,720 --> 00:06:52,120 Speaker 1: and and we love the addition that a student team fantastic. 111 00:06:59,360 --> 00:07:00,960 Speaker 1: Here's what we're gonn to do and this is really 112 00:07:00,960 --> 00:07:04,520 Speaker 1: timely and important. Alicia Levine, she wanders by with bn 113 00:07:04,640 --> 00:07:08,720 Speaker 1: Y Melon Wealth Management, had of equities in Capital markets advisory. 114 00:07:08,760 --> 00:07:14,360 Speaker 1: But what she understates is an absolutely prodigious mathematical foundation, 115 00:07:14,760 --> 00:07:18,320 Speaker 1: which is part of her strategy for Alicia, with the 116 00:07:18,360 --> 00:07:22,960 Speaker 1: mathematics of the moment, are their smooth curves and glide 117 00:07:23,000 --> 00:07:29,240 Speaker 1: pass for someone with a three year perspective, So I 118 00:07:29,280 --> 00:07:31,480 Speaker 1: wish it were the case. And after the first half 119 00:07:31,480 --> 00:07:34,880 Speaker 1: of the year, it would be a great thing to have. 120 00:07:35,240 --> 00:07:38,480 Speaker 1: We we just have too many cross currents here. So 121 00:07:38,560 --> 00:07:40,920 Speaker 1: as you've pointed out, the earnings that we got last 122 00:07:41,000 --> 00:07:45,160 Speaker 1: night from large cap tech have largely stabilized and calmed 123 00:07:45,320 --> 00:07:50,240 Speaker 1: markets because of the fear. But I'd say overall in 124 00:07:50,280 --> 00:07:54,920 Speaker 1: the equity market, if we're trading about four thousand here, 125 00:07:54,600 --> 00:07:59,040 Speaker 1: the equity market is already pricing in the FED pivot, 126 00:07:59,880 --> 00:08:04,600 Speaker 1: the bond market is pricing in the FED pivot. The 127 00:08:04,680 --> 00:08:09,200 Speaker 1: earnings estimates are still not reflecting in economic slowdown, so 128 00:08:09,240 --> 00:08:12,960 Speaker 1: those definitely need to come down. And I think the 129 00:08:13,080 --> 00:08:15,400 Speaker 1: thought that the FED is going to pivot on the 130 00:08:15,440 --> 00:08:19,080 Speaker 1: first sign of top line CPI or top line PCE 131 00:08:19,160 --> 00:08:22,880 Speaker 1: going lower because of the commodity price decrease, I think 132 00:08:22,920 --> 00:08:25,360 Speaker 1: that's a little too optimistic. And I think we're working 133 00:08:25,680 --> 00:08:29,239 Speaker 1: with an understanding of a FED from the post global 134 00:08:29,240 --> 00:08:32,839 Speaker 1: financial crisis and QUE and not the Fed of QT, 135 00:08:33,480 --> 00:08:35,959 Speaker 1: and this is a different FED, and I think that 136 00:08:36,080 --> 00:08:40,400 Speaker 1: has been largely um put to the side as a 137 00:08:40,520 --> 00:08:44,360 Speaker 1: left tail risk but not a central scenario risk. Well 138 00:08:44,400 --> 00:08:47,000 Speaker 1: said Alicia, we still got a nine handle on CPI 139 00:08:47,280 --> 00:08:49,080 Speaker 1: and it's it's FED mating and we're talking about a 140 00:08:49,120 --> 00:08:50,920 Speaker 1: fed set up for a pause. We need to think 141 00:08:50,920 --> 00:08:53,120 Speaker 1: about what's been unleashed in this economy, where we're seeing 142 00:08:53,120 --> 00:08:55,480 Speaker 1: weakness and how it spreads. Where we seeing weakness right now, 143 00:08:55,800 --> 00:08:59,440 Speaker 1: it's in housing and housing related industries. Perhaps I've got 144 00:08:59,440 --> 00:09:01,880 Speaker 1: a ton of message you this morning about Sherwin Williams 145 00:09:01,880 --> 00:09:05,240 Speaker 1: Show when Williams the Paintmaker is down by about in 146 00:09:05,280 --> 00:09:07,760 Speaker 1: early trading. This is what they have to say. The 147 00:09:07,800 --> 00:09:10,840 Speaker 1: shortfall in our second quarter results, demand pressures in Europe, 148 00:09:10,920 --> 00:09:13,719 Speaker 1: China and North American d I y, and a continuation 149 00:09:13,720 --> 00:09:17,839 Speaker 1: of the highest cost inflation scene in decades. Alicia, how 150 00:09:17,840 --> 00:09:20,240 Speaker 1: do you think this weakness that we're starting to see 151 00:09:20,320 --> 00:09:23,920 Speaker 1: is going to broaden out across this economy? Look, it's 152 00:09:23,920 --> 00:09:26,640 Speaker 1: it's it's a really great question. What's clear is that 153 00:09:26,720 --> 00:09:29,960 Speaker 1: all those industries and companies that benefited from the stay 154 00:09:29,960 --> 00:09:33,600 Speaker 1: at home bubble are are now deflating. And the question 155 00:09:33,679 --> 00:09:36,040 Speaker 1: is how much does that deflation in the state at 156 00:09:36,040 --> 00:09:39,400 Speaker 1: home sector now pass in to the rest of the 157 00:09:39,440 --> 00:09:42,000 Speaker 1: economy and the rest of the companies. This is what 158 00:09:42,040 --> 00:09:45,360 Speaker 1: we've learned from earning season. The staples companies are doing well. 159 00:09:45,400 --> 00:09:49,120 Speaker 1: They have pricing power, thus inflation will remain higher. For that. 160 00:09:49,480 --> 00:09:52,760 Speaker 1: The transition from goods to services could goods were in 161 00:09:52,800 --> 00:09:56,200 Speaker 1: a bubble is well underway, and if you're associated with 162 00:09:56,240 --> 00:09:59,920 Speaker 1: travel or leisure or restaurants at all, your earnings are 163 00:10:00,000 --> 00:10:03,040 Speaker 1: are fine. Um. The other thing that we noticed on 164 00:10:03,120 --> 00:10:07,199 Speaker 1: the consumer companies is that there's negative linearity in the quarter. 165 00:10:07,640 --> 00:10:10,839 Speaker 1: So April was better than May, which was better than June. 166 00:10:11,280 --> 00:10:14,520 Speaker 1: Something to think about as we move forward into the 167 00:10:14,600 --> 00:10:17,439 Speaker 1: rest of the year as the economy slows. So these 168 00:10:17,440 --> 00:10:19,440 Speaker 1: are just sort of really big picture of things that 169 00:10:19,559 --> 00:10:23,480 Speaker 1: tells you that transition from goods to services at some 170 00:10:23,520 --> 00:10:27,320 Speaker 1: point maybe a bubble. Also, we have these rolling bubbles 171 00:10:27,400 --> 00:10:30,160 Speaker 1: as the economy heals and as we move forward to 172 00:10:30,200 --> 00:10:33,240 Speaker 1: the next stage, and it's happening awfully quickly, as you 173 00:10:33,280 --> 00:10:36,199 Speaker 1: can see in the sexual performance of the SMP. Really 174 00:10:36,200 --> 00:10:40,160 Speaker 1: complicated market, not smooth, but the VIX is at twenty four. 175 00:10:40,280 --> 00:10:42,920 Speaker 1: The VIX isn't so worried. It's the bond market volatility 176 00:10:42,920 --> 00:10:45,480 Speaker 1: that's still there. And I think until the bond market 177 00:10:45,559 --> 00:10:48,920 Speaker 1: volatility subsides, it's very hard to go in you know 178 00:10:49,160 --> 00:10:51,880 Speaker 1: phase first. Well, Alicia to that point just sort of 179 00:10:52,080 --> 00:10:55,160 Speaker 1: underscore it. Do you think that the market reaction, the 180 00:10:55,240 --> 00:10:58,000 Speaker 1: sort of positive feel that we felt last week and 181 00:10:58,400 --> 00:11:01,120 Speaker 1: the better part of this week is incorrect, is an 182 00:11:01,160 --> 00:11:04,880 Speaker 1: inaccurate reading of earnings that aren't quite as positive as 183 00:11:04,920 --> 00:11:08,400 Speaker 1: perhaps they're being taken as So I think that when 184 00:11:08,440 --> 00:11:13,599 Speaker 1: the market reacts to really negative news with a stabilizing 185 00:11:13,640 --> 00:11:16,680 Speaker 1: stock price or perhaps a higher stock price, that's that's 186 00:11:16,679 --> 00:11:18,840 Speaker 1: a positive sign on the technicals, and I do not 187 00:11:18,960 --> 00:11:21,560 Speaker 1: want to ignore that. So we've had companies that that 188 00:11:21,600 --> 00:11:24,959 Speaker 1: have cut guidance by and their stocks are now higher 189 00:11:25,040 --> 00:11:27,120 Speaker 1: by ten percent, and they were than the day they cut. 190 00:11:27,520 --> 00:11:31,119 Speaker 1: That seems to suggest that in some sectors you've already 191 00:11:31,240 --> 00:11:36,120 Speaker 1: had the cut that is necessary to then go forward 192 00:11:36,240 --> 00:11:40,240 Speaker 1: and grow from there. It's not happened everywhere and most 193 00:11:40,280 --> 00:11:43,280 Speaker 1: you know, obviously, it hasn't happened in large cap tech, 194 00:11:43,320 --> 00:11:46,160 Speaker 1: which is what is holding up the market right now. 195 00:11:46,960 --> 00:11:50,240 Speaker 1: And so yeah, alesha I I Atlicia, we got to 196 00:11:50,280 --> 00:11:53,240 Speaker 1: get this in. It's really important. Something Pharaoh doesn't care about. 197 00:11:53,960 --> 00:11:59,360 Speaker 1: Deloitte says, back to school supplies now are six up 198 00:12:01,200 --> 00:12:05,440 Speaker 1: from pre pandemic. What happened. What happened is kids didn't 199 00:12:05,480 --> 00:12:08,120 Speaker 1: go to school for two years. Okay, it's the same 200 00:12:08,120 --> 00:12:11,319 Speaker 1: thing that's happening and travel. People didn't travel for two 201 00:12:11,360 --> 00:12:13,360 Speaker 1: years and children didn't go to school for two years. 202 00:12:13,360 --> 00:12:16,280 Speaker 1: So this is a celebration of life back to normal. 203 00:12:16,640 --> 00:12:19,160 Speaker 1: The question that is where the wallet is going is 204 00:12:19,200 --> 00:12:23,240 Speaker 1: going towards certain services and certain parts of the good sector. 205 00:12:23,520 --> 00:12:26,120 Speaker 1: But you have to ask yourself what happens after that bump. 206 00:12:26,160 --> 00:12:29,160 Speaker 1: What we've seen over and over again is that the 207 00:12:29,280 --> 00:12:32,880 Speaker 1: over earnings in certain sectors does stabilize and go back 208 00:12:32,920 --> 00:12:36,360 Speaker 1: to trend over time. There's been about two point four 209 00:12:36,480 --> 00:12:40,520 Speaker 1: trillion dollars extra and earnings since the pandemic started, and 210 00:12:41,120 --> 00:12:43,320 Speaker 1: we suspect that that has to come down to trend. 211 00:12:43,800 --> 00:12:46,920 Speaker 1: So that's where we are. We we we are marginally 212 00:12:46,920 --> 00:12:49,640 Speaker 1: more positive. We're still we still have a neutral rating 213 00:12:49,640 --> 00:12:52,319 Speaker 1: on equities. We never went underweight on equities because it's 214 00:12:52,320 --> 00:12:55,400 Speaker 1: too hard to time the market. We do think that 215 00:12:55,480 --> 00:12:59,160 Speaker 1: the market is over expecting a FED pivot in the 216 00:12:59,200 --> 00:13:02,760 Speaker 1: near term. I can't see how that happens. Once they 217 00:13:02,800 --> 00:13:05,880 Speaker 1: made the policy error of being too easy for too long, 218 00:13:06,160 --> 00:13:09,760 Speaker 1: the chances of overcorrecting and staying tighter for longer go 219 00:13:09,840 --> 00:13:12,800 Speaker 1: and go higher. And so the market's already rallied ten percent. 220 00:13:12,880 --> 00:13:16,000 Speaker 1: So what are you playing for at this point? Alicia, 221 00:13:16,040 --> 00:13:18,520 Speaker 1: I love you. That's just perfect. The kids come back 222 00:13:18,520 --> 00:13:21,200 Speaker 1: to school, a celebration of life getting back to normal. 223 00:13:21,640 --> 00:13:24,160 Speaker 1: Lesa's facial it up as well, Alicia Vain, I've been 224 00:13:24,200 --> 00:13:31,000 Speaker 1: one manument westh matachment. We're gonna dive into it now 225 00:13:31,040 --> 00:13:32,880 Speaker 1: and start our Fred coverage right now. We do this 226 00:13:32,920 --> 00:13:35,760 Speaker 1: with someone that has led the dialogue. Andrew Holland, Hor's 227 00:13:35,800 --> 00:13:38,760 Speaker 1: chief US economist at City Group, has really been out 228 00:13:38,800 --> 00:13:41,640 Speaker 1: front and saying this fet is behind. Let's go, let's go, 229 00:13:41,800 --> 00:13:45,479 Speaker 1: Let's go. Andrew Claudius sam this Morning and the Financial 230 00:13:45,520 --> 00:13:49,640 Speaker 1: Times with an absolute tourtive force on what she calls 231 00:13:49,640 --> 00:13:52,480 Speaker 1: the Philip cloud. The math is bad. The Phillips curve 232 00:13:52,559 --> 00:13:56,079 Speaker 1: doesn't work. Standard U c l A economics doesn't work. 233 00:13:56,480 --> 00:13:59,640 Speaker 1: Less than one third of monthly core inflation, which excludes 234 00:13:59,679 --> 00:14:02,400 Speaker 1: food and energy, is due to demand. This is all 235 00:14:02,480 --> 00:14:05,960 Speaker 1: supply side. There is no increase in the unemployment rate 236 00:14:06,240 --> 00:14:10,240 Speaker 1: that would produce microchips for new cars and China's lockdowns 237 00:14:10,240 --> 00:14:15,000 Speaker 1: defeat Vladimir Putin, drill oil and build apartments. Andrew helln Horse, 238 00:14:15,160 --> 00:14:19,040 Speaker 1: why do we need to raise the unemployment rate. I 239 00:14:19,080 --> 00:14:21,560 Speaker 1: think it's a very difficult situation for the FED, a 240 00:14:21,640 --> 00:14:24,800 Speaker 1: very difficult situation for the economy here. And you know, 241 00:14:24,840 --> 00:14:27,080 Speaker 1: it may be true that a lot of what has 242 00:14:27,120 --> 00:14:29,840 Speaker 1: gone on with inflation is due to issues on the 243 00:14:29,840 --> 00:14:33,520 Speaker 1: supply side, but it's always supply and demand together, and 244 00:14:33,560 --> 00:14:35,240 Speaker 1: I would say that's the u c l A economics, 245 00:14:35,280 --> 00:14:38,920 Speaker 1: is that those two forces work together, and we have 246 00:14:39,120 --> 00:14:42,560 Speaker 1: demand that is outstripping the supply side. So if you 247 00:14:42,640 --> 00:14:45,920 Speaker 1: can't create more semiconductors, if you can't build more autos, 248 00:14:46,280 --> 00:14:48,800 Speaker 1: the only way to bring down prices or to not 249 00:14:48,880 --> 00:14:52,320 Speaker 1: have prices continue to increase is to damn demand. So 250 00:14:52,560 --> 00:14:54,720 Speaker 1: it's an unfortunate outcome. It's not an outcome I think 251 00:14:54,720 --> 00:14:58,080 Speaker 1: anybody is pleased that we're dealing with now, But that 252 00:14:58,400 --> 00:15:01,120 Speaker 1: is the situation and that and that's standard back of economics. 253 00:15:01,120 --> 00:15:03,920 Speaker 1: So I'm very surprised to see economists coming out and 254 00:15:03,960 --> 00:15:06,200 Speaker 1: saying that there's nothing that the FAT can do. We 255 00:15:06,240 --> 00:15:07,880 Speaker 1: know exactly what the that can do, which is to 256 00:15:07,960 --> 00:15:10,480 Speaker 1: raise interest rates in damp demand if we get to 257 00:15:10,520 --> 00:15:14,640 Speaker 1: ahe Ors four percent or Bloomberg Economics Andrea Wong with 258 00:15:14,720 --> 00:15:19,280 Speaker 1: a stunning essay yesterday migrating up to five cent. What 259 00:15:19,440 --> 00:15:21,920 Speaker 1: does that do to the inflation rate? Does that drive 260 00:15:22,000 --> 00:15:25,480 Speaker 1: us back to John Taylor's two percent? John Taylor's at 261 00:15:25,480 --> 00:15:28,560 Speaker 1: a school Andrew north of Los Angeles. I don't know 262 00:15:28,600 --> 00:15:30,720 Speaker 1: if you're aware of that, But does it get us 263 00:15:30,760 --> 00:15:33,200 Speaker 1: back to a Taylor two percent or does it get 264 00:15:33,280 --> 00:15:36,760 Speaker 1: us halfway back? I'm vaguely aware of that school. I 265 00:15:36,800 --> 00:15:41,600 Speaker 1: have some intended there so but no we But what 266 00:15:41,720 --> 00:15:45,920 Speaker 1: the the issue here is that you get interest rates higher, 267 00:15:46,200 --> 00:15:50,000 Speaker 1: you tighten financial conditions, you slow down the economy, and 268 00:15:50,040 --> 00:15:53,480 Speaker 1: then you see how powerful that Phillips cur relationship is. 269 00:15:53,520 --> 00:15:55,560 Speaker 1: And that's what we really don't have a good sense of. 270 00:15:55,640 --> 00:15:58,440 Speaker 1: So there, I would really agree with the idea that 271 00:15:58,720 --> 00:16:00,840 Speaker 1: Phillips curve does not function the way that it used to. 272 00:16:01,400 --> 00:16:04,200 Speaker 1: We had a very flat Phillips curve at least up 273 00:16:04,280 --> 00:16:08,600 Speaker 1: until the pandemic period. If that Phillips curves proved to 274 00:16:08,720 --> 00:16:11,160 Speaker 1: be relatively flat, it could be hard to bring inflation 275 00:16:11,200 --> 00:16:13,400 Speaker 1: back down to two percent. I'm hoping that it's a 276 00:16:13,440 --> 00:16:15,320 Speaker 1: little bit steeper where we are right now, but that's 277 00:16:15,360 --> 00:16:17,720 Speaker 1: really something we have to find out. John. That's encamp. 278 00:16:17,840 --> 00:16:20,240 Speaker 1: We need this as a video for this afternoon when 279 00:16:20,280 --> 00:16:22,600 Speaker 1: we when we come back, get one of the interns 280 00:16:22,600 --> 00:16:24,560 Speaker 1: on and get the intern from UCLA to make the 281 00:16:24,640 --> 00:16:26,720 Speaker 1: video of what he just said. John, that's the heart 282 00:16:26,720 --> 00:16:28,280 Speaker 1: of the matter. So Andrew, let's get to the heart 283 00:16:28,280 --> 00:16:30,680 Speaker 1: of the matter in this news conference. How is Chairman 284 00:16:30,720 --> 00:16:32,920 Speaker 1: Pound going to navigate some of this stuff? And to 285 00:16:33,080 --> 00:16:34,680 Speaker 1: least this point a little bit earlier in the program, 286 00:16:34,720 --> 00:16:36,520 Speaker 1: we've been asking this question, how do you expect him 287 00:16:36,520 --> 00:16:38,840 Speaker 1: to acknowledge some of the week day to points we've 288 00:16:38,840 --> 00:16:43,000 Speaker 1: already seen it. What a tough job for chair Powell 289 00:16:43,040 --> 00:16:46,520 Speaker 1: this morning or this afternoon. Tomorrow we may get Q 290 00:16:46,680 --> 00:16:49,640 Speaker 1: two GDP that we think it will be slightly positive, 291 00:16:49,640 --> 00:16:51,400 Speaker 1: but it could be negatives. We could have two quarters 292 00:16:51,440 --> 00:16:53,600 Speaker 1: of negative growth. And then on Friday we're gonna get 293 00:16:53,640 --> 00:16:57,680 Speaker 1: the Employment Cost Index, which will probably show very strong 294 00:16:57,720 --> 00:17:01,240 Speaker 1: wage pressure. So you have an inflation situation that at 295 00:17:01,320 --> 00:17:05,040 Speaker 1: least in our view, looks more persistent, looks more problematic 296 00:17:05,320 --> 00:17:08,120 Speaker 1: um and you have growth that's slowing. It goes back 297 00:17:08,119 --> 00:17:09,800 Speaker 1: to what we were talking about initially, and it goes 298 00:17:09,840 --> 00:17:11,840 Speaker 1: back to what your power was talking about the June 299 00:17:11,880 --> 00:17:15,200 Speaker 1: fo MC, which is that it is painful to bring 300 00:17:15,240 --> 00:17:18,879 Speaker 1: inflation down once you have too high inflation. UM. I 301 00:17:19,119 --> 00:17:20,919 Speaker 1: don't think that he's going to completely stick to that 302 00:17:20,960 --> 00:17:23,840 Speaker 1: hawks hawkish message from June, like you were mentioning in 303 00:17:23,880 --> 00:17:27,200 Speaker 1: the market pricing, maybe the peak hawkishness um, in terms 304 00:17:27,240 --> 00:17:29,600 Speaker 1: of perceptions was in June. I think there does need 305 00:17:29,680 --> 00:17:31,720 Speaker 1: to be or there will be some acknowledgement of the 306 00:17:31,760 --> 00:17:33,920 Speaker 1: weaker data that could sound a little bit do wish 307 00:17:34,240 --> 00:17:35,960 Speaker 1: at this meeting, but you know, I would look at 308 00:17:36,000 --> 00:17:38,359 Speaker 1: that more as a do wish detour still on the 309 00:17:38,400 --> 00:17:40,680 Speaker 1: way to a hawkish destination. Well, let's talk about that 310 00:17:40,720 --> 00:17:42,680 Speaker 1: do wish days or do you think that the using 311 00:17:42,720 --> 00:17:45,400 Speaker 1: of financial conditions over the last month or so will 312 00:17:45,440 --> 00:17:50,800 Speaker 1: become problematic? I think that's what the FED is trying 313 00:17:50,840 --> 00:17:53,240 Speaker 1: to figure out. Now. We had a very swift tight 314 00:17:53,320 --> 00:17:57,159 Speaker 1: ending of financial conditions, um. And really it takes months, 315 00:17:57,240 --> 00:17:59,680 Speaker 1: if not quarders for these financial conditions to kind of 316 00:17:59,760 --> 00:18:02,800 Speaker 1: work their way into the economy, slow down demand and 317 00:18:02,840 --> 00:18:05,879 Speaker 1: then eventually affect inflation. So the idea that you're going 318 00:18:06,000 --> 00:18:09,200 Speaker 1: to see financial conditions tighten and in the next monthly 319 00:18:09,240 --> 00:18:12,240 Speaker 1: inflation reports sees some kind of effect, um, I think 320 00:18:12,320 --> 00:18:17,800 Speaker 1: that's really fanciful thinking so if financial conditions have eased 321 00:18:17,800 --> 00:18:20,960 Speaker 1: a little bit now but the titans significantly before, again, 322 00:18:21,080 --> 00:18:22,960 Speaker 1: it's a it's a reason for the FED to maybe 323 00:18:23,320 --> 00:18:26,280 Speaker 1: take a breather at this meeting and not push further 324 00:18:26,440 --> 00:18:28,840 Speaker 1: on in the hawk Is direction. I think eventually they'll 325 00:18:28,880 --> 00:18:30,680 Speaker 1: need to UM, but I don't know that they'll be 326 00:18:30,840 --> 00:18:34,240 Speaker 1: particularly concerned that financial conditions have eased in some ways 327 00:18:34,440 --> 00:18:37,040 Speaker 1: UM since the last meeting Andrew. It's so difficult for 328 00:18:37,119 --> 00:18:38,880 Speaker 1: a FED at a time when no one can predict 329 00:18:38,960 --> 00:18:41,400 Speaker 1: the future and economists are very split on where things 330 00:18:41,440 --> 00:18:44,440 Speaker 1: are going. So perhaps it's more instructive to understand the 331 00:18:44,480 --> 00:18:48,040 Speaker 1: parameters of risk. Which risks the FED views as the 332 00:18:48,119 --> 00:18:51,000 Speaker 1: most likely is the risk of them tightening too quickly 333 00:18:51,119 --> 00:18:55,080 Speaker 1: now and having to cut rates bigger or smaller than 334 00:18:55,240 --> 00:18:58,440 Speaker 1: slowly and steadily raising race. This seems to be underpinning 335 00:18:58,520 --> 00:19:00,560 Speaker 1: a big debate that the more it is weight in 336 00:19:00,680 --> 00:19:03,080 Speaker 1: on basically saying that they're going to cut rates next 337 00:19:03,200 --> 00:19:07,639 Speaker 1: year and it will be net net beneficial for markets. Right, 338 00:19:07,680 --> 00:19:09,240 Speaker 1: So I think that is what markets are starting to 339 00:19:09,320 --> 00:19:11,480 Speaker 1: prices that the FED will have some kind of a pivot, 340 00:19:11,920 --> 00:19:13,920 Speaker 1: And I don't think that we're going to see that 341 00:19:14,000 --> 00:19:15,960 Speaker 1: pivot from this FED. Really we have to hear more 342 00:19:16,000 --> 00:19:19,399 Speaker 1: about the FED reaction function exactly how they plan to 343 00:19:19,440 --> 00:19:22,760 Speaker 1: address too high inflation. If I take Chair Powell seriously, 344 00:19:23,280 --> 00:19:26,000 Speaker 1: the rhetoric at the June f MC was that inflation 345 00:19:26,240 --> 00:19:28,640 Speaker 1: is the number one issue this FED is trying to address, 346 00:19:29,080 --> 00:19:32,119 Speaker 1: and the Powell is willing to do the difficult things 347 00:19:32,720 --> 00:19:36,280 Speaker 1: like a former Chair Volker did to bring inflation down. 348 00:19:36,400 --> 00:19:39,200 Speaker 1: And it really is that commitment to bringing inflation down 349 00:19:39,280 --> 00:19:41,919 Speaker 1: that does bring it down if the market starts pricing, 350 00:19:41,960 --> 00:19:43,879 Speaker 1: and I think it's beginning to that this is a 351 00:19:43,960 --> 00:19:46,960 Speaker 1: FED that's not committed to bringing down inflation, that this 352 00:19:47,119 --> 00:19:49,680 Speaker 1: is a FED that's going to pivot to more dubbish 353 00:19:49,760 --> 00:19:53,320 Speaker 1: policy before you brought inflation down. Um, that's a real 354 00:19:53,400 --> 00:19:54,920 Speaker 1: issue for the FED. So they do need to get 355 00:19:54,920 --> 00:19:56,639 Speaker 1: ahead of that at some point. Do they do that 356 00:19:56,720 --> 00:19:59,119 Speaker 1: at this meeting? Do the wait until Jackson Hole or 357 00:19:59,160 --> 00:20:01,119 Speaker 1: September meeting? I think that that's where the kind of 358 00:20:01,200 --> 00:20:04,159 Speaker 1: tactics come in. But in terms of the longer term strategy, 359 00:20:04,440 --> 00:20:06,840 Speaker 1: there has to be that commitment to fighting inflation. Andrew 360 00:20:06,920 --> 00:20:08,560 Speaker 1: this is hinged on the belief. It seems to be 361 00:20:08,640 --> 00:20:11,440 Speaker 1: the consensus right now in markets that the bigger risk 362 00:20:11,680 --> 00:20:14,520 Speaker 1: is the FED not raising rates quickly enough and allowing 363 00:20:14,560 --> 00:20:18,479 Speaker 1: inflation expectations to become unhinged. Julian Emmanuel Yesterday, I've ever 364 00:20:18,600 --> 00:20:20,560 Speaker 1: corep came out and said it's actually the opposite that 365 00:20:20,720 --> 00:20:22,520 Speaker 1: is the bigger risk. That if the FED raises too 366 00:20:22,600 --> 00:20:24,800 Speaker 1: quickly now and then has to cut next year, that 367 00:20:25,160 --> 00:20:28,360 Speaker 1: is the key that will cause inflation expectations to become unmoored. 368 00:20:28,720 --> 00:20:33,119 Speaker 1: Why do you disagree? So? I I think that the 369 00:20:33,400 --> 00:20:36,800 Speaker 1: risk of the FED is facing is not hiking fast enough. 370 00:20:36,920 --> 00:20:39,600 Speaker 1: If you don't hike fast enough, then you get higher 371 00:20:39,680 --> 00:20:42,879 Speaker 1: inflation that becomes embedded in the economy and it becomes 372 00:20:42,920 --> 00:20:45,119 Speaker 1: that much more difficult to bring it back down, and 373 00:20:45,200 --> 00:20:47,359 Speaker 1: you may need an even higher unemployment rate to bring 374 00:20:47,400 --> 00:20:48,680 Speaker 1: it back down. So if you're a FED who cares 375 00:20:48,680 --> 00:20:52,280 Speaker 1: about inflation or cares about unemployment, the right thing to 376 00:20:52,400 --> 00:20:55,760 Speaker 1: do is to address inflation head on. This is a 377 00:20:55,800 --> 00:20:59,840 Speaker 1: lesson of the nineteen seventies. Seventies. We had various scenarios 378 00:21:00,160 --> 00:21:03,320 Speaker 1: where FED officials thought that the economy had slowed down 379 00:21:03,480 --> 00:21:06,920 Speaker 1: enough they took their foot off of the gas pedal, 380 00:21:07,160 --> 00:21:08,960 Speaker 1: or maybe we would say, the break in terms of 381 00:21:09,040 --> 00:21:11,840 Speaker 1: the economy, and then you saw inflation pick up again 382 00:21:11,880 --> 00:21:13,840 Speaker 1: and become more and more embedded in the economy. So 383 00:21:13,920 --> 00:21:16,720 Speaker 1: that's exactly the scenario that I think this FED is 384 00:21:16,720 --> 00:21:19,359 Speaker 1: trying to avoid. Andrew just quickly, it's just the final 385 00:21:19,440 --> 00:21:23,440 Speaker 1: seventy five basis point hike of this cycle. I don't 386 00:21:23,480 --> 00:21:25,920 Speaker 1: think so. I think we're gonna see strong enough inflation 387 00:21:25,960 --> 00:21:28,120 Speaker 1: between now and September for them to go seventy five 388 00:21:28,160 --> 00:21:31,080 Speaker 1: again in September. Um. You know, if you, if you 389 00:21:31,160 --> 00:21:33,760 Speaker 1: kind of look at where the FED wants to get to, 390 00:21:34,280 --> 00:21:36,800 Speaker 1: I think it's still significantly higher from gear. So another 391 00:21:36,800 --> 00:21:40,040 Speaker 1: seventy five wouldn't surprise me. Interesting. Andrew also to catch 392 00:21:40,119 --> 00:21:48,760 Speaker 1: out buddy Ashy s Andrew Hunting, host of City. This 393 00:21:48,920 --> 00:21:53,080 Speaker 1: is a joy. Regina Mayor is with KPMG. She's global 394 00:21:53,160 --> 00:21:56,080 Speaker 1: out of energy and with a much different view on 395 00:21:56,280 --> 00:21:58,280 Speaker 1: energy than just trying to game out what a barrel 396 00:21:58,280 --> 00:22:00,919 Speaker 1: of oil is gonna be. It's on a large your sphere, 397 00:22:01,040 --> 00:22:04,160 Speaker 1: and Regina, I want to go to the Pacific rim. 398 00:22:04,359 --> 00:22:07,280 Speaker 1: You had the joy of of working at the Pentagon 399 00:22:07,640 --> 00:22:09,960 Speaker 1: with the Supreme Allied Command of NATO and all the 400 00:22:10,000 --> 00:22:13,640 Speaker 1: rest of it as well. So let's go global Pacific RIM. 401 00:22:14,240 --> 00:22:18,000 Speaker 1: You're in the camp that Pacific RIM demand is one 402 00:22:18,040 --> 00:22:22,720 Speaker 1: of the definitive variables here, isn't it. Yes, absolutely, Asian 403 00:22:22,760 --> 00:22:24,880 Speaker 1: demand is going to continue to grow, and you're seeing 404 00:22:24,920 --> 00:22:29,000 Speaker 1: that driving a short term l G spot prices because 405 00:22:29,119 --> 00:22:31,720 Speaker 1: Asia is worried that Europe might hoard gas in the 406 00:22:31,800 --> 00:22:34,560 Speaker 1: meantime because we're really worried about a cold winter and 407 00:22:34,600 --> 00:22:37,560 Speaker 1: what Russia is doing to the European content. Help me 408 00:22:37,640 --> 00:22:40,640 Speaker 1: with the X axis here. I'm at a KPMG seminar 409 00:22:41,119 --> 00:22:43,120 Speaker 1: and I'm the wise guy going on, you can't give 410 00:22:43,160 --> 00:22:45,160 Speaker 1: me the direction. You've got to give me a timeline. 411 00:22:45,440 --> 00:22:48,520 Speaker 1: Help me here with the X axis of an Asian 412 00:22:48,600 --> 00:22:53,760 Speaker 1: demand ex COVID clicks in. Is it immediate? Is it 413 00:22:53,880 --> 00:22:58,200 Speaker 1: a quarter out? Is it three years out? I think it. 414 00:22:58,400 --> 00:23:00,520 Speaker 1: I actually don't think it's that for out. I think 415 00:23:00,560 --> 00:23:05,400 Speaker 1: it's coming in the latter part of calendar year. Which 416 00:23:05,480 --> 00:23:08,119 Speaker 1: is why I think the temporary pullback in crude and 417 00:23:08,200 --> 00:23:11,520 Speaker 1: gas prices or or crude to all prices is a 418 00:23:11,680 --> 00:23:16,080 Speaker 1: temporary rebrief because the basic supply and demand fundamentals haven't 419 00:23:16,160 --> 00:23:20,439 Speaker 1: changed and OPEC is producing under capacity. Three million barrels 420 00:23:20,480 --> 00:23:23,159 Speaker 1: per day, and we're about to see demand continue to 421 00:23:23,240 --> 00:23:26,919 Speaker 1: go up. So I'm calling triple digits through the end 422 00:23:26,960 --> 00:23:30,560 Speaker 1: of the calendar here, and Regina, let's paint this picture 423 00:23:30,560 --> 00:23:33,120 Speaker 1: a little bit more, because it's pretty striking that you're 424 00:23:33,119 --> 00:23:36,200 Speaker 1: saying that Chinese demand is going to come back online 425 00:23:36,320 --> 00:23:38,280 Speaker 1: ex COVID by the end of the year, at the 426 00:23:38,359 --> 00:23:41,520 Speaker 1: same time that Europe could be facing a cold winter 427 00:23:41,880 --> 00:23:46,080 Speaker 1: with Nordstream one potentially curtailed or cut off completely based 428 00:23:46,119 --> 00:23:49,320 Speaker 1: on the recent actions of Russia. How much do these 429 00:23:49,359 --> 00:23:53,000 Speaker 1: two stories feed together. Does the demand for fossil fuels 430 00:23:53,080 --> 00:23:56,679 Speaker 1: crude replacing some of the natural gas take over an 431 00:23:56,760 --> 00:23:59,520 Speaker 1: and the demand that causes prices to rise heading into 432 00:23:59,520 --> 00:24:03,240 Speaker 1: the year, why, I think that's definitely the story that 433 00:24:03,320 --> 00:24:06,840 Speaker 1: we're trying to balance. He says. We have extremely rising 434 00:24:06,920 --> 00:24:10,400 Speaker 1: demand or actually back to pre pandemic demand levels without 435 00:24:10,560 --> 00:24:15,280 Speaker 1: China fully entering the global mobility process, and we continue 436 00:24:15,320 --> 00:24:17,720 Speaker 1: to have restricted supply, and as I've talked to you 437 00:24:17,760 --> 00:24:20,719 Speaker 1: all before, we can't turn on a sigot right there 438 00:24:20,800 --> 00:24:23,119 Speaker 1: is no global spigot. And I do think we're finally 439 00:24:23,200 --> 00:24:26,679 Speaker 1: realizing and it's coming true in terms of what we're 440 00:24:26,720 --> 00:24:29,159 Speaker 1: seeing in the market that opec plus does not have 441 00:24:29,640 --> 00:24:32,880 Speaker 1: the extensive spare capacity that we had hoped they might 442 00:24:32,960 --> 00:24:35,400 Speaker 1: have that would help us get through this, which goes back, 443 00:24:37,280 --> 00:24:39,640 Speaker 1: which goes back to demand destruction. And have we learned 444 00:24:39,640 --> 00:24:42,320 Speaker 1: any lessons from the previous a couple of months in 445 00:24:42,480 --> 00:24:45,400 Speaker 1: terms of the price point that really causes that demand 446 00:24:45,440 --> 00:24:48,159 Speaker 1: destruction that so many people are looking for. I was 447 00:24:48,240 --> 00:24:50,119 Speaker 1: exactly just going to go to that point because we 448 00:24:50,240 --> 00:24:52,240 Speaker 1: are at the price point where we should have seen 449 00:24:52,320 --> 00:24:55,280 Speaker 1: demand instruction, but because we have so much pent up 450 00:24:55,359 --> 00:24:59,639 Speaker 1: demand from a pre COVID perspective. During COVID, we haven't 451 00:24:59,680 --> 00:25:02,760 Speaker 1: seen people stopped driving, stop flying. Now there are some 452 00:25:02,880 --> 00:25:05,439 Speaker 1: ecommists that say a lot of those tickets were purchased 453 00:25:05,480 --> 00:25:08,080 Speaker 1: three to six months ago, so we might actually see 454 00:25:08,119 --> 00:25:12,000 Speaker 1: the dip in demand that could coincide with Chinese demand 455 00:25:12,080 --> 00:25:14,240 Speaker 1: coming back into the marketplace, which may give us a 456 00:25:14,280 --> 00:25:16,399 Speaker 1: bit of a reprieve that could help us as we 457 00:25:16,480 --> 00:25:18,640 Speaker 1: go into the winter months. But right now I'm really 458 00:25:18,720 --> 00:25:21,240 Speaker 1: worried about it when a cold winter in both Europe 459 00:25:21,280 --> 00:25:24,080 Speaker 1: and the United States. Reginia, you're in Melbourne, Australia, which 460 00:25:24,119 --> 00:25:26,320 Speaker 1: I believe is distant from Perth, and I look at 461 00:25:26,359 --> 00:25:30,480 Speaker 1: the gas prices of Perth versus Melbourne, Australia, and the 462 00:25:30,560 --> 00:25:34,120 Speaker 1: bottom line is this is a large it's expensive. It's 463 00:25:34,160 --> 00:25:38,560 Speaker 1: like eight dollars nine dollars a gallon for gas. How 464 00:25:38,720 --> 00:25:42,239 Speaker 1: is Australia dealing with that? Yeah, I mean I think 465 00:25:42,280 --> 00:25:44,479 Speaker 1: they were calculating that it was maybe closer to ten, 466 00:25:44,520 --> 00:25:46,879 Speaker 1: because I was talking about how in the US we 467 00:25:47,000 --> 00:25:51,000 Speaker 1: had we had hit record highs of five dollars per 468 00:25:51,080 --> 00:25:53,639 Speaker 1: gap per gallon of gasoline, and they were saying that 469 00:25:53,680 --> 00:25:57,440 Speaker 1: would be equivalent to US at ten. It's um, they're 470 00:25:57,480 --> 00:25:59,680 Speaker 1: not even feeling the bite here. I mean, I think 471 00:25:59,800 --> 00:26:04,879 Speaker 1: we're dealing with wealthier countries that have insatiable energy appetites, 472 00:26:04,960 --> 00:26:07,760 Speaker 1: and they're able to move around the country and take 473 00:26:07,800 --> 00:26:11,560 Speaker 1: advantage of of what their relative prosperity brings and their 474 00:26:11,960 --> 00:26:16,480 Speaker 1: relative access to natural resources. So I'm down here proselytizing 475 00:26:16,680 --> 00:26:19,600 Speaker 1: that the world needs more oil and gas in the 476 00:26:19,680 --> 00:26:23,400 Speaker 1: short term while we continue to try to drive decarbonization 477 00:26:23,520 --> 00:26:27,040 Speaker 1: for the planet. We can achieve both objectives, but let's 478 00:26:27,240 --> 00:26:30,640 Speaker 1: not starve the planet of the resources that we need 479 00:26:31,080 --> 00:26:34,840 Speaker 1: for societal benefit. Machine A. Manne Thank you KPMG. This 480 00:26:35,000 --> 00:26:38,760 Speaker 1: is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Thanks for listening. Join us 481 00:26:38,880 --> 00:26:42,600 Speaker 1: live weekdays from seven to ten am Eastern on Bloomberg 482 00:26:42,720 --> 00:26:46,520 Speaker 1: Radio and on Bloomberg Television each day from six to 483 00:26:46,680 --> 00:26:51,280 Speaker 1: nine am for insight from the best in economics, finance, investment, 484 00:26:51,480 --> 00:26:56,440 Speaker 1: and international relations. And subscribe to the Surveillance podcast on 485 00:26:56,560 --> 00:27:00,399 Speaker 1: Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot com, and of course on 486 00:27:00,520 --> 00:27:04,520 Speaker 1: the terminal. I'm Tom keene In. This is Bloomer