WEBVTT - Iran Ceasefire Deal Spurs Global Relief Rally

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:21.240
<v Speaker 1>on Apple car Play or Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 2>John Stolfus APCO, We're thrilled that he could join us today.

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 2>What are you writing this morning? I mean, my head

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:37.159
<v Speaker 2>is spinning over the last forty eight hours. Just give

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:41.519
<v Speaker 2>us a summary of the Stolfus. It's cast in stone,

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 2>it's in granite out. What are you writing this morning?

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, actually we're not writing yet because I'm sitting here.

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 3>But I can tell you what we have done this

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 3>year thus far is we have not made any changes

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 3>on our outlook for the year. We continue with an

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 3>eighty one hundred target for the S and P five hundred.

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 3>Our favorite sectors continue to be information technology, communications services,

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:13.320
<v Speaker 3>consumer discretionary industrials, and financials, all of which have been

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 3>hurt over the period of the year since the market

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 3>hit the top I think it was in January twenty seventh,

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 3>and we think that we're going to get back to

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:27.960
<v Speaker 3>business here. That said, we have to say that you know.

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:31.119
<v Speaker 3>This is we've been at many different points in the

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 3>history of this country since we boomers have been around,

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:37.960
<v Speaker 3>when it looks like pieces in the Middle East and

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 3>that it doesn't actually come to fruition or it is

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:44.960
<v Speaker 3>very tentative. I think the markets remain sensitive to the

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 3>news flow on a day to day basis, but overall,

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 3>I think this today, what we know, at least for

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 3>today is certainly calls justifies a rally, but we think,

0:01:56.680 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's like John McLaughlin the guitar and his

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 3>acoustic album once set a thousand years ago. My goal

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 3>is beyond.

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 2>Our goal is.

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 3>Beyond as intermediate to longer term investors. So that's why

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:13.240
<v Speaker 3>with all that occurred, we keep looking ahead and we

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 3>have to think that this situation in the Middle East

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 3>is so extraordinary that it had to be dealt with

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 3>in some fashion, and the fact that there's a different

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:28.080
<v Speaker 3>play in terms of the allies. If you consider Saudi Arabia, Arabia,

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 3>the UAE, of a variety of very major players in

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 3>the Middle East that are on our side here and

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 3>have been attacked by around this is a very different situation.

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 3>They always say, be careful when you say this time

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 3>is different, but I think in so many ways, the

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 3>way we were is no longer the way we are today.

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 4>Believe it or not, we're going to get back to

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 4>some fundamentals next week, whether we like it or not.

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 4>Earnings are going to start here again. What are your expectations?

0:02:57.639 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 4>What do you think we're going to hear from companies?

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 4>Is they try to navigate this uncertainty. They've kind of

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 4>navigated terrorists. That was the last year's story. Now it

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 4>seems like war is going to be this year's story.

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:10.640
<v Speaker 3>I think it will, and I think in many cases,

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 3>what we'll likely see is how technology and the experience

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:19.800
<v Speaker 3>of solid managements being able to have over the last

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 3>eighteen years, gotten over the financial crisis, COVID, the variety

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 3>of intensity and supply chain disruptions. I think we'll actually

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 3>hear some very positive things from many companies. The initial

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 3>I think only seventeen companies are reported thus far, But

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 3>if you look at the EA page, it's a little wild.

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the growth looks so good in some areas

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 3>and others it doesn't, but overall it's.

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Very good so far.

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 3>I think we'll get plenty of positive surprises. I do think.

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 3>You know, we've always got to remember, just like with

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 3>the non farm payroll number, the one prior to this

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 3>one was a negative one. There's all is volatility. It'll

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 3>be a mixed bag, but I think overall it'll be positive.

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 3>I think we continue with good growth.

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Have you ever seen in your arched career, Glen back

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 2>to Les Paul, have you ever seen a decline in

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 2>multiple like we've enjoyed in Microsoft?

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 3>You know, not that I can think of off of

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 3>the top of my head, because I wasn't prepared to

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 3>answer this question without taking a look at the multiple

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 3>going back over the years.

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Let's go prominent.

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 3>Company, whatever done twenty one, I would have to say,

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 3>I don't think so. It is extraordinary. And what I

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 3>find that in many ways today, and it might have

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 3>to do with social media, is the large s that

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 3>is given to all kinds of negativity and projections on

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 3>companies and what has what has hit that company? For example,

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 3>when when you think about how powerful their position is

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:56.840
<v Speaker 3>and being deeply embedded in the lives of both business

0:04:56.960 --> 0:05:00.599
<v Speaker 3>and the consumers and their financial standing. The idea that

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:03.840
<v Speaker 3>companies that are investing large sums of money in AI

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:08.239
<v Speaker 3>have to be profitable on those investments immediate. It gives

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 3>me the question of where were they? When were these

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 3>people born? I mean, profitability usually takes time to come around.

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:17.479
<v Speaker 2>John stulf is with us and we will continue a

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:21.359
<v Speaker 2>headline we have anticipated. I'm sure the Secretary of Defense

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 2>is anticipated as well. This from Iran state television. First

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 2>ship passed through Harmez since cease fire. We'll see what

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:33.919
<v Speaker 2>that does to the market. We haven't really seen that

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 2>tone yet. We need confirmation of that, of course, but

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 2>there it is a tentative lift to the market here

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 2>at futures up one hundred and seventy eight points down,

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 2>features up one thousand, two hundred and sixty six points

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 2>two point seven percent. Good morning across America. We continue

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Paul Sweeney with John Stolphus of OpCo.

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 4>John, what'll be doing in the bond market here these days?

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 4>I mean people are clipping some nice coupons just in

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 4>the treasury market. Do they need to take credit risk here?

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Do you think? You know?

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 3>I have to think when it comes to the bond market,

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:12.839
<v Speaker 3>the bond market, within the community, within the bond market,

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 3>the trades there tends to be an obsession with keeping

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:19.920
<v Speaker 3>durations shorter rather than longer, and that seems to us

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 3>to be the right thing. With stickier than expected inflation,

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 3>plus the exasperation that people are feeling related to higher

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 3>oil prices, that are likely to take longer to work

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:33.040
<v Speaker 3>out of the system than one would like to see,

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 3>but at the same time probably getting resolved sooner than

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 3>the skeptics and the most parish would expect to be.

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:43.679
<v Speaker 3>But we'd have to think, you know, when it comes

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 3>to fixed income, our take is we are overweight equities

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 3>in our position in the portfolios, but with fixed income,

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 3>we see it as a great diversifier and means to

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:58.719
<v Speaker 3>get current income other than simply dividends, and you just

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 3>have to watch your duration. Is the quality the opportunity

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 3>and tax frees still look very attractive? Does in high

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 3>tax vicinities?

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 4>How about the It doesn't look like the Fed's going

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 4>to give us any help this year. I mean, I'm

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 4>just looking at the Bloomberg terminal and the warp function.

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 4>They've at market priced taken away and maybe any any

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 4>rate cuts this year. Can a market still work in

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 4>that kind of environment?

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 3>I think so based on what we've come to see.

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we've we've been living now for two years

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 3>in succession with just three cuts after what eleven hikes

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 3>and fourteen pauses at the higher end of that. And

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 3>the economy has shown remarkable resilience. Job growth has shown

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 3>remarkable resilience, even though it's slowing somewhat it could be expected,

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 3>but that we think that the operative word remains resilience here.

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 3>Don't look for robust things, but look for resilience is key.

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 2>What are you hearing from upgo? Your research has been

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 2>so sophisticated over the decades. There's almost a calmness there.

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Are they calm or is there some sweat going up? Well,

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm flattered what you just said. Thank you. Stay with us.

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 2>More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Apple Karplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:38.320
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Golder Mountavali is our definitive reporter on her Persia, her around,

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 2>and we're thrilled that she could join us from Queen

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 2>Victoria Street this morning. Golnar, there is Revolution Square, there

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 2>is Freedom Square, there are roads where there are protests

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 2>hiding from security, there are protests often from the rooftop.

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 2>What can you guess is the mood in your Tehran?

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 5>From what I'm hearing from people, there's I think, a

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 5>real mood of relief. I think a lot of Iranians,

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:19.959
<v Speaker 5>particularly those in the urban centers like Tehran, like Sfahan,

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:24.719
<v Speaker 5>cities like Tabres, that were seeing a lot of bombardment

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 5>from US and Israeli air strikes. I think from what

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:32.840
<v Speaker 5>I heard, particularly towards the end of this period, right

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 5>now that we have coming off of this tentative ceasefire

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 5>is exhaustion. I think even if there was a sense

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 5>in the beginning that people, some people, all large numbers

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:48.679
<v Speaker 5>of the youth, welcome the air strikes because they are

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:51.839
<v Speaker 5>exhausted with the regime and they really want a change

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 5>in the leadership, I think the extent and the breadth

0:09:57.000 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 5>and the scale of the bombings caused a kind of

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 5>a change in attitude amongst many. And while I think

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 5>that opposition fundamentally to the theocratic system still holds, I

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 5>think people just don't want or they don't want to

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 5>be attacked again like this ever again. And I think

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 5>while there's a sense of relief, I think there's going

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:24.560
<v Speaker 5>to be a lot of realization of the damage that's

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 5>taken place and what they now have to do to

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 5>repair and recover emotionally as well as economically, which is

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 5>going to be difficult for Iran obviously because it's so

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 5>heavily sanctioned.

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Goner. We have a widely read morning note from Mike

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 2>Allen at Axios. This is Neil Rothschild folks this morning

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 2>in Axios, and the key data point that they report

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 2>on Gonor Montevali is that the Supreme leader, we believe

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 2>injured out of the picture, clearly had instructed the negotiators

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:56.680
<v Speaker 2>for the first time since the war began to move

0:10:56.720 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 2>toward a deal. With your reporting and context, would you

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 2>suggest that the architecture of traditional leadership is still in place.

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 5>That's a very interesting question. I think the scaffolding is

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:17.679
<v Speaker 5>still there. But I think what has happened with the

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:24.440
<v Speaker 5>killing of the previous Supreme leader, Ali Harmenee, and with

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 5>the fact that his son has succeeded under extremely difficult

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 5>circumstances during war, it's kind of put the country generally

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:40.559
<v Speaker 5>in a force majeure situation over the past six weeks

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:44.679
<v Speaker 5>and the leadership structure that has had to change in

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:49.560
<v Speaker 5>response to an extraordinary set of events. We've seen a

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 5>kind of this so called mosaic structure of leadership where

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 5>personalities like Ali bath have become very important and very powerful. Earlier,

0:11:57.440 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 5>before he was killed, Ali Larajani was very influential. I

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 5>think we might see elements of this stay because moj

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 5>Taber Harmonae, the current Supreme Leader, he hasn't been seen,

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 5>he hasn't been heard, and already there is a sense

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 5>that the office of the Supreme Leader itself is not

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:21.840
<v Speaker 5>the same type of office and doesn't have the same

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 5>level of authority perhaps that it did while Harmonae the

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 5>Elder was still alive. So that points to possibly in

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 5>the future, fundamental changes in the way that the regime

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 5>itself is structured in terms of its leadership. But not

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 5>on the question of whether the regime is going to

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 5>remain in place, I think it's going to stay where

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 5>it is. I think it's going to stay firm. That

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 5>there may be an internal evolution as a result of

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 5>this war.

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 4>Conard, given that uncertainty as to perhaps the leadership structure,

0:12:57.280 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 4>how far do you think the Iranians can go in

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 4>terms of negotiating peace with the US? Can they can

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 4>they meet the US demands? How much leverage do you

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 4>believe that they have given maybe some of the uncertainty

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 4>in their government.

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 5>I think right now, the feeling, or at least the

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 5>impression that the hardline leadership in terror wants to give

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:28.199
<v Speaker 5>to the Iranian population, to its own loyal base of supporters,

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 5>and to the world more broadly, is that they're on

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 5>the front foot, that they're the party in the war

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 5>that has managed to get concessions out of Trump in

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:44.079
<v Speaker 5>the way that this ceasefire or was agree to. Whether

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 5>that's true or not tactically strategically is a separate question,

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 5>but I think on the ground they feel emboldened by

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 5>what has happened because they have managed to extract significant

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 5>major shifts, especially in terms of how the strator formals

0:13:59.120 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 5>is managed.

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 2>Gonner One final question here, and this goes to the

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 2>heritage of Matthew Winkler, the founder of Bloomberg News, and

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 2>John Minchleswade, our editor in chief. We try to stay

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 2>out of the debate, and Paul and I folks are

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 2>killing ourselves trying not to insert our thoughts at this

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 2>historic moment for America, for Israel, for Iran Goner, I'm

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 2>absolutely flabbergasted by the lack of coverage of Israel in

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 2>the last forty eight hours. How is Israel perceived, not

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 2>by the theocracy, not by the military, how is Israel

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 2>perceived by the people of Persia.

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 5>That's a complicated question. As you know, Historically there was

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 5>a relationship between Iran when it was under the Shah,

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 5>when it was under the monarchy, and Israel. At the

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 5>same time, I think I think the Shah also criticized

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 5>Israel quite heavily for its policy towards the Palestinians, and

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 5>I think he was unofficially not happy with the way

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 5>that Israel conducted itself, particularly in the nineteen seventies following

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 5>those wars. The examp Republic we know, has almost its

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 5>foreign policy has been completely defined by a strong hostility

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 5>towards the very existence of Israel, and a lot of

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 5>that has been based on also the fact that Israel

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 5>occupied Lebanon and that Iran helped fund and established and

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 5>train Hezbolah in the very early nineteen eighties. But that's

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 5>very much the political perception of the establishment in the

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 5>Islamp Republic. I don't think ordinary Iranians feel that way.

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 5>I think many many ordinary Iranians would like to see

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 5>not just a normalized relationship with the whole region, but

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 5>they want to see themselves. They want the world to

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 5>see their country as a normal country in quotes whatever

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 5>that may or or may not mean. But I do

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 5>think that I think this war, Before this war, I

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 5>think there may have been a sentiment, particularly amongst younger

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 5>educated Iranians who maybe have more experience traveling overseas, of

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 5>friendship or just a sense of neutrality and openness towards Israel.

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 5>But I don't know with this bombardment, with the past

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 5>six weeks, with the extent of the air strikes and

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 5>the types of targets that have been hit, I don't

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 5>know whether that has changed, whether it has gone backwards again.

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 5>I think that's something that's too early for us.

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 2>Generous with your time here on an historic day for Iran.

0:16:56.920 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Glenor Montevali reporting from Queen Victorious read in London. Stay

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 2>with us. More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch US live

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:27.400
<v Speaker 1>watch US live on YouTube.

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 4>Max Kattner joins US chief Multi asset Strategists at HSBC. Max, again,

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 4>here's just another day of the twists and terms of

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 4>geopolitics inserting itself in financial markets. Here, give us just

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:44.239
<v Speaker 4>a sense of some of the conversations you've had with

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 4>your institutional clients around the world over the last six weeks.

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, there's the big question. Those nations that we had really,

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:55.159
<v Speaker 6>i would say in the last week week and a half,

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 6>and that is when you really realized that not only sentiment,

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 6>not only what people would telling you, but the actual

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 6>positioning was getting much, much, much lighter. So in terms

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 6>of our positioning framework, where we track around twenty five

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:12.880
<v Speaker 6>different indicators, short term indicators across systematic and discretionary positioning

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 6>as well, that has now become as light as it's

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:20.440
<v Speaker 6>last been around Deliberation Day SAGA last year. And that

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 6>of course is then allowing these s reps that we're

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 6>seeing this morning.

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:27.159
<v Speaker 4>So Max, I guess one of the questions for a

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:30.399
<v Speaker 4>lot of folks, is just what is safety are? What

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 4>are safe havens here? How do you think about it

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:34.639
<v Speaker 4>in these times?

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 5>Here?

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:39.200
<v Speaker 6>I think the US dollar overall, right, the green bag

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 6>has really demonstrated that, even though that was coming from

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 6>the US and even though you could argue, well, does

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 6>it maybe call into question the institutional credibility of the dollar?

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:50.360
<v Speaker 2>You could have.

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:54.360
<v Speaker 6>Made that case maybe, yeah, But even there then actually

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 6>the US dollar really really worked the best as pretty

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:01.360
<v Speaker 6>much the only safe haven there was in an environment

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 6>where it's pretty much liquidation across the asset classes, which

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 6>we have seen in four to five days in March,

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 6>where gold sold off, where treasure is sold off, where

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 6>equities sold off, credit em everything except for the US dollars.

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:17.880
<v Speaker 6>So the US dollar as as a safe haven still

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:18.680
<v Speaker 6>reigned supreme.

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, Max heritage here of the Hong Kong and

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 2>Shanghai Bank is a research combine. You know. I can't

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 2>say enough Paul about this of Ben Ladler years ago

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 2>and David Bloom in Mexican or and all the rest

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 2>of them. You guys nail global correlation like no one.

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:39.439
<v Speaker 2>Are the markets correlated now? Are they vibrating in a

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:40.639
<v Speaker 2>constructive way?

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 6>I would say well, today they are in a constructive way.

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:47.879
<v Speaker 6>I think today is the kind of day where no

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:51.679
<v Speaker 6>one will complain about positive correlations. If you own rates,

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:54.360
<v Speaker 6>if you own em if you own equities, if you

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:57.680
<v Speaker 6>you know your own gold, even everything goes up. Now

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 6>that of course can go the other way, like we've

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 6>seen in the last six weeks, and that is the really,

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 6>really tricky thing. So I think in terms of correlations,

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 6>it is as you've said, when you are pressing in

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:14.120
<v Speaker 6>a higher likelihood of stagflation. Stagflation is the poisonous pill

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 6>for financial markets because there is nothing where you can

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 6>really hide out except for cash in the green back,

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:24.680
<v Speaker 6>in US dollar, but everything else, from gold, from precious

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 6>metals to equities, to credit to em everything sells off

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 6>in light of rates selling off, in light of rates

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:36.920
<v Speaker 6>volatility going higher, and that really spreading pain across the

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 6>asset classes. So in that light, correlations still are unfavorably

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 6>and uncomfortably positive.

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 5>Max.

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:48.240
<v Speaker 4>How about geographic here we had seen in twenty twenty

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:52.160
<v Speaker 4>five certainly pretty much all boats lifting with the type,

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:55.439
<v Speaker 4>but particularly markets outside of the US doing even better.

0:20:56.760 --> 0:20:59.640
<v Speaker 4>How do you think about maybe the US versus rest

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 4>of the world, world.

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 6>Here still very much preferring the rest of the world

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 6>right now, tactically, I think I want to be buying

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 6>most Europe and Asia. I really want to, you know,

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:10.680
<v Speaker 6>start to pay what we've seen in the last five

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 6>six weeks that you want to buy into Japan. Think

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 6>about how often have you guys talked in the last

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 6>six weeks about the fiscal story in Japan, about the

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 6>aftermath of the Japanese election, Like not not that I'm

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 6>going to put words in your mouth, but I guess

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 6>the answer is not at all. How often have you

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 6>talked about, you know, the really really strong earnings growth

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 6>story earning career career's got one hundred and seventy percent

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:37.680
<v Speaker 6>twelve month forward earnings growth. Right we're talking about valuations

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 6>of a twelve month formerd P below nine. Those things

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 6>have completely been forgotten.

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 2>This is this a bullish max retur I think it is.

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Explain Europe, Explain Europe, Max ken Her.

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:54.399
<v Speaker 6>I mean, Tom, I would say I wouldn't characterize myself

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:56.640
<v Speaker 6>as bullish. We've we've shifted about three and a half weeks,

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 6>we've shifted to maximum bullish and equities, so I cannot

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 6>be more bullish than I am right now there is

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 6>I can't even write by the dip anymore because I

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 6>don't have capital left. I'm as bullish as it can

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 6>get now. In Europe, look look what we are saying today.

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 6>We are seeing guilts rally. We are seeing front end

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:17.120
<v Speaker 6>guilts rally, the most front end European government bonds ECP

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 6>pricing really really reversing lower. That s deepens the curtain.

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 6>What does that help them? Helps the European banks, whether

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:29.120
<v Speaker 6>it's UK banks or Eurozone banks. The story around europe infrastructure, stimulus,

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 6>capital goods, defend spinning. None of those stories are going away.

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:35.400
<v Speaker 6>So it's the banks, it's the industrials. Really, those two

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 6>things that in Europe have been so forgotten I think

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 6>in the last month and attending like it doesn't exist. Next,

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 6>I think that's the stuff you want to buy again.

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:46.439
<v Speaker 2>Next sounds like Dick Van Dyke and David Tomlinson and

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Mary Poppins railways to India. Right next? Kenner never change.

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:57.159
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much. He is with HSBC. Stay with

0:22:57.240 --> 0:23:00.879
<v Speaker 2>us More from Bloomberg's Surveillance coming up after this.

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us Live

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern. Listen on

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:20.640
<v Speaker 1>watch us live on YouTube.

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 2>If Daniel Di Martino Booth joins us right now with

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 2>wonderful and not skeptical, but gently like, what's the BS

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 2>factor on our FED policy? Daniel Di Martino Booth is

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:38.640
<v Speaker 2>chief strategist QI Research. I got to do an audible

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:42.160
<v Speaker 2>to private credit as we heard that headline. Mister Diamond

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 2>wrote about it this Annuel letter in the Daniel Di

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:48.439
<v Speaker 2>Martino Booth Annual Letter. How big a mess is private credit?

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:50.120
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think we're learning it.

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 8>It's a pretty darn big mess because it's got tentacles.

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 8>And if you don't understand the conduit of non depository

0:23:57.320 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 8>financial institution loans, which goes straight back into the conventional

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:05.640
<v Speaker 8>banking system. It's the conventional banks that are making loans

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:08.120
<v Speaker 8>to the non banks, then you don't have a full

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 8>grasp of the situation. And then on top of that,

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 8>you can weave insurres into this whole private credit mess.

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 8>And these headlines are coming a mile a minute. If

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 8>I pull up my Bloomberg on my phone. The first

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:22.159
<v Speaker 8>thing that he knows I'm going to search for is

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 8>private credit news.

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 4>So from your mind, is it systemic?

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:27.120
<v Speaker 5>This risk?

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Here?

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:28.959
<v Speaker 4>Are they cockroaches?

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:31.920
<v Speaker 8>I think that there is a risk that it could

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:34.879
<v Speaker 8>be systemic because there is blowback into the banks. We

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:39.440
<v Speaker 8>do know that there's been multiple pledging of the same collateral.

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 8>Remember they started back with our Kagos, but we saw

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:44.199
<v Speaker 8>it with first Brands, we saw it with MFS, we

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:45.679
<v Speaker 8>saw it with Tricolor.

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 7>And that is you have to stop and say, wait

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 7>a minute.

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 8>If one investment banker had a light bulb go off

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 8>over his or her head, was that across the street?

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 7>Was there a lot of multiple pledging of collateral?

0:24:57.480 --> 0:24:59.679
<v Speaker 2>Paul, let me interrupt and say standard and pour five

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 2>hundred Future's legout new strength up one hundred and eighty

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:04.440
<v Speaker 2>nine points.

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:07.399
<v Speaker 4>I look at the WRP function on the Bloomberg Tournament,

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 4>Danielle I failed a reserve, I mean completely hands sitting

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 4>on their hands. Is that what they should be doing

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 4>here for the rest of the year.

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:18.400
<v Speaker 8>It is what they want to do for the rest

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 8>of the year, certainly until the good Senator till Us

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:27.200
<v Speaker 8>allow the pathway forward for Kevin Walsh. And I think

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:29.160
<v Speaker 8>that there's there's a chance that they can look they've

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 8>got a new We know that gas prices go up

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:36.920
<v Speaker 8>very quickly and that they're very sticky on the way down,

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 8>and so even though it's going to be a supply shock,

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:43.400
<v Speaker 8>so to speak, you could have kind of this entrenched

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:46.640
<v Speaker 8>mindset that FED officials can allude to. And by the way,

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:48.639
<v Speaker 8>if they want to reinvent the wheel today with the

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 8>minutes and say that some people were contemplating hiking rates,

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:54.919
<v Speaker 8>that's what we got the last time we were on

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 8>a Wednesday FED minutes was a big surprised.

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:00.199
<v Speaker 2>When we weren't distracted. Daniel. What I want to to

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 2>talk to you about is in the zeitgeist, and I think, folks,

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:05.719
<v Speaker 2>you'll see a lot of this into the weekend reading

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:12.240
<v Speaker 2>if we have OMG high inflation, if problems solved, we

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:16.920
<v Speaker 2>swing to one of two things, a disinflation, a lesser inflation,

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 2>or outright that fear of deflation.

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 4>Which will it be well.

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 8>I think that that is where there's the greatest risk

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:29.640
<v Speaker 8>right now, because we're seeing an acceleration in the downside,

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 8>whether you're talking about rents or home prices, and that

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:36.680
<v Speaker 8>is it's very very slow on the way up, but

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 8>once momentum is gained on the way down, Oftentimes in history,

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:43.639
<v Speaker 8>policy makers have a hard time getting a hold of

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:48.159
<v Speaker 8>that disinflationary impetus from the shelter side. And we already

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 8>know that the gasoline prices have squeezed away discretionary services,

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:55.680
<v Speaker 8>inflation and discretionary goods.

0:26:55.720 --> 0:27:00.359
<v Speaker 7>Information you're spending on the essentials we have, mister and

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:01.200
<v Speaker 7>Governor Myron.

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Can a central bank get out front of a disinflationary tendency?

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:06.199
<v Speaker 7>Probably not?

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:07.879
<v Speaker 2>I love to buster Chucks.

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 7>Probably not. This is central bank. Again.

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:14.440
<v Speaker 8>I refer back to the good Senator Tom Tillis, and

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:17.920
<v Speaker 8>again there is a pathway for there to be more

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:21.920
<v Speaker 8>than the potential for one rate cut in twenty twenty

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 8>in twenty twenty six, But right now it is an

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 8>institution that is plagued by paralysis.

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:30.200
<v Speaker 7>How do you think this is going to play out?

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 4>Just for the listeners and viewers out there, fetcherim and

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:37.639
<v Speaker 4>j Powell is going to step down in theoretically theoretically

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 4>how she says there's.

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:41.680
<v Speaker 8>Only a twenty eight percent possibility that he's gone by June.

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 4>Wow, So I mean, who blinks? Here is at the

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:46.920
<v Speaker 4>White House? Is it Senator Tillis. I mean it doesn't

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:47.680
<v Speaker 4>seem like I.

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 7>Don't think Tillis is blinking. You throw anything at him.

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 9>To cease fire, doesn't joke in the morning, Yes, no, no,

0:27:56.400 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 9>I think separtcies fire at the Eccos billet between the

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 9>Ecchoes building in the White House.

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 7>So they need to get how much you figure something, how.

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:07.119
<v Speaker 4>Much of a problem could it be if they don't

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:10.399
<v Speaker 4>come to some resolution and we've got some paralysis that

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:12.920
<v Speaker 4>we don't know who the Fed Chairman's going to be.

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:14.879
<v Speaker 8>Well, but we do know who the chairman of the

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:17.119
<v Speaker 8>Federal Open Market Committee's going to be because j.

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 7>Powell has been elected for the full calendar year.

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 8>So some might characterize our president as occasionally impulsive, but

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 8>he could end up seeing Chair Powell behind the podium

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 8>through the December meeting.

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but the reality is the market.

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 4>Functioned, Yes he is.

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean yesterday was completely about you know, adjusting this,

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 2>making the markets go. Clearly, his golden ear of the

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 2>Middle East has to do with S and P futures

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 2>up one hundred and sixty four points. Give us you

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:49.720
<v Speaker 2>your Danny take. I mean, where are the buying vigilantes

0:28:49.840 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 2>right now? And my answer is they're in full force.

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 7>You know they're in full force.

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Tom.

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 8>But you have to remember what brought us to the

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 8>situation with Iran in the first place. It was the

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 8>Friday that the ten year Treasure's your year yield close

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 8>to three point nine to six percent because there was

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 8>so much concern about private private credit at the time.

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 8>We forget this was just a few weeks ago that

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 8>this happened. But there was downsiding yields because there was

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 8>concern about private credit and the White House needed a great,

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 8>big distraction and they got one. So I would say

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 8>downsiding yields is much more problematic and worries.

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:24.640
<v Speaker 2>So you're this is I have to question you on this.

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:30.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean, by a journal, you're linking domestic financial challenges

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 2>to mister Trump's foreign policy.

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 8>I actually just did that, yes, okay, So I would

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 8>link anything any behavior in the standard and Poors five

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 8>hundred to any behavior out of the White House that

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 8>is a known barometer.

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 4>How about for the Fed, it's thought on just the

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 4>labor market here, because we got a strong labor print

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 4>last Friday when everybody was taking the holiday. What did

0:29:56.840 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 4>you take away from that and how do you think

0:29:58.240 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 4>the fed took that data point.

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 8>Well, we've only had fourteen consecutive months of negative revisions

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 8>in real time. Okay, so I say dot dot dot

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 8>T be determined. Let's see what happens with revisions.

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 2>I got headlines. I gotta go. Daniel di Martino, QI Research,

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much their look for her work. We

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 2>protect the copyright of all our guests. Look for her

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:20.800
<v Speaker 2>work at QI at Research.

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast, available on apples, Spotify,

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>weekday seven to ten am Easter and on Bloomberg dot com,

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal