WEBVTT - Efforts to Hold Law Enforcement Accountable

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Law with June Brasso from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Olympic gold medalists Simone Biles, Ali Raisman, and MICHAELA. Moroney

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:16.120
<v Speaker 1>are among the ninety women who are seeking more than

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:19.760
<v Speaker 1>one billion dollars from the FBI for failing to stop

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>disgrace sports doctor Larry Nasser from sexually assaulting them when

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the agency first received allegations against him. Here's Biles testifying

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:33.919
<v Speaker 1>at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing in September in reviewing

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the O I G S report, It truly feels like

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the FBI turned a blind eye to us and went

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 1>out of its way to help protect U. S A

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:44.239
<v Speaker 1>G and U S O PC. A message needs to

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>be sent. If you allow a predator to harm children,

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the consequences will be swift and severe. Enough is enough.

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I will close with one final thought. The scars of

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>this horrific abuse continue to live with all of us.

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Joining me is Regina Calcatera of cal Katea Pollock, Regina.

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Did these gymnasts file a lawsuit here? It's not necessarily

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>a lawsuit that was filed. What was significantly filed were

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>claims against the federal government under the Federal Tort Claims Act,

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and if there is a claim to be brought against

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the federal government, you first have to actually file a

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>claim and fill up documents and submitted to the subtle

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>agency for them to consider what it is that you're

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>asking for. So what the cases about is the gymnasts

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:33.399
<v Speaker 1>who were actually sexually assaulted by Larry Naster, the gymnast

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 1>physician who was their position at M s U when

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:39.559
<v Speaker 1>they were training there and also for the Olympic team

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>as well. He had been sexually molesting his students for

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the athletes for over thirty years. And in July, Stephen Penny,

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the head of Ewish Gymnastics, actually went to meet with

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the FBI in their Indianapolis office and advised the FBI

0:01:57.680 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that he has three gymnasts who want to come forward

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and explained to them what has been happening to them

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>by Larry Nassa. They didn't follow up for a few

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>months that they had a meeting in July and the

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>first time that the FBI agents actually pick up the

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>phone to speak to one of the gymnasts was on

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:16.359
<v Speaker 1>September two, several months later, and a conversation was had

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>with one of the Gymnasts Mikayla Maroney, and it lasted

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>for about three hours. At the end of the conversation,

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the agents abbot that is that at all. Then that

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>day had a discussion with the US Attorney's office on

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>what to do because they really didn't believe that they

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>had jurisdiction over this particular matter. And UM was also

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:36.639
<v Speaker 1>concerned that the evidence may not rise to their ability

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 1>to actually bring federal claims against NASA. So the U. S.

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Attorney for the Southern District of Indiana told them to

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:47.640
<v Speaker 1>actually transfer this over to the Lansing office of the

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:51.919
<v Speaker 1>FBI in Michigan, and that never happened. So eight months

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>go by and the US Attorney and U. S. Gymnastics

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't share anything. There's no follow up. So then what

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 1>they did is they went to an other FBI office.

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 1>They went to the Los Angeles office and share the

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>same back pattern with them as well. There was an investigation,

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>but the Los Angeles office also arrived at the same

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>conclusion that the Indianapolis office has, is that they weren't

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>so sure that they had enough evidence actually to bring

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:20.079
<v Speaker 1>a federal case against him based upon the sexual assault.

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>And again they were supposed to advise the local authorities,

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>because what both officers actually agreed to when they had

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 1>these discussions, and this is what came out in the

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 1>report that was issued by the Inspector General of the FBI,

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>they both realized that this really should be dealt with

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>by state or local authorities. So neither did the Los

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Angeles office or the Indianapolis office ever contact the attorney

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>general in the state of Texas where this was happening

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>by Nasser, or in the state of Michigan as well,

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>or any local authorities after that. And it was not

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>until the MSU campus police got a tip that a

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>sixteen year old boy was assaulted by Nasser that they

0:03:57.120 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 1>issued a subpoena and they went into NASA's house us

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 1>to get some information. And then after that the local

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>press picked it up. And when the local press picked

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>it up, then the local FBI office and Lansing started

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>taking a look at it. And that wasn't until about me.

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:17.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's confirmed in the Inspector General's report. There's no

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>dispute that the FBI agents knew in twenty fifteen that

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Nasser was accused of assaulting gymnasts but failed to act,

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>leaving him to continue the sexual assaults. So uster Napis

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:34.119
<v Speaker 1>actually went to the FBI in July and not until

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 1>May the FBI actually get involved the local FBI. So

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:41.840
<v Speaker 1>between that time, some of the women that he was

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>already assaulting he continued to assault, and also during that

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:49.039
<v Speaker 1>time he assaulted women that he didn't assault before. And

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>there were seventy survivors of his sexual assault during that

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:56.719
<v Speaker 1>window of time that could have been prevented if the

0:04:56.839 --> 0:05:01.479
<v Speaker 1>FBI actually stepped in, acted properly, documented it passed the

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 1>investigation off to the local office and Lansing and did

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>whatever they possibly could to mitigate anyone else being assaulted

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>by him. Because at the time that the U S

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Gymnastics actually learned of this and went to the FBI,

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 1>they fired him, but he also was working with the

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:20.599
<v Speaker 1>local high school, another local gymnastic team. He also worked

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>at the Bella Caroli camp down in Texas, and so

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:26.160
<v Speaker 1>he was continuing some of his work there, so there

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>was additional victims. Will pray basically that he was finding

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:32.919
<v Speaker 1>but if the FBI actually acted properly, they could have

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>mitigated this and prevented this from happening. So within the

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>past year you had a lot of the gymnastics, very

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>high profiles like Shamone Biles and many others that testified

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>before Congress and told them about what their experiences were

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:47.919
<v Speaker 1>and what the faults of the FBI was and the

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>faults of the U S gymnastics team as well, and

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 1>what they should have done, because there was also a

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of ethical lapses between the FBI and the U

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:00.040
<v Speaker 1>S Olympic team. But during this testimony and at a

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:04.160
<v Speaker 1>particular hearing christmer Pray, who's actually has U, the FBI

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>took responsibility and it is extraordinary for any law enforcement

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:12.480
<v Speaker 1>governments executive to admit fault or admit liability, were let

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 1>alone describe the conduct of an employee as a gross misconduct,

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and he apologized to them. So you have the statement

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>of the federal law enforcement officer taken responsibility for the

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:25.839
<v Speaker 1>mouth seasons of his employees. And in the meantime, what

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:29.359
<v Speaker 1>it had transpired is the Inspector General of the FBI

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 1>actually did his own investigation and he disclosed in this investigation,

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:38.719
<v Speaker 1>in this report that to the agents had lied, didn't

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 1>properly follow up, didn't document, didn't try to mitigate it,

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and in fact that they had lied to the FBI

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 1>as well, and the two agents are lying to those

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:51.839
<v Speaker 1>who are actually interviewing him, and one of the agents,

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:56.839
<v Speaker 1>agent Abbot, while he was meeting with Stephen Penny, who

0:06:56.839 --> 0:07:00.279
<v Speaker 1>had a USA Gymnastics Stephen Penny had expressed to him

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:01.920
<v Speaker 1>that he was concerned that there's going to be a

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of blowback to him based upon the sexual assaults,

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and Abbott told him, don't worry about it. You know,

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll have the FBI say something positive about you, basically

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 1>implying that that you came forward and you try to

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>help out. And in the meantime, while they're having this discussion,

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Abbott and Penny are talking about a job to be

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the head of security for the US Olympic Committee, and

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 1>then Penny is going to put in a good word

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>for him. So then you have an Asian who actually

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>has a different priority, and the priorities not to you know,

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 1>bring light to the fact that these girls were sexually assaulted,

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 1>but cover it up to protect the head of the

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>U S Gymnastics. So this agent could possibly be the

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 1>head of security for the Olympic Committee. So this is

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 1>what was disclosed in the report. What I want to

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 1>ask you before you go any further is since this

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>is a claim filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act,

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>what happens next. What happens next is once they file

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the claim, and in order to file the claim, they

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>have to file it within you know, two years of

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>when they were injured or or if there's some new

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>information that came out. So recently the report was disclosed

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>and the FBI said that they were not going to

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>prosecute the two agents. But what they need to do

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>is they basically need to file a form with the

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 1>federal government stay what their damages are and which we

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>know that they're claiming a billion dollars, but I think

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>they divided it up amongst the different gymnuts for about

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>fifty million each. They have to prove what their damages are,

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 1>submit that documentation, and the FBI has a few options.

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>The first option is that they could settle the case.

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>You could sit down and have a discussion with them,

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 1>which quite frankly, ethically immorality, that is what they should

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>be doing because you already had the executive take responsibility.

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Or they could deny the claim. And if they deny

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the claim, then lossuits can actually be filed. But when

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>those lassus of filed. They're actually filed before district court.

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 1>But with all the evidence that the SI has compiled

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and the culpability that they have, and based upon what's

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>in the Fiddle Torq Claims Act, is really in their

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>best interests to sit down to have a discussion the

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:05.559
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar request. Do you think that that's sort of

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>over the top. Well, what the Federal Tort Claims that

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 1>requires is that the first time you put in the claim,

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>whatever number you put there, you can't come back and

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:19.200
<v Speaker 1>increase that. Ever, So what they're trying to do is

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 1>put in the maximum that they actually believe, but understanding

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 1>that they're probably going to negotiate backwards because each individual

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:28.959
<v Speaker 1>claimant has to prove damages and those damages are based

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>upon the state where they were assaulted and what those

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 1>state laws are related to, um, you know, compensatory damages,

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>because they won't get punitive damages under the Act, they

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>won't get pre judgment interest. But if the state well

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>where they were assaulted allows them to get compensatory damages,

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:48.680
<v Speaker 1>they could get that. So that's what they're going to

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:52.360
<v Speaker 1>be relying upon. So that fifty million dollar per athletes

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:54.680
<v Speaker 1>is pretty high. But they needed to do that just

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 1>to insulate themselves as they're negotiating backwards. If this were

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.559
<v Speaker 1>a court case, it doesn't seem like there's even any

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 1>discovery or investigation needed here. It's all been done. Yes,

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>that is why morally and escally, the FBI should sit

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 1>down and have a conversation and they should not continue

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>having these young women being traumatized again. And there is

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>several hundred million dollars that as setified every single year

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>in Congress or the Judgment Act, and they pay out

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:25.679
<v Speaker 1>about over three hundred million dollars a year. There is

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 1>already a pot of money that is set aside for

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>judgments that are against the United States government. So this isn't,

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, an extraordinary claim that they brought. The number

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 1>is high, but that number is gonna be little down

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>who makes a decision about settling the case. It could

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:45.200
<v Speaker 1>either be the d o J with the FBI, and

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:47.320
<v Speaker 1>then if the case goes to court, it goes to

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Speaker 1>a district court and it's a bench trial. So it's

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:53.439
<v Speaker 1>either going to be a federal district judge or it's

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:55.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be the FBI and d o J. Do

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 1>you remember another case where you know, the FBI was

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:03.559
<v Speaker 1>sued for so much money, this seems like it's extraordinary.

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:05.560
<v Speaker 1>There have been other cases that have been brought in

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the past against them, not necessarily the FBI, but you know,

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 1>other government agencies. But the one that was brought against

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the SBI, there was a hundred million dollars settlements. And

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>this was a case where the FBI was you know,

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:24.680
<v Speaker 1>it was egregious government misconduct that were actually resulted in

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>wrong full incarceration of several men who were falsely accused

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:31.679
<v Speaker 1>of participating in the Grizzly Gang slang. And that was

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:34.439
<v Speaker 1>a hundred million dollars As far as claims that came

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>to add with this particular act, that's one of the

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 1>highest recoveries. Let's just say the FBI decides it's not

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 1>going to settle. Is there any kind of defense the

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 1>FBI could interpose outside of the facts of the case.

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:50.959
<v Speaker 1>What the federal tort claim ax is it waves immunity

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>in this particular situation. But what they can do is argue,

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, a series of things. One is, you know,

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>this conduct that will allow how a planket to actually

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 1>sue under this particular act, you know, has to be

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:07.359
<v Speaker 1>a government employee, which these two agents particularly you know, are,

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>but they also would have had to perform the act

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that they performed within the scope of their duties, and

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>and if they did, because they did, it was their

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>duty to either do this or not do this. But

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>so their omission of not passing on to the local

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>office that these assaults were going on is an omission.

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 1>It is within the scope of their duty. But there's

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 1>an exception to that called the discretionary clause. So if

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 1>these agents had discretion not to pass it on or

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 1>not to bring you a federal action against them, that

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 1>is what the FBI could argue, is that they had discretion,

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, not to prostitute federal claims, both in the

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles office and in Indianapolis office because they didn't

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:54.319
<v Speaker 1>believe that the allegation rose to a federal case. That

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 1>is the part that they may argue about discretion. But

0:12:57.160 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they live and they did not path

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 1>do anything to mitigate or contact local authorities when they

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 1>were told to do so is what the plaintiffs could

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>argue back. But so there is that discretionary exception, and

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 1>that exception is the most litigated defense by the federal

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 1>government and used in these types of cases. As you mentioned,

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 1>FBI Director Christopher Ray acknowledge that quote people at the

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 1>FBI had their own chance to stop this monster back

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>in tw and failed. And considering the publicity that this

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 1>has gotten, and considering the fact that you have the

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 1>guilty please by Nasser, you have the I G. S Report,

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>it seems like it will be a case that's settled.

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I hope so. And it should be because they're beyond

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the beyond the discretionary exceptions, that is their only defense.

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 1>And with all this evidence, like you said, that is

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 1>out there, it's going to be very difficult for them

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 1>to actually litigate this court this case in court. So

0:13:55.880 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>it's best for them to settle and settle now. And

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the parties have to be flexible. You the plaints that

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>will have to be flexible as far as you know

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 1>what their damages are, because they still have to prove

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>what their damages are. There are laws of scholarships, they're

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:10.440
<v Speaker 1>a laws of in some of them less less college.

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:14.200
<v Speaker 1>There's the trauma and emotional distress, UM. So they have

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 1>to be flexible with coming down with that number. And

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I think if they sit down and UM, they could

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>probably hash out a settlement within a few months for

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 1>each one of them, because there's there's nothing else to defend. Yes,

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>So let me ask you this. Suppose they can't reach

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a number, could they go to trial just on the

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>damages portion? They would they If they can't reach the number,

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>then they have to file a case after sixty days.

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>When um within sixty days of what it is that

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 1>there's some kind of an impass or the federal government

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 1>denies what it is that they're asking, but they can

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>go to court on damages. Thanks so much, Regina. That's

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Regina Calcatera of Calctera Pollock. Similar failures by federal law

0:14:56.640 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>enforcers have led to major settlements in looting a hundred

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven point five million dollars for families of those

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 1>killed or injured in twenty eighteen at Florida's Marjorie Stoneman

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Douglas High School. There, the FBI received a tip about

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 1>five weeks before, but never forwarded the tip to the

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 1>South Florida office. The Supreme Court has further weakened a

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>doctrine meant to hold federal law enforcement and other officials

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 1>accountable for violating constitutional rights. In a six to three decision,

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the justices would not allow a Washington State innkeepers excessive

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>force claims against a US Border Patrol agent to go forward.

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 1>The Court has consistently been narrowing what's referred to as

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>a Bivens action, which allows citizens to sue federal officers

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>who violate their constitutional rights for damages. In the majority opinion,

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Justice Clarence Thomas said the Court has declined eleven times

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>to extend Bivens, but stopped short of overturning the fifty

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>year precedent. The split was down ideological lines, and Justice

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Sonya Soto Mayor, joined by joice Is Stephen Bryan and

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Elena Kagan, said in dissent that the ruling closes the

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 1>door to biven suits by many who will suffer serious

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 1>constitutional violations at the hands of federal agents. Joining me

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 1>is former federal prosecutor George Newhouse of Richard's Carrington. Tell

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>us what happened here? You know the facts of the case,

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 1>so a fascinating set of facts. There is a guy

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>named Bouley who lives in Washington State, right on the

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 1>US Canadian border, and he operates a little bit and

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Breakfast there that he famously called smugglers in and not

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>surprisingly that got the attention of the Border patrol, which

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 1>was watching him and working with him. Over the years.

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>He in fact claimed to be cooperating with him, as

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 1>some of his guests would be turned into border patrol,

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and on one occasion he notified the border patrol that

0:16:56.840 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 1>he had a visitor coming. Border Patrol agent Egbert Eric

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Egbert responded pulled the guests out of the van as

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 1>he pulled up, and Bully came out and let's just say,

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:13.399
<v Speaker 1>invited the agents to leave private property. According to his

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 1>complaint filed in the federal court against the agent, the

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:21.360
<v Speaker 1>agent didn't like this and wound up throwing Boulet onto

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the ground, assaulted him, used excessive force, and then secondly,

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:30.679
<v Speaker 1>um when bull A complained to the Border Patrol about

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 1>this behavior, which he had a right to do, the

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 1>agent retaliated by sticking the I R s on him

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and seeing that other governmental actions occurred unfavorably, so he

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>then was sued in federal court the agent individually and

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:53.400
<v Speaker 1>what's called it Bivens action, and that's a Supreme Court

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:56.199
<v Speaker 1>case where the the court said that I've done a

0:17:56.280 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 1>federal agent in this case narcotics agents viole someone's Constitutional

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>rights Fourth Amendments, specifically that they could sue the agent

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:11.159
<v Speaker 1>in federal court for damages. And that's what Egbert did. Um.

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>It went to the Ninth Circuit. The Ninth Circuit upheld

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:16.879
<v Speaker 1>both of those causes of action. And remember, a cause

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:19.119
<v Speaker 1>of action is simply a right to sue someone in

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 1>federal court. Um. The issue in the Supreme Court was, um,

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 1>was the were the courts below right in implying i e.

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Allowing the plaintiff to proceed with a lawsuit for money damages?

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 1>And the interesting thing is why this is a significant

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 1>case is we have, as you know, a very conservative

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:43.400
<v Speaker 1>court which is strictly applying the words of the Constitution,

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>and in the court is saying, look, it's up to Congress.

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 1>It should be Congress's job to decide who has a

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>valid claim to file a claim against the United States.

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Good example being a statute called the Federal Torque Claims Act,

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:01.680
<v Speaker 1>which allows people on over by mail trucks to sue

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the government for their damages. McCourt here said, Look, maybe

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Egbert did the wrong thing, but it's not up to

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the courts to decide who gets to follow the lawsuit.

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 1>It's Congress's job, and Congress should weigh the costs and

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the benefit. And for that reason they threw the through

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the other plane of out of court thing. He had

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 1>no claim in federal court against the agent. So it's

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 1>an interesting constitutional issue, which is to say, win can

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 1>accord imply a cause of action that is not expressly

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 1>stated or delineated by some statute. Congress hasn't made this

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:38.919
<v Speaker 1>a specific of what we call right of action, and

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 1>that's the issue. So George, when he filed this, his

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>lawyers must have known that this was an uphill battle

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:49.400
<v Speaker 1>from the start, right because the Supreme Court has been

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>limiting Bevan's actions. Yes, since nine one, the Supreme Court

0:19:55.359 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 1>granted two other similar bivens suits, one involving an Eighth

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Amendment claim of by a prisoner um and another one

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 1>on the Fifth amen a claim. But generally speaking, as

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the courts set forth, Justice Thomas in his opinion, you

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:13.400
<v Speaker 1>know eleven or twelve times where the Court has refused

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:18.359
<v Speaker 1>to extend bivens um. What's interesting is, of course, the

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>plaintiffs said, this is a Bivins action. Bibbins involved a

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit against federal narcotics agents, the precursor to the d

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:31.680
<v Speaker 1>e A and for excessive force Fourth Amendment, and Bully said,

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm bringing such a claim only differences against the

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Border Patrol, but still a federal law enforcement agent. So

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 1>they felt, I think pretty confident. In the Ninth Circuit

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>agreed this is a Bivns action. The Supreme Court in

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>this case, however, said Nope, not a Byvin's action, and

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:54.119
<v Speaker 1>we decline to engage in judicial activism and create and

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 1>implied cause of action for you, So that the first

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 1>question the court dealt with is does this fall squarely

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>within the parameters of Bibbons or is it an extension

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:05.400
<v Speaker 1>of Bibbons? And if it's an extension of Bivens, then

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the conclusion is a foregone certainty, which is you're out

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 1>of court. So this was a six or three decision

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>down audiological lines. In descent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor said, the

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:22.399
<v Speaker 1>court's ruling Contravenes precedent. Do you think that a Contravenes

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:26.880
<v Speaker 1>precedent should this case have been within the Bivens precedent. Well,

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 1>it's far from me to criticize the United States Supreme Court,

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:33.440
<v Speaker 1>although I do from time to time. Her point, which

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 1>is a good one, is on the first prong, which

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:39.439
<v Speaker 1>is is this a BIBBNS action. She said, yes, it is.

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 1>She said, Okay, it's a different context because here it's

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 1>a different agency, the Border Patrol, rather than federal and

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 1>narcotics agents. But it's also a Fourth Amendment violation, allegedly

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 1>for excessive force. And so she said, is squarely within

0:21:56.560 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the parameters the confines of bibbons um and what different

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make She asks, whether it's the Border Patrol ice,

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, d E. If it's a federal law enforcement agency,

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 1>is should be all? And she of course pointed out

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 1>there are eight three federal law enforcement agencies. It can't

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>be that Bibbins is limited to only a federal narcotics agents.

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 1>So she was right in pointing out that somewhat artificial distinction.

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:27.880
<v Speaker 1>But the second question, which is Court went to great

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 1>length into Justice Corsage and his concurring opinion instead explicitly

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:37.160
<v Speaker 1>it's really time to overrule BIBBNS. Bibbons is not based

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>upon words in the Constitution, a close or explicit reading

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:45.119
<v Speaker 1>would deny the Bibbins action, And he basically said or

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 1>suggested in his concurring opinion that it's time to cut

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 1>all the way instead of cutting back on bibbons, to

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>cut it out, and this, of course is what the

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 1>court is. There are people concerned about the abortion case

0:22:57.080 --> 0:22:59.919
<v Speaker 1>that the Court is going to backtrack on established pre

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>sent so they didn't do it here. So they didn't

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:05.159
<v Speaker 1>say bibbins is no longer the law. But what the

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Court clearly said is bibmins will not be extended, even

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:13.880
<v Speaker 1>to highly analogous situation as as this case presents. So

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>some say that this decision makes it nearly impossible to

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 1>hold federal police accountable for excessive force. That makes it

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:29.720
<v Speaker 1>so difficult and almost impossible. Well, it's a valid criticism.

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>But on the other hand, as the court points out,

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 1>almost all federal agencies have alternative remedies. Maybe those remedies

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 1>are not as satisfactory to plaintiffs as filing a lawsuit,

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 1>but you can file it an administrative claim as he did.

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 1>He filed a complaint, and the court pointed out that

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:53.399
<v Speaker 1>that results in a lengthy investigation by the agency, which

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>is charged under the law withholding their agents responsible. So

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 1>you can file administrative claims against the agents and maybe

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>or maybe not, you could follow lawsuit in state court.

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:08.439
<v Speaker 1>But the Supreme Court is e s making it going

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 1>to make it very difficult in the future to file

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>excessive civil rights claims, excessive fourth claims against federal officers

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:20.399
<v Speaker 1>in federal court that are not exactly parallel analogous to

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the Bibbins case. Does the Supreme Court's position here seem

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:30.440
<v Speaker 1>contrary to the movement in our country today, the movement

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:33.919
<v Speaker 1>to whole police more accountable, you know, the Black Lives

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Matter movement. Well, let's just say you're right. This decision

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 1>is running a contrary direction. It is going to establish

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 1>hurdles for lawsuits. Now, lawsuits are not the only way

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:49.399
<v Speaker 1>of holding these police officers accountable, but lawsuits in federal

0:24:49.440 --> 0:24:52.640
<v Speaker 1>court on civil rights violations are going to be fewer

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and farther in between. But again, there are, as the

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Court points out, particularly when Congress. See Congress pass the

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:03.119
<v Speaker 1>Federal torqu Claim Act, and Congress is also responsible for

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:06.399
<v Speaker 1>regulating the fiddle agencies. So the Court is really saying,

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 1>don't look to us if we need to have fatal

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:13.400
<v Speaker 1>agents more accountable. Well, there's a body called Congress, there's

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>a legislature, and this is their job, and this is

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:19.640
<v Speaker 1>not the job of the courts to decide. We think

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the court. Thomas was quite clear, and Gorse agreed with

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:27.400
<v Speaker 1>him that the legislature is better suited to decide who

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 1>gets to sue and win and for what violations. And

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:34.400
<v Speaker 1>we defer to the legislature. So if you need more enforcement,

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the court is saying, talk to your congressman. Do these cases,

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 1>these Bivens actions usually split along ideological lines, not previously. No,

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:48.199
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so, and I'm not a constitutional scholar,

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 1>of course, but I'm I imagine that most scholars now

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 1>are looking at this court and saying, this is a

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:57.639
<v Speaker 1>new direction for a very conservative court. They have the votes,

0:25:57.800 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 1>they have six to three, and they are going to

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:05.640
<v Speaker 1>look at and question established precedents. And Bibens now is

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 1>per Justice Gorsage his criticism. I think in play it

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:12.439
<v Speaker 1>could well be that the next case will result in

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Bibbins being excised from the body of constitutional law. And again,

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 1>remember this can be overruled changed by Congress at the

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:25.439
<v Speaker 1>Court's express instruction or invitation. The Court is saying, go

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:28.919
<v Speaker 1>to Congress. They're in a better position to know and

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 1>to do the cost benefit analysis of deciding when to

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:36.119
<v Speaker 1>establish a judicial cause of action against a federal officer.

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:40.439
<v Speaker 1>And as far as the retaliation claim where he he

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:43.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of gratted the guy out to the FBI, the

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 1>justice is all agreed about that. Yeah, they actually all

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:50.680
<v Speaker 1>agreed about that, the first Amendment claim and actually rated

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 1>him out to what we say the Richard Nixon trick,

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:56.159
<v Speaker 1>which was he got the I R. S involved to

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 1>examine his tax returns. Remember when Tricky Dick did that

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>back in the seventies against to his political enemies. So

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>that was a wrong meaning, that was not the right

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:07.879
<v Speaker 1>thing to do, assuming that the allegations are right. But

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the court was agreed that that doesn't fit neatly within

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the exception of Bivins. Bivens has only been applied to

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:17.640
<v Speaker 1>a fourth amenmic claim, fifth amenic claim, and an eighth

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:20.440
<v Speaker 1>ammic claim, and there is no case decision that would

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:23.200
<v Speaker 1>support a first amenmic claim, the first amount of claim

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 1>being that the government can't retaliate against you when you

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 1>make a complaint or a petition alleging government as conduct.

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:33.120
<v Speaker 1>So it seems that all the justices were in agreement

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 1>on that. It was the deciding that he didn't have

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 1>what looks and looked too many, including myself, to be

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 1>a traditional Bivens claim under the Fourth Amendment when they

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 1>denied that right. Thanks so much, George. That's former federal

0:27:46.640 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 1>prosecutor George Newhouse of Richard's Carrington. And that's it for

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:53.399
<v Speaker 1>this edition of The Bloomberg Law Show. Remember you can

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:56.679
<v Speaker 1>always get the latest legal news honor Bloomberg Law Podcast,

0:27:56.920 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and remember to tune into The Bloomberg Law Show every

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 1>week at ten p m. Wall Street Time. I'm June

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Grosso and you're listening to Bloomberg