WEBVTT - Marlins Looking Like Sellers During Epic 2nd-Half Slump

0:00:00.520 --> 0:00:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Hey, this is Kyle Stowers and you're listening to fish

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:03.440
<v Speaker 1>On First.

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 2>The misery continues for the Miami Marlins.

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 3>Fish On First live on the Foul Territory Network, presented

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:45.519
<v Speaker 3>by jet Ski Rentals of South Florida.

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Usually, guys, we try to find the positives and I'm

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 2>not going to say that there's none.

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:53.480
<v Speaker 3>There there is, but the shadow hanging over this team

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 3>is it's too too gloomy and too dark to ignore.

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna talk about it.

0:00:58.040 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 3>I'll talk about all these new ways that the Marlins

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 3>finding to lose and what has become a twelve game

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:07.680
<v Speaker 3>losing streak franchise record, twelve game losing streak, beating their

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 3>previous record of eleven in twenty eleven.

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Where does this team go? I guess there's nowhere to

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 2>go but up right, But.

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, a twelve game losing streak, including today game that

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 3>they look to have in hand after you're after a

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:25.559
<v Speaker 3>good pitching performance, starting pitching indus series was actually good.

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 3>That's about the only thing that was consistently good in

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 3>this series. We'll talk about the rest of the bad ury.

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 2>Yesterday was good. Starting pitching to say wasn't bad.

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 3>Gusta even wasn't bad, but they found a way to

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 3>lose all three games against the San Diego Padres to

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 3>fall under five hundred, and it's looking more and more

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:44.399
<v Speaker 3>like they're going to be sellers.

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 2>As the days go on. Tough to say the least.

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, I think I can only talk for all

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 3>of us when I say that we're with you guys.

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 3>We know that this is We had a high hopes,

0:01:57.240 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 3>especially after June, but July has been a unbridled mess

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 3>for the Marlins. We'll go through it game by game

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 3>starting today. I'll go backwards, of course, as we always do.

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, a good start, actually a really good start

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:13.080
<v Speaker 3>to this game for the Marlins.

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 2>They've they've looked to have it in hand. Things looked

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 2>looked pretty.

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:19.639
<v Speaker 3>Good all the way up until what the fifth or

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:21.399
<v Speaker 3>sixth inning, I think it was, where they just kind

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 3>of unraveled. It really wasn't terrible at all by your

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 3>starting pitcher, as I noted before, Jansen junkin this one.

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 2>You gave a lot of hits but didn't walk.

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 3>Anybody, which is a huge plus for him, and pitched

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 3>into the fifth inning, actually almost got out of the

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 3>fifth inning. We'll talk about what happened after that, But yeah,

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:39.959
<v Speaker 3>I thought that this was good for Junk, who was

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 3>struggling coming into this one.

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Kevin, go ahead, just we'll start with the positive.

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 3>I guess this is about all you can ask for

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 3>out of Jansen Junk, you know, as he as he

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 3>continues to hold down a rotation spot. I thought this

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 3>was obviously a step forward for him, and he gave

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 3>the team a chance to win. Obviously they threw it away,

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 3>but a lot of hits, only the one run though,

0:02:57.480 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 3>six strikeouts, no walks.

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 2>Talk about him first go ahead.

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it was a short hook for Junk, regardless of

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 4>hypat it got into the fifth, didn't even finish the fifth.

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 4>But unfortunately, when he's been pitching the way that he

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:12.639
<v Speaker 4>has recently, you have to do that. I didn't watch

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 4>too much of Junks start, but he did. As you

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 4>guys noticed, he did keep him minute, and that's that's

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:18.359
<v Speaker 4>all you could ask for at this point, at this rate,

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 4>with how the season is going, it definitely seemed like

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 4>not a desperation move, but definitely a quicker hook for

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:26.920
<v Speaker 4>him than than usual. I watched him in Houston and

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 4>he went I think four or five innings in that start,

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 4>and at this point you just gotta do what you

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 4>gotta do in term to see if you could go

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 4>with your best relievers. Unfortunately, it was a weird situation

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 4>where they went with Peterson got hit in the arm.

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 4>I do believe he was gonna go out there for

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 4>the six is what Clayton said postgame. So for anyone

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 4>trying to think that Clayon's bullpen management is his dad,

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 4>I don't think it was in this case. It's just

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 4>an unfortunate situation where Peterson got hit in the arm

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 4>and definitely got to take priority to create the X rays.

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 4>Everything was good, so he should be fine. And yeah,

0:03:57.080 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 4>Junk was good, solid, much better than what we've seen

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 4>the last couple of arts. And certainly you were looking

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 4>at a point where you're thinking that maybe Junk isn't

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 4>supposed to be a starter, maybe not fit enough for it.

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 4>But I guess to a certain extent, it proved some

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 4>people wrong or at least made his case to remain

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 4>in their rotation moving forward.

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think did enough, but I would agree with

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 3>that thought. Maybe he could have at least finished that

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 3>fifth inning. You know, I know he really didn't help

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 3>his case with the traffic Kell out on the basis,

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:27.719
<v Speaker 3>but I don't think he was bad after that. Oh boy,

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 3>as you noted, Kevin, they go to Peterson, you only

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:32.039
<v Speaker 3>gets the one out because he gets hit by a pitch.

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 3>After that, it's Gibson for the lefties, which was good.

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:37.720
<v Speaker 3>Zoober bounces back with the scoreless inning, which was good.

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 3>And then Baker, who had been pitching decently until this

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 3>comes in and man, it's not good. Five hits, four

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 3>earned runs, does get two strikeouts or I'm sorry, two

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 3>home runs, no strikeouts, so obviously wasn't in the zone whatsoever.

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 2>He gets the loss and a blown save. Maybe do

0:04:58.160 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 2>for this, you know, I for Barker. I mean, like

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 2>I said, coming into this was pitching pretty well. I

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:03.839
<v Speaker 2>think you noted it, Kevin. I don't think bad bullpen

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:05.160
<v Speaker 2>management by Clayton in this one.

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we could blame remember for a lot of

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 3>other things, but I don't think this was bad, especially

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 3>if he was going to use Peterson in the next inning,

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:12.599
<v Speaker 3>even though he had left these new up. Maybe getting

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 3>away a little bit from the strict platoon situation that

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:17.840
<v Speaker 3>he had. But yeah, Boker, and this one takes a

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 3>step back and it cost to Marlin's game.

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Like I said, he like finding new ways to lose.

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 3>That's what's happening on this skid that the Marlins are

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 3>which are on, which is now twelve games.

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 2>So Boker in this one not good.

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:28.239
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Boker.

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:31.280
<v Speaker 5>Overall this season he's been solid, but there have been

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 5>those two huge anomalies. The one that I think burns

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 5>pretty brightly in people's memory is the yeary perfect game bid.

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 5>Boker was the one that came in with an eight

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 5>run lead, that was, and he didn't get a single

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 5>outs if I remember correctly, in that performance, that was

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 5>one of the worst relief outings of Marlin's history, allowing

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 5>five earned in that scenario. So that game sticks out,

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:53.239
<v Speaker 5>and they actually won that game, of course, even though

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 5>I remember coming on the stream and people being furious

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:58.479
<v Speaker 5>by the decision, they did at least win that game.

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:01.159
<v Speaker 5>And then since then, this is the one that sticks

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:03.720
<v Speaker 5>out that is very comparable to that outing, and this

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 5>one does end up making the entire difference between a

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 5>win and a loss. He came in with a two

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 5>run lead, he leaves with a two run deficit. And

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:14.039
<v Speaker 5>that's pretty much all she wrote right there. To me,

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 5>I'm not going to like micro analyze Boker's performance. That

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 5>just speaks to the fact that this this roster as

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 5>a whole right now is just not strong enough. The

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 5>fact that Boker, I think, could you actually made the

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 5>case was a reasonable choice given the alternatives to pitch

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:29.599
<v Speaker 5>in that situation. There weren't all that There weren't multiple

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 5>other guys left in the bullpen at that stage of

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 5>the game that I feel were significantly better than Boker.

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 5>But the fact that he is that high up on

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 5>the leverage order just speaks to the fact that these

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 5>injuries have taken their toll and they haven't made the.

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 6>Adjustments necessary to this roster.

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 5>There have been guys down in Jacksonville that I'd like

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 5>to have seen given a shot over these last couple

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 5>weeks that haven't gotten a shot, So they haven't really

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:55.719
<v Speaker 5>given these guys an opportunity to show themselves as impact

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 5>guys in the later endings. Boker is a guy that has,

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 5>in my mind, just limited ceiling in terms of what

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 5>he could do. He's kind of susceptible to having an

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:07.360
<v Speaker 5>occasional blow up like this. I wouldn't put too much

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:09.279
<v Speaker 5>on Baker, too much on Clayton. I think this is

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 5>one that really goes down to the team itself not

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 5>being strong enough. There's just not enough overall talent right now,

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 5>and they have found, as he kind of allude to,

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 5>so many different ways to fall just a little bit

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 5>short in these games, because as a whole, they're just

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 5>even teams that come in with very comparable records, teams

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 5>like the Patters that came into the series with the

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 5>worst record than the Padre than the Marlins did. But

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 5>the Padres, I think anybodyho says that they're a better

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 5>team right now. They have more overall talents, and that

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 5>kind of made the difference of the course of this weekend.

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Crutchick, I want to ask you, I mean, just to

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 3>end that topic really quick. On the bullpen, they do

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 3>have Acnes coming back. He threw a rehab outing yesterday,

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 3>looked like he had alos Villa. I think he topped

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 3>at ninety eight in a scoreless saying. I would say, you, Eli,

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, just to wrap this up, maybe one

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 3>more rehoub outing and we've maybe able to see him

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 3>back after his knee problem or whatever happened. I would

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 3>think that he come back, and it sounds it sounds

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 3>kinda kind of like maybe not trying to speak too

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 3>highly of him because his major league career is only

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 3>so short, but that will be a huge addition when

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 3>he comes back, just considering that he can if he has.

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 2>To go multiple innings.

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 3>But really, you know, shines in that one inning, one

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 3>inning role that just come in and fireball guys. So

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm excited to see Acnes back because I do think

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 3>that he is still good and Ken pitching a high

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 3>leverage if he has to. So I'm I'm looking forward

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 3>to them getting Actnes back, hopefully after like one more rehab.

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:34.959
<v Speaker 3>Any anyways, that's it on the bullpen for now, Crutchick.

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 3>I want to go to you just just ending with

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 3>we DELI said about the team not being good enough,

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:43.319
<v Speaker 3>and I would agree with it.

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 2>Is there a sense of urgency in this clubhouse?

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 3>You were there today and Kevin, I know you were

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 3>there I think the other two games of this series, right,

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 3>So I want to go to Kratchik first because you

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 3>were there today and saw this one, and we're there

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 3>for Clayton's post game to talk about Clayton yesterday post game,

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:59.680
<v Speaker 3>like just it doesn't seem from his comment from mcculla's

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 3>comments that there is a real sense of urgency to

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 3>win games.

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 2>It's like, oh, yeah, skids happened. We're talking about twelve

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 2>games and he's up on the stands smiling with his

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:12.119
<v Speaker 2>arms crossed. Yeah, well we'll go. We have another one tomorrow.

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Like there's maybe he knows that the team was over

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:19.319
<v Speaker 2>achieving in June. Maybe he knows that, you.

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 3>Know, they were kind of playing with house money coming

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 3>into July. But to look at this face that's on

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:27.319
<v Speaker 3>the screen after what was their eleventh straight loss, and

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 3>then I think even today it wasn't that much different

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 3>in his postgame press conference. You can correct me every

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm wrong.

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 2>My question for you is what is there a sense

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 2>of urgency in ending this and trying to actually compete

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 2>this year or is it just another day.

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 7>I do think there's a sense of urgency, and I

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 7>do think that there's a little bit of anger in

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 7>the clubhouse at the situation where.

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 2>They find themselves in.

0:09:52.160 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 7>The Reality is we only get in an hour with

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 7>them before the game and ten minutes with them after

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 7>the game. So there's no way for me to know

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 7>this for sure. But in covering this team and this

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:04.839
<v Speaker 7>specific regime for the last couple of years. You get

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 7>the sense that they are so locked in on their plan,

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 7>their plan, their game plan, their analytics, their philosophies that

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 7>when things like this happen, it's just, you know, stay

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 7>the course, stay the course. And to an extent, I

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:21.200
<v Speaker 7>agree with that. I'm not saying you should blow up

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 7>the entire blueprint, blow up the team, fire Clayton tonight.

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 7>But at the same time, you can't just come in

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 7>and say everything will be fine because we know who

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 7>we are and we know what we're gonna do. There

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 7>has to be some human element to it where I

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 7>need to see coach get mad. I need to see

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 7>some sort of elements which we saw earlier in the

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 7>season of you know, Peter Bendix sending guys down. Connor

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 7>Norby wasn't doing well enough, so we get sent down.

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 7>The same with Gus. Gus was not doing well enough

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:53.319
<v Speaker 7>at Catcher defensively or offensive link, so we get sent down.

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 7>I like those sort of things. Right now, I'm getting

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 7>the vited they are drinking too much of their own

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 7>kool aid when it comes to we trust our full again.

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 7>Like I said, nothing, you should blow up your philosophy

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:08.559
<v Speaker 7>because of a bad twelve game stretch, but clearly something

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 7>needs to change, even it's just temporary, like something you

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 7>need to have some sort of human element into what

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 7>you're doing instead of just saying we trust our process,

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 7>we trust our process.

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 4>And just to add on to that really quick, just

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 4>you know, I was in Houston for all three of

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 4>those losses. I think it's safe to say, like, the

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 4>way that this team went about it the first half

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:33.439
<v Speaker 4>of the season is certainly not the same. Like Kurtchick,

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 4>you were there today and you were there yesterday and

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:37.199
<v Speaker 4>we didn't walk into the clubhouse because it wasn't really needed.

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 4>But like, it's not the same vibe. The guys clearly

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 4>are feeling it. I do agree, though, like your manager

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 4>shouldn't be smiling and trying to spin every question into

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 4>a positive because at the end of the day, you

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 4>I hate to say it like this, and I have

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:53.560
<v Speaker 4>a lot of respect for Clayton what he does, but

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 4>you were on the hot seat, my friend. He is

0:11:57.480 --> 0:11:59.439
<v Speaker 4>on the hot seat. There's no doubt about it. I

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 4>don't know exactly the contract situation is that I think

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 4>it's either it ends after this season or he has

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 4>one more after this made a team option or whatever,

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:08.199
<v Speaker 4>but it's it gets to a point where if you

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 4>set the franchise record for most losses in a row,

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:12.960
<v Speaker 4>something needs to be done, something needs to change. And

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 4>and I understand they're going through this analytical plan that

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 4>crutchc mentions, but sometimes you have to go away from

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 4>that the way this team is mentally defeated. And you

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:22.959
<v Speaker 4>know what, this is what I've noticed. And I don't

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 4>know if you guys want to touch in on this too,

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 4>but for example, they gave up what was it the

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 4>homer to Renhifo. After that, you would have thought it

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 4>was a funeral in there. Like it was dead, Like

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 4>the clubhouse was dead, everything was dead. Like they just

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 4>seemed lifeless. Lifeless baseball is being played, and that's not

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 4>the team that we saw at the start of the season.

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 4>The team we saw at the start of the season

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 4>was a team that played small ball, was extremely vibrant

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 4>and had a lot of energy. You had spark plugs

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 4>in there with Sooha and and what's his name, Ruiz

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 4>and just not seeing that it's it's lifeless baseball, that

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 4>it's lacking energy. I'm not saying that the effort is

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 4>there Don't get me wrong, there is effort, and Clayton

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 4>mentioned that in Houston, and I'm sure there is because

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 4>they're pitching well, at least starting pitching. The starting pitching

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 4>has helped has kept them in games and has clearly

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 4>been a big reason as to why they stay close

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 4>in the games, and offensively in some of the games

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:16.599
<v Speaker 4>they have done just enough to at least stay in it.

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 4>It's sometimes the bullpen and sometimes the offense. And I

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 4>think I look at the Houston serious and you strike

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 4>out fourteen times in one game thirteen in the next.

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 4>I mean, guys, this one was. Offense is one of

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 4>the worst in baseball. Since the start of the losing streak,

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 4>they rank last and almost every statistical category you could

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 4>think of. Their second last in WRC plus second and last,

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 4>and on last, and on base percentage last, second and last,

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:40.559
<v Speaker 4>and OPS last, and batting average, they've hit the least

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 4>amount of home ors, they've scored the least amount of

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 4>runs in baseball. It really is truly the offense. But

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:48.599
<v Speaker 4>today it was the bullpen. And there's cases where it

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 4>has been the bullpen this season. And when they go

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:54.080
<v Speaker 4>down this team, you know, you talked about the fight,

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 4>the urgency, all this we spoke about the start of

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:58.839
<v Speaker 4>the season. Just you're not seeing it at all. You're

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 4>seeing a lifeless lacking of energy product when the team

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 4>it goes down into a game, and you know what, fine,

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 4>but they gotta find ways to get out of it

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:13.319
<v Speaker 4>because they are the reason that they are now probably

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 4>gonna sell and they're gonna see some of their team

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 4>mights go to another organization come August third.

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, and just a sorry Carver, I just want to

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 8>you guys have both touched on the hitting, which has

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 8>been an issue. I mean, they still have yet to

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 8>score more than three runs. They've they've scored more than

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 8>three runs two times in twelve games. That should be

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 8>almost impossible for a big lead team. In my opinion,

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 8>you guys touching the bullpen. I've never seen a team

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 8>miss a player like the Mans of missing Anthony Bender

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 8>for however long he's been out when you're working into

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 8>the eighth didn't even tie ball game, And no disrespect

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 8>for you, Tyler Zueber out there and Dad scored in

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 8>a one run game. And then Boker today, like Eli said,

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 8>I like Boker, but if he's that high up when

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 8>you're gonna use him leverage. I don't see that as well.

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 8>So when it comes to base running, which is also

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 8>what I've been looking at, hobby Er Snohak taking off

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 8>the third base and I've all hit right in front

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 8>of him. That just goes and I think they've they've

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 8>been impressing so much we saw with Auto yesterday. I

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 8>wouldn't say they're lifeless, because I mean, when they're up

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 8>like they were today, there is some energy there. But

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 8>I feel like they're all trying to fix the issue

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 8>with one player, one game and trying to get all

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 8>twelve games back in a single player, a single game

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 8>so they can take it more day by day by

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 8>Janson Johnson after his start today, and then they'll be

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 8>able to find more success. But it's a nothing in

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 8>any department is working right now, so something has to change.

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 8>I'm not going to say claims on the hot seat

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 8>because at the end of the day, he's not. He

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 8>hasn't scored more than three runs twice. It's the bats

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 8>he quots in the lineup, which are given to him

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 8>by Bendinson co. So That's where I'm at right now.

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 4>Really quickly to clarify it's lifeless, after they're down in

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 4>the game. For sure, they're when they're up and they're winning,

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 4>it's great. But when Kifo hits the homer in that

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 4>first game, dead, they give up the late it was

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 4>dead allot all of yesterday, and then they give up

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 4>the back to back homeers to Machada. I think it

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 4>was Jackson Merrill. Dead. You gotta I understand there's a

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 4>losing streak, but if they want to win, they're gonna

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 4>have to show some life and some energy. Because I

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 4>know that's not the big part of it, because there's

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 4>a lot more that's going on right now that outside

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 4>of that. But I'm watching lifeless baseball and that was

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 4>a big thing too in Houston.

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 2>And at the end of the day. To fix that,

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna go to you in a second one. To

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 2>fix that. I don't know if you're gonna say the

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 2>same thing.

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 3>To fix that. It starts with Clayton mccallough. Absolutely starts

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 3>with the manager of the baseball team in those moments

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 3>where it's dead, to encourage your team, to say something

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 3>to your team, to after a tenth eleventh straight loss

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 3>hole the closed door meeting, do something rather than sit

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 3>on a stand and say we got another game tomorrow.

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, it will end it. It's it's not just one thing,

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 2>it's it's a variety. Well, we'll, we'll get there, we'll

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 2>we'll end.

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 3>Every game matters, especially when you're barely playing to a

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 3>wildcard spot.

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 2>You have to find ways to motivate your players.

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 3>Yes, at the end of the day, it's up to

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:05.639
<v Speaker 3>the players that are on the field to play the

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 3>game and perform. It is up to the manager to

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 3>motivate the players to perform, and he's not doing that

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 3>right now.

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:14.919
<v Speaker 2>So Sean, how does McCullough fix that and why hasn't he?

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>But so far I've just been doing my impression of

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the Marlins offense man being super quiet. But how Clayton

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 1>fixes it? I mean, I agree with you completely. I

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:29.359
<v Speaker 1>get the argument that if he came in and did something,

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, very untrue to himself all of a sudden,

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 1>like started kicking over tables in the locker room, you know,

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 1>that's probably the gonna You know, some players might be

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>looking at him sideways thinking, you know, what's this guy?

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 1>But no, I'm just been in front of you know

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>that same you know placid expression, you know, lost after loss,

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 1>like these games count for something like That's that is

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the attitude you want. When we were learning how to

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:52.359
<v Speaker 1>win and learning how to be a baseball team last

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:55.879
<v Speaker 1>year and even earlier on in the season. But you know,

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:59.119
<v Speaker 1>the expectations changed and the pressure you know, should change

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:03.360
<v Speaker 1>with it, and that's requires far more you know, get

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 1>up and go. If that doesn't happen on camera, fine,

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:10.199
<v Speaker 1>but you really want to see that sense that the

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 1>manager is not satisfied to performance, that someone's going to

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:16.120
<v Speaker 1>be held accountable, you know, for this, and you've got

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to see a little more you know, feeling from them.

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think that, well, I don't think anything would happen,

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, this year. This certainly is going to come up.

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 1>And this is very much a situation where yeah, his

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:31.200
<v Speaker 1>seat is getting hot in a hurry. The national excrutiny

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:33.440
<v Speaker 1>has been on this team for about a month now.

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:36.479
<v Speaker 1>Half of that month is great, and this shows up

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>on the resume too, and I don't think it balances

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 1>out as a wash over the last thirty days. This

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 1>is what's going to stick and things need to turn around.

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:47.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, one more word on this before we hit into

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 5>our first break, Just about the reality about not so

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 5>much whether how much of Clayton's fault this is, but

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 5>just the reality that when you are steering a team

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 5>through this kind of losing, I think history would tell

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 5>you that the manager escapegoaded in almost all these circumstances.

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 5>I'm actually gonna do the research on this, just like

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 5>verify it. You look at the longest losing streaks in

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 5>baseball this year, it's the Mets fired their manager like

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:14.440
<v Speaker 5>a month after that, it's the Phillies who fired their

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 5>manager almost immediately after their ten games.

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 4>Kid.

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 5>That feels like a very familiar pattern that these guys eventually,

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 5>whether during the season or after the season, and I

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 5>think in his case would be the decision to be

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:27.199
<v Speaker 5>made after the season.

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 6>It is.

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's really difficult as a manager to avoid the

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 5>being caught in the shrapnel from that type of disaster,

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:40.680
<v Speaker 5>because when you have continuity on your roster of a

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 5>certain number of players, and the players perform at a

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 5>certain level for a sustained period of time, especially this

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 5>late into the year, and then all of a sudden,

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 5>it just falls apart in so many different areas, Like

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 5>it's not just one guy, as we've covered, it is

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:54.439
<v Speaker 5>every aspect of the team being deficient. We touched on

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:56.679
<v Speaker 5>the hitting and the bullpen I would go to outside

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 5>of this most recent series, the starting rotation just being

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 5>as thin as it is. A couple there are a

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 5>couple of spots where they just don't get linked out

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 5>of other starters. It's the defense too, it's a base

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 5>running as well, like every single area eroding and when

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 5>you can't like point to a particular player, and certainly

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 5>as the front office, when it's a front office that

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:18.120
<v Speaker 5>came in that or even before this manager did. Yeah,

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:21.120
<v Speaker 5>it's it's just it's very it's as hot a see

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 5>as you could have as as a manager. When you

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:26.159
<v Speaker 5>have consecutive games, loss after loss after loss, all these

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 5>different opponents.

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 6>You're losing at home.

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:30.199
<v Speaker 5>It's very hard to get swept at home, and the

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 5>Martins have been. That's happened twice. It's happened at the

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 5>start of the streak, and this happens most recently this

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 5>past weekend against teams that they thought were really comparable

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:41.399
<v Speaker 5>to them entering those matchups. Uh So that's kind of

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 5>the direction where this is headed. Of course, there's still

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 5>a long season to play and they're still within believe

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 5>it or not. They're still with the in striking distance

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:50.920
<v Speaker 5>of a postseason spot. It's just so difficult to believe

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 5>that this thing is going to turn around when they're

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 5>just leaking oil in all these different areas. So that

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 5>we're gonna go to a quick break here from mint

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 5>Mobile and then a whole lot more to on. This

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:03.959
<v Speaker 5>losing streak ends the team's outlook and the trade deadline,

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:05.879
<v Speaker 5>So definitely stick with us through this.

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:08.640
<v Speaker 9>What if you can actually have it all? And I'm

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:14.359
<v Speaker 9>talking about Mintmobile taking the premium wireless bouginess crats, but

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:17.919
<v Speaker 9>then bringing it to the transparency in pricing and the

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 9>affordability in pricing.

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:22.640
<v Speaker 1>They're going to lay everything out there with a cheap

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 1>bill that you know what everybody can handle right now.

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 9>You can even bring your current phone and your number

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 9>if you're thinking about it and you're like, I'm worried

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 9>about that, No worries. They have you covered because they're

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 9>able to convert people all the time to the Mintmobile way.

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:39.920
<v Speaker 9>Go to mintmobile dot com slash territory. That's mintmobile dot

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 9>com slash territory. Cut your wireless bill of fifteen bucks

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 9>a month at mintmobile dot com slash territory.

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 6>That's it.

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 9>There's no catch upfront payment of forty five dollars for

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 9>three months, ninety dollars for six months, or one hundred

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 9>and eighty dollars for twelve month. Plan required fifteen dollars

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 9>per month equivalent taxes and fees extra initial plan term

0:21:57.200 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 9>only greater than fifty gigabytes may slow when network is busy.

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 9>Includes up to twenty gigabyte hot spot capable device required availability,

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:07.400
<v Speaker 9>speed and coverage varies. Cement Mobile dot.

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:14.439
<v Speaker 3>Com back to continue talking about this uh skid that

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 3>the Marks are on, possibly their outlook on what do

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:20.440
<v Speaker 3>they do at the deadline, as well as looking forward

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:22.720
<v Speaker 3>to I think what to me is a make or

0:22:22.760 --> 0:22:25.119
<v Speaker 3>break series coming up against the Philly who preview that

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 3>in a little bit.

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 2>I want to talk about some positives.

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:31.160
<v Speaker 3>Though I know we've been a bit negative and there

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 3>are some positives believed or not, there are some positives

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:35.440
<v Speaker 3>to talking about this mare on this team. One is

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:39.159
<v Speaker 3>Uri Perez who pitched yesterday and what was this his

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:40.880
<v Speaker 3>fourth or fifth straight quality start?

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Really good and I don't.

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Think the the with.

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 2>With inducing Uri Perez.

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:51.680
<v Speaker 3>It was more of the fill up the strike zone

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:54.679
<v Speaker 3>and get we contact with his fastballs, both the four

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:56.879
<v Speaker 3>seam and the two seam. UH mixed and slider a

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 3>little bit, but didn't really use many of his breaking

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 3>pitch is on a consistent basis as mostly sinker fastball

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 3>and did well with it even though he didn't have all.

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Of his pitches.

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:08.119
<v Speaker 3>Uh give up some early runs but end a late

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 3>run in the seventh inning. We could talk about on

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 3>if he should have been out there for that inning

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:16.120
<v Speaker 3>or not whatever, But yeah, no, I think I think

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 3>pretty damn solid from from Uri Perez in this one

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:23.679
<v Speaker 3>to kind of have that mental toughness to get this

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:24.359
<v Speaker 3>done even.

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 2>Though he I don't think had all of his stuff. Kevin,

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 2>you were there for this one.

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 3>Another good start for Uri, another quality start, like I said,

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:33.120
<v Speaker 3>either his fourth or fifth straight. Just keeps going, keeps

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 3>getting better, keeps improving, even when he didn't have all

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 3>of his stuff.

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:40.399
<v Speaker 2>So I thought, damn encouraging from a pitcher that the

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 2>Marlins planned to have around for a while.

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:46.199
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and you look at that start and it's like

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:48.399
<v Speaker 4>doesn't get his first strike it until the sixth, like

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 4>you know, definitely a little concerning, I guess, but like

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 4>even then, like you'll take that right, you'll take a

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 4>start whek he gives you six innings, goes into that

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 4>leieve he once to the seventh like this was a

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 4>good start for Yurie. He's been one of the marlins

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 4>most consistent pitchers coming out of the All Star break,

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:04.359
<v Speaker 4>and if you look at since he's come off the eel,

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:06.920
<v Speaker 4>he's been really good. And I think a big reason

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 4>for that is the sinker that he added, which he

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 4>could play off the fast ball and playoff for some

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 4>of the other breaking ball pitches, breaking pitches. I think

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:18.120
<v Speaker 4>that's been a big part of it. So I'm curious

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:21.159
<v Speaker 4>to see how that continues to develop. But this is

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 4>this is a gyory that you know, you're very excited

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 4>and happy to have, right. This is a guy that

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:31.199
<v Speaker 4>is no longer dealing with the Tommy John, the rehab

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:34.360
<v Speaker 4>from the Tommy John, the limited pitch count, the limited

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 4>innings like he is now also on entering uncharted territory,

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:39.880
<v Speaker 4>something that I think is worth noting. I believe he's

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:42.159
<v Speaker 4>creeping up on his career high in innings pitched or

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 4>will certainly surpass that, So something to keep in him mind,

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 4>at least at the major league level. Not combining the minors,

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 4>so this is something to keep an eye out for.

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 4>But they let him go one hundred and ten something

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 4>pitches yesterday, so they definitely don't seem too concerned about it.

0:24:57.640 --> 0:24:59.159
<v Speaker 4>Hopefully they don't do what they did with Max and

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 4>now'll give him another day off and then it turns

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 4>into an extrain and now he's out for a long time.

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, I think this is the guy that you're

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:07.920
<v Speaker 4>going to count on for a very long time this rotation.

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 4>And I was gonna write about, you know, just how

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 4>good Yuri has been and what he's done, because I

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 4>think the sinker just plays a big factor into that.

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 4>And I know Corvertt had mentioned the high fastball usage,

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:20.479
<v Speaker 4>which is certainly fair, but at this point, like if

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 4>it's working, it's working. We made our complaints. There was

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 4>a time where he actually did start throwing a lot

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 4>more breaking pitches, and it certainly did help him. But

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 4>if you find some sort of combo there where you're

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 4>at least throwing enough breaking pitches to keep you in

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:36.440
<v Speaker 4>it and allow you to go further into a game,

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:38.199
<v Speaker 4>like he has been able to do something I think

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 4>he struggled to do early on in the season. I

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:41.239
<v Speaker 4>think we'll take that.

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:44.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, just the guy that can get it

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 3>done in multiple ways. It doesn't have to be the

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 3>the the whiffs all the time, right, it doesn't have

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 3>to be that. And I think Yuri's coming to the

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 3>realization that, you know, you're not gonna have that stuff

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:56.920
<v Speaker 3>every day. Some days you're gonna have to get ground balls.

0:25:56.920 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 3>You're gonna have to rely on we contact. And it's

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 3>damn refreshing to see a player who I don't think

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:03.120
<v Speaker 3>two years ago we could have said that he would

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:06.200
<v Speaker 3>be able to do that. Yesterday he did, and I

0:26:06.200 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 3>think that is very encouraging for a very young pitcher

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 3>that's still growing right awesome.

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 2>So, you know, as great as.

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 3>It is to see strikeouts, as great as it is

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:16.920
<v Speaker 3>to see you know, double digit strikeouts and all the

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 3>stuff that we know year he can do, I am

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:20.600
<v Speaker 3>equally excited to see him get eight ground ball outs

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 3>and six.

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 6>Flyouts exactly just me.

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, in me, I was going to go into a

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:27.359
<v Speaker 5>little bit just on the ground balls, because from the

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 5>moment he debuted, what really puzzled me is like how

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:33.719
<v Speaker 5>he was so averse to getting balls on the grounds,

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 5>Like his ground ball rate as a rookie was twenty

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 5>five percent and league averages in the low forties. He

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 5>was the most extreme flyball starting pitcher in baseball in

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty three as a rookie. He took a significant

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:49.159
<v Speaker 5>step forward last year sort of to like thirty one percent,

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 5>which is still like near the bottom of the barrel,

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 5>but you know, it's six percent jump, and now he's

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:56.960
<v Speaker 5>taken another seven percent lead to thirty eight percent. So

0:26:56.960 --> 0:26:59.119
<v Speaker 5>all of a sudden, he was in spitting distance of

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 5>being average in that apartment. I think that's a great

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:04.679
<v Speaker 5>trade off for him to be able to get more

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:06.919
<v Speaker 5>of that soft contact, even if it's more contact.

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 6>Overall by a little bit.

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:10.199
<v Speaker 5>The quality of contact going down the way it is,

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:13.159
<v Speaker 5>you're not going to really give up crooked numbers if

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 5>you're just getting grounders the way that he has been

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:17.679
<v Speaker 5>in it definitely so to me, this most recent outing

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:19.920
<v Speaker 5>that was one of the more higher ground ball rates

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 5>that he's had overall, even relative to his other starts

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:26.679
<v Speaker 5>this season. The sinker almost directly is contributing to that.

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:29.639
<v Speaker 5>Being able to use that pitch as an alternative to

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:33.640
<v Speaker 5>his four seamer. It's been a really good compliment overall.

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:34.919
<v Speaker 5>So this is the guy that I thought was going

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:36.439
<v Speaker 5>to be the best pitcher on the team this season.

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 5>I think when it's all settled, he might still actually

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:41.400
<v Speaker 5>end up being the most valuable pitcher. Now that Max

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 5>has gone down with his injury, Sandy has been up

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:45.920
<v Speaker 5>and down and up and down.

0:27:45.720 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 6>And overall very important, but your overall.

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:51.440
<v Speaker 5>He's the guy that I trust most moving forward the

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:52.879
<v Speaker 5>rest of the season. I think he's going to be

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 5>the guy that gives you both high upside and as

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 5>we've seen now ever since coming back from.

0:27:57.680 --> 0:27:59.639
<v Speaker 6>The il that was a full month ago, he's just

0:27:59.640 --> 0:28:01.680
<v Speaker 6>been extremely consistent during that stretch too.

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's been really good and like I said, getting

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 3>it done in multiple ways, which is the most encouraging thing.

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:11.720
<v Speaker 2>I think we'll go on. He's been great, So that

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:12.479
<v Speaker 2>is one positive.

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 3>The other positive I want to talk about Joe Mack.

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:16.159
<v Speaker 3>I mentioned this last time I was on here, and

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna mention it again. The more we see this

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:20.640
<v Speaker 3>guy play and the more he does what he continues

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:25.920
<v Speaker 3>to do and hitting, in fielding and throwing, I mean,

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 3>it's just a guy that is a clear extension can today.

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:31.679
<v Speaker 3>And you know, I know the Marlins don't have to

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 3>do it. I understand that he's under team controlled until

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 3>twenty thirty whatever, but man, this is a Cornerstone player

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 3>that I think as long as he is in the

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 3>Marlins striking distance and as long as they are able

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 3>to do it, I think this offseason they have to

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 3>try to extend the player because you don't find catchers

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 3>like this often whatsoever.

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 2>So my question to you guys is why not.

0:28:56.800 --> 0:28:58.480
<v Speaker 3>I understand they don't have to, which is the point

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 3>Isaac made last time I brought this up, and the

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 3>more that you see him do what he's doing is it.

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 2>How can you not?

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:08.800
<v Speaker 3>In my opinion, right, So that's what I think is,

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 3>how can you not extend this player? How can you

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 3>not at least try to extend the player in the offseason?

0:29:14.360 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 3>But will they and what does that extension possibly look

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:20.120
<v Speaker 3>like for a player that is looking more and more

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 3>like JT.

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 2>Realmuto every day. So that's my question to you guys.

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Who wants to hit this one?

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 8>Nate go ahead, Yeah, you said it best, Barb. I

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:33.880
<v Speaker 8>think Cornerstone is the best way to drop a guy

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 8>like Joe Matc. I mean, Michael Peterson takes a ball

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 8>off his forum today Joe Matt picks it up, spins around,

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:40.680
<v Speaker 8>and throws it at the first day out of the end.

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 8>I mean, that's just one of the many aprodible things

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 8>he does mind the plate, obviously, I think beyond just

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 8>throwing guys out and hitting homers and even looking a

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 8>lot better against lefties like he has recently, he's just

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 8>such a big culture that to have you have a

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 8>catcher that is so smart behind the plate, not knowing

0:29:56.040 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 8>to pictures trust him, but the entire team down for

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:00.240
<v Speaker 8>Rob who's calling the pitches, to trust it. I like

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 8>Joe Matt back there. In terms of what the contract

0:30:03.080 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 8>would actually look like that I completely agree with you

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 8>they should extend him. Not not too sure on that, honestly,

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 8>it's more of a Kevin or Eli type question. But

0:30:13.000 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 8>in terms of should they yes, if you like, it's

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 8>too late on a lot of the other guys we've

0:30:16.920 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 8>talked about in the past, and this would not be

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 8>like a Jacob Marcy type deal like you saw last year,

0:30:21.360 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 8>because at this point, not only his catcher a more

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 8>valuable position than center, but Joe has been showing that

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 8>he's been improving compared to Marcie when he really came

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 8>out of the gates hot and Hovis the next steadily

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 8>declined throughout the rest of the season. So anything match

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 8>trending up and if they want to get it done,

0:30:36.280 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 8>I feel like, honestly, after this next season, if it

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:41.480
<v Speaker 8>is played, it's going to be too late to extend

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 8>a guy like Joe Matt. So the time is now,

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:46.479
<v Speaker 8>as soon as possible it can get this guy, because

0:30:47.280 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 8>what he's looking at like you just said, Carver's JT realmutail, Like.

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 4>I think it's also like you look at this, it's

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 4>what you should do, right. You need to extend someone

0:30:57.400 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 4>win over the fan base somehow a little bit, just

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:03.480
<v Speaker 4>a little bit, if it's Mac, if it's Uri, which

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 4>I know people say Yuri's impossible to extend, But I'm

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 4>looking at all these starting pitcher extensions and I think

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:12.200
<v Speaker 4>those are pretty fair price rangers for Uri, who was

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 4>not quite an up and down career up to this point.

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 4>Most recently Chase Burns, who got extended for a good

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 4>chunk of money. And I think you're Wou'd be very

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:21.480
<v Speaker 4>happy to be one hundred million dollar pitcher in this game.

0:31:21.600 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 4>But anyways, with Mac, I can't remember the last time

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 4>a Catcher got extend. I guess Shaylangliers maybe got extended.

0:31:27.640 --> 0:31:30.280
<v Speaker 4>That's no, not even Drake Baldwin. So it's been a while, so.

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 5>Well, I was gonna correct it. It really hasn't been

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:35.120
<v Speaker 5>that long. It's been less than a years since Samuel

0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 5>Basaioh got his Memorials Drafters debut.

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:41.400
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so that was I'll be kind of quick on this.

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 1>I did.

0:31:42.200 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 5>I saw mac as an extension candidate before the season.

0:31:44.520 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 5>I thought that is when they could get the real

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:48.480
<v Speaker 5>value for him before debut, knowing that he was definitely

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:49.960
<v Speaker 5>gonna be joining the team early in the season.

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:51.480
<v Speaker 6>They didn't do that.

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 5>And I think the reason why it's it's unusual for

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:56.720
<v Speaker 5>ketches speak extended overall is just because it's a position

0:31:56.760 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 5>where the aging curve is different. Like a lot of

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 5>these guys, it's before, it's not even after thirty, it's

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 5>like before thirties. Sometimes they're like, you just don't get

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 5>back to that same level yet before And for the Marlins,

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 5>they have club control over him through his age twenty

0:32:10.040 --> 0:32:12.960
<v Speaker 5>nine season, for all of his twenties as things currently stands,

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 5>So what's the point of adding more years to it?

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 5>It depends how you really feel about him as an

0:32:17.720 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 5>overall athlete. I think he is a guy that, relative

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 5>to the position, is more athletic than most. How you

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 5>feel about the intangibles? I mean, to me, I think

0:32:25.560 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 5>there's still some question about where he's going to settle

0:32:27.680 --> 0:32:32.840
<v Speaker 5>in offensively, as the power is pretty good overall, the

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 5>plate discipline is I don't think anything particularly special. The

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:39.960
<v Speaker 5>strikeout rate is considerably higher than average right now. So

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 5>I just when you compare him to like real Mito,

0:32:41.880 --> 0:32:43.720
<v Speaker 5>I don't really see. I don't think you're going to

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 5>get that level consistency offensively. I do think that's very

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:50.680
<v Speaker 5>fair comp defensively overall. And just to go back to Besilloh,

0:32:50.720 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 5>that was eight years, sixty seven million dollars, but he

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 5>was a couple of years younger than Mac was, so

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 5>that was ensuring that they get all of his twenties,

0:32:58.720 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 5>and Basilah's was the same for hitter, and to this

0:33:01.200 --> 0:33:03.560
<v Speaker 5>point he is. I mean, the results have actually been

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 5>very similar to this point, but I think Basillah is

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 5>the one that has much higher floor as an offensive

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:13.000
<v Speaker 5>player and maybe certainly more sketchiness as a defender. I think,

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 5>all things considered, that is kind of the area you're

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 5>looking at where that's probably what max representation we're gonna

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:21.200
<v Speaker 5>shoot for. I think the Mons could get anything just

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 5>a little bit below that, below, like anything in like

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:27.200
<v Speaker 5>the fifty to sixty million dollar range over seven eight

0:33:27.280 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 5>years where they had a couple more years of team

0:33:30.240 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 5>control beyond what they already have. But in no particular

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:36.600
<v Speaker 5>year does it, you know, go past fifteen million dollars.

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:39.720
<v Speaker 5>I think that would kind of be the sweet spot.

0:33:39.920 --> 0:33:42.239
<v Speaker 5>So usually don't see extensions in the middle of the year,

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:44.280
<v Speaker 5>but as Kevin reference, we just saw a couple of

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 5>them across baseball. We saw not only Chase Burns, but

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:50.239
<v Speaker 5>also JJ Weatherholts or the Cardinals in the Pasaiah one

0:33:50.280 --> 0:33:51.920
<v Speaker 5>I referenced. He got that one right in the middle

0:33:51.920 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 5>of the season, right after he debuted. So there is

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:55.719
<v Speaker 5>some precedent for that to happen, even though it's more

0:33:55.840 --> 0:33:59.040
<v Speaker 5>likely to beat tables until the offseason or such.

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 4>Another extension with Oils did an extension with a picture

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 4>too recently, but exactly Bradish, Yeah, but you look at

0:34:06.400 --> 0:34:08.759
<v Speaker 4>like well, we had Robert Murray on too, and he

0:34:08.920 --> 0:34:10.759
<v Speaker 4>was telling us like these are going to become a

0:34:10.800 --> 0:34:14.439
<v Speaker 4>lot more common these mid season extensions, and he said

0:34:14.480 --> 0:34:16.200
<v Speaker 4>that teams are probably talking to players as we speak

0:34:16.280 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 4>right now, so it doesn't come as a surprise. I

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:20.759
<v Speaker 4>also think the interesting thing is here we look back

0:34:20.760 --> 0:34:22.160
<v Speaker 4>at the offseason, we look at all the names that

0:34:22.160 --> 0:34:25.920
<v Speaker 4>they were discussing extensions with. Marcy clearly does not deserve

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:30.480
<v Speaker 4>one anymore. Unfortunately, Kyle Stowers, No, I think guess what

0:34:30.800 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 4>uri they were they tried didn't work. I would try

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:36.760
<v Speaker 4>to re engage in those if I were the Marlins.

0:34:36.840 --> 0:34:39.360
<v Speaker 4>Probably not gonna work. So you look at this roster

0:34:39.520 --> 0:34:41.759
<v Speaker 4>from top to bottom. Maybe if you want to keep

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:44.680
<v Speaker 4>Sandy a little bit longer, you do something there, is

0:34:44.719 --> 0:34:46.600
<v Speaker 4>that going to be possible? Probably not. They're probably not

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 4>gonna do it unless Bruce tells him that he wants

0:34:49.520 --> 0:34:52.759
<v Speaker 4>Sandy here and he'll extended himself. But Joe Mack is

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 4>probably the best name to look at, like there's really

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 4>nobody else. It's it's Joe Mack, and you, Perez, is

0:34:57.239 --> 0:34:59.360
<v Speaker 4>that to one hundred percent guys that you want to

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:02.839
<v Speaker 4>keep around and an extent maybe Otto, But I don't

0:35:02.920 --> 0:35:05.239
<v Speaker 4>see that possible right now, and I wouldn't do it either.

0:35:05.400 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 4>So it's Joe Joe Nieri or nobody really at this point.

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:12.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Sean, I want to hit this with you. I

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 3>want to get your comments on this. You know, it

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 3>satisfies kind of what we're seeing in the comments here

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 3>on the screen, Like the Marlins never extend anybody. I

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 3>have no faith that they will extend. Those are fair

0:35:22.200 --> 0:35:24.760
<v Speaker 3>sentiments to come from fans because the Marlins don't extend

0:35:24.760 --> 0:35:25.400
<v Speaker 3>a lot of players.

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:28.760
<v Speaker 2>That's not really how they've ever operated.

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:30.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, they gave one to Stanton and then traded

0:35:30.680 --> 0:35:32.080
<v Speaker 3>all of his money to the Yankees, So I mean

0:35:32.120 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't really even count.

0:35:33.480 --> 0:35:35.400
<v Speaker 2>What two years into the contract he gets traded.

0:35:35.440 --> 0:35:36.800
<v Speaker 3>I think you can correct me if I'm wrong on that,

0:35:36.880 --> 0:35:39.279
<v Speaker 3>but it's pretty early into the contract, right before the

0:35:39.320 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 3>big money years hit. He gets traded to the Yankees

0:35:41.239 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 3>with all the money included, so or most of it,

0:35:43.560 --> 0:35:44.319
<v Speaker 3>I guess I should say.

0:35:45.440 --> 0:35:48.520
<v Speaker 2>So, you know, timing has to be right.

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:50.040
<v Speaker 3>It has to be a specific kind of player, as

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:52.400
<v Speaker 3>Eli was alluding to a specific kind of athlete. But

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:54.840
<v Speaker 3>I think even if the offense, even if the offense

0:35:54.920 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 3>is is only ever at its floor, for this player,

0:35:57.760 --> 0:36:00.479
<v Speaker 3>he does enough on defense to provide pots of value

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:02.960
<v Speaker 3>positive war year over a year, and you can't say

0:36:03.000 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 3>that for a lot of catchers. And I think the offense,

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 3>the floor of the offense really isn't bad and it's

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 3>still becoming of a starter.

0:36:09.040 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 2>I think at his worst, it's still a player that's gonna.

0:36:11.480 --> 0:36:14.239
<v Speaker 3>Hit like at least like two thirty every year and

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:16.440
<v Speaker 3>pop at least like ten to fifteen home runs. That's

0:36:16.680 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 3>my opinion, with the strikeouts not even being too too bad.

0:36:20.080 --> 0:36:20.960
<v Speaker 2>But that's my opinion.

0:36:21.120 --> 0:36:23.120
<v Speaker 3>Maybe some others see that the floor could be lower

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:26.600
<v Speaker 3>on the offense, which is fair. But even if his

0:36:26.719 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 3>offense is at the floor, the defense is more than enough,

0:36:30.040 --> 0:36:31.759
<v Speaker 3>and I think there's more room to grow into the

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:34.319
<v Speaker 3>offense as well. Maybe he goes through sophomore some next year,

0:36:34.320 --> 0:36:37.239
<v Speaker 3>it's totally possible. But at the end of the day,

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:39.480
<v Speaker 3>it's a young player. He's a special defender, he's a

0:36:39.520 --> 0:36:41.440
<v Speaker 3>great kid, says all the right things, does all the

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:44.279
<v Speaker 3>right things, learns a lot, did everything right through the

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:46.279
<v Speaker 3>miners as a high school catcher, which a lot of

0:36:46.360 --> 0:36:49.920
<v Speaker 3>times don't pan out. Yeah, and yeah, you're right, Like

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:52.759
<v Speaker 3>catcher's age a lot differently than a normal player, which

0:36:52.760 --> 0:36:55.320
<v Speaker 3>is why it's so rare. To see, you know, a

0:36:55.640 --> 0:36:58.120
<v Speaker 3>catcher get a huge extension or a big extension. But

0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:00.840
<v Speaker 3>I think that this player will have have no issue

0:37:00.880 --> 0:37:02.680
<v Speaker 3>whatsoever sticking there.

0:37:02.560 --> 0:37:04.719
<v Speaker 2>Through his prime years. I really don't think there's too

0:37:04.800 --> 0:37:06.080
<v Speaker 2>much of worry. It's not even the guy who was

0:37:06.120 --> 0:37:07.839
<v Speaker 2>really injured at all through his minor league career knock

0:37:07.880 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 2>on Woods, So I mean he's durable. The arm is amazing.

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:15.760
<v Speaker 3>The pop times you see them every time a cop stealing.

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:17.960
<v Speaker 3>There's a reason why Kevin publishes the pop time because

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:21.400
<v Speaker 3>anything under one point nine is incredible. Like, this is

0:37:21.440 --> 0:37:23.680
<v Speaker 3>a clear cut extension candidate in my opinion, even though

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:25.040
<v Speaker 3>he's a catcher. But I want to hear your comments

0:37:25.160 --> 0:37:26.800
<v Speaker 3>in terms of like where where where.

0:37:26.680 --> 0:37:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Are you on this?

0:37:27.200 --> 0:37:30.600
<v Speaker 3>Are you okay with him being an extension candidate as

0:37:30.640 --> 0:37:32.560
<v Speaker 3>long as if he's a catcher, Like what are your

0:37:32.640 --> 0:37:33.480
<v Speaker 3>your comments on this one?

0:37:35.640 --> 0:37:38.799
<v Speaker 1>Yes, absolutely they should extend it. And again we've hit

0:37:38.840 --> 0:37:41.760
<v Speaker 1>it with the floor on the skills he's had on defense,

0:37:41.880 --> 0:37:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the transformative impact he had on this team. Now granted

0:37:45.560 --> 0:37:47.600
<v Speaker 1>you know we're going through it right now obviously, but

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:49.480
<v Speaker 1>still the way the defense, you know, overall and you

0:37:49.719 --> 0:37:53.080
<v Speaker 1>turn turned around, they're at the confidence you saw every

0:37:53.120 --> 0:37:55.640
<v Speaker 1>picture you know, on the roster, having him right from

0:37:55.680 --> 0:37:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the get go. That's something this team you know, desperately

0:37:59.400 --> 0:38:02.520
<v Speaker 1>needed and still does. And that's not going you know,

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:04.880
<v Speaker 1>he's not going to age out of that. The arms,

0:38:04.920 --> 0:38:08.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, going to play for quite some time. I'm

0:38:08.280 --> 0:38:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Scott him got some power in his bat, you know,

0:38:10.880 --> 0:38:14.800
<v Speaker 1>so that but even you know, if he doesn't, he

0:38:14.840 --> 0:38:16.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to get better to be worth the money

0:38:16.719 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 1>that we were talking about, you know, for that, you know,

0:38:19.239 --> 0:38:23.279
<v Speaker 1>basile type extension and to the fan point of just

0:38:23.760 --> 0:38:26.120
<v Speaker 1>needing to see someone extended, I definitely do think that

0:38:26.320 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 1>is a factor. I think all the names you brought

0:38:28.200 --> 0:38:30.880
<v Speaker 1>up are it's the shortlist of candidates that you can

0:38:30.920 --> 0:38:33.600
<v Speaker 1>do that with. And this is a fan base that

0:38:33.680 --> 0:38:36.000
<v Speaker 1>desperately needs to see that, and this is certainly a

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:39.959
<v Speaker 1>piece that they can and should build around. I would

0:38:39.960 --> 0:38:41.640
<v Speaker 1>have no problem with it at all, based on what

0:38:41.680 --> 0:38:43.839
<v Speaker 1>he's done. I think it's different than Marcia last year.

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:46.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is a different situation, you know, than

0:38:46.160 --> 0:38:50.640
<v Speaker 1>that that was relying a lot on a really impressive

0:38:50.719 --> 0:38:54.799
<v Speaker 1>offensive August, you know, for that, markets about what he's

0:38:54.880 --> 0:38:58.799
<v Speaker 1>done with on defense all season, and that they should

0:38:58.880 --> 0:39:01.280
<v Speaker 1>capitalize and extend him as soon as possible.

0:39:03.680 --> 0:39:06.080
<v Speaker 6>Related point on it really quickly before we go to freak.

0:39:06.200 --> 0:39:08.840
<v Speaker 5>But what does it mean for Augustine Ramirez who was

0:39:09.239 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 5>the primary catcher a lot of last year and is

0:39:12.640 --> 0:39:16.000
<v Speaker 5>catching pretty regularly down in Jacksonville right now, but for

0:39:16.120 --> 0:39:18.080
<v Speaker 5>reasons that I don't think any of us fully understand,

0:39:18.160 --> 0:39:20.760
<v Speaker 5>because it's not really turning a corner. Like I highlighted

0:39:20.800 --> 0:39:23.160
<v Speaker 5>this really nice cost ceiling he had today, but that

0:39:23.440 --> 0:39:26.160
<v Speaker 5>was like picking a needle out of a haystack because

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:29.759
<v Speaker 5>so many of his defensive plays have been low light

0:39:29.840 --> 0:39:31.880
<v Speaker 5>since he going down there. He's been so error prone,

0:39:32.000 --> 0:39:34.359
<v Speaker 5>like he's never going to stick at that position at

0:39:34.520 --> 0:39:37.760
<v Speaker 5>the big league level. And I think that's an interesting

0:39:37.840 --> 0:39:39.719
<v Speaker 5>name to just keep your eye on over the next

0:39:39.920 --> 0:39:43.360
<v Speaker 5>eight days as a stealthy trade candidate, and Gus the

0:39:43.440 --> 0:39:46.120
<v Speaker 5>fact that he's just I don't know what they're going

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:49.520
<v Speaker 5>to do with him really, given that they are still

0:39:49.560 --> 0:39:52.080
<v Speaker 5>working him out as catcher, and I don't know who

0:39:52.120 --> 0:39:54.640
<v Speaker 5>they're trying to showcase him for when it comes to that.

0:39:55.480 --> 0:39:57.360
<v Speaker 5>And even though it's important to have some sort of

0:39:57.440 --> 0:40:01.320
<v Speaker 5>depth at this position, as Carver kind of like mentions

0:40:01.400 --> 0:40:04.600
<v Speaker 5>like max track record a durability these last four seasons

0:40:04.640 --> 0:40:06.759
<v Speaker 5>has been pretty impeccable. He hasn't been hurt since twenty

0:40:06.800 --> 0:40:10.440
<v Speaker 5>twenty two. They're just not going to need to invest

0:40:10.600 --> 0:40:13.319
<v Speaker 5>very much in that catcher position moving forward. Outside of Mac,

0:40:13.960 --> 0:40:17.520
<v Speaker 5>so Gus is somebody that maybe changes scenery candidate, which

0:40:17.600 --> 0:40:19.319
<v Speaker 5>is hard to believe given where we were a year ago,

0:40:19.440 --> 0:40:22.320
<v Speaker 5>but the past year has just gone pretty poorly on

0:40:22.400 --> 0:40:24.840
<v Speaker 5>both sized the ball with him. Just a name to

0:40:24.960 --> 0:40:26.680
<v Speaker 5>keep in mind, even though it would be selling love

0:40:26.719 --> 0:40:29.719
<v Speaker 5>from the Marlins perspective, So that will hit. This quick

0:40:29.760 --> 0:40:32.000
<v Speaker 5>ad break here from fan Duel and then the rest

0:40:32.040 --> 0:40:33.200
<v Speaker 5>of the show on the other side.

0:40:35.440 --> 0:40:38.240
<v Speaker 10>This episode is brought to you by fan Duel. Baseball

0:40:38.360 --> 0:40:40.520
<v Speaker 10>fans think you know who's hitting a homer today, Well,

0:40:40.600 --> 0:40:42.759
<v Speaker 10>Fan Duel is giving you a free chance to call

0:40:42.840 --> 0:40:45.800
<v Speaker 10>your shot with Daily Dingers joining the action is easy.

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:47.759
<v Speaker 10>Just make your free pick on who's hitting a home

0:40:47.840 --> 0:40:49.880
<v Speaker 10>run in their game, and if you're right, you'll get

0:40:49.920 --> 0:40:52.440
<v Speaker 10>a profit boost to use on your next bet for

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:55.600
<v Speaker 10>a chance at extra winnings. You've got nothing to lose

0:40:55.640 --> 0:40:57.759
<v Speaker 10>and a lot to gain, and don't forget you can

0:40:57.800 --> 0:41:00.520
<v Speaker 10>make a free pick every day, I'll see and long.

0:41:00.840 --> 0:41:03.719
<v Speaker 10>It's just another reason why FanDuel is the home for

0:41:03.880 --> 0:41:06.480
<v Speaker 10>home runs. So are you ready to play your game today?

0:41:06.920 --> 0:41:10.040
<v Speaker 10>Join all the action at FanDuel dot com slash podcast.

0:41:10.239 --> 0:41:14.600
<v Speaker 10>That's FanDuel dot com slash podcast to play daily dingers

0:41:14.680 --> 0:41:17.200
<v Speaker 10>and make your free pick on who's hitting a homer.

0:41:17.360 --> 0:41:20.840
<v Speaker 10>Playball and swing for the fences on FanDuel, an official

0:41:20.920 --> 0:41:23.400
<v Speaker 10>partner of Major League Baseball.

0:41:23.080 --> 0:41:26.040
<v Speaker 11>Twenty one plus Select states for Kansas and affiliation with

0:41:26.160 --> 0:41:30.800
<v Speaker 11>Kansas Star Casino eighteen plus DC Kentucky, Wyoming. No purchase necessary,

0:41:30.880 --> 0:41:34.320
<v Speaker 11>opt in required. Bonus issued is non withdrawable profit boost tokens.

0:41:34.440 --> 0:41:38.040
<v Speaker 11>Restrictions apply, including any token expiration and max wagerromount. See

0:41:38.080 --> 0:41:41.160
<v Speaker 11>terms at sportsbook dot FanDuel dot com. Gambling problem called

0:41:41.200 --> 0:41:43.520
<v Speaker 11>one eight hundred Gambler Call one eight hundred my reset

0:41:43.680 --> 0:41:46.520
<v Speaker 11>one eight eight eight seven eight nine seven seven seven seven.

0:41:46.640 --> 0:41:51.040
<v Speaker 11>Visit CCPG dot org, slash chat Connecticut, Visit MD gamblinghelp

0:41:51.080 --> 0:41:54.600
<v Speaker 11>dot org. Maryland Visit Gambling Helpline MA dot org. Call

0:41:54.719 --> 0:41:57.879
<v Speaker 11>eight hundred three two seven five zero five zero Massachusetts

0:41:57.960 --> 0:42:00.640
<v Speaker 11>call one eight seven seven eight Hope and why text

0:42:00.760 --> 0:42:02.879
<v Speaker 11>hope and why New York Call one eight seven seven

0:42:02.960 --> 0:42:04.800
<v Speaker 11>seven seven zero seven eight six seven.

0:42:04.719 --> 0:42:11.239
<v Speaker 3>Louisiana back for the rest of what has been a

0:42:12.160 --> 0:42:15.160
<v Speaker 3>jam packed but roller coaster of emotions. I guess I

0:42:15.200 --> 0:42:18.560
<v Speaker 3>would say on the show so far, you know, I

0:42:18.640 --> 0:42:22.080
<v Speaker 3>think we've we've found found the good as we can

0:42:22.280 --> 0:42:24.600
<v Speaker 3>and what has been a very tough stretch for the

0:42:24.640 --> 0:42:27.840
<v Speaker 3>Marlins hopefully coming to an end this week against the

0:42:27.880 --> 0:42:29.479
<v Speaker 3>Phillies at home. We'll talk about that in a second.

0:42:29.480 --> 0:42:30.879
<v Speaker 3>I want to get to two more things with you guys.

0:42:31.360 --> 0:42:34.239
<v Speaker 3>We mentioned them already a couple times. Jacob Marcy so

0:42:34.360 --> 0:42:38.080
<v Speaker 3>Jacob Marci Perier reporting Kevin is now as we heard

0:42:38.080 --> 0:42:40.920
<v Speaker 3>I think in Houston it was said that he won't

0:42:41.200 --> 0:42:42.320
<v Speaker 3>play every day against.

0:42:42.160 --> 0:42:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Right hand and pitching.

0:42:44.440 --> 0:42:48.600
<v Speaker 3>He is now, you know, succumbing some of those reps

0:42:48.680 --> 0:42:51.160
<v Speaker 3>to the guys like Conine and Ruiz, who I think

0:42:51.160 --> 0:42:53.719
<v Speaker 3>I've earned it for sure. Both of them have played

0:42:53.719 --> 0:42:57.759
<v Speaker 3>extremely well. We've already started to see that happen. And

0:42:57.840 --> 0:43:01.480
<v Speaker 3>we're also looking at the impending return of Owen Casey,

0:43:02.000 --> 0:43:05.120
<v Speaker 3>who yesterday we're heard is continuing baseball activities. He's been

0:43:05.160 --> 0:43:08.280
<v Speaker 3>able to run, hit and do defensive work with no issues.

0:43:08.320 --> 0:43:11.840
<v Speaker 3>At per MLB dot com. So I guess we probably

0:43:11.880 --> 0:43:14.440
<v Speaker 3>aren't too far away from Casey probably going on to

0:43:14.480 --> 0:43:16.280
<v Speaker 3>rehab assignment, maybe to Jupiter, maybe.

0:43:16.120 --> 0:43:17.160
<v Speaker 2>The Jacksonville, who knows.

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:21.320
<v Speaker 3>But my question for you guys is looking probably a

0:43:21.320 --> 0:43:23.000
<v Speaker 3>little bit down the road. I know we're probably like

0:43:23.040 --> 0:43:24.520
<v Speaker 3>at least a week to two weeks out on this,

0:43:24.719 --> 0:43:29.360
<v Speaker 3>but Marcy's gotten the whole season to show improvement.

0:43:29.760 --> 0:43:31.600
<v Speaker 2>We know that the Marlins still have faith in him.

0:43:32.000 --> 0:43:34.280
<v Speaker 3>I think that there's reason to still like the player,

0:43:34.640 --> 0:43:37.040
<v Speaker 3>given that he is a damn good defensive center fielder,

0:43:37.320 --> 0:43:39.799
<v Speaker 3>a true center fielder. He holds that position down very well.

0:43:40.239 --> 0:43:42.600
<v Speaker 3>It says that the bat has been a black hole,

0:43:42.800 --> 0:43:45.560
<v Speaker 3>there's no getting around it. I guess this series he

0:43:45.640 --> 0:43:48.520
<v Speaker 3>got two hits in the two games that he did play.

0:43:48.880 --> 0:43:51.040
<v Speaker 3>I think he pinched hit, say two or yeah, I

0:43:51.080 --> 0:43:53.360
<v Speaker 3>think he pitched it today as well. Didn't get anything.

0:43:53.440 --> 0:43:58.359
<v Speaker 2>But for lack of a better term, he struggled very

0:43:58.400 --> 0:44:01.680
<v Speaker 2>badly all the way through the year. So he's showing

0:44:01.719 --> 0:44:03.279
<v Speaker 2>glimpses of the times of kind of battling through it,

0:44:03.320 --> 0:44:03.560
<v Speaker 2>and then.

0:44:03.480 --> 0:44:05.480
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of just fallen off and he hasn't really

0:44:05.520 --> 0:44:09.000
<v Speaker 3>been able to stay consistent. So a triple A stent

0:44:09.040 --> 0:44:11.440
<v Speaker 3>workd for Harry Berto, would it work for Jacob Marcy?

0:44:11.880 --> 0:44:15.120
<v Speaker 3>I think we are of the opinion that it probably would.

0:44:15.840 --> 0:44:18.200
<v Speaker 3>Marlins have yet to make that move. But will they

0:44:18.320 --> 0:44:20.640
<v Speaker 3>do that when Owen Casey is ready to come back,

0:44:20.719 --> 0:44:24.680
<v Speaker 3>And can they live through manning centerfield without Jacob Marcy

0:44:25.680 --> 0:44:27.920
<v Speaker 3>if he continues to struggle for the next week to

0:44:28.000 --> 0:44:31.160
<v Speaker 3>two weeks. Kevin, go ahead, I'll let you hit on this.

0:44:31.719 --> 0:44:34.520
<v Speaker 3>What happens when Casey comes back? Is Marcy the guy

0:44:34.560 --> 0:44:36.000
<v Speaker 3>they send down? Or does something else happen.

0:44:37.160 --> 0:44:40.840
<v Speaker 4>I think by the time Casey's back, we should be

0:44:41.320 --> 0:44:44.319
<v Speaker 4>pretty much very close to either the deadline or right

0:44:44.400 --> 0:44:47.479
<v Speaker 4>after it. So I think we should have some moves

0:44:47.560 --> 0:44:50.080
<v Speaker 4>made there that maybe open up a spot for Casey,

0:44:50.239 --> 0:44:53.080
<v Speaker 4>just based off of trades. And I say this because

0:44:53.200 --> 0:44:55.600
<v Speaker 4>I don't know why. I just have a feeling they're

0:44:55.600 --> 0:44:58.279
<v Speaker 4>going to move on from Griffin Conine. They don't talk

0:44:58.320 --> 0:45:01.120
<v Speaker 4>about him as much as I think they I think

0:45:01.160 --> 0:45:04.279
<v Speaker 4>they should, they don't. It feels like they had their

0:45:04.360 --> 0:45:06.960
<v Speaker 4>guys right, and that's something that we've said with Braxon,

0:45:07.080 --> 0:45:10.759
<v Speaker 4>with other guys in the organization, and I think specifically

0:45:10.840 --> 0:45:12.560
<v Speaker 4>just look at this Casey situation. I think he'll just

0:45:12.560 --> 0:45:14.799
<v Speaker 4>take Conin spot. If Conin has moved. I'm not saying

0:45:14.840 --> 0:45:17.680
<v Speaker 4>he is. I'm not reporting that they're looking to move him,

0:45:17.800 --> 0:45:20.040
<v Speaker 4>but I don't know. I just have a feeling they

0:45:20.040 --> 0:45:22.160
<v Speaker 4>will when it comes to Marci. Yeah, I think this

0:45:22.320 --> 0:45:25.279
<v Speaker 4>is step one and let's see what you got in

0:45:25.360 --> 0:45:28.080
<v Speaker 4>this type of situation, and we'll go from there. If

0:45:28.120 --> 0:45:30.640
<v Speaker 4>he continues to struggle, if it doesn't go well for him,

0:45:31.080 --> 0:45:33.320
<v Speaker 4>they'll just have to send him down. Because there's this

0:45:33.440 --> 0:45:36.760
<v Speaker 4>guy named cam Canerella who continues to rake and continues

0:45:36.840 --> 0:45:39.080
<v Speaker 4>to prove that he is more than ready. And I

0:45:39.239 --> 0:45:42.080
<v Speaker 4>know the defensive aspect and the base running aspect for

0:45:42.120 --> 0:45:44.759
<v Speaker 4>Marshie specifically, something that they would be losing because he's

0:45:45.040 --> 0:45:47.759
<v Speaker 4>second on the team in stolen bases and he's buy

0:45:47.800 --> 0:45:50.920
<v Speaker 4>out above average, a pretty good defender in center field. Now,

0:45:51.360 --> 0:45:53.320
<v Speaker 4>this was not a very good series for base running,

0:45:53.320 --> 0:45:54.920
<v Speaker 4>and Marcy was at the forefront of that. And you

0:45:54.920 --> 0:45:57.480
<v Speaker 4>even look at Houston not very good either because they

0:45:57.520 --> 0:45:59.600
<v Speaker 4>got thrown out a couple of times. So at this

0:45:59.719 --> 0:46:02.200
<v Speaker 4>point you just have to assume it's something mental with him.

0:46:02.880 --> 0:46:05.600
<v Speaker 4>I really don't think he is a terrible baseball player.

0:46:06.000 --> 0:46:08.160
<v Speaker 4>I think he's a serviceable guy when when he is

0:46:08.480 --> 0:46:11.160
<v Speaker 4>a decent player. I just think maybe the pressure got

0:46:11.239 --> 0:46:12.759
<v Speaker 4>to end this season a little bit too much in

0:46:12.880 --> 0:46:14.480
<v Speaker 4>terms of like, hey, you're gonna have to step up,

0:46:14.520 --> 0:46:16.440
<v Speaker 4>be the guy, play every day. And I think this

0:46:16.520 --> 0:46:18.120
<v Speaker 4>is something they should have done at least a month ago.

0:46:18.520 --> 0:46:21.280
<v Speaker 4>This this transition off of being an everyday guy against

0:46:21.360 --> 0:46:23.959
<v Speaker 4>right handed pitching, and this is something ELI had noted,

0:46:24.040 --> 0:46:27.160
<v Speaker 4>like Marcias started every single game against the right handed

0:46:27.320 --> 0:46:30.480
<v Speaker 4>starting pitcher until that game against Houston where they started Ruiz,

0:46:30.520 --> 0:46:34.000
<v Speaker 4>And rightfully so, Ruiz deserves it. He's been probably the

0:46:34.040 --> 0:46:36.480
<v Speaker 4>best acquisition for Peter this offseason, at least on the

0:46:36.480 --> 0:46:38.279
<v Speaker 4>position player side. It's a very low bar, but he

0:46:38.560 --> 0:46:41.600
<v Speaker 4>didn't need it. And overall he's probably number one or

0:46:41.640 --> 0:46:43.640
<v Speaker 4>number two, right behind John King or ahead of Junking,

0:46:43.719 --> 0:46:47.160
<v Speaker 4>however youone assess that. But yeah, Ruise deserves it. Conan

0:46:47.160 --> 0:46:48.839
<v Speaker 4>and I do believe deserves it a lot too, because

0:46:48.880 --> 0:46:51.120
<v Speaker 4>he has been good. And I look at Conan and

0:46:51.120 --> 0:46:53.919
<v Speaker 4>as one of those solid players that just plays well

0:46:54.719 --> 0:46:56.800
<v Speaker 4>good overall defense. He has a great arm in the

0:46:56.840 --> 0:47:00.400
<v Speaker 4>outfield and he's just a consistent hitter. He doesn't need

0:47:00.440 --> 0:47:03.360
<v Speaker 4>to hit twenty bombs twenty five bombs, he hits fifteen

0:47:03.400 --> 0:47:05.239
<v Speaker 4>of them. You're happy with a good on base and

0:47:05.360 --> 0:47:08.480
<v Speaker 4>a solid approach, which I think Conan has certainly evolved

0:47:08.560 --> 0:47:10.440
<v Speaker 4>from what we saw during his Double eight a's and

0:47:10.520 --> 0:47:12.640
<v Speaker 4>even early Triple A where he was striking out almost

0:47:12.680 --> 0:47:15.200
<v Speaker 4>forty percent at the time. He's a much different player

0:47:15.200 --> 0:47:17.239
<v Speaker 4>from that, and I think that's a really good thing

0:47:17.320 --> 0:47:19.799
<v Speaker 4>and unfortunate. That's why I think teams would probably target

0:47:19.880 --> 0:47:23.040
<v Speaker 4>Conen as a trade option when it comes to the deadline.

0:47:23.080 --> 0:47:26.080
<v Speaker 4>Arizona needs an outfielder, Phillies need an outfielder. There's a

0:47:26.120 --> 0:47:27.680
<v Speaker 4>lot of teams that need anutfield. I'm gonn come out

0:47:27.680 --> 0:47:29.359
<v Speaker 4>with an article on a team that I think Conac

0:47:29.400 --> 0:47:32.120
<v Speaker 4>could end up in because I think we have unfortunately

0:47:32.160 --> 0:47:35.080
<v Speaker 4>reached a point where the Moons are We're looking at

0:47:35.120 --> 0:47:38.160
<v Speaker 4>this from a seller's perspective. We dropped the one for Hicks.

0:47:38.640 --> 0:47:42.399
<v Speaker 4>Con En is up tomorrow. So yeah, Casey, I think

0:47:42.480 --> 0:47:44.160
<v Speaker 4>just would take Kona spot it. There's a trade, now

0:47:44.239 --> 0:47:47.400
<v Speaker 4>there's no trade. Yeah, you gotta send down Marci if

0:47:47.440 --> 0:47:49.920
<v Speaker 4>he continues to struggle, or whoever continues to struggle. At

0:47:49.920 --> 0:47:52.960
<v Speaker 4>this point, they have grand Poli on the roster, and

0:47:53.000 --> 0:47:54.560
<v Speaker 4>maybe they could just get rid of Polly or or

0:47:54.640 --> 0:47:58.200
<v Speaker 4>Leohimanez if he continues to struggle. Maybe there's a name

0:47:58.200 --> 0:47:58.680
<v Speaker 4>I'm forgetting.

0:47:58.680 --> 0:47:59.319
<v Speaker 2>Oh nav Ritto.

0:47:59.440 --> 0:48:01.440
<v Speaker 4>Holy shit, he's still on the roster. They could send

0:48:01.520 --> 0:48:04.040
<v Speaker 4>him down. So there are guys that could send down. Yes,

0:48:04.360 --> 0:48:07.920
<v Speaker 4>over a Marshie before Marsi. But if they are so

0:48:08.200 --> 0:48:11.480
<v Speaker 4>adamant about keeping Leo he managed Grandpa and Brian Ovarette

0:48:11.480 --> 0:48:14.520
<v Speaker 4>on the roster, then I guess Marcia would get sent down.

0:48:14.520 --> 0:48:17.120
<v Speaker 5>For cases. It took you a few minutes, but you

0:48:17.239 --> 0:48:19.200
<v Speaker 5>kind of got to where I was originally on this

0:48:19.400 --> 0:48:22.120
<v Speaker 5>that I don't think they're necessarily related. One on one

0:48:22.320 --> 0:48:26.080
<v Speaker 5>Casey coming back soon and Marci potentially going down, But

0:48:26.480 --> 0:48:28.520
<v Speaker 5>without going like too granular on that stuff, because as

0:48:28.560 --> 0:48:31.160
<v Speaker 5>you said, this has coming almost certainly right after the deadline.

0:48:31.280 --> 0:48:32.920
<v Speaker 5>There we think the Martins are gonna make some sort

0:48:32.920 --> 0:48:34.880
<v Speaker 5>of moves and they're gonna be very open minded, so

0:48:35.040 --> 0:48:36.600
<v Speaker 5>we're not going to try to predict the moves and

0:48:36.680 --> 0:48:39.239
<v Speaker 5>all the related stuff. But just on Marsie, the fact

0:48:39.239 --> 0:48:41.160
<v Speaker 5>that it's kind of a combination of the physical and

0:48:41.200 --> 0:48:43.880
<v Speaker 5>the mental and the physical is pretty obvious to me

0:48:44.000 --> 0:48:46.000
<v Speaker 5>on several fronts. One, he's just not getting to his

0:48:46.080 --> 0:48:48.080
<v Speaker 5>power the way that he did last year. The reason

0:48:48.080 --> 0:48:49.800
<v Speaker 5>why he was such a breakup layer in the organization

0:48:49.920 --> 0:48:51.919
<v Speaker 5>last season, he was all of a sudden, he's showing

0:48:52.440 --> 0:48:56.839
<v Speaker 5>an average power conservatively, and he showed at the big

0:48:56.880 --> 0:48:58.480
<v Speaker 5>league level, and that small sample size as well, and

0:48:58.520 --> 0:49:00.279
<v Speaker 5>this years old, without even looking it up. I think

0:49:00.280 --> 0:49:02.920
<v Speaker 5>he has three homers because I can remember them because

0:49:03.239 --> 0:49:05.120
<v Speaker 5>every time he hit one and made me feel like, hey,

0:49:05.200 --> 0:49:06.920
<v Speaker 5>you might be turning the corner, and yet he hasn't.

0:49:07.400 --> 0:49:10.040
<v Speaker 5>So the power going away, the plate discipline going from

0:49:10.280 --> 0:49:13.080
<v Speaker 5>being elite, that was what we were excited about as well,

0:49:13.120 --> 0:49:17.080
<v Speaker 5>when I got called up elite plate disciplines going You know, Okay,

0:49:17.440 --> 0:49:19.560
<v Speaker 5>that's a pretty big difference in terms of his player value.

0:49:20.080 --> 0:49:22.600
<v Speaker 5>You mentioned the base running, maybe a little bit physical there,

0:49:22.600 --> 0:49:24.320
<v Speaker 5>but that's almost all mental. The fact that he's just

0:49:24.400 --> 0:49:28.000
<v Speaker 5>making really weird decisions of the indecisiveness he had during

0:49:28.040 --> 0:49:31.239
<v Speaker 5>that play on Saturday's game really stood out in a

0:49:31.320 --> 0:49:33.440
<v Speaker 5>way that this guy's just not a great frame of

0:49:33.520 --> 0:49:36.720
<v Speaker 5>mind right now. And we touched on his role changed

0:49:36.760 --> 0:49:38.279
<v Speaker 5>there was that game in Houston where he didn't face

0:49:38.280 --> 0:49:39.960
<v Speaker 5>a riety, and then today today was another one of

0:49:40.000 --> 0:49:42.200
<v Speaker 5>those days where they're facing a right handed starting pitcher

0:49:42.480 --> 0:49:44.880
<v Speaker 5>and not a very good one in Walker Bueler at

0:49:44.920 --> 0:49:46.520
<v Speaker 5>this stage of his career, and yet he's on the bench.

0:49:47.520 --> 0:49:51.640
<v Speaker 5>I chuckled in our group chat when in the late

0:49:51.760 --> 0:49:53.520
<v Speaker 5>ennings and the ninth inning he finally comes off the

0:49:53.560 --> 0:49:55.320
<v Speaker 5>bench to pinch hit against Mason Miller.

0:49:55.400 --> 0:49:55.719
<v Speaker 6>I don't know.

0:49:56.120 --> 0:49:58.360
<v Speaker 5>That's just one of those other head scratching ideas. You

0:49:58.440 --> 0:50:00.520
<v Speaker 5>take this guy that is completely law as a hitter

0:50:00.640 --> 0:50:02.200
<v Speaker 5>and you say you just throw them into the fire

0:50:02.239 --> 0:50:03.120
<v Speaker 5>against Mason.

0:50:02.920 --> 0:50:05.239
<v Speaker 2>Miller, maybe this will snap them out of it.

0:50:05.520 --> 0:50:07.920
<v Speaker 5>And that did not work out either. So the combination

0:50:08.080 --> 0:50:11.320
<v Speaker 5>of the physical going wrong the mental going wrong, not

0:50:11.480 --> 0:50:14.000
<v Speaker 5>that he necessarily deserves against sent down. As you noted,

0:50:14.040 --> 0:50:15.600
<v Speaker 5>there are guys on this roster that I think are

0:50:15.840 --> 0:50:18.720
<v Speaker 5>less equipped to help this team win games in various forms.

0:50:19.320 --> 0:50:21.680
<v Speaker 5>But this is about getting Marcie right for his future.

0:50:21.760 --> 0:50:23.200
<v Speaker 5>This is a guy that I think they still have

0:50:23.440 --> 0:50:25.680
<v Speaker 5>as a very significant part of their long term plans.

0:50:25.719 --> 0:50:28.279
<v Speaker 5>You want to get them right, and in his case,

0:50:28.800 --> 0:50:31.440
<v Speaker 5>I think he would benefit from some time off sometime

0:50:31.520 --> 0:50:34.040
<v Speaker 5>out of the major league level. So even if they

0:50:34.080 --> 0:50:36.080
<v Speaker 5>don't like any of the alternatives down there, whether it's

0:50:36.160 --> 0:50:41.480
<v Speaker 5>Andrew Pintar or Matthew Etzel, I thy the other potential

0:50:41.560 --> 0:50:43.840
<v Speaker 5>call ups that they can make Kemp Alderman, who I

0:50:43.880 --> 0:50:45.600
<v Speaker 5>think they like a lot but obviously can't help in

0:50:45.640 --> 0:50:49.600
<v Speaker 5>center field whatsoever. Like, even if there isn't a suitable replacement,

0:50:49.800 --> 0:50:51.759
<v Speaker 5>if you're this is a team that's not really going

0:50:51.800 --> 0:50:53.640
<v Speaker 5>to be in full contention anyway, you just got to

0:50:53.680 --> 0:50:55.600
<v Speaker 5>do what's best for the player long term. And so

0:50:55.760 --> 0:50:59.080
<v Speaker 5>for him, even though I'm not expecting it, I would

0:50:59.080 --> 0:51:01.440
<v Speaker 5>be on board if they gave him just a little

0:51:01.440 --> 0:51:03.800
<v Speaker 5>bit of a breather down in Triple A to reset

0:51:03.840 --> 0:51:05.320
<v Speaker 5>things and try to salvage this season.

0:51:08.480 --> 0:51:11.040
<v Speaker 3>In addition to ConA and Kevin, there's also harro Berto

0:51:11.160 --> 0:51:12.280
<v Speaker 3>who could nothing.

0:51:12.320 --> 0:51:14.440
<v Speaker 2>He is he could be a trade candidate as well.

0:51:14.520 --> 0:51:16.840
<v Speaker 4>So if they do move in outfield, well, look at yesterday,

0:51:17.000 --> 0:51:20.359
<v Speaker 4>Look at yesterday Connolly early got traded for Curtis meet.

0:51:20.360 --> 0:51:22.680
<v Speaker 4>I think Eli made a great had a great tweeter

0:51:22.960 --> 0:51:26.080
<v Speaker 4>he told us in the chat, Like that's that's a

0:51:26.160 --> 0:51:29.200
<v Speaker 4>great way to look at it, right, So definitely something

0:51:29.200 --> 0:51:31.399
<v Speaker 4>to consider there to with Bert. I know Eli had

0:51:31.640 --> 0:51:35.080
<v Speaker 4>Emerson Hancock in that trade for Bert. I know certain

0:51:35.120 --> 0:51:38.040
<v Speaker 4>someone named you know, I wouldn't even say. Someone on

0:51:38.080 --> 0:51:39.839
<v Speaker 4>Twitter said it was a very bad trade. But whatever,

0:51:39.920 --> 0:51:40.320
<v Speaker 4>we move on.

0:51:41.920 --> 0:51:44.800
<v Speaker 3>No comment on that anyways, we'll go on. I agree,

0:51:45.840 --> 0:51:47.239
<v Speaker 3>we'll see what they do at the deadline. I don't

0:51:47.239 --> 0:51:50.120
<v Speaker 3>think we're quite near the position where we're going to

0:51:50.760 --> 0:51:52.279
<v Speaker 3>guess at the moves that they make. I think we're

0:51:52.320 --> 0:51:55.600
<v Speaker 3>gonna probably wait at least this Philly series before we

0:51:56.800 --> 0:52:00.560
<v Speaker 3>like primely labeled the Marlins as sellers. Maybe they sweep

0:52:00.600 --> 0:52:03.839
<v Speaker 3>the Phillies and Padres losing games, you know, Padres leap

0:52:03.840 --> 0:52:06.480
<v Speaker 3>frogged Marlins today, and maybe the Marlins can get back

0:52:06.520 --> 0:52:08.640
<v Speaker 3>some positions in the standings for the Wild Purbais, they're

0:52:08.640 --> 0:52:11.920
<v Speaker 3>now three games out of We'll see, but I think

0:52:11.960 --> 0:52:14.680
<v Speaker 3>this series is a make your break series as we

0:52:14.760 --> 0:52:17.920
<v Speaker 3>go into previewing the division rival Philadelphia Phillies, who are

0:52:17.960 --> 0:52:21.920
<v Speaker 3>doing much better under our old friend Don Manningly. So firstly,

0:52:21.960 --> 0:52:23.600
<v Speaker 3>to you guys, I mean we're seeing them come back.

0:52:24.600 --> 0:52:26.719
<v Speaker 3>This team, I think we all knew it was kind

0:52:26.760 --> 0:52:28.200
<v Speaker 3>of too good to struggle the way that they were

0:52:29.080 --> 0:52:31.799
<v Speaker 3>under Thompson and manningly has this ship kind of righted

0:52:32.280 --> 0:52:34.520
<v Speaker 3>and they're doing pretty damn well as you can see

0:52:34.600 --> 0:52:39.520
<v Speaker 3>right now since the last time Marlin saw them. So yeah,

0:52:39.920 --> 0:52:42.200
<v Speaker 3>Phillies coming into town. First question to you, guys, Sean,

0:52:42.239 --> 0:52:45.000
<v Speaker 3>I'll go to you first, is this make or break

0:52:45.200 --> 0:52:47.160
<v Speaker 3>for the Marlins? Do they have to at least take

0:52:47.200 --> 0:52:50.080
<v Speaker 3>two or three for them to still say they have

0:52:50.160 --> 0:52:50.799
<v Speaker 3>a chance this here?

0:52:52.080 --> 0:52:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, I thought this series was make or break a

0:52:54.600 --> 0:52:57.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of sway against the Padres, But assuming that I

0:52:57.600 --> 0:53:00.320
<v Speaker 1>was wrong about that, then yes, absolutely they would need to,

0:53:01.080 --> 0:53:04.160
<v Speaker 1>especially with them having their three best horses going in

0:53:04.200 --> 0:53:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the rotation. Didn't really get any luck you know there,

0:53:07.320 --> 0:53:09.600
<v Speaker 1>unlike they've had, you know, during when they were doing well,

0:53:09.680 --> 0:53:11.799
<v Speaker 1>they caught a lot of lucky breaks. This is going

0:53:11.840 --> 0:53:13.719
<v Speaker 1>to be the best that the Phillies could could offer,

0:53:14.960 --> 0:53:18.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, for this lineup. So if they yeah, if

0:53:18.120 --> 0:53:20.560
<v Speaker 1>they lose this, then that's that's it. That's too much

0:53:20.600 --> 0:53:23.360
<v Speaker 1>ground to lose. It's another team that you'll is ahead

0:53:23.360 --> 0:53:25.120
<v Speaker 1>of you in the playoff race if you'd be seen

0:53:25.680 --> 0:53:29.799
<v Speaker 1>if you made the postseason, and if they don't show

0:53:29.880 --> 0:53:31.120
<v Speaker 1>some magic quickly, then.

0:53:31.200 --> 0:53:33.280
<v Speaker 2>This is it agreed?

0:53:33.560 --> 0:53:37.440
<v Speaker 3>Definitely, It's gonna take a pretty prime effort from the Marlins.

0:53:37.480 --> 0:53:38.640
<v Speaker 3>They're gonna have to be at their best because this

0:53:38.640 --> 0:53:41.360
<v Speaker 3>team's good. My question to you, guys, Eli, I'll go

0:53:41.400 --> 0:53:44.160
<v Speaker 3>to you, what's the difference? What's been the difference other

0:53:44.239 --> 0:53:45.320
<v Speaker 3>than Donnie managing?

0:53:45.400 --> 0:53:46.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I don't know how.

0:53:46.200 --> 0:53:51.080
<v Speaker 3>Much he has just in this but after he took over,

0:53:51.200 --> 0:53:54.520
<v Speaker 3>this team has been pretty pretty good. And we knew

0:53:54.520 --> 0:53:56.680
<v Speaker 3>that the lineup was too good to fail for too

0:53:57.040 --> 0:54:00.239
<v Speaker 3>too long of a time. So yeah, what what is

0:54:00.280 --> 0:54:02.319
<v Speaker 3>the difference in your mind in this Phillies team since

0:54:02.480 --> 0:54:03.480
<v Speaker 3>not too long ago this year.

0:54:04.040 --> 0:54:06.320
<v Speaker 5>I'm sort of gonna reject the entire premise of this

0:54:06.440 --> 0:54:09.120
<v Speaker 5>question and go lean on something I've told you guys.

0:54:09.120 --> 0:54:11.320
<v Speaker 5>Disagreements are healthy, Like this is the Phillies tin that

0:54:11.400 --> 0:54:14.080
<v Speaker 5>did turn things around for a significant period of time

0:54:14.120 --> 0:54:16.040
<v Speaker 5>in the first half of the season, but they're kind

0:54:16.040 --> 0:54:18.560
<v Speaker 5>of limping into town against Marlins. We're talking as the

0:54:18.600 --> 0:54:20.920
<v Speaker 5>Sunday night baseball game gets underway. Maybe they win it

0:54:20.960 --> 0:54:23.160
<v Speaker 5>and they have better vibes coming into it, but they're

0:54:23.160 --> 0:54:25.239
<v Speaker 5>going to lose this series against the Yankees after losing

0:54:25.280 --> 0:54:27.960
<v Speaker 5>their previous series I'll throw up the standings against look

0:54:28.080 --> 0:54:30.560
<v Speaker 5>very closely at the separation. There's only four and a

0:54:30.600 --> 0:54:33.279
<v Speaker 5>half games between the Marlins and the Phillies. If the

0:54:33.360 --> 0:54:36.080
<v Speaker 5>Marlins shockingly swip the Phillies, that's one and a half

0:54:36.200 --> 0:54:38.680
<v Speaker 5>games separating them. They've lost four in a row. They

0:54:38.719 --> 0:54:41.600
<v Speaker 5>have a negative run differential on the season minus eighteen.

0:54:42.480 --> 0:54:44.840
<v Speaker 5>The Marlins have a better run differential this season than

0:54:44.880 --> 0:54:46.920
<v Speaker 5>the Phillies do, and most of this season at this

0:54:46.960 --> 0:54:50.080
<v Speaker 5>point has now been managed under Donnie making his return.

0:54:51.560 --> 0:54:53.760
<v Speaker 5>I just want to point to the one particular area

0:54:53.880 --> 0:54:57.880
<v Speaker 5>where the Phillies continue to be mentally disappointing. Offensively, they are.

0:54:58.600 --> 0:55:00.600
<v Speaker 5>They're really not in any better condition than the Marlins

0:55:00.640 --> 0:55:03.000
<v Speaker 5>are as of late. The Phillies for the season overall,

0:55:03.440 --> 0:55:06.080
<v Speaker 5>this really shocked me. They are twenty ninth in baseball

0:55:06.200 --> 0:55:09.520
<v Speaker 5>in WRC plus. Their offense is the second worst offense

0:55:09.560 --> 0:55:11.719
<v Speaker 5>in baseball for the whole season. This is the Kyle

0:55:11.760 --> 0:55:15.040
<v Speaker 5>Schwarber and Bryce Harper offense, and outside of them, it's

0:55:15.080 --> 0:55:17.600
<v Speaker 5>a lot of zeros and a lot of inconsistent bats.

0:55:18.400 --> 0:55:20.960
<v Speaker 5>So it really comes down to that with this Phillies team,

0:55:20.960 --> 0:55:22.840
<v Speaker 5>they've been carried. If you've been you know, trying to

0:55:22.840 --> 0:55:25.080
<v Speaker 5>focus on the positives's they're pitching, Like the high end

0:55:25.120 --> 0:55:29.320
<v Speaker 5>starting pitching that they have really is amazing. Zach Wheeler,

0:55:29.480 --> 0:55:32.880
<v Speaker 5>Christopher Sanchez and now old friend Jesos Lozardo. That is

0:55:32.960 --> 0:55:34.799
<v Speaker 5>the best one two three in baseball and I don't

0:55:34.840 --> 0:55:36.720
<v Speaker 5>think you can really come up with a close second

0:55:36.840 --> 0:55:40.160
<v Speaker 5>right now. So that is what has been very good

0:55:40.200 --> 0:55:42.120
<v Speaker 5>for them. The Marlins are gonna have to face two

0:55:42.440 --> 0:55:44.120
<v Speaker 5>of those three headed monsters. They are gonna have to

0:55:44.160 --> 0:55:46.640
<v Speaker 5>face Wheeler in the opener and then Lozardo in the finale.

0:55:47.160 --> 0:55:50.120
<v Speaker 5>But offensively, this is a very challenged Phillies team. This

0:55:50.200 --> 0:55:53.960
<v Speaker 5>is not a deep roster whatsoever on deep lineup, and

0:55:54.080 --> 0:55:56.040
<v Speaker 5>that is why I guess I'll tease it in the

0:55:56.040 --> 0:55:59.280
<v Speaker 5>fact that Kevin kind of mocked Griffin Conine potentially.

0:55:58.920 --> 0:55:59.600
<v Speaker 6>Going to the Phillies.

0:55:59.600 --> 0:56:01.120
<v Speaker 5>The Philly could use a lot of help in that

0:56:01.160 --> 0:56:03.480
<v Speaker 5>particular area where a guy like Conine would be a

0:56:03.640 --> 0:56:06.279
<v Speaker 5>huge upgrade for them, even as a platoon player.

0:56:06.360 --> 0:56:08.799
<v Speaker 6>Potentially they need a lot of help.

0:56:08.840 --> 0:56:12.080
<v Speaker 5>Offensively, they're going to be a serious World Series contender

0:56:12.080 --> 0:56:14.680
<v Speaker 5>because right now they are just lopsided in terms of

0:56:14.760 --> 0:56:18.600
<v Speaker 5>talent so much concentrated on the pitching side and pretty

0:56:18.600 --> 0:56:22.200
<v Speaker 5>good defensively, but hitting anyway, slize that they've continued to

0:56:22.480 --> 0:56:24.640
<v Speaker 5>be pretty deficient in that area.

0:56:25.400 --> 0:56:27.239
<v Speaker 4>That's one thing I wanted to note, and I wish

0:56:27.760 --> 0:56:29.439
<v Speaker 4>and I was gonna tell you, like I wish ELI

0:56:29.560 --> 0:56:32.040
<v Speaker 4>would just on that screenshot of the standards just go

0:56:32.200 --> 0:56:34.560
<v Speaker 4>maybe one or two more slots down, because you look

0:56:34.560 --> 0:56:36.480
<v Speaker 4>at the phill Is they have a negative eighteen run

0:56:36.520 --> 0:56:39.400
<v Speaker 4>differential that they're expected when lost. They're supposed to be

0:56:39.440 --> 0:56:41.719
<v Speaker 4>the Marlins. They're supposed to be fifty one and fifty four,

0:56:41.800 --> 0:56:43.319
<v Speaker 4>so they should be kind of where the Marlins are

0:56:43.400 --> 0:56:46.239
<v Speaker 4>right now, where Miami, which is barely holding on to

0:56:46.320 --> 0:56:48.880
<v Speaker 4>their plus two run differential, is that fifty three and

0:56:48.960 --> 0:56:51.879
<v Speaker 4>fifty three. So the Marbles should right now have lost

0:56:51.960 --> 0:56:54.319
<v Speaker 4>like eleven straight and their five hundred or whatever ten

0:56:54.400 --> 0:56:56.840
<v Speaker 4>straight and they're five hundred and there are somewhat in it.

0:56:57.120 --> 0:56:59.959
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, I didn't actually realize how much how close

0:57:00.200 --> 0:57:02.480
<v Speaker 4>the gap was between the Marls and the Phillies. And

0:57:02.920 --> 0:57:05.160
<v Speaker 4>I guess Miami is a pretty decent opportunity to TVD

0:57:05.280 --> 0:57:06.759
<v Speaker 4>for the third game. I'm assuming it's just gonna be

0:57:06.800 --> 0:57:10.480
<v Speaker 4>Ryan Gusto starting that game. But yeah, you have Sandy

0:57:10.480 --> 0:57:12.520
<v Speaker 4>in the middle game, and then you have Tyler Phillips tomorrow,

0:57:12.600 --> 0:57:16.600
<v Speaker 4>who I thought Phillips was fine against the Astros after

0:57:16.920 --> 0:57:19.040
<v Speaker 4>you know, the first two rough innings and then he

0:57:19.080 --> 0:57:21.280
<v Speaker 4>really settled in. And I'm sure he's got some revenge

0:57:21.320 --> 0:57:23.080
<v Speaker 4>on his mind after what happened in Philly the last

0:57:23.120 --> 0:57:25.040
<v Speaker 4>time that it did not go very well at all.

0:57:25.240 --> 0:57:29.280
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, I didn't realize how not I guess not

0:57:29.560 --> 0:57:33.200
<v Speaker 4>bad the Phillies have been, just how reliant on Harper

0:57:33.360 --> 0:57:35.760
<v Speaker 4>and Schwerburn. I guess that three headed monsters have been

0:57:35.840 --> 0:57:36.120
<v Speaker 4>this year.

0:57:37.760 --> 0:57:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:57:38.120 --> 0:57:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Catching a team that's better on the road, their pitching

0:57:40.480 --> 0:57:44.800
<v Speaker 2>is what you have to get past. Agreed. You know,

0:57:45.000 --> 0:57:46.480
<v Speaker 2>I think it's been up and down for them. I don't.

0:57:46.480 --> 0:57:47.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it's been all good. I don't think

0:57:47.920 --> 0:57:50.080
<v Speaker 3>it's been all bad. Yeah, the run Deer franchial will

0:57:50.120 --> 0:57:54.040
<v Speaker 3>tell you that their their offense struggle. There's seven hundred

0:57:54.080 --> 0:57:56.080
<v Speaker 3>tm ops, but tell you that their offense struggles, which

0:57:56.680 --> 0:57:58.400
<v Speaker 3>it does. So it's kind of weird to see a

0:57:58.440 --> 0:58:00.640
<v Speaker 3>Phillies team that plays in that ballpark kind of leon pitching.

0:58:00.960 --> 0:58:03.080
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of what they do, and they have damn

0:58:03.120 --> 0:58:03.560
<v Speaker 2>good pitching.

0:58:03.640 --> 0:58:05.800
<v Speaker 3>So, like I said, they're better on the road. They're

0:58:05.800 --> 0:58:08.040
<v Speaker 3>seven games better on the road, twenty nine and twenty two,

0:58:08.080 --> 0:58:10.280
<v Speaker 3>I think they are on the road. So coming into

0:58:10.320 --> 0:58:13.280
<v Speaker 3>Miami against the Marlins team that is down and out

0:58:13.320 --> 0:58:16.000
<v Speaker 3>for lack of a better term, So I think it's

0:58:16.040 --> 0:58:20.200
<v Speaker 3>going to be an interesting series. It's kind of good

0:58:20.240 --> 0:58:22.240
<v Speaker 3>to what Eli you said that they come in having

0:58:22.320 --> 0:58:24.800
<v Speaker 3>lost what their last four, potentially their last five if

0:58:24.840 --> 0:58:26.120
<v Speaker 3>they lose this game to the Yankees.

0:58:26.640 --> 0:58:29.920
<v Speaker 2>So maybe the Marlins are catching a team. Somebody's someone's

0:58:29.920 --> 0:58:30.600
<v Speaker 2>got to break somewhere.

0:58:30.600 --> 0:58:33.760
<v Speaker 3>Maybe it's against the Phillies, who haven't been great, especially

0:58:33.800 --> 0:58:35.840
<v Speaker 3>in terms of their offense, but they kind of, like

0:58:35.880 --> 0:58:36.880
<v Speaker 3>I said, lean on their pitching.

0:58:37.720 --> 0:58:39.240
<v Speaker 2>How much does Donnie have to do with that? I

0:58:39.280 --> 0:58:40.760
<v Speaker 2>think talent's always been there for this team.

0:58:41.240 --> 0:58:43.800
<v Speaker 3>I think eventually, I mean we're halfway through the year

0:58:43.800 --> 0:58:46.360
<v Speaker 3>and I'm saying, let's I think eventually their offense should

0:58:46.440 --> 0:58:48.240
<v Speaker 3>come back to life given how much star power they.

0:58:48.240 --> 0:58:48.560
<v Speaker 4>Have in it.

0:58:50.320 --> 0:58:52.080
<v Speaker 3>And shout out to my boy gamering Knus by the way,

0:58:52.160 --> 0:58:56.520
<v Speaker 3>Sid from fau Glad to see that he's with the team. Anyways, Yeah,

0:58:56.520 --> 0:58:59.480
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of kind of the battle of two in

0:58:59.520 --> 0:59:02.120
<v Speaker 3>the Marlins case, a bad team right now and a

0:59:03.040 --> 0:59:04.800
<v Speaker 3>just so so team that just happens to be leading

0:59:04.840 --> 0:59:09.400
<v Speaker 3>a division. So yeah, uh, it's it's gonna be an

0:59:09.440 --> 0:59:13.480
<v Speaker 3>interesting time in Miami this this coming series. As you

0:59:13.520 --> 0:59:15.880
<v Speaker 3>know that Sean the Marns, we'll get there's two big

0:59:15.920 --> 0:59:19.080
<v Speaker 3>guys and then a TBD. Do we know who's gonna

0:59:19.080 --> 0:59:22.000
<v Speaker 3>fill that spot or is it still kind of ups.

0:59:21.560 --> 0:59:24.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm assuming it's Gust though, Yeah, gonna have either him

0:59:24.640 --> 0:59:28.120
<v Speaker 4>or Bok or some sort of or docks I guess now, Yeah.

0:59:28.760 --> 0:59:33.560
<v Speaker 2>That Witches White, So yeah, I don't know.

0:59:33.840 --> 0:59:38.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm I'm not confidence as we head into prediction time,

0:59:38.200 --> 0:59:39.520
<v Speaker 3>but I will get to that here in a second.

0:59:40.280 --> 0:59:42.760
<v Speaker 2>Uh, Eli, you gotta last ad to play or play

0:59:42.800 --> 0:59:43.120
<v Speaker 2>the video?

0:59:43.560 --> 0:59:44.120
<v Speaker 6>Mm hmmm.

0:59:44.720 --> 0:59:47.440
<v Speaker 5>Jeske Renolds of South Florida and then Predictions friends at

0:59:47.480 --> 0:59:50.080
<v Speaker 5>Jetski Rentals of South Florida. They present all of our

0:59:50.160 --> 0:59:53.760
<v Speaker 5>podcast efforts here on fish on First, Miami's best jet

0:59:53.800 --> 0:59:57.040
<v Speaker 5>ski in boat Adventures. Jesskey Rentals Love South Florida with

0:59:57.160 --> 0:59:59.560
<v Speaker 5>six ski locations in over one hundred and twenty boats,

1:00:00.000 --> 1:00:02.959
<v Speaker 5>something for every style and every budget ride Jetski's Riding

1:00:02.960 --> 1:00:05.520
<v Speaker 5>from the Downtown Skyline in Ferris Wheel, or book your

1:00:05.560 --> 1:00:07.800
<v Speaker 5>own private boat starting as love as three hundred dollars

1:00:07.840 --> 1:00:10.040
<v Speaker 5>with the captain included. Bring your drinks to your friends

1:00:10.080 --> 1:00:12.600
<v Speaker 5>and enjoy the water your way. The boat is completely

1:00:12.640 --> 1:00:15.160
<v Speaker 5>yours for the time you reserve it. The reservation based

1:00:15.200 --> 1:00:18.000
<v Speaker 5>only to book called three oh five nine nine oh

1:00:18.200 --> 1:00:20.760
<v Speaker 5>two one nine two, or check them out online at

1:00:21.000 --> 1:00:23.720
<v Speaker 5>SF jet ski Rentals dot com. Make sure to use

1:00:23.760 --> 1:00:26.960
<v Speaker 5>our promo code phish on first and that gets you

1:00:27.040 --> 1:00:30.160
<v Speaker 5>a ten percent discount off your next booking. Again that's

1:00:30.200 --> 1:00:32.680
<v Speaker 5>three oh five nine nine oh two one nine two,

1:00:33.160 --> 1:00:36.440
<v Speaker 5>or online at SF Jetski Rentals dot com.

1:00:40.680 --> 1:00:46.080
<v Speaker 6>That this is prodiction time. That's my prediction, but who knows?

1:00:47.360 --> 1:00:51.560
<v Speaker 2>There you go for prediction time. So will the bleeding

1:00:51.720 --> 1:00:52.480
<v Speaker 2>finally stop?

1:00:52.800 --> 1:00:55.360
<v Speaker 3>Or will the Marlins who cringe when I say this,

1:00:56.160 --> 1:00:57.720
<v Speaker 3>go to a fifteen game losing strike.

1:00:57.840 --> 1:01:01.560
<v Speaker 2>It is possible in this series? Uh, what will happen?

1:01:01.640 --> 1:01:02.200
<v Speaker 2>What do we think?

1:01:02.360 --> 1:01:07.200
<v Speaker 3>Do the Marlins finally finally getna win? Sean Millerrick, go ahead,

1:01:07.240 --> 1:01:08.760
<v Speaker 3>your prediction for the series and your MVP.

1:01:11.440 --> 1:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I have the Marlins winning one game, So not the

1:01:15.240 --> 1:01:17.440
<v Speaker 1>on to fifteen, but only one game in this series,

1:01:17.520 --> 1:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and Kyle Schwarber will be the series MVP.

1:01:21.240 --> 1:01:26.040
<v Speaker 4>Kevin streak will be snapped, but unfortunately, the Phillies take

1:01:26.080 --> 1:01:29.240
<v Speaker 4>two out of three. Bryce Harper has been so good,

1:01:29.280 --> 1:01:31.000
<v Speaker 4>so I'm just gonna go with them as a series MVP.

1:01:33.160 --> 1:01:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Be brief on this one.

1:01:34.800 --> 1:01:37.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't think the Marlins cracked through for a series win.

1:01:37.040 --> 1:01:39.240
<v Speaker 3>I do think they get one game, though, So the

1:01:39.240 --> 1:01:42.439
<v Speaker 3>Phillies win two out of three and Kyle Schwarber's the MVP,

1:01:43.920 --> 1:01:44.840
<v Speaker 3>Eli the Founder.

1:01:44.920 --> 1:01:50.000
<v Speaker 5>To wrap us up, I'll go with the Phillies winning

1:01:50.040 --> 1:01:53.240
<v Speaker 5>two out of three. As I kind of elaborated, I'm

1:01:53.280 --> 1:01:55.680
<v Speaker 5>not too high on them as a whole. It doesn't

1:01:55.680 --> 1:01:57.880
<v Speaker 5>line up fairly well that they get two of their

1:01:58.080 --> 1:02:00.880
<v Speaker 5>top three starting pitchers going in this series, and that

1:02:01.120 --> 1:02:02.360
<v Speaker 5>the Marlins are still going to have to wait a

1:02:02.400 --> 1:02:05.560
<v Speaker 5>little while longer to get these real reinforcements back from

1:02:05.600 --> 1:02:08.440
<v Speaker 5>the IL. Maybe they surprise us and may look for

1:02:08.480 --> 1:02:10.680
<v Speaker 5>a spark, do some sort of sexy roster moves to

1:02:10.760 --> 1:02:13.000
<v Speaker 5>try to get the energy up, bring up a guy

1:02:13.040 --> 1:02:15.160
<v Speaker 5>that's performing well in Jacksonville. But outside of that, I

1:02:15.280 --> 1:02:17.680
<v Speaker 5>just think it's still kind of flat, a team that

1:02:17.800 --> 1:02:19.800
<v Speaker 5>is still finding all these different ways to lose.

1:02:20.320 --> 1:02:23.200
<v Speaker 6>So I think they went won, they snapped.

1:02:22.840 --> 1:02:25.160
<v Speaker 5>The streak in this series, but end up still falling

1:02:25.240 --> 1:02:28.440
<v Speaker 5>even further behind in the wild card race. So forst

1:02:28.440 --> 1:02:30.520
<v Speaker 5>series MVP, I'll go with Trey Turner. He has been

1:02:30.600 --> 1:02:33.000
<v Speaker 5>heating up quite a bit as of Ladies. They needed

1:02:33.080 --> 1:02:36.600
<v Speaker 5>something for the Phillies to help out Schorber and Harper

1:02:36.640 --> 1:02:38.760
<v Speaker 5>in that offense, and Turner, after getting off to a

1:02:38.840 --> 1:02:41.880
<v Speaker 5>terrible start, has come around offensively to be closer to

1:02:41.920 --> 1:02:44.480
<v Speaker 5>the guy that they've been counting on. So I think

1:02:44.520 --> 1:02:46.520
<v Speaker 5>Trey Turner will pepper the Marlins with a lot of

1:02:46.600 --> 1:02:48.920
<v Speaker 5>singles and doubles over the course of the series and

1:02:49.080 --> 1:02:51.760
<v Speaker 5>to help manufacture some runs against them that will end

1:02:51.880 --> 1:02:54.240
<v Speaker 5>up making the difference in this three gift set.

1:02:56.920 --> 1:02:59.120
<v Speaker 3>A perplexing team coming in the Phillies, as we said

1:02:59.120 --> 1:03:01.160
<v Speaker 3>with the ruond differential, but they've still gotten it done

1:03:01.160 --> 1:03:03.520
<v Speaker 3>and they're still in the division race against the Braves,

1:03:03.600 --> 1:03:05.160
<v Speaker 3>so obviously still in a wildcard.

1:03:05.240 --> 1:03:06.960
<v Speaker 2>So again, I think they.

1:03:06.920 --> 1:03:08.720
<v Speaker 3>Have too much starpower not to be really damn good

1:03:08.720 --> 1:03:11.960
<v Speaker 3>down the stretch under Donnie, So yeah, that's our show

1:03:12.080 --> 1:03:15.080
<v Speaker 3>for today. I think a lot of us are still

1:03:15.200 --> 1:03:17.360
<v Speaker 3>doom and gloom, but maybe the Marlins surprises and get

1:03:17.400 --> 1:03:19.360
<v Speaker 3>too out of three. We'll be there to cover it

1:03:19.600 --> 1:03:21.920
<v Speaker 3>as we always are on the site in person in

1:03:22.040 --> 1:03:24.720
<v Speaker 3>this series, see if the Marlins can finally end this

1:03:25.360 --> 1:03:29.600
<v Speaker 3>horrid stretch which man, we found the positives.

1:03:29.240 --> 1:03:32.000
<v Speaker 2>In it, but they're few and far between, so I

1:03:32.080 --> 1:03:33.360
<v Speaker 2>think that will be our show for now.

1:03:33.600 --> 1:03:35.880
<v Speaker 3>Maybe we're talking about the Marlins being pure sellers on

1:03:35.960 --> 1:03:37.840
<v Speaker 3>our next show later this week.

1:03:38.480 --> 1:03:40.480
<v Speaker 2>Maybe they bounce back in surprise us, and we still

1:03:40.480 --> 1:03:41.160
<v Speaker 2>hold on to hope.

1:03:41.480 --> 1:03:43.320
<v Speaker 3>We'll see what happens after this three game set against

1:03:43.320 --> 1:03:45.200
<v Speaker 3>the Phillies. We'll see guys a little bit later on

1:03:45.280 --> 1:03:48.000
<v Speaker 3>the week. Thanks for all the questions. I'll the support,

1:03:48.120 --> 1:03:52.520
<v Speaker 3>all the feedback on Twitter. It's fun to engage with.

1:03:53.320 --> 1:03:56.120
<v Speaker 3>We appreciate everything, and we'll continue to do our best

1:03:56.160 --> 1:03:57.600
<v Speaker 3>to cover the Marlins good or bad.

1:03:58.040 --> 1:04:00.200
<v Speaker 2>For now. That's it. I think I speak for all

1:04:00.200 --> 1:04:02.640
<v Speaker 2>of us when I say, please, please go Fish get

1:04:02.720 --> 1:04:02.920
<v Speaker 2>a win.

1:04:04.840 --> 1:04:05.080
<v Speaker 4>Yah