WEBVTT - March 7th, Hour 1: Injured players, relief pitching, and more...

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess did Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Fantasy Best

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever. M Do do Do Do Do Do Do

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Do Do Do Do Do Do Do do do do

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even gonna try. And welcome to the Fantasy

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Best Friends Forever. I am Frank Standfeld. Greg Sussman out

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>doing activities. Sorry, he'll be here soon. It is Thursday,

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>March seven. Shout out to my dad, my birthday Dad.

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I know your home watch. So there you go, Thursday

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:19.759
<v Speaker 1>March seventh. Uh, you're gonna have fun show here, can

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>have fun show obviously h talking. We're gonna wrap up

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the relief picture position. I know some people last week

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>we're asking us about holds, categories and some relief pictures

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:30.400
<v Speaker 1>that you can target there, so we'll do some of that.

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>We'll also talk to Virginia zakas of inside injuries, get

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>some updates on Luis Savarino, obviously the latest there, and

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>then the rest of the show, we're really gonna talk

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 1>about some of those injured players and how they're being

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:43.960
<v Speaker 1>valued thus far through I mean, we have a lot

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of ADP data, so we'll see where a lot of

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>those injured players are going, what we expect from them

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>this year, when they're gonna return, how they're gonna return,

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>what they're gonna contribute, a whole bunch of stuff going on,

0:01:54.400 --> 0:02:01.639
<v Speaker 1>and with that I will come in. Yeah, this is

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy best Friends Forever Here the Fantasy Sports Radio Network.

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Frank's Happy Birthday, to the Dawn, to your father, appreciate

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you watching. Did he make the Fantasy basketball playoffs? He's

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna make it. We're in two leagues together. He finishes

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the top seeds and one of them and

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 1>finished last place in the other one. So listen, he

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>went to championship. Well worth it, you know it will be.

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>And that is the more expensive league anyway, So all right,

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:33.360
<v Speaker 1>it's one of that. That's that's the one that matters

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>more of course. Uh so, yeah, So on the show

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 1>that I Frank mentioned it, we'll talk to between Zaka

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>is inside injuries. We're actually gonna do a whole hour

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>on guys that are injured and where do you draft

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>them because we always are so hesitant, right like, we

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>stay away because we don't know how to deal with

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 1>this and a lot of the times makes sense, I

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:52.239
<v Speaker 1>get it, but some of the times you're getting a

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:54.239
<v Speaker 1>nazed discounts on these guys. So we're gonna take a

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>look at some where some of these injured guys are

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:59.799
<v Speaker 1>going and see what we can do. So that's kind

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of the injured guys, um. But I wanted to start

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>almost where we left off yesterday, frankief you didn't mind

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and relievers, Like we did a lot of these guys

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>that get saves and the quantity, and we made it

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>through all the ones we wanted to. Shockingly like, we

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>did a really nice job over the two hours going

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>over all the relievers. But we also got some breaking news.

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 1>It is rosel To injured, removed from the lineup today

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 1>dealing with side soreness. General left side soreness. Removed from

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the line of today. Alex Bregman, another one removed from

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the line up yesterday, was dealing with a back injury.

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>So the Houston Astros here we go. I think it's

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a it's a great day to talk about injuries because

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>now we're getting even more Greg so mosel To already

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>a guy that I was kind of avoiding. I don't

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>know about you. I did this little right up for

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros where they asked a bunch of experts. That

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>would be me. I'm an expert. Um ask you know who,

0:03:56.960 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>who's a player going in a hitter going inside the

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>top third hitters? Oh, you were avoiding and why? And

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>my pick was and my reason was, I don't think

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that he's going to run as much as he has

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 1>before last year, basis in each of his last six seasons.

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I just if he's not gonna give you thirty store

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>basis or even close at thirty store basis, if he's

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>not even given twenty stolen basis, is he returning that

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, early second round value. And now we're already

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:23.720
<v Speaker 1>dealing with a with a left side injury for for

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:27.039
<v Speaker 1>Josale two Bay two, So I just thought I'd keep

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:29.840
<v Speaker 1>keep the injury news going. Greg sprinkle that on top

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:33.840
<v Speaker 1>here a little. I don't know what is that Injury Bay,

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Salt Bay? No, you don't like that Salt Bay school.

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:40.919
<v Speaker 1>I've never did. I've never been there. I kind of

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>wanted to, I've never done. Is he still a thing?

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I think so. I know a lot of like famous athletes.

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Go visit his restaurant wherever it is. I don't know

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:52.360
<v Speaker 1>where it is. I've looked him on Instagram. He first

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 1>of all, he's hilarious. He owns the Salt Bay thing

0:04:55.880 --> 0:05:00.160
<v Speaker 1>and owns it. Every single post that he puts on Instagram,

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:04.280
<v Speaker 1>there's like hashtag salt, hashtag salt. But like ease, he

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>embraces the brand. Maybe you should embrace like sasamania. Morow

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:11.479
<v Speaker 1>not gonna start yelling about stuffing. No, no no, it says,

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>everyone yells me. Just stop yelling. I'm just like, okay,

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 1>that's true. The happy medium. There is no happy medium

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>for great, there's not either. He's you know today, Greg's

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>a little like lax. He's like maybe a little tired.

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Have you sleep us now? You're right better than I happen? Alright,

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>because you seem a little like down. I mean today

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm getting this right, Murphy's law. Anything that

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>can go wrong will go wrong. Pretty much. The theme

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:37.919
<v Speaker 1>of today so far hasn't been a great day, hasn't

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>been a great day, has been a great week. Hopefully

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>that turns around because you know, we got some drafts

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>coming up that we need to uh study up on together.

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:50.159
<v Speaker 1>We have an auction next Thursday. I think tomorrow tomorrow

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>after work, I think things will turn around for me.

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:55.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to a brewery in Brooklyn. You know you

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 1>have plans tomorrow. Um but and this is a pity invite,

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>by the way, just real wise that, oh, Frank, you

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>live close to bok. I actually was not hearing about

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 1>it right now. I was actually going tom So yesterday

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>as we were leaving, you said, hey, we really got

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>to come up with the time to go over the

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>draft so to do some research and sit and talk.

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>And I'm at that moment occurred to me, was like, Hey,

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna frank out if you want to doing Friday

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>night because it's gonna be well relatively close to where

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 1>he lives. We like drinking beer. This is a perfect

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to do this. What are you doing this? Grim Brewery?

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Grim Brewery? I never heard of it. It's like a

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:39.719
<v Speaker 1>half hour from here. M yeah, Metropolitan not it's not

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>too far, not far from me at all. You wanna come,

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>uh before you go wherever you do whatever you're doing, No,

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:49.840
<v Speaker 1>because that wouldn't really make sense because of what I

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 1>have to do is the city. So yeah, I go

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>back to Brooklyn. Are you going straight from here? Opens

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>at five o'clock. I'm hoping to leave here around then

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>this is this is right and Williamsburg. It's close to

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>where I live. So yeah, so I'm doing that, and

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:06.479
<v Speaker 1>then evidently it's close to like another one. You're taking

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the L train there, I'd imagine. Really, I thought I

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>did take the A C E there. The Google map

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>stole there close to the close to the L train though,

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll figure out tomorrow. I'm excited to do that. I

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>also had an Inner Borrow Breweries right around there as well.

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>It sounds a little more familiar. It's more a bit

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>more popular inter Borrow. Yes, like Inner Burrows, Yeah, I

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>got it, Greg, but not Burrows for that just b

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 1>or b o r oh. I think that's right there

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>as well, inter Borrow Spirits and ales that at the

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 1>place that kind of just sounds like a liquor store.

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not making this brewery somewhere close to that, never less,

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm doing tomorrow, Frank, So you're really welcome

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>to come, of course. I actually passed this every day

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 1>on the bus. Really. Yeah, well I never even noticed

0:07:56.840 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 1>that it was the brewery. Is just look, uh, it

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>might be. It kind of just when I passed it, it

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>it just kind of just looks like a warehouse, so

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 1>it definitely could be. Yeah, that's pretty cool. So I'm

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 1>really hoping my day turns around like then, you're just

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna drink yourself to oblivion and that everybing gets better.

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 1>All I want to do, man, that's all I want

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>to do. All right, let's start. Um, let's start with

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>these relievers before we get the injury guys. Virginia z

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>is coming up at the bottom of the hour. We

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>don't have necessarily the like b I don't I don't

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>think recommends on here is he? Like, I don't think

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I have a breaken on here. I put almost all

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:34.079
<v Speaker 1>starting pictures on here for the most part late yesterday. Yeah,

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 1>it's mostly all starting pictures this week because we did

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that. Um, A couple of other guys,

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:40.080
<v Speaker 1>these Astrois guys are still ingering by next week, then

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll definitely, yes, absolutely, but let's start with the relievers.

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Brank we talked really, the only guy we talked about

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:46.679
<v Speaker 1>really was Josh Had. Out of the guys that are

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna get you holds for the most part um because

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Hayter is amazing and Frankasm I believe is his nights

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:56.080
<v Speaker 1>rank reliever. Give her take. It might have changed since then. No,

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I'm ever going to own him. It

0:08:57.720 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 1>just seems like that's where you should be, right because

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 1>he's so I'm gonna yeah, But we've seen guys be

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:03.679
<v Speaker 1>down in the past and then not as downar the

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>next year, you know, So you know, I don't know

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>if I don't think that's gonna be the case for him.

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I think he's still gonna be really, really good. I mean,

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 1>his his delivery and stuff. It's just like the way

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 1>he pitches, it's so hard to pick up and his

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff is absolutely filthy. I think it's gonna translate. But

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're right, I mean, from year to year,

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty hard to project relief pictures. I mean, these

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>guys some sometimes they'll just they'll emerge out of nowhere

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:27.679
<v Speaker 1>and then the next the next year, you know, they

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 1>take a back seat. I don't necessarily think that's gonna

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 1>be the case for Josh had I still think he's

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna be really, really good. I don't know that I'm

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:36.559
<v Speaker 1>gonna own him. He's just I rank him this highly

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>because he's really dominant, and I still think they can

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>pick up like ten of fifteen saves along the way.

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>So let me let me ask this, outside of Josh Hayter,

0:09:46.720 --> 0:09:49.559
<v Speaker 1>who are you looking to next? If you want holes,

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:51.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking for a dominant reliever that's gonna give

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:53.719
<v Speaker 1>you holes and really help you in the e R

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>A wit and strikeout category, where do you head to next?

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 1>And how early do you do it? So, I mean

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna it's gonna sound like a Homer here, but

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I think Dylan Patances, right, I think Dylan Patances has

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>to be up there as one of the top guys.

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's just been so dominant for so long

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and he gets so many strikeouts. He's a legit three

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 1>category contributor in RHODO. Not gonna help and saves unless

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:19.199
<v Speaker 1>something happens with Chapman I do think that he would

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>be the direct replacement the next man up in the

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Yankees bullpen if anything were to happen to Chapman. We

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>saw that last year as well. But with Patances, you

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 1>do get legitimate like e. R A whip numbers, and

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>you get a lot of strikeouts too, So I don't

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 1>think that's just like, uh, I don't think that's a

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>homwer thing, Greg, what do you think? I think both.

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I think both Telebatances and Zach Brittan are both on

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:43.839
<v Speaker 1>this list for guys that are gonna I mean Britain

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 1>not gonna get as many strikeouts, definitely gonna get hold

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 1>for sure. I mean like holes are tricky, right, Like

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:51.599
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to look this up yesterday. Do you

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>even know what the definition of a hole is? Greg?

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 1>It's just like protecting a three run lead in a

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 1>safe situation. I thought it was. That's what I thought

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>it was too. I don't really, to be perfectly honest,

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a lot of experience playing with holds,

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 1>but I would never do it. I just imagine that

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 1>they're really good set up men, and you want to

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>target players target He set up pictures on teams that

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 1>are gonna win a lot of games because obviously you'll

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 1>get more opportunities for for holds that way. So I think,

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:18.959
<v Speaker 1>I guess just targeting relievers on winning teams that are

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:21.439
<v Speaker 1>really dominant. Ryan Pressley is another one that comes to mind.

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>We mentioned him yesterday. You know, I think he could

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 1>be in the conversation if something would have to a

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Sono or if if it'll soon have faltered. I know

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Hector Rondon is there and he has closing experience as well,

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 1>but Ryan Pressley once he joined the Astros last year,

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 1>you know these Astros, everything they touched turns to gold.

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>He develops this, you know, a new breaking pitch that

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>he's using, and he throws a to a zero point

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:44.839
<v Speaker 1>seven seven e R eight with his Astro stint last year.

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:49.560
<v Speaker 1>So I would put Ryan Pressley in that conversation as well.

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Even Adam Outavino, right, all the Yankees guys, Yeah, I

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>think all that. But like I agree with you, You're

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>you're picking really good teams and you're saying, hey, I

0:11:57.640 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 1>want their dominant relievers. I think the same toil be

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>said for even the Red Sox, right, Like we don't

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 1>know who the closer is there. It's a closure by

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:05.560
<v Speaker 1>a committee, and the Cubs said yesterday they're a closer

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 1>recommittee too. But the point being, like the Cubs really

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 1>said that. Joe Maddens, I believe he came out and

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>said that yesterday. Yeah, there goes pedro Strope. I guess,

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:17.960
<v Speaker 1>but I mean I think pedro Strope will still get

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the majority of them. But doesn't Well what I'm saying

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 1>he's like, doesn't there go pedro Strop because maybe those

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>are the situations that are even better than the Yankees,

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>because you're getting a guy that in a holds league,

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I have a lot of options. To remember, they signed

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Brad Brock, Carl Edwards is an amazing reliever. There's a

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of options there with the Cubs too, and then

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 1>last year they signed Brandon Morrow and he's always hurt

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and he's not gonna be ready to start the seat.

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at holds leaders from last year. Greg and

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Adam Montavino was number one with thirty four. Uh, you

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 1>know what, holes go a lot similar to saves here.

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there was only seven guys that had thirty

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 1>plus holds last year. Last yesterday, when I mentioned saves,

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 1>there was only eleven players who had thirty plus saves

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 1>last year. But you know, I think the high of

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the high for saves and closers are, you know, obviously

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Edwin d haz with fifty seven saves. I mean, there's

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>no one here that has like fifty seven holds. It's

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>really between thirty and thirty four. And you're looking at

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Adam Davino, Archie Bradley, Tony Watson, Yoshihisa Harno from the

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Arizona Diamondbacks, Chas Row with Tampa Bays, Alvarado Emma Bay

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>have good relievers. Is just you don't know who's gonna

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 1>be the closer. I would still put my money on Alvarado.

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>I tend to agree with you, and his stuff seems

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 1>to be the best. But what what it was getting

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>at is when you look at these dominant relievers, even

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>separately from the Yankees, like like, yes, we can talk

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>about it just holds. But to me, I would go

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>after situations where you're going to get holds and you

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 1>also have the possibility of potentially getting saves, right, so

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>you think of a weird closer situation. And I don't

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 1>know why this comes to mind, Frankie, but the White

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Sox with Kelvin Herrera and Alex Colinet, like we assume

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:55.679
<v Speaker 1>it's Colone right now. That could change. And I think

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:58.199
<v Speaker 1>your Red Sox example was even better though, because the

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Red Sox are just gonna win more games us, right,

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 1>But Herrera and or column A are probably the better reliever.

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I would think then Matt Barnes or what's his name,

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Brasier, Right, So I think Matt Barnes is pretty good.

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually gonna get more. I think he's gonna get

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>more strikeouts in both of those guys. So maybe Matt

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Barnes is the guy. Maybe that's really way that saves

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 1>plus hold league or even just like have a hold category,

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>like maybe sorry, both friends. I think it's really interesting

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>both of them changes and save plus holds leagues, Like

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>how much of this would change ranking wise? Like when

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and we talked about that history, Like is that the

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 1>way that fantasy baseball and just baseball in general is

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 1>going towards its trending towards? Is we need to just

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 1>eliminate the saves category and make it saves plus holds

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>or if you play in a home league, h you know,

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a points league should hold be worth the same as

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>much as savings, because that then we're looking at just

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 1>drafting the best relie possible reliever, which is how it

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>should be. Well again, well, my follow up question is,

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 1>you know how a lot of a lot of leagues

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 1>or people and not really basically but advanced leagues or

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 1>just eliminating wins right, because it's just arbitrary, but arbitrary

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>to an extent, they're they're replacing it with quality starts, right,

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>which is also arbitrary in its own right. Um, should

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the seething happen to saves like a save, like a

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 1>win like you have because there's times you just have

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the tie runs on deck and you have a reliever

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 1>come in and pitch one pitch and get a save,

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's like ridiculous. Obviously, Um, every save is not

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>created equal, like every one is not created equally. You

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 1>pitched ninety but eight shut out endings, you deserve a win.

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes you don't get it. You pitch five inutings of

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>six run ball on your team's up thirteen six, Like,

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>you don't deserve that one either, So it's very hard.

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>I I think saves plus holds on and we said

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 1>this yesterday on the show. I think saves plus holds

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 1>is probably where it should go because you're gonna draft

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the best reliever. It's gonna take a long time, though,

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>is it for people. I just don't think it will

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 1>be an industry standard for home leagues. I mean, people

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>could do it now whatever they want. Yeah, definitely. I'm

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>still I'm still pushing for errors. What Yeah, what do

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you what do you mean? I think error should be

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 1>a category? Why Why is feeling that counted? It's like

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>that's like the same reason why most people don't play

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I d P. You know, I don't think like too

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 1>much going on, Like I don't think why you draft

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I play hitter, play hit play hitter case. Well, it's

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>all about the play, right you. If you're a wide receiver,

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 1>they fumble, you lose point. People like offense. I don't

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>really care about defense. I mean, I'm just kidding in

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>my opinion. Yeah, you know, what I always thought is,

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you play in a point because if

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>you get penalized for strikeouts, why don't you get penoize

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>for hitting into a double play? It's much worse, worse

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>than striking out. I was looking at a few names

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 1>here that are coming to mind from from last year.

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 1>If you're just looking for some holds, I think Craig

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Stammon is another one with the San Diego Padres. He's

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 1>dominant last year obviously. Jeremy Jeffers, you got hurt yesterday,

0:16:56.840 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Joaquin Storia, Fernando Rodney, it was Oakland, but well, Joe Himenez,

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:09.360
<v Speaker 1>take a break. We're back after this. Daily Rodo dot

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Com Learn from the game's best DFS players. We don't

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:18.640
<v Speaker 1>just give you advice. We play every day, all major sports,

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 1>all year round. We never stopped industry leading DBS tools

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 1>and custom projections, and now the Daily rodo dot Com

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 1>optimizer in minutes, build an optimized line up for cash

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 1>games and tourneys. Learn from the game's best DFS players

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>joined Daily rodo dot Com. The following ad contains shocking material.

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Listener discretion is advised. Is someone in your family playing

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:48.360
<v Speaker 1>a dangerous game of Russian Roulette? Over forty three thousand

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 1>people die a year from drug overdose. A hundred and

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty people a day, five people every hour, one person

0:17:55.760 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>every twelve minutes. Thousand people die every year from excohol abuse.

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Over two hundred and forty people a day, ten an hour,

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 1>one person every six minutes somebody you know. Maybe next

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:13.160
<v Speaker 1>learn how to help someone you love get away from

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the drugs, alcohol, and bad influences. With the f m

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:19.479
<v Speaker 1>l A, people can take a leave of absence from

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 1>their job and still keep it. Call now and learn

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>how we can help you. Eight six six four eight

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>four nine six two one eight six six four eight

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 1>four nine six to one. That's eight six six eight

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 1>four ninety six one scout Fantasy Sports end up taking

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the door. I think it's a bold but brilliant move

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>here at him because guy's the top three pick when healthy.

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe people are over reacting. I think there are people

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 1>were talking about taking him at eleven, twelve, thirteen, and

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 1>you're getting him at pick twenty nine. Yeah. I was

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 1>thought he was there. And that's why I always say

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 1>you really can't find out a draft because you can

0:18:56.280 --> 0:18:57.639
<v Speaker 1>sit there and plot all you want. I'm gonna get

0:18:57.640 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 1>this guy. I'm gonna take two pictures. I never thought

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 1>in God gonna be now. I like started to see

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 1>him stuff on Mike Is he really gonna make it?

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:05.399
<v Speaker 1>Week days to the four pm Eastern on the Fantasy

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 1>Sports Network and on your popular podcast Providers Back with

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>You Fantasy best Friends Forever, Fantasy Sports Radio Network, Swing

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>of the Fences. This daily Fantasy Baseball season with Daily

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:26.639
<v Speaker 1>Rotor dot com. You're playing MLB DFS or Draft Kings

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 1>or Fan Duel Daily Rodo, Well you hit your first

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>home run. As twenty nineteen MLB Daily Rodo Premium package

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:34.719
<v Speaker 1>is now live. A lot of alerts are weather updates.

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 1>They have you covered, fantasy projections that have covered a

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of optimizes. The pros. Yeah, they may have you

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>covered there too. Sam Tever said off tempt states Ever

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 1>said on winning MLB DFS advice with the early bird

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>special using the promo code leadoff nineteen or f and

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>T s Y. That's twenty nine MLB Daily Rodo Premium

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:56.120
<v Speaker 1>package at Daily Rotor dot Com. Use the promo code

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>leadoff nineteen or f and T s y and get

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 1>your ten percent early bird discount today. With that, we

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:07.680
<v Speaker 1>are joined by our good buddy, Virginia Zackets of Inside Injuries.

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>What's going on, Virginia? Hey guys, it's good to be back.

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 1>It has been a long timetime, a lot of dr A.

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:16.680
<v Speaker 1>He's in better color now, which is great. Uh, a

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 1>new camera. We feel updated and it's good to have

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>you back on the show today. Unfortunately, it wasn't a

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>great day for us yesterday, or I guess two days ago,

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 1>where I was very much on tilt where the giants

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 1>are making all these dumb NFL decisions, and then Louis

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Savarino went down with inflammation in the right rotator cuff.

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Now I've done a lot of research on my own

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>about this particular injury, and I was very nervous because, yes,

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>there's inflammation in the right rottator. Coffee, takes some pain killers,

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 1>you take a cord zone shot, it'll get rid of

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the inflammation. He'll start throwing again. But the big question

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 1>is what is causing said inflammation, which is what scares

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the heck out of me, and which is what I'm

0:20:55.960 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 1>hoping you have the answer for. So right now, the

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:02.919
<v Speaker 1>plan is to shut him down for two weeks, receive

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 1>a cortisone shot, and see how he responds. UM. A

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:07.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of the time, this is enough to calm down

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:11.159
<v Speaker 1>that inflammation if there isn't an underlying cause for it. UM.

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 1>In this case, it sounded like the m R I

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:16.159
<v Speaker 1>was clean. But if there's a smaller problem, maybe you

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:18.919
<v Speaker 1>know a very slight tear or some slight cartilage damage.

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 1>There's a chance that wouldn't show up on the m

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 1>r I. UM. Right now, it's not clear exactly what's

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 1>causing the inflammation, but hopefully it's just Um. You know,

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>he put his shoulder through a lot in the first

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 1>few weeks of spring training and it wasn't really ready

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:32.639
<v Speaker 1>for it, and there isn't something more serious going on.

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:35.680
<v Speaker 1>But you know, right now it's kind of too soon

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:38.680
<v Speaker 1>to tell. UM. We're showing an optimal recovery time of

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>three weeks, so it actually looks like, according to our algorithm,

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>that he should shut things down for more than the

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>two weeks that he has planned right now. UM, But

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 1>my best guess is they'll sort of see how he's

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>feeling two weeks from now, and then if he's if

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:52.880
<v Speaker 1>he's paying free, he'll slowly start to work his way back.

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Do there a positive or negative Frank, I, I think

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:00.200
<v Speaker 1>it's still kind of up in the air. Yeah. I

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:02.440
<v Speaker 1>think that's what we're looking at here with with Luis

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Severio and you know, Greg, since since the news, right

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 1>so the news came out two days ago. For Luis Severio,

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>over the past two days is NFBC a DP, tell

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:13.239
<v Speaker 1>me what you think about this. For the past two

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:18.640
<v Speaker 1>days of NFBC a DP is sixty three. So he's

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 1>going right behind hi Own and Paxton and ahead of

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Flaherty and Strasburg. And when I told you I moved

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>him down to SP eighteen, you looked at me and

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:30.920
<v Speaker 1>said it might be a little bit too low. The

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 1>market kind of agrees with me, Greg, it does. But

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>if he comes back and starts throwing it in two weeks,

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 1>he's back by the end of April. We have seen

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 1>players come back and some big deal. It's just a

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:46.160
<v Speaker 1>little scarier when it comes to throwing shoulder. Took another

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 1>guy who's dealing with the with an injury to his

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 1>throwing arm, not necessarily his shoulder is Mike Fultonevitch, who's

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 1>dealing with right elbow sore and its now there was

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:57.119
<v Speaker 1>an update that said that he feels better and that

0:22:57.240 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>if this were the regular season, he actually wouldn't miss

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:02.119
<v Speaker 1>a star quote wouldn't miss a start because us of

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 1>this injury. I'm not really buying that one here. What

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 1>do you have on mikeful to Knevitch, do you expecting

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:09.920
<v Speaker 1>to be ready for the start of the season. How

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>severe is this elbow injury? So thankfully this one sounds

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty minor. Um. He was clear to resume throwing three

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 1>days later. He threw on Tuesday, and from out everything

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:22.359
<v Speaker 1>I can tell it, it went pretty well. Um. So

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 1>it's always a good sign when it pictures back out

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:26.159
<v Speaker 1>there just a few days later, because if they were

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 1>concerned it was anything more at this point in the season,

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 1>they'd shut him down for at least a week. So

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that's actually relatively positive. Um. Now, he still

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 1>has an elevated injury risk and his HPF is below average,

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 1>so right now, of course we don't expect him to

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:43.440
<v Speaker 1>play very well, but I don't think he'll be ready

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 1>for opening day. But I do think it's realistic for

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>him to make a start in the first week or

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 1>two of the season, as long as he avoids another

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 1>step back. So that's pretty positive if you're if you're

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:55.919
<v Speaker 1>a Mike ful Tovit fan, sure it's great. I mean,

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 1>there were already reasons that I was off him. I mean,

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:00.680
<v Speaker 1>walk too many guys. The swinging strike Ray wasn't really

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>in line with his strikeout right last year, so I

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 1>was kind of out on him already, so I don't

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:07.680
<v Speaker 1>think he's gonna end up on any of my teams.

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 1>But hey, if you're a Braves fan, or if you're

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>related to Mike Folton Evitch and you still want to

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:14.119
<v Speaker 1>draft him, good news. Listen. It's not as bad as

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:15.879
<v Speaker 1>you're making him out. No, he's not terrible. He's not

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>one of those guys. But alright, he was at his price,

0:24:18.960 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 1>where like when we first started drafting, he wasn't really

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:23.720
<v Speaker 1>a guy I was targeting. What about his teammate Virginia

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:27.160
<v Speaker 1>A J Minter who I thought should be the should

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:28.680
<v Speaker 1>have been the closer last year. He did a nice

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:31.199
<v Speaker 1>job during the summer for our all. Thisis Guyanny who

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 1>came back, gave him the job back for the playoffs,

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and there was a bit of a debate who would

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:37.679
<v Speaker 1>be the closure going into the season for the Braves

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>this year if they didn't sign Craig Kimberle Minter Yatt

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 1>hurt and it looks like this guy who has the

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 1>job for now, how soon do we expect a j

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Minter back? So we're actually only showing a one week

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 1>optimal recovery time for mentor Um. He was dealing with

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:54.680
<v Speaker 1>shoulder tightness. Left his appearance on Friday, but he was

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:56.920
<v Speaker 1>supposed to start during again on Tuesday, so sort of

0:24:56.960 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a similar timeline to fault navic Um. He was also

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:03.120
<v Speaker 1>involved in a car accident two days before he left

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:06.159
<v Speaker 1>his appearance, so I think it hopefully has more to

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 1>do with just kind of being a little sore and

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 1>banged up from the car accident and not a true injury.

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 1>So right now, this doesn't seem like it's something too concerning,

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:16.399
<v Speaker 1>but we'll definitely want to keep a close eye on

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:18.959
<v Speaker 1>him over the next few weeks. A J mentor if

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:21.399
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about relievers who could potentially get you holds,

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 1>or if you just want to kind of lock up

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 1>both players in a bullpen, Arrodi's dis guy, you know,

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 1>in a J mentor unless Craig Kimbrell signs with with

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the Atlanta Braves. Those are two relief pictures that you

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 1>can look at Virginia. Another picture starting pitchers specifically dealing

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>with an elbow injury is Andrew Heeny. And Andrewhini was

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, he was kind of getting some hype here

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 1>in the in the draft season by multiple analysts, and

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:47.320
<v Speaker 1>you know he's dealing with this elbow injury. Now, he

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 1>did have a bullpen session on Tuesday. He's always kind

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 1>of been a guy who's dealt with injuries. Um, what

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:56.160
<v Speaker 1>do you have on Andrewhini. Yeah, things aren't looking great

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 1>for him. Um, he's still very high injury risks. Um,

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and he's his HPF is currently poor. It doesn't look

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>like it's going to improve. Uh, it might get back

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:06.920
<v Speaker 1>to below average by the time the season starts, but

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to get into that above average or

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:12.400
<v Speaker 1>peak category anytime in April or May. Um, he's making

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a little progress, but you know he like he said,

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:18.119
<v Speaker 1>he's one of those guys he's dealt with a few injuries. Um,

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and things just aren't looking looking great for him as

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 1>he deals with inflammation in his elbema. So not a

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:28.440
<v Speaker 1>great report there about Andrew Heeny with the Angels, and

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 1>he's a guy that's been hurt a lot throughout his career. Unfortunately,

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>hoping for a better report. Maybe you'll give us one

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to his teammates Gangs. So currently not

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>dealing with anything serious, but he has a very very

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 1>concerning injury history. Um, he's one of those players that

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 1>still falls into the high risk category, and he's up there.

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 1>He's in you know, the forties something percentile right now

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:55.640
<v Speaker 1>in terms of his injury risk, which is really high

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 1>for a guy who's technically been healthy for you know,

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:01.199
<v Speaker 1>six months or so. Um. Last year, he had problems

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>with both his left and right groin. Um, He's had

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:06.920
<v Speaker 1>hamstring issues. He had a series of blique injury in

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 1>seventeen that forced him to miss three months. So all

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 1>of these muscular strains are somewhat related, you know, the

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:17.119
<v Speaker 1>groin area. UM. Honestly, I'd be really surprised if he

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have some sort of a problem um with one

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of those injuries again this year. So I definitely think

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>he's something someone that you stay away from, even though

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:27.119
<v Speaker 1>it seems like he's okay right now. Were you've ever

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 1>seen a movie Bubble Boy. Yes, it's a great movie,

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:32.959
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. I think with all the angels starting pictures,

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 1>like after they pitch, they should just enter a bubble,

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:39.399
<v Speaker 1>just try and learn to pitch while. It's because I

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 1>think they're talented, right. I want to like Andrew Heine.

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to like Tyler's gags. We went over Tyler's

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:45.920
<v Speaker 1>gags the other day. His numbers before we get hurt

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:48.920
<v Speaker 1>last year. But surprise, surprise, he always gets hurt. He

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:50.920
<v Speaker 1>was great last year before he got hurt. But it's

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 1>just this is always the case with these two guys.

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 1>So I think that they're talented pictures, but it just

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:58.880
<v Speaker 1>seems like they're always dealing with something. Here. I'm gonna

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 1>move over to another hyped starting pitcher earlier on in

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the draft season, not so hype now, which might actually

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 1>create a buying opportunity for fantasy owners right now, and

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that's Josh James of the Houston Astros, who has been

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>dealing with a quad issue that has kind of delayed

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:16.560
<v Speaker 1>him here in Astro's camp um as of right now.

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they have a lot of guys that they

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:20.160
<v Speaker 1>can fill in the rotation without Josh James. But I think,

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:21.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, for the long run, I mean, especially in

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 1>like keeper Kynasy leagues, this guy has legitimate upside. How

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 1>long do you think this squad as shoe is going

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:28.159
<v Speaker 1>to affect him? Is going to start the year on

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:30.399
<v Speaker 1>the d L or I L Rather, what do you

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:33.640
<v Speaker 1>have on Josh James? Yeah, things are actually looking pretty

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 1>good for Josh James. Um he's actually already back in

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the low injury risk category. Um. He threw a bullpen

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 1>session today, which is, you know, a very good sign

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 1>for him. Ram pain free yesterday, so he's definitely trending

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 1>in the right direction. When he originally heard his quad,

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 1>we gave him a Grade one strain, which is relatively

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 1>minor UM and you know, based on how he's progressed

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:57.480
<v Speaker 1>so far, it looks like that's pretty accurate. So may

0:28:57.520 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 1>not be ready by you know, the first week of

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the season, but I don't think he's gonna miss more

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 1>than a couple starts if he does end up back

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:06.960
<v Speaker 1>as a starter, um, and could be available within the

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 1>first few weeks of the season however they want to

0:29:08.800 --> 0:29:12.600
<v Speaker 1>use him. That's Josh James. This is Virginia August from

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Inside Injuries. Good news on Josh James, which is obviously encouraging.

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 1>But what about another young pitcher, and that's Alex Reyes

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 1>who missed a lot of last year and the year before.

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 1>He's working his way back. Uh, he seems to be

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty in pretty good shape. I don't know what the

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals are ultimately thinking, but what's the health side of

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Alex rays. Yeah, so I actually watched a few of

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 1>his pitches. From his appearance on Tuesday, he looked pretty

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:39.720
<v Speaker 1>good basketball touch ninety eight miles per hour UM. He

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 1>even threw a few curveballs, so he's mixing up his

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 1>pitches already, which is usually a sign that he's feeling

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty comfortable unhealthy. Um. He does remain a high injury

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 1>risk though, just these are two very serious surgeries. He's

0:29:51.480 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 1>come back from the torn loop muscle and Tommy John's surgery.

0:29:54.360 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 1>So his HPF right now is above average, which tells

0:29:57.680 --> 0:30:00.720
<v Speaker 1>me that he actually started pitch pretty well, but he's

0:30:00.800 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 1>he's at a high risk of re injury, and I

0:30:02.800 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 1>just it's I have a hard time seeing him not

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>suffering some sort of a slight setback throughout the year,

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>whether it's inflammation, some ten nitis and his shoulder, elbow, um,

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, a little core muscle strain, something like that.

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 1>But you know, right now should pitch pretty well. But

0:30:18.920 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be someone we need to watch really

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 1>closely throughout the entire season. Yeah. I couldn't agree more

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>on Alex Reyes and I think he has a lot

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 1>of talent, but I do think the Cardinals are gonna

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 1>baby him somewhat. I'd be surprised if he throws more

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 1>than a hundred und twenty endings this year. But you know,

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 1>those hundred endings could be really good. It's just a

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 1>matter of, all, right, well, when is he gonna pitch?

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 1>When can I actually depend on Alex Reyes. So you know,

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:43.880
<v Speaker 1>if you have him as as the end of your

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 1>fantasy rotation, Greg, I think that's fine, but he's not

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:48.760
<v Speaker 1>really someone that I want to depend on all that much.

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you about Jimmy Nelson, who has

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 1>yet to make his debut in spring training, but he's

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 1>inching closer to it. He's thrown, he's thrown some some

0:30:56.040 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 1>batting practice, some bullpens here. Um, he's coming missed the

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 1>entire season. He's coming off this shoulder injury. But the

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 1>last time we saw him was and he was lights out.

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 1>He was amazing. So you know, one are the chances

0:31:09.560 --> 0:31:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that Jimmy Nelson could get back to that forum? I mean,

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 1>how how much of a workload can we expect him

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to have his first season back? And what's his injury

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:18.960
<v Speaker 1>risk looking like? Yeah, so right now he falls into

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 1>that elevated injury risk category. Um, definitely an improvement. He

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 1>was high risk all of last year, um, which of

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 1>course isn't a surprise considering he never pitched, but so

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:30.280
<v Speaker 1>there's still some risk there. Um. That's going to be

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the case any time when players missed an entire season

0:31:32.800 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 1>and is working their way back, just because you don't

0:31:34.840 --> 0:31:36.720
<v Speaker 1>quite know how their body is going to respond once

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:39.680
<v Speaker 1>they start, um pitching, you know, as often as it

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 1>takes throughout the season. So um, we actually do expect

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 1>him to pitch pretty well though, as long as he

0:31:45.440 --> 0:31:47.920
<v Speaker 1>can stay healthy. He's already back in the peak category.

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 1>So I think things are looking pretty good for him

0:31:50.160 --> 0:31:52.239
<v Speaker 1>at the start of the season, but there's always going

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 1>to be some risk. Um. It's actually when I look

0:31:55.320 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 1>at our future projections, that looks like the entire season

0:31:57.680 --> 0:32:00.800
<v Speaker 1>he'll likely stay an elevated injury risked just because of

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the severity of the surgery he went through. All right, greggy,

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 1>little high risk, high reward was actually more positive than

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I expected from the crew and inside injuries. In regards

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to Jimmy Nelson, I thought they'd be can all off. Yeah,

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that was that was a lot more prepositive than I expected,

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to be profectly honest with you. For Szaka's inside injuries.

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 1>We've asked you a lot about starting pitchers. Let me

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 1>go off the starting pitchers for a moment, and let

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 1>me go to a guy that we're gonna talk about

0:32:23.760 --> 0:32:26.959
<v Speaker 1>later on today, and that's Gregory Polanco, who had um

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 1>a really nice year last year for Pittsburgh. I know

0:32:29.120 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 1>he had a slump in June. You dropped him, Frank,

0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I held on because my waiver claim didn't go through.

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:36.440
<v Speaker 1>And when I was dropping him and he really turned around.

0:32:36.440 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 1>It was a really nice season. Like I said, for Polanco,

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 1>who before uh September, before what happened September, he was

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 1>going really really great. Actually, he bangs his shoulder in

0:32:47.560 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 1>September and as major shoulder surgery and is expected to

0:32:50.720 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 1>miss at least the first month of the season. How

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 1>healthy will he be when he comes back? Is he

0:32:55.960 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 1>worth drafting it all? What do you think about Gregory Polanco? Yeah?

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 1>So his surgery was to stabilize an acute left shoulder

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:06.960
<v Speaker 1>dislocation and repair the labor min his shoulder. This is

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a very serious surgery. UM. The initial timeline for his

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:13.240
<v Speaker 1>recovery was around seven to nine months UM, which would

0:33:13.240 --> 0:33:16.320
<v Speaker 1>put a return hopefully sometime around June Um, but this

0:33:16.480 --> 0:33:18.440
<v Speaker 1>is one of those injuries it really takes closer to

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:21.480
<v Speaker 1>nine to twelve months to really get healthy and feel

0:33:21.520 --> 0:33:23.640
<v Speaker 1>back to normal. So I don't think he's going to

0:33:23.720 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 1>be out nine to twelve months, but he's not going

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 1>to be anywhere near one percent. His injury risk is

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 1>still very, very high. His HPF is kind of hovering

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 1>on the border of below average and a bug average

0:33:34.720 --> 0:33:39.120
<v Speaker 1>right now. So he could play fairly well once he's

0:33:39.160 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 1>cleared to return, but he still has a long way

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to go. Um. He's been throwing from a hundred twenty

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 1>feet but hasn't taken any throws from the outfield yet. UM.

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess at this point, we probably just need to

0:33:49.000 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 1>hope that he can get some at bats in late

0:33:50.600 --> 0:33:53.120
<v Speaker 1>at spring training so his start to the season isn't

0:33:53.120 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 1>delayed too much. But he's someone I would I would

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:57.760
<v Speaker 1>stay away from this year just because there's a lot

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:00.479
<v Speaker 1>of risk coming back from the surgery. I know it's

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 1>not exactly the same thing, Greg, but this reminds me

0:34:02.560 --> 0:34:05.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Michael Confordo from last year. But even like,

0:34:05.360 --> 0:34:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the timeline is even longer, right, so they rushed back

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:09.479
<v Speaker 1>and forth the last year struggled in the first half

0:34:09.840 --> 0:34:12.520
<v Speaker 1>because obviously he was still kind of like playing through

0:34:12.880 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 1>this shoulder injury. It kind of seems like it's just

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a wash year for Gregory Polanco. Like maybe

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 1>he contributes something late in the season, you pick him up,

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, around then, maybe around the All Star breaks,

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:25.080
<v Speaker 1>something like that, but it seems like it might be

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a wash here, maybe you know, by low in the

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:29.919
<v Speaker 1>dynasty or something like that. But for for re draft

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 1>season long, I just don't know that he's going to

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:34.400
<v Speaker 1>contribute much this season. We'll be over to another outfielder,

0:34:34.480 --> 0:34:36.200
<v Speaker 1>one that we hold very near and due to our

0:34:36.239 --> 0:34:38.920
<v Speaker 1>hearts greg Aaron Hicks dealing with a back injury. Fun

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:41.279
<v Speaker 1>fact about Aaron Hicks. Every single year he's been in

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the major leagues, he has been on the injured list.

0:34:44.760 --> 0:34:47.360
<v Speaker 1>So why would it be any different now We're already

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:49.880
<v Speaker 1>in spring training. He just got a seven year contract extension.

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 1>But dealing with a back injury. Now, this has my attention,

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:56.359
<v Speaker 1>Virginia because specifically the next man up for the New

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 1>York Yankees, which presumably would be Clint Frasier. That's why

0:34:59.680 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 1>it has attention because he's, you know, one of their

0:35:02.520 --> 0:35:05.600
<v Speaker 1>top outfield hitting prospects. What's the latest on Aaron Higgs?

0:35:05.640 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Do we expect him to start the season? Uh? Is

0:35:07.680 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 1>this going to be something that lingers throughout the year.

0:35:09.640 --> 0:35:12.480
<v Speaker 1>What do we have on Aaron Higgs? Yeah, so a

0:35:12.520 --> 0:35:14.360
<v Speaker 1>few weeks ago we actually talked about him and we

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 1>warned that he was one of those guys that's a

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 1>high injury risk but in the peak HPF so hopefully

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:23.120
<v Speaker 1>he plays well, but very head chance he gets reinjured. UM.

0:35:23.280 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Of course a few days later, he now is dealing

0:35:25.600 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 1>with this back injury and it's been almost a week

0:35:27.760 --> 0:35:30.239
<v Speaker 1>now that he's been out. Um, they're not making it

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:32.880
<v Speaker 1>sound like a very big deal and it really might

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 1>not be. But like you said, you look at his

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:38.759
<v Speaker 1>injury history and it makes this a huge red flag. UM.

0:35:39.000 --> 0:35:41.759
<v Speaker 1>Last year he dealt dealt with an intercostal strain and

0:35:41.960 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 1>hamstring and ankle injuries. UM. Seventeen it was multiple of

0:35:45.640 --> 0:35:49.759
<v Speaker 1>a week strains, and then it was hamstring strings. So

0:35:49.920 --> 0:35:53.480
<v Speaker 1>all of these muscular injuries are very, very easily aggravated.

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:55.920
<v Speaker 1>So even if he recovers from his back injury in

0:35:55.960 --> 0:35:58.879
<v Speaker 1>the next week or two, UM, he's going to deal

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:01.760
<v Speaker 1>with something throughout the season in and these core injuries

0:36:01.800 --> 0:36:05.320
<v Speaker 1>are very very very likely to recur, especially back issues,

0:36:05.440 --> 0:36:08.600
<v Speaker 1>So this is a major red flag. Um and I

0:36:08.719 --> 0:36:11.759
<v Speaker 1>think he's probably gonna miss a lot of games this season, right.

0:36:11.800 --> 0:36:13.799
<v Speaker 1>This is a classic case of there might be one

0:36:13.880 --> 0:36:16.200
<v Speaker 1>year in Aaron Higgs's career where he stays healthy to

0:36:16.400 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 1>seventy five thirty home runs and fifteen stolen bases, and

0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:21.680
<v Speaker 1>everyone's gonna say I told you so, I told you

0:36:21.760 --> 0:36:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Higgs. But it's only gonna be like one year

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 1>out of like these next seven that the Yankees have

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 1>signed him. I think he's gonna be really good, like

0:36:29.080 --> 0:36:32.439
<v Speaker 1>Virginia said, when he plays. It's just it's more likely

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 1>than not that he's gonna miss at least twenty or

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 1>thirty games every single season. That's just how I view

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:38.919
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Higgs. If you have a good replacement, then sure

0:36:39.000 --> 0:36:41.360
<v Speaker 1>own him. But it's harder to replace guys when you

0:36:41.400 --> 0:36:43.800
<v Speaker 1>play in these deeper leads, especially fifteen teams or a

0:36:44.040 --> 0:36:47.759
<v Speaker 1>only it's tough. Absolutely, Virginia Zakis from Inside Injuries, we

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:51.120
<v Speaker 1>appreciate the time as always, we have ten seconds to go.

0:36:51.400 --> 0:36:56.719
<v Speaker 1>MIELSA no draft or don't draft don't draft, but I

0:36:56.760 --> 0:36:59.800
<v Speaker 1>don't like it. All right, fair enough, Sorry, Frankie, I'm sorry.

0:37:00.120 --> 0:37:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Virginia lets you down before she leaves. Let's take a

0:37:02.400 --> 0:37:04.719
<v Speaker 1>break more over the injured at players. Next hour, we'll

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:09.520
<v Speaker 1>be back at the reliever's next The Fantasy Sports Network

0:37:09.600 --> 0:37:11.680
<v Speaker 1>is hitting you from all angles with the best fantasy

0:37:11.719 --> 0:37:14.480
<v Speaker 1>sports and betting analysis. You can catch the latest programming

0:37:14.520 --> 0:37:16.879
<v Speaker 1>on so many platforms. There's no way you'll miss out

0:37:16.920 --> 0:37:19.160
<v Speaker 1>on any of the award winning programming we pump out

0:37:19.280 --> 0:37:21.160
<v Speaker 1>every single day. You can listen through the f t

0:37:21.320 --> 0:37:23.760
<v Speaker 1>s Y Radio app, I Heart Radio, tune in Radio,

0:37:24.040 --> 0:37:27.400
<v Speaker 1>stitch Up, download our podcast through iTunes, Google Play, Spotify,

0:37:27.600 --> 0:37:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Audio Boom, and you can watch select programming on the

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 1>f t s Y YouTube channel. The Fantasy Sports Network

0:37:33.080 --> 0:37:35.799
<v Speaker 1>your only source for fantasy sports and wagering any time

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere. More s Allan two thousand and fifteen, two

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:43.319
<v Speaker 1>thousands and sixteen Europe being Long Drive Tour Champion two

0:37:43.400 --> 0:37:51.279
<v Speaker 1>thousand seventeen World number one be personally, I keep my

0:37:51.360 --> 0:37:56.920
<v Speaker 1>game face on me all the time, especially coming out

0:37:56.960 --> 0:38:00.760
<v Speaker 1>of the bucker, leaving the range or leaving the ports.

0:38:02.440 --> 0:38:04.799
<v Speaker 1>What's your story? You go to game face grooming dot

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Com from all your athletic fati wipes and body cleansing,

0:38:07.320 --> 0:38:12.520
<v Speaker 1>needs rain, make it rain. Baseball we know kind of

0:38:12.600 --> 0:38:15.440
<v Speaker 1>transcends just a World Series retitle, although that is always

0:38:15.480 --> 0:38:17.840
<v Speaker 1>what every team is striving for. I would think that

0:38:18.080 --> 0:38:21.720
<v Speaker 1>ten years of being relevant with Manny Machado and San Diego,

0:38:21.960 --> 0:38:25.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's the bar they're looking at as opposed to

0:38:25.280 --> 0:38:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I think in Philadelphia the bar is definitely championship or

0:38:28.000 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 1>bus for thirteen years and three thirty million, while in

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:34.480
<v Speaker 1>San Diego be relevant weekdays six and nine am Eastern

0:38:34.560 --> 0:38:37.600
<v Speaker 1>on the fantasy sports networking on your popular podcast providers

0:38:37.920 --> 0:38:40.799
<v Speaker 1>can't get enough Fantasy football. Rhodo Experts has launched their

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:44.719
<v Speaker 1>NFL three Fantasy Football Package, which includes the best math

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:48.200
<v Speaker 1>based seasonal projections and rankings available anywhere on the Internet

0:38:48.239 --> 0:38:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and Davis Madigan, the Rugo Experts are providing dynasty, season

0:38:51.360 --> 0:38:54.560
<v Speaker 1>long betting, best ball, and NFL Draft content every day

0:38:54.600 --> 0:38:56.400
<v Speaker 1>of the year to give you an edge regardless of

0:38:56.480 --> 0:38:59.360
<v Speaker 1>what type of fantasy football you play. Say temper at

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Rugo expert dot com with the promo code V and

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:05.320
<v Speaker 1>T s Y. It's the NFL three Fantasy Football package

0:39:05.480 --> 0:39:09.319
<v Speaker 1>only at Rhoto Experts dot Com. Joined the Experts live

0:39:09.440 --> 0:39:11.920
<v Speaker 1>on the air every day by calling in at April four,

0:39:12.840 --> 0:39:34.760
<v Speaker 1>seven nine to join the Fantasy Sports Network. The NFL

0:39:34.880 --> 0:39:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Scouting Combine is coming going of the twenty NFL Draft

0:39:38.680 --> 0:39:41.399
<v Speaker 1>just around the corner. For serious fantas football players, it's

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:44.359
<v Speaker 1>never too early to start preparing the twenty nineteen season.

0:39:44.440 --> 0:39:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Rhoto Experts has you cover with the NFL three sixty

0:39:46.880 --> 0:39:49.880
<v Speaker 1>five Fantasy Football Package, including the best math based seasonal

0:39:49.920 --> 0:39:53.440
<v Speaker 1>projections and rankings available anywhere on the Internet. Davis the

0:39:53.520 --> 0:39:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Roto Experts providing Dynasty and Vice, lowest season long betting, bestball,

0:39:57.680 --> 0:40:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and the FL Draft content each and every day of

0:40:00.560 --> 0:40:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the year to give you an edge regardless of what

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 1>type of fantasy football you played. Save temper Center Roato

0:40:05.120 --> 0:40:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Expers dot com with the promo code fnc s Y.

0:40:07.239 --> 0:40:09.400
<v Speaker 1>That's tempercent off for the promo code FNC s Y.

0:40:09.520 --> 0:40:12.920
<v Speaker 1>It's the NFL three sixty five Fantasy Football package available

0:40:13.000 --> 0:40:15.719
<v Speaker 1>now at road Experts dot com. What used to be

0:40:15.760 --> 0:40:17.440
<v Speaker 1>at Rohto Experts dot com this time of year, We

0:40:17.480 --> 0:40:20.279
<v Speaker 1>should be a graphic for this What used to be

0:40:20.480 --> 0:40:22.279
<v Speaker 1>at Rhoto Experts dot com this time of the year,

0:40:22.600 --> 0:40:24.799
<v Speaker 1>it was baseball coverage. But because we've gone to NFL

0:40:24.880 --> 0:40:26.920
<v Speaker 1>three sixty five and we know you still need your

0:40:26.920 --> 0:40:29.520
<v Speaker 1>baseball coverage, I don't know what my man Frank Snaffle's

0:40:29.520 --> 0:40:31.759
<v Speaker 1>Patreon page, we will have a graphic for this, I

0:40:31.840 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 1>promise you by next week, and you pay ten bucks,

0:40:35.400 --> 0:40:37.680
<v Speaker 1>you get Frank's Frankings, And if you don't like the

0:40:37.719 --> 0:40:39.719
<v Speaker 1>way rankings are presented on the site, he'll email them

0:40:39.719 --> 0:40:41.160
<v Speaker 1>to you. He just told me this off the air.

0:40:41.360 --> 0:40:43.479
<v Speaker 1>He will email let me to you directly. Ten bucks

0:40:43.520 --> 0:40:45.920
<v Speaker 1>a month, you get his rankings and all the advisers

0:40:45.960 --> 0:40:48.120
<v Speaker 1>would ever need to update this throughout the season, throughout

0:40:48.520 --> 0:40:50.279
<v Speaker 1>the next three weeks, certainly he'll be on top of

0:40:50.360 --> 0:40:52.239
<v Speaker 1>his game. I've watched him edit it right here in

0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:55.080
<v Speaker 1>front of me during our show. That's how quickly things

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:58.160
<v Speaker 1>get updated for Frank Snaffle on his Patreon page. If

0:40:58.200 --> 0:40:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you want a little bit more of Frank, you want

0:41:00.040 --> 0:41:02.640
<v Speaker 1>him to answer you whenever you need, whenever you have

0:41:02.760 --> 0:41:04.800
<v Speaker 1>to pick somebody up, whenever you're not sure what to

0:41:04.880 --> 0:41:06.600
<v Speaker 1>do in the draft, you don't know who to drop,

0:41:06.680 --> 0:41:08.880
<v Speaker 1>and you can't get ahold of us on the on

0:41:08.960 --> 0:41:11.359
<v Speaker 1>the phone line. Z four, four, three, six, seven nine.

0:41:11.480 --> 0:41:14.080
<v Speaker 1>You'll be able to contact Frank whenever you need. Do

0:41:14.080 --> 0:41:15.400
<v Speaker 1>you get at your phone number for this? How does

0:41:15.440 --> 0:41:18.600
<v Speaker 1>that work? Oh? There's actually a really cool like DM

0:41:18.840 --> 0:41:21.200
<v Speaker 1>process on Patreon that I've been using with with some

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of the patrons are ready to subscribers. So I think

0:41:24.600 --> 0:41:26.319
<v Speaker 1>we could either just use the Patreon DM, we use

0:41:26.320 --> 0:41:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Twitter DM. I mean, if you really need access like

0:41:28.600 --> 0:41:31.200
<v Speaker 1>from your phone, like sure, I'll text you, like perfectly fine,

0:41:31.200 --> 0:41:33.000
<v Speaker 1>it's really like whatever you want, all right, cool, So

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:36.600
<v Speaker 1>you'll have unlimited, unfiltered access to Frank Staffeld made twenty

0:41:36.680 --> 0:41:40.160
<v Speaker 1>five bucks again, that's well worth it. Ten bucks again,

0:41:40.239 --> 0:41:41.840
<v Speaker 1>I said, he's gonna be mad at me, but like

0:41:42.160 --> 0:41:43.759
<v Speaker 1>that's the sweet spot. You get ten bucks a month,

0:41:43.800 --> 0:41:45.880
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna get everything, I think, everything you need. I

0:41:46.239 --> 0:41:47.719
<v Speaker 1>like to make my own decisions. I don't really need

0:41:47.760 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Frank except when I text them and then he doesn't response,

0:41:49.560 --> 0:41:51.839
<v Speaker 1>So I'll maybe I'll pay twenty five bucks for this month. Um,

0:41:52.160 --> 0:41:54.800
<v Speaker 1>but that's kind of where my head is at. The

0:41:54.880 --> 0:41:57.040
<v Speaker 1>one dollar TI or the five dollars year like that,

0:41:57.160 --> 0:41:59.759
<v Speaker 1>that's fine. Ten dollars twenty five that's what you need

0:41:59.800 --> 0:42:01.680
<v Speaker 1>to be that's how you're going to win your league

0:42:01.719 --> 0:42:04.680
<v Speaker 1>this year. It's Frank Stanfell's baseball Patreon. It's available right

0:42:04.680 --> 0:42:07.080
<v Speaker 1>now heading over his Twitter page painted up. I still

0:42:07.120 --> 0:42:09.160
<v Speaker 1>have to put it up on my page and I apologize. Um,

0:42:10.360 --> 0:42:14.120
<v Speaker 1>check it out right now, Frank Frank Stanfell's Patreon page

0:42:14.200 --> 0:42:17.760
<v Speaker 1>for Fantasy Baseball this season. The number three overall rancor

0:42:17.800 --> 0:42:20.560
<v Speaker 1>in all of Fantasy baseball last year, and for just

0:42:20.640 --> 0:42:22.960
<v Speaker 1>ten bucks or twenty five dollars you get access to

0:42:23.160 --> 0:42:26.799
<v Speaker 1>him unlimited, all right, Frankie. Um, some of these other

0:42:26.840 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 1>relievers we have not spoken about. Yeah, I want to

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:30.680
<v Speaker 1>just do that before we get to the injured guys

0:42:30.719 --> 0:42:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and where to draft him, where they're going in drafts? Um,

0:42:33.400 --> 0:42:37.160
<v Speaker 1>some of these other whole guys, who else really stands

0:42:37.200 --> 0:42:39.640
<v Speaker 1>out to you as someone you want to draft and

0:42:39.760 --> 0:42:43.719
<v Speaker 1>hope for holds or at these gratios? Yeah. So, Luke

0:42:43.760 --> 0:42:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Trevino was one that I was looking at as well

0:42:45.560 --> 0:42:47.839
<v Speaker 1>with with the Oakland age, Just lu Trovino. I don't

0:42:47.840 --> 0:42:51.080
<v Speaker 1>think it's a Trevino. It's just like a red blooded American,

0:42:51.880 --> 0:42:54.719
<v Speaker 1>all right, man. He was someone that I looked at

0:42:54.840 --> 0:42:56.920
<v Speaker 1>last year at a two point nine to ear a

0:42:57.320 --> 0:42:59.960
<v Speaker 1>had the one point one four whip if you try

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:01.799
<v Speaker 1>god as well over a strikeout or any He's someone

0:43:01.840 --> 0:43:04.000
<v Speaker 1>that I'm looking at. I mentioned Craig Stalmon a little

0:43:04.040 --> 0:43:08.200
<v Speaker 1>bit earlier on with the with with the San Diego Padres.

0:43:08.239 --> 0:43:09.920
<v Speaker 1>He had a sub three e r A last year

0:43:09.920 --> 0:43:12.239
<v Speaker 1>as well, he had you know, over ten strikeouts per nine.

0:43:12.320 --> 0:43:14.560
<v Speaker 1>He had. His walks per nine were under two last year.

0:43:14.600 --> 0:43:20.239
<v Speaker 1>Greg so, Craig Stammons another one, Eurius familiar. I think

0:43:20.280 --> 0:43:22.400
<v Speaker 1>familiar makes a lot of sense to especially, you know,

0:43:23.000 --> 0:43:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a handcuff situation. We know he has closing experience. I

0:43:26.280 --> 0:43:27.719
<v Speaker 1>do think that you know, when he's on the mount,

0:43:27.760 --> 0:43:30.640
<v Speaker 1>he's still gonna get a decent amount of strikeouts. You know,

0:43:30.800 --> 0:43:33.120
<v Speaker 1>last year he was you know, ten strikeouts per nine.

0:43:33.160 --> 0:43:34.600
<v Speaker 1>He had a three point one three e r A.

0:43:34.680 --> 0:43:36.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, i'd expect an ear a better than that

0:43:36.760 --> 0:43:39.759
<v Speaker 1>out of out of Eurus Familia. Really, all the Yankees guys,

0:43:39.840 --> 0:43:42.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, like I don't want to sound like a Homer,

0:43:42.280 --> 0:43:47.200
<v Speaker 1>but they're Bullpen's amazing. Greg Tances to Adam Outavino to

0:43:48.239 --> 0:43:53.200
<v Speaker 1>uh what am I forgetting here? Child Green, Adam Zack

0:43:53.239 --> 0:44:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Britton forgotten Lefty forgot a nice less large contract. If

0:44:01.440 --> 0:44:03.960
<v Speaker 1>you had to place a wager on who's going to

0:44:04.080 --> 0:44:07.400
<v Speaker 1>leave the San Francisco Giants and Saves this year, who

0:44:07.440 --> 0:44:11.040
<v Speaker 1>would you say? Will Smith may think he's gonna trade it.

0:44:11.120 --> 0:44:15.520
<v Speaker 1>That's true. I think that they're a prime team to

0:44:15.640 --> 0:44:18.880
<v Speaker 1>just blow everything up, just like trade Bump under trade

0:44:18.920 --> 0:44:21.480
<v Speaker 1>away Will Smith and the one person that they're not

0:44:21.480 --> 0:44:24.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna be able to trade grade contract, Mark Lanson. Yeah,

0:44:24.760 --> 0:44:27.520
<v Speaker 1>see that's your answer. I think so. I don't think

0:44:27.560 --> 0:44:29.239
<v Speaker 1>he has the best stuff by any means. I guess

0:44:29.239 --> 0:44:32.080
<v Speaker 1>he's Sam nice leading and saves. He was random to

0:44:32.239 --> 0:44:33.840
<v Speaker 1>last year he popped up how many saves? The end

0:44:33.920 --> 0:44:35.399
<v Speaker 1>up with last was the last year they had the station.

0:44:36.200 --> 0:44:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Two years ago he was really good for I think

0:44:38.920 --> 0:44:41.600
<v Speaker 1>two years ago was he still with Texas years trade?

0:44:41.719 --> 0:44:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Last year? Uh, it's camp here right, Sam Nicon is

0:44:46.680 --> 0:44:50.800
<v Speaker 1>very not good. All right, here we go the whole saves.

0:44:51.719 --> 0:44:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Here we go. So last year he had three. The

0:44:54.600 --> 0:44:57.480
<v Speaker 1>year before he had fourteen. That was with San Francisco.

0:44:57.560 --> 0:44:59.520
<v Speaker 1>So that was all fourteen coming of San Francisco. Yeah,

0:44:59.520 --> 0:45:01.759
<v Speaker 1>it was two years. Yeah, that's what I thought. Last year.

0:45:01.880 --> 0:45:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Last year is much Yeah. Yeah, But the thing is

0:45:04.600 --> 0:45:07.600
<v Speaker 1>he just doesn't strike out a lot of peace eight

0:45:07.640 --> 0:45:09.520
<v Speaker 1>whip all right, So I mean he's a two category

0:45:09.560 --> 0:45:11.239
<v Speaker 1>contributor to give you a good ear, a good whip.

0:45:11.320 --> 0:45:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Not really love it to be Pet van Needy, but

0:45:13.239 --> 0:45:15.719
<v Speaker 1>it will never be pet. I feel like Mark Moranson

0:45:15.840 --> 0:45:18.359
<v Speaker 1>is going so late. And again I don't think he's

0:45:18.400 --> 0:45:21.080
<v Speaker 1>good his ear A and NFBC. I mean his his

0:45:21.160 --> 0:45:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a DP. It's twenty acronyms. Man like, too many three

0:45:23.960 --> 0:45:26.239
<v Speaker 1>letter acronyms that I'm dealing with. Here is a d

0:45:26.440 --> 0:45:29.759
<v Speaker 1>P in the National Fantasy Baseball Championship, Mark Lanson, it's

0:45:29.800 --> 0:45:33.319
<v Speaker 1>five a D two. Would you be surprised one bit

0:45:33.360 --> 0:45:35.680
<v Speaker 1>if he saved twenty games this year? I mean that's

0:45:35.760 --> 0:45:37.840
<v Speaker 1>like I would. I wouldn't surprised. Because of his contract,

0:45:37.880 --> 0:45:39.840
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna do everything they can to allow him to

0:45:39.880 --> 0:45:42.120
<v Speaker 1>be to be the closer. They're gonna give him every

0:45:42.160 --> 0:45:47.239
<v Speaker 1>opportunity today, I don't disagree with you. You know, I'm

0:45:47.239 --> 0:45:49.040
<v Speaker 1>looking at Greg who's kind of picking up some steam

0:45:49.080 --> 0:45:53.640
<v Speaker 1>here in the spring training all No, definitely not Richard

0:45:53.680 --> 0:45:57.359
<v Speaker 1>Baier guest. Well, you know, speaking of Richard Bayer leads

0:45:57.400 --> 0:45:59.759
<v Speaker 1>me into Michael Gibbons got blown up the other day,

0:45:59.760 --> 0:46:02.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, got blown up yesterday, Gregor another guy that

0:46:02.200 --> 0:46:06.239
<v Speaker 1>I drafted on my Great Fantasy Basic Invitational team, Second

0:46:06.360 --> 0:46:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Rider six and runs. What are we doing? Man? What

0:46:11.120 --> 0:46:13.800
<v Speaker 1>we what do we do? Like? What do the Marlins do?

0:46:13.920 --> 0:46:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know? What's your guests? Who's the closer? You

0:46:17.480 --> 0:46:19.920
<v Speaker 1>know who wouldn't surprise me? I think dark Horse in Miami,

0:46:20.360 --> 0:46:23.279
<v Speaker 1>Teyron Guerrero. This guy's like six ft eight until it's

0:46:23.280 --> 0:46:25.200
<v Speaker 1>like a hundred and five miles per hour, but he

0:46:25.239 --> 0:46:27.600
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't know where the ball is going. Sounds like

0:46:27.640 --> 0:46:31.960
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good closer, Like your guess is as good

0:46:31.960 --> 0:46:34.480
<v Speaker 1>as mine. They begin Sergio Romo, I guess he has

0:46:34.480 --> 0:46:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the closing experience, but he throws eighty five miles per hour.

0:46:37.680 --> 0:46:42.080
<v Speaker 1>So alright, nice little twenty difference from Tehran Guerrero. Drew.

0:46:42.160 --> 0:46:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Second Rider was the one who picked up some saves

0:46:44.480 --> 0:46:46.520
<v Speaker 1>down the stretch last year once they traded Kyle bear

0:46:46.600 --> 0:46:50.319
<v Speaker 1>Claw away. What does surprise me if Guerrero ends up

0:46:50.320 --> 0:46:53.000
<v Speaker 1>being the guy? So yesterday second Rounder gives up sixer

0:46:53.000 --> 0:46:55.279
<v Speaker 1>and runs, and I think Sergio Romo also gave up

0:46:55.280 --> 0:46:58.000
<v Speaker 1>like a two run bomb yesterday. Or you give up

0:46:58.000 --> 0:47:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a couple of runs for sure, Caska, random questions, the reliever,

0:47:01.719 --> 0:47:06.000
<v Speaker 1>if you don't mind, what's up? Who you got? I

0:47:06.080 --> 0:47:08.560
<v Speaker 1>gotta check this out in the FBC, Like I feel

0:47:08.600 --> 0:47:12.560
<v Speaker 1>like Domingo Santas just climbing. Oh yeah, shooting of draft

0:47:12.600 --> 0:47:15.960
<v Speaker 1>forwards right, four home runs, ready to spring. He's a

0:47:16.000 --> 0:47:19.000
<v Speaker 1>guy out a video. He hit home run yesterday. Bomb.

0:47:19.600 --> 0:47:21.799
<v Speaker 1>He's just and he makes it look so easy too,

0:47:21.920 --> 0:47:24.280
<v Speaker 1>which makes me think that his power is going to translate.

0:47:24.280 --> 0:47:26.000
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter where he is, like back that he's

0:47:26.640 --> 0:47:30.040
<v Speaker 1>like Chris Davis. Then you know, I'm gonna look hang

0:47:30.080 --> 0:47:33.160
<v Speaker 1>on over the over the last week when I'm tossing

0:47:33.200 --> 0:47:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and turning in bed. These are the things I think

0:47:34.520 --> 0:47:40.320
<v Speaker 1>about Outfielers. You know what's the very good values like that?

0:47:40.480 --> 0:47:42.600
<v Speaker 1>The other day Ronans took him in the thirteenth round though,

0:47:42.640 --> 0:47:46.080
<v Speaker 1>which is the earliest I've seen. That's early, yeah, but

0:47:47.040 --> 0:47:50.080
<v Speaker 1>it's it's good. It's a good idea. How much Domingo

0:47:50.160 --> 0:47:52.239
<v Speaker 1>Santana in the thirteenth and then he got Austin Medals

0:47:52.280 --> 0:47:55.399
<v Speaker 1>in the sixteen Like take my money, take my money

0:47:55.440 --> 0:47:57.840
<v Speaker 1>at Austin Meadows is actually going Johnny spots higher than

0:47:57.920 --> 0:48:00.400
<v Speaker 1>him in the NFP. Can we do that? This is

0:48:00.440 --> 0:48:02.080
<v Speaker 1>what I talk like, we do that next Thurs Night.

0:48:02.120 --> 0:48:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I respect everyone who's in the tout ward draft obviously,

0:48:05.040 --> 0:48:07.880
<v Speaker 1>but I feel like when obvious, you don't have to

0:48:07.960 --> 0:48:11.360
<v Speaker 1>know I do. I mean, these are these are proven

0:48:11.440 --> 0:48:15.879
<v Speaker 1>fititsy baseball. Michael Florio is a War League pretty good.

0:48:15.920 --> 0:48:21.359
<v Speaker 1>He's one of our teammates for turns forever. I feel

0:48:21.360 --> 0:48:23.120
<v Speaker 1>like when people draft with Ronus, they just forget how

0:48:23.160 --> 0:48:26.800
<v Speaker 1>to draft. You always say that where you no. No,

0:48:26.920 --> 0:48:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's really good too, Like he's good at

0:48:28.880 --> 0:48:31.520
<v Speaker 1>what he does, But like, how does Austin Meadows go

0:48:31.560 --> 0:48:33.600
<v Speaker 1>in the sixteenth round? Greg? I don't know. I don't

0:48:34.000 --> 0:48:36.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't get it. Would you ever have aust Meadows Santana.

0:48:37.120 --> 0:48:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I have Austin Meadows higher, but Domingo Santana's closing the gap.

0:48:41.840 --> 0:48:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I wrote a little I wrote a little piece on

0:48:44.680 --> 0:48:47.720
<v Speaker 1>my Patreon when you can check out about about Austin Meadows,

0:48:47.760 --> 0:48:51.160
<v Speaker 1>which is in my outfielder rankings. And I'm actually gonna

0:48:51.160 --> 0:48:53.440
<v Speaker 1>do this for outfields who are getting hyped up in

0:48:53.440 --> 0:48:55.719
<v Speaker 1>the spring. I'm actually gonna write about Mingo Santana as well.

0:48:55.960 --> 0:48:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to write about these outfielders who are kind

0:48:58.480 --> 0:49:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of getting hyped up throughout spring, whether or not you

0:49:00.560 --> 0:49:03.600
<v Speaker 1>can trust it. And Austin Meadows, I think he's a

0:49:03.600 --> 0:49:06.600
<v Speaker 1>guy that could come close to going this year. Am

0:49:06.600 --> 0:49:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I crazy? Great? Got a change? I mean, I'm crazy.

0:49:09.600 --> 0:49:12.279
<v Speaker 1>I have him forty one in my outfield. He's a

0:49:12.320 --> 0:49:14.560
<v Speaker 1>foward top prospect of a good reason, right. I also

0:49:14.640 --> 0:49:16.600
<v Speaker 1>wrote about Byron Buckston. He's in that group. I mean,

0:49:16.680 --> 0:49:21.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a group of Meadows. Byron Buxton, do mingo santag

0:49:22.080 --> 0:49:24.359
<v Speaker 1>Jackie Bradley is getting hyped up in the spring. Why

0:49:24.600 --> 0:49:27.000
<v Speaker 1>why is that? Well? He actually he made off season adjustments,

0:49:27.760 --> 0:49:31.120
<v Speaker 1>like Jenny Martinez is uh hitting coach, and he's like

0:49:31.440 --> 0:49:33.239
<v Speaker 1>trying to lift the ball more and so far it's

0:49:33.239 --> 0:49:35.319
<v Speaker 1>been paying off. And I also think that he had

0:49:35.360 --> 0:49:38.080
<v Speaker 1>like a strong second half as well. Did you see

0:49:38.120 --> 0:49:39.719
<v Speaker 1>the video of him miked up the other day during

0:49:39.719 --> 0:49:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the game? It was actually really cool. So and I

0:49:43.200 --> 0:49:44.960
<v Speaker 1>wonder if they're going to start doing this more during

0:49:45.000 --> 0:49:48.520
<v Speaker 1>like regular season games. They probably won't, but they make

0:49:48.640 --> 0:49:52.960
<v Speaker 1>up outfielders and they talk to them through other players.

0:49:53.120 --> 0:49:56.000
<v Speaker 1>So they did it with Jackie. He was talking about

0:49:56.040 --> 0:49:58.640
<v Speaker 1>how you know the second half, everything started clicking for

0:49:58.680 --> 0:50:00.960
<v Speaker 1>him a little bit more of that last year. He's

0:50:01.000 --> 0:50:04.080
<v Speaker 1>a guy that's had upside before, and he's in a

0:50:04.200 --> 0:50:07.080
<v Speaker 1>really good Red Sox lineup. So he's another guy that

0:50:07.120 --> 0:50:11.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm paying it tenn during the spring. But with

0:50:11.320 --> 0:50:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Domingo said Titana, what I was thinking about right was

0:50:14.520 --> 0:50:18.320
<v Speaker 1>two years he agoing he was amazing. He hit you

0:50:18.360 --> 0:50:20.080
<v Speaker 1>know to seventy eight, all right, you don't really want

0:50:20.120 --> 0:50:21.719
<v Speaker 1>it for batting average? Is everything else that he could do?

0:50:22.000 --> 0:50:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Thirty home runs, eighty eight run scored, eighty five RBIs,

0:50:25.400 --> 0:50:28.759
<v Speaker 1>fifteen stolen bases. And what I thought to myself, Greg

0:50:28.920 --> 0:50:32.839
<v Speaker 1>was he's obviously very talented. If you give this guy

0:50:32.920 --> 0:50:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the chance to play every single day, Let's say he

0:50:36.600 --> 0:50:39.080
<v Speaker 1>just gives you seventy five per cent of the production

0:50:39.120 --> 0:50:43.440
<v Speaker 1>he did two years ago, he's by far and away

0:50:43.560 --> 0:50:46.160
<v Speaker 1>worth being drafted where he is right now. If he

0:50:46.200 --> 0:50:49.400
<v Speaker 1>gives you, you know, to fifty five batting average with

0:50:50.680 --> 0:50:54.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty three to five home runs, seventy five runs, seventy

0:50:54.080 --> 0:50:56.880
<v Speaker 1>five r bis and twelve stolen bases, ten stolen bases,

0:50:58.719 --> 0:51:00.440
<v Speaker 1>he's a great value. Where he's going, he's still a

0:51:00.480 --> 0:51:09.040
<v Speaker 1>great value Jesse Winker, let me take the ring because

0:51:09.080 --> 0:51:12.719
<v Speaker 1>he's closing the gap. I know. I think the Mingos

0:51:12.719 --> 0:51:18.439
<v Speaker 1>Santana's playing time is more, although new Reds manager David

0:51:18.480 --> 0:51:20.839
<v Speaker 1>Bell has said he wants Jesse Winker to get at

0:51:20.920 --> 0:51:24.080
<v Speaker 1>least five season, so he wants him to be near

0:51:24.120 --> 0:51:28.239
<v Speaker 1>everyday player. So you know what, this is really funny, Greg,

0:51:28.320 --> 0:51:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I have Domingo Santana fifty first, I have Winker, have

0:51:31.280 --> 0:51:35.239
<v Speaker 1>them really close. I have Awesome Medals thirty nine. Action

0:51:37.000 --> 0:51:40.560
<v Speaker 1>very excited about Awesome. The prospect pedigree is there's a

0:51:40.600 --> 0:51:42.680
<v Speaker 1>guy that makes a lot of contact. I don't care

0:51:42.760 --> 0:51:44.920
<v Speaker 1>that he's a lefty and no roster resource has him

0:51:44.960 --> 0:51:48.520
<v Speaker 1>as a platoon player, but actually fared better against lefties

0:51:48.600 --> 0:51:50.200
<v Speaker 1>last years than he did against right He's geta It

0:51:50.239 --> 0:51:52.160
<v Speaker 1>was it was a small sample size, but I think

0:51:52.160 --> 0:51:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Austin Meadows is a guy that comes in here and

0:51:54.280 --> 0:51:57.320
<v Speaker 1>hit at the top of a very sneaky, underrated lineup.

0:51:58.080 --> 0:52:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Wouldn't surprise you at all. If they're the to their

0:52:00.239 --> 0:52:03.040
<v Speaker 1>lineuples like Austin Meadows, Tommy Famine and like insert whatever

0:52:03.120 --> 0:52:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the rest. That's a pretty good top of the lineup.

0:52:06.840 --> 0:52:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I like Austin Meadows. He come close, dude. How have

0:52:11.120 --> 0:52:13.839
<v Speaker 1>you not bet on the Rays over under yet? Well?

0:52:13.880 --> 0:52:16.520
<v Speaker 1>They play in a tough division. Greg love them, but

0:52:16.600 --> 0:52:18.200
<v Speaker 1>they against the Red Sox. They play against You know what,

0:52:18.360 --> 0:52:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I understand that there is a lot of As much

0:52:20.120 --> 0:52:22.799
<v Speaker 1>as I love Tommy Fame, I'm realistic. I could tell

0:52:22.800 --> 0:52:26.440
<v Speaker 1>you he's an injury risk. Yeah, I think what. He

0:52:26.440 --> 0:52:28.920
<v Speaker 1>hasn't played more than a hundred thirty seven games. I

0:52:28.960 --> 0:52:33.600
<v Speaker 1>love Tommy, al be realistic. Got to be realistic, Believe me.

0:52:33.680 --> 0:52:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm realistic. Moved Mingo Santanna up? How high should I

0:52:37.680 --> 0:52:39.600
<v Speaker 1>move him? Give me some name, I'll tell you just

0:52:39.680 --> 0:52:41.439
<v Speaker 1>ahead of him? All right, Well, he's definitely going ahead

0:52:41.440 --> 0:52:43.480
<v Speaker 1>of Ryan Brown. Yes, I haven't had he Ryan Bron

0:52:43.560 --> 0:52:46.120
<v Speaker 1>you should go ahead of Brandon Demo. I have very

0:52:46.160 --> 0:52:48.719
<v Speaker 1>close to Brandon mut Yes, but you play in O BP,

0:52:48.880 --> 0:52:50.719
<v Speaker 1>so it's a little bit different. These are just like

0:52:50.800 --> 0:52:54.040
<v Speaker 1>standard five by five Rod. What about Ian Desmond? Hes

0:52:54.080 --> 0:53:00.160
<v Speaker 1>been plays in Colorado and should he be? They think

0:53:00.160 --> 0:53:01.879
<v Speaker 1>the batting average is going to bounce back for Ian

0:53:01.920 --> 0:53:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Desmond too. He had to twenty last year and the

0:53:05.480 --> 0:53:07.720
<v Speaker 1>bad bit was unlucky, even though he picked in corps

0:53:07.800 --> 0:53:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Field you know, he hits a lot of groundballs, very frustrating.

0:53:12.680 --> 0:53:18.759
<v Speaker 1>Still last year is gonna be like a six hitter.

0:53:19.280 --> 0:53:21.320
<v Speaker 1>The opportunity probably should have him over and if I

0:53:21.480 --> 0:53:24.239
<v Speaker 1>if I wrote it, he's probably have him over Atana. Yeah,

0:53:24.280 --> 0:53:25.840
<v Speaker 1>just because I think he's gonna steal I'm not going to,

0:53:26.040 --> 0:53:28.279
<v Speaker 1>but you should have him. What about Harrison Bader? I

0:53:28.400 --> 0:53:31.440
<v Speaker 1>have him very close as well. He's a little overrated.

0:53:31.600 --> 0:53:34.399
<v Speaker 1>I agree, I have sent Tanna over Beader. I think

0:53:34.800 --> 0:53:36.839
<v Speaker 1>I think bad is wanted like the stat cast hero

0:53:37.000 --> 0:53:38.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of guys that I looked at and like a

0:53:38.400 --> 0:53:40.160
<v Speaker 1>sprint speed was really good. So I kind of got

0:53:40.160 --> 0:53:42.319
<v Speaker 1>sucked into like the possibility of him stealing a ton

0:53:42.360 --> 0:53:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of bases. I think that was my thinking with ranking

0:53:46.239 --> 0:53:50.439
<v Speaker 1>Harrison being or forty seven right now? Corie Dickerson, did

0:53:50.440 --> 0:53:53.040
<v Speaker 1>he be in this mix? Are you still I'm never

0:53:53.080 --> 0:53:55.919
<v Speaker 1>going to draft court never? Are you still sweating Malex Smith?

0:53:55.960 --> 0:53:58.399
<v Speaker 1>By the way, you're still doing that? What you're still

0:53:58.400 --> 0:54:02.360
<v Speaker 1>sweating Alex Smith? You mean sweating Smith? I don't. I

0:54:02.480 --> 0:54:05.279
<v Speaker 1>never loved Alex Smith. Greg He's a very good ball play.

0:54:07.000 --> 0:54:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I think in the second half is o BP was

0:54:08.640 --> 0:54:11.439
<v Speaker 1>over four dred I know it's not like Malex Smith,

0:54:12.560 --> 0:54:14.200
<v Speaker 1>but I'm worried about this injury that of course you

0:54:14.280 --> 0:54:17.719
<v Speaker 1>are definitely worried. And what was that you had dr

0:54:17.800 --> 0:54:19.960
<v Speaker 1>A on last week? Right? I spoke about Malex Smith

0:54:20.000 --> 0:54:21.640
<v Speaker 1>and said he's probably gonna miss like a third of

0:54:21.680 --> 0:54:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the season. I mean that worries me out. So I've

0:54:25.280 --> 0:54:26.759
<v Speaker 1>lowered him a little bit. I still have him in

0:54:26.800 --> 0:54:29.040
<v Speaker 1>this mix. He's he's forty three for me. Who would

0:54:29.040 --> 0:54:31.560
<v Speaker 1>you rather draft today, Greg, Alex Smith or Billy Hamilton's

0:54:34.120 --> 0:54:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather Malex Smith. He's a better hitter, definitely a

0:54:36.640 --> 0:54:40.439
<v Speaker 1>better here, no question. So well, Billy Hamilton's healthier, faster

0:54:40.920 --> 0:54:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and is he faster though I don't think so. Really

0:54:45.040 --> 0:54:48.200
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty cool. I think, well, how much stock do

0:54:48.280 --> 0:54:53.080
<v Speaker 1>you put into sprint speed? Greg? Which is the new

0:54:53.200 --> 0:54:56.399
<v Speaker 1>metric tons? I don't really think I MESSR speed while

0:54:56.440 --> 0:54:59.360
<v Speaker 1>you're running on the basis it's pretty much the truest

0:54:59.400 --> 0:55:03.200
<v Speaker 1>test of how Yes, So let me pull up Malex

0:55:03.239 --> 0:55:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Smith for you, and then I'll pull up Billy Hamilton.

0:55:04.680 --> 0:55:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure Malex Smith was top five in sprint

0:55:07.520 --> 0:55:11.520
<v Speaker 1>speed last year. Iron Bucks was number one again. Iron

0:55:11.560 --> 0:55:15.279
<v Speaker 1>buckson man, he's very fast as well. Alex Smith was

0:55:15.960 --> 0:55:22.360
<v Speaker 1>percentile and sprint speed which made him in all of

0:55:22.440 --> 0:55:25.040
<v Speaker 1>baseball eighth the year before. He hasn't been lower than

0:55:25.120 --> 0:55:27.920
<v Speaker 1>seventeenth the past three years. That's Malex Smith. Now we're

0:55:27.920 --> 0:55:30.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna pull up Billy Hamilton's who I mean, hopefully the

0:55:30.520 --> 0:55:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Royals taught about a hit because you know the old adage, Greggy,

0:55:33.800 --> 0:55:39.120
<v Speaker 1>you can't steal first base sprint speed or Billy hamilton'scenti

0:55:39.200 --> 0:55:44.879
<v Speaker 1>which would make him faster. And Malex Smith, yeah, oh yeah,

0:55:45.480 --> 0:55:47.759
<v Speaker 1>he's topping. He hasn't been lower than nine in each

0:55:47.760 --> 0:55:50.799
<v Speaker 1>of the past four years. Billy Hamilton's sprint speed still

0:55:50.880 --> 0:55:54.800
<v Speaker 1>very fast, still doesn't know it hit or walk for

0:55:54.920 --> 0:55:58.480
<v Speaker 1>that matter, Why would you ever walk? Billy Hamilton's that's

0:55:58.520 --> 0:56:02.000
<v Speaker 1>never m So did this help you figure out how

0:56:02.080 --> 0:56:04.640
<v Speaker 1>to value Domingo Santana? Yeah? I moved them up? How

0:56:04.640 --> 0:56:06.120
<v Speaker 1>how did you move them? Because I gotta figure out

0:56:06.120 --> 0:56:07.640
<v Speaker 1>how how high I should move? And I don't know,

0:56:07.680 --> 0:56:09.640
<v Speaker 1>you don't remember there's keepers in here and stuff. It's

0:56:09.760 --> 0:56:12.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's in somebody. He's like, how do you

0:56:12.719 --> 0:56:15.840
<v Speaker 1>feel about Ramon Loriano? He's not really a guy that

0:56:15.880 --> 0:56:17.880
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about but a lot of people in the

0:56:17.920 --> 0:56:19.960
<v Speaker 1>fantasy industry like it. He will like him a lot.

0:56:20.120 --> 0:56:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I read something I might have been on batting average

0:56:23.080 --> 0:56:24.600
<v Speaker 1>in the minors when I looked him up. I don't

0:56:24.600 --> 0:56:25.919
<v Speaker 1>know where did I read that. I read some about

0:56:25.960 --> 0:56:29.279
<v Speaker 1>Ramon Loriano that hit near the top of the They

0:56:29.360 --> 0:56:33.800
<v Speaker 1>think that the legal catch up to him now, and

0:56:33.840 --> 0:56:36.680
<v Speaker 1>that was that an article in the Athletic. Is that

0:56:36.760 --> 0:56:39.719
<v Speaker 1>where it was might have been, Yeah, it might have been,

0:56:40.760 --> 0:56:42.360
<v Speaker 1>but I think there was a counter to that. Like

0:56:42.480 --> 0:56:45.480
<v Speaker 1>he responded to it and said like, no, I know

0:56:45.600 --> 0:56:49.640
<v Speaker 1>it's coming and I'm getting ready for it. Oh say right,

0:56:49.640 --> 0:56:52.359
<v Speaker 1>we'll come back. We're gonna jump around a lot this hour.

0:56:52.760 --> 0:56:54.759
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna start with the injured players and we're to

0:56:54.840 --> 0:56:56.719
<v Speaker 1>draft them. We'll tell you that next