WEBVTT - Markets, Chevrolet, and Hunter Biden (Podcast)

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.960
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:07.000 --> 0:00:11.560
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moven news. Find the Bloomberg Markets podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>called Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.040
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast Listen. Our next guest

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>is firmly in the soft landing camp as well. He

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>expects a growth of around one and a half percent

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of the year and inflation to continue

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 1>to decline. But market's kind of up and down today

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 1>on concern that the elevated inflation that we've seen in

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:38.559
<v Speaker 1>recent data points, the core CPI reading still at four

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>point seven percent, is going to stay with us for

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 1>some time to come. And part of that problem is

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:47.199
<v Speaker 1>the super core gauge of prices that Powell watches so closely, right,

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 1>the services excluding housing has actually risen in the last reading.

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>And another part is that some elements of the depressed

0:00:55.960 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>CPI readings like airline tickets and medical costs aren't expected

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:05.279
<v Speaker 1>to continue to drop. And then got the housing picture

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>to add to all of that, so let's welcome in

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Bob Heater. He's a head of Investment Policy and Strategy

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>group over at Silvercrest Asset Management. Bob, welcome the program.

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for joining us in the Interactive Broker Studio. Why

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>are you optimistic that inflation will continue to decline?

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think one of the reasons is that we've

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 2>seen most of the inflationary fuel dissipate, so monetary growth

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 2>has all but flat lined here. You've seen all of

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 2>the supply chain problems dissipate. The index that's widely maintained

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:35.679
<v Speaker 2>and followed there really only hit normal just a few

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 2>months ago. You've seen a lot of the demand swings

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 2>in the economy start to normalize. We're still seeing some

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 2>of that, but supply and demand a bit more stable

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:46.960
<v Speaker 2>and allowing companies to really produce at a level that

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 2>they need to to keep prices in check. And so

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm relatively optimistic on the pace of inflation continuing to

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 2>decline from an economic perspective, but I think from a

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 2>market perspective, we've maybe gotten a little bit of ahead

0:01:57.040 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 2>of ourselves and there's a bit more work to do.

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting because these CPI figures don't necessarily look ahead

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 3>to things like rising oil prices and the impacts. I mean,

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 3>when we think of the FED, they're looking at this

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:13.360
<v Speaker 3>core number that strips out all this other stuff, that

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 3>is the stuff that consumers potentially feel most strongly. Is

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 3>this going to change the FEDS thinking? Is this going

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 3>to change their reaction to some of these data that

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 3>we get.

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 2>So the way that I look at that on a

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 2>go forward basis of trying to estimate the pace of

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 2>the decline in CPI, and I think that's the real

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 2>open question mark for markets here.

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right.

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 2>There are a number of things that are likely to

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:37.520
<v Speaker 2>put some upward pressure on CPI, and the energy complex

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:40.359
<v Speaker 2>certainly being one of those. The one that's the biggest one,

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 2>of course, on the downside is housing. And so when

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 2>we look through some of those estimates of how much

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 2>of the contribution from CPI from housing well over two percent,

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:49.920
<v Speaker 2>it looks like maybe middle of next year.

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:51.239
<v Speaker 1>That starts to go flat.

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 2>So if I add back in more energy inflation than

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:57.360
<v Speaker 2>we have currently and I take out the housing, I

0:02:57.400 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 2>get to a point where I sort of estimate we

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:02.080
<v Speaker 2>hit that two percent FED target sometime in the middle

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 2>of next year, so we're still a ways away from that,

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 2>and then beyond that, we still have to ask the

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 2>question what will the FED do if and when we

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 2>hit that two percent? So I think that's why the

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:12.639
<v Speaker 2>market's struggling a little bit here. With inflation's improved a lot,

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 2>I think we factored most of that in and we're

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 2>sort of looking for some additional fuel.

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>What do you think do you think the Fed is

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>going to hold at this level?

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>And what in twenty twenty four start to cut.

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 2>I think it won't be at least until the middle

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 2>or late in twenty twenty four until they start to cut.

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 2>I think I base that somewhat on the comments that

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 2>we saw from New York Fed President Williams talking a

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 2>little bit about the restrictiveness of policy increases as inflation

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 2>comes down. So if we do see inflation coming down

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 2>a bit, I think they may cut just a bit

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 2>just enough over that too.

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>This is the passive hike that we got basically yesterday,

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 1>right when CPI came down, even though rates were the same,

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>essentially gives you a higher real.

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 2>Rate, yes, And I think even that process, though, will

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 2>take some time. It's not like they're going to take

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, two hundred or three hundred bases points out

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 2>in a single meeting. It'll be thissured pace of very

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 2>slow cuts later in the year. So I think there's

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 2>still a long timeline for rates being a bit elevated

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 2>here and creating a bit of a drag on the economy.

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the ponderous twenty five basis points. Then we'll see

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 3>and we'll pause, and we'll see in that kind of

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 3>message impact on corporate profits. I mean, are we at

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 3>the end of a potential earnings recession where we see

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 3>things improve from here?

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 2>I think we're getting close to that. So I based

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 2>that on two things. One is, I do think economic

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:31.480
<v Speaker 2>growth is mostly stabilized. And while I think we'll be

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:33.359
<v Speaker 2>running at around one and a half percent, it certainly

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 2>could be a little bit lower than that in the

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:38.599
<v Speaker 2>next few quarters if the rate stress and bank stress

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 2>weighs more heavily than I'm expecting. But I think in

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:43.039
<v Speaker 2>terms of looking out to next year, there's reason for

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 2>some optimism. I've started to see some signals in earnings

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:48.480
<v Speaker 2>reports this past quarter that companies are making improvements in

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 2>productivity enhancement, and I think some of that has been

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:53.799
<v Speaker 2>masked by the wild swings we've had in the economy

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 2>in the past few years. Now that we get back

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 2>to a much more stable backdrop, I think some of

0:04:57.520 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 2>those productivity gains will start to flow through. So I

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't be surprised if next year is marked by a

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 2>period of slightly increasing margins and getting a little bit

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 2>of upside on the earnings.

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about the labor fight? So they

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:12.159
<v Speaker 1>two you know, industry specific and spread out. You've got

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:15.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, labor fight over streaming, you've got a labor

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:18.279
<v Speaker 1>fight and automotive production. But there's some big numbers that

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at.

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 2>Right yes, and I think we saw some of that

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 2>in different industries during the pandemic, particularly in service industries.

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 2>My take on that is that I think an overall

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 2>cost basis for companies, they can manage it. So it's

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:31.719
<v Speaker 2>good for the consumer, it's good for the people getting

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:33.799
<v Speaker 2>increase pay. But I think you do that with perhaps

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:36.159
<v Speaker 2>less headcount, and we've started to see some of that.

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:39.160
<v Speaker 2>Companies holding the line on headcount, or companies that in

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:41.600
<v Speaker 2>industries that have been disrupted in the pandemic at staffing

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:44.159
<v Speaker 2>levels lower than they were in twenty nineteen. And higher

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 2>capacity in terms of the number of customers they're serving.

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 2>So wages might be going up on a basis of

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:52.160
<v Speaker 2>hourly wages for employees, but lower headcount or flatheadcount on

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 2>higher revenue, okay for margins.

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:56.599
<v Speaker 1>So at bottom line for stocks we're at we're just

0:05:56.680 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>under s and P forty five hundred, right, we come

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>in about two and a half or so the last

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>couple weeks. But you think we're gonna remain at this

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:08.599
<v Speaker 1>level give or take into twenty twenty four, and then

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>you're constructive on the index from there, Yes, basically.

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's always, of course tough to time these

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 2>things point to point, but I think we're really struggling

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 2>for some fuel here. There's not much reason to be

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:21.040
<v Speaker 2>overly optimistic, not much reason to be overly pessimistic. Stocks

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:23.600
<v Speaker 2>look relatively fairly priced to me, and I think it'll

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 2>be until later in the year until investors start focusing

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 2>on what does the path look like for twenty twenty four,

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 2>maybe start to put some realistic expectations on inflation and

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:34.359
<v Speaker 2>FED policy, start to take a closer pencil to earnings

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:36.119
<v Speaker 2>in twenty four, that we start to get any fuel

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 2>to the upside.

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 3>Are there any sectors, any pockets of opportunity that you

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:41.280
<v Speaker 3>were looking at?

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:44.480
<v Speaker 2>So I like three sectors in particular. I think consumer,

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 2>discretionary and industrials are still benefiting from strong demand. I

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 2>think that will continue, and I think select pockets and

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 2>technology where they've shown the opportunity to ab productivity enhancing

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 2>and be be able to increase their own margins relatively efficiently.

0:06:57.279 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 2>I think there's some upsides to earnings there as well.

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:04.040
<v Speaker 3>Can I ask what's the impact of saying generative AI

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 3>in an earnings call?

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it's certainly showing up in every call. So I've

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 2>been trying to weed through a lot of that and

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 2>shut out the noise of just mentioning AI for hopeful

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 2>purposes and companies that are actually deploying things. I think

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 2>we're still very early in that it's a lot of

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 2>mentions and not a lot of activity, but we're starting

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 2>to see some of it pop through, and I think

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 2>we're starting to again see companies producing more revenue on

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 2>flat headcount. And that's beneficial, but is it.

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 1>A game changer? I mean, I saw a story the

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>other day that the Chinese have ordered five billion dollars

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>worth of chips from Nvidia trying to get in under

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the wire while they can. That's a massive number.

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 2>It is a massive number, and I think some of

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 2>it will be hugely productive and some of it will

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 2>be hugely wasteful. And that's really the challenge in sorting

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 2>through company by company who's able to manage these things

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:50.679
<v Speaker 2>well and deploy the technology to productivity benefit.

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 3>And then you have the kind of Inflation Reduction Act

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 3>and all of these long term investments in manufacturing. I mean,

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 3>do we see the impact of those in the near

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 3>term or is this something you're looking out for twenty

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 3>twenty five, twenty six.

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 2>I think we're seeing some of it presently. In terms

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 2>of economic growth. We're certainly seeing construction spend and manufacturing

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 2>has ticked up quite a bit. We haven't seen it

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 2>on the job front. I think hiring has been very

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 2>difficult there. So I do think the hiring cycle of

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 2>it will take some time, and maybe that's potentially over

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 2>time and offset to some of the other jobs that

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 2>get lost in other areas.

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, Bob, thanks so much for joining us, Bob Teeter.

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 1>They are from Silvercrest Asset Management. Really appreciate your time

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>in the studio with us.

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 5>You're listening to the Team Can's live program Bloomberg Markets

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 5>weekdays at ten am Eastern.

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 4>On Bloomberg dot Com, the iHeartRadio.

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 5>App and the Bloomberg Business App, or listen on demand

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 5>wherever you get your podcasts.

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>So there's a company in the Philippines called Ancass I

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>believe I have the pronunciation right. They have four million downloads,

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:49.080
<v Speaker 1>they have thirty thousand biker partners, and they are essentially

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>an uber that runs on two wheels rather than four.

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's bring in the CEO right now. Vancast George Royeka

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>joins us to talk more about the growth that they've

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 1>seen in the market. George, thanks so much for your time.

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm an avid motorcyclist, so I love the idea, but

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>how exactly does this work? I mean I imagine people

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>sometimes fall off.

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 6>Well, hi guys, thanks for having me here. Well, you know,

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 6>we're very close here in our side of the world,

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 6>and I much love to give I'm in transportation, right,

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:25.959
<v Speaker 6>so you do got to hug your driver unfortunately.

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Or fortunately depending on you know, everybody needs a hug

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>once in a while. What kind of growth have you shown,

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 1>because I know you have a goal of getting to

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>creating a million jobs, and right now you've got thirty thousand.

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 6>So actually we're at fifty thousand now.

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 5>Wow.

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 6>I think it's a few months ago we grew quite

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 6>significantly and we're about eight million downloads as of date.

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:52.599
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, what what spurred that growth because I know

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 3>very recently as of March it was it was quite

0:09:58.480 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 3>a bit less, right March.

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:02.840
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Well, I think in the you know, in our

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 6>part of tow congestion is you know it's a big

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 6>problem and a lot of the streets here, even the

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 6>main thoroughfares, it's just riddled with you know, cars and

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 6>buses and there's not enough infrastructure. So you know, a

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:20.439
<v Speaker 6>ten kilometer drive can take about two hours one way.

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 6>So that's that's that's very bad. So you know, there's

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 6>a really neat, big need for small, agile vehicles. You know,

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 6>Indonesia has led the way for for these types of transportation,

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 6>and this is something that we're seeing as a trend

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 6>all over to Southeast Asia.

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 1>So what does your growth look like like going forward?

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 1>If you double your download since March and you've almost

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 1>doubled your your driver pool, what do you expect in

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the next year or two.

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, well yet another we're experiencing double digit growths, right,

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 6>so this is something that we're expecting over the next

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 6>you know, twelve months even just the balance here. Right now,

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:03.080
<v Speaker 6>we're only the metropolitans and we're now expanding to the cities.

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 6>There's about maybe another twenty odd cities that will be

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 6>launching in the next sixty days. So it's been a

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 6>it's been you know, quite busy for us this past

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 6>few months.

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:18.199
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, sounds like it. I mean, are the chief customers

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 3>of your service? Are they people going to work? Are

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 3>they leisure travelers? How would you describe who is using

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 3>and cast at any given time.

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 6>I think we're alternative, you know, mode of transport really

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 6>really one for emergency use cases for people want to

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 6>get to their destination much faster, you know, for work especially,

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:48.079
<v Speaker 6>and also to get home to their families. Right, that's primary.

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 6>So really the workforces are the main constituency for for

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 6>my writers. Second would be really just anybody that you

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 6>know would like to get there faster for for whatever reason.

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:05.439
<v Speaker 6>So our demographic is quite large, so you'll see in

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 6>the morning, in the evening rush hour, it's really more

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 6>of the workforce and a little bit of the you know,

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 6>more guys that need an affordable motor transportation because taxis,

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 6>as you can imagine, can get very expensive, especially when

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 6>you're when you're on the road for for a long time.

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:24.680
<v Speaker 6>You know, an hour or two hour drive would really

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 6>be would cost you a lot more. So we have

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:30.199
<v Speaker 6>those people that want a more efficient ride and also

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 6>a more cheaper ride. But in the you know, throughout

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:36.560
<v Speaker 6>the day, as you go closer to you know, the weekend,

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 6>it gets pretty congested, even in the off peak hours,

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 6>so you just really get a wider demograph for even

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 6>the more affluent base that just wants to get to

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 6>places faster. So it's I think it's a little bit

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 6>of both. And as we expand to the provincial cities,

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:58.559
<v Speaker 6>there's actually less and less cars and more motorcycles. If

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 6>you go outside of Metro Manil, the racial between cars

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 6>to motorcycle is eighteen is to one, So we become

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 6>the dominant form of transportation. As you can imagine, buying

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:11.679
<v Speaker 6>a motorcycle is a lot cheaper than getting a car.

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 6>So this is something that a lot of people use,

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 6>as you know, not just their family car, not just

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 6>their work car, but also as a means for livelihood,

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 6>which is what we're trying to really espouse is give

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 6>people more jobs.

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 1>George, you, I mean, it seems like from looking at

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 1>your CV, you've been very active and still are in

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 1>media and content creation, entertainment, that sort of thing. Now

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 1>transportation is a wholly different industry. How did that transition happen?

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 1>And what does what does your exit look like? Do

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:46.439
<v Speaker 1>you have an IPO planned?

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 6>I think everybody wants to have that type of exit.

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 6>Right for now, we're just trying to open to more

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 6>cities and serving more customers. I think my media background

0:13:56.840 --> 0:14:00.320
<v Speaker 6>really helps and telling the story, and it is the

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 6>story of freedom getting unshackled from traffic. You know, in

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 6>the Philippines, especially in the Metro Manila, a lot of

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 6>your major and minor decisions revolves around where you live

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:12.719
<v Speaker 6>and how far it is to get to where you're

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 6>supposed to go, whether it's going on a date or

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 6>you know, putting your kids through school. The daily commute matters.

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 6>So this is something that I think a lot of

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 6>people use just because it allows them to do a lot,

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 6>you know, more things in the day and being able

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 6>to really create that relate that compelling story to people

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 6>is something that really has helped our company grow.

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, great talking to you, George, and we wish

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>you the best luck. Will continue to watch to see

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>if this astronomical growth goes forward. George Royaka there. He's

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of Ancas and the Philippines. It's like the

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 1>uber I Guess of motorcycles.

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 5>You're listening to the tape Can't Live program Bloomberg Markets

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 5>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio. Tune it up,

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg dot Com.

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 4>The Bloomberg Business App.

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 5>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 5>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa, play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 3>So our question of m Live Question of the week

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 3>is has the commercial real estate crisis escalated?

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>We asked this.

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 3>At a time when we work sharers are slumping. It's

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 3>not become kind of a penny stock memish thing. And

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 3>the question is, has you know, has this crisis really

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 3>begun and gotten crazy? And the person I want to

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 3>ask about this is Mark Dixon. He's the CEO of IWG.

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 3>This is a brand that includes Regis spaces HQ signature.

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 3>Actually we were competitor. So the question here is what

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 3>is the outlook. I mean, have enough people returned to

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 3>office that a lot of these office spaces can move

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 3>forward into the future. So, Mark, thank you so much

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 3>for joining us. I mean, you say eight million plus

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 3>people use IWG workspaces.

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 4>What are you.

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 3>Seeing in terms of the trends of people coming back?

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 3>Is this escalating and what's the way forward as we

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 3>get back into the farm.

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, well, look, thanks very much for having me. We're

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 8>in a similar business that we work, but we're not

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 8>exactly the same. Our network is very diversified.

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 8>We a large part of our customers were actually already

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 8>working from home.

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 4>We have a.

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 8>Significant business supports people working from home. We also have

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:42.160
<v Speaker 8>buildings very much in the suburbs and in rural locations,

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:46.239
<v Speaker 8>not just in the big cities. So what we published

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 8>this week, actually the day before, we work's announcement record

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 8>results for us with our revenues up to record levels

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 8>and also profits hitting a record level. So you know,

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 8>for us, we're producing seeing a lot of cash and

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 8>we're growing very quickly. So the market has changed. It's

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:08.680
<v Speaker 8>not that the real estate market is not there anymore.

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 8>It's changed, and it's changed we think fundamentally and forever.

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 8>And this is really technology changing how people can work

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 8>and most importantly where they can work. So we're the

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 8>leaders globally in hybrid work. We operate in one hundred

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 8>and twenty countries. We have four thousand locations and companies

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 8>and individuals are working with us in a completely different way,

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:37.199
<v Speaker 8>and that business is growing.

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I will say, I will I will say that we

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News used Regis office space. I remember visiting the

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Regis and Munich when I was a CUB reporter twenty

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:50.639
<v Speaker 1>years ago, and at my Berlin office right on the

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Brandenburg Gate, there is a Regis in our building. I

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>imagine we started out leasing that space as well. So

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>you've been around for a while, because I've been around

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 1>for a while. Does does that give you some advantage

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 1>over a bombastic upstart like a we work? I mean,

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>you're very different.

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:15.400
<v Speaker 8>We're very different business do we work? So Look, there's

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 8>nothing wrong with the industry that we works in. It's

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 8>just you know, they had a bad start. I mean

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 8>they started at the top of the market. They grew

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 8>very quickly, had a lot of capital, were the opposite

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:30.199
<v Speaker 8>the entire business has been built with three hundred million

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 8>of core capital, and you know we have created everything

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 8>from that. But you know, overall, you know, this isn't

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 8>this is new real estate. This is digital real estate.

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:47.200
<v Speaker 8>This is providing space to people on a platform. We

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 8>were doing it for Bloomberg fifteen years ago, right at

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:56.120
<v Speaker 8>the beginning of Bloomberg basically, and many many other companies

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 8>use us around the world and it is a growing

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:00.400
<v Speaker 8>part of the real estate industry.

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 3>So talk to me about the small towns, the I

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:08.199
<v Speaker 3>guess non traditional places that you're setting up some of

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 3>these offices. I know this is a key strategy for you.

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:15.679
<v Speaker 3>What's the thinking there in terms of well from a

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 3>company perspective too, why do they rent office space in

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:22.360
<v Speaker 3>places outside of major metro centers.

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 8>Look, we don't rent office space just to sort of

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 8>I know, we're not in the real estate business as such.

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:33.400
<v Speaker 8>You know, we provide workspace as a platform. So when

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:37.159
<v Speaker 8>we sign people up or companies up, they're using us

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 8>across the whole platform. So they're not it's not companies

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:44.120
<v Speaker 8>taking space generally in one particular location.

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 3>Sure, but why are they looking at these small a

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:47.680
<v Speaker 3>small town areas.

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:50.159
<v Speaker 8>It's close to where they live. Look, the elephant in

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:53.159
<v Speaker 8>the room is commuting. You know, it's the time it

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 8>takes to commute, It's the cost of commuting. It's not

0:19:56.640 --> 0:20:00.159
<v Speaker 8>anything else but that folks generally want to work in

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 8>an office. They don't want to work from home. They

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:04.400
<v Speaker 8>work from home some of the time, but they really

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:06.479
<v Speaker 8>want to get to an office meet with other people.

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 8>They just don't want that office to be too far away.

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 8>So what we're seeing is companies allowing people and encouraging

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 8>people in fact, to get an office with us close

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 8>to where they live. So these openings we're doing in

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:23.680
<v Speaker 8>provincial and rural United States, the suburbs in the US,

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 8>but all over the world are filling up, and they're

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 8>filling up with people from large corporates, mid sized companies

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 8>who just want to have an office close to home.

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 8>It's really as simple as that. They're very, very popular.

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>So in terms of you say, you started with three

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred million in core capital, and that's obviously a very

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:45.679
<v Speaker 1>different story to the billions we work burned. But do

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you have any debt that you need to roll over

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 1>or higher interest rates affecting you at this time?

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 8>Well, our debt will at the end of this year

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 8>be about just over one time zibit, so we're low

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 8>level bridge. We are reducing that debt. You know, we're

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:07.400
<v Speaker 8>producing a lot of cash. First half we produced about

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:10.359
<v Speaker 8>two hundred million dollars of cash. We'll produce more in

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:14.440
<v Speaker 8>the second half. So up until we just did our

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:18.919
<v Speaker 8>investor presentations this week, you know, this year is all

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 8>about reducing them and we continue.

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 4>To do that.

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 8>Next year we'll look to start distributing cash either share buybacks.

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 8>We have somewhat got caught in the tailwind of what's

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 8>going on with we work. Our stock prices is basically

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 8>depressed and people think we're in the real estate industry.

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 8>It's those two things together. But we will buy back

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 8>shares and you know there's CEM M and A we

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 8>can do and you know, potentially divings. But we're in

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:50.200
<v Speaker 8>a very good situation with regard to leverage and cash flow.

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Excellent. Great to get some time with you, Mark, Hope

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 1>we can talk to you again in the future. Mark Dixon.

0:21:55.600 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>They're the CEO of IWG. The ticker is i wg FF.

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:06.920
<v Speaker 5>Here in the US, you're listening to the team Ken's

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 5>are Live program Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 5>on Bloomberg dot Com, the iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:17.360
<v Speaker 5>Business app, or listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to get to, Well, we're going to talk

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 1>about the actual cage match that we've been talking about

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>for weeks, is it or is it not going to

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:30.400
<v Speaker 1>happen between Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg. But we're also

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:33.639
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about the comments President Biden made I

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 1>think yesterday about China, about the Communist Party leaders, about

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Shijin Ping.

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 3>With verbal cage match.

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:43.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it kind of it seems that way. He really

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:47.159
<v Speaker 1>came out swinging. Howard chiwa Ewan joins us. He's an

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 1>international editor with Bloomberg Opinion. Howard, great to have you on.

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I saw your newsletter this morning, the Opinion Rap, and

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:59.679
<v Speaker 1>you kicked it off with this with these comments. I

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:03.639
<v Speaker 1>thought President Biden and this administration wanted to get on

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 1>a friendlier footing with the Chinese, but he yesterday blasted

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 1>China's economic problems as a ticking time bomb. He said

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the Communist Party leaders are bad folks, and he also said,

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:19.919
<v Speaker 1>I think, most disturbingly, certainly from from their perspective, that

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:22.439
<v Speaker 1>the Belton Road initiative. He called it the debt and

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 1>noose initiative. I mean, that's pretty hardcore, isn't it.

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 9>It's pretty hardcore. It sort of reminds me of when

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:34.640
<v Speaker 9>Donald Trump said, I remember his bad ombre UH, when

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 9>he said bad folks. It just sort of reminded me

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 9>of all that UH and the UH the the news

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 9>UH comparison was particularly harsh because the Belt and Road

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 9>UH initiative by China has become a bit of a

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:57.879
<v Speaker 9>UH weight around she's neck actually, because it's everyone complains

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 9>about how he's got that China's gotten all these developing

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 9>countries UH in that the problem is, of course, China

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 9>is left holding the bag if they don't pay anything back.

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 9>So so there is a there. It's a it's a

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:18.439
<v Speaker 9>two sided, two edged swords, so so it's.

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:20.000
<v Speaker 1>It was kind of howard, even a little bit more

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Trumpian in that Biden seemed to be making up his

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 1>own facts which were not in fact facts, right. I

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 1>mean he said China percent growth exactly.

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:33.719
<v Speaker 9>When it was actually five point five. Well everyone is suspicious,

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:37.440
<v Speaker 9>of course of Chinese numbers, but that is quite quite

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 9>a difference, especially when America the American growth rate is

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 9>about what one point two one point five.

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 1>He also made up his own demographics for China.

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 9>Yes, so he turned it into a very very very

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 9>old country when it isn't. Actually it's it's aging, but

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 9>it hasn't aged that quickly in the last couple of years.

0:24:57.280 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 3>But I mean, how is this different than the sort

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 3>of bombastic commentary that we constantly got from president former

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:09.399
<v Speaker 3>President Trump? You know, I remember him talking about the

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 3>Chinese virus and I mean, yes, uh, that's sort of

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 3>rhetort rhetoric. How does this differ. How does it coming

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:18.119
<v Speaker 3>from Biden differ?

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 9>I'm not sure. And that's why I'm a little I

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 9>worry about it sometimes when when when the President comes

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:28.160
<v Speaker 9>out and talks this way and it feels like he's

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 9>just speaking off the cuff.

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 8>Uh.

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 9>I just worry that the things will get a combination

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 9>of certain things may happen, and and the same thing

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 9>that happened under Trump may happen again, which is that

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 9>people will take him a little too much of his

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 9>word and go after people they assume are the enemy.

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 9>Uh so uh, and these would be they're fellow Americans.

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 9>So I worry about things like that and I'm not

0:25:57.320 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 9>sure what the strategy is to speak this way, except

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 9>that the uh, the way American UH economic diplomacy has

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:10.640
<v Speaker 9>been conducted over the years has basically been it's it's

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:13.720
<v Speaker 9>a zero some game and basically, if you are the

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 9>main rival, UH, we're going we're going to destroy you.

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:18.640
<v Speaker 6>So uh.

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:22.399
<v Speaker 9>So it's and it's not that the Chinese are behaving otherwise,

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:27.360
<v Speaker 9>but it is that sort of lack of feeling that

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:30.160
<v Speaker 9>we're all in this together. There is a global economy

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 9>we should share, uh Dan Moss and his column was

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 9>was very good. He said, you know, there's there was

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 9>this period when everyone was growing at the same time,

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 9>and then suddenly the US went into recession, China had

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:46.119
<v Speaker 9>to come in. Basically it was the Chinese economy that

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:48.880
<v Speaker 9>buoyed the rest of the world. And so now there

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 9>it's the other way around, uh, and it's the the

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 9>US economy is expected to bring everyone along now that

0:26:56.400 --> 0:26:58.920
<v Speaker 9>the Chinese economy is down, and so there we we've

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:00.879
<v Speaker 9>come into what maybe be a new cycle.

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:01.679
<v Speaker 7>UH.

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 9>Dan very nicely points out that that uh that uh,

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 9>when the Chinese economy is down, the US economy has

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:16.440
<v Speaker 9>to come in, and if it doesn't work, out that way,

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:17.399
<v Speaker 9>then we're all in trouble.

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, he was also supposed to be more serious. President

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 1>brings some gravitas to the office, actually speaking truths rather

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 1>than just making up numbers. And uh, it's so weird

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:32.719
<v Speaker 1>that President Biden would say this to a group of

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:36.320
<v Speaker 1>his own donors in Park City, right, he's not talking

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:37.440
<v Speaker 1>to the general electorate.

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:42.359
<v Speaker 9>No, it's it's it's quite surprising that he wasn't aware

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 9>the people around him weren't aware to let him know

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:46.120
<v Speaker 9>that this was going to get out.

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:49.119
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's get to the other, to the real cage match.

0:27:49.160 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we hope it's real, right, we want this

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:54.199
<v Speaker 1>to happen, Howard you I guess we're a fan of

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the m m A at some point. I have paid

0:27:56.760 --> 0:28:00.639
<v Speaker 1>for a few fights myself. I think it's pretty fast stuff.

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:03.119
<v Speaker 1>But if if two of the richest people in the

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:06.160
<v Speaker 1>world get in the cage together, man, that would be cool.

0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Is it gonna happen? You know?

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:11.680
<v Speaker 9>I think if they keep on talking this way, they'll

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 9>have to make it happen, even though they even though

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:17.239
<v Speaker 9>one or both of them may not eventually want to

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 9>do it.

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:18.719
<v Speaker 6>Uh.

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:21.119
<v Speaker 9>And you know, I like all these matches it's a

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:25.879
<v Speaker 9>game of cycle psycking each other out. So at this point,

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 9>uh Zuckerberg looks incredibly fit. Uh while uh while must

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 9>looks like he needs he might need more surgery for

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 9>that supposed injury to his neck. So uh so. But

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:43.640
<v Speaker 9>but you know, as as you know, Matt, the fighters

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 9>like to psych each other out. And who knows, Musk

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 9>might pick the right time to do this, just like

0:28:50.160 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 9>Floyd Mayweather used to pick the right fights with with

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 9>with Manny Paco uh and uh and and who knows.

0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 9>You can't really tell whether it would be the timing

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 9>that will decide who the winner is.

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:12.239
<v Speaker 3>Well, very interesting discussion there. I'm rooting for this. I'm

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 3>rooting for this match to happen.

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I want it to happen too. And I want to say

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that Howard has a great column on this. So if

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:18.720
<v Speaker 1>you have a Bloomberg termine in front of you, type

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 1>OPI N go to check it out.

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 3>Howard. Thank you so much, Howard one joining us there.

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 5>You're listening to the tape cans Are Live program Bloomberg

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 5>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 5>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and.

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 4>The Bloomberg Business App.

0:29:36.360 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 5>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 5>flagship New York station. Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:29:44.800 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 3>We've been talking about remote work. Do people go back

0:29:48.160 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 3>to the offices all morning, especially with the CEO of

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 3>IWG who was talking about people wanting to be back

0:29:56.440 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 3>in the office, as we get a different flavor here

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 3>to bring in Hayden Brown. She's the CEO of Upwork.

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 3>This is a publicly traded company, reported earnings last week.

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 3>But before we get to kind of the numbers, in

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 3>the nitty gritty, Hayden, I want to understand do you

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:23.720
<v Speaker 3>think that this wave of remote work is turning a corner,

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 3>perhaps ending a little bit, and then you know, do

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 3>you benefit or suffer from that at Upwork?

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 10>That's a great question. I think this is a long

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 10>term trend that's here to stay. Remote work. The cat

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 10>is out of the bag. And even though a lot

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 10>of companies are going back into the office, which is great,

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:43.719
<v Speaker 10>you know, every company is going to find their place

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:46.719
<v Speaker 10>on the spectrum of remote work, whether it's in office,

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 10>whether it's hybrid, or whether it's fully remote. The norms

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 10>and the capabilities that every company figured out over the

0:30:53.640 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 10>pandemic are things that will serve them well as they

0:30:57.160 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 10>now tap into some variety of room workers on a

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 10>platform like ours, you know, we serve the world with

0:31:03.480 --> 0:31:07.480
<v Speaker 10>freelance talent that they can access globally. These are professionals

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 10>on our platform, you know, doing one hundred and twenty

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 10>five plus categories of work. And every business, whether they're

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 10>back in the office or not, is tapping into these

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 10>types of professionals to augment and accelerate their work strategies.

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 10>So I think this is a long term trend that's

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 10>not reversing, even though there will be you know, fits

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:26.719
<v Speaker 10>and starts as companies kind of navigate, you know, this

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 10>new normal.

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I have to ask just quickly about your stock price

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 1>because it was soaring during the pandemic. You're one of

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the darlings of the markets. It was up to sixty

0:31:37.440 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 1>dollars a share a few different times. Now it had

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 1>come back down to earth, but now it's heading back

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 1>up again. It was back down below ten and now

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 1>we're up above fourteen. How much do you have to

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:52.960
<v Speaker 1>watch this? As an agent? I guess of the owner's

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:55.960
<v Speaker 1>right of the company and what's influencing it.

0:31:56.840 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 10>You know, we are here building a business for the

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 10>long term through durable, profitable growth, and I think that's

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:03.400
<v Speaker 10>really the story. This is a company that's still in

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 10>its early innings. Frankly, you know, we went public in

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 10>twenty eighteen and we are going after a trillion dollar TAM.

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 10>So this is TAM total addressable market. Okay, okay, So

0:32:13.240 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 10>we're unlocking a huge addressable market opportunity for our customers,

0:32:17.040 --> 0:32:19.880
<v Speaker 10>for our shareholders, and I think that's really the headline.

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 10>We did have a great quarter, you know, raised our

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 10>guidance for the year on both the top line and

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 10>the bottom line, but this is still a business that's

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 10>in its early innings, and I think that's what's really

0:32:29.800 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 10>exciting is we are executing well, we're performing well, and

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:34.960
<v Speaker 10>yet we have a ton of runway ahead of us.

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I see kind of a discrepancy here, right

0:32:37.840 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 3>because these companies are asking their workers to return to

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 3>the office because they believe they collaborate better. Yet you're

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:48.800
<v Speaker 3>saying freelance on the rise and that there's a future

0:32:48.880 --> 0:32:51.880
<v Speaker 3>for this. Are there certain places where you're seeing a

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:57.000
<v Speaker 3>particular uptake and demand with respect to the clients that

0:32:57.280 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, the corporate clients that are looking for talent,

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:02.200
<v Speaker 3>are there things that they're going to just want to

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:05.000
<v Speaker 3>keep out of their business in the long term and

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 3>just kind of turn to outsource to freelance folks when

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 3>they need it.

0:33:10.000 --> 0:33:12.480
<v Speaker 10>You know, we serve every kind of company that is

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:16.120
<v Speaker 10>looking for freelance talent, whether they're in office, whether they're

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 10>back working remotely, and also small companies through large enterprises

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 10>are turning to this model. You know, freelancing was a

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 10>secular trend that was on the rise prior to the pandemic,

0:33:25.800 --> 0:33:28.960
<v Speaker 10>and it only accelerated through the pandemic because workers figured

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 10>out that they really want to work this way. You know,

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 10>they are excited to have the freedom the flexibility to

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 10>do this, and we see younger generations of workers leaning

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 10>into this even more. Forty three percent of Generation Z

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 10>is freelancing right now. So companies are realizing if they

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 10>want to tap into the workers they need with the

0:33:44.560 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 10>skills they need, they absolutely have to be tapping into

0:33:47.240 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 10>the freelance economy. So this is why companies of all

0:33:50.080 --> 0:33:52.680
<v Speaker 10>sizes are tapping into this workforce, and certainly as they're

0:33:52.720 --> 0:33:55.040
<v Speaker 10>looking at things like generative AI, which is a huge

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:58.000
<v Speaker 10>and growing category. For US, we saw these jobs increase

0:33:58.000 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 10>one thousand percent in Q two versus Q four. Companies

0:34:02.240 --> 0:34:04.360
<v Speaker 10>that need these types of workers with these types of

0:34:04.480 --> 0:34:07.760
<v Speaker 10>very current skills have to tap into freelancers to get

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 10>this type of work done.

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:13.759
<v Speaker 1>I recently learned about traveling nurses. I had never realized

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:17.399
<v Speaker 1>that it was such a massive industry. And I talked

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 1>with somebody who ran a company that helped you helped

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:26.000
<v Speaker 1>them administrate their their jobs. It's interesting they make more

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 1>money than the nurses that are actually installed permanently at

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:32.879
<v Speaker 1>the hospital. I'm wondering what the freelancers that you bring

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 1>in are making. I mean, my initial thought would be

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 1>they must not make very much money because they're freelancers,

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:41.680
<v Speaker 1>But then maybe they do. It's the opposite that's amazing.

0:34:41.760 --> 0:34:43.799
<v Speaker 10>This is a this is a very lucrative career. And

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:46.360
<v Speaker 10>I mean so in AI, for example, we're seeing people

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:49.920
<v Speaker 10>with these skills are making fifty percent more than the average.

0:34:49.960 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 10>And again to your point, folks are joining the freelance

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:56.279
<v Speaker 10>economy because this is a better way for them. It's

0:34:56.320 --> 0:34:58.239
<v Speaker 10>actually more safe and secure. They know they can't get

0:34:58.320 --> 0:35:01.280
<v Speaker 10>laid off, so this is something where they've got multiple

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:04.320
<v Speaker 10>steady clients, and it really insulates them from the vagaries

0:35:04.360 --> 0:35:08.479
<v Speaker 10>of the normal economy and they're earning more. We've heard

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 10>from our talent frequently they say no amount of money

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 10>would pay them to go back into a full time,

0:35:15.320 --> 0:35:17.800
<v Speaker 10>normal job because they make more, they have more freedom,

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 10>they more flexibility, they have control over their schedule. So

0:35:20.239 --> 0:35:22.759
<v Speaker 10>everything about the work arrangement as a freelancer is actually

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:23.600
<v Speaker 10>working better for them.

0:35:23.880 --> 0:35:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:35:24.000 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 10>Of course, this isn't a way of work that's going

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:27.480
<v Speaker 10>to be suitable for everybody, but everyone has to do this.

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 1>That's like a gig economy.

0:35:28.880 --> 0:35:31.640
<v Speaker 10>No, no, not at all. I mean these are independent workers.

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:33.759
<v Speaker 10>These are professionals. They set their own rates, they set

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:35.840
<v Speaker 10>their own schedule, they negotiate all of this for themselves.

0:35:35.880 --> 0:35:38.520
<v Speaker 10>And these are independent entrepreneurs, you know, really working on

0:35:38.520 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 10>their own terms.

0:35:39.760 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 3>Do benefits kind of offset that at all? I mean,

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 3>these are people who have to go and probably get

0:35:44.200 --> 0:35:46.200
<v Speaker 3>their own healthcare, all that sort of thing.

0:35:46.239 --> 0:35:47.400
<v Speaker 10>I mean, it depends on the geography.

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:47.719
<v Speaker 1>Of course.

0:35:47.719 --> 0:35:49.320
<v Speaker 10>In the US, you know, we have a certain benefit

0:35:49.360 --> 0:35:51.560
<v Speaker 10>setup and also we you know, serve customers all over

0:35:51.560 --> 0:35:54.320
<v Speaker 10>the globe, so some of them are buying their own benefits.

0:35:54.320 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 10>Some of them obviously are in you a relationship with

0:35:56.600 --> 0:35:58.280
<v Speaker 10>a spouse who has those benefits, So it really depends

0:35:58.320 --> 0:36:00.360
<v Speaker 10>on the worker, but that is absolutely not in heediment

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:01.959
<v Speaker 10>for them to being able to work this way.

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:04.720
<v Speaker 1>It definitely lays bare, I'm sure for you the stark

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:08.120
<v Speaker 1>differences between the healthcare system in this country and those

0:36:08.200 --> 0:36:09.000
<v Speaker 1>in other countries.

0:36:09.400 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 10>It totally does. But when you think about it, you know,

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:13.799
<v Speaker 10>no one should be barred from working the way they

0:36:13.800 --> 0:36:15.719
<v Speaker 10>want and doing the job they want just because of

0:36:15.920 --> 0:36:18.279
<v Speaker 10>a benefits issue, right, And that's just the saddest thing.

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:19.759
<v Speaker 10>But that's what we see people saying. You know what,

0:36:19.840 --> 0:36:22.440
<v Speaker 10>even if the benefits are more challenging, I still want

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:24.319
<v Speaker 10>to go and work this way, and absolutely they should

0:36:24.320 --> 0:36:25.879
<v Speaker 10>be empowered to do that, all.

0:36:25.920 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Right, Hayden, thanks so much for coming in. Fascinating conversation,

0:36:28.719 --> 0:36:32.920
<v Speaker 1>fascinating business as well. Hayden Brown is the CEO of Upwork,

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:38.799
<v Speaker 1>the ticker on the Nasdaq up WUK, and I, you know,

0:36:38.880 --> 0:36:41.319
<v Speaker 1>I think this is all part of the way the

0:36:41.360 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 1>economy changed post pandemic. It's not like we're going to

0:36:44.040 --> 0:36:47.920
<v Speaker 1>go back to normal. We're progressing into the future.

0:36:48.400 --> 0:36:51.480
<v Speaker 5>You're listening to the tape catch a live program Bloomberg

0:36:51.600 --> 0:36:55.200
<v Speaker 5>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:57.200
<v Speaker 5>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and.

0:36:57.160 --> 0:36:58.479
<v Speaker 4>The Bloomberg Business App.

0:36:58.520 --> 0:37:01.319
<v Speaker 5>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:37:01.360 --> 0:37:06.360
<v Speaker 5>flagship New York station, Jo Say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:37:06.840 --> 0:37:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Lisa Donahue joins US co Head of the Americas in

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Asia at the global consultancy firm Alex Partners. Lisa, thanks

0:37:13.640 --> 0:37:15.799
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. A lot going on on

0:37:15.840 --> 0:37:17.759
<v Speaker 1>this Friday that we thought was going to be a

0:37:17.800 --> 0:37:20.840
<v Speaker 1>slow day in August, but in terms of the markets,

0:37:20.960 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 1>it really is still slow and it has been all week.

0:37:24.640 --> 0:37:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Even though we got inflation data. It just kind of

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:30.480
<v Speaker 1>proved what we thought we already knew. How do you

0:37:30.520 --> 0:37:35.400
<v Speaker 1>look at the current US economic and Wall Street market

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:36.399
<v Speaker 1>situation right now?

0:37:37.520 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 11>First, thanks for having me, and yes, very busy day today.

0:37:41.680 --> 0:37:43.960
<v Speaker 11>You know, I think some of the market information that

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:48.080
<v Speaker 11>we're getting continues on the trend of confusing. Right If

0:37:48.120 --> 0:37:51.799
<v Speaker 11>you look at the consumer debt and you look at

0:37:51.800 --> 0:37:54.680
<v Speaker 11>the credit card debt, it's up to one trillion, and

0:37:54.719 --> 0:37:58.440
<v Speaker 11>that would suggest that the consumer is feeling comfortable, and

0:37:59.000 --> 0:38:01.239
<v Speaker 11>perhaps they are, but also seeing signs of a little

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:03.640
<v Speaker 11>bit of a pullback which continues on the trend of

0:38:04.600 --> 0:38:07.880
<v Speaker 11>push pull, which I think your reporter had just said. So,

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:12.040
<v Speaker 11>what we're seeing is, you know, companies and leaders are

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:17.239
<v Speaker 11>thinking ahead and they are taking this confusion time as

0:38:17.280 --> 0:38:22.600
<v Speaker 11>an opportunity to really work on the hygiene of their

0:38:22.640 --> 0:38:25.279
<v Speaker 11>businesses and think about what they should be doing to

0:38:25.360 --> 0:38:29.440
<v Speaker 11>be prepared for the continued disruption and the continued you know,

0:38:29.600 --> 0:38:34.799
<v Speaker 11>lack of clarity on where we're going from inflation, interest rates, disruption,

0:38:36.200 --> 0:38:37.800
<v Speaker 11>you know, war in Ukraine, et cetera.

0:38:38.360 --> 0:38:43.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, Lisa, before we get some of the product geopolitical issues,

0:38:43.360 --> 0:38:47.320
<v Speaker 3>you talk about hygiene of the business. Cost cutting layoffs

0:38:47.400 --> 0:38:50.640
<v Speaker 3>has been a theme we've seen across tech and finance.

0:38:50.760 --> 0:38:54.000
<v Speaker 3>To a degree, have we gone have business has gone

0:38:54.239 --> 0:38:56.120
<v Speaker 3>too far at this point?

0:38:57.520 --> 0:39:01.640
<v Speaker 11>You know, when I say hygiene, I don't necessarily mean layoffs.

0:39:02.239 --> 0:39:07.800
<v Speaker 11>I mean taking a look at non core assets, taking

0:39:07.840 --> 0:39:11.560
<v Speaker 11>a look at your employee base and is there upskilling

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:14.680
<v Speaker 11>that you have to do? Are you is your organization

0:39:14.840 --> 0:39:17.600
<v Speaker 11>and the way you're aligned does it fit for purpose?

0:39:17.719 --> 0:39:21.000
<v Speaker 11>You know, in some cases it might mean layoffs, but

0:39:21.040 --> 0:39:23.439
<v Speaker 11>in a lot of cases it doesn't. It could mean

0:39:23.600 --> 0:39:26.400
<v Speaker 11>just taking a look strategically at what you're doing and

0:39:26.400 --> 0:39:30.120
<v Speaker 11>should you be doing things differently In terms.

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Of the geopolitical issues US China, I mean President Biden

0:39:35.600 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 1>already kind of ratchet those ratchet of those up last

0:39:38.160 --> 0:39:41.600
<v Speaker 1>night saying that they're bad folks, and he called the

0:39:41.600 --> 0:39:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Belton Roade initiative the debt and noose initiative. Now we've got,

0:39:45.560 --> 0:39:49.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, us more problems in US politics. Does this

0:39:50.120 --> 0:39:53.760
<v Speaker 1>unrest play into your strategy at all?

0:39:53.960 --> 0:39:58.040
<v Speaker 11>You know it does in some ways. What we're seeing

0:39:58.280 --> 0:40:02.800
<v Speaker 11>some of our clients doing is is looking at alternatives

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:06.800
<v Speaker 11>and parallel supply chains. Because if one thing COVID and

0:40:07.360 --> 0:40:11.719
<v Speaker 11>that major disruption to actually getting product taught us is

0:40:11.719 --> 0:40:15.080
<v Speaker 11>that yes, low cost is important, but surety of products

0:40:15.160 --> 0:40:18.600
<v Speaker 11>is as important, if not more important. So what we're

0:40:18.640 --> 0:40:22.040
<v Speaker 11>seeing as a result of the political uncertainty, you know,

0:40:22.120 --> 0:40:27.200
<v Speaker 11>the relations with China, some of the Russian concerns, is

0:40:27.280 --> 0:40:31.880
<v Speaker 11>we're seeing more on shoring and more alternative sourcing for

0:40:32.040 --> 0:40:34.560
<v Speaker 11>where to put your supply chain. We're seeing folks go

0:40:34.680 --> 0:40:39.919
<v Speaker 11>to Japan as an alternative from an APAC perspective, and

0:40:40.000 --> 0:40:43.360
<v Speaker 11>we're seeing folks really looking at shortening the supply chains

0:40:43.400 --> 0:40:46.080
<v Speaker 11>and looking, as I said, at other considerations instead of

0:40:46.200 --> 0:40:47.080
<v Speaker 11>just price.

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 3>With respect to moving business assets around. We had a

0:40:52.600 --> 0:40:55.879
<v Speaker 3>really great, big take earlier in the week about how

0:40:56.040 --> 0:41:02.120
<v Speaker 3>trade is and the incentives offered by the Inflation Reduction

0:41:02.239 --> 0:41:06.960
<v Speaker 3>Act or really shaking things up for where companies put

0:41:06.960 --> 0:41:12.440
<v Speaker 3>their manufacturing, where they hire groups of new people. How

0:41:12.640 --> 0:41:17.520
<v Speaker 3>much interest are the executives you're speaking to giving to

0:41:18.400 --> 0:41:22.880
<v Speaker 3>where can I get the best the best incentives? And

0:41:22.920 --> 0:41:25.160
<v Speaker 3>how much more is the answer of the United States

0:41:25.200 --> 0:41:27.160
<v Speaker 3>than it was maybe six months ago.

0:41:28.239 --> 0:41:30.879
<v Speaker 11>You know, I think it's it's a big consideration. And

0:41:31.360 --> 0:41:33.680
<v Speaker 11>we talk with a lot of folks on a global basis,

0:41:34.160 --> 0:41:37.200
<v Speaker 11>And I was speaking with the CEO of a large

0:41:38.400 --> 0:41:43.160
<v Speaker 11>energy company that super focused on renewables and you know,

0:41:43.200 --> 0:41:48.520
<v Speaker 11>green initiatives, and they were talking about the genius of

0:41:48.560 --> 0:41:52.279
<v Speaker 11>this act and that it is ultimately going to make

0:41:52.320 --> 0:41:56.279
<v Speaker 11>the US more competitive when it comes to renewable green

0:41:56.320 --> 0:42:00.359
<v Speaker 11>initiatives because of the incentives that are baked in to it.

0:42:00.760 --> 0:42:04.680
<v Speaker 11>So I do think that it is something that leaders

0:42:04.800 --> 0:42:07.240
<v Speaker 11>are thinking of and should be thinking of as part

0:42:07.239 --> 0:42:09.399
<v Speaker 11>of the full picture on where you want to put

0:42:09.400 --> 0:42:10.400
<v Speaker 11>your investment dollars.

0:42:11.520 --> 0:42:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Rates are rising obviously five hundred and fifty basis points

0:42:15.600 --> 0:42:18.520
<v Speaker 1>since last March, and as inflation comes down, the real

0:42:18.600 --> 0:42:21.479
<v Speaker 1>rates even higher. How much more difficult does this make

0:42:21.760 --> 0:42:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the investment outlook or does it make things even juicier?

0:42:28.719 --> 0:42:30.560
<v Speaker 11>Well, I think it depends on your perspective.

0:42:30.680 --> 0:42:30.919
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:42:31.280 --> 0:42:34.400
<v Speaker 11>If you are a private equity firm and you're looking

0:42:34.400 --> 0:42:37.840
<v Speaker 11>to do deals, which is what they do, it means

0:42:37.920 --> 0:42:41.000
<v Speaker 11>they have to look at diligence deeper, They have to

0:42:41.040 --> 0:42:44.360
<v Speaker 11>look at synergistic opportunities more. They have to be a

0:42:44.360 --> 0:42:47.600
<v Speaker 11>little more creative from a structuring perspective because the cost

0:42:47.600 --> 0:42:51.480
<v Speaker 11>of capital is so much higher. If you are a

0:42:51.520 --> 0:42:54.560
<v Speaker 11>semiconduction manufacturer and you're trying to onshore, which we're seeing

0:42:54.600 --> 0:42:57.080
<v Speaker 11>a lot of in the US, you need to look

0:42:57.080 --> 0:43:00.440
<v Speaker 11>at alternatives. You need to look at quasi equity type

0:43:00.480 --> 0:43:05.600
<v Speaker 11>investments in addition to just that. So I think it's

0:43:05.880 --> 0:43:09.919
<v Speaker 11>forcing folks to be a bit more creative in how

0:43:09.960 --> 0:43:13.040
<v Speaker 11>they structure and where their investment dollars are going.

0:43:13.880 --> 0:43:16.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, Lisa, thanks so much for joining us. Sorry

0:43:16.680 --> 0:43:18.480
<v Speaker 1>that we took a little longer to get to you

0:43:18.480 --> 0:43:20.720
<v Speaker 1>today because of the breaking news, but we really appreciate

0:43:20.760 --> 0:43:22.719
<v Speaker 1>you sticking with us Lisa Donahue, co head of the

0:43:22.760 --> 0:43:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Americas in Asia and at the global consultancy firm Alex Partners.

0:43:27.080 --> 0:43:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Great to have you.

0:43:29.040 --> 0:43:32.160
<v Speaker 5>You're listening to the tape cans Are Live program Bloomberg

0:43:32.239 --> 0:43:35.799
<v Speaker 5>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:43:35.880 --> 0:43:37.839
<v Speaker 5>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and.

0:43:37.800 --> 0:43:39.120
<v Speaker 4>The Bloomberg Business App.

0:43:39.120 --> 0:43:41.960
<v Speaker 5>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:43:41.960 --> 0:43:47.040
<v Speaker 5>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:43:48.040 --> 0:43:51.319
<v Speaker 1>I want to get back to the breaking news that

0:43:51.400 --> 0:43:54.680
<v Speaker 1>we have Hunter Biden, the Hunter Biden probe over the

0:43:54.719 --> 0:43:58.200
<v Speaker 1>DOJ has been assigned a special council. So we saw

0:43:58.840 --> 0:44:02.200
<v Speaker 1>briefly Merrek Garland come out and make a statement appointing

0:44:02.200 --> 0:44:06.600
<v Speaker 1>this special counsel to oversee the government's ongoing criminal investigation

0:44:06.880 --> 0:44:11.680
<v Speaker 1>into President Biden's son over his taxes, as well as

0:44:12.080 --> 0:44:14.640
<v Speaker 1>a number of other issues. Certainly the Republicans hope there

0:44:14.640 --> 0:44:17.919
<v Speaker 1>will be another number of other issues there. We have

0:44:18.000 --> 0:44:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Nick Ackerman on the phone right now. He's a former

0:44:20.360 --> 0:44:25.200
<v Speaker 1>assistant special Watergate prosecutor, and Nick, you know, typically we

0:44:25.520 --> 0:44:30.439
<v Speaker 1>would talk to you about all things Trump. Increasingly these

0:44:31.480 --> 0:44:35.280
<v Speaker 1>conversations are about the Biden family, certainly about Hunter Biden.

0:44:35.520 --> 0:44:37.520
<v Speaker 1>We thought it was all going to be over a

0:44:37.560 --> 0:44:39.680
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago at the plea agreement, and now

0:44:39.680 --> 0:44:43.440
<v Speaker 1>it's come to this. Are you surprised, Not completely.

0:44:43.480 --> 0:44:46.120
<v Speaker 7>I was surprised that the plea didn't go down on

0:44:46.200 --> 0:44:50.000
<v Speaker 7>the day it was supposed to, but since then this

0:44:50.080 --> 0:44:52.760
<v Speaker 7>is not at all surprising. I think it was pretty

0:44:52.840 --> 0:44:57.600
<v Speaker 7>clear at that point that definitely would not have taken

0:44:57.680 --> 0:45:00.440
<v Speaker 7>care of all the other matters of that might be

0:45:00.520 --> 0:45:05.040
<v Speaker 7>under investigation. And I think that Merrick Garland did the

0:45:05.120 --> 0:45:08.480
<v Speaker 7>right thing. Appointed Weiss, had made it official that he's

0:45:08.560 --> 0:45:12.040
<v Speaker 7>really a special prosecutor in this thing, and that he

0:45:12.080 --> 0:45:16.239
<v Speaker 7>has complete independence as he had before. And I think

0:45:16.239 --> 0:45:20.160
<v Speaker 7>it just solidifies that. Don't forget he was appointed initially

0:45:20.160 --> 0:45:23.480
<v Speaker 7>as the US Attorney in Delaware, Yeah, by Donald Trump.

0:45:25.000 --> 0:45:29.719
<v Speaker 7>So I think this just you know, provides more distance

0:45:29.880 --> 0:45:34.200
<v Speaker 7>between the Department of Justice and the prosecutor, but does

0:45:34.239 --> 0:45:34.880
<v Speaker 7>it give him.

0:45:34.840 --> 0:45:37.719
<v Speaker 3>Any extra tools. I just you know, it seems like

0:45:37.719 --> 0:45:42.360
<v Speaker 3>an investigation had had been happening for a long time.

0:45:43.280 --> 0:45:46.560
<v Speaker 3>All the members of the Biden administration had said, you know,

0:45:46.640 --> 0:45:49.880
<v Speaker 3>Mary Garland's given him a bunch of tools whatever he wants,

0:45:51.360 --> 0:45:55.440
<v Speaker 3>but now you know the escalation here. June Grassa was

0:45:55.480 --> 0:45:57.520
<v Speaker 3>just with us, she's a legal analyst at Bloomberg Law

0:45:57.560 --> 0:45:59.479
<v Speaker 3>and was saying, you know, this looks like political move

0:46:00.000 --> 0:46:00.800
<v Speaker 3>a plain and simple.

0:46:01.800 --> 0:46:04.759
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think it's part of what Merrick Garland has

0:46:04.760 --> 0:46:07.160
<v Speaker 7>done all around. I mean, he has tried, on these

0:46:07.200 --> 0:46:13.320
<v Speaker 7>types of cases that affects the administration and particularly Joe Biden,

0:46:14.160 --> 0:46:17.279
<v Speaker 7>to make sure that the person who's doing the investigation,

0:46:17.440 --> 0:46:20.960
<v Speaker 7>whether it's Jack Smith or whether it's wise, that they

0:46:21.000 --> 0:46:25.560
<v Speaker 7>are completely independent. I mean, I think what Garland is

0:46:25.600 --> 0:46:30.360
<v Speaker 7>trying to do is basically used the model of Archibald Cox,

0:46:30.400 --> 0:46:34.279
<v Speaker 7>who has made the first Watergate special prosecutor where he

0:46:34.360 --> 0:46:40.359
<v Speaker 7>really had total independence, wasn't answerable to the Department of Justice.

0:46:40.840 --> 0:46:43.600
<v Speaker 7>And I think that's what Merrick Garland is trying to

0:46:43.640 --> 0:46:48.120
<v Speaker 7>set up, so that there is complete buffer between the

0:46:48.200 --> 0:46:51.799
<v Speaker 7>Department of Justice and Joe Biden. I mean, I think

0:46:52.040 --> 0:46:55.040
<v Speaker 7>that's really the whole purpose of this is to have

0:46:55.120 --> 0:46:58.680
<v Speaker 7>somebody in there who is truly independent, and I think

0:46:58.719 --> 0:47:03.080
<v Speaker 7>this was a way to make it more formalized, particularly

0:47:03.160 --> 0:47:06.440
<v Speaker 7>if there are other areas to be investigated. Now having

0:47:06.600 --> 0:47:11.600
<v Speaker 7>said that, a question, you know what is left to investigate,

0:47:11.800 --> 0:47:14.879
<v Speaker 7>mainly because you've got a statute of limitations that goes

0:47:14.880 --> 0:47:18.080
<v Speaker 7>for five years and most of these matters, and if

0:47:18.120 --> 0:47:23.080
<v Speaker 7>you take the two tax crimes, they were at a period

0:47:23.120 --> 0:47:26.440
<v Speaker 7>of time. Now that's getting beyond a normal statute of

0:47:26.520 --> 0:47:32.560
<v Speaker 7>limitations for anything, probably other than tax crimes. So I just,

0:47:33.000 --> 0:47:35.640
<v Speaker 7>you know, I think it's in some senses it is

0:47:35.719 --> 0:47:40.120
<v Speaker 7>political to the extent that it's set up so that

0:47:40.280 --> 0:47:44.520
<v Speaker 7>there is no question of politics not being involved. I mean,

0:47:44.560 --> 0:47:46.760
<v Speaker 7>I think, you know, to the extent you're saying it's political,

0:47:47.320 --> 0:47:51.200
<v Speaker 7>I'm having complete independence from the Department of Justice and

0:47:51.239 --> 0:47:55.799
<v Speaker 7>from Merrick Garland. Just adds to the fact that the

0:47:55.880 --> 0:47:59.000
<v Speaker 7>person has the independent ability to do what he's doing,

0:47:59.520 --> 0:48:04.960
<v Speaker 7>and even onto this crazy special prosecutor regulation, it's supposedly

0:48:05.640 --> 0:48:09.400
<v Speaker 7>the special prosecutor ultimately answers to the Attorney General. I

0:48:09.440 --> 0:48:12.120
<v Speaker 7>think that Merrick Garland has been and made it clear

0:48:12.160 --> 0:48:14.920
<v Speaker 7>that he's been totally hands off on all of these matters,

0:48:14.960 --> 0:48:17.680
<v Speaker 7>whether it's Jack Smith or now it's going to be wise.

0:48:18.200 --> 0:48:20.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, frankly, Nick, wouldn't they have been a lot

0:48:20.880 --> 0:48:22.600
<v Speaker 1>better off if they've done this from the get go.

0:48:23.200 --> 0:48:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Because the concerns are on the Republican side, not just

0:48:27.600 --> 0:48:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the tax crimes or the gun issue, but the the

0:48:33.719 --> 0:48:37.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of foot dragging, you know, the idea that if

0:48:37.960 --> 0:48:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the president's son is a tax evader, he can get

0:48:41.640 --> 0:48:44.520
<v Speaker 1>away with it, or he'll be given a lighter sentence,

0:48:44.960 --> 0:48:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Like wouldn't President Biden or the administration of Ben smarter

0:48:49.080 --> 0:48:51.279
<v Speaker 1>to get this out of the way at the at

0:48:51.280 --> 0:48:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the beginning.

0:48:52.800 --> 0:48:55.279
<v Speaker 7>Oh, I totally agree with you, But I think from

0:48:55.360 --> 0:49:00.920
<v Speaker 7>Merrick Donland's standpoint, appointing somebody who to investigated, who was

0:49:00.960 --> 0:49:05.480
<v Speaker 7>a Trump appointee as US attorney in Delaware had the

0:49:05.480 --> 0:49:08.960
<v Speaker 7>same effect, But in some ways it didn't. And I

0:49:09.000 --> 0:49:11.399
<v Speaker 7>think what he's trying to do is emphasize that now.

0:49:11.640 --> 0:49:14.360
<v Speaker 7>It also sends a signal that there are other matters

0:49:14.400 --> 0:49:18.920
<v Speaker 7>to be investigated. He wouldn't be doing this unless there

0:49:18.960 --> 0:49:22.120
<v Speaker 7>was something more to investigate beyond the tax crimes. So

0:49:23.280 --> 0:49:27.719
<v Speaker 7>I think this probably also signals the fact that there's

0:49:27.719 --> 0:49:31.839
<v Speaker 7>not going to be a plea anytime soon. That I

0:49:31.840 --> 0:49:34.480
<v Speaker 7>think that there are other matters that they're looking at,

0:49:34.560 --> 0:49:36.440
<v Speaker 7>and I don't think they're in a position yet to

0:49:36.480 --> 0:49:39.400
<v Speaker 7>say they're going to put this all behind Hunter Biden.

0:49:40.120 --> 0:49:40.359
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

0:49:40.440 --> 0:49:43.319
<v Speaker 3>I mean, so there was this closed door testimony of

0:49:44.200 --> 0:49:47.960
<v Speaker 3>Hunter Biden's x business partner, Devin Archer, and I think

0:49:48.000 --> 0:49:52.200
<v Speaker 3>the takeaway from some of the press was that this

0:49:52.239 --> 0:49:58.640
<v Speaker 3>didn't really back up the Republicans accusing President Biden, you know,

0:49:58.719 --> 0:50:03.000
<v Speaker 3>of crime and and corruption. But there were some bits

0:50:03.000 --> 0:50:05.279
<v Speaker 3>and pieces in there. Was there anything there for you

0:50:05.760 --> 0:50:08.759
<v Speaker 3>that you thought, you know, this might be potentially the

0:50:08.800 --> 0:50:13.480
<v Speaker 3>subjective of the a probe that could be continued under

0:50:13.560 --> 0:50:14.440
<v Speaker 3>David Wise.

0:50:14.920 --> 0:50:18.800
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, not really. I mean it sounded like Hunter Biden

0:50:19.000 --> 0:50:21.919
<v Speaker 7>had his dad caught in a couple of times, five

0:50:22.000 --> 0:50:25.839
<v Speaker 7>times over a long period of time, basically trading off

0:50:25.840 --> 0:50:29.319
<v Speaker 7>his name but trading off his connection. You know, a

0:50:29.360 --> 0:50:31.680
<v Speaker 7>lot of other presidents in the past have had the

0:50:31.800 --> 0:50:36.399
<v Speaker 7>same problem, and Richard Nixon did, Jimmy Carter did, even

0:50:36.440 --> 0:50:41.080
<v Speaker 7>Hillary Quinton had this problem with her brother that relatives.

0:50:41.800 --> 0:50:45.080
<v Speaker 7>You know, if you can pick your friends, but you

0:50:45.120 --> 0:50:49.840
<v Speaker 7>can't pick your relatives basically, and it's always been something

0:50:49.880 --> 0:50:54.920
<v Speaker 7>that's be deviled presidents and people in high public office.

0:50:56.160 --> 0:50:59.000
<v Speaker 7>So I don't think it really reflected that there was

0:50:59.080 --> 0:51:02.279
<v Speaker 7>any there there. But look, the public has to be

0:51:02.320 --> 0:51:06.319
<v Speaker 7>assured that everything is being done by the book that

0:51:06.440 --> 0:51:10.759
<v Speaker 7>everything that's out there is being investigated, and at the

0:51:10.880 --> 0:51:13.520
<v Speaker 7>end of the day, I think this will give that assurance.

0:51:13.920 --> 0:51:16.840
<v Speaker 7>You know, One he's a special made the special counsel

0:51:16.960 --> 0:51:21.040
<v Speaker 7>on this, and two he was a former Trump appointee

0:51:21.200 --> 0:51:25.560
<v Speaker 7>Ian a Republican who was the Delaware US attorney who's

0:51:25.560 --> 0:51:29.040
<v Speaker 7>been kept on and he's the one investigating it. So

0:51:29.360 --> 0:51:32.160
<v Speaker 7>I really don't see how you can have anybody with

0:51:32.320 --> 0:51:36.840
<v Speaker 7>any better credentials to do this than Weiss. And I

0:51:36.880 --> 0:51:40.759
<v Speaker 7>think this, you know, provides exactly what needs.

0:51:40.520 --> 0:51:40.919
<v Speaker 4>To be done.

0:51:41.160 --> 0:51:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Did we find out who the big guy was?

0:51:43.080 --> 0:51:43.319
<v Speaker 4>Nick?

0:51:43.480 --> 0:51:47.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean if in the emails that the post got

0:51:47.160 --> 0:51:52.560
<v Speaker 1>out of the laptop in the quote on the CFC

0:51:52.680 --> 0:51:58.000
<v Speaker 1>China Energy venture, when they said held by h for

0:51:58.040 --> 0:52:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the big guy, did we ever figure out who that was? Us?

0:52:04.560 --> 0:52:05.399
<v Speaker 1>Did we lose Nick?

0:52:06.000 --> 0:52:06.160
<v Speaker 7>Oh?

0:52:06.239 --> 0:52:07.600
<v Speaker 3>No, I think we might have lost Nick.

0:52:07.719 --> 0:52:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at the I'm looking at the zoom screen.

0:52:11.280 --> 0:52:13.279
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, Nick, there you are? So did we did we?

0:52:13.440 --> 0:52:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Do we care? I mean, is there any there there?

0:52:16.920 --> 0:52:19.279
<v Speaker 7>Well, so far they haven't found any there there. But

0:52:19.320 --> 0:52:22.800
<v Speaker 7>it doesn't mean that they shouldn't investigate it and assure

0:52:22.840 --> 0:52:25.160
<v Speaker 7>the public that they've looked at everything before they close

0:52:25.239 --> 0:52:27.359
<v Speaker 7>out the case. I think that is what they've got

0:52:27.400 --> 0:52:30.560
<v Speaker 7>to do, all right, and that's what Licen's job is.

0:52:30.880 --> 0:52:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Yep. Nick, thanks so much for joining us. Really appreciate

0:52:33.480 --> 0:52:36.440
<v Speaker 1>you jumping in on this breaking news. Nick Ackerman, former

0:52:36.719 --> 0:52:41.320
<v Speaker 1>special Watergate Watergate prosecutor, talking to us about the breaking

0:52:41.400 --> 0:52:44.920
<v Speaker 1>news that the Department of Justice will appoint a special

0:52:45.880 --> 0:52:50.080
<v Speaker 1>prosecutor in the Hunter Biden probe and that that prosecutor

0:52:50.239 --> 0:52:58.400
<v Speaker 1>is David Weiss. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast.

0:52:58.760 --> 0:53:02.000
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listens into interviews with Apple Podcasts

0:53:02.120 --> 0:53:06.040
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm

0:53:06.080 --> 0:53:09.520
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three. And I'm

0:53:09.560 --> 0:53:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Faull Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:53:11.719 --> 0:53:14.360
<v Speaker 6>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:53:14.360 --> 0:53:16.160
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg Radio