WEBVTT - Gold and Silver Fall as Record Rally Unwinds

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:21.240
<v Speaker 1>on Apple car Play or Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:32.239
<v Speaker 2>Cannot stop talking about the precious metals right, So we're

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:35.519
<v Speaker 2>seeing some signs of moderating here this morning. But the

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 2>size of the losses that we have seen in precious

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:40.839
<v Speaker 2>metals and silver, gold, copper is one really for the

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 2>history books. So let's talk more about it and where

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 2>things might be headed with James Steele, chief Precious Metals

0:00:46.720 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 2>analyst at HSBC. He joins us live in our Bloomberg Studios. James,

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 2>good to see you. Happy Monday morning to.

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:53.160
<v Speaker 3>You, Thank you, good morning.

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 2>So is this just really about this gold and silver

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 2>trade being too crowded and people were just trying to

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 2>try to get out or is there something else going

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 2>on here?

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think you've effectively hit the head on the

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:07.959
<v Speaker 3>nail for the immediate reason. I mean, any commodity that

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:12.040
<v Speaker 3>has this parabolic rally that gold and silver had and

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:15.119
<v Speaker 3>the new entrance into the market, which way they were

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 3>flooding in and have been for many, many months now.

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:24.399
<v Speaker 3>It really does invite a volatility and be profit taking

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 3>stroke liquidation on any news or developments that run counter

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 3>to gold, and we had a couple of them within

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 3>a few days, and it really did give us a

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 3>big and deserved, I think correction in both gold and silver.

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:43.199
<v Speaker 4>James, you've been at this precious metal game for decades now.

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 4>Just put into context the volatility both on the upside

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 4>and then the downside. On Friday, there's handful of daysaw,

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 4>just extraordinary volatility.

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 5>Just put that into context.

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, yes, you're right, and uh it's extraordinary and a

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 3>bit so and so was a rally. Yep. You know,

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 3>we were talking about gold made a fifty four I

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 3>think new highs last night, and people were talking about

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:13.519
<v Speaker 3>a new high and new high and I always cautioned everybody.

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 3>I said, look, it's not a new high until we

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 3>go above in real terms what it was in nineteen eighty.

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 3>In January of nineteen eighty, gold hit eight hundred and

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 3>fifty dollars an ounce, and that's about thirty four hundred

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:30.360
<v Speaker 3>dollars in today's There you go, And they did that

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:33.360
<v Speaker 3>in April last year, and then I said, Okay, now

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 3>we can genuinely talk about a new high. We can

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 3>genuinely talk about a real rally. And the difference between

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 3>now and seventy nine was a limited number of buyers

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 3>at that time, a hunt Brothers, especially in silver, but

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 3>also a much more broad based church this time, a

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 3>lot of lot a lot in it. But the volatility, nonetheless,

0:02:58.160 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 3>and to look at it this way, we had a

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 3>swing in a couple of days that was equal to

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 3>the absolute number that gold was trading at when I

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:06.640
<v Speaker 3>started covering it.

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:09.920
<v Speaker 2>Wow, that put it in perspective, right, So you know,

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 2>it's just when you look at where we've come. I mean,

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 2>gold top fifty five hundred dollars announced last week, it's

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:19.520
<v Speaker 2>now at about forty seven to fifty. I guess spot gold.

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 2>Silver wiped out thirty percent of its value in just

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 2>three days. Do you have a target for gold by

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 2>the end of this year, because for many who had

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 2>their target at fifty five hundred, well, it already blew

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 2>past that in just the first month.

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, are high for the rest of the year is

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 3>fifty five. We have an average which is almost where

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 3>it is now, and we're expecting a very wide range.

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 3>A good news could take us down closer to the

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 3>four thousand dollars level. But what we think will likely

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 3>the research view is that we have a moderately softer

0:03:56.880 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 3>dollar this year according to our effects people who've been

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 3>aready bang on on that. And also we would I

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 3>think very likely see a resumption in a greater central

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 3>bank buying. I mean, they are the ones that kicked

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 3>off the genesis of this rally back in twenty twenty two.

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 3>If you look at it this way, in twenty two,

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 3>twenty three, twenty four, almost one out of every three

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 3>ounces of gold that came out of the ground went

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 3>into a central bank vault, double or triple the average

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 3>for the previous ten years.

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:29.799
<v Speaker 2>That's incredible.

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:30.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, truly.

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:32.719
<v Speaker 5>So I think about a commodity.

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 4>Let's just take oil prices spike up, they start drilling

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:37.599
<v Speaker 4>holes in Texas.

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:40.840
<v Speaker 5>What happens when you see gold just spike up?

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean they don't start digging more mind No, well

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 4>not in the near term.

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:51.039
<v Speaker 3>Again, when I first started covering the markets, by the

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 3>time a group of geologists said I think there's some

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:56.479
<v Speaker 3>gold here, to the time when it went round your finger,

0:04:56.640 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 3>your neck, it was about ten years wow, exploration, permitting,

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 3>et cetera, et cetera. It's closer to twenty now. It

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 3>takes a very long time. You know, it's highly capital

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 3>intensive and the low hanging fruit has been picked. So

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 3>we're going into into different regions and areas. What is

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:23.599
<v Speaker 3>flexible is recycling because gold, unlike oil and grain, is

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 3>never consumed. It's stored somewhere. It's either around your bank

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 3>or on your neck in a central bank vault and

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 3>a vault some other place, and a bar and a coin,

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 3>and that's what can be mobilized at fairly short Now.

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 3>What we've noticed is that we haven't seen the response

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 3>on the recycling side. It is higher, there's not as

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 3>high as I would have expected. And it's rather like

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 3>owning a home. If the market keeps going up, you

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 3>may refrain from putting your flat on the market, but

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 3>when it comes down a bit, you might then say, okay,

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:01.040
<v Speaker 3>maybe we've hit the high I should sell now. So

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 3>we may see a pickup in recycling.

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, I just wonder, I mean, outside of just

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 2>of investors, what is the larger impact on the economy,

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 2>the fact that we have gold prices and we do

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 2>use gold in different ways every day. Gold and silver

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 2>prices being as high as they are, even despite the

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:22.039
<v Speaker 2>pullback we saw recently, they're still relatively high. What is

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 2>that impact on the broader economy.

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, it has been good for jewelry, simply put. A

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 3>jewelry is often about fifty percent of physical gold demand.

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 3>We calculate that last year it was only thirty five percent.

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 3>It's been down double digit. Also there's a reduction in

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:45.599
<v Speaker 3>coin demand. But generally speaking, gold does not have huge

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 3>macroeconomic impacts. It reacts to macroecerdomics. It doesn't set It's

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:53.239
<v Speaker 3>not like oil. It doesn't set the stage. It reacts

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 3>to the stage. And that's why you know, you've got

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 3>to pay attention because the gold price, let's tell you

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 3>that there are geopolitical or economic risks. It doesn't they

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 3>may not materialize, but right, you know, the geopolitical risk

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 3>index is fairly high and persistently high.

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 5>All right, folks.

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 4>G LCO that is the function of the day, gives

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 4>you all the global commodities. You click on the metals

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 4>and then it breaks it down between base metals, ferris metals,

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 4>and precious metals.

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 5>So there you go.

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 4>That's the function you need to be on top of

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 4>what's happening in the world of commodities.

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:30.119
<v Speaker 5>James Steel, thank you so much. We appreciate it.

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 4>James's chief Precious Metals analyst at HSBC. Whatever we see

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 4>big moves in precious metals by far. The first phone

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 4>call we go out to is to James Steele, and

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 4>he's kind of to give us some of his time there.

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 5>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on Applecarplay,

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business Up, or watch us

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>live on YouTube.

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 4>The alexis Christopher sitting in for Tom Keena Paul Sweeneyer

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 4>live here in our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio, streaming live

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 4>on YouTube as well. I can see one of the

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 4>other networks that Polsted Tiny Field. The Beast is out,

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 4>so I just I'm not sure if the Beast has

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 4>seen its shadow or not. We'll bring that to you

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 4>as that news breaks. Let's get back to these markets

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 4>here today. Madison Faller joins US Global investment strategists at

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 4>JP Morgan Private Bank, located in London Madison. Twenty twenty

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 4>five great year for equity markets. The US equity markets

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 4>did really well. A lot of markets outside of the

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 4>US did even better. How are you thinking about global

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 4>equity stock.

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:43.680
<v Speaker 5>Price performance in twenty twenty six?

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 7>Sure so, I think you know. Of course, twenty twenty

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 7>five was an incredibly strong year for markets broadly and

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 7>also for XUS, outperforming the US, which is not something

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 7>that we always see. As we look forward into this year,

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 7>I think it's another store where we are very much

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 7>focused on being globally diversified.

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:06.839
<v Speaker 8>We still do believe that the US should.

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 7>Remain the core of portfolios, given the access to growth

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 7>in technology and potential productivity gains that it can provide.

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 7>But at the same time, we are also seeing a

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 7>world where national champions across different regions are also growing

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 7>in increased focus, especially as it's underpinned by fiscal stimulus efforts,

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 7>and that's also starting to show through into the earnings

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 7>momentum as well. So I expect a continued narrowing of

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 7>the gap between the US and the rest of the world,

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 7>especially when it comes to earnings growth.

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 8>Heading into this.

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:40.199
<v Speaker 2>Year in Madison, we keep talking about broader market participation

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:42.679
<v Speaker 2>with our guests and we're seeing more and more of it.

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Which sectors regions are sort of your top pick outside

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:48.959
<v Speaker 2>of the usual big tech names.

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:54.079
<v Speaker 7>So when we look across the market, there are a

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 7>few different things that I would call out, and I

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 7>think that different regions are showcasing that they have different

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 7>strengths that.

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:01.440
<v Speaker 8>They can offer.

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:04.680
<v Speaker 7>So in the US, yes, you mentioned we do like

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:06.680
<v Speaker 7>big tech, but I do think that there's a broadening

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 7>out beyond that where we want to be focused on

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:12.559
<v Speaker 7>the entire AI ecosystem, so not just the hyper scalers,

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 7>but the entire AI value chain, from the hardware to

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 7>the software, to power to data center infrastructure. But you're

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:24.319
<v Speaker 7>also seeing support within the US around financials and a

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 7>catchup from healthcare, for instance.

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 8>In Europe, I think it's very.

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 7>Much a focus on energy security, on defense, we do

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 7>know that spending continues to become unlocked in that area.

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:38.599
<v Speaker 8>When it comes to emerging markets.

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 7>You know em can't be I think painted with one

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 7>broad brushstroke, but there's certainly a lot of opportunity there

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:49.680
<v Speaker 7>where it be broad broad India, which is a focus

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 7>of ours in addition to China Tech, and I would

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 7>also call out Taiwan and Korea as well in terms

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 7>of areas of focus within Asia.

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 4>Breaking news here Hawks of Tony Phil predict six more

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 4>weeks of winters to be no surprise, although two of

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 4>my offspringer in California and they both are texting me

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 4>like from the.

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 5>Beach, from the golf course.

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 4>Well that's just NaSTA, this is me, Yeah, Madison, talk

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:16.080
<v Speaker 4>to us about the bond market again. Fix income results

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 4>in twenty twenty five for were really really solid.

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 5>How do you think about opportunities to fixing come in

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty six.

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:26.439
<v Speaker 7>What I think about fixed income, I think what I

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 7>would be looking for are carry like returns. I think

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 7>that now that we have most developed world central banks

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 7>that are wrapping up their easing cycles, I do expect

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:40.320
<v Speaker 7>that bond yields will stabilize around these more elevated levels.

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:41.960
<v Speaker 7>And as a result of that, I think that we

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 7>can expect to you know, clip that carry as we

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 7>move along. Of course, if we were to be in

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 7>a more downside growth scenario, bonds could offer protection, but

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:52.560
<v Speaker 7>I think at the you know, the flip side of

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 7>that is that if we do see more inflation volatility,

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 7>bonds might not be enough, which is why we're very

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 7>much focused on complementing that with real assets like infrastructure

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 7>and commodities like gold.

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 8>Especially on the pullback.

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 2>What are you doing with this gold trade right now? That,

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it went up so fast? I guess we

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:13.319
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't be too surprised, Paul, right that it's violently the

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 2>violent move to the downside. But do you if you

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:19.960
<v Speaker 2>have gold, do you stick with it right now? Do

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 2>you just hold if you're not in it, do you

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:23.959
<v Speaker 2>forget the fomo and stay out for now?

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:24.839
<v Speaker 5>What do you do with gold?

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 8>We're buyers here.

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 7>I think that this pullback offers another you know, re

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 7>entry point for investors, especially if they aren't allocated already.

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 7>For those that are allocated, we we'd certainly be holding

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 7>those positions.

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:38.840
<v Speaker 9>Uh.

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 8>And I think you mentioned mentioned it.

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 7>You know, I think there's a you know a little

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 7>bit of a sentiment driven effect that's you know driven

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 7>driven prices lower over the course of the last few

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:51.320
<v Speaker 7>trading days. But I think the you know, structural drivers

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 7>very much remain in place, whether that be this continued

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 7>uncertainty premium, whether that's debt fiscal whether it's you know,

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 7>do youolitically driven, But at the same time, we know

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 7>that there's a lot of central bank buying. Retail buying

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 7>is also not I think, to elevate it and remains

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 7>below twenty twenty highs that we saw during COVID, So

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 7>I think the seeds are still there. We'd certainly be buyers,

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 7>and we actually just recently moved our targets higher north

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:21.080
<v Speaker 7>of six thousand Madison.

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:22.599
<v Speaker 4>We're just kind of right smack in the middle of

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:27.079
<v Speaker 4>earnings here. I guess to date they've been pretty solid.

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 4>What are you taking away from earnings and what do

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 4>you think the market needs to see from an earnings

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 4>perspective here?

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:35.719
<v Speaker 7>I think the market needs to see that corporations can

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 7>continue to you know, push through a lot of the

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 7>unknowns that we've seen take place. It's certainly over the

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 7>course of the last year. And so I think for

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 7>me it's more, you know, whether or not they can

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 7>really continue to show that resilience. We are looking at

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 7>Q four looking to produce, you know, just under twelve

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 7>percent year of year earnings growth, which is yet another

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 7>quarter of double digit profit growth, which is really meaningful,

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 7>and on top of that, we're all so seeing that

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:06.679
<v Speaker 7>profit margins are especially resilient and are historically high, so

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 7>we're looking to see whether that continues to be the case.

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 7>But the second thing that I would also point out is,

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 7>you know how this continues to broaden out between sectors.

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:18.199
<v Speaker 8>So we know that the earnings growth.

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 7>Gap between you know, the big tech, you know players

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 7>of the world and the rest of the market was

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 7>still quite wide and twenty twenty five, even if it

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 7>narrowed a bit, we're looking to see if that continues

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 7>to narrow and so far that that does seem to

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 7>be the case, with other sectors certainly starting to participate more.

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 2>I have exciting news. I'm looking at my weather app

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 2>and it's hit double digits. So here in midtown Manhattan

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 2>it is now of bolly twelve degrees. Madison, what is

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 2>it like by you? Are you in London?

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 7>I'm in London and it is cold and dreary and rainy,

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 7>And I must say, I'm originally from Florida, So when

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 7>you're talking about the weather and you know, pictures of sunshine,

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 7>that's something that I certainly miss and I see from

0:14:56.760 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 7>all my family members.

0:14:57.720 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 2>You're also a graduate of the University of Notre Dame.

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 2>So you're no stranger to like harsh Winters, right.

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 8>Correct, correct, I felt all the climates.

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 5>Madison, thanks so much for joining us.

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 4>Appreciate it as always, Madison follow Global Investment Strategist JP Morgan,

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 4>Private Bank.

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 5>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Apple Karplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 4>We're joined now by Joe Davis, Global Chief Economists at Vanguard.

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 5>Joe, I want to start with our feder Reserve.

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 4>We've had a lot of news over the last week

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 4>the Federal Reserve kind of staying pat with their rates,

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 4>but now we have the nomination of a new FED chair.

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 4>I love to just kind of get your you know,

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 4>FED thinking these days from at that thirty thousand foot level.

0:15:57.400 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 6>Well, again, I think it's really a good choice just

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 6>from what I know of just pass track records, and

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 6>our view was that the Federal Reserve, you know, may

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 6>ease once in twenty twenty six, but it would be

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 6>GDP growth that could eventually add a little bit more

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 6>half to labor market, which is pretty much stalled, and

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 6>so I think we'll see that over the course of

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 6>this year. Again we could have surprises on the jobs front.

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 6>But again overall, plaud and I think the financial markets

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 6>would agree. Joe.

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 2>I want to talk a little inflation in twenty twenty six.

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 2>Last week we got a backward looking number as we

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 2>continue to play catch up from the government shutdown. We

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 2>got the December producer price index and inflation at the

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 2>wholesale level was hotter than expected. What are your expectations

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 2>for inflation this year? And I wonder if the tariff

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 2>passed through is now behind us, because I don't nobody's

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 2>really talking about it anymore.

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 6>I know, I know, well again it was delayed, was

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 6>never dead. The tariff passed through, and so we should

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 6>see some moderation and inflation. So the progress should be

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 6>good yet frustrating. You know again, that's not you know,

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 6>that's certainly our view, it's it's others view. I think

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 6>as well. It's been stubborn inflation. It's almost five years

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:11.120
<v Speaker 6>above target. And again I applaud Kevin worse I think

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 6>he's pointed to the fact that we found in our

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 6>research fiscal easing or easy physical conditions have some modest

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 6>boost on inflation. I think that's one of the reasons

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 6>why it's been suffered.

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 4>What is your call about inflation going forward here? Because

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:30.399
<v Speaker 4>again it's been persistent sticky. One could argue that this

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:33.680
<v Speaker 4>one big, beautiful bill may result in maybe even pushing

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 4>inflation a little bit higher.

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:35.439
<v Speaker 5>How do you think about that?

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 6>Well, I think what will happen in twenty twenty six

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 6>is going to be the key just you know, tension

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 6>for the next three years, and that is can AI

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 6>and some of this productivity events as we've seen, be

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:50.880
<v Speaker 6>a relief valve on inflation versus if we don't have

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:54.199
<v Speaker 6>those sort of dividends, you're going to have, you know,

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 6>some some fiscal based price pressures. That really is the

0:17:57.760 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 6>tug of war we see, not just for this year.

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 6>This year it's more modest, but is your bold enough

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:04.439
<v Speaker 6>to look out two or three years That is the

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:06.680
<v Speaker 6>tug of war. Can we get lower inflation with high

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:10.360
<v Speaker 6>growth or the inverse? That is clearly when I think

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 6>the goal prices versus tech stocks point too on any

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:14.679
<v Speaker 6>given day Joe.

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Growth at four percent is pretty darn solid. Is it

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:20.120
<v Speaker 2>sustainable though? For the rest of the year.

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 6>Well, I think we have some someone off. So we

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:26.159
<v Speaker 6>obviously had some trade you know, volatility that boosted the

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 6>current numbers up. But our view was for twenty twenty

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 6>six remains intact, and that is we could have economic

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 6>upside from the US economic perspective, really driven at the

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:40.399
<v Speaker 6>margin by greater business investment and resilient consumer. You know,

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 6>we were talking about, you know, the risks above two.

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 6>Now we're clearly above that. We will see some moderation.

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 6>But our our thesis of economic upside despite market froth,

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 6>which gives us some concerns, that that core message remains intact.

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 4>Hey, Joe, the labor market, I guess you know, one

0:18:58.480 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 4>could call it resilient.

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 5>Doesn't seem to be a lot of hiring, doesn't seem

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 5>to be a lot of firing. Maybe that's okay. How

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 5>do you think about the labor market.

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 6>Well, again, we've had supply and demand moved down in locksteps,

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:13.679
<v Speaker 6>so clearly there's been a coin from a hiring perspective,

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 6>But we have one of the one of the deepest

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 6>labor market signals in the world. Given our four one

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 6>k record keeping surface, you know, millions of real time

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 6>we can see in real time how many are being

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 6>hired let go, and also their wage increases. And so

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:31.159
<v Speaker 6>what we see is is affirming at a low level.

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 6>Wage growth is stronger than employment growth. And if we're right,

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 6>we should see a little bit greater, bigger in the

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 6>labor market in the back half of the year. But

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 6>we're not out of that yet. I mean, we are

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 6>prepared to see in some month a modest negative non

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 6>farm payroll that's that break, even with the supply having

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 6>coming down, so that I think could be a you know,

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 6>some market nervousness. You could see a federal reserve easing

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 6>into that, you know, between now and the summer. But

0:19:56.640 --> 0:19:58.640
<v Speaker 6>if you're bold enough to look past that, we see

0:19:58.680 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 6>some firming in the labor market.

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:01.720
<v Speaker 5>Joe, thanks so much for joining us.

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:04.159
<v Speaker 4>Really appreciate getting a few minutes of your time. Joe Davis,

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 4>he's global chief economist at Vanguard Group.

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 5>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:22.200
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us live

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am. Eastern Listen on

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Apple Karplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 4>Lexus Christopher sitting in for Tom Keene this morning on Paulsweeny.

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 4>We live here in our Bloomberg Enrector Broker studio in

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 4>New York City. We're streaming live on YouTube as well.

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 6>Well.

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:42.359
<v Speaker 5>The US government stumbled.

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 4>Into a partial shutdown while waiting for the House to

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 4>approve a funding deal. President Donald Trump worked out with

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 4>Democrats to get the latest reporting from what's happening down

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 4>there in DC.

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 8>We go to Henrietta.

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 4>Tres co founder of Veda Partners. Henrietta, when are we

0:20:56.359 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 4>going to get this government this partial shutdown partially re opening?

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, that might be what it is, a partial, partial reopening.

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 10>We are looking at votes tonight in the Rules Committee

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 10>around four o'clock. Maybe movement on the House floor around

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 10>six pm at the earliest. But Speaker Johnson is setting

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:17.439
<v Speaker 10>the table for Tuesday votes, so it's going to be

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 10>a little while yet. I think we are on a

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 10>path towards reopening, but you should expect some drama on

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 10>and off today.

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 2>So what's the sticking point here? Henriette is it's still

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:31.680
<v Speaker 2>about immigration, ICE and how the White House is dealing

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:32.239
<v Speaker 2>with all of it.

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:36.680
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, definitely, And I think more than just the technicals

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 10>and the policy will fight that fight for the next

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:42.439
<v Speaker 10>two weeks over masks and IDs and videotapes and stuff

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 10>for all the ICE officers. But right now, it's really

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:49.639
<v Speaker 10>about the House Democratic Conference getting socialized the idea that

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:51.399
<v Speaker 10>they're going to need to provide quite a lot of

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 10>votes to this, and Speaker Johnson accepting that. So Leader

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 10>Schumer and President Trump were able to negotiate a deal

0:21:57.840 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 10>that would work on the Upper Chamber, but now you

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 10>know the House has to weigh in. What I look

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 10>at from the inside is where members who are not

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 10>Hakeem Jeffries are. Where not on the far left, you

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 10>have guys that are stalwarts in DC like Steady Hoyer

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 10>and Jim Clyburn saying that they want to support the bill,

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 10>and they're encouraging their moderate members to do so. I

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 10>suspect you'll see, much like in the Senate side, a

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 10>good chunk of bipartisanship to get this over the finish

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 10>line later on this week.

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:28.679
<v Speaker 4>Henretta, I believe the polling suggests that most Americans do

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:32.919
<v Speaker 4>not approve of the tactics Ice is employing here. How

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 4>does that translate into, you know, what some of these

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 4>Republican members of Congress do in terms of maybe this

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 4>vote and maybe pushing back on some of the other

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 4>president's agenda items.

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 5>Where do we stand there?

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, it's it's amazing. Everything is just broken right now.

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 10>So you can't just say up and down this is

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 10>a red versus Blue issue or a D versus R issue.

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 10>You have members up for reelection in Texas who saw

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 10>a thirty one point swing in a state Senate seat

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 10>just this weekend.

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 9>That's crazy town.

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 10>So you start to then fracture what would otherwise be

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 10>a unified Republican or Democratic base. President Trump is going

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:16.480
<v Speaker 10>to do some serious arm twisting on I would say

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:19.639
<v Speaker 10>at least thirty forty members of the Republican Party to

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 10>get them on board with this package. And on the

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 10>Democrat side, you're going to have to see a lot

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 10>of movement into the realm of being willing to negotiate

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:29.879
<v Speaker 10>with Speaker Johnson and with the White House.

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:32.920
<v Speaker 9>So it's the wild less out there right now.

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:35.359
<v Speaker 2>I just want to broaden this and go international for

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 2>a moment. Henriette. Because things are heating up here. It's

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 2>worrying between Iran and the US. I know that over

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 2>the weekend around Supreme Leader warned the US of what

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 2>he called a regional war. He said, quote, the Americans

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:50.679
<v Speaker 2>should know if they start a war this time, it

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 2>will be a regional war. Talk to us a little

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 2>bit about that, and where do things stand right now?

0:23:56.720 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean, military advisors will tell you that that's

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 10>a posture that must take on domestically because they do

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:04.639
<v Speaker 10>not have the firepower to go against the United States

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 10>one on one, so they need to turn it into

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 10>a regional theater. And what has occurred obviously as a result,

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 10>because so many folks in DC, myself included, are worried

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 10>about escalation on the military front, some sort of kinetic

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 10>event where we are in Iran or somewhere nearby.

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 9>We know the USS Abraham Lincoln is in.

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:27.440
<v Speaker 10>The region prepared to do what it was not prepared

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 10>to do, you know, a week or two ago.

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:30.640
<v Speaker 9>So things have absolutely escalated.

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:34.439
<v Speaker 10>But the United States Senate already has members who are

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:37.199
<v Speaker 10>out there trying to put a war powers resolution on

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 10>the floor to limit the president's ability to go you know,

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:43.359
<v Speaker 10>to the next level with Iran. So I think there's

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 10>going to be a sustained push that the president can't avoid.

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:49.119
<v Speaker 10>He doesn't get to just act in a vacuum here

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:51.959
<v Speaker 10>like perhaps was the case with Venezuela. Now members are

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:54.480
<v Speaker 10>very keen to what's going on. They do not want

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:56.399
<v Speaker 10>to see another regional war in the whole of the

0:24:56.440 --> 0:24:59.119
<v Speaker 10>Middle East. That does not play well with the American public,

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:01.400
<v Speaker 10>and Republicans don't want that on their backs going into

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 10>a midterm election cycle either. So a lot of oversight

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:06.680
<v Speaker 10>that we did not see earlier in the year with Venezuela.

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:10.639
<v Speaker 4>So we were going into this election year, Henriette, thinking

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 4>that perhaps Democrats could get control of the House, and

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:17.879
<v Speaker 4>then we see this state race in Texas that you mentioned,

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 4>which was a real surprise win for the Democrat there.

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 4>What's the feeling on the calculus for midterm elections here?

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 5>So so early in the year, yeah, I.

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 10>Mean, in this Texas seat, you had a plus seventeen

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 10>for Trump electoral outcome, and I want to say that

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 10>now it would swung back to plus thirteen for the

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 10>Democratic candidate over the weekend.

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 9>That is absolutely not normal.

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 10>That is obviously the trajectory of what you see in

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 10>a wave of election cycle. It builds up of what

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:51.200
<v Speaker 10>Democrats were able to notch as wins across the Northeast

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 10>in November and Minnesota, Georgia, and Mississippi around the same

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 10>time as they were doing the governor's races in New

0:25:58.080 --> 0:25:59.120
<v Speaker 10>Jersey and Virginia.

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 9>Sage is really quite clear.

0:26:01.560 --> 0:26:05.680
<v Speaker 10>I thought Senator Tillis had a really important point for Republicans,

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 10>which is, you know, the House is very likely to

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:10.360
<v Speaker 10>switch to Democratic control where at like eighty five percent

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 10>on the Senate side, though our odds are much more

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:15.919
<v Speaker 10>muted at thirty percent. But look at the fundraising in

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:20.439
<v Speaker 10>a race like Alaska, where the Democratic challenger freized, you know,

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:23.200
<v Speaker 10>one and a half million dollars in twenty four hours,

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 10>which is more than the current incumbent Republican race all quarter.

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:31.160
<v Speaker 10>There is okay, galvanization and enthusiasm, and it's coast to coast,

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:34.160
<v Speaker 10>I mean Jersey to Alaska. You can't get more inclusive

0:26:34.200 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 10>than that.

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 4>Zachy similar types of weather though, Henrietta, thank you so much.

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 5>I appreciate henning you to Trece, co founder of Beta.

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:45.159
<v Speaker 1>Partners, this is the Bloomberg surveillance podcast available on Apple, Spotify,

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 1>seven to ten am Easter and on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:26:57.200 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Tube and always on the Bloomberg Terminal

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 2>MHM