WEBVTT - BNY's Levine: Inflation Will Be Higher Than Expected

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Let's get right to

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 1>our next guest, Alicia Levin. She's a chief strategist and

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>managing director for b n y Melon Investment Management about

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:33.839
<v Speaker 1>two point two trillion dollars of assets under management. Alicia

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>is speaking today on the Financial markets panel at the

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Engage Undergraduate Investment Conference, so we're fortunate to get her time.

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Alicia a lotted the discussion from market participants really over

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 1>the last several weeks, in particular has been inflation and

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the impact on financial assets and where you want to

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>be with your portfolio and your investments. Love to get

0:00:57.000 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts right here, right now on inflation and kind

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 1>of how that's factoring it to your calculus. So that's great.

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me almost at the noon hour exciting

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>panel today. Um, look, I think that is that's the

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:14.479
<v Speaker 1>question of the moment, And I think what better example

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>of the problem with inflation and inflation risk than the

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Suez Canal where we saw that giant tank or sitting

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 1>there for about eight days choking up supply chain. And

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 1>today we've got a p p I number, you know,

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 1>four four point two percent year year growth on PPI prices,

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>much higher inflation and prices than expected for goods inputs,

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>and I think we are on a path for the

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>next few months of much higher inflation reads than UH

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>than we would have sought. Even though the FETE is

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>telling us not to worry. I think the prints are

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be higher. So there are two issues. One

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 1>is inflation coming and to what do central banks do

0:01:56.840 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>about it? And the two are separate. But I think

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the issue of inflation is real, and I think it's

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>going to last longer than a couple of months now.

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>We spent so much money on it already the pandemic

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 1>in terms of stimulus. But as I look at food

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 1>inflation and gasoline prices, you know, it doesn't matter if

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>they're coming from a lower UH comparison. These are still

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:22.360
<v Speaker 1>making up a much higher percentage of the incomes of

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:25.799
<v Speaker 1>the people who are hit hardest during the pandemic. Are

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>we going to see do we need to see more

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:32.640
<v Speaker 1>federal government spending in terms of stimulus. So I don't

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 1>think they're going to be able to get more stimulus

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:39.239
<v Speaker 1>for the kind of pandemic related issues. We had one

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>point nine trillion dollars, as you know, passed very quickly,

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and if you think about how much money is coming

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to the US economy, think about the timing of this.

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>On the one point nine one point two is going

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to be plowed into the economy one point two trillions

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:59.799
<v Speaker 1>by early September. So that's one point to trillion dollars

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 1>in six months. That's absolutely extraordinary and that can be inflationary. Um.

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:10.360
<v Speaker 1>The question is do labor markets really adjust quickly to

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>get people back into you know, as we reopen, demand increases,

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>demand for services increases, candle labor markets keep up. And

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that's really the big question, right, do people decide to

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>stay home and collect their unemployment benefits because it's about

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty three an hour through September six or do people

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 1>go back to to you know, to working, and that's

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>those are those are tough questions, but it really is

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>staff forwards, higher risk of inflation in the very short term,

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>all right, So is it the higher risk of inflation

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>in the short term? Alicia? Is that how does that

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of coloring where you guys at B and hy

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>melon are looking for opportunities. So this is really a

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>great question because again the two parts are is their

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>higher inflation we would say, yes, it's coming, and to

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>what is the said do about it? Right? Two different things,

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>because that's how it affects the economy. So the FED

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 1>has tried with every ounce of every know f o

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>MC member to say that they are strategiously patient and

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>will wait to see um until we get into whether

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>in three whether we've recovered in the labor market, and

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>they expect inflation to normalize as we exit. Data will

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>be noisy, and we expect and actually not to sit

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>on their hands. We think that the market believes that

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>this is going to happen. In addition, the inflation curved

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>invaser investors actually are buying the FED story, which is

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:39.479
<v Speaker 1>you're going to get higher inflation in the short term

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 1>and then lower inflation in the out years, and that's

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:46.160
<v Speaker 1>an inverted inflation curve. That's very unusual. We have an

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>inverted curve because people see its short terms. The big

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>wisp here is whether inflation expectations become unmoored right, whether

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:56.479
<v Speaker 1>they become un anchored, whether it last bombers than a

0:04:56.480 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>couple of months of April, May June, and whether they're

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 1>for future expectations so higher. And that's the big risk

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that would change FED policy. That's where you are. You know,

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 1>we're buying the stories for now, but the real numbers

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 1>are going to be coming through entire than expected. There's

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:18.039
<v Speaker 1>so much money UM in US retirement accounts tied up

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:22.280
<v Speaker 1>in stocks though, and any action from the FED would

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>not only work to um you know, tame inflation, but

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:30.359
<v Speaker 1>also probably push the equity market down in a pretty

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>rough way. Is the Greenspan put alive? And well, look,

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I think I think what the the overall tone of

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the market except for the last couple of weeks, that

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:47.040
<v Speaker 1>cyclicals are are the ways to play this right. So ultimately,

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>when you have higher inflations, financials outperform, energy outperforms, industrials

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and materials outperform. And we think while you will have

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:59.600
<v Speaker 1>periods of consolidation and yields, we think the removal yield

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:02.840
<v Speaker 1>is simately going to be higher. Although not spiky, right,

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>We had really spike. We had eight five basis points

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:07.159
<v Speaker 1>in the first quarter. We think the bulk of the

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:10.160
<v Speaker 1>big move is behind us, but there will be moments

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 1>of doubts, and there will be moments of doubt when

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:15.280
<v Speaker 1>we get some of those nasty inflation prints. Can we

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:18.039
<v Speaker 1>still think the cick local sectors are a way to

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:22.599
<v Speaker 1>insulate portfolios from some of the damage that higher rates

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:26.039
<v Speaker 1>can do from inflation. I think you need to think

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:30.479
<v Speaker 1>about your long duration assets, which are the speculative tech assets.

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Um those may have a tougher time, and we know

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>they have had tougher times as we so yield spikes

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>sometimes eight to tend basis points in a day. I

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 1>think investors should be conscious that those risks remain, and

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the market is somewhat sniffing out could there

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 1>be a policy mistake here? Right? Well, the FED sit

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>on its hand so long that it may get runaway inflation.

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:58.160
<v Speaker 1>We're not seeing it in the numbers yet, but you're

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 1>starting to have that conversation with investors. So I still

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 1>be insticklable. I still like the small caps. You are

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>going to have moments where you know your growth stocks

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>will outperform, and we think you should be invested in

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>those profitable growth stocks that have increasing earnings and and

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and not just trading on forty times revenue. And we

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>would use bond market volatility to start and grow positions

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 1>in those stocks. What do you think about the US

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>versus Europe? You mentioned that one point two trillion dollars

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 1>of US stimulus is going to be into the economy

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 1>by September. As far as I know, the in comparison

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 1>poultry seven and fifty billion dollar European rescue package or

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>billion euro European rescue package. Only of that is going

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>to go out to the countries that need it by

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 1>this summer. Are they going to have to do more?

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Are we gonna see the European assets continue to underperform?

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 1>So it's an interesting question, Shi. I think there may

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>be pressure for the Europeans to do more on the

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>fiscal side. Um. You know, the the ECB is absolutely

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>adamant that it will not allow the euro to appreciate

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>against the seller anymore. Oh, it looks like we lost

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Alicia there, unfortunately, but it was great to have her

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 1>for the time being. Alicia Levine, chief strategist at b

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>N y Melon Investment Management. We heard earlier from Rob Kaplan,

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Texas FED president, out of the Engage Undergraduate Investment Conference. UM.

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:38.959
<v Speaker 1>That's David Coudla's conference there in Michigan. Jeffrey Rosenberg is

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:42.559
<v Speaker 1>also there on the financial markets panel. He's a portfolio

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 1>manager at the black Rock Systemic Multi Strategy Fund. Jeff,

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>great to get you on the program. UM. I wonder,

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:56.080
<v Speaker 1>considering what we heard from uh from Kaplan, how how

0:08:56.120 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>supportive of this rally do you expect the FED to remain.

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 1>They want to obviously get us back to full employment.

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>They want to well, their stated goal is to to

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:08.319
<v Speaker 1>to fight I guess inflation in some ways, but or

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>keep price stability, maintain price stability. But now they're trying

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>to boost inflation and it's having a great effect on

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:19.680
<v Speaker 1>financial assets as well. Yeah, you know you you talking

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>about the FED um fighting inflation. This is a FED

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 1>that's fighting inflation from below too little inflation. And the

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:32.559
<v Speaker 1>implication for supporting the rally is that is providing historic

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 1>amount of accommodation, you know, first for the fighting for

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>fighting COVID, but then the second order impact of COVID

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>on inflation is that it is making it that much

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:46.239
<v Speaker 1>harder for the FED to achieve its its new policy objective.

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 1>And so the FED is absolutely here in a new

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 1>operating mode, and that operating mode has removed preemptive FED

0:09:55.840 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>tightening for tightening conditions in the labor mark. They basically said,

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>we're only going to look at one side of the

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>mandate when it comes to tightening. We're not going to

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 1>look at labor markets as an indication that we should

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 1>be pulling back from our accommodation. And that's absolutely very

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 1>supportive in terms of highly accommodative financial conditions, which supports

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Jeff the rally. To your question, the reason I ask

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 1>is that this morning on our m Live blog, um

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Wes Goodman wrote a story saying the bull run has

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:31.679
<v Speaker 1>years to go thanks to our beloved baby boomers. You

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 1>would have thought that they shifted into bonds at the

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>end of their you know, working life, but estimate show

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:41.680
<v Speaker 1>retirement accounts of US households on thirty percent of the

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 1>nation's corporate equity and so, um, you know, with this

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>entire generation invested in stocks, the FED has no other

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 1>choice but to remain supportive. At least that's how his

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>theory goes. Yeah, look, the FED is going to measure

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 1>its togree of supportiveness based on its economic outcomes and

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 1>its economic objectives. Financial conditions are part of that now

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>in in the in the post first GFC crisis environment,

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and certainly in the post COVID crisis environment. So it's

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 1>not a stated aim, but it's it's it means to

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>achieving that aim, and so that keeps the FED very

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 1>much supportive. We haven't had a situation, however, where the

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:32.679
<v Speaker 1>FED has been challenged by potential conflict within its objectives.

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>All of the objectives have lined up on the same side.

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Too little inflation, you need more accommodation. Too little growth,

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 1>you need more accommodation. Tightening of financial conditions, you need

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:50.560
<v Speaker 1>more accommodation. The future will be one where the FED

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:54.439
<v Speaker 1>may see a period where some of those objectives are

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>no longer all lining up in the same way, and

0:11:57.080 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the uncertainty for the market will be well, how going

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to balance and manage the conflict between those objectives. So

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 1>far that that has been pretty clear to say we're

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 1>going to preference financial conditions and achieving inflation over any

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of the other concerns. Concerns such as financial stability, on

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>a long run basis in terms of too much accommodation,

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:25.680
<v Speaker 1>or asset price bubbles, financial stability concerns, all of those

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 1>have been secondary. So that's where you get to these

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of statements that the FED will always be there.

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 1>I think we're going to be perhaps in an environment

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 1>where in a rising inflationary environment that isn't transitory, that

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>FED faces a different challenge. The market will face that challenge,

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 1>But right now that remains a pretty uncertain call as

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>whether or not we're going to get to that point.

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>For now, the FED has been able to remain entirely

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>accommodative because they face no conflict in their multiple objectives.

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, Jeff, Given where we think the FED is,

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>where are you guys at black Rock finding value here? Well?

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Value in value? Uh? You know, I'm on the fixed

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:15.199
<v Speaker 1>income side, But we certainly take a broad market perspective

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 1>in terms of investing, and in many of the investment

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>strategies we run, we run cross market. Uh. You know.

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>A long period of falling real interest rates reflective of

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>secular stagnation, falling term premium have certainly benefited the secular

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 1>growth story um to the point where valuations have become

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>secondary uh, and now there's a real challenge in the

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>market around that viewpoint. It starts with the fundamental top

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 1>down macro debate that we were just having in terms

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 1>of does the FED face the future environment where they

0:13:55.440 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 1>are achieving their objectives? But along the way and where

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:01.680
<v Speaker 1>we are right now, is that is significantly change the

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 1>relative value in some of the growth stock story versus

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the value stock story, where that rising potential of breaking

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>out of thirty years of falling interest rates secular stagnation

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 1>starts to benefit that that value perspective. On the fixed

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>income side of the value perspective, UM, there's uh not

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>much value left, uh. Spreads across our credit markets, headlines

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>in Bloomberg highlighting you know, tight levels of high yield

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>spread predating the global financial crisis going back to two

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>thousand and seven. So it's hard to find value, uh

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>in the fixed income market, the way that you can

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 1>still find some value in the equity market. All right, Jeff,

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. We always appreciate

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>getting your perspective here. Jeffrey Rosenberg, portfolio manager of the

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>black Rock Systematic Multi Strategy Fund at Blackbird Molly should

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 1>joins us Bloomberg Technology reporter Molly, Um, did it ever

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 1>look like the unions we're going to take this? Hi? Um.

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 1>I think in the very beginning it was a little

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 1>bit close. It was hard to see maybe which way

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 1>it would go. But as soon as they started counting

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the vote, Amazon quickly pulled ahead. They spent about three

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>hours counting the votes yesterday and Amazon was ahead UM

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>at the close yesterday evening, and this morning, just in

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the past hour and a half or so, Um, Amazon

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>pulled even further ahead. And so now, like you said,

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 1>they have a large majority of the of the votes

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 1>here and it doesn't look like there's any way that

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the the union side could could catch up at this point. Molly,

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 1>what do you think both sides again here Amazon in

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the unions will learn from what happened in Alabama? Is

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 1>this just the beginning what will likely be more efforts

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 1>to unionized parts of Amazon dot Com. It will definitely

0:15:57.320 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>be interesting to see. It's, you know, give in the

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>fact that you know, Amazon did win here. This is

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of the status quo going forward with them. They've

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>always been anti union. This was a hard effort from

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the beginning for the UM the retail union here in Alabama.

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>But given the Biden administration support for unionization and the

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 1>support for workers rights to unionize, they could get a

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>little extra federal support in the movement across the country

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>and try this again in other um, in other factories

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>at Amazon and other warehouses and factories that Amazon has

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 1>across the country. Molly, to some extent, you are You're

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>a tech reporter, but you're also kind of a gig

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>worker reporter, right, because a lot of these tech companies

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>rely on gig workers, and there's been some push for change,

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 1>but in the big headline cases, the gig worker seems

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>to have lost out. I'm thinking about Uber and California,

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 1>which is I think doubly interesting because it's a really

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 1>an historically left leaning state, right, and they still voted

0:16:57.520 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 1>against giving those workers the same kind of it's that

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:05.920
<v Speaker 1>salaried workers have. Why is this, I mean, well, the

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the Yeah, the gig worker situation is challenging and interesting

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:14.879
<v Speaker 1>for for many reasons. I mean, in this case, these

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 1>are I wouldn't say that you can categorize them necessarily

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 1>as gig workers at the factory they have you know,

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>they do have some uh they have regular hours and

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:27.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're basically part time or even full time workers,

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 1>so it's a little bit of a of a different

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:34.119
<v Speaker 1>situation here. So Molly, it's um, you know, one point

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>three million employees at Amazon. This is it's just an

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>area that I would think you needs can't ignore. So

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>what's the next steps do we think? Well, they're already

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 1>making UM noise about challenging this, uh this this vote here,

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>saying that Amazon you know, put pressure on on workers

0:17:56.320 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 1>in mandatory information sessions, trying to you know, it's maybe

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:06.719
<v Speaker 1>not explicitly threatened them, but definitely lean hard on reasons

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:09.399
<v Speaker 1>why they should not join the union. And they sided

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Amazon putting up a mailbox on the site of the

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 1>warehouse UM as kind of a threatening gesture to workers.

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:19.880
<v Speaker 1>So they're definitely already saying that they're going to um

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 1>go after, you know, to to challenge this vote. So

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I have no doubt that there will be a whole

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:27.680
<v Speaker 1>series of legal challenges and issues going forward from this.

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>So this probably isn't just an open end shut vote today,

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 1>so we'll see some more challenges to that going forward

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>for sure. All Right, Molly, thank you so much for

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 1>joining us. It's really a fascinating story. Developing here at

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Amazon dot com. Molly Shoots, us technology editor. Uh about

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg again, I'm sorry talking about Amazon, and uh, it's

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>interesting here the in Alabama, Amazon wins this round against

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the union. Brad Bretti joins us. He senior wealth advisor

0:18:57.040 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 1>from Mainstay Capital Management. They have three and a half

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.920
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars worth of assets under management out of Michigan.

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:08.679
<v Speaker 1>But more importantly, he's been working on the annual Engage

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:13.879
<v Speaker 1>Undergraduate Investment Investment Conference. As Paul was saying, it is

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the largest collegiate investment conference in North America and it

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>is also sponsored by the Gate David Kudla Foundation. So um,

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Brad tell us about the point of the conference, where

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the goals of the event. Yeah, good morning, Paul, Matt.

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 1>This is bread and I'm very thankful to be a

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:34.719
<v Speaker 1>part of the process. You know, David Coudla is our

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 1>CEO of main State Capital Management, really has made this

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 1>conference the pillar of his ongoing philanthropic endeavors. And what

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:44.480
<v Speaker 1>we're able to do is attract the bust in the

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:48.160
<v Speaker 1>brightest minds all across North North America and even globally.

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:54.399
<v Speaker 1>Students from Harvard, Yale, Stanford, Princeton, Uh, Duke Paul, I

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>know which is uh uh you're all mo monitor to

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:01.720
<v Speaker 1>to um free nba um. But bring them in right

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:05.359
<v Speaker 1>and have them compete in a real, live stock pitch competition.

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:08.439
<v Speaker 1>This isn't um you know, a false or or a

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>made up company. But they're able to pick uh any

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 1>any company that's public. They can pitch a long or

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:18.159
<v Speaker 1>a short and dig into all the details some of

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the I'll be honest, some of these presentations that are given,

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 1>they're fantastic and um. They get to pitch these live

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and they get feedback from not just a professor, but

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>industry executive level professionals so CEOs of investment firms, private

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 1>equity chief strategists, and receive real life feedback um and

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:43.120
<v Speaker 1>so quite frankly, it really serves as a launchpad um

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>for the next generation of financial leaders, right, people that

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 1>are interested in our industry and finance investment world. And

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:53.199
<v Speaker 1>they come and compete with the very best across the

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 1>globe and see how they stuck up and then receive

0:20:56.840 --> 0:21:00.040
<v Speaker 1>feedback in real time, like I said, and it's and

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>it's been excellent. I've spoke to not only just partisans,

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:05.879
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna hear about when are we gonna because I

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 1>want to know who's the winner and what's the stock idea.

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to have that kid on my show. Yeah, yeah, no, absolutely.

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 1>So the actual Investment Undergraduate Conference spotun by David Koup

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:19.359
<v Speaker 1>Foundation is underway as we speak. So the final rounds

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 1>are going to be held throughout today. At the very

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, they're going to pick a first, second,

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and third, and they're they're all over the board, UM

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 1>as far as the different companies that are chosen. But

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 1>it's not just the competition is that great. It is,

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:34.919
<v Speaker 1>but during the entire event, David's able to bring together

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:38.640
<v Speaker 1>UM Federal Reserve officials. As you guys mentioned previously, you're

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's very own Kathleen Hayes is gonna be going live

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:45.440
<v Speaker 1>very shortly with Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas President Robert Kaplan. Um.

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Later on in the day, we have an executive member

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 1>of Mainstay Capitals team, Michael Braza, will be interviewing to

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 1>have a fireside chat with Melody Hobson, President co CEO

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Arial Investments, Board chair of Starbucks, on the JP Morgan Board,

0:21:57.080 --> 0:22:00.199
<v Speaker 1>many many other roles. UM but it's able to and

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 1>there's questions and answer sessions. These aren't just watching people

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 1>you know on TV on YouTube, interacting directly with these

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:11.440
<v Speaker 1>officials that quite frankly, it energizes a eighteen, nineteen twenty

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 1>year old and my my myself, uh, at my age

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>in my role, I'm very excited to be a part

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of it. Um. I can only imagine as a young

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 1>uh just you know, double it, but uh, as a

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 1>eighteen nineteen twenty year old right to be able to

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:31.440
<v Speaker 1>hear from somebody in those different roles. Uh, it really

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 1>just serves as a launchpad um to project and because

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 1>let's face it, these kids, right are the next people

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 1>in our industry, in the media industry, running hedge funds,

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>investment companies and the like. So very excited, all right, Brad.

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>So obviously this year is different for all of us here. Uh,

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:52.479
<v Speaker 1>your conference this year is virtual. Tell us about some

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:55.879
<v Speaker 1>of the you know how that's going. Yeah, it is,

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>so obviously we this is an annual event and David's

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 1>actually been putting on and involved heavily with investment conferences

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:04.919
<v Speaker 1>for the better part of a decade. It's usually always

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:08.159
<v Speaker 1>in person. Obviously, with everything going on throughout the country,

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 1>especially here in Michigan. Um, it is a virtual event,

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:15.400
<v Speaker 1>but quite frankly, it's been able to attract even more participation.

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 1>We have a group joining us from the Republic of Kazakhstan.

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:22.439
<v Speaker 1>We have multiple Canadian groups and competitors that are joining it.

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's nice. Um, you know, I think we're all

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 1>getting more acclimated to zoom or to a virtual interaction

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>than we were maybe a year or so ago. UM,

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 1>So we're not gonna let anything slow us down. Engage

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 1>is going to march forward. Have you seen any of

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:41.159
<v Speaker 1>the pitches so far? Has anything moved you? Uh? You

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:43.880
<v Speaker 1>know what? Here's honestly what's moved. The teams are made

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>up of four or five individuals, but these are the

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 1>spokespersons for their respective college. There are stock pitch clubs

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and finance clubs, groups of on college campuses spread across America.

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 1>Some of the best and brightest minds. There's a twenty

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the thirty slide presentation. Quite frankly, even at my age

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and and uh at my experience level, some of these

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>things are way over my head. Many of the speakers

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:11.120
<v Speaker 1>sometimes and even President Kapitlan will remark Hey, those were

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:13.879
<v Speaker 1>fantastic questions. I wish I was shocked in surprise, right

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 1>or um. It serves as a networking event, to be honest,

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 1>many of these students can obtain maybe an in or

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:24.200
<v Speaker 1>an internship or something moving forward because they're talking with

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the bust and the brightest in our industry. Hey, Brad,

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. We really appreciate

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>that and the best of luck for a good conference today.

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:38.399
<v Speaker 1>Brad Repki, Senior wealth advisor at Mainstay Capital. Thanks for

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:41.959
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:49.400
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Miller three on False Sweeney I'm on Twitter at pt

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Sweeney Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide

0:24:56.440 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg Radio.