WEBVTT - Chuck’s Commentary - Democratic Dysfunction On Full Display + Branding Protest As “Hating America” Is Un-American 

0:00:05.320 --> 0:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Hello, They're happy Thursday, and welcome to another episode of

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the Chuck Podcast, our third for the week. Yes, I

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 1>am wrapping up my visit to the financial capital of

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:21.479
<v Speaker 1>the world here in New York City. Gotten quite a

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:25.759
<v Speaker 1>bit done, learned quite a bit at these various industry

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>summits that I'm learning both on digital media and in

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the world of investment, in the world of the media space.

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:35.959
<v Speaker 1>Just wanted to be a bit transparent about what I'm

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>up to here. I actually have a notebook of items

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I want to get to sort of I'm gonna sit

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:43.599
<v Speaker 1>here and say, have one giant theme to me, it's

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff that I want to alert you guys to that

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to surface sort of things that I think

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:51.879
<v Speaker 1>are percolating, that are coming around the corner. But we're

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>going to go ahead and start with a quick update

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>on the shutdown. And I say that because I don't,

0:00:57.400 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's really nothing to update. As my friend

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and Brendan Buck tweeted our early on Wednesday, he said,

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:04.320
<v Speaker 1>there was not a single story I think it was

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>in the Wall Street Journal of the Washington Post about

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>any update on the shutdown, and it was just it's

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:18.760
<v Speaker 1>it is not having a impact in the larger media space.

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>And again it goes back to one reason. You know,

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>we are now organized. Whether that's good or I'd saying

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>this is a good thing, this is just the reality.

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>But the entire political media ecosystem is really organized around Trump,

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and Trump's just not engaged at all in this shutdown.

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:41.559
<v Speaker 1>My friend George Conden, who works over at National Journal,

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>he's been there a long time, long enough that he

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and I were colleagues at National Journal before I left

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to go to NBC. He did some terrific analysis on

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of the lack of engagement by this president on

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the shutdown issue, and he compared it to the big

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>shutdown that happened in his first term and how engaged

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>he was in there. So I want to read a

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit from Condon's story here in National Journal this week.

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Since the current shutdown began in October one, Condon rights

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Trump has met in the Oval Office with the leaders

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>of Canada and Finland. He's traveled to Israel in Egypt,

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and he's meeting this week with the presidents of Argentina

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>and Ukraine. He has not met with any Democratic Party leaders.

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>While the trip Israel in Egypt made a lot of

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>sense no matter what. It is worth noting that Trump

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>is also planning later this month to go to Malaysia,

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>South Korea, and Japan. These are more routine trips. Their

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>meetings with these various international associations at the United States

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>dabbles in the Asia Pacific Economic Conference APEK. It's known

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 1>as the Association of Southeasts Asian Nations. These are all

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 1>places that the United States likes to be a part of.

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:57.359
<v Speaker 1>They're basically collections of Asian countries that want to put

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>a check on China in some form or another. What's

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:04.679
<v Speaker 1>interesting is that these summits always take place around this

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 1>time of year, and if we were in a government shutdown,

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:11.080
<v Speaker 1>both Bill Clinton Barack Obama didn't go to these events.

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 1>If they were in the middle of a shutdown. Both

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>of them thought it was a bad political look if

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>they were continuing the business of the country overseas, spending

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>money overseas while people weren't getting paid there. And Donald

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Trump himself during and this is where Condon did some

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 1>terrific analysis. In the thirty five days between December twenty second,

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighteen and the reopening of the government on January

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifth, twenty nineteen, Donald Trump tweeted. Back then he

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>was tweeting there was no truth Social. He hadn't been

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>deplatformed from Twitter yet. He tweeted thirty seven times about

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the shutdown, and the post projected a mix of frustration

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and sense of urgency. That was the thirty five days.

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>So far, we've been in this shutdown for fourteen days.

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Trump has posted only seven times on the shutdown on

0:03:57.080 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 1>truth Social, and he's only posted twice since the second day,

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 1>so twelve of those were in the first essentially thirty

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>six hours. But since then he has posted thirty two

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>times on foreign policy, sixteen times in the Middle East,

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>five times on the Nobel Peace Prize, eleven times on

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:16.479
<v Speaker 1>his grievances with the FBI, the Russia probe, and Jim Comy.

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 1>It goes back to what I've said now for I

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know three straight podcast openings, which is this is

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>going nowhere until Democrats find a way to engage Trump.

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 1>The congressional Republicans cannot negotiate without Trump in the room.

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:39.039
<v Speaker 1>They have no standing, right. Mike Johnson has no He

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>cannot do this without Donald Trump. He has never been

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>able to pass a vote without the help of Donald

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Trump among House Republicans. So there is you know, the

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>only entity to negotiate with is the White House, and

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Democrats can't get Trump to engage. Trump

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want to engage. Whatever it is. This and again,

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.719
<v Speaker 1>and I will say the same thing that I said

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:07.279
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hours ago. Every day now that this goes

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>is one day less that this becomes politically. You know,

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I know that Democrats think they've won something out of

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 1>this so far, and I think that you can. I

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>think it's clear that they've made healthcare a bit more

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 1>front and center on the mines, and we're now seeing

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>other reasons why healthcare. You're going to see the premium

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>notices go out on November first. That will get some attention.

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>It's why I think actually that the Democrats probably made

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>a tactical mistake in triggering this shutdown when they did.

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I think they would have been better off triggering the

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 1>shutdown after those premium hike notices went out of November first,

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:47.840
<v Speaker 1>not before. But the problem they have now is every

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>day this goes on, more damage is done to the

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>federal government. Russell Voyd fires more people, targets more blue areas,

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I want to get to that in a minute, and

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Creds may start to lose sort of the momentum that

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:06.840
<v Speaker 1>they believe they were getting on the healthcare issue. Again,

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Democrats are terrible about declaring victory. They don't know how

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>to ever act like they've won something and when they're

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 1>actually they're actually winning this argument. But the longer they

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:19.839
<v Speaker 1>go they will not They will lose whatever they've gained here,

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and you can kind of tell they're kind of flailing here.

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:26.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Schumer knows how to get Trump in

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the room. That's clearly a problem. Jeffreys doesn't. So if

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:35.479
<v Speaker 1>they're the two lead negotiators here, it's in that sense,

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>if you can't get in the room to negotiate with

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the person you have to negotiate, you're not doing a

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 1>very good job leading here. So this is I don't

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>think this is going to age. Well, we'll see, but

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:52.599
<v Speaker 1>again Trump's not engaged. That's a huge issue. But I

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:56.479
<v Speaker 1>want to point out something this sort of the way

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:59.599
<v Speaker 1>that Trump administration is targeting things and and sort of

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>how stuff their math is. So we've seen that Russell

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Voyd omb he's trying to essentially cut programs or cancel

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 1>funding or suspend funding. And it's targeting blue areas, right,

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>They're targeting the Democratic agencies, the Democratic this prominent geographic

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>areas they've targeted, or you know, funding for things in

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 1>and around LA County, funding for things in and around Chicago,

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and funding for things in and around New York. Well,

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the things I'd love to remind and I

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and I just did a data deep dive on this.

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 1>So Donald Trump received one point one eight nine million

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 1>votes in LA County. Okay, Yes, Kamala Harris got one

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 1>point three million more than him. Okay, it is a

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>blue county. But the raw number of Republican votes that

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump received in LA County one point one eight

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 1>nine million. That is more raw vote than he received

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>in fifty states that he carried Alaska, Arkansas, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada,

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming.

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>There are more Trump voters that they're punishing in LA

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>County than any of those fifteen states that I talked about.

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>This administration's inability to understand that they're supposed to be

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the president of the entire country. When they start nitpicking

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:34.840
<v Speaker 1>at quote unquote blue areas or blue states, they're punishing

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people that supported them, a lot of

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 1>their own supporters who have it comes across as if

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 1>they have no respect for the system and no respect

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>for some of their own voters. And by the way,

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:51.680
<v Speaker 1>in Cook County he received over five one hundred and

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>eighty thousand votes. Well, in case you're wondering, that's more

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>raw vote, all right, he got crushed in Cook County.

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 1>It is a blue county, but total was more than

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the raw votes he got out of Alaska, out of Idaho,

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>out of Montana, out of Nebraska, out of North Dakota,

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:14.319
<v Speaker 1>out of South Dakota, out of Utah, and out of Wyoming.

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>That's eight states. It's it is, it is sort of.

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>It really is a bit self defeating. And by the way,

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 1>you want to add more states to that. He received

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>over eight hundred thousand votes in the five boroughs of

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>New York City. When you put that together, and that

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 1>would mean more votes than what he got in Alaska,

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 1>more votes than what he got in Kansas, more votes

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and what he got in Mississippi, more votes than what

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 1>he got in West Virginia. So you see the point

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm making here, This sort of what they think the

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>own the Libs move is right, They're just attacking hundreds

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 1>of thousands of their own voters. Now maybe they think, oh, well,

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>this will teach those Trump voters from living in these

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:06.679
<v Speaker 1>blue areas, I guess. Or maybe they're trying to punish

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic voters and get whatever whatever they think they're accomplishing.

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>They're not accomplishing with this. So it is this is

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>this may unfortunately end up motivating Democrats to keep sticking

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 1>this out because they are it is triggering the Trump

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>administration to do a lot of dumb things. Here the

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>House Republicans are behaving bizarrely. Here Mike Johnson's inability to

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>swear in a duly elected member of Congress in a

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 1>now certified election down from Arizona at Alita Grialva, the

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>daughter of Raoul Garalva, who passed away a few months ago.

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I have to tell you I am not the quickest

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:55.679
<v Speaker 1>person to jump down a conspiracy theory hole. Don't get

0:10:55.679 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 1>me wrong. I'll let me a good conspiracy theory. But

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to now now I understand why all the

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:07.679
<v Speaker 1>Epstein folks are saying, Hey, what are they afraid of?

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Are they really afraid of seeing this vote forced? I mean,

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a headst Obviously, Mike Johnson's trying to

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 1>prevent putting Republicans on the record on these Epstein files, right,

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 1>they don't. And that's there's no doubt there's something here

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>where Republican leadership is petrified of forcing because guess what

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:32.200
<v Speaker 1>this If the Epstein vote does hit the floor of

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the House, it's going to get four hundred votes because

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have all the Democrats vote for it, and

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 1>you're going to have at least one hundred if not more,

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Republicans vote for it because they don't want to be

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>on the record. It's somehow not voting it. And it's

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 1>actually a safe vote because the Senate isn't ever going

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 1>to you know, this is just simply a vote in

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the House. So it is the only motivation I can

0:11:56.920 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 1>see if Epstein really is the motive, And I don't

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 1>know any other reason other than Epstein at this point, right,

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Johnson is really sort of losing his rationale. He keeps

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 1>changing his rationale, so it's making it's making even the

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 1>biggest skeptic like me think, wow, you guys are this

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 1>paranoid about the Epstein files vote. Unbelievable? So what is

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the paranoia. It is about a whole bunch of Republicans

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:24.599
<v Speaker 1>not wanting to upset Donald Trump who doesn't want this

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>vote to happen. That's pretty clear. And we know many

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 1>of these House Republicans have been so public in their

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:34.440
<v Speaker 1>demand for the Epstein files to be released that they

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:37.720
<v Speaker 1>that they cannot go back to there. They're afraid of

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 1>going back to their constituents and not having to do that.

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 1>So it is a it is It is fascinating to

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 1>watch this. I do think this is what happens right

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:52.719
<v Speaker 1>the shutdowns. It's sort of like when you may think

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 1>you know how to start one, but nobody it is

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>amazing how hard it is to end one, even though

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>logic lee. And again this goes back to a rant

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>from two weeks ago. The government should never be allowed

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>to be put in this situation. And the fact that

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:14.199
<v Speaker 1>the government just decides that it is going to abide

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:18.319
<v Speaker 1>by this absurdity that we somehow aren't going to pay

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:22.320
<v Speaker 1>our bills if there's a funding dispute in Congress is

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 1>no way to run It's no way to run a country,

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 1>it's no way to run a company, it's no way

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:31.080
<v Speaker 1>to run a household. No rational person would behave this way,

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 1>but unfortunately Washington is filled with the irrational. The big thing,

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the big moments this weekend we're going to

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>learn a lot, a little bit about sort of language

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and all this stuff is the No King's protest. There's

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:53.680
<v Speaker 1>been some really disgusting language. The Speaker of the House,

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:58.439
<v Speaker 1>Mike Johnson, described the planned protests. I don't think it

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:00.679
<v Speaker 1>will end before the Hate America Rally on the ball

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 1>on Saturday, where all the Marxist and Antifa people and

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:06.319
<v Speaker 1>all the people who hate Trump and hate America will

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 1>be there. This idea that if you don't, if you

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>protest something Donald Trump does, you hate America is the

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:17.559
<v Speaker 1>single most undemocratic thing you can actually accuse a fellow

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>American of doing. The whole point of being in America

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 1>is the right to disagree. We founded this country on

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a fuck you Britain man. Yes, I'm not going to

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>apologize for it, but this is one of those that

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 1>this is who we are. We have the right to

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 1>flip the bird at people. We have the right to protest.

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>It is smack dab in the First Amendment. And one

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of the dumber arguments that you hear people say is

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>well somebody paid for a protest, Well, who gives a shit? Sorry,

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I get and this stuff. It's it's just this is

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>do you know nothing about the founding of this country

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>When you sit here and and essentially accuse anybody of

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>protesting their government as being on a American It is

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the most American thing you can do, the most patriotic

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>thing you can do, is to protest your government, because

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>in this country it is it is a right, not

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>a privilege. It is a right written into our constitution.

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 1>So the behavior I'm old enough to remember when these

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>were the free free speech absolutionists, right, which then brings

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>me to the JD Vance defense of those awful telegram

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>chat techs that were released on from the young Republicans.

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>The whole thing is such a weird story. I mean,

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 1>first of all, it is this, Here's what's troubling, right

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>that these young Republicans believe there's a they've been given

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>a permission slip by the MAGA movement in Trump to

0:15:56.320 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 1>just casually talk about gas chambers and Nazis and all

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>all this hateful rhetoric. What's really troubling is that these

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 1>young Republicans think that this is this is okay in

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the new Trump dominated Republican Party. We are in this

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 1>moment right and I connected back to the incredibly rude

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 1>behavior of the golf fans at best page Black. This

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 1>is we are culturally. Donald Trump has culturally changed us,

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and there are many people who think the best way

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>to become Trump is to behave like these hooligans did.

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 1>What's interesting here is how they're all there's this weird

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Apparently one of the guys involved says, this is part

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of a long conspiracy theory. This is what the political

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>article noted, and this gets it to the bizarre world

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 1>of MAGA and this I think you know how the

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>whole lower lumer nonsense works. So one of the young

0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Republicans claim that the release of the chat is part

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of a quote highly coordinated, year long character assassination led

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 1>by a guy named Gavin Wax and the New York

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:11.919
<v Speaker 1>City Republican Club. Everything is always a conspiracy and people

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of a grievance against them and all of this

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:23.639
<v Speaker 1>it is it really is sort of it to me,

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 1>is emblematic of the culture that has been created in

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>this young mega movement. And what's interesting is the lack

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of consistency among those that try to champion speech and

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:37.199
<v Speaker 1>free speech right. This in some ways is you know,

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you want to be anti woke, apparently

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>it's become a permission slip to say whatever the hell

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:45.400
<v Speaker 1>you want about anybody, right, That is what's anti woke.

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:48.639
<v Speaker 1>What's fascinating, though, is to watch people like JD Vance

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>trying to apologize for these for these folks, but say

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that these awful things that are being said by these

0:17:56.640 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 1>young Republicans, hey it's just nothing but a college group chat.

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:04.640
<v Speaker 1>But the leaked text from the former Virginia delegate who's

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 1>running for attorney general in Virginia, J Jones, you know

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:11.159
<v Speaker 1>that those are much worse. Here's the thing. If you

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:13.880
<v Speaker 1>believe that there should be no speech police at all,

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 1>which is what the mag of movement and Jade Vance

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 1>campaigned on and Donald Trump campaigned on. Jade Vance went

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 1>to Europe to lecture Europeans on speech. But there's and

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 1>he's always willing when somebody on his side of the

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 1>aisle says something stupid, They should be forgiven. When somebody

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't like says something stupid, they should be prosecuted. Okay,

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:39.359
<v Speaker 1>this is somebody who does not understand the Constitution. I

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>know JD. Van's Vance went to Yale Law School. I

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 1>assume Yale's going to ask for their law for their

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>degree back because he does not understated. He clearly didn't

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 1>pass constitutional law with with what he's doing here. But

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>what's really frustrating here is the fact is both are shameful.

0:18:57.040 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 1>The fact that Jay Jones fantasized about what he did

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 1>shameful and disqualifying. And the fact that these young Republicans

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 1>behave this way is incredibly disqualifying. And those that are

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 1>losing their jobs deserve to lose their jobs. Okay, they

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:14.120
<v Speaker 1>need to make they do need to pay a penalty

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:18.640
<v Speaker 1>for what they did. It's free speech, but nobody says

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:22.120
<v Speaker 1>there aren't consequences for your behavior and for your speech.

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>But the fact that JD. Vance does not understand that

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>this is a culture that's being created on the right

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 1>that's celebrating the anti woke has turned into permission to

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:39.439
<v Speaker 1>say anything and a celebration of hateful rhetoric. If you

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 1>don't like hateful rhetoric thrown at you, then you should

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:46.880
<v Speaker 1>denounce hateful rhetoric that's thrown at others. And if you're

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 1>uncapable of doing that, then you're incapable of being a

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 1>leader in the United States of America. I know I'm

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of preaching to people who understand this and those

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>of you that listeners sort of you guys are coming

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:02.879
<v Speaker 1>from the rationally frustrat I assume uh is most of

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:05.119
<v Speaker 1>most of the folks. But I have found all this

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:08.880
<v Speaker 1>and I'm really concerned about what we may see from

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 1>the right in an attempt to weaponize what's said or

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 1>what's done on these protest in these protests, do I

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:19.119
<v Speaker 1>think you know the thing is politically to me, I

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:24.360
<v Speaker 1>think the more the Trump administration tries to denounce these protests,

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the more energy they're going to give to them, the

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:29.680
<v Speaker 1>more attention they're going to receive, and the more politically

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 1>problematic they're going to become. That's the irony here. The

0:20:34.640 --> 0:20:36.920
<v Speaker 1>more they the more they go after this, the the

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:42.159
<v Speaker 1>worse off they're gonna that this, the more impactful that

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 1>they have a potential chance to be here. But it's

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to just the lack of consistency, and I know nothing

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 1>matters anymore, right, consistency doesn't matter. Principles have been thrown

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:58.119
<v Speaker 1>out the window. But particularly JD. Vance, who does sort

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:05.440
<v Speaker 1>of play and intellectual, his incredible lack of consistency on

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:10.359
<v Speaker 1>his belief system is startling and the lack of self

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 1>awareness about it is something. There's a reason results matter

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 1>more than promises, just like there's a reason. Morgan and

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Morgan is America's largest injury law firm. For the last

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:30.359
<v Speaker 1>thirty five years, they've recovered twenty five billion dollars for

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 1>more than half a million clients. It includes cases where

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:37.160
<v Speaker 1>insurance companies offered next to nothing, just hoping to get

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>away with paying as little as possible. Morgan and Morgan

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 1>fought back ended up winning millions. In fact, in Pennsylvania,

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 1>one client was awarded twenty six million dollars, which was

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>a staggering forty times the amount that the insurance company

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:52.919
<v Speaker 1>originally offered. That original offer six hundred and fifty thousand

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 1>dollars twenty six million, six hundred and fifty thousand dollars.

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>So with more than a thousand lawyers across the country,

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>they know how to deliver for everyday people. If you're injured,

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 1>you need a lawyer. You need somebody to get your back.

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Check out for the People dot com, Slash podcast or

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>now Pound Law, Pound five two nine law on your

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 1>cell phone. And remember all law firms are not the same,

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>So check out Morgan and Morgan. Their fee is free

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:24.160
<v Speaker 1>unless they win a few of the notes I want

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to hit the Voting Rights Act and the Supreme Court

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 1>argument today. I know there's a lot of concern on

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the left, a lot of concern among Democrats that the essentially,

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:39.159
<v Speaker 1>if the rest of the Voting Rights Act gets gutted,

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>that this is going to be an automatic win for

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:46.439
<v Speaker 1>Republicans in a sort of remapping of congressional seats, and

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:51.640
<v Speaker 1>an automatic loss for Democrats. I'm not so sure. I'm

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 1>old enough. My first professional year covering American politics was

0:22:54.960 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the ninety two campaign. That was a year of brand

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:04.160
<v Speaker 1>new districts, and at the time, the Bush forty one

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Justice Department worked pretty closely with the Congressional Black Caucus

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:10.400
<v Speaker 1>to interpret the Voting Rights Act in such a way

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:15.439
<v Speaker 1>to essentially try to create as many majority African American

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 1>seats as they could in the South. And the reason

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:21.920
<v Speaker 1>this was one of those the Congressional Black Caucus wanted

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to increase its ranks, and the Bush forty one Justice

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:32.119
<v Speaker 1>Department wanted to pack more Democrats into pack more Democrats

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:35.439
<v Speaker 1>into fewer districts. What would that do? So one of

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:38.920
<v Speaker 1>my favorite examples at the time, there was eleven congressional

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:43.880
<v Speaker 1>districts in Georgia at the time in nineteen ninety Democrats

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>had eight Democratic House seats and Republicans had three by

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety two. In January of ninety three, I believe

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:55.399
<v Speaker 1>it went from eight. It literally was eight three again,

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 1>eight Republican seats and three Democratic seats, and I believe

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 1>all three Democratic seats were African Geordie, African American or

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 1>at least plurality African American. So I'm not so sure

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>that this. You know, again, everybody thinks they understand how

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 1>easily they can pack, crack and pack districts, do the

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 1>hub and spoke model as we've seen, you know, But

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 1>if this idea that if if you don't have to

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 1>do a majority African American district, that this is automatically

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 1>going to help. If more Democratic vote gets dispersed to

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:34.719
<v Speaker 1>more congressional districts in a given geographic area, you may

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 1>see a lot more swing seats in the in the sunbought.

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 1>This may be a lot harder to Jerrymander than many

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 1>folks are thinking today. So look a few things to

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind with this Supreme Court argument. It does

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:51.920
<v Speaker 1>seem as if Roberts and Kavanaugh are looking to put

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>an end date to the Voting Rights Act on Section two.

0:24:57.119 --> 0:24:58.639
<v Speaker 1>What does that end date look like. It's at the

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 1>end of this decade, aid right, is it a review

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 1>in another four years? Is it throwing it back to

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Congress to come up with an end date. That's something else.

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 1>They're very good at punting, particularly Roberts in capitall. They

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:15.400
<v Speaker 1>do like to sort of see if they can come

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>up with an extraordinarily narrow ruling. I can tell you this,

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think John Roberts wants to be make feeling

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:27.359
<v Speaker 1>as if he is deciding the midterm elections. So I

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 1>anticipate this is going to be narrow. But another thing

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 1>to keep in mind. If this ruling comes out when

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:36.360
<v Speaker 1>most Supreme Court rulings come out, which is late June

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 1>early July, and it does have these dramatic changes into it,

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:42.679
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to impact twenty twenty six, it's just

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 1>too so there'll be too many filing deadlines will have passed,

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:48.879
<v Speaker 1>you won't be able to see that this probably is

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>more likely to impact twenty twenty eight, and frankly is

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:54.680
<v Speaker 1>more likely. I could even you could even see in

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 1>that this will apply to the next census, to the

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:01.879
<v Speaker 1>next reapportionment, which would take place census in twenty thirty

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:06.160
<v Speaker 1>in the next reapportionment in twenty thirty one. So keep

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:09.919
<v Speaker 1>in mind those deadlines. And do you know, I, like

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I said, I'm not as I'm not as convinced that

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 1>this is as clean of a political victory for the right. Now.

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:24.440
<v Speaker 1>There may be other issues. Representation may go down, you know,

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 1>those are some our serious issues that we need to

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:30.639
<v Speaker 1>have a conversation about. But if you're just playing a

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:33.359
<v Speaker 1>numbers game here, I'm not sure this is going to

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:37.200
<v Speaker 1>be as damaging to the Democrats or as helpful to

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans as a lot of what I would say,

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:43.919
<v Speaker 1>the cheap commentary has come. You know, there's just a

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of so much of our reporting and commentary just

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:49.879
<v Speaker 1>comes from does this help the left, does it hurt

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the left? Does its help the right? Doesn't hurt the right,

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and you know, sometimes you just don't know. You can

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:58.879
<v Speaker 1>have a larger conversation about whether do we need this anymore?

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:01.679
<v Speaker 1>Do we not be this? We're going to have disenfranchisement

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:05.680
<v Speaker 1>of African American voters and of African American representation, which

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 1>was the whole point of the Voting Rights Act. That

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:10.920
<v Speaker 1>needs to be the conversation that's had. Everybody is trying

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to apply it to gerrymandering and redistricting. It's why, I

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:15.920
<v Speaker 1>tell you, if you just looked at it through the

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:19.879
<v Speaker 1>data lens, this isn't as clean as the commentary is

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:26.360
<v Speaker 1>making it seem. The other interesting news over the last

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hours so yesterday I made it. At least

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday, I made a bit of a deal about

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the main Senate primary, Graham Platner, the Oyster farmer, Janet Mills,

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:41.119
<v Speaker 1>the sitting governor. For what it's worth, the DSCC claims

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:42.879
<v Speaker 1>that they have not endorsed in the primary, but they

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 1>set up a joint fundraising committee with Janet Mills. Now

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 1>they've set up joint fundraising committees in the past with

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 1>multiple primary candidates. I'll be curious to watch the d

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 1>SCC here do they set up a joint fundraising committee

0:27:58.040 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 1>with Graham Platner, do they offer to send one to

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 1>actually put some uh to make the case that they're

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 1>not taking sides, or maybe they want donors to think, no,

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:14.360
<v Speaker 1>we have a preference here and this is how it's

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 1>going to work. How are they going to operate in Minnesota?

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:20.679
<v Speaker 1>How are they going to operate in Michigan. I'm curious

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 1>with both of those primaries where they we'll see, well,

0:28:23.200 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 1>what's going to happen in Iowa, what's going to happen

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:28.399
<v Speaker 1>in these senate races in the Texas Senate race. So

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I am curious to see if, if if the d

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:36.880
<v Speaker 1>SEC is serious about making it clear they're not endorsing

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Mills in this primary, because they're operating as if she's

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 1>their preferred candidate. But then Kirsten Jelburn, who is the

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 1>d SEC chair, said said that they that they would

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 1>not do an official endorsement. Look, Platner is already on

0:28:56.920 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the air, the U a W has already taken sides

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and isn't sing Platner in this one. And I also

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 1>think the fact that another New England state is going

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 1>to have another sort of generational primary and the big

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 1>one is Seth Moulten, Democratic Congressman from Massachusetts deciding the

0:29:13.400 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>primary Ed Marquis. This is actually the second time Ed

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Markey's had to deal with a Democratic primary that was

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 1>more or less more of a generational argument, and he

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 1>turned it into an ideological argument. In his initial race

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 1>for the Sea against Joe Kennedy the third Joe Kennedy

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 1>was making a he was making a generational argument, and

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 1>essentially Marky Randa Kennedy's left had the backing of AOC.

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 1>In particular, he had become sort of a big champion

0:29:44.800 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 1>of the Green New Deal, and I think he's counting

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 1>on that this time. Seth Moulton comes from a bit

0:29:50.560 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 1>more of the of the middle, I don't know what

0:29:53.520 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 1>you call mainstream liberal versus or you know, sort of

0:29:56.760 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>a closer to the center than Markie is. So it's

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be an interesting test of so Platner and Mills. Platner,

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I think, arguably presents himself as is more populous, more

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 1>progressive than Janet Mills. In the case though, of Molten

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:18.200
<v Speaker 1>and Markey, it's Markey that is going to make the

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 1>case he's more progressive, but he's going to be on

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the older side, So it's gonna be interesting. There's a

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of democratic groups out there calling for generational change.

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 1>The question is is it generational or is it ideological?

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 1>The Markey Molten primary is going to test how many

0:30:33.320 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 1>of these young groups are actually more focused on ideological

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:45.520
<v Speaker 1>purity than generational change. If Molten gets the same support

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 1>that Platner gets from many of these groups, then maybe

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:51.120
<v Speaker 1>it really is generational. But if Markey and Platner have

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 1>more endorsements in common then than than than Molten, uh,

0:30:57.560 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 1>then then if you know, if it's it's sort of

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of if Moulten and Mills have sort of more

0:31:03.080 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 1>of the same endorsements than Platner and Markey or whatever

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 1>that works out, then you'll know that this is more ideological.

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:13.960
<v Speaker 1>So it's going to be fascinating to watch to watch

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that Molten candidacy. There two other nuggets I want to

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 1>mention before letting the weekend go. One is back in

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Virginia a G two. Both are having to do with

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 1>TV ads that I really would like you guys to

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 1>take a look at. One is a new ad from

0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Attorney General in Virginia, Jason Mires addressing Abigail

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Spaanberger voters. And what's interesting here is so in the

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Virginia Governor's race, Winston Earl Sars, who's basically thrown spaghetti

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 1>at the wall to try to make to try to

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:49.479
<v Speaker 1>pick up ground on Spamburger, has been desperately trying to

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 1>use the texting controversy of the AG's race to try

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 1>to make look like Spamberger is somehow supportive, won't denounce

0:31:57.960 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Jones enough. But guess what. The Mira's campaign has obviously

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 1>decided Spamberger's already has got this race in the back.

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:09.800
<v Speaker 1>So they've got an ad out that essentially says, hey, look,

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Spanberger refuses to endorse j Jones, and they play clips

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 1>from the debate where she will not reiterate her endorsement

0:32:18.280 --> 0:32:21.479
<v Speaker 1>for Jay Jones. She's asked multiple times during the debate,

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and she will not. She says it is up to

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 1>everyone's individual decision on how they're going to vote in

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 1>that race. Essentially, it was Spanberger giving her permission slip, going,

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I'm not vouching for this guy. I'm

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 1>certainly not going to put my campaign in jeopardy to

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 1>help out this guy. And she made that clear during

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the debate. She didn't say don't vote for him, but

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 1>she didn't say to vote for him. Now you got Winston.

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Merl Sears' campaign is trying to say, aha, it means

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 1>she secretly supports them. Jason Miaris Republican Attorney Jay are

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:57.360
<v Speaker 1>going aha, See she doesn't. She's giving you a permission slip.

0:32:57.600 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 1>The ad is addressed to Spanburger voters, essentially saying, look,

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:05.800
<v Speaker 1>she's giving you she may not be voting for him.

0:33:05.880 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 1>She's not comfortable with it. You don't have to be

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 1>comfortable with it either. It's a fascinating ad. It is

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a subtle way of Mirs throwing winsome Earl Sears under

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the bus, going look, we know she can't win. We

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 1>know who the next governor's going to be. So hey,

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Abigail Spamberger, voters, are you sure you want this guy?

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 1>J Jones is the chief law enforcement officer anyway. A

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 1>fascinating development in that race, and frankly kind of predictable

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 1>because it did seem it some I've said this before.

0:33:37.320 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 1>If the governor's race were closer, Spamberger would have called

0:33:40.080 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 1>for him to get out of the race. I think

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:44.719
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it isn't closer. She's trying to not

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 1>engage in that issue, or engage in it as little

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:52.080
<v Speaker 1>as she possibly can. And now in some ways Mirs

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 1>has just inoculated her because he's going to be up

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 1>with an ad that's probably going to have more money

0:33:57.400 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 1>behind it than what Winston Earl Series is. If you're

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the in Earl Series campaign, you hate this ad. You're

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:08.759
<v Speaker 1>frustrated because it is essentially me are is giving Spamberger

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a pass and in some ways inadvertently praising the fact

0:34:14.200 --> 0:34:16.919
<v Speaker 1>that she refuses to endorse j Jones. So it really

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 1>does undermine whatever last minute strategy the Winston Earl Series

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 1>campaign thought was going to work for them. And then

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:25.360
<v Speaker 1>one other ad I want to alert you to because

0:34:25.400 --> 0:34:28.080
<v Speaker 1>it it is, and yes it's you know, I have

0:34:28.120 --> 0:34:30.360
<v Speaker 1>a feeling that if somebody wanted to develop a drinking

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:33.040
<v Speaker 1>contest with my podcast, it would be how often he

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:37.360
<v Speaker 1>mentions Florida. Well, I'm about to mention Florida, So drink.

0:34:38.360 --> 0:34:42.319
<v Speaker 1>There is a new Senate candidate that jumped in the race,

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 1>a gentleman by the name of Hector Muhika. He is Venezuela.

0:34:47.719 --> 0:34:51.360
<v Speaker 1>He has worked with Google in the past, and it's

0:34:51.800 --> 0:34:55.319
<v Speaker 1>he's got this personal video that he's put out and

0:34:55.320 --> 0:35:00.319
<v Speaker 1>he's an and what's interesting to me. I think his

0:35:00.360 --> 0:35:02.600
<v Speaker 1>background potentially is interesting and we'll see if he can

0:35:02.640 --> 0:35:05.800
<v Speaker 1>get traction. And he's been he was a Google he

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:10.719
<v Speaker 1>worked in Google phil philanthropy for a while, handing out

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Google money. My guess is he must have some of

0:35:13.120 --> 0:35:15.080
<v Speaker 1>his own. We'll see if he's going to use some

0:35:15.160 --> 0:35:17.600
<v Speaker 1>of his own. But what I wanted to alert you

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 1>were sort of two policy hits that were AI related

0:35:22.239 --> 0:35:24.759
<v Speaker 1>that he used in this. As you know, a few

0:35:24.960 --> 0:35:28.239
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago, I said, I have a feeling that come

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty eight, the most animating issue that you're not

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:33.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to run for president and not

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:40.200
<v Speaker 1>have a some sort of answer to a voter concern

0:35:40.280 --> 0:35:44.400
<v Speaker 1>about AI job displacement. Right, fear of AI job displacement,

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:46.359
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a real thing or not by twenty twenty

0:35:46.400 --> 0:35:48.640
<v Speaker 1>eight won't matter. The fear of it is going to

0:35:48.680 --> 0:35:53.680
<v Speaker 1>be an issue. Well, this Muhika announcement video touches on

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 1>it in a couple of ways that I hadn't seen.

0:35:56.040 --> 0:35:59.560
<v Speaker 1>So he attacks Ashley Moody, who's currently who is the

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:02.719
<v Speaker 1>appointed senator to replace Marco Rubio, who, of course has

0:36:02.719 --> 0:36:06.120
<v Speaker 1>been who's the Secretary of State, National Security Advisor, head

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:10.279
<v Speaker 1>of the Archives, and maybe the chief dog walker two.

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:12.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm not quite sure what other jobs that Trump has

0:36:12.800 --> 0:36:16.719
<v Speaker 1>made him have on that front. But when he could

0:36:16.800 --> 0:36:19.840
<v Speaker 1>hit her and said she is basically on the side

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 1>of the AI. You know that she cheered on the

0:36:22.640 --> 0:36:25.400
<v Speaker 1>federal job cuts which put clean water and all this

0:36:25.440 --> 0:36:31.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff in danger. She is for using AI to get

0:36:31.760 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 1>rid of human jobs. She is for AI to set

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 1>medicare pricing. I found it to be an interesting hit,

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:46.839
<v Speaker 1>and it was clearly here's the Google exec using fear

0:36:46.880 --> 0:36:51.279
<v Speaker 1>of AI as an attack. I don't think he got

0:36:51.320 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 1>it quite right. For what it's worth, I think AI

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:58.440
<v Speaker 1>using AI itself is sort of a double edged sword.

0:36:58.480 --> 0:37:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I think those who know know what AI is are

0:37:01.760 --> 0:37:05.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of are a sort of tech optimists, and you

0:37:05.080 --> 0:37:07.200
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be seen as the candidate not on

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:11.279
<v Speaker 1>the side of progress a more. But I do think

0:37:11.320 --> 0:37:14.920
<v Speaker 1>an older electorates are going to be a bit skeptical

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:19.920
<v Speaker 1>and fearful of AI. And the smarter way to probably

0:37:19.920 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 1>go about this is to say, do you want a

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:25.360
<v Speaker 1>computer deciding what you're what the pricing is on medicare

0:37:25.440 --> 0:37:27.760
<v Speaker 1>or do you think you know or do you think

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 1>that you know human beings should be involved in those decisions.

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you want a computer deciding whether your insurance covers this,

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 1>or do you think human beings ought to be involved

0:37:35.640 --> 0:37:38.279
<v Speaker 1>in that decision. I think talking about it as a

0:37:38.320 --> 0:37:41.120
<v Speaker 1>computer rather than using the phrase AI probably will make

0:37:41.120 --> 0:37:47.239
<v Speaker 1>it more effective. But the real reason I'm learning to

0:37:47.280 --> 0:37:50.280
<v Speaker 1>this ad is I think this is this is my canarios.

0:37:50.320 --> 0:37:52.799
<v Speaker 1>It's the first one I've seen in a Senate race

0:37:52.840 --> 0:37:58.040
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty six to start to put AI in

0:37:58.080 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the mainstream political conversation and fuse it with healthcare pricing,

0:38:02.560 --> 0:38:07.239
<v Speaker 1>fuse it with job displacement. I have a feeling he

0:38:07.320 --> 0:38:10.239
<v Speaker 1>will be the first that this is. He's not going

0:38:10.280 --> 0:38:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to be alone in using AI this way. So again,

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:15.719
<v Speaker 1>take a look at it, see how he did it.

0:38:15.760 --> 0:38:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I Like I said, I think if you're a political

0:38:18.800 --> 0:38:21.600
<v Speaker 1>strategist here trying to trying to figure out how do

0:38:21.640 --> 0:38:26.520
<v Speaker 1>you talk about AI without sounding anti progress, there are

0:38:26.600 --> 0:38:30.239
<v Speaker 1>probably ways to do it that just talk in the

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:32.640
<v Speaker 1>form do you want a computer deciding these things? Or

0:38:32.640 --> 0:38:36.440
<v Speaker 1>do you want a human being who understands the impact

0:38:36.480 --> 0:38:40.680
<v Speaker 1>on your life making these decisions. That is a conversation

0:38:40.800 --> 0:38:43.200
<v Speaker 1>that I think voters do want to have. And I

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:48.239
<v Speaker 1>go back, I think that in a larger sense, I

0:38:48.280 --> 0:38:52.359
<v Speaker 1>think the big the release of the Sora video app. Right,

0:38:52.400 --> 0:38:54.680
<v Speaker 1>We're already two weeks into it, and it feels like

0:38:55.040 --> 0:38:57.480
<v Speaker 1>you can't trust any video now that you see on

0:38:57.520 --> 0:39:01.680
<v Speaker 1>social media. It is going to put a premium on

0:39:01.800 --> 0:39:07.120
<v Speaker 1>human interaction, live in person interaction, and even perhaps in

0:39:07.160 --> 0:39:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the digital realm, being at least live streaming at any

0:39:10.440 --> 0:39:15.480
<v Speaker 1>one time, but the premium. I did this when I

0:39:15.520 --> 0:39:18.720
<v Speaker 1>was doing this talk at this industry conference earlier this week.

0:39:19.440 --> 0:39:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I asked for a show of hands, how many of

0:39:21.040 --> 0:39:24.920
<v Speaker 1>you would pay extra if you knew you could get

0:39:24.960 --> 0:39:28.960
<v Speaker 1>a human customer service rep. And literally two thirds, This

0:39:29.040 --> 0:39:30.759
<v Speaker 1>is a crowd of about five hundred people. Two thirds

0:39:30.800 --> 0:39:35.640
<v Speaker 1>of people put their hands up. It is I do

0:39:35.760 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 1>think this is why I'm weirdly optimistic about all about Right,

0:39:40.160 --> 0:39:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the unintended consequence of AI advancement may be reminding people

0:39:46.680 --> 0:39:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the importance of human connectivity. And if that ends up

0:39:50.680 --> 0:39:54.239
<v Speaker 1>being the unintended consequence of the rise of AI, is

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 1>that so bad? If we end up deciding, hey, the

0:39:59.080 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 1>human element is more valuable than ever that, my friends

0:40:04.680 --> 0:40:18.960
<v Speaker 1>would be serious progress. Well, I hope you enjoyed that

0:40:19.719 --> 0:40:22.080
<v Speaker 1>tour of the world with my friend Mike McFall, and

0:40:22.440 --> 0:40:25.120
<v Speaker 1>do get the book. Yes it's a readable book. Yes

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:27.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a big book. Okay, both things can be true.

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:33.600
<v Speaker 1>And it's a good long holiday weekend set of reading.

0:40:33.640 --> 0:40:35.759
<v Speaker 1>So maybe it's something you think about for either your

0:40:36.040 --> 0:40:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the Turkey week or the end of the year holidays.

0:40:40.960 --> 0:40:43.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's do some questions and then I'll do

0:40:44.000 --> 0:40:46.800
<v Speaker 1>my little college football preview for the week as Chuck.

0:40:49.360 --> 0:40:54.520
<v Speaker 1>This comes from Chase c Little Rock, Arkansas. Anyways. Well

0:40:54.560 --> 0:40:59.279
<v Speaker 1>after another derailed Arkansas Razorback football season. Sigh, my uncle

0:40:59.360 --> 0:41:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Joe concur, I've shifted my attention to the new season

0:41:03.080 --> 0:41:05.440
<v Speaker 1>of The Morning Show. Giving your experience in the industry,

0:41:05.440 --> 0:41:07.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious how closely does the show reflect the inner

0:41:07.840 --> 0:41:10.200
<v Speaker 1>workings of a real network news operation. Is it anywhere

0:41:10.200 --> 0:41:12.920
<v Speaker 1>near reality? Pure dramatized fiction. Would love to hear your take.

0:41:13.719 --> 0:41:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, all right, you're gonna get my whininess about

0:41:16.960 --> 0:41:22.879
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. It is. It is more fiction than real.

0:41:25.520 --> 0:41:27.719
<v Speaker 1>Do they get you know? I would argue in the

0:41:27.760 --> 0:41:32.319
<v Speaker 1>first season you know, and look, I'm never, never a

0:41:32.320 --> 0:41:38.000
<v Speaker 1>fan of these shows as much that involve things that

0:41:38.120 --> 0:41:41.200
<v Speaker 1>involve entities that I've actually been a part of or

0:41:41.239 --> 0:41:44.200
<v Speaker 1>have covered. Right, you know, the West Wing used to

0:41:44.200 --> 0:41:46.960
<v Speaker 1>frustrate me because it is just not how Washington worked.

0:41:49.400 --> 0:41:52.040
<v Speaker 1>It is. It is Veep right, that is more likely,

0:41:52.200 --> 0:41:56.000
<v Speaker 1>certainly at least how the how, the how, how how

0:41:56.160 --> 0:42:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Washington politicians behave and how they really are. Veep is

0:42:01.560 --> 0:42:04.920
<v Speaker 1>more accurate. And it doesn't matter the party of the person.

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:12.560
<v Speaker 1>The sort of the lack of self awareness, the the

0:42:12.800 --> 0:42:22.440
<v Speaker 1>narcissism that Julia Louis Dreyfus's character emits is all very

0:42:22.520 --> 0:42:25.680
<v Speaker 1>much in line. You talk to any political operative left

0:42:25.680 --> 0:42:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and right and they would say, oh, yeah, Veep is

0:42:28.040 --> 0:42:30.440
<v Speaker 1>much closer. So, you know, I used to because I

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:32.239
<v Speaker 1>do think some people watch it and think this is

0:42:32.280 --> 0:42:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the way it should be, and I just would argue,

0:42:34.000 --> 0:42:35.719
<v Speaker 1>the West Wing has never been that way. It is

0:42:36.120 --> 0:42:41.560
<v Speaker 1>literally a utopian version of how life works, or actually

0:42:41.640 --> 0:42:44.440
<v Speaker 1>life never has worked, at least in the political sense.

0:42:45.000 --> 0:42:47.240
<v Speaker 1>And I would argue with the you know, I felt

0:42:47.360 --> 0:42:49.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the Sorkin work, which I love, Right,

0:42:49.760 --> 0:42:51.360
<v Speaker 1>It's just like I love a few good men. But

0:42:51.440 --> 0:42:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the jag world that well, and I'm

0:42:54.640 --> 0:42:57.799
<v Speaker 1>sure it doesn't work that way in real life, right

0:42:58.239 --> 0:43:00.840
<v Speaker 1>that Tom Cruise is going to, you know, bendering away

0:43:01.440 --> 0:43:07.040
<v Speaker 1>at Colonel Jessop and all of that. So I just

0:43:07.360 --> 0:43:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm just, you know, I'm suspect on the Morning Show.

0:43:11.400 --> 0:43:13.480
<v Speaker 1>It is based loosely in a book that was written

0:43:13.480 --> 0:43:17.200
<v Speaker 1>by Brian Stelter about the Morning Show Wars. So what

0:43:17.239 --> 0:43:19.439
<v Speaker 1>I would say is that there was a time when

0:43:19.560 --> 0:43:24.800
<v Speaker 1>there was these outsized personalities. There were the executives behind

0:43:24.800 --> 0:43:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the scenes who felt that they were star makers. We

0:43:28.040 --> 0:43:32.799
<v Speaker 1>will designate you an anchor and you must leave, you know,

0:43:33.200 --> 0:43:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing. And there was some truthiness that

0:43:35.520 --> 0:43:38.040
<v Speaker 1>that is the way it is, but it is really

0:43:38.160 --> 0:43:42.239
<v Speaker 1>more of a twentieth century phenomenon. It led into the

0:43:43.000 --> 0:43:46.399
<v Speaker 1>twenty first century. I mean the I to this day

0:43:46.440 --> 0:43:48.359
<v Speaker 1>don't know if Matt Lauer made the amount of money

0:43:48.360 --> 0:43:52.320
<v Speaker 1>that was reported about him. For those of us even

0:43:52.360 --> 0:43:56.680
<v Speaker 1>within it was a shocking amount, and it certainly made

0:43:56.719 --> 0:43:59.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people related to me assume that I

0:43:59.120 --> 0:44:01.640
<v Speaker 1>was far wealthier than than I am, or I made

0:44:01.680 --> 0:44:05.040
<v Speaker 1>far more money than I actually did. It was always

0:44:05.080 --> 0:44:07.600
<v Speaker 1>an I'll be honest, it was a bit uncomfortable. How

0:44:07.640 --> 0:44:08.920
<v Speaker 1>often it's like, what am I going to do? Go

0:44:08.960 --> 0:44:12.000
<v Speaker 1>out there and say, no, that's just you know. I

0:44:12.000 --> 0:44:14.279
<v Speaker 1>did get a piece of advice once from somebody that said,

0:44:14.320 --> 0:44:18.920
<v Speaker 1>if you never want, if you never want your how

0:44:19.000 --> 0:44:20.879
<v Speaker 1>much you make to leak in the public, don't tell

0:44:20.880 --> 0:44:23.920
<v Speaker 1>anybody because the minute you tell one person somebody is

0:44:23.920 --> 0:44:26.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, outside your basically immediate family, it's going to

0:44:26.680 --> 0:44:29.879
<v Speaker 1>get out. And the fact is, nobody's ever accurately had

0:44:29.880 --> 0:44:35.240
<v Speaker 1>my ever had because I've never told anybody. I refuse.

0:44:35.320 --> 0:44:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't tell any extended family member, Nobody, nobody's business,

0:44:39.520 --> 0:44:45.080
<v Speaker 1>nobody should. These larger contracts, a lot of times there

0:44:45.120 --> 0:44:46.839
<v Speaker 1>are people that want to brag that they were able

0:44:46.880 --> 0:44:49.919
<v Speaker 1>to get that amount of money for somebody. So maybe

0:44:49.960 --> 0:44:52.160
<v Speaker 1>it's an agent, maybe it's a lawyer, maybe it's whatever.

0:44:52.760 --> 0:44:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it's the principle themselves think that it somehow makes

0:44:58.080 --> 0:45:01.480
<v Speaker 1>them a bigger star if they're seen as being worth

0:45:01.520 --> 0:45:05.640
<v Speaker 1>a certain amount of money. So I would say what

0:45:05.680 --> 0:45:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the Morning Show captures sort of what that world was

0:45:10.320 --> 0:45:13.480
<v Speaker 1>like when I first entered it in twenty eight, twenty

0:45:13.480 --> 0:45:16.280
<v Speaker 1>oh seven, twenty eight and twenty oh nine. But literally,

0:45:16.440 --> 0:45:19.040
<v Speaker 1>by the time of the end of the Great Recession

0:45:19.760 --> 0:45:23.200
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twelve and twenty thirteen, the place stopped. You know,

0:45:23.239 --> 0:45:26.560
<v Speaker 1>it was sort of it is, you know, you stopped

0:45:26.560 --> 0:45:30.360
<v Speaker 1>having the larger than life anchors who could get executives fired.

0:45:30.440 --> 0:45:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I did see that in my early days. So, you know,

0:45:36.000 --> 0:45:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the way to watch the morning show is this is

0:45:38.080 --> 0:45:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the way that this world worked for about the first

0:45:42.960 --> 0:45:47.120
<v Speaker 1>decade of the twenty first century. This is not how

0:45:47.320 --> 0:45:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the world of Today's show works or Good Morning America.

0:45:50.800 --> 0:45:54.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm not saying that there isn't some attempt

0:45:54.239 --> 0:45:55.839
<v Speaker 1>in the world of Page six and some of these

0:45:55.840 --> 0:45:58.239
<v Speaker 1>other gossip columns to try to create drama where there

0:45:58.280 --> 0:46:01.080
<v Speaker 1>isn't any, but it has doesn't have near the amount

0:46:01.080 --> 0:46:04.000
<v Speaker 1>of drama because frankly, the stakes have never been lower. Right,

0:46:04.040 --> 0:46:09.319
<v Speaker 1>everybody's losing audience. The fight for exclusives isn't the same anymore.

0:46:09.840 --> 0:46:11.920
<v Speaker 1>But you know, if you were asked me, when is

0:46:12.120 --> 0:46:15.799
<v Speaker 1>the morning show sort of peak? Sort of the zeitgeist

0:46:15.840 --> 0:46:19.640
<v Speaker 1>of it that it's trying to capture in reality is

0:46:19.719 --> 0:46:24.800
<v Speaker 1>somewhere Serkha, I would basically say the peak morning show

0:46:25.040 --> 0:46:32.280
<v Speaker 1>power was probably mid nineties to twenty to twenty twelve,

0:46:33.120 --> 0:46:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and in that sense that that culture which the Morning

0:46:38.480 --> 0:46:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Show still seems to lean on is that. But I

0:46:43.080 --> 0:46:45.439
<v Speaker 1>will make a confession I won't watch it. I watch

0:46:45.560 --> 0:46:51.160
<v Speaker 1>enough to understand where they're going, because I don't even

0:46:51.239 --> 0:46:53.680
<v Speaker 1>want to see how they're trying to portray people that

0:46:54.120 --> 0:46:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I know and they're not portraying them correctly. I don't

0:46:57.160 --> 0:47:01.400
<v Speaker 1>even want to get into that game, and so it

0:47:01.520 --> 0:47:04.239
<v Speaker 1>is kind of why I kind of I'm not a

0:47:04.320 --> 0:47:08.000
<v Speaker 1>viewer of the show anyway. All right, next question comes

0:47:08.000 --> 0:47:10.080
<v Speaker 1>from mattam. Hey love the new podcast. I come for

0:47:10.120 --> 0:47:13.279
<v Speaker 1>the political analysis and stay for the college football talk.

0:47:13.360 --> 0:47:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate saying that there's more college football is coming up.

0:47:15.880 --> 0:47:17.680
<v Speaker 1>In a few minutes. You mentioned how the new rules

0:47:17.719 --> 0:47:19.920
<v Speaker 1>have made FBS football feel more like the NFL. But

0:47:20.040 --> 0:47:22.080
<v Speaker 1>what are your thoughts on fcs and Division two and

0:47:22.120 --> 0:47:25.360
<v Speaker 1>three programs as the truer representation of college athletics. My

0:47:25.480 --> 0:47:28.040
<v Speaker 1>alma mater, Presbyterian College is a great example. For years

0:47:28.040 --> 0:47:30.799
<v Speaker 1>of struggle, they've turned things around and are now six

0:47:30.840 --> 0:47:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and oh, proving that good leadership and love of the

0:47:32.480 --> 0:47:36.160
<v Speaker 1>game still matter. Matt, m Look, I do think you're

0:47:36.200 --> 0:47:41.759
<v Speaker 1>going to see. It's going to be interesting about the

0:47:41.800 --> 0:47:44.759
<v Speaker 1>way D three works and actually how D three could

0:47:44.840 --> 0:47:48.239
<v Speaker 1>end up being sort of for the love of the

0:47:48.280 --> 0:47:53.680
<v Speaker 1>game division on that front, and obviously with some D

0:47:53.760 --> 0:47:56.960
<v Speaker 1>two in that. But I emphasize D three because my

0:47:57.040 --> 0:48:01.239
<v Speaker 1>beloved University Miami Hurricanes won the D three hockey championship

0:48:01.680 --> 0:48:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and they're a W REC team. They never actually are.

0:48:03.800 --> 0:48:06.600
<v Speaker 1>They don't play, they're not a Division one team. They

0:48:06.640 --> 0:48:09.320
<v Speaker 1>don't have an on site facility to practice in or

0:48:09.360 --> 0:48:14.839
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. I think the I think there will

0:48:14.880 --> 0:48:22.399
<v Speaker 1>be somewhere something in between REC and this professionalized minor

0:48:22.480 --> 0:48:27.120
<v Speaker 1>league football that's being created, right which will you know,

0:48:27.160 --> 0:48:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I think you're going to see a whole bunch of

0:48:28.640 --> 0:48:32.959
<v Speaker 1>Division I schools go down to D three. There won't

0:48:32.960 --> 0:48:37.480
<v Speaker 1>be scholarships, and so it will be more of the

0:48:37.640 --> 0:48:43.640
<v Speaker 1>for the love of the game type of stuff, and

0:48:43.760 --> 0:48:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I you know, in that look, sports is still important

0:48:47.239 --> 0:48:50.160
<v Speaker 1>to alumni. Sports is still I'm very friendly with the

0:48:50.160 --> 0:48:54.560
<v Speaker 1>president of GW where I went. She's new president, Ellen Gramberg.

0:48:55.160 --> 0:48:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm biased. I think she's terrific. I think she's been

0:48:57.719 --> 0:49:01.200
<v Speaker 1>a breath of fresh air for the university. She views

0:49:01.320 --> 0:49:05.200
<v Speaker 1>sports as a way to build community. It's look, it's

0:49:05.280 --> 0:49:07.279
<v Speaker 1>there's a financial cost to it if you want to

0:49:07.280 --> 0:49:10.040
<v Speaker 1>be competing on that division IE level, and there's always

0:49:10.040 --> 0:49:12.200
<v Speaker 1>some set of donors that want to do that. But

0:49:12.680 --> 0:49:15.279
<v Speaker 1>she also believes that there's you know, wouldn't be a

0:49:15.280 --> 0:49:17.400
<v Speaker 1>surprise if you see a lot of the mid major

0:49:17.560 --> 0:49:22.040
<v Speaker 1>conferences sort of get cut in half because schools decide

0:49:22.040 --> 0:49:25.759
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to try to keep up financially to

0:49:25.800 --> 0:49:29.600
<v Speaker 1>try to be you know, even just mid level relevant

0:49:29.600 --> 0:49:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and Division I college basketball, for instance, and instead drop

0:49:32.640 --> 0:49:37.000
<v Speaker 1>down to D three and if you can still keep

0:49:37.040 --> 0:49:39.840
<v Speaker 1>a culture, I mean, because that sports does create community

0:49:39.880 --> 0:49:42.600
<v Speaker 1>on college campuses and content and that is part of

0:49:42.640 --> 0:49:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the student experience and it's becoming an important part of

0:49:45.640 --> 0:49:51.440
<v Speaker 1>recruiting students to apply to schools. So I'm hopeful. I

0:49:51.520 --> 0:49:54.480
<v Speaker 1>want it to be that. I want to have that nostalgia,

0:49:56.560 --> 0:49:58.839
<v Speaker 1>But I wonder if we start to see something that's

0:49:58.880 --> 0:50:04.840
<v Speaker 1>a little more that you have. And I'd love to

0:50:04.880 --> 0:50:08.320
<v Speaker 1>see the NCAA change these rules. I think every school

0:50:08.320 --> 0:50:10.520
<v Speaker 1>should be able to find something their Division one in

0:50:10.560 --> 0:50:12.319
<v Speaker 1>and right now, I think you can be Division one

0:50:12.880 --> 0:50:15.320
<v Speaker 1>in one sport and then and then Division three and

0:50:15.360 --> 0:50:18.719
<v Speaker 1>everything else. I think you have that in hockey, there's

0:50:18.760 --> 0:50:20.960
<v Speaker 1>a I think Colorado College is one of those, if

0:50:20.960 --> 0:50:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I if I'm not mistaken, I'd like to see that

0:50:24.280 --> 0:50:27.759
<v Speaker 1>more loosened up a little bit where you pick and

0:50:27.800 --> 0:50:29.719
<v Speaker 1>shows it. You know, because you're you're going to have

0:50:30.200 --> 0:50:33.360
<v Speaker 1>certain sports that maybe you have the alumni financial network

0:50:33.400 --> 0:50:36.440
<v Speaker 1>to support to be Division one, and then certain sports

0:50:36.440 --> 0:50:38.480
<v Speaker 1>that you don't, but you still want to have students

0:50:38.520 --> 0:50:40.960
<v Speaker 1>feel as if there's something to play for and compete

0:50:41.000 --> 0:50:43.759
<v Speaker 1>with and have in the world of Division three. I'd

0:50:43.760 --> 0:50:45.640
<v Speaker 1>love to see a little more flexibility there. I think

0:50:45.680 --> 0:50:48.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a way to sort of keep up the spirit

0:50:48.640 --> 0:50:52.560
<v Speaker 1>of amateur athletics and at the same time embrace this

0:50:52.680 --> 0:50:57.200
<v Speaker 1>new world that's going to that is the reality of

0:50:57.200 --> 0:51:01.920
<v Speaker 1>of of the revenues, the revenues generating sports in college.

0:51:02.800 --> 0:51:08.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, next question. Two part question here comes from

0:51:08.560 --> 0:51:11.640
<v Speaker 1>John from Frisco, Texas. I'm learning more about Frisco, another

0:51:11.640 --> 0:51:15.760
<v Speaker 1>one of these growing ex serb suburbs of the Dallas

0:51:15.840 --> 0:51:18.360
<v Speaker 1>area of the Metroplex. Anyway, two part question. Love the

0:51:18.360 --> 0:51:20.120
<v Speaker 1>show and have followed the podcast from your Meet the

0:51:20.120 --> 0:51:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Press days. Given Greg Abbot's enthusiasm for supporting the Trump

0:51:23.560 --> 0:51:26.680
<v Speaker 1>administration by sending the Texas guard to Chicago. Do you

0:51:26.760 --> 0:51:29.279
<v Speaker 1>think that the Texas governor is using the national notoriety

0:51:29.560 --> 0:51:31.520
<v Speaker 1>as a launching point towards twenty twenty eight in the

0:51:31.520 --> 0:51:34.719
<v Speaker 1>Republican nomination. You've mentioned that members of the administration maybe

0:51:34.760 --> 0:51:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm twenty twenty eight, but may not have as much

0:51:37.239 --> 0:51:39.520
<v Speaker 1>of a resume to run on. Would Abbot be more

0:51:39.560 --> 0:51:42.200
<v Speaker 1>formidable in the primary? Also, what sorts of other non

0:51:42.200 --> 0:51:44.480
<v Speaker 1>political podcasts do you listen to? I think you mentioned

0:51:44.480 --> 0:51:47.880
<v Speaker 1>some economics ones. Would you name some of them here? Thanks?

0:51:47.920 --> 0:51:51.359
<v Speaker 1>Love the show. Go Caines John from Frisco, Texas. So, look,

0:51:51.400 --> 0:51:53.319
<v Speaker 1>I think Abbot wants to be would like to try

0:51:53.320 --> 0:51:55.919
<v Speaker 1>to run for president. I think Dave Carney, his chief

0:51:55.920 --> 0:51:59.520
<v Speaker 1>political advisor, who I've known forever, one of the savvier

0:51:59.600 --> 0:52:04.400
<v Speaker 1>republic strategists out there, has some unique New Hampshire ties,

0:52:05.680 --> 0:52:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and he could certainly help Abbot there. I just don't

0:52:10.160 --> 0:52:14.560
<v Speaker 1>know if Abbot's going to be able to be I

0:52:14.600 --> 0:52:17.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know what his lane is, right. You know, one

0:52:17.160 --> 0:52:19.560
<v Speaker 1>of the stories that I meant to bring up at

0:52:19.560 --> 0:52:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the start of this podcast that I didn't get to

0:52:22.200 --> 0:52:27.440
<v Speaker 1>was the story about how Christy Nomes government paid ad

0:52:27.480 --> 0:52:31.799
<v Speaker 1>campaign praising you know, sort of praising President Trump for

0:52:31.920 --> 0:52:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the elevated deportations. It's funny the coverage of it is

0:52:38.120 --> 0:52:42.320
<v Speaker 1>being portrayed as you know, this ad campaign to support

0:52:42.320 --> 0:52:45.839
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration. I look at it as a taxpayer

0:52:45.880 --> 0:52:49.960
<v Speaker 1>funded ad campaign to promote Christy Nome for president in

0:52:50.000 --> 0:52:54.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty eight. The point is is that you have

0:52:54.760 --> 0:52:57.279
<v Speaker 1>Christy Nome wanting to run for president, Tulsey Gabbert wants

0:52:57.320 --> 0:53:00.560
<v Speaker 1>to run for president, RFK Junior wants to run for president,

0:53:01.520 --> 0:53:03.839
<v Speaker 1>Marco Rubio wants to do it. Maybe he joins as

0:53:03.840 --> 0:53:08.879
<v Speaker 1>a ticket with JD Vance. What what do Donald Trump

0:53:09.000 --> 0:53:11.919
<v Speaker 1>Junior Eric Trump end up doing? I think they both

0:53:11.960 --> 0:53:14.360
<v Speaker 1>have some interesting ambition. Is twenty eighth the year that

0:53:14.400 --> 0:53:16.399
<v Speaker 1>they try to execute it? The point is is that

0:53:17.120 --> 0:53:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and then you have Rand Paul and Glenn Younkin who

0:53:19.640 --> 0:53:22.879
<v Speaker 1>are clearly going to not run as MAGA candidates. All

0:53:22.880 --> 0:53:24.719
<v Speaker 1>these other candidates I mentioned are all going to try

0:53:24.719 --> 0:53:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to be in the Magaline. What is Abbot going to do? Right?

0:53:27.920 --> 0:53:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Abbott in some ways has succeeded in Texas politics because

0:53:31.719 --> 0:53:34.839
<v Speaker 1>he's been He's been somebody that hasn't been seen as

0:53:34.960 --> 0:53:37.840
<v Speaker 1>on one side or the other in this intra party

0:53:37.920 --> 0:53:41.280
<v Speaker 1>war that is happening in Texas. Right, Cornyn v. Paxton

0:53:41.480 --> 0:53:44.919
<v Speaker 1>in the Senate primary is actually more than about John

0:53:45.000 --> 0:53:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Cornyn and more than you know, sort of a maga

0:53:48.160 --> 0:53:51.200
<v Speaker 1>versus the rhinos, whatever you want to to describe that.

0:53:51.239 --> 0:53:55.040
<v Speaker 1>If you're if you're on the snarky right, you know,

0:53:55.200 --> 0:53:57.959
<v Speaker 1>it was it was a Republican controlled House of State

0:53:58.000 --> 0:54:02.279
<v Speaker 1>House or representatives in tech is that impeached Ken Paxton, Right,

0:54:02.400 --> 0:54:05.680
<v Speaker 1>it was. This has been a bipartisan effort, but it's

0:54:05.719 --> 0:54:09.320
<v Speaker 1>really been sort of a divide inside the Texas Republican Party.

0:54:10.400 --> 0:54:14.440
<v Speaker 1>And Abbott you know, is at times nervous about the

0:54:14.480 --> 0:54:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Ken Paxton and Dan Patrick wing. Dan Patrick the lieutenant governor,

0:54:17.840 --> 0:54:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and in Texas, the lieutenant governor in some ways has

0:54:21.320 --> 0:54:27.040
<v Speaker 1>more actual policy power than the governor, being the president

0:54:27.080 --> 0:54:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Senate and really sort of very much has

0:54:29.719 --> 0:54:32.000
<v Speaker 1>has a lot more influence at times on the legislature

0:54:32.000 --> 0:54:35.200
<v Speaker 1>than the governor does. But Patrick's clearly to Habbit's right,

0:54:35.440 --> 0:54:38.879
<v Speaker 1>Paxton clearly Tobbits right. Abbott definitely you know, came up

0:54:39.000 --> 0:54:41.480
<v Speaker 1>more through was an ag during the Rick Perry came

0:54:41.560 --> 0:54:43.920
<v Speaker 1>up through sort of the Bush and Perry years of

0:54:43.960 --> 0:54:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party, and Perry, all you might say, is

0:54:47.040 --> 0:54:51.040
<v Speaker 1>slightly more conservative than w I mean, you know, Perry

0:54:51.120 --> 0:54:53.359
<v Speaker 1>is never you know, this is the guy that once

0:54:53.400 --> 0:54:57.080
<v Speaker 1>called Donald Trump a cancer on conservatism. We used to

0:54:57.160 --> 0:54:59.960
<v Speaker 1>run these clips so often. I used to know them

0:55:00.280 --> 0:55:04.560
<v Speaker 1>cancer on conservatism that he said multiple times the day

0:55:04.600 --> 0:55:07.239
<v Speaker 1>he dropped out of the race, and an attempt to

0:55:07.280 --> 0:55:11.680
<v Speaker 1>consolidate an anti Trump candidate back in the twenty sixteen race,

0:55:11.920 --> 0:55:14.840
<v Speaker 1>remember he ran twice. He was a front runner for

0:55:14.840 --> 0:55:17.799
<v Speaker 1>about two days until he couldn't figure out which which

0:55:17.840 --> 0:55:20.160
<v Speaker 1>of the three agencies he wanted to eliminate, and that

0:55:20.280 --> 0:55:26.319
<v Speaker 1>sort of went the campaign went south there. So I

0:55:26.400 --> 0:55:28.680
<v Speaker 1>just don't know if Abbot has a as a as

0:55:28.680 --> 0:55:32.480
<v Speaker 1>an easy lane. I think Abbot only becomes a viable

0:55:32.560 --> 0:55:37.279
<v Speaker 1>candidate if MAGA is seen as a broken ideology or

0:55:37.320 --> 0:55:40.440
<v Speaker 1>as a as a net negative in the Republican Party

0:55:40.480 --> 0:55:44.200
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty eight. What's the likelihood of that, right?

0:55:48.120 --> 0:55:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I think, I definitely think Abbot's itching to do something

0:55:53.000 --> 0:55:57.880
<v Speaker 1>else and he wants to run for president. But I

0:55:58.040 --> 0:56:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, I just I don't know what he doesn't.

0:56:02.120 --> 0:56:05.719
<v Speaker 1>He's not comfortably mega. He tries to be Mega adjacent,

0:56:06.880 --> 0:56:10.399
<v Speaker 1>but he's also you know, he does. He does end up.

0:56:11.000 --> 0:56:14.239
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a closet Chamber of Commerce Republican who

0:56:14.320 --> 0:56:17.480
<v Speaker 1>is trying to play mega and every once in a

0:56:17.480 --> 0:56:21.120
<v Speaker 1>while that comes through. So I don't see it. That

0:56:21.160 --> 0:56:23.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean he won't try. He's going to want to

0:56:23.400 --> 0:56:27.600
<v Speaker 1>do it. You know, he would be the third straight

0:56:27.680 --> 0:56:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Texas governor to try to do this. W did it.

0:56:32.239 --> 0:56:36.399
<v Speaker 1>Perry ran twice and it didn't go well, and you'd

0:56:36.400 --> 0:56:38.719
<v Speaker 1>have Abbot there. Abbitt's on the verge of Actually, Rick

0:56:38.760 --> 0:56:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Perry's the longest serving governor, and now Abbot, if he

0:56:40.960 --> 0:56:44.600
<v Speaker 1>wins this reelection, is going to end up surpassing that mark.

0:56:45.080 --> 0:56:48.799
<v Speaker 1>So I'm a I'm I'm a bit I'm a bit

0:56:48.840 --> 0:56:52.799
<v Speaker 1>more skeptical. So you're asking me my podcasts, how much

0:56:52.840 --> 0:56:57.360
<v Speaker 1>do I confess trying to see here? How much do

0:56:57.440 --> 0:57:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I confess to my some of these gambling podcasts that

0:57:01.600 --> 0:57:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I listened to, But you're asking what I listened to.

0:57:03.280 --> 0:57:06.600
<v Speaker 1>So I listened to Simmons, I listened to Kornheiser. Their

0:57:06.640 --> 0:57:10.360
<v Speaker 1>pals during football season. There's a couple of I like

0:57:10.480 --> 0:57:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the guys at the Action Network. Their football previews some

0:57:15.080 --> 0:57:21.320
<v Speaker 1>of the best. There's I can't even I keep forgetting

0:57:21.320 --> 0:57:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the guys. He goes by his last name his last

0:57:25.960 --> 0:57:28.560
<v Speaker 1>name only. I'm drawing a blank on it. I think

0:57:28.560 --> 0:57:34.040
<v Speaker 1>it's Sharky or Stucky. Excuse me. Sharky's another friend of mine,

0:57:34.160 --> 0:57:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a guy named Stucky. I enjoy his football previews. I

0:57:39.600 --> 0:57:44.200
<v Speaker 1>think they're very good. Other podcasts that I enjoy I

0:57:44.240 --> 0:57:47.520
<v Speaker 1>listened to something the White House sixteen hundred Sessions. This

0:57:47.600 --> 0:57:51.160
<v Speaker 1>is basically the White House Historical Association. They always have

0:57:51.320 --> 0:57:56.440
<v Speaker 1>some fun sort of history nuggets about presidents. They have

0:57:56.480 --> 0:58:01.800
<v Speaker 1>one unpresidential Pets that I have found myself enjoying. The

0:58:01.880 --> 0:58:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Acquired podcast. These are these huge, long deep dives on

0:58:08.360 --> 0:58:11.200
<v Speaker 1>like how did Google become Google? And it's almost like

0:58:11.240 --> 0:58:15.920
<v Speaker 1>a like a biography of a company. They did one

0:58:15.920 --> 0:58:18.400
<v Speaker 1>on JP Morgan and had an hour long interview with

0:58:19.560 --> 0:58:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Jamie Diamond that I felt found just super fascinating. And

0:58:25.320 --> 0:58:28.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, look, their podcasts are commitments, so sometimes you know,

0:58:28.600 --> 0:58:30.600
<v Speaker 1>they only put the big ones out once a month

0:58:30.760 --> 0:58:35.200
<v Speaker 1>because it takes almost a month to do that. I

0:58:35.360 --> 0:58:41.040
<v Speaker 1>enjoy the Bulwarks Hollywood podcast Sunny Bunch as sort of

0:58:41.080 --> 0:58:45.680
<v Speaker 1>an an entertainment culture that you know, talks a little

0:58:45.680 --> 0:58:49.919
<v Speaker 1>culture stuff in the media world I enjoy. I enjoy

0:58:49.960 --> 0:58:53.360
<v Speaker 1>both the Ben Smith podcast on Semaphore and Dylan Byers

0:58:53.480 --> 0:58:59.560
<v Speaker 1>on Puck. It's funny. I don't listen to many political podcasts.

0:58:59.600 --> 0:59:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I listened to sort of media podcasts on that front.

0:59:03.080 --> 0:59:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll listen to some issue specific stuff on foreign policy

0:59:07.720 --> 0:59:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and on domestic policy, and then I just grab highlights

0:59:12.800 --> 0:59:14.640
<v Speaker 1>of some of the other political podcasts out there that

0:59:14.680 --> 0:59:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I know have have that but as far as my

0:59:16.800 --> 0:59:21.000
<v Speaker 1>own personal those those are the ones that do and

0:59:21.080 --> 0:59:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I should. There's there's also there's one baseball card podcast

0:59:27.600 --> 0:59:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I consistently listen to. It's it's called There Is No

0:59:33.520 --> 0:59:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Off Season, I believe, is what it's called, and they

0:59:39.920 --> 0:59:42.400
<v Speaker 1>do a pretty good job of sort of assessing the

0:59:42.440 --> 0:59:46.920
<v Speaker 1>market for sports cards. So there, I probably revealed too

0:59:47.000 --> 0:59:49.959
<v Speaker 1>much about my habits, but you asked, and I thought

0:59:49.960 --> 0:59:52.520
<v Speaker 1>i'd chair. I'm gonna take one more question here and

0:59:52.560 --> 0:59:57.680
<v Speaker 1>do my little college football preview here. This comes from

0:59:57.680 --> 1:00:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Aaron from Skokie, Illinois Wire Conservatives attacking Bad Bunny's citizenship.

1:00:02.280 --> 1:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to believe they don't know he's an American citizen. Yeah,

1:00:05.320 --> 1:00:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I know, Puerto Rico is one of those. Apparently that's

1:00:08.600 --> 1:00:11.400
<v Speaker 1>one of those trick questions on the test right, just

1:00:11.440 --> 1:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>feels like a blatant display of racism. If they were

1:00:13.560 --> 1:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>honest and said they simply don't like that the Super

1:00:15.520 --> 1:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Bowl halftime show will be in Spanish, they might actually

1:00:17.760 --> 1:00:20.040
<v Speaker 1>find more agreement than they expect. I'm a Mexican American

1:00:20.040 --> 1:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>but don't speak Spanish and his music isn't really my

1:00:22.440 --> 1:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>style yet now, because of his backlash, even people like

1:00:24.840 --> 1:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>me feel compelled to watch just to push back against

1:00:27.440 --> 1:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the hate. The idea of replacing him with Lee Greenwood

1:00:29.720 --> 1:00:33.000
<v Speaker 1>is laughable. There's zero chance that happens, right, pr Nightmare,

1:00:33.040 --> 1:00:36.160
<v Speaker 1>thanks for the show. Look, Aaron, you're you're not wrong,

1:00:36.200 --> 1:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>and you know I'm now of the age that I

1:00:39.360 --> 1:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>expect whoever's picked is somebody that isn't appealing to me.

1:00:42.760 --> 1:00:44.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, I know what the NFL is up to.

1:00:44.240 --> 1:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>They're trying to appeal to a younger demographic, and they're

1:00:47.800 --> 1:00:51.280
<v Speaker 1>really trying to appeal to a more Latino demographic. The

1:00:51.280 --> 1:00:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the single, by the way, the single most streamed. You know,

1:00:54.240 --> 1:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I saw what was it? Ronda Santis attack Bad Bunny's like,

1:00:59.200 --> 1:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't you know, I don't know who this guy is. Well,

1:01:01.840 --> 1:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>he was only the most streamed artist in the state

1:01:04.880 --> 1:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>of Florida according to Spotify in calendar year twenty twenty four.

1:01:08.680 --> 1:01:12.680
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of Ron DeSantis' constituents seem to know

1:01:12.680 --> 1:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>who Bad Funny is. But whenever you're picking any genre

1:01:17.640 --> 1:01:21.760
<v Speaker 1>of music, you're gonna alienate people who don't like that

1:01:21.960 --> 1:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>genre of music. It, you know, I'm sure a lot

1:01:25.440 --> 1:01:27.760
<v Speaker 1>of when they did the Who, there were a lot

1:01:27.840 --> 1:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>of people going, why are they doing old people music? Right?

1:01:33.480 --> 1:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's a it's obvious to me this is it's

1:01:40.120 --> 1:01:44.040
<v Speaker 1>almost always the halftime show feels like an attempt to

1:01:44.120 --> 1:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>talk to a demographic that the NFL feels like that

1:01:46.640 --> 1:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>they don't know how to talk to, and they use

1:01:49.480 --> 1:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>an artist to try to do that, and frankly, they're

1:01:52.000 --> 1:01:54.919
<v Speaker 1>pretty smart about it. The NFL continues to grow its

1:01:54.920 --> 1:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>fan base. They're the most you know, the thing that

1:01:58.640 --> 1:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>everybody ought to respect here in the NFL. I think

1:02:01.160 --> 1:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>has learned this, you know, sort of figuring out how

1:02:06.000 --> 1:02:10.400
<v Speaker 1>to try to get above the culture wars, right. Colin

1:02:10.480 --> 1:02:13.439
<v Speaker 1>Kaeperne put them knee deep into the culture wars between really,

1:02:13.440 --> 1:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump suck them into the culture wars more than anything.

1:02:19.840 --> 1:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>But when you look at the demographics of football fans,

1:02:22.400 --> 1:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>it looks like the demographics of the country right when

1:02:26.160 --> 1:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean football is the single most sort of honest

1:02:30.920 --> 1:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>representation of the It is literally something like thirty seven

1:02:35.080 --> 1:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>percent Republican, thirty seven percent Democrat right, and everybody else independent.

1:02:38.760 --> 1:02:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's like the actual presidential electorate is represented.

1:02:43.040 --> 1:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>You know amongst football fans, most other sports have have

1:02:47.560 --> 1:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>a lean right. Baseball fans it leans right, golf fans

1:02:51.720 --> 1:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>it leans right, NBA fans lean left, NHL fans lean

1:02:55.280 --> 1:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>right like WNBA fans lean left. So you see, there's

1:02:59.600 --> 1:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>some of the sports you kind of like you could

1:03:03.920 --> 1:03:05.880
<v Speaker 1>look you just look at the crowd when you see

1:03:06.000 --> 1:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>go to a game and you have an idea of

1:03:08.480 --> 1:03:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the because our politics is in some ways is so

1:03:11.120 --> 1:03:16.960
<v Speaker 1>identity based right now, But I would caution everybody be careful.

1:03:17.000 --> 1:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the NFL is America. It is a tapestry.

1:03:20.200 --> 1:03:24.640
<v Speaker 1>It is the NFL fan base is the complicated picture

1:03:24.640 --> 1:03:30.560
<v Speaker 1>of America that is an asset for the NFL. And

1:03:31.400 --> 1:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I do think when it comes to their attempts to

1:03:35.280 --> 1:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>do more outreach, particularly in the Western hemisphere. They've now

1:03:38.720 --> 1:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>had back to back years of games in Brazil. There's

1:03:42.640 --> 1:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>no doubt in my mind that I think Mexico City,

1:03:47.080 --> 1:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>at some point or Monterey, one of the two is

1:03:49.120 --> 1:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>going to have a major league sports franchise, and maybe

1:03:52.040 --> 1:03:57.439
<v Speaker 1>it's an NFL team first, although the Dallas Cowboys, who

1:03:57.560 --> 1:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>have the largest number of fans in Mexico, actually don't

1:04:01.040 --> 1:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>want to see a Mexico City team because for the

1:04:03.920 --> 1:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>same reason they that they don't want a team in Austin,

1:04:06.720 --> 1:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Texas either, even though that's a metro a metro area

1:04:09.880 --> 1:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that actually could support one, because they want to have

1:04:13.680 --> 1:04:15.880
<v Speaker 1>they want to have the demographic to themselves. They want

1:04:15.880 --> 1:04:19.439
<v Speaker 1>to make uh, they want to make money off of

1:04:19.440 --> 1:04:22.360
<v Speaker 1>off of that demographic. So I find the whole thing

1:04:23.240 --> 1:04:25.720
<v Speaker 1>it's just a pretty closed minded way of thinking. I

1:04:25.760 --> 1:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>look at this, when I see these decisions, I'm like, oh,

1:04:28.640 --> 1:04:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I need to understand that this lad of the NFL

1:04:30.880 --> 1:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>is not picking somebody that isn't popular, Okay, So and

1:04:35.080 --> 1:04:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I know that this is you know what, to me,

1:04:36.920 --> 1:04:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the most amazing fact about what the NFL does is

1:04:39.880 --> 1:04:42.560
<v Speaker 1>that they never pay the halftime they know, they like

1:04:42.800 --> 1:04:45.040
<v Speaker 1>they basically say, if you you're going to make so

1:04:45.120 --> 1:04:48.200
<v Speaker 1>much money becoming the halftime entertainment, we don't have to

1:04:48.240 --> 1:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>pay you. That is extraordinary. How powerful that that that

1:04:53.440 --> 1:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the NFL has that kind of power. So this is

1:05:08.800 --> 1:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the first of what are going to be a series

1:05:11.680 --> 1:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>of games for my beloved Miami Hurricanes where they're supposed

1:05:15.600 --> 1:05:18.439
<v Speaker 1>to win, and they're going to face a whole bunch

1:05:18.440 --> 1:05:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of teams and they get the big target on their back.

1:05:21.280 --> 1:05:22.920
<v Speaker 1>And if you want to make a name for yourself,

1:05:22.960 --> 1:05:26.240
<v Speaker 1>you've got a shot at doing it. I am petrified

1:05:26.240 --> 1:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of this Louisville game. I'm glad it's first of all.

1:05:29.560 --> 1:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>These standalone games on Thursday and Friday are just always,

1:05:35.400 --> 1:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, feel like traps. You know, my wife's beloved

1:05:40.000 --> 1:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Florida State Seminoles lost them this Friday night game at Charlottesville. Now,

1:05:44.360 --> 1:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>if this game we're at Louisville, I'd be a lot

1:05:46.840 --> 1:05:50.360
<v Speaker 1>more nervous. In fact, Miami's been through tough games. Louisville

1:05:50.440 --> 1:05:55.560
<v Speaker 1>has always seen Miami as an aspirational rival, is what

1:05:55.600 --> 1:05:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I would call it. Miami. You know, like Louisville is

1:05:59.200 --> 1:06:02.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, right. They they had Howard celiber as a

1:06:02.600 --> 1:06:06.560
<v Speaker 1>coach after Miami. They recruit sort of, you know, they

1:06:06.600 --> 1:06:10.240
<v Speaker 1>try to recruit anybody that Miami rejects down in Miami.

1:06:10.280 --> 1:06:11.920
<v Speaker 1>That you look at their roster, it's filled with a

1:06:11.920 --> 1:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of South Florida guys. They actually won one of

1:06:14.760 --> 1:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the bigger recruiting battles that I can remember about ten

1:06:17.640 --> 1:06:20.600
<v Speaker 1>years ago, when they got Teddy Bridgewater. Teddy Bridgewaters should

1:06:20.600 --> 1:06:24.040
<v Speaker 1>have been a University of Miami quarterback. We had a

1:06:24.040 --> 1:06:26.840
<v Speaker 1>guy named Jacorey Harris at the time. Teddy Bridgewater was

1:06:26.840 --> 1:06:29.600
<v Speaker 1>actually his replacement at the same high school that Jacorey

1:06:29.600 --> 1:06:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Harris played at, Jack Cary. Harris was a full four

1:06:31.520 --> 1:06:35.680
<v Speaker 1>year starter, very good. Bridgewater was better. Bridgewater didn't want

1:06:35.680 --> 1:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>to sit behind Jacorey for two or three years, which

1:06:38.440 --> 1:06:40.920
<v Speaker 1>is why I ended up going to Louisville. I'm convinced

1:06:40.960 --> 1:06:45.280
<v Speaker 1>had Bridgewaters come to Miami sat behind Harris would have

1:06:45.360 --> 1:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>ended up probably having well. It certainly would have helped

1:06:49.400 --> 1:06:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Miami's football program in the early teens. But look, I'm

1:06:54.400 --> 1:06:59.080
<v Speaker 1>nervous about it. You know, right now, it's Miami against

1:06:59.120 --> 1:07:01.880
<v Speaker 1>themselves for the rest of their schedule. On paper, if

1:07:01.920 --> 1:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>you look at it analytically, they're going to be double

1:07:03.840 --> 1:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>digit favorites in every game they have left. To me,

1:07:07.120 --> 1:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the nervous the games that I'm nervous about going forward

1:07:10.560 --> 1:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>for Miami. One is this Louisville game Friday night. And

1:07:14.760 --> 1:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>my daughter will tell you, traffic to hard Rock is

1:07:17.880 --> 1:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>our you know, it sucks on a Saturday. It really

1:07:20.360 --> 1:07:24.120
<v Speaker 1>sucks on a Friday evening. So I'm nervous about the

1:07:24.120 --> 1:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>crowd attendance though this year Man Miami fans have turned

1:07:27.520 --> 1:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>out even for sort of the you know, the games

1:07:30.960 --> 1:07:34.560
<v Speaker 1>that don't that aren't on the marquee, so I'm pretty

1:07:34.560 --> 1:07:38.760
<v Speaker 1>pleased about that. But that game has me nervous. The

1:07:39.000 --> 1:07:41.960
<v Speaker 1>game at SMU Road game that'll be for Miami's first

1:07:42.040 --> 1:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>road game outside of the state of Florida on November first,

1:07:47.200 --> 1:07:49.440
<v Speaker 1>And then of course the Pit game. That's the last game,

1:07:49.480 --> 1:07:51.080
<v Speaker 1>that's our last regular season game of the year, and

1:07:51.080 --> 1:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>it's at Pit. We've struggled that Pit before when we

1:07:54.720 --> 1:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>were we blew a Pit game in twenty seventeen. We

1:07:59.520 --> 1:08:02.160
<v Speaker 1>were on our way to and were already qualified for

1:08:02.160 --> 1:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the a SEC title game, so it didn't really matter,

1:08:04.560 --> 1:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>except it was the beginning of sort of we lose

1:08:06.720 --> 1:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to pit then we get pummeled by Clemson, and then

1:08:09.720 --> 1:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>it was like, oh, Miami was a mirage. We were

1:08:11.800 --> 1:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>a ten and oh start and then we turned into

1:08:13.760 --> 1:08:18.839
<v Speaker 1>a mirage. So we don't have Georgia Tech on our schedule, thankfully,

1:08:18.880 --> 1:08:22.639
<v Speaker 1>which is the other nemesis in Miami. So obviously Friday night,

1:08:22.760 --> 1:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of you will end up watching

1:08:24.120 --> 1:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>that game. I hope it's not a game by the

1:08:25.840 --> 1:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>second half. We shall see a couple of other games

1:08:30.040 --> 1:08:34.439
<v Speaker 1>of note this weekend. You know, Brian Kelly will find

1:08:34.439 --> 1:08:37.760
<v Speaker 1>out the Brian Kelly hot seat. You know how hot

1:08:37.800 --> 1:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>will his seat get in LSU? Well, he LSU's going

1:08:42.240 --> 1:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>to Vanderbilt. LSU's an underdog at Vanderbilt, right, And I'd

1:08:49.760 --> 1:08:52.519
<v Speaker 1>love to know every week there's a new stat not

1:08:52.640 --> 1:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>since the nineteen forties is a ranked Vanderbilt team played

1:08:56.120 --> 1:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>another ranked team or not since the nineteen forties, has YadA,

1:08:58.800 --> 1:09:02.960
<v Speaker 1>YadA YadA happened? Right with Vanderbilt, this is a hugely

1:09:03.000 --> 1:09:06.559
<v Speaker 1>important game for both teams. If either team basically winners

1:09:06.760 --> 1:09:10.200
<v Speaker 1>winner is this is a playoff elimination game, They're both

1:09:10.240 --> 1:09:12.920
<v Speaker 1>five and one second loss for either one of them,

1:09:12.960 --> 1:09:14.559
<v Speaker 1>I think puts them on a path to not make

1:09:14.560 --> 1:09:17.439
<v Speaker 1>the playoff. And in l s Hu's case, it probably

1:09:17.479 --> 1:09:21.479
<v Speaker 1>puts Brian Kelly on the hot seat Unloster Vanderbilt, so

1:09:21.560 --> 1:09:26.639
<v Speaker 1>that'll be a big deal. Duke Georgia Tech. This has

1:09:27.640 --> 1:09:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Georgia Tech upset. I think they should be an upset alert.

1:09:31.080 --> 1:09:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Duke's actually the favorite. It's a home game for Duke.

1:09:35.200 --> 1:09:39.479
<v Speaker 1>If Georgia Tech loses before you know, loses before the

1:09:39.920 --> 1:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>end of their see, this is probably their toughest game

1:09:42.200 --> 1:09:44.439
<v Speaker 1>left on their acc schedule. A little of course, play

1:09:44.720 --> 1:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Georgia at the end of the year and their and

1:09:46.280 --> 1:09:51.080
<v Speaker 1>their annual rivalry game. But this is probably the game

1:09:51.120 --> 1:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be putting in one of my four

1:09:53.040 --> 1:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>boxes at noon on Saturday. I would have put Ohio

1:10:00.360 --> 1:10:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Wisconsin on this. I can't believe Luke Fickle still got

1:10:03.280 --> 1:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>a job. The embarrassment of getting shut out by Iowa

1:10:09.760 --> 1:10:13.559
<v Speaker 1>after they supposedly did push ups, being embarrassed that they

1:10:13.560 --> 1:10:15.599
<v Speaker 1>gave up forty two points to Iowa the year before,

1:10:16.560 --> 1:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and they were this focused on the Iowa game that

1:10:20.200 --> 1:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess this time they only gave up thirty seven

1:10:21.880 --> 1:10:25.080
<v Speaker 1>points instead of forty two points. Something ain't right in Wisconsin.

1:10:26.240 --> 1:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I hate that Wisconsin football all of a sudden looks

1:10:28.800 --> 1:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>like they did in the eighties. Right. Wisconsin football was

1:10:31.600 --> 1:10:36.200
<v Speaker 1>a doormat in the eighties until they finally Frankly, it

1:10:36.200 --> 1:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>was the leadership with Dona Shalela, who spent more money

1:10:39.479 --> 1:10:43.080
<v Speaker 1>hiring when she was the chancellor in the University of Wisconsin.

1:10:43.840 --> 1:10:46.280
<v Speaker 1>She deserves a lot of credit for getting sort of

1:10:46.280 --> 1:10:50.240
<v Speaker 1>both Wisconsin football and Wisconsin basketball sort of back off

1:10:50.280 --> 1:10:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the mat into the sort of higher tier of Big

1:10:53.200 --> 1:10:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Ten football. It's just something's wrong that Wisconsin. This isn't working.

1:11:01.760 --> 1:11:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I can't imagine that they're going to

1:11:04.880 --> 1:11:07.080
<v Speaker 1>get up for this Ohio State game, but you know

1:11:07.520 --> 1:11:10.200
<v Speaker 1>it might be the only shot Thickle has to give

1:11:10.240 --> 1:11:15.599
<v Speaker 1>himself one more year. One other game that I think

1:11:16.280 --> 1:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>a couple other games Texas A and M at Arkansas

1:11:20.479 --> 1:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>is it. Did Bobby Patrino give Arkansas a sort of

1:11:25.479 --> 1:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>one game dead cat bounced type of focus or does

1:11:31.479 --> 1:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the Patrino difference carry over in a second week? And

1:11:34.439 --> 1:11:37.560
<v Speaker 1>if it does, this is a dangerous game for A

1:11:37.640 --> 1:11:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and M on the road at Arkansas it's you know,

1:11:44.360 --> 1:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>you saw the game with Tennessee the one thing about

1:11:47.120 --> 1:11:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Patrino he wants you know he's playing for this job.

1:11:50.200 --> 1:11:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's an absolute non starter. I cannot believe

1:11:55.360 --> 1:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>he's in a candidate to be coach again, considering all

1:11:59.200 --> 1:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the drama there's a the athletic that are terrific sort

1:12:01.920 --> 1:12:05.559
<v Speaker 1>of rundown of all the ways that he's been an

1:12:05.680 --> 1:12:10.200
<v Speaker 1>untrustworthy person to hire, whether it was in his flirtations

1:12:10.520 --> 1:12:14.200
<v Speaker 1>to go to other schools, let alone the infamous motorcycle

1:12:14.240 --> 1:12:17.679
<v Speaker 1>incident at Arkansas, et cetera. But if he starts winning

1:12:17.680 --> 1:12:21.840
<v Speaker 1>football games, as we know, winning changes everything, right, Winning

1:12:21.880 --> 1:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>cures a lot of concerns among donors or administrators. Upsetting

1:12:26.439 --> 1:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Texas A and M would go a long way. So

1:12:29.680 --> 1:12:31.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Arkansas is going to quit in this game.

1:12:32.240 --> 1:12:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Katrino's going to keep throwing, going to keep trying to

1:12:34.760 --> 1:12:37.120
<v Speaker 1>do trick plays, going to do all sorts of things.

1:12:38.160 --> 1:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>If I were an A and M fan, because I

1:12:39.840 --> 1:12:42.800
<v Speaker 1>think A and M's best team in the SEC, I'd

1:12:42.800 --> 1:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>be really This game would really have me nervous, the

1:12:45.080 --> 1:12:47.400
<v Speaker 1>way I'm nervous about Loloivlle. I think it's that time

1:12:47.439 --> 1:12:49.639
<v Speaker 1>of game and them should win. But if you told

1:12:49.640 --> 1:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>me this were a field goal game in the fourth quarter,

1:12:51.439 --> 1:12:55.400
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't surprise me. And then, of course, the best story

1:12:55.439 --> 1:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>in the SEC this year is the is the new

1:12:58.160 --> 1:13:02.160
<v Speaker 1>quarterback for old myth? Let me get his name right.

1:13:03.360 --> 1:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I read a terrific story about him, Trinidad Chambliss. It's

1:13:08.439 --> 1:13:11.680
<v Speaker 1>a It was for the Trinity. If he had been

1:13:11.680 --> 1:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>a girl, he was going to be Trinity. They decided

1:13:14.240 --> 1:13:18.080
<v Speaker 1>to do Trinidad. It's been it's this guy is a

1:13:18.080 --> 1:13:21.160
<v Speaker 1>as a marvel. And the fact that they couldn't believe

1:13:21.200 --> 1:13:23.320
<v Speaker 1>what they saw his story. He was sort of a

1:13:23.400 --> 1:13:27.320
<v Speaker 1>multi sport athlete, was was focused more on basketball, ended

1:13:27.360 --> 1:13:31.720
<v Speaker 1>up playing D two football. Folks didn't realize how good

1:13:31.760 --> 1:13:34.040
<v Speaker 1>he was at it, and lo and behold, he's quite

1:13:34.040 --> 1:13:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the story. We'll find out. I don't know if either

1:13:38.200 --> 1:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Georgia or Ole Miss is playoff quality, right, I you know,

1:13:42.439 --> 1:13:45.439
<v Speaker 1>the Old Miss barely getting by Washington State last week.

1:13:45.640 --> 1:13:47.479
<v Speaker 1>Maybe there was a look I had spot with Georgia.

1:13:47.640 --> 1:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm fine with that, but Georgia needs to sort

1:13:50.960 --> 1:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>of have something to prove as well here. This is

1:13:53.040 --> 1:13:55.639
<v Speaker 1>one of those It's not an eliminator for Ole Miss

1:13:55.640 --> 1:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>if they lose, but it is if Georgia loses. So

1:14:02.920 --> 1:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>this is an important in some way. It's a more

1:14:04.880 --> 1:14:10.479
<v Speaker 1>important game for Georgia than anybody else after that. Alabama Tennessee.

1:14:10.680 --> 1:14:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I know, Alabama Tennessee. This one also might be an

1:14:12.920 --> 1:14:18.559
<v Speaker 1>elimination game, right not every two loss team in the

1:14:18.640 --> 1:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>SEC is going to make it, and the loser of

1:14:21.680 --> 1:14:27.200
<v Speaker 1>this will have their second loss, so it's Alabama's of

1:14:27.200 --> 1:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>course doesn't have only this would be their first conference loss,

1:14:30.360 --> 1:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>so that is a bit of advantage here for them.

1:14:35.040 --> 1:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee cares about the Alabama rivalry more than I think

1:14:37.840 --> 1:14:40.559
<v Speaker 1>Alabama cares about the Tennessee rivalry. That's one of those

1:14:40.600 --> 1:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>big brother little brother games. I'm more of a believer

1:14:47.280 --> 1:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>in Alabama this one. I'm curious if they can get

1:14:50.200 --> 1:14:53.760
<v Speaker 1>margin here. I expect them to get some margin. If

1:14:53.760 --> 1:14:57.519
<v Speaker 1>they don't, maybe that tells us maybe maybe I'm not not.

1:14:57.640 --> 1:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's all right about that. Notre Dame is this week.

1:15:02.640 --> 1:15:05.080
<v Speaker 1>That's one of these great rivalries. My wife's got no

1:15:05.120 --> 1:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>attend one of those games at Notre Dame. It's one

1:15:07.040 --> 1:15:09.360
<v Speaker 1>of those i'd like to I'd like to see. It's

1:15:09.400 --> 1:15:12.680
<v Speaker 1>an important game for both teams. Obviously, every game is

1:15:12.680 --> 1:15:15.479
<v Speaker 1>an elimination game for Notre Dame now with their two losses.

1:15:15.479 --> 1:15:17.559
<v Speaker 1>As long as Texas A and M and Miami keep winning,

1:15:17.960 --> 1:15:19.519
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame is going to make it into the playoff

1:15:19.520 --> 1:15:21.320
<v Speaker 1>as a ten and two team. They will not make

1:15:21.360 --> 1:15:22.840
<v Speaker 1>it to the playoff as a nine to three team.

1:15:23.240 --> 1:15:27.400
<v Speaker 1>This is the toughest game remaining on their schedule, hands

1:15:27.439 --> 1:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>down the toughest game remaining on their schedule. So a

1:15:31.160 --> 1:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty important game. And then I realized I should not

1:15:33.800 --> 1:15:36.920
<v Speaker 1>be remiss. One of my favorite rivalry names is the

1:15:37.000 --> 1:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Utah BYU game, The Holy War. I don't know is

1:15:39.720 --> 1:15:41.519
<v Speaker 1>it politically correct to say the Holy War or not.

1:15:44.200 --> 1:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Either way, it's one of the great names for a

1:15:47.960 --> 1:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>rivalry game. This one's at BYU, and this one also

1:15:51.920 --> 1:15:56.000
<v Speaker 1>actually has some playoff implications, big twelve implications. Don't sleep

1:15:56.000 --> 1:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>on BYU. They're still undefeated, the undefeated, all right, enjoy

1:16:02.920 --> 1:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>your weekend in college football. Hopefully, depending on how Friday

1:16:06.439 --> 1:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Night goes, I get to do the same. And with that,

1:16:09.720 --> 1:16:10.559
<v Speaker 1>I'll see you next week.