WEBVTT - Don't Call It A "Bailout", But It's a Massive Big Tech & China Bailout

0:00:01.080 --> 0:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome. Its verdict was Senator Ted Cruz Ben Ferguson with

0:00:04.559 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>you and Senator the biggest news story of the week.

0:00:07.600 --> 0:00:12.119
<v Speaker 1>Many Americans are concerned about their banks. They're concerned about banking.

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>They're concerned about what's happened with a fallout of Silicon

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:18.959
<v Speaker 1>Valley Bank. This wasn't a little bank. This was a

0:00:19.000 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>big bank. It was one of the top three failures

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:24.919
<v Speaker 1>of my lifetime. I want to get your initial reaction

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 1>to this and what you've heard, at least from those

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>in Washington that were supposed to be keeping an eye

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>on this bank and many others every day. Well, this

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>has been a very chaotic time in the markets. We've

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>seen two different banks fail, including the sixteenth largest bank

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, Silicon Valley Bank, with two hundred

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>and ten billion dollars in assets. That has called into

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:50.840
<v Speaker 1>question a lot of the financing for the tech industry.

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>It's called into question a lot of the financing for

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>venture capital, and it has potentially imperiled a significant number

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>of midside banks. In response to this, the Biden administration

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:09.919
<v Speaker 1>rolled out a major bailout, conveniently bailing out the politically

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>collected connected friends of the Biden White House in a

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>way that we'll have lasting repercussions for the economy and

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>will almost certainly incentivize future bad conduct by other banks.

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 1>When you look at this from a standpoint of it

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 1>being called a bailout, a lot of people have been

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>calling it that, but this administration keeps saying, this is

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>not a bailout. Is this a bailout? Or the taxpayers

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 1>going to have to put the bill for this? Is

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>this a delayed bill for taxpayers? How should the American

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>people be reacting to this? This is one of bailout,

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and the Biden administration is spinning like crazy trying to

0:01:55.680 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>pretend that it's not. What they are arguing is the money.

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>There's one hundred and twenty billion dollars in a fund

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>that is paid by banks, and they say, well, that's

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:09.519
<v Speaker 1>not taxpayer money. Well, the last time I checked banks

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>or taxpayers, banks pay quite a bit in taxes. Not

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>only that, but the fees that the banks are paying

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:20.639
<v Speaker 1>into this fund they get from in turn extracting revenues

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 1>from consumers, and so it comes from you and me.

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:25.799
<v Speaker 1>At the end of the day. This money didn't grow

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 1>on a magic money tree that the Biden administration has

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>that they decided to spend well over one hundred billion

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>dollars in response to this. And here's what happened. So,

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley Bank has two hundred and ten billion dollars

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>in assets, and a big chunk of its portfolio was

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>held in securities and in particular long term government debt.

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, it had the highest securities portfolio as

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>a percentage of total assets of any bank, and it

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 1>took long term government debt. But then the Fed's policies

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>raising interest rates made that government debt made those bonds

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>go down in value about twenty percent. And what happened

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>is that the bank was required to mark to market

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>those securities at their current valuations. Now, if it held

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:32.639
<v Speaker 1>those government bonds to maturity, it would get the full payout,

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>but their worth about twenty percent less because the interest

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>rates they were taken out at are significantly lower than

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>where interest rates are today. That in turn caused an

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>old fashioned run on the bank, which is depositors and

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>in particular venture capital companies and tech companies began removing

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>their funds in mass, and it was one after the

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>other after the other that began pulling their their funds out. Now, look,

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>we all know, uh from from classic movies like It's

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a Wonderful Life, that that a bank doesn't have all

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 1>of the deposits just sitting there in cash, that it

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:16.840
<v Speaker 1>it in the case of an snlor or a mortgage bank,

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 1>it is loaning them out. Uh. In in this instance,

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the bulk of the funds were in securities, including in

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 1>particular both government debt and mortgage bonds. And so when

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 1>when a ton of the depositors are saying, give me

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>my money back, uh, they ran ran into real trouble

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:39.840
<v Speaker 1>because there was a liquidity mismatch. In other words, the

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the assets they had available to give the depositors back

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>where were less than the demand for from the depositors

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>to get it back. And so California stepped in and

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>shut the bank down on Friday. Uh. And what happened

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 1>next was a series of things. So one consequence, the FDIC,

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, insures deposits up to two

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty thousand dollars. So if you or I

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>have our checking account or savings accounts, most of us

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>presumably have less than two hundred and fifty thousand dollars

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>in our checking or savings accounts. Those are entirely insured

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 1>by the government. And that's true for anyone that has

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 1>less than two hundred and fifty thousand. That's also true

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>for smaller businesses, for mom and pop businesses, smaller businesses,

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:32.600
<v Speaker 1>but above two hundred and fifty thousand, that is not

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:37.840
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be insured by the FDIC. And in the

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 1>case of Silicon Valley Bank, a massive amount ninety six

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>percent of their deposits were uninsured. In other words, it

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>had a bunch of big, big, big deposit accounts way

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:54.280
<v Speaker 1>above the two hundred and fifty thousand dollars insurance cap.

0:05:55.440 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>The folks that had deposits in Silicon Valley Bank that

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:04.279
<v Speaker 1>were above the two hundred and fifty thousand dollars insurance

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 1>cap include a ton of politically connected venture capital firms

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:14.719
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and startups. So, for example, Circle, the

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 1>payment technology firm, had three point three billion dollars in

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley Bank. That's a bunch of money. Three point

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:27.160
<v Speaker 1>three billion is way way way above two hundred and

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 1>fifty thousand. There were a total of one thousand and

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>seventy four private equity and venture capital funds that were

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 1>banking with Silicon Valley Bank. And if you look at

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>some of the players. In addition to Circle, Roku, the

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 1>streaming service, had four hundred and eighty seven million dollars

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley Bank. The crypto lender Block five, which

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>is now defunct, had two hundred and twenty seven million. Roadblocks,

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the online gaming platform had one hundred and fifty million,

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and BuzzFeed, the online media platform, had about fifty six

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>million in cash and cash equivalence at the end of

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two, the majority of which was held at

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:18.119
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley Bank. So you have a lot of big

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>players with huge amounts of money. Now, these players chose

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 1>to deposit it knowing what the FDIC limits were. They

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't seek to ensure it, they didn't seek to find

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>any other way to protect it. They counted on number

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>one that they believe Silicon Valley Bank was too big

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>to fail. But number two what happened is the White

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>House very quickly responded to Democrat politicians and tech firms

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>and VC firms expressing dismay, and the Biden administration said,

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 1>you know what, We're going to guarantee every deposit doesn't

0:07:56.080 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>matter how big that was. Any way, you look at

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>it a massive bailout, and it was a bailout that

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 1>was done, was done with no authorization from Congress. You know,

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>you think back to the financial crisis that we saw

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and eight. Two thousand and eight, there

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 1>was a financial crisis and there was a massive bailout.

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>And what happened there The George W. Bush administration went

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>to Congress and they seek sought to pass what was

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>called TARP, the Troubled Asset Recovery Program, and the first time,

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 1>in fact, the House of Representatives voted it down and

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:39.959
<v Speaker 1>didn't give the Bush administration the bailouted asked for. Then

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 1>ultimately it did, and actually the response to TARP prompted

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:50.839
<v Speaker 1>in significant part the Tea Party, the enormous wave of

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>fed up voters that were very unhappy. Why rich connected

0:08:54.760 --> 0:09:00.559
<v Speaker 1>bankers were getting billions in government money. It king here.

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>The Biden administration didn't go to Congress, didn't think Congress

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:06.559
<v Speaker 1>had anything to say at all. They just announced it,

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>we're giving away money. Why because these are Democrat donors

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and people we listen to, and you know what, mom

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and pop across this country are going to pay more.

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Local community banks in Texas and all across the country

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:24.079
<v Speaker 1>are going to end up paying more because the Biden

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:28.719
<v Speaker 1>administration decided to bail out Silicon Valley Bank and to

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>ignore the FDIC cap and give unlimited guarantees on deposits. Senator,

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you a question, and this really

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>is a political one, about the money that was coming

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>out of Silicon Valley Bank. We've now been told that

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>apparently they had given more than seventy three million in

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>donations to Black Lives Matter and related organizations. Before I

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>get your thoughts on that, though, I want to tell

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 1>you about Chalk. If you're a real American man and

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>you want to maximize your masculinity by boosting testosterrum levels

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>up to twenty percent over ninety days, you can actually

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>do it with the Chalk Male Vitality Stack. Now, if

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>you're a guy and you just feel like you've lost

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of that edge, you're getting a little

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 1>bit older, and you don't feel like yourself anymore, you

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:22.200
<v Speaker 1>can fight back again that war on masculinity, and you

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>can do it with Chalkhoq. They are here to help

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>real men just like you and I maximize our testosterrum

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:33.559
<v Speaker 1>levels by boosting them up to twenty percent over ninety days.

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>If you are ready to get that feeling back, then

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 1>you need to check out Chalk. Go online to choq

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 1>dot com use the promo code Ben for thirty five

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 1>percent off any Chalk subscription for life. Plus you can

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 1>cancel Anytimehoq dot com promo code Ben for thirty five

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 1>percent off. So you see, and you go back to

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>what you're mentioning about how the FDIC works. Right, and

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>you're supposed to have a limit to the first two

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty thousand hours of your deposits in a bank.

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 1>But what Biden basically said is, hey, this is a

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:09.680
<v Speaker 1>woke liberal bank, and we cover it all. Even though

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:11.839
<v Speaker 1>the people that were putting the money in the bank

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>knew that they were overly leveraged here, that they didn't

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>have as sound of a lending practice as many other banks,

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>they didn't care. So are we now at the point

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>where we have a government that says, Okay, you can

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 1>act recklessly in the financial industry, specifically in banking, as

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 1>long as you are in the right side of giving

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>to democrats or to parties, We'll cover you no matter

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>how reckless you are no matter how big you are,

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and as long as you're on our team and donating

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to things that we believe in, will get your back

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>up to one hundred percent of all of your deposits. Look,

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>they're an awful lot of folks. They're going to take

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:55.359
<v Speaker 1>exactly that message from this. This was an act of cronyism.

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 1>It was also critically your right that Silicon Valley Bank

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 1>was one of the most woke banks in America. It

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 1>was very into ESG, it was very into climate change,

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>was very into Black Lives matter, it was very into

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 1>everything except apparently having a risk management process to protect

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:18.079
<v Speaker 1>its depositors deposits and in fact, stunningly, Silicon Valley Bank

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:21.840
<v Speaker 1>for a year prior to this didn't even have a

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 1>chief risk management officer at a bank that's pretty damn important.

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:32.959
<v Speaker 1>They didn't have this hedged against interest rate risk. They

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 1>were gambling that the FED would not raise rates, even

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>though they'd been screaming from the mountaintops that they were

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 1>going to raise rates. A bank that is being prudent

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>can hedge its investments against interest rates rising by by

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>investing also in counterbalancing investments that will go up when

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>interest rates go up. They didn't do that. They were

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:58.680
<v Speaker 1>focused on on virtue signaling. They were focused on showing

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 1>just how woke they are. And it's important understand also

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 1>look back the bank here. These bank officers were bad actors.

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Let me let me tell you two data points that

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:18.720
<v Speaker 1>have been vastly underreported. Number one, hours before the bank

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:24.599
<v Speaker 1>was shut down, Silicon Valley Bank gave very substantial bonuses

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>to all of its employees. They just began writing checks

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to everyone hours before they were shut down. Data point

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:39.840
<v Speaker 1>number two, in the two weeks prior to their being

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 1>shut down, the CEO and the CFO sold large amounts

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 1>of stock. The CEO ended up making over a two

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 1>million dollar profit from selling stock less than two weeks

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 1>before the bank was shut down. Both of those indicate

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:02.200
<v Speaker 1>corrupt intent. I'll tell you I had a conference call

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 1>in the last forty eight hours with all one hundred

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 1>senators were invited to participate, and Treasury in the FDIC

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 1>was on there, and I asked, I said, look, is

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>it true that they gave bonuses to their employees? Number one,

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>If so, I think it is outrageous. And number two,

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 1>has there been any investigation into clawing back those bonuses

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>that because they're literally this. As far as I'm concerned,

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 1>this is like Bonnie and Clyde. They're robbing the bank

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>as they know their customers deposits are about to get

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 1>blown up. And much of the media coverage has ignored

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the exceptionally bad conduct by the bank's officers. You look

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 1>at Joe Biden and one of the things that I

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 1>think is very concerning about this Biden bail out. That's

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>what it is, we should call it. That is the

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>question now? Is this it's a big step towards government

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 1>control of the banking system. Because if the government can

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>choose winners and losers, and those are supposed to be

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>giving oversight of the banks are not doing it. That's

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>another huge problem here. And many people may not understand this,

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and I want you to explain it for people. The

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco Fed was who was supposed to be supervising

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>this bank. They either were asleep at the wheel or

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't care that they were acting this way. And if

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 1>this is what the government's going to do, is this

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>almost a play where they say, Hey, we're just going

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>to have a United States government now that is in

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 1>total control of the banking system that would be terrible

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 1>for this country. Well, the banking system right now is

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>already heavily regulated, and bank regulators are deeply involved in

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 1>examining the books, and they should be involved. That there

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 1>is a very important role for bank regulators to make

0:15:56.480 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>sure that banks are being honest in our have sufficient liquidity,

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and are sufficiently financed. I will note that this crisis

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Number one was heavily encouraged by government policy, and in particular,

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the FED for years pursued an easy money policy of

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 1>quantitative easing of virtually zero percent interest rates that was

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>flooding the system with cash. Number two, the federal government

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>also treated long term government debt as essentially risk free,

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 1>zero risk government debt. Dodd Frank, rammed through by the Democrats,

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>heavily encouraged banks to invest in long term government debt. Now,

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 1>one thing that does is it helps finance the massive

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>debt that the Democrats are racking up on their spending spree.

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 1>They want banks incentivized to buy that debt. But Number two,

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>that may make sense in a non inflation inflationary environment,

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>but when inflation exploded under Joe Biden and the Fed

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>was forced to raise rate suddenly, that long term government debt.

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:07.119
<v Speaker 1>You you had a spread there that severely reduced the

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:10.879
<v Speaker 1>value of those bonds, and it was government policies that

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:13.879
<v Speaker 1>encouraged it on the front end, but then on the

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 1>back end. You were absolutely right. The regulator of Silicon

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Valley Bank was the San Francisco Fed. The San Francisco

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 1>Fed bears an enormous amount of responsibility for what happened,

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:27.399
<v Speaker 1>because this wasn't subtle, This was out in the open,

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>this was it was obvious. Silicon Valley Bank was not

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 1>hiding from the regulators that it had massive amounts in

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>long term government debt. The FED obviously knew that the

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:45.119
<v Speaker 1>Fed was raising interest rates, and yet this exposure, and

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:51.159
<v Speaker 1>the Fed presumably knew that this interest rate exposure was

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>not hedged. And so you have to ask what the

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:58.359
<v Speaker 1>hell happened at the San Francisco Fed. You don't you

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 1>go look at the San Francisco Fed website. They, again,

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:05.680
<v Speaker 1>like Silicon Valley Bank, have all sorts of woke things

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:09.359
<v Speaker 1>on there about ESG and climate change, in black lives

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:13.720
<v Speaker 1>matter that was their priority, but actually doing their job.

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:18.719
<v Speaker 1>It is striking that the San Francisco Fed did nothing

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 1>until it was too late. Will there be any accountability

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>for the government regulators, specifically in San Francisco on this,

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:30.159
<v Speaker 1>and is there anything that Washington can actually do to

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:33.920
<v Speaker 1>hold them accountable, Because if you basically simplify this, you

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty much had a group of wealthy speculators that got

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:40.160
<v Speaker 1>really upset that their money ended up being locked into

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:43.160
<v Speaker 1>a ten year obligation at less than a two percent return.

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>That's how one person put it. So then they basically said,

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 1>all right, we'll convince the government it was in everyone's

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 1>best interest to help them out of their jam at

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:54.479
<v Speaker 1>the expense of everyone else. And the Fed, who's supposed

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to be looking at this, watching this bank, they just

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:01.399
<v Speaker 1>didn't do a darn thing. Well, there needs to be accountability,

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 1>and I do have a high level of confidence that

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 1>at a minimum, there'll be accountability in the House, that

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the House is going to hold the regulators to account.

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>What what Joe Biden and the Democrats and what the

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>corporate media are trying to do is, of course, blame

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:17.359
<v Speaker 1>it all on Trump because that's the that's their answer

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:19.680
<v Speaker 1>for everything. But if you look at who the bank

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 1>regulators were that were in charge of it, it wasn't Trump.

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Trump's been out of office for over two years. It

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 1>was the Biden administration asleep at at the wheel. And

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>when you look at it, also look the moral hazard

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 1>this will create is dangerous and it's a basic principle.

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:45.439
<v Speaker 1>When you socialize the risk and you individualize the benefits,

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:50.639
<v Speaker 1>you always get bad behavior. Silicon Valley Bank, but was

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>behaving according to the incentives that they were getting from

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:58.959
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administration. They believe they'd be bailed out. And

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>in particular, look at it's worth noting the bailout it

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 1>is not even directed at Silicon Valley Bank, at its stockholders,

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 1>that they have not been bailed out, at least not yet.

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>The people who were bailed out were all of the

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:18.199
<v Speaker 1>depositors that had tens of millions or hundreds of millions

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 1>or even billions of dollars in Silicon Valley Bank. By

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the way, among many of those depositors billions of dollars

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 1>worth were Chinese companies. Silicon Valley Bank one of the

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 1>things that specialized in was was doing banking for foreign companies,

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:38.439
<v Speaker 1>foreign investors, and so this was also a bailout of

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 1>China by the Biden administration. But you know what ordinarily

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>happens when a bank fails, and listen, we've seen banks fail.

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:50.119
<v Speaker 1>That's part of how the system operates. When the bank

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:54.879
<v Speaker 1>managers take on too much risk, the bank should fail

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 1>because you don't want to incentivize. You don't want to

0:20:57.320 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 1>have everyone taking on too much risk. K. But what

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:05.239
<v Speaker 1>ordinarily happens when a bank fails is number one, they

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:08.680
<v Speaker 1>try to find a private buyer, and they did try

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>to do that over the weekend, and apparently they were

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>unable to do so. There were several bids submitted, but

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the Biden FDIC refused to take any of the bids.

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 1>They found the terms unacceptable. Now we don't know what

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:23.440
<v Speaker 1>those terms were. I can tell you in the call

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 1>with the senators. We asked them and they didn't tell us.

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:28.200
<v Speaker 1>They didn't want people to know what the terms were.

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 1>But the Biden administration turned down a private buyer that

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>could come in and take over the bank, which is

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 1>ordinarily what happens. Also, ordinarily what happens when a bank

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>fails is that everyone's deposits up to two hundred and

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:47.120
<v Speaker 1>fifty thousand dollars get held completely harmless, and those are

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:50.920
<v Speaker 1>guaranteed by the FDIC and the larger deposit holders. Typically

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 1>they're not blown out there. They're larger. Deposits are not

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:58.119
<v Speaker 1>typically worthless, but they usually take a haircut somewhere in

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the fifteen to twenty percent range. And that's what ordinarily

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:03.919
<v Speaker 1>happens when you put a whole bunch of money in

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:08.879
<v Speaker 1>one place at risk without it being insured. All of

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:12.479
<v Speaker 1>the depositors knew that, but they also knew that with

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:16.160
<v Speaker 1>their friends and the Biden administration that they could count

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 1>on higher returns from Silicon Valley Bank playing fast and loose,

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and if things went south, I think they were confident

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 1>that Democrats in Washington would have their back. Last question

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:31.640
<v Speaker 1>on this for you, Senator. They're obviously having two banks

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>back to back collapse is going to make people uneasy.

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:38.360
<v Speaker 1>When you guys were on these calls, did anyone talk

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 1>about other banks or there's still concerns that other banks

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>may have been following and doing the same exact thing

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:46.879
<v Speaker 1>that Silicon Valley Bank was doing. Before I get that,

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to tell you real quick about our friends

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:51.400
<v Speaker 1>that gusts of precious medals. You know what's been happening

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:53.879
<v Speaker 1>in the headlines in the economy, you know what's been

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 1>happening with interest rates, and if you've been saving for

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:59.359
<v Speaker 1>retirement for a long time, you know how important it

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:03.439
<v Speaker 1>is to hecked your assets. Well, you can protect some

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:05.959
<v Speaker 1>of your assets by putting some of your money with

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 1>a gold IRA. I'm excited to tell you about a

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 1>company I trust and I use, August of Precious Metals.

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:14.639
<v Speaker 1>They're different because they even tell you if a gold

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Ira isn't your answer. There's no pressure with August of

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Precious Medals, just the facts about how it could work

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:25.639
<v Speaker 1>for you and your retirement. Now, if you have an

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:28.159
<v Speaker 1>IRA or a four one K and you've saved more

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 1>than a hundred thousand dollars, and you know how crazy

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 1>economy is, and you know how important it is to

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 1>protect your assets, especially if you're close to retirement, because

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:40.479
<v Speaker 1>there is no time to make up losses, call August

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 1>of Precious Medals. Not only will you get their free guide,

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:46.879
<v Speaker 1>but you will also get a web conference. Now, the

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 1>web conference is amazing. I've done it, and you'll sit

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 1>down and chat with someone one on one about your goals.

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:56.919
<v Speaker 1>Call them eight seven seven four the number four Gold

0:23:57.040 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Ira eight seven seven the number four Gold Ira or

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>online augusta Precious Metals dot Com. Use my name Ben,

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 1>and you will actually get fees for up to ten

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 1>years for free Augusta Precious Metals dot Com. Now other

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 1>banks do, in fact have hard times over the next

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:18.959
<v Speaker 1>week or two. Is the policy now officially of the

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:22.359
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration to bail out those banks ensure one hundred

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:25.120
<v Speaker 1>percent of deposits no matter what, because of the president

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 1>that they just created out of thin air. So possibly,

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:33.159
<v Speaker 1>but when you look at other banks, look, there's always

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a risk of contagion, and that is a serious concern.

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a concern that regulators need to take seriously. It's

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 1>a concerned that Congress needs to take seriously. We need

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:45.440
<v Speaker 1>our banking system to be safe and secure. There are

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:50.400
<v Speaker 1>very few off atty banks though, that are similarly situated

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:55.920
<v Speaker 1>to Silicon Valley Bank. Number one. It was almost exclusively

0:24:56.119 --> 0:25:02.679
<v Speaker 1>big tech and venture capital companies that were deposits in

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:05.359
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley Bank. And the way Silicon Valley Bank would

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:10.159
<v Speaker 1>work is they'd they'd bank a big venture capital firm,

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:14.639
<v Speaker 1>and the VC firm would require that all their portfolio companies.

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>So a venture capital firm is a firm that takes

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>investments from individuals and institutions and then invest typically in

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the tech space early stage and startup companies, and so

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:32.719
<v Speaker 1>a VC firm could have dozens or even hundreds of

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>tech startups that it's invested in, and many of the

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 1>vcs would require every one of the tech startups that

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:43.479
<v Speaker 1>had they had to bank at Silicon Valley Bank, and

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>so you ended up having a very high concentration. That

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>degree of sector exposure makes a bank quite vulnerable, that

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:56.920
<v Speaker 1>it was so intertwined with tech that tech has been

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 1>hard hit lately, and in particular the high interest rates.

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Much when you look at startups, they are often heavily

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 1>funded by debt, and a startup it could often be

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>a pretty long ramp up before they have significant revenue.

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:15.159
<v Speaker 1>And so Silicon Valley Bank had greater exposure because they

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:19.959
<v Speaker 1>were so sector concentrated in one area. Number One. Number

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>two the fact that ninety six percent of their deposits

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 1>were uninsured. That is an unusually high number that they

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 1>were not their business was not having lots and lots

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 1>of depositors under the FDIC insurance camp. It wasn't a

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of mom and pops. It was big firms with

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:43.360
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of millions or billions of dollars and number three.

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:46.159
<v Speaker 1>As I mentioned, they had the highest securities portfolio as

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 1>a percentage of total assets of any bank, and so

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 1>that they ended up with their investment strategy, they were

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:58.640
<v Speaker 1>particularly vulnerable to this interest rate risk. As I mentioned,

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>for a year they didn't even have a risk officer.

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:04.400
<v Speaker 1>They didn't hedge significantly against this risk, and so their

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>behavior invited this. Now there is a risk of other,

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 1>particularly midsize banks, facing a run on the bank, and

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 1>so we don't want that any any bank is potentially

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:19.680
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable to a run on the bank. We want people

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:23.919
<v Speaker 1>to have confidence in our banking system. But you asked

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 1>about the moral hazard. Will others behave recklessly because of this?

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:31.879
<v Speaker 1>And I think the odds are are quite high now.

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 1>A second element that was created is what's called a

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 1>FED Emergency Lending Facility. It's also known as a thirteen

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:43.639
<v Speaker 1>three facility because that's where the authority appears in the

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve Act, in which case the Feds said they

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 1>will loan money for a year to back up long

0:27:54.200 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 1>term government debt, and they will value that money not

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:03.359
<v Speaker 1>its current market value, but at its original purchase price.

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:06.920
<v Speaker 1>That's yet another bailout. I mean, let's let's be clear

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 1>that that is billions and billions of cash that is

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:15.439
<v Speaker 1>on the hook to go out from the FED, and

0:28:15.560 --> 0:28:19.119
<v Speaker 1>it really is striking. Look, we could have a reasonable

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 1>public policy debate listening to economist examining what needs to

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 1>be done to ensure stability in the banking system. But

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administration didn't want that that that reasonable debate.

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 1>It didn't want the input of Congress, it didn't want

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the public to have any say in it. It just

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 1>wanted political cronies to make that decision. And I think

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 1>that is a very dangerous dynamic. Yeah, it is concerning,

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and it seems like the new policy of the Biden

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 1>administration is be a woke bank and support an advocat

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and give donations to woke ideology and we'll back you

0:28:55.320 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 1>up no matter what. And if that's what they're going

0:28:57.120 --> 0:28:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to do for the next two years, that's going to

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 1>be very concerning. Should be an issue moving into the

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 1>next presidential election, no doubt about that. I want to

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>talk also about China and really what's happening with climate

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 1>change and with regulations. There are a couple of different

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration clips that have emerged recently highlighting just how

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 1>much the Democrats are in bed and idolizing the Chinese

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Communist Party. These were moments that when you hear them,

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 1>you're kind of in shock because you've got the Biden

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 1>administration officials who are actually saying that they think China

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:43.480
<v Speaker 1>is amazing. You have Jennifer Granholm, you also have another

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 1>individual with a Biden administration and here's a montage of

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 1>what they've been saying. We're hopeful that, you know, we

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 1>can all learn from what China is doing. But the

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 1>amount of money that they're investing in clean energy is

0:29:56.040 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 1>actually you know, encouraging. This isn't about decoupling. Now, that's

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 1>not the only Democrats that seem to be idolizing the

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Biden at ministration or excuse me, China from the Biden team,

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:20.120
<v Speaker 1>you have former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, who

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 1>also came out saying this about China. But here's the thing.

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 1>You can't just go after China with a cudgel. You

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 1>have to say, we have to live on this planet together.

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 1>How can we work together to save the planet from

0:30:36.280 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 1>climate change? They're essential in that discussion. How can we

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 1>try to work together with them on issues where we

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 1>can find common ground center China. Just so people understand this,

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 1>they're one of the biggest, if not one of the biggest,

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:55.320
<v Speaker 1>polluting industrialization in the world. They don't ever play by

0:30:55.360 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the rules that we are that these Democrats are trying

0:30:57.920 --> 0:31:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to force us to play by. And not only are

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:04.720
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese laughing at us on all of our global

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 1>warming issues that are just stifling our economy and manufacturing,

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 1>but they're making money off of these bad policies and

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 1>polluting at record levels that we've never seen before, and

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 1>now you've got Democrats praising them. You know, it really

0:31:21.160 --> 0:31:24.200
<v Speaker 1>is striking that in the same week that the Biden

0:31:24.240 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 1>administration does a bailout for their politically connected friends in tech,

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 1>including billions of dollars of a bailout for Chinese tech

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 1>companies and Chinese investors, that you have a coordinated pivot

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 1>from the Democrats to embrace China. Those three clips you played,

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the first one was from Jennifer Granham, the Energy Secretary,

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the second one was from Gina Raimondo, the Commerce Secretary,

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and the third one was from Nancy Pelosi, the former

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Speaker of the House. All of them are saying almost

0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 1>exactly the same thing. They're all saying we've got to

0:32:01.880 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 1>work with China as our partner in fighting climate change. Now,

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:09.959
<v Speaker 1>those are the talking points, and I will give Democrats credit.

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Democrats have incredible message discipline. The fact that you see

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 1>all three of them saying almost word for word the

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 1>same thing is clear. They got a message. They're sticking

0:32:19.560 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 1>to it. It just so happens the message is laughably absurd.

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:27.800
<v Speaker 1>So never mind all the human rights abuses, the torture,

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the murder, the genocide, the concentration camps. Never mind the

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 1>culpability for COVID and millions of lives lost and trillions

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 1>in damage done to the global economy. Never mind the

0:32:41.120 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 1>intellectual property theft that China pursues as a business as

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:50.480
<v Speaker 1>a state policy. Set all that aside, just focus on

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the environment. Communist China is the single biggest polluter on

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the face of the planet, year after year after year.

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:01.920
<v Speaker 1>It's the biggest pollution pollutor on the face of the planet.

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 1>But wait, pen, you might say, Nancy Pelosi just says

0:33:05.320 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 1>they're doing great things on the environment. Let me read

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 1>you an amazing statistic. China right now is in the

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 1>process of building more new coal capacity than all of

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the existing US coal plants combined. I want you to

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 1>pause and think about that for a second. So US

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:35.800
<v Speaker 1>capacity right now, we have one hundred and ninety eight

0:33:35.840 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 1>gigawatts of coal fired electricity generation capacity. That's of the

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 1>end of twenty twenty two, one hundred and ninety eight gigawatts.

0:33:45.080 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 1>How much do you think China is building, has planned,

0:33:48.520 --> 0:33:52.400
<v Speaker 1>and is building right now, No clue. So it has

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and fifteen gigawatts under construction, and it has

0:33:57.560 --> 0:34:02.280
<v Speaker 1>another two hundred and fifty gigawatts plant and so all told,

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:05.360
<v Speaker 1>that is three hundred and sixty five It is nearly

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:10.760
<v Speaker 1>double the current US capacity. That's what they are building

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and planning right now. And these plants are designed to

0:34:15.160 --> 0:34:19.640
<v Speaker 1>last forty years or longer. And so to watch the

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Democrats pivot in, Look, this has nothing to do with

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the environment. We've talked before about how today's Democrat party

0:34:26.800 --> 0:34:32.720
<v Speaker 1>is structurally pro China. Why because they're major stakeholders, big tech,

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 1>big business, big university's, big Hollywood, all of them are

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 1>in bed with China. And so when you have Pelosi

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:44.000
<v Speaker 1>in the Democrats reading the CCP's talking points about how

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 1>great they are on the environment, it is both deeply

0:34:49.080 --> 0:34:53.920
<v Speaker 1>dishonest and laughably absurd. One other thing on China. You

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 1>look at this moment and in history, I think this

0:34:57.120 --> 0:34:59.320
<v Speaker 1>is going to go down as an extremely pivotal moment

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:04.640
<v Speaker 1>because it's not just this administration basically fan boing over

0:35:04.920 --> 0:35:09.320
<v Speaker 1>China and rewriting history of what China's doing on climate change,

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:14.239
<v Speaker 1>but they're also allowing for China to really take advantage

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:18.040
<v Speaker 1>of what's happening with Russia and Ukraine. You can bine

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:20.919
<v Speaker 1>these two things together on top of what they're doing

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:24.440
<v Speaker 1>with TikTok and spying, and what they've been able to

0:35:24.480 --> 0:35:27.120
<v Speaker 1>do with just stealing anything they can get their hands

0:35:27.160 --> 0:35:30.400
<v Speaker 1>on through hacking in this country and stealing trade secrets.

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 1>The list goes on and on. Before we go through that,

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to tell people about Patriot Mobile real quick.

0:35:34.920 --> 0:35:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Patriot Mobile is the only Christian conservative cell phone company

0:35:38.400 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 1>in the US. And if you're sick and tired of

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:43.799
<v Speaker 1>what companies that you pay money to every month and

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:47.279
<v Speaker 1>then they actually go against your values, You've got an

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:50.280
<v Speaker 1>option now in the cell phone industry. You can actually

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:52.839
<v Speaker 1>switch Patriot Mobile, and it's easy. You can keep your

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:55.319
<v Speaker 1>same cell phone number, you can keep your same cell

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:57.400
<v Speaker 1>phone or switch to a new phone. Maybe you want

0:35:57.400 --> 0:35:59.680
<v Speaker 1>to upgrade, you can do that. The other great thing

0:35:59.719 --> 0:36:02.719
<v Speaker 1>about Patriot Mobile is when you pay your bill every month,

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 1>they take a portion of that bill and they give

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 1>it back to conservative causes and organizations that actually stand

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:13.200
<v Speaker 1>for what we believe in. We're talking about First and

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Second Amendment right organizations, standing up for the rights of

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:20.319
<v Speaker 1>unborn children, and even helping people with adoptions. If you're

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 1>ready to have a company stand with you and what

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:25.320
<v Speaker 1>you believe in, you're gonna have a cell phone anyway,

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:27.399
<v Speaker 1>you might as well support what you believe in. When

0:36:27.400 --> 0:36:30.280
<v Speaker 1>you pay your bill, call them age seven eighth Patriot.

0:36:30.560 --> 0:36:34.920
<v Speaker 1>That's eight seven eight Patriot eight seven eight Patriot. Use

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:37.479
<v Speaker 1>a promo verdict you get the best deals of the day.

0:36:37.800 --> 0:36:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Patriotmobile dot com slash verdict now center. This administration so

0:36:42.080 --> 0:36:45.080
<v Speaker 1>far and correct me if I'm wrong, has still to

0:36:45.239 --> 0:36:49.240
<v Speaker 1>date not one time stood up to China on any

0:36:49.520 --> 0:36:54.920
<v Speaker 1>significant issue. I would even say probably any basic issue.

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:58.480
<v Speaker 1>What is the reasoning behind them being so obsessed with

0:36:58.480 --> 0:37:01.719
<v Speaker 1>allowing China to just continue to grow, do whatever they

0:37:01.760 --> 0:37:04.920
<v Speaker 1>want to do and putting American second to China in

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:08.840
<v Speaker 1>this policy? Well, Number one that's been Joe Biden's policy

0:37:08.920 --> 0:37:13.240
<v Speaker 1>his entire life. He has been an advocate on behalf

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:16.400
<v Speaker 1>of China for decades. If you remember the video of

0:37:16.480 --> 0:37:20.200
<v Speaker 1>him saying, come on man, China's our friend, Come on man.

0:37:21.320 --> 0:37:24.640
<v Speaker 1>He has been arguing that for a long time. Number two,

0:37:24.719 --> 0:37:28.279
<v Speaker 1>by the way, he's also been perfectly happy to be

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:32.040
<v Speaker 1>personally enriched and for his family to be personally enriched, because,

0:37:32.040 --> 0:37:34.600
<v Speaker 1>as we've talked about at length on this podcast, Hunter

0:37:34.640 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Biden made millions of dollars monetizing his father's political connections,

0:37:40.320 --> 0:37:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and that included, as we know from the Hunter Biden laptop,

0:37:43.360 --> 0:37:45.840
<v Speaker 1>ten percent for the big guy, for Joe Biden himself.

0:37:46.080 --> 0:37:49.680
<v Speaker 1>So he's had a personal financial stake in doing business

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:53.040
<v Speaker 1>with China for a long time. But number three is

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:57.759
<v Speaker 1>the structural reality of the Democrat Party today. They're not

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:01.000
<v Speaker 1>willing to stand up to China because the people who

0:38:01.200 --> 0:38:05.960
<v Speaker 1>fund them depend upon China. The people who form the

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:10.880
<v Speaker 1>core of the Democrat Party today are deeply intertwined with China,

0:38:10.960 --> 0:38:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and actually the Silicon Valley Bank situation illustrates that perfectly.

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Biden was all too eager to bail out his buddies

0:38:20.760 --> 0:38:24.440
<v Speaker 1>in tech, but in doing so, he's providing billions and

0:38:24.560 --> 0:38:29.160
<v Speaker 1>bailouts for China as well, and that's because the two

0:38:29.239 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 1>are deeply intertwined. I'll point out on top of that,

0:38:34.960 --> 0:38:37.239
<v Speaker 1>if you say, well, we'll wait a second. You know,

0:38:37.920 --> 0:38:43.720
<v Speaker 1>isn't that an exaggeration. In the last Congress, I forced

0:38:43.719 --> 0:38:48.840
<v Speaker 1>to vote on the Senate floor on my amendment that

0:38:49.000 --> 0:38:52.440
<v Speaker 1>said the federal government should be prohibited from buying electric

0:38:52.520 --> 0:38:59.720
<v Speaker 1>vehicles or batteries manufactured using slave labor in concentration camps

0:38:59.719 --> 0:39:02.799
<v Speaker 1>and China. You would think this would be an easy vote.

0:39:02.800 --> 0:39:04.239
<v Speaker 1>You would think this would be one hundred and nothing.

0:39:05.440 --> 0:39:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Every single Democrat except one, Every Democrat except Joe Mansion

0:39:09.440 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 1>voted no. And that is a structural dynamic of how

0:39:15.080 --> 0:39:19.000
<v Speaker 1>today's Democrat Party is organized. Yeah, it's certainly not looking

0:39:19.000 --> 0:39:21.680
<v Speaker 1>out for the American people first and foremost, and we're

0:39:21.680 --> 0:39:23.600
<v Speaker 1>seeing that. Whether it's the bank, whether it's China, whether

0:39:23.600 --> 0:39:26.040
<v Speaker 1>it's climate change. The list goes on and on. Senator,

0:39:26.080 --> 0:39:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Always a pleasure. Don't forget if you're listening. We do

0:39:28.239 --> 0:39:30.000
<v Speaker 1>this show three days a week, so make sure you

0:39:30.040 --> 0:39:33.520
<v Speaker 1>have that subscribe and or the auto download button so

0:39:33.560 --> 0:39:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you get each and every episode. When we're dealing with

0:39:36.320 --> 0:39:39.319
<v Speaker 1>what's really happening in Washington, with what's happening with the

0:39:39.320 --> 0:39:41.640
<v Speaker 1>banks right now. You won't get this anywhere else, so

0:39:41.719 --> 0:39:44.919
<v Speaker 1>makes you subscribe, Hit that auto download button and rute

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:47.400
<v Speaker 1>us to five story review. It helps us reach a

0:39:47.480 --> 0:39:49.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of new listeners. When you do that, it matters

0:39:50.239 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot and how they rate podcasts. So if

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you'll please rite us a five star review as well,

0:39:55.040 --> 0:39:57.480
<v Speaker 1>we'd greatly appreciate that, and we'll see you back here

0:39:57.560 --> 0:39:58.400
<v Speaker 1>in a couple of days.