WEBVTT - Oaktree's Wayne Dahl on Credit Markets Right Now

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisenthal and.

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Tracy, we just got back from California. We're at the

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>future Proof Conference. I love going to southern California.

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:26.439
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you can't beat Huntington Beach. It was pretty sweet.

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>It was so beautiful, it was really cool. We were

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>out on the beach.

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:32.559
<v Speaker 2>We walked out to the pier, watch the.

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Perfect weather, watched the surfers, ate some really good food,

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 1>and had some pretty good conversations about the state of

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>financial markets.

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:44.239
<v Speaker 3>Yep, and we finally got to record an episode that

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:47.479
<v Speaker 3>we've been meaning to do for a while. We dived

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:51.160
<v Speaker 3>into not the ocean, but the credit market.

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 1>I guess, like the credit market like comes up here

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>or there in various aspects of our conversations. I guess

0:00:57.560 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 1>typically when we talk about real estate, maybe a little

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>bit about the FED. But the credit market is obviously

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:06.399
<v Speaker 1>so diverse and it's such a its own world that,

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>like we really it had been too long since we

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:10.479
<v Speaker 1>talked about, Okay, what is happening in credit?

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 4>Well.

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 3>Also, I think there was this expectation that as interest

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:17.400
<v Speaker 3>rates went up, you were going to see lots of

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 3>drama in the credit market, and even though we've seen

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 3>bankruptcies rise a little bit, we haven't really seen the

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:26.319
<v Speaker 3>big fallout that a lot of people had been expecting.

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Right, And you know, look, the way people think about

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the FED is that it works by tightening credit conditions,

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:34.320
<v Speaker 1>right like in theory, like that's what like how the

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>it's all's supposed to work, as you said, when interest

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:39.039
<v Speaker 1>rates go up. And yet we have got this rise

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 1>in interest rates. For sure, we definitely see it on

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the mortgage side, like less housing activity, but the sort

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 1>of like broader tightening of like business credit. We certainly

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen much of a widening in spreads at all.

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's a confusing time.

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely. So we really do have the perfect guest to

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 3>talk about this.

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>That's right, our guest. We spoke with Wayne Dall. He's

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a managing director, portfolio manager, an investment risk officer at

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 1>oak Tree. We talk about all things credit. What do

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>you see, Why did rates move so hard? Why are

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 1>they still like pressed up against the ceiling.

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 4>We went through a period so long where interest rates

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 4>were very low and money was very easy, and unfortunately,

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 4>during the period of COVID with some of the supply

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 4>chain issues, with a lot of the stimulus that was

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:26.080
<v Speaker 4>put into the economy, both through the monetary channel and

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 4>the fiscal channel, that really set up kind of the

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 4>perfect storm for demand to go through the roof and

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 4>supply to be diminished, and ultimately we ended up with

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 4>this big inflation push, which, if you go back to

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 4>the formula from the seventies and eighties, how do you

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:46.799
<v Speaker 4>cure inflation? You raise interest rates quickly, And I think

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 4>that's the playbook that the central banks, not only in

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:53.360
<v Speaker 4>the US but really globally had no choice but to follow.

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 3>What does risk actually mean to you an oak Tree

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 3>and does it differ from maybe other financial firms definition

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:02.800
<v Speaker 3>of risk?

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that is that is a great question, And anyone

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 4>who's read our chairman Howard Marx's memos knows that he's

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:11.639
<v Speaker 4>very clear that risk is more than just the masure

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 4>of volatility. I mean when typically at oak Tree, when

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:18.079
<v Speaker 4>we talk about risk, it is our number one investment philosophy,

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:21.959
<v Speaker 4>an investment tenant to keep risk under control. Really it's

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:25.360
<v Speaker 4>to avoid loss. And the tagline there for oak Tree

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 4>is if you avoid the losers, the winners take care

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 4>of themselves. So as credit investors, especially in a market

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 4>like this where yields are high, you want to earn

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 4>that yield and keep that yield and not give it

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 4>back in the form of default. So to us, minimizing

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 4>risk is largely related to kind of minimizing loss for investors.

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's dive deeper into credit. I mean, let's start, like,

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>spreads are still pretty narrow, yeah, and credit is such

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>a huge world, so I know we have to like

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 1>go from like slice to slice and slides. But like

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>big picture, people don't seem particularly concerned about like defaults.

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, look, I think one of the things

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 4>with credit that has changed is largely related to the

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 4>backdrop of interest rates. And to quote Howard again, our chairman.

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 4>You know, he wrote a memo in December called a

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:18.160
<v Speaker 4>sea change, and in that memo he talked about this

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 4>change in what was a low return world.

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:22.720
<v Speaker 5>To a high return world.

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 4>And that has really I think shifted the dynamic and

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:30.479
<v Speaker 4>the expectations around credit. And you're right, have credit spreads

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 4>moved maybe as wide as people thought, No, but the

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:37.280
<v Speaker 4>yields have become very attractive, and ultimately, I think if

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 4>you look at credit this is something we did a

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 4>lot last year. There's kind of three ways I would

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 4>look at value in fixed income. Number one is what

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 4>is the yield? Well, that was very attractive. Number two,

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:52.040
<v Speaker 4>what is the price? If I can buy fixed income

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 4>at a discount, then I can you know, earn more

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:57.679
<v Speaker 4>than just the coupon. And number three what is the spread?

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 4>The first two where it very attractive levels and spreads

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 4>maybe kind of at median levels, but you know, two

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 4>out of three makes a pretty good investment.

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:09.479
<v Speaker 2>Well, how are you thinking about default risk now?

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 3>Because certainly there were a lot of people, I mean

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 3>just last year in twenty twenty two, who were warning

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 3>about we're going to get this big recession, there's going

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 3>to be a big spike in defaults. We certainly haven't seen,

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, the bankruptcy rate has picked up a little bit,

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 3>but we haven't seen this wave of failures that a

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 3>lot of people were predicting.

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that is definitely true.

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 4>And I think for part of that, you have to

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 4>think about what happened during COVID, And in a way

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:41.160
<v Speaker 4>you could almost say COVID was maybe recession part one,

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 4>and we're on our way to recession part two. And

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 4>the reason why I say that is because if you

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 4>think back to the end of twenty nineteen, before COVID,

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 4>the FED had stopped hiking rates in December twenty eighteen,

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 4>and at that time actually had planned to continue to hike.

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:03.279
<v Speaker 4>Chairman Powell pivoted in early January twenty nineteen and ultimately

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 4>ended the year by cutting rates three times. There were

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 4>a lot of the similar signs of slow down in

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 4>ism data, in industrial production data, a lot of your

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:16.720
<v Speaker 4>typical signs of a recession. So in a way, COVID

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 4>potentially just accelerated us into a recession that was maybe

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 4>on its way already. But what it also did is

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 4>brought forth a number of defaults. You had, you know,

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 4>default rates in the high yeld bond market, the broadly

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:32.239
<v Speaker 4>syndicated loan market anywhere from kind of four to six percent,

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 4>And in a way that was kind of a cleansing

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:38.840
<v Speaker 4>event that prepared us for this time here in the

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 4>high yield bond market. Because of that default rate, you

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 4>cleared out a lot of the lowest rated companies that

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:49.839
<v Speaker 4>were under the most stress. Simultaneously, you had a number

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 4>of downgrades, so triple B rated securities into double B

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 4>or single b rated into.

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:58.840
<v Speaker 5>High yield, so you up the quality of.

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 4>The high yeld bond market maximum triple b's, minimum triple c's,

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 4>and kind of created this environment where everybody just refinanced

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 4>at the lowest rates in history and they don't really

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 4>have a cash flow problem or a maturity problem.

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 1>So you anticipated my next question. And I appreciate that

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>you brought the twenty nineteen experience because we don't really

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about twenty nineteen, but it's that much anymore. But

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>of course that was an interesting year. And then so okay,

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>so we have these defaults, then then the the pool

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 1>of credit gets better, and then the big turming out

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 1>of debt, so everyone refinances fixed.

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 5>Rate ultra low.

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Talk to us about, like today in September twenty twenty three,

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>how that turning out is playing into things now, and like,

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, people talk about the maturity wall.

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 2>And no, Joe, you have to say looming maturity.

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>That's the rule, the looming maturity wall. Talk to us

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>about like the effects we're seeing today from that turning out.

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 4>You're absolutely right, I mean, just to kind of put

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 4>some numbers to that. In twenty twenty and twenty twenty one,

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 4>the highy bond market in the US had gross issuance

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 4>of about eight hundred billion dollars in a one point

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 4>three trillion dollar market, so you had two thirds of

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 4>the market refinance.

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 5>Wow.

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 4>Now today, you're right, we've obviously the the duration has

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 4>shrunk in that market because refinancings have declined. But it

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 4>does kind of become a twenty twenty six maturity, you know,

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 4>kind of problem. Companies don't wait for the last minute

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 4>to refinance their debt. That wouldn't be wise because what

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 4>if the capital markets freeze up, So you kind of

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 4>bring that forward maybe one to one and a half years.

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 4>So I think as we get into twenty twenty four,

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 4>you will start to see a situation where companies are

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 4>going to have to come to the capital markets.

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 5>Well it's not there yet.

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 3>Well I was about to ask, though, because this month

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 3>we have seen a pickup in new issue and so

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 3>what's going on there? Like, why are companies deciding this

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 3>is the moment to start selling new bonds?

0:08:57.559 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 5>I mean there are certainly companies.

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 4>I mean I can't remember the exact number, Maybe less

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 4>than twenty percent of the market that comes due over

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 4>the next eighteen months. So there is some amount of refinancing.

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 4>There is some capital activity going on, and some of

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 4>it I think is moving exposure from one market to

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:18.439
<v Speaker 4>another market. If you look at the broadly syndicated loan market,

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 4>that market is made up of floating rate debt. I

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 4>mean there is a market where people's interest cost has

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 4>gone well, it's more than double in the last eighteen months,

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 4>and the high yield market has seen some refinancing out

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 4>of the loan market into secured bonds in the high

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:37.680
<v Speaker 4>yield market, So there has been some kind of new

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:42.319
<v Speaker 4>entrance in there as opposed to simply refinancing.

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Other sectors or types of borrowers who, in your view,

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>are going to have a trickier time over the next

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>eighteen twenty four months as some of these refinancings pick up.

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 4>Well, Like I said, I mean you if you want

0:09:57.400 --> 0:09:59.679
<v Speaker 4>to talk about the places in I'll say that non

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 4>eventvement grade or speculative grade market that's going to have trouble.

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 4>It will, I think potentially be some of these issuers

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 4>in the loan market. And again the reason for that

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 4>is they have seen their cost of financing really go

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 4>up as their index to short rates, which are now

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:17.320
<v Speaker 4>five and a half percent what type.

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 5>Of borrowers in the loan market.

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 4>So you certainly get you know, exposure to many industries,

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 4>but the loan market today has really shifted into the

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 4>financing source of leverage buyouts. That is the majority of

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 4>the issuance in that market. When you talk about a

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 4>pick up an issuance in the loan market, you're typically expecting,

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:40.959
<v Speaker 4>you know, a pickup in m and A activity using

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:44.079
<v Speaker 4>loans to refinance. And one of the biggest areas that's

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:46.680
<v Speaker 4>seen a lot of m and A activity from private

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 4>equity sponsors over the last few years is in some

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 4>software and technology related business. So that is the largest

0:10:53.559 --> 0:11:10.719
<v Speaker 4>single sector in the loan market today.

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:14.680
<v Speaker 3>Do you see froth in the leverage loan market, because

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 3>this was an area of concern for I mean years,

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 3>even before COVID, you saw a lot of financial regulators

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 3>start to crack down on you know, capital requirements for

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 3>leverage loans. You saw I should tell a story about

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 3>I was in a bank one time, and I won't

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 3>name the bank, but I was going to see their

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 3>leverage loan bankers and they had a framed T shirt

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 3>in their office that said I stole this shirt off

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 3>my client's back, So that.

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Kind of encapsula I think it would have been.

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 3>Like maybe twenty fifteen, twenty sixteen, it was definitely the

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 3>height of the leverage loan boom.

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 2>But is there froth?

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 4>Look, I mean, there's definitely been frauth in that market,

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 4>and maybe to define that a little more clear, to say,

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 4>there are certainly borrowers that probably you are at risk

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 4>of having extended their balance sheet too much, and in

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 4>the face of borrowing costs or interest rates going so high,

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 4>they've kind of put themselves in a tough situation. I

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 4>think one of the things to remember in the loan

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 4>market that has maybe masked some of the potential volatility

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 4>over the years is the majority of buyers in that market,

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:36.440
<v Speaker 4>almost seventy percent, are coming from the CLO market or

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 4>clateralized loan obligations, and those buyers are not active traders,

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 4>so you don't see loans traded like you do some

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 4>of the other investment grade bonds, high yield bonds, and

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 4>in a way that can kind of mask some of

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:51.679
<v Speaker 4>that building volatility.

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 3>Again, one of the stories pre pandemic was this idea

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 3>that a lot of the power in the market had

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 3>shifted from lenders to so the companies who are issuing

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 3>debt or taking out a loan could dictate the terms

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 3>of that deal, and so we saw a lot of

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:12.199
<v Speaker 3>cove light deals, maybe some sketchy leverage loans. Is that

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:14.679
<v Speaker 3>still the case or does it feel like the pendulum

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:17.319
<v Speaker 3>has swung a little bit as interest rates have risen.

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 4>I think in the broadly syndicated loan market that's probably

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 4>still largely the case. There is a lot of demand,

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:27.079
<v Speaker 4>and obviously over the last call it eighteen months, supply

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 4>has been diminished. So you have people who want to

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:34.560
<v Speaker 4>buy loans. As institutions, you're competing against CLO's buying loans,

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:37.840
<v Speaker 4>so that demand has kept up. I think one of

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 4>the places where maybe you have seen a little bit

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:42.560
<v Speaker 4>more of a shift there is in the private credit

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:45.839
<v Speaker 4>market that's issuing loans, where interesting you've seen kind of

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 4>a pullback from some of the buyers that were very,

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 4>very active in twenty twenty one, and the either the

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 4>new buyers or continuing buyers have been able to be

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 4>a little bit more strict with their demands for terms.

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:02.080
<v Speaker 5>Cove things like that, and those deals.

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>When a private credit comes up all the time, and

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 1>we probably should even do more on this, But it

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:10.840
<v Speaker 1>always seems like, for whatever reason, and I don't really

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:12.680
<v Speaker 1>understand it. I don't know much about the market. For

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>whatever reason, it seems like it doesn't matter where the

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 1>cycle is. It just seems like it just grows and

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>grows private credit. What's the how does that happen?

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 5>Well?

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 4>I mean, who wouldn't want to put an asset in

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 4>their portfolio that has no volatility and the price doesn't

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 4>Is that.

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 5>Really isn't really that simple? Is it?

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 3>Like?

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Because people say that, I'm like, Oh, can't really be

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>like that. They can't really be the story? But is

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>that the story?

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 4>I mean, Joe, to date, I think that largely has

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 4>been the story. I mean, you're right, there has been

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 4>a story can to the well, the time will come

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 4>for the day of reckoning of you know, all this

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 4>all this borrowing in this private credit market, all these

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 4>marks that are staying at par are gonna are gonna

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 4>come down, and you know, perhaps we are getting closer

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 4>to that date, but you're right, that really still has

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 4>not been tested, although I think people are preparing a

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 4>little more, you know, for that day to come.

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Every time I hear about like pe or VC or

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>private credit, and people are like, well, the biggest nice

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>thing is like it doesn't move, and so I'm like,

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 1>that can't be it.

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 5>It can't be that.

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 1>And yet maybe that is a big thing.

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it has kind of been that easy to date.

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 4>But like I said, I think people are getting a

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 4>little more concerned where you see. You know, I think

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 4>some private credit managers deciding do I want to deploy

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 4>this incremental capital that I can draw down or do

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 4>I need to preserve this to potentially, you know, rescue

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 4>some of the deals that are already in my portfolio.

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 4>I think investors are getting a little more picky as

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 4>well when looking at some of these legacy portfolios, going, hey,

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 4>I like private credit and I like where it's priced today,

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 4>But do I want to buy the portfolio that was

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 4>built in twenty twenty one when money was free?

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 3>Does the rise of private credit affect oat Tree at all?

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 3>And what I mean by that is like, maybe there

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 3>are certain opportunities that end up getting taken by private

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 3>lenders versus publicly traded. You know, a company will decide

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to do a private deal. There's a lot

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 3>of appetite, a lot of demand, rather than go down

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 3>the publicly traded route.

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:11.800
<v Speaker 4>Maybe the caveat is it depends which group you talk to. Yeah,

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 4>but no, I think the growth in private credit, especially

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 4>over the last few months, has has been positive for

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 4>oak Tree and has potential to be to be positive.

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 5>For more areas.

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 4>I mean, we are certainly active in these private credit

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 4>markets seeking to you know, find value and really fill

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 4>a gap that I think has grown over the last

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 4>eighteen months where some of the larger players have you know,

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 4>maybe step back and including some of the banks.

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 4>I think on the other hand, you know, oak Tree

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 4>obviously we're known for our distressed as distressed debt business,

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 4>which now is our global opportunities business. You know, here's

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 4>an here's an opportunity for you know, a group like

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 4>that to maybe you know, step in and support some

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 4>of these deals if if things go south. So I

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 4>think there's multiple ways where where we can see a

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 4>benefit from from this growth.

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned, you know, maybe like some of these private

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 1>credit managers and maybe they don't want to like to

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 1>deploy that additional marginal capital for that risk. It made

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>me wonder, just going back to the sort of the

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the conversation, like you can get a real

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 1>return risk free these days, which you haven't been able

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to get in a long time, and you don't even

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 1>have to take any like duration risk. You can like

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>there's positive rates at the short end. Does that change

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:26.440
<v Speaker 1>risk ampetite or you see people was like, yeah, look

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I could make money and I don't have to take

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:30.719
<v Speaker 1>any risk. Does that change like how money gets deployed

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 1>in your view?

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I definitely think it does. And really from our standpoint,

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:38.919
<v Speaker 4>it kind of shifts even where we take risk on

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 4>the you know, on on the maybe the risk spectrum

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 4>or the duration spectrum. I mean, it's rare that you

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 4>have short rates being the highest part of the curve.

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:49.920
<v Speaker 5>So what's what's kind of.

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 4>Resulted in that is securities that pay interest index to

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 4>those short rates.

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 5>Have become even more and more attractive.

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:00.199
<v Speaker 4>So just to again kind of put some numbers that

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 4>if you look at the high yield market, a fixed

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 4>rate market, sure their yields have gone up, but their

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 4>income they generate has stayed, you know, right around low

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 4>sixes despite the call it nine percent yields. Can you

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 4>just explain that a little for what I mean is

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 4>the coupon on a high yield bond is under six percent,

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 4>their price is currently below par. So you take that

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 4>coupon divided by the price, that's your current yield.

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 5>That's going to be in the low sixes.

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:28.680
<v Speaker 4>Whereas, if I can buy a high quality floating rate

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 4>security that might be a structured asset, that might be

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:35.679
<v Speaker 4>a broadly syndicated loan, I'm earning that near five and

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 4>a half percent solfar rate plus a spread of call

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 4>it four hundred basis points, now I'm earning nine and

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 4>a half percent. So, yes, risk free is a you know,

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 4>certainly a viable investment, but you know, so are a

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 4>lot of other investments that are you know, reasonably safe,

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:53.639
<v Speaker 4>that have you know, an appropriate kind of spread for

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:54.200
<v Speaker 4>their risk.

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 3>So we're talking about yields sort of enticing buyers at

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:01.440
<v Speaker 3>this moment in time. But there's something else that has

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:05.480
<v Speaker 3>happened since the pandemic, which is the Federal Reserve announced

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 3>this massive corporate bond buying program that, in theory is

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 3>now a permanent backstop for the market. Do you think

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 3>that's affected investing behavior.

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:19.920
<v Speaker 4>There's no doubt that had a significant impact on investing

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 4>behavior in twenty twenty. Just knowing that that backstop was there,

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:27.879
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure how much today. I mean, I think

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:30.479
<v Speaker 4>in the case of say the hi Yo bond market,

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 4>you have seen that market kind of shrink over the

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:37.919
<v Speaker 4>last eighteen months, shrink because deals of come do that

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 4>haven't been refinanced. You've had actually more upgrades than downgrades

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:45.639
<v Speaker 4>in that market, which may be surprising given the you know,

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 4>all the talk of recession and the need for spreads

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:50.919
<v Speaker 4>to be wider. So you know, you do kind of

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 4>have this almost supply demand mismatch on the side of

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:58.959
<v Speaker 4>you know, maybe demand kind of pushing those those spreads tighter.

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:02.399
<v Speaker 4>But I think it's in the back of people's minds somewhere.

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>How do you think about the Fed here Tracy mentioned

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the backstop, but in terms of like the sort of

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>good old fashion where they are on the rate side.

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Obviously there's hope that maybe they could cut rates even

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:17.679
<v Speaker 1>in the absence of a recession.

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 5>But is the FED like, are we clear?

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Is the Fed kinda like we got the inflation thing licked.

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:26.440
<v Speaker 4>I think that's a mistake that the market has made

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 4>for the last year, that inflation would come down regardless

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:33.919
<v Speaker 4>of what the economic backdrop is, regardless of what happens

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:36.879
<v Speaker 4>to asset prices, the FED would turn around and cut rates.

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:40.120
<v Speaker 4>That was a big story in January of this year,

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 4>when you had kind of everything rallied spreads, compressed rates,

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 4>rallied high yield, rallied investment grade credit rally kind of

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 4>everything rallied on this expectation that rates would come down

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 4>before the end of the year, despite the fact that

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:57.399
<v Speaker 4>people called for a recession and that I think the

0:20:57.440 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 4>market's kind of coming around to the fact that is

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 4>probably maybe a little bit too much wishful thinking.

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 1>My memory's gonna hit you. At some point, people were

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 1>thinking that by like they would already be cutting by this.

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 5>Point, yes, yeah, oh yeah in January. Well yeah.

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:14.119
<v Speaker 4>The other triggering event for the FED was in March.

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 4>Right in March this year, when you had the Silicon

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 4>Valley Bank signature bank, kind of regional bank flare up.

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:23.360
<v Speaker 4>The market really pivoted to expecting rates to be cut

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 4>by about one hundred and fifty basis points.

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 5>By the end of this year. That's completely reversed.

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 1>And everyone said, like, oh, historically the FED hikes untilcilding

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>breaks and then like a few weeks later it's still

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>red hot.

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 4>I think the Fed's kind of in an interesting spot

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:41.119
<v Speaker 4>right now. And you know, obviously you guys were at

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:43.879
<v Speaker 4>Jackson Hole, and you know, had a number of guests

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 4>out at Jackson Hole. And I think looking at Chairman

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:49.639
<v Speaker 4>Powell's speech this year, maybe compared to the last two,

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:52.360
<v Speaker 4>I think he's got to be feeling pretty good about

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:55.919
<v Speaker 4>himself right now, because clearly last year he kind of

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 4>had to give the market a bit of a scolding

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 4>and say, hey, all you dreamer out there that think

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 4>inflation is going to come down and we're going to

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:06.960
<v Speaker 4>immediately kind of ease financial conditions, you're wrong. We're in

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 4>this for the long haul. And this year he was

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:11.399
<v Speaker 4>kind of able to stand up and say, thank you

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 4>for listening to us. We're still in it for the

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:16.440
<v Speaker 4>long haul as long as the data dictates.

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Given your credit perspective, what do you think about the

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 3>R star debate? So the idea that the neutral rate

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 3>of interest might be higher than we once thought, or,

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 3>to put it another way, the idea that maybe the

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:46.159
<v Speaker 3>economy is more interest rate resilient than it was previously.

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 4>I will say, personally, I don't really have an opinion

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 4>on what our star could be and should be, And

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:52.399
<v Speaker 4>I feel like I get a little cover from that

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 4>because I believe Chairman Powell, he said the same thing,

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 4>also said that. So, but I do think if you

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 4>look at kind of where the market, you know, moved

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 4>from a rate perspective, maybe leading into Jackson Hole, if

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:08.359
<v Speaker 4>you look at that kind of shift, maybe you know,

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:11.359
<v Speaker 4>call it like a shift in turn premium across the curve.

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 4>I think there's no doubt that investors were probably thinking

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 4>that there's a possibility that we may kind of have

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:21.680
<v Speaker 4>some form of higher rates for longer, and in order

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 4>to compensate that.

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 5>Let's let's lift the yield curve.

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, how much does the turning out of debt that

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 1>we talked about a few minutes ago explain the lack

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of impact? They're the like, you know, we haven't had

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 1>a recession, we have at a slow down. The rates

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:42.919
<v Speaker 1>have gone a lot higher than many people would have guessed,

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly in January, certainly in.

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:46.360
<v Speaker 5>March, et cetera.

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:48.159
<v Speaker 1>Like how much is it just the fact, you know,

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 1>there are all these charts that people look at where

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 1>it's like, yeah, rates are here, but actual net interest payments,

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 1>share gdper whatever are still pretty low. How much is

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 1>that just a function of Yeah, when so much fixed

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 1>rate debt, these rate heis just don't wipe vent that quickly.

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:04.359
<v Speaker 4>I think that's definitely true in the corporate space, And

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:07.160
<v Speaker 4>don't forget. I mean a lot of corporates built up

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 4>a lot of cash during the COVID period, So much

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:13.160
<v Speaker 4>was poured into the economy that yes they turned out

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:16.199
<v Speaker 4>that yes the rates were lower, but they also built

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:19.359
<v Speaker 4>cash and you know, saw leverage come down. But I

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 4>think from an economy perspective, one of the keys to

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:25.919
<v Speaker 4>kind of why we haven't felt that interest rate push

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 4>is in the residential housing market. Yeah, I mean that,

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 4>to me is the real one of the real keys

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:35.640
<v Speaker 4>to why twenty twenty three from a consumer standpoint, from

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:39.400
<v Speaker 4>a spending standpoint, from a confidence standpoint, from a gross standpoint,

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:42.680
<v Speaker 4>has been a lot more robust than people would have expected.

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 3>You mean the refinancing boom, basically putting money in a

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 3>lot of people's pockets.

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:49.880
<v Speaker 4>Well, what I mean is if you look at the

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 4>house prices since COVID, so from December twenty nineteen through

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:57.879
<v Speaker 4>you know twenty twenty one, house prices were up thirty percent,

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 4>mortgage rates were three percent. If I told everyone in

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:03.920
<v Speaker 4>the room at that time. Hey, by the way, in

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 4>the next eighteen months, the mortgage rate on a thirty

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 4>year mortgage is going to go from three to seven

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 4>and a half. How many would have said, oh great,

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 4>I think house prices will go up another fifteen percent.

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:18.440
<v Speaker 4>I don't think anyone would have done that. But that's

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 4>exactly what happened, because in this country, with our ability

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:24.879
<v Speaker 4>to lock in that financing like the companies for a

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:29.439
<v Speaker 4>long time, everyone just immediately said, well, great, honey, I'm sorry.

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 4>That means we're not moving for the next ten years,

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:33.160
<v Speaker 4>and nobody has.

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:37.160
<v Speaker 1>We did an episode about a thirteen or fourteen months

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 1>ago and our guest was like, house prices aren't going

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:41.640
<v Speaker 1>to fall and for this reason, And in the back

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of my head, I was like, man, this guy's saying,

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:44.159
<v Speaker 1>this guy's really going.

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 5>Out on a limb.

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:47.439
<v Speaker 1>But I'm glad it is, like he gets it.

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 5>He was right.

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:50.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, But I mean, think about think about what makes

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 4>people happy they see the equity in their home. I mean,

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 4>that is a big part of I think consumers kind

0:25:56.320 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 4>of propensity to spend, maybe spend down some more of

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:01.680
<v Speaker 4>that access savings.

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:02.639
<v Speaker 5>It's a real driver.

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 4>I think of just kind of overall kind of balance

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:10.920
<v Speaker 4>sheet stability and from a consumer standpoint, for sure.

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 3>The last time interest rates were really high would have

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 3>been the nineteen seventies, and.

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:19.920
<v Speaker 5>I think time we all remember fondly obviously.

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 2>Well so, I think a lot of people remember the.

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 3>Nineteen seventies for inflation, you know, the oil crisis, things

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:30.399
<v Speaker 3>like that. Not many people except maybe me, remember it

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 3>as the birth of the junk bond market.

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 2>And there are a lot of people who.

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 3>Made their names in that environment, Mike Milkin being one.

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 3>Howard Marx I think got his start then as well.

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:45.639
<v Speaker 3>Do you see the opportunity in the current environment of

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 3>higher rates, maybe more volatility around bonds, things like that

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:52.920
<v Speaker 3>for a similar dynamic, could you see something brand new

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 3>enter the market?

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 5>Oh? Good question. Yeah, that is a great question.

0:26:56.760 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 4>I mean, look, you're right that the junk bond market,

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:02.640
<v Speaker 4>the high yield market did really kind of benefit from

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 4>that that kind of peak and rates. And you're right,

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 4>Howard Marx did start one of the first kind of

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 4>public high yield bond funds back in the late seventies.

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 4>You know, I think the one difference maybe then versus

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 4>today is rates were you know, fifteen to twenty percent,

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 4>and you know, fixed income just.

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:23.399
<v Speaker 5>Rode that wave for forty years.

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:27.160
<v Speaker 4>And Howard mentioned this in his memo you Know More

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:30.440
<v Speaker 4>most recently that one thing he's certain is rates probably

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 4>won't fall two thousand basis points again over a twenty

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 4>year period. So I don't know if you get that

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 4>same dynamic and fixed income, but the market seems to

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 4>always find a way to to, you know, find a

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:44.120
<v Speaker 4>new way to solve an old problem.

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm buying a house right now, and one of the

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 1>things people will tell me, like, oh, well to buy

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:51.160
<v Speaker 1>a house to They're like, oh, well, it's okay.

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:53.679
<v Speaker 5>That like paying cash, that's.

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:54.400
<v Speaker 1>A long story.

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:57.479
<v Speaker 5>That's funny. You should say that. No, I'm not.

0:27:57.800 --> 0:27:59.400
<v Speaker 1>But one of the things people say is like, oh,

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 1>it's yeah, it's all right, you just refined a few years.

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 1>And what that tells me is like everyone is a

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:06.959
<v Speaker 1>bunch of people at least like are like of this

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 1>generation locked into like a sort of assert mentality where

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:12.719
<v Speaker 1>it's like seven percent mortgages like super high, right, and

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:14.640
<v Speaker 1>so it's like this is abnormal, and the Fed's gonna

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and then they're gonna cut and just kind of what

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:18.639
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about before. But like, could it go

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 1>in the other direction? Could we have like I mean,

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 1>it just seems so unfathomable that like FED funds rates

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:26.359
<v Speaker 1>wherever like above ten. But it's like, is there some

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 1>natural limit? Could we go like much higher on rates

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>like that? None of us are thinking about.

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 4>Look, that debate has certainly come up more often in

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:37.359
<v Speaker 4>the last twelve months, and it certainly did in the

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 4>previous ten years. You mentioned kind of that belief about mortgages,

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 4>and I think that's true. I can tell you with

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 4>somebody who refinanced a mortgage in twenty twenty one that

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 4>wasn't a thirty year and thought, okay, I have seven

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 4>to ten years. Rates will probably come down again or

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 4>won't stay high. But I think the big wild card

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 4>in that is really just the cost of public debt.

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:00.680
<v Speaker 4>And I know you guys have spoken about this with

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 4>other guests, but I mean that burden on the on

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 4>the you know, our our budget annually to see rates

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 4>at that level to refinance what's now you know, thirty

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 4>two trillion dollars of debt. No, that's that's not a

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:16.480
<v Speaker 4>good story in the long And I don't know how

0:29:16.520 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 4>you have a kind of viable economy with persistent rates

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 4>that high.

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:26.040
<v Speaker 3>So we've been talking about inflation and rates and yields

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 3>and default risk.

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 2>But I'm curious.

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 3>Even before COVID, there was a massive discussion around how

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 3>bonds and credit are actually traded, and a lot of

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 3>people talked about liquidity issues. They talked about the rise

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 3>of exchange traded funds as a mechanism for maybe trading

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 3>more liquid assets. And I'm curious, in twenty twenty three,

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:53.240
<v Speaker 3>in the current environment, has the way we traded we

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:55.560
<v Speaker 3>trade bonds changed even further.

0:29:56.920 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 4>Not being a definite expert to answer the question, but

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 4>but I think one thing that's happened for sure is

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 4>that these exchange traded funds have increased liquidity in certain

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 4>pockets of the markets. I speak a lot about the

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 4>high yield market and not surprising, that's where you know,

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 4>non investment great credit is kind of where where oak

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 4>Tree makes its name and we focus a lot, but

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 4>you know that is a market to where today, if

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 4>you wanted to trade a lot of double B rated bonds,

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 4>there's probably more liquidity because that's where the ETFs are

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 4>going to be buyers. But if you still want to

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 4>trade that, maybe you know, smaller maybe slightly sketchyr issue

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 4>single B minus or triple C. You know, you're still

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:40.760
<v Speaker 4>going to have some challenges from a liquidity standpoint, So

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 4>I guess it kind of depends exactly what you're buying.

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 4>It certainly hasn't been you know, equally distributed across all

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 4>of these different segments of the market.

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to go back to real estate for a second.

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, we talked about the residential component. One area

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 1>where there's like obvious weakness is certainly like large swaths

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 1>of the commercial real estate market. And I understand that

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not the entire market, and the commercial real estate

0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 1>is diverse, but offices in a lot of cities aren't

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 1>doing great.

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 5>Has that been felt like.

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Other people and other like further shoes to drop in

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 1>commercial real estate?

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 5>What's your view on that? You mean beyond like the

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 5>challenge in the office.

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 1>So right, so we've seen like these big jobs in office,

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and but then there's.

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Questions where will office get worse.

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Have they likes will get worse, or have have the

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 1>holders of these assets really taken their marks yet or

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 1>are they still living in some sort of fantasy where

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 1>next year everyone comes back to the office and vacancy

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 1>rates drop and everything, there's still like chapters to the

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 1>series story.

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:43.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, look, there's no doubt that office has

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 4>has its challenges, and I'm sure we have certainly not

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 4>heard the end of it. One of the things in

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 4>commercial real estate maybe unlike some of the corporate markets,

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 4>when you have a maturity in a bond, you've either

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 4>paid the bond or you've defaulted from a because the

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 4>maturities dictated that. In commercial real estate you don't quite

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 4>have that same dynamic. There's extensions you don't have to

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, in the case of securitizations, you can go

0:32:09.520 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 4>into real estate owned, so you're effectively defaulted, but the

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:16.440
<v Speaker 4>asset maybe didn't change hands. A mezzanine buyer can step in,

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 4>so there's a lot of ways to kind of you know,

0:32:19.200 --> 0:32:21.680
<v Speaker 4>I'll honestly like kick the can down the road, and

0:32:21.880 --> 0:32:24.440
<v Speaker 4>to some degree, so I don't think we've seen the end.

0:32:24.480 --> 0:32:28.080
<v Speaker 4>But to your other point is there is a lot

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 4>of dispersion and what is perceived today as the quality

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:35.040
<v Speaker 4>parts of the commercial real estate market certainly don't trade

0:32:35.200 --> 0:32:38.520
<v Speaker 4>like stress is around the corner, and I'm not sure

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 4>it is. We've had this debate at work a few

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:43.720
<v Speaker 4>times of hey, are we going to get a chance

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 4>to buy this high quality industrial asset at a fifteen

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:48.680
<v Speaker 4>percent yield?

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 5>And so far that answer has been no real estate owned.

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 3>Is a blast from the sort of like two thousand

0:32:56.000 --> 0:32:57.240
<v Speaker 3>and eight, two thousand and nine passed.

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:00.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, your job.

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 3>Is to think about risk on a day to day basis.

0:33:02.120 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 3>So I'm going to ask the very obvious, lazy journalistic question,

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:09.200
<v Speaker 3>which is what do you worry about the most?

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:12.080
<v Speaker 5>Wow in today's environment?

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think one of the things that's really challenging

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 4>right now is it's very hard to define I think

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 4>what is normal and a lot of people look at

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 4>you know, different kind of masures of what they perceive

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 4>to be normal. Oh, look at the jobs market. We're

0:33:28.760 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 4>seeing an uptick in part time jobs. We're seeing an

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 4>uptick in or a downdraft in full time jobs. Oh no,

0:33:37.000 --> 0:33:39.719
<v Speaker 4>that's a sign that the labor market's weakening. We're going

0:33:39.760 --> 0:33:43.480
<v Speaker 4>to fall into a receession. But really, in reality, we're

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 4>kind of getting back to what we the labor market

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 4>look like pre twenty twenty. You know, with inflation, is

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 4>inflation going to remain sticky? A lot of that has

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 4>to do with shelter price is how quickly will those

0:33:56.360 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 4>feed through? I think to me there's just a big

0:33:59.120 --> 0:34:02.080
<v Speaker 4>kind of unknown in how to interpret some of these

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:07.080
<v Speaker 4>kind of traditional economic measures that you know historically were

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:10.759
<v Speaker 4>our kind of benchmarker indicator for how much risk and

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:13.360
<v Speaker 4>in this case, maybe a risk of recession was building.

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:16.319
<v Speaker 4>And I think this year is an example for how

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:19.760
<v Speaker 4>hard that's been because, and I think you mentioned this earlier, Joe,

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:22.760
<v Speaker 4>the market went from thinking we were near an imminent

0:34:22.760 --> 0:34:26.239
<v Speaker 4>recession twelve months ago to now thinking we might not

0:34:26.320 --> 0:34:27.359
<v Speaker 4>have a recession at all.

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:28.319
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Wayne Dahl, thank you so much for doing the live

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:36.200
<v Speaker 1>podcast here as a real treat, great perspective, and appreciate

0:34:36.239 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 1>you coming on.

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:46.840
<v Speaker 5>Thank you very much for having me. It's my pleasure.

0:34:50.880 --> 0:34:55.040
<v Speaker 1>That was our conversation with Wayne Dull, Managing Director, assistant

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:59.480
<v Speaker 1>portfolio manager and investment risk officer at oak Tree, recorded

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:03.400
<v Speaker 1>live at the future Proof Conference in Huntington Beach, California.

0:35:03.840 --> 0:35:04.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:35:04.880 --> 0:35:07.240
<v Speaker 3>You can follow me at Tracy Alloway.

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:10.080
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart.

0:35:10.360 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Follow our producers Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen Arman dash Ol

0:35:14.160 --> 0:35:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Bennett at dashbot and Moses Adnan and for all of

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:21.279
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg podcasts, check out at Podcasts and for more

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Odd Lots content, go to Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots.

0:35:25.120 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 1>We have transcripts, a blog, and a newsletter, and you

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 1>can chat about markets and this topic and others at

0:35:30.200 --> 0:35:32.480
<v Speaker 1>discord dot gg slash online.

0:35:32.600 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 3>And if you enjoy odd Lots, if you like it

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:37.960
<v Speaker 3>when we talk all things credit, then please leave us

0:35:38.000 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 3>a positive review on your favorite podcast platform.

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:41.800
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening

0:36:07.000 --> 0:36:07.040
<v Speaker 3>In