WEBVTT - ‘Scared For the Market’

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to What Goes Up, a Bloomberg Weekly

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Markets podcast. I'm Sarah Plants, a reporter on the Cross

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Asset team, and I'm Mike Reagan, a senior editor on

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the Markets team. Sort of the John Oates to Sarah's

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Darryl Hall. And this is going to be a you're

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>going to keep coming up with. All right, let's keep

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:33.839
<v Speaker 1>you going. Let's see how many weeks you can go

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to this one, Like I'll grow a mustache and get

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>a perm um. I don't know if people get perms anymore.

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Back in my day. You know, my classmates in high

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:45.519
<v Speaker 1>school spent more on perms than they do on their

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:48.519
<v Speaker 1>cars these day. I think. I don't think too many

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>people perms nowadays, Mike, at least not like the eighties.

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>At least not like the eighties. Coming anyway, are essential

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>for podcast posts. I don't think you can really be

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>a pie cats howse people trust? I think you're right, Ben,

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I think right, And we might as well introduce that

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>voice there. That is our guest for the week. Very

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:09.039
<v Speaker 1>happy to have him on the show. He does not

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>have a perm as far as I can tell from

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the sum video, but his name is Ben Inker. He

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>is the head of asset allocation for GMO, the money

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>management firm in Boston. Ben, welcome to the show. Thanks

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:23.839
<v Speaker 1>very much for having me. I think that means once

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the lawns are open in each of our areas, each

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>of us will be going out and getting perms and

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:32.319
<v Speaker 1>will confirm the next time we're all in the same

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>place together. But Ben, we're so excited to have you

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 1>on the show. And lately, this past week stocks have

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>been breaking out. The rally has been broadening out. All

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden. We've seen smaller companies, value stocks, firms

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>really that have been hit hardest by the coronavirus. Well,

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>they're all of a sudden leading this charge higher. But

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>you over at GMO, you guys aren't buying it. So

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>we're excited to discuss with you why that is and

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>how you guys are going about changing your aff that

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>allocation strategies. Yeah. So, I mean there's part of what

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>you said that I think makes some sense. Uh, small

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>cap stocks and value stocks were really left behind. Uh

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>in the year up until now, they were underperforming on

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:17.799
<v Speaker 1>the way down, they were underperforming on the way up.

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>They deserve to outperform. The thing we find a little

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>bit mystifying is the general upward move for the market. UM,

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 1>as near as we can see, the uncertainty about the

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>economy really hasn't gone away, and almost all of that

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty is downside uncertainty. Uh. And yet you know, we're

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>we're sitting here with the S and P five hundred

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>downs something like five percent for the year in the

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:51.640
<v Speaker 1>worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. That just doesn't

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>seem right, you know. But and I've read that you've

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Sarah said you've de risked the portfolios at your firm.

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I think I read the equity allocation of something like

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>right now. So what is the rest in right now?

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously, Uh, you know, yields are so low

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 1>money market yields are barely there. Where do you hide

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>out in this environment? Yeah, that's a great question. And uh,

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's an explanation for why the market is going up.

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe people are saying there is no alternative to owning equities. Uh,

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:29.080
<v Speaker 1>we think there is a better alternative to owning the market. UM,

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:33.079
<v Speaker 1>which comes back to the smaller cap stocks and the

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>value stocks that we were talking about earlier. UM. Value

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>stocks have had an absolutely horrendous twelve years relative to

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the market. They came into this year trading at some

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest valuation spreads we've ever seen, and then

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>they proceeded to underperform by double digits. UM. So what

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>we think makes more sense than just owning equities is

0:03:57.120 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>going along a portfolio of value stocks and short the market.

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>And the reason why we like that is, well, if

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the optimists are right in the economy can make a

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>V shaped recovery, Well, those stocks that have just underperformed

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the market by double digits deserved to outperform the market

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:17.840
<v Speaker 1>quite strongly, So you should still make money. UM. And

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>if the world gets disappointed, uh, and we don't make

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>that that miraculous V shaped recovery, UM. Value has a

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of margin of safety here relative to the market.

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:35.280
<v Speaker 1>We can get some very bad news and they still

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>don't deserve to underperform. And so as investors we love

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 1>having a margin of safety UM. And there's very few

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>assets today which offer a margin of safety. We do

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>think along short portfolio, long the cheap guys, and short

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the broad market does actually have a margin of safety

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and deserves to make money in the good times and

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 1>deserves to probably make money even if things do very badly,

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>if they're really really horrible. Uh, you know, we enter

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the second Great Depression. Um, maybe they're not going to

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:14.159
<v Speaker 1>outperform in that environment, but they're going to do an

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>awful lot better than a long equity position. So you

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>just gave us a sense of how you guys are positioning.

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Now you short the broad market, go along the cheap guys.

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Can you give us a little bit more detail on

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 1>how you guys are actually going about cutting that equity

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>exposure though? I mean I get the sense that if

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>you guys are shorting the broad market, then then you

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>have to be pulling out out of a lot of

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>large cap names, maybe those megacap tech names. I mean,

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:41.559
<v Speaker 1>how are you going about restructuring these portfolios to get there? Yeah,

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:46.359
<v Speaker 1>so you know the megacap tech. UM. I do find

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit mystifying. You know, the Googles and facebooks

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of this world will certainly get through this. UM. But

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 1>if you were an advertising firm and the world is

0:05:56.839 --> 0:05:59.280
<v Speaker 1>entering a large recession, I don't think that's very good

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 1>for your ad rates. UM. So I don't really know

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>why these stocks should be going up, But UM, I

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:15.159
<v Speaker 1>recognize the fact UM that they are much less bothered

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:20.040
<v Speaker 1>by a really bad economic circumstance than most companies UH

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Not only do they have very strong competitive positions they

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 1>are kind of largely monopolis, but they also have very

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>strong balance sheets, so we don't have to worry about

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>them from that. From that front, the market as a

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:38.159
<v Speaker 1>whole uh has neither of those benefits. UM. But because

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:40.720
<v Speaker 1>we didn't come into this owning a lot of US

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:44.239
<v Speaker 1>stocks to begin with, UM, we didn't want to take

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the so called basis risk of owning a bunch of

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:53.840
<v Speaker 1>European and Japanese cheap stocks and then shorting the SMP

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:57.119
<v Speaker 1>five hundreds. So what we actually did to take about

0:06:57.240 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 1>thirty points of net equity exposure off of our portfolios,

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:07.919
<v Speaker 1>we shorted UM a lot of uh IFA stocks, so

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>non US developed market stocks, which haven't had quite as

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 1>strong a rally as the US but are still up

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 1>probably somewhere in the mid twenties from the lows UM

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and are no longer really priced to deliver something particularly

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>close to an equity like return, So we have kind

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>of that value spread trade on in the developed world

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>outside of the US. UM. We do have a few

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 1>US stocks UM cyclicals that we bought in April, a

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>few kind of stocks in our special Opportunities portfolio, and

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>we chose to hedge those with S and P s UM.

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>But mostly it's a non US equity portfolio, so our

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>shorts are mostly non US equities as well. So Ben

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I I certainly share your cause in about this market

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 1>right now, UH, As Sarah will tell you, I'm a

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>big fan of confirmation bias. So I'm happy to uh

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to hear you speak a lot of the thoughts I've

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 1>been saying to UM. But I would say, you know,

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 1>if I'm gonna play Devil's advocate here and and lay

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>out the bullish case, it is pretty compelling simply the

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the amount of money being thrown at the problem by

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the government and the Federal Reserve. I mean, the FED

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 1>has basically inoculated the credit markets from the type of

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>real trauma that could really make this a lot worse

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 1>economically and and market wise. UM. People on unemployment now

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 1>are getting in many cases being paid more than they

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:45.439
<v Speaker 1>were making before they lost their job, at least until

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that that federal UH extra help expires in July UM.

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>But then unemployment claims being extended. There's a lot of

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>money being thrown at this problem. Um, is it possible

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>that you know it's it's problem solved given all the

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 1>support being thrown at this it's definitely problem helped. Uh.

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Is it possible it's problem solved? I mean, you know,

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:14.960
<v Speaker 1>nothing is impossible, so maybe it's it's problem solved. You know.

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>The reality with the credit markets is tighter credit spreads

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:22.839
<v Speaker 1>are helpful, but at the end of the day, what

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the credit markets need is corporate cash flow. Uh. And

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>corporate cash flow is tough when revenue is down a

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 1>ton um. And even as the economy opens up. I

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:38.679
<v Speaker 1>don't know whether the economists were the ones who coined this,

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 1>but they talked about economy right, we can't get quite

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 1>all the way back. It will feel better than April did, um,

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:50.679
<v Speaker 1>But until we can really get the pandemic behind us,

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 1>we can't go all the way back. And the problem

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>with being a economy is the economy was not built

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 1>to run at the operational gearing right relative to GDP

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of corporate profits is large UM. So if the economy

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>is running at even the drop off in earnings should

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 1>be a multiple of that UM. But if you look

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>at the earnings forecast. Q four earnings forecast is down

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:26.959
<v Speaker 1>six relative to Q four two nineteen, which was really

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the best quarters in history. UM. And that

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:39.559
<v Speaker 1>strikes us as wildly implausible. UM. The other issue where

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's hard to fix the entirety of the problem, UM,

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 1>is you can throw a lot of money around, but

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 1>it isn't so easy getting it to the right places. Uh.

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>And we've seen that with the p p P program,

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:59.599
<v Speaker 1>where you know the money was going to the wrong businesses.

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Bisness is that really were deserving of it. Couldn't get

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 1>banks to answer the phone, They couldn't get the website

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 1>to work. The money was not flowing and is still

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:12.959
<v Speaker 1>not flowing to the small businesses where it really needs

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to be. And frankly, on the unemployment side, the sad

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 1>truth about this country is the state unemployment benefits have

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>been made in many cases intentionally difficult to get right.

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>You have to jump through a lot of hoops, you

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>have to fill out a lot of forms. People don't

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>understand how, and not everybody who is eligible, not everybody

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 1>who should be getting the money is getting the money. Uh.

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 1>And then the last piece that I think is worrying

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and Frankly, I worry about this more in the US

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>than I do in the rest of the world. UM.

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:50.199
<v Speaker 1>I've been hearing a lot of people talk about the

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 1>idea of UM resilience and supply chains, and people have

0:11:56.559 --> 0:11:59.679
<v Speaker 1>learned from this that having a far flung supply chain

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:02.959
<v Speaker 1>is an unacceptable risk and they're going to have to

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 1>do something about it. Honestly, I don't get that. Uh.

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:11.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, just in time inventory works of the time,

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 1>So there's five percent of the time where it doesn't work,

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and so you can't produce the stuff you want. But man,

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the profitability on that five had better be awesome to

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>make up for the higher cost of good soul in

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>order to have that broadly resilient UH supply chain. On

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, the one thing that the US has

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 1>done over the past twenty years is we've moved to

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 1>this just in time corporate cash flow management, where most

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:47.440
<v Speaker 1>of the corporate system has levered themselves up in a

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>way that works if everything is happening smoothly, and suddenly

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>everything is not happening smoothly, and the wheels will not

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 1>come off in the first month or two, but over

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the core of the next nine months, the next eighteen months.

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:07.200
<v Speaker 1>We have an awful lot of capital structures that were

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 1>not designed to handle even a normal recession, let alone

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a very severe one. So it sounds like you're not

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:19.680
<v Speaker 1>a believer in this whole idea of uh sort of

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>reflation as companies on shore overseas manufacturing again, I mean

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:28.680
<v Speaker 1>in a way that's that would be you know, assuming

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:30.719
<v Speaker 1>that pandemics or something and we're gonna have to deal

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 1>with on a semi regular basis, you know, kind of

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>fighting the last war rather than preparing for the future.

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:38.959
<v Speaker 1>I guess yeah, I mean, pandemics are something we will

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 1>have to deal with periodically, a truly global pandemic. It

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter a ton where your supply chain is, unless

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:50.560
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about you know, medical necessities where uh, you know,

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:53.319
<v Speaker 1>nationalism may become an issue and you really want to

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 1>be producing your masks and and your swabs in the country.

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:01.439
<v Speaker 1>If everybody is having a mom it doesn't matter whether

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 1>you're getting your stuff from Michigan or while the world

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 1>is a smaller place than it used to be. Um,

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not obvious to me that, oh, pandemics are now

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:18.440
<v Speaker 1>something we should expect to happen once a decade, and

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that we can all hope that next time

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>we will all be more prepared, considering now that pretty

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 1>much every country around the globe has been through this.

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 1>But Mike laid out the bowl case for us, and

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm just curious what you think, Ben, I mean, when

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>does that reality actually strike then, of the realization of

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the depth of the recession that we are actually facing.

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I've seen this chart floating around this past

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>week of the price liquidity ratio. So you have the

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 1>market cap of the SMP plotted against them two money

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 1>supply and people saying, look, it's below average. There's so

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>much cash flooding the system. There actually is a lot

0:14:57.080 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>of room potentially for upside in the market. I with

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>that case, with that argument out there, when when is

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the reality of the depth of the recession actually take

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>over and hit? Honestly, I don't entirely know. You know,

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the interesting thing about where we are right that this

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 1>is we are beyond the depths of this recession. Right.

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>We may get a w we may get an l

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>who knows um, but probably the worst fall was March

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and April UM So it's a weird recession from that standpoint.

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 1>The funny thing is, if you think about past recessions,

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 1>most of the time, when you are two months into

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>a recession, nobody has any idea the recession has occurred. Right.

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>It is only well after the fact that we say, oh,

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 1>guess what, this recession started in you know, December two

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand seven, and you didn't know it until September two eight.

0:15:56.640 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>But the recession was really there. Um. So I think

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 1>at some level, um, we haven't come to grips with

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the kind of the depth of the lasting problem here.

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 1>There's been so much of a fixation on the acute

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>problem um, and much less on the issue that you know,

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>for all the money that is being thrown around, GDP

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>is down a bunch, right, There is simply a lot

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>less output happening. Um. And again, corporations thrive on output.

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 1>The other thing that corporations rather desperately need is enough

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:53.479
<v Speaker 1>certainty to cause people to want to make investments. Um.

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>And you know, maybe I am the person here who

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 1>uh is just is kind of has has failed to

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:09.120
<v Speaker 1>drink the kool aid that everybody else has. But if

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:13.879
<v Speaker 1>I was running a kind of traditional business right now,

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I would not want to be doing a lot of investing.

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:19.639
<v Speaker 1>You know, I might have to invest in some ppe

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>so people can come back to work or something. But

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to build a new factory, you know,

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not. I'm certainly not going to sign a long

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 1>term lease for new office space because suddenly I've realized, well, actually,

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:35.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe people can work from home. Maybe that actually is

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 1>a thing that can happen. UM. So you know, you know,

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the two biggest pieces of uh G d P are

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>consumption and corporate investment. UH. And I don't see how

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 1>corporate investment gets to normal until corporations are truly seeing Okay,

0:17:56.040 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I know what the future looks like, and it's good. Um.

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:07.680
<v Speaker 1>And frankly, even if currently unemployment benefits are pretty good, uh,

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I would think precautionary savings should be going up right now.

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:15.719
<v Speaker 1>Your certainty about what those benefits are going to be

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:20.399
<v Speaker 1>is pretty low. Um. Your certainty about your job situation

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 1>is pretty low. I don't know whether. I mean. One

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 1>of the things, um that could be going on, UM

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:32.440
<v Speaker 1>is that this recession, even more than normal recessions, has

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:39.399
<v Speaker 1>cost jobs from the lower paid segment of the workforce. UM.

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the rich people can work from home,

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's working okay for them as long as they

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:51.399
<v Speaker 1>have some child care somehow. Um. And and so maybe

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 1>this just doesn't seem so bad if you are if

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:57.160
<v Speaker 1>you're working from home and uh, you know you've got

0:18:57.200 --> 0:19:00.400
<v Speaker 1>some time back on your commute. Um, if you are

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:03.720
<v Speaker 1>not sure whether the businesses that you work for are

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:06.439
<v Speaker 1>ever going to come back and where your job is

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be Um if they don't. UM, I'd say,

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:16.680
<v Speaker 1>even if you're getting a surprisingly good unemployment check, which

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>not everybody is, uh, i'd want to be saving some

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:38.680
<v Speaker 1>of that. You know. It's you make a great point

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 1>about not having to date this recession or no one's

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 1>waiting for the NBER to come out and officially officially

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:48.119
<v Speaker 1>give us the start date of this one. Um. But

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:51.400
<v Speaker 1>you know what I think of the reasons why recessions

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:54.720
<v Speaker 1>and bear markets always go hand in hand. Obviously, you

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 1>know that their earnings damage uh causes valuations to be

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 1>less a tractive to investors in the equity market. But

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:04.879
<v Speaker 1>I also think part of it might be, you know,

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 1>stocks for a lot of individuals become sort of a

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>piggy bank where you have to cash out if you

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:14.399
<v Speaker 1>had lost your job, you know, maybe cash out some

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:17.159
<v Speaker 1>of that retirement money to pay your mortgage, to to

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 1>pay those tuition bills whatever it is, you know when

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and on the institutional side, um, maybe you have head

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:25.119
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds that you know have to de risk for

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a variety of reasons, margin calls and that sort of thing.

0:20:27.920 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>So I what's weird about this one, and Sarah's written

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot about this, is we keep hearing sort of

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the opposite that all of a sudden, this retail trader,

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:41.879
<v Speaker 1>retail investor is super engaged in this market, uh Matt Levine.

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Sarah had a funny reference to your one of your

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:48.240
<v Speaker 1>stories saying, there's no other entertainment left, you know, everyone's

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:51.639
<v Speaker 1>done Netflix. So people are so bored they're they're firing

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 1>up there their e trades and their schwab accounts. Um.

0:20:55.800 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I think he calls it b MH boredom, market boredom,

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the market hypothesis. So you know, but I wonder if

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:05.640
<v Speaker 1>you've given any thoughts to that, is that sort of

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:09.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, the people that are getting a little extra

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>unemployment insurance uh cash, then they would have made otherwise

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 1>everyone who got their stimulus check from the government. Is

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 1>that part of this sort of little sugar high we've

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:22.159
<v Speaker 1>seen in this rebound. And if so, I mean to

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:24.640
<v Speaker 1>me that seems like it has an expiration date on

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>it that is fast approaching. You know, the federal unemployment

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 1>supplement I think expires in July. So, um, you know

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 1>that seems like a little bit of euphoria that could

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:38.880
<v Speaker 1>get sapped out of the market pretty quickly. Yeah, I did.

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I did. Uh read that peace and quite enjoyed it. UM.

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:49.680
<v Speaker 1>In general, day traders don't have a lot of money

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 1>and are not putting a lot of money to work,

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:58.919
<v Speaker 1>So I haven't seen the the hard data on it, UM,

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>but I wouldn't be surprised if they were driving the

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 1>performance of some of the particularly volatile stocks UM. But

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>for them to be driving the overall market would be

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 1>an impressive feat. Um. It takes a lot of money

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 1>to do that. Uh. And And frankly, one of the

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:23.119
<v Speaker 1>things I'm impressed by. In recent years, the only buyer

0:22:23.240 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 1>of note of US equities have been US corporations buying

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:32.199
<v Speaker 1>back their own stock um, and there has got to

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>be an awful lot less of that going on right now. UM.

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:39.920
<v Speaker 1>So I will say I am impressed by the market's

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:47.640
<v Speaker 1>ability to go up without its big driver of demand there. UM.

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:50.679
<v Speaker 1>But UM, you know, there's the old saying that in

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 1>the short term the market is a voting machine and

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 1>the long term it is a weighing machine. UM. And

0:22:56.920 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the biggest reason why markets have a strong tendency to

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 1>get cheap in really bad economic times, UM is because

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 1>of the coincidence. And it's not a coincidence, it's it's

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:18.400
<v Speaker 1>completely causal. But UM, corporate cash flow drives up at

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:22.919
<v Speaker 1>the same time that people's other sources of income drives up.

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:25.399
<v Speaker 1>And the reason why there needs to be an equity

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 1>risk premium is not just because equities are volatile. It's

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the circumstances in which equities are going to give you

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 1>really bad returns UM. And I don't see that there's

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:46.359
<v Speaker 1>any way to unhook that in the longer term. UM.

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 1>If stock prices, you know, stay up and and push higher, well,

0:23:51.560 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 1>corporate cash flow is clearly worse. UM. Then I guess

0:23:56.720 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 1>it could be that people are prepared to own equities

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 1>much lower returns than they used to be UM. And

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:09.439
<v Speaker 1>and maybe that can work, and maybe that can be sustainable.

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:13.959
<v Speaker 1>We heard that story in two thousand UM part of

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 1>the pitch for why the stock market made its sense

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 1>was that there shouldn't be an equity risk premium. Um. Uh.

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:24.159
<v Speaker 1>It always struck me as a very strange thing because

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>at the time, if you asked the people who were

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:30.719
<v Speaker 1>buying stocks, what returns were you expecting from stocks, they

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:33.440
<v Speaker 1>were expecting extraordinarily high returns. They weren't saying, Hey, I

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 1>think I'm going to get you know, two percent plus inflation,

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 1>but I'm good with that. Uh. And I haven't heard

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 1>anybody saying, you know what, I'm buying Google today because

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:46.359
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to give me two percent real um.

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>And in this world, I'm fine with two percent real.

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:56.679
<v Speaker 1>If we were getting that, UM, I would be a

0:24:56.680 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit less scared for the market. Uh. Then if

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 1>people are saying, well, look, with the Fed here, the

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 1>market can't help but go up. And so all I

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:11.680
<v Speaker 1>care about is is the short term, I think scared

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:14.119
<v Speaker 1>for the market, we can we can leave it at that.

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 1>That's your segway. We're living in unique times, crazy times.

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 1>In the short term. This podcast is your place for

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 1>thoughtful analysis. It's here in the long term, it's really

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a place just for crazy market stories that that we've

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 1>all witnessed. It's so that's what people come for. They

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 1>want their return on crazy things. So, um, I think

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:38.880
<v Speaker 1>we got a call into what goes Up hotline from

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 1>a listener down in your state of sunny Florida. Let's

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 1>give that a listen my neck of the woods. Well,

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 1>my name is Morgan Hill, calling from Bookerts from Florida.

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:52.359
<v Speaker 1>My mestwor is for what goes Up? Uh blue Berg podcast?

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 1>What's crazy about this market? What I've noticed just here

0:25:56.720 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesday is uh, the change in which driving market returns. Um,

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 1>you know through yesterday, Uh, you know youre to day,

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 1>we witnessed technology really providing the buffer for you know,

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 1>overalltly returns, and you know through Tuesday, real estate and

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 1>industrials are kind of leading the way, you know, followed

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:25.359
<v Speaker 1>by financials and you know, communication services. So it's it's

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 1>quite interesting to see the change of of you know,

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the wave. But I think that's that's pretty crazy. Everybody

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 1>has a great week. Yeah, but that sounds a little

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 1>bit like the value rotation you were talking about, right, Uh,

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:41.240
<v Speaker 1>financials industrials at least, Um, I guess you'd throw energy

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>into into that group as well. Yeah, I would. Uh,

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 1>And and again that's the economic reflation trade. And I

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:52.919
<v Speaker 1>don't know whether it's right from a timing perspective, but

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there is something weird about a market where

0:26:57.359 --> 0:27:00.159
<v Speaker 1>tech was leading on the way up, tech leads the

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:02.399
<v Speaker 1>way down, and then tech leads on the way up again.

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 1>There's at some point that has to end. And the

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 1>groups he was talking about, our groups that have been

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 1>pre beaten down and we'll recover at some point. Um

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>whether we have enough data to say, oh, few the

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:23.679
<v Speaker 1>worst is behind us. Uh, let's go off to the

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 1>races now with the more economically sensitive ones. You have

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 1>to be you have to have a better crystal ball

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:33.640
<v Speaker 1>than I to be confident that that's the right thing

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to do. But a change of leadership in the market,

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 1>my god, is at least well overdue. Is what we

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 1>saw this past week. Do you think it's uh what

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:45.680
<v Speaker 1>it might look like for the market on the way up?

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:48.879
<v Speaker 1>Just a bit too soon? I mean, considering how you

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 1>describe how you guys were positioning earlier on in the show,

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 1>even though you are reducing your net equity exposure, I mean,

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:58.639
<v Speaker 1>is this what we should expect? Though, once we do

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 1>get to that point when we're out of the woods,

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 1>it certainly could be a lot of it depends on

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 1>what the world looks like when we finally can see

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:14.920
<v Speaker 1>our way through. UM. But ordinarily, in you know, the

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:20.639
<v Speaker 1>recovery from a bear market in recessionary low, it would

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:24.880
<v Speaker 1>be the smaller cap stocks, uh, and the more economically

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:29.720
<v Speaker 1>sensitive companies that would lead the way. So that that

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 1>does make some sense. UM. It does not necessarily mean

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the markets, right, but it would make sense. Alright, Sarah,

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 1>let's see you make sense with some your craziest thing, alright. So, UH,

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I have a statistic. We talked about the speed a

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of the recovery that we've seen and really just

0:28:50.040 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 1>how unbelievable it has been. And this statistic comes from

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Sundale Capital Research, and this past week we saw the

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 1>SMP move not only above three dolls in, but also

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 1>above it's two hundred day moving average. And what they

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 1>found was that typically, on average, if you fall in

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 1>from a high, the time it takes to get back

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 1>above that two hundred day moving average is typically over

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 1>two hundred days. Well, this time we've done it in

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 1>fifty six days, fifty six trading sessions. UM. So that

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of just shows you how quick the snap back

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 1>really really has been. And then I also have one

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 1>that's a bit more fun. Uh. The SpaceX launch moved

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 1>to Saturday. But I think we're all sitting back waiting

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:39.720
<v Speaker 1>with bated breath on the launch. And I mean pretty

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 1>crazy that we're going to have the first launch with

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 1>an American company off of US soil UM to the

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 1>International Space Station. Since even that is pretty cool. That's

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:53.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty cool, I gotta admit. And I don't know if

0:29:53.280 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>they warned you about our gimmick, but have you seen

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 1>any crazy stories in the market this week? Nothing? Nothing

0:29:59.840 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 1>that specific this week. I mean the craziest action I

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 1>think I have seen, uh this year other than oil

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 1>going negative, uh, is what happened to Wayfair, which is

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 1>a company that there is that one of the pms

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 1>of my firm has quite liked UM and from the

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 1>middle of January to the middle of March it went

0:30:30.840 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 1>down something like eight uh. And he was scratching his hat.

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:38.719
<v Speaker 1>He's like, I don't understand why they're why it's doing this,

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 1>because these guys should be beneficiaries of stay at home, right.

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 1>If you can't go to furniture stores, you have to

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 1>shop for your furniture online. Uh. And well, they're all

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 1>they're all sourced out of China, though right mainly not

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 1>everything is sourced out of China, And it would have

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 1>been weird if that had driven them to bankruptcy. M

0:30:57.760 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 1>But speaking of the speed of recovery, um, from that

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>low in the middle of March of twenty three and

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a half, it then went up to a hundred and

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 1>ninety in less than two months. Um. And I mean,

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 1>if that is not a market with some kind of

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:23.239
<v Speaker 1>a d h D problem, I don't know what is,

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 1>you know. I think it was wayfair. Uh that was

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 1>advertising to me on Instagram this past week with pictures

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of saunas and big saunas to have in your homes.

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>And I always think of furniture, and I'm like, what

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 1>is is sauna now being classified as stay at home furniture?

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 1>You can't get out to your sauna. I really was

0:31:46.800 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 1>intrigued by it. Well, I'm witing for our air conditioner

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to be services, so it's kind of like a sauna

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 1>here in my house. Hopefully they'll they'll get out here soon. Um. Well,

0:31:56.520 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 1>that's a good one, Ben, I like that wayfair stock

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 1>a d h D. That's a pretty good one. Sarah

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you mine, But first, Sarah, I gotta say.

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I reached out to our chief crazy things correspondent, vil

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Donna Hirich and and because she'd really been slacking on

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the job, I hadn't heard a single crazy thing from

0:32:14.920 --> 0:32:19.200
<v Speaker 1>her since the pandemic hit. And her response was, Oh,

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 1>that's unfair. I've been feeding Sarah crazy things this whole time,

0:32:23.320 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 1>like three yesterday, And I'm like, what what, Mike, You

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:29.480
<v Speaker 1>know what it is. She just she trusts me with

0:32:29.520 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the content more more than she does with you. But yeah,

0:32:32.400 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 1>we've we've been we've been wrong and uttered that I'm

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 1>I also have outswerced my crazy thing this week, um

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to a listener in Buenos Aireas, Argentina. And yes, this

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:48.960
<v Speaker 1>is partially just a flex on our part that we

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 1>have listeners in Argentina, which I think is really cool.

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 1>So a little bit of a flex. As the kids say, hope,

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 1>hopefully I'm using that that right. Um, you're using it right, Mike.

0:32:58.800 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, I like to illusion that I'm a young hipster.

0:33:02.080 --> 0:33:05.480
<v Speaker 1>His name is Manuel Goody Luque. He's a lawyer at

0:33:05.480 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mackenzie and Buenos Aireas, and he points out in Argentina,

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:14.520
<v Speaker 1>rather than worry about the effects of UH low oil

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:17.240
<v Speaker 1>prices on the economy, they just pegged the price of

0:33:17.240 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 1>oil at at forty five dollars of barrel. They called

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the barrel creola CREOLEO. I'm not I'm not pronouncing it right,

0:33:23.600 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 1>but the barrel creoleo. UH. And the government's basically pegged

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 1>oil at forty five So if you're a refiner in

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:34.920
<v Speaker 1>UH refinery in Argentina, you have to pay forty five

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:37.400
<v Speaker 1>bucks of barrel. And the idea is to sort of

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 1>support UH. You know they're big their domestic industry. YPF

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 1>is the big producer. Um ben I don't know about

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 1>this though. UM, you support your your upstream oil production.

0:33:51.680 --> 0:33:54.240
<v Speaker 1>But you look at the Argentine pays so what it's

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 1>been doing lately, and you're gonna make it basically unaffordable

0:33:57.400 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 1>to fill your tank. I think in Argentina, what what

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 1>do you make to that move? Unfortunately, that doesn't sound

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:08.920
<v Speaker 1>that far out of the norm for Argentina. UM, I

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:11.840
<v Speaker 1>have a good point. Argentina has done a lot of

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:15.000
<v Speaker 1>things like that over the years. Right. They used to

0:34:15.080 --> 0:34:21.000
<v Speaker 1>have people coming in before the economists were calculating UH.

0:34:21.040 --> 0:34:27.000
<v Speaker 1>The inflation rate to reprice goods in stores UM, which

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:31.640
<v Speaker 1>would then be repriced exactly afterwards. UM. So Argentina unfortunately

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:35.239
<v Speaker 1>doesn't necessarily want to live in the world as it is,

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:38.719
<v Speaker 1>but the world that they would like it to be. UM,

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:42.920
<v Speaker 1>and that may have something to do with why they

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:45.840
<v Speaker 1>seem to have now just defaulted for the third time

0:34:46.680 --> 0:34:50.480
<v Speaker 1>in the last twenty years. Well, it's uh, it's certainly interesting.

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:53.920
<v Speaker 1>But I am highly certain that we won't have forty

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 1>five pegged oil here in the US at any time

0:34:58.440 --> 0:35:02.359
<v Speaker 1>in our lifetimes. Likely I'll agree with you on that,

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:06.080
<v Speaker 1>although whoever thought we'd see negative oil prices, so who knows?

0:35:06.840 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 1>That's also true. That's also true. But with that said,

0:35:10.040 --> 0:35:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Ben Ankara, thank you so much for coming on the

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:14.279
<v Speaker 1>show today. We really appreciate it. Thanks very much for

0:35:14.320 --> 0:35:24.720
<v Speaker 1>having me. What goes up? We'll be back next week.

0:35:25.080 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Until then, you can find us on the Bloomberg Terminal

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 1>website and app or wherever you get your podcasts. We

0:35:31.120 --> 0:35:32.759
<v Speaker 1>love it if you took the time to rate and

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:35.759
<v Speaker 1>review the show on Apple Podcasts so more listeners can

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:38.560
<v Speaker 1>find us. And you can find us on Twitter, follow

0:35:38.600 --> 0:35:42.279
<v Speaker 1>me at at Sara pont Sech Mike is at Reaganonymous

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and you can also follow Bloomberg Podcast at podcasts and

0:35:46.520 --> 0:35:48.640
<v Speaker 1>don't Forget. You can also give us a call at

0:35:48.680 --> 0:35:52.480
<v Speaker 1>our very own Bloomberg Podcast hotline at six four six

0:35:52.680 --> 0:35:56.640
<v Speaker 1>three two four three four nine zero, and we may

0:35:56.719 --> 0:35:59.640
<v Speaker 1>even play your voicemail on the show, What Goes Up

0:35:59.760 --> 0:36:03.320
<v Speaker 1>is produced by Jordan Gospore. The head of Bloomberg Podcast

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:06.399
<v Speaker 1>is Francesca Levie. Thanks for listening, See you next time.