WEBVTT - Apollo President Talks Credit Market

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.920
<v Speaker 2>So, Pollo Global Management just posted third quarter roundings that

0:00:10.000 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 2>surpassed Wall Street estimates, as the firm edges closer to

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 2>reaching one trillion dollars of assets. The Apollo president Jim Seutzer,

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 2>joined us Now for more. Jim, good morning, Good morning.

0:00:19.000 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 3>I was good to be here.

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 2>Congratulations. We choked when you walked in. What happens when

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:24.800
<v Speaker 2>you hit a trillion? Does Mark run around popping champagne?

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Has this work? Well?

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 3>Listen, as we said yesterday, we've said before, assets under

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 3>management are just a great vote of confidence for great

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 3>performance and if you deliver for investors over time. We

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 3>find ourselves that the flywheel of our business is really

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 3>in place. Whether it was capital formation, whether it was origination,

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 3>we just find that our business model is really hitting

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 3>the mark right now and accelerating, and we're very happy

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 3>with the quarter, but feel very good about the trajectory

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 3>of the business.

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 2>In runt of us, there's a phrase that you in

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 2>the tain use, we are what we originate? Can we

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 2>talk about that a little bit more sure to scale?

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 2>Can you just flesh that out? How things attract into

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 2>the moment?

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, they're tracking very well. But I think you know,

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 3>if you go back to our investor to day six

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 3>years ago, in a year ago, we really put a

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:16.319
<v Speaker 3>pin in the key attribute of success in our business.

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:19.839
<v Speaker 3>As we see the financing markets evolve, when we see

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 3>the evolution of banking system, when they see the evolution

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 3>of private capital. You know, many in our industry, and

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 3>we're guilty of it quite a bit. In fact, your

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:30.839
<v Speaker 3>first question, we're guilty of it. It's all about AUM.

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 3>It's not about AUM. It's about your ability to really

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 3>generate very strong, proprietary, scalable origination across the spectrum, whether

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 3>it's investment grade, private credit, or private equity transactions and

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 3>everything in between. And we have taken that to heart.

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 3>We have invested a tremendous amount of money in terms

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 3>of our origination platforms. And I think that's what when

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 3>investors come to us today on the institutional side, when

0:01:56.760 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 3>sovereign funds come to us to partner, when insurance companies

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 3>come to partner, Yes, it's because of our investor returns,

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 3>but it's because of our origination. And I just think

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 3>that's the bigger story here. People want to talk about

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:11.919
<v Speaker 3>this company, that company first brand's tricolor. You know, it's

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 3>been sixteen years since the Great GFC. The real story

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 3>is the evolution of modern finance and the role that

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 3>we all play. And so I think that's the thread

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 3>and the theme that investors are really engaging in today. I

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 3>got back from nine countries in two and a half weeks,

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 3>which I'm happy to talk about. And the impact around

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:34.920
<v Speaker 3>the globe of this model evolving is really the story.

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 2>We'll spend some time on that. Just for the record,

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 2>you brought up first Brand and Strike Color before we did.

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:40.239
<v Speaker 2>We'll get to that in just a moment too. You

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 2>want to talk about origination, let's talk about it that

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 2>you originated. You talked about this a bit yesterday. What

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 2>was the average rating and are you able to maintain

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 2>excess spread as you scale up?

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So if you look at our we think about

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 3>the world investment grade and non investment grade, not private

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 3>and public. And when you think about the spreads that

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:01.239
<v Speaker 3>we garnered in terms of our non in our investment

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 3>grade business, you know, it's in the mid three hundreds.

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 3>And we've been able to really create that spread over

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 3>the last twenty four months with a little degradation of

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:12.640
<v Speaker 3>fifteen to twenty basis points a year over year. On

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 3>the non investment grade side, it's in the mid four hundreds,

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 3>and again we've been able to generate that spread over

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 3>the last twenty four months. And again it's not just

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 3>the direct private lending, but it's all the things you

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 3>do to a sponsor. So our origination put foot print

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 3>is about eighty percent investment grade twenty percent non investment grade.

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 3>But really it's the change of the model in the

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 3>last twenty thirty years. As a credit investor or fixed

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 3>income investor, you were an agent in the market. Whatever

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 3>the origination machine wanted to deliver you. It was only

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 3>price that you actually had to negotiate, and so you

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:53.119
<v Speaker 3>were an agent. Was really not a lot of the

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 3>ability to really conduct and have the outcome. In our

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 3>model where we're the origination principle, where we actually have

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 3>an m pact, it allows you really to have a

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 3>much greater degree of control of documentation and return and yield,

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 3>and that's going to suit us well over time. So

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 3>it's this principal agent issue, and we find ourselves really

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:16.160
<v Speaker 3>in the leading pack of the origination principal model versus

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 3>the old model of an agent or vendor model.

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>And Jim, what this does is it allows you to

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 1>look at a lot of documents, It allows you to

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 1>look at a lot of companies. It allows you to

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 1>see a broad swath of the economy to understand exactly

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>where the pitfalls may be. Do you find some of

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>these arguments about cockroaches and in growing weakness in the

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>economy credible or are you just not seeing it in

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>what you're viewing even among the things that you're rejecting.

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:41.920
<v Speaker 3>You're fifteen sixteen years in a credit cycle right now.

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 3>In terms of the expansion since the GFC, You're going

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 3>to find issues and challenges in the last five to

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:52.040
<v Speaker 3>seven years. You've had companies like SVB and First Republic Bank,

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:55.599
<v Speaker 3>and so yes, these are clearly idiosyncratic. We're seeing a

0:04:55.720 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 3>much larger theme of a strong economy towards some talk

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 3>about yesterday in terms of a K shape economy. We're

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 3>seeing an administration it's very pro business, antira, not very

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:11.599
<v Speaker 3>regulatory friendly, want to push rates lower, and so all

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 3>of those things where you will see challenges in certain

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 3>companies late in a cycle. But we are not seeing

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 3>any kind of credit cycle on the horizon. That's waning

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 3>anytime soon. We are not seeing it.

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Are you seeing a scary allocation of resources? And I

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 1>say this given the fact that it has been very

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>top heavy to AI related endeavors. Deutsche Bank this morning

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>a story in the Financial Times looking for ways to

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>hedge against some of their data center loans because they're

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>worried about the overall concentration the risks that you're seeing overnight.

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Are you staying away from that?

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 3>Well? I think what you're talking about is whenever you

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 3>see a massive impulse infusion of capital into a sector

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:53.719
<v Speaker 3>dark fiber E and p shale in the US software

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 3>enterprises and now AI in the brought ecosystem, you have

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:02.159
<v Speaker 3>to think about debt and equity returns on invested capital.

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:05.719
<v Speaker 3>And there's been a tremendous rise in valuations on the

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 3>debt side on the equity side in the last twenty

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 3>four months, and certainly the assumptions that you're making on

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 3>the debt side as an investor and a lender to

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 3>those companies, you're taking more residual risks than you did six, twelve,

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 3>eighteen months ago. So valuations are high. You have to

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:23.359
<v Speaker 3>be a bit more cautious. You want to be a

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 3>lot more senior. You want to be secured, and so

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 3>I think there's going to be a dispersion between returns

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 3>between the investment grade and non investment grade market. But

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 3>that's just late cycle behavior. And when you look around

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 3>the globe, as we talked about yesterday, their valuations are high,

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 3>geopolitical risks are a bit greater, and we don't see

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 3>rates dramatically lower in the next twenty four months. So

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 3>that tells us take the risk down on subordinated credit,

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:52.039
<v Speaker 3>lean into senior investment grade opportunities.

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 2>Jim, We've seen these capex cycles throughout economic history. You've

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 2>lift a few of them for a long career as well,

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 2>But there's something different about this one. Versed in this

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 2>in a way that I'm not Some of these assets

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 2>depreciate rapidly for you and the team. Does that change

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:08.919
<v Speaker 2>how you put together some of these deals that you

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 2>make it does?

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean? I think you're raising a really interesting point.

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 3>Are we thinking is the right way to think about

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 3>a data center? Utility lines and electrical lines? Seventy eighty

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 3>ninety years ago, when day one, all you were doing

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 3>is wiring the house for lights, and then you wired

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 3>the house for a dishwasher, a TV, and everything else

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 3>that goes with it, And how do you think about

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 3>that technology and what really is the advantage of that

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 3>data center in five, ten, fifteen years with the power supply.

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 3>I differentiate that with how you might finance a portfolio

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 3>of chips GPUs that rapidly depreciate over three to five years.

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 3>And they might still all they might both be in technology,

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 3>but how you fund and structure both of those is very,

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 3>very different. And I think that's the subtlety behind behind

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 3>the headlines, which is going to differentiate the winners and losers,

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 3>Because in every industry, even the last twenty years that

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 3>I just mentioned, those are all sectors that drew in

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 3>a tremendous amount of capital and you really don't know

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 3>who the winner is from the debt and equity side

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 3>for a few years. And so certainly with valuations as

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 3>high as they are in this cycle right now, you

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 3>have to take a step back and pause and say, Okay,

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 3>do I want to be a lender? Do I want

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 3>to be an equity owner? What's the residual value assumptions

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 3>that I'm making. That's really what will differentiate the winners

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 3>and losers.

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure how many people have taken a step back, Lisa.

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 2>At the moment right.

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Now, it seems like absolutely nobody. Those debt offerings are

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>absolutely flooding, and frankly, there is a real question about

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:41.320
<v Speaker 1>whether there's behavior that potentially isn't as prudent as what

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>you're doing, that could potentially post some sort of risk

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:44.680
<v Speaker 1>to the rest of the market.

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, if you think about the meg seven, in the

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 3>last five to seven years, they have been a very

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:53.679
<v Speaker 3>very small participant of the IG new issue market. In

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 3>the last two months, there's been a handful of these

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 3>companies that have been issued very very large benchmark transact

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 3>And again that's not a zip code we play in

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 3>day in and day out. But you have to wonder

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 3>as a CFO, are they being very strategic about accessing

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 3>that financing and what's the long term return of those opportunities.

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Jim, you're going to stick with us, I'm sure. Say

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 2>we've got a lot to talk about. Jim's out to

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 2>that of Apollo