WEBVTT - Bitcoin Soars and Tesla Shorts Take a Hit

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>From Marhart where Innovation, Money and power Collie in Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and.

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:11.560
<v Speaker 3>Ed loved Love.

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 4>Live from New York and San Francisco. This is Bloomberg

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 4>Technology coming up. Bitcoin rallies past eighty four thousand to

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 4>reach a new record high, boosted by the election outcome.

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:36.279
<v Speaker 4>Where next for crypto.

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 5>Plus Tesla shorts proved to be a losing bett Hedge

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:43.879
<v Speaker 5>funds shorting must company lose billions of dollars.

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 4>And we talk about the future of defense tech and

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 4>American dynamism and Andrews and Horowitz partner Catherine Boyle. But first,

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 4>let's just check in on bitcoin. It is the story

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 4>of the day. It leaps yet further another five percent

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 4>higher on the day. We're at eclipsing eighty four thousand,

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 4>never been seen in terms of numbers, and it's the

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:04.320
<v Speaker 4>same reasoning behind it. Let's get to that with blubg

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 4>Shnani Bassack, who can talk us through basically us being

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 4>the capital of the crypto planet. But what do we

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 4>need to see in the short term to keep vindicating

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 4>an eighty four thousand level for bitcoin?

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 6>One thing is just watching the flows because they have

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 6>been dramatic, and you have seen stunning flows not just

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 6>into Bitcoin but almost every stock related to bitcoin as well.

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 6>If you think about it over a seven day period,

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 6>you have coinbase up almost seventy five percent in a

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 6>seven day timeframe, and you have micro Strategy up more

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:37.759
<v Speaker 6>now today than it was the day that the Trump

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:40.839
<v Speaker 6>victory was announced. So that's just how much you're seeing

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 6>the excitement around these stocks. And what's interesting, too, Caroline,

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:47.039
<v Speaker 6>is you haven't even seen some critical moves by the

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 6>Trump the future Trump administration, rather, for example, who would

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 6>be the SEC chair? What tone would they take when

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 6>it comes to crypto? Will that make Bitcoin go higher?

0:01:56.920 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 6>From here, we're looking at Salana, dogecoin as well over

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 6>one week, and you're seeing the gains across the crypto

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 6>atmosphere just stunning.

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 5>This is an industry that put one hundred million dollars

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:10.960
<v Speaker 5>into backing its preferred candidates, and in President elect Trump,

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 5>they got their preferred candidate. And you're so right about, well,

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 5>what happens next? The market thinks that bitcoin keeps going right,

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 5>it thinks bitcoin goes to one hundred thousand US dollars

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 5>for token, It does well.

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 6>Let me give you one man's example for what we

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:29.920
<v Speaker 6>heard this morning. We talked to a metified CEO, Frank Speiser.

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 6>He gave us essentially a target of about one hundred

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:34.800
<v Speaker 6>thousand dollars for the end of the year and one

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 6>hundred and fifty into next year. Towards the end of

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 6>next year, so a significant move higher. But the one

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 6>hundred thousand dollars time frame he gave us was also

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 6>what he had given us before. So the additional upside

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 6>remains a question at least what it looks like for

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:53.799
<v Speaker 6>the next year or so. To the point that you've

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 6>been making flows have driven the story here, but what

0:02:57.000 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 6>about fundamentals and is there anything here?

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:01.360
<v Speaker 3>You just take the beginning of the.

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:05.080
<v Speaker 6>Year, for example, when you saw the new bitcoin ETFs

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 6>approved by the SEC. You saw a huge run up

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 6>into that moment, but a leveling off for a long time.

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 6>Ed you and I have sat here talking about it.

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 3>One question I.

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:17.399
<v Speaker 6>Have is the assets outside of Bitcoin, the places where

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 6>the SEC had cracked down on different forms of tokens

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:21.919
<v Speaker 6>that are trading on exchanges.

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 3>Do you see more of a flow.

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 6>Into that and does that take away from Bitcoin at all?

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 6>Something to keep an eye on. As the story goes on.

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 5>Keep an eye on bitcoin eighty four thousand US dollars

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 5>per token, risk on attitude in markets if you look

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 5>at it, Bloomberg shan Ali Bassek, thank you so much.

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 5>You look away from bitcoin and the equity markets. Technology

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 5>more risk off, particularly the chip sector with the socks

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 5>down significantly. Jordan Klein and lists of Assoo America's joins

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 5>US now and let's start there. It's an interesting sentiment

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 5>in the market this morning, Bitcoin going gangbusters, semiconductors softer.

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 7>Why Well, I don't know if there's any one specific

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 7>data point today that's putting the semiconductor sector under pressure.

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 7>I mean, this is a sector that's going to be

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 7>pretty volatile. I think until Trump takes office and you

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 7>can get more clarity around his positioning around tariffs, how

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:22.719
<v Speaker 7>aggressively be what will the impact be on global trade?

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:26.600
<v Speaker 3>And this group has had a nice move. I mean it's.

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:30.159
<v Speaker 7>Underperformed broader tech and definitely software since the election. But

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:33.480
<v Speaker 7>remember it's one of the top performers in the equity

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:36.359
<v Speaker 7>market year to date, with Nvidia leading the way. So

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:38.279
<v Speaker 7>I just think you're going to see ebbs and flows,

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:41.359
<v Speaker 7>but clearly there's a lot of momentum in SEMIS, and

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:44.719
<v Speaker 7>when it sees a sector like crypto and fintech take off,

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:46.839
<v Speaker 7>there's going to be some people who want to play

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:47.280
<v Speaker 7>into that.

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 4>Can I go micro for a moment? And super Microcomputer

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 4>we completely basically ignored because it came out with its

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 4>update for the market on the same day as the

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:01.839
<v Speaker 4>election results. But it needs focusing on because it's down

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:04.360
<v Speaker 4>another eleven percent. It is a raised an awful lot

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 4>of market capitalization because well, why basically not only about

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 4>disappointing sales forecasts, but ultimately about accounting probes, about a

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 4>DJ investigation, about a delayed ten K financial disclosure, all

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 4>of the above. How much do you focus in on

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 4>these individual names and as to whether they can vindicate

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 4>the AI bubbles.

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 7>Well, we cover SMCI, as do a lot of people

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:28.039
<v Speaker 7>who follow it, you know, as a big you know,

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 7>supplier of the AI servers and these Blackwell rack systems

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 7>that are such in such high demands, so they're part

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:40.840
<v Speaker 7>of the ecosystem for AI. And this is a huge

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 7>question mark. It's a big dark cloud, particularly over that

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 7>company and the stock obviously, and people are looking to

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 7>figure out, like, what could this mean for customers who

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:55.160
<v Speaker 7>are waiting for these Blackwell rack systems, and what could

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 7>it mean for other competitors who might benefit if you know,

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 7>order move from super Micro into players like Dell or

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 7>Hewlett Packard or Hanhai. I don't necessarily think it changes

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 7>the whole dynamic of AI investment and demand exceeding supply.

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 7>I think that's going to remain intact into next year.

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 7>But I think it just shows you the risk associated

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 7>with some of these names. You know, what goes up

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:21.360
<v Speaker 7>can come down, and you never know when you're going

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 7>to be hit with some of these headlines kind of

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:25.839
<v Speaker 7>out of the blue, to be honest, Jordan.

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 5>Common to super micro and video the industry at large

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 5>is China, and when it comes to President elect Trump,

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 5>we have a firmer sort of understanding of a tariff policy.

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 5>But when you think about the end market that is China,

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 5>do you have a clear sense of whether President Elect

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 5>Trump will or will not allow America's biggest technology companies

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 5>to do more business in China going forward?

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:55.359
<v Speaker 7>Now, I think that's part of the uncertainties is I

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 7>don't think he's going to restrict you know, across the board,

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 7>US companies dealing in China, but I think he definitely

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:06.119
<v Speaker 7>wants to gain more leverage over you know, the trade

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 7>and balance, and he wants to bring as much investment

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 7>to the United States as possible, particularly companies you know

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 7>that that go overseas for their production or their purchasing,

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 7>and that's why you've seen things like the chip decks

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 7>stimulate US investment. So again, I think he's going to

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:31.119
<v Speaker 7>do anything he can to incentivize companies, whether they're US

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 7>based or even overseas, to look to the United States first,

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 7>you know, as opposed to China. And I already think

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 7>that was going on right even before Trump was elected.

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 7>I think this was part of the Biden administration's focus

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 7>with the chips ACKed money. But I think that only accelerates,

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 7>and then the question becomes, what is the actual implication

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 7>if he puts these large tariffs on It's it's going

0:07:57.760 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 7>to be something we have to wait and see.

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 5>I'm a creature of habit. Every day I wake up

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 5>and I read the same thing client's Quick Tech Bites

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 5>authored by you, And in today's edition, you're talking a

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 5>lot about cyberstocks. What's your focus there?

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 7>Well, this is an area I would watch closely if

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 7>I was an investor looking to make money into the

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 7>coming year. I mean, security stocks are always topical, just

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 7>because there's a lot of risks for companies globally from

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 7>attacks and breaches and so forth. But we did a

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 7>survey of over one hundred US based IT managers and

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 7>ask them, you know, their propensity to spend and invest

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 7>in the security sector and how AI might actually impact

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 7>their spending, and the results.

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 3>Were quite favorable.

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 7>It's a long report, but the summary is is that

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 7>companies are looking to spend more in security, not less.

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 7>I think AI is going to drive more investment. And

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 7>some of the companies that you know were talked about

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 7>that look to be the clear beneficiaries not only include Microsoft,

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 7>but also CrowdStrike, Palo Alto, and a company called cyber Arc.

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:07.719
<v Speaker 7>So I think you want to overweight this group. You're

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 7>going to get some earnings this week which could make

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 7>it volatile, but a year from now, I think a

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 7>lot of these stocks are higher.

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 4>What else are you seeing your phone and ring off

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 4>the hook about what stock aren't we talking about that

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 4>your clients are well, I'll.

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 7>Tell you one group that I think is going to

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 7>remain and focus. It's done well, but I think generally

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 7>the more average investor is still unaware of the opportunity

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 7>is optical. So a lot of the cloud data centers

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 7>to be able to handle all the data and the

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 7>higher speeds from Nvidia's Blackwell, they need to basically upgrade

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 7>all the connection points inside the data center and from

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 7>data center to data center, and optical is the fastest.

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 3>Most efficient way to do that.

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:51.440
<v Speaker 7>So you've seen some companies if you pull up the

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:59.679
<v Speaker 7>charts on Coherent, Cohrlumentum Lite, other companies called Asteri Labs,

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 7>and uh, you know these are companies, and you even

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 7>look at Marvel and Broadcom, which a lot of people

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 7>own and know, but they're all going to benefit from

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 7>this shift. And Capex spend in the data center to

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 7>broaden out into connecting all these high speed GPUs together

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 7>so that they can basically, you know, produce the output

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 7>that these cloud companies are seeking with this, with these

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 7>AI enabled applications.

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 3>That's an area that's.

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 7>Going to remain and focus and I continue to expect

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:29.680
<v Speaker 7>more money to move into those stocks.

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 4>Okay, hearing down on the day, but up thirteen percent

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 4>on the month. We appreciate it. Jord and Client analyst

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 4>and a Zooho Americas.

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 5>Since Donald Trump's election win, the hedge funds clinging on

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:52.439
<v Speaker 5>too bets against Tesla have lost billions of dollars feeling

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 5>the fallout of the special relationship between the President elect

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 5>and Elon Musk. According to Bloomberg calculations, hedge funds that

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 5>had short positions against Tesla between election day and Friday's

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 5>close took an on paper hit of at least five

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 5>point two billion dollars. Let's bring in Bloomberg's David Welsh

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 5>in Detroit. I mean, this has been the calculus for

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 5>some time, but that time period and a five point

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:19.680
<v Speaker 5>two billion dollar loss is quite something, David.

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 1>It is. Look, people have lost money trying to short

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Tesla and bet against Elon Musk for a long time.

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:29.200
<v Speaker 1>But in this case, I think the bed was that

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>his whole robotaxi plan turning Tesla into an AI company

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>either wouldn't happen or wouldn't happen on time, so there

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 1>would be a lot of bad or delayed news on

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Tesla stock and go down, and the shorts would do

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>well with it, when in fact, now you've got this

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 1>tight relationship with Donald Trump that means you'll see ev

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>policies probably that are crafted to help Tesla, and more importantly,

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 1>you'll probably see some sort of permissive federal framework for

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:58.439
<v Speaker 1>autonomous vehicles that will also help Tesla's plans for robotaxis

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 1>and invest like that. They're willing to bet on that,

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and the shorts they got hit, hit and hit hard.

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 4>Is anyone still clinging on I know that Bloomberg spoke

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 4>to play Lacanda, ceof h fund manager Clean Energy Transition,

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 4>who had a little bit of skin in the game

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:18.199
<v Speaker 4>when betting against Tesla, But what's the sort of percentage

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 4>float that shortened?

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Now, Look, I think it's pretty small. I figure what

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>it was in the story, But I think a lot

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 1>of people have had to buy to basically cover their

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:31.960
<v Speaker 1>short positions. I think there's some still in there who

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:36.319
<v Speaker 1>are thinking that Trump will gut some of these IRA

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>credits and things that help EV sell. And if Trump

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:43.959
<v Speaker 1>had a lawsuit against the state of California before, and

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:47.440
<v Speaker 1>if that happens again, if it's successful and you get

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 1>rid of some of these clean air credits that other

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 1>companies have to buy from Tesla, which is a very

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>profitable part of Tesla's business, if that shrinks because of this,

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>then it could work against the company a Trump presidency.

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 1>But again you've got UoN Musk is sitting next to

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump talking to him about policies for this thing.

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's hard to for these kinds of things, it's

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>hard to imagine he's going to suggest that Donald Trump

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:13.960
<v Speaker 1>do anything that's going to hurt Queen Air credits, that's

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>going to hurt Ira credits, and other things that will

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 1>help his company.

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 4>As on November, the sick the story says only seven

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 4>percent of hedge funds were net short Tesla, way down

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 4>from seventeen percent, but only eight percent to actually net

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 4>long the stock, probably reflecting how far it's already run up.

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 4>David Welch, we really appreciate it, Thank you so much. Next,

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 4>Switch Gears, let's talk about China and China Singles Day

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 4>kicks off officially to day with many retailers slashing prices

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 4>offering promotions for the big shopping day. But look, for

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:44.680
<v Speaker 4>many this has been a week's long affair. That's his. China,

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:48.200
<v Speaker 4>of course, grapples with weak economic data and flaming domestic demand.

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 4>We want to go out to China. Jacob Cook is

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:53.440
<v Speaker 4>with us WPIC Marketing and Technology CEO, and it has

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 4>been weeks long in the making. What of today, Jacob,

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 4>how much spending is done on eleven eleven?

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, probably about twenty five to thirty percent has actually

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 2>done on the day Now. The festival has been getting

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 2>longer and longer every year. We started back in October

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Speaker 2>this year. But we're all pretty optimistic. We just closed

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:12.439
<v Speaker 2>out about ten minutes ago. Here we're now the twelfth

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 2>in China. But overall we're actually predicting a little bit

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:17.200
<v Speaker 2>stronger growth we had year over year this year than

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 2>last year, So it's looking pretty optimistic so far.

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 4>And what are they buying?

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, a lot different things now actually, you know, there's

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 2>a lot about the hobbies and outdoor consumption. You know,

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 2>pat had a really good shopping festival as well, exercise,

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 2>outdoor vitamins, personal care, cosmetics, these types of things. Definitely,

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 2>what we've kind of summarized this trend is to be

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 2>more around the Lulu lemon and a little bit less

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 2>than Louis Baton, And that's kind of just a general

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 2>emergence of that new consumer that's come out of China.

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 5>For global audience on Blombow Technology, a lot of people

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 5>watching this won't have experience, particularly of Ali Barber, but

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 5>also JD dot COM's consumer facing businesses. What's the experience

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 5>like in China? Is it kind of something akin to

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 5>an Amazon Prime Day window in the United States? How

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 5>do people rush to do their shopping?

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think there's two things.

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 2>One, there's probably people that have had their eye on

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 2>certain items for the year, maybe it's a new set

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 2>of golf clubs or supporting equipment. And then there's also

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 2>the people that stock up. You know, pet food really

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 2>has a lot to do. And the pad category with

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 2>people stocking up for months and months in advance, You're

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 2>going to see basically every ad on elevators and TVs,

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. Promoting the Shopping festival for about a month

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 2>and combining this with the six to eighteen Shopping Festival

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 2>in June. A lot of brands are expecting to do

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 2>about fifty percent of their online sales during these two

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 2>periods combined, so it's obviously very substantial.

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 4>Jacob, you help global brands make inroads into China, but

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 4>also Japan, South Korea other Asian markets. What are they

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 4>telling you about nervousness around continuing to focus in on

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 4>China at this moment, given the economic concerns, given a

0:15:57.000 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 4>new administration that's going to come in the US.

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, certainly are brands has been asking for diversification throughout

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 2>the region, and we operate, as you said, all throughout Asia,

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 2>so that's Korea, Southeast Asia. We are taking a lot

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 2>of learnings from here. So if you look at a

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 2>lot of the dominant platforms, whether it's Copang in Korea

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 2>or Lazada Shoppy in Southeast Asia, a lot of them

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 2>are either owned by Chinese, heavily invested by Chinese, or

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 2>they have some major operations that have come out of China.

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 2>So as we're diversifying, you know, China's still being about

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 2>two thirds of all e commerce GMB when you add

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 2>up that region. But we do see a lot of

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 2>the learnings coming from China being able to be applied,

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 2>especially in the live streaming, the influencer marketing, and these

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 2>types of things that are becoming more and more popular,

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 2>especially when we see the rise of TikTok sales throughout

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Asia too as well.

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 5>Jacob Kirk of WPIC Marketing and Technologies, thank you very much.

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 5>Coming up AI sales startup eleven x gets an investment

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 5>boost from Andres and Horror.

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 2>It's more on that next.

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 5>Let me go back to Tesla. So Tesla is trading

0:16:56.880 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 5>more than ten percent session high, at its highest level

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 5>since April fifth of twenty twenty two. It is up

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 5>for a fifth straight day post the election, matching the

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:08.680
<v Speaker 5>runou games it had in September. A lot of momentum there,

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:30.160
<v Speaker 5>not for the shorts. This is Bloomberg. Artificial intelligence powered

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 5>sales start up eleven x has raised fifty million dollars

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:35.880
<v Speaker 5>in a new funding round led by Andres and Horowitz,

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 5>boosting its total funding to seventy six million with evaluation

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 5>of around three hundred and twenty million. For more, eleven

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:46.920
<v Speaker 5>x CEO Hasansuka joins us in San Francisco. An interesting

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 5>story because this is a company and startup started in

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:53.919
<v Speaker 5>London and you've just moved to the Bay Area, San Francisco.

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 5>You've now got fifty million dollars more. What's the next

0:17:57.119 --> 0:17:58.239
<v Speaker 5>phase of eleven x?

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:01.639
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely, First of all, it's great to see you, Ed.

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 8>You're exactly right. We recently moved eleven x from London

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:10.120
<v Speaker 8>to San Francisco. Moved quite a big portion of our

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:14.200
<v Speaker 8>team here to accelerate the development of the company, and

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:17.880
<v Speaker 8>there's a tremendous amount of exciting milestones we're pushing towards

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 8>that I'm happy to take you through.

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:22.720
<v Speaker 5>That's on the basics. What is an artificial intelligence powered

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 5>sales startup?

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:26.679
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely so. Look at its core. Eleven X is an

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:30.159
<v Speaker 8>automation company that builds digital workers. You can think of

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 8>digital workers as AI employees. They have names and faces

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 8>and job categories they're trained on, and companies can hire

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:41.120
<v Speaker 8>them to execute tasks. And really it's about the work

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 8>outcomes the software licenses or seats. Our digital workers focus

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:48.920
<v Speaker 8>on revenue teams or go to market teams. More broadly,

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 8>we have a two different products, but ultimately, really the

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:57.440
<v Speaker 8>core model is digital workers instead of traditional saaspace software.

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:01.920
<v Speaker 4>It's a competitive space as a who do you want

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 4>to take on?

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 3>How do you.

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 4>Partner with the other big players in this space?

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely so. The way we think about it, traditional software

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 8>was built to make employees more productive or more efficient

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:18.919
<v Speaker 8>or more collaborative. But with AI agents, the scope for

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:21.679
<v Speaker 8>what you can automate and how you can automate is different.

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:26.200
<v Speaker 8>So you can take entire processes, workflows, streams, of work

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 8>and have agents execute them. And we believe this will

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 8>create a huge shift in how people think about software

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 8>the way we think about it internally, just like how

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:40.399
<v Speaker 8>about twenty five years ago Salesforce really innovated on the

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 8>cloud based software model we think with agents, and there's

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:47.639
<v Speaker 8>the beginning of a big shift in how customers and

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 8>enterprises around the world think of the value of utilizing

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:53.200
<v Speaker 8>agents at work. And that's how we think of the

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 8>opportunity here.

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 4>But Salesforce is all in on agents itself, and so

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:00.199
<v Speaker 4>how do you muscle in and ensure that you you

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 4>take and run with the market share we see the

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 4>companies that you've already got as clients.

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely, so customers are smart and they realized that companies

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 8>that are AI native companies with agentic architectures and workflows

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 8>at their core, are best suited to truly capture the

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 8>benefits of the technology that the agents enable, and really

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:26.640
<v Speaker 8>the way to think about it, just like how historically

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:29.399
<v Speaker 8>you know when the move to cloud happened and it

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 8>enabled a pletfor of opportunities in companies that are native

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 8>to that cycle to how eleven x is really operating

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 8>with agents at the core. So ultimately the way we

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:44.360
<v Speaker 8>build technology is leading to much bigger impact for our

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 8>customers than what you would get in co pilots or

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 8>in more incremental software editions.

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 5>Hassana, I want to go back to your move from

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 5>the United Kingdom to here on the West Coast. Why

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 5>what was the sort of motivating factor to do that.

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:58.439
<v Speaker 8>We believe that there is no better place in the

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 8>world to scale a company than San Francisco. Everything from

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:07.439
<v Speaker 8>so many of our customers are here, the depth of talent,

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:12.200
<v Speaker 8>where our investors are, and ultimately just an environment where

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 8>we can scale to the huge market opportunity that we

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:16.919
<v Speaker 8>see ahead of us. Being the core reason behind or

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 8>moved to.

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 4>To ss Ile an x Ai CEO A Sansuka come back,

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:22.400
<v Speaker 4>we appreciate it.

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 9>My reaction on kind of the more business side, the

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 9>defense side is it's great to have someone inbound who

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 9>is deeply, I guess deeply aligned with the idea that

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 9>we need to be spending less on defense while still

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 9>getting more, that we need to do a better job

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 9>of procuring the defense tools that protect our country.

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 3>Trump famously got involved.

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 9>In the nitty gritty of some of our aircraft carrier design,

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:53.680
<v Speaker 9>some of the procurement of Air Force One.

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 3>To see that level of involvement from a president.

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:59.120
<v Speaker 9>Is pretty rare, and I think an indicator of his priorities.

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 5>That was Anderil founder Palmer Lucky on the show last Thursday.

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:08.360
<v Speaker 5>Lucky also told us he's in touch with the transition

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 5>team on key posts like the next Secretary of Defense.

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 5>Our next guest is Catherine Boyle, an investor in Anderil

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:18.479
<v Speaker 5>and general partner at Andresen Horris. She's the co founder

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 5>of the firm's American Dynamism Practice, which investing companies supporting

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 5>national interests across aerospace, defense, and critical infrastructure. And Catherine,

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:31.440
<v Speaker 5>this is the first opportunity we've had to talk since

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 5>the outcome of the election. Part of what Palmer was

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 5>talking about there was, I guess evidence that President Electrump

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 5>will spend in those areas that you're focused on defense technology.

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:46.160
<v Speaker 5>But beyond the spend, what else can you give our

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:49.679
<v Speaker 5>audience that convinces you that President elect Trump was the

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 5>right candidate for the American dynamism movement.

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:56.399
<v Speaker 10>Well, so, I think the focus of this administration is,

0:22:56.520 --> 0:23:01.360
<v Speaker 10>particularly as it relates to defense, will be on production, production, production,

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 10>Let's invest in the defense industrial base. Let's make sure

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:08.159
<v Speaker 10>that the technologies that are needed for the battles of

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 10>the twenty first century are procured as quickly as possible.

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 10>And as Palmer said, which I think is often a

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 10>message that's lost inside of the DoD and outside of it,

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:18.919
<v Speaker 10>we need to focus on doing more with less. Technology

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 10>is actually better for the American tax paper. Pair these

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:24.399
<v Speaker 10>companies that are startups that are focused on production, that

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 10>are building products that are for the.

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:27.399
<v Speaker 3>Next generation warfighter.

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:30.879
<v Speaker 10>These are actually cheaper than the large, exquisite systems that

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 10>have dominated the Department of Defense for many decades. I

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 10>think that will be a huge focus of this administration

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 10>going forward.

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 5>Catherine doing more with less Department of Government efficiency. Elon Musk,

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:46.920
<v Speaker 5>what is it that you think that Elon Musk will

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 5>actually do, or encourage or guide President electrom to do

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 5>if he's to have some sort of role in this administration.

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:57.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, so, I don't know much about the DOGE Department.

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:00.400
<v Speaker 10>I think there's lots of details on that that will

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 10>remain to be seen. But I think the thing that's

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:05.160
<v Speaker 10>most important about the people who are around this administration

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 10>and the administration themselves, is that they very much understand

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:11.679
<v Speaker 10>the importance of American dynamism and little tech. They very

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 10>much understand how tech that makes things more efficient, not

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 10>less efficient, how I can save taxpayer dollars across.

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 3>A range of industries. And I think that will be paramount.

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:24.679
<v Speaker 10>That is, you know, the Silicon Valley understands company building,

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 10>understands how important job creation is to the American economy,

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 10>and I think you also have that and Vice President

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:31.919
<v Speaker 10>elect Jdvans.

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:33.440
<v Speaker 3>You know, the story that.

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 10>Really wasn't told that much on the campaign trail is

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:39.639
<v Speaker 10>that JD left San Francisco, moved to Ohio and started

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 10>investing in companies in the Midwest with his venture firm

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 10>because he believed that investing directly in manufacturing, investing directly

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 10>in companies that are based around the country is the

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:51.679
<v Speaker 10>funt of American dynamism. That is a large part of

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:54.400
<v Speaker 10>our American dynamism thesis, that you can build companies anywhere

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 10>in America and that tech is good for all Americans

0:24:57.119 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 10>in all society. So I think you're going to see

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:02.440
<v Speaker 10>that be a an innovation message in this administration because

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 10>they have first hand experience with building companies.

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:09.639
<v Speaker 4>You invested alongside Jed Evans. I think in some of

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 4>the seed rounds for Androil, What then of his presence

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:15.679
<v Speaker 4>in Washington and what do you think he will evolve

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:17.360
<v Speaker 4>there well.

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 10>So I think there's an understanding again that it is

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 10>important to invest in next generation capabilities for the Department

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:26.359
<v Speaker 10>of Defense. But the thing that I think Senator Vance

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 10>has been very, very focused on throughout his entire career

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 10>is manufacturing.

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 3>And again I want to go.

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 10>Back to say production is such an important part of this.

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:37.439
<v Speaker 3>Philosophy of the administration.

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:39.320
<v Speaker 10>But also I think where the DoD is going, that

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:41.200
<v Speaker 10>we need to invest in companies that.

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 3>Are building and supporting.

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:45.880
<v Speaker 10>Our defense industrial base, because the defense industrial base cannot

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 10>be removed from manufacturing. The future of manufacturing in this

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 10>country is reliant on these companies that are building for aerospace,

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:58.119
<v Speaker 10>building for defense, bringing next generation manufacturing capabilities inside of

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 10>all of the industries that are important to the American economy.

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 10>So I think that is going to be a key

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:05.880
<v Speaker 10>belief of this administration. It's something that they've talked about

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 10>very publicly before, and that will that will that will

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:10.640
<v Speaker 10>speak volumes to the to the companies that are coming

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 10>up today that want to build as quickly as possible

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:14.680
<v Speaker 10>for next generation capabilities.

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 4>Senator Mitch McConnell, echoing in many ways your view that

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 4>we need to ramp up defense spending. He's been saying

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:22.679
<v Speaker 4>it's a lot cheaper to prevent war, of course, than

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:26.199
<v Speaker 4>it is to have one. Kevin, what about outside of

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 4>America investing in American startups or larger defense companies. We've

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 4>already hear from Taiwan, for example, discussing how it's going

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 4>to up its defense spending. Europe probably trying to front

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 4>run that too.

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:41.080
<v Speaker 10>I think there's an understanding that deterrence matters, and that

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:43.120
<v Speaker 10>if you do not have a strong defense industrial base

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 10>in your home country, that that is a weak point

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 10>for national security.

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 3>And I very much agree with the sentiment.

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 10>That the best way to stop wars is to prevent war,

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 10>to invest in the capabilities, the manufacturing capabilities in country.

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:58.359
<v Speaker 10>And so just as you're seeing a focus and an

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 10>emphasis on the American defense industry base, which definitely needs

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 10>injections of both public and private capital, you're also seeing

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 10>that across other countries that say, Okay, we're going to

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 10>start investing in our defense industrial base as well. And

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:12.400
<v Speaker 10>I think there's a lot that those countries can learn

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 10>from American companies. There's a lot that they can learn

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:18.440
<v Speaker 10>from the startup ecosystem and what's happened with American dynamism

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:21.400
<v Speaker 10>over the last several years in terms of bringing autonomy

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:24.919
<v Speaker 10>into capabilities, making sure that you're not investing again in

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:27.960
<v Speaker 10>these large exquisite systems that are very expensive and time

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 10>consuming to build, but investing in drone's autonomy, unmanned surface vessels,

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 10>things that can be built very cheaply, very quickly, and

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 10>be put in the hands of the warfighter if need be.

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:40.919
<v Speaker 5>Catherine I wrote in the Tech Daily newsletter this morning

0:27:41.000 --> 0:27:45.360
<v Speaker 5>about your colleagues in industry who supported Kamla Harris doing

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:49.640
<v Speaker 5>some soul searching, right, but also considering how Trump two

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:52.680
<v Speaker 5>point zero will work for them for their portfolio companies.

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 5>Would you be able just to talk a little bit

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:58.919
<v Speaker 5>about the conversations you've had with your colleagues and your

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 5>competitors even in the world events capital, and the case

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 5>that you would make that this is going to be

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:05.680
<v Speaker 5>a good four year period for them.

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 10>Well, what I'll say is American dynamism is probably one

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 10>of the few categories of innovation where Republicans and Democrats

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:13.880
<v Speaker 10>in Washington agree wholeheartedly.

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:16.440
<v Speaker 3>We need to be investing in our events industrial base.

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 10>We need to make sure that we're restoring and restoring

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 10>the resiliency in America. This is these are not controversial issues.

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:25.439
<v Speaker 10>In fact, you know, Republicans and Democrats alike come together

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 10>on them very often. So I think that that is

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 10>something that you know, our colleagues that supported, you know,

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 10>the Harris administration. There's definitely a view that this is

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:37.959
<v Speaker 10>this is a category of innovation that will touch all Americans,

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 10>something that I think everyone can agree is important and

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 10>that we need to we need to invest in these

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 10>capabilities going forward.

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 5>Catherine, how does a VC focus on American dynamism need

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 5>to invest now at which stages, which geographies, what kind

0:28:52.080 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 5>of companies.

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, so, I don't know that the strategy necessarily changes.

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 10>Again, I think this is something that you know, since

0:28:58.320 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 10>twenty fifteen, former Secretary of Defense Ash Carter has been

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:03.720
<v Speaker 10>pounding the drum that the Department of Defense needs to change.

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 10>As Palmer said last week on your show, every administration

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 10>has been sort of has an understanding that the Defense

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:13.720
<v Speaker 10>Department needs to modernize, that aerospace needs to modernize. And

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:16.240
<v Speaker 10>so I think in many ways there will be a

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 10>continuation of investing in companies that are fantastic for the

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 10>national interest, Companies in aerospace, defense, transportation, potentially nuclear, you know,

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:28.479
<v Speaker 10>companies that are important for all Americans. And I think

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 10>we're just going to continue to see more and more

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 10>investment in these categories, in particular.

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 4>In his Veterans' Day. And we want to note that

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:36.720
<v Speaker 4>you have invested in a number of companies founded by veterans.

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 4>But I want to go to another founder that you've backed,

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 4>and we mentioned him briefly, but Elil Musk, you are

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 4>invested in SpaceX, and can you just tell us as

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 4>to whether you worry about if there is a long

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 4>term role for him within well, whether it's kabinat or

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 4>indeed as a whisperer to the White House, does that

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 4>worry you about leadership at the companies that he currently helms.

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 10>I know, I mean, Elon is a superhuman figure in

0:29:57.520 --> 0:30:00.080
<v Speaker 10>terms of the number of companies that he's support or

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 10>the number of companies that he's built. He is the

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 10>most extraordinary founder not only of our era, but when

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 10>we look back in history, we will remember the name

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 10>Elon Musk, and so I'm very excited that he is

0:30:11.680 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 10>you know, taking on interest in politics, that he is

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 10>thinking about how to make the government more efficient. And

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 10>I think a lot of people, a lot of people

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 10>would agree with that sentiment, that he is one of

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 10>the most extraordinary builders, one of the most efficient people

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 10>with his time, and that he will have an incredible

0:30:25.480 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 10>impact on American government.

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:31.240
<v Speaker 4>Katherine Boyle, we appreciate you joining us today of Andrews

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 4>and Horowitz. Meanwhile, technology that once seemed like science fiction

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 4>is rapidly becoming reality. In a new four part series

0:30:39.440 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 4>called Posthuman, the New Megamini Chang meets some of the

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 4>world's most advanced robots. Here's a sneak peak. I what

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 4>to expect. There is this Hollywood idea of killer robots.

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 3>Actually not that far fetched.

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 11>Oh, it's not far fetched at all. It's coming very soon,

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 11>like in the next few years. And all of the

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 11>governments to sell arms, like the US and Russia and

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:07.400
<v Speaker 11>Britain and Israel, all of those governments refuse to regulate

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 11>military uses of AI. So if you look at the

0:31:09.480 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 11>European regulations, they've got all these limitations on AI. Should

0:31:13.920 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 11>be sort of transparent in this amount, shouldn't be discriminate.

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 11>But there's a little clause in there that says none

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 11>of this applies to military uses of AI. They don't

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 11>like regulating themselves, and all of the big arments manufacturers

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 11>are very keen to make killer robots. So if you

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 11>look at Asimov's laws of robotics, that you know the

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:39.680
<v Speaker 11>first law should be do not harm people. Well, that's

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 11>the whole point of a killer robot. That's not going

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 11>to be built into a killer robot.

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 5>You can catch the first episode airing tonight on Bloomberg

0:31:47.920 --> 0:31:50.800
<v Speaker 5>TV at ten pm Eastern time.

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 4>Let's have a quick check on these markets as we

0:31:54.040 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 4>trade it, because when we're talking about it throughout the morning,

0:31:56.600 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 4>eighty four and a half thousand now is the level

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 4>for bitcoin, new record high. Of course, with the idea

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:05.120
<v Speaker 4>that not just a Trump in the White House, but

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 4>a far more pro crypto Congress at large will mean

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 4>more regulation that gives more clarity, more change. At the

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 4>top of the sec micro Strategy dining out on that rally.

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 4>Of course, this has basically become a proxy for bitcoin ownership,

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:21.959
<v Speaker 4>but Michael Saylor, the leader of micro Strategy, has been

0:32:21.960 --> 0:32:24.760
<v Speaker 4>investing yet more. Another twenty seven thousand bitcoin have been

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 4>bought over the last few trading days and where up

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 4>some eighteen percent on that particular stop is outperformed even

0:32:31.480 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 4>in Vidia since the start of twenty twenty an absolutely

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 4>phenomenal run for that particular stop. And what's also interesting,

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 4>we got news when it comes to crypto FTX that

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 4>old chestnut filed a lawsuit against Binance and its former

0:32:45.120 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 4>CEO to recover one point eight billion dollars which is

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:52.239
<v Speaker 4>allegedly forudulately transferred by Sam Bangmanfreed then also claims that

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:56.040
<v Speaker 4>Baguan Freed used ftx's exchange token and Binance branded coins

0:32:56.440 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 4>to pay for a share repurchase steal in twenty twenty one,

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:02.840
<v Speaker 4>which was made fraudulent since FTX was allegedly insolvent at

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 4>the time.

0:33:03.720 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 5>Ed okay, a lot more to come up on the show.

0:33:05.640 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 5>We're going to discuss how AI is transforming solutions in

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:12.080
<v Speaker 5>the climate tech space with James Jaquin from Obvious Ventures.

0:33:12.080 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 3>That's next. This is Bloomberg.

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 5>Technology time for the VC Roundup. First stup, Talabat says

0:33:34.120 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 5>they're eyeing ways to diversify beyond food and grocery deliveries,

0:33:38.400 --> 0:33:42.720
<v Speaker 5>with a possible expansion to healthcare, beauty, and fintech. This

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:46.479
<v Speaker 5>is the Middle Eastern subsidiary of delivery hero Tease up

0:33:46.480 --> 0:33:49.480
<v Speaker 5>a share sale that could value it at fourteen point

0:33:49.480 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 5>four billion dollars plus. Indian food delivery platform Swiggy Sorry,

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 5>it's one point three billion dollar IPO subscribe more than

0:33:56.880 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 5>three times on Friday, driven in part by a late

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 5>surge in demand. One of the few one billion dollar

0:34:02.800 --> 0:34:05.680
<v Speaker 5>plus listings in India this year, it drew bids for

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:09.920
<v Speaker 5>six times the shares kept for foreigners and domestic money managers,

0:34:10.280 --> 0:34:13.400
<v Speaker 5>and LG has added access capital to its roster of

0:34:13.480 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 5>banks for a potential IPO of its Indian unit. That's

0:34:17.120 --> 0:34:20.400
<v Speaker 5>according to sources. The South Korean company selected the Indian

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:22.640
<v Speaker 5>bank as it moves forward with a share sale in

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 5>Mumbai seeking to raise one to one point five billion dollars. Caroline,

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:28.399
<v Speaker 5>and let's just.

0:34:28.320 --> 0:34:30.719
<v Speaker 4>Talk about the US and how it will continue its

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:33.960
<v Speaker 4>fight against climate change as even with Donald Trump in

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:36.200
<v Speaker 4>the White House. Those are the words of Biden's top

0:34:36.200 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 4>climate negotiator John Pedesta earlier today at COP twenty nine.

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 4>Let's discuss this and how perhaps artificial intelligence can be

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:46.160
<v Speaker 4>helping with that. James Jaquin is with US today's VC

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 4>Spotlight co founder managing director at Obvious Ventures, which was

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:52.880
<v Speaker 4>founded more than a decade ago. And James, when you

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:55.640
<v Speaker 4>do see potentially a new administration coming in that doesn't

0:34:55.680 --> 0:34:59.279
<v Speaker 4>seem to be as pro climate change avoidance as the

0:34:59.320 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 4>current administry, what does that mean in terms of your

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:03.840
<v Speaker 4>thesis in termes you're investing in this space, Well.

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 12>First and foremost, we're long term investors. I think all

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:09.920
<v Speaker 12>of venture capital is an industry where we'll spend sometimes

0:35:09.960 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 12>twelve or fifteen years building a company before it reaches.

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:13.800
<v Speaker 3>The public markets.

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 12>That's three presidential administrations, so we worry less about what's

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:21.239
<v Speaker 12>going to happen in one administration or another. We try

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:24.920
<v Speaker 12>to focus more on bringing these breakthrough technologies to market,

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 12>some of the ones.

0:35:25.920 --> 0:35:27.960
<v Speaker 4>That you've backed that we all know about beyond meat

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:31.480
<v Speaker 4>for example, you know multiple rounds there. What is the

0:35:31.560 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 4>new area of innovation in climate change and how is

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:37.960
<v Speaker 4>it being how spearheaded from a generative AI perspective.

0:35:37.520 --> 0:35:41.760
<v Speaker 12>For example, Well, with climate there's a lot of unsolved problems.

0:35:41.800 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 12>We need better battery technologies, we need more renewable energy

0:35:45.560 --> 0:35:49.560
<v Speaker 12>to power all of our AI data centers, and the

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 12>thing that we're excited about is using AI to solve

0:35:52.560 --> 0:35:56.239
<v Speaker 12>these unsolvable problems. We call it generative science, and it's

0:35:56.280 --> 0:35:59.720
<v Speaker 12>an idea of instead of using large language models trained

0:35:59.719 --> 0:36:02.560
<v Speaker 12>on the Internet, we're backing teams that are building large

0:36:02.600 --> 0:36:06.759
<v Speaker 12>science models trained in areas like chemistry, biology, and physics,

0:36:07.320 --> 0:36:10.840
<v Speaker 12>and those generative science AI systems can actually output or

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:12.880
<v Speaker 12>generate new scientific breakthroughs.

0:36:14.160 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 5>James I was writing this morning in the Tech Daily

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:20.319
<v Speaker 5>newsletter about the idea that there are lots of vench

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:23.319
<v Speaker 5>capses that backed Harris because they felt she was the

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:25.680
<v Speaker 5>better candidate in the context of climate, the work of

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:28.799
<v Speaker 5>the Inflation Reduction Act, but there are others out there

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:32.080
<v Speaker 5>that basically see staying power. They would cite data on

0:36:32.880 --> 0:36:36.560
<v Speaker 5>install stalled capacity of renewable energy sources, the hiring in

0:36:36.600 --> 0:36:40.520
<v Speaker 5>those fields. You said you're a long term investor. How

0:36:40.640 --> 0:36:43.080
<v Speaker 5>closely would you track those data sets over the next

0:36:43.080 --> 0:36:43.640
<v Speaker 5>four years.

0:36:44.880 --> 0:36:47.360
<v Speaker 12>Well, there's a lot to be optimistic about ed with

0:36:47.520 --> 0:36:51.000
<v Speaker 12>climate and particularly with the Inflation Reduction Act. There's a

0:36:51.000 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 12>lot of fear and uncertainty that Trump two point zero

0:36:54.120 --> 0:36:57.480
<v Speaker 12>administration is going to somehow repeal that, and I share

0:36:57.520 --> 0:37:01.440
<v Speaker 12>those concerns. However, there's data to be optimistic. If we

0:37:01.480 --> 0:37:04.560
<v Speaker 12>look at the two hundred plus billion that has already

0:37:04.560 --> 0:37:08.560
<v Speaker 12>been deployed out to states. One hundred and sixty five

0:37:08.560 --> 0:37:11.520
<v Speaker 12>billion have gone to Red states, so more than three

0:37:11.560 --> 0:37:15.400
<v Speaker 12>times what Blue states have received. That means in states

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:18.880
<v Speaker 12>like Georgia and North Carolina and Tennessee, we have new

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:23.359
<v Speaker 12>electric battery and electric vehicle plants coming online. That's good

0:37:23.400 --> 0:37:27.160
<v Speaker 12>green jobs in red states. That's Christmas for climate tech.

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:31.640
<v Speaker 5>James, how focus should everyone be on nuclear and how

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:32.440
<v Speaker 5>important is it for you?

0:37:33.880 --> 0:37:36.959
<v Speaker 12>It's funny nuclear has really had a change of heart.

0:37:37.080 --> 0:37:40.120
<v Speaker 12>I think with investors and with environmentalists as we look

0:37:40.160 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 12>at the needs of our energy grid. We're going to

0:37:43.200 --> 0:37:45.399
<v Speaker 12>have to double the number of electrons on the US

0:37:45.520 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 12>grid to power electric vehicles and bitcoin mining and AI

0:37:50.280 --> 0:37:53.920
<v Speaker 12>data centers. At Obvious we want those electrons to be green.

0:37:54.120 --> 0:37:56.440
<v Speaker 12>We don't want more coal plants, we don't want more

0:37:56.520 --> 0:37:59.840
<v Speaker 12>natural gas plants, and so to deliver that much power

0:38:00.120 --> 0:38:03.200
<v Speaker 12>need I think two big areas. One is geothermal, which

0:38:03.200 --> 0:38:05.320
<v Speaker 12>we're investing in, and the other is nuclear.

0:38:06.760 --> 0:38:10.239
<v Speaker 5>James fucking co founder and managing director Obvious Ventures, thank

0:38:10.280 --> 0:38:22.520
<v Speaker 5>you very much. For years, Apple Watches customers and investors

0:38:22.600 --> 0:38:25.799
<v Speaker 5>have been fixated on the same question, what is the

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:29.560
<v Speaker 5>company's next blockbuster products? Bloombos Mark Goman wrote about it

0:38:29.560 --> 0:38:33.360
<v Speaker 5>in this week's Power On and joins us. Now, beyond

0:38:33.360 --> 0:38:36.359
<v Speaker 5>the iPhone, what is it? What is the next thing

0:38:36.600 --> 0:38:38.360
<v Speaker 5>that is going to be the driver of growth?

0:38:39.280 --> 0:38:41.480
<v Speaker 13>Well, let's just take a step back and talk about

0:38:41.520 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 13>the iPhone for a second.

0:38:42.680 --> 0:38:42.879
<v Speaker 9>Rate.

0:38:43.200 --> 0:38:46.800
<v Speaker 13>It generates over half of the company's revenue as a standbone.

0:38:46.320 --> 0:38:48.919
<v Speaker 3>Product, but almost the rest of all.

0:38:48.800 --> 0:38:52.359
<v Speaker 13>Of Apple's revenue from services to things like Apple Care,

0:38:52.480 --> 0:38:56.720
<v Speaker 13>to AirPods, to Apple watches, even iPads marixx Apple TVs

0:38:56.719 --> 0:38:59.960
<v Speaker 13>flon pods. All of these things are bought by customers

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:02.160
<v Speaker 13>because they have an iPhone, or because they're in the

0:39:02.160 --> 0:39:05.239
<v Speaker 13>Apple ecosystem, because they fall in love with the iPhone.

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:08.200
<v Speaker 13>There will never be another Apple product like the iPhone,

0:39:08.239 --> 0:39:10.719
<v Speaker 13>something that sits at the center of the company and

0:39:10.960 --> 0:39:13.960
<v Speaker 13>generates half of the revenue from a hardware standpoint and

0:39:14.000 --> 0:39:17.000
<v Speaker 13>the other half from an attachment and services standpoint. Right,

0:39:17.239 --> 0:39:20.960
<v Speaker 13>So investors have to understand that and come to that realization.

0:39:21.640 --> 0:39:24.560
<v Speaker 13>But there are little beats, more modest things that Apple

0:39:24.600 --> 0:39:27.839
<v Speaker 13>will bring to market, some built around the iPhone, some

0:39:27.880 --> 0:39:31.480
<v Speaker 13>completely standalone, and the hope for Apple investors is that

0:39:31.520 --> 0:39:34.000
<v Speaker 13>you can stack up a bunch of twenty to fifty

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:36.920
<v Speaker 13>billion dollars a year businesses, things about the size of

0:39:36.920 --> 0:39:40.200
<v Speaker 13>the AirPods, Apple Watch, and iPad. So to answer your question,

0:39:40.280 --> 0:39:44.560
<v Speaker 13>the areas that Apple is exploring and moving into obviously headsets,

0:39:44.640 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 13>but beyond mixed reality, going into pure augmented reality glasses

0:39:49.000 --> 0:39:53.279
<v Speaker 13>or standalone glasses without displays, things like expanded versions of

0:39:53.320 --> 0:39:54.839
<v Speaker 13>AirPods that tap into AI.

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:55.920
<v Speaker 3>There have been.

0:39:55.800 --> 0:40:00.359
<v Speaker 13>Explorations into home robotics, explorations into home energy, a way

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:04.000
<v Speaker 13>to monetize the health products into a subscription service. Right.

0:40:04.400 --> 0:40:06.719
<v Speaker 13>The big thing coming next year is a push into

0:40:06.719 --> 0:40:07.399
<v Speaker 13>the smart home.

0:40:07.640 --> 0:40:09.520
<v Speaker 3>So for the first time, Apple's really.

0:40:09.360 --> 0:40:12.480
<v Speaker 13>Going to dive two feet first into smart home appliances.

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:14.560
<v Speaker 13>So in the first half of next year, you'll see

0:40:14.560 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 13>a push into smart home displays. Right, a couple of

0:40:17.239 --> 0:40:19.719
<v Speaker 13>years after that, you'll see a new smart display with

0:40:19.800 --> 0:40:22.640
<v Speaker 13>the robotic limb. So definitely a bunch of these little

0:40:22.680 --> 0:40:25.320
<v Speaker 13>categories that they hope will add up into something bigger.

0:40:25.760 --> 0:40:28.479
<v Speaker 4>One key category that was new, innovative and perhaps hasn't

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:30.520
<v Speaker 4>taken off in the way they expected was Vision Pro.

0:40:30.960 --> 0:40:33.400
<v Speaker 4>But you're saying in the latest power on that we

0:40:33.560 --> 0:40:35.879
<v Speaker 4>finally got the color app. Just talk us through it.

0:40:36.960 --> 0:40:38.680
<v Speaker 13>If you have a vision Pro, and I know there's

0:40:38.719 --> 0:40:41.880
<v Speaker 13>not many of us out there you want to try.

0:40:42.160 --> 0:40:44.400
<v Speaker 13>Coming out in the beginning of next month is a

0:40:44.480 --> 0:40:47.640
<v Speaker 13>vision OS two point two update. It's available in beta now.

0:40:47.719 --> 0:40:51.439
<v Speaker 13>I've been using it. There's been this long lasting Mac

0:40:51.520 --> 0:40:54.160
<v Speaker 13>external monitor feature. You can put on the headset and

0:40:54.200 --> 0:40:56.439
<v Speaker 13>you can view your Mac display in there, and it's

0:40:56.440 --> 0:40:58.879
<v Speaker 13>basically an enlarged version of your what's on your Mac.

0:40:58.960 --> 0:41:01.520
<v Speaker 13>Right now, a lot of people vision pros use that.

0:41:01.760 --> 0:41:03.919
<v Speaker 13>They're adding a new feature that allows you to add

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:07.120
<v Speaker 13>a wide monitor or an ultra wide monitor, and so

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:09.520
<v Speaker 13>if you turn this feature on, you get a gigantic

0:41:09.760 --> 0:41:13.080
<v Speaker 13>curved display that can go almost three hundred and sixty

0:41:13.080 --> 0:41:15.200
<v Speaker 13>degrees and you can see what's on your Mac through that,

0:41:15.560 --> 0:41:18.680
<v Speaker 13>and it's a really powerful tool and a great productivity

0:41:18.760 --> 0:41:21.480
<v Speaker 13>use case for the vision Pro. The problem is is

0:41:21.480 --> 0:41:23.560
<v Speaker 13>that the vision Pro, if you're not laying down with

0:41:23.640 --> 0:41:25.640
<v Speaker 13>your head on the back of a pillow on your couch,

0:41:26.040 --> 0:41:28.840
<v Speaker 13>it's often hard to wear the vision Pro for extended

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:32.080
<v Speaker 13>periods of time. And the bands that Apple include in

0:41:32.120 --> 0:41:34.400
<v Speaker 13>the box of the Vision pro are part of the reason.

0:41:34.680 --> 0:41:36.799
<v Speaker 13>There's a backup headband and then there's a band that

0:41:36.800 --> 0:41:38.719
<v Speaker 13>has a thin strap that goes behind the head on

0:41:38.760 --> 0:41:41.120
<v Speaker 13>top of the head. Neither are very good for long

0:41:41.200 --> 0:41:44.680
<v Speaker 13>term productivity. But Belkan, this is a company that's owned

0:41:44.760 --> 0:41:47.320
<v Speaker 13>by a fox Con subsidiary, so they work very closely

0:41:47.360 --> 0:41:50.400
<v Speaker 13>with Apple came out with a new overhead strap that

0:41:50.440 --> 0:41:53.040
<v Speaker 13>attaches to the back of head strap and combined you

0:41:53.040 --> 0:41:54.560
<v Speaker 13>can wear it for longer use cases.

0:41:55.520 --> 0:41:57.960
<v Speaker 4>Mark German. With all the latest and greater out of Apple,

0:41:58.000 --> 0:42:00.360
<v Speaker 4>we really appreciate. Meanwhile, let's do a quick check on

0:42:00.400 --> 0:42:02.400
<v Speaker 4>the rest of the tech sector for you, because ed

0:42:02.880 --> 0:42:04.840
<v Speaker 4>we are down on the NASDAK chip sector falls. But

0:42:04.880 --> 0:42:07.839
<v Speaker 4>Bitcoin above eighty four thousand Tesla you said it at

0:42:07.840 --> 0:42:09.160
<v Speaker 4>a higher since twenty twenty.

0:42:10.719 --> 0:42:14.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, astonishing momentum. That does it for this edition of

0:42:14.360 --> 0:42:16.520
<v Speaker 5>the show, check out the pod. You know where to

0:42:16.600 --> 0:42:18.520
<v Speaker 5>find it. Happy Monday.

0:42:18.680 --> 0:42:19.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg