WEBVTT - Daybreak Holiday: Trump's Second Term, Netflix, Fed

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:12.559
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much for joining us on this special

0:00:18.160 --> 0:00:21.639
<v Speaker 2>edition of Bloomberg Daybreak. US markets are closed for the

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:24.919
<v Speaker 2>Martin Luther King Junior Day holiday. I'm Nathan Hager, and

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 2>coming up this hour, we'll look ahead to the federal

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 2>reserves first policy decision of the year, what's in store

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 2>for interest rates after last week's key reports on inflation,

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Plus streaming behemoth Netflix gets set to report earnings. We'll

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 2>have a special Bloomberg Intelligence roundtable with media analyst KEITHA.

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 2>Ronganathan and senior credit analyst Stephen Flynn. But first we

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 2>begin with politics because this is not only MLK Day

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 2>in a rare occurrence, it is also Inauguration Day, as

0:00:55.680 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump officially begins his second term as president. So

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 2>what will the next four years hold in store with

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Trump back as commander in chief. We're pleased to welcome

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:09.319
<v Speaker 2>Wendy Schiller, director of the Alfred Taubman Center for American

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Politics and Policy at Brown University. Great to speak with

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 2>you on this inauguration Day. Wendy, thanks for being here,

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 2>And of course we saw plenty of dramatic moves in

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 2>the first hundred days of the first Trump administration, how

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 2>could the second first one hundred days be different?

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 3>Hello Nathan, and happy inauguration Day to you too. You know,

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 3>there's just a question mark, you know, will the second

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 3>Trump administration learn from some of the stumbles of the

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 3>first Trump administration, things like the travel band, things like

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, sweeping immigration and deportation actions. This time, I

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 3>think the rollout will be much smoother, and I do

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 3>think that the Trump administration is planning ahead for things

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 3>like lawsuits or public challenges to some of the actions

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 3>that's going to take. Clearly it will use more security

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 3>and immigration as some of its pillar foundations in the

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 3>early part of the administration. But politically, you know, the

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 3>Trump administration, led by incoming President Trump, is very focused

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 3>on getting a tax cut bill and certainly making sure

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 3>the debt ceiling gets extended. And so those are the

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:21.360
<v Speaker 3>things that the Trump administration wants to get done earlier

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 3>in sort of the congressional legislative season. Then we typically

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 3>see I do.

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:29.360
<v Speaker 2>Want to get to the plans for tax policy. But

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned the possibility or at least the preparation for

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:37.359
<v Speaker 2>potential legal challenges to some of what President Trump may

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 2>have in store here. How prepared is the next president

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 2>for what could be coming in terms of the flurry

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 2>of executive orders that he has said he wants to

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 2>enact on day one.

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 3>This is all are very much dependent on the Justice Department.

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 3>You know, should the Attorney I'll be confirmed fairly, smoothly,

0:02:57.240 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 3>and then what happens to career Justice Department lawyers? Do

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 3>they stay or do they go? How much of an

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 3>exotus will there be in the executive branch for people

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 3>who are still service and who are either fearful of

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 3>served you projects twenty twenty five, or you know, any

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 3>kind of other attempt to cut or eliminate positions. But

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 3>even that, they don't want to carry out Trump administration policies.

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 3>So you know, if you get a hollowing out of.

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 4>The Justice Department.

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:27.919
<v Speaker 3>I'm not suggesting that there will be a hollowing out,

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 3>but there could be. Then when groups that are gearing

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:33.799
<v Speaker 3>up that are already prepared to challenge some of these

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 3>executive orders go to court, you know, who's going to

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 3>defend the Trump administration. That's where I think the opponent

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 3>may have a head start, depending on what the staff

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 3>situation looks like in the executive branch. So at the

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 3>same time you want, you know, elon Musk and then

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 3>go almost want me to clean up and limit and

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 3>trim government. He's going to need those people to implement

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 3>his policy.

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 2>Do you think we're going to see the kind of

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 2>sea change that President Trump has talked about if it

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 2>does produce some kind of backlash from the electorate, if

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 2>some of these things are seen as not popular, if

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 2>they come into drastically.

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, Nadan, this is a really important part of the

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 3>federal government that a lot of people sort of overlook.

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 3>It is deeply embedded in every American's daily life. Everything

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 3>we do, the safety, the food we eat, the healthcare system,

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 3>the roads, which of course you know up in New

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:32.039
<v Speaker 3>England we complain about all the time. Every single thing

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:35.720
<v Speaker 3>we do is absolutely affected by the federal government. And

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 3>you need people to be implementing those policies and conducting

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 3>oversight of how they're going on the ground level. So

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 3>if you want to gut or trim or eliminate, people

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:49.039
<v Speaker 3>will feel that. And so the big question is how

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 3>many of those people will be in Republican leading districts

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 3>and whether the House of Representatives they very slim Republican

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 3>majority react to the things that are happening on the

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:02.600
<v Speaker 3>ground in their districts. So this is the big thing

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 3>that I'm watching for, and we may not see it

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:06.599
<v Speaker 3>till this summer, but those of those who know history

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 3>go way back to nineteen ninety five and New Cambridge

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 3>to have got out of the gate very fast, very

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 3>successfully in the Republican House, and then by the summer

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 3>the impact of some of those decisions are being self

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 3>and districts and the party started to really fight with itself.

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 3>So we have to see how they roll it out,

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 3>where they roll it out, and what they're actually going

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 3>to cut.

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Of course, it's not just you know, the Department of

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:31.360
<v Speaker 2>Government efficiency that we've been looking forward to, but there's

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:34.359
<v Speaker 2>been a lot of talk as well about plans to

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 2>really rain in immigration, boosting border security, a lot of

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:43.600
<v Speaker 2>executive orders expected there as well. How could the rollout

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 2>of a border policy be different from where it was

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 2>the last time around, when, as you mentioned, it was

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 2>facing a lot of challenges under the first Trump administration.

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, Nathan, when you think about the border policy and

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 3>shotainly what outcome President Biden did and many argues far

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 3>too late, But you know understanding that if you are

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:06.479
<v Speaker 3>seeking asylum, and then refugees are different from assyl leads

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 3>for different kinds of reasons. You know, can you cross

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 3>the border and make the claim and then stay in

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:14.919
<v Speaker 3>the United States while the claim is being processed. Certainly

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 3>that was the Biden administration policy, and we had millions

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 3>of people come over the border. The Trump administration will

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 3>not have that policy used to be called stay in Mexico.

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 3>But what they're going to say is you cannot come

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 3>here if you are not legally permitted to do so.

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 3>If you don't have legal permanent residents, you cannot come

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 3>and stay. And that will be disruptive to those people

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 3>who are currently have being allowed by the bidenmistration to

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 3>come here stay here. Will the Trump administration force all

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 3>those people to return to their home countries. That's a

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 3>lot of people, So when we think about undocumented, it's

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:51.480
<v Speaker 3>a very long range of people. But certainly these sylum

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 3>seekers are probably going to be the first target after

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 3>what they view as the criminals. Those people are irrestively

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:00.719
<v Speaker 3>hard to find, and that will be a steady stream

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:05.720
<v Speaker 3>of women and children being shown to being deported. And

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:08.360
<v Speaker 3>we saw last time that did not go overwhel with

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 3>the American public, So they're even disconnecting voters' minds. They

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 3>want border security, they want limited on document and immigration.

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 3>Of course, on the other hand, they don't like the

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 3>images of seeing women and children, you know, forcibly deported

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 3>from the United States.

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 2>We're speaking with Wendy Schiller, director of the Alfred Taubman

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Center for American Politics and Policy at Brown University. Of course,

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 2>the policy that markets are looking for in terms of

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 2>the rollout is tax cuts and the potential for expanded tariffs,

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 2>not just on adversaries but potentially on allies as well.

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 2>When it comes to the tax cut piece, how much

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 2>of a difficulty is the new president going to face

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 2>when the margins in Congress are so much tighter than

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 2>they were when the twenty seventeen tax cuts were passed

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 2>the last time around.

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean, you know, the Democrats and Republicans will

0:07:57.000 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 3>vote for a renewal of some version of the original

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 3>trop tax cuts. Congress rarely meets the tax cut. They

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 3>don't want to pay us. And that's true across the

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 3>aisle political aisle. Question is what are the specifics of

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 3>the you know, what are we going to do with corporations,

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 3>what about repatriation coming back to the United States, you know,

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 3>or everything capital gains, particularly you know, the state and

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 3>local tax possession fault, which disproportionately affects a Democrat or

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 3>blue leaning state. These are the sort of nuts and

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 3>bolts of the bill that will bog it down, and

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 3>you'll see very strong differences I think, between the House

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:36.560
<v Speaker 3>and the Senate based on geography. You know, a district's

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:38.440
<v Speaker 3>impact from some of this stuff is not the same

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 3>as the space impact, so you know you're going to

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 3>see that. And at the same time, if you see

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 3>tariffs negatively affecting particular industries geographically, that's also going to

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 3>be something that the GOP has to manage internally within

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 3>its caucus. That's where I see the biggest difficulties in

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 3>the response to any kind of sweeping Trump tariffs. You know,

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 3>Pennsylvania went for Trump right like it's starting to lean Republican.

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 3>You start throwing tariff on things, does that affect manufacturing

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 3>in Pennsylvania? So we will see that local nature of

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:12.079
<v Speaker 3>Congress rear its head, I think, particularly in the Republican

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 3>CLOCKUS in response to.

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 2>What Trump does in terms of the herding of cats

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 2>on Capitol Hill. How do you see President Trump dealing

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 2>with the congressional leadership. Of course, you've got House Speaker

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 2>Mike Johnson and a brand new majority leader in the

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 2>Senate in John Thynne.

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:31.199
<v Speaker 3>No President denpawn Republican, loved Congress go all aback to

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 3>George Washington is constantly complaining about Congress even before he

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:36.199
<v Speaker 3>was President of United States. They don't like it. They

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 3>think they got elected their president. They also be able

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 3>to do what they want to do, and the party

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:43.559
<v Speaker 3>is you know, a trifecta. But Trump will get frustrated

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 3>very quickly if things don't go his way. We've seen

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 3>Mike Johnson even do some small things like you know,

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:52.680
<v Speaker 3>raising the flags and inauguration around the Capitol. You know,

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 3>we have a period of morning for Jimmy Carter, usually

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 3>supposed to be a half step, they'll be raised because

0:09:57.400 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 3>Trump complained about it. It may seem small, but if

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.679
<v Speaker 3>it's an indication of the President's influence and House of

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 3>Representatives in the Senate, Johnson's a pretty healthy majority, so

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 3>he doesn't really have to trade away too much. But

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 3>he's got people with Lisa Murkowski, sus and Collins, who

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 3>may not go along with everything, You've still got some

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 3>leeway there. So I think Soon and Trump may have

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 3>a so smoother relationship because soone can deliver in ways

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:23.079
<v Speaker 3>that Mike Johnson's gonna have very difficult time doing.

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 2>As we get into this new administration, Wendy, we're returning

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:30.320
<v Speaker 2>to unified government in Washington. We have a Republican president

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:35.199
<v Speaker 2>and Republican majorities on both sides of Capitol Hill. How

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 2>do Democrats regroup after President Trump's win?

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 3>People think about regrouping politically, these broader teams moving to

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 3>the center. I do see it that way. In the

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:48.319
<v Speaker 3>first year of the Trump administration. You're going to twenty

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 3>twenty six, which are midterm elections more locally focused. It's

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 3>really hammering home if it happens negative impacts from the

0:10:56.280 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 3>Trump administration policies on local constituents have to go back

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 3>to their retail routes and really sort of lead bigger

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:07.200
<v Speaker 3>issues I think on the table probably leading up to

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 3>twenty eight, but for twenty six, it's how are these

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 3>benefiting you or hurting you? And we are the party

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:14.680
<v Speaker 3>that tries to help you, and this is what we're

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:17.959
<v Speaker 3>trying to do. And a consistent message. Chancy Pelosi was

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 3>very good at this in two thousand and six, consistent

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:23.959
<v Speaker 3>message across district about the way that Trump policies are

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 3>hurting voters where they live, where their kids go to school,

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 3>where they work. And that's sort of the key for

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 3>Democrats to regain their footing, and they have a very

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 3>good chance of taking the House back in twenty and

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 3>twenty six. The Republicans are well aware of that, so

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:42.359
<v Speaker 3>focusing local, focusing on the things they can stop or obstruct,

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 3>and if they can't, focusing on the negative impact of

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 3>their constituents, you know, focusing on the national I don't

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:49.719
<v Speaker 3>think it's going to get a very cost And.

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 2>In terms of the focus for President Trump, do you

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 2>see him being focused on policy, implementing an agenda or

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 2>how much do you think he's going to be focusing

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 2>on on retribution in the first one hundred days.

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, predicting President Trump is a risky business. I think

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:09.839
<v Speaker 3>he could derail his agenda if he focuses too much

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 3>on retribution. And I think that's where the Democrats may

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 3>have their singular national issue is if he looks like

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 3>his abusing presidential power to go after personal enemies and

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:22.679
<v Speaker 3>sort of personal grudges. That's going to derail things. It's

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 3>hard for Congress that to send that. It's harder soon

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 3>and Mike Johnson to actually publicly defend that behavior. So

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 3>I think his advisor is going to say, don't do that.

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 3>We play the long game. Got four years. Let's focus

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 3>on wins. And I think the president wants to keep

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 3>his very high approval rating highest he's never had. It's

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:40.599
<v Speaker 3>comparable for Reagan and Clinton at the end of their administrations.

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 3>He's going to want to keep that and stay popular.

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 3>So he'll want win after win after win. But I

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 3>think he's less concerned with the actual policy and more

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:49.559
<v Speaker 3>concernable with the outfix of winning.

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 2>Really good to have you with us on what happens

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 2>to be an inauguration day on a federal holiday. Wendy

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 2>Schiller there, Director of Brown Universities, Alfred Taubman Center from

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 2>American Politics and Policy, and up next, we're going to

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 2>preview earnings tomorrow from Netflix and a special Bloomberg Intelligence roundtable,

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:10.959
<v Speaker 2>So stay with us for that. I'm Nathan Hager, and

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 2>this is Bloomberg. Welcome back to this special edition of

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg daybreak, markets are closed from the Martin Luther King holiday.

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm Nathan Hager, and Wall Street gets back to work

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 2>tomorrow with a key earnings report on the docket. After

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 2>the close of trading, we get the latest quarterly numbers

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 2>from Netflix. So what should we expect from the streaming behemoth.

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Let's find out with a special Bloomberg Intelligence roundtable. Joining

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:55.439
<v Speaker 2>us now Bloomberg Intelligence Media analyst Geeta Ranganathan and BI

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 2>Senior credit analyst Stephen Flint. Great to have both of

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:01.440
<v Speaker 2>you with us as we wait for these results. And

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:05.080
<v Speaker 2>as I recall, Githa, Netflix had a pretty solid quarter

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 2>last time around, So what are we expecting now?

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, they've had solid multiple quarters, Nathan, and I think

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 4>we're going to continue to see that play out again

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 4>for the fourth quarter when they report results. So you know,

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 4>it's actually been this perfect moment for them because they've

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 4>had one of the strongest content cycles ever in their history.

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 4>They've made this very big foray into live events. We

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 4>had two huge live events that they streamed on their

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 4>service actually in the fourth quarter. One was the big

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 4>Mike Tyson Versus Jake Paul boxing event, which happened in

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 4>November and then in December, on Christmas Day, you had

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 4>two NFL games, and both those along with the release

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 4>of their biggest hit ever, which was Quid Game Season

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 4>two on December twenty sixth, is believed to have really

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 4>kind of boosted those subscriber numbers. So we're expecting roughly

0:14:56.560 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 4>about eleven million or so subscriber editions will make, you know,

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 4>one of their biggest years ever in terms of adding subscribers.

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 2>And Stephen, in terms of the numbers that you look

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 2>at on the credit side, what are your expectations. Yeah, well, Netflix's.

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 5>Credit profile is very strong and we believe it's likely

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 5>to stay that way given the companies capital allocation priorities

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 5>and its ability to generate significant free cash flow. The

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 5>company has a pretty conservative approach to cash and debt

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 5>and I don't see that changing.

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 2>When it comes to that cash flow. Githa, Is it

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 2>all about the subscriber numbers? Is it about the advertising

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 2>revenue that they're starting to generate now with these new

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 2>ads supported tiers? What are you looking at?

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 4>It's a little bit of everything, Nathan. So remember after

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 4>this report, they will stop disclosing subscriber metrics, So you know,

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 4>Netflix of course, we all kind of think and we

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 4>know highly anticipate the subscriber numbers when they come out

0:15:57.520 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 4>every quarter, but they will no longer be providing those metrics.

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 4>So really this is kind of almost this watershed moment

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 4>for Netflix because investors have to kind of really refocus

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 4>how they think about Netflix, and so the metrics that

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 4>we are really going to be focusing on is revenue growth,

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 4>is operating income growth, as well as operating margins. And

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 4>if you just kind of see the profile for Netflix

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 4>over the next few years, you're absolutely right. Advertising is

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 4>going to be a significant portion driving that revenue growth.

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 4>So we're expecting obviously ten plus percent revenue growth for

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 4>the next few years, as well as operating margin, and

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 4>all of those actually then factor into free cash flow

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 4>because remember Netflix, along with increasing its revenue as well

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 4>as subscribers, has also really been very disciplined when it

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 4>comes to costs, and that has really helped fuel free

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 4>cash flow pretty dramatically.

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 2>Gud, you reminded me about the end of subscriber number reporting,

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 2>because Steven raises the question for you about what kind

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 2>of metrics you're going to be looking at in terms

0:16:56.840 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 2>of gauging the ongoing health of this company.

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so from the credit side, we look at a

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 5>lot of the traditional credit metrics. We look at free

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 5>cash flow, what the company is doing with the free

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 5>cash flow. Obviously leverage. Netflix's leverage is very low. Net

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 5>leverages less than one times, and it should remain around

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 5>the one times area going forward. I mean compare that

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:21.199
<v Speaker 5>to companies like very highly rated Disney or Comcast. They

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 5>each have a net leverage ratio about two point four times,

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 5>so Netflix is very conservative relative to them. Netflix has

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 5>no plans to add debt to its balance sheet to

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:34.880
<v Speaker 5>fund dividend or fund buybacks, so they're very conservative. We'd

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 5>like to keep a couple of billion dollars of cash

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 5>on hands. We look at a lot of those metrics

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 5>going forward, and Netflix's credit profile looks very strong.

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:43.359
<v Speaker 2>Another way even to look.

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 5>At it is if you look at Netflix's debt versus

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:48.479
<v Speaker 5>its equity market cap, it shows you how conservative they are.

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:50.959
<v Speaker 5>The company has about sixteen billion dollars at debt right

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:53.120
<v Speaker 5>now and the market cap is, you know, over three

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 5>hundred and fifty billion dollars, so it's a very conservative profile.

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:01.719
<v Speaker 2>And Githa. When it comes to then you mentioned some

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 2>of the live events and the scripted content that Netflix

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 2>is expected to put out. What more are you looking

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:10.959
<v Speaker 2>for when it comes to the type of content that

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Netflix is putting out there and how it could stack

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 2>up to some of its competitors.

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:17.200
<v Speaker 4>It stacks up really, really well, Nate than compared to

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 4>its competitors, And we are actually going to see Netflix

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:23.399
<v Speaker 4>make a deeper and deeper foray into live events, especially

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 4>as it looks to build that advertising business. So we

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:28.400
<v Speaker 4>talked a little bit about, you know, the Jake Paul

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:30.399
<v Speaker 4>Mike Tyson event, we talked a little bit about the

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 4>NFL games, but the real big move happened actually a

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 4>few weeks back when Netflix really started streaming WWE's raw

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 4>content every Monday. So that's live on Netflix globally, and

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 4>we're going to see you know, Netflix actually make I think,

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 4>bigger investments, you know, and MLB and NFL rights may

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:54.680
<v Speaker 4>be available in the next few years, you know, we think.

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 4>And Netflix definitely obviously gained in terms of both subscribers

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 4>as well as made good advertising money as well on

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 4>the Christmas Day games, and so I think this is

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 4>going to definitely become a bigger portion of their content strategy.

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:10.920
<v Speaker 4>Going forward. Along with that, of course, we do have

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:14.919
<v Speaker 4>you know, all the usual hits in terms of scripted content.

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 4>So if you just kind of look at the slate

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 4>for twenty twenty five, it's once again it's a blockbuster slate.

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 4>So you have you know, hit shows like Stranger Things, Wednesday,

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:28.920
<v Speaker 4>Squid Game, you Cobraki, So it's just endless. So again,

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:32.920
<v Speaker 4>the content cycle looks extremely strong for the next twelve months.

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 2>And Stephen, when we think about those kinds of investments,

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 2>not just in the scripted content but live events, how

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 2>could that affect the balance sheet for Netflix?

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:44.119
<v Speaker 5>Well, Netflix has plenty of cash flow to handle that.

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 5>It's very interesting you think about the history of Netflix.

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:48.680
<v Speaker 5>For many, many years, it was a high yield rated

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 5>company that would borrow to invest in its business, and

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:54.400
<v Speaker 5>it had pretty significant free cash flow losses every year.

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 5>But they were able to finance that in the bond

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:58.120
<v Speaker 5>market until they got to the point where they got

0:19:58.119 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 5>scale and they were able to flip that to pause

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 5>a free cash flow. And the credit has significantly improved

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:06.119
<v Speaker 5>over the past couple of years, and so they have

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:09.160
<v Speaker 5>plenty of cash, plenty of cash on hand, plenty of

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:12.879
<v Speaker 5>free cash flow coming in the future to invest in

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:16.680
<v Speaker 5>their business, and the company could even easily borrow to invest,

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:18.119
<v Speaker 5>but there's no need for them to do that, and

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:19.679
<v Speaker 5>they seem to have no desire to do that.

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Speaking with Steven Flynn, Senior credit analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 2>along with Bimedia analyst Githa Rongganathan, as we look ahead

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:34.440
<v Speaker 2>to Netflix earnings this week. Githa, we've been talking about content, subscribers, advertising.

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 2>How is the advertising environment right now? Do you see

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:42.639
<v Speaker 2>advertisers willing to spend to be on Netflix, particularly with

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:43.880
<v Speaker 2>some of these live events.

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:47.439
<v Speaker 4>I absolutely think so. So advertisers are going to go

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 4>wherever eyeballs go, and we are seeing more and more

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 4>content move to streaming. So we've seen this big shift

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 4>away NASAN from linear TV into what is known as

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 4>connected TV. Linear TV is know was a sixty sixty

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 4>five billion market, but connect to TV has been really

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:07.360
<v Speaker 4>growing at a very very rapid pace and advertisers are

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 4>kind of really scrambling to make sure that they reach

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 4>their audiences. We've seen some pretty hefty numbers in terms

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 4>of viewership for all of these Netflix events. So if

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 4>you look at those Christmas Day games, for instance, we

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 4>had an average twenty seven million people you tune into

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 4>those games. That compares very nicely to broadcast television. So

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 4>they were able to kind of gain the same amount

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 4>of reach that broadcast TV has had, which means that

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 4>they should be very easily able to command the same

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 4>amount of advertising revenue.

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:39.440
<v Speaker 2>And how do you see the ad environment, Steven, not

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 2>just for Netflix, but for the streaming and a linear

0:21:43.359 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 2>industream more broadly.

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well, obviously linear has its challenges with subscribers moving

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 5>from linear television to streaming services or just you know,

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:55.640
<v Speaker 5>cutting the cord completely. I think overall advertising is going

0:21:55.640 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 5>to be better in twenty twenty five, giving a stronger

0:21:57.880 --> 0:21:59.440
<v Speaker 5>underlying economic environment.

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 2>And for subscriber churn Githa, We've talked about that in

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:10.640
<v Speaker 2>the past, you know, customers canceling, renewing depending on how

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 2>they can handle it. How do things look for Netflix

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:15.159
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to that now that we do have

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:18.160
<v Speaker 2>these ads supported tiers as well.

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:22.920
<v Speaker 4>So churn actually has been historically pretty low for Netflix,

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:25.879
<v Speaker 4>and we think it will continue to trend downwards. And

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 4>that's really mainly a factor of industry dynamics nation. So

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:31.880
<v Speaker 4>we've seen you know, obviously the streaming wars were very

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 4>intense at one point of time, but we've seen kind

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:38.439
<v Speaker 4>of Netflix really cement its dominance. They've they've kind of

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:42.239
<v Speaker 4>become the go to TV viewing options, so they are

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 4>the undisputed leader right now in streaming. So not a

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 4>lot of cancelations right now as we see, you know,

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 4>for Netflix, and then if in the future, you know,

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:53.200
<v Speaker 4>obviously one of the main triggers for chure and for

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:57.400
<v Speaker 4>subscriber cancelations are price sikes. And even if Netflix does

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:00.640
<v Speaker 4>decide to high prices in the near future, they obviously

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:06.159
<v Speaker 4>do have that the AD tier, which can handle that

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 4>because it's a much more cheaper economic option that people

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 4>could kind of defall to.

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:13.880
<v Speaker 2>And Stephen, you've mentioned how much cash on hand Netflix has.

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 2>Do you see a need for the company to raise

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 2>rates at any point?

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 5>Well, they have the power to do it, but I

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 5>don't think they would need to do it for generating

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:25.399
<v Speaker 5>enough cash. Company does generate a lot of cash.

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:30.119
<v Speaker 2>KEITHA. Where do you see the stock price going for Netflix?

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 2>The last time I looked at the A and R

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 2>function on the Bloomberg terminal, there are a lot of

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 2>buys for the stock, not very many cells and a

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 2>pretty wide range in terms of price targets. After we

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 2>get these earnings, do you expect a lot of change

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 2>in terms of how Wall Street looks at this company?

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 4>Valuation is definitely very, very demanding for Netflix. It currently

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 4>trades at about twenty nine times forward but about forty

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 4>two times forward PE. And just for context there, Nathan Disney,

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 4>for instance, trades about twenty times forward PE. So definitely

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 4>rich valuation. But I think it has definitely grown into

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:07.880
<v Speaker 4>those metrics, and you know, after it reports, I think

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 4>what investors are really going to look for is color

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 4>on advertising and how it can potentially be a driver

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:17.679
<v Speaker 4>off that double digit revenue growth. So we're seeing fifteen

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 4>percent revenue growth in twenty twenty four. The question is

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 4>can it sustain that same level for the next few years,

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:27.359
<v Speaker 4>And if they do provide some color would suggest that

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:30.360
<v Speaker 4>advertising is going to ramp significantly. We think that those

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 4>levels of valuation can be supported.

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 2>And not to put either of you on the spot

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 2>here in our last minute, but are there shows coming

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:40.639
<v Speaker 2>up on Netflix or any of the other streamers that

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 2>you're particularly excited about? Steven, I'll start with you.

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:45.719
<v Speaker 5>I have talked to my wife. She tells me about that.

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Gita, you mentioned quite a few What are you

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:54.239
<v Speaker 2>looking for Love Blind? Oh my goodness, Really tell me

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:58.439
<v Speaker 2>more about why you look forward to Love is Blind.

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 4>That's interesting. It's the perfect show. And you know it's

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 4>interesting because it's reality television. They have actually Love is

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 4>Blind now and you know they're running so many different

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:12.199
<v Speaker 4>shows across different parts of the university. You know, you

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 4>have Love is Blind US, you have Japan, you have Brazil,

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 4>and it's so interesting to see the difference in cultures.

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 4>I think it's one of the most fascinating watches on Netflix.

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, there is a lot more reality TV

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 2>across all these streaming services. It just goes to show

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 2>you how the landscape has changed. Used to see it

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 2>on cable. Now, like everything else, it's moved on to streaming.

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for this roundtable. Really appreciate you having you both

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:40.159
<v Speaker 2>on with us today. That's Githa Ranganathan, media analysts for

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence, and BI Senior credit analyst Stephen Flynn, head

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 2>of the Netflix earnings this week. Up next, we'll take

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 2>a look at the fed's first interest rate decision of

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 2>the year. We'll speak with Bloomberg International Economics and Policy

0:25:56.040 --> 0:26:00.880
<v Speaker 2>correspondent Michael McKee. I'm Nathan Hager, and this is S Blimberg.

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 2>We're just over a week away from the Federal reserves

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 2>first policy decision of twenty twenty five. How many rate

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:24.440
<v Speaker 2>cuts are in store after the latest reports on inflation

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 2>and employment?

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 6>For more.

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 2>We're joined by Bloomberg International Economics and Policy correspondent Michael McKee.

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Great to speak with you, Mike, But before we get

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:36.639
<v Speaker 2>to you, here's what Chair Powell had to say. The

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 2>last time the Fed cut rates.

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:41.399
<v Speaker 7>We reduced our policy rate now by one hundred basis points,

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:45.159
<v Speaker 7>were significantly closer to neutral at four point three percent

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:48.639
<v Speaker 7>and change. We believe policy is still meaningfully restrictive. But

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:50.919
<v Speaker 7>as for additional cuts, we're going to be looking for

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 7>further progress on inflation, as well as continued strength in

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 7>the labor market.

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:57.199
<v Speaker 2>That was just over a month ago, and here we

0:26:57.240 --> 0:26:59.679
<v Speaker 2>are with a dip in core consumer prices and the

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 2>paper market sure looks strong. Is there room for the

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 2>Fed to start thinking about thinking about cutting again?

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 4>Mike.

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:09.160
<v Speaker 6>I suppose there's room to start thinking about thinking about

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 6>but there's no room for them to actually start cutting.

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:16.120
<v Speaker 6>Why not January I know, I'm the party pooper here.

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:19.719
<v Speaker 6>The FED has basically said they're going to be on hold,

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 6>and the underlying reason, which they won't say out loud,

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 6>is Donald Trump and the fact that he's now president

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 6>and what's he going to do. They don't know the

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 6>impact that his policies are going to have on the economy,

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:39.159
<v Speaker 6>so better to wait and see a lot of the

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:44.960
<v Speaker 6>policies he's talked about could be inflationary. You've heard that before,

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 6>the tariffs and deportations and things. But until we know

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:52.199
<v Speaker 6>what the details are, is no way to tell. So

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:54.360
<v Speaker 6>right now, the Fed's on hold in January. The real

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:56.359
<v Speaker 6>question is what are they going to do in March,

0:27:56.960 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 6>and that'll depend in part on what Trump proposes and

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:06.440
<v Speaker 6>in part on how inflation develops between now and then.

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 2>So does this mean that the FED is moving from

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 2>a data dependent FED to a Trump dependent FED or

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:15.880
<v Speaker 2>is it a combination of the two or what.

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 6>Well, it's a combination of the two, because they won't

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:23.119
<v Speaker 6>move up or down if the data don't support it.

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 6>But if they're thinking about what the Trump administration may do,

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:31.359
<v Speaker 6>they have to look forward because it takes maybe a

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 6>year to get a rate move into the markets and

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 6>into the loans that people actually take out in the economy,

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 6>and so they got to think about what's going to

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 6>be happening going forward. Obviously President Trump can propose something immediately,

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 6>how long is that going to take to get done.

0:28:50.800 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 6>You've got all the Washington analysts saying extending the tax

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 6>cuts to the extent they do, that won't happen until

0:28:56.760 --> 0:29:00.960
<v Speaker 6>the fall. Yes, there's going to be a certain eyes

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 6>cast at what the administration proposes, but it also has

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 6>to be that inflation is continuing to fall towards two

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 6>percent and unemployment doesn't go down too much more for

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 6>the Fed to consider cutting again.

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 2>So is there some thinking in the market that that

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 2>could be why investors have dialed back their expectations for

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 2>the number of cuts they're expecting from the Fed this year,

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 2>something like one for the whole year, just because it

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 2>could take some time for not just Trump policies to

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 2>take effect, but for Trump policies to get passed.

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 6>I think the investors are more looking at the inflation

0:29:37.800 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 6>outlook and the fact that the economy has been growing

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 6>faster than anticipated, and we haven't got the fourth quarter

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 6>numbers yet, but when we do, it's expected to suggest

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:52.280
<v Speaker 6>that the economy grew as strongly or a little more

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 6>than in the third quarter. So for the year, things

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 6>were pretty good and it sets us up for a

0:29:56.720 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 6>good beginning to twenty and twenty five. That means that

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:04.080
<v Speaker 6>you're more likely to have in some inflationary pressures because

0:30:04.120 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 6>demand stays high, and so that's kind of what the

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 6>markets are looking at, and then they're trying to combine

0:30:10.280 --> 0:30:13.360
<v Speaker 6>that with well, what could Trump mean for all of this.

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 6>I think that's why you have seen because there's this uncertainty,

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 6>all these jitters in markets, and for the last week

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 6>or two we've seen incredible volatility in bonds. Yields went

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 6>way up ahead of the data that we got at

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:31.240
<v Speaker 6>the end of last week. The middle of last week,

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 6>CPI came out and everybody changed their mind again because

0:30:35.320 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 6>they thought inflation's under control. It's hard to know exactly

0:30:39.200 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 6>where the markets are going to come down on all this,

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 6>but for right now they don't have to worry about

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 6>the FED through the end of the month, just.

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 2>To put policy uncertainty aside. I know that's a big

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 2>ask because it's so important to the market, but based

0:30:53.960 --> 0:30:57.200
<v Speaker 2>on the data that we've seen so far on inflation

0:30:57.760 --> 0:31:02.560
<v Speaker 2>cooling last month and the labor market still showing signs

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:05.960
<v Speaker 2>of strength. What would that say for the Fed? Again

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 2>putting Trump policy uncertainty.

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 6>Aside, I think you have to wait. You have to wait,

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 6>and I know it is the problem if you're just

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:20.840
<v Speaker 6>looking at it in a world minus and administration. I

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 6>don't say by style Trump, but if Joe Biden wasn't

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 6>there either, you would be looking at an economy that

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 6>is moving in the right direction but still very strong,

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 6>and so you have that underlying possibility of inflation. But

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 6>inflation is coming down from where it was, and we've

0:31:40.680 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 6>had a lot of idiosyncratic reasons for inflation to go higher.

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 6>We had the hurricanes ripped through the southeast, destroyed many

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:53.239
<v Speaker 6>many people's cars. They got to get to work, so

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 6>they go out and buy a new used car. That

0:31:54.680 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 6>pushes up the prices of used cars, and that tends

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 6>to fade out, so then there'll be something else. End

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 6>of the year, we saw airfares go up significantly and

0:32:06.080 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 6>that will probably not continue. It'll sort of level out.

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 6>So it just depends on how strong the economy is

0:32:14.400 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 6>and whether some of these idiosyncratic moves start to level off.

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:25.040
<v Speaker 6>We did see housing in the CPI continue its lower move.

0:32:25.080 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 6>It went up a tenth of a percent on a

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:31.760
<v Speaker 6>rounding basis, But in general, housing prices have started to

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 6>do what the Fed's been waiting for them to do,

0:32:33.600 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 6>which has come down. And if that continues, that continue

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 6>to put downward pressure on inflation, and hopefully if inflation

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 6>gets closer to two percent, if then can say, well,

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 6>all right, we need to continue cutting rates to get

0:32:47.160 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 6>back to whatever we think normal might be.

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:53.680
<v Speaker 2>Speaking with Mike McKee, international economics and policy correspondent for

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 2>a Bloomberg News and I wanted to pick your brain

0:32:56.200 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 2>on that just a little bit, Mike, because it feeds

0:32:58.840 --> 0:33:02.640
<v Speaker 2>into the debate about out whether FED policy is as

0:33:02.640 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 2>restrictive as the FED has said it feels like it

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 2>is when we continue to see these signs of economic strength.

0:33:09.320 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 2>Is there a debate going on within the Fed, not

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:14.600
<v Speaker 2>just in the markets, but within the FED about whether

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:17.760
<v Speaker 2>policy is restrictive, whether we have to think about a

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 2>new neutral rate.

0:33:19.640 --> 0:33:21.560
<v Speaker 6>Well, we do have to think about a new neutral rate,

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 6>because we never know exactly what the neutral rate is.

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:27.480
<v Speaker 6>You can only observe it in the past tense. But

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 6>it does seem that the economy is stronger right now.

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 6>So for the short term, I think you get a

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 6>lot of agreement with members of the FED that we

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:40.560
<v Speaker 6>do need higher rates right now. Maybe not. They may

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 6>disagree about whether we need to be at four and

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:45.600
<v Speaker 6>a quarter to four and a half percent could be

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:48.120
<v Speaker 6>a little lower, but they're not going down to three

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:51.600
<v Speaker 6>percent that quickly until they see signs that the economy

0:33:51.640 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 6>may have cooled off. So on a short run basis, yes,

0:33:55.680 --> 0:33:58.280
<v Speaker 6>we get a higher neutral rate, but on a longer

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:01.680
<v Speaker 6>term basis, that's going to depend on the way productivity develops.

0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:04.400
<v Speaker 6>We do know that the number of people who are

0:34:04.560 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 6>entering the labor force has been strong because of immigration,

0:34:09.640 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 6>illegal or not, and if that goes down, then productivity

0:34:14.480 --> 0:34:17.160
<v Speaker 6>is the way you get stronger growth, and productivity could

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:21.520
<v Speaker 6>go up because of AI things like that. So there's

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 6>a lot of uncertainty about that at this point, but

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:29.400
<v Speaker 6>I think most people think on the FED there within

0:34:29.520 --> 0:34:33.200
<v Speaker 6>striking distance of neutral for right now. A year from

0:34:33.239 --> 0:34:34.480
<v Speaker 6>now that may be different.

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:37.360
<v Speaker 2>Still quite a bit of a ways of striking distance

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:40.959
<v Speaker 2>from the fed's two percent inflation target. And there's an

0:34:41.000 --> 0:34:44.000
<v Speaker 2>ongoing debate in the market as well about whether the

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:48.160
<v Speaker 2>FED can reach that anytime soon. Is a two percent

0:34:48.400 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 2>inflation target realistic, particularly when I bring back the idea

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:56.439
<v Speaker 2>of Trump policy uncertainty.

0:34:56.360 --> 0:34:59.839
<v Speaker 6>Well, unfortunately, whether it's realistic or not, it's what you got.

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:04.880
<v Speaker 6>The FED is looking at its framework for Monetary policy,

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:08.239
<v Speaker 6>reviewing it this year, but jay Pole has already said

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:10.000
<v Speaker 6>we're not going to change the two percent target. The

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:12.439
<v Speaker 6>thing the FED worries about is that if you move

0:35:12.480 --> 0:35:15.400
<v Speaker 6>the goalposts, then the markets will always expect you to

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:19.320
<v Speaker 6>move the goalposts. And if we have another bout of inflation,

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 6>the FED might say, well, we'll do three percent target,

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 6>and then inflation doesn't come down as much and people

0:35:26.239 --> 0:35:28.719
<v Speaker 6>lose confidence in the FED. So they're saying they're going

0:35:28.760 --> 0:35:30.920
<v Speaker 6>to leave it at two percent at this point.

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:34.279
<v Speaker 2>And in terms of the data we've gotten most recently

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:37.600
<v Speaker 2>obviously producer consumer prices, how does it all feed into

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:42.520
<v Speaker 2>the Fed's preferred measure of inflation? What are the expectations there?

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:46.759
<v Speaker 6>Well, that's a good question because the PPI has more

0:35:46.840 --> 0:35:50.080
<v Speaker 6>categories that feed into the PCE, and it suggested that

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:56.320
<v Speaker 6>we would see a higher PCE than people anticipated. CPI

0:35:57.120 --> 0:35:59.279
<v Speaker 6>also has a few things that feed into it that

0:35:59.320 --> 0:36:02.960
<v Speaker 6>were lower than anticipated. So the general feeling now is

0:36:03.080 --> 0:36:06.439
<v Speaker 6>that PCEE will come in maybe about where people thought

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:09.319
<v Speaker 6>it was, which is little changed on the month. But

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 6>there's a risk either way because we're in this world

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:17.799
<v Speaker 6>now where we go out to three descperate places to

0:36:18.000 --> 0:36:21.440
<v Speaker 6>measure inflation, and then it becomes a rounding issue.

0:36:21.880 --> 0:36:23.920
<v Speaker 2>In the time we have left. Now that we are

0:36:24.040 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 2>getting a new administration, we've got to think about how

0:36:28.160 --> 0:36:31.160
<v Speaker 2>the Federal Reserve is preparing for that. We heard during

0:36:31.200 --> 0:36:35.879
<v Speaker 2>the campaign President Trump talking about how presidents should have

0:36:36.040 --> 0:36:39.279
<v Speaker 2>a say when it comes to monetary policy. Are you

0:36:39.320 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 2>going to be watching for challenges to FED independence as

0:36:43.040 --> 0:36:45.400
<v Speaker 2>we embark on this second Trump administration.

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:49.239
<v Speaker 6>We'll be watching for it, But there is a kind

0:36:49.239 --> 0:36:52.839
<v Speaker 6>of growing feeling that maybe for the time being they

0:36:52.880 --> 0:36:56.120
<v Speaker 6>won't do anything because we saw Michael Barr, the Vice

0:36:56.160 --> 0:37:00.880
<v Speaker 6>chair for Supervision, resigned that post on the FED. But

0:37:01.480 --> 0:37:05.240
<v Speaker 6>the regulatory clash that we might have expected could be avoided.

0:37:05.600 --> 0:37:07.319
<v Speaker 6>And then when you think about it, Jay Powell is

0:37:07.360 --> 0:37:11.319
<v Speaker 6>going to be gone in May as chair in May

0:37:11.360 --> 0:37:13.960
<v Speaker 6>of next year. Is it worth it to the new

0:37:13.960 --> 0:37:17.960
<v Speaker 6>Trump administration to start a fight now and end up

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:19.719
<v Speaker 6>in court and all the things that you end up

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:22.759
<v Speaker 6>having to do to fight that out if he's going

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:25.120
<v Speaker 6>to leave right away, and so they may hold off

0:37:25.120 --> 0:37:26.080
<v Speaker 6>for a little bit on that.

0:37:26.600 --> 0:37:30.200
<v Speaker 2>So do you think this idea that President Trump could

0:37:30.320 --> 0:37:33.520
<v Speaker 2>challenge the Fed's independence? Is it something that's kind of

0:37:33.520 --> 0:37:36.560
<v Speaker 2>been a little overblown by critics or is it something

0:37:36.600 --> 0:37:37.360
<v Speaker 2>really worth watching?

0:37:37.480 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 6>Probably a little overblown, but it depends on what you

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:42.920
<v Speaker 6>mean by challenge. Does he really try to fire J Powell?

0:37:43.000 --> 0:37:46.720
<v Speaker 6>I don't think so. Does he go on social media

0:37:46.880 --> 0:37:48.799
<v Speaker 6>and say bad things about him?

0:37:48.840 --> 0:37:49.000
<v Speaker 3>Oh?

0:37:49.080 --> 0:37:52.680
<v Speaker 6>Of course he does that about everybody, and so I

0:37:52.719 --> 0:37:54.840
<v Speaker 6>would expect, especially with the FED on hold instead of

0:37:54.880 --> 0:37:57.280
<v Speaker 6>cutting rates, I would expect some nasty comments.

0:37:58.080 --> 0:38:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Appreciate this, Mike, always good speaking with you. That's Bloomberg

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:06.440
<v Speaker 2>International Economics and Policy correspondent Michael McKee with us on

0:38:06.480 --> 0:38:09.560
<v Speaker 2>this special edition of Bloomberg Daybreak. Thanks as well to

0:38:09.800 --> 0:38:13.280
<v Speaker 2>a Bloomberg intelligence analyst, get the Ranganathan and Stephen Flynn,

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:17.560
<v Speaker 2>along with Brown University political scientist Wendy Schuller. And we'd

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:20.520
<v Speaker 2>like to thank you, of course as well for listening.

0:38:20.800 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Ie.

0:38:21.040 --> 0:38:25.720
<v Speaker 2>You enjoy this MLK and Inauguration Day. I'm Nathan Hager,

0:38:25.800 --> 0:38:27.480
<v Speaker 2>and this is Bloomberg