WEBVTT - 9/10:  MNF Recap, Waiver Wire Adds and Drops

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess did Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and listen to me. This is the Fantasy Football Best

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever Show. Start listening to us or suffer the

0:00:37.720 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>consequences never Dodd did. Yeah. Now's welcome your baby, your host,

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>by Bait from Maryland, your co host, by Time, Saint Prectic,

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Trike Stepfall, your co host, and five eleven from pun Why,

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:44.960
<v Speaker 1>ladies and tentlemen yours and with that we welcome you

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>inside Studio thirty four. This is the BFFs. He is

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>frank stamfoll I am Grace sousman e y on the

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>way in just a moment, Frankie, what's happening? Rank you?

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>What's up? Man? Week one? Officially in the books, we

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 1>had some pretty good games last night. Honestly, the first

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>game was awesome. I would say it's probably the game

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>of the week, just driving up and down the field

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>with Shawn Watson and Drew Brees. Will recap those games

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit here in the first segment. The second

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:13.640
<v Speaker 1>game not nearly as exciting, but I think we all

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:17.640
<v Speaker 1>expected that. But still a lot of fantasy football takeaways. Nonetheless, Greggy,

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:19.799
<v Speaker 1>how did you sleep last night? I slept well, man,

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I slept really, really well. It was good to wake

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>up this morning. How did you stay up? I'm gonna

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>guess you you watched none? No, no, no, that's centrue.

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>You watched the first quarter of the Raiders Broncos and

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>went to bed the first half alright, I wasn't far off,

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 1>was the first half? Once let's got your sleeping habits

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:38.359
<v Speaker 1>down almost, You're close. It's best friends, man, would you

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>did you watch the whole game? I did watch the

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:43.400
<v Speaker 1>whole game. I went to bes way too late. Well,

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I bet on the Broncos, so we didn't go well,

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I had to, you know, just stay up till the

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 1>end to see what happened. Let's bring it ey, what's happening, man, boys,

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:54.959
<v Speaker 1>good to be here. Yeah, I also watched the whole game.

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:58.079
<v Speaker 1>Frank was up to one thirty and was awake at

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 1>four on my way to the airports. So not as uh,

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:04.959
<v Speaker 1>not as well rested well, but yeah, doing Okay, I

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>think we should bring up the fact that, like, you're

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:10.519
<v Speaker 1>here at this table. Yes, yes, I'm sure we work

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>on a thirty fourth Street you'd say in Manhattan, Yes, yea,

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I am here at this table. We weren't street some

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 1>other people that are on the show, was was working

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:22.079
<v Speaker 1>on thirty fourth Street yesterday? They didn't make an appearance here,

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 1>just say no. Yeah, it was weird to be in

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 1>New York and not see you guys. Uh. It's one

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>of those things you come in you know, your your

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>day is just kind of filled with menal tasks and

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>you know right now I'm working one day a week,

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>and the least I can do is show up and

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>be there for the show. That's that's what I did.

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>And uh, but yeah, pumped up to talk football with

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you guys. I wish I could be on every day

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>with you, schedules permitting, I'm here as often as possible. Absolutely,

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I was just joking e y uh and New York

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>last night and tonight, so I was grosser street at

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the garden too busy of course to hang best friends.

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>But that's a guy and its cancer taking home betweenty

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>four seven titles? Greg? How about that? And his kids

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and now has more more title wins and than other people.

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Too soon? Come on, and we still have a lot

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of time left. All right, let me let me get

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>into last night's games before we hit the break. Let's

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>start out with the later game that I didn't watch.

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>You guys to help me out. Let me start off

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>with Broncos Raiders. People are raving about the Raiders. Now, Um,

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>is this one of those un theory type of things.

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>E Y was like, all right, they lost Antonio Brown.

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:30.279
<v Speaker 1>Now they're winning, not in spite of him, another winning

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>because he's gone, and they're simply better. Yeah. Well, I mean,

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 1>let's not get ourselves. Skill wise, they're not better. But

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I do believe, uh, you know, sometimes it's as fantasy

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>analysts or experts or whatever you wanna call us, I

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>call myself an enthusiast. Um For me, a thing like

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>that can can bring a locker room together. And the

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 1>reality is is football is a team sport. There's not

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 1>one guy that's going to to make or break anyone team.

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>He was the best player on the team. You can't

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:02.600
<v Speaker 1>tell me any anything otherwise. But obviously it was a

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>massive distraction from day one. Um barely practiced, was barely

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>a training camp, probably probably wasn't in a whole lot

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 1>of meetings. It wasn't really around. The guys aren't going

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to miss him because most of them didn't even know him.

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Um and and the Raiders look decent. Tyroll Williams looked

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>real good, Derek Carr looked, you know, pretty efficient, better

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 1>than I think that most anyone thought he was going

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 1>to be without Antonio Brown. So yeah, it's it's exciting.

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>The NFL is a better place when the Raiders are

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:32.160
<v Speaker 1>a good football team. Yeah, I want to piggyback off

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>that as well. I don't think that they're better off

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>without Antonio Brown, but I actually think Antonio Brown not

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>being with the Oakland Raiders is better for everybody involved

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>on this team from a fantasy perspective, because the way

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>that I'm looking at it, I think that it's really

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>concentrated amongst three people. It's really just gonna be Tyroll Williams,

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Darren Waller, and Josh Jacobs. And that's a good thing

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:54.480
<v Speaker 1>because the more that we can concentrate fantasy production, uh,

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:56.839
<v Speaker 1>the more opportunity that the easier it is to predict

0:05:56.960 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 1>moving forward weekend and week out. Darren Waller played fifty

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 1>five of fifty five offensive snaps yesterday. He played of

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the snaps, he looked really really good. Clus seven of

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 1>eight targets for seventy yards. Looks like he is going

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to fill that Jared Cook roll from a year ago

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>looked explosive. Tyrol Williams same thing. He had a few

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>deep passes down the field. Didn't know Derek Carr had

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>it in him, but ultimately, you know Tyro Williams. I

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 1>said this yesterday when we were previewing this game from

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a betting perspective on the FANDUL Hurry up, Greg. Honestly,

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I might have you know downplayed Tyroll Williams talent, and

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I said, I don't know that he can hang as

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 1>a wide receiver one in the NFL. Well, you know what,

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:35.039
<v Speaker 1>in his first opportunity to do so, he looked pretty

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>damn good. Seven targets, six receptions over a hundred yards

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:41.479
<v Speaker 1>and a touchdown. And Josh Jacobs man twenty three carries

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 1>that was second among all running backs in Week one,

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:47.359
<v Speaker 1>behind only Marlon Mack. He had eight red zone carries

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>greg that led the NFL in Week one. So look,

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>if Josh Jacobs is getting twenty twenty five touches weekend

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:54.919
<v Speaker 1>and week out, he's going to be a high end

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>RB two, borderline RB one. Yeah, absolutely, Josh Jacobs, that

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:01.280
<v Speaker 1>usage continues, he's going to absolutely be a mortal line

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>running back one of the season. I thought you said

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 1>it really nicely, Frank, that Antonio Bryants all condensed. We

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>know what we're getting, which is nice with Tyrielle Williams,

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>with Darren Waller, with a lot of Josh Jacobs, and

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>that's that's it. And if you picked up hunk to

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Ren for I think it's safe to say you could

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 1>drop him absolutely. Well, that's some more of that coming

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 1>up in just a moment. The early game was the

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>fun game Saints and Texans, arguably the game of the week,

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and we had an overtime time. But last night between

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the two good teams, the Saints and the Texans, you

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>saw Bill O'Brien's fallacies, you saw the struggles on the

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>defensive end of the Texans. Ultimately a fifty eight yard

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>field will seals the deal for Will Lutts and the Saints.

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I was very, very impressed with the Texas last night, Frank.

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>It was status quo as always for them. Deshaun Watson

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>looked amazing. DeAndre Hopkins looked awesome as well. Surprised Will

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Fuller didn't get worked in a little bit more. He

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>did have a phenomenal catch, but outside of that wasn't

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 1>really targeted much. Duke Johnson played on forty one sixty

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>four snaps yesterday and Carlos Hyde played on the other

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, So this seems like it's basically a two

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>thirds split in favor of Duke Johnson, which is pretty

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>much what we expected. But Carlos Hide, we'll talk about

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>this a little bit more when we get back. We'll

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about Weaver wired today. Carlos Hide, looks like you

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 1>still might have a little bit something left in the

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 1>tank here. Greg, absolutely absolutely. We'll see about Carl Lewis

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 1>side who was left for dead, talk about him picking

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>him off the way over wire and who else to

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 1>grab when we return. You're on the VFF wait talk

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 1>with Teddy Covers at Ralph Michaels. I think the public

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>is going to be on Tennessee because a week one results.

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 1>When you have eighteen penalties like the Browns had eighteen

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>accepted penalties, you're never gonna win that game. The Browns

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>basically their newness, their non familiarity, just the penalties were

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 1>just absurd. I think if you want Tennessee, play it

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>now at minus three What's live week days three or

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>four pm Eastern on Sports Grade and Smotiv Channel seven

0:08:56.600 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 1>nineteen Daily Rhado dot Com from the game's best DFS players.

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>We don't just give you advice. We play every day,

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:11.560
<v Speaker 1>all major sports, all year round. We never stop. Industry

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>leading DFS tools and custom projections, and now the Daily

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Roado dot Com Optimizer. In minutes, build an optimized line

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 1>up for cash games and attorneys. Learn from the game's

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:27.680
<v Speaker 1>best DBS players. Join Daily Roado dot Com. Money Now

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>one hundred is not a lender, broker or agent of

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 1>any lender or financial advisor. We do not make loans

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 1>or credit decisions. He must be eighteen years or older

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and the US resident to qualified. This is not an

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:39.200
<v Speaker 1>offer or solicitation to lend. I want the money Now

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 1>one hundred dot com and got the five thousand dollars

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I needed deposited in my account the next business day.

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 1>If you need money for any reason, help is here.

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Go to money Now one hundred dot com and get

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the money you need. Need to pay off credit card debt,

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>go to money Now one hundred dot com. Need your

0:09:57.040 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 1>car repair, need home improvement? Money? Visit now one hundred

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 1>dot com. If you need fast cash for any reason,

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>go to money Now one hundred dot com. Good, bad,

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>or no credit at all. Go to money Now one

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:13.199
<v Speaker 1>hundred dot com. You could get up to five thousand

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>dollars as soon as the next business day. Go to

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>money Now one hundred dot com On your phone, tablet,

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:22.439
<v Speaker 1>or computer. Type in the address bar money now one

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred dot com. That's money now the number one hundred

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 1>dot com. If you've heard of weather Tech floor liners,

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you probably know that for your vehicle's floor, nothing protects better.

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 1>But what about protection for the rest of your car

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 1>or truck. I'm David McNeil, founder of weather Tech. Besides

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>our floor liners, we design, engineer, and manufacture a wide

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:48.199
<v Speaker 1>range of automotive accessories right here in America. And just

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 1>like our floor liners, everything is done to the highest

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 1>standards possible. We understand what kind of investment owning a

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:58.439
<v Speaker 1>vehicle can be, so we do everything possible to help

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you protect it. We don't shortcuts and we never make

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>concessions when it comes to quality for everything from cargo

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:08.319
<v Speaker 1>liners to cleaning and detailing supplies to mud flaps and

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 1>car covers. The one place you need to go is

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 1>weather tech dot com. So if you are familiar with

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:16.959
<v Speaker 1>our floor liners, just imagine how well the rest of

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 1>our products will work for you. Learn more about our

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>full line of automotive accessories at weather tech dot com

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>or call one eight hundred car mats weather tech dot com,

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>proudly made in America. Back with you BFFs here, He's

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Frank I'm Greg Eise here as well. We mentioned Carlo

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Side and what he did last night. It was eight

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:46.079
<v Speaker 1>flos rushing yards on not that many carries. He was

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the feature back with with Do Jackson, Do Jackson, Duke

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Johnson having his role, checkson having his role obviously Frankie,

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:55.959
<v Speaker 1>but it was more. It was a bigger role that

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in Cleveland. But it was still one b role.

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:01.439
<v Speaker 1>I thought for a lot to Carlos Tide when it

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 1>comes to running the football in the PVR league. Johnson's

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 1>exactly who he thought he was. Carlos Hide more so

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Carlos Hides out there on the waiver wire. How much

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>you're spending this week? Not much. I'll look at two

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:14.679
<v Speaker 1>to three percent, and in PPR, I mean even less

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>than that one to two percent. But it is a

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>running back that's seeing a third of the snaps on

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:21.679
<v Speaker 1>one of the most explosive offenses in the NFL. And

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I have a feeling that if they would have got

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 1>down on the goal line, you know, a one yard

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:28.439
<v Speaker 1>run situation, it's probably Carlos Hyde who is on the field. So,

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, two to three percent, two to four percent,

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:32.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe a little bit more aggressive if you

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 1>own Duke Johnson and you just want to lock up

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>both of those guys in the backfield. But as I mentioned,

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 1>it's really a you know, two thirds split for Duke Johnson,

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:42.679
<v Speaker 1>like a sixty five percent snap share for Duke, thirty

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:44.679
<v Speaker 1>five percent for Carlos Hide. But he did look good.

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:46.839
<v Speaker 1>Ten rushing attempts for eighty three yards eight point three

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry, not use much in the past game.

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty much what we expected. But you know, there

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>are a few of the running backs that we'll talk

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>about that I like more than Carlos Hyde. He's more

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:57.200
<v Speaker 1>of one of the lower end running backs that's target

0:12:57.240 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>this Well, let's break into those running backs that works hard.

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Who is the number one guy, Eric Young this week

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>off the waiver wire that you want to pick up.

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you play in a league that I'm

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:11.959
<v Speaker 1>not in, that Malcolm Brown is available, but if you

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:13.960
<v Speaker 1>play in one with me, and I took him probably

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 1>probably earlier than you were thinking. And and uh, this

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 1>week he showed why. I mean, this is a guy

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>that the Rams spend money on to keep him around.

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>You know that you just got to follow the money.

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>And like I said, you can't listen to what they say.

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 1>You can only listen to what they do. And what

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 1>they did is they paid this guy a bunch of

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 1>money when other teams were trying to take him away.

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:35.559
<v Speaker 1>I understand that Darryl Henderson was drafted high, but he

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 1>is a rookie in a very complex offense, and they

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 1>like Malcolm Brown. Malcolm Brown is the number two there,

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 1>and uh, he's he's worth his weight in gold, I believe. Yeah.

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:47.719
<v Speaker 1>For me, I'm gonna go a little bit of a

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 1>different round. I do like Malcolm Brown and agree that

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:52.680
<v Speaker 1>he should be added, especially in standard or non PPR

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:56.320
<v Speaker 1>leagues where the touchdown counts for so much in leagues

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>like that. But I'm looking at Ronald Jones and Giovanni

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 1>Bernard now things are still kind of up in the air.

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to Joe Mixon, he's dealing with an

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 1>ankle injury. They're saying he's day to day, still has

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>a chance to play in Week two. Unlike Kevin Coleman,

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 1>who's dealing with a high ankle sprain, he's already been

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>ruled out for the next couple of weeks. Joe Mixon

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:15.560
<v Speaker 1>is still a chance he can play, but if he doesn't,

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>it might only This might only be a short term

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>add but every week matters in fantasy football, and if

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Joe Mixon is out, Gio Bernard is easily a top

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty four running back. We saw last year in weeks

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>three and four when Joe Mixon did not play, Giovanni

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Bernard average ninety one total yards per game, eighteen touches

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 1>per game, had three rushing touchdowns in those two games

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>as well. And then when it comes to Ronald Jones,

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I think this could actually have some staying power here.

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>He has some long term, long lasting effect for fantasy.

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I only played one percent of the snaps this week.

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I understand that it was third most on the team

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 1>behind darry O Goomba Wally and Peyton Barber, but he

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>was clearly the most explosive running back on the team

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 1>thirteen rushes for seventy five yards five point eight yards

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 1>per carry. He had three red zone wushing attempts this

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>past week as well, while Peyton Barber only had one.

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 1>There was a report that came out just earlier today

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>where um Bruce Arians basically said they're gonna go with

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a similar approach. Peyton Barber is going to start, and

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna mix in Ronald Jones and if he has

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the hot hand and they're going to use him. I

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>fully believe that Ronald Jones is better than Peyton Barber,

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to continue to see that the further

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>that the season goes along. He has the pedigree. In

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the off season, he added muscle mass. He looked more confident,

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, in Week one running the football than any

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 1>time he did last year. So to me, Greg, it's

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Giovanni Bernard and Ronald Jones, but I don't think that

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Malcolm Brown is that far behind those guys. I just

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 1>think that as long as Todd Gurley is healthy, it's

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>very obvious that Malcolm Brown is the one B on

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the Rams offense. Yeah, so Malcolm Brown is that one B.

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>And it's very very frustrating, more so than anything else

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>to the Todd Gurley owner who's going to have to

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>deal with that. I'm e're gonna feel comfortable for growing

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Malcolm Brown in there. It was a long time. I'm

0:15:57.360 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>not gonna feel comfortable in week two starting Malcolm Brown

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>as a flex option. Probably not. You're you're almost hoping

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>for a touchdown for me as I look at the

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire. Sure he scored two touchdowns a week one

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 1>he did. He had all five red zone rushing attempts.

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Todd Gurley had zero. Yes, I recognized that and one.

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>And so I said to you, you sound very angry.

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Is it because you're the girly owner? Yes, that's clarify.

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't know if you have like a

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>personal vendetta against Malcolm Brown. I love Malcolm Brown. I

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>told Malcolm Brown up also have him as a handcuff

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>in in GST and we don't even have Todd Gurley.

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>We just drafted as I forced the Yeah, he was

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a guy I wanted absolutely this exactly, you and I

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 1>were on him. It makes a lot of sense. So

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the frustrating part about this is some of the times

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>that Malcolm Brown got those red zone carries, it was

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Malcolm Brown drive right like they had girl on the

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>bench and Malcolm Brown drove them down the field. But

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 1>one time where it was a girly drive and girlies

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>droving down the field, droving down the field that got

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 1>to the ten yard line. But in Darrel Henderson and

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, now, girls not even saying the game on

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 1>his own drives. That's what can earns me as a

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Todd Gurley owner. Not even so that they're splitting carries

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:05.440
<v Speaker 1>in a way, it's that he was taking out on

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:08.880
<v Speaker 1>a drive that was all him, Rodell Henderson. So people

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 1>have said they don't want big lineman falling on his

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 1>knee out of the short stage. That's what I said yesterday,

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:14.680
<v Speaker 1>And it was a short yard of situation of like,

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, I'm very concerned about the situation. We're

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna see how it plays out ultimately. Now go into

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>where you're talking about with Tampa Bay and Daria Goomo

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>wal a Um and Ronald Jones. I think the part

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and I don't want you glossed over it, but had

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the most snaps and of anybody the pass catch. He's

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:33.440
<v Speaker 1>a pass catcher running back. And say what you will

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 1>with the Bucks, I think they're gonna be down more

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:37.920
<v Speaker 1>often than not this season. They're gonna be chasing points,

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:40.359
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna be chasing a comeback, which I believe me.

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Goo is gonna be on the field more than anybody.

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Jones definitely looked the most explosive. But I'm not

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>going all in here and dropping the bag, as some

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 1>would say on Ronald Jones. I'm just not gonna do it. Yeah,

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:54.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna be too aggressive on this either. You know,

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:57.399
<v Speaker 1>if you really need running back help, maybe five to

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 1>six percent, But honestly, I'm not going higher than for

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 1>any of the running backs. I think that this is

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:04.880
<v Speaker 1>a week to be aggressive on wide receivers and tight ends.

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>And this is something we talked about a lot throughout

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 1>draft season. Why we're so aggressive on running backs early

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 1>on in fantasy football, because there's so many wide receivers

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:15.399
<v Speaker 1>that emerge off the waiver wire. Now, it's not that

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:18.119
<v Speaker 1>we know that these wide receivers are going to be

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 1>consistent options weekend and week out, but we have seen

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of wide receivers emerge off waivers and I

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 1>think that's a lot of the reason why at least

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I target running backs early on in fantasy drafts, because

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:31.679
<v Speaker 1>so many of these wide receivers do emerge. So when

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Ronald Jones five to six percent, Giovanni Bernard,

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:36.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're the mixing owner, you should have

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 1>already had Bernard, But if you don't, then you're also

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 1>probably in that five to six percent range. Greg, how

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 1>would you rank Giovanni Bernard, Ronald Jones, and Malcolm Brown? Uh?

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 1>For me? And is there anyone else that you think

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 1>should be in this mix when it comes to running backs?

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:52.159
<v Speaker 1>So when it comes to run there are there are

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:54.400
<v Speaker 1>actually you actually wrote them down here, Frankie. I think

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 1>we gotta get ahem most there. And it's the same

0:18:56.880 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 1>reason before you bear ranking, let me just talk about

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 1>most for for a few moments, because for me, everybody

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>knows this. I've said this, I banged this drum for

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:06.639
<v Speaker 1>years on Kyle Shadahan. That's why I was higher on

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 1>Tevin Coleman than others. And Tevin Coleman and Matt Brina

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 1>this past Sunday both look good and then Coleman gets hurt.

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Matt Brenda is not in a position physically to get

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty touches a game. He cannot handle it. They are

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 1>going to use a second running back, and that running

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:26.680
<v Speaker 1>back clearly right now is where he Moster. I understand

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:30.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of his touches last weekend. Kwan Brina, no surprise,

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 1>left the game due to dehydration issues. It's going to

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:37.959
<v Speaker 1>happen weekend and week out. Whether it's dehydration, whether it's

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:39.440
<v Speaker 1>getting the win knocked out of him, whether it's a

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:41.400
<v Speaker 1>leg and ankle, a hamstring, or growing. It doesn't matter.

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Matt Brena can't stay on the field, So there's going

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:46.439
<v Speaker 1>to be somebody else that steps up, and I believe

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>after looking at it this past Sunday, it's going to

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>be most He has a role here. So I like

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Whee Moster, just like I like the Redskins duo of

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Adrian Peterson and Chris Thompson. If Darius Guys is out

0:19:56.960 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and it looks like he has a sprain, Minsk is

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:01.200
<v Speaker 1>a tornments disc is something going on that knee. That

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 1>means Adrian Peterson's going to be active. He's going to

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:05.639
<v Speaker 1>have a role. Also, if you will leave like so

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 1>many others, that Washington is going to be coming from behind.

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Chris Thompson needs quote in the best shape of his

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>life and feeling better than he ever has. Thompson's role

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>and you saw it on Sunday, Frank, it hasn't changed.

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>He's the third down guy. He's the passing down back.

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 1>His role hasn't changed. And you know from years of

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:25.680
<v Speaker 1>experience that Adrian Peterson doesn't catch the football. So maybe

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Darius Guys will be a three down back. He's not yet.

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Adrian Peterson will get back in the mix. He's

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 1>not yet. The one thing that is secure is Chris Thompson.

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I want Chris Thompson. I want Rhee Moster, I want

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Malcolm Brown. I want all these guys, not none of

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:43.879
<v Speaker 1>them more from like five percent of my budget. But

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I think all of them are around the same level.

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't have any any of them significantly above. Yeah,

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and I would agree with that. I'll throw this to

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:54.400
<v Speaker 1>u UI real quick, we're coming up on a Berson away, right, Yeah,

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>so we'll throw the y when we come back. But overall, yeah,

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. I tweeted this out yesterday. I

0:20:57.960 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>think Mostart is going to be one of the most

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 1>under raided waiver wire pickups here. We want Kyle Shanahan

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:06.879
<v Speaker 1>running backs for Fantasy football that Greta cannot handle a

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 1>full workload. As you mentioned Greg Mostart, he looked really

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:12.160
<v Speaker 1>good last year. He looked pretty good in Week one too,

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 1>So Kevin Coleman out the next couple of weeks, and

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:18.920
<v Speaker 1>if anything happens, Tabrita Mostert Skyrocket or be our Salar

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:20.920
<v Speaker 1>would be too. In that scenario, let's take a break

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 1>with e y s thoughts on all these running macks.

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Will move on to the wide receivers, where we return

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:29.159
<v Speaker 1>on the bfs lit Daily Rodo dot Com guide you

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 1>to victory as you swing for the fences playing Daily

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Baseball, become the eighth Daily Rodo lineup, Optimize it

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:37.919
<v Speaker 1>will win one million dollars in a Fanduela Draft Kings tournament,

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:40.199
<v Speaker 1>or become part of the growing community. We have won

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 1>thousands of dollars. If you're playing MLB dfs and not

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:46.119
<v Speaker 1>using Daily Roado dot com, You're doing it wrong. Enter

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>promo code f n t s Y for a ten

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 1>percent discount the two thousand and nineteen MLB Daily Rodo

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Premium package at Daily roado dot com. Use a promo

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 1>code f n T s Y and get your ten

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:59.400
<v Speaker 1>percent discount today. Get in the game with Draft Kings

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 1>sports book listeners of this network can get a risk

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:04.920
<v Speaker 1>free bet up to five hundred dollars. Here's how it works. First,

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:07.639
<v Speaker 1>create a Draft King sports book account, Then make a

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 1>deposit and place your first bet and Draft Kings will

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>match it up to five hundred dollars. Just go to

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:15.719
<v Speaker 1>sports Spirit dot com slash dk to play at Sports

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Spirit dot com slash d k at quickly. This offer

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:23.119
<v Speaker 1>won't be around forever. Gambling problem called gambling twenty one

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and over New Jersey only. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:31.399
<v Speaker 1>for details. I had great results. I lost seventy pounds

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>by way to sixty five and went down to my doctor.

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Told me, if it works for you, then do it.

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>But a lot of people say to me, how would

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 1>you lose the weight? I said, I take andrew four

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred everything I'm gonna take it forever. That was Walt

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:46.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about Andrew four hundred. Now listen to what Bob

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 1>has to say. When you listen to your radio commercials,

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 1>you say that's not possible. But since I've experienced it,

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:56.159
<v Speaker 1>your commercials aren't strong enough. I am seventy and I've

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>had a belly for way too long. My whole body

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:01.160
<v Speaker 1>is shrinking. My energy level has gone up, and don't

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>think differences. And four D it's great stuff. I tried

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:06.879
<v Speaker 1>other products and nothing happen. Guys, if you'd like to

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>lose stubborn belly fat, gain energy, and feel years younger,

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:15.200
<v Speaker 1>try Andro four hundred, the safe, natural and affordable way

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to boost your testosterone. Go to Androw four hundred dot

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 1>com or call eight four hundred zero four three five

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:28.400
<v Speaker 1>four hundred zero four three five Androw four hundred dot com.

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Lose weight now, got a fat one hundred dot com.

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Lose that unwanted belly fat today and get free information

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 1>at fat one hundred dot com. Fit in the dress

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 1>or pets or bathing suits you've always wanted to Go

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 1>to Fat one hundred dot com. Lose ten twenty or

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 1>more pounds immediately go to fat one hundred dot com.

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 1>For free information on how you can lose weight, go

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to fat one dot com Fat one hundred dot com.

0:23:56.520 --> 0:24:01.480
<v Speaker 1>That's fat one dot com. Kink enough fantasy football. Rhoto

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Experts has launched their NFL three Fantasy Football package, which

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 1>includes the best math based seasonal projections and rankings available

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 1>anywhere on the Internet, and Davis Madig and the Rhoto

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Experts are providing dynasty season long betting, best ball and

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>NFL Draft content every day of the year to give

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>you an edge regardless of what type of fantasy football

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 1>you play. Save temper cent at roto experts dot com

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>with the promo code V and T s Y. It's

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the NFL three Fantasy Football Package only at Rhoto Experts

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 1>dot com. We're back here on the BFFs. He's Frank

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 1>staffeld I own grace. Let me just jomp write into

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:49.680
<v Speaker 1>e Y. We need a lot of running backs there

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 1>from Ji Bernard, you mentioned Malcolm Brown, Ronald Jones, Chris Thompson,

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:57.399
<v Speaker 1>Adrian Peterson, My guy, most how do you see this

0:24:57.520 --> 0:25:00.640
<v Speaker 1>running max? These running backs breaking down on a waiver wire?

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 1>How do you rank it? How are you um budget

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:07.680
<v Speaker 1>for these guys? What's your plan. It's all around the same.

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it just you got to decide, uh if

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:13.359
<v Speaker 1>you're playing for this week or you're trying to you know,

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:16.119
<v Speaker 1>do you need a starting running back for this week?

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:19.119
<v Speaker 1>Because I think what Frank said um with Giovanni Bernard

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 1>is that's probably the guy to go to. The Zach

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Keylor's offense look really good. Uh wow, what an epiphany.

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Make the guy that runs a four or four run

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>really fast down the field and throw it to him.

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:32.119
<v Speaker 1>That's ah, it's a new it's a new us, the

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 1>new world. We're living in a new Cincinnati Bengals. What

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>a concept. But the Nivani Bernard is the guy that

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I would want for this week. But Malcolm Brown is

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 1>still the guy that I want one term and I

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 1>agree on on the Ronald Jokes stuff. I read the

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:48.639
<v Speaker 1>thing that arians named Peyton Barber the starter again and

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 1>it makes me want to put my head through a wall.

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it was clear he was the best running

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 1>back on the team. I just don't know that it

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 1>matters who's the starter, who plays on the first plan,

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:01.200
<v Speaker 1>who doesn't? Right, like we saw we saw how it

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>wrote down right, like, are they the separation and carries

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 1>or snaps. Rather, it was all within like seven of

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:08.680
<v Speaker 1>all three of them, right, like, yeah, I have it

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:11.440
<v Speaker 1>right here. Oomba Wally was twenty six, Peyton Barber was

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, and Ronald Jones was twenty two, so they're

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:15.920
<v Speaker 1>all within four yet, so not even seven, so it

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter. It's so frustrating too, because most teams really

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 1>have two backs where like to have an early down

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:22.119
<v Speaker 1>guy and to have like the pass down guys. So

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>that would make sense if it was just Ronald Jones

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and Ogomba Wally, and I still think that we can

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 1>get there. That's why I'm talking about this is a

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:30.199
<v Speaker 1>long term play. I'm not saying that you're gonna use

0:26:30.280 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Jones this week, although the matchup against Carolina does

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 1>not look terrible based on what Girley and Malcolm Brown

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:37.880
<v Speaker 1>just didn't week one. But overall, I think it won't

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 1>be long before Ronald Jones really does take over as

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 1>like the early down running back. And then if they're

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 1>trailing in games or if they're playing catch up, they

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:47.120
<v Speaker 1>have o Goomba Wally as that pass catching running back. Greg.

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 1>If I'm ranking these guys, I'm going Giovanni Bernard first,

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and then I'm going Ronald Jones, I'm going Malcolm Brown

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 1>love Raheem mostert Uh. He played only twenty snaps in

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:58.439
<v Speaker 1>Week one, but not nine rushes for forty yards four

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:01.080
<v Speaker 1>point four yards per carry. Last, you're only thirty thirty

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:04.160
<v Speaker 1>four carries overall, extremely small sample size, but seven point

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:07.400
<v Speaker 1>seven yards per carry. And as we've mentioned Kyle Shanahan

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 1>running backs, you just want to own these players when

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:12.359
<v Speaker 1>it comes to fantasy football. It's not like Matt Breeda

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>has been the model of health either. And then if

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:17.399
<v Speaker 1>you're playing PPR, I would put Chris Thompson as the

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 1>next running back up. If you're playing standard, I would

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:22.119
<v Speaker 1>put Adrian Peterson as the next running back up. And

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 1>then after that it's just if you're play in deeper leagues,

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I would look at Darren Sprowls. Just I understand it's

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:31.359
<v Speaker 1>Darren Sprowles, but exposure to a really good Eagles offense.

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 1>He played twenty two snaps, that was more than Jordan Howard.

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 1>He had twelve touches in Week one as well, five

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:39.119
<v Speaker 1>point two yards per carry. And then after him, I

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:41.680
<v Speaker 1>would have Carlos Hide. But it's not a bad week

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>for running backs, Greig, but I would argue the wide

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 1>receivers are much better than the running backs on waiver

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 1>wire after Week one. I would totally agree. As I said,

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not spending more than five or six percent of

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 1>my budget on any of these guys this week. But ultimately,

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 1>you know they're nice, they're nice death to have, and

0:27:57.520 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what they could come up to do. I

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 1>agree with frank we look at the running backs this week,

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:02.359
<v Speaker 1>you want to look a little bit long term. That's

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:05.160
<v Speaker 1>why Ronald Jones is a top options on. Malcolm Brown

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 1>is tom option raheem moastered as well. Let's move on

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to those wide receivers, Frankie, And at the end of

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:14.359
<v Speaker 1>our draft, almost everywhere I begged you to for us

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:16.960
<v Speaker 1>to draft John Brown and Jameson Crowd is a guy

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 1>that I thought climbed throughout draft season, like people saw

0:28:19.760 --> 0:28:21.719
<v Speaker 1>how the Jets were using him and they liked him.

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:24.399
<v Speaker 1>And James Crowd of John Brown, both had monstrous games

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>in their own right this past Sunday. But the man

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:32.920
<v Speaker 1>that I always surprised everybody, but surprised everybody were the rookies.

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood Brown in particular, scary Terry McLaurin as well, and

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 1>DK Metcalf had a role here UM for Seattle. These

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:43.239
<v Speaker 1>three rookies really really jumped off the page for us,

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 1>of course, starting with Hollywood Brown in the first half

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 1>UM in that big blowout in Miami. Or Ke's Brown

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>was amazing, but the naysayers were points and he didn't

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 1>really play that many snaps. He didn't need to. He

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't really have many targets or many receptions. He didn't

0:28:56.680 --> 0:28:58.400
<v Speaker 1>need to do any of those things. But we want

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to project going forward. Jamison Crowder and Steve Sataboy has

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 1>a great stat Jamison Crowder had more receptions than markets

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Brown played snaps. It's insane, right like it's it's a

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 1>it's at and it's true. So what do you take

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>of Markey's Brown and how much you're spending on I

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 1>will start with Jamison Crowder and John Brown real quick.

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 1>The only reason I had those names on the list

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 1>is because they're less than six owned in YAHOO League.

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 1>So just see if they're available. If you play in

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 1>ten team leagues, those players should be owned. That's John

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Brown and Jamison Crowder. I agree that in your standard

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 1>twelve team leagues, those players were probably drafted, but I

0:29:32.800 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 1>thought it was worth mentioning throwing their names out there

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 1>and make sure that they are owned. When it comes

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to Mark's Brown, I think he's going to be a

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 1>very boomer bust option. I see a lot of DeShawn

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Jackson in his game. He is extremely fast. His repertoire

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 1>was on full display this past week. Only playing fourteen snaps,

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 1>but he took a quick slant to the house, and

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 1>he also got behind the defense and caught a deep

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 1>pass that went through the air over the top. So

0:29:57.040 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, he showed what he can do on limited

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:03.719
<v Speaker 1>snap ups. But I think moving forward, they're still going

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to want to run the football, and they're still Mark

0:30:06.080 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Andrews in this offense, and they're still Miles Boykins. So

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 1>while I think that he's an explosive player and he

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 1>has upside you can take any one catch to the

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:16.520
<v Speaker 1>house for a touchdown, I don't know how consistent his

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 1>targets are going to be. And that's why I would

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 1>argue Greg that Scary Terry McLaren might actually be the

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 1>top waiver wire add this week over Hollywood Brown. I

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 1>just think that there could be a little bit more

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:31.239
<v Speaker 1>consistency there Adam McLaren versus Mark He's Hollywood Brown. Well,

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that's something we have to figure out right,

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 1>that consistency and who we trust more going forward. McLaren

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 1>had a good opportunity this week and he won't pay

0:30:38.600 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 1>major dividens. We thought would be Tray Quinn, it wasn't.

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 1>It was McLaren. Even though Quinn didn't catch a touchdown. Um,

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood Brown though lit off the pages, jumped right off

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:49.440
<v Speaker 1>it as hell e y. As he gets healthier, there

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 1>may be more snaps available to him. Yeah, I believe that.

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like he said, he didn't have to play,

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, Lamar Jackson didn't play the whole game.

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 1>He was hurt for them for the majority of training camp. Uh,

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 1>and there's no sense of risking a player of that caliber.

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I think you mean he's a he's a speed guy

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 1>with I'm pretty sure it was a hamstring injury, so

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 1>they're just watching his reps. I do believe I agree

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 1>with what you say that he is going to be

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 1>similar to Vincent Jackson. Um, I think he will be

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 1>more reliable than or not Vincent Jackson, sorry Deshaun Jackson,

0:31:24.080 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 1>but he would be more reliable. I think he's probably

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the number one waiver wire guy to grab and but McLaurin, Uh, Look,

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the Washington Redskins are going to be losing and are

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be throwing the ball at the end of

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 1>almost every single football game, and McLaren could be the

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 1>number one receiver there. So that's always a valuable guy

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to have in fancy. Here's what you have to ask

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:47.200
<v Speaker 1>yourself as well, Greg, when pinning Marky's Brown up against

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Terry McLaurin on the waiver wire, you have to ask yourself,

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 1>how much of what we saw against the Miami Dolphins

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 1>is real? Because they are a god awful football correct?

0:31:56.280 --> 0:31:57.920
<v Speaker 1>And you know I said this last week. I still

0:31:57.960 --> 0:32:00.719
<v Speaker 1>stand by it. The strength of their defense is their

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 1>secondary is Avian Howard is still a really good player

0:32:03.160 --> 0:32:05.960
<v Speaker 1>make of Fitzpatrick is a I think up and coming

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:08.320
<v Speaker 1>player as well, second year player for the Miami Dolphins.

0:32:08.520 --> 0:32:10.360
<v Speaker 1>It didn't show in Week one. I understand that, But

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you have to weigh how efficient that offense was, Greg,

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 1>how much of that was real? Right? How much of

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 1>what Lamar Jackson did as a passer in week one

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>is real? Is that something that we can actually hang

0:32:21.960 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 1>our hat on moving forward, because if not, if we don't,

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:25.880
<v Speaker 1>if we still think that they're going to run the

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:28.080
<v Speaker 1>football a lot with Mark ingram In, Justice Hill and

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Gus Edwards, then that's why I think I'm slightly leaning

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:33.719
<v Speaker 1>with Terry McLaurin. And McLaurin looked great as well. I mean,

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 1>he played the second most snaps among their wide receivers,

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 1>behind only Tray Quinn. Trey Quinn should be owned as well,

0:32:39.560 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 1>played a ton in the slot, but Terry McLaurin was

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 1>used all over the field and he was used in

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>a variety of ways at five catches on seven targets,

0:32:46.960 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 1>sixteen percent targets share, including a sixty nine yard touchdown

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:54.320
<v Speaker 1>as well, And when Dwayne Haskins takes over as the

0:32:54.360 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 1>starting quarterback, I don't know if it's gonna happen soon.

0:32:56.680 --> 0:32:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's, you know, the final four or five weeks

0:32:58.560 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 1>of the season. He played with Terry McLaurin in college.

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 1>They both went to Ohio State. So I think that's

0:33:03.360 --> 0:33:06.480
<v Speaker 1>something that also lends itself to the longevity. If you're

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:09.600
<v Speaker 1>looking at who has more season long upside and potential,

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 1>it's Terry McLaurin over Marky's Brown, But I do think

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:14.440
<v Speaker 1>it's close. How much? So what is this number that

0:33:14.480 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 1>we're spending on these guys? And that's the magic question. Man,

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk this out right now, at least I'm trying

0:33:18.640 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 1>to figure it out right now while I put my

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:23.080
<v Speaker 1>bids in before you do, before you do, while you

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:25.560
<v Speaker 1>swimmer on that. I think we have to mention John Ross.

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Like John Ross has it's a one A, one B,

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:29.960
<v Speaker 1>one C. And you can ask, you know, three different

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:32.320
<v Speaker 1>people finding people, you get completely different. And Ross has

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to be in that conversation, man. And there was somebody

0:33:35.320 --> 0:33:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I was with that's just the show on Sunday and

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 1>he's just like, oh it is is yours Tyler Boyd?

0:33:39.680 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 1>And it's funny because it's like ridiculous. But I know,

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 1>we had a conversation about John Ross the summer. We

0:33:44.280 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of laughed it off and we kind of like

0:33:46.600 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 1>jokingly said, is he gonna be the Brandon Cooks of

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 1>this ram style offense that did his best Brandon Cooks inpersonation?

0:33:53.040 --> 0:33:55.080
<v Speaker 1>And we exactly what we said over the summer, and

0:33:55.360 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 1>you have to wonder and I'll do it out loud.

0:33:57.280 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Not that Tyler boy had a bad game or something

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 1>because he didn't. But what he is for the foreseeable

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:04.719
<v Speaker 1>future going to get the number one cornerback covering him.

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:07.040
<v Speaker 1>John Ross is the number two wide receiver in this

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 1>in this office, He's the number two option this offense.

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I did a fan new video a month ago saying, hey,

0:34:11.160 --> 0:34:13.799
<v Speaker 1>don't sleep on Tyler Iford for this exact reason. John

0:34:13.960 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Ross is a has been reborn. There's a new coaching

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:21.320
<v Speaker 1>staff here, there's a new regime in town that aren't

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to turn him into a cornerback. They're trying to

0:34:23.840 --> 0:34:27.080
<v Speaker 1>use his speed to route that he can be successful,

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 1>that he provides a different dynamic to this offense than

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:33.319
<v Speaker 1>anybody else, including a Jan Green, and including Tyler Boyd.

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Sure when a J. Green comes back, Ross will not

0:34:36.000 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 1>have the same presence, I'm sure, but he's going to

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:42.880
<v Speaker 1>have eight presents. Cincinnati is a tough spot in Seattle.

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:46.400
<v Speaker 1>We all thought, so Sletting is going to get it

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:48.319
<v Speaker 1>was nine and a half point spread. Sletting is going

0:34:48.400 --> 0:34:50.919
<v Speaker 1>to get easier for John Ross. There is a case

0:34:51.000 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 1>to be made that he should be one A to

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 1>McLaren and the Marquis Brown. How much are we spending

0:34:57.480 --> 0:35:02.160
<v Speaker 1>y on these three guys, I'm with you. I'm really

0:35:02.200 --> 0:35:05.000
<v Speaker 1>excited about what John Ross can be. I mean, the

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 1>truth is is like it's recency biased. You just think

0:35:07.560 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 1>about the Cincinnati Bengals. You think about what John Ross was,

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:13.600
<v Speaker 1>uh and how he was. You know, most people going

0:35:13.600 --> 0:35:15.279
<v Speaker 1>into this year, we're saying, look at this guy's that

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 1>he's a bust. He was drafted high, he had all

0:35:18.120 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 1>these unbelievable intangibles crazy forty time. I think Chris Johnson

0:35:23.040 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 1>may be the only guy that run faster for aty time,

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:29.759
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember, but like having him in a guy

0:35:29.880 --> 0:35:34.479
<v Speaker 1>that can design an offense around what he has, John

0:35:34.640 --> 0:35:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Ross is going to take the top off defense is

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:39.920
<v Speaker 1>It's going to make the Cincinnati Bengals better. Joe Mixon

0:35:40.040 --> 0:35:43.120
<v Speaker 1>is going to prosper when he's healthy, and John Ross

0:35:43.200 --> 0:35:45.720
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be a huge part of this offense. Yes, please,

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Like the number that came to mind immediately was twelve

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to fiftent of my fed especially if you're really, you know,

0:35:52.600 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 1>desperate for wide receivers as well, if you drafted some

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:56.960
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers early on and they don't look like they're

0:35:56.960 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 1>working out so far. Stefen Diggs were kind of worried

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:01.440
<v Speaker 1>about Stefon dig If you need the wide receiver help,

0:36:01.719 --> 0:36:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I would rank it Terry McLaurin, Marquis Brown, John Ross.

0:36:05.640 --> 0:36:07.479
<v Speaker 1>It's all really close. I like all three you guys.

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Twelve to fiftent is the number. I'm looking at a

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of money, but I recommend doing it because you

0:36:12.640 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 1>need to spend the money now. Because he helping me

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:16.720
<v Speaker 1>with the next fifty weeks. It reminds you of Tyler

0:36:16.800 --> 0:36:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Boyd from last season. You pick them up early on,

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 1>he helped you all season long. We have more wide

0:36:20.600 --> 0:36:23.400
<v Speaker 1>receivers and will get d J. Hockenson as well. A

0:36:23.480 --> 0:36:25.120
<v Speaker 1>lot more to come, not a lot of time to

0:36:25.160 --> 0:36:29.160
<v Speaker 1>do it. Toffs. The Fantasy Sports Network is ready to

0:36:29.200 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 1>take you out to the ball game. Our experts and

0:36:31.520 --> 0:36:33.960
<v Speaker 1>analysts are following the Boys of Summer through all one

0:36:34.040 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty two games of the two thousand nineteen

0:36:36.560 --> 0:36:40.160
<v Speaker 1>MLB season with the best fantasy baseball analysis in the industry.

0:36:40.239 --> 0:36:42.239
<v Speaker 1>Catch the latest news and notes every day to help

0:36:42.280 --> 0:36:44.480
<v Speaker 1>you win your fantasy leagues and your t A best

0:36:44.520 --> 0:36:47.440
<v Speaker 1>tournaments will always want you back listening and watching the

0:36:47.480 --> 0:36:49.759
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports Network on the fn T s Y Radio

0:36:49.840 --> 0:36:52.000
<v Speaker 1>app and the fan t s Y YouTube channel the

0:36:52.080 --> 0:36:55.279
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports Network where we're Root Root rooting for your

0:36:55.480 --> 0:37:00.160
<v Speaker 1>fantasy baseball team. Mori Allen two thousand and fifteen, two

0:37:00.160 --> 0:37:03.239
<v Speaker 1>thousand and sixteen Europe being Long Drive Tour Champion two

0:37:03.320 --> 0:37:11.200
<v Speaker 1>thousand seventeen World number one Me personally, I keep my

0:37:11.280 --> 0:37:16.839
<v Speaker 1>game face on me all the time, especially coming out

0:37:16.840 --> 0:37:20.640
<v Speaker 1>with the bucker, leaving the range or even leaving the ports.

0:37:22.320 --> 0:37:24.920
<v Speaker 1>What's your story? Go to Game based Grooming dot Com

0:37:25.000 --> 0:37:27.520
<v Speaker 1>from all your athletic facial wipes and body cleansing needs.

0:37:27.840 --> 0:37:29.759
<v Speaker 1>Get in the game with Draft Kings sports Book where

0:37:29.800 --> 0:37:31.960
<v Speaker 1>listeners if this network can get a risk free bet

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:34.600
<v Speaker 1>up to five hundred dollars. Here's how it works. First,

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:37.320
<v Speaker 1>create a Draft Kings sports book account, then make a

0:37:37.400 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 1>deposit and place your first bet and Draft Kings will

0:37:40.160 --> 0:37:42.440
<v Speaker 1>match it up to five hundred dollars. Just go to

0:37:42.480 --> 0:37:45.360
<v Speaker 1>sports spit dot com slash dk to play that sports

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:48.919
<v Speaker 1>spriit dot com slash dk at quickly. This offer won't

0:37:48.960 --> 0:37:52.799
<v Speaker 1>be around forever. Gambling problem called one gambling twenty one

0:37:52.840 --> 0:37:56.640
<v Speaker 1>and over New Jersey only. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website

0:37:56.680 --> 0:38:00.520
<v Speaker 1>for details. If you've heard of weather texts or liners.

0:38:00.719 --> 0:38:04.719
<v Speaker 1>You probably know that for your vehicle's floor, nothing protects better,

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:07.000
<v Speaker 1>But what about protection for the rest of your car

0:38:07.080 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 1>or truck. I'm David McNeil, founder of weather Tech. Besides

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:15.160
<v Speaker 1>our floor liners, we design, engineer, and manufacture a wide

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 1>range of automotive accessories right here in America, And just

0:38:18.840 --> 0:38:21.720
<v Speaker 1>like our floor liners, everything is done to the highest

0:38:21.760 --> 0:38:25.279
<v Speaker 1>standards possible. We understand what kind of investment owning a

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:28.839
<v Speaker 1>vehicle can be, so we do everything possible to help

0:38:28.920 --> 0:38:31.759
<v Speaker 1>you protect it. We don't take shortcuts, and we never

0:38:31.920 --> 0:38:35.040
<v Speaker 1>make concessions when it comes to quality for everything from

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:38.640
<v Speaker 1>cargo liners to cleaning and detailing supplies to mud flaps

0:38:38.680 --> 0:38:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and car covers. The one place you need to go

0:38:41.280 --> 0:38:44.480
<v Speaker 1>is weather tech dot com. So if you are familiar

0:38:44.520 --> 0:38:47.279
<v Speaker 1>with our floor liners, just imagine how well the rest

0:38:47.320 --> 0:38:49.879
<v Speaker 1>of our products will work for you. Learn more about

0:38:49.920 --> 0:38:52.759
<v Speaker 1>our full line of automotive accessories at WeatherTech dot com

0:38:53.120 --> 0:38:55.799
<v Speaker 1>or call one eight hundred car mets weather tech dot

0:38:55.880 --> 0:39:02.200
<v Speaker 1>com proudly made in America style. Yes, Giovanni Bernard, if

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:04.200
<v Speaker 1>mixing is gonna miss time, but that's a function of

0:39:04.280 --> 0:39:06.359
<v Speaker 1>how much time mixing is missing and if you really

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:08.759
<v Speaker 1>think you would start Giovanni Bernard given the rest of

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:11.319
<v Speaker 1>your roster in that time, that mixing isn't done. That's

0:39:11.320 --> 0:39:12.479
<v Speaker 1>the way you need to look at this with people

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:15.160
<v Speaker 1>that are replacing them, would they crack you're starting lineup? Anyway? Well,

0:39:15.200 --> 0:39:17.320
<v Speaker 1>if the answers though, and it's like a three week injury,

0:39:17.480 --> 0:39:19.400
<v Speaker 1>then do you really need to spend your priority on

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 1>that or your fat budget on it? I understand making

0:39:21.600 --> 0:39:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the assets, but you gotta prioritize sometimes. Monday and Thursday

0:39:24.440 --> 0:39:26.560
<v Speaker 1>seven eight pm Eastern heav key is Y Radio and

0:39:27.040 --> 0:39:37.560
<v Speaker 1>TV channel seven nineteen. All right, we have a lot

0:39:37.600 --> 0:39:39.160
<v Speaker 1>more to do, not that much time to do, is

0:39:39.200 --> 0:39:40.759
<v Speaker 1>I want to jump back in Frank, you said twelve

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:42.880
<v Speaker 1>to fifty were sent for These top wide receivers are

0:39:42.920 --> 0:39:46.319
<v Speaker 1>all aboard, including Martin's Brown, Terry mclauren, and John Ross,

0:39:46.400 --> 0:39:49.400
<v Speaker 1>And you everlieve ranked it in that order? Right? For me,

0:39:49.600 --> 0:39:53.320
<v Speaker 1>it is mclauren first, Marcy's Brown, and then John Ross.

0:39:53.480 --> 0:39:57.160
<v Speaker 1>But they're all really close. You know. It's interesting because

0:39:57.200 --> 0:40:00.319
<v Speaker 1>I guess the thing was really both McLaren and they

0:40:00.360 --> 0:40:02.080
<v Speaker 1>have the ability to be the wide receiver one on

0:40:02.160 --> 0:40:05.080
<v Speaker 1>their team right now. And the McLaren played. I don't

0:40:05.080 --> 0:40:06.600
<v Speaker 1>think John Ross is ever going to have that a

0:40:06.640 --> 0:40:09.279
<v Speaker 1>bitter not from a target share perspective, but it will

0:40:09.320 --> 0:40:12.560
<v Speaker 1>say this based on this offense. Once A J. Green

0:40:12.640 --> 0:40:14.440
<v Speaker 1>returns and people are gonna be worried about, well, I

0:40:14.480 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 1>don't want a bid too much on John Ross because

0:40:16.239 --> 0:40:18.239
<v Speaker 1>once Green is back, you know his target chair is

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:20.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna go down. I mean, this guy clut seven or

0:40:20.920 --> 0:40:24.480
<v Speaker 1>twelve targets. He finished as the wide receiver three overall

0:40:24.600 --> 0:40:27.719
<v Speaker 1>in Week one and he had three drop passes, so

0:40:27.920 --> 0:40:31.440
<v Speaker 1>he left production on the field. I think once this

0:40:32.200 --> 0:40:35.319
<v Speaker 1>Bengals offense is at full strength, John Ross is gonna

0:40:35.320 --> 0:40:36.919
<v Speaker 1>be one of those players that can do a lot

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:39.759
<v Speaker 1>with a little because defenses are going to be trying

0:40:39.800 --> 0:40:42.400
<v Speaker 1>to stop Tyler Boyd and a J. Green. And you know,

0:40:42.480 --> 0:40:44.320
<v Speaker 1>only if John Ross, if he only gets you know,

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:46.520
<v Speaker 1>four to five targets a game, if a few of

0:40:46.600 --> 0:40:50.000
<v Speaker 1>those are deep shots, he's someone that can be a volatile,

0:40:50.040 --> 0:40:52.239
<v Speaker 1>boomer bust wide receiver three. So I don't think that,

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:54.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, John Ross's value is just completely gonna go

0:40:54.960 --> 0:40:57.719
<v Speaker 1>away once A J. Green returns to this offense. Greg plus,

0:40:57.800 --> 0:40:59.879
<v Speaker 1>there's a good chance that he gets hurt again. It's

0:41:00.040 --> 0:41:02.759
<v Speaker 1>Green has been consistently hurt the past couple of years,

0:41:02.960 --> 0:41:05.560
<v Speaker 1>dealing with lower leg injuries. So it's not like once

0:41:05.640 --> 0:41:08.480
<v Speaker 1>he gets healthy, he's gonna remain healthy. So that's you know,

0:41:08.520 --> 0:41:10.440
<v Speaker 1>if you're worried about John Ross for the entirety of

0:41:10.480 --> 0:41:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the season, I would just say keep those things in mind.

0:41:13.480 --> 0:41:16.799
<v Speaker 1>I believe maybe I'm wrong that the Hollywood Brown hype

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:18.400
<v Speaker 1>is gonna have him being one of the probably the

0:41:18.600 --> 0:41:21.160
<v Speaker 1>most expensive piece here, especially based because he was the

0:41:21.239 --> 0:41:25.160
<v Speaker 1>first round pick this year, this year's NFL Dame being

0:41:25.239 --> 0:41:27.880
<v Speaker 1>related to Antonio browning, these things actually matter. Like it

0:41:27.960 --> 0:41:30.160
<v Speaker 1>sounds ridiculous, but people look at stuff like that. You

0:41:30.200 --> 0:41:32.399
<v Speaker 1>look at Washington, like Terry McLaren doesn't have the name,

0:41:32.440 --> 0:41:35.920
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have the draft pedigreely, but he can be

0:41:36.000 --> 0:41:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the number one wider. He ran a four point three

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:42.480
<v Speaker 1>ft targeted seven times on Sunday. His speed score was

0:41:42.520 --> 0:41:45.319
<v Speaker 1>in the ninetent. That's more targets and more. He's Brown

0:41:46.760 --> 0:41:49.080
<v Speaker 1>just saying, and he was on the field a lot.

0:41:49.520 --> 0:41:51.719
<v Speaker 1>As I mentioned, he played over fifty snaps. He was

0:41:51.760 --> 0:41:55.160
<v Speaker 1>behind only Trey Quinn, who's the slot guy. All Richardson

0:41:55.239 --> 0:41:58.040
<v Speaker 1>was non existent. What Richardson snaps were similar, Like they

0:41:58.160 --> 0:42:00.600
<v Speaker 1>ran three wide receiver sets and it was mcclaure in Richardson.

0:42:00.680 --> 0:42:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you do you think that if Judary never comes back,

0:42:04.160 --> 0:42:07.719
<v Speaker 1>he's affected or now I think that probably affects Tray

0:42:07.840 --> 0:42:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Quinn more and someone like Paul Richson. I really do

0:42:10.600 --> 0:42:12.760
<v Speaker 1>think that based on what we saw, Like Terry McLaurin

0:42:12.800 --> 0:42:14.239
<v Speaker 1>is a bawler, like I think, I think he's a

0:42:14.280 --> 0:42:16.359
<v Speaker 1>real player, and I think that they're gonna find ways

0:42:16.400 --> 0:42:17.920
<v Speaker 1>to get him involved now based on what he did

0:42:17.960 --> 0:42:20.319
<v Speaker 1>in week one, Oh it was not so Tray Quick

0:42:20.360 --> 0:42:23.080
<v Speaker 1>was actually afterwards that Chris Thompson had ten targets and

0:42:23.120 --> 0:42:25.960
<v Speaker 1>then it was Richardson, McLaurin. Chris Thompson. Sorry, share was massive.

0:42:26.440 --> 0:42:28.239
<v Speaker 1>I actually am buying in on this, like best shape

0:42:28.239 --> 0:42:30.480
<v Speaker 1>of my life. You don't normally see him get that

0:42:30.560 --> 0:42:33.160
<v Speaker 1>many targets in J Gruden's offense. They've always kind of

0:42:33.400 --> 0:42:36.000
<v Speaker 1>like to limit him because of his injury history. I mean,

0:42:36.040 --> 0:42:39.680
<v Speaker 1>getting three carries and ten targets, thirteen running back opportunities,

0:42:40.080 --> 0:42:44.799
<v Speaker 1>that is a massive amount for Chris Thompson. All right,

0:42:44.880 --> 0:42:47.320
<v Speaker 1>let me move on to some of the other wide

0:42:47.360 --> 0:42:50.080
<v Speaker 1>receivers here that are on this list, and that brings

0:42:50.160 --> 0:42:54.319
<v Speaker 1>me to Randall Cob and I know I gotta get

0:42:54.360 --> 0:42:55.680
<v Speaker 1>through a lot of these guys quickly, so let me

0:42:55.680 --> 0:42:57.840
<v Speaker 1>start with Randall Cop and Cole Beasley and Danny Almond olags.

0:42:57.840 --> 0:42:59.560
<v Speaker 1>They're all similar that they're all suck and I would

0:42:59.560 --> 0:43:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I would put me Cole Hardman in that mix just

0:43:01.280 --> 0:43:03.600
<v Speaker 1>in terms of my priority. An Harman in that mix.

0:43:03.760 --> 0:43:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I think he's different than these guys. Randall Cob, Cole Beasley,

0:43:06.880 --> 0:43:10.799
<v Speaker 1>Danny Amadola. They are slot they're slot wide receivers, all veterans, right,

0:43:11.000 --> 0:43:13.360
<v Speaker 1>How would you rate those three guys, e y veteran

0:43:13.440 --> 0:43:16.040
<v Speaker 1>slot wide receivers who certainly showed up to play in

0:43:16.120 --> 0:43:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Week one? Randall Cob against the Giants, Danny A. Mandola

0:43:18.880 --> 0:43:20.640
<v Speaker 1>doing his thing in his first game of Matthew Stafford

0:43:20.800 --> 0:43:22.400
<v Speaker 1>say that, Cole Beasley and Josh Allen. How do you

0:43:22.480 --> 0:43:24.440
<v Speaker 1>rate those three slot wide receivers and how bad do

0:43:24.480 --> 0:43:29.680
<v Speaker 1>you do want him? I think, I mean Amadola he's

0:43:29.719 --> 0:43:31.520
<v Speaker 1>one of those guys like when he looks good man,

0:43:31.640 --> 0:43:33.719
<v Speaker 1>he looks good and it looks like he's going to

0:43:33.800 --> 0:43:36.480
<v Speaker 1>be a pretty good part of the offense, there's going

0:43:36.520 --> 0:43:38.160
<v Speaker 1>to catch a bunch of balls. Is going to be

0:43:38.680 --> 0:43:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Stafford's kind of like, uh, release Valve. I don't think

0:43:43.160 --> 0:43:44.799
<v Speaker 1>the tight end is going to be as strong as

0:43:44.840 --> 0:43:48.160
<v Speaker 1>he was the first week. I just I mean they're

0:43:48.160 --> 0:43:51.480
<v Speaker 1>playing the Cardinals. They've been brutally, historically brutal against the

0:43:51.520 --> 0:43:54.320
<v Speaker 1>tight tight end, and uh, he's a rookie. I just

0:43:54.400 --> 0:43:56.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think they're going Stafford's going to rely on him

0:43:56.560 --> 0:43:58.520
<v Speaker 1>like he did in that game. And then those all

0:43:58.600 --> 0:44:01.400
<v Speaker 1>those kind of like underneath, you know, middle of the

0:44:01.480 --> 0:44:03.480
<v Speaker 1>field balls are going to bed. So I think I

0:44:03.560 --> 0:44:05.640
<v Speaker 1>had to rank one, I rank him the highest. But

0:44:05.760 --> 0:44:07.640
<v Speaker 1>they all are intriguing, you know. I mean, they're all

0:44:07.760 --> 0:44:10.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of the same guy in the same position and

0:44:10.120 --> 0:44:14.240
<v Speaker 1>are probably gonna have around the same production. Definitely all intriguing.

0:44:14.239 --> 0:44:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I would take Randall Cobb of this group. Greg. I

0:44:16.200 --> 0:44:18.680
<v Speaker 1>know he's been so injury prone over the past couple

0:44:18.760 --> 0:44:22.759
<v Speaker 1>of years, but I want exposure to this Dallas Cowboys offense. Man,

0:44:23.000 --> 0:44:26.040
<v Speaker 1>they looked phenomenal under Kellen Moore calling plays there. They

0:44:26.120 --> 0:44:28.800
<v Speaker 1>used a lot of play action. Dak Prescott looked amazing

0:44:28.840 --> 0:44:30.960
<v Speaker 1>as well. Through over four hundred yards and four touchdowns.

0:44:31.120 --> 0:44:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I realized it came against the New York Giants, so

0:44:33.160 --> 0:44:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of quarterbacks are gonna look great against the

0:44:35.520 --> 0:44:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Giants this here, but I won't exposure to that Cowboys offense,

0:44:38.200 --> 0:44:40.360
<v Speaker 1>so I would take Randall Cobb over All. These played

0:44:40.400 --> 0:44:43.440
<v Speaker 1>forty eight of sixty eight snaps on Sunday forty one

0:44:43.560 --> 0:44:46.400
<v Speaker 1>in the slot, saw five targets, four for sixty nine

0:44:46.480 --> 0:44:48.560
<v Speaker 1>and one touchdown as well, so I would take Randall Cobb.

0:44:48.640 --> 0:44:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I would actually rank Cole Beasley second, the reason being

0:44:51.920 --> 0:44:53.919
<v Speaker 1>I think they're gonna be games where Marvin Jones gets

0:44:53.960 --> 0:44:56.879
<v Speaker 1>more involved, and I think that there are legitimately four

0:44:57.280 --> 0:44:59.759
<v Speaker 1>pass catchers on the Lions on a team that still

0:44:59.800 --> 0:45:02.719
<v Speaker 1>won to run the football. They have Baby Tron, they

0:45:02.800 --> 0:45:04.839
<v Speaker 1>have Marvin Jones, they have t J. Hockenson, and they

0:45:04.840 --> 0:45:07.520
<v Speaker 1>have Avendola. When I look at the Buffalo Bills, I

0:45:07.600 --> 0:45:10.680
<v Speaker 1>really just see two pass catchers and John Brown and

0:45:10.760 --> 0:45:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Cole Beasley. They'll probably use Devin Singletary as well, So

0:45:13.680 --> 0:45:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I would rank it ran new Cobb, then Cole Beasley,

0:45:17.120 --> 0:45:22.120
<v Speaker 1>then well dany A Mendel. Dani Avendola would be third

0:45:22.160 --> 0:45:24.080
<v Speaker 1>of that group, and again Greg I know I just

0:45:24.160 --> 0:45:26.320
<v Speaker 1>mentioned him. He's kind of a different player, but I

0:45:26.320 --> 0:45:28.480
<v Speaker 1>would take McCole Hardman over all of them. Yeah, so

0:45:28.600 --> 0:45:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Nkole Harmon, I would also take over all of them

0:45:30.760 --> 0:45:32.719
<v Speaker 1>because as you pointed out to me yesterday, and the

0:45:32.719 --> 0:45:35.239
<v Speaker 1>reason I'm separating because he's different. As you went out

0:45:35.239 --> 0:45:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to me yesterday, he was on the field. He was

0:45:37.080 --> 0:45:40.240
<v Speaker 1>all the fifty three snaps. Fifty three snaps, just twenty

0:45:40.280 --> 0:45:42.720
<v Speaker 1>two of them came into slot. Greg tyreek Hill didn't

0:45:42.800 --> 0:45:45.879
<v Speaker 1>play for the most part. Obviously, Sammy Watkins went nuts

0:45:46.280 --> 0:45:48.640
<v Speaker 1>as teams adjusted to take Sammy Watkins out of the

0:45:48.680 --> 0:45:51.120
<v Speaker 1>game or attempt to take Sammy Watkins in the game. Sure,

0:45:51.320 --> 0:45:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Travis Kelsey is gonna step up, but another wide receiver

0:45:53.800 --> 0:45:55.239
<v Speaker 1>is going to do as well. They're going to use

0:45:55.320 --> 0:45:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Nicole Hardman speed, They're gonna use his ability, and he's

0:45:58.120 --> 0:46:01.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be a valuable fantasy come. I want him

0:46:01.000 --> 0:46:02.880
<v Speaker 1>because I think the upside is simply higher than it

0:46:03.000 --> 0:46:06.160
<v Speaker 1>is for Randall Cobble, Cole Beasley and whoever else we

0:46:06.239 --> 0:46:09.440
<v Speaker 1>just named Dannie A. Mandola. Yeah, I agree, it's what

0:46:09.520 --> 0:46:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I just said about Randall Cobb, but times that by ten.

0:46:12.719 --> 0:46:15.239
<v Speaker 1>I just want exposure to this Chief's offense any way

0:46:15.280 --> 0:46:17.480
<v Speaker 1>that I can get it, and Hardenan looked really good

0:46:17.480 --> 0:46:20.440
<v Speaker 1>in the preseason. He scored two touchdowns in the preseason,

0:46:20.520 --> 0:46:22.880
<v Speaker 1>as I mentioned, played fifty three snaps on Someboday. Twenty

0:46:22.880 --> 0:46:25.800
<v Speaker 1>two of those came in the slot. So yeah, Sammy,

0:46:25.840 --> 0:46:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Watkins and Kelsey are far and away the number one

0:46:28.520 --> 0:46:31.279
<v Speaker 1>and two receivers in this offense. Damian Williams is going

0:46:31.320 --> 0:46:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to see targets out of the backfield. But if you're

0:46:34.080 --> 0:46:36.160
<v Speaker 1>asking me who's gonna see those deep shots, you know,

0:46:36.320 --> 0:46:38.680
<v Speaker 1>one to three of those per game that Tyreek Kill

0:46:38.719 --> 0:46:41.160
<v Speaker 1>normally gets, I think it's going to be me. Cole Hardman,

0:46:41.239 --> 0:46:43.080
<v Speaker 1>so e y, I'll throw it your way as well.

0:46:43.400 --> 0:46:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Where would you rank Hardman amongst all the wide receivers

0:46:46.040 --> 0:46:49.480
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about? Is he, you know, clearly behind the

0:46:49.719 --> 0:46:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Marquis Brown, Terry McLaurin, and John Ross group for you?

0:46:52.719 --> 0:46:55.759
<v Speaker 1>And is he ahead of those slot receivers for for me?

0:46:56.040 --> 0:46:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Is just because I mean, we didn't see him do

0:46:57.719 --> 0:47:00.600
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot, and I I don't know, maybe it's

0:47:00.680 --> 0:47:03.239
<v Speaker 1>a it's a bias, but I think DeMarcus Robinson is

0:47:03.280 --> 0:47:06.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be the guy that that fills in and

0:47:06.200 --> 0:47:09.200
<v Speaker 1>get um some of the volume there when Tyreek Hill

0:47:09.280 --> 0:47:11.040
<v Speaker 1>is out. That that's just what I think. I know

0:47:11.160 --> 0:47:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that they drafted him high by DeMarcus Robinson has been

0:47:13.560 --> 0:47:16.480
<v Speaker 1>in the offense. He's a very similar athlete. I mean,

0:47:16.560 --> 0:47:18.800
<v Speaker 1>nobody is the same as Tyreek Hill, but he's a

0:47:18.880 --> 0:47:22.040
<v Speaker 1>very similar style of athlete and receiver that Tyreek Hill is.

0:47:22.280 --> 0:47:25.439
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, for me, uh, I think McLaren would

0:47:25.440 --> 0:47:29.000
<v Speaker 1>probably be my number one UM. But I'm battling with

0:47:29.080 --> 0:47:31.319
<v Speaker 1>that right now. Do I do I bid more on him?

0:47:31.440 --> 0:47:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Or do I bid more on Markis Brown? Marky's Brown,

0:47:34.040 --> 0:47:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I think is the number one receiver there. But they're

0:47:36.520 --> 0:47:38.560
<v Speaker 1>not going to play the Dolphins every week, and they're

0:47:38.560 --> 0:47:40.480
<v Speaker 1>a running team, like I still believe, and I know

0:47:40.560 --> 0:47:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I said in the off season, and I still believe

0:47:42.080 --> 0:47:43.919
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to be the number one rushing team

0:47:44.200 --> 0:47:47.000
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. Uh, And they're just not going to

0:47:47.080 --> 0:47:50.120
<v Speaker 1>throw the ball enough to have him. You know that

0:47:50.440 --> 0:47:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that much of I think he's the best player out

0:47:52.440 --> 0:47:54.839
<v Speaker 1>of him. But I mean, the situation is McLaren, they're

0:47:54.840 --> 0:47:56.319
<v Speaker 1>going to be down and they're gonna be throwing the ball.

0:47:56.400 --> 0:47:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I think he's going to be the most valuable by

0:47:58.440 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year. They've just been like a

0:47:59.719 --> 0:48:02.880
<v Speaker 1>half four on Baby Shark. DJ Shark. We haven't mentioned

0:48:02.960 --> 0:48:06.200
<v Speaker 1>him yet, should we have. I'm a little bit worried

0:48:06.200 --> 0:48:08.640
<v Speaker 1>about DJ Chark. To touch the touchdown Daddy score was

0:48:08.680 --> 0:48:10.480
<v Speaker 1>an awesome one. He's a big body. He can get

0:48:10.520 --> 0:48:12.680
<v Speaker 1>behind the defense, but that came with Nick Foles in

0:48:12.760 --> 0:48:15.239
<v Speaker 1>the game. Once Gardner Minshew came in, d J Chark

0:48:15.320 --> 0:48:17.880
<v Speaker 1>saw only eight percent of the target chair. Chris Connley

0:48:17.960 --> 0:48:19.680
<v Speaker 1>is the one that I would actually rank ahead of

0:48:19.760 --> 0:48:22.480
<v Speaker 1>d J Chark, so twenty of the target chair. With

0:48:22.600 --> 0:48:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Gardner Minshew at quarterback, Chris Conley played forty four snaps

0:48:26.080 --> 0:48:28.440
<v Speaker 1>compared to d J Chark. Do Do Do Do To

0:48:28.520 --> 0:48:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Do only played forty one, So Chris Conny was on

0:48:31.719 --> 0:48:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the It was close, but they're the outside guys very

0:48:34.160 --> 0:48:36.640
<v Speaker 1>clearly for this offense. GDSD. Westbrook is in the slot.

0:48:36.719 --> 0:48:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Let me move on to the tight ends very quickly here.

0:48:39.000 --> 0:48:41.359
<v Speaker 1>Because there's two names that matter more than anybody else.

0:48:41.560 --> 0:48:44.120
<v Speaker 1>It's t J. Hockinson who proved his role in a major,

0:48:44.200 --> 0:48:47.000
<v Speaker 1>major way yesterday for Detroit. Although Frank has pointed out

0:48:47.040 --> 0:48:49.440
<v Speaker 1>he's owned in quite a few leagues. And then Darren Waller,

0:48:49.480 --> 0:48:51.640
<v Speaker 1>who we speculated over the weekend when this team cut

0:48:51.680 --> 0:48:54.319
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Brown, go pick a Hunter, run fro go, put

0:48:54.440 --> 0:48:56.520
<v Speaker 1>pick up Darren Waller. And I said to you yesterday

0:48:56.680 --> 0:48:59.160
<v Speaker 1>right after our show, is like, dido Darren Waller, And

0:48:59.200 --> 0:49:01.040
<v Speaker 1>You're like, well we we we have Jervis Kelsey. What

0:49:01.080 --> 0:49:02.840
<v Speaker 1>do we what do we ever need him for? It

0:49:02.960 --> 0:49:04.680
<v Speaker 1>was like, you want to stockpile talent. And I say

0:49:04.760 --> 0:49:07.359
<v Speaker 1>this to you, even if Travis Kelsey is your tight end,

0:49:07.560 --> 0:49:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you stockpile talent. You never know what will happen. Darren

0:49:10.600 --> 0:49:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Waller is talented and you saw it last night. Yeah.

0:49:13.200 --> 0:49:15.319
<v Speaker 1>And I will go as far as to say, hot

0:49:15.400 --> 0:49:17.279
<v Speaker 1>take here, I would take Darren Waller ahead of t

0:49:17.440 --> 0:49:20.200
<v Speaker 1>J Hockinson. I understand how amazing Hockinson looked over a

0:49:20.280 --> 0:49:23.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards, receiving nine targets, six receptions, scored a touchdown

0:49:23.800 --> 0:49:25.920
<v Speaker 1>as well. He was on the field for over seventy

0:49:26.280 --> 0:49:28.920
<v Speaker 1>of the snaps. But as I mentioned, the Lions have

0:49:29.120 --> 0:49:31.600
<v Speaker 1>four legitimate pass catchers on this team. I didn't even

0:49:31.640 --> 0:49:33.520
<v Speaker 1>mention carry On Johnson, Who's gonna catch the ball out

0:49:33.560 --> 0:49:36.480
<v Speaker 1>of the backfield, and they still want to establish the run.

0:49:36.520 --> 0:49:39.040
<v Speaker 1>They want to run the football there. Darren Waller, I

0:49:39.160 --> 0:49:41.800
<v Speaker 1>believe will be the number two target getter on the

0:49:41.840 --> 0:49:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Oakland Raiders. I think that he can have a Jared

0:49:43.920 --> 0:49:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Cook type season, which means that he's going to be

0:49:46.160 --> 0:49:49.000
<v Speaker 1>in consideration to be a top six, top five tight

0:49:49.120 --> 0:49:50.719
<v Speaker 1>end this season. So I think he's gonna be a

0:49:50.719 --> 0:49:53.439
<v Speaker 1>little bit more consistent than t J. Hockinson. I really

0:49:53.520 --> 0:49:55.799
<v Speaker 1>like the talent and what I saw of Hockinson. He's

0:49:55.800 --> 0:49:57.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna be on the field a ton because he's a

0:49:57.600 --> 0:50:00.760
<v Speaker 1>phenomenal blocker as well. But you why if you're asking

0:50:00.800 --> 0:50:04.759
<v Speaker 1>me between the two, I'm taking Darren Waller over t J. Hockinson. Yeah,

0:50:04.760 --> 0:50:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Buddy Frank with this is the Breast Friends Forever podcast,

0:50:08.040 --> 0:50:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and Uh, I am agrees. That's how I look at

0:50:11.200 --> 0:50:13.680
<v Speaker 1>it exactly. Uh. They're like he said, they're not going

0:50:13.719 --> 0:50:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to play the Cardinals every week. They've been brutal against

0:50:16.320 --> 0:50:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the tight end for as long as I can remember.

0:50:18.960 --> 0:50:21.920
<v Speaker 1>And the reality is his Waller is going to be

0:50:22.120 --> 0:50:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the second, you know, maybe the third, but he's proven

0:50:25.800 --> 0:50:28.520
<v Speaker 1>that that he can handle the workload. I feel like

0:50:28.640 --> 0:50:31.600
<v Speaker 1>this is like a redeption story for him, which you

0:50:31.640 --> 0:50:33.400
<v Speaker 1>know you can't like. I know, I'm maybe I'm the

0:50:33.480 --> 0:50:36.880
<v Speaker 1>master of the narrative. Uh and sometimes people wanted to

0:50:37.080 --> 0:50:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of the narrative. But look at the end,

0:50:38.560 --> 0:50:40.600
<v Speaker 1>these guys are human beings. This is a guy that

0:50:41.160 --> 0:50:43.600
<v Speaker 1>people are looking at as his rookie season, but I

0:50:43.640 --> 0:50:46.520
<v Speaker 1>think he's been in the for five years, um, but

0:50:46.640 --> 0:50:48.760
<v Speaker 1>it has been non existent because of drugs and alcohol.

0:50:49.000 --> 0:50:51.880
<v Speaker 1>He's turned his life around. He's sober, he's clean, he

0:50:52.200 --> 0:50:55.840
<v Speaker 1>is dedicated to football and the Raiders, and uh, I

0:50:55.920 --> 0:50:58.359
<v Speaker 1>think he's going to pay dividends this year. And he's

0:50:58.360 --> 0:51:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a crazy mismatched problem too. Reminds you of Evan Ingram, right.

0:51:01.520 --> 0:51:03.719
<v Speaker 1>He has a wide receiver coming out of college. He's

0:51:03.760 --> 0:51:06.280
<v Speaker 1>six ft six, He ran like a four point five

0:51:06.440 --> 0:51:08.960
<v Speaker 1>forty coming out and now he's been converted to tight end.

0:51:09.040 --> 0:51:12.440
<v Speaker 1>So just a mismatch problem. I take Darren Waller over Hawkinson. Greg.

0:51:12.600 --> 0:51:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I put the poll out before the show, and just

0:51:14.640 --> 0:51:16.840
<v Speaker 1>to give you perspective, how close this is a hundred

0:51:16.880 --> 0:51:20.480
<v Speaker 1>and eight votes in Marcus Marcy's Brown leads to votec

0:51:20.840 --> 0:51:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Darren Waller, Terry McLaurin, John Ross ninetent In terms of

0:51:26.920 --> 0:51:29.719
<v Speaker 1>which player would you prioritize most in the on the

0:51:29.760 --> 0:51:32.040
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire this week, I think ultimately it comes down

0:51:32.160 --> 0:51:33.880
<v Speaker 1>to what position you need. You need tight end, you

0:51:33.960 --> 0:51:36.200
<v Speaker 1>go Darren Waller over those wide receivers. Greg It. We're

0:51:36.200 --> 0:51:38.800
<v Speaker 1>streaming defenses here this week. The number one defense. He

0:51:38.840 --> 0:51:40.560
<v Speaker 1>wrote it down. Frankly, I agree with it. It's abuf

0:51:40.600 --> 0:51:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a little Bills taking on the New York Giants. Giants

0:51:42.560 --> 0:51:45.040
<v Speaker 1>can't do much of anything this past week. Bills were

0:51:45.080 --> 0:51:47.160
<v Speaker 1>solid against the Jets. I actually started the Bills against

0:51:47.160 --> 0:51:49.319
<v Speaker 1>the Jets last week knowing st against the Giants this week,

0:51:49.560 --> 0:51:52.040
<v Speaker 1>so that worked out well. Other defenses, you point out

0:51:52.280 --> 0:51:53.960
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco four night. There is actually people a lot

0:51:53.960 --> 0:51:57.600
<v Speaker 1>of points last week. That's uh touchdown return, uh interception

0:51:57.680 --> 0:52:00.239
<v Speaker 1>returning for a touchdown to pick six. They face his Adi.

0:52:00.840 --> 0:52:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Not bad, not a terrible match, not bad. Rago's versus

0:52:04.120 --> 0:52:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Chicago Mitchell Drowisky in that the offensive line did not

0:52:06.200 --> 0:52:08.320
<v Speaker 1>look good for the most part. Really like the Broncos

0:52:08.400 --> 0:52:10.840
<v Speaker 1>this week in Chicago. They're out there in most refence

0:52:10.880 --> 0:52:13.320
<v Speaker 1>game for VIC Fanjou, that's true. And you mentioned, of

0:52:13.360 --> 0:52:17.839
<v Speaker 1>course Carolina here against Tampa Bay. You wanna meagine quarterbacks quickly? Yeah,

0:52:17.840 --> 0:52:19.839
<v Speaker 1>I'll just throw it to Josh Allen if you play

0:52:19.840 --> 0:52:22.759
<v Speaker 1>in a one quarterback league and you need a streaming quarterback. Um.

0:52:23.239 --> 0:52:24.880
<v Speaker 1>He goes up against the New York Giants who just

0:52:24.920 --> 0:52:27.640
<v Speaker 1>got Tors for four hundred yards and four touchdowns. Josh

0:52:27.719 --> 0:52:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Allen actually led all quarterbacks in Week one with ten

0:52:30.520 --> 0:52:33.080
<v Speaker 1>rushing attempts only thirty eight rushing yards. It was a

0:52:33.160 --> 0:52:35.360
<v Speaker 1>mixed bag performance for Josh Allen. I realized that he

0:52:35.440 --> 0:52:38.279
<v Speaker 1>had four turnovers, but the completion percentage was very good

0:52:38.360 --> 0:52:40.359
<v Speaker 1>as well. I'm looking for Josh Allen to get back

0:52:40.400 --> 0:52:42.719
<v Speaker 1>on track in Week two against the Giants. I also

0:52:42.800 --> 0:52:45.399
<v Speaker 1>liked Sam Donald against the Browns and Derek Carr going

0:52:45.480 --> 0:52:47.799
<v Speaker 1>up against the Chiefs, who just made Gardner Minshew look

0:52:47.840 --> 0:52:52.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty damn good. He went five yards and two touchdowns.

0:52:52.080 --> 0:52:53.600
<v Speaker 1>They asked you yesterday, I gotta ask you a gett

0:52:53.640 --> 0:52:56.040
<v Speaker 1>a super flex? How much for Gardner Minshew. I'm not

0:52:56.120 --> 0:52:58.920
<v Speaker 1>throwing down much unless I was relying on Nick Foles

0:52:59.000 --> 0:53:00.799
<v Speaker 1>as my super flex core are back. In that case,

0:53:01.080 --> 0:53:03.320
<v Speaker 1>probably looking at five to seven. But if I just

0:53:03.400 --> 0:53:05.759
<v Speaker 1>need to back up, I'm probably only throwing one on

0:53:05.840 --> 0:53:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Gardner pretty zero dollar bin and a super flex legal

0:53:08.680 --> 0:53:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Josh Dobbs no e y, that'll do it for us.

0:53:13.239 --> 0:53:15.920
<v Speaker 1>He's Frank easy y. I'll be back tomorrow. These guys

0:53:16.000 --> 0:53:17.720
<v Speaker 1>both well, I'll try to pop in. I'll be around,

0:53:18.080 --> 0:53:19.960
<v Speaker 1>see what happens. I'm Grea. Thank you so much for

0:53:20.000 --> 0:53:21.640
<v Speaker 1>watching you good luck in your bitch tonight. We'll do

0:53:21.680 --> 0:53:28.759
<v Speaker 1>it all in tomorrow. We hope. Lose weight now. Got

0:53:28.840 --> 0:53:33.200
<v Speaker 1>to fat dot com lose that unwanted belly fat today

0:53:33.400 --> 0:53:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and get free information at fat one dot com. Fit

0:53:37.160 --> 0:53:39.840
<v Speaker 1>in the dress or pets or bathing suits you've always

0:53:39.920 --> 0:53:44.160
<v Speaker 1>wanted to. Go to fat dot com lose ten, twenty

0:53:44.320 --> 0:53:47.960
<v Speaker 1>or more pounds immediately go to fat one dot com

0:53:48.200 --> 0:53:51.000
<v Speaker 1>for free information on how you can lose weight. Go

0:53:51.160 --> 0:53:55.479
<v Speaker 1>to fat dot com fat one dot com. That's fat

0:53:56.440 --> 0:54:00.560
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Hi. I'm Keith O. I believe every child

0:54:00.640 --> 0:54:04.320
<v Speaker 1>is entitled to a complete and inspiring education. Music education

0:54:04.400 --> 0:54:08.200
<v Speaker 1>programs and our schools help kids learn, socialize, gang confidence,

0:54:08.280 --> 0:54:10.239
<v Speaker 1>and stay in school. But they need you will help

0:54:10.280 --> 0:54:13.760
<v Speaker 1>to survive. Mr Hollends Others Foundation give school music programs

0:54:13.840 --> 0:54:16.719
<v Speaker 1>the instruments they need to make this opportunity available to

0:54:16.840 --> 0:54:19.279
<v Speaker 1>every student who wants to play. If you will help,

0:54:19.400 --> 0:54:21.759
<v Speaker 1>if we can keep music alive in our schools and

0:54:21.840 --> 0:54:25.600
<v Speaker 1>give you all kids education they deserve. Visit mhopis dot

0:54:25.719 --> 0:54:28.239
<v Speaker 1>org now to find out how you can help. Money

0:54:28.320 --> 0:54:30.439
<v Speaker 1>Now one hundred is not a lender, broker, or agent

0:54:30.480 --> 0:54:32.680
<v Speaker 1>of any lender or financial advisor. We do not make

0:54:32.760 --> 0:54:34.960
<v Speaker 1>loans or credit decisions. You must be eighteen years or

0:54:35.040 --> 0:54:37.160
<v Speaker 1>older and a US resident to qualified. This is not

0:54:37.360 --> 0:54:39.719
<v Speaker 1>an offer or solicitation to lend. I want the money

0:54:39.800 --> 0:54:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Now one hundred dot com and got the five thousand

0:54:42.840 --> 0:54:46.600
<v Speaker 1>dollars I needed deposited in my account the next business day.

0:54:46.760 --> 0:54:49.439
<v Speaker 1>If you need money for any reason, help is here.

0:54:49.600 --> 0:54:52.239
<v Speaker 1>Go to money Now one hundred dot com and get

0:54:52.320 --> 0:54:54.919
<v Speaker 1>the money you need. Need to pay off credit card debt,

0:54:54.960 --> 0:54:57.719
<v Speaker 1>go to money Now one hundred dot com. Need your

0:54:57.760 --> 0:55:01.359
<v Speaker 1>car repair, need home improvement money? Visit money Now one

0:55:01.480 --> 0:55:05.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred dot com. If you need fast cash for any reason,

0:55:05.280 --> 0:55:08.480
<v Speaker 1>go to money Now one hundred dot com. Good, bad,

0:55:08.640 --> 0:55:11.120
<v Speaker 1>or no credit at all. Go to money Now one

0:55:11.200 --> 0:55:13.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred dot com. You could get up to five thousand

0:55:13.960 --> 0:55:16.759
<v Speaker 1>dollars as soon as the next business day. Go to

0:55:16.920 --> 0:55:19.760
<v Speaker 1>money now one hundred dot com on your phone, tablet,

0:55:19.880 --> 0:55:23.160
<v Speaker 1>or computer. Type in the address bar money now one

0:55:23.280 --> 0:55:27.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred dot com. That's money now the number one hundred

0:55:27.160 --> 0:55:31.680
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Are you single? Everyone single is looking for

0:55:31.800 --> 0:55:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the best day possible. Well, I found one website that

0:55:35.480 --> 0:55:38.160
<v Speaker 1>can find you the best date and it's called the

0:55:38.320 --> 0:55:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Best Date one hundred dot com. Just go there and

0:55:41.200 --> 0:55:43.360
<v Speaker 1>log in for your free trial and see if you

0:55:43.440 --> 0:55:46.840
<v Speaker 1>can find your new and maybe last best date. Remember,

0:55:47.000 --> 0:55:49.160
<v Speaker 1>you can find the best date of your life at

0:55:49.239 --> 0:55:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the Best Date one hundred dot com. That's the best

0:55:52.520 --> 0:55:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Date one hundred dot com. One more time, the Best

0:55:56.160 --> 0:56:00.839
<v Speaker 1>Date one hundred dot com. Do want to risk free

0:56:00.840 --> 0:56:03.040
<v Speaker 1>wagers up to one thousand dollars? If so, go to

0:56:03.120 --> 0:56:05.680
<v Speaker 1>points pet dot com forward slash grid, open yourself up

0:56:05.680 --> 0:56:08.400
<v Speaker 1>a points pet sports wagering account, enter the promo code grid,

0:56:08.520 --> 0:56:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and you'll get to risk free bets of up to

0:56:10.520 --> 0:56:13.520
<v Speaker 1>one thousand dollars. In addition to traditional betting, points bets

0:56:13.600 --> 0:56:16.400
<v Speaker 1>also offers its own betting concept where customers they are

0:56:16.400 --> 0:56:18.160
<v Speaker 1>rewarded by how much they win their beat, and that's

0:56:18.160 --> 0:56:20.439
<v Speaker 1>points pet dot com Forward slash Grid. Enter the promo

0:56:20.560 --> 0:56:22.759
<v Speaker 1>code grid and get your two risk free bets of

0:56:22.880 --> 0:56:25.920
<v Speaker 1>up to one thousand dollars. Today gambling problem called one

0:56:26.040 --> 0:56:28.359
<v Speaker 1>hun Gambler twenty went over New Jersey only eligibility restriction

0:56:28.400 --> 0:56:36.240
<v Speaker 1>supply see website for details. So what did what? Here's

0:56:36.280 --> 0:56:39.600
<v Speaker 1>what you miss on the BFTS. Let me start off

0:56:39.640 --> 0:56:42.719
<v Speaker 1>with Bronco's Raiders. People are raving about the Raiders. Now, Um,

0:56:43.040 --> 0:56:44.839
<v Speaker 1>is this one of those euing theory type of things.

0:56:44.920 --> 0:56:46.799
<v Speaker 1>E Y was like, all right, they lost Antonio Brown.

0:56:47.080 --> 0:56:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Now they're winning this not in spite of him, another

0:56:49.800 --> 0:56:52.400
<v Speaker 1>winning because he's gone and they're simply better. Yeah. Well,

0:56:52.400 --> 0:56:54.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, let's not get ourselves. Skill wise, they're not better.

0:56:54.960 --> 0:56:57.640
<v Speaker 1>But I do believe, uh, you know, sometimes just as

0:56:57.880 --> 0:57:01.279
<v Speaker 1>fantasy analysts or expert or whatever you wanna call us,

0:57:01.320 --> 0:57:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I called myself an enthusiast. Um for me, a thing

0:57:05.719 --> 0:57:08.960
<v Speaker 1>like that can can bring a locker room together. And

0:57:09.000 --> 0:57:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the reality is is football is a team sport. There's

0:57:12.120 --> 0:57:14.560
<v Speaker 1>not one guy that's going to to make or break

0:57:14.680 --> 0:57:17.959
<v Speaker 1>anyone team. He was the best player on the team.

0:57:18.080 --> 0:57:21.040
<v Speaker 1>You can't tell me any anything otherwise. But obviously it

0:57:21.120 --> 0:57:24.960
<v Speaker 1>was a massive distraction from day one. Um barely practiced,

0:57:25.760 --> 0:57:28.640
<v Speaker 1>was barely a training camp probably probably wasn't in a

0:57:28.680 --> 0:57:30.919
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of meetings. It wasn't really around. The guys

0:57:30.960 --> 0:57:32.720
<v Speaker 1>aren't going to miss him because most of them didn't

0:57:32.720 --> 0:57:35.960
<v Speaker 1>even know him. Um and and the Raiders look decent.

0:57:36.160 --> 0:57:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Tyrone Williams looked real good, Derek Carr looked, you know,

0:57:39.760 --> 0:57:42.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty efficient, better than I think that most anyone thought

0:57:42.920 --> 0:57:45.200
<v Speaker 1>he was going to be without Antonio Brown. So yeah,

0:57:45.200 --> 0:57:47.480
<v Speaker 1>it's it's exciting. The NFL is a better place when

0:57:47.480 --> 0:57:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders are a good football team. Yeah, I want

0:57:49.480 --> 0:57:51.320
<v Speaker 1>to piggyback off that as well. I don't think that

0:57:51.360 --> 0:57:53.480
<v Speaker 1>they're better off without Antonio Brown, but I actually think

0:57:53.520 --> 0:57:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Brown not being with the Oakland Raiders is better

0:57:56.960 --> 0:57:59.760
<v Speaker 1>for everybody involved on this team from a fantasy perspective,

0:57:59.760 --> 0:58:01.680
<v Speaker 1>because us the way that I'm looking at it, I

0:58:01.720 --> 0:58:04.800
<v Speaker 1>think that it's really concentrated amongst three people. It's really

0:58:04.880 --> 0:58:07.720
<v Speaker 1>just gonna be Tyroll Williams, Darren Waller, and Josh Jacobs.

0:58:08.040 --> 0:58:09.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's a good thing because the more that we

0:58:09.880 --> 0:58:13.800
<v Speaker 1>can concentrate fantasy production, the more opportunity that the easier

0:58:13.840 --> 0:58:16.360
<v Speaker 1>it is to predict moving forward weekend and week out.

0:58:16.800 --> 0:58:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Darren Waller played fifty five of fifty five offensive snaps.

0:58:20.560 --> 0:58:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Yesterday he played of the snaps, he looked really really good.

0:58:24.240 --> 0:58:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Clus seven of eight targets for seventy yards. Looks like

0:58:26.480 --> 0:58:29.320
<v Speaker 1>he is going to fill that Jared Cook roll from

0:58:29.320 --> 0:58:32.480
<v Speaker 1>a year ago looked explosive. Tyrol Williams same thing. He

0:58:32.560 --> 0:58:34.680
<v Speaker 1>had a few deep passes down the field. Didn't know

0:58:34.800 --> 0:58:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Derek Carr had it in him, but ultimately, you know

0:58:37.040 --> 0:58:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Tyro Williams. I said this yesterday when we were previewing

0:58:39.760 --> 0:58:42.720
<v Speaker 1>this game from a betting perspective on the fandal, hurry up, Greg. Honestly,

0:58:43.040 --> 0:58:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I might have, you know, downplayed Tyroll Williams talent, and

0:58:46.440 --> 0:58:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I said, I don't know that he can hang as

0:58:48.000 --> 0:58:50.680
<v Speaker 1>a wide receiver one in the NFL. Well, you know what,

0:58:50.800 --> 0:58:52.800
<v Speaker 1>in his first opportunity to do so, he looked pretty

0:58:52.840 --> 0:58:55.680
<v Speaker 1>damn good. Seven targets, six receptions over a hundred yards

0:58:55.720 --> 0:58:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and a touchdown. And Josh Jacobs man twenty three carries

0:58:59.280 --> 0:59:01.600
<v Speaker 1>that was second among all running backs in Week one,

0:59:01.840 --> 0:59:05.240
<v Speaker 1>behind only Marlon Mack. He had eight red zone carries Greg,

0:59:05.400 --> 0:59:08.240
<v Speaker 1>that led the NFL in Week one. So look, if

0:59:08.320 --> 0:59:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Josh Jacobs is getting twenty to twenty five touches weekend

0:59:10.680 --> 0:59:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and week out. He's going to be a high end

0:59:12.760 --> 0:59:15.720
<v Speaker 1>RB two, borderline RB one. Yeah, absolutely, Josh Jacobs, that

0:59:15.840 --> 0:59:19.000
<v Speaker 1>usage continues, he's going to absolutely be a mortal line

0:59:19.120 --> 0:59:21.480
<v Speaker 1>running back one of the season. I thought you said

0:59:21.520 --> 0:59:24.200
<v Speaker 1>it really nicely, Frank, that Antonio Bryant's all condensed. We

0:59:24.280 --> 0:59:26.280
<v Speaker 1>know what we're getting, which is nice with Tyrielle Williams,

0:59:26.640 --> 0:59:28.760
<v Speaker 1>with Darren Waller, with a lot of Josh Jacobs, and

0:59:28.880 --> 0:59:30.960
<v Speaker 1>that's that's it. And if you picked up Hunter Ren

0:59:31.040 --> 0:59:32.520
<v Speaker 1>for I think it's safe to say you could drop him.