WEBVTT - We're Drunk On Texans!

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 2>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from iHeartRadio, your weekly

0:00:10.480 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 2>source for the nation's best fantasy football advice, speculation, and

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 2>whatever stupid stuff they decided to drop into the show.

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Now here's your host, Paul Chargion.

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>It's Fantasy Football Weekly, another playoff edition. Very excited for

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the divisional round games. Joining me like you did last week,

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Brian Johnson. Brian, we could not have Look, I don't

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:39.840
<v Speaker 1>want to immediately come right out of the gate and

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>start with this. We couldn't have been hotter last week,

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:46.160
<v Speaker 1>could not have been hotter.

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean it's.

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Look, I don't know, Brian, but the way that the

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>angles provided on this show last week were frankly staggering

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>in their accuracy.

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 4>I'm assuming you're just talking about yours. I think mine

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 4>were pretty good. I'm trying to remember. I'm feeling better

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 4>about this week, though. I think we say it every year,

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:14.199
<v Speaker 4>this is the best weekend of football. It is the playoffs. YEP.

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>In the old days, we used to bring all our

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>employees out. This was this was the week. You go

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:21.319
<v Speaker 1>this week, you get the you get the four games,

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>you get great teams, you don't have any of the

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>wild card suckers that shouldn't be in there.

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 3>They all got bounced.

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, they got filtered out pretty easily last weekend.

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 4>I think this weekend, though, I think every underdog has

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:38.680
<v Speaker 4>a legitimate chance. Don't sleep on them, the Texans, the Chiefs,

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 4>of course, even the Packers. I mean, we're gonna get

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 4>into all these games, of course, and what am I

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 4>weaving out?

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Lastly, I think the reckoning comes for the Packers here.

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>If they came into last week Lucy Goosey, nothing to lose,

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>lots of intangibles going their way. I think I get

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the feeling it all comes it all comes back here.

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 4>We'll find out in the book. The last underdog, of course,

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 4>and the other chance, but the Packers and the Texans went.

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 4>There's something to be said about these red hot teams

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:11.919
<v Speaker 4>as a Giants fan, because that's how they've won their

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 4>most recent Super Bowl. So they have not been that

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 4>recent recently, but just they're hot. And then they go

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 4>face the number one seed who has rested their players

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 4>the last week of the regular season. They've been run

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 4>by of course, so they've been sitting around and the

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 4>other team's got a lot of momentum though, but we'll

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 4>get them to them all.

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's start with that one.

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:32.519
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore Houston, Right, So this is you know, Baltimore hasn't

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>played in a couple of weeks. Houston comes in off

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>a big win that was previewed on this very show.

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Signature win for these new look Texans, right, I mean,

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>this is no matter what happens here, they roll into

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>next year feeling great organizationally and for the first time

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:54.920
<v Speaker 1>in five years for Houston. I love I love what

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:57.080
<v Speaker 1>they've built. We talked, you know in the preseason.

0:02:57.120 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 3>I loved him.

0:02:57.600 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I banked the wrong guy in Damian Pierce, but we

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:02.079
<v Speaker 1>talked about how much how much better we thought that

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:05.519
<v Speaker 1>Houston would be and they got a real chance here.

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:08.360
<v Speaker 1>There's I'm gonna give you some angles, and the Prey

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>should mention the way we're gonna do this for the

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>all of these We're just gonna break down angles that

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>we like in all these games. We're not doing the

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>whole that all the letter grades for every single player,

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>but we've found we've unearthed angles that we love. I

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>want to start here, Brian Baltimore's best cornerback, Marlin Humphrey

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>has been ruled out of this game.

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 3>Humphrey.

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Humphrey missed the first three games of the season. You

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>want to hear what the Ravens gave up through the

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>air in those games. And keep in mind first three

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>games this season, they saw c. J. Stroud in his

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 1>very first NFL game. Then they saw Joe Burrow who

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>was playing hobbled at the time. Remember when Burrow couldn't

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>complete a pass more than ten yards downfield. They saw

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Joe Burrow during that stretch. And then they saw Anthony

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Richardson in his first then his third NFL start. Right,

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>they gave up just to the wide receiver position with

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Marlon Humphrey out, they gave up one hundred and eighty

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>four yards to wide receivers per game in that stretch.

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 1>That would have made them thirty first across a full season.

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>And so Nico Collins feels really good here.

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 3>What do you think?

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 4>Oh? For sure, you gotta love love Nico in this one.

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 4>And I just it's been a long time. I still

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 4>implementing tank Dell going down because it's imagine if they

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 4>tank Dell right now, I mean, yeah, yeah, yeah, it's

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 4>a huge boon. You'll get into a little more for

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:36.359
<v Speaker 4>Collins with Humphrey out, that's for sure.

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:39.039
<v Speaker 1>Singletary is the other angle I really like.

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Ravens are this great defense, right are they?

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 3>Mostly? Yeah? But you know where? You know where they're

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 3>really struggling against the run. Get this.

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Over the last five weeks, Ravens rank twenty ninth in

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards allowed, thirtieth in yards per carry five point

0:04:57.000 --> 0:05:00.559
<v Speaker 1>two yards per carry allowed for the Ravens over five games.

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I man's that's a pretty long sample size in the NFL.

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Since Week ten, five different backs have topped one hundred

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:12.599
<v Speaker 1>yards against Baltimore. And that's even when Baltimore has blowout wins.

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:15.239
<v Speaker 1>They're still getting run upon. Houston runs the ball twenty

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 1>six times per game. Singletary gets almost all of that work,

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 1>and since taking over the starting job in week nine,

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Singletary averaging seventy four percent of the carries. This could

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>you know his overline by the way, fifty six and

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 1>a half. This is not a betting show, but this

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:35.359
<v Speaker 1>is an opportunity for Devin Singletary.

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, sorry, I was. I wanted to look at his price,

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:42.919
<v Speaker 4>his DFS price. I won't list. I won't say the

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:44.920
<v Speaker 4>name of the site because we're not sponsored by them

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 4>or anything. But he's he's coming in too cheap. I

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:50.279
<v Speaker 4>know that. So I love Singletary from a DFS angle,

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:52.359
<v Speaker 4>and I'm gonna guess he's probably like the fifth or

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 4>sixth most expensive running back when there's not a lot

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 4>of running backs on the slate. So yeah, I like

0:05:57.160 --> 0:05:59.159
<v Speaker 4>Singletary in this one. I think people are just gonna

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 4>they'll see uh yeah, you know, middle of the pack,

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 4>fourteenth against So people are not gonna think it's a

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 4>smash like you pretty much waited out. It kind of

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 4>is a smash spot for a single time.

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 3>It is. It really is.

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:19.479
<v Speaker 4>The seventh he's under, he's priced lower than Edwards, Montgomery, Cook, Oh, Gibbs, Jones.

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's go to right to Gus Edwards and Well,

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I think Gus Edwards is going to struggle here in

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>this game. Last week we hit the under on the

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:30.159
<v Speaker 1>Browns number one runner against the Texans Jerome Ford.

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 3>So we're going back to the.

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Well and we're gonna go against Gus Edwards against this

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:41.040
<v Speaker 1>tough Houston run defense. Over the past five regular season games,

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the Texans ranked number one in yards per carry allowed,

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>three point two yards per carry. Then in the playoff

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:51.599
<v Speaker 1>game last week, they held Kareem Hunt and Jerome Ford

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to two point five yards per carry.

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 3>That's it.

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>And Gus Edwards he's a replacement level runner four yards

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:02.480
<v Speaker 1>per carry. He's the forty fourth ranked runner by Pro

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Football Focus. And you always get this rotation in Baltimore, right,

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:07.720
<v Speaker 1>so we know there's gonna be a bunch of Justice Hill,

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be some Dalvin Cook worked into this thing.

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>And since week twelve, Gus only averaging eleven carries per game.

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm anti Gus in this one. I don't think Gus

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>is gonna do much.

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he'll, like you said, he'll certainly gonna get some

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:25.119
<v Speaker 4>more more of the pass down back, but he still

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 4>gets some carries. But I think we're gonna see more

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 4>Dalvin Cook than expected in this one. I think we're

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 4>gonna see like five to eight carries, which is five

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 4>to eight carries too many for Dalvin Cook. I has

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 4>got a bad feeling that there's gonna force Dalvin Cook

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 4>into this game, which does not bode well for a

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 4>Gus Edwards hitting that over. So I'm with you on

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 4>the under there. I like that call after.

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 3>Fifteen and a half yards for the betters out there.

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Dalton Schultz could be in a tough spot. And let

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>me explain why. Kyle Hamilton is the star safety for

0:07:55.440 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens elite coverage safety. Here's how they deploy him.

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>If there's an opposing great, good slot receiver, the Ravens

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>will put Kyle Hamilton on that slot receiver. But with

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Tank Dell out, John Mitchie is not worthy of Kyle

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Hamilton's attention.

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:22.800
<v Speaker 3>But you know who is is Dalton Schultz. They're gonna roll.

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 1>So they will roll Kyle Hamilton over to good tight

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 1>ends if there isn't a great slot receiver. And I

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 1>think Dalton Schultz is sitting out a tough game against

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Hamilton.

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 4>And Brevin Jordan has proven himself to be quite a weapon.

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 4>Took a seventy six yard like screen pass essentially to

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 4>the house last week. He's a tight end for those

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:45.440
<v Speaker 4>that don't know, he might be more of a threat

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:50.079
<v Speaker 4>than Metchi and the the zombie corpse of Robert Woods,

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 4>who still gets trotted out there every now and again.

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, I like that that call as well. K

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 4>I get a quick DFS angle on this game. Yeah,

0:08:59.600 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 4>are you.

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, go for it anything, We're just having fun.

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:06.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well yeah, we can jump in and out of

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 4>each other's matchups. Here we should mention Mark Andrews was

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 4>ruled out or it's most likely will be ruled out

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 4>when it looked like he was coming back. Yeah, so everyone,

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 4>of course isay likely great for him. But Charlie Kohler,

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 4>if you just if you want to punt play a

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 4>tight end.

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Cohler again, what's your what's your thinking on this?

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 3>Help me understand?

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:31.719
<v Speaker 4>He has caught touchdowns, not many, but I mean he

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 4>gets run. Since Andrews has been down, he's the backup

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:39.440
<v Speaker 4>tight end. You know what's interesting about likely? Well, so

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:41.959
<v Speaker 4>Mark Andrews, We've talked about this so many times, was

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 4>the second tight end drafted by the Ravens. ZERI was drafted.

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:48.719
<v Speaker 4>They took Hayden Hurst in the first round, Andrews in

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 4>the second round. The Ravens took Charlie Kohler. I mean

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 4>it was last year, yeah, before they took Isaia Likely.

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 4>So like like Mark Andrews, isay likely was the second

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 4>tight end drafted by the team. He was drafted. But

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 4>Charlie Kohler, he's just gonna be a bare minimum punk

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 4>play tight and and everyone's going to be on Isaiah

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:09.319
<v Speaker 4>Likely as he should be as a great matchup. But

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:11.959
<v Speaker 4>it's a it's a he's a pun play and it's

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 4>a great pivot play too, or leverage play. I should say, well,

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:18.199
<v Speaker 4>while everyone's gonna be on Likely, Charlie Coler gets a

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 4>cheap touchdown and a good matchup. You never know. That's

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 4>all say.

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>He saw a huge up tick in usage last last game,

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 1>but that was the meaningless Week eight team game for

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 1>a team that already locked, already locked, So I don't,

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't.

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm not with you on the didn't play in that game,

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 4>though Likely did play. I was shocked to see Isaiah

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 4>Likely playing in that game and Justice Hill. I remember

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 4>being like, why are these guys out there? I know

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 4>they have a bye coming up.

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 3>And I think that was why. I think that was why.

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go over to Green Bay at San Francisco.

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll start it off by mentioning this. The Packers are

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:52.079
<v Speaker 1>known as a team that has a traveling fan base,

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>but the reports are that ninety seven percent of the

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>tickets are being held by held close by forty nine

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>ers fans, so it might not be the way game

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>advantage that the Packers often get when they travel.

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and I know it's not San Francisco anymore, but

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 4>that's probably better for the sack the Packer fans. San

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 4>Francisco underrated, fear for your safety city, go to away games.

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, like they throw they throw you out at

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the top of the stadium.

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 3>What are we talking about?

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:25.679
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, like like Philly Oakland used to be in that

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 4>territory back when the Raiders played in Oakland. And yeah,

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 4>San Francisco not a place you want to be flaunting

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 4>your the post colors. I didn't know that, okay, but

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:38.319
<v Speaker 4>now they're in like Santa Clara or whatever. But I

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 4>don't know the riff raft travels.

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 3>But anyway, it feels so suburban.

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 4>It's what like forty five minutes outside of San Francisco.

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:51.320
<v Speaker 4>But I don't know, just Packers fans. They'll be happy

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 4>they're not there, but maybe they may be sad they're

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 4>not there, because is this the matchup of the two

0:11:57.160 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 4>best offenses in the NFL? Charge And I'm gonna make

0:11:59.880 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 4>it for it right now. The Packers and the forty

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:06.679
<v Speaker 4>nine ers. Since Week nine, the most yards per play

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 4>Number one forty nine Ers number two the Packers. Wow,

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 4>the highest EPA per play Now. EPA stands for expected

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 4>points added. Not going to get too deep into it,

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 4>but at the highest level, EPA is a measure of

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 4>how well the team performs relative to expectations. So high

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 4>EPA very good for an offense. Number one since week

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:32.439
<v Speaker 4>nine forty nine Ers number two the Packers, Wow, we

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 4>got we got a shootout on our hands here. From

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:41.080
<v Speaker 4>an injury perspective, JayR Alexander, stand out corner for the Packers,

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 4>did reaggravate his ankle injury last week. He is questionable

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 4>to play. That would be huge if he misses this game,

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 4>so monitor his datus obviously would benefit Brandon Ayuk, Deebo

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 4>Samuel and company. AJ Dillon might make his return, but

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 4>no really cares. Aaron Jones looked incredible last week, Like.

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Wen he has for like three or four straight weeks

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 1>since They've basically opened up the throttle on him and

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>just let him let him play.

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:07.199
<v Speaker 3>Which is great.

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:10.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he's playing out of this world right now. And

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 4>nothing too major. On the forty nine er side, starting

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 4>linebacker Dre Greenlaw might not play with an Achilles injury,

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:20.839
<v Speaker 4>but he probably played. But anyway, back to the fantasy aspects,

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 4>I got a couple of dfs angles. I like here.

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 4>I like naked Jordan Love. Now, don't like your mind

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 4>wander too much there. Naked Jordan Love means you don't

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 4>pair him with anyone. You play Jordan Love and you

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 4>just roll him naked. You don't try it because, honestly,

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 4>how hard is it to predict who's going to catch

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:44.080
<v Speaker 4>a touchdown for the Packers these days? Right? Jaden Reid

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 4>didn't have a catch last week, and he was like

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 4>top ten in receptions in the NFL. You have to

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 4>catch last week.

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:52.199
<v Speaker 3>I think the bounce back is coming for real.

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I think they're gonna feed Read the ball, give him

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>some extra love this week to make up for you.

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 4>It is a good If I had to pick one,

0:13:58.280 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 4>it would be Read and people will be kind of

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 4>off of him because of the goosegg last week. But

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 4>I love Jordan Love. Price lower. The only quarterback price

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:09.560
<v Speaker 4>lower than Love right now is Baker Mayfield, which is

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:12.079
<v Speaker 4>criminal for a guy as hot as Love has been.

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 4>And the forty nine Ers have yielded the third most

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:18.199
<v Speaker 4>pass attempts this regular season. Since Week four, they've allowed

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 4>at least forty rushing yards indoor a rushing touchdown to

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 4>an opposing quarterback six times. That's a fair amount during

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 4>that span, and Love has rushed for at least thirty

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 4>yards end or a touchdown in six games. So long

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 4>story short, Love is a dual threat and this is

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 4>a great matchup for him. Games. Trip is going to

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 4>be in his favorite It's going to be neutral at best,

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 4>and Packers' offense is rolling, so I think people are

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 4>gonna they'll gravitate towards Love, but I think they're going

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 4>to try it to stack him up and that they

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 4>might whiff. So just rolling him out there solo is

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 4>how I would approach Love in this game. And a

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 4>cheap guy like in this matchup is Juwan Jennings, wide

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 4>receiver for the Packers. I'm sorry for the forty nine

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 4>Ers has n't played since Week fifteen, been out with

0:14:57.960 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 4>a concussion, but he is back. He's ready to go.

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 4>Jennings takes more than sixty percent of his snaps from

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 4>the slot, and since Week thirteen, Green Bay has allowed

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 4>the fifth most receiving yards and their top ten in

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 4>the most points per target allowed to slot receivers, So Jennings,

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 4>you know, everyone's going to be all excited about McCaffrey

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 4>of course, and Ayuk.

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 1>And Debo and running from the slot too.

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 4>Yes, Diebo runs from the slot as well, but technically

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 4>Jennings is the primary. But they move all these guys

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 4>all over the place. But overall, great matchup for the

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 4>forty nine ers wide receivers, and so the Jennings the

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 4>cheapest option and by the least rostered option as well.

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 4>So I like Jennings in this one. And what should

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 4>be a good game. We might see a little rain,

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 4>but nothing that you should have warrants any real concern

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 4>when it comes to weather terrorism.

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I like the passing game for San Francisco.

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 4>Here.

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay has played an incredibly soft schedule of opposing quarterbacks.

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>And when I was looking to try to find what's

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 1>happened when Green Bay has played at a purty level

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>of quarterback, so you know, above average quarterbacks, I counted

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>exactly five all year, including Dak last week. The average

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>game that they yielded two hundred and ninety five yards

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and two touchdowns. I feel like that's probably about the

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 1>right ballpark here for brock Perty sitting on a pretty

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 1>nice game and green Bay is getting rocked by tight ends,

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 1>including Jake Ferguson's three scores last week. But get this,

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>recent touchdowns allowed to the tight end positioned by green

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Bay mentioned Ferguson, Johnny munt co keif Noah Gray and

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Stone Smart.

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 3>Here comes George Kittle.

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm with you. And when Kittle goes off, he

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 4>goes off big, big time. Yeah. It feels like it

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 4>worth the shooting for the Kittle in this one.

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, agreed.

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go to our next matchup, which is

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's Bucks Lions.

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 3>Yes, Bucks Lions.

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>This would be the first game on Sunday, and they

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>they decided to go interestingly, you know, no, there is

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:04.879
<v Speaker 1>not an early game. There's the late afternoon start and

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 1>then there's an evening game on Sunday. My first angle

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of attack here is Rashad White, who I do not

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>like in this matchup. The Bucks don't run very well

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:22.639
<v Speaker 1>in general, but they do pass well. Meanwhile, the Lions

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>run defense is very good and they can't stop the pass.

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just everything says pass pass pass for the

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Bucks offense, including if you think the six and a

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 1>half points spread is legit. That means you've got negative

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:37.879
<v Speaker 1>game script working against Rashad White as well. Lions finished

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the season number one in rushing yards allowed, number three

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:45.440
<v Speaker 1>in yards per carry allowed, number two in rushes attempted,

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's going to be a problem for

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Rashad White here as well. Of the Lions' last nine opponents,

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 1>seven of them did not have a runner reach fifty

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 1>five yards, which by the way is Rashad White's over under.

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:03.200
<v Speaker 1>And the two that barely did that did go over

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>fifty five, they were like sixty two and sixty five.

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>So nobody really goes off against the Lions. I don't

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 1>like Rashad White here.

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I would be. It's all about it. I know

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 4>you're probably gonna get into it. It's all about the past,

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:18.639
<v Speaker 4>and Rashad White can catch passes, but you want to

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 4>have a somewhat solid matchup on the ground, and it's

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 4>it's not the Lions or not that forposing running backs.

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 3>They're not.

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk Kendall Vildor again. We identified him as

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>a huge problem in that Lion's secondary last week. We

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 1>thought we were like Pooka Nakula. Every way you can

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>find imaginable this week, Chris Godwin, let's talk it through

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:42.919
<v Speaker 1>and why not, Mike Evans.

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:44.480
<v Speaker 3>You might be wondering. Here's why.

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>The way the Lions handled last week, how they handled

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Poka Nakula with Kindall Vildor, is they hid Kindall Vildor

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:57.200
<v Speaker 1>wherever wherever Pooka Nakula was, Kendall Vildor hit the other

0:18:57.240 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 1>side of the field.

0:18:58.640 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 3>They wouldn't let him.

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Need Puka Nakua and Nicolea only ended up catching one

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of his many catches came against Kendallvildor, but it didn't

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 1>matter because Kendallvildor still gave up gigantic plays to to

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Atwell's long touchdown.

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:18.919
<v Speaker 3>Derek Allen, all these guys.

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:21.879
<v Speaker 1>Just pounding Kendallvildor last week, who ended up giving up

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 1>one hundred one yards and a touchdown in his coverage.

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 1>So what's gonna happen here is I believe they're gonna

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 1>make sure Kendallvildor is not on Mike Evans' side of

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:35.199
<v Speaker 1>the field. They're gonna take their chances with Kendallvildor on

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the other side of the field. And that's Chris Godwin,

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:42.639
<v Speaker 1>get this and we mentioned this last week regular season

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Kendallvildor giving up twenty two yards per reception, which is insane.

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Last week Kendallvildor gave up twenty five yards per reception.

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 1>You're giving up a quarter of the field every time

0:19:56.640 --> 0:19:57.679
<v Speaker 1>anybody throws at you.

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 3>Insane. So the Godwin, how's that?

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:09.400
<v Speaker 4>The revolving kill door, the revolving killed door. I like it.

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 3>I like it nicely done.

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield sitting out a big game because I don't

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:17.160
<v Speaker 1>think they're gonna run well, They're gonna pass with relative ease.

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:22.119
<v Speaker 1>Here Baker didn't score in the earlier matchup between these teams,

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:23.640
<v Speaker 1>but I don't care this way back in week six.

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 3>They're just different teams now.

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I like Godwin's matchup and Mike Evans matchup is against

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Cam Sutton. He's got six inches and fifty pounds on

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Sutton and Sutton got roasted, roasted by Pokinakua. He's allowed

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in three of his past four games. Baker's thrown

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 1>multiple touchdowns in six of the past seven, ten of

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the past thirteen. And get the yardage numbers the Lions

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 1>are giving up through the air. Last four weeks, four

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred eleven yards, three hundred and forty five yards, three

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred and ninety six yards, and three hundred and sixty

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 1>seven passing yards.

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean, they're just getting scorched.

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:01.879
<v Speaker 1>Baker may sitting on what I think is going to

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:04.879
<v Speaker 1>be a very good game. My friend, Miss Mitch Moss

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and I were texting, how about this bet to lead

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:13.159
<v Speaker 1>the weekend in passing yards Baker Mayfield plus seven hundred

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and fifty.

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:18.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I like that. I like that bet. I mean, yeah,

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 4>it's all there, it's all on paper. Why this this

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 4>should be a great game for Baker. Want to hear

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 4>my one concern and please, it's kind of out outside

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 4>the lines, and it's just I know, we share that

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:35.440
<v Speaker 4>we are in agreement with this. It pertains to coordinators

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:40.639
<v Speaker 4>interviewing for jobs while they're still coordinating in the playoffs. Yeah.

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 4>So Dave Cannet, the offensive coordinator for the Bucks, the

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:49.360
<v Speaker 4>quarterback whisperer, by the way, brought Geno Smith back to life. Yeah,

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 4>doing the same with Baker Mayfield. He's been interviewing this week.

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 4>I think Carolina was one. So that's what I just

0:21:56.880 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 4>I just hate how they do that, and it's distracting

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:02.959
<v Speaker 4>and I don't think big and Maville is gonna hit

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:04.359
<v Speaker 4>his unders because of that. But I just wanted to

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 4>throw that out there that I just had to air

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:12.879
<v Speaker 4>my grievances on the coordinators interviewing while they're preparing for

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 4>a huge playoff game.

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I can see that. I think there might be a

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:18.199
<v Speaker 1>little something there. By the way, have you noticed this?

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 1>These teams are interviewing an absurd number of candidates. Panthers

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 1>have had eleven interview requests that they put out, Chargers,

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>thirteen Falcons, eleven, Titans, ten Seahawks seven these they're staggering

0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>numbers of interviews. It's I don't ever remember teams doing

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 1>this many interviews before.

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:48.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's crazy. And even regardless of the just going

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 4>back to the coordinators, the coach is still coaching. I

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:55.680
<v Speaker 4>know teams with vacancies need a head coach immediate as

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 4>soon as possible, but how can it just not be

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:03.639
<v Speaker 4>the rule, the law, whatever, that you're still your team's

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 4>still alive, you're not interviewing. You gotta wait, and the

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 4>other the team's gotta wait. I'll get you that bad.

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 4>They can wait two weeks, three weeks from now. Tops.

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 3>I like this, it's a two edged sword.

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 1>If you you know, these are the most coveted These

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:21.440
<v Speaker 1>playoff coaches are the most coveted ones out there, right,

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 1>And if you've got to wait a month only to

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 1>find out that that coordinator doesn't even want to talk

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>to you, or it's a bad fit, or you don't

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 1>like that guy after all, and you've waited a month

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>for that team to get through the Super Bowl or

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:37.680
<v Speaker 1>get through the conference championship games, that's it's too long

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:39.679
<v Speaker 1>to sit, to sit and not know your coach is

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:40.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be I think.

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:43.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I know, it'll never change for those reasons. I'm

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 4>just still.

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 3>Let's go to Chief Spills. Let's wrap it up with

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 3>Chief Spills.

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 4>Uh, this to me is outside.

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 1>This is the new Manning versus Brady. In terms of

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:58.200
<v Speaker 1>non divisional rivalries, Manning Braiding Brady was the best there

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 1>was for about a decade. Now it's Josh Allen Patrick

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:04.359
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes Bill's Chiefs is the best non divisional rivalry going

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 1>in football. And for the first time we get to

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:11.399
<v Speaker 1>see Patrick Mahomes with an inconsistent offense on the road,

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think the.

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 3>Bills are going to knock him out of the playoffs.

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:18.960
<v Speaker 4>Right here. Yeah, first time we will see Mahomes on

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:21.159
<v Speaker 4>the road. Like you said, in the playoffs, Buffalo two

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:24.880
<v Speaker 4>and a half point favorite, forty five point over under,

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 4>which is not a lot for these two teams, you

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 4>know in recent past. I know it's going to be

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:35.239
<v Speaker 4>cold in Buffalo and all that, but the defenses much improved, well,

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:38.640
<v Speaker 4>at least on the Kansas City side, probably the best

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 4>defense Patrick Mahomes has ever played with in his career.

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 4>But back to the offense, of course. For the Chiefs,

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:50.160
<v Speaker 4>Canarius Tony has been limited this week as questionable to play.

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 4>Don't really care. Sky Moore could make his return.

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't care.

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:56.120
<v Speaker 4>We don't care about that. Gabe Davis has been ruled out.

0:24:56.640 --> 0:24:58.880
<v Speaker 4>You kind of have to care about that, especially because

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 4>he had a Easton showing the last time. He's too

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 4>met in the playoffs a couple of years ago.

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 3>Turned out okay, yes, two.

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 4>Hundred yards and four touchdowns, but he has been ruled out.

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 4>So again, we'll see a bump in usage for Khalil's

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 4>here alongside Stefan Diggs, who was just a I don't know.

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:19.639
<v Speaker 4>We'll talk about digs in a second, but uh, you

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 4>gotta like all the all the Bills in this matchup

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 4>outside of Diggs. Really you'll be facing the Jerry as

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 4>sneed the guy like most from a DFS perspective, and

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:32.400
<v Speaker 4>again it's he's a cheaper option, almost a pun play.

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 4>Is Dawson Knox, who I know, he's technically the backup

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 4>tight end to Dalton Kincaid, but Kincaid is more of

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 4>a wide receiver. He only takes twenty percent of his

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:48.880
<v Speaker 4>snaps in line, and quite honestly, with with Gabe Davis

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:52.919
<v Speaker 4>out and with whatever Stefan Diggs is right now, the

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:56.120
<v Speaker 4>Bills need Kincaid to step up as a wide receiver

0:25:56.760 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 4>in this matchup. So so back to Knox. He's Gordon

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:03.399
<v Speaker 4>back to back games. These teams played in Week fourteen.

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:06.240
<v Speaker 4>By the way, it was a twenty seventeen win by

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 4>Kansas City, so not a lot of fireworks in that one.

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 4>But Knox had three catches thirty six yards. Not great,

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:16.119
<v Speaker 4>but we take that for as a floor with his

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:19.920
<v Speaker 4>bare minimum price tag essentially, but Knox scored against the

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:23.119
<v Speaker 4>Chiefs last year. He also had playoff success last year.

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:24.880
<v Speaker 4>Three catches twenty yards in a touchdown.

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, wasn't there last year?

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 4>He was m kincaid. Still he's gonna be operating more

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 4>as a wide receiver. My point there is he's had

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 4>three strong playoff games knocks in a row now, and

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:38.879
<v Speaker 4>so you know Josh Allen, he looks his way in

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 4>the playoffs. And the Chiefs allowing five catches forty five

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 4>yards per game to opposing tight ends in the regular season,

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 4>so we take that all day. That's a double digit

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 4>PPR points. So I like Knox here, and most people

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 4>are going to be obviously gravitating towards the Sam Laportas,

0:26:55.040 --> 0:27:00.680
<v Speaker 4>the George Kittles, Travis Kelcey's like the three best option

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 4>today end just on you know a name basis right now,

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:06.639
<v Speaker 4>which is which is crazy? But I like Knox and

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:09.919
<v Speaker 4>you gotta love James Cook. I think he's just an

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 4>auto play. I think you got to use him if

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 4>you're like in a one and done pool. Since Buffalo

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 4>fired offensive coordinator, well former offensive coordinator Ken Dorsey after

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:25.440
<v Speaker 4>Week eleven, the Bills have become the most run heavy

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 4>offense in the NFL. Love it. So from weeks one

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 4>to ten with Dorsey as OC, they're running the ball

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 4>thirty six percent of the time. And now from from

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 4>weeks eleven up until now through the wild Card game

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 4>with Joe Brady as OC nearly fifty percent one percentage,

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:45.199
<v Speaker 4>the highest in the league since Week eleven, which is

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:49.160
<v Speaker 4>which is insane to think with a quarterback like Josh Allen.

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 4>And since week thirteen, Kansas City has allowed the twelfth

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 4>highest explosive run rate and the sixth lowest stuff rate.

0:27:57.160 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 4>So Cook it in a smash spot in this one.

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 4>It's gonna be another cold weather game. That doesn't mean

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:04.120
<v Speaker 4>they're not gonna be throwing the ball. But I love

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 4>Cook here. I think he's just probably my outside of McCaffrey,

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 4>might be my favorite running back. Plates Yeah, love him.

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 1>When these teams met a few weeks ago, he averaged

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 1>six yards a carry, and so I I love it.

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 1>By the way, he also hammered the Chiefs through the air.

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 1>He had five catches eighty three yards through the air

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 1>in the previous matchup. But I'm with you, I think

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the I think rushing yards are absolutely here for Cook

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:34.399
<v Speaker 1>sitting on a potentially very good game, and I like

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I like him a lot. I want to talk for

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 1>a second about the Bill's secondary, which basically from the

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 1>point of the Rasul Douglas trade. This Bill secondary has

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 1>been terrific, and I think Mahomes is sitting up potentially

0:28:48.080 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 1>a really bad game. Get this, here's the last six

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 1>games yards allowed. Well, let me give you touchdowns allowed

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 1>by the Bills. By the Bills passing touchdowns allowed by

0:28:56.640 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the Bills to the last six games brian one zero, zero, zero,

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 1>one and one.

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 3>That's it.

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 1>And one of those ones was the Patrick Mahomes was

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes in the previous matchup. It is a This

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 1>is a really tricky spot and his best wide out

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Rashi Rice. He's got a tough matchup against Tarreon Johnson

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:22.719
<v Speaker 1>in the slot. Johnson's last ten games zero touchdowns allowed,

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven yards allowed per game.

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 3>That's it.

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the passing game is gonna struggle for Kansas City,

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and I wonder if you see it the same.

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 4>Way, Yeah, just like it's a better matchup on the ground,

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 4>like it, you know, the best way to attack both

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 4>of these defenses is on the ground. So yeah, I

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 4>like the checko more than anyone in the past game

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:46.480
<v Speaker 4>for the Chiefs, and it's pretty much the same way

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 4>on the on the the same way on the other

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 4>side with the Bills with Cook and the pass game there,

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:53.960
<v Speaker 4>I just prefer that the ground game in this one.

0:29:53.960 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 4>I think we're gonna see a lot of running in

0:29:56.560 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 4>this game, which people aren't gonna be expecting, but I

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 4>think it's we're going to be seeing.

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 1>So do you think there's gonna be uh fewer, fewer

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 1>points to be had in general in this game Chief Spills.

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Like I said, I mean, forty five, that's that's

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 4>pretty low, even considering, you know, the cold weather. If

0:30:18.000 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 4>this game was being played last year in the same weather,

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 4>the over under would be over fifty easy. I feel

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 4>like I think you know, Vegas knows that the Chiefs

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 4>defense is legit, and the Bills, despite losing multiple key

0:30:31.800 --> 0:30:35.720
<v Speaker 4>members throughout the season, Tredavious way A corner, Matt Mulano,

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 4>they're they're basically their leader on defense, linebacker, like you said,

0:30:41.440 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 4>their lights out, especially their secondary. So whether factored in

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 4>Taylor Swift factored in, how she factors in, but she's

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 4>always a factor. Yeah, it's not going to be the

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 4>shootout that people again really have come to expect when

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 4>these two teams meet up. But wrong, you never know.

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the Bills are so Bills are gonna rock them.

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I think this they're gonna get out years of pent

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 1>up frustration. I think this is the you know, this

0:31:08.880 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 1>is their big chance to get some closure on the

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 1>collapse of of two years ago with h with the

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable finish that they that they had to endure.

0:31:20.520 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 3>That was two years ago, right, yeah, yeah, it was

0:31:24.200 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 3>two years ago.

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, it's just supertime. Yeah it is double overtime.

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I think that's right. I think that's right. Yeah.

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:35.120
<v Speaker 3>So there that's uh. Any other thoughts on that game.

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:39.800
<v Speaker 4>No, I'm with you. I think the Bills roll them.

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:43.160
<v Speaker 4>Honestly think the Chiefs are my my least favorite underdog

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 4>to win this weekend. I like the Texans, the Bucks,

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:50.480
<v Speaker 4>and the Packers chances even more than the Chiefs this week,

0:31:50.760 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 4>which is crazy because they're the defending Super Bowl champions.

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:56.080
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, finally playing on the road.

0:31:56.040 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 3>And they've played it.

0:31:56.840 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 1>They've been so inconsistent with their play and just last

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 1>week Miami for can mailed it in.

0:32:02.680 --> 0:32:03.800
<v Speaker 3>No interest in winning.

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:06.920
<v Speaker 1>That was a primrose path game for them in.

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:07.959
<v Speaker 3>The arctic conditions.

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 1>And I don't I just don't think it's I don't

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 1>think it's coming again.

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I know you don't watch Hard Knocks. I think

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 4>you still should go back and watch because this in

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 4>season one was overall one of the best seasons I think. Okay,

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:24.920
<v Speaker 4>but went back and watched the last one, which focuses

0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:27.240
<v Speaker 4>around this game, which is awesome. Just the behind the

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 4>scenes of them prepping for the cold. Yeah, but of

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 4>course they show them prepping all week and Hindsight's twenty twenty.

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 4>But just watching it, you could just sense they knew

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 4>they were gonna get their ass kicks.

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 3>Didn't seem that way.

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:43.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, just like they're trying to hype themselves up and

0:32:43.320 --> 0:32:46.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, give me each other. It is like, you

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 4>know it, you know you're not gonna win this game.

0:32:49.160 --> 0:32:50.520
<v Speaker 4>It seemed that way, no chance.

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm with you.

0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 4>The exciting about uh yeah, I was gonna take a

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:00.840
<v Speaker 4>moment to a lament Sports Illustrated. Yeah, we shaid shutting

0:33:00.880 --> 0:33:02.200
<v Speaker 4>its doors. Have you heard? Yeah?

0:33:02.200 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I did some friends in the industry that were, you know,

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 1>they still had a fairly bare bones fantasy operation going

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:13.760
<v Speaker 1>at Sports Illustrated. That looks like it's probably done. Some

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:16.400
<v Speaker 1>of our friends in the industry maybe looking for work.

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:19.200
<v Speaker 1>They've you know, they had a show on sirius. I mean,

0:33:19.240 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's there's it's really sad. I mean, you know,

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:24.640
<v Speaker 1>you and I've got several years between us, But when

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I was growing up, and I'm sure for at least

0:33:26.520 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 1>some of your childhood, same man. You like, the cover

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:32.200
<v Speaker 1>of Sports Illustrated was a signature thing. That was huge,

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 1>that was a that was a big, big deal, and

0:33:35.240 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 1>they were a bastion of journalistic integrity. Then they never

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:45.160
<v Speaker 1>they never got into a What killed them, terrible decisions

0:33:45.160 --> 0:33:47.560
<v Speaker 1>that killed them in the two thousand range was never

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:51.920
<v Speaker 1>really going online, never really putting a meaningful effort into

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 1>their online destination, and then secondarily ignoring fantasy. Sports Illustrated

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 1>in the late nineties early aughts, if they had wanted

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to own fantasy, they could have owned fantasy.

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:08.399
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I remember at one point they started putting maybe

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 4>like a page dedicated to it. But yeah, they should

0:34:12.120 --> 0:34:18.440
<v Speaker 4>have had basically the whole magazine every week almost that.

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:21.399
<v Speaker 4>I think someone thought of something like that.

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Yes, Unfortunately, ye, sorry, somebody, Fortunately, some other some other

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:29.640
<v Speaker 1>people decided to take the void in fantasy content when

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Sports Illustrated wasn't wasn't going to dabble in something so dubious.

0:34:34.400 --> 0:34:37.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah I was. I was a subscriber for for many years.

0:34:37.280 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 4>I have the phone, oh yeah, football phone. And I

0:34:43.360 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 4>was at the age when I don't know how long

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:49.320
<v Speaker 4>it was around, but when Sports Illustrated for Kids started,

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:52.720
<v Speaker 4>that was right in my wheelhouse. That was a great,

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 4>a great magazine and it bothers me to this day.

0:34:57.000 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 4>So every Sports Illustrated for Kids magazine would have nine

0:35:01.640 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 4>cards in it, yeah sports card, and it would be

0:35:04.040 --> 0:35:06.000
<v Speaker 4>like a sheet you could rip out and then you know,

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:08.719
<v Speaker 4>they were all perforated, so you could peel each card

0:35:08.719 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 4>out to make an individual card. I would just peel

0:35:12.160 --> 0:35:15.080
<v Speaker 4>out the sheet and just put them like in a stack.

0:35:15.960 --> 0:35:18.440
<v Speaker 4>I did this for two or three years because I

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:21.719
<v Speaker 4>wasn't into Sports Illustrated for Kids for too long. But

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:24.200
<v Speaker 4>I know I did it in this era now where

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm seeing these cards individually being sold for thousands of dollars.

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:32.239
<v Speaker 4>Like there's Tiger Woods and like a Serena Williams. I

0:35:32.280 --> 0:35:34.600
<v Speaker 4>don't think I would have the Serena Williams one, or

0:35:34.640 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 4>maybe not even the Tiger Woods. I was probably too

0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:38.400
<v Speaker 4>old for that. But like there's a Jordan one that

0:35:38.440 --> 0:35:40.040
<v Speaker 4>I know I would have had, and I talked to

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:42.360
<v Speaker 4>some people in the industry. I'm like, well, if I

0:35:42.400 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 4>had the sheet that, like, you know, if it was

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:46.520
<v Speaker 4>in the sheet and not just the card, They're like,

0:35:47.120 --> 0:35:50.799
<v Speaker 4>you had that, Yeah, Like you don't want to know

0:35:50.840 --> 0:35:56.120
<v Speaker 4>how much that is worth something. Yeah, anyway, pour one

0:35:56.120 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 4>out for Sports Illustrated. My grandpa used to actually renew

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:02.560
<v Speaker 4>my subscription every year my birthday.

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:03.840
<v Speaker 3>That's a great gift.

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I love the magazine subscription as a gift because every

0:36:09.120 --> 0:36:12.040
<v Speaker 1>time the magazine shows up, you're you're getting you're giving

0:36:12.080 --> 0:36:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and getting a new gift, which I like, you know,

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:17.360
<v Speaker 1>whether it's every week or every month or whatever. And

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:20.319
<v Speaker 1>now heck, it's uh, it's almost downright quaint to give

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the gift of the printed word.

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:25.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, admittedly, I mean this this ended a couple of

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:27.919
<v Speaker 4>years ago as my grandpa did pass but the last

0:36:28.000 --> 0:36:30.600
<v Speaker 4>few years I didn't even really open them.

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:32.880
<v Speaker 3>That's sad.

0:36:34.800 --> 0:36:39.120
<v Speaker 4>I still did open the swimsuit issue though, you.

0:36:39.080 --> 0:36:39.839
<v Speaker 3>Know, so I did.

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Uh back a month ago when s I got embroiled

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:45.800
<v Speaker 1>into a controversy because they were using a I authors

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and faking it and not telling people they were and they.

0:36:48.680 --> 0:36:51.400
<v Speaker 3>Were looked like they were real people.

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:54.560
<v Speaker 1>They had they had they had created bios for the

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:58.759
<v Speaker 1>AI and it was it was super sleazy, honestly, And

0:36:58.800 --> 0:37:00.239
<v Speaker 1>so we were talking about a little bit it and

0:37:00.280 --> 0:37:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I was talking to listeners about it. It was all

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:05.640
<v Speaker 1>swimsuit issue. Everybody's like, they all love the swimshe I'm like,

0:37:05.680 --> 0:37:07.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, what are your favorite memories of sports.

0:37:07.520 --> 0:37:11.239
<v Speaker 3>Illustrated swimsuit issue? Swimsuit issue? Remember this? You know it's

0:37:11.280 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 3>this woman, this woman, this one.

0:37:13.640 --> 0:37:14.000
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

0:37:14.120 --> 0:37:17.040
<v Speaker 3>That's what it got reduced to. I guess who's.

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:22.439
<v Speaker 4>Your your all time swimsuit issue cover girl?

0:37:22.520 --> 0:37:22.839
<v Speaker 3>I didn't.

0:37:22.840 --> 0:37:23.600
<v Speaker 4>I don't know. I don't.

0:37:23.600 --> 0:37:25.600
<v Speaker 3>I can't even name one. It's just not my thing.

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:26.520
<v Speaker 4>Really, yeh.

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:29.120
<v Speaker 3>Was Kathy Ireland on it one year?

0:37:29.600 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, Kathy Ireland, she was in all that. That

0:37:31.600 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 4>might have been That was probably my that might have

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:37.279
<v Speaker 4>been my number one month answer Kathy Ireland. I mean

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:43.640
<v Speaker 4>Sidney c Sidey Crawford was on the swimsuit issue, wasn't she.

0:37:45.000 --> 0:37:48.279
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, I don't know. I'm Bland. But like

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:53.319
<v Speaker 4>Ti Pirate Banks, I can like I can picture them.

0:37:53.320 --> 0:37:55.400
<v Speaker 4>All the names are all envisioning, they're all they're all

0:37:55.440 --> 0:37:57.640
<v Speaker 4>going away. But Kathy Ireland that would be my one

0:37:57.680 --> 0:38:00.120
<v Speaker 4>O one. I used to have to rush home on

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:00.600
<v Speaker 4>swim set.

0:38:00.840 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, just stopp now to do. I don't

0:38:04.520 --> 0:38:04.920
<v Speaker 3>need to know.

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:06.640
<v Speaker 4>I had to beat my mom to it because she would.

0:38:06.800 --> 0:38:08.839
<v Speaker 4>My mom would get issue and she'd like rip out

0:38:08.840 --> 0:38:10.040
<v Speaker 4>the pictures that were.

0:38:10.320 --> 0:38:13.400
<v Speaker 3>Not good for her. That's actual parenting.

0:38:13.480 --> 0:38:16.080
<v Speaker 4>I like it. Screw that. I didn't want my swim

0:38:16.080 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 4>set issue sensor just back then.

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:18.160
<v Speaker 3>I bet you did.

0:38:18.280 --> 0:38:21.240
<v Speaker 4>I had to race home to get those good stuff.

0:38:21.480 --> 0:38:23.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, Thanks for listening to those that had just

0:38:23.600 --> 0:38:25.919
<v Speaker 1>put up with five minutes of insanity at the end here.

0:38:25.960 --> 0:38:29.279
<v Speaker 1>But we appreciate you listening to Fantasy Football Weekly. We'll

0:38:29.280 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 1>be breaking down two games next week.

0:38:32.560 --> 0:38:32.880
<v Speaker 3>That's it.

0:38:33.000 --> 0:38:34.359
<v Speaker 4>Who are they going to be? Who are they going

0:38:34.440 --> 0:38:36.200
<v Speaker 4>to be? What are your official predictions?

0:38:36.600 --> 0:38:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Niners, Niners, Lions, Bill's Texans. I'm gonna go with my

0:38:48.160 --> 0:38:50.959
<v Speaker 1>heart all year. I've been on Houston. I'm not giving

0:38:51.040 --> 0:38:51.399
<v Speaker 1>up now.

0:38:53.160 --> 0:38:54.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm kind of on the same path. I'm picking an

0:38:55.000 --> 0:38:59.840
<v Speaker 4>upset both sides. I'm going Packers to shock the world. Packers, Lions,

0:39:01.640 --> 0:39:06.800
<v Speaker 4>then the Ravens, Bills. My upsett is the pack.

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah and click, I think you outlined it beautifully. Packers

0:39:10.040 --> 0:39:12.399
<v Speaker 1>offense has been great, it's the defense. I just think

0:39:12.440 --> 0:39:17.839
<v Speaker 1>that secondary has been so under attacked. And I just

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I can't see Kyle Shanahan not pounding Keyshawn Nixon and

0:39:24.880 --> 0:39:27.759
<v Speaker 1>Valentine Alexander. And not only that, but they need the

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:30.400
<v Speaker 1>right version of Alexander. They need the good version to

0:39:30.440 --> 0:39:33.000
<v Speaker 1>show up, which is always hit and miss.

0:39:34.880 --> 0:39:36.400
<v Speaker 4>I know, I know it's a long shot. They're nine

0:39:36.440 --> 0:39:38.279
<v Speaker 4>and a half point underdogs at Green Bay, But.

0:39:38.960 --> 0:39:41.719
<v Speaker 3>Isn't he nine and a half under as well? I

0:39:41.760 --> 0:39:42.120
<v Speaker 3>think so?

0:39:42.520 --> 0:39:45.960
<v Speaker 4>Is that that probably I wouldn't be shocked that's in

0:39:46.000 --> 0:39:46.959
<v Speaker 4>that ballpark? I think.

0:39:47.520 --> 0:39:50.239
<v Speaker 1>All right, we'll see, we'll see how which ones we

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:52.600
<v Speaker 1>get right here, we'll find out. Look forward to talk

0:39:52.600 --> 0:39:53.680
<v Speaker 1>to you next week, everybody.

0:39:53.760 --> 0:39:54.520
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for listening.

0:39:54.760 --> 0:39:58.359
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly is a production of iHeartRadio. For more

0:39:58.400 --> 0:40:02.200
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from iHeart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:40:02.400 --> 0:40:04.400
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.