WEBVTT - Travis Kavulla Explains Why Electric Bills Shot Up

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots podcast.

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:23.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joe and.

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 2>Tracy, it's been too long since we've done an electricity

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 2>great episode.

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 3>I've been avoiding it on purpose, Joe. I, in all honesty,

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 3>I really find this particular market slash issue a difficult

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 3>one to talk about because it's impossible to talk about

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 3>it in broad terms, and I know on odd thoughts

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 3>we try to avoid doing that generally, but even in

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 3>an hour long podcast, even with multiple episodes, we could

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 3>do an episode for each electricity market in the United

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 3>States and still only scratch the surface, right, Like you

0:00:57.240 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 3>have to talk about regulated monopolies versus competitive markets, and

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 3>then you have to talk about what's an independent system

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 3>operator and what's like, well, what's Texas? That's all about Texas?

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 2>What is Texas?

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 3>What is Texas?

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 2>What is Texas? Would be its own episode, but yeah,

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 2>that's right. You ask a question to a grid expert

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:18.400
<v Speaker 2>and their first thing and they're like, wait, are you

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 2>talking about a competitive market or regulated market here?

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 3>That's always a meter basis or unmetered or I don't know.

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, behind the meter, et cetera. Yeah, But anyway, obviously

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 2>with the sort of Ian Dunning who we recently had

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Hudson River Trading, he was talking about how, you know,

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 2>their main constraint is power and that's just a small,

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 2>a very small in the grand scheme of things user

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:45.119
<v Speaker 2>of AI services. We're talking about using AI and high

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 2>frequency trading. And he said even more than chips that

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 2>the power constraints are their biggest constraints right now. And

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 2>so I do think that one thing we have to

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 2>think about is, especially how long can this AI boom

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 2>go on? Is what's it going to get all of

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 2>this AI activity on the grid, Like how constrained is it?

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 3>That's right, And we also recorded that episode with Sager

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 3>and Jetty and we were talking about the political controversy

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 3>surrounding AI, and obviously power consumption is a big one

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 3>of those. At a time when electricity prices have already

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 3>been rising, is AI only going to drive them up further?

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 3>Although that said, you can't even say that electricity prices

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 3>have been rising because in certain states they've actually been

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 3>going down on an inflation adjustment basis. But even that

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 3>is a nuanced picture.

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 2>But by and large, especially since the pandemic. Really by

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 2>and large we have seen faster than normal increase in

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 2>electricity price inflation, and we have the big AI question.

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 2>So we really have to figure out a how is

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 2>all of this new data center capacity going to come

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 2>onto the market, Who's going to apply the generation? And

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:54.800
<v Speaker 2>then who is going to bear that cost? Is it

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 2>going to be the consumers who are already generally speaking

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:01.919
<v Speaker 2>across several markets seeing their bills go up.

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:05.960
<v Speaker 3>If we have to talk about this rubber band ball market,

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 3>then I'm glad we at least have the perfect guest

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 3>to do.

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 2>That's im say we do, in fact have the perfect guest.

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm very excited to say we're going to be speaking out.

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Someone been trying to get on the podcast for a

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 2>little while, Travis Cavula. He is a VP of regulation

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 2>at energ Energy. He's also been on a public commission

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 2>in Montana, so he knows that side of the business

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 2>in terms of how prices are set in those regulated

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 2>monopoly markets. He is also an academic. Travis, thank you

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 2>so much for coming on Outlaws.

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 4>It's great to be here. Thank you.

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 2>We're really excited about this one because there's so many questions,

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 2>why are we talking to you? What do you give

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 2>us the sort of brief intro of what you do

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 2>and what your background is, so that our audience has

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 2>some idea of why are the perfect guest?

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 4>Sure?

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 5>So I spend my time on regulatory affairs at a

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 5>company NRG. We're a big producer of power. We sell

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 5>power to end use customers. That's permitted by law where

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 5>competition exists in the power and gas markets. So we've

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 5>got about eight million end use customers. And previously I

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 5>was the head of the Montana Public Service Commission, the

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 5>rate setting body for regulated utilities in the state. I

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:17.280
<v Speaker 5>head it up an organization that represents state utility commissions

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:19.840
<v Speaker 5>at the national level called NAYRUK, and I teach a

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:21.919
<v Speaker 5>little bit on the side at University of Chicago's Hair

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 5>School of Public Policy, of course on utility regulation and

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 5>electricity markets. So I spend my time thinking a lot

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:31.280
<v Speaker 5>about what goes into customer bills, both the stuff that

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 5>we can control being a company that is a provider,

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 5>and also stuff that are sort of upstream costs of

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 5>goods sold that appear on my company's bills, the sort

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 5>of polls and wyers charges, that go into people's bills.

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 5>So basically, you know, there's two parts of people's bills,

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 5>the commodity and the regulated grid charges that get the

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:53.919
<v Speaker 5>commodity to you, and both of those are subject to

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 5>some form of regulation in this industry.

0:04:56.960 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Tracy, when we were in Chicago recently for a

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:04.840
<v Speaker 2>live episode, I met one of Travis's students there and

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 2>he's like, you got to talk to Travis. Travis is

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:09.480
<v Speaker 2>the man that will explain all these things. So Glamor

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 2>finally making this happen.

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 4>I'm high rating for that's important from.

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Rate by professor.

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 3>That's right. Okay, so no pressure Travis.

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 4>All right.

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 3>So you were talking about the wholesale cost of the

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 3>thing that goes across the wires and the polls and

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 3>all of that. So that's electricity versus the actual transmission system.

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 3>One thing that we hear whenever this topic comes up

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:36.360
<v Speaker 3>is it's not necessarily about the wholesale cost of electricity.

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 3>It's the cost of actually maintaining and expanding the grid.

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 3>How much truth is there to that? If you're going

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 3>to pinpoint the dominant factor behind higher electricity prices right now,

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 3>is it the wholesale price or the actual cost of transmission.

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's kind of the scope of time that you

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 5>choose to evaluate, but you know, just to give you

0:05:56.839 --> 0:05:59.720
<v Speaker 5>kind of a benchmarking. You know, if you looked at,

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 5>say the New England power market over the last twenty years,

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 5>which sort of is the beginning point of the restructuring

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 5>of the industry and the introduction of competition in a

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:14.159
<v Speaker 5>place like New England, the actual commodity cost would have

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 5>fallen by about fifty percent on an inflation adjusted basis,

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 5>whereas on the same basis, transmission costs would have increased

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:24.920
<v Speaker 5>something like nine hundred percent now from a very low

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 5>level to a much more substantial level. But then if

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 5>you drew that comparison in another market, say the mid Atlantic,

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 5>over a shorter period of time, like year over year,

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:38.119
<v Speaker 5>you know, the grid costs would not have risen substantially

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 5>in a year, but power prices would have. And that's

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 5>really just because the commodity works on more fundamental kind

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 5>of supply and demand balance. You know, scarcity will drive

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 5>up prices relatively rapidly, and then an oversupply that occurs

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 5>when the market is moving back toward equilibrium will drive

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:57.159
<v Speaker 5>prices down rapidly. Whereas those regulated set of costs that

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:00.720
<v Speaker 5>attached to the transmission and distribution systems. You know, those

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 5>are still cost plus regulated industries, and they have a

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 5>funny way of working monodirectionally up over the course of time.

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 5>But these do things trade off against one another. You know,

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 5>you need to invest in transmission in order to facilitate

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 5>the efficient delivery of electricity. You need to invest in

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 5>it in order to open up regions for low cost

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 5>renewable energy production. So they do have an interactive effect,

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 5>but they're regulated in a very different way, and both

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 5>of those land on consumers bills. I think the easiest

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 5>way to understand this is that, you know, consumers in

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 5>a sense had maybe been as a result of the

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 5>regulated charges the proverbial frog and gradually warming water, and

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 5>then when you finally enter a commodity supercycle, people can

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 5>have the sense that, oh wow, someone just ratcheted up

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 5>the heat on this pot. But both of those are

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 5>contributing factors and they require sort of different structural approaches

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 5>in order to reckon with them.

0:07:56.240 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 3>Jo, this is my perennial frustration talking about electricity prices

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 3>and the electricity system in the US, which is you

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 3>cannot talk in generalities, right, there are different types of

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 3>regulations for different entities. There are different regulations for each state.

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 3>Basically there's you know, the New England system, then there's

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 3>the West Coast, and then there's Texas, which is its

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 3>own special entity. You kind of have to talk about

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 3>every single market in isolation, which is difficult even on

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 3>our long podcasts. So that's going to be the caveat

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 3>throughout this conversation.

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 5>I think it's idiosyncratic and it's funny because at the

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 5>same time restructuring and competition was introduced into this industry,

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:37.079
<v Speaker 5>it was also occurring in things like telecom. Telecom, you know,

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 5>was substantially deregulated and federalized. At the same time, states, however,

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 5>were left to make their own decisions about the power sector,

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 5>and as a result, you really have a huge patchwork

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 5>quilt of state and federal regulation and different industry models.

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 4>It's true.

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 2>I have another really rudimentary question, I guess what are

0:08:57.280 --> 0:09:01.079
<v Speaker 2>we even talking about when we talk about competition in electricity?

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, I don't get to choose which wire I

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:07.199
<v Speaker 2>get into. There's one utility I have the option from.

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes there are these people on the street, and they're like, oh,

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 2>sign will you sign up for clean power or something

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 2>like that, and they try to get me to do stuff.

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 2>But I don't really understand how that works, because I

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 2>don't understand how electrons can be directed to anyone's home.

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 2>So I'm always very skeptical of it. What do we

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 2>talk about when people talk about a competitive market.

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:29.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so think of the electricity system as sort of

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 5>a chain of links. Upstream, you've got the power generators,

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 5>and then after that you've got the high voltage transmission system.

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 5>It patches into a substation that steps down the voltage

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 5>to a lower level. That's what we'd call the distribution system.

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:46.320
<v Speaker 5>And then there's a meter hanging on the side of

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 5>your home, and beyond that meter, you are the consumer

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 5>of electricity. The most upstream the generation and the most

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 5>downstream retailing have been opened in some states to competition,

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 5>and I think it's fairly intuitive what that means. For

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:05.559
<v Speaker 5>generation power plants are owned by private investors who make

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:08.840
<v Speaker 5>investments in them. Those power plants compete against one another

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 5>in auctions for electricity and to sell their power to

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:16.559
<v Speaker 5>wholesale off takers. Some of those off takers then are

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 5>the retailers of electricity who sort of buy an upstream

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 5>supply of goods and then use the regulated poles and

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 5>wires and pay regulated rates to deliver that commodity to

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 5>you at your home. So some of the value proposition

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 5>of what you're experiencing as a potential retail customer and

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 5>a competitive market is your product selection. I mean to

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 5>give an example, a retailer came to me and marketed

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 5>me a five year fixed price for electricity. Last year,

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:47.599
<v Speaker 5>I bought it. I locked in a rate, I'm insulated

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:52.359
<v Speaker 5>from upstream changes in wholesale market volatility.

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 4>As a result, that's.

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 5>Generally the value proposition of competitive retail. Though in places

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:01.079
<v Speaker 5>like Texas, you're also seeing product differentiation, and that has

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 5>a ring of telecommunications and data competitions sort of like

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 5>more apps. As part of your retail electric supply service,

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 5>people selling you smart thermostats or residential batteries that can

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 5>be packaged onto your retail electricity supply plan to sell

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 5>back to the grid, help manage your costs upstream to

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 5>stabilize pricing. But that's the paradigm of competition in this space.

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 5>It's a regulated system in the middle with competition on

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 5>the edges.

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 3>Can we back up for a second and go back

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:33.839
<v Speaker 3>to that big restructuring of the market, because I have

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 3>a feeling this will help us understand our current situation.

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 3>But what was the problem that we were trying to

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:43.320
<v Speaker 3>solve back then? You know, people have short memories. A

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 3>lot of people would say that our electricity system right

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 3>now has its own special problems, and they would forget

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 3>that there were previous problems that this system was meant

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 3>to address.

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:55.439
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean, it's kind of haunting. It's funny you

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 5>should ask that question, because the problem it was meant

0:11:57.880 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 5>to address is that regulated utilities, which used to own

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 5>this whole chain of links on a consolidated, vertically integrated basis,

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 5>bet wrong very badly on the amount of demand growth

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 5>in the sector, and they put themselves out there building

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:17.680
<v Speaker 5>power plants that were intended to be included in what's

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 5>called their rate base, on which they earn a return

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 5>and are able to charge off those costs to a

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:25.680
<v Speaker 5>captive set of customers. When they bet wrong on the

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 5>demand that would ultimately materialize on the system, they found

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:32.080
<v Speaker 5>themselves well over their skis in the amount of power

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 5>generation that they either had built or were in the

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 5>process of building. At the heart of regulated utility economics

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 5>is this division problem where kind of a total system

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 5>of fixed costs is the numerator divided by the denominator

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 5>of throughput. So these regulated utilities were adding handsomely to

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:54.560
<v Speaker 5>the numerator. The denominator wasn't propping up that, and the

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 5>result was that division problems, spitting out a price that

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 5>was escalating higher and higher. Some utilities, at that point

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 5>their state regulators said you've been imprudent. We're going to

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 5>not allow you cost recovery because you've been imprudent. They

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:10.320
<v Speaker 5>went bankrupt, but that was the exception to the rule.

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 5>Most of them allowed those costs to be recovered from

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 5>a captive customer base. But some of those states also

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:19.319
<v Speaker 5>pass laws that said, let's never do this again. There's

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 5>no reason why we shouldn't have power generation invested in

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 5>to meet the levels of demand needed on the system.

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 5>Be a function of investors' competitive bets in the market,

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 5>and so in about you know, call it a third

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 5>of the states, but accounting for more than half of

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 5>the power sold. That's now the business model where companies

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 5>like mine are, you know, have to make guesses about

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:45.680
<v Speaker 5>what the demand is going to be and try to

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 5>sign up customers to voluntarily contract with us to produce

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:53.959
<v Speaker 5>revenue for the power generation we might invest in. And

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 5>for the rest of the country. It still works by

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 5>you know, people like me wearing my former hat, you know,

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:02.199
<v Speaker 5>as as the chairman of a utility commission, like guessing

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 5>what the future is going to be and charging off

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 5>the costs of those guesses to a monopolized customer base.

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about your former hat, because one of the

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 2>things you hear about is that the utilities have this

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 2>incentive to overinvest because that might help determine what they're

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 2>allowed to charge on a going forward basis. But why

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 2>don't you sort of talk about your former hat and

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 2>the basic role you played, how you thought about decision making,

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 2>and how we are to understand what the world looks

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 2>like from the standpoint of someone sitting on the regulatory commission.

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well, you're number one.

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 5>You're absolutely correct about the incentives at play under the

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 5>style of economic regulation that is widely used really without

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 5>exception the United States to regulate the monopoly industries in

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 5>the utility sector. The companies earn a return that is

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 5>sort of announced and advanced by their state or federal

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 5>economic regulators based on the amount of capital they've invested

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 5>in the system. So spend more, make more has some

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 5>paradoxical effects where the most amount of profit a utility

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 5>will ever make is in the first year that it

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 5>owns a particular asset, and then when they own it

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 5>free and clear, they actually earn zero profits, so sort

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 5>of an inversion of the cash flow paradigm that you

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 5>would expect out of competitive businesses. Regulators also establish the

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 5>depreciation life span for rate making purposes of regulated assets,

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 5>which has some interactive effects with that model. So that's

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 5>basically the grist in the mill of what state regulatory

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 5>utility commissions do. They determine the amount that is quote

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 5>unquote used and useful in service to customers of the

0:15:56.680 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 5>capital investments that utilities have made. They also establish an

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 5>allowance for so called prudently incurred expenses the O and

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 5>M on the system around which the utility earns no margin,

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 5>just gets a recovery of those costs, and that also

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 5>has the knock on incentive of if I'm a utility

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 5>and I look at a problem that I have to solve,

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 5>I will always want to solve it with capital investment.

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 5>I will never want to solve it with opex, you know.

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 5>And because that one earns return, one does not. So

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 5>ordinary trade offs that would occur in competitive businesses between

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 5>capex and opics tend not to occur in the regulated sector.

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 5>Other countries have done this a different way and have

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 5>tried to establish more of a performance based framework of

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 5>regulation that rewards utilities with profits based on outcomes. But

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 5>you know, the United States has never got there for

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 5>a whole variety of frankly dumb reasons. So that's the

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 5>way those sector is regulated. It's weird to have a

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 5>sector that is really regulated according to early twentieth century

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 5>standard that's trying to serve a modern economy.

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 4>To be fully candid.

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 3>With you, yeah it does feel that way, doesn't it.

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 3>So again I said in the intro, I do not

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:10.680
<v Speaker 3>know much about the electricity market. I feel like I'm

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:13.959
<v Speaker 3>constantly struggling to try to understand it. But one thing

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 3>I do know is that a lot of the electricity

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 3>companies seem to complain for years and years and years

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:23.119
<v Speaker 3>that loads in the US had actually been either declining

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:26.679
<v Speaker 3>or stagnant. Now we have the situation where everyone is

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 3>talking about data centers coming on stream and they use

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 3>a lot of electricity, so loads are finally rising. Shouldn't

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:35.920
<v Speaker 3>this be a good thing for the electricity company. Shouldn't

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 3>they be celebrating they have extra money to spend on,

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 3>If not opics, then capex.

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 5>Generally yes, And it's true that for most electricity markets

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:49.160
<v Speaker 5>in the United States it's been fairly flat. In the PGAM,

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:52.880
<v Speaker 5>the Pennsylvania New Jersey Maryland market that stretches from Washington,

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 5>d C. To Chicago, they last recorded a record peak

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:59.440
<v Speaker 5>demand in two thousand and six. They'll in all likelihoods

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 5>set a demand next year twenty years later in twenty

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 5>twenty six. Some markets, like Texas's ERCOT market have been growing,

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 5>but it is definitely the exception to the rule. Most

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:12.360
<v Speaker 5>of these people less set a record demand. You know,

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 5>before the period of offshoring and de industrialization of industries

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 5>that use a lot of electricity, and that actually facilitated

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:24.919
<v Speaker 5>the kind of turnover of capital from colt gas and

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:27.160
<v Speaker 5>to renewables a little bit as well in a lot

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 5>of these places. But net of net, you know, that

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 5>was kind of neutral or even a little bit negative

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 5>in terms of the total installed generation capacity was kind

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 5>of managing to even in terms of generation capacity editions,

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 5>and then in terms of like, shouldn't they be celebrating, Yes, definitely.

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:47.680
<v Speaker 5>Everyone in the sector, my business and the regulated utilities

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 5>are excited about the prospect of growth. They're also nervous

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 5>about whether or not this growth is real and to

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 5>what magnitude. Part of what makes it a little worrying

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 5>is that ordinarily electric city demand growth would be a

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:06.920
<v Speaker 5>composite of growing demand from many different end use applications

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:09.399
<v Speaker 5>that would kind of diversify the risk of betting on

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:12.119
<v Speaker 5>growth here, it's like a one or a zero. You know,

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 5>if you take out the data centers, the sector is actually,

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:19.400
<v Speaker 5>you know, pretty stable in terms of electricity demand. If

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 5>you add the data centers, the sector is really poised

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 5>to grow a heck of a lot. And when you

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:28.880
<v Speaker 5>look at the projections of the grid operators, I mean,

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 5>just to put some numbers on this, the market PJAM

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 5>in the Mid Atlantic that I was referring to, it's

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 5>currently about one hundred and sixty thousand megawat market. It's

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:42.119
<v Speaker 5>projecting to add forty thousand megawatts by twenty thirty. The

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 5>URKAT Texas market, you know about eighty five thousand megawats

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:49.359
<v Speaker 5>right now. Its latest projection is up to nearly one

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 5>hundred and forty thousand megawatts by twenty thirty. Now, that's

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:57.360
<v Speaker 5>like adding a California to Texas in terms of electricity

0:19:57.400 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 5>demand in five years. And that's not going going to

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:03.920
<v Speaker 5>happen because it can't. It just, I mean literally could

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:08.160
<v Speaker 5>not occur. But therein lies the problem is like what

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 5>are we actually investing toward and what are the regulatory

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:16.399
<v Speaker 5>policies that can essentially help call the question on the

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:19.679
<v Speaker 5>amount of off take that will actually materialize from AI

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:23.919
<v Speaker 5>so that then capital investments can propagate throughout the supply

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:28.119
<v Speaker 5>chain to end up serving them. That's really the fundamental

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:32.639
<v Speaker 5>question that policymakers, utilities, and competitive providers like US are

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:33.440
<v Speaker 5>trying to deal with.

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 2>Those numbers are absolutely staggering the idea of adding California

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 2>size demand to Texas in just a standpoint of a

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 2>few years. When you say you don't think those numbers

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 2>can happen, what is the constraint is it on the

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:51.959
<v Speaker 2>generation side in a market like Texas or if we're

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 2>talking about what any other region, or because I think

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:58.400
<v Speaker 2>it's pretty easy to set up, you know, solar farms

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:00.919
<v Speaker 2>or whatever. Texas seems pretty liber with what kind of

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:03.239
<v Speaker 2>how easy it is to plug into the grid or

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 2>is it in a state like that there isn't the

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 2>transmission capacity even if you can stand up the production.

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's I mean, it's a little bit of everything,

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 5>everything from stuff that isn't you know, on the power

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 5>sector side of the fence line in terms of actually

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 5>being able to construct data centers and you know, their

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 5>chips and the fiber optics that would back them up.

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 5>And then on our side of the fence, you're right

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 5>getting access to the grid through interconnection, getting all the

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:34.400
<v Speaker 5>equipment that you would need to tap into the grid.

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:37.400
<v Speaker 5>We're talking about, you know kind of grid step up generators,

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 5>step up transformers and stuff like that. Joe, I know

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:42.119
<v Speaker 5>that's topic near and dear to you from listening to

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 5>the pot over the years. And then it is the

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:48.439
<v Speaker 5>power equipment in terms of like gas turbine availability. You know,

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 5>solar panels probably aren't going to do it for you

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 5>given the demand for you know, kind of consistent power

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:57.680
<v Speaker 5>production off of these data centers, but they are helpful.

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:00.040
<v Speaker 5>So it's just the magnitude.

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 4>There is a dilemma.

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 5>And you know, right now, if I were to place

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:07.880
<v Speaker 5>in order for something like you know, a generator's step

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:10.959
<v Speaker 5>up transformer, you know, pre COVID, it would have been

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 5>maybe like twelve to eighteen months. Now we're talking about

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 5>three to four years for a spoke piece of equipment

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 5>whose specifications are only available to me after the local

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 5>utility the Polls and Wires company tells me what my

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 5>interconnection study looks like in terms of grid availability in

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:30.879
<v Speaker 5>our connection to the system. So that that's one, you know,

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:33.680
<v Speaker 5>and RG is lucky enough to have some gas turbines

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:37.400
<v Speaker 5>lined up for delivery you know, later in this decades,

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 5>so we would be able to facilitate some of this investment.

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 5>But if you were going to get in line right now,

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:44.200
<v Speaker 5>that too would be a process that would take several years.

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:47.639
<v Speaker 5>Some of it's the availability of equipment, and some of

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 5>it is a natural pacing of steps in the kind

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:55.880
<v Speaker 5>of quasi regulatory process to get projects online. It would

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 5>be better, I think one of the interesting policy innovations

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 5>that's out there is if you had kind of more

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 5>of a market to make use of the scarce remaining

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 5>headroom in our system from sort of a grid interconnection

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 5>point of view without tripping into having to build a

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:16.119
<v Speaker 5>bunch of capital investments in polls and wires. But you

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:18.640
<v Speaker 5>know that's not the way the regulatory model is set up.

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 5>You know, right now we have a paradigm where final

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 5>power generator I kind of knock on the door of

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 5>the local utility and say, hey, you know, I want

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 5>to build a power project at this place. Can you

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 5>study it for the sake of its interconnection to the grid.

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 5>They come back with a study and I don't like

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:37.479
<v Speaker 5>the number, I don't like the specs, and then I

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:40.360
<v Speaker 5>submit another study and we iterate. So it's a time

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:44.960
<v Speaker 5>consuming process sometimes to develop these projects, and there probably

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 5>needs to be avenues that are more coordinated between the

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 5>demand and supply side. And even if you don't, you know,

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:57.160
<v Speaker 5>even if you certainly shouldn't functionally reintegrate the utility business model,

0:23:57.160 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 5>but there does need to be more coordination between the

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 5>blue on the polls and wires and the people who

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:04.479
<v Speaker 5>are doing the generation. And that's kind of a missing

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:07.400
<v Speaker 5>link right now in this policy landscape.

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 3>Other than sheer volume of power needs, I guess sheer megawatts.

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 3>Do data centers have specific energy needs in terms of

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't know the type of electricity. I would assume

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 3>a megawat is a megawat, but what do I know?

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:25.399
<v Speaker 3>But maybe in terms of timing and things like that,

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:29.119
<v Speaker 3>are there sort of operational considerations that are unique to

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:34.639
<v Speaker 3>data center's electricity consumption versus say an industrial factory or

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:37.240
<v Speaker 3>US turning the lights on when we get home.

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So, I mean the first experience, you know, at

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:46.439
<v Speaker 5>any scale that anyone seemed to have with computing technologies,

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:50.679
<v Speaker 5>you know, were kind of you know, cloud based servers.

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 5>And then really on the other side, like crypto mining

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 5>facilities and both of them data centers. But the two

0:24:57.480 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 5>could not be more different, right, I mean, doak and

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:05.640
<v Speaker 5>it becomes uneconomic at a certain strike price for cryptocurrency

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 5>to continue mining. And so it's a highly flexible load

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 5>that drops off the system when conditions become tight in

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:14.680
<v Speaker 5>an electricity market, and we see that all the time

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 5>in Texas. On the other hand, for you know, cloud

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:24.439
<v Speaker 5>services that are providing kind of real time instantaneous hosting capabilities,

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:26.880
<v Speaker 5>you know, they kind of need they have a very

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 5>high what's called load factor of their power consumption. They're

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:34.639
<v Speaker 5>drawing from the system on a relatively consistent basis, and

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:37.159
<v Speaker 5>of course they need to be highly reliable. You know,

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 5>they can't really be interrupted without having cloud fare or

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 5>aws interruption style problems, so very different. And you can

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 5>look back to analogues of you know, other industrial customers,

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:51.159
<v Speaker 5>you know, aluminum smelters, high load factor when they were

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 5>doing the batching of smelting, couldn't be interrupted. Paper mills,

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 5>maybe you could interrupt them. So the industry has some

0:25:57.680 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 5>like kind of learnings from this and have been markets

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:05.919
<v Speaker 5>designed around the flexibility of demand to try to do

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:09.359
<v Speaker 5>for the power sector what previously happened to say, the

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 5>airline sector, which had used to have, you know, a

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:16.120
<v Speaker 5>very low load factor, and then after restructuring and deregulation

0:26:16.200 --> 0:26:19.640
<v Speaker 5>in the seventies, suddenly everyone's you know, everyone's airplanes ended

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:22.640
<v Speaker 5>up full, you know, and two full in some cases

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 5>where you know, people get bumped and compensated for it.

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 5>So we've yet to achieve that though in the power sector,

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 5>where load factors continue to be you know, fifty sixty

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:35.359
<v Speaker 5>seventy percent, so there's a lot of headroom during certain

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:39.440
<v Speaker 5>hours and very little headroom during other hours. So kind

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 5>of the primary question in terms of the network economics,

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:45.160
<v Speaker 5>is if you end up with a bunch of high

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 5>load factor data center customers, the type that can't be interrupted,

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:53.639
<v Speaker 5>how do you get them online without tripping into a

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 5>bunch of necessary capital investments to serve that last few

0:26:58.080 --> 0:27:01.399
<v Speaker 5>percent of hours where they're demand needs to be served

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:04.119
<v Speaker 5>in firm or can you source flexibility out of the

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:07.959
<v Speaker 5>system somewhere else, like from residential air conditioning or something

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:10.480
<v Speaker 5>like that. That's a question again, that's very important to

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:12.919
<v Speaker 5>figure out. People have kind of issue spotted it, but

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 5>we've really yet to solve in any meaningful way. The

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:18.639
<v Speaker 5>markets like Texas are kind of geared towards solving it

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 5>in more of a free enterprise premise. Other markets seem

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 5>to be struggling a bit.

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:41.639
<v Speaker 2>It's funny to think about getting an alert on your phone.

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 2>It's like GPT six is completely against training run. Sorry, no,

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:48.200
<v Speaker 2>we would like you to turn down your air conditioning

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:49.640
<v Speaker 2>right now. No, I don't know if that would happen.

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 2>But the part of the reason everyone's interested in data

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 2>centers period, well, there's a lot of reasons, but people

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 2>are worried when they hear these numbers. They're like, oh, am,

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:01.920
<v Speaker 2>I as the consumer. Let's say I lived in Texas,

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 2>which I sometimes have am I as the consumer going

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:07.879
<v Speaker 2>to in some way or another, be paying the price

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:13.399
<v Speaker 2>for this massive expansion of demand thanks to data centers. Intuitively,

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:15.640
<v Speaker 2>it seems like, well it shouldn't be. They could pay

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 2>for their own electricity, they can pay for their own upgrades.

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 2>But how does this massive increase in demand play out

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:25.199
<v Speaker 2>from the sort of the ratepayer perspective.

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so we go back to the kind of segmentation

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 5>between the regulated grid costs and the commodity costs. In

0:28:33.160 --> 0:28:36.119
<v Speaker 5>answer to that question. On the commodity side, you know,

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 5>this tends to be a marginal cost pricing environment where

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 5>if you have demand growth outstripping supply editions, the system

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 5>becomes tighter, the supply curve moves up for the kind

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 5>of last unit that's necessary to serve demand, and its

0:28:57.040 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 5>marginal costs in a very real way dablish the clearing

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 5>price that all demand has to pay unless and to

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 5>the extent to they are bilaterally contracted with some kind

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 5>of hedging instruments, which everyone should be. No one should

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 5>be in an ideal market exposed to that spot price.

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:18.560
<v Speaker 5>But we find that many people are for a variety

0:29:18.560 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 5>of reasons. So some policy interventions that people have contemplated is,

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 5>you know, usually we would let these markets kind of

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 5>equliberate on their own. We would expect sort of organic

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 5>growth to be met with organic supply editions. Here people

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:39.280
<v Speaker 5>have observed, like, wow, this demand growth seems really out

0:29:39.280 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 5>of scale with what the markets have organically been able

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 5>to achieve. Maybe we should have a requirement to just

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 5>bring your own generation. You know, we're not going to

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 5>let the power markets on a forward traded basis send

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 5>the right signal and hope that enough generation shows up

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 5>to serve this demand. As sort of part of the

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 5>social license or even a four normalized regulatory requirement for

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 5>them to get online, you've got to show us the

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 5>megawots that you bring on in the system. So that's

0:30:05.920 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 5>one of the debates. On the other side of the ledger.

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 5>The regulated costs, that too can be a problem usually,

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 5>and again this division problem of network economics. For the

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 5>regulated costs, if you're adding to that denominator of throughput

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 5>at a rate that is higher, then you're adding to

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 5>additions to the fixed costs of the system. Everyone's rates

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 5>go down produces a lower quotient, which is the price

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 5>of grid consumed electricity. The problem here is that in

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 5>a kind of an inflationary environment for all the materials,

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 5>the transformers, the cabling, everything that goes into the polls

0:30:41.960 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 5>and wires, if you're adding demand and you're not just

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 5>using headroom that already exists on the system, if you're

0:30:48.280 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 5>not increasing that capacity factor on the system, if you're

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:55.800
<v Speaker 5>tripping into a lot of new capital expenditures, then even

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:58.760
<v Speaker 5>if you're adding demand that's paying regulated rates, it may

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 5>not be enough to offset at the total amount of

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:04.840
<v Speaker 5>expenditures incrementally you're making on the system. So there's policy

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 5>interventions there too, where you can try to directly assign

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 5>the costs that are caused on the grid back to

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 5>the data centers. But those are pretty nascent approaches, and

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 5>some of the ones that have been tried are kind

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 5>of aiming at the wrong thing. So a lot of

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 5>policy work remains to be done here. And all of

0:31:22.320 --> 0:31:24.880
<v Speaker 5>this is kind of a political debate where you know,

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 5>a lot of state governors, the people who are really

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:29.719
<v Speaker 5>the ones kind of in charge of, you know, with

0:31:29.800 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 5>their state utility commissions, setting these policies, they simultaneously want

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:37.200
<v Speaker 5>the economic development of data centers, but they don't want

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 5>any negative externalities around reliability, affordability, clean energy and all

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:45.960
<v Speaker 5>those things trade off against one another. But you know,

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 5>political actors will want to maximize all of those variables,

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 5>which is not possible in the current environment.

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 3>Can I ask a very basic question, and I'm struggling

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 3>to think of a way to frame it that doesn't

0:31:57.800 --> 0:32:00.800
<v Speaker 3>sound like I've just taken an elderly family member to

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 3>a medical office or something. But what is a node?

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 5>A node usually would be a place like a substation.

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:14.000
<v Speaker 5>It is the place on the physical grid at which

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 5>electricity is bought and sold. It's a physical destination on

0:32:18.280 --> 0:32:21.480
<v Speaker 5>the grid. When we say nodal markets, which is a

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 5>way to describe electricity markets, we're referring to markets where

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:30.480
<v Speaker 5>electricity is priced on a so called locational marginal price basis,

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 5>and the LMPs as they're called, are based on physical

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:39.680
<v Speaker 5>destinations on the grid called nodes. I'm just estimated, guess here,

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 5>but a market like Texas will have a few thousand

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 5>nodes at which electricity is traded on an individuated price basis.

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 3>That seems like such a weird way of doing it

0:32:50.400 --> 0:32:52.560
<v Speaker 3>to me, and I'm sure there are very valid reasons

0:32:52.600 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 3>for doing it in this way, But like nowadays, given

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:58.240
<v Speaker 3>all the data at our disposal, given the rise of AI,

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 3>can't we work out some sort of average cost across

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 3>the system. It seems really weird that we're taking it

0:33:03.680 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 3>at like physical points, although I guess you know there

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 3>are plenty of commodities that do trade based on particular locations,

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:11.320
<v Speaker 3>but it just seems strange to me.

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 5>Well, it is important that you have nodal pricing in

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:19.479
<v Speaker 5>the system only because it sends a powerful price signal

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 5>for the accurate location of necessary power generation. There are

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 5>certain markets, I'm thinking of Alberta, some of the European

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 5>markets that actually do establish a zonal price across their

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 5>entire market. But there you end up with power plant developers,

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 5>you know, who develop wind in a particular area far

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:45.480
<v Speaker 5>away from demand to capture the average price, but then

0:33:45.520 --> 0:33:49.480
<v Speaker 5>that energy ends up being undeliverable because there are transmission

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:54.800
<v Speaker 5>system constraints and congestions. So the nodal pricing formulation is

0:33:54.840 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 5>intended to reflect a market that, unlike the stock exchange,

0:33:59.320 --> 0:34:02.959
<v Speaker 5>isn't just trading bits of data to represent kind of

0:34:03.080 --> 0:34:07.000
<v Speaker 5>paper securities. It in a very real way, is meant

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 5>to simulate a kind of flow of electrons on a

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:15.319
<v Speaker 5>system constrained basis, And then it provides valuable information too,

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:20.080
<v Speaker 5>because if you continue to see locational marginal prices you know,

0:34:20.200 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 5>in one place that are very high and twenty miles

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:27.080
<v Speaker 5>away they're very low, that's a signal to the people

0:34:27.080 --> 0:34:29.120
<v Speaker 5>who plan the transmission grid that hey, you know, we

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 5>should probably build a transmission line here, because the addition

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 5>of the transmission line will be the thing that flattens

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:38.760
<v Speaker 5>out that price differential and creates a market that looks

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:41.799
<v Speaker 5>more like a you know, a copper plate rather than

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 5>two separate swimming pools.

0:34:44.680 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Interesting. Just to be clear though, if I want it

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:50.120
<v Speaker 3>to be public enemy number one, could I build a

0:34:50.160 --> 0:34:54.720
<v Speaker 3>gigantic data center next to a locational marginal price point

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:58.319
<v Speaker 3>node and affect the cost of electricity for you know,

0:34:58.360 --> 0:34:59.240
<v Speaker 3>a greater area.

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 5>Yes, you absolutely could, And in fact, I mean I

0:35:03.080 --> 0:35:05.920
<v Speaker 5>know of at least one example. You know, North Dakota

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:08.319
<v Speaker 5>is actually a good example of this. A place that

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:13.240
<v Speaker 5>is doesn't have a lot of robust transmission infrastructure does

0:35:13.320 --> 0:35:16.759
<v Speaker 5>have a lot of renewable resources that cause and those

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:19.400
<v Speaker 5>renewables are almost kind of dumping on the market in

0:35:19.440 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 5>a way that causes the energy price to go down

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:26.880
<v Speaker 5>and even negative at times in North Dakota. And you know,

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 5>some of the first data centers that we've seen in

0:35:29.200 --> 0:35:32.920
<v Speaker 5>this wave of expansion chose to locate in North Dakota

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:36.720
<v Speaker 5>because they had access to wholesale prices that were lower negative.

0:35:36.760 --> 0:35:38.919
<v Speaker 5>They were just following the price signal. And so there's

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:41.120
<v Speaker 5>you know, there's certain data centers out there that are

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 5>literally being paid to consume electricity because there's such an

0:35:44.640 --> 0:35:47.839
<v Speaker 5>oversupply and so little transmission into the area.

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:50.319
<v Speaker 2>I you know, I got to ask this question on

0:35:50.400 --> 0:35:52.760
<v Speaker 2>a podcast recently and I didn't have a good answer,

0:35:52.760 --> 0:35:55.320
<v Speaker 2>and I so now I want to ask So you mentioned, Okay,

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 2>all these different pieces of electrical gear, they're in short supply.

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 2>You might not be able to get some key equipment

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:06.200
<v Speaker 2>until twenty thirty. Is it strain going to ease at all?

0:36:06.360 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Is there any additional capacity coming on the market. When

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:12.239
<v Speaker 2>I was asked this, I like sort of like hesitated.

0:36:12.239 --> 0:36:14.400
<v Speaker 2>I was like, well, maybe they're not sure about the future,

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:17.600
<v Speaker 2>so they're like reluctant to do the capital expending involved.

0:36:17.600 --> 0:36:20.560
<v Speaker 2>But do you think there's any like is capacity growing

0:36:20.600 --> 0:36:22.840
<v Speaker 2>for some of this core infrastructure As far as you

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:23.440
<v Speaker 2>can tell.

0:36:23.480 --> 0:36:26.760
<v Speaker 5>My impression is yes. I mean you've seen public announcements

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:32.200
<v Speaker 5>from the largest gas turbine manufacturer, ge Vanova about new

0:36:32.560 --> 0:36:37.360
<v Speaker 5>manufacturing base editions, you know, some of the transformer equipment

0:36:37.400 --> 0:36:40.480
<v Speaker 5>as well. I think you're seeing some incremental investment in.

0:36:40.920 --> 0:36:45.280
<v Speaker 5>You're certainly seeing power generators like NRG, you know, take

0:36:45.360 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 5>positions in lining up their optionality to have power projects

0:36:50.920 --> 0:36:54.279
<v Speaker 5>that can be deployable to either the Texas market or

0:36:54.400 --> 0:36:59.000
<v Speaker 5>the mid Atlantic market, depending on where consumer demand actually arises.

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:02.880
<v Speaker 5>So I think there is some development in that market.

0:37:03.120 --> 0:37:05.359
<v Speaker 5>I will say, I think what people are waiting for.

0:37:05.520 --> 0:37:08.080
<v Speaker 5>You know, everyone looks around the supply chain and you

0:37:08.120 --> 0:37:11.399
<v Speaker 5>know is reasonably asking, well, who's got the deep pockets here?

0:37:11.800 --> 0:37:14.480
<v Speaker 5>And then everyone turns to big tech. You know big tech.

0:37:14.520 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 5>Obviously if they signed a power purchase agreement for fifteen

0:37:18.080 --> 0:37:21.560
<v Speaker 5>years or even less to take power at a certain price,

0:37:22.000 --> 0:37:25.560
<v Speaker 5>some of this supply chain would fall into place pretty readily,

0:37:25.680 --> 0:37:28.480
<v Speaker 5>I would say. And so people are kind of waiting

0:37:28.520 --> 0:37:32.440
<v Speaker 5>in a sense for big tech to make those big

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:38.040
<v Speaker 5>bilateral contracting moves that would serve to propagate sort of

0:37:38.120 --> 0:37:41.879
<v Speaker 5>rationality around response to the perceived demand up and down

0:37:41.920 --> 0:37:44.480
<v Speaker 5>the supply chain. And I think that's kind of the

0:37:44.600 --> 0:37:49.359
<v Speaker 5>leading indicator to watch for in the sector. How many

0:37:49.400 --> 0:37:51.440
<v Speaker 5>of those contracts are actually being signed.

0:37:52.400 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 2>Big tech is just going to do everything. They're going

0:37:54.239 --> 0:37:55.920
<v Speaker 2>to build nuclear plants, so they're going to build their

0:37:55.920 --> 0:37:57.800
<v Speaker 2>own ships, and they're going to build their own fabs,

0:37:57.840 --> 0:38:00.680
<v Speaker 2>and everything will be this entire ecosystem that it is

0:38:00.719 --> 0:38:02.920
<v Speaker 2>just alphabets from down the line. I want to go

0:38:02.960 --> 0:38:05.080
<v Speaker 2>back though, to something you said, which is that part

0:38:05.120 --> 0:38:08.280
<v Speaker 2>of what's tricky about the data center thing is that, Okay,

0:38:08.280 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 2>here's this big boom in demand, but it's not because

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:14.919
<v Speaker 2>of like general like trend economic growth. And you could

0:38:15.000 --> 0:38:17.680
<v Speaker 2>be perhaps that a year from now or six months

0:38:17.680 --> 0:38:20.880
<v Speaker 2>from now or tomorrow, people say, oh, I want to

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:23.840
<v Speaker 2>slam the brakes on AAI spending. We're not getting this return.

0:38:23.960 --> 0:38:26.160
<v Speaker 2>Fears of a bubble, you know. Fourth I talk to

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:29.799
<v Speaker 2>us a little bit more. Howady commissions are dealing with

0:38:29.960 --> 0:38:33.840
<v Speaker 2>this risk and this very binary state of planning.

0:38:34.400 --> 0:38:37.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so commissions at the state level have dealt with

0:38:37.239 --> 0:38:40.120
<v Speaker 5>this in a very different way. Some of them have

0:38:40.920 --> 0:38:45.080
<v Speaker 5>candidly and regulated utilities themselves have said we want no

0:38:45.160 --> 0:38:48.400
<v Speaker 5>part of this risk. Like we're a small MidCap utility

0:38:48.640 --> 0:38:52.120
<v Speaker 5>and someone is knocking at our door asking us to

0:38:52.160 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 5>invest in power generation that would be like a third

0:38:55.560 --> 0:38:59.000
<v Speaker 5>of our total existing balance sheet that's remained stable for decades.

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:01.480
<v Speaker 5>We're just not doing it. You can get on our grid,

0:39:01.480 --> 0:39:03.680
<v Speaker 5>and you can pay the cost to get on our grid,

0:39:03.920 --> 0:39:06.399
<v Speaker 5>but in terms of power generation, you've got to bring

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:09.600
<v Speaker 5>your own project. We're not involved in that. Other utilities

0:39:09.640 --> 0:39:14.280
<v Speaker 5>that have larger balance sheets, the Southeastern utilities, are using

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:17.640
<v Speaker 5>their regulated balance sheets to build out generation and supply

0:39:17.719 --> 0:39:21.720
<v Speaker 5>data center customers. Devils in the details on those heavily

0:39:21.760 --> 0:39:25.120
<v Speaker 5>redacted commercial agreements that would I would desperately love to

0:39:25.160 --> 0:39:29.239
<v Speaker 5>see about the degree to which they protect consumers. And then,

0:39:29.239 --> 0:39:31.800
<v Speaker 5>of course, the other side of the industry, the competitive industry.

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:35.080
<v Speaker 5>You know, it's companies like mine and data centers that

0:39:35.239 --> 0:39:38.440
<v Speaker 5>enter into commercial agreements for the purchase and sale of power,

0:39:38.760 --> 0:39:41.400
<v Speaker 5>and neither of those parties have recourse to a captive

0:39:41.400 --> 0:39:44.080
<v Speaker 5>base of customers. So they could go bust, we could

0:39:44.120 --> 0:39:46.640
<v Speaker 5>go bust. It's not going to you know, be skin

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:49.520
<v Speaker 5>off the teeth of a set of quote unquote ratepairs.

0:39:50.160 --> 0:39:53.680
<v Speaker 5>Again on the grid costs, it's about whether or not

0:39:53.920 --> 0:39:56.920
<v Speaker 5>state commissions, and in this case of federal regulator, the

0:39:56.960 --> 0:40:01.719
<v Speaker 5>Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, are going to style take or

0:40:01.760 --> 0:40:06.480
<v Speaker 5>pay contractual agreements to require large data centers that come

0:40:06.520 --> 0:40:13.160
<v Speaker 5>onto the grid to essentially collateralize a revenue stream associated

0:40:13.200 --> 0:40:17.600
<v Speaker 5>with the incremental costs of developing the grid to serve them.

0:40:18.120 --> 0:40:21.439
<v Speaker 5>And so far there seems to be relative unanimity that

0:40:21.440 --> 0:40:24.200
<v Speaker 5>that is the right way to go in order to

0:40:24.239 --> 0:40:27.600
<v Speaker 5>protect legacy customers. But again, the devils in the details,

0:40:27.800 --> 0:40:30.280
<v Speaker 5>and I have a problem with some of the math

0:40:30.360 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 5>that's being done in those regulatory approaches. So it's not

0:40:33.640 --> 0:40:37.560
<v Speaker 5>as if this problem is invisible to the people who

0:40:37.560 --> 0:40:40.759
<v Speaker 5>are economically regulating this industry, but they are trying to

0:40:40.840 --> 0:40:42.520
<v Speaker 5>in a very real way. They are trying to figure

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:45.000
<v Speaker 5>it out on real time, and I'll be the first

0:40:45.040 --> 0:40:47.760
<v Speaker 5>to say their solution set is far from perfect.

0:40:48.040 --> 0:40:50.200
<v Speaker 3>So just on this note, it strikes me that the

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:53.880
<v Speaker 3>difficulty in the system, I mean, setting aside the patchwork

0:40:54.000 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 3>of fifty different states all having their own different regulations,

0:40:57.200 --> 0:40:59.560
<v Speaker 3>like the heart of the difficulty in the current system

0:40:59.680 --> 0:41:05.200
<v Speaker 3>is we're trying to preserve the market signal for further investment,

0:41:05.320 --> 0:41:08.200
<v Speaker 3>but also smooth out some of the volatility so that

0:41:08.320 --> 0:41:11.560
<v Speaker 3>Joe and I don't have to spend an inordinate amount

0:41:11.560 --> 0:41:14.160
<v Speaker 3>of time thinking about what is like the most cost

0:41:14.160 --> 0:41:17.359
<v Speaker 3>effective time to blow dry our hair or do our

0:41:17.400 --> 0:41:20.719
<v Speaker 3>laundry or something like that. So we're kind of trying

0:41:20.760 --> 0:41:24.360
<v Speaker 3>to have our capitalism cake and eat it too. Cake italism,

0:41:24.960 --> 0:41:28.799
<v Speaker 3>cake italism. That kind of works. What is your platonic

0:41:29.040 --> 0:41:34.440
<v Speaker 3>ideal of a electricity market. Do you have one, either

0:41:34.480 --> 0:41:37.000
<v Speaker 3>in the US or elsewhere in the world that you

0:41:37.040 --> 0:41:39.880
<v Speaker 3>would say, look, here is a system that actually manages

0:41:40.239 --> 0:41:41.799
<v Speaker 3>to do both these things.

0:41:42.239 --> 0:41:44.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, man, I love that question.

0:41:44.160 --> 0:41:48.400
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I will say that one of the real

0:41:48.480 --> 0:41:53.440
<v Speaker 5>flaws in the US electricity system is that it is

0:41:53.560 --> 0:41:57.080
<v Speaker 5>not as robustly a two sided market as you would

0:41:57.080 --> 0:42:01.640
<v Speaker 5>hope for. It's still demand. It just exists on the system.

0:42:01.760 --> 0:42:05.040
<v Speaker 5>It's coming onto the system based on people's on the

0:42:05.040 --> 0:42:07.880
<v Speaker 5>supply side guesses about what will happen, and then the

0:42:07.920 --> 0:42:11.160
<v Speaker 5>supply side is expected to solve all of it. There's

0:42:11.280 --> 0:42:14.759
<v Speaker 5>very little in the way of demand elasticity, and that's

0:42:14.800 --> 0:42:18.000
<v Speaker 5>been for a variety of historical reasons. I mean, the

0:42:18.000 --> 0:42:20.799
<v Speaker 5>first and most obvious one is that you didn't even

0:42:20.840 --> 0:42:24.600
<v Speaker 5>have the technology in the form of advanced metering infrastructure

0:42:24.880 --> 0:42:28.680
<v Speaker 5>to understand when people were actually using the power in

0:42:28.719 --> 0:42:32.920
<v Speaker 5>relation to a highly time variable set of upstream costs.

0:42:33.480 --> 0:42:36.600
<v Speaker 5>Now you do have that. You are also increasingly having

0:42:36.680 --> 0:42:40.080
<v Speaker 5>the software that allows financial settlements on the part of

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:43.600
<v Speaker 5>the people retailing electricity to end use consumers to be

0:42:43.800 --> 0:42:48.000
<v Speaker 5>settled on the basis of that advanced metering infrastructure's actual

0:42:48.040 --> 0:42:51.520
<v Speaker 5>meter reads so on a time interval basis. And finally,

0:42:51.640 --> 0:42:53.680
<v Speaker 5>because you shouldn't have to think about when you're going

0:42:53.680 --> 0:42:56.360
<v Speaker 5>to blow dry your hair, you have a significant amount

0:42:56.360 --> 0:43:01.480
<v Speaker 5>of device automation in the form of smart thermostat, battery storage,

0:43:01.600 --> 0:43:07.040
<v Speaker 5>electric vehicles, manufacturing, and industrial processes which can be sort

0:43:07.080 --> 0:43:10.080
<v Speaker 5>of a set it and forget it to automatically respond

0:43:10.080 --> 0:43:12.799
<v Speaker 5>to high prices to try to increase the system's load

0:43:12.880 --> 0:43:16.800
<v Speaker 5>factor and avoid using electricity at very high cost times.

0:43:17.120 --> 0:43:21.240
<v Speaker 5>So that is just starting happen in the American electricity sector.

0:43:21.719 --> 0:43:25.400
<v Speaker 5>I would tend to look to the UK and Australia

0:43:26.080 --> 0:43:30.279
<v Speaker 5>as places that have gone a bit ways further in

0:43:30.360 --> 0:43:35.360
<v Speaker 5>trying to solve that problem and embrace the inherent flexibility

0:43:35.360 --> 0:43:38.759
<v Speaker 5>of a system as versus the United States, which is

0:43:38.880 --> 0:43:42.320
<v Speaker 5>kind of stuck in this sort of supply does something

0:43:42.360 --> 0:43:47.120
<v Speaker 5>to demand framework of industry. So that's definitely on my

0:43:47.520 --> 0:43:49.719
<v Speaker 5>It's always on the top of my homework list, if

0:43:49.760 --> 0:43:51.600
<v Speaker 5>only because I think a lot of people are thinking

0:43:51.640 --> 0:43:55.560
<v Speaker 5>about solving this problem highly conventionally with supply editions, which

0:43:55.760 --> 0:43:59.680
<v Speaker 5>is going to be really important. But that demand flexibility

0:43:59.719 --> 0:44:03.360
<v Speaker 5>comp is actually essential to get to a market that

0:44:03.400 --> 0:44:07.320
<v Speaker 5>looks like every other efficient and competitive market in the world,

0:44:07.440 --> 0:44:08.920
<v Speaker 5>which has two sides to it.

0:44:09.280 --> 0:44:11.640
<v Speaker 2>We've been telling you a lot about sort of the future,

0:44:11.719 --> 0:44:14.839
<v Speaker 2>looking forward and figuring out, you know, how that we're

0:44:14.840 --> 0:44:17.959
<v Speaker 2>going to get all this new capacity on to the market,

0:44:17.960 --> 0:44:21.120
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. Let's look at the last several years, like

0:44:21.239 --> 0:44:23.040
<v Speaker 2>what happened. Part of the reason we're even having this

0:44:23.120 --> 0:44:26.440
<v Speaker 2>conversation is because electricity bills are on people's minds, right,

0:44:26.480 --> 0:44:28.520
<v Speaker 2>and they've been high, and it's a little unclear like

0:44:28.719 --> 0:44:31.080
<v Speaker 2>how much of this is just keeping up with inflation.

0:44:31.800 --> 0:44:36.480
<v Speaker 2>I presume that, like grid maintenance is actually straightforwardly in

0:44:36.600 --> 0:44:39.640
<v Speaker 2>effective labor costs and inflation, et cetera. One thing we

0:44:39.719 --> 0:44:43.439
<v Speaker 2>do know, however, is that the pace of electricity price increases. Really,

0:44:43.480 --> 0:44:46.319
<v Speaker 2>since the pandemic seems to have been a level step up.

0:44:46.719 --> 0:44:49.600
<v Speaker 2>What's driven that? How would you characterize the last several

0:44:49.680 --> 0:44:53.640
<v Speaker 2>years of electricity prices and perhaps the role of load

0:44:53.680 --> 0:44:55.360
<v Speaker 2>growth in driving those increases.

0:44:55.840 --> 0:44:59.319
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so so far load growth is really not the

0:44:59.520 --> 0:45:03.960
<v Speaker 5>contribute to what has happened here is almost an awakening

0:45:04.280 --> 0:45:08.359
<v Speaker 5>to the fact that we had, already, without any more

0:45:08.440 --> 0:45:12.520
<v Speaker 5>load growth, a less reliable system than we thought we did,

0:45:13.000 --> 0:45:15.359
<v Speaker 5>and that's due to a variety of reasons. You know,

0:45:15.680 --> 0:45:18.719
<v Speaker 5>we retired a lot of coal, which you had a

0:45:18.840 --> 0:45:21.239
<v Speaker 5>lot of emissions, but we replaced it with a bunch

0:45:21.280 --> 0:45:26.200
<v Speaker 5>of natural gas. That created a you know, a sort

0:45:26.200 --> 0:45:30.080
<v Speaker 5>of more of a dependency on an interrelated network system,

0:45:30.600 --> 0:45:34.359
<v Speaker 5>the gas supply and pipeline system, which, while usually very

0:45:34.440 --> 0:45:39.319
<v Speaker 5>robust and very economically efficient, in winter conditions where there's

0:45:39.360 --> 0:45:43.719
<v Speaker 5>a lot of residential heating drawn, that system can show frailties,

0:45:44.400 --> 0:45:48.080
<v Speaker 5>and so market operators in these electricity markets sort of

0:45:48.160 --> 0:45:51.359
<v Speaker 5>de rated the value of that capacity in how they

0:45:51.360 --> 0:45:55.000
<v Speaker 5>set up these markets, which meant effectively a sort of

0:45:55.040 --> 0:46:00.600
<v Speaker 5>administrative withdrawal of supply from some of these markets similar

0:46:00.600 --> 0:46:04.480
<v Speaker 5>to that renewables were seen not as a one to

0:46:04.560 --> 0:46:08.799
<v Speaker 5>one replacement for reliable generation in the parts of the

0:46:08.800 --> 0:46:11.200
<v Speaker 5>country the middle of the country, especially where they were

0:46:11.200 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 5>heavily invested in, but they were really being leaned on

0:46:14.400 --> 0:46:19.719
<v Speaker 5>as an effective substitute for more dispatchable power. And I

0:46:19.800 --> 0:46:21.480
<v Speaker 5>think everyone in the back of their head knew that

0:46:21.560 --> 0:46:25.799
<v Speaker 5>wasn't the case. But only recently, as things have gotten tight,

0:46:25.840 --> 0:46:28.200
<v Speaker 5>have people begun to do a lot of hard math

0:46:28.239 --> 0:46:31.440
<v Speaker 5>around it. And then finally, you know, we've just seen

0:46:31.760 --> 0:46:36.239
<v Speaker 5>a few really traumatic winter storms, in particular, one in

0:46:36.280 --> 0:46:39.120
<v Speaker 5>the East and one in Texas that have sort of

0:46:39.239 --> 0:46:43.600
<v Speaker 5>reshaped the way in which the people who have responsibility

0:46:43.880 --> 0:46:48.040
<v Speaker 5>to operate the grid think about the operational posture and

0:46:48.200 --> 0:46:51.520
<v Speaker 5>need for reliable resources on the grid. And so there

0:46:51.520 --> 0:46:55.680
<v Speaker 5>were a variety of regulatory changes that were made that

0:46:55.800 --> 0:46:59.120
<v Speaker 5>had net of net the effect to tighten up the

0:46:59.320 --> 0:47:03.600
<v Speaker 5>understanding of what generating capacity was available in the system

0:47:04.040 --> 0:47:07.600
<v Speaker 5>relative to a base of demand that really didn't change.

0:47:07.640 --> 0:47:10.799
<v Speaker 5>But suddenly, because of all of the retirements that had

0:47:10.840 --> 0:47:14.759
<v Speaker 5>happened of coal and older gas due to economics as

0:47:14.760 --> 0:47:18.479
<v Speaker 5>well as environmental regulation, we suddenly found ourselves pretty tight.

0:47:19.160 --> 0:47:22.200
<v Speaker 5>And then this demand growth started to happen, so we

0:47:22.200 --> 0:47:26.120
<v Speaker 5>were not particularly well positioned for the present moment of

0:47:26.120 --> 0:47:31.319
<v Speaker 5>demand growth. We'd already driven the system to Some might

0:47:31.320 --> 0:47:34.040
<v Speaker 5>call it a tight and efficient system if you had

0:47:34.040 --> 0:47:36.759
<v Speaker 5>demand growth that was level, but it was not well

0:47:36.800 --> 0:47:40.000
<v Speaker 5>situated to pick up tens and tens of new gigawatts

0:47:40.000 --> 0:47:40.480
<v Speaker 5>of demand.

0:47:41.040 --> 0:47:45.399
<v Speaker 3>I have a hypothetical question, but just as a theoretical exercise,

0:47:45.960 --> 0:47:48.719
<v Speaker 3>if we are all in the pursuit of cheap and

0:47:48.800 --> 0:47:52.120
<v Speaker 3>plentiful energy, and if as part of that pursuit, you

0:47:52.160 --> 0:47:54.840
<v Speaker 3>could choose between two options. You could either wave a

0:47:54.840 --> 0:47:58.280
<v Speaker 3>magic wand and get a bunch of nuclear reactors scattered

0:47:58.280 --> 0:48:01.799
<v Speaker 3>around America, or you could wave ad and get huge

0:48:01.840 --> 0:48:06.359
<v Speaker 3>advances in battery technology across America. Wish of those would

0:48:06.400 --> 0:48:10.760
<v Speaker 3>be most conducive to having that cheap and plentiful energy supply.

0:48:11.640 --> 0:48:13.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean, I'm going to make a lot of

0:48:13.600 --> 0:48:16.279
<v Speaker 5>my friends unhappy with this one, but I'd probably go

0:48:16.400 --> 0:48:21.120
<v Speaker 5>batteries and storage. I think there are some natural economic

0:48:21.160 --> 0:48:26.279
<v Speaker 5>advantages and wide swaths of the country for relatively affordable

0:48:26.400 --> 0:48:31.200
<v Speaker 5>even without subsidies, solar production in particular, and batteries seem

0:48:31.360 --> 0:48:34.640
<v Speaker 5>like a pretty good natural match to that. It really

0:48:34.719 --> 0:48:37.799
<v Speaker 5>has been in the kind of Texas story to date,

0:48:38.360 --> 0:48:42.840
<v Speaker 5>the pairing of batteries and solar together with natural gas

0:48:42.960 --> 0:48:47.640
<v Speaker 5>additions that have supported really the only electricity market that

0:48:47.640 --> 0:48:51.080
<v Speaker 5>has been growing without data centers. So I would take

0:48:51.120 --> 0:48:54.040
<v Speaker 5>that as the leading indicator. That's not to speak ill

0:48:54.080 --> 0:48:57.239
<v Speaker 5>of my friends in the nuclear bro community. I hope

0:48:57.280 --> 0:49:01.239
<v Speaker 5>that technology pantses that seem to be occurring in the

0:49:01.280 --> 0:49:04.600
<v Speaker 5>small modular space come to fruition. I just so far,

0:49:04.680 --> 0:49:08.719
<v Speaker 5>I don't see a lot of people laying down serious

0:49:08.840 --> 0:49:12.080
<v Speaker 5>capital on that from a commercial perspective, but I do

0:49:12.120 --> 0:49:15.239
<v Speaker 5>see people laying down money on storage.

0:49:15.800 --> 0:49:18.240
<v Speaker 2>I just have one last question, and it's kind of cheating.

0:49:18.280 --> 0:49:20.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm actually this question. I'm kind of going to have

0:49:20.760 --> 0:49:24.320
<v Speaker 2>you do our work for US et cetera. You know,

0:49:24.360 --> 0:49:26.239
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to think of a really good title for

0:49:26.320 --> 0:49:29.240
<v Speaker 2>this episode. But if you look out over the next

0:49:29.600 --> 0:49:32.359
<v Speaker 2>five years, you know, you mentioned adding a whole California

0:49:32.400 --> 0:49:35.560
<v Speaker 2>to Texas. How are you thinking about the scale of

0:49:35.600 --> 0:49:39.080
<v Speaker 2>the challenge overall that the US electricity system, that the

0:49:39.120 --> 0:49:43.319
<v Speaker 2>grid overall really faces in this moment? Like how big

0:49:43.400 --> 0:49:46.080
<v Speaker 2>is it that everyone from companies like yours to the

0:49:46.160 --> 0:49:49.640
<v Speaker 2>various utility commissions. Like, how big is this a challenge

0:49:49.640 --> 0:49:50.000
<v Speaker 2>going to be?

0:49:50.280 --> 0:49:52.520
<v Speaker 5>It could be a substantial one. I mean, I think

0:49:52.560 --> 0:49:58.279
<v Speaker 5>that AI demand growth for electricity consumption is real. I

0:49:58.320 --> 0:50:02.840
<v Speaker 5>also think that that growth needs to pony up financial

0:50:02.880 --> 0:50:08.400
<v Speaker 5>commitments to engender capital investments in the power sector that

0:50:08.440 --> 0:50:11.120
<v Speaker 5>it intends to rely upon. I think those will be

0:50:11.160 --> 0:50:14.799
<v Speaker 5>the table stakes of their social license to operate in

0:50:14.880 --> 0:50:18.360
<v Speaker 5>a grid that, even where competition has been introduced, remains

0:50:18.480 --> 0:50:23.160
<v Speaker 5>pretty heavily regulated. So I think we're going to get there.

0:50:23.760 --> 0:50:27.000
<v Speaker 5>I do think that in terms of the regulatory policy

0:50:27.000 --> 0:50:29.920
<v Speaker 5>that I deal with, there's too much small ball thinking

0:50:30.080 --> 0:50:33.560
<v Speaker 5>on this, and there's too much trust in the way

0:50:33.600 --> 0:50:38.520
<v Speaker 5>we've always done things. It's probably a time to really

0:50:38.600 --> 0:50:43.120
<v Speaker 5>have kind of regulatory policy innovations like we've seen with

0:50:43.800 --> 0:50:48.320
<v Speaker 5>the FCC regulating spectrum and the deregulation of the airline

0:50:48.360 --> 0:50:53.520
<v Speaker 5>industry that tries to allocate the capacity on the grid

0:50:54.239 --> 0:50:57.080
<v Speaker 5>to the highest value the people who are actually willing

0:50:57.160 --> 0:51:00.399
<v Speaker 5>to pay the most for it, and those payments, which

0:51:00.440 --> 0:51:04.440
<v Speaker 5>would likely exceed the incremental cost of serving them, could

0:51:04.480 --> 0:51:08.560
<v Speaker 5>then actually be a revenue source back to consumers that

0:51:08.719 --> 0:51:12.000
<v Speaker 5>helps on the affordability side. So I you know, it's

0:51:12.000 --> 0:51:14.440
<v Speaker 5>almost a call to your listeners that, you know, if

0:51:14.440 --> 0:51:17.840
<v Speaker 5>you're doing a mundane corporate job and want to do

0:51:17.920 --> 0:51:22.400
<v Speaker 5>something completely different, consider becoming a utility regulator and applying

0:51:22.480 --> 0:51:26.400
<v Speaker 5>some market based principles to help solve some of these problems.

0:51:26.440 --> 0:51:30.279
<v Speaker 5>Because really, when you think about it, utility regulation they

0:51:30.320 --> 0:51:33.600
<v Speaker 5>need to be an agent of capital formation here in

0:51:33.640 --> 0:51:37.319
<v Speaker 5>the sector and to clarify this moment in terms of

0:51:37.360 --> 0:51:40.799
<v Speaker 5>demand uncertainty. And that is the kind of challenge on

0:51:40.880 --> 0:51:43.200
<v Speaker 5>a conceptual basis that we're grappling.

0:51:42.719 --> 0:51:45.640
<v Speaker 2>With Crevis Kavila. You know, we could talk to you

0:51:45.640 --> 0:51:48.319
<v Speaker 2>for hours actually just on you know, I have a

0:51:48.360 --> 0:51:51.799
<v Speaker 2>million more questions just about specifics from your time in

0:51:51.880 --> 0:51:54.239
<v Speaker 2>Montana and how all those things work, but we'll let

0:51:54.280 --> 0:51:56.800
<v Speaker 2>you go. Really appreciate your time. Let's do it again sometime.

0:51:56.840 --> 0:51:59.120
<v Speaker 2>And I did learn a few things on this episode.

0:51:59.160 --> 0:52:00.520
<v Speaker 2>So appreciate you coming on our luck.

0:52:00.760 --> 0:52:02.600
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much, Thank you so much, Travis.

0:52:02.640 --> 0:52:16.040
<v Speaker 2>That was great, Tracy.

0:52:16.080 --> 0:52:16.600
<v Speaker 4>I really like that.

0:52:16.640 --> 0:52:18.319
<v Speaker 2>I really like the way you put it there in

0:52:18.360 --> 0:52:21.600
<v Speaker 2>your question of we want to have a market ish

0:52:21.760 --> 0:52:25.960
<v Speaker 2>environment and demand signals are pretty important, et cetera, and

0:52:26.000 --> 0:52:28.400
<v Speaker 2>we want capital to flow where it's going to be

0:52:28.400 --> 0:52:31.440
<v Speaker 2>profitable and all that, we just don't really want anything

0:52:32.000 --> 0:52:34.560
<v Speaker 2>associated with the market.

0:52:34.920 --> 0:52:37.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And I mean the irony is that the market

0:52:37.960 --> 0:52:40.960
<v Speaker 3>could be functioning as intended in the sense that a

0:52:41.120 --> 0:52:44.440
<v Speaker 3>large consumer of power, like a data center, decides to

0:52:44.480 --> 0:52:47.560
<v Speaker 3>relocate itself to a place where energy costs are actually

0:52:47.640 --> 0:52:50.560
<v Speaker 3>quite low. Yeah, and then because it does that, it

0:52:51.040 --> 0:52:53.919
<v Speaker 3>ends up distributing, you know, the cost of its own

0:52:53.960 --> 0:52:56.880
<v Speaker 3>power needs across a wider area. And it all seems

0:52:57.320 --> 0:52:58.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I'm just going to go back to what

0:52:58.560 --> 0:53:02.200
<v Speaker 3>I said earlier. It all seems so convoluted, yeah, and

0:53:02.320 --> 0:53:07.360
<v Speaker 3>so idiosyncratic across different jurisdictions. I do actually really respect

0:53:07.600 --> 0:53:10.960
<v Speaker 3>Travis's coll Just then, if you're interested in markets and

0:53:11.040 --> 0:53:14.080
<v Speaker 3>want to have an impact on people's everyday lives, consider

0:53:14.120 --> 0:53:16.880
<v Speaker 3>trying to clean up the mess that is energy regulation.

0:53:17.200 --> 0:53:21.120
<v Speaker 2>But you know, even in the non convoluted version of it,

0:53:21.280 --> 0:53:23.920
<v Speaker 2>if we just imagine the platonic ideal of a normal

0:53:24.000 --> 0:53:28.080
<v Speaker 2>market and there's this commodity electrons, and it's well, what

0:53:28.239 --> 0:53:32.399
<v Speaker 2>if AI is this really valuable thing, and it's more

0:53:32.480 --> 0:53:35.120
<v Speaker 2>valuable than blow drawing your hair. I mean, for real,

0:53:35.200 --> 0:53:37.520
<v Speaker 2>this could be a thing like you know, we were

0:53:37.520 --> 0:53:41.799
<v Speaker 2>talking about making cars or making steel, et cetera. Like, Oh, yeah,

0:53:41.800 --> 0:53:43.920
<v Speaker 2>well this is this thing.

0:53:44.160 --> 0:53:46.160
<v Speaker 3>I wasn't going to do it. I wasn't going to

0:53:46.239 --> 0:53:47.680
<v Speaker 3>But now I'm going to bring up that time you

0:53:47.719 --> 0:53:51.360
<v Speaker 3>wrote that mining crypto could theoretically be a more valuable

0:53:51.440 --> 0:53:53.520
<v Speaker 3>activity than running a fridge.

0:53:53.840 --> 0:53:57.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, right, this is the question in a normal market.

0:53:58.040 --> 0:54:00.960
<v Speaker 2>The reason why that example seems absurd. I'm glad you

0:54:01.000 --> 0:54:03.520
<v Speaker 2>actually brought up because the reason why that example seems

0:54:03.640 --> 0:54:07.440
<v Speaker 2>absurd is because very few people could ever wrap their

0:54:07.480 --> 0:54:11.720
<v Speaker 2>heads around, well, could cryptomning be more valuable or value

0:54:11.800 --> 0:54:14.400
<v Speaker 2>add than running a fridge. That being said, when it

0:54:14.440 --> 0:54:17.120
<v Speaker 2>comes to something like AI, there really is a debate,

0:54:17.200 --> 0:54:19.720
<v Speaker 2>and some people would say that's a total waste because

0:54:19.920 --> 0:54:22.760
<v Speaker 2>AI is just a costly way to make fast poems.

0:54:22.760 --> 0:54:25.040
<v Speaker 2>And other people would say, no, this is the fourth

0:54:25.120 --> 0:54:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Industrial Revolution or whatever. And so I think part of

0:54:28.000 --> 0:54:31.760
<v Speaker 2>the reason we're sort of uncomfortable with the oh, let's

0:54:31.840 --> 0:54:34.200
<v Speaker 2>just move the electrons to where they're who's going to

0:54:34.200 --> 0:54:36.239
<v Speaker 2>pay for them most is because I don't think a

0:54:36.239 --> 0:54:37.960
<v Speaker 2>lot of people there are a lot of people who

0:54:37.960 --> 0:54:42.200
<v Speaker 2>intuitively are skeptical that this is a good allocation of

0:54:42.239 --> 0:54:43.440
<v Speaker 2>real resources.

0:54:43.080 --> 0:54:46.200
<v Speaker 3>Right, I mean, I think politically, the message that the

0:54:46.239 --> 0:54:48.759
<v Speaker 3>cost of your electricity has to go up so that

0:54:48.800 --> 0:54:51.640
<v Speaker 3>AI can do its thing, Yeah, you can lose your job.

0:54:52.160 --> 0:54:54.120
<v Speaker 3>Is it an extremely unpalatable one.

0:54:54.360 --> 0:54:55.200
<v Speaker 4>No, it's totally.

0:54:55.239 --> 0:54:57.239
<v Speaker 2>It's totally. I think this is why I'm just going

0:54:57.280 --> 0:55:00.120
<v Speaker 2>to break a lot of people's brands. But on the

0:55:00.160 --> 0:55:02.840
<v Speaker 2>other hand, if we accept that, you know, the belief

0:55:03.320 --> 0:55:07.680
<v Speaker 2>that markets are generally good allocators of resources, et cetera,

0:55:07.760 --> 0:55:09.839
<v Speaker 2>they're like, well, it's not really our job to have

0:55:09.880 --> 0:55:11.640
<v Speaker 2>an opinion on this is a good use. So this

0:55:11.760 --> 0:55:14.160
<v Speaker 2>is not a good use. But anyway, I did find

0:55:14.160 --> 0:55:17.840
<v Speaker 2>that to be a very interesting conversation. It does seem

0:55:17.920 --> 0:55:21.160
<v Speaker 2>like those commissions that have to decide what is an

0:55:21.200 --> 0:55:25.240
<v Speaker 2>appropriate amount to spend on upgrades and capacity, they really

0:55:25.320 --> 0:55:27.279
<v Speaker 2>have their work cutout for them right now.

0:55:27.520 --> 0:55:29.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. The way I would put it is they are

0:55:29.440 --> 0:55:33.920
<v Speaker 3>not always the most popular people among their respective jurisdictions,

0:55:34.000 --> 0:55:34.719
<v Speaker 3>that's for sure.

0:55:34.800 --> 0:55:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, someone has to have the job of doing the

0:55:36.560 --> 0:55:37.560
<v Speaker 2>unpopular stuff, right.

0:55:37.640 --> 0:55:42.360
<v Speaker 3>Someone has to have the job of adequately compensating investors

0:55:42.400 --> 0:55:45.120
<v Speaker 3>in utilities for the risks that they take on in

0:55:45.239 --> 0:55:49.960
<v Speaker 3>providing a necessary commodity for life and the Fourth Industrial Revolution.

0:55:50.200 --> 0:55:51.080
<v Speaker 2>That's right, all right?

0:55:51.160 --> 0:55:51.920
<v Speaker 3>Shall we leave it there?

0:55:52.000 --> 0:55:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Let's leave it there.

0:55:52.880 --> 0:55:55.200
<v Speaker 3>This has been another episode of the Odd Thoughts podcast.

0:55:55.320 --> 0:55:57.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy al the.

0:55:57.880 --> 0:56:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Way, and I'm Jill Wisenthal. You can follow me at

0:56:00.520 --> 0:56:04.000
<v Speaker 2>the Stalwart. Follow our guest Travis Kavula, He's at Tkavula.

0:56:04.239 --> 0:56:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Follow our producers Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen armand dash Ol

0:56:07.680 --> 0:56:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Bennett at Dashbot and Kilbrooks at Kalebrooks. For more odd

0:56:11.239 --> 0:56:13.960
<v Speaker 2>Laws content, go to Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots

0:56:13.960 --> 0:56:16.400
<v Speaker 2>were a bit daily newsletter and all of our episodes,

0:56:16.600 --> 0:56:18.560
<v Speaker 2>and you can chat about all of these topics twenty

0:56:18.600 --> 0:56:23.320
<v Speaker 2>four seven in our discord discord dot gg slash odlines.

0:56:23.120 --> 0:56:25.279
<v Speaker 3>And if you enjoy odd Lots, if you like it

0:56:25.360 --> 0:56:28.839
<v Speaker 3>when we try to untangle the US utility landscape, then

0:56:28.880 --> 0:56:31.920
<v Speaker 3>please leave us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform.

0:56:32.200 --> 0:56:34.719
<v Speaker 3>And remember, if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can

0:56:34.760 --> 0:56:37.839
<v Speaker 3>listen to all of our episodes absolutely ad free. All

0:56:37.840 --> 0:56:39.759
<v Speaker 3>you need to do is find the Bloomberg channel on

0:56:39.840 --> 0:56:43.240
<v Speaker 3>Apple Podcasts and follow the instructions there thanks for listening,