WEBVTT - More Biden Balloon Deceptions plus Twitter Bans a US Senator

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome at his verdict of Senator Ted Cruz Ben Ferguson

0:00:03.480 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>with you as well, and Senator, you just got out

0:00:06.120 --> 0:00:11.560
<v Speaker 1>of classified briefings that deal with something the President refused

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:13.319
<v Speaker 1>to bring up during the State of the Union, and

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>that is the Chinese government and their balloons and the

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:19.520
<v Speaker 1>fact that they went all the way across our country

0:00:19.520 --> 0:00:21.079
<v Speaker 1>and then finally he said sorry, I'll deal with it

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.080
<v Speaker 1>after they pretty much got anything they wanted. What did

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>you learn today that the American people need to know about? Well,

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I spent two hours today in a classified briefing in

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:33.879
<v Speaker 1>the skiff down in the basement of the Capitol. And

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:35.960
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I'll point out that when I left

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the classified briefing, I didn't bring any classified materials with

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>me because you can't bring it out of the skiff,

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and so I don't have any at home with me.

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't have many any anywhere else. That seems to

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>be very unlike Joe Biden, who seems to have classified

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>materials everywhere he goes. But the two hour briefing was

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>entirely on the Chinese spy balloon, and it was a

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>detailed briefing. It included senior official from the Department of

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Defense and the Department of State and the intelligence community

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>walking through what happened, and they revealed quite a lot

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 1>because it was classified. I'm not going to repeat anything

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that was said there, but I can characterize the administration's

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>position is they are spinning mightily. Number One, They're trying

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to diminish the seriousness of the damage to national security

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 1>that happened from the espionage that China was allowed to

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>undertake in the United States. I did not find their

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>spinning credible. Number two, they were presenting highly legalistic arguments

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>as to why they didn't shoot down the balloon when

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>it first entered US airspace. And mind you, they did

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 1>shoot down the balloon a week later, after it had

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>spent a week in US airspace, after it had been

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>able to hover over sensitive military facilities and other facilities

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 1>that that implicate national security, and after it had traversed

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the entire United States of America. Was only when it

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:11.919
<v Speaker 1>crossed out into the Atlantic off the coast of South

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Carolina that more than a week later, they finally shut

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:16.959
<v Speaker 1>it down. You know, I have to say it was

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:24.639
<v Speaker 1>really striking listening to the administration give these these over

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>lawyered answers suggesting that there were impediments to they're shooting

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:33.399
<v Speaker 1>it down in Alaska. Apparently you can shoot it down

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>off of South Carolina, but not Alaska, which is assinine it.

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I practiced law for a lot of years. It was

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 1>it reeked of after the fact, rationalization and trying to

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>find a justification for impotently doing nothing for the entire

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>week it was over the United States. And just from

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the public time line, there's one thing that is critically

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:05.920
<v Speaker 1>important that I don't think many people have focused on.

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>So the public timeline, it was Saturday, January twenty eighth

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>when the balloon began entering American territory, entering Alaskan airspace

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>near the Aleutian Islands. And that was on the twenty eighth.

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>By the thirtieth, two days later it left American territorium,

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 1>was over Canada. Did we warn Canada? By the way?

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:32.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is that something that we would have done?

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>And I know when we say we found the same

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>coming over Alaska, but that's when the public noticed it.

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Do we even know if our military noticed it before then?

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>So I know the answers to both of those questions

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not able to answer what I will say is

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>is that NORAAD and Northcom operates in close coordination with Canada,

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>and so our military is in frequent consultation and discussion

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>with their Canadian counterparts. That's as much as I can say.

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>But here's the other piece that we know, again from

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:17.719
<v Speaker 1>public reports, not from the briefing. Today, Tuesday, January thirty first,

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:22.280
<v Speaker 1>was the first day President Biden was briefed, which means

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese spy balloon was over Alaska for two days,

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:34.480
<v Speaker 1>over US soil, conducting surveillance, and yet Joe Biden had

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>not been brought in the loop. Joe Biden had not

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>been briefed, and so a lot of us, myself included,

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:46.279
<v Speaker 1>have asked why the hell didn't they shoot it down

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>when it first entered Alaska. And just from the public record,

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the facts that's there is when it entered Alaska,

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden had no idea because the commander in chief

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 1>had not been informed at that point. That that's a

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:05.280
<v Speaker 1>what is the chain of command? Because you just you

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:09.160
<v Speaker 1>just giving that information immediately brings up the question does

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the military get to make the decision when it's over

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a lask if the president doesn't notice shoot it down

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>or does it go to the commander in chief every time?

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 1>And they just said, ah, we don't need to inform

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:21.679
<v Speaker 1>him of this. I mean that that's a either way.

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 1>That is a shocking reality that there could be this

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>much of a disconnect. So that there is existing statute

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>that governs this, that that that if if if there

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>is an airship, an unmanned airshift with with with hostile intent,

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>with hostile capacity, that our military commanders have the legal

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:45.480
<v Speaker 1>authority to engage and to take it out. Uh And

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and so the northcom commander has the authority to do that.

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>They also have the authority to engage and take it

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 1>out if it if it is engaged in hostile intelligence gathering,

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 1>which which I think in this instance it plainly was.

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>It is to some extent a judgment call when and

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to what extent it is reported up the chain of

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>command to the commander in chief. So you know, in

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 1>a hypothetical where where suddenly you see something that has

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>say a bomb payload, that could do harm in an

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 1>immediate circumstances, our military can engage and take it out

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>in the instance to protect the American homeland. Well, let's

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about that you're going in a skiff for this

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:38.919
<v Speaker 1>classified briefing. Who gets invited to this is that? And

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>what qualifies you to get this briefing? Can any senator

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 1>ask to be a part of this, to be a

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>part of this briefiefing or just based on the committees

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>that you are appointed to that you serve on. So

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>there are often classified briefings that are committee based, and

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 1>so I serve on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. We

0:06:55.720 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>have many classified briefings on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Previously served on the Senate Arm Services Committee. We had

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>many classified briefings on the Senate Arm Services Committee. So

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>there are committee specific reasons that you'll go to classified briefings.

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>There are also periodically all senator briefings. That's what this was.

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>So every senator was invited. If you are a US senator,

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>you that this was at TSSCI, so at a high

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>level of clearance, and all senators have that clearance by

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>virtue of being elected senators. And virtually all the senators

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>were there. I didn't notice anyone missing, but it was

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 1>certainly was a full room and there was a lot

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>of interest. I stayed until the very end, and and

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to point out something else that is striking

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>and yet not a lot of people have noticed and

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>focused on, which is on February fourth, the same day

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:54.559
<v Speaker 1>that the Biden administration shot down the balloon. The Biden

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>administration was getting a lot of criticism, obviously for having

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>allowed this balloon to stay in US airspace and conduct

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>surveillance for over a week. On the day on that day,

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>on February fourth, the Biden administration arranged a briefing with

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the media with a quote senior defense official. And one

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of the things that I asked about in the briefing

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>today was who that senior defense official was. And I

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>got an answer to that, but I can't tell you

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the answer to that. But the transcript of the briefing

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:38.079
<v Speaker 1>from the unnamed senior defense official included the following paragraph

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:40.680
<v Speaker 1>that that individual told the reporters on the day the

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:45.719
<v Speaker 1>balloon was shut down. Quote PRC Government surveillance balloons transited

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the continental United States briefly at least three times during

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the prior administration, and once that we know of at

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of this administration, but never for this duration

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 1>of time. And so you'll recall when the balloon was

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 1>shot down. This paragraph suddenly became a major talking point

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>that the defenders of the Biden White House began using, saying, well,

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 1>three times there were balloons during the Trump administration. And

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>you'll recall, as it played out, we then had a

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 1>series of senior officials from the Trump administration, like the

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Secretary of State, like the Director of National Intelligence publicly

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 1>say I don't know what these guys are talking about.

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 1>That didn't happen. We don't know anything about it. In

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:31.440
<v Speaker 1>other words, they weren't briefed on it, and they see

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>they were held in the dark. Well, it turns out

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that at the time the Biden administration was telling reporters

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 1>that this happened three times during the Trump administration, the

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration knew full well that nobody in the Trump

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>administration was aware of this. They knew that, and so

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>they were deliberately misleading the reporters by saying, well, happened

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:05.200
<v Speaker 1>three times out under Trump. And they were speaking the

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>truth technically, but they were omitting a major part because

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the obvious inference when you hear that is, oh, and

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Trump didn't do anything about it, And they know full

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 1>well that Trump didn't know about it. The Secretary of

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>State didn't know about it. Secretary Defense didn't know about it.

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>And so the Biden administration was perfectly happy to spend

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the reporters, and the reporters were perfectly happy to be

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>spun and to midsly the American public on purpose to

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>cover their rear end political spin. And it was deliberate

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>on a matter of really important national security. I want

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>to ask you about another public report that's come out

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:50.080
<v Speaker 1>that the Chinese by balloon passing over Sense of Sites

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:54.079
<v Speaker 1>quote could have collected communications. The State Department has now

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:57.560
<v Speaker 1>revealed that. Before I ask you about that aspect of this,

0:10:57.600 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to tell you about our friends over at

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Patriot Mobile. If you are a conservative and you're proud

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 1>to be a conservative, and you're proud to defend conservative values,

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and you've got a cell phone, you need to check

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>out Patriot Mobile. Why when you switch to Patriot Mobile,

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>you get the same exact cell phone coverage you're used

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 1>to right now. You get to keep your same cell

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 1>phone number, You get to keep your same cell phone

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>or upgrade to a new one if you want to.

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>But when you pay your bill every month, you're actually

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>supporting causes that you believe in we're talking about setting

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 1>up for the First and the Second Amendment. We're talking

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 1>about setting up for the rights onboard. We're talking about

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:36.079
<v Speaker 1>helping people with adoptions. These are the things that Patriot

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Mobile uses your dollars to actually advocate and support. If

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>you are ready to fight back, then do it with

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 1>your cell phone a bill you're already going to pay,

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 1>support conservative causes and make the switch. Go online to

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Patriot Mobile dot com slash verdict. You'll get the best

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>deals of the day. You can also call them eight

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>seven eight Patriot. That's eight seven eight Patriot used the

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>promo code verdict. You'll get the best deals they have

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>right now eight seven eight Patriot or Patriotmobile dot com

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 1>slash verdict center that this was for me, I think

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 1>honestly shocking when this came out. The State Department is

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 1>admitted that the Chinese spy balloon that floated over the

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>United States America for these eight days, including floating over

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>vital national security sites, was equipped they now say, with

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 1>intendas that likely could collect our communications. How concerns of

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the American people be about that aspect of the spy balloon, Well,

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we should be very concerned. It was a

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 1>balloon that was launched for the purpose of espionage, for

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the purpose of presumably taking photographs, perhaps using infrared or

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 1>other technology, and attempting to intercept communications, attempting to gather

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 1>information that can be used to undermine the national security

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 1>of the United States. And if you look at the

0:12:56.120 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>flight path of this balloon, it was very liberate that

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>it went over sensitive sites. It went over sites, the

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:09.679
<v Speaker 1>military sites. It went over sites that are extremely sensitive

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>from a national security perspective. And by the way that

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>you and I, if we were in a private plane,

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>are not allowed to fly over and if we did,

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>it would probably be shot down. That's how secure these

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>sites are. Well I'm not sure we'd be shot down,

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 1>but they are sites that are highly secure. And the

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration made a decision to allow this to happen.

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 1>They could have shot it down in Alaska. Mind you,

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 1>no one even bothered to tell Joe Biden about it

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:40.679
<v Speaker 1>when it was over Alaska. But they could have shot

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>it down there. They could have shot it down in

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the wilderness of Canada. They could have shot it down

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>in Idaho or Montana, and they didn't. They allowed it

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:55.599
<v Speaker 1>to spend a week collecting intelligence. That intelligence presumably was

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:59.440
<v Speaker 1>sent up via satellite back to Beijing, so that Beijing

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 1>has what ever information they gathered and stole. Presumably the

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Chinese Communist government has that information now, and it was

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 1>only after the mission was complete, after the espionage was done,

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:17.079
<v Speaker 1>that they shot it down in the Atlantic Ocean. I

0:14:17.120 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 1>think that was a reckless decision, but I also think

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>it was a dangerous decision because it projected weakness. It

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 1>projected weakness to the Chinese Communist government and to every

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>other enemy of America because it told them that they

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 1>could brazenly enter American airspace conduct espionage on sensitive military secrets.

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 1>And this president, this commander in chief would not act

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to prevent that. Last question on this, I want to

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>ask you, and this is something I just think that

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>we should debunk very quickly. I've actually seen commentators and

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 1>people on social media saying, well, you don't have to

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 1>worry about what information China got, because we shot this

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 1>thing down. They didn't get their balloon back. That to

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>me maybe one of the biggest lies that I've seen

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 1>that has kind of happened over the last several days.

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 1>This information that they were stealing was going back up

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:10.160
<v Speaker 1>to their satellites in real time at what they didn't

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 1>need to get their balloon back to basically get all

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the intel In all likelihood, that's exactly how this operated,

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>was that it was sending the information back to China

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>real time so that it doesn't have to go back

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to China for them to get the data. Senator, before

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>we get to some other big news things happening on

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Commerce and Judiciary, which you're a member of, and I

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>know you want to give an important update on what's

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>happening in DC this week on that on those committees,

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk to guys out there listening about

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>something that's really important, and that's about being a real

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 1>American man. Look in the midst of the relentless war

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 1>masculinity in America today, I want you to know that

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 1>there is something that can help you with strength and

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 1>vitality over weakness and complacency. If you have felt like

0:15:57.560 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>you're losing that edge a little bit, then you need

0:15:59.880 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 1>to check out Chalkhoq. They're here to help real American

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 1>men take back their right to proudly maximize their masculinity

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 1>by boosting to stosterone levels up to twenty percent over

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>ninety days now I've been taking Chalk it's spelled choq

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and for two weeks now. This is what I've been

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 1>doing and what I can tell you is it's working.

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking the Mail Vitality Stack manufactured right here in

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the USA. Chalk is a natural herbal supplement that are

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>clinically proven to have game changing effects on your energy,

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>your focus, your mood, and your libido. So maximize your

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>masculinity today at Chalk cchoq dot com. That's chalkhoq dot com.

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Use the promo code verdict for thirty five percent off

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>any Chalk subscriptions for life Chalk dot com Code verdict

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 1>for thirty five percent off. Senator, I want you to

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 1>give us some updates on what you're working on right

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>now on these important committees, because you've had a lot

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 1>of meetings over the last twenty four forty hours. Well,

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:04.639
<v Speaker 1>today was a busy day. In addition to the classified

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:07.919
<v Speaker 1>briefing on the Chinese by balloon, we also had hearings

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 1>in both the Commerce Committee and the Judiciary Committee. The

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:17.119
<v Speaker 1>morning started in Judiciary with the Senate Democrats taking up

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine judicial nominees who were who had been nominated

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 1>last year and had not gotten confirmed, and they were

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 1>moving moving them forward out of committee. Now these were

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:32.719
<v Speaker 1>these included many of the most extreme and radical nominees.

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:37.239
<v Speaker 1>These include the judicial nominee who, at a conference at

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:43.120
<v Speaker 1>actually my alma mater, Princeton University, reportedly said that police

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:47.159
<v Speaker 1>kill unarmed black men every single day. And she reportedly

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:50.440
<v Speaker 1>agreed with that statement. When she was questioned about it

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>at her confirmation hearing, she said, well, I said that

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:59.160
<v Speaker 1>as an advocate. Now, mind you, that statement is wildly

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 1>blatantly false. It's not remotely true as a factual matter,

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's an incredibly harmful statement because if people believe it,

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 1>it is a lie that has real consequences and that

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>endangers the lives of police officers. And three times she said, well,

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:17.680
<v Speaker 1>it was as an advocate, so you know, apparently, look,

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I spent a lot of years practicing law as an advocate.

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:23.400
<v Speaker 1>You're not entitled to lie either that It's not like

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you have the ability when you're just being an advocate

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to lie. She subsequently, after a confirmation hearing, tried to

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>say in a letter, oh no, I don't think I

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 1>said this after all, But she did it after the

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 1>hearing when there was no opportunity to ask her questions.

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:40.200
<v Speaker 1>She was one of the judges. They were moving forward

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 1>another judge, another district court nominee, as a judge who

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:49.440
<v Speaker 1>described himself as a wild eyed liberal and described how

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 1>he is motivated every morning to get out of bed

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:58.439
<v Speaker 1>by his hatred for conservatives. And I asked the Democrats

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:01.160
<v Speaker 1>on the committee, I said, look, this is who's been

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 1>nominated to be a district judge in New York. How

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:05.959
<v Speaker 1>would you feel if you were a Republican, you were

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a conservative in New York, there are some and you

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>found yourself in front of a federal judge who has

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:15.440
<v Speaker 1>said he gets up every morning motivated by his hatred

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 1>for you. That's a person obviously unfit and without a

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:26.399
<v Speaker 1>judicial temperament suitable to be a judge. And then I

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:29.160
<v Speaker 1>also asked about the district court nominee that we talked

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>about on a previous podcast, who went under questioning from

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 1>John Kennedy didn't know what Article five of the Constitution was,

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't know, which is not a trick question. If you

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 1>miss that in our pod, go back and listen to

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 1>that podcast that we did, because you explained how basic

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 1>that that question is to any legal scholar, any anybody

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that's a lawyer, especially if you are looking to serve

0:19:57.200 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 1>at this level, you would be prepared to know about

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:02.679
<v Speaker 1>this well. And the follow up, John Kennedy asked, he

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 1>asked about what's an Article two of the Constitution, and

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>she said she didn't know, she couldn't remember. Now that

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:14.160
<v Speaker 1>that is not a gotcha question, that is not obscure.

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 1>That is a question that any first year law student

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 1>could answer. And if you couldn't answer it, you would

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 1>flunk constitutional law. It is very simple. So the first

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 1>three articles of the Constitution. Article one establishes the Congress,

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the legislative branch of our government. Article two establishes the

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:36.479
<v Speaker 1>President of the United States, and the executive branch. An

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Article three establishes the judiciary. This person is nominated to

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:44.640
<v Speaker 1>be what is called an Article three judge. And yet

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>apparently she doesn't even know what that is. She didn't

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:49.919
<v Speaker 1>know what Article two was. And I pointed out at

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:53.119
<v Speaker 1>the hearing that Dick Durban, the Democrat chairman of the committee,

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 1>said after that hearing, well, there are probably a lot

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 1>of members of our committee that couldn't answer those questions either,

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 1>And so I brought that up, and I said, I

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 1>thought that was really an astonishing statement. And I said,

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:10.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm confident that everyone on the Republican side of the

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:13.360
<v Speaker 1>aisle could answer the question what's article too? But but

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I find it stunning to the Democrats here that your

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 1>chairman is saying you have no idea what Article two

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 1>of the Constitution is it? And I had said I

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 1>would do this on the podcast, so I followed through it.

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I said, does anyone here what who admit right now

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't know what Article two is? And they all

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 1>stared away and stared at their phones, and stared at

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 1>their shoes and did everything to avoid eye contact. And

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:40.359
<v Speaker 1>it's a ridiculous point, as I said, listen, it's real simple.

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Anyone who doesn't know what Article two of the Constitution

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 1>is has no business serving on the Senate Judiciary Committee,

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:49.959
<v Speaker 1>and certainly has no business serving as a federal judge.

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 1>And and I made a plea to my Democrat colleagues.

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I said, look, what is wrong with you people. You

0:21:55.800 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 1>have rubber stamped every single Biden judiciariinee, one hundred percent

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 1>of them in the last two years. You have voted

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 1>for every single nominee, no matter how bad, no matter

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>how extreme. And by the way, every other Senate Democrat

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 1>has as well. All of the judicial nominees when they

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 1>went to the floor. One hundred percent of the Democrats

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 1>have voted for all of them. And I put it out.

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I said, look, during the Trump administration, Trump nominated some

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:26.200
<v Speaker 1>fantastic judges. We confirmed some fantastic judges, but there were

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 1>several nominees that were not fantastic nominees that had problems.

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:35.440
<v Speaker 1>And as Republican Senators who actually take seriously the quality

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and caliber and qualifications of the judiciary, we push back

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:43.679
<v Speaker 1>and made clear to the Trump White House those nominees

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 1>would not get confirmed. And I looked at my colleagues

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and said, are none of you willing to stand up

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:53.399
<v Speaker 1>for anything? Will you at least admit a judge should

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:55.679
<v Speaker 1>know what Article two of the Constitution is? Will you

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:58.679
<v Speaker 1>at least admit a judge shouldn't have a record of

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 1>saying he has motivated by hatred for conservatives each and

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:06.199
<v Speaker 1>every day. Not a single Democrats said a word. The

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>only substance of response I got as I said, look,

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:17.919
<v Speaker 1>your behavior suggests that if Joe Biden nominated a ham sandwich,

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:22.199
<v Speaker 1>you would vote to confirm the ham Sandwich is a judge.

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:25.639
<v Speaker 1>And the only substant of response I got is Corey

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Booker chimed in afterwards and he said, I just want

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:30.920
<v Speaker 1>to clarify one thing. He said, I'm a vegan, so

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:34.639
<v Speaker 1>I would not vote to confirm a ham sandwich, which

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>he was pretty funny. Yeah that, And actually Corey Booker

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:42.920
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty good guy. He and I are get

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 1>along well and are often kidding each other back and forth.

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:49.640
<v Speaker 1>But it spoke volume that neither Durban nor anyone else

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 1>engaged in any of the substance. And then, like the

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Politburo in the Soviet Union, they all voted dah and

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 1>moved on the nominees and they do not care. They'll

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>fill the judiciary with left wing zealots and they don't

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:09.200
<v Speaker 1>even feel, as far as I can tell, a twinge

0:24:09.240 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>of remorse or guilt. What scares me more than liberal

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 1>is an ignorant liberal. And if you have these types

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of individuals on our court system, it terrifies me what

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:22.400
<v Speaker 1>it means when you walk into their courtroom knowing that

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:24.120
<v Speaker 1>this is who they're putting there. And I think every

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Americans should care about this, especially if you're listening and

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 1>you have a senator that is a democratic liberal. You

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 1>should be calling them and telling them that this is unacceptable.

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to move to something else, and that deals

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:38.159
<v Speaker 1>with the Twitter files. And before we get to that,

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 1>there's also a new senator that's actually got banned from

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and now he's getting reinstated. We're going to tell

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:45.719
<v Speaker 1>that story in a moment, but first, let me tell

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:49.880
<v Speaker 1>you about Augusta's Precious Metals. If you have been saving

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 1>for retirement, then you understand how important it is to

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 1>protect your money. One way you can do that is

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 1>with a gold Ira. Now I'm excited to tell you

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:00.040
<v Speaker 1>about a company that I not only trust, but I

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 1>actually use them, August of Precious Metals. They're different because

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 1>they even tell you if a gold Ira isn't your answer,

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:10.880
<v Speaker 1>they just give you the facts at August of Precious Metal. Now,

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:13.880
<v Speaker 1>they do things differently because they want you to have information.

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 1>And that's one of the reasons why not only do

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 1>they have a free guide, but they also do a

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 1>web conference at August of Precious Metals. It is about

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:24.760
<v Speaker 1>protecting your ira in your four oh one k in

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 1>this crazy economy. So if you're close to a retirement,

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you understand there's no time to make up losses. Call

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>August of Precious Metals eight seven seven four gold IRA

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 1>or visit them August of Precious Metals dot com. That's

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:44.120
<v Speaker 1>eight seven seven four gold IRA. You'll get their free report,

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>plus you can also do their web conference, which is amazing.

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Tell them I sent you and they'll pay your fees

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 1>up to ten years. That's August of Precious Medals eight

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:56.480
<v Speaker 1>seven seven four gold IRA or August of Precious Metals

0:25:56.520 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>dot com. You look at the Twitter files that has

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:03.400
<v Speaker 1>hit the outside this week, and I want to play

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:07.679
<v Speaker 1>just one of the examples of all these former executives

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:10.680
<v Speaker 1>have been fired by Elon Musk Center had to come

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>before the House, before the House Oversight Committee, Jim Jordan

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>talked about when what made them decide to get rid

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 1>of the Hunter Biden story, to get rid of the

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>New York Posts article, to treat it even if you

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:29.440
<v Speaker 1>try to share it in private messages like child pornography sharing,

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 1>to make sure this story got shut down and it

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:36.320
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't impact or minimize the impact to the presidential election.

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>And this was a very interesting viral moment from Jim

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Jordan talking to all these fired leaders. Some of them

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 1>former FBI officials who then went to work at Twitter.

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 1>So the FBI didn't tell you that it was faked

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and tell you that it was hacked, And mister Roth,

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:57.920
<v Speaker 1>did did the story violate your policies? In my judgment

0:26:57.960 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>at the time, No, it did not. Yeah, that's why

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you said, said what I would propose. Excuse me, as

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>you said, it isn't clearly a violation of our hack

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:07.119
<v Speaker 1>materials policy, nor is it clearly the violation of anything else.

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:09.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think what a lot of people are wondering is,

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 1>if it didn't violate your policies, and they didn't tell

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:14.679
<v Speaker 1>you it was fake, didn't tell you it was hacked,

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 1>why'd you take it down? The company made a decision

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 1>that found that it did violate the policy. It wasn't

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 1>my personal judgment at the time that it did, but

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the decision was communicated to me by my direct supervisor,

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately I didn't disagree with it enough to object

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:33.919
<v Speaker 1>to you know, you know what, you know what I

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 1>think happened, mister Roth. I think I think you guys

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:40.639
<v Speaker 1>got played. I think you guys wanted to wanted to

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:42.639
<v Speaker 1>take it deep down. We saw it, but the chairman

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:44.359
<v Speaker 1>put up where you said, you know everyone in the

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 1>White House is as a fascist. I think you guys

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 1>wanted it to be taken down. I think you meet

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 1>with these guys every week. We know that's been established

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:53.880
<v Speaker 1>in the Twitter foles. You had weekly meetings with mister

0:27:53.960 --> 0:27:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Chan and the run up to the election, they send

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you all kinds of emails. They send you documents on

0:27:58.320 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the super secret James Bond tell reporter you get information

0:28:01.560 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 1>on that. I think you guys wanted to take it down.

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:07.679
<v Speaker 1>I think you guys got played by the FBI. I

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 1>think that's a brilliant assessment of this. It was either

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:13.919
<v Speaker 1>you got played by the FBI or you knew you

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 1>were getting played and you went along with it because

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:18.119
<v Speaker 1>you didn't want Donald Trump to have a chance to

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:22.399
<v Speaker 1>become the president again. Yeah, I think that's right. The

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 1>only thing about there getting played by the FBI is

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 1>they were so willing to get played that I think

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 1>they were eager to jump in that bed along with

0:28:30.359 --> 0:28:33.919
<v Speaker 1>them that it was. They hated Donald Trump, they wanted

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 1>him to lose, they wanted Biden to win, and they

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 1>were going to use the power they had to silence

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 1>any story that was politically problematic for Joe Biden, and

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 1>it was naked politics. You know, the fact that the

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 1>FBI was being political and was urging them to do

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 1>it made it all the worse because they were essentially

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 1>conspiring with the FBI. And we've talked a lot on

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 1>this podcast about the fact that Elon Musk has gone

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 1>in and bought Twitter and fired these these left wing

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 1>petty authoritarians who believe they had blanket authority to influence

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 1>and steal elections, to silence and censor anyone they disagreed with,

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 1>to coordinate and act as henchmen on behalf of the

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 1>federal government, silencing their political enemies. Elon Musk coming in

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and firing them was a big deal. But I'll tell you,

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 1>even with and Elon's fired, I think up to two

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 1>thirds of the employees at Twitter and he is running

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Twitter day in, day out. But even so that they

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:45.840
<v Speaker 1>are still fighting him. It is It's reminiscent of the

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 1>deep state in government, where during the Trump administration, there'd

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 1>be good people in a political position and the deep

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 1>state would fight them a rearguard action. Well, this week,

0:29:56.840 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that happened is Twitter spended a

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 1>US senator suspended Steve Danes. Steve Danes as Senator from Montana,

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 1>a good friend of mine. Steve Danes had posted on

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:13.520
<v Speaker 1>his profile picture a beautiful picture of Steve and his wife,

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Cindy and an antelope that they had just shot on

0:30:16.960 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 1>a hunting trip. And it's it's a gorgeous picture, and

0:30:18.920 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 1>he had it on his profile picture. And he woke

0:30:22.440 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 1>up Monday morning to find that he was blocked on Twitter.

0:30:27.440 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 1>They had shut down his senatorial account, and the message

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:34.240
<v Speaker 1>they had given was delete profile image. That he was

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 1>not going to be allowed to use Twitter until he

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 1>deleted that image, and it was deleted because Twitter said

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you may not include graphic violence or adult content in

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>your profile header image, and and we consider graphic violence

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 1>to be any form of gory media related to death,

0:30:53.760 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 1>serious injury, violence, or surgical procedures. So apparently hunting qualified,

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and so Steve. Tuesday morning, as I was flying to

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 1>DC for the State of the Union, Steve texted me

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and told me he had been banned from Twitter. And

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 1>so I jumped on Twitter to speak up for my friend.

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I sent out a tweet. I said, ridiculous, my friend

0:31:18.760 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Steve Danes is in Twitter. Jail for posting this pick

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:25.480
<v Speaker 1>with his wife, Cindy. If you don't like hunting, fine,

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:31.680
<v Speaker 1>don't go, but don't censor others who disagree. And I'm

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure this is a formal job responsibility for a

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:39.120
<v Speaker 1>senator from Montana. Yeah, if you don't, If you don't

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 1>hunt in Montana, it's pretty hard to get elected statewide.

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>It is. And I'll tell you, actually, I did a

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:47.560
<v Speaker 1>follow up, which is I put a comment on it.

0:31:48.160 --> 0:31:51.280
<v Speaker 1>I said, Steve also told me that he was aiming

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:55.760
<v Speaker 1>for the balloon, but he had an antelope instead. Well,

0:31:57.880 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>that took you a minute. Ben, don't go back and

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:04.400
<v Speaker 1>editing and take that pause out. That that pause that

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 1>there is a lengthy pause there is, Ben's processing. What

0:32:08.200 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I will give you, well played. When you make a

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 1>joke that's a good one, I'll give you the golf

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:14.000
<v Speaker 1>clap for that one. I'll give you the golf clap.

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:18.239
<v Speaker 1>There we go. I'll take it. Um. But thankfully I

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 1>began tweeting about it. Mike Lee began tweeting about it,

0:32:21.720 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and interestingly enough, Elon Musk had to get personally involved.

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 1>He reached out directly to Steve Danes. The two of

0:32:30.160 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 1>them talked on the phone and Elon number one reinstated

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Steve Danes on Twitter, but he had to do it personally.

0:32:37.160 --> 0:32:39.720
<v Speaker 1>And number two he changed the policy so it is

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 1>no longer their policy to ban you if you put

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>up a picture of of of you hunting, and it

0:32:47.240 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 1>was it number one, it was the right thing to do.

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm very glad Elon did it. But it speaks volumes

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:57.360
<v Speaker 1>that you think of the thousands of decisions he has

0:32:57.440 --> 0:32:59.360
<v Speaker 1>to make every day that he had to get involved

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 1>at that La granularity to reverse the decision that was

0:33:03.680 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 1>baked into the Twitter operations. It also tells you I

0:33:06.800 --> 0:33:10.479
<v Speaker 1>think about the mindset, lastly, of those working at Twitter

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 1>who are just obsessed with their power to silence and

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:18.240
<v Speaker 1>censor and to shadow band people that they just don't

0:33:18.280 --> 0:33:21.440
<v Speaker 1>like their life. And they're willing to do it to

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 1>United States senator, which means they're obviously more than willing

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to do it to others. And imagine if you're not

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:28.960
<v Speaker 1>a US senator and they find you. And we've seen

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 1>this through the Twitter files, and I think this is

0:33:30.840 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the part that Elon Musk is up against. It's almost

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 1>like he has people within Twitter that are willing to

0:33:35.920 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 1>have the come be destroyed and be a part destroying

0:33:38.040 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the company, hoping that he runs it into the ground. Actively,

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I would argue working against him just so they can

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 1>at least make sure that conservatives or people that they

0:33:49.440 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 1>disagree with how they live their lives, that they're not

0:33:51.680 --> 0:33:53.480
<v Speaker 1>a vegan, that they actually go out and hunt and

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:56.880
<v Speaker 1>fish and do other things. They're willing to go all

0:33:56.960 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 1>in because they had to know there was going to

0:33:59.120 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 1>be a story written about this. I can't imagine they're

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 1>dominant to think that elon'sco isn't going to hear about it.

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I just think there's a culture of arrogance that they

0:34:10.000 --> 0:34:12.520
<v Speaker 1>have the ability to silence. Look, these are the same

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 1>people that ban Donald Trump. If you think, okay, former

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:19.640
<v Speaker 1>President of the United States doesn't matter, I can decide

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:22.960
<v Speaker 1>to silence them. If they can ban the President, they

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:27.880
<v Speaker 1>can ban anybody. And the level of arrogance if you

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:31.280
<v Speaker 1>disagree with what someone says. Look, I think AOC says

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 1>lots of things that are idiotic. I think Bernie Sanders

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:36.560
<v Speaker 1>says lots of things that are idiotic. I wouldn't ban them,

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't silence them. Heck, I might even want them

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:42.399
<v Speaker 1>to get more people hearing what they say. I think

0:34:42.440 --> 0:34:46.000
<v Speaker 1>it actually helps the cause of common sense when people

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:50.400
<v Speaker 1>hear the ridiculous things they're saying. But there is a culture,

0:34:51.400 --> 0:34:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's not just Look what is so significant about

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:56.840
<v Speaker 1>what Elon is doing at Twitter, as Twitter wasn't acting alone.

0:34:57.480 --> 0:34:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Facebook's doing the same thing. Google's doing the same thing,

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 1>YouTube's doing the same thing. They're all engaged in it.

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 1>It's just Elon is airing the dirty laundry. I'll tell

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:08.719
<v Speaker 1>you I spent more than a half hour this week

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:12.359
<v Speaker 1>on the phone with Elon talking about the challenges he's

0:35:12.360 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 1>facing at Twitter. And I'm now the ranking member, the

0:35:15.239 --> 0:35:17.879
<v Speaker 1>senior Republican on the Senate Commerce Committee, and we are

0:35:17.880 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be focusing very directly and vigorously on big

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:26.279
<v Speaker 1>tech censorship. And I think what Elon is doing at

0:35:26.320 --> 0:35:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Twitter is enormously, enormously consequential. Yeah, not just for freedom

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:33.440
<v Speaker 1>of speech, but also to see what happens in the

0:35:33.480 --> 0:35:36.880
<v Speaker 1>future with big tech. Senator, It's always a pleasure to

0:35:36.920 --> 0:35:39.320
<v Speaker 1>get to chat, especially on a busy week in Washington.

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:41.239
<v Speaker 1>This is why I think so many people love listening

0:35:41.280 --> 0:35:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to Verdict. You get to see behind the scenes here.

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Don't forget to make sure you hit that subscribe button,

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 1>our auto download button wherever you're listening to the show,

0:35:50.400 --> 0:35:52.040
<v Speaker 1>so you get the show three days a week. We

0:35:52.080 --> 0:35:54.880
<v Speaker 1>do this Monday, Wednesday and Friday. We also do a

0:35:55.000 --> 0:35:57.960
<v Speaker 1>video version, so you can see that on YouTube and

0:35:58.040 --> 0:36:00.640
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook, so make sure you follow this UNDERS page

0:36:00.640 --> 0:36:03.359
<v Speaker 1>there on Facebook and on YouTube, the Verdict channel there,

0:36:03.760 --> 0:36:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and we will see you guys back here in a

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 1>couple of days.