Speaker 1: This is Buck's first thoughts. The news you need to
Speaker 1: get for your day in forty five minutes. Make sure
Speaker 1: you subscribe on the iHeart app or wherever you get
Speaker 1: your podcasts. Oh so, now we're supposed to think that
Speaker 1: a mediocre, below expectations jobs report is something to celebrate.
Speaker 1: Is this what the media is really going to tell us?
Speaker 1: You know, it's good. Joe Biden can go around. It's
Speaker 1: your great economy. I saw the things the charts. You know,
Speaker 1: I got all the smart people around me, and you know,
Speaker 1: social justice blah blih blah, equality blah blah blah. I'm
Speaker 1: gonna go play golf. Right. That's who's running the country now.
Speaker 1: Isn't that exciting? Now we are seeing a repeat of
Speaker 1: the eight years of Obama, when weak economic growth, weak
Speaker 1: job growth was somehow celebrated. Oh, because it's better than
Speaker 1: it was, They're gonna be telling you soon. Look at
Speaker 1: the comparison between now in the middle of the pandemic.
Speaker 1: Look at how much better it is. Joe Biden's great
Speaker 1: And we'll all be saying that's because there's not a pandemic.
Speaker 1: It has nothing to do with Joe Biden. But we'll
Speaker 1: get into that. You know, my friends, you know how
Speaker 1: important it is to help small businesses these days, you
Speaker 1: know how much they matter to me. And for a
Speaker 1: few weeks now I've been telling you about a great
Speaker 1: company based out of Charleston, South Carolina called Allegiance Flag Supply.
Speaker 1: I love their story. Three friends who noticed that the
Speaker 1: American flags they had in front of their houses were
Speaker 1: constantly getting tangled, mildewed, torn, or shredded after just a
Speaker 1: few months in flight. They searched high and low for
Speaker 1: a better flag, but big box stores and Amazon purchases
Speaker 1: only turned up flags that were made in China, or
Speaker 1: even if they were made here in the US, felt
Speaker 1: mass produced or spit out of some big machine, making
Speaker 1: thousands at a time with cheap materials. Like you and me,
Speaker 1: the flag means more to them, so they decided to
Speaker 1: do something about it. They started Allegiance Flag Supply out
Speaker 1: of their own garage and have built the company from
Speaker 1: the ground up. No investors, no loans, just their blood, sweat, tears,
Speaker 1: and time, and today they make the best American flags
Speaker 1: and accessories you can find on the market. So if
Speaker 1: you've been looking to purchase a flag for your home
Speaker 1: or you're too tired of the flag getting tangled or
Speaker 1: torn or shredded, so quickly go to show Allegiance dot com.
Speaker 1: Just go to that website show Allegiance dot com and
Speaker 1: you'll find the highest quality American flags. Show Allegiance dot com.
Speaker 1: Make sure you enter promo code buck that I'll get
Speaker 1: you ten percent off your purchase flag days coming up
Speaker 1: June fourteenth. Get your flag for the summer season by
Speaker 1: going to show allegiance dot com and enter promo code
Speaker 1: buck for ten percent off. US employers added five hundred
Speaker 1: and fifty nine thousand jobs last month, well below what
Speaker 1: was expected, and the unemployment rate dip down from six
Speaker 1: point one percent to five point eight percent. So we're
Speaker 1: crawling in the right direction. But we're supposed to think
Speaker 1: that this is great. Why Well, because there's a Democrat
Speaker 1: in office. And because when there are democrats who spend
Speaker 1: a lot of time talking about climate change and social
Speaker 1: justice and critical race theory and Marxism and its various iterations,
Speaker 1: businesses people who actually have to function in the private sector,
Speaker 1: they make decisions that are a response to exactly what
Speaker 1: the Democrats are doing. That means slower growth, less investment,
Speaker 1: less hiring. We all know this, but the American people forget.
Speaker 1: You see, they have a Republican pro business leave you alone,
Speaker 1: Let the American people prosper president. And then enough of
Speaker 1: them forget, and they're told, oh, there's more free stuff
Speaker 1: out there. We're going to give you more free things.
Speaker 1: Just vote Democrat, and we just keep going through this cycle.
Speaker 1: I really wish that well, we'd have to break through
Speaker 1: the really now, the social media monopoly as well as
Speaker 1: the mainstream corporate media is fire hose of disinformation to
Speaker 1: get people to understand what the truth is about the
Speaker 1: American economy and what the Democrats are actually doing to it.
Speaker 1: But it's okay. We have a party, the Democrat Party,
Speaker 1: that has run effectively for the elites and the dependent
Speaker 1: class and special interests, and people who are trying to
Speaker 1: make it, who are trying to build financial stability and
Speaker 1: then security, and then even wealth people that are in
Speaker 1: the fight. They don't matter to the Democrat Party. You
Speaker 1: want to be rich living in Malibu, or you want
Speaker 1: to be a bureaucrat getting paid more than you're worth
Speaker 1: working for the government somewhere, or you want to be
Speaker 1: demanding free college, free healthcare, free everything, that's the Democrat
Speaker 1: economic mantra. But I wanted to switch gears here for
Speaker 1: a second because it's it's troubling that we have to
Speaker 1: go through so many, so many different versions of this
Speaker 1: same story, and we're going to continue to suffer through
Speaker 1: this before eventually enough people in the Democrat Party and
Speaker 1: of those who work in the media will have to
Speaker 1: relent from the madness of defund the police. It's going
Speaker 1: to take time, it's going to require suffering. That's one
Speaker 1: of the big problems of having the left in charge.
Speaker 1: They have quite a high tolerance for the suffering of others.
Speaker 1: You have to start with that, and they also create
Speaker 1: excuses for the suffering they create because it's all about
Speaker 1: their intentions, not about results. Oh, we wanted to create
Speaker 1: total equity among all people in America. So the fact
Speaker 1: that what we really did was make people less free, poorer,
Speaker 1: more dependent, more angry, that doesn't matter. You've seen this
Speaker 1: in plenty of centrally planned society centrally planned economies, and
Speaker 1: it plays out exactly as expected. With law enforcement these days,
Speaker 1: we all know what's going to continue to happen. They
Speaker 1: undermined the cops. You have big spikes in murders and
Speaker 1: shootings all across the country. You have major challenges now
Speaker 1: for cities. It's not even really worth it to name them.
Speaker 1: The top fifty cities in America basically are deteriorating, going
Speaker 1: through greater crime, greater dysfunction. And what do they offer
Speaker 1: us in response, Well, the media continues to look for
Speaker 1: every opportunity to find some story of prejudice somewhere, some
Speaker 1: instance of a cop behaving badly, using excessive force. And
Speaker 1: because there's such a focus on that, there is a disconnect.
Speaker 1: There is a sense among many that law enforcement is
Speaker 1: not doing a good job, that they are in fact
Speaker 1: the problem, that they are causing violence all across America,
Speaker 1: when they are the solution to that violence, largely the solution.
Speaker 1: There's many things we could talk about that would help.
Speaker 1: But I'm seeing this story about a fiery riot in
Speaker 1: George Floyd's Square in Minneapolis, because, as you know, Saint
Speaker 1: George George Floyd is now elevated, has been elevated to
Speaker 1: the status of a religious icon. A man who was
Speaker 1: a convicted felon and had a long rap sheet who
Speaker 1: was killed by a police officer in Minneapolis is now
Speaker 1: treated as though he is a civil rights hero. This
Speaker 1: is the way that the story goes. Now, so he
Speaker 1: has a square, there are people that go there, there
Speaker 1: are vigils by candlelight or whatever. Well, now we have
Speaker 1: George Floyd Square smoldering because a number of BLM activistsyeters, protesters,
Speaker 1: whatever you want to call them, very angry. Why were
Speaker 1: they so upset? Well because there was a man who
Speaker 1: was shot by police in Minneapolis, Winston Boogie Smith, thirty
Speaker 1: two years old, wanted for possession of a firearm by
Speaker 1: a felon, which is in itself a felony. He was
Speaker 1: outside of parking garage at about two o'clock yesterday, three
Speaker 1: miles from George Floyd Square. US marshals. I've worked with
Speaker 1: some of those individuals, I know them well. US marshals
Speaker 1: swooped in to arrest him. He was in a parked
Speaker 1: car and he according to police, and yes, there will
Speaker 1: be in should be an investigation and we should make
Speaker 1: sure that this is what happened. But they say that
Speaker 1: he pulled a handgun and then they fired on him. Now,
Speaker 1: mister Smith had twenty arrests. Was somebody who was violating
Speaker 1: his probation for aggravated robbery. So this is a man
Speaker 1: who's been in trouble with the law many many times.
Speaker 1: He's a felon in possession of a firearm, He's committed robberies,
Speaker 1: committed serious crimes, aggravated robbery, and the police try to
Speaker 1: arrest him, he pulled a gun. They shot him. If
Speaker 1: the police are not able to use force in a
Speaker 1: situation like this, again, assuming that the investigation finds that
Speaker 1: that is what happened, but we have no reason to
Speaker 1: believe as of now that is not what happened. If
Speaker 1: the police can't use force in that situation, then they
Speaker 1: are effectively incapable of doing their jobs, and they won't
Speaker 1: want to do their jobs. They're not going to show up.
Speaker 1: Why would they Why put your life on the line
Speaker 1: in such a way you can't even defend yourself. It's
Speaker 1: dangerous enough when you can use lethal force. But now
Speaker 1: if you have to use your nervous weapon, whether you're
Speaker 1: a US marshal or state or local police or whatever
Speaker 1: law enforcement agency you're with, if you can't respond to
Speaker 1: a lethal threat with lethal force, you got to find
Speaker 1: another job. What does that mean for society? But I
Speaker 1: also want to know why do we not have a disdain?
Speaker 1: Why is there not vitriol? There should be such a
Speaker 1: repudiation of the kind of actions that we see here
Speaker 1: in George Floyd Square. Afterwards, they're they're looting stores, they
Speaker 1: looted a CVS. They're they're lighting dumpsters on fire. For
Speaker 1: what what does that accomplish? What does that show? Is
Speaker 1: this really now just a movement that's an excuse for
Speaker 1: people who are angry, who are frustrated, who are often
Speaker 1: acting in a way that is childish, that is selfish,
Speaker 1: looting stores, destroying buildings, destroying property because something happened that
Speaker 1: quite honestly has nothing to do with any of these individuals.
Speaker 1: They weren't there, They don't know what happened, but they
Speaker 1: loot and they riot and they burn anyway, And does
Speaker 1: anyone in the corporate media aligned with the Democrat Party
Speaker 1: show disgust? Does anybody go on TV and say this
Speaker 1: is grotesque. You are dishonoring the member of the memory
Speaker 1: of Saint George Floyd, You're dishonoring whatever the BLM movement
Speaker 1: actually stands for. As you know, it's an anti cop movement,
Speaker 1: but sometimes they pretend it's about police reform. Or something
Speaker 1: like that, and that this is not acceptable in a
Speaker 1: civilized country. You don't just respond to reports of a
Speaker 1: police involved shooting by burning down, looting and destroying. You
Speaker 1: don't do that. It's it's never okay. It's not okay
Speaker 1: now and won't be okay in the future. They won't
Speaker 1: say that. No, there's so much pandering. Oh, the BLM activists,
Speaker 1: We don't want to upset them. The corporate media, so
Speaker 1: many of them millionaires who live in not diverse neighborhoods,
Speaker 1: I might add, and send their children to not diverse schools,
Speaker 1: private schools, and then go on TV and lecture all
Speaker 1: the rest of you about criminal justice and the need
Speaker 1: to do more for BIPOC communities. And you say, what
Speaker 1: are you doing, CNN anchor what are you doing New
Speaker 1: York Times editorial board other than feeding into false narratives
Speaker 1: and lies that lead to this kind of completely unacceptable conduct.
Speaker 1: This is just pathetic. It's pathetic. It's a baby ish
Speaker 1: tantrum in the name of justice. Yeah, I'm sure the
Speaker 1: people who work at CBS who have to clean up
Speaker 1: the mess the next day after the looting happens, I'm
Speaker 1: sure they feel like it's really about justice do they
Speaker 1: count to Never mind all the law enforcement officers that
Speaker 1: will have to deal with the rioters that they have
Speaker 1: to wrestle to the ground, that throw things at them,
Speaker 1: that just resist arrest. All of this stress and anger
Speaker 1: and destruction for what Because some people refuse to live
Speaker 1: in the real world and the Democrat Party has concocted
Speaker 1: a very convenient narrative for those who don't want to
Speaker 1: be held accountable, who don't want to show individual responsibility
Speaker 1: and initiative for their actions. BLM activists running around telling
Speaker 1: lies about law enforcement helps nobody. And I just wish
Speaker 1: the Democrats would knock the crap off and be honest
Speaker 1: about this, but it's not going to happen. Essential for
Speaker 1: their power to continue this lie. It's always good to
Speaker 1: hear voices out there that will speak the truth, even
Speaker 1: when it's not fashionable in much of our culture, even
Speaker 1: when it's not going to get you a lot of
Speaker 1: praise by the corporate media, by the hashtag brigades in
Speaker 1: these left wing social media giant corporations. But it's still
Speaker 1: good to hear the truth, isn't it? And I have
Speaker 1: no illusions here. I always tell people, if you believe
Speaker 1: that the truth is what people want to hear. You
Speaker 1: haven't spent a lot of time walking around America lately.
Speaker 1: Some people want to hear it. I would certainly make
Speaker 1: the case that they listen to shows like this one.
Speaker 1: They want to hear the truth. Not everybody wants to
Speaker 1: hear the truth though, Oh no, definitely not. But when
Speaker 1: you hear it, and and you're somebody who does appreciate it,
Speaker 1: oh it is sweet, isn't it. Here is a father,
Speaker 1: a black father, with his daughter, speaking about his view
Speaker 1: of individuals and race and critical race theory, and it's
Speaker 1: just brilliant. He just he makes so much sense and
Speaker 1: all of it, it all comes together so well. I
Speaker 1: just want to let you listen to that. If we
Speaker 1: find out this gentleman's name, by the way, I want
Speaker 1: to give him credit for it. But it was just
Speaker 1: a video, a viral video that's been making the rounds
Speaker 1: the last couple of days. Here's what he says. Play twelve.
Speaker 1: Daddy teaches you can be anything in this world that
Speaker 1: you want to be, Right, don't daddy teach you that? Yeah,
Speaker 1: And it doesn't matter if you're black or white or
Speaker 1: any color, doesn't matter if you're black, white, brown, yeo, right, black,
Speaker 1: And how we treat people is based on who they
Speaker 1: are and not what's final and if they're nice and see,
Speaker 1: this is how this is how children think. Right here,
Speaker 1: critical race theory wants to end that not with my children.
Speaker 1: It's not gonna happen. My baby's gonna know that no
Speaker 1: matter what she wants to be in life, all she
Speaker 1: has to do is work hard, and she can become that.
Speaker 1: Work hard. Even though you don't know anyone, you can
Speaker 1: make Yeah, you can make friends no matter what color
Speaker 1: they are. So we need to stop crt period, point blank.
Speaker 1: Children do not see skin color. Man. They love everybody.
Speaker 1: If they're good people, they love them. If they're good people,
Speaker 1: they love them. What matters is are you nice? Are
Speaker 1: you smart? These are some of the most basic messages.
Speaker 1: I remember being a preschooler, and this was what we
Speaker 1: were all being instructed about. We're all being told all
Speaker 1: that matters is how a person is, how they treat you,
Speaker 1: how they treat other people. And this gentleman's name is
Speaker 1: Corey Shua. This was posted on TikTok, the social media
Speaker 1: platform that I know some of you are concerned about
Speaker 1: Chinese surveillance via TikTok. But anyway, I'm actually I use TikTok.
Speaker 1: I don't really post on there, but I'm on it sometimes.
Speaker 1: Corey Yeshua went viral of this video with his daughter Royalty,
Speaker 1: who is particularly adorable. If you watch the video, it's
Speaker 1: really cute and she's six years old, and he's just
Speaker 1: speaking simple truths. He's just saying things that we had
Speaker 1: all thought in America. We had come to this point
Speaker 1: where we agreed that these things were universal, they were
Speaker 1: obvious in fact and essential. That a person's skin color
Speaker 1: does not matter. That treating every human being as a
Speaker 1: human being, and that judging them by yes, the content
Speaker 1: of their character instead of the color of their skin,
Speaker 1: to borrow from Martin Luther King, is what matters. But
Speaker 1: we are going we're being put in this opposite direction
Speaker 1: now as a country where we have to think of
Speaker 1: of racial identity in everything that is going on around
Speaker 1: us all the time, and that there should be decisions
Speaker 1: distinctions made based upon skin color. This is a This
Speaker 1: is a moral failing. This is not something that we
Speaker 1: can allow to continue as it is. And when you
Speaker 1: have individuals like Corey Issua, who's who is black, and
Speaker 1: his daughter who's black and you know, six years old,
Speaker 1: who are seeing things with this clarity. It's just it's encouraging.
Speaker 1: It makes me think that maybe we will be able
Speaker 1: to push back this tide of CRT nonsense. I mean,
Speaker 1: there's so many there's so many levels where it's wrong.
Speaker 1: It all falls apart. I always wonder, you know, I
Speaker 1: have you know, in my own family, my little nephew
Speaker 1: would be somebody of two race, my adorable little nephews
Speaker 1: of two races. So is he BIPOC when he grows up?
Speaker 1: Is he going to be told the s to be bipoc? Does?
Speaker 1: Does he choose one for identity purposes over the other
Speaker 1: or the whole thing? This is just all a construct
Speaker 1: used by people who want to sew division and pull
Speaker 1: us apart and control. This is for power for those
Speaker 1: who are pushing this narrative. This is because they want
Speaker 1: to tell you what to do and they want things
Speaker 1: for themselves. And I'm talking about people like Nancy Pelosi
Speaker 1: and Chuck Schumer and many others. Right, this is this
Speaker 1: is the entire left. People who are on the left
Speaker 1: of all races. They view critical race theory and the
Speaker 1: social justice left as a mechanism for achieving power, as
Speaker 1: a mechanism for advancing themselves at the expense of others
Speaker 1: and su and using the state to accomplish that, using
Speaker 1: the government and the force of the government to those ends.
Speaker 1: It's troubling to see. But as long as we have
Speaker 1: enough corey isshuas and royalty issuas in this country who
Speaker 1: are willing to speak the truth we've got, we've got
Speaker 1: a fighting shot at being the America I know we
Speaker 1: can be. Your online data and online identity is constantly
Speaker 1: under attack. That much we know for sure. Big tech
Speaker 1: is constantly looking for ways to withhold and use your
Speaker 1: information to sell. So what's the best way to keep
Speaker 1: your privacy and operate in business and your personal life
Speaker 1: when you're doing anything online? Introducing Secure, the one hundred
Speaker 1: percent privacy and security focused instant messaging and email platform
Speaker 1: located in Switzerland. Why in Switzerland, that's the country with
Speaker 1: the world's strictest data privacy laws. In effect, Secure, that's
Speaker 1: SEK you are very important. We get the spelling here.
Speaker 1: SEK you are Secure is held by privacy advocates globally
Speaker 1: and the assurance that their data is truly kept safe
Speaker 1: by proprietary technology, independent platform, and military grade encryption methods.
Speaker 1: Your data is yours alone. Secure does not data mine, use,
Speaker 1: or sell your data. Experience the ultimate bliss of knowing
Speaker 1: that your privacy is not in jeopardy from the prying
Speaker 1: hands of big tech. It's time to take back your privacy.
Speaker 1: Welcome to Secure. Go to this website now secure dot com.
Speaker 1: That's s e K. You are Secure dot com. Use
Speaker 1: the coupon code buck for one week free and twenty
Speaker 1: five percent off. It's a great deal. Be sure to
Speaker 1: use coupon code buck go to secure seku are dot
Speaker 1: com and regain your privacy online. And so in Florida,
Speaker 1: we chose freedom over fauciism, and we're much better off
Speaker 1: for doing that. I think his lockdown policies were not
Speaker 1: justified by the scientific data. He was somebody that fear
Speaker 1: mongered about schools. He did not support Florida when we
Speaker 1: had our kids in school. In person, I think he
Speaker 1: was wrong about mass and asymptomatic spread. And then obviously
Speaker 1: he does so many interviews that it was pretty clear
Speaker 1: to me after a pretty short time, you know, this
Speaker 1: was all about himself in his own image, and for me,
Speaker 1: you look at that magazine cover with him lounging by
Speaker 1: the pool with the sunglasses on, you know, right in
Speaker 1: the midst of a pandemic. I mean it was almost
Speaker 1: like a lethemic Cake moment for all the people who
Speaker 1: were chafing under his lockdowns, and yet he seemed to
Speaker 1: be having the time of his life. I can't tell
Speaker 1: you how proud I am, not just of what we've
Speaker 1: done on this show during the course of the pandemic
Speaker 1: to come bat Faucism, but how many of you listening
Speaker 1: were really supportive, told me to keep it going, stay
Speaker 1: in the fight, don't drop this issue, don't shy away
Speaker 1: from it, get weak on it, go right into it.
Speaker 1: You know what's true. So thank you to all of
Speaker 1: you that were writing in and sending us words of
Speaker 1: encouragement and support. Because now, yeah, now, anybody who's reasonable
Speaker 1: and honesty is that Fauci is a smug, little totalitarian
Speaker 1: lab coat fraud. But there was a long time when
Speaker 1: social media would shut you down for contradicting Faucism, for criticizing,
Speaker 1: for saying that it was wrong. There was a long
Speaker 1: time when you were considered some kind of conspiracy nut,
Speaker 1: a loon for even questioning Saint Fauci. I think we
Speaker 1: can all see now what an utter disaster this guy
Speaker 1: has been and it didn't have to be this way
Speaker 1: at all. I don't just mean it didn't have to
Speaker 1: be this way for the country, with the bad decisions
Speaker 1: that were pushed on all of us by Faucism. I
Speaker 1: mean that he could have been a bureaucrat in the
Speaker 1: background doing his job. There was no reason for him
Speaker 1: to come forward and be the face of our response
Speaker 1: to the pandemic. But this guy loved the limelight. You know,
Speaker 1: he's he's older. What else, what else is he waiting for?
Speaker 1: Right this This was his big chance. This was his
Speaker 1: big moment, and he seized it and then some. But
Speaker 1: unfortunately he was weighed and found wanting, not a good
Speaker 1: show from from Fauci at all. And that's why people
Speaker 1: like Ronda Santis are now pointing out that this was
Speaker 1: not necessary. And Ronda Santis has done such an incredible
Speaker 1: service for the country because if it was not for
Speaker 1: if it wasn't for Florida, we would not be in
Speaker 1: a position that we're currently in, where reasonable rational people
Speaker 1: are going are just living their lives now. People who
Speaker 1: are no longer. People rather whose are still living with
Speaker 1: lockdown restrictions voluntarily in any capacity. They're suffering from an
Speaker 1: anxiety disorder. They have a mental illness, perhaps low grade,
Speaker 1: but they have a problem because there's no basis for
Speaker 1: this anymore. There's no basis in reality, in real risk factors,
Speaker 1: in real risk mitigation. But that's what happens when you
Speaker 1: have a steady diet of absurdity from Fauci and the rest.
Speaker 1: Here's the statement by Donald Trump, forty fifth President of
Speaker 1: the United States on this one. I just want to
Speaker 1: read this to you, or this just came out yesterday
Speaker 1: after seeing the emails. Our country is fortunate. I didn't
Speaker 1: do what doctor Fauci wanted me to do. For instance,
Speaker 1: I closed our borders to China very early, despite his
Speaker 1: not wanting them closed. The Democrats and the fake news
Speaker 1: media even called me a xenophobe. In the end, we
Speaker 1: saw this was a life saving decision, and likewise with
Speaker 1: closing our borders to Europe, typically to certain heavily infected countries,
Speaker 1: I was later given credit even by Tony for saving
Speaker 1: hundreds of thousands of lives. Doctor Fauci also didn't put
Speaker 1: an emphasis on speed of vaccine production because he thought
Speaker 1: it would take three to four or maybe even five
Speaker 1: years to create. I got it done in less than
Speaker 1: nine months with operation warp speed. In retrospect, the vaccine
Speaker 1: is saving the world. Then I placed the greatest bet
Speaker 1: in history. We ordered billions of dollars worth of vaccines
Speaker 1: before we knew it even worked. Had that not been done,
Speaker 1: our wonderful vaccines would not have been administered until October
Speaker 1: of this year. No one would have had the shot
Speaker 1: that has now saved the world and millions of lives.
Speaker 1: This is very important. What is the one truly successful
Speaker 1: component of our response to COVID nineteen The vaccine? The vaccine.
Speaker 1: Now that's not to say that I'm telling everybody all
Speaker 1: you have to get the vaccine or everything else. I'm
Speaker 1: just saying the one thing that does work. If you
Speaker 1: are a senior citizen, this vaccine brought your risk down
Speaker 1: tremendously and made it much much safer for you to
Speaker 1: just live your life normally. You know, if you're seventy
Speaker 1: five and up, this vaccine was certainly a lifesaver for
Speaker 1: many of them, and for other people too who had
Speaker 1: comorbidities or at high risk and it looks like now
Speaker 1: we are getting to a place closer to herd immunity
Speaker 1: where there won't even there just won't be the room
Speaker 1: for this virus to spread in the way it had
Speaker 1: in the past, which means that everybody will be at
Speaker 1: lower risk too. That's part of the premise of herd immunity,
Speaker 1: right if there are fewer vectors for the disease in
Speaker 1: the first place because of people having protection, including from
Speaker 1: natural immunity, which doesn't get factored into anything the BIDE
Speaker 1: administration is talking about, we're all better off. But the
Speaker 1: vaccine and operation warp Speed was an enormous success. The lockdowns,
Speaker 1: the mask mandates, all this stuff was an enormous failure.
Speaker 1: We should all be very honest about that. We should
Speaker 1: see it for what it is. What they told us
Speaker 1: did not work. It did not work. And now that
Speaker 1: the truth seems to be coming out or beginning to
Speaker 1: come out about doctor Fauci, I'm glad that people are
Speaker 1: finally willing to ask questions about this whole process, the
Speaker 1: cover up, which we talked about a lot yesterday, of
Speaker 1: the origins or the origin the thinking in the early
Speaker 1: days about the origins of COVID nineteen. That cover up
Speaker 1: is remarkable when you really start to piece it all together,
Speaker 1: and pretty terrifying that the scientific community could move so
Speaker 1: quickly to this kind of false consensus for what are
Speaker 1: obviously political reasons should give everybody a chill up their spine. Really,
Speaker 1: we were supposed to believe that scientists were better than this.
Speaker 1: That's at least that was the the public perception of all.
Speaker 1: We're supposed to believe that. But the truth is, it's
Speaker 1: a shame. But the same leftist indoctrination that has overtaken universities, journalism,
Speaker 1: corporate boardrooms has also churned out new generations of looke
Speaker 1: scientists and social justice obsessed doctors. And now these are
Speaker 1: all professions that the public will generally trust less going forward,
Speaker 1: and rightfully so. I mean, if you need a refresher
Speaker 1: on this, never forget that our blue check public health experts,
Speaker 1: the ones appearing on CNN and MSNBC night after night,
Speaker 1: told us that paddling a surfboard alone at the beach
Speaker 1: in California was basically murdering old people. But thousands and
Speaker 1: thousands of b AM protesters and rioters in close quarters,
Speaker 1: hundreds and hundreds of times all across the country screaming
Speaker 1: at police, spittle flying out of their mouths. Well, that
Speaker 1: was somehow saving lives during the pandemic. According to the
Speaker 1: public health experts, do not trust journalists and do not
Speaker 1: trust any public health bureaucrat. Check their work always. If
Speaker 1: you take it on faith, you are going to be fooled.
Speaker 1: Check their work. Check the work of doctor Fauci, specifically,
Speaker 1: Former Secretary of State Pompeo had quite an observation, and
Speaker 1: that is, Faucci has a strange habit of sounding very
Speaker 1: much like talking points from the Chinese Communist Party. Fauci
Speaker 1: seems to take a very pro Chinese government position. He
Speaker 1: keeps acting like the scientists who work work in state
Speaker 1: funded laboratory, state run laboratories in China. Oh, they're fine,
Speaker 1: They're not subject to any pressures or anything. There is
Speaker 1: treasured colleagues, This is Faucci. Isn't that quite strange? It's bothersome,
Speaker 1: isn't it. Here we have Pompeo saying exactly that play
Speaker 1: ten when you heard doctor Fauci this morning, Lord of
Speaker 1: those are the exact same words, the exact same excuses,
Speaker 1: the exact same theories that the Chinese Communist Party has
Speaker 1: presenting for over a year now. But we can all
Speaker 1: draw our own conclusions. I know this. We had a
Speaker 1: group inside the State Department, Miles you, a handful of
Speaker 1: others working diligently to get this information out to the
Speaker 1: American people so the world could see what the Chinese
Speaker 1: Communist Party had done to all of us. Yes, the
Speaker 1: world should see that. But remember this, because I think
Speaker 1: that this has gotten lost in a lot of this discussion.
Speaker 1: While we see everything going on here, it was clear
Speaker 1: that the Democrat Party and federal Health bureaucracy, which are
Speaker 1: really the same thing, were so interested in protecting China's
Speaker 1: government from blame for the COVID nineteen outbreak that it
Speaker 1: was more important to them to blame Trump and win
Speaker 1: the election in twenty twenty then to get it right
Speaker 1: and hold the CCP accountable. They would rather lie to
Speaker 1: all of you and the whole world about the origins
Speaker 1: of COVID nineteen, even though that means we're more susceptible
Speaker 1: to another outbreak, We're not as able to understand how
Speaker 1: this happened, how we should deal with it. That didn't matter.
Speaker 1: All that mattered to the Democrat Party and they're aligned
Speaker 1: media of mouthpieces was defeating Trump in twenty twenty, if
Speaker 1: that meant running cover for China, they were fine with that.
Speaker 1: They had no problem with that. In fact, they saw
Speaker 1: it as an opportunity. As disgraceful as that is, they
Speaker 1: saw it as an opportunity. They managed to convince just
Speaker 1: enough people to blame Trump for covids as if you know,
Speaker 1: he was serving bat soup himself, were experimenting with gain
Speaker 1: of function research at Mara Lago. These people are nuts
Speaker 1: for generally peacemakers, right, But that's our problem. Our campaign
Speaker 1: in electioneering a cemetery has left us in a position
Speaker 1: where we are watching democracy collapse. So, you know, it
Speaker 1: is time. It's kind of like being you know, attacked
Speaker 1: in Pearl Harbor. We had Pearl Harbor, right, We've been
Speaker 1: living through it. It's been a slow running event. But
Speaker 1: you know, with Trump's um, you know, comments about election
Speaker 1: integrity from the beginning, I mean the beginning of the
Speaker 1: presidential cycle, we now see about thirty five percent of
Speaker 1: our fellow Americans think that Joe Biden stunned up stole
Speaker 1: the presidency, and they're seeing that message reinforced all for
Speaker 1: their ecosystem, right, and what our side is seeing is
Speaker 1: not that stuff. Right. Many people who vote voted in
Speaker 1: this like what I call the Trump against Trump coalition.
Speaker 1: They've tuned back out. They are complacent. Two thousand, four
Speaker 1: hundred and three people Americans were killed at Pearl Harbor. Okay,
Speaker 1: can we stop with the idiocy about the January sixth insurrection?
Speaker 1: It was like worse than nine eleven, worse than Pearl Harbor.
Speaker 1: It was the worse than the than the bubonic plague.
Speaker 1: It was the worst thing. I mean, can can they
Speaker 1: just stop? No? They won't though I say that, I
Speaker 1: know you're saying no, Buck, They're not going to stop
Speaker 1: because their emotion These are emotionally damaged, deeply unhappy people
Speaker 1: that are popping up all over you know, MSNBC and CNN,
Speaker 1: These libs, these sad Marxists, have to find a way
Speaker 1: to explain their constant need to both control you and
Speaker 1: to live in abject fear. They want to tell you
Speaker 1: what to do all the time and how you have
Speaker 1: to do everything. But also, oh my gosh, I'm so
Speaker 1: scared of you. What is this this whole storyline that
Speaker 1: you know, we're in this crisis of democracy because of
Speaker 1: people who think that Donald Trump won the election or
Speaker 1: whatever it is, sixty percent, maybe you've been as high
Speaker 1: as seventy percent of Democrats thought that Russia stole the
Speaker 1: election from Hillary Clinton. The year after the twenty sixteen election,
Speaker 1: huge majorities of Democrats believed that. Crap. Okay, they believed
Speaker 1: it a large percentage. I've got to go back and
Speaker 1: check the numbers. A large percentage of Democrats thought that
Speaker 1: Russia actually changed votes in the voting machines. You can
Speaker 1: go back. You can go back and see these numbers yourself.
Speaker 1: And now after four years of that, which is, you know,
Speaker 1: a completely Looney Tunes insane conspiracy theory, after four years
Speaker 1: of that, now they turn around and say, oh, but
Speaker 1: but but people don't people think that Democrats cheated to
Speaker 1: get Joe Biden to win our democracies and crisis. Our
Speaker 1: Republicans out burning stuff and lighting things on fire and
Speaker 1: freaking out and acting like maniacs. No, we're doing our jobs,
Speaker 1: taking care of our families, obeyed the law, and you know,
Speaker 1: hopefully tuning into the Bucks Exton Show, especially at the
Speaker 1: Clay and Bucks Show starting in a few weeks twelve
Speaker 1: to three on four hundred plus stations roughly across the country.
Speaker 1: That's hopefully what they're doing. That's what we well, that's
Speaker 1: what we're doing, and hopefully you'll join me. You're doing
Speaker 1: all the other stuff. No, we're responsible, well adjusted human beings,
Speaker 1: all right. They don't get to do this thing. Were
Speaker 1: they riot and loot and pillage and act like mediacs
Speaker 1: all the time on the left. And one time there
Speaker 1: was a riot and people got out of hand and
Speaker 1: broke the law, and they were on the ideological right,
Speaker 1: and we get to hear about it always in forever.
Speaker 1: This is I told you as soon as it happened,
Speaker 1: We're gonna this is gonna be you know, nine to
Speaker 1: eleven for the next ten years. You hear about this
Speaker 1: all the time, and they'll use it to justify whatever
Speaker 1: truly abhorrent, thuggish, destructive behavior the Democrat bass and the
Speaker 1: Marxist left wants to engage in. I knew it would
Speaker 1: happen as soon as I saw it on Oh my god,
Speaker 1: playing right into their hands. It's with the people on
Speaker 1: that day who engaged in the riots where they did
Speaker 1: play right. The biggest help they could have given the
Speaker 1: authoritarian democrats imaginable, and I just you know, it's so
Speaker 1: what's so sad? It really is. I know there were
Speaker 1: so many tens of thousands of people who were just
Speaker 1: in DC that day, who are there to peacefully protest
Speaker 1: and enjoy their First Amendment rights. But you know, we don't.
Speaker 1: We don't live in a fair media environment where that
Speaker 1: context is ever given. We don't get the mostly peaceful
Speaker 1: protest designation on the right. We don't even get the
Speaker 1: what we should get, which is the ninety nine point
Speaker 1: nine percent of our protests, of our gatherings, whether it's
Speaker 1: tea party or any number of things, are lawful and
Speaker 1: law abiding. You know, But one time, and this is
Speaker 1: all we hear about one time, and it's like Pearl Harbor.
Speaker 1: And how could someone go on TV and say something
Speaker 1: so stupid and not be laughed at by everybody regardless
Speaker 1: of political party across the country. Because the Democrats are
Speaker 1: living in a mass delusion. The Biden administration formally ended
Speaker 1: the remain in Mexico policy of a Trump amistration this
Speaker 1: week at our southern border. We've got that and other
Speaker 1: hot hot topic political issues to get into here with
Speaker 1: our friend Ryan Grudusky. He's a political consultant and author
Speaker 1: of They're not listening how the elites created a national
Speaker 1: populist revolution, mister Grudusky. Always good to have you, Thank
Speaker 1: you for having me back. So the Biden administration response
Speaker 1: to what's going on to the border is to really
Speaker 1: clarify that they don't want this to stop. And Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris is now saying she's going to be like the
Speaker 1: voting rights are instead of the borders are. She wants
Speaker 1: no part of it. What's going on here right Well,
Speaker 1: she hasn't never visited the border while she's been vice president,
Speaker 1: so that's very discouraging, and either has Joe Biden. You know,
Speaker 1: to listeners who don't understand, the border situation is the
Speaker 1: worst it's been in decades. It is fundamentally an open border.
Speaker 1: There are so many people crossing into the border right
Speaker 1: now that to kind of mitigate the situation and make
Speaker 1: it go faster, they've stopped shooing court dates to migrants.
Speaker 1: So they say to them, go to your city of
Speaker 1: destination where you're going, New York, Chicago, wherever it may be,
Speaker 1: find an Ice office, say you're here illegally, and then
Speaker 1: get a court date, which, of course will never happen.
Speaker 1: Is functionally an open border right now. And what the
Speaker 1: New York Times said this week, which was shocking, was
Speaker 1: that they've discovered so many people from India, a Southeast Asia,
Speaker 1: the Middle East, Africa coming through our southern border going
Speaker 1: and flying to Mexico, I mean, crossing the southern border
Speaker 1: where they know they can get in, which is ironic
Speaker 1: because Joe Biden has issued no travel advisory stuff towards
Speaker 1: a lot of these countries because a coronavirus, So you
Speaker 1: cannot fly directly to India, but you can fly from
Speaker 1: India to Mexico and then from Mexico walk to the
Speaker 1: United States. And that's what is happening time and timing,
Speaker 1: and they found already I think two Yemeni people who
Speaker 1: are on the terror watch list. There's warnings that many
Speaker 1: many more could be coming in. There are the terror
Speaker 1: and no fly list, the terror watch list and no
Speaker 1: fly it's a functionally open border, and it's so manufactured.
Speaker 1: This was not this was not the case before Joe
Speaker 1: Biden won the elected office because they know he's not
Speaker 1: going to do anything about it. And for decades we've
Speaker 1: heard Democrats and we've heard progressives sit there and say,
Speaker 1: you know, we want to help the situation. It's just
Speaker 1: people who are here illegally already. No, they want to
Speaker 1: sit there and exacerbate the situation and make sure we're
Speaker 1: in a full on humanitarian crisis, you know. And I
Speaker 1: was on a plane flight to New Orleans a few
Speaker 1: weeks ago, and I saw a miner who was clearly
Speaker 1: here illegally. He didn't speak English, he had a translator.
Speaker 1: They escort him on the plane. He got one of
Speaker 1: those comfort seats on taxpayer money, and they escored him
Speaker 1: off the plane first. And so many liberals like, look
Speaker 1: at a kid like this, you know, probably twelve or
Speaker 1: thirteen years old, and they think, oh, it's so much better.
Speaker 1: He'll have an opportunity for a better life than they
Speaker 1: did in Honduras or else Savad or Guatemala. Those teenagers
Speaker 1: are the primary primary targets for MS thirteen and the
Speaker 1: Latin Kings and the thirteenth Street Gang, all the gangs
Speaker 1: of made up compromise of large portions of non citizens
Speaker 1: in this country look at that as a recruiting method.
Speaker 1: They look at a lot of these kids as recruiting
Speaker 1: methods for new members, and most of The people, by
Speaker 1: the way, who are coming are not coming as women
Speaker 1: and children. They are men of working age, coming for jobs,
Speaker 1: but carrying diseases. We have no idea. They're not being
Speaker 1: tested for medical diseases. They're not being seen if they
Speaker 1: have coronavirus or new strands of the coronavirus that are
Speaker 1: you know that would work against vaccines or not work
Speaker 1: with vaccines. And people clearly have been arrested on the
Speaker 1: terror watch list. It is a huge national security, economic
Speaker 1: humanitarian crisis is made billions of dollars for the cartel
Speaker 1: and coyotes and human smugglers. It is so irresponsible, and
Speaker 1: it just shows that anyone pretending that there's some kind
Speaker 1: of bipartisan compromise that we could have on the issue
Speaker 1: of immigration and border are lying to you because if
Speaker 1: they were listen, I mean, because of our fourteen Amendment,
Speaker 1: and the legal alien cannot give birth to another legal alien,
Speaker 1: they become American citizens. If we were to just stop
Speaker 1: any future illegal immigration, the situation will go away on
Speaker 1: its own over the course of decades, as people die
Speaker 1: or they move back home. It would not be a situation.
Speaker 1: The fact that the administration has turned a blind eye
Speaker 1: to that bringing over tens of thousands per month, hundreds
Speaker 1: of thousands per month in one case, or one hundred
Speaker 1: thousand plus per month in one case across the border
Speaker 1: and are turning a blind eye to it and are
Speaker 1: taking away the controls. The Trump administration had to sit
Speaker 1: there and stop this. The Safe Third Country Greement's brain
Speaker 1: membermain in Mexico. These were wildly successful things that he
Speaker 1: did on an illegal immigration wildly successful, and they're being
Speaker 1: ripped apart, you know, point by point for nothing besides
Speaker 1: political reasons. We're speaking to Ryan Grdusky, author of They're
Speaker 1: not listening how the elites created a national populist revolution.
Speaker 1: He's a political consultant and to that end, Ryan, are
Speaker 1: we seeing any indicators, I know, it's early midterms or
Speaker 1: people are like, oh, the midterms, you know that they're
Speaker 1: not gonna want to talk about it until we're really
Speaker 1: in the cycle, but it's gonna come pretty quickly here.
Speaker 1: But from any of the indicators polling we can see,
Speaker 1: or even just what you pick up from from other
Speaker 1: people who are thinking about or or already working on campaigns,
Speaker 1: you know, at the ground level, is this costing Democrats?
Speaker 1: It feels like the borders open, the media tries to
Speaker 1: avoid covering it, and a lot of Americans don't care
Speaker 1: because they don't know how bad it is. Is that
Speaker 1: what's going on here right well? In Arizona, the number
Speaker 1: one issue now is immigrations. It's to replaced coronavirus in
Speaker 1: the economy. In a lot of border areas, it's immigration.
Speaker 1: You know, I think that they don't They don't see it,
Speaker 1: so they don't know how bad is happening. And it's
Speaker 1: funny when you look at polling for Joe Biden, it's
Speaker 1: pretty much a mixed bag on a few issues like
Speaker 1: the economy and foreign policy. It's very negative on Israel,
Speaker 1: it's very negative on immigration. And the one thing that
Speaker 1: he is benefiting from, the one thing that's saving the
Speaker 1: Democrats is the A virus vaccine, which was created under Trump.
Speaker 1: It's the biggest irony in the entire world. I just
Speaker 1: don't know how long he can possibly milk that four.
Speaker 1: Given that our job numbers which came out today were
Speaker 1: pretty horrendous. I think they underreported for a second straight
Speaker 1: month by by a huge number, huge margins. The amount
Speaker 1: of workers in the people in the workforce is you know,
Speaker 1: lower than it's been in a very long time. People
Speaker 1: are not looking for jobs because they have a higher unemployment.
Speaker 1: It is, it is, it's it's a dire situation. So well,
Speaker 1: how it's gonna effect the cogress of twenty twenty two elections,
Speaker 1: no one really knows. Yet they keep looking to these
Speaker 1: special elections like their like their tea leaves. I'm telling you,
Speaker 1: most special elections do not guarantee the outcome of a
Speaker 1: presidential election or a midterm election. They can show signs,
Speaker 1: but it's it's very often they don't show anything. The
Speaker 1: election in New Mexico, where Democrats have a big victory
Speaker 1: last week, is probably not a guarantee for anything because
Speaker 1: only thirty eight percent or thirty nine percent of the
Speaker 1: population they voted in twenty twenty showed up in that election.
Speaker 1: In Texas six, in a suburb of Dallas, Republicans had
Speaker 1: a big victory three weeks before. Republicans also had a
Speaker 1: big victory in Pennsylvania. The midterms are gonna come down to, essentially,
Speaker 1: especially in the Senate, They're going to come down to
Speaker 1: a handful of states. North Carolina, there's a retiring Republican, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin.
Speaker 1: Those are all Republican health seats, and the Democrats seats
Speaker 1: will be New Hampshire, Nevada, Arizona, and Georgia. And those
Speaker 1: eight or nine races, maybe Missouri if there's a fluke
Speaker 1: and Democrats went a lot, but those eight or nine
Speaker 1: races decide the entire United States Senate. We don't have
Speaker 1: a redistricting map yet, so we have to see how
Speaker 1: much they redistrict in these other states and make you
Speaker 1: swing things for Democrats Republicans, depending on who controls the
Speaker 1: redistricting process. So it's a little too early now to
Speaker 1: sit there and make the claim that we're going to
Speaker 1: have things move one way or the other, you know,
Speaker 1: but certainly things are not looking as rosie for Democrats
Speaker 1: as they were just a few months ago. I think
Speaker 1: the election national electras like D plus like four or
Speaker 1: D plus five. It's looking more and more now like
Speaker 1: it's D plus two. And we're still a year and
Speaker 1: a half away. And if that happens and it becomes
Speaker 1: a dead even race, you'll look at Republicans taking the
Speaker 1: House definitely, And we'll wait and see what happens with
Speaker 1: the Senate. We're speaking Ryan Grdusky He's a political consultant
Speaker 1: and author of They're not listening Ryan, the maniacal fixation
Speaker 1: from pundits, the media, and the Democrat you know, the
Speaker 1: Democrat ruling elites. On January sixth, it seems like they're
Speaker 1: running a contest every day to come up with the
Speaker 1: most outrageous and absurd thing to say. It's like nine
Speaker 1: to eleven, It's like Pearl Harbor. It's the worst thing
Speaker 1: to happen in America since the Civil War. Right, I mean,
Speaker 1: these are things that they're directly saying. I'm not exaggerating
Speaker 1: or I mean, those are all quotes in one form
Speaker 1: or another, and those are all the kinds of comparison
Speaker 1: that are being made. Does this is this one of
Speaker 1: these things where it's like Russia collusion, which was an
Speaker 1: enormous fixation for the media, but actually in the midterms
Speaker 1: people cared about healthcare or do you think that this
Speaker 1: is actually, you know, a tool for the Democrats to
Speaker 1: mobilize their base and to get votes. Is this like
Speaker 1: a preoccupation of the elites or is this real? No,
Speaker 1: this is all fake. I mean, no one outside of
Speaker 1: the Virginia Maryland DC corridor actually care about this. Issue whatsoever.
Speaker 1: No one cares. This is what they're hoping. Listen, It's
Speaker 1: like the old expression of God would have to make
Speaker 1: him up. Well, Trump doesn't exist on social media. Mean
Speaker 1: now he does on Instagram and Facebook, I gust, but
Speaker 1: he really doesn't exist on social media. He's not what
Speaker 1: he was in the presidency anymore. So they've had to
Speaker 1: stir up you know that Matt Gates and Marjorie Taylor
Speaker 1: Green are you know in Lauren Fauber, they're the new Trumps,
Speaker 1: and they're they're having to set there and create this
Speaker 1: you know, national anxiety again over issues because for a year,
Speaker 1: I mean, ratings were super high. The press was full
Speaker 1: of election stories and Trump's stories in January sixth and
Speaker 1: coronavirus stories. And now look at the ratings. I mean,
Speaker 1: CNN regularly does not have a million people watch their
Speaker 1: show at any given time. And I think that they're
Speaker 1: looking for something to set They're in gna people into
Speaker 1: a national anxiety. But people can't live like that for
Speaker 1: years and years and years and years and uh. And
Speaker 1: I think that a lot of people are just exhausted
Speaker 1: with the amount of chaos. And I've been I've been
Speaker 1: all over the country and at this point, I mean
Speaker 1: a lot of people have just they've checked out of
Speaker 1: the coronavirus hype, they've checked out of of the political hype.
Speaker 1: So you know, Joe Biden being this innocuous figure who
Speaker 1: very rarely gives press conferences, no one really sees what
Speaker 1: he does. Um has been to their benefit, but it's
Speaker 1: been to the media's. Uh, it's been worse for the media,
Speaker 1: that's right. I think I think every major show on
Speaker 1: CNA and MSNBC covered that Trump shut down his blog.
Speaker 1: This is not a major news story in an in
Speaker 1: the slightest, but they have to sit there in genep
Speaker 1: something that they need, something to sit there and keep
Speaker 1: you know, the chardonnay Antifa resistance moms clicking onto their network.
Speaker 1: So they got really nothing right now. Yeah, it is
Speaker 1: amazing how much they still really want to talk about Trump,
Speaker 1: which is quite odd because even people that support and
Speaker 1: voted for Trump are like, Okay, we're not talking about
Speaker 1: Trump right now. We got other things we're trying to
Speaker 1: talk about. But they still they want to go back
Speaker 1: to that. Well, they haven't given it up yet, and
Speaker 1: I think I think this upcoming election is probably the
Speaker 1: most important election for the Republican Party since nineteen eighty
Speaker 1: and I'll say this well, or maybe since twenty sixteen
Speaker 1: and nineteen eighty because now that Trump is no longer
Speaker 1: in office. I mean Trump really went after some traditional
Speaker 1: Republican orthodoxy for a very long time as far as
Speaker 1: what it's like to believe in an industrial policy and
Speaker 1: immigration policy of foreign policy different than George W. Bush
Speaker 1: and from John McCain and Mit Romney and previous Republicans.
Speaker 1: And there are going to be candidates who are really
Speaker 1: who are running from us, that really believe in those values,
Speaker 1: is that really want to change the system. There's a
Speaker 1: lot that I've spoken to, and then there's other ones
Speaker 1: who are going to sit there and have a magabumper
Speaker 1: sticker on their campaign bus, but they're gonna be the
Speaker 1: same old thing. And depending on who wins a lot
Speaker 1: of these primaries for these Senate offices and these governorships,
Speaker 1: these House candidates, we will see a new Republican Party,
Speaker 1: or we will see the same Republican Party with a
Speaker 1: magabumper sticker on there on their bustor right now, someone
Speaker 1: forces you to answer the question, is Trump really going
Speaker 1: to run again? What's your feeling. No, I've said this,
Speaker 1: I've said I've been I'm on the record. No. He
Speaker 1: branded the term forty five, which is if you're branding
Speaker 1: the number rather than them, rather than the candidate, assumes
Speaker 1: that he's not going to run again. There's so much
Speaker 1: excitement behind Ron de Sante's right now in Florida. I
Speaker 1: think the base really really wants him. I was saying
Speaker 1: to Pholstery yesterday, I said, you know, no one realized this,
Speaker 1: but it's nineteen seventy eight and Ron to Santas is
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, and which is waiting for him to run.
Speaker 1: I don't think that there's any kind of confusion behind it.
Speaker 1: I think we all really know who we want. And
Speaker 1: you know there's though there's not support for other people
Speaker 1: like Nicky Haley or you know, other nonsense candidates, but
Speaker 1: we have our guy who's right on almost every issue
Speaker 1: and is willing to at least at least if he's
Speaker 1: not right, he's willing to sit. They're in try and
Speaker 1: maybe doesn't do a perfect answer, and everything he's going
Speaker 1: to go to bat. And I just don't see how
Speaker 1: it's not. I just don't see how it's not. Ron
Speaker 1: de santists at this point. I mean, something could randomly
Speaker 1: happen and they'd be a huge scandal, or he could
Speaker 1: lose the governorship re election. I find it very, very
Speaker 1: very difficult to sit there and see a way that
Speaker 1: it's not. Yeah, I've been I've been waiting for Ron
Speaker 1: descantists to know me, and it hasn't happened. Where you go, oh, okay,
Speaker 1: so you actually aren't what we thought you are and
Speaker 1: aren't willing to fight. He hasn't done it yet, so
Speaker 1: it's hard to you want to. You don't want to
Speaker 1: get excited about a politician because they disappoint you so often,
Speaker 1: but he hasn't, and I'm just it gives me more
Speaker 1: anxiety that he hasn't. Then it gets I feel exactly.
Speaker 1: I was just talking with this, I think a couple
Speaker 1: of weeks ago, how I feel like I gotta say
Speaker 1: something negative about him just for my own my own head,
Speaker 1: because every day I'm just doing like the ron On
Speaker 1: de Santis, you know, celebration party here, and that's not
Speaker 1: how That's not the kind of show I do for anybody.
Speaker 1: But he keeps right, he's not tired of winning, Ryan,
Speaker 1: He's actually not tired of winning I'm like, so, there's
Speaker 1: that Ryan your Dusky everybody check out. They're not listening
Speaker 1: his book. My man the political Consultant. Good to see you,
Speaker 1: Thank you,