WEBVTT - BONUS: Fringe Panel Aftershow, Why the Heavy Hand of the State Is Getting Heavier

0:00:04.880 --> 0:00:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Merrin Dorogs Money the After Show. This is

0:00:08.280 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the bit where we look again at everything you heard

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 1>in our regular podcast. Some of it we like, some

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of it we're not so certain about. So we're going

0:00:15.120 --> 0:00:17.919
<v Speaker 1>to talk about that a bit. I'm Maren Zumsep Web.

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>This week, John Steppe is a senior reporter at Bloomberg

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and author of the Daily Money Distilled newsletter, joins me

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:26.159
<v Speaker 1>to discuss the two panels I did at the end

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>of August as part of the Fringe Festival in Edinburgh. Now,

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>there were two of these and you can listen to

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>them wherever you get your podcasts on the Merrin Brooks

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:36.159
<v Speaker 1>Money Feed. We had some brilliant guests that were some

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>very interesting themes. But of course John, you weren't there.

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 2>I know, I feel bad, but I was attending. I

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 2>was attending one of my kids gigs somewhere.

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you just said that. You think that's cooler. You

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:52.200
<v Speaker 1>think going to your kids gigs is cooler than Yeah, okay,

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 1>right at it?

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 2>I think I think it may be. Also, I would

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 2>just say google dement shabos because then I can win

0:00:58.680 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 2>them up a boot being nipple.

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:05.039
<v Speaker 1>They can't be never have to be in the same

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:06.039
<v Speaker 1>industry as you.

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh okay, I thought financial journalism was pretty rock and roll.

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 1>But no, if your children become pop stars, trust me,

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>it's got nothing to do with you being a senior

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>reporter at Bloomberg.

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay.

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, just for the record, John was invited. He refused

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 1>to come. He said children were more important than his career.

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>That's what he said, right, yeah, yeah, right, So John,

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>you really missed out. We had James Anderson, who used

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 1>to be the co manager of Scottish Mortgage, which so

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:39.839
<v Speaker 1>many of were listener at all, and he was fascinating.

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>We had Russell Aper, our favorite strategist. We had Ana

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 1>McDonald who so good on UK small caps. We'll come

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>back to that. We had Jim Mellon, you know, one

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>of the UK's greatest investing gurus. We had Simon Evans,

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>very funny comedian, although we did have to edit some

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>bits him out I think in the end, or maybe

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>we didn't. Maybe we didn't let it out everything we

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>should have. Who knows. Anyway, So as fantastic and a

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>couple of themes came up again and again and again

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 1>in the conversations and they were a lot of talk

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:10.960
<v Speaker 1>about the UK, state of the UK, investing in the UK, etc.

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Jimmelon was really interesting on that, and you and I

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>have both written about that recently, so we'll come back

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:19.920
<v Speaker 1>to that, but also a lot on big government, the

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>role of government, the extent which government should be involved

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>in everything, the way that risk has been socialized, in

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>particular since the Great Financial Crisis, and then socialized again

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and again and again during the pandemic, and how we're

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>now in a situation where the role of the state

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:38.080
<v Speaker 1>really is very different or perceived to be very different

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to the role of the state ten to fifteen years ago,

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:43.639
<v Speaker 1>and how that in turn means taxes in the UK

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>can only go up, which of course is interesting in

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that you know, and I've written about this a lot

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>over the years that in the main it's always been

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>incredibly hard in the UK to get taxation. Is a

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>percentage of GDP up over thirty six thirty seven percent

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:01.360
<v Speaker 1>and keep it there. But it looks like other guests

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:03.919
<v Speaker 1>was Paul Johnson from The IFS. He's just just brilliant,

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>so interesting, and you know, he said, well it has

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 1>to doesn't matter if it's been difficult in the past,

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>there's no choice. We have to get back to revenues

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>up because otherwise we can't pay for social care, for

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the triple lock, for net zero, for you know, the

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:21.079
<v Speaker 1>nightmare that is the NHS, etc. There's no choice here.

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>So we had a lot of conversations around those things,

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>and it was kind of depressing, to be honest.

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm sorry, I messed it. It's a degree

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 2>and the guests, I mean, a stupidous lay up.

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 3>I thought.

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 2>I thought Paul Boy's very interesting, and I thought one

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 2>of the things that Boy's interesting is that he sort

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 2>of seemed like, on the one hand, yeah, there was

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 2>this kind of thing that is no option but big government.

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 2>And on the other hand he was saying that politicians,

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 2>he was gradually quite an advocate for, they should stop

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 2>doing stuff and just let everything settle for.

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 4>A whale, which is clear way beyond what they're do

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 4>people doing.

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Ex Prime ministers are the most disappointed group of people

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>in the world, and that they awry. They walked through

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the door of Number ten going yes, finally I can

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>implement my ideas and I'm going to do this, and

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to do this, and I'm going to do

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>this and then they look around and realize that actually

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>they can't really do any of those things, is not

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the power is not really with them as well them

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>in the way they thought it did, had a few

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:21.840
<v Speaker 1>weeks to do it.

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:26.160
<v Speaker 4>To be fair, yes, I mean, I don't know whether

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 4>that Prime minister is the most disappointed or the rest

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 4>of us the most disappointed about that. But I think this,

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 4>if you read Tony Blair's memoirs, one of the things

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 4>he's disappointed about. I think he wasn't there for much

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 4>longer because he kind of feels he learned on the

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 4>job and could do more. And I think we probably

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 4>all feel about after we've left a job. The other

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 4>thing I suppose I think is yes, you can't. It

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 4>is quite difficult, but I do have I do think

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 4>governments can make a difference over a long term. I

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:56.840
<v Speaker 4>think one of the things that is problematic about our

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 4>politics and so on is that you know, you'll get

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 4>prime minis or chances or whatever saying I'm going to

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 4>make the economy grow next year, or you know, I'm

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 4>going to transform the education system in three years, I'm

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:07.840
<v Speaker 4>going to level up in ten years, or have you.

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 4>These things take decades, but government can make a big,

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 4>big difference. I mean, part of the reason that our

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 4>growth over the last fifteen years has been terrible has

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 4>been down to government policy, quite clearly being down to

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:22.720
<v Speaker 4>the government policy. But they can't turn it around this

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 4>year or possibly even within the term of a parliament.

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:29.160
<v Speaker 4>But if you get competition policy right, education policy right,

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 4>infrastructure investment right, the planning policy, are you times three right,

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 4>then in ten years time will be a bit better off.

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:39.800
<v Speaker 4>There's this great quote which.

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 2>And I kin of thought that really the most talent

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 2>thing was that even someone who was sort of saying

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 2>more as we do need does tax take was setting

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:51.720
<v Speaker 2>us in But the states should try to stop doing

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 2>so much and should stop missing a boat.

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:56.359
<v Speaker 4>You know, I mean, there is.

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 2>There are some sort of things we could at least

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 2>look at, you know, I mean, like the triple lock

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 2>is quite a good example. It's like, I am not

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:10.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm not happy about the way that this is constantly

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 2>framed as you know, kind of intergenerational warfare, and I

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 2>have no I don't like the way that we kind

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 2>of we kind of have the conversation now where you know,

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 2>like twenty years ago everyone pitied pensioners and now everyone

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 2>hates them. But what I would say is that the

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 2>triple lock now is kind of stupid. It's like, we

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 2>should have it to it should be a single lock.

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:33.039
<v Speaker 2>It should be a single lock. To Cepi, we are

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 2>a floor of zero percent, so that the state pension

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 2>has never actually cut. But if we've decided that it's

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 2>big enough in real terms now, there's no reason to

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, raise it way wages for example, which is

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 2>probably what's going to happen this year. And there's no

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:50.360
<v Speaker 2>reason that state pension should get a real terms pair eyes,

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 2>and particularly at a time whenever everyone essentially seems to

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 2>agree that it's now generous enough. So how about we

0:06:57.400 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 2>just get rid of the other two locks and kind

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:02.279
<v Speaker 2>of like put that one then. I mean, that's that's

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 2>a really manor easy move. It doesn't require spending any

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 2>more money. It would save a fortune over the longer

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 2>run relative to what it's going to be. I mean,

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 2>that's just that's just that's just one idea, you know,

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 2>it's not I wouldn't see that this stuff is quite

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 2>as the old thing is the lack of political courage,

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 2>because somebody will complain about it in headline somewhere.

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, I was just going to say that. One

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>of the other things we talked about in terms of

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>easy wins, in terms of spending is the extraordinary amount

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>of money that the government gives to other semi governing

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>bodies gives to you know, we talked before about, didn't

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 1>we about term of production of elites in the UK,

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 1>et cetera on a different podcast with Peter Touchon, And

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, it is absolutely extraordinary when you sit down

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and look at it, the amount of money that is

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>handed over the by the government to vast bureaucratic organizations

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to fight for the government. Yeah, and you know, we

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>have the opposits for that. We have an opposition in

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>parliament to fight the government. We don't need the stake

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>to give large amounts of money to other organizations to

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>slight the government. So this is another one of those

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>things that came up a couple of times in these

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 1>conversations that you know, money just flows all over the

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>place to all sorts of places you don't really expect

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't necessarily need to.

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 2>And also the other thing that would was reading the transcripts,

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 2>there was a lot of talk about business getting into

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 2>politics and how that was bad, and I agree with that,

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 2>but business is still much more accountable than the actual

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 2>lobby groups that are causing the majority of the problems

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 2>in the first place. You know, it is kind of

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:43.439
<v Speaker 2>like the third sector, and they can charity groups that

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:47.679
<v Speaker 2>have become you know, essentially kind of like political wings

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 2>for certain particular kind of like issues, and the businesses

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 2>all kind of follow suit in a semi reluctant, sort

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:02.200
<v Speaker 2>of mostly perfect by the HR departments to justify their

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 2>existence kind of way. But as soon as you know,

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 2>you hit a huddle like rising interest rates. I mean,

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 2>you look at how fast everyone's rolling back on ESG

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:13.679
<v Speaker 2>from a corporation point of view now that it's no

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:18.560
<v Speaker 2>longer as politically popular in the States, for example, and.

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>So easy to make money off.

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, exactly.

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And so you know, the good thing about businesses

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:27.199
<v Speaker 2>is if nothing else, they are always accountable to the

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 2>bottom line. So if they do things that are too stupid,

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 2>then most of the time that will have an impact

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 2>on the bottom line and they have to roll back

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:37.599
<v Speaker 2>from that. Butas the you know, the charitable and the

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 2>NGO sector is not at all accountable on that front.

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:44.319
<v Speaker 2>And it's the amount of money that's going to them

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:46.320
<v Speaker 2>is not very visible. I mean, there was a really

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 2>interesting I mean, Rory Stewart is obviously a guy who

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:54.839
<v Speaker 2>said I doubt very much that I'm one of the

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:58.719
<v Speaker 2>same political kind of like him wavelength as him, But

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 2>he's just written a book in one of our Bloomberg

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 2>colleagues review this morning, and he was saying that he's

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:06.679
<v Speaker 2>kind of pointing things out about the lackey you know,

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 2>political courage and governments by headline, and also pointing out

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:13.200
<v Speaker 2>that during the period when everyone was complaining about austerity,

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Now you can take that term austerity where a pinched saw.

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 2>But the point I was making was that the budget

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 2>spent on the overseas aid department like shot up in

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:28.319
<v Speaker 2>real terms at the same time as everything domestic was

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 2>getting cut. And you're kind of, well, you know this,

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 2>it's that kind of thing. It's like that there is money,

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 2>there are savings to be had. The NHS is definitely

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 2>not the most efficient way to run a healthcare system.

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Now, now, don't you dare say a thing like that

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 1>about our NHS. I won't have it, not on this podcast.

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 2>So again I'm just clapping stop that now, listen.

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:53.319
<v Speaker 1>That was a really interesting part in the conversation that

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Pamel has on the second day about the NHS about

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 1>exactly that, and I think it was Jim someone started

0:10:58.720 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about the white.

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 6>Drugs education, and you know, I just want to say

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 6>something about innovation that everyone here will be familiar with

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:10.200
<v Speaker 6>the new drugs, which are the weight loss drugs wega

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 6>V and OZMPK and all that sort of stuff, nov

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 6>nor disc and Eli Lilly. At the moment, the biggest

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:20.079
<v Speaker 6>selling drug in history until about two years ago was Humera,

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 6>which is used for autoimmune disease, particularly rheumatoid arthritis, and

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:28.200
<v Speaker 6>it sold fourteen billion dollars a year at its peak.

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 6>It's about to go off patent. These drugs next year

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:33.599
<v Speaker 6>will sell more than one hundred billion dollars between the

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:37.679
<v Speaker 6>two companies. That's unbelievable. And they're having these positive effects

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:40.839
<v Speaker 6>that are radiating so much so that probably everyone in

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 6>this country over the age of forty should be taking them.

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 6>They reduce heart risk, they reduce obesity, they reduce diabetes,

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 6>they reduce all the things that are costing the NHS

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 6>so much money. So you want another optimistic thing, it's

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:55.719
<v Speaker 6>that we have the potential in the next ten or

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:58.439
<v Speaker 6>twenty years using some drugs that are here and now

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:01.959
<v Speaker 6>to take the strain off. The NHS do not have

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:05.679
<v Speaker 6>people waiting in corridors in the NHS because they won't

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:08.679
<v Speaker 6>be obese, they won't have cardio disease, they won't have

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 6>the care.

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:13.839
<v Speaker 1>And I am so interested in this in that you know,

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest expenses for the NHS is obesity.

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 1>You know already at the moment twenty five percent plus

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of the UK population is obese. Another thirty eight per

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:25.719
<v Speaker 1>centers say are overweight look for you as and it's

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>even worse. And you know, we know, we know that

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>that's not going to go away by itself. There's every

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 1>diet book in the world that every body of advice

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:37.960
<v Speaker 1>you can possibly get. It's just not going to happen

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>that all those people who are troubled by obesit are

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:42.319
<v Speaker 1>suddenly going to be not obese anymore. We know that's

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>not going to happen, particularly with the huge power of

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>big food and their horrible processed foods, et cetera. And

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the way our doubts have changed, people will not become

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 1>We're all going back to the nineteen seventies in terms

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>of BMIs right, And ten percent of the NHS budget

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>is spent on diabetes and complications from diabetes, So that's

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be seventeen teen percent in a decade or so.

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 1>And libsitis, you know, is linked to link to cancers,

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:07.839
<v Speaker 1>to heart disease, to dementia, to depression, I don't know

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 1>name anything else. It's linked to almost everything that is

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:15.439
<v Speaker 1>thoroughly unpleasant for the patients and thoroughly unpleasant for the

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>NHS and of course anyone attempting to finance the NHS. Now,

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 1>if you can give everyone a drug, that will mean

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>that they dropped fifteen percent of their body weight in

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 1>a year and every year for five years, or however

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>however much weight there is to lose. That's an absolute miracle.

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Transformative for people's lives, transformative for the NHS, and hence

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 1>transformative for the public finances, Transformative for the way people work.

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Think about the number of people we have on disability.

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:46.079
<v Speaker 1>Imagine if all that went away, and rutually transformative for

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 1>big food.

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I think is I mean I think

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 2>that we give THEE and ozam pic of like just

0:13:55.160 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 2>either you will potentially be hugely transformative. Also, like the

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 2>booze industry when he had colleagues, was pointing out recently that,

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, because it seems to kind of like block

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 2>all cravings, not just cravens for food. Like you know,

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:13.719
<v Speaker 2>if you if you get a problem with gambling, then

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:15.319
<v Speaker 2>you stop wanting to gamble and things like that. So,

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:17.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, I think it could be absolutely amazing.

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, there has been some I saw a bit

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>of research on it from Morgan Sanley the other day.

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I was telling you about it that once people start

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>taking these drugs, I mean I think that you know,

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the sample is very small with the MAM, so you

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 1>mustn't get too carried away. But they snacked less. And

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>when they cut back on food, people are not cutting

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 1>back on vegetables, misteaks. They're cutting back on high sugar,

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>high fat, really processed food, a high margin food. You know,

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>they're cutting back on the high margin stuff. There's a

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 1>big risk in there for the food companies. I'm not

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>sure they're taking that seriously.

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that's a really good point. And yeah,

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 2>I suppose you could say, oh no, the tax base

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 2>will be in trouble. Then there'll be no more vices

0:14:57.320 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 2>to tax.

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's fair. But you know, we don't tax big

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>food any extra, do we? So doesn't it make it?

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 1>What difference does it make to the taxman if we

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>had a big pearl of vegetables or a big pile

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>of processed food. Let me think through that one. I

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>haven't talked through that one yet, but I will. You know.

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I was just thinking that this is this might be

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 1>good for the NHS, might then be good for the

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>tax payer, might you know, even be good for But

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know people who reduce fresh food as opposed

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>to processed food.

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean it'd be great, And I mean I'm

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 2>sure this was said joking. Leave that the thing was, Yeah,

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 2>if people don't day of obesity, they will just level

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 2>on un day or something.

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Was Absolutely Paulson was absolutely not convinced by the whole

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 1>weight loss drugs will transform the world thing.

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 4>When the NHS was founded, it was treating large numbers

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 4>of people with infectious diseases, which covid apart is no

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 4>longer a big part of the issue. People are surviving

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 4>those as viving older. Actually, heart diseases down a lot,

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 4>but we're teaching a lot more people with cancer and

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 4>dementia and so problem with health is you save them

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 4>from this stuff, the buggers go and get something else

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 4>later on, and often it could be even more expensive.

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 4>If someone dies at forty, it cheap, whereas you know

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 4>if they lived to ninety, then they're going to be expensive.

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 4>So I'm actually less optimistic about I mean about give

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 4>the long run effects on the NHS of this, because

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 4>you know, people.

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Malon very much was so they were saying, yeah, a

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit of friction in there, you know, our panels

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>alway there a little friction, So that was that was interesting.

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>But I was very taken by this idea that that,

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, a drug can transform life. And I know

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>that feels a little bit too simplistic and it's bound

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 1>to und up having you know, nasti side effects, and

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I was thought of yet because that's just the way.

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 1>But if it didn't, this could be amazing.

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 2>And also, I mean, it's going to increase people's health

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 2>spines as well, and.

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 1>How could that possibly be bad?

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, yeah, you know, I say you had the

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 2>ten years to everyone's working life, or in a in

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 2>a positive way rather than that a girl of going

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 2>work for an ten years kind of thing. I don't

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 2>really see. I mean, this is the whole point. Ultimately,

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 2>the human endeavor isn't it to live longer and healthier?

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Area? It could It could transform our productivity numbers. Think

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:07.640
<v Speaker 1>if you think about companies in the number of sick

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:09.440
<v Speaker 1>days that people take and that kind of thing, and

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:12.239
<v Speaker 1>the difficulties of working when you don't feel great. I mean,

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the stuff could change.

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:18.679
<v Speaker 2>We're talking about polls, and obviously antibiotics and vaccines are

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 2>the things that you know, the other health measures that

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:24.440
<v Speaker 2>can transform things. So it's you know, this this could

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:28.920
<v Speaker 2>be something similar given the skal of the obesity form

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 2>and of course it's bad it is, and how and.

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 1>How obviously, how appallingly unbelievably difficult it is to stop

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:39.400
<v Speaker 1>being abyes. You know, point Britanny, it's easy, it quite

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 1>clearly isn't so for drug and sorted out and help everybody.

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Now we should move on from this. I can't quite

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:45.879
<v Speaker 1>see where we're going to get hate mail on this,

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:50.360
<v Speaker 1>but I'm feeling hate now. The other thing that came

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:53.679
<v Speaker 1>up because I did ask everybody where would you invest?

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:55.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, what are you going to buy now? And

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 1>we heard a lot about the different sectors et cetera.

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 1>But there was some agreement across the board that UK

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>equities are really kind of okay, And Jim Allen, who

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 1>is always very interesting on investment, did say towards the

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 1>end he said, the UK market is the cheapest in

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the world and you should get out there and buy

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:15.359
<v Speaker 1>UK investment trust trading on a discount to then that

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:16.160
<v Speaker 1>as a value.

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 6>Do that, he said, I was talking to Sandy about

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 6>it earlier on and I think the UK is the

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:23.479
<v Speaker 6>cheapest market in the world and i'd buy UK investment

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:27.680
<v Speaker 6>trusts that are selling at a discount to their fundamental values.

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 6>And one of the things that's not appreciated about the

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:31.920
<v Speaker 6>United Kingdom apart from and you made a very good

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 6>point by the way, about the vulnerability of British companies

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 6>being to take over. But we are also huge investors

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 6>in other countries, so it works both ways. We're a

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:43.399
<v Speaker 6>much bigger creditor nation than we are a debtonation. So

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:46.159
<v Speaker 6>you know that we have very large investments overseas, and

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 6>particularly in our listed companies, which are I think the

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:53.360
<v Speaker 6>foot see one hundred and seventy five percent overseas revenues,

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 6>which is fantastic. So invest in the UK and look anyone.

0:18:57.320 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 1>So I went away to have a look at the

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:02.879
<v Speaker 1>discounts on investment trusts and see where they were, because

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, if I read about the stuff a lot,

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 1>but I mean, it takes full attention into exactly where

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:08.440
<v Speaker 1>they were. And it turns out that, you know, we

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>have got the average investment and the average discount on

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 1>investment trust at the kind of levels where you usually

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 1>see a fairly mammoth rebound afterwards. So at the kind

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:19.400
<v Speaker 1>of levels we saw in March two thousand and three,

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:22.640
<v Speaker 1>June twenty sixteen and back in the financial crisis, et cetera.

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>So you know, nasty troughs and good returns after that.

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:28.919
<v Speaker 1>We're knocking around those levels at the moment. And at

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the same time UK equities are very cheap, so you've

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 1>got a bit of a double whammy there in that

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 1>if there is to be a turnaround and you're holding

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:40.400
<v Speaker 1>investment trust that hold UK equities, you get the rise

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 1>in the in the net has at value, and you

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:47.199
<v Speaker 1>also get the closing of the gap between the net

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:49.880
<v Speaker 1>asset value and the share price.

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I think that makes a lot of sense.

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 2>And I mean, the only thing I did is that,

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:58.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, haven't been writing a bit that's for about

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 2>a year or no. I would say it's noticeable that

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:06.960
<v Speaker 2>most other analysts are a large number of kind of

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:10.639
<v Speaker 2>mainstream normal investment banking analysts are now kind of saying,

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:13.879
<v Speaker 2>you know, you know, regardless of what you know, you

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 2>think of the UK et cetera, et cetera, it's kind

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:18.680
<v Speaker 2>of it is cheap. And there's a sort of even

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 2>the ones who aren't kind of you know, that's the

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:23.440
<v Speaker 2>remain varies on it, are kind of like, well, you know,

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 2>you can't deny it's cheap. You know, it's just it's

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 2>going to be cheap forever, or that's they've kind of

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 2>got some sort of excuse. But like Goldman Sachs was

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:34.359
<v Speaker 2>putting out something today that basically said that we dividends

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 2>and buybacks added together and throw in essentially kind of

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 2>de equitization process, and nobody's been issuing you shares that

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 2>the kind of the UK market, of the large caps

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 2>at least are now yielding about six percent. But I

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 2>mean that's pretty much inflation now, and that's before you

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 2>throw in any well, okay, let's not take the capital

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 2>gains for granted, but you know, it's it's it's clearly cheap.

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 2>It's just what what might change it? I mean, well,

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 2>the Bank England might change it, because you know, if

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 2>they're telling around and decide to stop raising interest rates

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.880
<v Speaker 2>a little bit earlier than everyone expects, which I think

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 2>is quite possible depending what happens with wages and inflation

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 2>in the next you know week, that that could be

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 2>a trigger, you know, something that people could start saying, oh, actually,

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 2>well maybe it's fine.

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Then they come to us in the end, John eventually eventually,

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:31.120
<v Speaker 1>was there anything else in the conversations that really caught

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:32.879
<v Speaker 1>your eye that we shook about before we say goodbye?

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Actually, there was one minor thing about university.

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 1>The way you say that is making me feel nervous.

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 2>It's just it's the thing that I think it was

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Paul that was talking about it and talking about like

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 2>the number of students going to UNI, and yes, Paul

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 2>and Simon, because Simon was basically saying if I know

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 2>it was it was all because Richard brought up the

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 2>lectures don't get paid enough, and then Simon said, yeah,

0:21:55.680 --> 0:21:57.679
<v Speaker 2>but if he's a you know, media studies lecturer, then

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 2>he doesn't serve to get paid and then pouls Tom.

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 2>But a number of people who got unni.

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Can I make it just a.

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 3>Very quick observation about the lecturer who gets forty five

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:09.119
<v Speaker 3>K and what a disaster is, and we should invest

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 3>more in education. I think everyone would like to see

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 3>people trained in the skills that Jim describes in nuclear

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:19.639
<v Speaker 3>fusion and biotech. But there has been an eruption in

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:23.120
<v Speaker 3>the last few years of worthless degrees of people accruing

0:22:23.240 --> 0:22:25.639
<v Speaker 3>student debt, coming out into the real world finding that

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:27.200
<v Speaker 3>nobody cares about gender studies.

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:30.400
<v Speaker 1>And I think I find a lot of people understand

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 1>for the next.

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 3>Ten years as they try and pay off debt, and

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:38.400
<v Speaker 3>they have a burning, souring sense of entitlement and resentment

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 3>towards the state that duped them into this. You get

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:43.400
<v Speaker 3>elite over production. If you don't get the typing rebellion.

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 3>At the very least you get you know, identity politics

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 3>and all this crap, And are you really got to

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 3>try and refocus on what are the skills we actually

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:53.959
<v Speaker 3>want to teach people? And then I think you might

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 3>find the lecturer's wages naturally rise.

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 2>And the thing that kind of got me slightly was

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:03.640
<v Speaker 2>the id that well, people who graduate tend to get

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 2>paid more, and therefore they should be paying for the

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 2>privilege to go to UNI. And I just kind of

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:13.399
<v Speaker 2>thought that was interesting because that's a complete reversal of

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 2>the way that society used to think about going to UNI.

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:21.440
<v Speaker 2>As I understand it, it's like whenever one in twenty

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:24.399
<v Speaker 2>people went to university and they were like, I don't know,

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:27.399
<v Speaker 2>like ten unis in the whole country. It's like, we

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 2>not only paid for their fees, but we also paid

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 2>for their drinking money on top of it, in the

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:34.920
<v Speaker 2>form of a grant. Because the whole point was that

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 2>that top five percent were meant to be the ones

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 2>who went off and did kind of difficult jobs and

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 2>contributed a lot to society, and that's also why their

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 2>kind of salaries ended up being higher than everyone else's.

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think I'm writing thinking that that was

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:53.639
<v Speaker 2>the basic idea behind why taxpayer, why you know, the

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 2>massive taxpayers should have supported a small group of people

0:23:56.920 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 2>who go to UNI. And then of course, like you know,

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 2>we all sort of said, oh, well, why shouldn't everyone

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 2>be able to go to UNI? And then it's like, okay, well,

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 2>now you have to pay for it.

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 6>But now it's.

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 2>Because you get paid more, you should be paying for

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 2>going to UNI, as if it's well, the excess money

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:17.160
<v Speaker 2>that you make by having gone to UNI should then

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 2>be clawed back by the state. It's kind of it's

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:22.159
<v Speaker 2>just it's the really flawed way of thinking about it.

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's it's there is that and that whole

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:27.919
<v Speaker 2>conversation's happening a lot just now, I see it a lot.

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:30.920
<v Speaker 2>It's like, oh, this this job only pays this much.

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:33.479
<v Speaker 2>That's terrible. It should be higher. It's kind of, well, well,

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 2>who's going to who's going to make that higher? You know,

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 2>are you saying that the state should mandate what everyone

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 2>gets paid now according to which particular job is flavor

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 2>of the month and who is seeing is the most

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 2>moral workut So, I think I think it kind of

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:51.440
<v Speaker 2>goes back to what we were talking about. Is this

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 2>this big government thinking has invaded almost everyone's minds. You know,

0:24:57.359 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 2>it's like, the market should be sending wages, and you

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:02.880
<v Speaker 2>should be setting wages on the basis of what kind

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 2>of jobs are most valued by society in terms of

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, the need for them in the supplying demand thing.

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 2>And that's why, you know, I mean, the whole thing

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 2>was about Adam Smith in the first place. That's it's

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:18.680
<v Speaker 2>the only way to allocate resources efficiently. So she's trying

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 2>to roll back this thinking that you know, there's some

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:30.359
<v Speaker 2>sort of arbiter and this guy that should be deciding

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:33.200
<v Speaker 2>wages as opposed to you know, just supplying demand.

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 5>Really yeah, well, wage and price controls.

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 1>They haven't got a great history, have they.

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 2>They haven't. And yeah, well this thing was a guy

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:43.159
<v Speaker 2>writing about it and the ft the other day suggesting

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 2>it as a good idea, and he used to be

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 2>on the MPCE and he's the Jeremy Hunt.

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 5>That was one of the worst columns I've ever read.

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:55.639
<v Speaker 5>That's terrible, absolutely terrible, and also one of the worst

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 5>ideas I've ever had. And god, there's a low bar

0:25:58.440 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 5>for that.

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and it's this sort of thing you would have.

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Mary expected it from Jeremy Corbyn, but even then,

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 2>at least Jeremy, but they just said, I think I think,

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:12.479
<v Speaker 2>you know, we should be at these levels in Ohio,

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, as opposed to having some really kind of

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 2>like twisted, weird way of framing it through excess taxes

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 2>and all that sort of stuff. Anyway, that wasn't really

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 2>that was a kind of It.

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Wasn't minor at all. It wasn't minor at all. It

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:33.679
<v Speaker 1>was absolutely huge, huge, And we did have an interesting

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>talk in there as well on the on the panel

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:39.119
<v Speaker 1>about degrees that have value and degrees that do not

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 1>have value and how that works. Really came fifty cuffs

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 1>there as well. Actually think that it wasn't quite as

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:48.399
<v Speaker 1>harmonious as I have fixed in my mind those panels.

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I think we better leave it there now. Listen. If

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:52.920
<v Speaker 1>you haven't listened to both of those conversations, you really

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 1>should listen to them, because they were They were incredibly interesting.

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 1>We haven't talked much about the one with Russell and

0:26:57.480 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>James and in this conversation with John, but they were

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:02.920
<v Speaker 1>absolutely fastening. A little bit more intellectual, maybe a little

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 1>bit more for the experienced investor than the second panel was,

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 1>which is a bit more accessible. But if you're interested

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:10.920
<v Speaker 1>investing at all, you have to listen to James and

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:14.159
<v Speaker 1>Russell talking because they really tell you what the world's

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:16.440
<v Speaker 1>going to look like over the next decade, or give

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:18.159
<v Speaker 1>you a version of what the world is going to

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>look like over the next ghetto that is more likely

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:24.159
<v Speaker 1>than a versions you might hear from other people. Anyway,

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 1>there we are, John, Will you becoming next year? Will

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:27.119
<v Speaker 1>you have more parenting to do?

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:28.720
<v Speaker 4>I will?

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 2>I will go out with my week to come next year.

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Bring the kids, you'll be famous.

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:35.200
<v Speaker 1>They can sing afterwards.

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Oh that's how I'm going to hold you.

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and we can dance and have drinks or maybe

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 1>they can and they can they can be our h

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 1>what's it called our pre what they're called when someone

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:46.160
<v Speaker 1>plays before.

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 2>You go in the night?

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 1>Are opening acts? Tell the kids and you heard it

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 1>here first? Everybody sign up for tickets next year. They

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 1>sold out in about ten minutes this year. And if

0:27:56.800 --> 0:27:59.120
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be singing and dancing as well, they're

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 1>going to sell that real for us next year. Thanks

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 1>for listening to this week's Marin Talks Money the after Show.

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 1>This episode was hosted by me Marren Sunset Web alongside

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 1>John Steppek. It was produced by Someasadi. Additional editing by

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 1>Blake Maples