WEBVTT - Bloomberg Surveillance TV: July 18, 2024

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 2>with Lisa Bromwitz and Amrie Hordern. Join us each day

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 2>for insight from the best in markets, economics, and geopolitics

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:24.920
<v Speaker 2>from our global headquarters in New York City. We are

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to nine

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 2>am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify or

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 2>anywhere else you listen, and as always on the Bloomberg

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:38.199
<v Speaker 2>Terminal and the Bloomberg Business App. J Pilowski of TPW

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:40.599
<v Speaker 2>Jay remember when summer was boor and wasn't that great?

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 2>There is nothing boring about this right now, is there?

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 3>No? Not at all? John.

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:46.280
<v Speaker 4>It's been really a crazy market just in the last

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 4>couple of days, going back the last couple of months.

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 4>I mean, when you talk about just as the crescendo

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 4>about a narrow market in bad breath reaches its peak,

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 4>right boom, massive reversal.

0:00:56.920 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 2>Huge move in small caps that we can talk about

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 2>throughout this morning, needs to talk about the politics as well, Ja,

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 2>So let's get into it. The former president addressing the

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 2>Republican Convention a little bit later, we need to talk

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 2>about the pressure building on Joe Biden. The dam is

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 2>breaking big time, and I'll go through just some of

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 2>the reports we've had, not in the last twenty four hours,

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 2>in the last twelve hours. This from ABC News reporting

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 2>that both Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and Minority Leader

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 2>of the House at King Jeffries have indicated to the

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 2>president it's time to step aside. CNN reporting the former

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 2>House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is basically told President Biden the

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 2>same thing in private conversation Semophore yesterday afternoon as well,

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Jay reporting that the campaign funding is essentially drying up.

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Has the pressure ever been greater on this president?

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:39.679
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 4>It's interesting, right, John, because I think Joe Biden is

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:45.040
<v Speaker 4>a fighter, and this is all making him dig in.

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 4>Seems to be the case so far. And what's really

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 4>surprising to me is you have this massive push, but

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 4>on the other side of it, you have things like

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 4>five thirty eight and they're pulling on the electoral college,

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 4>which suggests Joe Biden today if the election was held today,

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 4>Joe Biden would win with two hundred and seventy seven

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 4>electoral votes versus two sixty three for former President Trump,

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 4>and yet that seems to get lost in the perspective.

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 4>The other thing that I think is really powerful, and

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:12.359
<v Speaker 4>I know we're going to talk about it over the

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 4>course of the hour here, is that the economic policy

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 4>mix between the two candidates is night and day.

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 3>And one of.

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 4>Them is very constructive for the United States, is I believe,

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 4>and the other is very destructive from an economic point

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 4>of view.

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:28.639
<v Speaker 2>Would you like to tell us which one's destructive and

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 2>which one's constructive.

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's not just me, right, I mean, if you

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 4>look at Goldman Sachs, if you look at Moody's, if

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 4>you look at the Peterson Institute, if you look at

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 4>sixteen Nobel laureates all have come out and said that

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:43.920
<v Speaker 4>Donald Trump's plan is bad for the United States. It

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 4>means lower growth, it means higher inflation.

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 4>You have mass deportations that throws a wrench into the

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 4>labor market.

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:53.959
<v Speaker 3>You have tariff hikes, you have.

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:58.360
<v Speaker 4>Extension of fiscal of tax cuts, you have essentially fiscal

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 4>and continents. And I think it's sets up the real

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 4>risk of a dollar crash, which sets the stage for

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:09.639
<v Speaker 4>a reversal of what has been a fifteen year run

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 4>of massive US financial asset outperformed it.

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 2>Donnar weakness appears to be the objective of the incoming

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 2>administration if they win. Are you saying that US exceptionalism

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 2>dollar dominance is going to be questioned come November if

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump wins.

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, that's I think that's the case, And you're already

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 4>starting to see it a little bit right now. It

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 4>hasn't really manifested because I think, notwithstanding the kind of

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 4>the frenzy around Joe Biden, the polling.

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 3>Is not at all a suggestive of the same. Right.

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 4>Polling is extremely tight within the margin of error across

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 4>the swing states as well as nationally, and so that's

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 4>why I think the market hasn't quite moved in this.

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 4>But it really does set the stage for things like, Okay,

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 4>does this small cap rally have legs? Does this broadening

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 4>out of the equity market is it sustainable?

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 3>Or do we run kind of hard.

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 4>Into the fall and then get smacked in the face

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 4>with a from victory that leads people to question the

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 4>policy mix of the United States and the FED gets

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 4>put in a box, right, because the Fed is going

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 4>to be cutting I think that's pretty clear. But if

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 4>we get this situation, this worry, the dollar starts to fall,

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 4>the Fed has to raise rates, the dollar continues to fall,

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:21.719
<v Speaker 4>rates have to go higher. And look, we're in a

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 4>bond market that has not broken out. Equities have clearly

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 4>broken out. And by the way, it's global, right, it's

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 4>not narrow. It's not the magnificent seven AQUI all country

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 4>world all time highs, IFA all time highs, aqui xus

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 4>two year highs, emerging market two year highs. Okay, So

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 4>we're in a situation where the other countries are starting

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 4>to do reasonably well, and here we call them to

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:48.280
<v Speaker 4>question the policy mix of the United States and a

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:53.039
<v Speaker 4>massively over owned asset. Right, everybody is overweight US equities,

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:57.160
<v Speaker 4>everybody is overweight US treasuries. Okay, So you have things

0:04:57.200 --> 0:04:59.919
<v Speaker 4>like the yen fair value is considered to be one hundred,

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 4>it's now at.

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 3>One fifty six.

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 4>You look at the euro fair value is considered one twenty,

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:07.839
<v Speaker 4>it's at one o nine. You work at emerging market

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 4>currency's absolutely bludgeoned. So I think there's it's not yet

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 4>percolated in the minds of folks, but we got to

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 4>be careful what we wish for if we wish for

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 4>a week or dollar and we get a weeker dollar,

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 4>then I think that suggests that the US is not

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:25.039
<v Speaker 4>going to be the place to be for the next

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 4>several years.

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 2>We've got a stronger dollar on the screen this morning,

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:29.599
<v Speaker 2>were Firmer by tent to one percent on the Dollar Index.

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 2>We've got a lot to talk about this morning too.

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Through the hour with Ja Piloski, you recording market on

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:35.480
<v Speaker 2>the s and P five hundred just to touch Firmer

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 2>trying to crawl back inchin Kai by just two points

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:41.480
<v Speaker 2>on the SMP up my zero point zero five percent

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:43.840
<v Speaker 2>in the bond market, yields creeping higher back towards four

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 2>twenty four, eighteen twenty seven. We can talk a lot

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 2>about foreign exchange. The Euro a little weaker going into

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 2>that ECB decision a little bit later, Euro dollar at

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 2>one on nine thirty, coming up this hour, and Marie

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 2>joining us as Democratic leadership pushes Biden to step aside.

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:02.839
<v Speaker 2>Shila Coolu, Jeffries as deep discounting hits the airlines, and

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:06.279
<v Speaker 2>Louke kickmore of Aberdeen looking for a super September for

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 2>global rate cuts. We begin with our top story, Biden

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 2>can't catch a break. Just as illness forces the President

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:16.160
<v Speaker 2>to leave the campaign trail, the damn breaks. ABC News

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:19.720
<v Speaker 2>reporting both Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Leader Haqem Jeffries have indicated to President Biden it might

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 2>be best to step aside. Am re joined us now

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 2>from the R and C in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and Marie,

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 2>before we get to the events of where you are,

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:34.679
<v Speaker 2>we need to talk about what's happening elsewhere. How great

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:37.159
<v Speaker 2>is the pressure on President Biden to make a move.

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 5>It's intensifying, that's for sure. Over the past twenty four hours.

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 5>He had a really rough twenty four hours. Not to

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 5>mention that the White House came out and said he

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 5>tested positive for COVID nineteen. It is not just Senate

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 5>Majority Leader Chuck Schumer going to Rehoba Beach over the

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:56.359
<v Speaker 5>weekend telling him we think you need to step aside,

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 5>or the fact that Hakeem Jeffries as well, the House

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 5>Minority Leader, saying to the President, if you stay in

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 5>this race, this is going to hurt down ballot. This

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:07.039
<v Speaker 5>might mean we can lose the House. But then you

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 5>have former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi. According to CNN,

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 5>according to Politico, also having a direct conversation with the

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 5>President saying, look, you're polling shows that this is going

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 5>to be a loss against former President Donald Trump, and

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 5>you are going to really ruin the ticket for House members.

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 5>So these are three top Democrats. Now they're not saying

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 5>this publicly, although if you read their statements of denials,

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 5>these are not exactly straightforward denials to the press that

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 5>these conversations took place. But what you are seeing is

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 5>top three Democrats, especially Speaker Pelosi, who's very close to

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 5>the President, telling him directly face to face that we

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 5>think you need.

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 6>To step aside.

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 7>Now.

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 5>The President is now isolating. He's back in Delaware, and

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 5>I think the next few days we should note who

0:07:57.480 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 5>he is meeting with. Is there going to be a

0:07:59.880 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 5>family powwow? And could this potentially can he heed these

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 5>calls and step aside at the moment, though it does

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 5>sound like he is defiant. When you ask the White

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 5>House what is going on, they say, this is his race.

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 5>He's sticking with it. He has the delegates, and he

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 5>will be on the ticket November fifth.

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 4>Je Marie, I think that's really interesting. Jay Puloski here,

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 4>I know, we like to talk to geopolitics.

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's funny. I think that Joe Biden.

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 4>Is a fighter, right, and all this pressure is forcing

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 4>him to dig in deeper.

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 3>You talk about the down ballots.

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 4>It's interesting, right, because when you look at the Senate

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 4>races in the swing states, Democrats are pulling considerably above

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 4>the Republican candidates. So in the Senate, which is arguably

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 4>more important for the Democrats to hold than taking the House,

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 4>they actually seem to be doing well. Biden, truly, as

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:55.079
<v Speaker 4>you note, is not pulling as well as those candidates.

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:57.960
<v Speaker 4>So I wonder if we're not getting over our skis

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 4>a little bit and talking about Biden stepping away.

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 5>Well, you're one hundred percent right that Biden is a fighter,

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 5>and this is a man who's fueled really by the

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 5>complications in his life, and he talks about the trial

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 5>tribulations of his life and then he's always able to

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 5>overcome it. He thinks he's still in the best position

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 5>to beat Donald Trump when it comes to some of

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 5>these swing states. This is where he's really struggling. But

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 5>you're right, a lot of this is in the margin

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 5>of error when you look at some of the different polling.

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 5>But that is why you see the concern of individuals

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:35.079
<v Speaker 5>on the ballot, whether they're running for Senate, whether they're

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 5>running for Congress, they think that Biden is actually potentially

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 5>going to hurt their chances. There's something else that I

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 5>think we should take it to consideration. Biden has changed

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 5>his message three different times. When asked what would it

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 5>take to drop out when he sat down with ABC.

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:55.160
<v Speaker 5>In that interview, he said he could only be convinced

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 5>if the Lord Almighty came down and said, Joe get

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 5>out of the race. Then the NATO press conference about

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 5>a week later, he was pressed on this issue.

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I was in the room, This was.

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:07.560
<v Speaker 5>All anyone cared about, and he said, no, there's nothing

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 5>that can make me get out of the race, except

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 5>maybe they came back and they said there's no way

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:13.079
<v Speaker 5>to win.

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 7>The polls.

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 5>He says, if his team came to me and said

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 5>the polls show there's no way to win, then In

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:20.439
<v Speaker 5>an interview with Beet that was on display last night

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 5>was broadcasting is supposed to be this counter programming to

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 5>the RNC, He said, if he had some sort of

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 5>medical condition that emerged, if someone if doctors came to

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 5>me and said, you got this problem and that problem anyway,

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:36.440
<v Speaker 5>he said that would potentially be a reason why drop out.

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:38.679
<v Speaker 5>So I do think there is a little bit more

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 5>of wiggle room now because Joe Biden himself has changed

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:44.439
<v Speaker 5>the reasoning why he would get out of this race.

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 2>And right after we saw those comments about the potential

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 2>of a medical problem taking him out of the race,

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 2>he gets a COVID diagnosis. Can we just look at

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 2>the compare and contrast. It could not be staker Saturday evening,

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 2>an attempt at assassination on the form of President of

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 2>the United States walks away from it with this fists raised,

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:03.679
<v Speaker 2>American flag waving in the background, compared to say this

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 2>and re I understand this brutal, But look at the

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 2>pictures of yesterday evening, Yesterday afternoon, President Biden contracting COVID

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:13.839
<v Speaker 2>no musk, struggling to walk up the steps of Air

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:17.439
<v Speaker 2>Force one a little bit later on this evening, This

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 2>president won't be able to count a program the former

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 2>president of the United States when he addresses the RNC.

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 2>How stark is that contrast going to be?

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 5>It's incredibly stark because you also have a Republican party

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 5>that's trying to tone down the rhetoric at this RNC,

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 5>and they're trying to unify really the Maga wing of

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 5>the party, this trump Ism that many Hawks and many

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:46.719
<v Speaker 5>fiscally conservative and more moderate Republicans were hoping potentially this

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 5>would basically no longer be the brand of the Republican

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 5>Party unless Trump was top of the ticket. But yesterday

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 5>and that speech from JD Vance that just showed that

0:11:57.360 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 5>Maga and trump Ism is.

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:00.439
<v Speaker 6>Here to stay.

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 5>The populous wing of this Republican Party is now the

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 5>majority of the Republican Party with this ticket, and this evening,

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 5>we're just going to see that tonight with President Trump

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:15.080
<v Speaker 5>coming to the stage and formally accepting his party's nominee

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:19.079
<v Speaker 5>to face off against potentially what will be Joe Biden

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 5>November fifth, and he's probably going to put his fist

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 5>in the air and say fight, fight, fight, like he

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 5>did after that former that assassination attempt on Saturday. And

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 5>then in contrast to President Joe Biden, who cannot counter

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 5>programming because he's self isolating in Delaware. And then it's

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 5>just a drip treat of reports that members of his

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 5>own party, senior members of his own party, and some

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 5>of them who really love the president, like Nancy Pelosi,

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 5>are telling him, we think it's time you step aside.

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Let's get into that address a little bit later. Let's

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:50.719
<v Speaker 2>talk about that and finish there. I want to talk

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:54.200
<v Speaker 2>about policy on Wall Street. For a long long time,

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 2>we've always thought of the Republican Party is pro business.

0:12:57.320 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 2>And you and I have been talking about this now

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 2>for a number of weeks, been talking about how pro

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 2>business this Republican administration may actually turn out to be.

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 2>What is going to be in the address a little

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 2>bit late to maybe settle that school on that front, Well,

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 2>it's very different.

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 5>I think if you hear what jd Vance has to

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 5>say his VP pick and what President Trump has to say.

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 5>So jd Vance last night said this is no longer

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 5>the party of Wall Street. This is the party of

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 5>the working class. He called out auto workers in Michigan,

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 5>factory workers in Wisconsin, and energy workers in Pennsylvania. Donald

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:34.959
<v Speaker 5>Trump likely chose him to park him in these three

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:37.680
<v Speaker 5>states to try to win the election, because if Joe

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 5>Biden cannot hold the Russ Belt, if he cannot hold

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:43.199
<v Speaker 5>the Blue Wall, then he is not winning re election.

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 5>To see the White House again, but Donald Trump is

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 5>going to go to the stage today after an interview

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 5>with Bloomberg business Week, and he said he'd actually like

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:53.839
<v Speaker 5>the corporate tax rate at fifteen percent. So I am

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 5>struggling in all of my conversations here. And I had

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 5>this conversation yesterday with Virginia Governor Glenn Younkin, who they

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:02.559
<v Speaker 5>think Virginia is definitely in play when it comes to

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 5>Republican Party about which Republican Party is good for business?

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 5>And honestly, Jonathan, I still don't know the answer. It

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 5>really depends who you ask, because someone like JD. Van's

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 5>wants to see a higher corporate tax rate, while the

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 5>top of the ticket wants as low as fifteen percent.

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 5>So we're still struggling to.

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 6>Figure this out.

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 5>One thing that I'm continuously told when I ask about

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 5>some of the rhetoric from Jdvans about the business community,

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 5>everyone says the same thing. It's Trump's party. Jdvans is

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 5>going to.

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 3>Get in line.

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 2>I might on the lights said the Republican Convention. I'm Marie,

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 2>thank you.

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 3>Jay.

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 2>That's a question we keep asking just how business friendly

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 2>is is government going to be if they get back

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 2>into power.

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 4>I think that there's a queer distinction between the two

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 4>candidates and their economic policy.

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 3>Ms.

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 4>Biden has been probably the most successful president in terms

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 4>of economic policy and outcomes in.

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 3>Fifty years or more.

0:14:56.160 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 4>Right and President former President Trump, I think is his

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 4>policy mix is basically fiscal incontinence, where you're talking about

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 4>mass deportation that destroyed the labor market, You're talking about

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 4>raising tariff sixty percent, you're talking about extending tax cuts,

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 4>you're talking about cutting taxes even further. So I think

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 4>the situation is setting up for really it could be

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 4>a significant shift, in a significant surprise in terms of

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 4>the dollar, because if the dollar weekends, when we blow

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 4>out the physical deficit here, the bed is in a box.

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 4>I think people start to get worried about policy confusion

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 4>and chaos, which was kind of the motif of the

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 4>Trump first administration. Then I think you have a situation

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 4>where you have a massively over owned asset, which is

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 4>US financial assets represented.

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 3>By the dollar, that could roll over. It's at one

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 3>oh four to one oh three.

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 4>People target ninety as a reasonable place if it really

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 4>does start to sell off.

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 2>J Piloskiv TPW Advisory is still optimistic. Rights In this

0:15:57.320 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 2>they say rotation is the lifebud of Bullmark, and it

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 2>sure seems like a broadening gown in rotation to x

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 2>Tech would go a long way to sustaining the bull Jays.

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 2>With us around the table through the rest of this hour, Jay,

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 2>I want to talk about one name in particular, before

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 2>we've broaden out ourselves. I want to talk about Taiwan

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 2>Semi time on Semi gets Hamma yesterday. But this is

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 2>a company putting up real numbers just this morning. This

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 2>is what we learned. They now expect sales to grow

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 2>more than the maximum mid twenty percent it had guided

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 2>towards previously with things that buy yesterday for you, Yes.

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 4>They were, John, I think you know markets that really extended.

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 4>You live by the sword, you die by the sword. Right,

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 4>So when you're up twenty thirty percent in a matter

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 4>of a month or two, you come you pull back

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 4>eight percent a day.

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 3>That's just kind of normal.

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 4>But the point you're making is fundamentally, these are solid, fast,

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 4>rapidly growing stories.

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 3>Which are unique in the world.

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 4>Right, You're talking about forecasts that were made a couple

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 4>of months ago, and they're already beating them and raising them.

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 3>And this is a story we've seen with.

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 4>N Video and other chip makers that are involved in

0:16:56.800 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 4>AI for a year now, right, and so you've had

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 4>massive moves, but the stocks are actually cheaper now than

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 4>they were a year ago because earnings have outpaced the

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 4>stock price appreciation. And so we have been and continue

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 4>to be big believers in AI and big believers in

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 4>the idea of the pick and shovel.

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 4>The pick and shovel for AI is the semiconductor space,

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 4>and so when you have pullbacks, those are opportunities to.

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 3>Add in our views.

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 2>So this is what we've been rotating away from in

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 2>the last week. Let's talk about what we've been rotating

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:30.719
<v Speaker 2>towards small caps. I've had questions around this table, conversations

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:33.439
<v Speaker 2>about whether we're going into a small cap presidency with

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:36.119
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump the president in the White House, heading up

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 2>the United States and driving small business in America and

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 2>punishing big business big tech in particular. How do you

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 2>frame that one?

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I look at it differently.

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:47.440
<v Speaker 4>I look at it that small caps are big beneficiaries

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:50.440
<v Speaker 4>of lower interest rates. Right, fifty percent of small cap

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 4>debt is floating rate versus ten percent for large cap,

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 4>So they are big beneficiaries. And so we've seen this movie.

0:17:57.640 --> 0:17:59.679
<v Speaker 4>We saw it in the fall. Right, small caps at

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 4>are twenty seven percent move in three months October to December.

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 4>I think they're set up for something similar. Small caps

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 4>today trade at ten times twenty twenty five earnings on

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:14.639
<v Speaker 4>a medium basis, That is extremely cheap. They're massively under owned. Right,

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 4>there's a massive short which is why this is moved

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 4>so fast. Right, This is always the case. Right, it's

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 4>a massive short covering, but you have fundamentals again like

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:25.360
<v Speaker 4>DSMC to support it. The other thing that I think

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 4>is really really interesting, John, is that things are broadening

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:32.199
<v Speaker 4>out right. We just updated our model portfolios at TPW Advisory,

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 4>and I go through all the positions, all the indices,

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 4>and all the things we're thinking about. And what's interesting

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 4>to me is that thematics are breaking out right. You

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:43.359
<v Speaker 4>look at biotech, you look at things like robotics, you

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:47.120
<v Speaker 4>look at things like security, cybersecurity, they're all breaking out

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 4>to new all time highs. You also look at things

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:53.440
<v Speaker 4>like infrastructure and cap X. Right, we saw the industrial

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 4>production numbers yesterday. Infrastructure pave all time highs, XLI all

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:04.879
<v Speaker 4>time highs, which is a smart energy for the grid system,

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:07.640
<v Speaker 4>all time highs. And so to me, you're looking at

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 4>a situation where there's multiple parts of the market starting

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 4>to move in unison higher and it's not just the

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:18.440
<v Speaker 4>Magnificent seven anymore. And to me, that's a much more robust,

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 4>much healthier market. Now, as we talked about it the

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 4>open whether with a Donald Trump, should he win, whether

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 4>that sustains, I think is a very real question.

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 2>That's a good thing, so long as we are going

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 2>into an economic answer, just cyclicals for an example, Let's

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 2>take the likes of Delta United in the last twenty

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 2>four hours. They're warning about discounting, they're wanting about driving

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 2>down prices going for the summer. That shouldn't be happening

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:42.919
<v Speaker 2>if this economy is hold enough, should it.

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:43.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 4>It's so interesting, right because we ran airlines and jets

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 4>for quite some time as a reopening play coming out

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:50.360
<v Speaker 4>of COVID.

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 3>And they really just didn't work.

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 4>And they still don't work, even though you read about

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:58.400
<v Speaker 4>tourism US citizens going abroad in record numbers this year,

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 4>and yet it obviously doesn't seem be enough for the

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 4>airlines to make money. And so I think it's it's

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 4>it's interesting, but I think it's an anomaly. If you

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 4>work at broader issues like you look at retail sales

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 4>the other day. Consumer is still strong, right, you have

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:15.440
<v Speaker 4>real wage growth, you have record loan unemployment or close

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 4>to it, you have disposable income rising, and so consumption

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:23.199
<v Speaker 4>I think is fine. And what's interesting is are we

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:26.400
<v Speaker 4>having the manufacturing sector starting to catch up and give

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:27.119
<v Speaker 4>us another.

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 2>Leg to banter japerslk Gen writing this well, recent data

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:43.199
<v Speaker 2>is supportive of rate cuts sooner than we anticipated. The

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 2>market might be getting ahead of itself, pricing more than

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 2>three cuts by January and nearly six cuts by the

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 2>middle of twenty twenty five. Stres with us for more

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Sabatric and Morning Good Mine the official house called at

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 2>salt Gen was no cuts yep this year. It feels

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 2>like September might happen before we get there. I want

0:20:57.840 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 2>to talk about the biger you from you and the

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:02.960
<v Speaker 2>tea challenging really this view that once you stop, they

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 2>keep going. What's the pushback to that?

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:09.239
<v Speaker 7>The fact that the data has been relatively strong, right,

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 7>it's it's something that the FED has to kind of

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:16.919
<v Speaker 7>recalibrate as we go along. If you listen to what

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:22.360
<v Speaker 7>you know. Fed Chair Williams. I'm sorry, Williams, the FED

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 7>president said. He basically said that, you know that they're

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:30.679
<v Speaker 7>trying to move into less restrictive policy, so they're not

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 7>really talking about embarking on a very aggressive path of

0:21:34.920 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 7>rate cuts or even any sort of a you know,

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:41.159
<v Speaker 7>a cadence of once a meeting or once a quarter.

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 7>So they're going to be very very data dependent once

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 7>they start. So you know, kind of drawing the analogy

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 7>with the ECB. They cut rates in June, and some

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:55.159
<v Speaker 7>often rightfully called it a data independent rate cut, so

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 7>you know, again coming into the end of the year,

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 7>they're going to be faced with questions about unit labor

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 7>costs and how the data is progressing. So it's not

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 7>certain to us that the ECB is going to be

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:09.199
<v Speaker 7>cutting every meeting. So the FED might very well be

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:11.639
<v Speaker 7>in the same situation where they're going to have to

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 7>recalibrate as we go along, as they move away from

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 7>from restrictive policy.

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:18.920
<v Speaker 2>There might be something else they need to consider as well,

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 2>And Robert Kaplan talked about it. If you're a current

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 2>FED official you want to touch this subject. Former FED officials

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 2>can dance around it a little bit more. I guess

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:28.159
<v Speaker 2>if new policies come out, it'll take some time for

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 2>them to digest those, and that may affect their next decisions.

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 2>How important is November as a date for how you

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 2>think about twenty twenty five?

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 7>So the November elections I think are very very meaningful.

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 7>I think that after they cut in September, it'll be

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 7>interesting to see how they message their policy path from

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:55.640
<v Speaker 7>there on. You know, the market I think is aggressively

0:22:55.680 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 7>pricing in for several cuts between between now and January.

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 7>That feels like it's a little bit too much, But

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 7>really the outcome of the elections I think are going

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:09.160
<v Speaker 7>to be very key on how they think about policy

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:15.680
<v Speaker 7>after November. So the you know, the the Trump administration

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:19.719
<v Speaker 7>is talking about, you know, higher tariffs, you know, the

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:21.919
<v Speaker 7>debt and deficits picture is something that they're going to

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 7>be very focused on as well. So, you know, it's

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:29.879
<v Speaker 7>something that the power, the the the FED is going

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 7>to have to be more attention to. Is not just

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:34.920
<v Speaker 7>a monettery side, but also the general trajectory for the

0:23:35.000 --> 0:23:36.240
<v Speaker 7>for the fiscal side of things.

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:38.199
<v Speaker 6>You know, it's interesting because both the ECB and the

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 6>FED have had calls of being political different flavors. For

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:44.359
<v Speaker 6>the ECB, it's that by cutting, you're acting as a

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 6>king maker. You're letting these governments come in run really

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:50.400
<v Speaker 6>high deficits and again you're saving them by cutting. If

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 6>we're in a position we're in November, we get a

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 6>Trump presidency and we know that's going to be the policy,

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 6>we know the deficit is going to be higher, and

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:57.919
<v Speaker 6>the Fed is still cutting.

0:23:58.480 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Is that a problem?

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:01.639
<v Speaker 6>Are they doing the same thing that's accused of the

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:03.680
<v Speaker 6>that the ECB is being accused of doing.

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:09.440
<v Speaker 7>So, you know, the trajectory for debton deficits is quite

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 7>dire regardless of who gets elected, whether it's it's Trump

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:15.440
<v Speaker 7>or Biden. I think that that's something that the next

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 7>administration is going to have to address. So it's not

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 7>really the purvey of one, you know, party or the other.

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 7>And I think that that's why I think it makes

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 7>it very tricky for the FED to be able to

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:32.639
<v Speaker 7>cut rates. You know, in an environment where debton deficits

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 7>are and long end yields could potentially arise of the

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:38.440
<v Speaker 7>market and the bond vigilanties start to kind of push

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 7>back on the narrative that's coming and coming put forth

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:45.880
<v Speaker 7>by the administrations that come to power. So I think

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:49.400
<v Speaker 7>that they're going to be very very careful about policy adjustments.

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 7>It's going to be more about moving away from restrictive

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 7>policy as opposed to embarking on several rate cuts. I mean,

0:24:57.280 --> 0:24:59.399
<v Speaker 7>the last leg of inflation is going to be kind

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 7>of tricky. Again. You're talking about, you know, infation getting

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:06.160
<v Speaker 7>from three percent to two percent. That pathway is probably

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:09.119
<v Speaker 7>going to be a lot slower than people anticipate. So

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:13.400
<v Speaker 7>the first rate cuts, you know, will kind of signal

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 7>that they're willing to do more, but whether they deliver

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:17.879
<v Speaker 7>on that really depends on the data.

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 6>That idea that you mentioned that the bond of vigilantes

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:22.199
<v Speaker 6>are going to come in if there's government spending that

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:25.920
<v Speaker 6>they don't like. To your point, we already know there's

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 6>going to be a lot of spending, and with that backdrop,

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 6>sure there's been some curve steepeners, but we still get

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 6>a twenty year auction yesterday that's absorbed really well. There's

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:36.639
<v Speaker 6>clearly still demand for duration. So how big of a

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 6>risk you actually think that is that at some point

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:41.399
<v Speaker 6>this bond market might try to punish too much spending

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 6>from the government.

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:47.360
<v Speaker 7>So at an environment where the data is starting to weaken,

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:53.360
<v Speaker 7>you are going to see the market rallying and bondiles

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 7>coming down. If anything, I'd say in the last you know,

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 7>three to four weeks, what we have seen is the

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 7>market kind of getting ahead of itself, pricing in the

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:03.880
<v Speaker 7>Trump trade, the five series part of the curve steepening

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:06.680
<v Speaker 7>out quite meaningfully, and in the last week I'd say

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 7>there's been a little bit of a rethink and profit

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:13.920
<v Speaker 7>taking on those trades, and as the market positions for

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:17.399
<v Speaker 7>Ray cuts, you're going to see that decline in yields

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:19.920
<v Speaker 7>heading into the elections. This has been our call all

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 7>along is that TENNY yields will start to decline. We'll

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 7>get TENNY yels around four percent by the elections or

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 7>the end of the year, and then after that is

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 7>when you'll start seeing the selloff led by the back

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 7>end because of debt and deficits. There's really not any

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:39.639
<v Speaker 7>willingness on either party to really address the debt and

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 7>deficit issues, and there's not really that much room, i

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 7>would argue, for cuts and spending. So it's going to

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 7>be very very interesting to see how the next administration

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 7>deals with the issues. On debton deficits and how much

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 7>the bond market is going to push back on that narrative.

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 2>That's an important phrase and deficits, So let me get

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 2>this right. Rallianto November, yourself coming down in November. We've

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 2>been trying to work out if we get higher yields,

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 2>is it because of a better growth profile, higher inflation,

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 2>or because of supply. Do you think it's just about

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:14.400
<v Speaker 2>supply or do we get a higher bump of inflation

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 2>as well? Do we get higher interest rates from the

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:18.120
<v Speaker 2>Federal Reserve too? How do you think about those other

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:18.639
<v Speaker 2>parts of this?

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:21.880
<v Speaker 7>So I think it's going to be a combination of factors, John,

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:23.440
<v Speaker 7>and I think you're right to point out that part

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 7>of that could be because of the stimulative effects you're

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 7>getting from rate cuts. So if the market starts to

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:31.159
<v Speaker 7>look towards you know, especially at a time when the

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:34.159
<v Speaker 7>economy is relatively strong, this is a very unusual cycle,

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 7>at least in my career. I haven't seen one where

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:39.479
<v Speaker 7>the Fed is cutting rates to get policy out of

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 7>restrictive territory and not cutting rates because we're heading into

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 7>some sort of a crisis or a meaningful recession. So

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:48.719
<v Speaker 7>in that sort of context. They have to be very

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:51.400
<v Speaker 7>very careful if they cut too aggressively, that could again

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:53.399
<v Speaker 7>lead to frauth in the market. We've already seen an

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 7>easing of financial conditions. You know, if you look at

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:59.359
<v Speaker 7>the equity markets, it's extraordinarily you know, it's performing really well.

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:02.359
<v Speaker 7>Credits are very very tight, so you're looking and the

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 7>dollar is very strong. So all of these metrics lead

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:07.480
<v Speaker 7>us to believe that financial conditions are easy. So they

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 7>have to be careful about cutting and not causing financial

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:13.679
<v Speaker 7>conditions to ease further. And if that would happened, and

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 7>if growth actually starts to pick up, and we see

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 7>what we saw in the first month of the year,

0:28:18.960 --> 0:28:21.400
<v Speaker 7>the first few months of the year, you could actually

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 7>see you yields rise.

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 2>Super unfair to once for number. But I've got a

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 2>once for number. So we run it down to four

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 2>percent on tens, what do we sell off to. We're

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 2>threatening five again on a ten year in America.

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 7>Probably at least our forecasts are foretelling it's getting back

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 7>towards four and a half percent by the middle of

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 7>next year. Again, it's you know, the policies put forth

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 7>by the administration to come is going to dictate how

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 7>much of a selloff we see, and it also depends

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 7>on the trajectory for the economy. So a modest sell

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 7>off from here on makes sense for us to get

0:28:56.080 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 7>from four and a half to five percent. You're going

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 7>to really need to see a perhaps a further degeneration

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 7>in the outlook for a fiscal policy.

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:06.200
<v Speaker 2>Sabanthra super thoughtful. It's going to say thank you, Sabata

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 2>Jampether of selk Gen. Chris Harvey off wels Fargo saying

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 2>this what looked like a popped last week has indeed

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 2>become a rotation driven by Trump's polling and policies. We

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 2>are confident regulatory pressure has crested, and we upgreat banks

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 2>to outperform. Chris joins us for more. Chris is good

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 2>to see you. It's good to see this is a

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 2>change for you and a short amount of time as well.

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 3>It is a change, right.

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 1>We didn't expect what happened this weekend to happen, and

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 1>what that did. It made the probability of Trump taking

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the presidentship from likely to highly likely. And then suddenly

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 1>we weren't talking about the fundamentals anymore. We were talking

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 1>about policies. We were talking about tariffs, we were talking

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 1>about taxes, where we're talking about regulation. And when you

0:29:57.200 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 1>talk to people, and I'm sure you've had lots of conversations,

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:04.080
<v Speaker 1>get you have ten different ten different conversations, you get

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 1>ten different answers. Rates are going higher, rates are going lower.

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 1>The curve's going to step, and the curve is going

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to invert. We're going to have inflation. We're not going

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to have inflation. The only thing that we're confident in

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 1>is that we've crested on the regulatory side.

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:15.120
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>It was already occurring with some of the things with

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Basil III, it was occurring with Chevron, But now that

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>it looks like the Trump Trump administration is going back

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 1>in it is something that we think is long and exploitable,

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 1>which was a.

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 3>Catalyst we needed to upgrade banks.

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 2>How broad is this bank's co Is it launch caps

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 2>and regional is one or the other.

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:36.280
<v Speaker 1>It's starting with large cap, But really we like the banks,

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:39.680
<v Speaker 1>we like the financial space, and the regulation is going

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 1>to help the group across the board. It's going to

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:44.600
<v Speaker 1>help multiples, right. Ultimately, I think it's going to help

0:30:44.680 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 1>earnings as well.

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 3>But the issue is that.

0:30:46.960 --> 0:30:48.760
<v Speaker 1>It's multiples and you can start to price that in

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's already beginning.

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:51.320
<v Speaker 3>We can talk as much as.

0:30:51.280 --> 0:30:54.360
<v Speaker 1>We want about trade and tariff, but the regulatory environment

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 1>is already changing.

0:30:55.760 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 6>So having a vice presidential candidate who talks about Wall

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 6>Street barons saying you won't cater to Wall Street? Do

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 6>you just write that office campaign rhetoric.

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:05.960
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't.

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:09.720
<v Speaker 1>No, I wouldn't write that office campaign rhetoric. Right, there's

0:31:09.840 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be a lot of push and there's going

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 1>to be a lot of pull. Jd Vance is new

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:16.040
<v Speaker 1>to the platform, and so there's going to be some

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I think there's also going to be some growing pains,

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and he has some very strong opinions. I don't dismiss that, right.

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 1>But what they talk about and what I think is

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 1>going to come through and is coming through, is it's

0:31:29.280 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 1>America first, right, and so it's domestic companies over global companies.

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 3>There's a talk.

0:31:33.960 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 1>About being pro cyclical, and so it's more about economically

0:31:37.440 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 1>sensitive names, at least in the short term than your

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 1>growth names. And also with the regulation, it's more about

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the capital markets, whether it's companies with M and A

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 1>or IPOs or just multiple revow valuation across the financial

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and banking space in that.

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 6>Trade of American companies versus abroad. Full on display yesterday

0:31:57.320 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 6>where you get the TSMC's the world. Those chip makers

0:31:59.760 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 6>are falling, and Intel does find it kind of trades

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 6>Water does that kind of rally have legs.

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:10.040
<v Speaker 1>So yesterday was a really interesting one because you're right,

0:32:10.320 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>everything went down and so there wasn't a whole lot

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 1>of discrimination. And if you look across tech, there's certain tech,

0:32:16.120 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 1>more so on the hardware semi side that you would

0:32:19.240 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 1>punish or weigh on a little bit more than you

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 1>would on the services and software side. But everything went down,

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's just going to take a while

0:32:25.920 --> 0:32:28.239
<v Speaker 1>for the market to really discriminate. And the other thing

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 1>is we're going we saw this last time. We're going

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 1>to have a number of iterations. There's going to be

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 1>a number of things out in the public that we

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about. It's going to be ten percent, it's going

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 1>to be these companies, it's going to be that come

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 1>this industry, and it's going to change over time and

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the markets reacting. But what the market is saying is, hey,

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 1>we went from a likely change in administrations to a

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 1>highly likely change administration. And the views here are much different.

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 2>So we need to price those in just to get

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:54.040
<v Speaker 2>a bit of nu ones fo you from you and

0:32:54.160 --> 0:32:55.960
<v Speaker 2>pin you down a little bit. What is the difference

0:32:56.000 --> 0:32:59.040
<v Speaker 2>between sort of this traditional rotation and a pure Trump trade.

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:00.400
<v Speaker 2>What's the difference between it's.

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 1>So traditional rotation. So I think there are two things.

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:05.480
<v Speaker 1>So last week what we were saying and we were

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 1>wrong about this. Hey, the rotation is not going to

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:12.120
<v Speaker 1>happen because it's not fundamentally driven. The fundamentals just aren't there, right,

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Because what we're seeing is if you look at surprise indicies,

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 1>they're rolling over right. If you look at the reaction

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 1>to bad news, companies are reacting poorly to bad news.

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:25.160
<v Speaker 1>But then you had the weekend and all of a sudden,

0:33:25.800 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the political environment just changed, right, And this week it

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:33.040
<v Speaker 1>was all about almost all about the political So I

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 1>think the only thing that's really long tailed nature are

0:33:36.360 --> 0:33:40.640
<v Speaker 1>things that touch that regulatory environment. As far as the fundamentals,

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 1>we need to start digesting the fundamentals, and I still

0:33:43.160 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 1>think the fundamentals favor your larger cap and your growth.

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Your names we'll see, right, But until we see the

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 1>fundamentals change, I'm still not entirely sure that you're going

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 1>to see the broadening out that a lot of people hope.

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:56.719
<v Speaker 2>So let's park the banks right dory story that you've

0:33:56.760 --> 0:33:59.040
<v Speaker 2>got confidence on. I'm not just in your recession. I

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 2>think it's a fact character by some what you've just

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 2>said as well, a little bit nervous about incoming gaining

0:34:03.520 --> 0:34:05.400
<v Speaker 2>so far. It likes a doubt set what we had

0:34:05.440 --> 0:34:08.439
<v Speaker 2>from United yesterday pepsi as well. What do you say

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:09.280
<v Speaker 2>in in those stories?

0:34:09.680 --> 0:34:10.319
<v Speaker 3>It's not great?

0:34:10.480 --> 0:34:12.279
<v Speaker 1>Right, So the economy is not as strong as I

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:15.560
<v Speaker 1>think people expected. And what you're seeing is, you know,

0:34:15.600 --> 0:34:16.880
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the beginning of the year, a

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:19.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of economists I think that the forecast was for

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 1>like one or one, one, two, and it doubled, but

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:25.479
<v Speaker 1>economic strength did not double. And what happened was people

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:26.840
<v Speaker 1>took out the recession.

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 3>Forecast, right.

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:29.880
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't oh my god, the economy is so strong,

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 1>it said, and we're not going to have a recession.

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:34:32.280 --> 0:34:34.479
<v Speaker 1>And now what we're looking at is, hey, we didn't

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:37.520
<v Speaker 1>expect the FED to be as strong or as tight

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 1>as they have been, and that that's starting to eat

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 1>into the psyche. What's also happening is you're having inflation fatigue,

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and you're also saying that companies have been pushing price

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:53.279
<v Speaker 1>and individuals are beginning to push back, right, and so

0:34:53.480 --> 0:34:56.400
<v Speaker 1>now you really can't have And what we say is

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:58.319
<v Speaker 1>the economy is not going to value out. People think

0:34:58.360 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the economy is accelerating, I just don't see it, and

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:03.799
<v Speaker 1>so we need things to slow down. And what we've

0:35:03.800 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 1>had is we had a bump because of the Trump trade,

0:35:06.840 --> 0:35:08.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's really not supported by the fundamentals.

0:35:08.680 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 6>So there are people who say, it's not the economy

0:35:10.719 --> 0:35:12.799
<v Speaker 6>that's going to save us, it's the FED that's going

0:35:12.840 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 6>to save us. And we're going to get some Fed

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:16.879
<v Speaker 6>FED cuts rather, and that means that for these small

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 6>caps that have floating rate debt, they're all going to

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:19.120
<v Speaker 6>be saved.

0:35:19.360 --> 0:35:20.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, fair point.

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Right, So we were oversold, we had an oversold bounce. Now,

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:29.400
<v Speaker 1>this is probably the oddest easing cycle I've ever seen. Right,

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Typically when you enter an easing cycle, things are really bad.

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:35.320
<v Speaker 1>The Fed's cutting because either there's a liquidity issue or

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:37.759
<v Speaker 1>the economy slowing down. Here, they're just saying, hey, we're

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:40.120
<v Speaker 1>going to start cutting. So how are they going to

0:35:40.200 --> 0:35:43.279
<v Speaker 1>cut twenty five basis points here twenty five basis points there?

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Is that really aggressive enough to change the economy?

0:35:46.560 --> 0:35:47.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't think so.

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:51.359
<v Speaker 1>Is that enough to change an oversold condition to something

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:52.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better?

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? I think so.

0:35:53.680 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 1>But until you see the economy is starting to reaccelerate,

0:35:56.600 --> 0:35:59.040
<v Speaker 1>it's really hard for these smaller cap companies that have

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous amount of balance sheet and operational leverage to

0:36:02.120 --> 0:36:04.719
<v Speaker 1>outperform for a sustained period of time recap growth.

0:36:04.800 --> 0:36:07.160
<v Speaker 2>You've heard some of these simplastic sort of commentary we've

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 2>heard over the last couple of weeks as well, which

0:36:08.719 --> 0:36:11.240
<v Speaker 2>is sort of buy everything else, leave big techet behind,

0:36:11.440 --> 0:36:13.800
<v Speaker 2>buy everything else? Can you tell us not just what

0:36:13.880 --> 0:36:16.239
<v Speaker 2>you want to buy banks? What wouldn't you touch? What

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:18.799
<v Speaker 2>would you tell our audience this morning as everyone gets

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:20.319
<v Speaker 2>wrapped up in the everything house rally?

0:36:20.600 --> 0:36:23.600
<v Speaker 1>What should they avoid? Yeah, so we're still not fans

0:36:23.640 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 1>of commoding commodity related stocks. If you're going to a

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:28.600
<v Speaker 1>period where inflation is lower, I'm not really sure how

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:31.759
<v Speaker 1>that works. Also, we don't think the economy is accelerating.

0:36:32.080 --> 0:36:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Those are places where where we don't want to be.

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:37.880
<v Speaker 1>So we're still underweight energy and we think that's going

0:36:37.960 --> 0:36:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to be a difficult spot. So anything commodity commodity related,

0:36:41.200 --> 0:36:43.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, in an inflation or non inflation or environment,

0:36:44.360 --> 0:36:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I just don't see how it works.

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:47.160
<v Speaker 2>Chris, it's going to see I've bred in the banks.

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, sir, Thank you, Chris Harvey.

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:48.759
<v Speaker 1>There.

0:36:49.600 --> 0:36:53.120
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Sevenans podcast, bringing you the best

0:36:53.200 --> 0:36:56.480
<v Speaker 2>in markets, economics, angiot politics. You can watch the show

0:36:56.560 --> 0:36:59.480
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg TV weekday mornings from six am to

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:03.360
<v Speaker 2>nine am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify,

0:37:03.520 --> 0:37:05.759
<v Speaker 2>or anywhere else you listen, and as always on the

0:37:05.760 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 2>bloom Blog terminal and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:37:12.120 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 7>Mm hmm