WEBVTT - Smart Talks with IBM: Unlocking Data Strategy: Data Literacy for Better Business

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Hey everyone, it's Robert and Joe here. Today we've got

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:06.960
<v Speaker 1>something a little bit different to share with you. It

0:00:07.080 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 1>is a new edition of the Smart Talks podcast series,

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:14.319
<v Speaker 1>which is produced in partnership with IBM. This season of

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Smart Talks with IBM is all about new creators, the developers,

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:22.600
<v Speaker 1>data scientists, c t o s, and other visionaries creatively

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>applying technology and business to drive change. They use their

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>knowledge and creativity to develop better ways of working, no

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:34.840
<v Speaker 1>matter the industry. Join hosts from your favorite Pushkin Industries

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:38.560
<v Speaker 1>podcast as they use their expertise to deepen these conversations.

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Malcolm Gladwell will guide you through this season as your

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>host to provide his thoughts and analysis along the way.

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Look out for new episodes of Smart Talks with IBM

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>every month on the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you get your podcasts. And learn more at

0:00:55.520 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>IBM dot com slash smart Talks. Hello, Hello, Welcome to

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Smart Talks with IBM, a podcast from Pushkin Industries, I

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio and IBM. I'm Malcolm Gladmo. This season, we're

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>talking to new creators, the developers, data scientists, ct o s,

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>and other visionaries who are creatively applying technology in business

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>to drive change. Channeling their knowledge and expertise, they're developing

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 1>more creative and effective solutions, no matter the industry. Our

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 1>guest today is Nicholas Renaut, Senior Data science and AI

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 1>technical specialist at IBM. Nicholas's job is to help companies

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>formulate a data strategy that streamlines the way they do

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>business and prepares them to use sophisticated AI technologies. But

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>beyond his day to day, Nick is also a content

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 1>creator on YouTube, where his channel has over a hundred

0:01:56.280 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand subscribers. His videos explain computer science incepts in a

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 1>way beginners can understand, and he often demonstrates how to

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>use machine learning and data science to solve novel problems.

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>On today's show, How Nicholas learned Data science from the

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:17.679
<v Speaker 1>bottom up, the fundamentals of data management, and how an

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:24.079
<v Speaker 1>innovative data strategy can help businesses create novels solutions, Nick

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>spoke with Ronald Young Jr. Host of the Pushkin podcast Solvable.

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Along with being a frequent contributor to MPR, Ronald also

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:37.639
<v Speaker 1>hosts and produces the podcast Time Well Spent and Leaving

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the Theater. Okay, let's get to the interview. So tell

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 1>me a little bit about how you got into data

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and when you found out like the power that it

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>really harnesses. Do you have a story or anything that

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of like when you first piqued your interest in data.

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:59.839
<v Speaker 1>My first interaction with data and with coding was act

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>really when I was around about eleven years old. So

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 1>this was really just getting started with just looking at spreadsheets.

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:12.080
<v Speaker 1>So my dad would come home and after working a

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:16.919
<v Speaker 1>nine or five job, he actually started working with investing

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:21.239
<v Speaker 1>in stocks and doing value based trading that way. I'll

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>always remember I walked up to his desk one time

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:25.959
<v Speaker 1>and he said, Nick, if there's one thing that you

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:29.639
<v Speaker 1>should learn, I'm seeing all these people work on these

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 1>things called macros in spreadsheets, and these people like wizards

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>inside of my business. I know that you're still you're

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>still in high school, but I really think you should

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>learn this stuff. And I started doubling in some Excel

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>spreadsheets and started just recording macros and tweaking stuff, and

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 1>that that's where it all started. But from there, it's

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>It's always been a recurring vein throughout my career that

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I've done some sort of wizardry with data, whether it

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>a coding or business intelligence or data is it's it's

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>always had a bit of a strain throughout throughout whatever

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I've done, whether they start ups or YouTube or or

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>what I'm doing now at IBM. Your dad was right.

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Let me just say that, because as someone who's trying

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>to put together a spreadsheet just to manage my personal finances,

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to look up the formula to actually bring a

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:25.840
<v Speaker 1>value from what what uhet to another is enough of

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 1>a struggle for me. So I'm glad to do it. Really,

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's absolutely is uh so like knowing that

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, this was how you started getting into spreadsheets.

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:38.160
<v Speaker 1>You know you're looking at stocks and all of that. Um,

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:41.159
<v Speaker 1>can you talk to me about how you found out

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:45.359
<v Speaker 1>the importance of data literacy, how you begin to value

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 1>understanding what the numbers meant and what power that could have.

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I got a cadet ship at one of the big

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:57.720
<v Speaker 1>four accounting firms and started out as an orditor there,

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty much day to focus. So I saw

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>that these numbers ultimately fed into a significantly bigger picture,

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>which was a formal annual report, and numbers being wrong

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 1>in an annual report can move markets. Right. Those numbers

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:20.359
<v Speaker 1>need to be absolutely bang on. But I think that

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>is sort of where it started. Where it really culminated

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 1>was when I started doing some work at the Reserve

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Bank of Australia. And those numbers don't just impact the

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>metrics for a particular organization, they impact the entire countries metrics.

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Getting those numbers wrong on a particular chart or getting

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:44.600
<v Speaker 1>them right on a particular chart can move entire organizations

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>or can shift an entire country. It's kind of crazy

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>what the value that doing things correctly with data has.

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:56.840
<v Speaker 1>So when you're presenting a metric, you have to ensure

0:05:56.960 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 1>that you are portraying the appropriate message. It's not just

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 1>about the raw number, because correlation does not necessarily imply causation.

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 1>So understanding what it is that you're saying is so

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>so important, and it is so much more powerful now

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>that we've got so much more data available at our fingertips.

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:16.159
<v Speaker 1>It's really easy to go and grab a bunch of

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:18.480
<v Speaker 1>metrics and go, hey, I'm gonna grab this data from

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 1>over here, grab that data from over here for a

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:23.479
<v Speaker 1>measured together. Hey, look, these two lines follow the same trend.

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>They must be related. Do you find yourself ever looking

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>at data points and saying those the how do I

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>don't understand this chart? Why did they Where did they

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>pull this from? Do you find yourself doing that a

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of your regular life? Oh? Yeah, that There's there's

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:38.840
<v Speaker 1>some great charts out there as well that you always see,

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and they plut like the number of Nicolas Cage movies

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>against the g d P of Bolivia or something, and

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>it's like, well, they're going in the same direction. They

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>must have some relationship. But people can really quickly look

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>at a picture and go and make an assumption about

0:06:55.760 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>what that is saying without actually interpreting. Hey, are these

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:02.279
<v Speaker 1>on the same scales? The what time period is being displayed?

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>What am I actually looking at here? And I find

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>myself doing this more and more often when I just

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 1>see a child on my hold on, Let's just not

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>make any assumptions. What is this chart actually trying to say?

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 1>What is it actually trying to portray? Because you can

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 1>lie with statistics if you know what you're doing. It

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 1>is they're so powerful and people can gloss over them

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>so quickly. We've got attention spends that is so much

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>shorter of these days that it can be very very

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>easy to take away the wrong message. So you also

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>produce content across various platforms, including YouTube and your personal blog.

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Uh as a content creator, how did you get started

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>in that field and what type of content are you creating? Yeah,

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a crazy story, right. So I always wanted to

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 1>get into tech and said, hey, I'd really really like

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>to work for IBM. I saw what they were doing

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>with Watson, and I'm like, why people were talking about

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 1>this more? And I had no affiliation with with IBM

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>at the time, and I'm like, well, this is so cool.

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 1>There used to be this thing called or this service

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 1>available and that the cloud platform called Personality Insights, and

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 1>you could plug in a little bit of text and

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 1>from that piece of text, it would analyze that particular

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>person's personality based on the Big five personality traits. And

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>there actually used to be this demo app where you

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>could hook it up to a Twitter account, so I

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:33.959
<v Speaker 1>could pass through Oprah's Twitter account or Lebron's Twitter account

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>and it would actually analyze their profiles. And this is

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>so cool. It was nuts, and I was like, and

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:43.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people don't know how to use this.

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>So that was quite possibly one of the first two

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:51.199
<v Speaker 1>toils that I made on YouTube, and I actually used

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of videos that I made following after that too.

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Finally land a job at IBM. I actually spammed a

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:01.319
<v Speaker 1>bunch of links in my resume and my couple that

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I was like, Hey, I'm already working with this stuff

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and I could do it. And the person that hired me,

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:11.560
<v Speaker 1>she actually said that that was like such an amazing

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>way to portray what what you love about what you do.

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>That that that had such an influencing factor in actually

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>getting the job. But yeah, I did it because one

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the tech was so cool and I thought it was

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 1>so interesting and so powerful, and yeah, eventually that helped

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>me land that job. So you do a lot of

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:36.319
<v Speaker 1>tutorials where you're you're breaking down complex topics to kind

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of a wider audience. Why is that important for you

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 1>to do? Yeah? I think one of the amazing things

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>about knowledge is it's one of the things that you

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>can give away and never lose, right. And I think

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the trickiest things about the whole data science

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and machine learning field is that it can be pretty

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 1>tricky to get started, and sometimes we get hung up

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>with learning from the bottom up right and there's nothing

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 1>wrong with learning fundamentals and learning foundations and really getting

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>stuck in. But in order to stick with something, you

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 1>have to find it interesting. So if you can see

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the end result and then work your way back up

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>and work out how that's worked, then it is so

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>much more attractive because you get that instant gratification and go, hey,

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>I've just built this machine learning app that is able

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:33.440
<v Speaker 1>to decode sign language. It's so cool. Now I'm going

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:35.479
<v Speaker 1>to go and work out the tech behind it. Admittedly,

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 1>not everyone goes and works out the tech behind it,

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>but what I'm trying to do is make it so

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 1>that more people can get involved and get started with it. Lately,

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I've been doing these things called code that challenges, and

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:50.680
<v Speaker 1>they're kind of crazy, right, but I love doing them.

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>So I have to build entire machine learning or data

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 1>science applications without looking at any reference code, stack over

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:05.560
<v Speaker 1>a flow, or looking at any documentation within fifteen minutes.

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>So it is literally just like a trial by fire.

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:11.319
<v Speaker 1>I'll have my phone, I'll set a time, and I'm like,

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 1>all right, guys, we're on. Like the edit is literally

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 1>just coding NonStop and me explaining on the go. But

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 1>it allows people to see and explain my thought process

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 1>as I'm developing it. UM, that's obviously super fun, right,

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 1>because it's highly engaging and it shows people that, hey,

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you can get started in this relatively quickly. Nicholas is

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:34.440
<v Speaker 1>a kind of person whose passion for data science is

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 1>so great it spills over from his professional life onto

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>his YouTube channel. But when he's not making videos, he's

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>using that same expertise to help his clients make their

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:50.440
<v Speaker 1>businesses work better. At IBM, Nicholas works with businesses to

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:54.079
<v Speaker 1>formulate a data strategy, preparing them to get the most

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 1>out of technology like machine learning or deep learning. He

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 1>explained to Ronald Wife, thinking critically about the data it

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>generates can help a company run more efficiently. So there's

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a quote that you've used in your presentations say their

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>firms are trying to become insights driven, but only one

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>third report succeeding. What is the role of creativity in

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the successful one third and how are you at IBM

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 1>helping to increase that number. I remember going to a

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>talk by our previous CEO, and she said that there's

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>a large number of organizations that are just experimenting with

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 1>random acts of digital so they're just testing out some

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 1>of these news technologies are saying kind of what's possible.

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 1>But the ones that are truly being successful are the

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:47.840
<v Speaker 1>ones that are getting there, that data ready, that data

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>strategy in play. They're the ones that are starting to

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>collect their data. They're starting to get it ready and organized.

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>They're starting to take a look at it and starting

0:12:56.440 --> 0:13:00.720
<v Speaker 1>to iterate and prototype and in a st ructured manner,

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 1>they're starting to roll this stuff out. The journey to

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 1>get something as sophisticated as machine learning into production is

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot more difficult than I think people realize because

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>you're now building a box that has its own rules.

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>You haven't defined those rules yourself, So how do you

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 1>explain that when something goes right? But how do you

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>explain when something goes wrong? And having governance around that

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:33.440
<v Speaker 1>is absolutely critical, which is really whether the data strategy

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:36.319
<v Speaker 1>does come into play. So let's let's get into a

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:40.319
<v Speaker 1>more business focused data strategies. Why is it so important

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to have a data strategy in place to fuel AI

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 1>modeling and how does data literacy play a role in

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>getting value from these models. We've got algorithms left, right

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and center these days, but I think the thing that

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:56.959
<v Speaker 1>people forget is that you can't use any of these

0:13:57.000 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>algorithms unless you've got data. So ensuring that you have

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>a structure in place too one, collect your data, to

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:12.839
<v Speaker 1>organize it, three, analyze it, and then or infuse to

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>machine learning or deep learning into it is absolutely critical

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>because if you don't collect it, you can't do anything

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 1>with it. If you don't organize it, you can't discover

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 1>what you've actually got, what the quality looks like. You

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 1>don't analyze it, you don't know whether or not you

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 1>can trust it. Um and then he infused is always

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 1>like the icing on the cake, right to the machine learning,

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the deep learning, all the cool buzzwords that people throw around.

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>That is like the last step, and it is always

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the coolest step. But you can't ever get to that

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 1>last cool step unless you've gone through that the hard

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>work that that's come before. Let's like expand a little

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>bit on the pain points for companies when they're developing

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>or implementing a data strategy. What do those pain points

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>look like? Honestly, the biggest pain point that I see organizations,

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>actually the top two that I see them coming back

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to over and over again, is collecting and organizing their data.

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>So let's say, for example, you've got a manufacturing type organization,

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and what they want to do is they want to

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>improve the production quality on a particular manufacturing line. So ideally,

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 1>if they see that they've got defective products on the

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing line, they want to get rid of those sooner

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>rather than later because they don't want to be shipping

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>him out to the customer going through the whole warranty

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and claims process that just costs a ton of money.

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 1>So they're like, well, it would be great to use

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 1>some computer vision or some deep learning to detect when

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>we've got defects on the product line, and then we

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>can grab those and rip them out. Somebody along the

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>line is like, great, let's go and do it. The

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>first stumbling block that you're going to trip up at is,

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 1>hold on, do you have any images of defective products

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 1>from example cameras that are looking at that production line.

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 1>So if you haven't gone and collected images of that

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 1>or video of that, there is no way in hell

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 1>that you can actually go and build that system to

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>improve your organizational productivity. So knowing well in advance what

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 1>data you're likely to need is absolutely critical. It is

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the first step in the data science life cycle. So collecting, understanding,

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>and exploring your data is the absolute first step. The

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>second one is a little bit more interesting. So let's say,

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 1>for example, you sort of want to get in on

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the craze that is data science or machine learning, and

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>you bring on a data science team. The next biggest

0:16:57.240 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>stumbling block that I find a lot of organizations trip

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>up on is discovering their data. They've got a ton

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:06.879
<v Speaker 1>of data, but nobody knows what they've got. So being

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 1>able to find, search, discover, rate, review, and rank that

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 1>information is paramount because you'll have people come in and

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 1>go okay. So a line managers approached me and said

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 1>that we want to take a look at our top

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:26.160
<v Speaker 1>performing customers and we want to build a retention strategy

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:30.120
<v Speaker 1>so we're not losing customers anymore. Well, your data scientists

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 1>is then going to go, well, do we have data

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>of customers that have left previously. If you can't easily

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 1>search and find out what you've got, that makes it

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty hard to go and build those models. So collecting, organizing,

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:46.919
<v Speaker 1>and discovering really absolutely critical, but that they can be

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit tricky to handle in a large number

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of organizations. What kind of supporting technology and new solutions

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:58.199
<v Speaker 1>do we need to meet growing data management issues? It

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>really comes down to a few things. So ensuring that

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>you can one collect the types of data that you're

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>looking at. So I think when people think of data,

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.119
<v Speaker 1>they're always thinking of hate it's just going to be

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of spreadsheets. It might just be stuff that

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:15.679
<v Speaker 1>we can throw into a database, But there is so

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:18.199
<v Speaker 1>much more out there. Right, there's video, how do we

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>store that? How do we hold that? There is images,

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>there's natural text. Like we're just talking about ensuring that

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:29.119
<v Speaker 1>you've got appropriate processes in place to be able to

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 1>store holding catalog that I think is absolutely critical. We

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 1>talked a little bit about data cataloging and the need

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>to be able to search and discover that data. That

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:44.879
<v Speaker 1>is absolutely paramount. Once you've got it collected, how do

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you find it? What is IBM's unique approach to facilitating

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 1>access to data within companies. So one of the biggest things,

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and one of the my favorite things that I get

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:02.159
<v Speaker 1>to work with, is a particular tool set, right, and

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:04.440
<v Speaker 1>this tool set is called cloud Path for Data. So,

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>without getting too pitchy, that the absolutely amazing thing about

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>This is that those stages that I was talking about, right,

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>So collect, organized, analyze, and infused. It actually helps facilitate

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 1>each one of those stages. Right. So you can actually collect, store,

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 1>and hold your data in a secure and government place.

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 1>You've got data catalog in capabilities which allows you to search.

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Like one of my favorite things is that you might

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>have a data set. Right, So I might be a

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:34.640
<v Speaker 1>data scientist, and then we might have another data scientist

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>on the team. I can have a data set inside

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 1>of there, and I can actually rank it and add

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>comments and go, hey, just be wary of this column

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 1>with lot certain features that you need to be mindful of,

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 1>and that provides additional metadata understand what is what my

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>data actually looks like and and things that I should

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:58.400
<v Speaker 1>be mindful for. So I'm I'm Joe employee. How can

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 1>data be helpful to me? Great question? So, I mean

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:07.160
<v Speaker 1>data is impacting everyone, right, whether you you like it

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:11.879
<v Speaker 1>or not. Um and more often than not, what you're

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>going to find is that you can improve whatever it

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 1>is that you do by by looking at that data,

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>whether it's let's take an organization out of it. If

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:26.920
<v Speaker 1>you use sleep trackers, you can begin to see when

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:30.360
<v Speaker 1>you're sleep, or when you're getting good quality sleep versus

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:33.199
<v Speaker 1>when you're getting bad quality sleep. If you start to

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>collect additional data points like hey, am I drinking enough

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:41.119
<v Speaker 1>water during the day? Am I doing certain things like

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 1>looking at my phone just before I go to bed?

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Are these things influencing my sleep? And is that causing

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 1>a negative impact on my quality of life? So that's

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 1>taking a broader view of it. But when you step

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>into a team or a business view, data can can

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>make your life for billion times easier. If you know

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>that there's a particular issue in a system earlier on

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:09.159
<v Speaker 1>in a data pipeline, before something crosses your desk, you

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>might go and say, hey, look, if we just changed

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>how we collected these pieces of information, if we just

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>transformed what we actually did with it, this is going

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to streamline my entire workflow and and help me out.

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:23.400
<v Speaker 1>But not only that, Right, So I work a little

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 1>bit with the automation team, and they're really big on

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:30.359
<v Speaker 1>robotic process automation. Let's say you're doing something each and

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 1>every single day. You're copying a far from here to there.

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:37.359
<v Speaker 1>You're grabbing some information from a website, You're throwing it

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>into a form and you have to do that twenty

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:43.199
<v Speaker 1>times a day. There are tools that can automate that

0:21:43.359 --> 0:21:45.919
<v Speaker 1>entire process for you, and they're smart. They're not just

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:48.160
<v Speaker 1>looking at where you're clicking on the page. They're looking

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:51.200
<v Speaker 1>at what applications you're opening. They're looking at what fields

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you're pulling data out of. You can automate those entire workflows.

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 1>That means that you don't have to do that repetitive

0:21:57.840 --> 0:22:00.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of boring work that you don't really want to.

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 1>You can palm that off and do the very bot

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:04.919
<v Speaker 1>and do the stuff that you actually really want to

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:08.360
<v Speaker 1>get involved in. As Nicholas said, the way a company

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 1>leverages this data has an impact on every level of

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the business. Data informs how we do our jobs day

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to day and how we plan for the future. Having

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>an open mindset about data makes it easier for a

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>business to come up with creative solutions. In the next

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 1>part of their conversation, Ronald asked Nicholas how data science

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:34.159
<v Speaker 1>and creativity come together. So let's talk a little bit

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 1>more about creativity. We talked a little bit about your

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:38.400
<v Speaker 1>YouTube channel, UH and how you use that to help

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>people get started with data science. What does creativity mean

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to you? And do you see your work as creative.

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I definitely say my work as creative, and I think

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:57.440
<v Speaker 1>creativity is truly thinking outside of the box and looking

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:02.359
<v Speaker 1>at just different ways of doing things. I think the

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>biggest thing that I try to embody is having an

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 1>open mindset and really never being willing to shut something

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>down or not look at a particular solution or option,

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 1>because you really never know where a particular solution might

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 1>come from. If you look at where some of the

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>advancements in that the medical field are coming from, it's

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 1>because they're being open to new ideas, new materials, new ingredients,

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:37.680
<v Speaker 1>new recipes, new technologies. Having an open mindset really helps

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:41.679
<v Speaker 1>improve that that that ability to solve complex problems. And

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:44.919
<v Speaker 1>I think for me, creativity is really just having that

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:47.400
<v Speaker 1>that open mindset. Tell me a little bit about how

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:51.119
<v Speaker 1>you approach novel problems. What do you do when you

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>get stuck? I think the most important thing I really

0:23:56.880 --> 0:24:01.159
<v Speaker 1>like when I push myself to do something that I've

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:04.639
<v Speaker 1>personally never done before, and a lot of the time

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>that yields new solutions to problems that that that might

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:14.119
<v Speaker 1>be really difficult to solve. It doesn't necessarily need to

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 1>be using this particular set of techniques. It's what else

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:19.920
<v Speaker 1>can we do to solve this problem? And sometimes like

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:22.159
<v Speaker 1>it'll be staring you in the face and you'll just

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 1>have no idea until you go, hey, I'm going to

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>throw everything out of the box and just give it

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:29.920
<v Speaker 1>a crack and see what is possible. Um. But sometimes

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>it does require that that little bit of grit to

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to push yourself to see just what is possible. And

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that's when I've come up with some of

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:44.679
<v Speaker 1>my favorite things that I've ever done, so something that

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:47.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to adopt in my in my daily life.

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:51.400
<v Speaker 1>And I'm reading a lot more about stoicism and philosophy,

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:54.359
<v Speaker 1>and I'm seeing that you kind of really just got

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to push through sometimes to to see what what's on

0:24:57.080 --> 0:25:00.639
<v Speaker 1>the other side. We talked a little bit earlier about

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>how um folks can take bits of data and kind

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>of tell their own story with it, especially if they

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 1>if they know the story that they're trying to tell.

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 1>But let's talk about using that for good. How does

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:18.440
<v Speaker 1>creativity play a role in data storytelling. I think there's

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 1>just so much good that you can do with data

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:27.680
<v Speaker 1>that if you have that in your core ethos then

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the world's your oyster, right. I always come back to

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:33.679
<v Speaker 1>my favorite project that I've ever done, and that was

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 1>using computer vision to try to decode sign language. It

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 1>is by no means a state of the art model,

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 1>but I forget hold on why is never nobody ever

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 1>approached this or at least shared how they've tried to

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 1>do it. And I've kind of just had to get

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:51.439
<v Speaker 1>real creative and trying to build that I had. I

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:55.120
<v Speaker 1>literally spent weeks just trying to install stuff, then trying

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to get it writting on my computer before I even

0:25:57.080 --> 0:26:01.640
<v Speaker 1>got anywhere near building that particular model, And and it's

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 1>super hard grow in terms of trying to get it

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:06.639
<v Speaker 1>set up. But there's so many opportunities for good, whether

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:13.679
<v Speaker 1>that's improving accessibility to certain technologies, improving the quality of

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>life for people that could benefit from us using data

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:19.439
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better. There's a large body of work

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 1>with a bunch of different data scientists where they're actually

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:30.400
<v Speaker 1>building language translation models for languages which aren't hyper popular

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>or aren't as widely spread as we might see in

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:37.400
<v Speaker 1>our day to day lives. If you look at India,

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>there are a turn of dialects. If you look at

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 1>even where my parents from Mauritius. There's there's a whole,

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:50.320
<v Speaker 1>completely separate dialect where if you've never heard it before,

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:54.119
<v Speaker 1>you were like, it's just slang French, but no, it's it.

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:58.440
<v Speaker 1>It's like um, it's its whole separate language. That obviously

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:02.399
<v Speaker 1>allows or improves the ability for people to to to

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 1>tap into data and do a little bit of good.

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:08.640
<v Speaker 1>But there's so much I mean, people are using medical

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 1>image data to improve medical segmentation and improve diagnoses that

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 1>there's just so much amazing work that that's happening in

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 1>that space. There is obviously the temptation or used data

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 1>for bad, but I'd like to think that the large

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:27.679
<v Speaker 1>majority of the community are really trying to use it

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 1>for good. You started talking about a little bit just now,

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>but what are some future trends and challenges and future

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 1>topics or projects you're excited about, anything in particular looking

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 1>real further forward. What I'm super excited about and I

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:46.879
<v Speaker 1>still don't know how it's necessarily going to impact me,

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 1>whether or not that's going to change my experience as

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:52.679
<v Speaker 1>a developer or not. That we've got quantum computers coming right,

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a ton of work that's happening in that space.

0:27:55.760 --> 0:28:01.920
<v Speaker 1>It's going to radically shift how large a machine learning

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 1>model we're able to create, how fast we're able to

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>train them. I'm just excited to see what happens in

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:11.680
<v Speaker 1>that space. I'm not a quantum physicist by any means,

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 1>but I'm still excited to see what I'll be able

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to do with him in the future. I love that,

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 1>as you'll continued belt this technology, you're excited to play

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:23.680
<v Speaker 1>with it after it's built, which I'm I'm totally bored

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 1>that I don't want to have to build it, Nicholas

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:29.440
<v Speaker 1>or not. Thank you so much for a talk with

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:33.119
<v Speaker 1>me today. It's been an absolute pleasure. Thank you so

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:36.879
<v Speaker 1>much for your insightful questions. It's it's been awesome. Ronald

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Nick made a point that I think is important to

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 1>remember when it comes to technologies ability to improve our businesses,

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 1>or make our jobs easier, or even do social good,

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>a thoughtful data strategy is always the first stepping stone.

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Without good data, using machine learning or artificial intelligence to

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:04.960
<v Speaker 1>create in a sative solutions becomes much much harder. Our

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 1>technology gets more sophisticated every day, but that doesn't mean

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 1>we should lose sight of the fundamentals. If we want

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to get the most out of smarter technologies, better business decisions,

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>more optimized technology, fresh and unexpected insights, we're going to

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 1>need smarter data strategy. On the next episode of Smart

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Talks with IBM, the Power of Salesforce to transform the

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:36.479
<v Speaker 1>customer experience, we talked with Phil Weinmeister had a product

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 1>for Salesforce America's at IBM consulting about transforming digital experiences

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:46.920
<v Speaker 1>with the Power of Salesforce and IBM. Smart Talks with

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 1>IBM is produced by Matt Romano, David jaw Roist and

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Deserve and Edith Rousselo with Jacob Goldstein were edited by

0:29:55.640 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Sophie Crane. Our engineers are Jason Gambrel, Sarah brug Air,

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and Ben Holliday. Theme song by Granmoscope. Special thanks to

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Carli Migliori, Andy Kelly, Kathy Callaghan and the eight Bar

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and IBM teams, as well as the Pushkin marketing team.

0:30:13.800 --> 0:30:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Smart Talks with IBM is a production of Pushkin Industries

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:20.760
<v Speaker 1>and I Heart Media. To find more Pushkin podcasts, listen

0:30:20.840 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 1>on the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you listen to podcasts. I'm Malcolm Gladwell. This is a

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:38.200
<v Speaker 1>paid advertisement from IBM