WEBVTT - Colin Cowherd Podcast - Russ Broncos Disaster + 'Sharp or Square' Week 5 NFL Picks

0:00:01.240 --> 0:00:08.399
<v Speaker 1>The volume. It's the Colin Coward Podcast presented by fan

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Duel Football Seasons. Here no better place to get in

0:00:12.280 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>on the action. FanDuel app is safe. You get paid fast.

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:18.800
<v Speaker 1>A lot of ways to play the spread, the money line,

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>team totals, players, props, a lot of stuff over unders,

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:26.799
<v Speaker 1>jump into the action, same game parlays are my favorite.

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Just use the promo code, Colin and download the FanDuel

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>app today. All right, let's have an instant reaction to

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 1>what we all just witnessed the Colts and overtime escaping.

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>What was like an ugly accident on a freeway, smoldering,

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 1>smoke and awful, except you didn't even want to crane

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>your neck to look at it. It didn't slow traffic.

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 1>People just drove by. They didn't want to look at

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>this thing. That was really atrocious. So generally in football,

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 1>there is a way out of most of yr problems.

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:19.040
<v Speaker 1>This is going to be a lot of finger pointing.

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Nathaniel Hackett is a head coach, even

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the special teams. At the end of the half whatever,

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 1>it's like five seconds left and a half, the ball

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>was kicked seven yards deep and somebody brought it out.

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>You wouldn't see that with the Patriots, Like what are

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you doing? I mean, that's just lack of discipline, a

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>lack of coaching. There's special teams in Denver bad and

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>you can get rid of Nathaniel Hackett. You can after

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the year get rid of him. That's the easy one.

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's what teams like the Giants do with

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Ben McAdoo Cleveland, Freddie Kitchen, Steve Wilkes in Arizona. You

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>can move off a coach pretty quickly. Wilkes got one year.

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>That is oble. Denver's got some really good players at

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 1>all levels. What is not really solvable is Russell Wilson.

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>That's a huge contract. So listen, we know what washed

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:16.799
<v Speaker 1>looks like. Remember Big Ben about a year ago, rolled

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>out and just fell over. That's washed. Baker Mayfield looks washed.

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Cam Newton in New England at the end of that year. Accuracy,

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Jake Cutler, Peyton Manning in Denver's final year, Like, we

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>can see what washed is Russell Wilson scrambled a couple

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:38.920
<v Speaker 1>of times in the first half. He looked athletic. His

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>velocity is good enough. But the one thing with Russell

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Wilson that even I can't deny is that he was

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>known I think beyond his ability to make people miss

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and move around in the pocket. His second pitch was

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>always he threw the softest, pretty most accurate deep ball

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 1>in the league. It was a rain drop, and he

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>was just sort of understood that's what he did as

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>well as anybody. And some thought, ever, just that rainbow

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:16.800
<v Speaker 1>over the defense. That is no longer a great element

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:18.959
<v Speaker 1>to his game. He can still move. We saw it

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:21.519
<v Speaker 1>in the first half. We've seen it five or six

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>times this year. He can still move. He still has

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>decent speed. I think he has his fastball. I don't

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>see his velocity. Matt Ryan looks like he's lost about

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>seven miles an hour off his fastball. But Rus Soul's

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>deep ball, which was really he could throw for a

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>strike anywhere on the field, it's bad. He had the

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>worst interception that I can recall in his career at

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>one point on a deep ball, and then that interception

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:51.839
<v Speaker 1>in the end zone. He just threw it too late.

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>So there are elements to his game that remain. He

0:03:57.560 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't look like Big Band. The last two years we're

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>been literally couldn't move, fell down, rolling out he doesn't

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>look as physically incapable as Peyton Manning's last year or

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 1>like Baker Mayfield right now, that's not what I see.

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>But his inability to drop that deep ball in was

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 1>such a part of his game and it's not there now.

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>People aged differently. Lebron has aged wonderfully, Carmelo, Anthony and

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Westbrook have not. Brady has aged wonderfully. Aaron Rodgers has

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 1>aged very well. He's late thirties, and there's a lot

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:45.239
<v Speaker 1>of different reasons Matt Ryan isn't aging well. Is it pliometrics?

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:46.919
<v Speaker 1>How do you take care of your body? Some of

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>it's just genetics. Some guys are just built to compete longer.

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Brady's obviously been obsessed with nutrition, working out and off seasons.

0:04:56.080 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>But Russell Wilson's inability to hit on that deep ball

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>when you have Jerry Judy, who's a burner, is a

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>real problem. It's not an element of Denver's offense. And

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:09.840
<v Speaker 1>then with Hackett you have what I consider to be

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>a suboptimal creator of offense. He's not a play designer

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 1>like Andy Reid. I will give Nathaniel Hackett credit for this.

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 1>On that big drive, latent regulation fourth down and two,

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>he went for it. I would have done the same.

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 1>He went for it. He knew it was an ugly night,

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>we're at home, we're gonna go for it. And in overtime,

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:34.719
<v Speaker 1>fourth and one, he went for it. I'll give Nathaniel

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Hackett credit for that. There was no indecision, no pause

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:41.840
<v Speaker 1>in both instances. He was trying to win the game.

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>That's what you should do when you have a playmaker

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:46.160
<v Speaker 1>at quarterback and you're at home and you're facing an

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 1>average team. So Hackett gets credit for that. I still

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>don't think they'll run enough motion. They don't have enough

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:55.280
<v Speaker 1>variants in their sets. They're not multiple enough. They're kind

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:58.839
<v Speaker 1>of predictable. They don't roll the pocket out ever. For

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:01.839
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson. They never ever roll the pocket out. It's

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>just uncreative. It's lacking in juice or energy. They don't

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>put Russell Wilson in great situations to succeed. But I

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think Russell's washed. But he has lost his number

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:20.720
<v Speaker 1>two pitch. He's lost it. He just can you regain it.

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I also think the offensive line for Denver and Mitchell

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:30.839
<v Speaker 1>Schwartz on social media Twitter mentioned this. I mean he's

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:33.920
<v Speaker 1>been there like five six months. The offensive line, the

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>cadence with Russell Wilson, doesn't feel great. It's just things

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>aren't clicking. They're not hitting. Matt Stafford's first game was

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Sean McVay. Remember that against the Bears. Good defense was outstanding.

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:54.160
<v Speaker 1>But then again Tom Brady in Tampa. He had an

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>awful Thursday night game against the Bears in Chicago. It

0:06:57.279 --> 0:06:59.919
<v Speaker 1>took him until week fourteen or fifteen to get it

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 1>going with an offensive coach, Bruce Arians. So Stafford and

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>McVeigh clicked immediately. By the way, Shannon and Jimmy Garoppolo

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>remember that first year, he came his first five starts,

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>five and oho, this thing is a work in progress.

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I have great reservations about Hackett going forward, but some

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 1>of it has to go on Russ. Those were two

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>of his worst interceptions. He's still mobile, but they don't

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>roll the pocket. He still has a fastball. You could

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>see that in a couple of his sideline throws. He

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>gets rid of it quickly. But you take away that

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>rain drop deep ball and he's not the same quarterback.

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>So of course you add to this that Geno Smith

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>is like second or third in the NFL and quarterback rating.

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>John Snyder, the GM of the Seahawks, and Pete Carroll,

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the head coach. You and I know they were texting

0:07:56.600 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>each other tonight watching this. You know it and I

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 1>know it. Pete Carroll and John Snyder were on the

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>phone texting tonight and those were laughing emogs because this

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>was a standalone game and incredibly ugly. And for those listen,

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 1>for those people who think Russell Wilson is washed, you

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 1>win tonight. Now, can it become Brady and Arians in

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>week twelve or thirteen? I don't know. I don't have

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 1>high hopes. I don't think Nathaniel Hackett's Arians. I don't

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:41.319
<v Speaker 1>think Russell Wilson is Brady. Listen, a lot of times

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL, you can cut people. The answers are quick.

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 1>That Russell Wilson contract with those new owners. You can't

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>get out of that thing. I mean, you cannot get

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 1>out of that contract. You can get out of Nathaniel Hackett.

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can fire him today, just give it

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 1>to a coordinator. But I mean when they took those

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:07.960
<v Speaker 1>shots of John Elway and George Peyton, the GM of

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos, who I think is really sharp. I mean

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:13.559
<v Speaker 1>you saw the look on his face. It was not anger,

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>it was despair. It was not anger for a bad moment,

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>it was how are we going to get out of this?

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:26.439
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to chat Millman Action Network, the CCO. We're

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>doing sharp and square. But first, let me tell you

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>about my friends at LinkedIn Listen. These days, every new

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:35.200
<v Speaker 1>potential hire can feel like a high stakes wager for

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 1>your small business. Right the margins have never been tighter.

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 1>You want to be one hundred percent certain you have

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 1>access to the best qualified candidates and fast. That's why

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 1>you should check out LinkedIn Jobs number one in delivering

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 1>quality hires in America. LinkedIn Jobs Listen never been easier

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to create a free job post on LinkedIn and find

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 1>a great employee. Add your job and the purple hashtag

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 1>hiring frame to your LinkedIn profile. By the way, spread

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the word faster screening questions, simple tools make it easy

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to focus on candidates with the right skills. Every business

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>owner knows how important it is to finish the year

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>out strong. You need the right team members. LinkedIn jobs

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>go there right now. Post your job for free LinkedIn

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash colin LinkedIn dot Com slash colin. Terms

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and conditions apply all right, Chad Millman, Action Network c CEO.

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>All odds presented by a fan duel. It's sharp or square.

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I didn't like the lines initially this week, but I'm

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 1>warming to them. Let me throw you out one that

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:53.559
<v Speaker 1>just feels right. Tomlin is one of the great underdog

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>coaches in the league. Pittsburgh plus fourteen against Buffalo feels

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>like the obvious one. Fourteens an absurd number. Buffalo jumps

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>to a lead, hides the playbook, pulls some starters. They're

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>already missing five due to injury. Steelers plus fourteen sharper square,

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 1>totally sharp. That's Look, you look at a fourteen point

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>favorite in the NFL, and it's like a forty two

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:22.239
<v Speaker 1>point favorite in college football. And I'm not even exaggerating,

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>That's just what it is. And you're talking about Mike

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Tomlin being in a Mike Tomlin ra Ros spot. That's

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the favorite spot. And that doesn't matter if he's got

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Ben Roethlisberger or Duck Hodges or now Kenny Pickett, who

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>at least showed some mobility, He showed some ability to

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>throw the ball downfield, he showed some athleticism. This is

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:47.679
<v Speaker 1>a team that I think has more opportunities with Kenny

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Pickett to move the ball than they had with miss Rubisky.

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>So and it's always hard to play a quarterback for

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the first time. You don't have any film on him yet.

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>The wise guys are going to be on the Steelers

0:11:57.200 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 1>A plus fourteen. Okay, here's a game. Some times a

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>line is so weird. I think Vegas knows something, or

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 1>fan Duels knows something that I don't. Saints minus six

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 1>hosting the Seahawks, who have looked good, I don't get

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:15.080
<v Speaker 1>it at all. I think the line should be three

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and a half. I would lean Saints. Sharper square Well,

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 1>you would lean Saints if you think the line should

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>be three and a half. Well, there's something here I

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:31.680
<v Speaker 1>am missing. Now. I know the Saints defense is really good.

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:36.199
<v Speaker 1>They're at home. Gino has done it a little bit.

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>They have rookie tackles a little bit, smoking mirrors playing

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>better at home on the road. Saints awful loss. It

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 1>seems to me the Saints. That line seems way too big.

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 1>So Vegas knows something I don't. I would lean Saints,

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 1>all right. So this is a very interesting game, and

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>it's come up a lot in plenty of wise guy

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 1>conversations because there's no planet in which the Saints are

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:12.199
<v Speaker 1>worthy of being six points exactly over anybody right now.

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>So I saw this on Sunday night. It was one

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 1>of the first bets I made of the Seahawks plus

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 1>five and a half. And this is where it gets

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 1>really interesting in betting. Betters like to bet the number

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 1>and then they like to sprinkle in and compliment the

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 1>number with situations and personnel. The Seahawks had just beaten

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 1>up on the Lions on the road. Geno Smith has

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>looked amazing one of the better quarterbacks in the NFL

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 1>this year, and offensively, the Seahawks are second in DVOA,

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>which I don't have to break it down, but essentially

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>it means, according to all the advanced metrics that every

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:55.559
<v Speaker 1>geek likes to play with, the Seahawks are the second

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 1>best offense in the NFL right now. The Saints, we

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know who's going to be quarterback. Alvin Kamara looks

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 1>like he's not Alvin Kamara anymore. Michael Thomas, we don't

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 1>know if he's going to be playing. Everybody was questionable

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 1>this week on the injury list, the defense has not

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 1>been getting to the quarterback the way they have. It

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 1>feels like the books have not adjusted on this game

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>yet from what they thought in the beginning of the season,

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 1>which was the Saints could be contenders in the NFC

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 1>South and the Seahawks are supposed to be one of

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the two or three worst teams. I think there's still

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 1>value in the Seahawks here. The wise guys have been

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>betting the Seahawks in this game. The line just feels

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 1>fishy to me. It feels very fishy. Hate big favorites.

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Don't think I'm getting the best of the number, but

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the Buccaneers are getting healthy. I think the Chiefs are

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the best team in the league and are competitive. Atlanta

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 1>is really bad against good teams. Little bit fool's goal.

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 1>They can play average and below average teams close Buccaneers.

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 1>In my blowout of the week nine ten, I think

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I'd take him sharper square. So this is the game, Colin.

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>As you know on the podcast that I co host

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 1>with my friend Simon Hunter. Because I don't want you

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>trying to drive a wedge between us, we'll do the

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>segment sharp Calls where professional betters will call us about

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 1>games that we talked about in part one of the

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 1>podcast early in the week so they can give us

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>their input when we talk about it in part two

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 1>of the podcast later in the week. We loved Atlanta

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>early in the week. Atlanta one of the three bets

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I made on Sunday, along with the Seahawks. In one

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 1>other game, which we may talk about at eight and

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 1>a half, I loved it. I am shocked the line

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>has moved to ten. Even more shocked because this is

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 1>a pro Joe's game. The bets are coming in on

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the Buccaneers. When you see bets on one side, that's

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 1>usually the public. The money is on the Falcons, that's

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 1>usually professional money. The line usually moves in the direction

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 1>of the professional money. Simon got a lot of calls

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>this week about how much people love the Bucks, and

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>betting is a little bit like investing. You want to

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 1>ride the wave and then you want to sell at

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the peak. And with the Falcons specifically, professional betters have

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 1>been on the Falcons every single week. They are four

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and against the spread. Professional betters have loved him every

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 1>single week. I think what they saw with the Bucks

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 1>last week was Tom Brady playing really well in a

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>high scoring game when he's got a full complement of

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>his receivers available. And I think they're thinking we're selling

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>high on the Falcons and getting in on the Bucks.

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>So there's a little bit of a split in what

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the conversation is. I can't fault you for taking the Bucks.

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll be on the Falcons. Bailey Zappi is not mac Jones,

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not so sure he's that much worse than

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>mac Jones. Patriots only minus three and a half. Jared

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Goff splits he's great at home, not so on the road.

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Still missing Swift, still missing his top receiver. Detroit has

0:16:57.400 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>not shown an ability. This is going to be a

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 1>ball control game. With the Patriots owning time of possession.

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I think they're gonna win, dominate the clock. Mac Jones

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 1>may play the number tells me about Detroit, three and

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a half. I'm gonna take Patriot. Sharper square. Well, look

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 1>if it's three and a half, take the Lions. If

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>it's three. If you like the Patriots, take the Patriots

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and hope for a push. Because the Lions. Everything you're

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 1>saying is right, and we don't know about DeAndre swift right.

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 1>We don't know about aman Ra st Brown. Playing on

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 1>the road in New England is different than playing inside

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:38.920
<v Speaker 1>where the Lions have been playing, and they've they've performed

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:42.399
<v Speaker 1>incredibly well offensive Liam Jared Goff looks like he's, you know,

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a different player than what he really is. But this

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 1>is a number and the Lions have risen up and

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 1>bitten kneecaps and played with three toes and half a

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 1>butt cheek. And doesn't matter how far out of the

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>game they are, they don't stop coming at you. And

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:01.800
<v Speaker 1>even if the Patriots are up by a touchdown or

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:04.199
<v Speaker 1>ten points late in the game, the lines are going

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 1>to find a way to make cookie plays and keep

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 1>playing until the final whistle. So just feels like you

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:10.359
<v Speaker 1>got to play the number here, and if you've got

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 1>half a point, you play the lines. If you don't,

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:18.159
<v Speaker 1>you play the Patriots. College football is back, baby, and

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>now is the perfect time to download fan Duel, America's

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 1>number one sports book. Right now, new customers get a

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 1>no sweat first bet up to a thousand dollars. That's

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 1>free bets back if your first bet doesn't win. The

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 1>promo code is always Colin. Fan Duel has tons of

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>betting options. I like the same game, parlay, bet a

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 1>little win a lot. FanDuel's app is safe, secure, easy

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>to use, and you get paid your winnings really fast.

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 1>The no Sweat first bet up to a thousand bucks

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:55.679
<v Speaker 1>promo code Colin make every Moment More this season with

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 1>fan Duel twenty one plus some present in Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Indiana,

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and Louisiana. Permitted parishes only Michigan, New Jersey, New York, Tennessee,

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Virginia or West Virginia. First online real money wager only.

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:08.399
<v Speaker 1>Refund issued as non withdrawal ssite credit that expires in

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:11.200
<v Speaker 1>fourteen days. Restrictions uply s terms at sportsbook dot fandel

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Gambling problem one eight hundred, next step or

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 1>text next step to five three three four two Arizona

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:17.920
<v Speaker 1>one eight eight seven eight nine seven seven seven seven

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>or visit CCPG dot org, slash chat, Connecticut one hundred

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>gambler or visit FanDuel dot com, slash RG and Colorado, Indiana, Jersey,

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and in Virginia one eight seven seven seven seven zero

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>stop in Louisiana one hundred two seven oh seven one

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>one seven for confidential help in Michigan one eight seven

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:32.680
<v Speaker 1>seven h Ope, n Y. Or tex Hope, n Y.

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>For six seven three six nine in New York, tennessee

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:36.719
<v Speaker 1>redline one one hundred eight eight nine nine seven eight

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 1>nine Tennessee visit one eight hundred gamble dot in West Virginia.

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:47.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, here's a game where I liked the Rams initially.

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Then I got news the Lions moved to Cowboys plus

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 1>five and a half, and news the Rams are missing

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:58.680
<v Speaker 1>another starting offensive linemen. They're now down to a right

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:03.160
<v Speaker 1>tackle off lash your Super Bowl team until Alan Robinson

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 1>becomes something. They have a one man wide receiving crew

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>beat up on the offensive line. I think they'll tread water.

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 1>But at five and a half with that injury, I

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>would take Dallas and the point sharper square. So that's square,

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and this line is moving, really because the wise guys

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 1>like the Rams a lot. They liked him at four

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 1>and a half, they liked him at five, they'll like

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:29.159
<v Speaker 1>him at five and a half. When you're betting, and

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:32.440
<v Speaker 1>this is technical, five to five and a half, it's

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:36.120
<v Speaker 1>a dead number. Games don't really land on those numbers.

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:38.160
<v Speaker 1>So if you're getting four and a half, you might

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:39.640
<v Speaker 1>as well, bet the five. You might as well bet

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the five and a half. If he gets to six,

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>then you want to reevaluate. But there's no real delta

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>between four and a half and five and a half.

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:48.119
<v Speaker 1>I bet this game at four and a half. The

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 1>offensive line was in shambles, whether or not they were

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 1>down one more player. Matthew Stafford has been getting pressured.

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:57.399
<v Speaker 1>This has been a challenging offensive year for the Rams,

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:01.159
<v Speaker 1>but they're betting against Cooper cut Cooper Rush here, okay,

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>And what you're seeing is Cooper Rush starting off hot,

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>not throwing interceptions. If you look beyond the final score

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 1>in these games, look at who the Cowboys have played.

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 1>They've played teams in disarray, they've played not very good teams,

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:23.880
<v Speaker 1>and Cooper Rush, while he doesn't have any interceptions, he's

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 1>had three interceptions called back because of defensive penalties and

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:31.959
<v Speaker 1>two interceptions dropped. So this is not a team that

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>is flawless in any way. And people, I think are

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 1>getting hypnotized by what he's done and by Michael Parsons

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and what he can do as a pass rusher against

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:45.680
<v Speaker 1>a Rams offensive line. But I don't think this Cowboys

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:47.439
<v Speaker 1>team is good enough to stay with the Rams. For

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the record, Kyle Allen won a bunch of games years ago,

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:52.880
<v Speaker 1>was a backup, and then after about four games, everybody

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 1>got tape and then Kyle Allen's back to being a backup.

0:21:56.160 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Cooper Rush. That, by the way, is the exact compard.

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I've heard so many people talking about that this week

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:07.639
<v Speaker 1>that Kyle Allen is a perfect analog for this scenario. Okay,

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I took I took the Texans based on your recommendation

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 1>last week and took it in the shorts. I ask

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 1>you every week for a bet you like fireaway Sharper Square.

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 1>The Texans last week was tough because they could have

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>covered that game right And I'm glad you bring that up.

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Because the Texans played the Chargers this week. The Chargers

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 1>are on the road again. The Chargers are three point

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:38.119
<v Speaker 1>favorites at Cleveland. I'm not buying it. This is a

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 1>this is we talked about stock market terminology before. This

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>is a Bilow sell high situation. The Browns coming off

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 1>a loss to the Falcons, the Chargers coming off a

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 1>road win against the Texans. The Browns have the best

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 1>running back in football. The Texans are missing their best

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:03.440
<v Speaker 1>defensive play along the front seven in Joey Bosa. I mean,

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>not the Texans, the Chargers. They're still missing their best

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>offensive lineman and will miss him for the rest of

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:12.439
<v Speaker 1>the year in Rashaan Slater. So you've got a better

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:15.359
<v Speaker 1>defensive front in the Browns. You've got a better rushing

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 1>game in the Browns. You're playing the Browns outdoors, not indoors, outdoors,

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 1>A really well coached team. I love the Browns in

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 1>this spot. I think the Browns are going to win

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:30.159
<v Speaker 1>this game. I actually feel like Colin I'm going to

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:34.640
<v Speaker 1>say it here now it's October. Browns win this game.

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 1>There's going to come a point in time later in

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the year when Deshaun Watson comes back in December. The

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:43.159
<v Speaker 1>Browns are going to be hanging around and then all

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:44.919
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, they're going to get to Shaun Watson.

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:46.959
<v Speaker 1>We're going to see how well rounded they are, and

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna wish we had bought Cleveland Browns AFC futures

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:55.959
<v Speaker 1>in October. And finally, don't have a strong feeling on it,

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:58.680
<v Speaker 1>though I did tell you starting in the second half

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 1>against Dallas, Cincinnati got right. I think Miami's a very

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 1>good team beating them is impressive. Half with two and

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>a half with Teddy Bridgewater, the Ravens are struggling to

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:16.159
<v Speaker 1>score in the second half. Concerning just where do you

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 1>land on this? Again, all of our odds provided by FanDuel.

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:21.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what the latest number is, but I

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 1>just kind of your interpretation of a big division rivalry

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 1>game where you know they're going to put their best

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>corner on Jamar Chase or they take him out. The

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Bengals aren't running it very effectively. Where do you land

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:39.280
<v Speaker 1>on that one? So I am on the Ravens at

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:43.439
<v Speaker 1>minus three in this game right now. I'm checking it

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 1>on FanDuel as we speak. Had been moving around a

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit, so it's three and a half. So the

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:56.159
<v Speaker 1>money has been coming in on the Ravens. I'm not surprised.

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it will continue to come in. I think

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens. You say they've struggled to score in the

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 1>second half. I think they're a couple of plays away

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:09.640
<v Speaker 1>from being four oh and having beaten two really good

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 1>teams in Miami and in Buffalo. And I think the

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:17.399
<v Speaker 1>Bengals while I was on them last week, and I

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 1>do feel like they started to get right. I think

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:22.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a really tough spot for them, and so

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm on the ravens here. The wise guys have been

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:28.159
<v Speaker 1>on the ravens. It's one of the reasons why this

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:31.199
<v Speaker 1>number is flashing to three and a half. Chad Millman

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Action Network as owa's it's great seeing you again. Say

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 1>hi to Simon Hunter. I do feel bad about the

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>fissures in your relationship, but you can amend that hopefully

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 1>over the course of the season. Listen, we have one

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 1>more thing to bring up. I listened to your radio

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 1>show and today I'm listening to it driving my kid

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:54.480
<v Speaker 1>home from school. What phrase did you bring up today?

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 1>That's a Corner TV game? Corner TV game. Yeah, we

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:03.439
<v Speaker 1>have a fissure right now. Do you know why? You

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>know why you couldn't say, by the way, how much

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>hypocrisy is happening right now? Last week you're on me

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 1>because I say, we're talking about the podcast, and you're like, well,

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 1>you didn't mentioned Simon Hunter, who's like my best friend.

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:19.920
<v Speaker 1>And today I'm listening to my friend Colin Cowards radio show.

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>He's talking about Corner TV's did he once say Corner

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 1>TV that my friend Chad moment gives me all the

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 1>time when he talks on his podcast favorites. Not once

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned it like four times with Jason McIntyre. Well,

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 1>you know what, there were time restraints. I had to

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 1>get out commercials. Otherwise I would have jammed it right

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:43.359
<v Speaker 1>in there. Oh yeah. A guy who's been doing radio

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 1>for thirty years and has the clock in his head

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and knows exactly how much time he has couldn't fit in.

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 1>My friend, Chad moment. Good to see anybody, all right, man,

0:26:52.400 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk to you later the volume. Make sure to

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:15.920
<v Speaker 1>check out The Draymond Green Show. I brought Draymond Green

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 1>into the volume because one of the more entertaining voices

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 1>in sports. Unique perspective understands behind the rope, also chops

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 1>up with guests like Gary Peyton, Zach Levine, Tracy McGrady.

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Make sure download The Draymond Green Show wherever you get

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>your podcasts, only on the Volume podcast Network