WEBVTT - Name the Enemy with James Lindsay

0:00:00.440 --> 0:00:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I've interviewed a ton of people for this podcast, so

0:00:03.840 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>many smart and thoughtful people, thought provoking conversations. But this

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>next interview is one of the more interesting ones I've

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>had to date. I watched a speech that our next guest,

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:18.800
<v Speaker 1>James Lindsay, gave before the European Parliament. I reached out

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to him after watching it to have him on the show.

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's just take a listen to some of what he said.

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 2>I wrote a book called Race Marxism, and I defined

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 2>critical race theory as it really is in that book.

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 2>On the first page, I said that critical race theory

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:34.239
<v Speaker 2>is calling everything you want to control racist until you

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:37.480
<v Speaker 2>control it. But couldn't we say the same about Marxism.

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 2>It's calling everything you want to control bourgeois until you

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 2>control it. As we tell our children, being white is bad.

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 2>Being white is oppressive. You automatically hurt people of other

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 2>races by your very existence. But by the way, if

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 2>you become queer, we'll celebrate you, and you can create

0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 2>a radical army of people who identify as gender minorities

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 2>and sexual minorities at seven years old.

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>So the entire speech is worth watching. But what he

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>did so well was to name the enemy that we're facing.

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>The enemy is Marxism, this march towards tyranny that we

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 1>are on. You know, he articulated that threat better than most,

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:21.399
<v Speaker 1>that threat that we face, What it looks like, where

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:23.959
<v Speaker 1>it comes from. You might know him from Twitter as

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>conceptual James, but doctor James Lindsay is an American born author,

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>a mathematician, and, as he says, a professional troublemaker. He

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>has written six books and has been really leading the

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>charge against critical race theory. And he joins me, next,

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:46.679
<v Speaker 1>trust me, this one is absolutely worth listening to. James.

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>It's great to have you on the podcast. I've been

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>following your work for a while. I watched a speech

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>he recently gave in the European Parliament, and you really

0:01:56.440 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>touch on the societal decline that we are facing, which

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>is probably the most important issue today.

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, thanks. They invited me over to the EU

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 2>to speak about what is woke. It's kind of a

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 2>funny thing they perceive, although you know, here in America

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 2>we look over at Europe and we think, wow, they're

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:19.799
<v Speaker 2>really far down the old socialist road way ahead of us.

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 2>And they look over at us and they think we've

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 2>gone crazy and they don't think that we They say

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:26.680
<v Speaker 2>that in Europe they don't really have woke yet. You know,

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 2>men are still men and nobody's confused about this. People

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 2>know what a woman is and the race issue is present,

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 2>but it rings a little off key. So they don't

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:42.080
<v Speaker 2>really have kind of the same woke movement, but they

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 2>do have a very you know, strong and active leftist culture.

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:48.559
<v Speaker 2>So the European Union, actually a group called Identity and Democracy,

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 2>which is a center right party throughout Europe which has

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:55.920
<v Speaker 2>some representation in the Parliament, invited me over to a

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:59.360
<v Speaker 2>conference that they were hosting to speak about woke and

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 2>it's it's kind of making its way into Europe with

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 2>a particular emphasis on what is it and how can

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 2>they stop it from kind of doing to Europe what

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 2>it's doing to the United States and Canada.

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, and what's interesting is I feel like a lot

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of times, you know, we talk about these terms like

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>equity or woke or critical race theory, and what you

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>did so well in this speech was defined them. You

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 1>said at the end of the speech, you said you

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>came to name the enemy for the audience. Who is

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:28.519
<v Speaker 1>that enemy? And what should people know about that enemy.

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, there are kind of two questions with regard to

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 2>the enemy, and those questions are really who and what?

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 2>And so the who is a little bit, you know,

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 2>obviously more accusatory to start naming names, but the organizations

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 2>that are facilitating this upon us usually tend to go

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 2>by acronyms. I would name the United Nations as a

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 2>central actor in this story, the primary coordinator. I was

0:03:57.560 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 2>talking to my wife last night and I said, it's

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 2>almost like the transmission of the car that makes the

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 2>power go from the engine to the wheels is the

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 2>World Economic Form, which meets in Davos, you know, every January,

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 2>and it meets in China in the summer, mentioning China.

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 2>The CCP is somehow involved in these other big organizations

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 2>like the World Health Organization WHO, the Council for Foreign

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Relations CFR. It's kind of this acronym soup of tyranny.

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 2>But the primary actors for the concerns in the West,

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 2>I would say overwhelmingly are the United Nations in coordination

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:34.599
<v Speaker 2>with the World Economic Forms. That's the who, the what,

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 2>And that was the thesis of my speech is that

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:41.279
<v Speaker 2>this is the updated form of Marxism, adapted to take

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 2>over the Western context. It you know, Marxism took over

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 2>the Russian context with the Russian Revolution led by the Bolsheviks,

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 2>took over the Chinese context using Mao and his strategies

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 2>to do first a kind of traditional revolution in nineteen

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 2>forty nine forty six to forty nine, and then a

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:02.480
<v Speaker 2>full blown culture revolution to transform China starting in nineteen

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 2>sixty six. And what we are actually seeing is a

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 2>cultural revolution has a very Maoist kind of substructure has

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:15.920
<v Speaker 2>been brought to the West using Western technology in a sense,

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:20.599
<v Speaker 2>cultural technology, whether that's identity politics in the form of race, sex, gender,

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 2>and so on, whether that's literally corporate power, which is

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 2>the way that Western power really kind of operates, the

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:33.359
<v Speaker 2>growing managerial what they call public private partnership, the revolving door,

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 2>if you will, and arrangements and agreements between big capital

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 2>and big government.

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:42.599
<v Speaker 1>What is the intention with this form of Marxism that

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>we're facing here in America.

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean the form of Marxism overall, always in general,

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:54.280
<v Speaker 2>is to create a single global system of administered political

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 2>and socioeconomic economy. The goal is to be able to

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 2>take control over all of the means of production, and

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:06.279
<v Speaker 2>that means the kind of physical, literal material production, whether

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 2>that's goods or services, but also the production of who

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 2>we think we are and in fact who we are

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 2>as people. This has always been the goal, going back

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:18.719
<v Speaker 2>to Marx's early writings, even before the Communist Manifesto, writing

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 2>in say, eighteen forty three eighteen forty four, it was

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 2>always the goal to seize the means of production of mankind.

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:26.280
<v Speaker 2>But it's also to create, in a more prosaic sense,

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 2>a perfectly controlled and stable system that doesn't have the

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of boom and bus cycles that get out from

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:37.479
<v Speaker 2>underneath their control. The idea is that they need perfectly

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:43.359
<v Speaker 2>controllable consumers, perfectly controllable political entities or citizens, so that

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:47.039
<v Speaker 2>they can have a perfectly smooth economy that operates according

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:51.279
<v Speaker 2>to their changing whims as they go. And so that's

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 2>the overall goal, is to create a single global system

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:57.920
<v Speaker 2>that in a sense is, if I might use their

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:00.600
<v Speaker 2>word for it, sustainable. On the other hand, and the

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 2>woke movement as kind of a cultural revolution, is meant

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 2>to in many of the things that we see like this, esg.

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Scoring of corporations, the strict environmental net zero policies. We

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 2>just saw the new king talking about the ESG or whatever,

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 2>the net zero protocols that he was instrumental in organizing.

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 2>It's law in the UK. Those are actually meant to

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 2>economically and culturally break and destroy Western civilization so that

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 2>this new culture and this new model can can replace it.

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Is that the point of equity to drive everything down?

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>You'd mentioned in this speech about equity. Where did the

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>term come from? What should people know about it?

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 2>To answer your question about equity, first, the answer is

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 2>kind of that's the point of equity. It's certainly the

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 2>effect of equity. The question is as a side effect

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 2>or an intended effect, and I think in this case

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 2>it's actually both. I think they know that it drives

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 2>things down, and then they use the degradation that it

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 2>creates to drive more of their initiatives, because this is

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 2>how the left operates. They create problems, than they blame

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 2>somebody else for the problems, and demand more power to

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 2>solve the problem that they in fact themselves created. And

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 2>so equity does. My saying for that is equity equalizes

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 2>downward because it must. Because if in my speech I

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 2>gave the definition of equity and the definition of equity

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 2>is an administered socio political economy in which shares are

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 2>adjusted so that citizens are made equal. I should probably

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 2>pause and let people rewind and listen to it again,

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 2>because it's a lot of big words. But what that

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 2>is is socialism. That's literally the definition for socialism. It

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 2>is the socialism that was originally envisioned by Stalin that

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 2>would extend beyond economic socialism and reach into cultural and

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 2>political and social spheres to make genuine, full communist equality.

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 2>And so it's a rebranding and kind of fulfillment of

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 2>the concept of socialism. And it must because it redistributes shares.

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't create, it doesn't build. It redistributes shares so

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 2>as to make citizens equal. Now, the term equity arose

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 2>in the public administration and administive state or managerial state literature.

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 2>They started to arise in the US following World War Two.

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 2>This kind of literature started to blossom in about forty

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 2>five to forty eight. Dwight Waldo wrote a book called

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 2>The Administrative State. In nineteen forty eight, he held a

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 2>series of conferences later called the Minnobrook Conferences, and at

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 2>one of these Mino Brook conferences, the definition of social

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:27.080
<v Speaker 2>equity was given, and it was argued that the administrative

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 2>state has an obligation not just to consider efficiency an

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 2>economy when they're trying to determine what they should do,

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 2>say mass transit or whatever else. It shouldn't just be

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 2>efficient and economical, it should also be equitable. So they

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:45.320
<v Speaker 2>added a third leg to the stool of how public

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 2>administration should prioritize, where that goal was to redistribute share

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 2>so that citizens are made more equal. Well, this of

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:58.840
<v Speaker 2>course is saying explicitly that the administrative apparatus of whether

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:02.959
<v Speaker 2>it's corporations but actually large nations in the West should

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 2>start tooling themselves specifically to redistribute shares an opportunity to

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:10.319
<v Speaker 2>try to adjust for social inequality, and that was always

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 2>its intention. Well, like I said, that's always going to

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 2>lead downward, not upward. It always means taking from somebody

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 2>and then redistributing through an inefficient mechanism that doesn't have

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:30.079
<v Speaker 2>actually kind of full contact with This is too abstract.

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 2>I should really simplify what I'm saying, But.

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh, go for it, say whatever you want.

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So at time, so the government is what's called

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 2>a third person consumer and spender. This is the first person,

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 2>second person third person model. If I'm a first person consumer, right,

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:48.199
<v Speaker 2>So let's say you run a coffee shop and I

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 2>come to your coffee shop and I'm like, I want

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 2>coffee and I'm going to buy coffee, and you say,

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 2>coffee cost ten dollars, and I have to sit here

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:58.439
<v Speaker 2>and I have to calculate in my thoughts, is Lisa's

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 2>cappuccino worth ten dollars? In other words, am I willing

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:03.560
<v Speaker 2>to part with ten dollars in order to obtain the

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 2>cappuccino that you make? And maybe you make a world

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 2>class cappuccino that I want sometimes and it's worth ten bucks.

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:11.439
<v Speaker 2>Maybe you don't. And I think, now you know what?

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 2>So I have to take into account two variables when

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 2>I make my purchasing decision as the first person, which

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 2>is quality and cost. I care about both of those things. Now,

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 2>if it's a second person decision, I'm using somebody else's money.

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to go. You know, you say, hey, I'll

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:28.680
<v Speaker 2>buy you a coffee, So now it's your money, I

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 2>get the coffee. I care about quality, but I don't

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 2>care about cost. You care about cost, but you don't

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 2>care about quality. Do you see how that works? So

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 2>in the second person decision, only one of those two

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 2>variables is actually being optimized around. The government isn't even

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 2>second person, it's third person. The administrative body, the bureaucracy,

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 2>This administrative apparatus is a third person buyer. It doesn't

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 2>care about quality because it's not the consumer, and it

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 2>doesn't care about cost because it's ultimately not responsible for

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 2>the spending. They may write the check or pay the

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 2>bill or whatever. They may purchase the coffee physically, but

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 2>they're using somebody else's money, so cost and quality are

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 2>not concerned. So what you end up with when you

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 2>have an administrative bureaucracy is a very inefficient. It's not

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 2>even you know, if you used an individual who cares

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 2>they're processing is not one hundred percent efficient. Nothing is.

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 2>But when you go to a third person kind of consumer,

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 2>like a government, you now have an overwhelmingly inefficient process.

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 2>So when equity goes to redistribute shares, what it's doing

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 2>is it's taking value from somewhere running it into a

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 2>horrifically inefficient machine where it doesn't care about cost or quality.

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 2>So outcomes and inputs become sort of these abstract, irrelevant

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 2>entities to them, and what comes out the end is,

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, not nearly as good as what would happen

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 2>if we had you know, tons of individual largely autonomous

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 2>consumers going out and making individual purchasing decisions, weighing out

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 2>both variables for themselves. So the effort to I know

0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:59.680
<v Speaker 2>that was a little high follutin, but that's actually a

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:05.079
<v Speaker 2>large or you know, profoundly important reason why socialism or

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 2>equity initiatives are always going to actually make things worse,

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:11.560
<v Speaker 2>not better. There's no such thing as a government that's

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 2>a first person buyer, that cares about the relevant variables

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:17.080
<v Speaker 2>or that can be held to account properly, so its

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 2>efficiency level is far lower in this kind of schema,

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 2>so you can expect that it's going to do bad results.

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm picking up what you're putting down. And then

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>of course you know, the people in charge, the rulers,

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 1>aren't necessarily subjected to some of this. I mean, you

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:33.200
<v Speaker 1>can look at examples like Cuba, when you know, if

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the tel Castros net worth was something like nine hundred,

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, million dollars. So of course, if you're either

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 1>part of the World Economic Forum or are some of

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 1>these these world leaders. You're not that worried about what

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 1>this means for your general income or what it means

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 1>for you.

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, of course not, because you know, you're in a

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:56.199
<v Speaker 2>sense very insulated from all of those concerns. It's not

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 2>just having what some people call fu money. It's that

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 2>you're actually even and further insulated from anything. These things

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 2>layers and layers of insulation. So it's not really important

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:07.959
<v Speaker 2>to you. So your little theory about how the world

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 2>should work, it's something that if you can gather up

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:13.679
<v Speaker 2>the power to start to implement it, because you don't

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 2>get hit with the impacts of that, it doesn't really

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 2>matter to you. Now. Of course, we saw what happens when,

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, people test this theory. For example, when Governor

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 2>DeSantis decided to send a bunch of illegal immigrants to

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 2>Martha's vineyard. All of a sudden, that was like the

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 2>most horrific thing that anybody could possibly have done. He

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 2>was like a super racist, xenophobic, something, hate crimes, you know, whatever, words,

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 2>every apoplectic word that the left uses came out. Somehow

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 2>it was probably transphobic. Somehow they were so angry that

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 2>all of a sudden, you know, the normally fully ensconced

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 2>people would have to actually deal with the consequences of

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 2>their policies, even in a very minor and short term way,

0:14:57.560 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 2>and to take it, you know, with public relations on

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 2>the as a result, and they didn't like that one bit.

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 2>So you can tell that they're used to being, you know,

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 2>policies for the but not policies for me. They're used

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 2>to feeling above the laws, above the effects of their decisions,

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 2>and they can therefore tinker around in what a friend

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 2>of mine calls perfect ideal land about how the world

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 2>should be, and then they can just kind of force

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 2>other people to live in the crappy world that that

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 2>creates while they get to kind of float above it

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 2>and grift off of whatever's happening while holding themselves out

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 2>as you know, the great moral paragons of our time. Oh,

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 2>we're the ones who are solving the biggest social issues

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 2>and cultural issues and economic issues of our time. Look

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 2>how great we are. And meanwhile, you have a few

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 2>of these people that are tucked within them, proportionally speaking,

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 2>a few that are just grifting for the power that

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 2>they can get out of it. They are actually into

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 2>the idea of implementing not just kind of whimsical failures

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 2>of ideas, but ones that increase the level of social

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 2>control in the next iteration wards, they're tyrants. Tyrants will

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 2>be drawn to opportunities like this, and we'll exploit them.

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 2>And history has taught us that this is the case

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 2>every single time, and it's the case this time as

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 2>well well.

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 1>And we saw that in abundance and with absolute clarity

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>during COVID, when we were lectured to about certain things,

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and then our leaders did the exact opposite, whether it

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>be Obama throwing a rager in Martha's vineyard while telling

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>everyone else to isolate and stay away from people, or

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>doctor Burke's or you know, Gavin Newsom or you know,

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the list goes on. But you had mentioned tyranny. Isn't

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 1>that really what this is about, is a fight against tyranny?

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, that's what this is. This is this all

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 2>boils down to tyranny versus liberty. Everybody's kind of looking

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 2>for the axis. Is it left versus right? Is it

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Republicans versus democrats? The answer is no, it is tyranny

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 2>versus liberty. It is Some people will try to say

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 2>that it's control versus freedom, or control versus liberty. But

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 2>it's really tyranny. The goal with all of these kinds

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 2>of huge programs that are kind of tucked into woke

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:04.639
<v Speaker 2>language or environmentalist language or whatever else, is to create

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:07.920
<v Speaker 2>social control mechanisms very much like the ones that I

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 2>would go so far as to say, we're piloted in China.

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:13.880
<v Speaker 2>So what we see happening in China with the kind

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 2>of very strict social credit system, with the kind of

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 2>neighborhoods that have these extraordinary lockdowns and turnstile gates you

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 2>have to pass through and scan your face so the

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 2>government can track your movement and know where you are.

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:28.640
<v Speaker 2>All of this kind of extraordinary tyranny that you were

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 2>seeing emerge in China is the pilot for what they

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 2>want globally, what they want in the West. And so

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 2>we're dealing with tyrants whose ambitions for us are to

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 2>keep us. You know, you will own nothing and be

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 2>happy is probably ambitious. You will own nothing is probably correct.

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that they actually are genuinely that concerned

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 2>with their happiness. They just want us unable to revolt,

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 2>and the call being unable to revolt happy just like

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:54.919
<v Speaker 2>you know, they did with white fragility. I remember they

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 2>called you white, or they called you racist, and you said,

0:17:56.960 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't think I'm racist, and I said, oh, that's

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 2>white fragility. Your emotion only fragile. You can't handle the accusation.

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 2>And the opposite of fragility in their literature is resilience.

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 2>So if you're a good resilient person, when they call

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 2>you names, you shut up and take it. Well, it'll

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 2>be the same thing this way, you'll own nothing and

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:16.160
<v Speaker 2>you'll be happy. Where happy happens to mean that you're

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 2>not revolting, you're not complaining, because if you complain, it'll

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 2>get worse for you. And so see you look how

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:24.440
<v Speaker 2>happy everybody is. Not a single person put that they're

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 2>unhappy on the survey. Everybody is still clapping for Stalin.

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Nobody sat down. It's amazing they love him. Well.

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I really do think Omicron saved us from some pretty

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>dark times here in the United States, because I do

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 1>believe they were looking at what was happening with China

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:43.440
<v Speaker 1>and China's zero tolerance policy or zero COVID policy, and

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>what they were trying to achieve there, and that was

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 1>the direction we're heading in and then Omicron kind of

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 1>deprogrammed people because all these people who looked at getting

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:54.959
<v Speaker 1>COVID as being unclean or what have you, they got COVID,

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and then it was, oh, you know, time to move on.

0:18:57.240 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 2>It's not that bad.

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, you're not a bad person if you get

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 1>COVID as someone who didn't get the vaccine. You know,

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 1>obviously we were on the receiving end of calls to

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>not be able to live our lives to you know,

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 1>potentially end up in some sort of government facility.

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I mean, so COVID gave us a very very

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:18.400
<v Speaker 2>clear window into the ambition, the tyrannical ambition that we're

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 2>up against, and that it was willing to do not

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:26.159
<v Speaker 2>just damage to the economy, not just damage to you know,

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 2>with failure of public health policies or whatever else or

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:33.440
<v Speaker 2>whatever they did in the hospitals, but it was willing

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 2>to do damage, vicious damage sociologically and psychologically to people.

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 2>It was willing to openly, viciously to divide the population

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 2>and create an unclean class that is the scapegoat for

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 2>the society's problems, that when it's controlled or done away with, everything,

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 2>will finally be allowed to get better. I mean, this

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 2>is straight out of the Tyrants playbook. And yes, Omicron,

0:19:56.960 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 2>for you know, wherever it happened to come from, whatever

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:05.400
<v Speaker 2>caused to come into being totally disrupted and dismantled their ambition. There.

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:08.199
<v Speaker 2>You talk about a train running down the tracks and

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 2>hop in the rails. This thing came all the way

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 2>off the rails and ended up in the ditch. And

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:14.919
<v Speaker 2>now they very sheepishly are kind of trying to you know,

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 2>they just recently admitted, oh, the emergencies over, we finally

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 2>defeated COVID, and they're trying to kind of salvage themselves.

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 2>But for whatever reason, we got two things there. One

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:31.360
<v Speaker 2>is Omicron did disrupt, for whatever reason, wherever it came from,

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 2>whatever it was, being a much mild or very virulent

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 2>and completely you know, transparent to the vaccine strain of COVID,

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:44.440
<v Speaker 2>completely disrupted the program. But before that happened, and even

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:47.119
<v Speaker 2>some after that happened, we got a very very clear

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 2>look behind the curtain at what these people who are

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:54.399
<v Speaker 2>in charge are after and what they're interested in, what

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 2>lengths they're willing to go, and how many of our

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 2>natural and inalien rights they're willing to just trample upon

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:05.440
<v Speaker 2>in order to get it by setting people the most

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:09.359
<v Speaker 2>cruel ways, setting people families against one another, with this

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 2>kind of again clean versus unclean narrative.

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:14.639
<v Speaker 1>Well, and you've really got a glimpse for how quickly

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 1>society can turn and how quickly friends can turn on you.

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, family, people, colleagues, you know people who know

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:25.719
<v Speaker 1>you. You sort of get a glimpse of how quickly and

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 1>easily that can happen in societies and how it could

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>lead to atrocities. Talk about how Mao used identity politics.

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:36.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so a lot of people don't understand that what

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 2>we're going through right now actually mirrors things that happened

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 2>in the Maoist regime very specifically, maybe a little less.

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Of course, Mao used crises, etc. To advance as powers,

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 2>so we could compare to COVID. But when we look

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 2>at the woke phenomenon, the identity politics phenomenon, it's exact.

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:00.159
<v Speaker 2>The only difference is that we're using categories relevant to

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Americans rather than categories relevant to Chinese communists. And I

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:08.919
<v Speaker 2>say that that way very specifically. So what happened just

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:11.880
<v Speaker 2>to get little historical context of people understand how Mao

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 2>used identity politics, and why has identity politics worked the

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:19.880
<v Speaker 2>way that it did. Mao actually took power twice. He

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 2>was in power, then he actually had to step down,

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 2>and then he got back into power. So there were

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:27.639
<v Speaker 2>actually two different periods when Mao had power. The first

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:32.360
<v Speaker 2>of those was following a real old school, genuine military

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:35.639
<v Speaker 2>coup of the Chinese Nationalist government, which was called the

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Guomingdong was the name of the party, and so that

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 2>was a military coup that was a classic communist revolution.

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Mao took power at the end of nineteen forty nine.

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:50.439
<v Speaker 2>He immediately in nineteen fifty fired every teacher in the

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:55.200
<v Speaker 2>country and made them all get re educated into socialist doctrine.

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 2>He totally brainwashed him If they didn't satisfactorily get thought

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 2>reform or brainwashing, wouldn't let them come back to the classroom. Ever,

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:05.680
<v Speaker 2>by nineteen fifty two, the entire education apparatus had been

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:11.160
<v Speaker 2>transformed into Maoist propaganda brainwashing instead of education. And so then,

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 2>for whatever reason, Mao advances in nineteen fifty eight launches

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 2>this program called the Great Leap Forward, which sounds ominously

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 2>like the Great Reset, and it's a disaster kills upwards

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 2>of sixty million. Fifty to sixty million Chinese is the

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:31.120
<v Speaker 2>estimated number of deaths from starvation and other things from

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 2>this program that he tries to leap China forward into

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 2>being a grand industrial economy like the United States and

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Soviet Union. Some tens of millions die, the economy is

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:43.239
<v Speaker 2>utterly devastated. So in nineteen sixty two they make him

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 2>step down in shame. This, of course just makes him

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 2>really mad because he's a dictator and a narcissist. So

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen sixty six he unleashes his revenge where he

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 2>takes those radicalized students. And this is why I wanted

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 2>to give this preamble. You have to understand that by

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 2>the time Mao came back in nineteen sixty six for

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:00.199
<v Speaker 2>his bid to power and launched what was called the

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Cultural Revolution, which people have heard of, there had already

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:07.880
<v Speaker 2>been sixteen years of socialism in China, in sixteen years

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:12.199
<v Speaker 2>of socialist education, so everybody under the age of sixteen

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 2>years old had never seen anything else in this actually

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 2>twenty one years old, because they're at five years old

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 2>when they start school. So everybody under the age of

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty one had only seen maoist brainwashing and their education

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:25.680
<v Speaker 2>at this point, and so the categories he used were

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 2>socialist in kind of the traditional sense, and that made

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 2>sense before that, before he had power and did this

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:35.159
<v Speaker 2>in the nineteen twenties and thirties. They actually used the

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 2>racial strife between the fifty six races of China, with

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 2>the Han Chinese being by far the biggest and kind

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:43.399
<v Speaker 2>of a prototype of critical race theory that we see today.

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:46.879
<v Speaker 2>But after this it's all socialists. So Mao created for

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:50.879
<v Speaker 2>the Cultural Revolution ten identity categories, and I've heard that

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:54.199
<v Speaker 2>these expanded later in his regime because he needed extra

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:56.680
<v Speaker 2>good guys and bad guys to keep the power going.

0:24:57.240 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 2>But the original ten five were classified as bad and

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:03.719
<v Speaker 2>they were given the color black, and five were classified

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:05.919
<v Speaker 2>as good and they were given the color red. And

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 2>the goal was to create a system that worked like

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 2>a pressure pump to push people that were in the

0:25:11.560 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 2>black identities, the bad identities, into the red good identities,

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 2>and to take the people who are in the red

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 2>ones and concentrate them into more and more radical activists.

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 2>Now that should already start to sound familiar. So he

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:28.120
<v Speaker 2>had bad categories that were like landlord, rich farmer, counter revolutionary,

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 2>so if you were against him, that was bad, bad influence.

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:33.919
<v Speaker 2>We call them domestic extremists, I think today at the

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 2>Department of Justice, and then right winger just rightest people

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:42.199
<v Speaker 2>who were right wingers. He later added revisionist, which has

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 2>a specific meaning. And so these are the bad guys.

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:46.640
<v Speaker 2>And if you were a bad guy, your kids were

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:49.160
<v Speaker 2>the bad guys. If you were a bad guy, your

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 2>grandkids and great grandkids automatically got a black identity and

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 2>they got mistreated at school. They were, oh, you're shameful,

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:57.880
<v Speaker 2>you're a black identity. You need to do better, blah

0:25:57.920 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 2>blah blah, the whole kind of thing. And if you

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:02.640
<v Speaker 2>had a red identity, you were treated better. So you're

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:05.359
<v Speaker 2>creating this pressure pump based on who you are, based

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 2>on things like who your parents are, how you were born.

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 2>The good identities were a little different. They're a peasant

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 2>and laborer because it was communism. So that's a hammer

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 2>and sickle if you didn't know. The sickle is the

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 2>peasant and doing the farm work, and the hammer is

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 2>the laborer working in the factory. And then you had

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:27.200
<v Speaker 2>basically three categories of revolutionaries. You had revolutionary activists, revolutionary cadres,

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 2>which is the word they used for kind of the

0:26:29.160 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 2>leadership class of the revolution and revolutionary martyrs, people who

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:36.320
<v Speaker 2>had died for the cause. Those were red identities, and

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:39.679
<v Speaker 2>red identities were somewhat heritable too. But if you were

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:41.680
<v Speaker 2>a kid with a black identity and you wanted to

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 2>get the better treatment of a kid with a red identity,

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 2>you'd have to do something like confess that you were

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 2>against the people, sell out your parents, rat out your father,

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:53.879
<v Speaker 2>condemn your father, something like this in order to you know,

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:56.119
<v Speaker 2>my parents are landlords and that makes them enemies of

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 2>the state, and I hate them. And then you can

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 2>go start to become a revolutionary and they'll reassign your identity.

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:04.879
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes in fact, they gave you a new name. A

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:07.119
<v Speaker 2>lot of people changed their names, kind of like we

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:09.920
<v Speaker 2>see with the trans phenomenon. And we have this exact

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 2>same identity politics pressure pump happening today under intersectionality. In fact,

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 2>intersectionality is just this repurposed I recently spoke at Northwestern

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 2>and gave this history that Mao's ideas about identity politics

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 2>inspired Herbert marcusa who laid down the program of the

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 2>New Left, which inspired the radicals of the seventies who

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 2>formed a thing called the Combahee River Collective and the

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 2>kamba He River Collective gave the idea that all forms

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 2>of identity based oppression are interlinked, which became intersectionality in

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 2>nineteen eighty nine when Kimberly Crenshaw gave it that name.

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:46.199
<v Speaker 2>And so this is ultimately a maoist program. So you

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:49.359
<v Speaker 2>have things like, you know, your race is bad. You're straight,

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:52.719
<v Speaker 2>that's bad, you're white that's bad. You know you're a

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 2>man that's bad. You're a thin and able body that's bad.

0:27:56.320 --> 0:27:59.120
<v Speaker 2>And so you have these black identities about who you are,

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 2>and then you can do something about it. You can

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:05.120
<v Speaker 2>be an ally. That's a good identity. Sort of, it's

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 2>not good enough. You can. When I said that you

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 2>can be an ally, I said this part in the

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:11.399
<v Speaker 2>speech at Northwestern and I said ally. The woke people

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:14.240
<v Speaker 2>booed because they knew that ally is not good enough.

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 2>Solidarity is not enough. But you can become an ally.

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 2>You can become an activist. You can you know, do

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 2>any of these things. But you can also now adopt

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 2>a queer identity. Because queer identities unlike your race, which

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 2>you can't change. You can't go Rachel doleas all yourself

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 2>and declare yourself black. If you're white. You can, however,

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:35.600
<v Speaker 2>declare yourself pan sexual and nobody can question you. Or

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 2>gender fluid or non binary or trans and nobody can

0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 2>question you. And now all of a sudden, you have

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 2>one of these good, radical revolutionary identities. And you get

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 2>brought to, you know, or if you're a child, to

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 2>clubs after school, like the Gay Straight Alliance now known

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 2>as a Gender Sexuality Alliance, and you get affirmed and

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 2>you get celebrated, and you get love bombed, and you

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:58.400
<v Speaker 2>get dragged into this and you get taught that it's

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 2>a political identity that you have to It's not enough

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 2>to be LGBTQ. You have to be politically LGBTQ. It's

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 2>not enough to be As Aana Presley put it, she said,

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 2>that's a congresswoman said, we don't want any more blackfaces

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:14.760
<v Speaker 2>who don't want to be black voices, and we don't

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 2>want any more brown faces who don't want to be

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 2>brown voices. What that means is you better be an activist.

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 2>It's not enough to look one way or another. You

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 2>have to be an activist. And this is the exact

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 2>same dynamic. This is the identity politics of Mao Zedong,

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 2>updated from socialist categories that would worked in nineteen sixty

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 2>six China to identity categories that work in twenty twenty

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 2>three America.

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Quick commercial break more with James Lindsay, Well, why do

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:47.719
<v Speaker 1>you think the desire to be accepted is so strong,

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 1>because obviously none of these things would matter if there

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 1>wasn't this intense desire to fit in.

0:29:53.960 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, Honestly, we're a social we're very very social entities.

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 2>People are not terribly good at being individuals, and I

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 2>don't necessarily think there's something wrong with that. It's literally

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 2>how we are. It is part of human nature to

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:13.520
<v Speaker 2>seek the approval, to see ourselves and wonder how other

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:17.040
<v Speaker 2>people see us, and to judge ourselves. This is actually

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 2>called psychosocial valuation in the psychological literature. To understand ourselves

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 2>and valuate ourselves as a good person or a bad person,

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 2>a valuable member of the community, essential or non essential

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 2>in the language of COVID, based upon how others might

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 2>perceive us. So it's very important to us to fit in,

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 2>and there's only this kind of weird fringe. About twenty

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 2>percent of the population that seemed not to care as

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 2>much about it and that will resist these kind of

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 2>heavy social pressures. So this is articulated in various ways

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:52.440
<v Speaker 2>in the psychological literature. I've been banging a drum. I

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 2>don't know all social psychology theories. I kind of keep

0:30:55.320 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 2>at arm's length, but I've been banging a drum for

0:30:57.360 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 2>actually over ten years now, well before I started talking

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 2>a lot about woke about this theory in social psychology

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 2>called social identity theory. And I'm not claiming to buy

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 2>into all of social identity theory or any of this,

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:11.560
<v Speaker 2>but I think that this concept of social identity that

0:31:11.600 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 2>we form an identity around a social group we perceive

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:17.480
<v Speaker 2>ourselves to be a member of, and then we define

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 2>ourselves in terms of looking good and fitting into that

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 2>group very strongly, and we also define ourselves as part

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 2>of that in not liking those people who are outside

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 2>of that group. And so if we think of this

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 2>as a natural human tendency and one that can therefore

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 2>be driven like virtually any other one to access into madness,

0:31:34.840 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 2>I think we can see where this kind of desire

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:41.719
<v Speaker 2>to fit in and identify through the class, especially when

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:43.760
<v Speaker 2>it's hard to stand out, which I think is a

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:48.960
<v Speaker 2>very important lesson and point in our present environment becomes

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 2>very strong and I think that it's the communists who

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 2>are oriented in the idea of developing literally a class consciousness,

0:31:56.960 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 2>whether that's economic class, racial class, sexual class, whatever. They

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:03.000
<v Speaker 2>want you to be very conscious of which class you're

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 2>in and what it means to be in class solidarity.

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:06.920
<v Speaker 2>They want you to think of yourself as a member

0:32:06.920 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 2>of a class before they think of you yourself as

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:12.080
<v Speaker 2>a person. They even say that, By the way, Crenshaw

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 2>says that in our big paper called Mapping the Margins

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:18.800
<v Speaker 2>about intersectionality, she says that there's a fundamental difference between

0:32:18.920 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm a person who happens to be black and the

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 2>statement I am black. She says that the first one

0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:28.280
<v Speaker 2>makes a mistake of striving for personhood first, this idea

0:32:28.280 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 2>that there's this universal person you can be and you

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:33.840
<v Speaker 2>happen to be some other category, whereas I am black,

0:32:33.920 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 2>she says, admits that that category is imposed upon you

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 2>and adopts the identity as what she calls a discourse

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 2>of resistance, which is obviously divisive. So they literally want

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 2>you to think in terms of class. They don't want

0:32:49.360 --> 0:32:51.200
<v Speaker 2>you to think in terms of individual and so they

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:55.440
<v Speaker 2>can exacerbate that tendency to social identity, flare it up,

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:59.719
<v Speaker 2>and start turning it to kind of very zealous ends.

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 2>We see with this kind of activism and people just

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:05.280
<v Speaker 2>screaming their heads off trans women or women, which is

0:33:05.320 --> 0:33:09.560
<v Speaker 2>like a rallying cry around the idea of whatever it

0:33:09.600 --> 0:33:12.800
<v Speaker 2>means to be trans as a class. But I think

0:33:12.800 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 2>it's humans are this way now. Just if I might ramble,

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 2>I said, it's when it's harder to stand out as

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 2>an individual, this becomes maybe more poignant, and that's important today.

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:23.640
<v Speaker 2>We'll think about this like when you when we were kids.

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:25.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, maybe you're a lot younger than I'm. Probably

0:33:25.840 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 2>you are, I don't know, thirty eight, Okay, so we're close.

0:33:29.200 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 2>So when we were kids.

0:33:30.080 --> 0:33:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Appreciate that though, yeah, but certainly.

0:33:32.600 --> 0:33:35.440
<v Speaker 2>When our parents were kids, right, So when our parents

0:33:35.480 --> 0:33:38.440
<v Speaker 2>were kids. This is unequivocal. If you say, picked up

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:41.280
<v Speaker 2>the guitar and decided to play guitar, and you got

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:43.560
<v Speaker 2>okay at the guitar, and you play maybe at church

0:33:43.640 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 2>or whatever, and you're like, wow, you know, you're the

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 2>least is great at guitar. You know, you're like a

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 2>big deal because you're great at guitar, and then you

0:33:50.480 --> 0:33:52.080
<v Speaker 2>get to go off to the state and you find

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 2>out that actually you're not that good at guitar. There's

0:33:53.880 --> 0:33:56.320
<v Speaker 2>these amazing other people ever, but you were like the

0:33:56.320 --> 0:33:58.400
<v Speaker 2>bee's knees And when you come home, you kind of

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 2>this nostalgic, you know, not real image, but you're still

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 2>the great guitarist of you know, po Dunk QSA, right,

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 2>and you're competing against that kind of local neighborhood. But

0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 2>now you're competing against people on YouTube who do things

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 2>that I'm almost positive aren't humanly possible. I've watched some

0:34:15.200 --> 0:34:17.960
<v Speaker 2>of these guitarists or the gymnasts or the athletes on

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:19.839
<v Speaker 2>the internet. I you know, it was a big thing

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:21.799
<v Speaker 2>ten years ago. I'd watched these videos. My friend and

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:24.359
<v Speaker 2>I like, let's go watch some motivational videos. Then we'll

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:26.719
<v Speaker 2>go work out or whatever. And we'd watch them and

0:34:26.760 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 2>I started to notice and I said to him when

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:31.040
<v Speaker 2>I was like, these are demotivational, Like I'm never going

0:34:31.080 --> 0:34:33.480
<v Speaker 2>to be able to do that, Like I just am fat.

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:35.840
<v Speaker 2>There's no way that's happening. Like I'm never going to

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:38.040
<v Speaker 2>climb a pole like that and stick off like a flag.

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:39.959
<v Speaker 1>Well not with that attitude, that's what he said.

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 2>But the truth is, I think it's just real, right

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 2>like I was in my thirties, like this isn't going

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:50.399
<v Speaker 2>to happen. And so think about being like sixteen years

0:34:50.440 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 2>old and you've just picked up a guitar or whatever

0:34:52.560 --> 0:34:55.040
<v Speaker 2>for the first time, and you jump on YouTube and

0:34:55.080 --> 0:34:57.320
<v Speaker 2>there's all these tutorials and there's all these guys that

0:34:57.320 --> 0:35:00.319
<v Speaker 2>are so good at it, and you're super inspired, and

0:35:00.360 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 2>you figure out real quick that it's hard to play

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:06.040
<v Speaker 2>a guitar at first, and yeah, there's great lessons, but

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:09.319
<v Speaker 2>you're definitely never going to be like Alexander Misco or

0:35:09.400 --> 0:35:11.839
<v Speaker 2>no time soon, or you know, one of these guys

0:35:11.840 --> 0:35:14.400
<v Speaker 2>that you're watching that does these amazing things that inspired

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:15.840
<v Speaker 2>you to pick it up in the first place. So

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:17.960
<v Speaker 2>I think it makes it harder for people to feel

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:20.319
<v Speaker 2>like they're standing out when they're competing not with their

0:35:20.400 --> 0:35:23.759
<v Speaker 2>town or the school or you know, the church, but

0:35:23.840 --> 0:35:27.719
<v Speaker 2>now they're competing against Instagram, which I think that this

0:35:27.920 --> 0:35:30.200
<v Speaker 2>is a I mean, we're tangential to kind of the

0:35:30.239 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 2>big point, but I think this matters with understanding why

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 2>so many young people are so susceptible to feeling like

0:35:37.160 --> 0:35:41.440
<v Speaker 2>they have to identify as something completely ridiculous like their

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 2>skin color or their genitals or something in order to

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 2>feel value.

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, I agree in this sense of you know,

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:51.840
<v Speaker 1>social media is what is sort of pushing this desire

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:55.160
<v Speaker 1>to be accepted and also defining what is acceptable and

0:35:55.520 --> 0:35:57.760
<v Speaker 1>what is not, which too many young people are obviously

0:35:58.320 --> 0:36:01.799
<v Speaker 1>adhering to. You got into this a little bit, but

0:36:02.000 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are obviously numerous quotes, numerous examples of

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:10.080
<v Speaker 1>name the dictator who has highlighted how the youth are

0:36:10.160 --> 0:36:14.440
<v Speaker 1>important to controlling societies. Talk about a little bit further

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 1>with some of this trans issue, I worry that it's

0:36:17.320 --> 0:36:19.879
<v Speaker 1>a mechanism and a means to try to turn young

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:21.240
<v Speaker 1>people against their parents.

0:36:21.520 --> 0:36:23.560
<v Speaker 2>It is, I mean, it certainly is. I'm sure it

0:36:23.600 --> 0:36:26.840
<v Speaker 2>has a multitude of uses, Like the pharmaceutical industry is

0:36:26.880 --> 0:36:29.600
<v Speaker 2>not crying about what's going on in the trans phenomenon

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:32.839
<v Speaker 2>in any way whatsoever because they're making crazy money off

0:36:32.880 --> 0:36:36.239
<v Speaker 2>of it. But it certainly is a mechanism used to

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:38.319
<v Speaker 2>is the same as MAO. So we're going to dip

0:36:38.360 --> 0:36:43.120
<v Speaker 2>back to MAO with that, which the goal with Mao

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:46.279
<v Speaker 2>was that he had to overcome Confucian society, and like

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:50.839
<v Speaker 2>rule numro uno in Confucian society is you know, thou

0:36:50.880 --> 0:36:53.279
<v Speaker 2>shalt not disgrace thy father. If you had to kind

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 2>of lay it down your father is like the you

0:36:56.920 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 2>never would insult your father. You would always try to

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:02.759
<v Speaker 2>save face for your father. And so the goal was

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:05.279
<v Speaker 2>very often say your father was what he called a

0:37:05.360 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 2>landlord or a bad influence or whatever, so he's got

0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 2>a black identity. They give you a black identity. The

0:37:09.600 --> 0:37:12.000
<v Speaker 2>goal was to get you to denounce your father, which

0:37:12.080 --> 0:37:15.040
<v Speaker 2>is like a sin like throwing away your religion. In

0:37:15.120 --> 0:37:18.760
<v Speaker 2>the West, it'd be like blaspheming Christ if you're a Christian,

0:37:18.800 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 2>to denounce your father in Confucian society, and so this

0:37:22.320 --> 0:37:26.120
<v Speaker 2>wasn't something that was extremely emotional, extremely powerful, but the

0:37:26.160 --> 0:37:30.040
<v Speaker 2>goal was to split families if they the Confucian family

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:33.760
<v Speaker 2>organization was so strong and tight. And then the reports

0:37:33.760 --> 0:37:36.640
<v Speaker 2>of people who went through the brainwashing programs in China

0:37:36.680 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 2>and the revolutionary universities say Robert Lifton has written about

0:37:40.560 --> 0:37:44.440
<v Speaker 2>with many case studies. He says a lot of the

0:37:44.440 --> 0:37:48.239
<v Speaker 2>times it was actually family piety and family love that

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:52.520
<v Speaker 2>stopped people from getting fully brainwashed into becoming communists under

0:37:52.520 --> 0:37:55.440
<v Speaker 2>now and fleeing, you know, to the West or Taiwan

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:58.120
<v Speaker 2>or Hong Kong or somewhere else to get away because

0:37:59.040 --> 0:38:01.560
<v Speaker 2>that family is so powerful, and so Maw knew that,

0:38:01.920 --> 0:38:03.680
<v Speaker 2>and so he knew he had to break that apart,

0:38:03.680 --> 0:38:06.320
<v Speaker 2>and his identity politics were designed to give you reasons

0:38:06.360 --> 0:38:09.239
<v Speaker 2>to denounce your family. And now the same thing here.

0:38:09.520 --> 0:38:11.799
<v Speaker 2>The goal with the trans if you can pressure kids

0:38:11.800 --> 0:38:15.360
<v Speaker 2>into these sexualities, first of all, it becomes extremely important

0:38:15.360 --> 0:38:18.279
<v Speaker 2>to them. It's tapping into something very powerful in what

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:21.680
<v Speaker 2>it means to be human. But then you tell your parents,

0:38:21.719 --> 0:38:25.359
<v Speaker 2>and they are first primed to believe they're told, they're

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:27.680
<v Speaker 2>groomed to believe that their parents will reject them when

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:30.719
<v Speaker 2>they do this, and then their parents often are at

0:38:30.840 --> 0:38:33.839
<v Speaker 2>least confused pan sexual what is that? Or they make

0:38:33.840 --> 0:38:36.080
<v Speaker 2>fun of them, or they tease them or whatever. And

0:38:36.400 --> 0:38:41.680
<v Speaker 2>this is designed to put wedges between children and their parents.

0:38:41.960 --> 0:38:44.719
<v Speaker 2>This is one hundred percent designed to do that, and

0:38:45.000 --> 0:38:48.360
<v Speaker 2>it's a very sophisticated mechanism they used. It's also maliced

0:38:48.680 --> 0:38:50.200
<v Speaker 2>because what they're trying to do is to get you.

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:52.680
<v Speaker 2>The reason they want to wedge away from the family,

0:38:52.880 --> 0:38:56.160
<v Speaker 2>is that the family pulls them, would pull somebody away

0:38:56.160 --> 0:38:58.280
<v Speaker 2>from the cult. They want you to be in the cult,

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:01.720
<v Speaker 2>and your family is a competitive that they have to destroy.

0:39:02.200 --> 0:39:05.799
<v Speaker 2>And so Mao framed this out with a formula he

0:39:05.800 --> 0:39:08.160
<v Speaker 2>said he created in nineteen forty two, which is called

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:12.240
<v Speaker 2>unity criticism Unity. I think I talked about that in Europe.

0:39:12.520 --> 0:39:15.640
<v Speaker 2>He said that you start by creating the desire for unity,

0:39:15.719 --> 0:39:18.080
<v Speaker 2>the desire to fit in, the desire to in our

0:39:18.200 --> 0:39:22.120
<v Speaker 2>current parlance, belong. You want to make the environment inclusive,

0:39:22.239 --> 0:39:24.440
<v Speaker 2>so you want people to feel like they're included, and

0:39:24.480 --> 0:39:27.719
<v Speaker 2>then you engage in criticism and struggle. So that's the

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:31.920
<v Speaker 2>middle part. After the people desire for belonging or unity,

0:39:32.320 --> 0:39:35.680
<v Speaker 2>you then induce criticism. The reason we don't have unity.

0:39:35.920 --> 0:39:37.480
<v Speaker 2>We would have unity, but some of you in here

0:39:37.480 --> 0:39:40.839
<v Speaker 2>are transphobic, so our trans friends can't feel included, they

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:42.959
<v Speaker 2>don't feel like they belong. So you have to fix

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:45.720
<v Speaker 2>your transphobia so that everybody feels like they can belong.

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:48.640
<v Speaker 2>And maybe you need to know some trans people. Maybe

0:39:48.680 --> 0:39:50.640
<v Speaker 2>you need to come to the club after school. Maybe

0:39:50.640 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 2>you need to form a gay straight alliance and get

0:39:53.120 --> 0:39:56.239
<v Speaker 2>to form what they call in the literature relationship allyship,

0:39:56.600 --> 0:40:00.160
<v Speaker 2>maybe you need to dip your toes in yourself to

0:40:00.160 --> 0:40:02.799
<v Speaker 2>ask yourself the questions. But you also need to criticize

0:40:02.800 --> 0:40:05.840
<v Speaker 2>your own transphobia, find out what's stopping you, et cetera.

0:40:06.120 --> 0:40:08.680
<v Speaker 2>And if that's your family's, you've got to criticize your

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:10.799
<v Speaker 2>family too. And then what MoU says is on the

0:40:10.800 --> 0:40:12.719
<v Speaker 2>other side of his formula is you have what he

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:15.120
<v Speaker 2>says unity on a new basis according to a new

0:40:15.160 --> 0:40:18.440
<v Speaker 2>standard that he called for him socialist discipline. But we

0:40:18.520 --> 0:40:24.440
<v Speaker 2>call a inclusive environment or inclusive school or inclusive society.

0:40:24.880 --> 0:40:28.560
<v Speaker 2>So we're going to have a new basis on sustainability

0:40:28.560 --> 0:40:30.719
<v Speaker 2>and inclusion to be more kind of complete to the

0:40:30.760 --> 0:40:34.799
<v Speaker 2>whole program. And it's the exact same model though, and

0:40:34.920 --> 0:40:37.760
<v Speaker 2>trans as any of the actually gender and sex stuff

0:40:37.800 --> 0:40:41.799
<v Speaker 2>is a very profound and powerful way to create very

0:40:41.880 --> 0:40:45.120
<v Speaker 2>dramatic wedges between children and their parents, and they have

0:40:45.200 --> 0:40:47.279
<v Speaker 2>to because the goal is to bring you into a

0:40:47.280 --> 0:40:51.520
<v Speaker 2>political activism cult that's meant to overthrow society, and the

0:40:51.600 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 2>family is literally standing in the way of that.

0:40:54.120 --> 0:40:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, what worries me as well is this all seems

0:40:56.760 --> 0:41:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to be coming at a time when critical thinking seems

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:02.760
<v Speaker 1>to be on the decline as well, whether it be

0:41:02.760 --> 0:41:05.520
<v Speaker 1>because of the access and the ease of information with

0:41:05.680 --> 0:41:10.040
<v Speaker 1>everything being accessible online, or just lack of educations today's schools.

0:41:10.239 --> 0:41:13.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, there does seem to be a decline of

0:41:13.160 --> 0:41:14.959
<v Speaker 1>just critical thinkers in America.

0:41:15.080 --> 0:41:17.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think that there's a war against critical thinking,

0:41:17.280 --> 0:41:19.560
<v Speaker 2>and I think that we can actually trace that. We

0:41:19.560 --> 0:41:22.640
<v Speaker 2>can see it in the literature. Our education system uses

0:41:22.680 --> 0:41:25.080
<v Speaker 2>that phrase critical thinking a lot, but they're using it

0:41:25.120 --> 0:41:29.160
<v Speaker 2>in a quite disingenuous way because what they're doing is

0:41:29.200 --> 0:41:32.520
<v Speaker 2>they're conflating the idea of critical thinking with the idea

0:41:32.520 --> 0:41:35.759
<v Speaker 2>of critical theory through the word critical, which they are

0:41:35.840 --> 0:41:37.719
<v Speaker 2>using in two ways at once. So they can pull

0:41:37.719 --> 0:41:41.600
<v Speaker 2>this trick. They'll often say that we have to, you know,

0:41:41.760 --> 0:41:46.160
<v Speaker 2>enhance thinking critically or critical thought, but what they actually

0:41:46.200 --> 0:41:48.960
<v Speaker 2>mean is criticism. And there's a paper that's really actually

0:41:49.040 --> 0:41:52.080
<v Speaker 2>explicit about this that was published by a fairly influential

0:41:52.200 --> 0:41:57.480
<v Speaker 2>education theorist and whiteness scholar by the name of what

0:41:57.560 --> 0:41:59.960
<v Speaker 2>was her name, Alison Bailey. She published it in Hypatia

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:03.959
<v Speaker 2>in two thousand and seventeen or eighteen seventeen. I think

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:06.759
<v Speaker 2>it's The paper is about a concept she invented called

0:42:06.760 --> 0:42:09.880
<v Speaker 2>privilege preserving epistemic pushback, which is a lot of words

0:42:09.880 --> 0:42:11.600
<v Speaker 2>that makes it really easy to find. If you want

0:42:11.600 --> 0:42:13.600
<v Speaker 2>to go find this article yourself, you can type in

0:42:13.640 --> 0:42:17.400
<v Speaker 2>privilege preserving epistemic pushback Bailey and you'll find it. So

0:42:17.480 --> 0:42:19.719
<v Speaker 2>Alison Bailey writes this paper, but she has this couple

0:42:19.760 --> 0:42:23.480
<v Speaker 2>of paragraphs and she says explicitly in them that critical

0:42:23.520 --> 0:42:26.880
<v Speaker 2>theory and critical thinking are not the same thing. And

0:42:26.920 --> 0:42:30.440
<v Speaker 2>she says it explicitly in the context of education that

0:42:30.640 --> 0:42:34.319
<v Speaker 2>critical education or critical pedagogy as she calls it, is

0:42:34.760 --> 0:42:38.080
<v Speaker 2>not the same thing as critical thinking. And she says,

0:42:38.160 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 2>here's what critical thinking is. It's about caring about things

0:42:41.239 --> 0:42:44.200
<v Speaker 2>like she's a philosopher, so the vocabulary is challenging, but

0:42:44.239 --> 0:42:47.960
<v Speaker 2>she says, it's caring about things like epistemic adequacy, knowing

0:42:48.000 --> 0:42:50.360
<v Speaker 2>what you know and how you know it. It's about

0:42:50.760 --> 0:42:53.960
<v Speaker 2>soundness and validity of arguments. It's about weighing the evidence.

0:42:54.040 --> 0:42:58.000
<v Speaker 2>It's about stepping back and you know, analyzing things objectively.

0:42:58.040 --> 0:43:01.400
<v Speaker 2>And she says the critical theory or critical pedagogy the

0:43:01.400 --> 0:43:04.800
<v Speaker 2>approach to education that is overwhelmingly dominant in our country

0:43:04.800 --> 0:43:06.799
<v Speaker 2>and has been now at least since the nineties, by

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:09.040
<v Speaker 2>the way, so this is why the kids are not

0:43:09.080 --> 0:43:11.600
<v Speaker 2>so good at critical thinking. That they're not doing critical

0:43:11.600 --> 0:43:14.960
<v Speaker 2>thinking or training critical thinking, they're learning critical theory. And

0:43:15.000 --> 0:43:17.320
<v Speaker 2>she says that has a completely different set of assumptions.

0:43:17.360 --> 0:43:20.560
<v Speaker 2>It's based in what she says. She explicitly says the

0:43:20.680 --> 0:43:25.160
<v Speaker 2>neo Marxist Frankfurt school approach, and it is explicitly neo Marxist,

0:43:25.239 --> 0:43:28.120
<v Speaker 2>and it doesn't teach you to try to understand in

0:43:28.200 --> 0:43:30.440
<v Speaker 2>what we normally think of as a critical thinking way.

0:43:30.840 --> 0:43:33.399
<v Speaker 2>It teaches you instead to analyze power structures and how

0:43:33.400 --> 0:43:37.200
<v Speaker 2>power structures are used to maintain people's power, privilege, and

0:43:37.239 --> 0:43:41.720
<v Speaker 2>advantage unfairly and unjustly, thus to create and perpetuate injustices.

0:43:41.960 --> 0:43:44.839
<v Speaker 2>She says that explicitly, and that what she's arguing for

0:43:44.960 --> 0:43:48.840
<v Speaker 2>is a shift away in education from the idea of

0:43:48.920 --> 0:43:53.400
<v Speaker 2>critical thinking evidence, you know, soundness and validity of arguments,

0:43:53.840 --> 0:43:58.680
<v Speaker 2>logical reasoning, and toward critical theory, which is analysis of

0:43:58.719 --> 0:44:01.880
<v Speaker 2>power and how it generates and maintains social advantages that

0:44:01.920 --> 0:44:04.880
<v Speaker 2>are unjust. And she says that she had one of

0:44:04.920 --> 0:44:07.680
<v Speaker 2>the reasons that the shift is necessary, is it critical

0:44:07.719 --> 0:44:11.799
<v Speaker 2>thinking itself is invoked in order to maintain power. In

0:44:11.840 --> 0:44:14.680
<v Speaker 2>other words, she's doing a critical theory analysis of critical

0:44:14.680 --> 0:44:17.600
<v Speaker 2>thinking and says that if we teach kids critical thinking,

0:44:17.840 --> 0:44:20.040
<v Speaker 2>what they're going to do. This is why it's called

0:44:20.080 --> 0:44:23.080
<v Speaker 2>privilege preserving epistemic pushback is when you say something to

0:44:23.120 --> 0:44:26.239
<v Speaker 2>them about racism or transphobia or whatever else, they'll use

0:44:26.280 --> 0:44:29.680
<v Speaker 2>critical thinking and say, maybe that's not logical. And what

0:44:29.719 --> 0:44:32.759
<v Speaker 2>they're actually doing, in her kind of demented worldview, is

0:44:32.800 --> 0:44:36.040
<v Speaker 2>defending what she calls their epistemic home turf. They don't

0:44:36.080 --> 0:44:38.359
<v Speaker 2>want to let go of their power. They aren't saying

0:44:38.400 --> 0:44:40.719
<v Speaker 2>it's not logical because it's really not logical. They're saying

0:44:40.760 --> 0:44:43.920
<v Speaker 2>it's not logical because they want to stay transphobic and racist.

0:44:44.280 --> 0:44:47.320
<v Speaker 2>And that's actually what she says explicitly in that paper.

0:44:47.400 --> 0:44:49.640
<v Speaker 2>So if we take that for granted, and we take

0:44:49.840 --> 0:44:54.600
<v Speaker 2>another Marxist education theorist, Isaac Gotdisman from Iowa State University

0:44:54.640 --> 0:44:57.480
<v Speaker 2>at his word. He says that by nineteen ninety two

0:44:57.640 --> 0:45:02.200
<v Speaker 2>our colleges of education were completely connected to and promoting

0:45:02.360 --> 0:45:06.720
<v Speaker 2>critical pedagogy, then we can see exactly why critical thinking

0:45:06.719 --> 0:45:09.040
<v Speaker 2>has been on the decline. Where they tell us. We

0:45:09.080 --> 0:45:12.680
<v Speaker 2>have whitewashed education because they want to teach CRT to

0:45:12.719 --> 0:45:15.800
<v Speaker 2>fix that allegedly. The fact is we have red washed education.

0:45:15.920 --> 0:45:20.719
<v Speaker 2>We have education that's been washed over in communist revisionism,

0:45:20.920 --> 0:45:24.040
<v Speaker 2>leaving out the history of communism and its atrocities, leaving

0:45:24.040 --> 0:45:26.359
<v Speaker 2>out what communism is and why it's a problem, and

0:45:26.440 --> 0:45:30.920
<v Speaker 2>also teaching critical theory in place of critical thinking, so

0:45:30.960 --> 0:45:34.560
<v Speaker 2>that critical thinking can't be used to stop the critical theory,

0:45:35.120 --> 0:45:39.640
<v Speaker 2>which again Bailey made that explicit in this paper about education,

0:45:39.760 --> 0:45:44.359
<v Speaker 2>written and publishing a high ranking feminist philosophy journal just

0:45:44.400 --> 0:45:45.399
<v Speaker 2>five six years ago.

0:45:45.880 --> 0:45:52.239
<v Speaker 1>Quick commercial break more with James Lindsay. James, how do

0:45:52.280 --> 0:45:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you define woke?

0:45:53.640 --> 0:45:57.680
<v Speaker 2>Having critical consciousness? So woke, obviously is a slaying term

0:45:57.680 --> 0:46:00.840
<v Speaker 2>that means woke up right or awake? And what are

0:46:00.880 --> 0:46:03.200
<v Speaker 2>you awake to a different consciousness of the world. So,

0:46:03.239 --> 0:46:06.279
<v Speaker 2>when you are unconscious and asleep, you're unconscious. When you

0:46:06.320 --> 0:46:09.279
<v Speaker 2>are awake, you are conscious. You have consciousness or your

0:46:09.280 --> 0:46:11.799
<v Speaker 2>consciousness has awakened, and so it refers to having what

0:46:11.800 --> 0:46:15.040
<v Speaker 2>they call critical consciousness. Well, this thing I just discussed,

0:46:15.040 --> 0:46:19.600
<v Speaker 2>called critical pedagogy, is defined specifically as education designed to

0:46:19.719 --> 0:46:23.759
<v Speaker 2>raise critical consciousness. It was created original. The term originates

0:46:24.480 --> 0:46:26.880
<v Speaker 2>for the most part with an educator from Brazil who

0:46:26.960 --> 0:46:29.440
<v Speaker 2>was a Marxist by the name of Palo Ferrari, and

0:46:29.480 --> 0:46:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Poalo Ferrari wrote a book called Pedagogy of the Oppressed,

0:46:32.120 --> 0:46:35.640
<v Speaker 2>And when I cited Goddessman a moment ago, it's specifically

0:46:35.680 --> 0:46:38.200
<v Speaker 2>Palo Ferrari's Pedagogy of the Oppressed that he said, by

0:46:38.239 --> 0:46:42.200
<v Speaker 2>nineteen ninety two had achieved its current place and status,

0:46:42.200 --> 0:46:44.080
<v Speaker 2>which is to say that it is in pride of

0:46:44.120 --> 0:46:48.880
<v Speaker 2>place everywhere. And so that's where that actual date and

0:46:49.000 --> 0:46:52.840
<v Speaker 2>remark came from. Is that the idea of using education

0:46:53.120 --> 0:46:57.279
<v Speaker 2>to do critical consciousness raising in that critical consciousness is

0:46:57.320 --> 0:46:59.799
<v Speaker 2>itself being woke. So, in other words, or education has

0:46:59.800 --> 0:47:03.000
<v Speaker 2>been retooled to be woke, has been firmly established in

0:47:03.000 --> 0:47:07.000
<v Speaker 2>college colleges of education since nineteen ninety two, is historically grounded.

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:10.760
<v Speaker 2>What it actually means, according to Ferrari, to be critically conscious,

0:47:10.800 --> 0:47:14.239
<v Speaker 2>in other words, to be woke, is that you understand

0:47:14.280 --> 0:47:17.680
<v Speaker 2>that the very terms of society are in fact corrupted

0:47:17.719 --> 0:47:20.640
<v Speaker 2>with the power dynamics of society. And so what you

0:47:20.719 --> 0:47:23.240
<v Speaker 2>have to do is learn to understand that every context

0:47:23.239 --> 0:47:28.000
<v Speaker 2>that you're in contains the various dehumanizing forms and what

0:47:28.040 --> 0:47:31.400
<v Speaker 2>he calls domesticating modes of being and learning, and they

0:47:31.440 --> 0:47:34.799
<v Speaker 2>have to be called out or denounced, as he puts it.

0:47:35.680 --> 0:47:39.000
<v Speaker 2>This is where this is parallel to where Mouse said

0:47:39.000 --> 0:47:40.719
<v Speaker 2>that the young people had to be awakened to a

0:47:40.760 --> 0:47:45.160
<v Speaker 2>socialist consciousness and destroy the four olds of society, which

0:47:45.239 --> 0:47:47.839
<v Speaker 2>is what they went around doing. So what it would

0:47:47.880 --> 0:47:50.920
<v Speaker 2>be is that racism's contained in everything, and it's your

0:47:51.000 --> 0:47:52.799
<v Speaker 2>job to learn to be able to see that and

0:47:52.920 --> 0:47:55.560
<v Speaker 2>call it out. Transphobia is contained in everything, and it's

0:47:55.560 --> 0:47:57.080
<v Speaker 2>your job to learn to be able to see where

0:47:57.120 --> 0:47:59.440
<v Speaker 2>it's hidden and call it out. And that's why we

0:47:59.480 --> 0:48:03.880
<v Speaker 2>see so many young people, especially in Brooklyn journalist jobs,

0:48:04.400 --> 0:48:09.040
<v Speaker 2>writing why air is racist, why trains are somehow transphobic,

0:48:09.360 --> 0:48:12.480
<v Speaker 2>why going outside is racist. It's because they've been trained

0:48:12.520 --> 0:48:16.120
<v Speaker 2>to have critical consciousness. And critical consciousness means believing that

0:48:16.160 --> 0:48:18.799
<v Speaker 2>the world is organized in this way. And whether we

0:48:19.600 --> 0:48:24.080
<v Speaker 2>pin that on Frairi, who is I think the progenitor

0:48:24.120 --> 0:48:27.040
<v Speaker 2>of the concept of certainly the first really big promoter

0:48:27.120 --> 0:48:30.120
<v Speaker 2>of the concept of critical consciousness and the idea that

0:48:30.280 --> 0:48:32.200
<v Speaker 2>education is geared for it, or we give it to

0:48:32.239 --> 0:48:35.360
<v Speaker 2>Max Horkheimer, who created critical theory. He said he created

0:48:35.360 --> 0:48:40.879
<v Speaker 2>the critical theory specifically because, in his view, the very

0:48:41.120 --> 0:48:45.040
<v Speaker 2>terms that society has written on in every sense, social, legal, etc.

0:48:45.760 --> 0:48:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Are corrupted by the systems of power, and therefore an

0:48:49.239 --> 0:48:52.280
<v Speaker 2>ideal society, he said, cannot be expressed on the terms

0:48:52.280 --> 0:48:56.239
<v Speaker 2>of the existing society. All we can do is identify

0:48:56.360 --> 0:49:01.600
<v Speaker 2>the problems in the existing society and denounce them. That's

0:49:01.840 --> 0:49:06.120
<v Speaker 2>what being woke is about, is thinking that there's a

0:49:06.360 --> 0:49:08.680
<v Speaker 2>the whole of society is corrupted by all of these

0:49:08.680 --> 0:49:11.239
<v Speaker 2>systemic evils, and that you can be trained to see

0:49:11.239 --> 0:49:15.280
<v Speaker 2>them and call them out. Marcusa another Herbert Marcusa, another

0:49:15.440 --> 0:49:18.760
<v Speaker 2>critical theorist from the mid part of the last century,

0:49:19.120 --> 0:49:23.160
<v Speaker 2>said very explicitly that the ideal society is contained within

0:49:23.880 --> 0:49:26.239
<v Speaker 2>the existing society. So if you can criticize all of

0:49:26.280 --> 0:49:29.600
<v Speaker 2>the excess off the outside, all the racism, transphobia, et cetera,

0:49:30.320 --> 0:49:34.239
<v Speaker 2>then the ideal society can emerge and blossom and fill in.

0:49:34.360 --> 0:49:37.040
<v Speaker 2>It's in there, but we've got to carve the racism off, etc.

0:49:37.520 --> 0:49:40.000
<v Speaker 2>It's almost like a sculptor, right, you have a statue

0:49:40.160 --> 0:49:42.680
<v Speaker 2>and starts as a block of marble. You want to

0:49:42.680 --> 0:49:46.520
<v Speaker 2>make it into a lion or something. So you get

0:49:46.520 --> 0:49:48.640
<v Speaker 2>a chisel and a hammer and you chip chip, chip, chip,

0:49:48.680 --> 0:49:50.719
<v Speaker 2>chip away, and it starts to look more and more

0:49:50.760 --> 0:49:52.840
<v Speaker 2>like a lion. And the sculptor says, well, I didn't

0:49:52.880 --> 0:49:55.239
<v Speaker 2>carve the lion. The lion was in there, and I

0:49:55.320 --> 0:49:57.399
<v Speaker 2>removed all the excess. They think that all these bad

0:49:57.400 --> 0:50:00.160
<v Speaker 2>things like racism and sexism and so on are the excess,

0:50:00.320 --> 0:50:02.480
<v Speaker 2>and if they can just carve those away, the perfect

0:50:02.520 --> 0:50:05.640
<v Speaker 2>society will be in the middle the lion. But in

0:50:05.680 --> 0:50:08.840
<v Speaker 2>their mythology, it's actually the myth of Pygmalion. If you

0:50:08.880 --> 0:50:12.040
<v Speaker 2>go back to the Greeks, the statue, when made perfect,

0:50:12.080 --> 0:50:15.440
<v Speaker 2>the existing society will come alive and the gods will

0:50:15.440 --> 0:50:17.680
<v Speaker 2>grant it life and it will live its own life. This,

0:50:17.719 --> 0:50:20.919
<v Speaker 2>of course, is fiction. So what happens is they think

0:50:20.920 --> 0:50:22.799
<v Speaker 2>that they must not have got the statue perfect, and

0:50:22.840 --> 0:50:25.120
<v Speaker 2>they carve off more things, and they carve off more

0:50:25.160 --> 0:50:28.920
<v Speaker 2>things until there's nothing left. And that's why it's inherently destructive,

0:50:29.000 --> 0:50:30.920
<v Speaker 2>because the statue is never going to come to life.

0:50:31.040 --> 0:50:34.319
<v Speaker 2>But I've digressed quite a bit, but that's what woke means.

0:50:34.360 --> 0:50:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Woke means believing all that woke means believing that we

0:50:38.680 --> 0:50:41.640
<v Speaker 2>could have a perfect society if we just carved off

0:50:41.719 --> 0:50:45.759
<v Speaker 2>everything that is a problematic racism, sexism, and so on,

0:50:45.800 --> 0:50:48.399
<v Speaker 2>by learning to see it in everything and calling out

0:50:48.440 --> 0:50:51.919
<v Speaker 2>how it manifests, and handing over power to the people

0:50:51.960 --> 0:50:56.279
<v Speaker 2>who understand that, allegedly, because otherwise we'll just repeat the

0:50:56.320 --> 0:50:57.080
<v Speaker 2>same patterns.

0:50:57.239 --> 0:50:59.879
<v Speaker 1>But some people don't want to fight the culture war.

0:51:00.160 --> 0:51:03.880
<v Speaker 1>What's at steak everything? I mean, I really encourage people.

0:51:04.120 --> 0:51:08.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, people have seen. People have seen a lot

0:51:08.080 --> 0:51:10.160
<v Speaker 1>of either books or films.

0:51:09.719 --> 0:51:13.200
<v Speaker 2>About when the Nazis took over. This is a familiar phenomenon.

0:51:13.400 --> 0:51:15.920
<v Speaker 2>We know a lot less in the West in general

0:51:15.960 --> 0:51:18.000
<v Speaker 2>about what it was like after, say the Bolsheviks took

0:51:18.040 --> 0:51:21.160
<v Speaker 2>over in Russia, or Mao took over in China, or

0:51:21.160 --> 0:51:24.680
<v Speaker 2>Polepot took over in Cambodia. Although we know more about

0:51:24.680 --> 0:51:26.839
<v Speaker 2>that because of the movie The Killing Fields did get

0:51:26.840 --> 0:51:30.840
<v Speaker 2>some play. I actually ask audiences a lot in my

0:51:30.960 --> 0:51:33.279
<v Speaker 2>public talks, who's heard of this? Who's heard of that?

0:51:33.320 --> 0:51:36.360
<v Speaker 2>Who's heard of the Holidamore in Ukraine? Very few people

0:51:36.520 --> 0:51:38.960
<v Speaker 2>who've heard of you know, various Soviet things. Very few

0:51:39.000 --> 0:51:41.479
<v Speaker 2>people who's heard of you know, the Great Leap Forward.

0:51:41.600 --> 0:51:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Very few people who has heard of the Killing Fields,

0:51:44.160 --> 0:51:46.160
<v Speaker 2>usually about half the audience, And I think that's because

0:51:46.160 --> 0:51:48.120
<v Speaker 2>there was a film, But we don't hear a lot,

0:51:48.160 --> 0:51:49.719
<v Speaker 2>We don't learn a lot about that. But what people

0:51:49.760 --> 0:51:53.640
<v Speaker 2>need to understand is that we are in that same story. Now,

0:51:54.200 --> 0:51:58.520
<v Speaker 2>we are under a cultural revolution, and what is at

0:51:58.520 --> 0:52:03.440
<v Speaker 2>stake is all of your liberty. The other side of this,

0:52:03.640 --> 0:52:06.880
<v Speaker 2>there will be very little liberty. All of your liberty

0:52:06.920 --> 0:52:11.080
<v Speaker 2>will be privileges granted for whatever good behavior or acceptable

0:52:11.120 --> 0:52:14.520
<v Speaker 2>behavior that you've demonstrated. All the freedoms that you've enjoyed

0:52:14.800 --> 0:52:17.080
<v Speaker 2>so far in your life are going to be taken

0:52:17.120 --> 0:52:19.080
<v Speaker 2>away from us. And we're going to live under a

0:52:19.120 --> 0:52:22.719
<v Speaker 2>totalitarian state that has absolutely no concern for us, like

0:52:22.719 --> 0:52:25.440
<v Speaker 2>we already talked about, and that may active actively hate us.

0:52:25.760 --> 0:52:28.200
<v Speaker 2>And so if you don't want to get involved, I understand.

0:52:28.200 --> 0:52:30.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't particularly like being involved myself. People ask me

0:52:30.840 --> 0:52:33.120
<v Speaker 2>how I got started. I say, I fell backwards into it.

0:52:33.719 --> 0:52:35.400
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's the story for a lot of people.

0:52:35.760 --> 0:52:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Other people they see what's going on and they say,

0:52:37.760 --> 0:52:40.279
<v Speaker 2>enough is enough. My friend Chris Elston, it goes by

0:52:40.320 --> 0:52:43.359
<v Speaker 2>Billboard Chris has that story. He said he heard about

0:52:43.360 --> 0:52:45.480
<v Speaker 2>puberty blockers. He had two young girls. He said, what

0:52:45.480 --> 0:52:47.880
<v Speaker 2>are puberty blockers? He said, he went to the internet

0:52:47.920 --> 0:52:49.680
<v Speaker 2>and he looked them up. Turns out there exactly what

0:52:49.719 --> 0:52:52.360
<v Speaker 2>they sound like. They are. They block your puberty causes

0:52:52.400 --> 0:52:54.440
<v Speaker 2>all these health problems. And he was like, not my girls,

0:52:54.560 --> 0:52:56.480
<v Speaker 2>not in this lifetime. This is child abuse. And he

0:52:56.560 --> 0:52:58.360
<v Speaker 2>started to stand up and do something about it. But

0:52:58.440 --> 0:53:02.399
<v Speaker 2>what's at stake is if you want I don't want

0:53:02.400 --> 0:53:03.960
<v Speaker 2>to go full or well and say, if you want

0:53:03.960 --> 0:53:06.920
<v Speaker 2>a vision to the future, imagine bootstamping on a human

0:53:06.960 --> 0:53:09.319
<v Speaker 2>face forever. I want to say, if you want a

0:53:09.400 --> 0:53:11.759
<v Speaker 2>vision of the near term future, you need to look

0:53:11.840 --> 0:53:15.000
<v Speaker 2>at what's going on in China with its social control mechanisms.

0:53:15.239 --> 0:53:17.440
<v Speaker 2>And if you don't want to live in that world,

0:53:17.600 --> 0:53:20.520
<v Speaker 2>you'd probably better start speaking up. If you think it's

0:53:20.520 --> 0:53:23.480
<v Speaker 2>going to blow over, it's not. They've invested probably a

0:53:23.560 --> 0:53:26.000
<v Speaker 2>trillion dollars or more into this project. They're not just

0:53:26.080 --> 0:53:29.040
<v Speaker 2>going to give it away, and the big entities playing

0:53:29.080 --> 0:53:31.880
<v Speaker 2>in it have trillions to win if it goes the

0:53:31.880 --> 0:53:34.160
<v Speaker 2>way they want it to. They're not going to stop.

0:53:34.320 --> 0:53:36.480
<v Speaker 2>They are all in at this point. So if you

0:53:36.520 --> 0:53:40.560
<v Speaker 2>don't want to get involved, I understand, But unfortunately, if

0:53:40.600 --> 0:53:42.680
<v Speaker 2>we want to be a little poetic about it in

0:53:42.680 --> 0:53:45.280
<v Speaker 2>a way that I think is dangerous. History has visited

0:53:45.280 --> 0:53:49.160
<v Speaker 2>this moment upon us and it wasn't ours to choose.

0:53:49.200 --> 0:53:51.359
<v Speaker 2>But we have to take responsibility for where we are.

0:53:52.239 --> 0:53:56.160
<v Speaker 2>This is a bid to transform the world into a

0:53:56.200 --> 0:54:00.680
<v Speaker 2>global tyranny, and there's no reason to mince words around anymore.

0:54:01.160 --> 0:54:03.920
<v Speaker 2>And if we don't speak up and do something about it.

0:54:03.960 --> 0:54:07.600
<v Speaker 2>I encourage people to look at countries that are further

0:54:07.680 --> 0:54:10.440
<v Speaker 2>along the path than we are. South Africa as an example,

0:54:10.480 --> 0:54:13.160
<v Speaker 2>it's further along the path than we are. Especially with

0:54:13.200 --> 0:54:16.799
<v Speaker 2>the critical race theory direction, China is the kind of

0:54:17.280 --> 0:54:20.200
<v Speaker 2>model for what the first round of social control is

0:54:20.200 --> 0:54:22.880
<v Speaker 2>supposed to look like. Whether that's through a vaccine passport

0:54:22.960 --> 0:54:26.240
<v Speaker 2>they didn't succeed in getting, whether it's creating digital ideas

0:54:26.239 --> 0:54:29.520
<v Speaker 2>and currencies with a Everify or whatever else they're fooling with. Now,

0:54:32.560 --> 0:54:35.400
<v Speaker 2>this is our future, and if you want your to

0:54:35.440 --> 0:54:37.520
<v Speaker 2>have your freedoms, and you want your children and their

0:54:37.600 --> 0:54:41.840
<v Speaker 2>children to have their freedoms, you had better start saying something,

0:54:42.239 --> 0:54:46.359
<v Speaker 2>doing something, and doing something prudent and judicious about this

0:54:46.400 --> 0:54:49.680
<v Speaker 2>something informed, starting to work together with other people who

0:54:49.760 --> 0:54:52.160
<v Speaker 2>are are kind of you know, getting their feet under them,

0:54:52.239 --> 0:54:55.880
<v Speaker 2>and doing a lot of things locally and primarily just

0:54:55.920 --> 0:54:58.800
<v Speaker 2>as long as I'm saying things people should do, bonding

0:54:58.840 --> 0:55:01.360
<v Speaker 2>with your own children and to protect them from the

0:55:01.400 --> 0:55:03.320
<v Speaker 2>fact that the state is trying to break that bond.

0:55:03.400 --> 0:55:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I've interviewed a lot of people for my podcast. This

0:55:06.680 --> 0:55:09.960
<v Speaker 1>is one of the most interesting conversations I've had to date,

0:55:10.120 --> 0:55:13.799
<v Speaker 1>So I truly appreciate your time and your voice and

0:55:13.920 --> 0:55:17.080
<v Speaker 1>what is the most important fight that we're facing, both

0:55:17.080 --> 0:55:19.680
<v Speaker 1>in America and just society worldwide.

0:55:19.800 --> 0:55:21.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, I really appreciate that.

0:55:21.080 --> 0:55:22.680
<v Speaker 1>That's very kind of you to say, thank you so

0:55:22.760 --> 0:55:24.839
<v Speaker 1>much for taking the time. I really appreciate it.

0:55:24.960 --> 0:55:26.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, I hope to talk again soon.

0:55:31.800 --> 0:55:34.960
<v Speaker 1>That was James Lindsey. You know, look, I've interviewed a

0:55:35.000 --> 0:55:37.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of people on this podcast, and I found that

0:55:37.719 --> 0:55:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to be one of the more interesting conversations I've had

0:55:40.600 --> 0:55:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to date. I hope you feel the same. I appreciate

0:55:43.480 --> 0:55:45.600
<v Speaker 1>you guys listening to the show every Monday and Thursday,

0:55:45.640 --> 0:55:47.880
<v Speaker 1>but you can listen throughout the week. Give us a review,

0:55:47.920 --> 0:55:50.399
<v Speaker 1>Give us a rating. On Apple Podcast love looking at

0:55:50.400 --> 0:55:52.719
<v Speaker 1>those What do you think? John Cassio, my producer, for

0:55:52.760 --> 0:55:54.719
<v Speaker 1>putting the show together. Until next time

0:56:00.040 --> 0:56:00.080
<v Speaker 2>You