1 00:00:00,200 --> 00:00:03,000 Speaker 1: All right, second hour, clay An Buck kicks off, and 2 00:00:03,400 --> 00:00:06,240 Speaker 1: this is a story that you might not have heard 3 00:00:06,280 --> 00:00:08,800 Speaker 1: much about. We'll give you the details and the backstory 4 00:00:08,840 --> 00:00:12,400 Speaker 1: on it so we can dive into why it is meaningful. Flags. 5 00:00:13,440 --> 00:00:16,240 Speaker 1: A lot of focus on them from the New York Times. 6 00:00:16,400 --> 00:00:19,799 Speaker 1: Why Who's flags? Oh, Supreme Court. 7 00:00:19,800 --> 00:00:26,640 Speaker 2: Justice Elito and flags that have flown years ago at 8 00:00:26,680 --> 00:00:31,360 Speaker 2: two of his different residences, one in Alexandria, Virginia, which, 9 00:00:31,400 --> 00:00:33,360 Speaker 2: of course, as we know, has also been the site 10 00:00:33,479 --> 00:00:39,000 Speaker 2: of lunatic left wing protesters intimidating a member of the 11 00:00:39,040 --> 00:00:43,200 Speaker 2: federal judiciary, which is a federal crime, not enforced, of course, 12 00:00:43,240 --> 00:00:50,839 Speaker 2: by the Biden administration, because intimidating conservative constitutionalists Supreme Court justices. 13 00:00:50,720 --> 00:00:55,160 Speaker 1: Is considered okay by Democrats. The law doesn't really count. 14 00:00:55,200 --> 00:00:57,960 Speaker 1: Remember that, while they're prosecuting Trump in New York City, 15 00:00:58,080 --> 00:01:02,120 Speaker 1: defending Supreme Court justices, even after there was a lunatic 16 00:01:02,160 --> 00:01:04,399 Speaker 1: who showed up who said he wanted to assassinate a 17 00:01:04,640 --> 00:01:08,080 Speaker 1: conservative Supreme Court justice, It's not something that Biden doj 18 00:01:08,400 --> 00:01:11,800 Speaker 1: is really focused on. There's probably an anti abortion protester 19 00:01:12,000 --> 00:01:15,480 Speaker 1: somewhere who said a mean thing to a planned parenthood 20 00:01:15,520 --> 00:01:17,480 Speaker 1: clinic member who needs to be thrown in prison for 21 00:01:17,520 --> 00:01:20,160 Speaker 1: thirty years. You know, there's other things that the DOJ 22 00:01:20,319 --> 00:01:24,080 Speaker 1: focus is on, but let's get into this. Here you go. 23 00:01:24,200 --> 00:01:27,959 Speaker 1: This is the New York Times headline, the Alito's the 24 00:01:28,040 --> 00:01:34,160 Speaker 1: neighborhood clash and the upside down flag inside the escalating 25 00:01:34,240 --> 00:01:38,360 Speaker 1: conflict on a bucolic suburban street that Justice Alito said 26 00:01:38,360 --> 00:01:41,800 Speaker 1: prompted a stop the steel symbol at his home. Now, 27 00:01:41,840 --> 00:01:46,000 Speaker 1: first of all, it is not a stop this steal symbol. 28 00:01:46,600 --> 00:01:49,360 Speaker 1: But they pick and choose the meanings of things. And 29 00:01:49,400 --> 00:01:51,320 Speaker 1: this comes of course from the same Democrats who I 30 00:01:51,360 --> 00:01:55,280 Speaker 1: remember years ago were insistent that the word jihad had 31 00:01:55,280 --> 00:01:58,160 Speaker 1: nothing to do with Holy warm was only about internal struggling. 32 00:01:58,200 --> 00:02:00,840 Speaker 1: Do you remember that claim Gha was just trying to 33 00:02:00,840 --> 00:02:03,080 Speaker 1: be a better person. And all these people running around 34 00:02:03,080 --> 00:02:05,520 Speaker 1: who were yelling about I'm doing jihad and blowing myself 35 00:02:05,600 --> 00:02:09,520 Speaker 1: up and killing all these people, they were just confused 36 00:02:10,280 --> 00:02:12,600 Speaker 1: about the nature of jihad. It really just meant internal 37 00:02:12,639 --> 00:02:15,440 Speaker 1: striving and struggling to be a better person. All these 38 00:02:15,560 --> 00:02:18,840 Speaker 1: Jihada's terrorists were confused, so they pick and choose meaning 39 00:02:18,840 --> 00:02:21,400 Speaker 1: as they see fit for the political purposes of the moment. 40 00:02:21,440 --> 00:02:24,280 Speaker 1: I think that's important the basics of this, because they 41 00:02:24,320 --> 00:02:27,280 Speaker 1: go deep into the story Clay, They're going back into 42 00:02:27,320 --> 00:02:30,960 Speaker 1: phone calls made in twenty twenty one. Here you had 43 00:02:31,040 --> 00:02:36,680 Speaker 1: Alito in Alexandria, his wife Martha, and Alito live next 44 00:02:36,720 --> 00:02:41,679 Speaker 1: to Is this going to surprise anyone? A failed actress 45 00:02:41,720 --> 00:02:44,880 Speaker 1: from New York City with crazy eyes living with her 46 00:02:44,880 --> 00:02:48,640 Speaker 1: boyfriend at her parents' home. Okay, so that is the 47 00:02:48,720 --> 00:02:53,960 Speaker 1: neighbor of Alito's, of the Alitos, and she started putting 48 00:02:54,160 --> 00:02:58,760 Speaker 1: profane signs out, you know, bleep Trump and stuff like that. 49 00:02:59,520 --> 00:03:04,440 Speaker 1: And so in response, the Alitos on January seventeenth of 50 00:03:04,440 --> 00:03:08,160 Speaker 1: twenty twenty one, had an upside down flag outside their home. 51 00:03:08,240 --> 00:03:11,640 Speaker 1: They say it is because they really felt the country 52 00:03:11,760 --> 00:03:15,960 Speaker 1: was in distress. The New York Times is trying to 53 00:03:15,960 --> 00:03:18,920 Speaker 1: make the case that this is somehow tied to stop 54 00:03:19,000 --> 00:03:22,040 Speaker 1: the steel and the insurrection and blah blah, all that 55 00:03:22,880 --> 00:03:25,680 Speaker 1: not content to merely get into this squabble where by 56 00:03:25,720 --> 00:03:29,440 Speaker 1: the way, the crazy eyed failed actress, democrat, Black Lives 57 00:03:29,440 --> 00:03:33,520 Speaker 1: Matter protester, lady white liberal female. So we're all clear, 58 00:03:34,480 --> 00:03:38,080 Speaker 1: the people white leftists, white left wing females who fail 59 00:03:38,120 --> 00:03:41,000 Speaker 1: at their at their chosen path in life, probably doing 60 00:03:41,000 --> 00:03:43,600 Speaker 1: more to destroy America than any other group of human beings, 61 00:03:44,600 --> 00:03:48,440 Speaker 1: just saying, and that includes those who have you know, married, 62 00:03:48,520 --> 00:03:50,960 Speaker 1: married billionaires and gotten divorced and now want to fund 63 00:03:51,000 --> 00:03:53,400 Speaker 1: every terrible left wing calls on the planet because you know, 64 00:03:53,440 --> 00:03:58,600 Speaker 1: they have no purpose otherwise. But this woman called the justices, 65 00:03:59,760 --> 00:04:04,960 Speaker 1: you know, senior citizen wife a word that I obviously 66 00:04:05,040 --> 00:04:08,280 Speaker 1: can't stay on radio. But it's it's even worse than 67 00:04:08,320 --> 00:04:10,800 Speaker 1: the B word. How about that it's the worst one 68 00:04:10,840 --> 00:04:13,160 Speaker 1: than the B word. She admits in the article to 69 00:04:13,320 --> 00:04:15,240 Speaker 1: just calling her neighbor this word because she didn't like 70 00:04:15,320 --> 00:04:18,599 Speaker 1: the flag. So she's a really stable, good person. The 71 00:04:18,640 --> 00:04:20,960 Speaker 1: New York Times then dove in Clay. Sorry, I know 72 00:04:20,960 --> 00:04:23,160 Speaker 1: we're getting deep into the details here, but just whoeveryone 73 00:04:23,240 --> 00:04:29,000 Speaker 1: knows to a appeal to Heaven flag that flew at 74 00:04:29,000 --> 00:04:34,760 Speaker 1: the Alito's New Jersey summer home residents and the appeal 75 00:04:34,800 --> 00:04:37,000 Speaker 1: to Heaven? Where have you seen that before? Well, they 76 00:04:37,040 --> 00:04:38,400 Speaker 1: go into some of the history of this. You can 77 00:04:38,440 --> 00:04:42,720 Speaker 1: find out that it was it was the maritime flag 78 00:04:42,960 --> 00:04:47,680 Speaker 1: of the Massachusetts state after seventeen seventy six, and it 79 00:04:48,040 --> 00:04:52,640 Speaker 1: was used at basically in the American Founding. It appears, 80 00:04:53,200 --> 00:04:55,040 Speaker 1: as I understand to Clay in the trailer for the 81 00:04:55,120 --> 00:04:59,880 Speaker 1: John Adams series on HBO. So it's a little bit 82 00:04:59,880 --> 00:05:02,200 Speaker 1: like like the Gods Didn't flag in that sense, it's 83 00:05:02,240 --> 00:05:06,440 Speaker 1: an Revolutionary era flag that some people still fly because 84 00:05:06,480 --> 00:05:10,440 Speaker 1: of those Revolutionary founding father's spirit. Guess what, Clay, they 85 00:05:10,440 --> 00:05:12,839 Speaker 1: found that Alito had one of those. Now they're running 86 00:05:12,920 --> 00:05:17,640 Speaker 1: pieces like this. The Appeal to Heaven flag evolves from 87 00:05:17,880 --> 00:05:21,000 Speaker 1: revolutionary war symbol to banner of the far right that 88 00:05:21,120 --> 00:05:23,960 Speaker 1: was just published a few days ago. What are they 89 00:05:24,040 --> 00:05:27,039 Speaker 1: trying to do to Alito with these flag deep dives 90 00:05:27,120 --> 00:05:28,360 Speaker 1: is where I want to hand it off to you. 91 00:05:28,520 --> 00:05:29,440 Speaker 1: Something is up here. 92 00:05:30,320 --> 00:05:32,600 Speaker 3: Let me also mention that the Alitos have a lot 93 00:05:32,600 --> 00:05:34,880 Speaker 3: of flags. The one that I was most offended by 94 00:05:35,160 --> 00:05:38,640 Speaker 3: was the Philadelphia Phillies flag. I would have expected better 95 00:05:38,880 --> 00:05:42,000 Speaker 3: of justice Alito than to be a Phillies fan. I'm 96 00:05:42,040 --> 00:05:45,960 Speaker 3: saying that as a Braves fan, but it is worth 97 00:05:46,040 --> 00:05:48,479 Speaker 3: mentioning that they have a bunch of flags. Based on 98 00:05:48,520 --> 00:05:50,960 Speaker 3: the photos that I have seen, this is not a 99 00:05:51,000 --> 00:05:54,800 Speaker 3: one off thing, including a Phillies flag that they fly. 100 00:05:54,960 --> 00:05:56,000 Speaker 1: So they're sports. 101 00:05:55,680 --> 00:06:00,840 Speaker 3: Fans, So I am of the belief. I was talking 102 00:06:00,880 --> 00:06:02,719 Speaker 3: about this with U off air. We were texting about 103 00:06:02,760 --> 00:06:06,760 Speaker 3: it last night. These flags flew in twenty twenty one, 104 00:06:06,880 --> 00:06:10,120 Speaker 3: and I think this is really important. The Washington Post 105 00:06:10,200 --> 00:06:14,960 Speaker 3: Supreme Court reporter got tipped off about this in twenty 106 00:06:15,000 --> 00:06:19,240 Speaker 3: twenty one, went to the residence, interviewed the Alitos at 107 00:06:19,279 --> 00:06:23,520 Speaker 3: that time, and The Washington Post decided in twenty twenty 108 00:06:23,560 --> 00:06:27,400 Speaker 3: one that this was not a story worthy of writing. 109 00:06:28,120 --> 00:06:31,880 Speaker 3: The New York Times then says that they became tipped 110 00:06:31,920 --> 00:06:34,440 Speaker 3: off to it years later, and they've put it on 111 00:06:34,600 --> 00:06:39,159 Speaker 3: the front page of their newspaper multiple days. Why Why 112 00:06:39,200 --> 00:06:43,280 Speaker 3: did they suddenly resurrect a story, Buck, I think it's 113 00:06:43,320 --> 00:06:46,360 Speaker 3: fair to say that the Washington Post is no great 114 00:06:46,440 --> 00:06:50,640 Speaker 3: fan of Justice Alito or any Trump Supreme Court appointee. 115 00:06:51,360 --> 00:06:55,120 Speaker 3: Why did they resurrect this story from twenty twenty one 116 00:06:55,720 --> 00:06:59,200 Speaker 3: and suddenly decide to run it in the late spring 117 00:06:59,400 --> 00:07:04,000 Speaker 3: early ish of twenty twenty four, And why would they 118 00:07:04,080 --> 00:07:08,440 Speaker 3: try to turn this into a multi week story. To me, 119 00:07:08,960 --> 00:07:12,840 Speaker 3: and this is my theory, I think they know that 120 00:07:12,920 --> 00:07:16,640 Speaker 3: the Trump Immunity ruling is going to come down in 121 00:07:16,720 --> 00:07:19,880 Speaker 3: Trump's favor. I think they believe it's going to be 122 00:07:19,960 --> 00:07:25,440 Speaker 3: five to four, and they want Alito knocked out of 123 00:07:25,480 --> 00:07:29,520 Speaker 3: being able to have a vote in this case, which 124 00:07:29,560 --> 00:07:33,400 Speaker 3: would then put it four four and would not allow 125 00:07:33,520 --> 00:07:37,480 Speaker 3: there to be a change of the decision that was 126 00:07:37,560 --> 00:07:40,320 Speaker 3: made from the Circuit Court. Now, people out there can 127 00:07:40,360 --> 00:07:43,000 Speaker 3: call and you can react to this. Certainly, they have 128 00:07:43,080 --> 00:07:46,400 Speaker 3: been attacking the Supreme Court Justice Thomas amy Cony Barrett. 129 00:07:46,440 --> 00:07:49,360 Speaker 3: The Rolling Stone has a story up today where shutterer 130 00:07:50,280 --> 00:07:53,640 Speaker 3: amy Cony Barrett. Her husband is one of the lawyers 131 00:07:53,680 --> 00:07:58,160 Speaker 3: who is representing Fox and suddenly meaning the larger Fox 132 00:07:58,240 --> 00:08:03,520 Speaker 3: corporation information claims that they still have outstanding. Her husband 133 00:08:03,640 --> 00:08:05,640 Speaker 3: is a highly trained attorney. I don't know why this 134 00:08:05,680 --> 00:08:07,480 Speaker 3: would be a surprise at all, but they're trying to 135 00:08:07,480 --> 00:08:10,400 Speaker 3: make it seem very nefarious, as if there's something that 136 00:08:10,520 --> 00:08:14,600 Speaker 3: is not honest going on here. I think they know 137 00:08:15,560 --> 00:08:19,080 Speaker 3: inside of the times what the result of this case 138 00:08:19,160 --> 00:08:22,600 Speaker 3: is going to be, or they highly suspect that it's 139 00:08:22,640 --> 00:08:25,000 Speaker 3: going to be a five to four decision, and they 140 00:08:25,040 --> 00:08:27,920 Speaker 3: are trying to knock Alito out of being able to 141 00:08:27,920 --> 00:08:30,960 Speaker 3: be involved because they don't want Trump to get a 142 00:08:31,040 --> 00:08:33,719 Speaker 3: positive result in the immunity case. That's my theory of 143 00:08:33,760 --> 00:08:36,640 Speaker 3: why this is resurrected in twenty four. There is I 144 00:08:36,640 --> 00:08:40,360 Speaker 3: think basically no chance that Alito. I mean it would 145 00:08:40,400 --> 00:08:42,600 Speaker 3: be I would give you less than a one percent 146 00:08:42,600 --> 00:08:44,800 Speaker 3: shot that he actually recuses himself based on any of this. 147 00:08:44,880 --> 00:08:46,720 Speaker 3: He's not going to do it. There's no basis for 148 00:08:46,800 --> 00:08:49,320 Speaker 3: him doing it. So I don't even think it's about 149 00:08:50,160 --> 00:08:52,440 Speaker 3: trying to pressure him to get that result Clay just 150 00:08:52,480 --> 00:08:57,800 Speaker 3: because there's no chance. I think it is trying to 151 00:08:57,840 --> 00:09:01,880 Speaker 3: delegitimize the conservative is on the court because they know 152 00:09:02,000 --> 00:09:05,000 Speaker 3: there are decisions, and specifically Alito. They know there are 153 00:09:05,000 --> 00:09:07,760 Speaker 3: decisions that are coming down that they will not like 154 00:09:07,880 --> 00:09:11,440 Speaker 3: as it pertains to Trump, and they're holding out. I 155 00:09:11,480 --> 00:09:14,960 Speaker 3: think hope that let's say Joe Biden is able to 156 00:09:15,120 --> 00:09:19,200 Speaker 3: hold on in some way. I mean, Democrats will pack 157 00:09:19,280 --> 00:09:21,040 Speaker 3: the court. It is just a question of when. In 158 00:09:21,080 --> 00:09:24,280 Speaker 3: their minds, they're just waiting for when they have the 159 00:09:24,400 --> 00:09:27,520 Speaker 3: votes to do it and they decide to pull. 160 00:09:27,360 --> 00:09:29,360 Speaker 1: The trigger, they decide that they're gonna use the political will. 161 00:09:29,559 --> 00:09:31,360 Speaker 1: So that's one component of it. I think it's just 162 00:09:31,400 --> 00:09:34,160 Speaker 1: the undermining because I mean, do you think Alito, based 163 00:09:34,160 --> 00:09:36,080 Speaker 1: on any of the think they could be trying to 164 00:09:36,679 --> 00:09:38,839 Speaker 1: So here's my concern. But do you see what I'm saying? 165 00:09:38,880 --> 00:09:41,319 Speaker 1: The pressure campaign has zero chance of working. That's not well. 166 00:09:41,640 --> 00:09:45,480 Speaker 1: My concern that it could work on John Roberts. And 167 00:09:45,960 --> 00:09:49,600 Speaker 1: that's why aren't they going after Roberts going after it. 168 00:09:49,640 --> 00:09:53,120 Speaker 3: Because he didn't he didn't do it. They're using Alito 169 00:09:53,280 --> 00:09:57,360 Speaker 3: to attack Roberts. I think he's wobbly again. I think 170 00:09:57,400 --> 00:10:00,160 Speaker 3: it's messy because of the past history. It just does 171 00:10:00,200 --> 00:10:02,120 Speaker 3: it make sense to me that they would sit on 172 00:10:02,160 --> 00:10:05,160 Speaker 3: this for three years The Washington Post, why didn't they 173 00:10:05,160 --> 00:10:07,319 Speaker 3: write this story three years ago? They know there's the 174 00:10:07,320 --> 00:10:09,640 Speaker 3: the immunity case is coming down soon, right, we know 175 00:10:09,720 --> 00:10:11,960 Speaker 3: that for sure? Yeah, I and you and I see 176 00:10:11,960 --> 00:10:15,240 Speaker 3: that the same way they're gonna say that Trump, They're 177 00:10:15,240 --> 00:10:18,720 Speaker 3: gonna come back with some version of the specific, some 178 00:10:18,760 --> 00:10:21,280 Speaker 3: more specific version of what kind of immunity present has 179 00:10:21,320 --> 00:10:22,920 Speaker 3: and kick it to the lower courts. I think we 180 00:10:22,960 --> 00:10:25,320 Speaker 3: both see that as the likeliest outcome, and I think 181 00:10:25,360 --> 00:10:27,040 Speaker 3: that is what's going to happen here. 182 00:10:28,960 --> 00:10:32,280 Speaker 1: They want to tell their audience New York Times, ap 183 00:10:32,640 --> 00:10:35,760 Speaker 1: et cetera, all these different outlets that they want to 184 00:10:35,840 --> 00:10:38,680 Speaker 1: undermine the conservatives on the Court as much as they can, 185 00:10:38,760 --> 00:10:40,520 Speaker 1: because this is going to go to the heart of 186 00:10:40,520 --> 00:10:44,040 Speaker 1: the narrative which you brought up before, of Trump is 187 00:10:44,160 --> 00:10:47,360 Speaker 1: illegitimate and a threat to a threat to democracy, and 188 00:10:47,400 --> 00:10:50,840 Speaker 1: they're losing their grip on the threat to democracy stuff 189 00:10:50,960 --> 00:10:54,240 Speaker 1: via the law Fair campaign. But they may try to say, 190 00:10:54,320 --> 00:10:55,960 Speaker 1: just look they did in two thousand and bush by 191 00:10:56,080 --> 00:11:00,439 Speaker 1: Gore Trump, everything about him is illegitimate, even the Supreme 192 00:11:00,480 --> 00:11:03,920 Speaker 1: Court stuff that holds up his rights or that that's 193 00:11:03,960 --> 00:11:07,480 Speaker 1: illegitimate too. So to me, it's it's smearing them all. Also, 194 00:11:07,600 --> 00:11:10,320 Speaker 1: I think they just hate Aledo. I think they hate 195 00:11:10,360 --> 00:11:13,560 Speaker 1: him in a way that's irrational to all of us 196 00:11:13,640 --> 00:11:16,880 Speaker 1: because of what he did for the abortion decision, in 197 00:11:16,920 --> 00:11:19,280 Speaker 1: the you know, writing the Dobbs decision. I think that 198 00:11:19,480 --> 00:11:23,160 Speaker 1: they can't help themselves. You know, you've ever been around 199 00:11:23,200 --> 00:11:25,319 Speaker 1: somebody who knows it's not a good idea to attack 200 00:11:25,400 --> 00:11:27,680 Speaker 1: somebody at a dinner or something. But they just load 201 00:11:27,760 --> 00:11:29,720 Speaker 1: them so much that they kind of say they let 202 00:11:29,800 --> 00:11:31,880 Speaker 1: things rip anyway, and you're like, oh gosh, you know, 203 00:11:31,960 --> 00:11:34,320 Speaker 1: you know what I mean, I've seen what I've seen 204 00:11:34,320 --> 00:11:37,840 Speaker 1: that happen before, where it's clearly unwise, but they'll do 205 00:11:37,880 --> 00:11:41,360 Speaker 1: it anyway. I'm not sure it's unwise for them, but 206 00:11:41,400 --> 00:11:45,240 Speaker 1: it's definitely uncouth. It's definitely showing their hand. Clay. I 207 00:11:45,280 --> 00:11:49,959 Speaker 1: just think the mainstream Democrat legacy media hates Justice Alito, 208 00:11:50,120 --> 00:11:52,080 Speaker 1: and so they're willing to go down this rabbit hole 209 00:11:52,080 --> 00:11:53,880 Speaker 1: on the flag. I'm not saying that's a primary. I 210 00:11:53,920 --> 00:11:55,520 Speaker 1: think you're right on the pressure side of this as 211 00:11:55,559 --> 00:11:58,600 Speaker 1: the primary. But I do think that whenever you're talking 212 00:11:58,600 --> 00:12:02,640 Speaker 1: about Alito and Thomas, they just low. You know, they 213 00:12:02,679 --> 00:12:05,079 Speaker 1: don't feel the same way about Amy Coney Barrett or Gorsics. 214 00:12:05,120 --> 00:12:07,480 Speaker 1: They just don't. They hate Alito and Thomas. 215 00:12:07,520 --> 00:12:11,560 Speaker 3: They really Gorsuch gets off with no criticism, relatively speaking, 216 00:12:11,600 --> 00:12:13,679 Speaker 3: and I don't know why that is, but I ranked 217 00:12:13,720 --> 00:12:17,400 Speaker 3: them as you were talking. Clarence Thomas clearly the most hated. 218 00:12:18,280 --> 00:12:21,480 Speaker 3: I think Alita well, but Kavanaugh clearly has been ripped 219 00:12:21,480 --> 00:12:25,760 Speaker 3: to the shreds. I'd put him second, Alito third, Amy 220 00:12:25,760 --> 00:12:28,360 Speaker 3: Coney Barrett fourth. It feels like all four of those 221 00:12:28,400 --> 00:12:32,600 Speaker 3: they've had people going after over the years. Roberts and 222 00:12:32,679 --> 00:12:36,600 Speaker 3: Gorsach don't get as much of an attack. We'll take 223 00:12:36,640 --> 00:12:38,439 Speaker 3: some of your calls on this, and also I want 224 00:12:38,480 --> 00:12:40,800 Speaker 3: to just talk about the way that this is so 225 00:12:40,920 --> 00:12:45,560 Speaker 3: dishonest to me because the story is laundered through the 226 00:12:45,600 --> 00:12:49,760 Speaker 3: New York Times, which has really just become a propaganda 227 00:12:49,960 --> 00:12:53,439 Speaker 3: arm of the Democrat Party, and they want the Times 228 00:12:53,480 --> 00:12:56,480 Speaker 3: to write it so they then can then claim the 229 00:12:56,520 --> 00:13:00,360 Speaker 3: Democrat Party, can oh, look this independent are or a 230 00:13:00,480 --> 00:13:04,200 Speaker 3: fact is actually coming down on our side. We had 231 00:13:04,280 --> 00:13:07,120 Speaker 3: nothing to do with this. We're just reacting. We're talking 232 00:13:07,200 --> 00:13:10,440 Speaker 3: right now, by the way, about potentially trying to make 233 00:13:10,520 --> 00:13:13,760 Speaker 3: part of a trip over to Israel. Maybe I'll go, 234 00:13:13,800 --> 00:13:15,960 Speaker 3: Maybe Buck, We'll go. We'll see exactly how this is 235 00:13:16,000 --> 00:13:18,199 Speaker 3: going to work out. But we want to tell you 236 00:13:18,240 --> 00:13:22,079 Speaker 3: about one of our new sponsors. Israeli citizens really appreciate 237 00:13:22,120 --> 00:13:25,240 Speaker 3: the support they're receiving from many groups around the world, 238 00:13:25,440 --> 00:13:29,360 Speaker 3: including our friends at the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews. 239 00:13:30,480 --> 00:13:33,440 Speaker 3: We know there's all been an increase in tax in 240 00:13:33,480 --> 00:13:37,840 Speaker 3: attacks and anti Israel rhetoric. The IFCJ is a welcome 241 00:13:37,880 --> 00:13:41,760 Speaker 3: friend to many throughout the region. They're helping so many 242 00:13:41,880 --> 00:13:45,600 Speaker 3: Israelis by providing emergency bomb shelter kits that can be 243 00:13:45,720 --> 00:13:49,960 Speaker 3: delivered immediately. Your donations will help place these kits enough 244 00:13:49,960 --> 00:13:53,680 Speaker 3: food and emergency supplies for twenty people in bomb shelters. 245 00:13:53,720 --> 00:13:55,960 Speaker 3: The cost to put together the kits just under three 246 00:13:56,040 --> 00:13:59,520 Speaker 3: hundred dollars each. Thanks to a matching challenge gift from 247 00:13:59,559 --> 00:14:03,800 Speaker 3: a general tris IFCJ supporter, your gift will double in 248 00:14:03,960 --> 00:14:07,000 Speaker 3: impact generosity of so many in the audience and around 249 00:14:07,040 --> 00:14:11,439 Speaker 3: the nation providing contributions so they can gift needy Israeli 250 00:14:11,480 --> 00:14:14,840 Speaker 3: families and individuals with supplies to make a difference. The 251 00:14:14,920 --> 00:14:17,840 Speaker 3: number to call to make your gift eight eight eight 252 00:14:18,240 --> 00:14:23,120 Speaker 3: four eight eight IFCJ. That's eight eight eight four eight 253 00:14:23,240 --> 00:14:28,280 Speaker 3: eight IFCJ. You can also go online to support IFCJ 254 00:14:28,520 --> 00:14:34,880 Speaker 3: dot org to give that's one word support IFCJ dot org. 255 00:14:35,680 --> 00:14:39,680 Speaker 3: Have fun with the guys on Sundays the Sunday Hang Podcast. 256 00:14:39,800 --> 00:14:43,640 Speaker 3: It's Silly, It's goofy, It's good times. Fight it in 257 00:14:43,680 --> 00:14:46,800 Speaker 3: the Clay and Buck podcast feed on the iHeartRadio app 258 00:14:46,960 --> 00:14:50,560 Speaker 3: or wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome back in play 259 00:14:50,680 --> 00:14:53,920 Speaker 3: Travis Buck Sex Show. Appreciate all of you hanging out 260 00:14:53,960 --> 00:14:57,720 Speaker 3: with us. We roll through the Wednesday edition of the program. 261 00:14:57,760 --> 00:15:01,400 Speaker 3: Reminder that the jury has the k in New York City, 262 00:15:01,600 --> 00:15:04,120 Speaker 3: and we will update you as soon as any of 263 00:15:04,160 --> 00:15:06,200 Speaker 3: this might come out. But we're talking about the Supreme 264 00:15:06,240 --> 00:15:11,400 Speaker 3: Court and the immunity case that potentially will be resolved 265 00:15:11,440 --> 00:15:15,280 Speaker 3: either next month or early in July if they hold 266 00:15:15,280 --> 00:15:19,240 Speaker 3: it a bit. Here's the other thing that I think 267 00:15:19,280 --> 00:15:23,520 Speaker 3: all of you need to be aware of. They wandered this. 268 00:15:23,520 --> 00:15:25,520 Speaker 3: This gets me so fired up, and I think it's 269 00:15:25,520 --> 00:15:28,640 Speaker 3: important to take you behind the sort of the curtain here. 270 00:15:29,320 --> 00:15:34,560 Speaker 3: This is all Democrat operatives deciding to waunder this story 271 00:15:34,720 --> 00:15:38,240 Speaker 3: through the New York Times. This is not a legitimate 272 00:15:38,320 --> 00:15:40,880 Speaker 3: news story. If it was, the Washington Post would have 273 00:15:40,880 --> 00:15:44,920 Speaker 3: written it back in twenty twenty one. They made the decision. 274 00:15:45,600 --> 00:15:48,960 Speaker 3: They made the decision to go after Alito, and they 275 00:15:49,080 --> 00:15:51,360 Speaker 3: use the New York Times to do it. You pointed 276 00:15:51,360 --> 00:15:54,680 Speaker 3: out we were talking off Airbuck. It's like planting evidence 277 00:15:55,000 --> 00:15:55,920 Speaker 3: and then saying. 278 00:15:55,800 --> 00:15:58,720 Speaker 1: Like, oh, look at what the police found. This is crazy. 279 00:15:58,760 --> 00:16:00,520 Speaker 1: Who could have ever known this was here. 280 00:16:00,880 --> 00:16:04,280 Speaker 3: This is a targeted attempt to go after him and 281 00:16:04,440 --> 00:16:09,320 Speaker 3: his family because they don't like his decisions as a judge. 282 00:16:09,920 --> 00:16:14,840 Speaker 3: Ruth Bader Ginsburg made far more politically inflammatory comments by 283 00:16:15,120 --> 00:16:19,120 Speaker 3: far during her tenure and The New York Times lionized 284 00:16:19,160 --> 00:16:21,760 Speaker 3: her as a great workout star. Remember all these articles 285 00:16:21,800 --> 00:16:23,040 Speaker 3: they had about her personal. 286 00:16:22,840 --> 00:16:26,920 Speaker 1: Yeah, it was bizarre. There was this RBG workout cult thing. 287 00:16:27,000 --> 00:16:29,760 Speaker 1: I was like, she's a tiny, decrepit woman. Everyone calm down, 288 00:16:29,840 --> 00:16:31,680 Speaker 1: like this is very weird, Like look at how many 289 00:16:31,760 --> 00:16:33,840 Speaker 1: look at how long she can plank for. There were 290 00:16:33,920 --> 00:16:36,800 Speaker 1: videos about this. It was weird, okay, And I'm not 291 00:16:36,920 --> 00:16:39,760 Speaker 1: one to throw around my Jim prowess, but I'm just saying, 292 00:16:40,200 --> 00:16:44,440 Speaker 1: you know, RBG was not my gym hero. There's something 293 00:16:44,440 --> 00:16:46,560 Speaker 1: else about this too. They've been trying to do this 294 00:16:46,640 --> 00:16:50,240 Speaker 1: with Justice Thomas through Ginny Thomas forever as well. They've 295 00:16:50,240 --> 00:16:54,040 Speaker 1: been trying to say, well, she's you know, she has opinions, 296 00:16:54,080 --> 00:16:57,320 Speaker 1: therefore Justice Thomas can't be on the case. What are 297 00:16:57,320 --> 00:16:59,480 Speaker 1: you talking about. That's not how this works, right, It's 298 00:16:59,520 --> 00:17:03,400 Speaker 1: not unless there's a monetary incentive of some kind. Your 299 00:17:03,440 --> 00:17:06,720 Speaker 1: spouse having opinions or saying things in public does not 300 00:17:06,840 --> 00:17:10,439 Speaker 1: mean that you, as a judge, recuse yourself from anything 301 00:17:10,480 --> 00:17:13,040 Speaker 1: having to do with you know. But they've been trying 302 00:17:13,040 --> 00:17:15,359 Speaker 1: this for a long time with her as well, with 303 00:17:15,480 --> 00:17:17,440 Speaker 1: Justice Thomas as well. It's not going to work, you see. 304 00:17:17,440 --> 00:17:20,479 Speaker 1: By the way, it's reminded me of back Remember when 305 00:17:20,480 --> 00:17:22,679 Speaker 1: they had a COVID death clock on CNN. You know 306 00:17:22,720 --> 00:17:24,880 Speaker 1: of all the people that have died from COVID. Oh yeah, 307 00:17:24,920 --> 00:17:25,320 Speaker 1: of course. 308 00:17:25,680 --> 00:17:25,879 Speaker 4: You know. 309 00:17:26,760 --> 00:17:29,600 Speaker 1: CNN has a jury deliberation clock on the screen right now. 310 00:17:29,640 --> 00:17:33,000 Speaker 1: Do you know that they're running a minute by minute? 311 00:17:34,400 --> 00:17:36,160 Speaker 1: You know, I don't. I don't hate it. 312 00:17:36,240 --> 00:17:39,400 Speaker 3: If you're desperate for people to be why the showman 313 00:17:39,520 --> 00:17:40,640 Speaker 3: does not hate just doesn't. 314 00:17:40,880 --> 00:17:41,639 Speaker 1: I don't hate it. 315 00:17:41,680 --> 00:17:41,840 Speaker 4: You know. 316 00:17:41,880 --> 00:17:44,600 Speaker 3: I went to Fox News and said, instead of the 317 00:17:44,640 --> 00:17:49,080 Speaker 3: COVID illegal illegal immigrants for sure immigrant ticker, I said, 318 00:17:49,080 --> 00:17:51,320 Speaker 3: we should have an illegal immigrant ticker on the front 319 00:17:51,320 --> 00:17:51,920 Speaker 3: page of Fox. 320 00:17:52,040 --> 00:17:52,080 Speaker 4: No. 321 00:17:52,200 --> 00:17:54,800 Speaker 1: But so democracy is at stake, do you really need 322 00:17:54,840 --> 00:17:56,879 Speaker 1: a you know, you know, lock on? I don't know, 323 00:17:57,400 --> 00:17:58,760 Speaker 1: a little bit a little weird for me, a little 324 00:17:58,760 --> 00:18:00,760 Speaker 1: a little a little bit off. I think there's a 325 00:18:00,840 --> 00:18:02,919 Speaker 1: video I want you to watch. It's not a series, 326 00:18:02,960 --> 00:18:06,600 Speaker 1: it's not fiction. It's a documentary that goes deep into 327 00:18:06,800 --> 00:18:11,760 Speaker 1: what's coming for this country politically and even more so economically, 328 00:18:11,800 --> 00:18:14,800 Speaker 1: as in the dollars in your bank account, the cost 329 00:18:14,960 --> 00:18:18,959 Speaker 1: of living, your house, all that stuff. It's titled America's 330 00:18:19,119 --> 00:18:23,120 Speaker 1: Last Election, and it's from my friend economist Porter Stansbury, 331 00:18:23,160 --> 00:18:27,120 Speaker 1: who is a legend in the financial publishing world. Porters 332 00:18:27,119 --> 00:18:28,879 Speaker 1: put this online for you to watch. I watched the 333 00:18:28,920 --> 00:18:32,360 Speaker 1: whole thing myself. It is powerful, it is necessary. You've 334 00:18:32,400 --> 00:18:35,320 Speaker 1: got to go check this out. This documentary details how 335 00:18:35,400 --> 00:18:39,359 Speaker 1: a new financial crisis is brewing in America right now. 336 00:18:39,720 --> 00:18:41,760 Speaker 1: I mean, think about it, with thirty four trillion dollars 337 00:18:41,760 --> 00:18:44,639 Speaker 1: in debt, what are we heading toward. Go to Last 338 00:18:44,720 --> 00:18:49,280 Speaker 1: Election plot dot com, Last Election plot dot com to 339 00:18:49,359 --> 00:18:53,440 Speaker 1: watch this documentary for free. Last Election plot dot Com 340 00:18:53,440 --> 00:18:55,439 Speaker 1: paid for it by Porter and Company. And it turns 341 00:18:55,480 --> 00:18:59,119 Speaker 1: out our timing today is really something we were just 342 00:18:59,119 --> 00:19:03,280 Speaker 1: talking about. The deep dive into flags, the appeal to 343 00:19:03,400 --> 00:19:08,520 Speaker 1: Heaven flag, like they're practically flying the stars and stripes 344 00:19:08,560 --> 00:19:09,200 Speaker 1: over there too. 345 00:19:09,240 --> 00:19:09,880 Speaker 4: It's crazy. 346 00:19:10,040 --> 00:19:12,520 Speaker 1: The appeal to Heaven flag outside of a justice Alito 347 00:19:12,600 --> 00:19:15,440 Speaker 1: Beach home from three years ago, very upsetting to The 348 00:19:15,440 --> 00:19:18,520 Speaker 1: New York Times. We discussed why they might be doing this, 349 00:19:19,200 --> 00:19:21,200 Speaker 1: and I said to you, I believe I would say 350 00:19:21,200 --> 00:19:24,680 Speaker 1: almost exactly ten minutes ago the chance. Yes, I agree 351 00:19:24,680 --> 00:19:27,359 Speaker 1: with Clay. They want to put pressure on Aledo. The 352 00:19:27,440 --> 00:19:29,800 Speaker 1: chance of Alito recusing over this, as I said, is 353 00:19:30,160 --> 00:19:33,439 Speaker 1: absolutely zero. I said, there's no chance of Alido doing it. 354 00:19:33,760 --> 00:19:36,360 Speaker 1: And now we have a statement that was just released 355 00:19:36,560 --> 00:19:38,800 Speaker 1: as we are on air with You Live from Justice Alito, 356 00:19:38,840 --> 00:19:42,280 Speaker 1: who wants to guess Clay go ahead. He is responding, 357 00:19:42,320 --> 00:19:43,960 Speaker 1: and again this is where I talk about the way 358 00:19:43,960 --> 00:19:48,000 Speaker 1: that this is wandered. After the New York Times story 359 00:19:48,200 --> 00:19:54,200 Speaker 1: which Democrats got them to write, multiple senators demanded that 360 00:19:54,440 --> 00:19:59,240 Speaker 1: Alito recuse himself. Alito now has just released a letter 361 00:19:59,359 --> 00:20:05,399 Speaker 1: to Durban and White House, two Democrat senators, and he says, 362 00:20:05,480 --> 00:20:08,240 Speaker 1: this is in response to your letter of May twenty 363 00:20:08,280 --> 00:20:11,320 Speaker 1: third to the Chief Justice, which I was saying John Roberts, 364 00:20:12,080 --> 00:20:16,399 Speaker 1: requesting that he takes steps to ensure I recuse in 365 00:20:16,520 --> 00:20:21,440 Speaker 1: Trump the United States and any other cases quote related 366 00:20:21,520 --> 00:20:25,200 Speaker 1: to the twenty twenty presidential election or quote the January 367 00:20:25,240 --> 00:20:29,800 Speaker 1: sixth attack on the Capitol. And he cites the code 368 00:20:29,800 --> 00:20:34,240 Speaker 1: of conduct and says that it does not disqualify him 369 00:20:35,240 --> 00:20:40,639 Speaker 1: because his impartiality might not reasonably be questioned here. He 370 00:20:40,720 --> 00:20:45,760 Speaker 1: then explained the two incidents you cite again, these flag 371 00:20:45,840 --> 00:20:50,000 Speaker 1: flying incidents don't meet conditions for recusal and this is 372 00:20:50,080 --> 00:20:51,960 Speaker 1: kind of funny, I thought, Buck, as I was reading it. 373 00:20:52,040 --> 00:20:55,720 Speaker 1: The first incident cited concerns the flying of an upside 374 00:20:55,760 --> 00:20:59,480 Speaker 1: down American flag outside the Virginia house where my wife 375 00:20:59,520 --> 00:21:03,240 Speaker 1: and I zide, and he said, I. 376 00:21:03,200 --> 00:21:06,679 Speaker 3: Had I'm reading. I had nothing whatsoever to do with 377 00:21:06,760 --> 00:21:09,520 Speaker 3: the flying of that flag. I was not even aware 378 00:21:09,680 --> 00:21:11,960 Speaker 3: of the upside down flag until it was called to 379 00:21:12,000 --> 00:21:14,800 Speaker 3: my attention. As soon as I saw it, I asked 380 00:21:14,800 --> 00:21:17,479 Speaker 3: my wife to take it down, but for several days 381 00:21:17,560 --> 00:21:18,560 Speaker 3: she refused. 382 00:21:19,960 --> 00:21:21,760 Speaker 1: I just I want to pause here for a guy 383 00:21:21,840 --> 00:21:24,160 Speaker 1: is married. The guy is married, you know what I mean. 384 00:21:24,240 --> 00:21:25,359 Speaker 1: He's got to do what he's gotta do. 385 00:21:25,640 --> 00:21:28,920 Speaker 3: There's a lot of married men out there, Buck, you're 386 00:21:28,920 --> 00:21:32,639 Speaker 3: a newly married man my wife. And then he continues, 387 00:21:33,600 --> 00:21:36,520 Speaker 3: My wife and I own our Virginia home jointly. She 388 00:21:36,720 --> 00:21:39,760 Speaker 3: therefore has the legal right to use the property as 389 00:21:39,880 --> 00:21:43,119 Speaker 3: she sees fit, and there were no additional steps I 390 00:21:43,160 --> 00:21:46,360 Speaker 3: could have taken to have the flag taken down more promptly. 391 00:21:46,960 --> 00:21:50,600 Speaker 3: My wife's reasons for flying the flag are not relevant 392 00:21:50,640 --> 00:21:54,200 Speaker 3: for present purposes, but I note that she was greatly 393 00:21:54,240 --> 00:21:56,560 Speaker 3: distressed at the time, doing a large part to a 394 00:21:56,680 --> 00:21:59,640 Speaker 3: very nasty neighborhood dispute in which I had no involvement. 395 00:22:00,200 --> 00:22:03,719 Speaker 3: A house on the street displayed a sign attacking her personally, 396 00:22:04,000 --> 00:22:05,719 Speaker 3: and a man who was living in the house at 397 00:22:05,720 --> 00:22:07,919 Speaker 3: the time trailed her all the way down the street 398 00:22:07,960 --> 00:22:12,480 Speaker 3: and berated her in my presence, using foul language, including 399 00:22:13,040 --> 00:22:15,840 Speaker 3: what I regard as the vilist epithet that can be 400 00:22:15,880 --> 00:22:17,320 Speaker 3: addressed to a woman. 401 00:22:17,840 --> 00:22:20,960 Speaker 1: Yes, than the bee word, The one that's worse than 402 00:22:21,000 --> 00:22:22,680 Speaker 1: the bee word. Yeah, starts with the C. 403 00:22:22,960 --> 00:22:26,239 Speaker 3: In case you're wondering, my wife wouldn't recommend to use it, 404 00:22:26,480 --> 00:22:29,600 Speaker 3: especially not with a woman. My wife is a private citizen. 405 00:22:29,880 --> 00:22:33,280 Speaker 3: She possesses the same First Amendment rights as every other American. 406 00:22:33,680 --> 00:22:36,639 Speaker 3: She makes her own decisions, and I've always respected her 407 00:22:36,720 --> 00:22:40,159 Speaker 3: right to do so. She's made many sacrifices to accommodate 408 00:22:40,240 --> 00:22:44,159 Speaker 3: my service on the Supreme Court, including the insult of 409 00:22:44,600 --> 00:22:50,000 Speaker 3: having to endure numerous loud, obscene, and personally insulting protests 410 00:22:50,359 --> 00:22:53,359 Speaker 3: in front of our home that continue to this day 411 00:22:53,680 --> 00:22:58,040 Speaker 3: and now threatened to escalate. This is important. That is illegal. 412 00:22:58,359 --> 00:23:01,840 Speaker 3: They are not enforcing the law to protect Supreme Court justices. 413 00:23:02,119 --> 00:23:05,880 Speaker 3: We know this because someone tried to kill Brett Kavanaugh. 414 00:23:06,000 --> 00:23:09,439 Speaker 3: Remember before the Roe v. Wade case. Until the case 415 00:23:09,520 --> 00:23:13,200 Speaker 3: is published, the case is not law. 416 00:23:13,280 --> 00:23:13,560 Speaker 4: I am. 417 00:23:13,680 --> 00:23:16,800 Speaker 3: I'm continuing to read. I am confident a reasonable person 418 00:23:17,000 --> 00:23:21,520 Speaker 3: who is not motivated by political or ideological considerations or 419 00:23:21,640 --> 00:23:24,040 Speaker 3: desire to affect the outcome of the Supreme Court cases 420 00:23:24,080 --> 00:23:27,200 Speaker 3: would conclude the events are counted above do not meet 421 00:23:27,240 --> 00:23:33,120 Speaker 3: the applicable standard for recusal. I am therefore required to 422 00:23:33,520 --> 00:23:39,120 Speaker 3: reject your request. That is the official letters that has 423 00:23:39,200 --> 00:23:40,040 Speaker 3: just been released. 424 00:23:40,280 --> 00:23:43,640 Speaker 1: This is Elito kind of like that Leonardo DiCaprio meme, 425 00:23:43,960 --> 00:23:45,840 Speaker 1: but he's not using any profanity where he's like, I'm 426 00:23:45,880 --> 00:23:49,280 Speaker 1: not leaving. Alito is not leaving. He's not recusing. He 427 00:23:49,359 --> 00:23:53,480 Speaker 1: is not stepping down. Sorry, Libs. Nice tried, but not 428 00:23:53,600 --> 00:23:56,200 Speaker 1: even close, not even close. But I think it does 429 00:23:56,280 --> 00:23:59,639 Speaker 1: go to the anxiety they have Clay over some of 430 00:23:59,640 --> 00:24:03,200 Speaker 1: the super Court decisions that are coming this way, and 431 00:24:03,240 --> 00:24:06,520 Speaker 1: they are hoping that they can at a minimum delegitimize, 432 00:24:07,040 --> 00:24:09,760 Speaker 1: if not pressure, I mean pressuring Alito, you know, good luck, 433 00:24:09,800 --> 00:24:12,720 Speaker 1: like they've been pressuring Thomas, as I said, for thirty 434 00:24:12,760 --> 00:24:18,440 Speaker 1: something years, and it doesn't Thomas loves to just you know, crush, crush, 435 00:24:18,520 --> 00:24:22,800 Speaker 1: the communists hopes and dreams at every opportunity. So yeah, 436 00:24:22,840 --> 00:24:25,239 Speaker 1: I think it's a couple of more funny quotes. By 437 00:24:25,280 --> 00:24:27,960 Speaker 1: the way, from this letter, my wife is fond of 438 00:24:28,000 --> 00:24:32,240 Speaker 1: flying flags. I am not, which is a very funny line. 439 00:24:32,320 --> 00:24:35,439 Speaker 1: My wife was solely responsible for having flags put up 440 00:24:35,440 --> 00:24:38,200 Speaker 1: at the residents and our vacation home, and she's flown 441 00:24:38,240 --> 00:24:40,840 Speaker 1: a wide variety of flags over the years, and I 442 00:24:40,840 --> 00:24:43,480 Speaker 1: thought this is funny. In addition to the American flag, 443 00:24:43,560 --> 00:24:48,439 Speaker 1: she's flown other patriotic flags and flags of nations from 444 00:24:48,520 --> 00:24:51,800 Speaker 1: which the ancestors of family members came, flags of places 445 00:24:51,840 --> 00:24:56,600 Speaker 1: we have visited, seasonal flags, and religious flags, and we 446 00:24:56,640 --> 00:25:01,000 Speaker 1: get with the appeal to Heaven flag. He addressed both 447 00:25:01,000 --> 00:25:03,600 Speaker 1: of these stories that specifically have been written. 448 00:25:03,880 --> 00:25:04,080 Speaker 4: Yeah. 449 00:25:04,080 --> 00:25:05,640 Speaker 1: One thing that I will say, and this just came 450 00:25:05,720 --> 00:25:08,119 Speaker 1: up in one of our one of our commercial breaks. 451 00:25:08,440 --> 00:25:10,480 Speaker 1: Clay did not warn me that as a married man, 452 00:25:10,560 --> 00:25:15,080 Speaker 1: it is my duty to smell all questionable meat in 453 00:25:15,160 --> 00:25:19,080 Speaker 1: the refrigerator and make the final determination. But it's whether 454 00:25:19,119 --> 00:25:22,280 Speaker 1: it's like safe to eat or spoiled. But once is 455 00:25:22,320 --> 00:25:24,240 Speaker 1: not enough. I usually have to smell it a couple 456 00:25:24,240 --> 00:25:27,119 Speaker 1: of times to make sure that she truly believes that 457 00:25:27,200 --> 00:25:30,520 Speaker 1: I have given enough smelling of the spoiled meat to 458 00:25:30,760 --> 00:25:33,600 Speaker 1: make that determination. I had never done this before I 459 00:25:33,640 --> 00:25:35,639 Speaker 1: was married. I did not know that this was this 460 00:25:35,800 --> 00:25:37,720 Speaker 1: was a thing I usuld just go. It looked okay, 461 00:25:38,320 --> 00:25:40,400 Speaker 1: no problem, but I am forced to smell this. Clay 462 00:25:40,400 --> 00:25:43,080 Speaker 1: tells me he does not have to smell the possibly 463 00:25:43,119 --> 00:25:45,639 Speaker 1: expired meat as part of his gig, So I don't know. 464 00:25:46,000 --> 00:25:49,119 Speaker 3: Well, that's just because my wife rightly recognizes that I 465 00:25:49,160 --> 00:25:51,879 Speaker 3: can't smell anything. I mean, I I think I have 466 00:25:53,240 --> 00:25:55,879 Speaker 3: no now. I mean not like I'm not like a 467 00:25:56,119 --> 00:25:58,520 Speaker 3: one of these COVID long sufferers who claims it. I mean, 468 00:25:58,560 --> 00:26:01,959 Speaker 3: I can smell like road, you know, sense of smell. 469 00:26:02,320 --> 00:26:04,160 Speaker 1: But if you ever lose your sense of taste during 470 00:26:04,160 --> 00:26:06,520 Speaker 1: COVID that when I had COVID, that did happen to me. 471 00:26:06,880 --> 00:26:09,480 Speaker 1: And I remember just ordering lots of really spicy food 472 00:26:09,480 --> 00:26:13,720 Speaker 1: because I had learned from the interwebs that your ability 473 00:26:13,760 --> 00:26:17,760 Speaker 1: to detect spice is like heat based, it's not sensory 474 00:26:17,840 --> 00:26:20,280 Speaker 1: taste based. So you could pick up spice even if 475 00:26:20,280 --> 00:26:24,639 Speaker 1: you couldn't pick up salty, sweet and sour important stuff. 476 00:26:24,680 --> 00:26:28,040 Speaker 3: That's true, I had no I had other than like 477 00:26:28,080 --> 00:26:31,679 Speaker 3: a mild cold. The multiple times that I know of 478 00:26:31,760 --> 00:26:34,119 Speaker 3: that I had COVID, I had like I mean, it 479 00:26:34,160 --> 00:26:36,560 Speaker 3: was I would rather have had a lot of bad 480 00:26:36,680 --> 00:26:40,359 Speaker 3: colds rather than I would rather have COVID than a 481 00:26:40,359 --> 00:26:43,040 Speaker 3: lot of bad colds I've had. Do you think, by 482 00:26:43,080 --> 00:26:46,200 Speaker 3: the way, this is I'm still laughing about this flag situation. 483 00:26:46,359 --> 00:26:52,040 Speaker 3: This is utterly absurd. Alito having to have conversations with 484 00:26:52,119 --> 00:26:54,439 Speaker 3: his wife about the fact that he was going to 485 00:26:54,480 --> 00:26:57,320 Speaker 3: write a long letter about the flags that she's been 486 00:26:57,320 --> 00:27:00,840 Speaker 3: flying outside of the house is one has to have 487 00:27:00,880 --> 00:27:05,240 Speaker 3: been one of the most ridiculous Supreme Court discussions ever. 488 00:27:05,480 --> 00:27:07,639 Speaker 3: Because I bet Alito, even though he's one of the 489 00:27:07,760 --> 00:27:11,600 Speaker 3: nine most powerful jurists on the planet. I bet he 490 00:27:11,640 --> 00:27:16,600 Speaker 3: gets to decide nothing inside of his house, right, I mean, has. 491 00:27:16,480 --> 00:27:18,800 Speaker 1: Married, he wants to stayment. This is what you saw. 492 00:27:18,800 --> 00:27:21,000 Speaker 1: There was a letter of a Supreme Court justice who 493 00:27:21,080 --> 00:27:24,760 Speaker 1: is one not recusing himself and two correct not planning 494 00:27:24,760 --> 00:27:26,040 Speaker 1: on getting divorced. 495 00:27:26,440 --> 00:27:30,119 Speaker 3: I just I love the idea that he is all powerful, 496 00:27:30,359 --> 00:27:33,280 Speaker 3: that he can decide whether abortion is legal in the country, 497 00:27:33,480 --> 00:27:36,600 Speaker 3: that he can decide whether Trump has a presidential immunity, 498 00:27:37,160 --> 00:27:40,879 Speaker 3: But he can't even decide what flags fly outside of 499 00:27:40,920 --> 00:27:45,760 Speaker 3: his actual house, and that I'm not kidding strikes me 500 00:27:46,000 --> 00:27:50,920 Speaker 3: as exactly one hundred percent true for the vast majority 501 00:27:50,960 --> 00:27:53,760 Speaker 3: of married men in the country. If your wife's really 502 00:27:53,760 --> 00:27:57,600 Speaker 3: into flags, and it sounds like she is because this list, 503 00:27:57,720 --> 00:28:01,359 Speaker 3: he's sports teams flags, college flag she is a flag 504 00:28:01,440 --> 00:28:04,840 Speaker 3: flying fan. The last thing you want to do is 505 00:28:04,880 --> 00:28:07,199 Speaker 3: get into a dispute with her over what flag she 506 00:28:07,240 --> 00:28:07,840 Speaker 3: could fly. 507 00:28:09,160 --> 00:28:12,200 Speaker 1: Eight hundred two way two two eight A two Supreme 508 00:28:12,240 --> 00:28:16,200 Speaker 1: Court analysis and or marital advice. That's taking it now, 509 00:28:16,320 --> 00:28:18,760 Speaker 1: taking it out here on the program. Do you or 510 00:28:18,800 --> 00:28:20,719 Speaker 1: a loved one fall on any of these categories? By 511 00:28:20,760 --> 00:28:24,440 Speaker 1: the way, military, police, fire and ems, medical educator a 512 00:28:24,600 --> 00:28:29,159 Speaker 1: medical COMMA educator. Government service employee that includes federal, city, 513 00:28:29,280 --> 00:28:32,440 Speaker 1: or state employees. Look if the answer is yes, check 514 00:28:32,480 --> 00:28:36,120 Speaker 1: this out. Gov X incredible savings for those who serve 515 00:28:36,119 --> 00:28:38,640 Speaker 1: our country and communities. This is a website where if 516 00:28:38,640 --> 00:28:41,479 Speaker 1: you're one of those categories a lot of different public 517 00:28:41,520 --> 00:28:46,000 Speaker 1: service categories, right, you get special deals. I am a 518 00:28:46,040 --> 00:28:49,920 Speaker 1: former federal government employee, so I qualify and gov x 519 00:28:49,960 --> 00:28:54,560 Speaker 1: has got great stuff, unbeatable discounts from really amazing brands 520 00:28:54,760 --> 00:28:57,560 Speaker 1: you know, ones you recognize. Yeddy ray Ban, I just 521 00:28:57,560 --> 00:28:59,720 Speaker 1: got my ray Band sunglasses a couple of weeks ago 522 00:28:59,720 --> 00:29:03,040 Speaker 1: from X wear them all the time, Benchmade, Garmin, I 523 00:29:03,040 --> 00:29:05,040 Speaker 1: mean brands you're gonna want to be buying and have 524 00:29:05,120 --> 00:29:08,320 Speaker 1: been buying from. Anyway. They're on gov x dot com. 525 00:29:08,320 --> 00:29:11,760 Speaker 1: But you're just getting a much better deal and gov 526 00:29:12,000 --> 00:29:14,560 Speaker 1: x has a give back initiative as well. They donate 527 00:29:14,600 --> 00:29:17,120 Speaker 1: a portion of every order to nonprofits that serve military 528 00:29:17,160 --> 00:29:23,320 Speaker 1: and first responder communities. Save up to forty percent on apparel, footwear, jewelry, watches, camping, 529 00:29:23,400 --> 00:29:26,480 Speaker 1: hunting gear, and so much more. See if you qualify 530 00:29:26,920 --> 00:29:31,760 Speaker 1: go to govgov govx dot com. Use the code buck 531 00:29:31,760 --> 00:29:33,880 Speaker 1: in the shopping cart. You get an extra fifteen dollars 532 00:29:33,880 --> 00:29:39,320 Speaker 1: off your first order. That's govgov govx dot com savings 533 00:29:39,320 --> 00:29:40,160 Speaker 1: for those who serve. 534 00:29:40,920 --> 00:29:44,480 Speaker 4: You know them as conservative radio hosts, Now just get 535 00:29:44,520 --> 00:29:46,400 Speaker 4: to know them as guys. 536 00:29:46,320 --> 00:29:49,960 Speaker 3: On This Sunday Hang podcast with Clay and Fuck. Find 537 00:29:49,960 --> 00:29:52,920 Speaker 3: it in their podcast feed, on the iHeartRadio app or 538 00:29:52,960 --> 00:29:56,680 Speaker 3: wherever you get your podcast. Welcome back in Clay Travis 539 00:29:56,720 --> 00:30:02,000 Speaker 3: buck Sexton Show. The jury has the Trump Alito will 540 00:30:02,040 --> 00:30:06,640 Speaker 3: not recuse himself over the flag related incidents and more 541 00:30:07,400 --> 00:30:10,280 Speaker 3: legal related news for those of you out there who 542 00:30:10,360 --> 00:30:14,600 Speaker 3: have followed this case at all in Louisville, where we 543 00:30:14,640 --> 00:30:17,680 Speaker 3: are number one, we appreciate all of you listening all 544 00:30:17,720 --> 00:30:22,080 Speaker 3: over the state of Kentucky. They have dropped all charges 545 00:30:22,360 --> 00:30:28,120 Speaker 3: against PGA golfer Scotty Scheffler, who was arrested as he 546 00:30:28,280 --> 00:30:35,440 Speaker 3: was driving into the PGA Championship in Louisville and at Valhalla. 547 00:30:35,640 --> 00:30:38,840 Speaker 3: I believe I've got the golf course correct there. Their 548 00:30:38,920 --> 00:30:44,240 Speaker 3: video came out of the arresting officer. Scheffler has pretty 549 00:30:44,280 --> 00:30:47,600 Speaker 3: good attorneys, I would imagine, as a millionaire charged with 550 00:30:47,680 --> 00:30:49,200 Speaker 3: a crime often does. 551 00:30:49,880 --> 00:30:52,080 Speaker 1: And the Louisville DA. 552 00:30:51,800 --> 00:30:55,160 Speaker 3: Has announced that based on the evidence, they have dropped 553 00:30:55,320 --> 00:31:01,200 Speaker 3: all charges against Scotty Scheffler. So that entire store, crazy 554 00:31:01,320 --> 00:31:04,160 Speaker 3: as it was, of him being arrested almost missing his 555 00:31:04,280 --> 00:31:09,880 Speaker 3: tea time, is officially resolved in that respect. 556 00:31:09,920 --> 00:31:12,600 Speaker 1: Can I just say I saw that as a news story, Clay, 557 00:31:13,000 --> 00:31:16,600 Speaker 1: and I just remember reading the headlines and they made 558 00:31:16,680 --> 00:31:20,680 Speaker 1: it sound serious. Oh yeah. Then they said that the 559 00:31:20,680 --> 00:31:24,120 Speaker 1: police officer said he was dragged by a car, and 560 00:31:24,240 --> 00:31:26,160 Speaker 1: you know, they made it seem like it was a 561 00:31:26,200 --> 00:31:29,160 Speaker 1: really big deal. And then there's video and now they 562 00:31:29,240 --> 00:31:33,600 Speaker 1: dropped the whole thing. Something really funky went on here, 563 00:31:33,680 --> 00:31:36,480 Speaker 1: something something, This was not acceptable. 564 00:31:36,920 --> 00:31:41,680 Speaker 3: When the Louisville cop didn't have the functioning camera that 565 00:31:41,720 --> 00:31:45,000 Speaker 3: he's supposed to have, you know, it's a bad sign. 566 00:31:45,080 --> 00:31:49,200 Speaker 3: They found footage of from a further distance didn't look 567 00:31:49,240 --> 00:31:53,120 Speaker 3: like Scotty Scheffler really did anything wrong. The cop overreacted. 568 00:31:53,160 --> 00:31:55,760 Speaker 3: We've said this for a long time. Most cops are 569 00:31:55,760 --> 00:31:59,080 Speaker 3: good at their jobs, and they have an incredibly difficult job, 570 00:31:59,360 --> 00:32:01,680 Speaker 3: and we were speck the heck out of him. Doesn't 571 00:32:01,720 --> 00:32:04,840 Speaker 3: mean that cops don't make mistakes too, and sometimes the 572 00:32:04,880 --> 00:32:07,680 Speaker 3: mistakes are more serious. This one, in the grand scheme 573 00:32:07,760 --> 00:32:12,880 Speaker 3: of things, not super serious in terms of the injury 574 00:32:12,920 --> 00:32:15,000 Speaker 3: to the cop or any injury to Scotti Scheveler or 575 00:32:15,000 --> 00:32:17,600 Speaker 3: anything like that. But this cop appears to have been 576 00:32:17,640 --> 00:32:20,400 Speaker 3: out of wine and uh and as a result, the 577 00:32:20,480 --> 00:32:24,959 Speaker 3: charges have been dropped and there doesn't seem to have 578 00:32:25,000 --> 00:32:28,200 Speaker 3: been a major harm here other than Scotty Scheffler having 579 00:32:28,200 --> 00:32:30,600 Speaker 3: to spend a couple of hours in prison. And actually 580 00:32:30,680 --> 00:32:33,680 Speaker 3: I think he helped his overall notoriety and fame in 581 00:32:33,720 --> 00:32:34,840 Speaker 3: the end result here. 582 00:32:35,320 --> 00:32:37,760 Speaker 1: Yeah, this guy who's the guy who threw the chair 583 00:32:37,800 --> 00:32:40,520 Speaker 1: off the roof that is just selling out wall and 584 00:32:40,720 --> 00:32:44,120 Speaker 1: three straight days sold out in Nashville, sold out everything. 585 00:32:44,200 --> 00:32:45,760 Speaker 1: You know, he threw a chair off the roof and 586 00:32:45,800 --> 00:32:48,360 Speaker 1: his ticket sales went up. No one seems to care. 587 00:32:48,520 --> 00:32:53,600 Speaker 1: So you know, sometimes these things, these things have unexpected 588 00:32:53,720 --> 00:32:56,400 Speaker 1: situations that occurred. You want to take some of these calls? Yeah, 589 00:32:56,440 --> 00:32:59,200 Speaker 1: let's take something my Crockett coffee which is delicious at 590 00:32:59,200 --> 00:33:00,080 Speaker 1: Crocket Coffee. 591 00:32:59,840 --> 00:33:06,800 Speaker 3: Dot Linda in Bernie, Texas. Linda, what you got for us? Hi? 592 00:33:06,880 --> 00:33:10,680 Speaker 4: There, guys, I just have a question. This judge has 593 00:33:10,720 --> 00:33:15,160 Speaker 4: been so biased in this whole thing of favoring the prosecution. 594 00:33:15,800 --> 00:33:19,040 Speaker 4: What are the chances, in your opinion of him, if 595 00:33:19,040 --> 00:33:23,320 Speaker 4: this goes to appeal of him being brought up and disbarred? 596 00:33:23,880 --> 00:33:25,360 Speaker 1: Zero percent? Zero. 597 00:33:25,400 --> 00:33:28,720 Speaker 3: Thank you for the Call's addressed it. 598 00:33:29,160 --> 00:33:32,760 Speaker 1: This is part of the problem here is the system 599 00:33:33,360 --> 00:33:35,840 Speaker 1: that this has been brought under in New York. It 600 00:33:36,720 --> 00:33:39,800 Speaker 1: has to function the way that it is set up, 601 00:33:39,960 --> 00:33:43,040 Speaker 1: and so there's going to be an appeal. I think 602 00:33:43,040 --> 00:33:45,320 Speaker 1: Clay's right. I think on appeal, I'm not as certain 603 00:33:45,320 --> 00:33:47,320 Speaker 1: he is as Clay is that this will be overturned, 604 00:33:47,320 --> 00:33:49,080 Speaker 1: but I think there's a good shot that there will 605 00:33:49,160 --> 00:33:52,360 Speaker 1: be some stuff on appeal just because it makes the 606 00:33:52,360 --> 00:33:55,520 Speaker 1: whole It'll be less important politically by the time they 607 00:33:55,600 --> 00:33:57,960 Speaker 1: look at this, so there won't be the same Oh 608 00:33:58,000 --> 00:34:00,680 Speaker 1: my gosh, the election looming and this makes the whole 609 00:34:00,800 --> 00:34:03,640 Speaker 1: New York judicial system look like a farce, and I 610 00:34:03,640 --> 00:34:06,840 Speaker 1: think there'll be some awareness of that. I'm not convinced 611 00:34:06,840 --> 00:34:10,480 Speaker 1: that they will, you know, overturn if there's a guilty verdict. 612 00:34:10,480 --> 00:34:11,960 Speaker 1: The it's all assum there's a guilty verdict. I'm not 613 00:34:11,960 --> 00:34:14,000 Speaker 1: convinced that will happen, but it could happen. I think 614 00:34:14,000 --> 00:34:16,279 Speaker 1: it's far likely or that will happen. Then say, you'll 615 00:34:16,280 --> 00:34:18,800 Speaker 1: get a not guilty verdict coming in the next few days. 616 00:34:19,560 --> 00:34:24,400 Speaker 1: But unfortunately, judges and prosecutors have a lot of power 617 00:34:24,440 --> 00:34:27,879 Speaker 1: and authority. It is very hard to get rid of them. 618 00:34:27,920 --> 00:34:30,200 Speaker 1: It's especially hard to get rid of them in a 619 00:34:30,280 --> 00:34:34,920 Speaker 1: one party state, effectively like New York. In a politicized case, right, 620 00:34:34,960 --> 00:34:37,840 Speaker 1: I mean, it would be like asking, you know, why 621 00:34:37,880 --> 00:34:41,920 Speaker 1: don't Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer work together to remove 622 00:34:42,040 --> 00:34:46,839 Speaker 1: some Democrat left wing justice on the federal bench. Well, 623 00:34:46,920 --> 00:34:50,359 Speaker 1: because they don't want to, right, That's why. And they're 624 00:34:50,400 --> 00:34:53,080 Speaker 1: the check and balance in a sense, or rather, Democrats 625 00:34:53,080 --> 00:34:56,080 Speaker 1: are the check and balance on the judiciary in New York, 626 00:34:56,120 --> 00:34:59,759 Speaker 1: it's not going to work. The standard for removal of 627 00:35:00,000 --> 00:35:04,520 Speaker 1: a judge or even disbarment of a lawyer is typically 628 00:35:04,760 --> 00:35:08,279 Speaker 1: pretty high. Now, I will make a couple of caveats here. 629 00:35:08,760 --> 00:35:11,319 Speaker 1: I think that there have been several people who represented 630 00:35:11,360 --> 00:35:15,840 Speaker 1: Trump in Blue state and blue city jurisdictions that have 631 00:35:16,040 --> 00:35:19,880 Speaker 1: been treated unfairly as it pertains to their law license. 632 00:35:20,520 --> 00:35:24,360 Speaker 1: Usually you have to engaged in criminal behavior, and so 633 00:35:24,480 --> 00:35:26,640 Speaker 1: I think there's a zero percent chance on that one. 634 00:35:26,840 --> 00:35:30,600 Speaker 1: Mark in Savannah. Yeah, Claive, before you get Mark, we'll 635 00:35:30,600 --> 00:35:32,120 Speaker 1: get through the second as well, say, there have been 636 00:35:32,200 --> 00:35:34,560 Speaker 1: judges that have been removed I think for public drunkenness 637 00:35:35,200 --> 00:35:38,440 Speaker 1: or drunkenness on the bench, and judges have been impeached. 638 00:35:38,440 --> 00:35:40,400 Speaker 1: But see why that might be. It might be a negative. 639 00:35:40,480 --> 00:35:41,759 Speaker 1: Is fair? That seems fair? 640 00:35:41,800 --> 00:35:44,120 Speaker 3: You show up in your slosh, You're like, oh here, 641 00:35:44,239 --> 00:35:47,880 Speaker 3: you know, court to order. That's not good, but probably 642 00:35:47,880 --> 00:35:51,080 Speaker 3: hard to manage. I would imagine a courtroom while wasted. 643 00:35:51,520 --> 00:35:53,640 Speaker 3: Mark in Savannah, Georgia what you got for us. 644 00:35:54,920 --> 00:35:58,520 Speaker 4: Yeah, guys, as as competitive as you all are, I'm 645 00:35:58,560 --> 00:36:01,840 Speaker 4: surprised you haven't taken a bet on how long the 646 00:36:02,360 --> 00:36:04,120 Speaker 4: jury is going to have this case. 647 00:36:04,480 --> 00:36:07,480 Speaker 1: Oh that's a good think about the timeline. You know, 648 00:36:07,640 --> 00:36:09,520 Speaker 1: do you think it's going to be short long? 649 00:36:09,800 --> 00:36:11,920 Speaker 4: And if it is short and long, is that good 650 00:36:12,040 --> 00:36:12,480 Speaker 4: or bad? 651 00:36:13,080 --> 00:36:15,359 Speaker 1: Okay, Clay, ready, we got to just fire on this one. 652 00:36:15,480 --> 00:36:19,400 Speaker 1: You call sir for Martin Marcusavna. Don't get mad at me, everybody. 653 00:36:19,440 --> 00:36:21,920 Speaker 1: I'm just making a prediction, Okay. I think the verdict 654 00:36:21,960 --> 00:36:23,640 Speaker 1: is guilty. I think we know before the weekend. 655 00:36:24,800 --> 00:36:28,239 Speaker 3: I think that they will The faster it comes back, 656 00:36:28,280 --> 00:36:30,120 Speaker 3: the worse it is for Trump. So if they came 657 00:36:30,120 --> 00:36:32,960 Speaker 3: back today, for instance, I would almost certainly guarantee it's 658 00:36:32,960 --> 00:36:35,399 Speaker 3: going to be guilty. The longer it goes, the better 659 00:36:35,480 --> 00:36:38,200 Speaker 3: for him. I Well, the reason why I don't know 660 00:36:38,239 --> 00:36:40,080 Speaker 3: what I think there's going to be a mistrial. I 661 00:36:40,120 --> 00:36:42,279 Speaker 3: think there's going to be a mistrial. My prediction here 662 00:36:42,400 --> 00:36:44,920 Speaker 3: at least one judge or and the reason why, I 663 00:36:44,960 --> 00:36:46,040 Speaker 3: don't know when that would happen. 664 00:36:46,080 --> 00:36:46,560 Speaker 1: When do we know? 665 00:36:46,760 --> 00:36:46,880 Speaker 4: When? 666 00:36:46,920 --> 00:36:47,320 Speaker 1: Do we know that? 667 00:36:47,520 --> 00:36:49,839 Speaker 3: Well? One, I think that merchand will make them fight 668 00:36:49,920 --> 00:36:52,760 Speaker 3: it out. I think it'll be next week, next week. Okay, 669 00:36:52,840 --> 00:36:53,600 Speaker 3: he did get it in the