WEBVTT - Markets, Oil, And Metals (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.800
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. All right, let's get

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to these markets here. I mean a lot of folks.

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Tell me, Matt, if you want to try to call

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the bottom, look for capitulation. That means when everybody just

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of throws it in town. I'm looking at it.

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, the volume today, the dal Jones above normal,

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 1>SP above normal. I don't know. That's kind of feels

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:39.560
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of people are just kind of thrown

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:41.879
<v Speaker 1>into town. But let's talk to our professional here, Mike

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:46.840
<v Speaker 1>vogals On, Chief Investment Officer Managing director at cap Trust. Uh, Mike,

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:51.160
<v Speaker 1>are we at or near the bottom? If we are,

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>what data points do you look at to give you

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>some confidence about that call? Yeah, we've been wrestling with

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:57.600
<v Speaker 1>that question a lot, guys. I mean, it's it's a

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, clearly, what we're seeing is just continued obviously

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 1>de risking in the in the I think particularly the

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>hedge fund community. Um. You know that the hedge fund

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:09.960
<v Speaker 1>returns have been all over the place this year, and

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>along short guys are are really struggling. A couple of

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a couple of winners, but most of them are really

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 1>in trouble. And so I think I'm trying to de

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 1>risk sort of at any price. And you see that

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>in some of the activity today, Um, that that's certainly

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>a phase that the market has to go through. Um.

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think one of the things that's interesting

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>is this this uh sort of the sort of the

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 1>orderliness with which we've seen this this meltdown. Now right,

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>we're down fifteen percent or something like that from the

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:44.119
<v Speaker 1>peak on December or January three in the SMP. And

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:46.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's not been crazy. We haven't hit anywhere

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>near forty on the VIX. We're even today we're a

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>three four. Um, you know, it's it's it's we kind

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>of looked for it's. You could look at it in

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the numbers. But there's also a visceral reaction of just

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>like get me out at any price, right, And I

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>think you're starting to see that at some of the

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>most beaten down names, some of the really speculative innovation

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of names that that that have really you know,

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>they're down already. UM, So there's probably pockets of it,

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>but you know, I don't I don't think overall there's

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>a there's a ton of fear here. I'm worried that

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.119
<v Speaker 1>as interest rates continue to climb, as you pointed out,

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:30.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're over three ten, we're up three fifteen.

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:33.079
<v Speaker 1>This war hand and tame year, My goodness, I don't

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where it stops. The Feds have the

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 1>fence has really even haven't even started yet. Yeah, but

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I wonder when that's going to get priced in though

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>they haven't even started yet, but we already expect you know,

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:47.919
<v Speaker 1>half back to back, half basis point cuts. Some people

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>were saying seventy five and seventy five as well. Um,

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>is there a point when that gets priced in and

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, all of the concerns you had about inflation

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and fighting inflation, um, and the economy slowing down are

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>all priced in and we can get out. I think

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I think you've got to look for a direction, right,

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 1>You've got to look for the directional change and and

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>right now inflation has only been getting worse. Um And

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and at some stage we need to see a consistent

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:20.920
<v Speaker 1>pattern of you know, lower employment cost index or we

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>are slower slower growth, same thing with inflation. We need

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to see uh COVID lockdowns in China beginning to ease,

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:32.080
<v Speaker 1>so we have some sense that the that the that

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the logistics supply problems are are beginning

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>to free up. You know this. Right now, it seems

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>like everything is continuing to go in the wrong direction.

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>And until we get some fundamental change at the margins,

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 1>it's just hard to see why anybody would want to

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>step in front of it because there's no there's no

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>way to to know um. You know. Look, and every

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>time we talk about something like this, it really comes

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>down to your time frame. And if if your time

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>frame is relatively short, um, I think you're going to

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>stay out of the way of this thing. I think

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're a long term investor and you have some

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>dry powder, I think you have to begin to think

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>about nibbling at the at the margins here. Just because

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>there are some things that are pretty inexpensive. It's pretty easy,

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 1>for example, to buy a large cap value portfolio with

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the price to earnings ratio pretty close to single digits now,

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:25.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe ten or eleven twelve times earnings UM with a

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty healthy dividend. Okay, that's pretty interesting right over the

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>next five or ten years. UM. So, you know, I

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>think the pockets of a sort of long term allocation

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:38.160
<v Speaker 1>that can happen if you're if you're in the right

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 1>spot and you're sort of smart enough to know that

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>it's sort enought to see some of this coming, um

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:47.279
<v Speaker 1>and so, but you know, I just don't think we're

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:49.480
<v Speaker 1>there yet on a on a momentum kind of basis.

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>There's no way yet. Hey, Mike, thanks so much for

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 1>joining us here. Always appreciate getting your thoughts from here

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>on in these markets. Mike phobos On. He's a chief

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:04.840
<v Speaker 1>investment officer and managing director at Cap Trust. All Right, Matt,

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:09.239
<v Speaker 1>I filled up the beamer this weekend four one per gallon.

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to blame somebody, so I just obviously just

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>looked at OPEC because I'm looking at the oil here,

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Brent crude on eight dollars a barrel. But I forgot

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 1>about the whole refining process and taking that crude oil

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:23.479
<v Speaker 1>into gas or dies or whatever else we need to consume.

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 1>There's a whole refinery process out there, and don't you

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>know haveavier Blast Calumnus for Bloomberg Opinion comes out with

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 1>a fantastic column today looking at that part of the

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>energy stream. The mark of the refinery business. How your

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>those guys are making a lot of money right now?

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Aren't they making quarter lot of money right now? Record

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:49.279
<v Speaker 1>margins for American refiners currently about fifty dollars per barrel

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:52.280
<v Speaker 1>of refining margin. This is a bit of a back

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>of the envelope calculation. Each refinery is different, so you

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 1>cannot really have like a benchmark for the whole industry,

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:01.839
<v Speaker 1>but we have a of the envelope calculation that in

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the industry we called the three to one refinery margin,

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and that is the record high up. In simple terms,

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 1>a refinery usually makes something between ten and twenty dollars,

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:15.280
<v Speaker 1>but barrely, they're making about fifty five right now, so

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 1>it's as good as it gets for them. And uh,

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, people pay attention to normal gas every you know,

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>consumer focused cable TV news channel. Uh, we're looking at

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Paul and I have a huge bank of screens here.

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>They're all focused on the price at the pump and

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>talking about regular unleaded, but diesel is almost seven dollars

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 1>a barrel where I live. What is going on with that? Well,

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that is the market that is the tightest of all

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:46.840
<v Speaker 1>of them. There is very little diesel going around. And

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>this is a this is something that really mattered. You're right,

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:52.720
<v Speaker 1>most of consumers, myself included, we we we really look

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 1>at cattle in prices because that's what we we we

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:58.360
<v Speaker 1>we need for our car. But the global economy, the

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:02.479
<v Speaker 1>American economy, really run on diesel. That is the fuel

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>for tracks, that is the fuel for heavy machinery things

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 1>about all of those machines and diggers on construction sites,

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's also the fuel for for farming. And supplies

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>are well above pre pandemic levels because in far all

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>of us, myself included, are buying all these stuff online

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 1>and that all needs to be transported in tracks and

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 1>bands and their fuel on on diesel. The supply has

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>not really come back, and lots of refineries with trouble

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 1>coming back from from pandemic and the combination of both

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>has sent inventories to very low levels, and particularly the

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>East Coast, the Eastern seaboard of the United States, lowest

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 1>inventories in thirty two years for diesel, and that's why

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you see retail prices going to record levels. And UH

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>diesel prices have never been so high compared to gasolin

0:07:56.040 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>prices in the United States. And and just ongoing comfort

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and scoll from one of the independent American refinance hs

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Sinclair where the CFO used to me gave the quote

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>of the day or the month of what's going on

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>on the on the diesel market, and morgenally all the

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of retail fuel market in the US. He said,

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>pre pandemic demand and post pandemic supply. That's that's the problem.

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Demand is back to what it was before the pandemic,

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 1>but the supply has not come back. One of the

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:32.439
<v Speaker 1>other things that we've noticed, Javier, just on an anecdotal level,

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>is it's harder and harder to get cheap tickets on

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 1>an airline. Okay, in Europe, um, it's a different story,

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 1>but here a lot of people are getting priced out

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of the market to fly, even in luggage class. Jet

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Fuel is another one of those markets that's super tight, right, Yeah,

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 1>jet fuel is also very tight. I think that generally

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 1>what has happened was that the industry has been a

0:08:56.360 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>bit surprised by the return of trouble by by air,

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>not only in the US but also in Europe. Refinance,

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>we're not making enough jet fuel now. The prices are there,

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>so get fuel is selling in New York hardword that

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:14.199
<v Speaker 1>the benchmark for the US East coat at the equivalent

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to about two and fifty dollars per barrel, so very

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:22.320
<v Speaker 1>very high prices that the highest ever. And refiners are

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>something that we are trying to make more get fuel.

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>But if they make more get fuel at the expense

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>of making maybe a bit less decent or maybe a

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>less a bit of less catoline, we really are getting

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 1>quite a lot of strong demand for all of them.

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 1>And and and you are right, consumers are starting to

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:43.199
<v Speaker 1>get price out on airth travel just because it's getting expensive.

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 1>But I was in America only ten days ago UM

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:51.679
<v Speaker 1>flying into New York. Both my flying and my flyout

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>were completely booked UM every class, first class, business, Premium, Economy,

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and Economy. All of the seats were occupied. And that

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a sense of how Weston the demand is.

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>After two years of not traveling around, people are still

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>putting with high prices because they want to They want

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>to see relatives, they want to see colleagues, they want

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to see business contacts. Have your How hard or difficult

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 1>is it for refineries to increase capacity? They have to restart,

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:24.559
<v Speaker 1>refineries have to build new ones. How does that look

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:27.599
<v Speaker 1>on the spade. It's very difficult because once you you

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 1>shut down a refinery, that's not going to come back.

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 1>And the trend in Europe and the United States over

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the last few years have been of reducing refining capacity

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 1>because of um well, we thought that peak demand was coming,

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the energy transitions, some of the refineries were actually now

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 1>surrounded by big cities or operating with new environmental regulations

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>was getting more difficult. And then pandemic hit and that

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 1>two more charge the trend. So what we saw is,

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 1>excluding the Middle East, on China, we saw the biggest

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 1>amount of refining capacity laws in thirty years over the

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:07.199
<v Speaker 1>last year and a half two years. Because of the pandemic.

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Those refineries are not going to come back. And China

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 1>has a specifying capacity, but they really control a lot

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>of what they are exporting, so you cannot count on them.

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 1>So we unfortunately seem that we have hit the refinery wall,

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:24.199
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna we're gonna have to deal with that

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:26.959
<v Speaker 1>for for for a time, and the only solution is

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to reduce our slow down the demand for fuel, and

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:35.319
<v Speaker 1>that only comes be are two things that they are

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 1>closely related. Demanded strokes will be a very high prices.

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>So just some American Son people just decide that they

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>cannot drive because it's very expensive for outright recession and unfortunately,

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 1>probably we're gonna hit both of them by the end

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>of the year. By the way, I heard Tom talking

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 1>to Will Kennedy the other day on Bloomberg Radio and

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:58.839
<v Speaker 1>asked him, you know where would Brent be right now

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:01.679
<v Speaker 1>in price terms if it weren't for the lockdowns in China,

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>if it weren't for COVID zero, And he said, maybe

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 1>more like or even closer to the high. What do

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you think. I think that we will be higher. I

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>think that we will be a hundred and fifty. It

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>was not because of China shut down. I mean, China

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 1>is all what is stopping this market to really rallying

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>on a moneyful way. Um, if China will not shut down,

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 1>we will be higher than that. Uh. Really in some ways,

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 1>as Son speaking in private son government officials both in

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:38.079
<v Speaker 1>the US and Europe say, and also oil traders, the

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 1>refusal of China to really go with the fives and

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the moderna vaccine. It's all what is preventing this market

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 1>to a hundred and all? Right? Have you ever last

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 1>calumnist for Bloomberg Opinion got a great, great calm today

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 1>talking at the refining aspect of the supply chain within

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>global energy. You know, for a lot of folks, medals

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>are a say haven or seen as a safe haven

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 1>for investors in uncertain times. I wonder if that's still

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the case given all the uncertainty we have out there,

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:12.200
<v Speaker 1>whether it's economic, federal reserve, UH, interest rate moves, geopolitical issues.

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>It's checking with one Matthew Miller, one of many medals

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and mining analyst at cfr A Research. Matt, can people

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of hide out a little bit in metals here? Yeah?

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean it is a great question because we've seen

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 1>we've seen precious medals have a safe haven bid earlier

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:34.560
<v Speaker 1>in the year, but they have they have since sold off,

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think that you know, people are preferring the dollar,

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the US dollar as a safe haven of choice right

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 1>now and you know, I think with the strength of dollar,

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 1>we have seen both precious metals and industrial metals sell off,

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I think that risk off trade is

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 1>really um, you know, a combination of three major factors.

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:56.840
<v Speaker 1>But you know it fears about inflation and dead number

0:13:56.840 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 1>one in Russia's war against Ukraine and how that impacting

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the supply side of the equation for industrial medals in particular,

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>And then you have China's COVID lockdown, and I think

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 1>that you know, with inflation remaining elevated, we here at

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 1>c fr A do think the industrial medals in particular,

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 1>it is a good place to you know, hedge inflation,

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>even though we have seen that weakness recently, we do

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 1>think it's a great place to be currently in terms

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of treasuries. Uh, this morning we're looking at three eighteen.

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I think, let me check to get the exact here

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>three spot Well we've come down substantially three spot zero

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>one eight and nonetheless it's a much better return than gold.

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Is that a competitor? Yeah, I I absolutely think it is.

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think gold tends to do well when

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 1>real rates are declining, and we we threw in the

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>talent gold we were bullish for a number of years

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 1>leading up to the end of one, and you know,

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 1>we were too early on that knowing what's happened this year.

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>But um, we do think old is gonna struggle to

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>reach new highs in this cycle because you you do

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>see um, you know, you do see real rates starting

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to creep back up. And so we think that as

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the FED is tightening and real rates start to you know,

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 1>they're now above UM, they're now positive again, and we

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>think that gold's gold and precious metals are gonna really

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 1>struggle in this environment. And we do think that that

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 1>is maybe the number one thing over the short intermediate

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>term that drives gold prices, that negative correlation with real yields.

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 1>So we do think that that's a major headwind for gold. Hey, Matt,

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at the nickel a thirty five percent year

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>to date. What was slash is the nickel call that

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I so obviously missed well, I mean, nicol is an

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting one because um, the spike and nickel really was

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>driven by a major um, a major short squeeze, and

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>so um, when you look at nickel, it is one

0:15:56.600 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 1>of the medals that is at risk on the supply side.

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 1>From Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Russia produces around seven percent

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 1>of the of the global UH supply of nickel, and

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 1>it was already pretty um you know, the the inventory

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 1>levels were already pretty tight. So it was already a

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 1>structurally tight market. And what we saw with um uh

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, Russia invading invading Ukraine, you did see a

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>major um, a major short seller in China that was

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 1>was literally the big short that that kind of drove

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 1>what's happened with nickel and causing the CME to actually um,

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, causing the LMY excuse me to actually um

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 1>halt the exchange a number of times in the last

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>couple of months. And so we think that you know,

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 1>there that market is going to be structurally tight, along

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>with aluminum and palladium. Um, there's a number of markets

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that rely pretty heavily on that region for for global supply.

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I'm sure the CMME is very happy

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>that that was the l M E and and on them.

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that's done more than just reputational damage

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 1>to the LEMY, I mean other people who are saying,

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I'm not trading there anymore. Yeah, Well,

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I do think that they will regain sort of that trust.

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it does hurt in the short term because

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:19.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are a number of trades that were

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 1>canceled that the days that these were um you know,

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the days that the halt happened, and and you never

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:28.640
<v Speaker 1>really want that to happen, and you don't you never

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:31.880
<v Speaker 1>want to see that type of volatility. But the reality

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 1>is there there are a number of metals markets that

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 1>aren't very liquid that are you know, they will see

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 1>this sort of volatility, and so you know, the exchanges,

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:44.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, they do want to, you know, kind of

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:47.119
<v Speaker 1>do do their part to kind of correct the market

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:50.360
<v Speaker 1>when you do have a major, um, a major trader

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 1>out there where this was this was a lot of speculation,

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 1>but it was also somebody that was going to be

0:17:55.680 --> 0:17:59.119
<v Speaker 1>needing to close those short positions. So um yeah, I

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:01.679
<v Speaker 1>mean it's there's no easy solutions for them, But I

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 1>do think that um, you know, they're gonna regain trust.

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's a long term issue in my opinion.

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>All Right, Matthew Miller, thank you so much for joining us.

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Miller Metals and Mining Analysis c f R, a

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:22.400
<v Speaker 1>research well in person investor conferences are back. In fact,

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence is hosting its first annual Thematic Investing Conference

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 1>UH May ten and eleven at Bloomberg's Global HQ in

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:33.200
<v Speaker 1>New York City. The inaugural in person event will focus

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:38.160
<v Speaker 1>on these key themes plant based foods, digital healthcare, digital commerce,

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>digital payments, and cryptocurrency. So all the big topics that

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:42.879
<v Speaker 1>are front and center. Let's get a little bit of

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 1>a preview. Eric Baltunist, Uh, he covers E t F

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Intelligence, and Eric, I know you're deeply involved

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:51.639
<v Speaker 1>in this conference, so you know, what are Bloomberg clients

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>that are attending here? What are they going to see? Um,

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna see basically a different themes emerging themes. Why

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:00.399
<v Speaker 1>themes matter? You have throw stand, A lot of the

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:03.680
<v Speaker 1>investing universe used to be divided or is divided into sectors,

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the gift sectors. But the the world is changing so

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>quickly theme ets I think capture that changed a little

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 1>quicker than the sectors. Do you know some of these

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>stocks are in multiple sectors at least in their business lines,

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 1>So more and more of the money is going towards

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>thematic ETFs and that's why I'm involved because e t

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:22.879
<v Speaker 1>f s are tend to be sort of at the

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:25.439
<v Speaker 1>forefront of finding new themes because if you find a

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 1>new theme and it starts to go up a lot,

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:28.919
<v Speaker 1>you can get some cash. So if you look at

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the sectors, uh if thematic ETFs have the second most

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 1>assets after tech, So we all know tech rules the sectors,

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>but themes are number two now above healthcare. So that's

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 1>how this is. These used to be kind of a

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:42.879
<v Speaker 1>laughing stock like a video game. Et F would come

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:44.920
<v Speaker 1>out everyday the trash and laugh at it. Now it's

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:47.399
<v Speaker 1>big business. This stuff is the future of active in

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, and it's smart of b I to get

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>on board. So a lot, a lot a lot of

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>times Matt and I away ask a guess, you know,

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:56.440
<v Speaker 1>what sectors are you looking at? But maybe a better question,

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:58.359
<v Speaker 1>or certainly a different question be what themes are you

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 1>guys focusing on? Yes, so well they're going to focus

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>on everything. You know you talked about blockchain, cryptocurrency, plant

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 1>based themes, the digit digitization of everything is a big one.

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:10.679
<v Speaker 1>Some that we're looking at this year that are interesting

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>are natural resources, right themes time Sometimes people think theme

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>are themes are just growth stocks sort of you know, repackaged,

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:21.159
<v Speaker 1>but there's natural resources which hold oil mining stocks. You've

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 1>also got infrastructure is a theme, and with the infrastructure

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>spending that could be big the metaverse, even though that's

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 1>been hit hard, that is a theme people are looking at.

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:32.359
<v Speaker 1>So those are some of the ones that we're looking

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>at on my panel. We also have ARC. We don't

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>have Kathy, We have Brett Witten and ARC. To me,

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I think put themes on the map all of Kathy's

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>funds or theme ETFs. But the main fund isn't a theme, right,

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:48.160
<v Speaker 1>It kind of is disruptive innovation. We consider innovation a theme,

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:50.640
<v Speaker 1>and Kathy kind of kicked off a whole category because

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Kathy goes across sectors to just find innovative and disruptive companies.

0:20:56.680 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>So in a way, that's how we define themes. And

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>so it's interesting because I was I was thinking first

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:04.639
<v Speaker 1>about factors, right, because that became huge, especially in the

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>hedge fund world five six, seven years ago. Right, And

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Paul mentioned sectors. Now those are two different things, right.

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 1>A factor and a sector are different ways of categorizing

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>investment opportunities. I guess companies or what have you? Um,

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>themes can be kind of either one. Yeah, no, you're

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>what you're hitting on is so important and interesting and

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 1>what everybody in asset management should understand. Themes are going

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 1>to steal your thunder. They steal from the sectors, which

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:36.639
<v Speaker 1>are sort of born in this legacy. There's only eleven

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>of them, and they're sort of stale, and they steal

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:42.639
<v Speaker 1>from factors because growth momentum value. Some of these to

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 1>a normal person or an advisor with younger clients, they

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 1>just don't resonate. Whereas some of these themes have a

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:52.360
<v Speaker 1>narrative attached to them. You can identify them. They get

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 1>your imagination going. And a lot of them also will

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:57.400
<v Speaker 1>hold stocks that aren't in the broad indexes, so they

0:21:57.440 --> 0:22:00.360
<v Speaker 1>compliment nicely. So I agree with you, Matt, you're kind

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 1>of stealing the thunder from both the factor world and

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the sector world. By the way, Um, Paul, did you

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 1>know that Eric and I have a television show every

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Monday at one pm? Do you really? Yes? So that

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:16.679
<v Speaker 1>today's Monday and today's Monday, we're almost there focused on

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>E T F s and what have we got on

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:21.879
<v Speaker 1>the program today? Today? We have Dimensional, which is a

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>major factor issue where I'm gonna actually hopefully ask dimensional

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 1>what do you think about themes coming in and trying

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to steal some of your business? You know what, I'll

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:32.440
<v Speaker 1>make sure And then the drill down. We drill down

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 1>into one ticker every week is net Z and this

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:37.679
<v Speaker 1>is the climate Transition stocks. So these are stocks like

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:41.239
<v Speaker 1>auto companies and chemical companies and even oil companies that

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 1>uh engine number one fields are driving the transition. But

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:47.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a thirty stocks and again it's a thematic sort

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:51.120
<v Speaker 1>of E s G climate play E T F UM

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:53.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's what we're gonna drill down. So themes will

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:56.159
<v Speaker 1>be part of the show. They're part of most shows actually, UM,

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and I'm looking forward to it. What are we seeing

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>in terms of flows because we've had but I think

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:03.120
<v Speaker 1>five weeks of losses on the sm P, right, that's

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the worst in over a decade in terms of losing streaks. Um.

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>We've even seen a big losing streak for bitcoin. I

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:13.640
<v Speaker 1>think six weeks in a row of losses on bitcoin,

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the worst since like two thousand fourteen, which was back

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:19.400
<v Speaker 1>when no one cared about it except for me. Um,

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>What are we seeing in terms of flows when I

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 1>pull up E T F go What am I looking at?

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I remember I was on a segment

0:23:26.880 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 1>one time with you on bitcoin. Still kick myself for

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 1>not just buying a little I'm like, what was I thinking? You?

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:39.160
<v Speaker 1>And anyway, So look, generally speaking, the flows are still

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>buying H y G, the cues, they are getting bids,

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>they've taken in money, the triple leverage cues. I think

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>that by the dip crowd is still looking for opportunities.

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:49.719
<v Speaker 1>That said, if you look across the flows in general,

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 1>what you tend to find is like investors are in

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:54.880
<v Speaker 1>a dark room searching for a door out, because there's

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 1>not really a rhyme or reason. You'll see gold within

0:23:57.600 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 1>flows one week out the next, and then financials in

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.399
<v Speaker 1>flows out. So I can tell people just are a

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:05.359
<v Speaker 1>little lost. Whereas most year there's a general sort of slow,

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 1>hurd ish move towards one or two things, this year

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 1>is just all over the place, like someone trying to

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 1>find something. Eric good stuff. As always, Eric Baltunas making

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the trek into New York for the Bloomberg and Arrector

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Broker studio. He's a senior et f Annals for Bloomberg

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence and also a proud graduate of the State University

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:27.160
<v Speaker 1>of New Jersey, the Rutgers Scarlet Knights. Thanks for listening

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to interviews of Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller three.

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Pet On Ball Sweeney I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide at

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.