WEBVTT - How The Voynich Manuscript Works

0:00:01.880 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff you Should Know, friend House Stuff Works

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>dot Com, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark.

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>There's Charles W. Chuck Bryant, and uh Noel's over there,

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 1>and this is Stuff you should know. Which episode I'm

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>not a percent sure yet. Let's do this one. Okay,

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>how's it going. It's going pretty well, man? Yeah, yeah,

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 1>how over with you? I'm pretty excited about both the shows. Yeah,

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 1>these are gonna be blockbusters if we can get them right.

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's right, they're gonna break the box office. Yeah. Uh so, Chuck,

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>where you ever? Um? Have have you ever heard of

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the Voytage Manuscript before? Prior to this? It's it's fairly famous. Yeah,

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>but just a few years ago, like through working here. Yeah,

0:00:57.240 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>thanks to the stuff they don't want you to know

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>boys today. I'm sure they covered this already. Certainly, there's

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:04.759
<v Speaker 1>just no way. It may have been their first episode.

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>You know. You just say the words ancient codex and

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:10.759
<v Speaker 1>guys come flying. Yeah, they're like, what do you want?

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>When they open their trench coats and they got ancient

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>codices aligning it. Um. Well, for those of you who

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know what the Voyage Manuscript is It is a

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>what appears to be a legitimate medieval codex, which is

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff that was formerly a loose leaf manuscript that's been

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:33.559
<v Speaker 1>bound later on. That's what a codex is. Um. That

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>is written in a language that no one has any

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>idea how to read. It's never read it, it's never

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>been seen before. Um. It doesn't appear in any other

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>type of writing that's known to survive. And it's also

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>illustrated with some really bizarre pictures, like otherworldly plants, women

0:01:54.920 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>doing things that you are aren't readily identifiable. They're hears

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>to be a recipe section, yes, pharmac pharmacological section. Yeah.

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>It's almost like a a farmer's almanac of sorts from

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>medieval times, written in language and depicting plants and things

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>that have never existed. And the reason why it's it

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>seems legitimate is that it bears a striking resemblance two

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>similar books at the time. But those books are written

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:31.080
<v Speaker 1>in things like Old English or Italian or things that

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 1>people can read, and they have pictures of plants in

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>them that you point to and say, oh, well, that's

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a holly bush or something. This is not the case.

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:45.679
<v Speaker 1>The thing is a mysterious otherworldly tome that clearly made

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>an appearance. Somehow it crossed over from a parallel multiverse

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>into this one accidentally. Yeah, I've got my theory, which

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll just go ahead and tease the listener with it.

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll throw out later. Okay, that's it. That's your teeth.

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:01.079
<v Speaker 1>I'll throw out my you've got the theory, but I

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>just laid mine on the table. Which is what that

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a book from a parallel multiverse to ours. Dude,

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>it's slipped into this. It's like that. Have you heard

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 1>that barren Stain bears theory? Yeah? Sure, I don't remember

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 1>it is barren Stein. I always remember, is Barren Stain.

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh really, huh you're the only one. No, that's not true.

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>You're one of the few. I was really surprised to

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:26.359
<v Speaker 1>hear people thought it was barren Stein. But apparently as

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>far as that theory goes, and if you don't know

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 1>what I'm talking about, just like a barren Stain Bears theory,

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess. Yeah. I mean I was convinced that barren

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Stein Berenstein, Yeah, but not a e instead Berenstein Bears

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>always always Barren Stain. For me, it's so weird, and

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm one of those that was so convinced. I was like, no,

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>this is clearly some weird hoax because it's the Berenstein Bears.

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Everybody knows that that's so funny. And I'm not alone,

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>like it seems like the majority of people are definitely,

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 1>they're very You're one of the few barren Stainers. Well,

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>its supposedly, according to this this hypothesis, I actually managed

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>to slip over from a multiverse into this one without

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>realizing it from the baron staying in the universe. So um, anyway,

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's get back to the Voyage Manuscript, shall we, because

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:17.720
<v Speaker 1>it is a real deal thing, um, and it apparently

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:21.359
<v Speaker 1>it has a certain amount of providence to it. We

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 1>know about when it first popped up thanks to a

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:29.919
<v Speaker 1>seventeenth century letter that identifies it as having been purchased

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:34.679
<v Speaker 1>by one Rudolph the Second, who was the Holy Roman

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Emperor for a while. Um. And Rudolph loved curious things, right,

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 1>he collected um little people apparently. Uh, he had a

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>cabinet of curiosities of sorts, and he was very interested

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:52.479
<v Speaker 1>in this Voyage manuscript, so much so that he paid

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>six hundred gold dukits for it, which is apparently about

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the same as ninety thou dollars today for this book

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>because he a lot and he supposedly was the first

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>owner of the Voyage manuscript. That's right. It has been

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>dated um with carbon dating to the early fourteen hundreds. Uh,

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>And it has a very strange it's not written on

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:18.159
<v Speaker 1>parchment or any kind of regular paper. It's written on

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>calf skin, which is not a it's sort of is

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a somewhat of a giveaway or at least a big

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 1>clue what that it dates it. Yeah, well, we'll talk

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>about whether or not it's a hoax if someone found

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>this this vellum, and that'd be very strange to create

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:41.719
<v Speaker 1>a hoax and dig up hundreds of year old calf skin.

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>So it's not likely that's a hoax. No, there's all

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>sorts of reasons it's it's not a hoax, but that

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that rumor still persists. So in six nine, this antique

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:55.040
<v Speaker 1>collector and progue named George Bresch he uh sent a

0:05:55.120 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>letter to this dude uh a fantasist I think so,

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>a fantasyist cuature. He was a scholar in Rome. And

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 1>he basically said, and this is so weird to me.

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 1>He's he teases this guy, It's like, I've got this thing.

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:13.359
<v Speaker 1>It's really weird. It's got all these crazy symbols and

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>images and this alphabet that is uh, unknown to anyone.

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>But I'm just not gonna send it t Im, just

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna tell you about it. Well, he loved it himself.

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:26.160
<v Speaker 1>He tried to crack the code himself, the guy who

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 1>was the owner of it at the time. But I

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 1>send that letter, just teasing the guy and be like,

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>have a nice day, because he wanted him. He he

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:34.720
<v Speaker 1>wanted him to crack it for him, but he didn't

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:36.599
<v Speaker 1>want to give up the book. Well how can you

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>crack it if you don't send it. Well, you can

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>send like, um, facsimiles of it that kind of stuff.

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 1>So he did that, I believe. So I know he

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>was cracking it himself. But this guy UM an atheist

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Kirk creature. He uh. He was supposedly very well known

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 1>at the time for having cracked Egyptian hieroglyphics, even though

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>it later turned out he had gotten it wrong. But

0:06:58.000 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>that's why I wonder why I didn't send it to

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the guy. Well, the lesson has learned because um what

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>was the dude's named barsh the original guy who wrote

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the letter. Yeah, George boresh So, um, he dies and

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>he's he dedicated his life to cracking the Voynage Manuscript,

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>which wasn't called the Voyage Manuscript by that point. No,

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I should point out I don't think I had a

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>name at the time. I actually called this something. Um, well,

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>they definitely didn't call it the Voyage Manuscript. We'll see

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 1>in a minute. But um, George boresh Uh, he died

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and he gave it to a friend of his, Jan

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Mark Marcy. And Marcy is pretty good reason or supports

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the idea that Borresh didn't want to give up the

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>book for good reason, because he actually did contact um

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the Jesuit living living in Rome Kircher and said, hey,

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 1>here's the book, figure it out, and the guy never

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>got it back. So if Borsch wanted to keep his book,

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>he was very smart to not send it to Kircher. Well,

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and when he sent it, when Marcy sent it to Kircher,

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>he said, by the way, um, I know a little

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 1>bit about the background. It looks like it was of

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the work of Roger Bacon. Yeah, even though there was

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 1>no nothing to back that up. Well there there isn't

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>anything to back it up. And that's actually it turns

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>out Rudolph the Second believed that it was a work

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>of Roger Bacon when he bought it. That's right. Roger

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Bacon was this. Um, he was basically a proto scientist

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 1>from the thirteenth century in England. And we've talked about

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 1>him before, I think in the Scientific Method episode, like

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>he really helped lay the groundwork for science in the

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Western world. Yeah, he's credited with a lot of things

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>he didn't do too. Oh is that right? Yeah? Um, well, anyway,

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>this is possibly one of them. They there's still a

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>persistent legend that it was Roger Bacon's work, that it

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 1>did come from England. But um, the prevailing ideas about

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the voyage manuscripts providence, um kind of drifted a little

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>further east, as we'll see. But um, when Rudolph the

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Second bought the thing, uh, he thought it was Francis

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Bacon and all this were we know, second hand, Chuck, like,

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 1>we don't. Like, there's no documents showing that Rudolph the

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Second purchased this book. There's not a sales receipt, no

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>but there's something close that does kind of back it up.

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Rudolph the Second had a dude um named Jacobus the

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 1>temper Nets I believe it's how you pronounced that, And

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>this was his um court pharmacists, basically his court botanist um.

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>And he was actually a really rich man. And Rudolf

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 1>the Second, out of an appreciation to this guy for

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>saving his life, gave him the Voyage Manuscript as a gift.

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>And this dude's watermark or seal or signature appears very

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>faintly in the Voyage Manuscript. So it definitely backs up

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the idea that Rudolf the Second own this book at

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 1>one point in time, and it's entirely possible that he

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:55.839
<v Speaker 1>did think Roger Bacon created it, but that doesn't mean

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that Roger Bacon did create it. Uh So, for a

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 1>couple hundred years, it kind of, you know, wasn't on

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the forefront of anyone's mind, basically disappeared until when here

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 1>we go, Wilfrid Voynage bought it in Italy, uh and

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>get said, I guess let's name it after me. Yeah,

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Well they he in the manuscript became like very uh

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty famous because he was tireless in trying to get

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 1>this thing cracked. This book has this really neat um

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>trait of like bringing people under its sway. You know,

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 1>it's well, it's a mystery, it is, and everybody loves

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 1>a mystery. It seems like it's possibly an impenetrable mystery,

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 1>which I think makes people want to crack it even

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:45.680
<v Speaker 1>more sure because you get to be the one, you know, Yeah,

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 1>and you could change the name to the Josh Clark

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Manuscript and say Voynage. Get bit, who's that? Do you

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:55.079
<v Speaker 1>remember some company like bought the Sears Tower and tried

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to change the name to their company's name for the tower,

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 1>and she, howgo do you learn that a few years ago?

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:04.319
<v Speaker 1>Is it not the serious tower anymore? They tried to

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>change Everybody's like, no, we're still calling it the Sears Tower.

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh Like even if they did change it, people are

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>still going to call it that. Yeah, gotcha. So I

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>think the same thing would happen with the Voyage Manuscript

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 1>even if I cracked it, right. That's like with a

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:20.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of professional sports stadiums, I'll still refer to it

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:23.199
<v Speaker 1>as the original cool name and not you know, right,

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the r c A Dome or whatever. Although the new

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:28.679
<v Speaker 1>stadiums are are they just don't even bother naming them.

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 1>They just go ahead and say who's got the most money? Right? Uh?

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>So voyage Uh, this manuscript he worked tirelessly. Uh and

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 1>it eventually ended up in modern times at Yale University

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:45.320
<v Speaker 1>in nine where it still resides today. Right. So that's

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:47.719
<v Speaker 1>just the story of it. And there's a lot more

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>detail to who have had their hands on this thing

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>over the years. Yeah, we'll talk about that, um right

0:11:52.559 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>after this break. Big announcement, folks. It's called a podcast

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 1>event called The Message, that's all right. Thanks to ge

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Podcast Theater and Panoply, there is an eight part series

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:17.679
<v Speaker 1>out right now called The Message, and you can get

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 1>it wherever you get your podcasts. Yeah, and you know what,

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna blow your collective scientific minds because it's currently

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>rocking our worlds. So The Message follows the story of

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:30.839
<v Speaker 1>Nicki Tomlin, who's a PhD in linguistics, right, that's right

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 1>at the University of Chicago, if I'm not mistaken, that's right.

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>And she's following a team of cryptologists, which really, if

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you say cryptology, you've really got me hooked already. Their

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>research thank tank called Cipher and they're trying to dacode

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 1>a message received from outer space from seventy years ago. Yeah,

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>it's from outer space, we think. And if you're not

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>familiar with the story, well then I guess you'd better

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>go listen to the message. You can get it on iTunes,

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 1>you can get it on any of your podcast apps.

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Just go search for the message and subscribe today. So

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 1>thanks to g E Podcast Theater and panopally for pushing

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the boundaries of the medium. You guys are doing a

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 1>great job. Go subscribe to the message and listen today.

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>So Chucky, you're saying that um Voyage, it went from

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Voyage ultimately to Yale, but in between that, like, Voytage

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 1>really kind of brought this manuscript into the four. Like

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:31.079
<v Speaker 1>he he identified people who were professionals at cracking codes

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and said, can you can you do this? The first

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>guy he went to was a University of Pennsylvania philosopher

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:43.680
<v Speaker 1>UM and he had a really weird idea of what

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the Voyage manuscript is really all about. Yeah, so if you, um,

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the Voyage manuscript, the script is

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 1>like this weird really ornate lettering, right and it's actually

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 1>called gallows because a lot of it were like looks

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 1>a bit like a hangman's gallop, and um this uh.

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:10.959
<v Speaker 1>University of Pennsylvania professor philosophy professor decided that it wasn't

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the text itself that mattered. It was the little tiny

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 1>microscopic figures that the ink made inside each letter that

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 1>was the actual code. And I think Voytage like just

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>took his manuscript back and slowly backed out of the

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 1>room when the guys told him, man, yeah, he said,

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>they corresponded to Greek letters. Uh. And he actually said,

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a message in here that confirms that it's Roger

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Bacon inside the inc with these Greek letters. Uh. And

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 1>not only that, but Bacon well just some other theories

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 1>that's not even worth getting into, other theories that Bacon

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>hid in this inc. It was all untrue though, right.

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Other people went back and said, oh, let us look

0:14:56.880 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>at these little weird um letters, microscopic letters that you're

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>seeing in the ink. Oh, well, that's just the ink

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>cracking as it dries, So you're nuts. Yeah, he I mean,

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>he tried to decrypt some of it, and it held

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>water for a little while, but it was only like

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a very small part that was that even matched what

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>his decryption uh theory. So yeah, it didn't hold any water.

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>So that was the first guy who took a real

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 1>crack at it UM. The second people who did were

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>actually world War two codebreakers UM and the guy who

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>founded the n S a William Friedman who gets a

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of the credit, but his wife is actually at

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 1>least as equal, if not as better, in in cryptography,

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>his wife Elizabeth, and they actually UM as World War

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Two was waning, These people like broke the Japanese code right,

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the Purple Code, I think is what it was called.

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 1>So they weren't like slouches as far as cryptography went. UM,

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>but they got together as the war was waning and

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>winding down and they weren't as needed any longer. They

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>got a bunch of their fellow cryptographers together and said,

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>let's work on the Voyage manuscript. And I guess they

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 1>probably figured that they would have it handled in short order.

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 1>That's not at all how it worked out. No, he

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 1>did not figure anything out. He gave up I think

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 1>he spent like thirty years working on it and then

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 1>finally declared that the thing was impossibly couldn't do it

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and surrendered. I think it's how it was put. And

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 1>so after that this thing, once this guy and his

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 1>group said we can't do this, it kind of got

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 1>relegated to Yale for a while, and then the internet came.

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 1>That's right, So you want to talk about the book

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>itself a little bit, man, I would love to. The

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 1>book itself is two hundred and forty six pages, although

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 1>they think it is missing up to uh, you know,

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty fifty five pages. Uh. I mean they don't know,

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>but they're guessing right, it could have been up to

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and seventy three pages long. It's about nine

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>inches uh tall by six inches wide, and um, like

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 1>we said, it's on calf skin, which lends credence to

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it's from the fourteen hundreds. It it

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>matches up with the carbon dating, so that makes some sense,

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:17.879
<v Speaker 1>it does. They think that up to eight people worked

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 1>on the righting itself, and it is written from left

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>to right, which also lends credence to the fact that

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 1>could be European in nature. Makes sense, of course, uh,

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:34.199
<v Speaker 1>although there are other theories that it is from the

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:36.159
<v Speaker 1>eastern side of the world. But I don't know what

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>evidence they have on that. There's also the theories that

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>it's from the far west as well, if like Mexico

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:44.479
<v Speaker 1>or Central Americas. Some people say that's right. Um. And

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 1>then so with the actual words themselves, the letters, there's

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I think forty to forty characters in this weird alphabet

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 1>and understand, and that depends on who you ask. I've

0:17:56.480 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>seen as low as fifteen. Yeah, the highest I saw

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:01.800
<v Speaker 1>is forty, but average I saw was thirty. Is what

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:06.120
<v Speaker 1>people typically cite. Um, and these things, these letters are

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:09.880
<v Speaker 1>put together to form what we would think of his words,

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and then the words are put together without any punctuation,

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and then occasionally are put into paragraphs. But for the

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>most part, it's just like world World World word, World

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 1>World Word. And then on almost every single page of

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the codex itself, Um, there's an illustration of some sort

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:32.119
<v Speaker 1>or another. Yeah, about two and twenty illustrations. Um. The

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 1>fact that it didn't have punctuation isn't a big deal.

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:37.919
<v Speaker 1>Apparently that was pretty normal for the time, so that

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:42.159
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really give anything away. Um. And it's also not

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:47.879
<v Speaker 1>divided into chapters via text, but via illustrations. They believe

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 1>it might be divided into six different chapters, which are

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>a botanical this is where you're gonna find your weird

0:18:55.000 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>unknown plants, um astronomical which uh zos, adiacal signs, and

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>celestial bodies stuff like that, which are and we should

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:07.640
<v Speaker 1>say the zodiac symbols and um drawings of the zodiac

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 1>are the only things that are unquestionably recognizable in the

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:14.199
<v Speaker 1>whole book, which makes it even stranger that it's not

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:19.639
<v Speaker 1>just completely fantastic. There's also some stuff that's recognizable. There's

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:25.639
<v Speaker 1>a biological chapter with naked ladies doing weird things and

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 1>bathtubs um or possibly water slides. It kind of looks

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:34.119
<v Speaker 1>like in at least one a water slide. Yeah, I

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 1>don't know what you would call it a water slide.

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:38.159
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it would be uh No, there's one there's a

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Roman aqueduct or something. There's another one though that's like

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a vertical drawing straight up and down. Uh And

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:49.199
<v Speaker 1>there's like three women that are clearly like together in

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the way that that three people would go down a

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:54.720
<v Speaker 1>water slide at once. There's one a little further down

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and she's like on her back going downward, and then

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:00.880
<v Speaker 1>there's another woman at the bottom who's like basically splashed

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 1>down the almost spitting image of a water slide, a

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:09.120
<v Speaker 1>green water slide. Uh. There's cosmological um with just these

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>weird circular patterns. It almost looks like um, like crop circles,

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:18.919
<v Speaker 1>just weird designs that make no sense. Uh. And then

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 1>pharmaceutical this is where they have like different parts of

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:25.879
<v Speaker 1>plants broken down and these like jars and things that

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 1>doctors you know, may have put things in right, which

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:31.919
<v Speaker 1>they did at the time in the medieval era. This

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>is what it like a pharmacist, a doctor would have

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:38.919
<v Speaker 1>stored their pharmacological herb zoom, which is why they're like,

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:43.199
<v Speaker 1>this is the pharmacological section. And then finally, um, no

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 1>illustrations in the recipe section. Uh, it's just nothing but deliciousness.

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how they know it was a recipe section.

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Even so, they divided the book up into these six

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 1>chapters and they actually think that, um, remember the book

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>was loose pages at one point, what was it, I

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:05.680
<v Speaker 1>think a hundred and twenty folded pages, um. And they

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:08.719
<v Speaker 1>think that when the whoever bounded because it was bounding

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 1>goat skin of a younger age than the actual manuscript,

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 1>that whoever bounded, got the pages out of order here

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:19.879
<v Speaker 1>or there, so that there's some pages that are in

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 1>the wrong chapter, but that roughly it's in the right order. Yeah, uh,

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 1>they have. Um. Another reason it might be Europeans because

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:31.919
<v Speaker 1>the average length of the word is four or five letters,

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:35.919
<v Speaker 1>although there are no two letter words and nothing with

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 1>more than ten characters, which is just more confounding. It

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 1>is because none of it is there's no consistency that

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:47.879
<v Speaker 1>points exactly in one direction basically. Well, even more confounding

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 1>is there are examples of the same word used in

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:56.920
<v Speaker 1>succession two or three times. Here there up to five times,

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:59.439
<v Speaker 1>so that's very odd. You don't see that very often,

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 1>and say English. Maybe they were just trying to make

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a point. Times they're like I like this recipe very

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>very very very very much. You never know. Yeah, it

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 1>was written by Chainsaw and Dave from Summer School, who

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:19.159
<v Speaker 1>remember that movie Summer School. They had to write like

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 1>a five word essay, so they used like the last

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 1>forty words where they like texas Chainsaw mask are very

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 1>very very battle trick. Yeah. So check. We've laid out

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of details here and we're not the first

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 1>person in the first people who notice these details, right,

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Other people have and they really like studied them, especially

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>as the use of computing and linguistics has come together

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 1>in the twenty first century. And we will talk about

0:22:46.840 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>all that jazz right after this. So chuck, there's weird

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 1>things like the same word being used up to five

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 1>times in a row. There's no punctuation, which apparently is

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>fairly normal, no word over ten letters. All this stuff

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 1>like it seems weird. But if you put that into

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 1>a computer with what we know about language these days,

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 1>you can spit out some pretty interesting conclusions about the

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Voyage Manuscript. One of the things that people have long said,

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:44.199
<v Speaker 1>especially after William Friedman and his wife Elizabeth threw up

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:47.159
<v Speaker 1>their hands and said we're done after thirty years of

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:49.879
<v Speaker 1>studying this thing, a lot of people said, it's just

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 1>a hoax. It doesn't mean anything. It's gibberish. The reason

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>that no one will ever be able to crack it

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 1>is because it doesn't mean anything. And um, that's still

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 1>a longstanding theory. Like you can find plenty of journal

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>articles in um, you know, respectable pure of your journals

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 1>about how this thing is hoaxed. And in fact, there

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:12.399
<v Speaker 1>was one a few years back that said, we found

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>a Renaissance cipher key, which is used for encoding anything,

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 1>but it was Renaissance era, and that if you took

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 1>gibberish and put it into it, you could conceivably come

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>up with what's in the Voyage manuscript. And everybody said,

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:29.920
<v Speaker 1>that's great, you proved that it's possible, but you didn't

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 1>actually show how they did that to produce the Voyage manuscript.

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 1>So the thing is still a mystery. It doesn't really

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>prove anything, but it does support this idea that is,

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 1>it's possible, and no one involved in looking at the

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:44.919
<v Speaker 1>Voyage Manuscript will disagree. It is possible that it is

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>just a hoax and that it is just gibberish. So

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the hoax, there's a hoax theory, right, But there are

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>plenty of other theories as to this thing, and a

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of them say, no, this thing is real. Uh yeah, Well.

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:00.920
<v Speaker 1>One theory is that it's just a language that we

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:04.199
<v Speaker 1>don't know and haven't seen. I don't buy that, no,

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how could this possibly be the only surviving

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 1>evidence of that language you know exactly? Another theories that

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's so well coded that it's impenetrable. But

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 1>that raises a good question too. So if you wanted

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to code something, especially if it were safe for art

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 1>or a hoax or to show what an incredible mind

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:33.200
<v Speaker 1>you had, why would you make it so impenetrable that

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 1>no one can ever possibly crack it. Yeah, it seems

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 1>like you would eventually be doing that for some sort

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 1>of recognition. Sure, so that kind of kicks a little bit,

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>kicks the legs out of that theory to me, or

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:51.199
<v Speaker 1>that it's so important and secretive, like the meaning of

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:54.439
<v Speaker 1>life is contained here in and it doesn't look like

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 1>it from looks like the illustrations. It doesn't because I

0:25:57.080 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 1>mean you say you're correct, the illustrations are kind of

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:04.680
<v Speaker 1>hockey a little. Um, it's not the most Uh, it's

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 1>not the most gorgeous book you've ever seen. If it's

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the Secrets in the Universe, then I'm pretty disappointed. Yeah. Yeah,

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>what's the third theory? Uh, there's another one that, um, well,

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:20.200
<v Speaker 1>now that basically that it's gobbledygook, that that's sort of

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the hoax thing. There's two different parts. One that it's

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 1>just gobbledygook and it was someone having fun, and another

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 1>one is that it was a hoax trying to fool

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:32.120
<v Speaker 1>people into thinking something right, So that's sort of split

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>into two parts. Uh, mental illness is another theory. Yeah,

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 1>like um, Franciscan monk locked away in a room with

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:45.440
<v Speaker 1>autism who like just really went to town. Yeah, that's

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 1>a that's actually a theory as well, or that it

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 1>might be religious like speaking in tongues transcribed. Yeah, you

0:26:56.280 --> 0:27:00.400
<v Speaker 1>want to hear my theory. Yeah, you think it's drugs. Yeah, man,

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 1>so kind of like where you'll find like the doodles

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 1>in a college textbook margin. I think someone uh got

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 1>ahold of a lot of really good hallucinogenics and over

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the course of a few months did them and did this. Yeah,

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 1>so went on like a three month bender and ended

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:20.920
<v Speaker 1>up spitting out the voyage spanning script or a lifelong bender.

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>And this was just one of the things they produced.

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's pretty interesting, to tell you the truth.

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's pretty druggy to me. It does

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 1>also again, the quality of the um the illustrations themselves

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of suggest like this is really awesome, but I

0:27:34.520 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>don't have full control over my my motor cortex right now. Yeah.

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:41.439
<v Speaker 1>Plus it it would solve the problem of like it

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 1>has meeting, or it can be transcribed, or this person

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 1>was trying to get famous. Yeah, they're just making it. Yeah,

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:51.160
<v Speaker 1>so that's a pretty good theory. Um, let's go back

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:53.639
<v Speaker 1>to the hoax theory, right, Yeah, there's a lot of

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:56.119
<v Speaker 1>people who shout down the hoax theory because they say,

0:27:57.320 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 1>do you know how much time this thing took? Sure, like, yeah,

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a that's one. So the hoax people would say back, well,

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 1>people still made hoaxes in the Renaissance, which is the

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:11.920
<v Speaker 1>time this book first popped up. They made fraudulent medieval

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 1>documents because that's when antiquarian book collecting really started and

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you could make some money from some suckers like Rudolph

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:21.399
<v Speaker 1>the Second. Right, So I mean there's like a there's

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 1>definitely teeth in both arguments as to whether it's a

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:27.919
<v Speaker 1>hoax or whether it's not. But as we've gotten a

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:31.120
<v Speaker 1>lot better with um using computers to figure out things

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:34.680
<v Speaker 1>like statistical distribution and stuff like that, and have applied

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 1>it to things like language. When looking at the Voyage manuscript,

0:28:38.760 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 1>it actually follows a lot of the patterns that a

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 1>natural language does, which leads a lot of people to

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 1>believe that no, there's actually real meaning in the Voyage

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Manuscript that we just haven't unlocked. Yeah. So for example,

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 1>like um, the different sections have their own vocabulary. There's

0:28:57.080 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 1>words that show up and say like the pharmacological sect

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 1>and do not appear anywhere in the cosmological section, which

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:06.760
<v Speaker 1>again is something that you would find in natural language.

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 1>If you're reading a chapter of a textbook on cosmology,

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and you pick up a book on far pharmacology, like,

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be words in each one that would not

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 1>appear in the other one, right, And that's how the

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Voyage Manuscript is. That's a big one. There's this thing

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 1>called Zip's law, which is probably a podcast episode in

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and of itself. But Zip's laws this weird statistical law

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 1>that says that, um, say, the second most common word,

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the second most frequently used word, will be used twice

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 1>as much as the third most frequently used word, The

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 1>third most frequently used word will be used three times

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 1>as much as the fourth most frequently used word. It's

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:53.720
<v Speaker 1>a really weird thing, and it appears to be a

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 1>natural law, and apparently natural languages follow this kind of distribution,

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:00.720
<v Speaker 1>so does the Voyage Manuscript. So to come up with

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Zip's Law, which wasn't discovered until the nineteen thirties. I think,

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 1>so to create this text understanding that Zip's Law was

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 1>eventually going to be discovered, and then going to the

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 1>trouble of predicting the frequency of these words that you're

0:30:16.920 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 1>going to use and then spreading them out accordingly. Again,

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not impossible, but it's mind boggling the amount of

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 1>work that would have been put into this being a hoax. Yeah,

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 1>here's my deal too. Let's say it is a cipher um.

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 1>From from looking at the thing, it would just end

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 1>up being you know, this is this plant, this is

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 1>this recipe. It just seems kind of boring to begin with.

0:30:44.160 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 1>And for that reason, a lot of people hope that

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the Voyage Manuscript has never cracked that one was. Yeah,

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to discover that they Yeah, I mean

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:54.360
<v Speaker 1>like because ultimately it is there's pictures of plants there

0:30:54.360 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and they look weird and everything. But if we cracked

0:30:57.000 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 1>this code, it would as as this one. I, um,

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 1>what is his name? He a dude named Read Johnson

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 1>wrote a New Yorker article on it. I don't think

0:31:06.240 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 1>there's been a podcast this year where we didn't mention

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 1>a New Yorker article that that magazine is banging read

0:31:14.160 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 1>read Johnson said he'd put it that right now, the

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Voyage manuscript is in this quantum state where it's in

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>all positions at once. But once we crack it, they'll

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 1>be forced to take this collapse into this one single

0:31:26.560 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 1>position and it'll lose all of its mystery or aura.

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 1>It'll just be the farmer's almanact. Yeah, and that it's

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 1>as it is right now. It's in basically it's perfect

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:40.040
<v Speaker 1>form to stop working people. Right. But that's not the

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 1>case at all, because, as I said before, the Internet

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:44.520
<v Speaker 1>is on this and there are a lot of people

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:47.920
<v Speaker 1>who think that they have cracked it, but I haven't. Necessarily. Yeah,

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:52.480
<v Speaker 1>there's this one guy, Um Stephen Backs. He's a professor

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:56.680
<v Speaker 1>of applied linguistics at the University of Bedfordshire in England,

0:31:56.760 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and he said he claims he's deciphered fourteen characters. The

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:04.520
<v Speaker 1>reason that this is somewhat believable because he's not saying, hey,

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I know what the whole thing means. He's he's being

0:32:07.000 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 1>very modest and saying, of cipher deciphered only fourteen characters

0:32:12.240 --> 0:32:18.200
<v Speaker 1>based on what he thinks are matching plants Juniper coriander

0:32:18.280 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 1>and Hella bore uh specifically and Taurus an illustration um,

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 1>basically the constellation Taurus. So he thinks, I would if

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 1>you can identify those pictures, then you should be able

0:32:32.400 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to correspond the letters saying those names next to them. Right.

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:38.960
<v Speaker 1>He went on a hunt for like proper nouns in

0:32:39.000 --> 0:32:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the text, Yeah, which is pretty good approaches. Yeah. Yeah,

0:32:41.280 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I think he said he identified fourteen right, fourteen characters

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 1>only Oh I thought it was fourteen words, no ten words. Um,

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 1>And he's the first to say, like, I might be right,

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 1>it might be wrong. This is certainly not a closed case.

0:32:55.440 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 1>But here's my best crack at it. Well, there's a

0:32:57.120 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 1>live science article on our podcast page for this episod

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:03.560
<v Speaker 1>so that has um kind of a rundown of his discovery.

0:33:03.560 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 1>And I think embedded in it is a YouTube video

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 1>that he made demonstrating how he found this. Yeah, and

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:11.880
<v Speaker 1>he's not a crackpot. He seems like a good guy.

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 1>He's at Bedfordshire. There's another dude, is that the latest

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 1>theory is from guy named Nick pelling um Britain. Nick Pelling,

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's his name. I thought two thousand six. Uh,

0:33:27.000 --> 0:33:28.680
<v Speaker 1>he came up with this theory. That was an Italian

0:33:28.760 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>architect name Antonio Abolino um as the author and he says,

0:33:34.680 --> 0:33:36.600
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I think this guy tried to escape

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:41.280
<v Speaker 1>a Tanbul around five and before he left recorded his

0:33:41.400 --> 0:33:45.960
<v Speaker 1>knowledge of said place. UM. But basically that's been shot

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:49.440
<v Speaker 1>down for various reasons. So there are a lot of

0:33:49.480 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 1>people believe that northern Italy is where it was made

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 1>where it's from um. So that part's not entirely like

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 1>out of the realm of possibility, but um. And the

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 1>reason why they think it was actually in the Tyrolean

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Alps is the predominant view of where the Codex was made. UM.

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 1>But if you look at some of the pictures just

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:15.799
<v Speaker 1>drawing on the margins of castles, the architecture depicted is

0:34:15.880 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 1>peculiar to the Northern Alps from that time, in northern

0:34:19.640 --> 0:34:22.239
<v Speaker 1>Italian Alps from that time, and usually write about in

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 1>pain about what you know? Yes plus around uh trent

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 1>to I believe, um, there there are some healing waters

0:34:30.960 --> 0:34:33.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think possibly that's what's depicted with the women

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:39.279
<v Speaker 1>bathing and water sliding and water sliding. Uh. So I

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:41.799
<v Speaker 1>think I do agree that let's well, I mean, keep

0:34:41.800 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 1>on trying, but I don't think anyone's gonna correct this thing.

0:34:44.320 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 1>So I think the mystery will remain, which is kind

0:34:46.120 --> 0:34:49.720
<v Speaker 1>of neat. But you do think that there's actual language

0:34:49.800 --> 0:34:52.840
<v Speaker 1>encoded in it? No, I think it's drugs, Okay, So

0:34:52.880 --> 0:34:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you think it's just total gibberish. Yeah, or or you know,

0:34:57.200 --> 0:34:59.320
<v Speaker 1>this dude and his drug friends made up a language

0:34:59.520 --> 0:35:03.360
<v Speaker 1>that exists that within their turret. But again it's following

0:35:04.640 --> 0:35:13.880
<v Speaker 1>almost unpredictable, just so unbelievably complex statistical distribution of of

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:17.400
<v Speaker 1>words and letters that it's like that the genius it

0:35:17.440 --> 0:35:20.880
<v Speaker 1>would take to fake that or even accidentally make it up,

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:24.440
<v Speaker 1>as I'm saying, maybe they did have have their own

0:35:24.480 --> 0:35:27.959
<v Speaker 1>little language, Well they were, there were some smart burnouts. Yeah,

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 1>there were a lot of smart burnouts back then. I

0:35:30.560 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 1>wonder if they would be blown away to know that

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 1>people were still trying to crack that code that they

0:35:35.480 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 1>made in high school listening to Van Halen. Or maybe

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 1>there's some other discovery yet to be made of another text,

0:35:43.400 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 1>a legend, perhaps you know, a Rosetta stone as it were. Yeah,

0:35:47.120 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe they just haven't found it yet, and there maybe

0:35:50.160 --> 0:35:53.839
<v Speaker 1>there's a whole series of things. Um, you would think

0:35:53.840 --> 0:35:55.520
<v Speaker 1>it would have popped up by now, but you never know,

0:35:55.800 --> 0:35:58.600
<v Speaker 1>or maybe that has lost the time forever. I'm sticking

0:35:58.640 --> 0:36:01.719
<v Speaker 1>with the multiverse idea. Yeah, it's fun to theorize if

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:04.000
<v Speaker 1>you want to fall down a rabbit hole. I also

0:36:04.000 --> 0:36:07.040
<v Speaker 1>want to say, before we sign off, go to Voynage

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 1>dot nu. There is a dude named Renee zanderberg In

0:36:11.800 --> 0:36:15.920
<v Speaker 1>who is a pre eminent voyage scholar. Uh, and he

0:36:16.000 --> 0:36:18.600
<v Speaker 1>actually discovered a letter. It was like the the only

0:36:18.640 --> 0:36:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the second letter associated with the Voyage manuscript ever discovered.

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:25.880
<v Speaker 1>The first one was discovered with the voyage manuscript. Um.

0:36:25.920 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 1>So he's like hardcore knows what he's doing when it

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:30.640
<v Speaker 1>comes to the Voyage manuscript. And he's compiled this really

0:36:30.680 --> 0:36:33.719
<v Speaker 1>amazing website where it's like, here's all the information we have,

0:36:33.880 --> 0:36:37.680
<v Speaker 1>here's what we know. Not slanted, not like I'm right

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:40.560
<v Speaker 1>or anything. That's just a really interesting website to go

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:43.880
<v Speaker 1>check out. Does he have did you have everything pasted

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:49.279
<v Speaker 1>on his wall with like yarn at the scratched out

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:52.319
<v Speaker 1>on all the pictures. I think it's pretty neat. I

0:36:52.320 --> 0:36:55.320
<v Speaker 1>mean I just like things that are unknown and you

0:36:55.360 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 1>can speculate all day, and it's not one of these

0:36:57.719 --> 0:37:02.680
<v Speaker 1>unknowns where, uh, you know, where skeptics can come in

0:37:02.760 --> 0:37:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and say, you know, this doesn't even exist, like it's

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:08.279
<v Speaker 1>a real thing. Yeah, they're like it's a hoax. They

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:11.000
<v Speaker 1>just got their hands on some velum. But really, and

0:37:11.040 --> 0:37:15.719
<v Speaker 1>they predicted that we would be carbon dating fifty years later.

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so, Buddy goes down. It's nice like

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:24.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a genuine bona fide mystery residing in the Yale Library.

0:37:25.640 --> 0:37:27.560
<v Speaker 1>If you want to know more about the Voyage Manuscript,

0:37:27.560 --> 0:37:29.400
<v Speaker 1>like I said, go to voytage dot and you. You

0:37:29.440 --> 0:37:32.879
<v Speaker 1>can also visit our website at um how stuff works

0:37:32.920 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 1>dot com by typing voyage in the search bar. And

0:37:35.600 --> 0:37:38.920
<v Speaker 1>since I said dot and you, it's time for listener

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:42.120
<v Speaker 1>mail or the Yale Library is it on display or

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 1>is it chucked away? They actually, I'm glad you brought

0:37:44.640 --> 0:37:49.840
<v Speaker 1>that up. There's another um uh, the Yale Collection. They

0:37:49.880 --> 0:37:52.759
<v Speaker 1>did high resolution scans of every single page. You can

0:37:52.840 --> 0:37:55.480
<v Speaker 1>go on to the Yale Library site and basically browse

0:37:55.520 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the Voyage Manuscript. You have to have a an appointment

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and get permission first, which I imagine would be the

0:38:02.080 --> 0:38:04.920
<v Speaker 1>result of like an extensive letter writing campaign. You have

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to make an appointment to go see the actual thing, yes,

0:38:07.120 --> 0:38:09.480
<v Speaker 1>but I mean not just like. I'll be there at

0:38:09.520 --> 0:38:11.759
<v Speaker 1>five Tuesday. How's our for your Like you have to

0:38:11.800 --> 0:38:14.600
<v Speaker 1>get permission and submit your credentials and all that stuff.

0:38:15.239 --> 0:38:17.520
<v Speaker 1>But you could conceivably see it. You have to be

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a friend of John Hondgman he holds the keys um

0:38:23.160 --> 0:38:26.000
<v Speaker 1>all right, Uh okay, So the answer is they don't

0:38:26.040 --> 0:38:30.919
<v Speaker 1>have it on display prominently. That's another way of saying

0:38:30.920 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 1>what I said. All right, I'm gonna call this. Uh,

0:38:34.560 --> 0:38:37.080
<v Speaker 1>my baby won't sleep. Hey, guys, I'm sure you get

0:38:37.080 --> 0:38:40.480
<v Speaker 1>a handful of thanks every day, Actually not as many

0:38:40.520 --> 0:38:43.200
<v Speaker 1>as you'd think, But I just want to offer up

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:45.560
<v Speaker 1>my thanks for my wife, my daughter, and I. My

0:38:45.600 --> 0:38:48.719
<v Speaker 1>wife and I recently had a baby, Madeline. At times

0:38:48.800 --> 0:38:51.120
<v Speaker 1>we find ourselves up all hours of the night attending

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:53.480
<v Speaker 1>to a sleepless baby. I think she was born on

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:56.279
<v Speaker 1>a twelve hour jet lag, and for that we take

0:38:56.320 --> 0:38:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the Red Eye every night until she ad just. Uh.

0:39:00.000 --> 0:39:01.600
<v Speaker 1>When we have tried every method in the book to

0:39:01.600 --> 0:39:03.040
<v Speaker 1>try and get her to sleep, it just seems like

0:39:03.080 --> 0:39:06.360
<v Speaker 1>nothing will do. However, we've come to find that she

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:09.040
<v Speaker 1>loves car rides. So whether it's one am, two am,

0:39:09.160 --> 0:39:11.000
<v Speaker 1>or four in the morning, there's a good chance we

0:39:11.040 --> 0:39:13.719
<v Speaker 1>are in the car driving around the neighborhood, listening to

0:39:13.760 --> 0:39:18.359
<v Speaker 1>stuff you should know that sounds really creepy, hearing our

0:39:18.440 --> 0:39:22.279
<v Speaker 1>voices echoed down empty streets. Yeah, while we're trying to

0:39:22.280 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 1>get our daughter to fall asleep. And now it's cute

0:39:24.120 --> 0:39:26.480
<v Speaker 1>again when I can assure you that I don't fall

0:39:26.520 --> 0:39:28.640
<v Speaker 1>asleep in the cars, being the one driving, I can say.

0:39:28.880 --> 0:39:30.799
<v Speaker 1>I can't say the same for my daughter. It's not

0:39:31.280 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 1>to say that you guys put her to sleep, but

0:39:33.200 --> 0:39:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the combination of a car seat or

0:39:35.080 --> 0:39:39.040
<v Speaker 1>running engine and the background background noise of two podcasters.

0:39:39.640 --> 0:39:42.040
<v Speaker 1>So thank you for keep us, keeping us up listening

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:44.239
<v Speaker 1>to your show at the same time putting my daughter

0:39:44.280 --> 0:39:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to sleep. You may have the youngest stuff you should

0:39:46.640 --> 0:39:49.239
<v Speaker 1>know fan at only a month old, and that is

0:39:49.440 --> 0:39:54.960
<v Speaker 1>sleepless and hat Field p a wow. So we've been

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:57.120
<v Speaker 1>told by plenty of adults that we put them to sleep,

0:39:57.160 --> 0:40:00.040
<v Speaker 1>so it's nice that there's just a little cute to

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:03.400
<v Speaker 1>be now. So our one month old Fan is not

0:40:03.480 --> 0:40:07.120
<v Speaker 1>our youngest. We have one that's even younger one born

0:40:07.120 --> 0:40:11.680
<v Speaker 1>on October. We want to wish a huge, huge hearty

0:40:11.719 --> 0:40:17.880
<v Speaker 1>congratulations to our buddy Adam and serena huge congrats the

0:40:18.120 --> 0:40:22.360
<v Speaker 1>utes couple. Cute baby yes uh right out of the

0:40:22.400 --> 0:40:25.680
<v Speaker 1>womb cute, which is yes, not often the case, he

0:40:25.800 --> 0:40:29.280
<v Speaker 1>really is. His name is Henry Hollis, so do you guys.

0:40:29.320 --> 0:40:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Congratulations Henry, Welcome to the Stuff you Should Know family,

0:40:33.480 --> 0:40:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and UM. Way to go, dude, agreed. Um. If you

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:39.320
<v Speaker 1>want to get in touch with us, you can tweet

0:40:39.360 --> 0:40:41.839
<v Speaker 1>to us at s y s K podcast. You can

0:40:41.920 --> 0:40:44.440
<v Speaker 1>join us on Facebook dot com, slash Stuff you Should Know.

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:48.000
<v Speaker 1>You can send us uh an email to Stuff Podcast

0:40:48.040 --> 0:40:50.680
<v Speaker 1>at house stuff works dot com and has always join

0:40:50.760 --> 0:40:53.040
<v Speaker 1>us at our home on the web, Stuff you Should

0:40:53.080 --> 0:41:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Know dot com. For more on this in thousands of

0:41:01.640 --> 0:41:12.680
<v Speaker 1>other tappics, isn't Hasta works dot com