WEBVTT - Wall Street Titans Warn of the Next Big Risks

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purtnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on the Bloomberg Radio or watch us

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:32.480
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube search Bloomberg Clovel News. Well. About nine months

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:35.239
<v Speaker 1>after the arrival of vaccines, dozens of countries have yet

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 1>to reach ten percent of their populations. It's a milestone

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>seen as crucial in narrowing the worldwide gap and access

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to him in European countries with lower vaccination rates can

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>see a surge in COVID nineteen infections, hospitalizations and deaths

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>over the next two months that according to the European

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Center for Disease Prevention at CONTROL. It's not easy, all right.

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Once again, for our daily COVID update, Elizabeth Stewart Professor

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>of American Health at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Public Health. Another member of the Hopkins team that we

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>lean on to get us through and understand everything and

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 1>all things COVID night teen and she joins us on

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the phone in Washington, d c Um Elizabeth, good to

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 1>have you here with us. Among the headlines that keep coming,

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>what is it that you think we should be paying

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the most attention to. It's great to be here, Thanks

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>for talking with me today. I think we see some

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:26.320
<v Speaker 1>good news on the horizon. Cases are plateauing or even

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:29.639
<v Speaker 1>going down in many places, and there's hopes that the

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:32.680
<v Speaker 1>vaccine is going to be available for kids under twelve

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>in the next you know, couple of months. But I

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 1>think we have to be careful not to let down

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>our guards. As we've learned throughout the sandemic, we're not

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 1>out of the woods yet, and so we need to

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of stay vigilant. Okay, what are those things that

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>we need to do to stay vigilant, because I've known

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm definitely not acting the same way that I acted

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>when I wasn't vaccinated. Yeah, I think the key thing

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>is still avoiding indoor gatherings, especially without masks, and and

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>in large groups, keeping an eye on sort of trying

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>to maintain contact with people who are vaccinated, being careful

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 1>again if it's going to be a large group that

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>might not be vaccinated. I think people with kids under

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>twelve also have very different considerations, and for them, again

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of the core masks, keeping distance, and any of

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the adults, anyone overage twelves who can be vaccinated really

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 1>should get vaccinated, and that can really help keep even

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the younger kids safe. Well, so let's talk about that.

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm lucky enough to have a kid who's

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:34.920
<v Speaker 1>old enough that she's been able to get the vaccine.

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Tim has a little one who hasn't been vaccinated. So

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 1>what is your thoughts advice to parents, many of which

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>are vaccinated, but their younger kids are not, and increasingly

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>there in daycare or they're back in school. You know,

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>how do we manage that in the best way? Yeah,

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>it's it's something many of us are struggling with. I

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:58.919
<v Speaker 1>think keeping an eye on reducing the risk as much

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:01.960
<v Speaker 1>as you can, but without sort of sacrificing the essential

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 1>activities that these kids need. So I've been very happy

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>to see schools really opening this fall, many of them

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>are implementing the mitigation strategies that they should be in

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 1>terms of masks and ventilation. One thing that I think

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I would put on people's radar screen are the role

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:21.640
<v Speaker 1>of rapid tests, and I think they've been underutilized. I

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>think all households should have some in their cabinet to

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>pull out when a kid has a sniffle. I think

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 1>schools should be using them more to kind of track

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:33.079
<v Speaker 1>infections and sort of just keep an eye on who

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 1>has symptoms and and do a really quick fifteen minute

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>test which can be quite accurate to see who might

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>actually be infectious. I try to go and get these,

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and I have several times going to drug stores in

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>my neighborhood. They're sold out. It's a major problem everywhere.

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>They were available more so over the summer, but after

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 1>me and has increased this fall. I agree, him, shaking

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>his head. I was actually at a drugs, a drug

0:03:57.640 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>store in my neighborhood, and the guys said, our truck

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>is coming in today. I will put one aside for you.

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>And I went back later and he said the truck

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>had none on there. I'm so sorry, Like that's what

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>people are doing in my neighborhood in Brooklyn. Yes, I

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>think that's happening in a lot of places. The federal government,

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I think is working, I hope is working on art

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:18.919
<v Speaker 1>to increase supply. Um. But I think that's really what

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:22.040
<v Speaker 1>we need to focus on, is increasing supply, increasing access,

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>because I think that rapid tests are going to be

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:26.480
<v Speaker 1>a key tool that's really going to help us keep

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 1>this under control. Right, We've talked about we had no playbook,

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>We didn't really have a tool kit at the beginning

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>of this, but we increasingly do. And it sounds like

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 1>this those rapid tests should be part of it. If

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 1>you can get them, yeah, if you can get them, yeah, exactly.

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:40.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, Elizabeth Stewart, thank you so much, Professor of

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 1>American Health at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health,

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of course, supported by Michael R. Bloomberg, founder of Bloomberg

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>LP and Bloomberg Philanthropy. She is joining us or was

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:51.040
<v Speaker 1>joining us on the phone from the Nation's capital. Look,

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the alternative to not having rapid tests in your home

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:57.279
<v Speaker 1>is going to an urgent care clinic and standing around

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of people and waiting. It's why in the beginning,

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:02.919
<v Speaker 1>if we thought we maybe wanted to get a test.

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>My husband and I were like, before we were vaccinated,

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to go and stand with people who

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>think they might have COPI, especially when it was often

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:14.160
<v Speaker 1>long lines and long waits. This is Bloomberg Business Week

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:18.280
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovich on

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. So in its sites an initial public offering

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:26.360
<v Speaker 1>and as such, Patreon and I saying it right, Patreon

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Patreon or Patreon Patreon, all right, thank you, Joel Weber.

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:33.160
<v Speaker 1>They're investing in original programming in the face of growing competition.

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>So let's get right to this story. You know, with

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>us is Bloomberg Business Week editor Joel Webber and someone

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>who's been following the beginning of the story now the

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>transformation of this company is Bloomberg News Entertainment reporter Lucashaw.

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>He's on the phone in l A. What I'm just thinking.

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:49.839
<v Speaker 1>It's like, like Lucas starts out the piece, everybody is

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:52.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to get on the bandwagon that Patreon created. Joe,

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>they literally created it. You know, this is like the

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:59.159
<v Speaker 1>company that basically helped facilitate people to be like you

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>can you can just straight up ask people for money online,

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:05.359
<v Speaker 1>just say, hey, would you like to donate money to

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:08.919
<v Speaker 1>my people? And people will give it to you. And

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and you know, when when that first happened, I was like, wait,

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>what there's like this is like a company that's doing

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:17.919
<v Speaker 1>this like and and Business Week had covered it forever,

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 1>and then the pandemic happened, and then it's like everybody

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>realized this was a business opportunity and then you could

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:24.839
<v Speaker 1>do it in many different ways. And then I think

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>that's um, you know, basically caused Patreon to realize, hey,

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>we were way ahead of this and we know what

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>we're doing. And now it's like, okay, if we're gonna

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>go go public, you know, how do we how do

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>we distinguish ourselves? So so, Lucas, what's the plan. The

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>plan is to get a lot more people using Patreon

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 1>uh through this enticement where they're going to you know,

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 1>offer too fun uh podcast, a video series, what have you,

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>um and hope that the more people go use it,

0:06:56.760 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the more the revenue grows. And then there's also a

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:03.039
<v Speaker 1>design or to make Patreon a little bit more of

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 1>a destination. You know, for most of its existence, it's

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 1>been this layer in between. You know, you are a

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>YouTube or you're a Twitter streamer, you're a podcaster, but

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>you use Patreon to kind of monetize your most art

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and fans. Now they want people if they're going to

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>see that that podcast that they pay for, the video

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>series they pay for, maybe they'll do so on Patreon.

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Can they compete with the biggest players out there, even

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>if they're the original the the O g s on this?

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, Twitter allows tipping, you can directly pay

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>for creators through sub stack. You know, I think that

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the odds of them competing as a media destination are

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty low, and that's why you see the CEO Jack

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>CONTI stress that they're not trying to compete head to

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 1>head with YouTube because pretty much anyone who's tried to

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>do that other than TikTok has failed. Um. I do

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 1>think that they can continue to exist as this and

0:07:57.200 --> 0:08:00.080
<v Speaker 1>b to be business in between, because one thing that

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>that they offer is an ability to sort of work

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>across all of these different sites. So if you're someone

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 1>who is both a podcaster but you also upload a

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>video of your podcast YouTube and maybe you also want

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 1>aid followers on Twitter, you can centralize it in one place,

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and so as long as some of these other sites

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 1>don't cut off Patreon, I think it can because this

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>market is so big, it's going to keep growing. They're

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be a lot of people who do it

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people who win. And you know,

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe they don't just want to charge people on

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 1>YouTube because you tend to charge your fans for multiple things,

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 1>not just for one thing. Hey, Lucas, how do creators

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>see Patreon? Because there's a line in your story about

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Conti and how he has always described the company as

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 1>creator first. Do creators feel that way? Is there something

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>special or different that they feel like they get with

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>this versus going to some of the bigger platforms that

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 1>probably have deeper pockets and can do a lot more.

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>He has the creators that we spoke with view Patreon

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>very sa aforably, Perhaps I'm surprising link is peop always

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:05.319
<v Speaker 1>spoke with it. Are those making money using the service

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>and using their different tools? I think people like the

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>average creator likes that there is an independent company that

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:14.079
<v Speaker 1>is allowing them to make money and so that they're

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 1>not to beholden to one of these tech giants. But

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>there are a number of people who don't use Patreon

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:24.560
<v Speaker 1>or don't charge fans in any way. And I think

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the keys for Patreon is getting more of

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>those people to use it. That can be you know,

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:31.719
<v Speaker 1>there's a desire I think have some of these A

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 1>list celebrities thinking about using Patreon, But some of those

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>those celebrities are are still uncomfortable with the idea of

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:42.320
<v Speaker 1>asking fans for direct donations. You know, there's a difference

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>between Will Smith asking people to pay him five dollars

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>a month and some YouTuber. If the average person knows

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 1>that Will Smith has a lot of money and might

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:55.440
<v Speaker 1>not like that idea. But Patreon wants more people to

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:58.200
<v Speaker 1>get over some of that concern because that's that's really

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>a key to their business. Everybody can just be asking

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>for money for anything. Um So, which, how does how

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>do investors feel when Patreon asked them for money? It

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 1>seems right now pretty good. I mean Patreon went from

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>being worth one point two billion in September of last

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>year to being worth more more than four billion just

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:20.839
<v Speaker 1>a few months ago, so they more than tripled in

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>less than a year. That is certainly tied up in

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>this this rush around the creator economy and what the

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 1>pandemic has wrought. You know, it's hard to know how

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, if this is a case where people just

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>got over enthusiastic or not um but there is just

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>a ton of money flooding into this space. There third

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>party estimates saying that the creator economy is now at

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty billion dollar business, maybe even more than that. Uh

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and and Jack County at least feels good enough that

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 1>he says he's not selling uh and and his he's

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>not spacking his desires to go public in a more

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>traditional way. Okay, more fun question. In doing your research

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:04.599
<v Speaker 1>on on Patreon, what were your favorite UH causes that

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>you that you either found and discovered or you know,

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 1>old favorites. You know, the biggest category this is this,

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I apologize because this might not be the kind of

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the fund quirky answer you're looking for, But the biggest

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 1>category to me that feels like it really works on

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Patreon is podcasting, because that's that's an industry that is

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>almost entirely ad supported. The ad market is still is growing,

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>but still relatively small, and you have these people who

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:38.680
<v Speaker 1>host the shows and their fans feel a strong personal

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>connection with it, and so there is. I think there's

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a willingness to contribute and fund and so a

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of these podcasters can make as much, if not

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 1>more money from Patreon than they would from the traditional

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 1>podcast marketplace. And I think that's one of the keys

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 1>to this is you look across the Internet and a

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of the kind of the creators are making money

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:06.320
<v Speaker 1>off relatively low CPM kind of call or just low

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>rate advertising. YouTubers, you can only make it if you

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 1>reach a lot of money, if you reach huge scale.

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Same podcasting, You've got this whole middle class of creator

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:19.319
<v Speaker 1>that really needs support from their fans to make it work.

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Um and and podcasting is one I think Patreon has

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 1>just had a ton of success. Yeah, and certainly an

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>alternative to the model that's out there when it comes

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 1>to podcast. Imagine, like the key to the new middle

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>class is just asking for money. Like it's actually kind

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 1>of jeeus. Like you can see it. You know, if

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>you could facilitate this, and all you needed to do

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 1>is be able to you know, hey, subscribe and actually

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>have like you know, a way to actually facilitate that.

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:47.559
<v Speaker 1>It's it's there's hope, there's hope. I know what we're

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:50.439
<v Speaker 1>all going to be doing later on I don't know, Carol,

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:52.599
<v Speaker 1>I gotta reminds me the fact that nobody's tipped to

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 1>yet on Twitter, Carol, that hasn't happened. All Right, we

0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>gotta run. Lukashaw check it out his story and the

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:02.319
<v Speaker 1>upcoming issue Bloomberg Business Week, Entertainment reporter of Bloomberg News.

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>This is the Big Take, the best of Bloomberg's in

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 1>depth original reporting from around the globe. Well, we have

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to make sure we do. As the Economy covers, is

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>what cup The data kind of broken down a bit.

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:18.560
<v Speaker 1>It's fun to becoming more and more expensive, maybe looking

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 1>at for fifteen billion dollars for the entry levels. There's

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 1>been ways of immigration that have faced a lot of resistance,

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of color behind the scenes in a great

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>untold story. How did Bezos really come out on top?

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>As the cover says, Jeff wins, he always seems to

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>win the Big Take on Bloomberg Radio. You are listening

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Business Week Carl Master along with Tim Stenovik

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg Headquarters in New York City. So the Bloomberg

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Big Take. It's also the most read story on the

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:48.839
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Today it is about the Wall Street Titans warnings

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>of the next big risks for investors. So our Bloomberg

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 1>News Wall Street reporter Shinelli Boss she caught up with

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the founder of our investment Management, Kathy Would. She talked

0:13:57.520 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>with the chief economic advisor of Alians at Bloomberg pinion

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 1>contributor Muhammad al Aaron, and also Googenham Investments chairman Scott Minors.

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>So let's kick things off and see what some of

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 1>them had to say. Let's start with our investment CEO

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Cathy Wood. She says, not inflation, but deflation. That's her

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>biggest concern. There are companies who thought the world would

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>never change and have been catering to short term shareholders

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>who wanted that extra penny or two in earnings and

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 1>so got it by having the company's leverage up and

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>take more debt and shrink the number of shares UH.

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 1>And they've also been um focused on dividends. UH. They

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 1>are probably settled with products and services that will become

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>obsolete because of the record breaking amount of innovation taking

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>place today, and in order to service their debt, they

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>are going to have to cut price, says UH, and

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 1>move those Uh, those goods and services that are on

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>their way out anyway. So I am concerned about that,

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think there's going to be a lot of

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>confusion around it as well. That's our investment CEO Cathy

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>would on the risks she sees from deflation now onto

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>our next risk. In the view from Guggenheim Chairman and

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 1>chief Investment Officers, Scott Minored, when it comes to risks

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 1>for the global financial system, his main concern is tied

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>to hackers targeting global payments systems. Let's take the thing

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 1>that bothers me about something like the global payment system

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 1>is I don't think anyone's focused on it. And this

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 1>really takes a high degree of international cooperation. It takes

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>a real macro look, meaning there needs to be somebody

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>or some group of people who who are looking at

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 1>how everything interconnects and and where the potential vulnerabilities are.

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I think there's stage um this is in the world

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 1>of the unthinkable, and so therefore, um, you know, I've

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>used this phrase before. There's a cognitive dissidence around it,

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 1>which is to talk about this idea. The consequences are

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>so dire that immediately people just sort of moved on

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to say, well, that will never happen, right, and so

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 1>it's uh, I think there's there's a real vulnerability that

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 1>would certainly freak out the world in the markets. That

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>of course with Koggenheim chairman and chief investment officers Scott

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>married right, we talk about security, especially when it comes

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to our financial world. Yeah, all of these so diverse

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>with what their big risks are exactly. All Right, lastly,

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 1>let's see what's concerning and on the mind of Alian's

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 1>economic advisor, Bloomberg opinion columnist at Muhammad al Arian. When

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 1>it comes to long term risks for global markets, Arian says,

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>rising inequality. That's really his primary concern. I think the

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>thing that worries me to most is inequality, both within

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and across countries. And it's something that the financial markets

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:08.959
<v Speaker 1>puts aside as a social problem, not really an economic

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 1>or financial problem, and we risk seeing the issue of

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 1>inequality gather momentum. COVID has already been the great unequalizer,

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:23.680
<v Speaker 1>but rather than go back to where we've come from,

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 1>we are now creating the dynamics inequality to worsen and

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 1>to assume greater importance in disrupting all sorts of things

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 1>in our society. But the one thing that worries me

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:38.160
<v Speaker 1>even more than that, and I'm already worried about income,

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:42.679
<v Speaker 1>and what's inequality is the inequality of opportunity. We know

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>what COVID did to people who had no WiFi at home,

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>who had no computers. We know that school districts, public schools, listen,

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>lost touch with a lot of their students. And these

0:17:54.800 --> 0:18:00.920
<v Speaker 1>students risk not only becoming unemployed, but unemployable, which means

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:04.879
<v Speaker 1>a lost generation of young people. And that, of course,

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>was a Mohammad l Arian. He's Alliance's economic advisor. He's

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:12.400
<v Speaker 1>also a Bloomberg opinion columnist. And you can get more

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:15.440
<v Speaker 1>on all of this to another risks facing the market side.

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a big take. It's on the Bloomberg terminal at

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, so check it out. Some really thoughtful ideas,

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>really thoughtful, and also each one is so different. It

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 1>is I thought, it's really fascinating, and we're going to

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:28.479
<v Speaker 1>talk about this through you know, throughout the when our

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg TV friends join us a little after the close

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>of trading to call it beyond the Bell. Beyond the Bell.

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I know, oh, I know, but the idea of what

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Cathy Wood is talking about, because there's so much concern

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 1>about inflation right now, and she's saying, no, that is

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:43.639
<v Speaker 1>not what you have to be concerned about. Deflation is

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>what's going to happen, and it's going to be caused

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 1>by these disruptive companies, and of course disruptive companies that

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>she's invested in. I think it's fascinating because a lot

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:52.920
<v Speaker 1>of things are changing how we do it. Think about

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, and healthcare has been one of those areas

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 1>that's been slow to change. We know it. We still

0:18:57.560 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>have to fill out for you know, we all talked

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 1>about this massive man database. We're concerned about privacy. I

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:05.359
<v Speaker 1>get it, But during the pandemic, things in terms of

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the medical world took a big step forward in terms

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:10.360
<v Speaker 1>of embracing the virtual world. Yeah, I mean I still

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:13.440
<v Speaker 1>can't get those you know, rapid COVID tests, but that

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:17.720
<v Speaker 1>supply chain problems, the inequality, inequalities though around the world,

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 1>it's something we hear from global central bankers, it's something

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:23.160
<v Speaker 1>we hear from global leaders. That's a big problem because

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:26.880
<v Speaker 1>we have seen in the pandemic again exacerbated that that

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 1>people are not sharing in in the wealth creation equally

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:33.439
<v Speaker 1>around the globe, and what happens if that doesn't if

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 1>it continues to get worse, it turns into this cycle

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>as l Arian was describing, where people cannot actually improve

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 1>their own stations in life, and they cannot pull themselves

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:45.920
<v Speaker 1>up by their bootstraps, as you know, many had hoped

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>would happen in developing markets. And he said, you know too,

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to consumption and economic growth. He writes

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 1>that the rich capture more income and more wealth, they

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 1>spend less of it, and that the poor tend to

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>consume more. And so how does this all trickle down

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 1>essentially in turn of momentum, if you will, in growth

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:04.400
<v Speaker 1>around the world. So I guess we'll have to see.

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna talk a little bit more about this. But

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I love when we can get these kind of big

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>macro conversations three different people and see what's on their

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:14.639
<v Speaker 1>minds and what's got mind said to about security and hacking.

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a huge time and I think it just becomes

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 1>a bigger and bigger concern going forward. Again. Check that

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 1>out at Bloomberg dot com. I'm roc yeah, but you

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:27.639
<v Speaker 1>let me drive. Oh no, no, no, no, this is

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>not a toy home, all right, please, I'll do the

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>right gravels I want to dry. It's good question, good drive.

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 1>This is the Drive to the Clothes on Bloomberg Radio.

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Listen to you. Just about ten minutes left in today's

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:53.639
<v Speaker 1>trading session. We are definitely off our best levels of

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the session. Taking another lay down in the last I

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 1>would say about half an hour or so, one point

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>four percent lower on the DAD would start from Charlie,

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the biggest decline on a percentage basis, and the SMP

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>still down about nine tents of NAZAC just down about

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>two tents of percent. So let's get to it. Drive

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to the Clothes with Jana. Janna Barton is equity portfolio

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 1>manager and Director of Specialty Solutions at Eaton Vance, and

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:17.880
<v Speaker 1>she joins us once again on the phone from Boston. Janna,

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:19.880
<v Speaker 1>great to have you back on the show with us.

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Here we are end of the quarter, end of the month.

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:24.199
<v Speaker 1>This is the first mixed quarter and eight for u

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:26.119
<v Speaker 1>S stocks, the first down month on the SP five

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>since January. Help us look backward but also look forward.

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Good afternoon. I seem to have quite timing with you

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>guys every time out on the air. It's like a

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:38.720
<v Speaker 1>sea of red. But let's see if we can turn

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>this around. Um, I think you know the most important

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>thing is Q three is almost in the books, as

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you said, in volatility, and these mini rotations seem to

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 1>be the only constant we've got vixed up almost this

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:54.360
<v Speaker 1>quarter you had a bit of a reversal from here.

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Today you've got growth leading a little bit. You had

0:21:57.359 --> 0:22:00.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit for everyone. Financials were, defensives are up

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 1>um and a mix of everything else. I think the

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 1>most important takeaway is one short term is murkye. You

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 1>got to think long term as an investor, not a trader.

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's when it becomes apparent that equities, particularly US equities,

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:18.320
<v Speaker 1>remain the place to be. That you have to always

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:22.399
<v Speaker 1>be long term. Yes you do, that's how you make money.

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 1>But I do wonder, But I do also wonder. And

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I know, you know, we all talk about you can't

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 1>time the market and so and so forth, But there

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 1>is a point do you think that it makes sense

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:33.199
<v Speaker 1>as an investor to maybe say, all right, if I

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:35.200
<v Speaker 1>look at the S and P five hundred so far

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 1>this year, let me just pull it up on the

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:39.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg we're up fift we were up a little bit

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:41.879
<v Speaker 1>more before the decline that we saw in September. Do

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I say not a bad year? Uh, and just say

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I can take some money off the table in case

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 1>there's some pullback, just even on valuation concerns. Um, What

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 1>do you say to investors who must pose that argument

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:57.400
<v Speaker 1>to you at some point? I think, Carol, you bring

0:22:57.480 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>up a really fair point, which is the fact of

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the matter is nine months. Uh. Here we are nine

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>months out of twelve, when we've already done what usually

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:07.919
<v Speaker 1>SMP does in a matter of twelve months. In fact,

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:11.640
<v Speaker 1>you're probably ahead of the long term average of ten

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:14.400
<v Speaker 1>percentage points or so. That being said, I think there's

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>still value in the market. How do you assess value?

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I think you look at earnings yield, which is the

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 1>inverse of what we're expecting, uh, in terms of profitability

0:23:23.520 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>for SMP five constituents, and that's nearing five percentage points

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:30.679
<v Speaker 1>cash flow yield in excess of four percent. Why is

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>that important? Well, all eyes are on ten year treasuries

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 1>that are at one point five percent, which means you're

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 1>if you're in fixed income instruments, your real rate of

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:44.120
<v Speaker 1>return is negative with inflationary pressures. UM, you know, certainly

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:47.199
<v Speaker 1>passing through two percent and higher. So you look at

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 1>value and you are absolutely correct. Valuations a stretch, which

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:53.639
<v Speaker 1>is why you have to go to areas of the

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>market that have lagged or are selling at a discount.

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:58.920
<v Speaker 1>And there's plenty of that. Okay, Well, let's talk about

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 1>those areas the market. What are some areas of the

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 1>market to keep an eye on those that you say

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:05.639
<v Speaker 1>have lagged UM. Healthcare continues to be an area of

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the market that I think is an opportunity, particularly for

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>those looking for the next year. Again, it lagged the

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 1>market by about two and forty basis points here to date,

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 1>it's trading at about sixteen point eight times, which is

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 1>nearly discount. You've got earnings and revenue growth, and you

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>have a really nice hybrid exposure of defense with pharma

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and growthier errors of the market like healthcare equipment and supplies,

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 1>which will should do well irrespective of the backdrop on

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the macro level. Well, it's interesting that you say that.

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to probably bring this up in our discussion

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:39.399
<v Speaker 1>with our TV colleagues in just a few minutes, but

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:42.920
<v Speaker 1>healthcare stocks are Bailey lipshelts putting out and say they're

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:45.119
<v Speaker 1>on pace for the worst months since the pandemic began

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 1>back in February. So we have seen a pullback in

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>these names in a big way. So healthcare, what what else?

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:56.120
<v Speaker 1>What do you say to the big tech argument? There's

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 1>been concerns as rates go higher, worries about future cash

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:01.719
<v Speaker 1>flow at these peese. You know they're already trading on

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:04.720
<v Speaker 1>you know what we get from them, uh in the future.

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Having said that we are increasingly a big tech economy,

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:13.920
<v Speaker 1>great point. I think the fact is, well, tech is

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:16.640
<v Speaker 1>a percentage of the overall market, is now the biggest

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:20.400
<v Speaker 1>slice of the pie, and excess of thirty percentage points.

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:23.440
<v Speaker 1>The fact is it's it's heading higher. And I think

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 1>when people talk about tech, they sort of do it

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 1>in homogeneous form. But there's so many dimensions to tech,

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 1>right even when we talk about software, security, the enablement

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of this digital world that we find ourselves in. I

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 1>think the fact that networking, five G, cloud computing, cybersecurity, semiconductors,

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:46.919
<v Speaker 1>they will remain a key solution to the world that

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 1>we will be living in five to ten years from today.

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 1>So to me, I would say it remains an area

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:57.200
<v Speaker 1>of focus, particularly for long term oriented investor that has

0:25:57.240 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 1>seen the sector underperform multi both have compressed, particularly within

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the hardware equipment area. I think it's an opportunity inflation

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:11.479
<v Speaker 1>transient in some parts, and someone will be with us

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:14.159
<v Speaker 1>for a while. Okay, expand on that, where do you

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:16.239
<v Speaker 1>think it will be with us for a while? I

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 1>think wage inflation obviously is a I do. I mean,

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, once you give somebody raise, you can't really

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 1>take it from them. And you've got the big guys

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 1>like the Amazons that are paving the wave for I

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:33.159
<v Speaker 1>see that, But I also see you know, Apple offering

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:36.919
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollar bonuses and those are one time bonuses that

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:42.400
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily come back, right, Yeah, good point. I think

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 1>there will be pockets of sort of transitory and it

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>depends on what your time frame is, you know. I

0:26:48.160 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 1>think if it's within three or six months, then I

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 1>think most of the things that we're living with will

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 1>be with us for a while. If it's longer than that,

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I think you'll have a full cycle to kind of

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:01.440
<v Speaker 1>digest and readjust where you are. Sort of long term

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 1>average has been um But I bring up the other

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:07.639
<v Speaker 1>side of the equation, which is I'm sure you guys

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 1>have talked quite a bit about which are the supply

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:14.399
<v Speaker 1>chain issues right right? Um, things that unfortunately even the

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 1>corporates are telling us are not just a two issue.

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:20.919
<v Speaker 1>They will be with us for three and perhaps beyond

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 1>that that's a little bit longer term and not so

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:26.440
<v Speaker 1>transitory or longer transitory if you can even say that.

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Jana Barton, thanks so much, really uh good to get

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>some time with you, Equity portfolio manager, director of Specialty

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Solutions at EAT Advance on the phone from Boston. And

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:36.879
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be I think a big issue, the

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:40.919
<v Speaker 1>supply chain issues. We saw, you know, China looking to

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 1>acquire energy at at any cost, essentially to make sure

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that they've got what they need for their citizens and

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 1>to be able to manufacture and do other things. You

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:51.719
<v Speaker 1>do wonder the fight for commodities is that what we're

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be facing for some years, fight for lots

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 1>of things and how does that play out and what

0:27:55.000 --> 0:27:56.679
<v Speaker 1>we see in terms of goods and services, I mean,

0:27:56.680 --> 0:27:58.879
<v Speaker 1>look no further than the problems that Nike's facing back

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:02.879
<v Speaker 1>more same it in the retail stories today. Thanks for

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:06.679
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Business week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:08.960
<v Speaker 1>or Bloomberg dot com, and you can also listen to

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 1>our radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:14.440
<v Speaker 1>or watch us on YouTube search Bloomberg Global News