Speaker 1: Our two Sean Hannity show Told Free is eight hundred
Speaker 1: and nine point one Sean if you want to be
Speaker 1: a part of the program. There's now a new investigative
Speaker 1: report our friend John Solomon, Founder, editor in chief, chief
Speaker 1: investigative reporter of justinews dot com, and it's breaking on
Speaker 1: the twenty twenty election and interference from nefarious foreign actress
Speaker 1: top geopolitical foes and for example, the US Intel hid
Speaker 1: you know, election meddling in the twenty twenty election from
Speaker 1: Trump because they opposed his policies. You know, I don't
Speaker 1: want my intelligence going to the White House where it
Speaker 1: will be used with that vulgarian in the Oval Office
Speaker 1: to support policies against China with which I personally disagree.
Speaker 1: That is not up to them. They're not elected to anything.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump is the commander in chief. The idea that
Speaker 1: anybody in the intel community could ever think if they
Speaker 1: can't pass this information on anyway, We'll get more details
Speaker 1: of this from John Solomon. It's not the only piece
Speaker 1: of evidence pointing to the Chinese government and their election
Speaker 1: influence efforts in this country. Although much of China's activities
Speaker 1: remains classified. Justinews dot Com was able to conduct a
Speaker 1: thorough review of publicly available intelligence assessments. In other words,
Speaker 1: there's more info, they just they have it under wraps
Speaker 1: right now. And federal indictment's foreign government warning cybersecurity from
Speaker 1: analysis that's out there, incredible evidence that the Chinese government
Speaker 1: also wanted to get a look at all of the
Speaker 1: you know, the voter roles in this country anyway, John Solomon,
Speaker 1: Editor in chief, founder, chief investigative reporter justinnews dot com.
Speaker 1: This runs deep and wide, and it has a lot
Speaker 1: of different aspects to this.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you're exactly right, Sean, It's pretty remarkable. So what
Speaker 2: do we know? First, I want to take people back
Speaker 2: in history. Just two years in twenty twenty four, one
Speaker 2: of our allies, Great Britain, learned that China had access
Speaker 2: and hacked into the voter registration database of Great Britain.
Speaker 2: It created an enormous moment of national alarm. There were firings,
Speaker 2: there were election security measures, there were hearings and independent commissions,
Speaker 2: and Great Britain treated this as something of grave concern
Speaker 2: to the future election integrity of their system. And not
Speaker 2: only that the Biden administration reacted with anger, they actually
Speaker 2: punished China on behalf of Great Britain. But when they
Speaker 2: took those actions, and when Great Britain was in alarm our,
Speaker 2: own intelligence community harbored its own deep dark secrets. It
Speaker 2: has known. The CIA, the DNI, the Homeland Security Department
Speaker 2: in the FBI has known since early twenty twenty spring
Speaker 2: of twenty twenty that China had also gained access to
Speaker 2: US voter registration data in America, the very data that
Speaker 2: right now Democrats say they don't even want that to
Speaker 2: be shared with the Trump Justice Department. There are several
Speaker 2: Blue states trying to block Trump's Justice Department from reviewing
Speaker 2: that data to make sure we don't have legal aliens
Speaker 2: or non citizens on the motor roll. So it's so
Speaker 2: sensitive we don't trust our own government. But it turns
Speaker 2: out China penetrated it in America, and for the last
Speaker 2: six years we've all been kept in the dark. The
Speaker 2: way we know this is true, we were able to
Speaker 2: get a declassified document, ironically, a document declassified by the
Speaker 2: Biden administration before it left office. It lays out the
Speaker 2: fact that China had gained access to this. We then
Speaker 2: talked to some of the intelligence analysts on the record
Speaker 2: who did this work in twenty twenty, and they confirmed that,
Speaker 2: in fact, China did gain access to multiple states of databases.
Speaker 2: Then we learned that the FBI had evidence that China
Speaker 2: sent a bunch of driver's licenses into the United States
Speaker 2: a months later. So in early twenty twenty, China acts
Speaker 2: the databases or gains access to the databases. In the
Speaker 2: summer of twenty twenty, they were sending fake driver's licenses
Speaker 2: to shoo Ago Airport with the intention, according to the
Speaker 2: FBI documents, of creating fake ballot registration and ballot ballots
Speaker 2: that would help Joe Biden when the election. That's what
Speaker 2: the FBI's intelligence source told them, is.
Speaker 1: This Joe Biden's FBI that first determined.
Speaker 2: This, No, this was the Trump one because it's still
Speaker 2: twenty twenty when it occurred. So Trump won FBI, So
Speaker 2: Chris Ray is doing this, and so all of that's
Speaker 2: been kept a secret from us, and then today we
Speaker 2: just put out the last piece of it, and you
Speaker 2: mentioned it so brilliantly in your opening statement there Sewan,
Speaker 2: the CIA and intelligence community decided they weren't going to
Speaker 2: tell President Trump, they weren't going to tell the Congress.
Speaker 2: They weren't going to tell the American public, contrary to
Speaker 2: how Great Britain reacted, solely because the analysts who handled
Speaker 2: China believed that this would help President Trump's policies. They
Speaker 2: disagreed with President Trump. They considered him make quote unquote bulgarian,
Speaker 2: so they put their political beliefs, their political party ahead
Speaker 2: of the national interest. It is such a remarkable story.
Speaker 2: Now we know that part because there's a little known
Speaker 2: office called the Ombudsman for Analytics. That Ombudsman's job is
Speaker 2: to watch the CIA and THEDIA and all the intelligence
Speaker 2: community to make sure that their analytics are honest. And
Speaker 2: in this case, the ombudsmen said they were not. That
Speaker 2: while the community was very aggressive intelligence community in saying
Speaker 2: China was involved in the election, they ignored, underplayed, hid,
Speaker 2: and suffocated evidence of China doing the same thing. And
Speaker 2: then he concludes, quoting from the emails of the CIA analysts,
Speaker 2: that the reason China's meddling in the election was suppressed
Speaker 2: was because the analyst in the Intelligence Committee did not
Speaker 2: like Donald Trumper's policies and they decided to thwart them
Speaker 2: by not telling our president, our commander in chief, our Congress,
Speaker 2: or the American people of these intrusions by China. It
Speaker 2: is such a remarkable story. We spent a decade you
Speaker 2: and I talking about the deep state. Here is perhaps
Speaker 2: one of the most coajinig examples of how dangerous the
Speaker 2: deep state can be. It can keep actionable intelligence, intelligence
Speaker 2: that made Great Britain go to deat Con five on
Speaker 2: election integrity from a president, from a Congress and American
Speaker 2: people purely because of their political beliefs. That has got
Speaker 2: to be very concerning to everyone listening today.
Speaker 1: I'm trying to understand who knew what and when. In
Speaker 1: other words, this is this is one intelligence official comes
Speaker 1: up with the assessment. We only have one commander in
Speaker 1: chief at a time, we only have one president at
Speaker 1: a time. You don't get to pick and choose what information,
Speaker 1: and especially when it deals with national security that you're
Speaker 1: going to pass on to the president. And this one
Speaker 1: individual did this. How many other people likely knew?
Speaker 2: Oh, we know for certain from the reporting we've done
Speaker 2: that Chinese sorry, China experts in the FBI, the Homeland
Speaker 2: Security Department, and the CIA had concluded with certainty that
Speaker 2: China had penetrated the voter registration databases of the United
Speaker 2: States American voters by April of twenty twenty. It is irrefutable.
Speaker 2: It is in a document that has shared community wide.
Speaker 2: Now what's remarkable about that is the president is briefed
Speaker 2: twice on external elections threts, once in February, once in May.
Speaker 2: It does not appear that he gets that level of detail.
Speaker 2: It's kept from him, at least that's what the ombudsman
Speaker 2: is suggesting in his work. So it is well known
Speaker 2: across multiple agencies, across scores of analysts, and there's consensus.
Speaker 2: They agree, they assess that this happened. They just simply
Speaker 2: don't want to tell them.
Speaker 1: Well, why would they be stupid enough to put this
Speaker 1: in writing? I mean, I find that kind of spectacularly stupid.
Speaker 2: It is remarkable, it is quite remarkable, and so they
Speaker 2: create these products. Now, in fairness, there were analysts who
Speaker 2: were very concerned that this was being buried. One of
Speaker 2: them is a guy named Christopher Porter. I interviewed him
Speaker 2: on the record in my story. Chris Porter believed that
Speaker 2: there was a cover up going on. He went to
Speaker 2: the Inspector General, went to the ombudsman in clearly was
Speaker 2: trying to get this out. But despite his efforts. It
Speaker 2: remained a secret until just a few short weeks ago
Speaker 2: or just until recently. The intelligence analysts will write their
Speaker 2: products knowing that they're going to be highly classified, never
Speaker 2: read by Joe Sixpack, you and I or the president
Speaker 2: unless someone briefed the president. The president enough time to
Speaker 2: go through the HIA library and read things. And so
Speaker 2: even though you write it down because it's important to
Speaker 2: collect what you put in, it's legally required that you
Speaker 2: collect the information to write it. You can control who
Speaker 2: knows what by just determining who gets it. And they
Speaker 2: kept these things off the books, They kept them from
Speaker 2: the getting to the President, the Congress. I've talked to
Speaker 2: dozens of senators excuse me, more than a dozen centators
Speaker 2: in the last week, people who are currently debating the
Speaker 2: same America actor like jod we never heard this, Like
Speaker 2: we looked at the document. We're disbelief. We weren't told.
Speaker 2: But that's how powerful a bureaucracy can be. It can
Speaker 2: find things, write them, and then keep them from being
Speaker 2: discovered by people because of the they bury documents. Is
Speaker 2: what cash Bettel keeps talking about with all of these
Speaker 2: skiffs and secret documents and code named investigations. The deep
Speaker 2: state is very powerful, and sometimes it may come at
Speaker 2: the expense of the American public.
Speaker 1: We know how high up it goes or is this
Speaker 1: just a work of one or a few analysts to
Speaker 1: be determined.
Speaker 2: There is a large body of evidence that we are
Speaker 2: asking Director Ratcliffe, Director Gabbert to declassify that would allow
Speaker 2: us to see how high up and who knew what when.
Speaker 2: It is highly likely that the CIA director at the time,
Speaker 2: Gena Haspell, would have to have known, given that this
Speaker 2: was a National Intelligence Council assessment. Usually the CIA director
Speaker 2: is brought to that and I have photos I may
Speaker 2: share these some of your staff of Gena Haspal sitting
Speaker 2: in a meeting with President Trump in February of twenty
Speaker 2: nineteen and again in May. I was sorry February of
Speaker 2: twenty twenty and May of twenty twenty, where these two
Speaker 2: election briefings were given. We need to find out whether
Speaker 2: they kept it from her, but most likely to see
Speaker 2: IA director almost certainly would have been told of this assessment,
Speaker 2: given the fact that there's an official product. We don't
Speaker 2: know about Christopher Ray. We do know that when the
Speaker 2: FBI discovered the driver's licenses and the alleged plot by
Speaker 2: China to maybe fake some to fake some ballots that
Speaker 2: would be voted for Joe Biden to try to help
Speaker 2: Joe Biden win the election. That they knew that this
Speaker 2: evidence ran contrary to what Chris Ray told timas he
Speaker 2: had said no foreign intrusions by China. They actually say
Speaker 2: it in an email. They write it, Hey, this is
Speaker 2: going to contradict Chris Ray, the director's testimony. Let's pull
Speaker 2: it back. And they pulled the intelligence report back so
Speaker 2: that people can't talk about it. We do know at
Speaker 2: least the people below Chris Ray knew it. Now, whether
Speaker 2: Chris Ray knew it or whether they kept him in
Speaker 2: the dark to be determined, but it is pretty a
Speaker 2: widespread I've interviewed many intelligence experts in people who were
Speaker 2: in the community at that time. They're like, oh, yeah,
Speaker 2: we all knew it. We just kept quiet about it.
Speaker 2: And I've interviewed some bying there are people and they're like,
Speaker 2: we were kind of amused that President Trump's own team
Speaker 2: kept us from him while he was in office, given
Speaker 2: his concerns about China. So the Biden people knew it,
Speaker 2: they kept quiet. Lots of career people knew it, because
Speaker 2: I've interviewed those people. It is remarkable that it stayed
Speaker 2: a secret for six years.
Speaker 1: Unbelievable, unbelievable. I mean, I just I cannot believe that
Speaker 1: we have what we call the deep state, and these
Speaker 1: are people that are supposed to be patriotic, They shouldn't
Speaker 1: be serving a political agenda. And it's time and time
Speaker 1: and time and time again. And I know what frustrates
Speaker 1: my audience because I'm in tune with what they're saying,
Speaker 1: and I feel their frustration because you have come on
Speaker 1: this program time after time, You've broken story after story.
Speaker 1: You show evidence upon evidence upon evidence, and then nothing
Speaker 1: usually happens to the people involved, or we find out
Speaker 1: in the case of like James Comey stature limitations of
Speaker 1: long since past, and then they go for, you know,
Speaker 1: whatever remaining low hanging fruit unless they can somehow eventually
Speaker 1: put together a grand conspiracy case. Right that frustrates people
Speaker 1: at you know, at an incredible level. The last time
Speaker 1: you were on this program, you were telling that it
Speaker 1: wasn't just arctic frost, that there were how many separate
Speaker 1: work but five separate investigations with various code names that
Speaker 1: are in fact, you know, looking into the people that
Speaker 1: are opponents of a particular political agenda or those that
Speaker 1: support Donald Trump. What's the status on that.
Speaker 2: Well, we hope soon the most interesting of them, the
Speaker 2: one that's really the most murky and dark and west
Speaker 2: well kept secret, is soon to be declassified. Round River
Speaker 2: Cash Betel, the FBI director, a little busy today's up
Speaker 2: on the hill testifying alongside of Telsey Gabbert and John
Speaker 2: Rakoff to see I, INDI and I directors. But if
Speaker 2: those get to classify, that I think will be one
Speaker 2: of the most shocking investigations because that investigation was driven
Speaker 2: by speech deliminers, meaning what you said, what you spoke
Speaker 2: with your words in the country that's supposed to have
Speaker 2: a First Amendment determined whether the FBI considered you a
Speaker 2: threat in subjected you potentially and.
Speaker 1: In other words, if you want to after zero experience
Speaker 1: Hunter and Barisma and no experience in oil gas energy,
Speaker 1: but got paid millions in the quid pro quo, you're
Speaker 1: not getting the billion unless you unless you fired the prosecutor.
Speaker 1: I have we talked about that. Were we targeted? Was
Speaker 1: I targeted? Were you targeted?
Speaker 2: Oh, we don't know the names who were targeted yet,
Speaker 2: but we do know that the some of the speech
Speaker 2: diliminters involved Hunter Biden, the Biden family in Ukraine. Hopefully
Speaker 2: soon will know that. Now I know personally that I
Speaker 2: was subjected to a criminal investigation because in twenty twenty two,
Speaker 2: my lawyer has had a.
Speaker 1: Criminal investigation for what is no more honest human being
Speaker 1: on earth?
Speaker 2: Yeah, for reporting on Hunter Biden. And they believed I
Speaker 2: was getting my information from Russian sources longer to Brete
Speaker 2: Giuliani and the lawyers around President Trump. They they got
Speaker 2: a little lesson. They got a schooling that day because
Speaker 2: they realized I got my stuff from the FBI's files.
Speaker 2: And the second they realized I got myself from very
Speaker 2: concrete sources government documents, they close that down and thanks.
Speaker 2: Maybe they were going to bring me before the grand jury,
Speaker 2: said out, you don't to before a grand jury. You're done,
Speaker 2: and I walked away. But you know, I had to
Speaker 2: hire a lawyer to defend what turned out to be
Speaker 2: very accurate, honest reporting.
Speaker 1: Tell you what, well, when you get this information, we're
Speaker 1: just on the clock here, but we'll bring you back
Speaker 1: and we'll give a full accounting of it. Why do
Speaker 1: I suspect your names at the top of the list,
Speaker 1: and I'm probably down by like number twelve. I don't know,
Speaker 1: well your name's been I mean maybe a what's that.
Speaker 2: Department was monitoring you? So we know that's true.
Speaker 1: As people only knew half of what we have to
Speaker 1: deal with that we don't talk of a lot about.
Speaker 1: But anyway, John Solomon, justinnews dot com great reporting. As always,
Speaker 1: will continue to follow the story in any updates you have,
Speaker 1: I clickbreak, I pack will continue straight ahead. Eight hundred
Speaker 1: and nine four one Shawn is a number.
Speaker 3: The Dens want to stand on the step singing terrible
Speaker 3: songs and cursing out Trump. You know you have one
Speaker 3: guy over this shout and ever wonder if these people
Speaker 3: ever go to work me too? Throughout This is the
Speaker 3: Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 1: Now, Linda, we've been spending a lot of time California.
Speaker 1: You know, they're they're insane taxes, the mass exodus, this
Speaker 1: referendum that's coming up in California that would be retroactive
Speaker 1: to January, and all these billionaires are making a mass exodus.
Speaker 1: I mean, the top six alone are going to cost
Speaker 1: that state billion tens and tens of billions of dollars.
Speaker 1: We have talked at length about the state of New
Speaker 1: York and this latest proposal fifty death tax for the
Speaker 1: City of New York only, I mean New York City,
Speaker 1: non New York State. New York City has a higher
Speaker 1: proposed budget under Marxist Kami Mamdani than the entire state
Speaker 1: of Florida. And it's they don't have They have lousy schools,
Speaker 1: they have lousy infrastructure, they don't have law and order.
Speaker 1: He's all part of the defund dismantled no bail law madness.
Speaker 1: Of course, I don't like his views or his wife's
Speaker 1: views when it comes to Israel and the Jewish community,
Speaker 1: and how his wife in particular saw October the seventh
Speaker 1: pretty repulsive to me. But with all that said, you
Speaker 1: know New York and I'm going to play for you
Speaker 1: in a minute. Kathy Hokl, the governor, Now all of
Speaker 1: a sudden, she's like, well, we'd like the people to
Speaker 1: come back to New York and they all go down
Speaker 1: to Palm Beach. But this is her thing, Lee Seldon
Speaker 1: go down to Florida and all these other conservative trump
Speaker 1: go down to Florida where you belong. She tells them listen.
Speaker 4: And we're here to say that the era of Trump
Speaker 4: and Zelden and mon Ro. Just jump on a bus
Speaker 4: and head down to Florida, where you belong. Okay, get
Speaker 4: out of town. Get out of town because you don't read,
Speaker 4: you don't represent our values. You are not New Yorkers.
Speaker 1: And then, of course, famously, then Governor Andrew Cuomo made
Speaker 1: the statement, you were not in New Yorker if you're
Speaker 1: pro gone and pro wife and anti gate nobody, I'm
Speaker 1: no conservative and knows anti gay. Okay, put that aside.
Speaker 1: You know you're not in New Yorker. There's no place
Speaker 1: for you in the state in New York. Here's what
Speaker 1: he said.
Speaker 5: Their problem is not me and the Democrats. Their problem
Speaker 5: is themselves. Who are they? Are they these extreme conservatives
Speaker 5: who are right to life, a pro assault weapon, anti gay?
Speaker 5: Is that who they are? Because if that's who they are,
Speaker 5: and if they are the extreme conservatives, they have no
Speaker 5: place in the state of New York since that's not
Speaker 5: who New Yorkers are.
Speaker 1: Then he said, tax, the Ridge tax, the Ridge tax
Speaker 1: the rich. We did and the rich start leaving, God forbid,
Speaker 1: here's that cut.
Speaker 6: We have one of the most progressive tax codes in
Speaker 6: the United States, which is a good thing, which means
Speaker 6: the richer you are, the more you pay. However, that
Speaker 6: presents a very fragile economy because then you are relying
Speaker 6: on a very small number of people for the vast
Speaker 6: amount of your tax dollars. One percent of the tax
Speaker 6: pay nearly half of all the taxes. One percent pay
Speaker 6: nearly half of all those taxes. Those one percent are
Speaker 6: the richest people in the state. They're the richest people
Speaker 6: in the country, and they are the most mobile people
Speaker 6: in the country. And you see the chart on the bottom,
Speaker 6: top one percent, about forty six percent, top five percent,
Speaker 6: sixty three percent of all the revenue, top ten percent,
Speaker 6: seventy four percent of all the revenue. Tax the rich tax,
Speaker 6: the rich tax the rich. We did now, God forbid
Speaker 6: the rich leave.
Speaker 1: Now, this is what's fascinating. They chase everybody out, They
Speaker 1: beg you to go. People leave, you know when you
Speaker 1: have you know, JP Morgan chase more employees in Texas
Speaker 1: than you do in New York. And it's so identified
Speaker 1: with New York. It tells you everything. Now, this guy's
Speaker 1: proposing dropping the estate threshold from se seven point five
Speaker 1: million seven hundred and fifty thousand. You can't even own
Speaker 1: a closet to live in in New York City for
Speaker 1: that amount of money. And he wants fifty percent of
Speaker 1: all the money you've been taxed on, and he wants
Speaker 1: to confiscate it when you die. It's a death tax
Speaker 1: on top of a forty percent federal death tax, on
Speaker 1: top of her ten percent state tax. And you know,
Speaker 1: Kathy Hogel, our tax bases are eroding. Businesses are leaving
Speaker 1: because of the tax rate. I'm like, oh, you're just
Speaker 1: figuring that out now. Because Wall Street South, every big business,
Speaker 1: every private equity firm, every investment firm, every big bank
Speaker 1: has a massive presence in South Florida. And all these
Speaker 1: companies are escaping and they're taking with them mass a
Speaker 1: massive amount of money. And these states are going to
Speaker 1: be going bankrupt. The City of New York, I'm telling you,
Speaker 1: is it going to be headed towards bankruptcy. It as
Speaker 1: a matter of when not if. Is Kathy Hogl you know,
Speaker 1: now finally identifying the problem, but she was begging, you know,
Speaker 1: conservators to leave.
Speaker 4: What I want to make sure we are smart about
Speaker 4: is having a system in place where it's not just
Speaker 4: taxing for the sake of taxing, and being conscious of
Speaker 4: the facts that I need people who are high net
Speaker 4: worth to support the generous social programs that we want
Speaker 4: to have in our state. Right now, there are some
Speaker 4: patriotic millionaires who've stepped up.
Speaker 7: Okay, cut me the checks.
Speaker 4: I mean, just if you want to be supportive, But
Speaker 4: maybe the first step should be go down to Palm
Speaker 4: Beach and see what you can bring back home. Because
Speaker 4: our tax base has been eroded. So I philosophically don't
Speaker 4: have a problem. It is like I have to look
Speaker 4: at the fact that we are in competition with other
Speaker 4: states who have less of a tax burden on their
Speaker 4: corporations and their individuals, and I would say remote work
Speaker 4: changed everything. There are people who could only work in
Speaker 4: an office in manhatt and work in New York State,
Speaker 4: and they were captives to our state. They were within
Speaker 4: a state. We saw that that's not the case. I mean,
Speaker 4: you know Wall Street businesses looking at Texas. They're not
Speaker 4: going there because they have a nicer governor. I know
Speaker 4: that for sure, But they're going there because of the
Speaker 4: tax rate.
Speaker 1: No, they're going because they like the governor too, Like
Speaker 1: they like my Governor. Governor de Santa's two of the
Speaker 1: best governors in the country. He still doesn't get it.
Speaker 1: I'm just asking high network people to please support our
Speaker 1: social safety net and go down to Palm Beach and
Speaker 1: ask all your friends to come up here so we
Speaker 1: can take more of their money. There comes a tipping point, Governor,
Speaker 1: and with all due respect, you begged people to leave,
Speaker 1: and now you want their money. And guess what, You're
Speaker 1: not going to be able to get your hands on
Speaker 1: it because there's not one wealthy company or person that
Speaker 1: I know that doesn't have a complete exit strategy, hiring
Speaker 1: our accountants and lawyers to make sure that the cut
Speaker 1: is is so acute that you can't, you know, come
Speaker 1: in there with with your your tax people. That's why, Linda,
Speaker 1: when people say to me, well, you only have to
Speaker 1: spend six months in a day and you're a resident
Speaker 1: of Florida, right, I'm like wrong.
Speaker 8: Well, in fairness, Sean, you might be a little bit
Speaker 8: wrong here because as memory serves, you were asked. You
Speaker 8: were asked to stay.
Speaker 5: Sean.
Speaker 9: We know you're mad at us, and you have every
Speaker 9: right to be occupy Wall Street. Governor Cuomo, that weird
Speaker 9: smell New York has made a lot of big mistakes,
Speaker 9: but we're gonna change.
Speaker 1: Just please stay stay, stay loser, Yo, Sean.
Speaker 7: Man, you can't leave. We need you, don't.
Speaker 1: I will lose la accent if you'll stay.
Speaker 7: Let's that beer and watch the game. How's that?
Speaker 9: We'll make Sex and the City tours, Sean and the
Speaker 9: City Tours.
Speaker 2: You don't go.
Speaker 1: Say we're in love. We'll marry women instead.
Speaker 7: We'll stop saying hello food.
Speaker 1: Who was still abbibi?
Speaker 5: Pipeline We'll run it through Central Park, no problem.
Speaker 8: The city depends upon job readers like New Sewan, so
Speaker 8: we're going to give you the perks you deserve.
Speaker 9: We'll name a street after Reagan health. We'll name them
Speaker 9: all after Reagan.
Speaker 1: Worried about your commute home?
Speaker 2: No problem?
Speaker 7: This patriot is now running directly to Sean's out. Take
Speaker 7: a note, please stay, stay, Stay.
Speaker 5: Stay, say mister Hannah, he stay.
Speaker 7: Who would we text to this money was gone?
Speaker 1: Who would be imposed socialism upon?
Speaker 7: Stay?
Speaker 9: Can't taking stay in your first and second homes.
Speaker 7: Don't disappear forever by an.
Speaker 2: Pleez mister.
Speaker 9: Jeez, or you need friend and say to you and
Speaker 9: the rest of humanities.
Speaker 8: Remain in the States, and that fills you with hats
Speaker 8: as the same.
Speaker 7: Anyway, on second thought, who gives.
Speaker 2: A what you do?
Speaker 1: I mean right, that was Broadway Stars, Nathan Lane, you
Speaker 1: ever did Nathan Lane and all wonderful people. They were
Speaker 1: begging me to stay, and then he says, ye, get
Speaker 1: the hell out of here. We don't care. We'll name
Speaker 1: every street after Reagan. It's pretty funny. That actually is
Speaker 1: fret funny. And that was the Jersey Boys that were singing,
Speaker 1: which is pretty cool.
Speaker 2: So that.
Speaker 1: See, I do have a sense of humor when people
Speaker 1: make fun of me.
Speaker 8: Well, you actually have a great sense of humor when
Speaker 8: people make fun of you. Other people get very bent
Speaker 8: out of shape, but you do not.
Speaker 1: I don't care.
Speaker 8: I don't And for those of you who don't remember
Speaker 8: who are listening, I have been here long enough that
Speaker 8: Sean used to have a hate hotline and we used
Speaker 8: to get calls and then he would play them on
Speaker 8: the air. Some of them were too vile to play,
Speaker 8: but I was like, really, this is what we're doing.
Speaker 1: Yeah, by the way, we should bring back the hate. Hannity, No,
Speaker 1: what do you think?
Speaker 8: No, Yeah, the world it's got enough hate. Let's do
Speaker 8: something positive.
Speaker 1: Please, you're the one with the hate list, not me.
Speaker 8: Yes, I have thirteen people I hate. Doesn't mean I
Speaker 8: will spread that around to millions.
Speaker 1: All right, quick break to our phones. We'll go when
Speaker 1: we get back. Eight hundred and nine to four one,
Speaker 1: Shawn our number. If you want to be a part
Speaker 1: of the program.
Speaker 3: You're on the Sean Hannity Show, a place where free
Speaker 3: speech and the First Amendment are still alive and well.
Speaker 1: Liberalism is a failed ideology.
Speaker 3: Get your dose of independence and liberty every weekday right
Speaker 3: here with Sean John Hannity.
Speaker 1: Let's set a busy phones. Eight hundred and nine one, Shawn. Roberto,
Speaker 1: my free state of Florida. Roberto, how are you great?
Speaker 10: Thank you, Thank you, my close. I appreciate it. Just
Speaker 10: two things I wanted to run by you, if I may.
Speaker 10: One of our founding fathers in our frame when they
Speaker 10: created the Second Amendment. There were geniuses in doing that.
Speaker 10: If you look at all these countries like Iran, Venezuela, Cuba,
Speaker 10: all these socialists, communist country they don't allow citizens to
Speaker 10: possess weapons, and that's where the citizens are so oppressed
Speaker 10: and they can't do anything unless the United States soil
Speaker 10: them mount and so the Second Amendment to me is
Speaker 10: one of the brightest idea that a founding fathers ever had,
Speaker 10: even though I was warning Cuba, but I'm an American
Speaker 10: citizen arrived here in nineteen fifty nine.
Speaker 1: Once they disarmed the people, remember, and we're seeing this
Speaker 1: now a little bit. It's problematic for the people that
Speaker 1: are standing up against the Iranian regime. Is you can't
Speaker 1: win a revolution with a slingshot. And whether there's plans
Speaker 1: to arm the people, I don't know. I'm not that
Speaker 1: that in the know on it. I would imagine there
Speaker 1: probably is, but there's coming a moment and I would say,
Speaker 1: you know, watch the next two, three, four weeks, and
Speaker 1: I think this thing's going to wrap up, and then
Speaker 1: it's going to be in the hands of the people
Speaker 1: in Iran, and then they will decide they will be
Speaker 1: the masters of their own destiny. And this will be
Speaker 1: the opportunity of a generation. As President Trump said, seize it,
Speaker 1: and as Netnyahu said, be ready for it. And my
Speaker 1: hope and prayer, I do believe God created every man,
Speaker 1: woman and child for the purpose of living free and
Speaker 1: fulfilling the talents that he put inside all of us,
Speaker 1: and that is the natural state of mankind. It was
Speaker 1: our framers and founders talked a lot about it, that
Speaker 1: we're endowed by our creator with inalienable rights, and it
Speaker 1: is that natural inclination desire. It's in every human's DNA
Speaker 1: to be free, and so many people on the face
Speaker 1: of this earth don't live in freedom. Anyway, my friend,
Speaker 1: I appreciate your call. Eight hundred and nine point one.
Speaker 1: Shawn is on number. You want to be a part
Speaker 1: of the program, all right, when we come back the
Speaker 1: latest on the Save Act. We've been checking in with
Speaker 1: a lot of senators and I'd love to see this happen.
Speaker 1: I'd love to see Republicans fight. I'd love to see
Speaker 1: them convince people, and hopefully the American people will get
Speaker 1: behind those people that see the importance of proof of
Speaker 1: citizenship and voter ID if you're going to vote, and
Speaker 1: it's just voter integrity. All Democrats Republicans have complained about
Speaker 1: not having both over the years. This is the chance
Speaker 1: to fix it, and Chuck Schumer's losing his mind as
Speaker 1: per usual. Anyway, we'll get the latest update from Senator
Speaker 1: Eric Schmidt of Missouri. On the other side, we'll also
Speaker 1: get your calls in eight hundred and ninety four one sewn.
Speaker 1: As we continue