WEBVTT - Recession Obsession

0:00:03.760 --> 0:00:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Bloomberg Opinion. I'm Ronny. When this week inflation

0:00:07.600 --> 0:00:09.879
<v Speaker 1>and the bear market, we'll speak with Barry Riddles and

0:00:10.000 --> 0:00:12.840
<v Speaker 1>near case are and later. It would be very helpful

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to know who was on the side of things that

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>really should not be involved in mainstream politics anymore. Jonathan

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:23.799
<v Speaker 1>Bernstein on the continuing January six hearings. First to the

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>markets and whether earning season will reflect the confusion in

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>economic and fed forecasting. Let's get straight to Barry Riddles. Okay,

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>So it's been an interesting first half Bury, to say

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the very least, and yet it seems to be pretty quiet,

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 1>almost dull at this point. Well, the question is how

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>much of the bad news is already reflected in stock prices. Hey,

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>look at the second quarter, the SMP down, Russell two thousand,

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>NASA down. Those are epic numbers. You have to go

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>back to the COVID pandemic quarter, to the Great financial crisis,

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and to the dot com andplos to find quarters that

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>bad since the crash. So this is up there with

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:09.319
<v Speaker 1>the worst quarters we've seen. It was really quite phenomenal,

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:11.759
<v Speaker 1>and yet now it feels like the market is frozen.

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:14.479
<v Speaker 1>And I don't mean literally frozen. I just mean people

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 1>they're waiting to see what's going to happen in terms

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>of the economy, in terms of the Federal Reserve, they're

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>not putting money to work, it feels like, so we're

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>waiting on when the Federal Reserve will recognize that peak

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>inflation is passed. When we look at a lot of

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>data points in copper commodities, oil wages are slowing, down,

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>home sales, there's lots of evidence that that big surge

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>in inflation we saw in into two has peaked. But

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:47.040
<v Speaker 1>we've had twenty four consecutive days of gasoline prices falling.

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Oil is back under a hundred from a hundred and twenty,

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>copper down, industrial medals down, lumber cut in half from

0:01:56.640 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>really and we've actually seen the Mannheim used car. And remember,

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 1>inflation first reared its head with cars because you couldn't

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>get new cars because semiconductor production head legged and was

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:13.080
<v Speaker 1>so delayed opening. Now we're seeing a pretty substantial decrease

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>in use cars from admittedly very inflated levels. So once

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 1>we get under that eight handle on cp I, if

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:25.079
<v Speaker 1>it's seven or for bids six in the coming months,

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that will let the fed realize they've slowed

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the economy enough, they've already seen inflation roll over, and

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe a more moderate set of increases five or fifty

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>basis points instead of seventy will continue to pressure inflation,

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>but without causing a full blown economic crash in recession. Well,

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:51.679
<v Speaker 1>so this is it. Our recession expectations overdone. Almost nobody

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I speak to isn't expecting a recession. They're not expecting

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>it immediately. Might be twelve to eighteen months out? Is

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>that because there are supply chain concerns further out? So

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:03.639
<v Speaker 1>first eighteen to twenty four months is just so far

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>off in the future, it's you know, it's makeable. It

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>might be twenty years off because when we look at

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the year head forecast, just what Wall Street does for

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the economy, for the stock market, nobody gets it right.

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Twelve months is forever. Eighteen is a whole another lifetime.

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>When we talk about the supply chains, some really interesting

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>data points. We're seeing the transit times for international shipping

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:29.919
<v Speaker 1>have fallen pretty substantially. The backlog at ports and the

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>time to ship has fallen. And we also are seeing

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the shipping containers which pre pandemic cost about two thousand

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>dollars to ship from China to Europe or or the

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>United States spiked up to twenty thousand and has since

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>more than cut in half to about eight thousand. It's

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>still much higher than when it was, but it's less

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>than half of of the peak. So that suggests that

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the shipping and demand for goods is sort of normalizing.

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>And keep in mind, as we get more and more

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 1>infectious but less dangerous variations of COVID, people are are moving.

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Remember we're primarily a services based economy. During the lockdown, hey,

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>we didn't go on vacation. We bought all this junk,

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:19.479
<v Speaker 1>We bought televisions, we expanded our houses. All these goods

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>purchases put real stress on the supply system, and so

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:26.160
<v Speaker 1>we end up with things starting to get back to normal.

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>It's not a surprise to see that drop. I'm not

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>in the recession camp. We're certainly not in recession today.

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>You don't feels like the economy is mooming. Listen, you

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:38.840
<v Speaker 1>just added two point seven four million jobs in the

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:42.159
<v Speaker 1>first half of the year. Wages have gone up about

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>five four percent. The bottom half of the wage pool

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>of bottom quartile is up about six percent. Consumer spending

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 1>year over year is up about five uh. The only

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 1>place we're really seeing an economic slowdown has been in housing,

0:04:56.600 --> 0:05:00.600
<v Speaker 1>from admittedly very elevated levels form us in a row

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 1>of decreased existing home sales during the season where home

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:08.799
<v Speaker 1>sales typically go up, home sales bottom around December January,

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and they go up throughout the beginning of the county year,

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and they peak in July and August. To see that

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>negative is telling you that increased mortgage rates and the

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>ongoing big price increases have discouraged fired. But other than housing,

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>which is more of an inventory problem than anything else,

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the economy looks pretty robust. The mid terms,

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>how are they going to impact what gets done? The

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>president obviously wants people to stop talking about inflation, or

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>to at least not vote on inflation, because there are

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 1>so many other issues to vote on. What can he do?

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>So first, I'm not a political analyst, and I try

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>not to make political forecast because of all the terrible

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 1>objective thing that we can say. No matter who would

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>be in the president's right, will he do anything? You think?

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Is there anything that you know a sitting president can do?

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>The problem is it's very difficult to do something about inflation,

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>isn't it if you don't have the full cooperation of Congress.

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>And even then when it comes actually inflation, it's hard

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 1>to do something about it. Well, well, when it's it's

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>more these days of what you don't do than what

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>you actually do. When you look at the impact of

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the Cares Act, all three segments, the first one under

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:21.159
<v Speaker 1>President Trump was two trillion dollars. It was unprecedented, was

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:24.839
<v Speaker 1>ten percent of GDP. The second one, also in the

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Trump was another nine hundred billion, and then Biden came

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 1>into office and there was another two trillion dollars. So really,

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the people to blame our Congress who passed these giants

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>spending bills. But both Trump and Biden put a lot

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>of money into the system, and that's part of the

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>reason we've seen prices go up. Consumers are out spending

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money. So once that toothpaste is out

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of the tube, I don't know how you get that

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:55.160
<v Speaker 1>back in other than dampening demand by cranking up rates,

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>and the Fed seems to have accomplished that. So all right,

0:06:57.480 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about valuations. How are people value in companies

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>these days? How do they measure what the intrinsic value

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:05.840
<v Speaker 1>of a company is when clearly stock market valuations are

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>just all over the place. So there are two key

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 1>factors that drive valuation. One is just the basic math.

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>What are the earnings right now? You could look at

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of other ways of measuring revenue, growth in

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>price the book, and whatever, but really it all comes

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>down to earnings. That's your starting point. And then the

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>market will put some type of a multiple on earnings.

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>And here's where investor psychology becomes so important. The multiple

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>is really a function of everybody's collective consensus as to

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 1>what investors should pay. Hey, how much are you going

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to pay for that dollar of earnings? And we see

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 1>that this rises and falls with the market cycle. My

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>favorite example, you start in the beginning of the eighty

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>two to two thousand bull market. The P ratio for

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the S and P five hundred was seven x, and

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 1>it ended at thirty two x. And so while the

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 1>economy expanded an earnings ru over that eighteen year period,

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>three quarters of the market gain was caused by multiple expansion.

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>One of the reasons we look at that and don't

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 1>say this is a crazy delusion, This is a bubble

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 1>is the nature of corporate America has changed. Go back

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to the seventies, the era that led to that high inflation,

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 1>low economic growth, and industry was big and costly, a

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of manpower, a lot of material, a lot of

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>capital required. Compare that to you know, the Instagram purchase

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>by Facebook. The joker is a couple of guys on

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>a laptop and it was sold for a billion dollars.

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>The intangibles have not been measured correctly by investors for

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the past twenty years. And when you saw a technology

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:51.319
<v Speaker 1>run up as much as it has over the past decade,

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that was those intangibles. That's everything from

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>patents to copyright to business methods and algorithms. I think

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>we've started to see intangibles be reflected in prices. Their

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>value is starting to be recognized. So where do we

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 1>go from here? We have a quarter coming up where

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:11.200
<v Speaker 1>earnings are not going to be all that exciting, They're

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 1>going to be disappointing people. Well, that's the big question

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>is you know, we're we've seen record high earnings over

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of years. We're still forecast for two

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 1>The consensus is a ten point six percent gain and earnings.

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Some people think that's a little rich. We've seen a

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>correction in the SMP five hundred, but we haven't seen

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 1>a correlated downgrade of earnings. I think we'll know really quickly.

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Is the consensus estimates too high? Ps Historically they're always

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:50.199
<v Speaker 1>too high. The analysts community always overestimate earnings, the exception

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>being in the Nadia of recessions, they underestimate the recovery.

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:57.320
<v Speaker 1>The odd thing about the past couple of years is

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the overly optimistic estimates of earnings turned out to be

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 1>more or less dead on. Well. The other thing is

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>that there's going to be a bifurcation between companies that

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 1>can pass down inflation problems and still hold onto their

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>margins and the company's account. One of the things that

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I think the average investor doesn't often recognize is that

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:19.319
<v Speaker 1>stocks have long acted as an inflation hedge. And if

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 1>that sounds counterintuitive, you know, if your input costs go

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 1>up and there's still plenty of consumer demand for your products,

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>just pass along the price. So your revenues go up

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 1>on a nominal basis, but they're going up because of inflation.

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Your earnings go up as inflation. The exception to that

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>is when you can pass along those increases in input costs.

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>So you know when we see five percent increases in

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:47.959
<v Speaker 1>consumer demand year over year. Not only is corporate America

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 1>as well set up in terms of their debt and

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet, but we look at the household balance sheets.

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 1>People are sitting on a couple of trillion dollars of cash.

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:01.319
<v Speaker 1>The average household is working, Most Bello have gotten pay raises.

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>This isn't the standard situation that you see heading into

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a recession. This is a pretty robust expansion where unique

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 1>circumstances caused by COVID nineteen, the pandemic, the lockdown, and

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>then the reopening have caused the spike in inflation. As

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 1>things start to normalize, we could have a pretty typical

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>two to and g d P with two pc inflation

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>in twenty three. Everybody is so focused on the change

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>in the cost of capital and the increase in rates

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>they may be missing the optimistic picture, which is the

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 1>economy is still fairly robuts how much is Russia's war

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 1>in Ukraine lingering when it comes to the US economy

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and particular U s docs, so it's less of a

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:49.199
<v Speaker 1>factor in the US than it is overseas, but it's

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 1>a global market. So if Russia restricts their output, all

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:55.439
<v Speaker 1>those little bumper stickers on gas stations, with Biden saying

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:59.319
<v Speaker 1>I did that, it's a fair argument to say Putin

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>did that. Before the war, oil prices were fairly elevated.

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>They were, then the war came in and tacked on another.

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 1>So at the moment, you're painting a fairly rosy pitcher

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 1>which seems to die. But with what we're saying, rosy

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 1>picture from down exactly I was. You know, it's easier

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>to be rosy when the market has gone on sale

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. Yeah, exactly, Well, what could derail the

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:25.679
<v Speaker 1>market further? Of all of the scenarios you painted, there

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem to be any kind of an event in there.

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>So the biggest threat is a policy mistake by the FED,

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and that means overtightening. It's not a fragile economy, but

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not a bulletproof economy either, So that's one issue.

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>We would hate to see the Russian invasion of Ukraine's

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>spill into the rest of Europe. That could be really problematic.

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>You never know what's going on in China. China's economy

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:55.200
<v Speaker 1>seems to be slowing much more than I think people

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:59.440
<v Speaker 1>were expecting. That's still impacting supply chains and goods. We

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:01.439
<v Speaker 1>also help this stronger dollar, which doesn't seem to be

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 1>going anywhere and anything. It's going to strengthen more. I

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:07.319
<v Speaker 1>love the expression the cleanest shirt and a hamper full

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of dirty laundry. Where else are you going to put

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:14.960
<v Speaker 1>your currency? The Euro? Certainly not the end come on

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 1>or when? When we look at China's currency, the US

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:23.840
<v Speaker 1>is clearly the best choice amongst those. And by the way,

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:26.719
<v Speaker 1>we've been hearing about the death of the dollar, I

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know my whole adult lifetime. If you think the

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>dollar is dead, you should go to Europe and spend

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:35.319
<v Speaker 1>some time in Italy or Paris or wherever you like,

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and you'll see the purchasing power of the dollar remains very,

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 1>very really strong. Well, it's a party now basically with

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the euro amazing. So honestly, everything you've just said makes

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:47.199
<v Speaker 1>me think the markets by so the market is a

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:49.959
<v Speaker 1>bye if you have a time horizon of more than

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, six to twelve months, because anything can happen

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 1>in a giving year. I think the concern is when

0:13:56.000 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 1>will the FED realize that we are past peek inflation,

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that their original take that inflation wasn't going to be

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:05.839
<v Speaker 1>sticky and it was going to be transitory turned out

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 1>to be right, just trans story took a lot longer

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 1>than anyone expected, and that they've already done most of

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 1>what they need to do. I hope the FED is

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>aware of the fact that copper metals, lumber, gas, oil,

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>even housing and wages are either slowing their rate of

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>increase or tacking downwards, in which case they should be

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>a little more gentle Barry riddles there. Let's get to

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the January six hearings now here in seven, with another

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>to come next Thursday. We're joined by Jonathan Bernstein. We

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 1>seem to be getting a lot more details, and I mean,

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the gossipmonger parts of us are very satisfied with what

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 1>we're hearing out of the committee. But what struck you

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>as the most intense part of this week's hearing, Well,

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're just continuing to fill in the details

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of the basic story of of You know that Donald

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Trump was attempt thing to overturn the election and essentially

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 1>overthrow the government the United States. So you know, each

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>detail sort of adds to that without anything in particular

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 1>really changing what we've actually known since January six itself.

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>But you know, it's increasingly clear that it was a

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>deliberate plan, that he was deliberately trying to do this,

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and that he was calling on anybody who was willing

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 1>to work with him, including these extremist organizations. Now, did

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 1>it give the committee half to the Patsy Bylonian people

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 1>like that, did actually give testimony in the end, And

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 1>do we need to hear from people like Steve Bannon?

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Part of this goes beyond my expertise, which is to

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the legal side of things and exactly what is criminal

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 1>and what kind of evidence would they need to you know,

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 1>make certain charges stick. And you know, I'm not a lawyer,

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 1>so I can't really speak to that. But the more

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>evidence that they can get, and and not just about

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Trump himself, but about you know, other people who are

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 1>active leaders of the Republican Party, whether they're members of

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the House or people who were in the administration who

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>are still active leaders of the Republican Party. Whatever happens

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to Donald Trump, it would be very helpful for us

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>to know who was involved into what level because you know,

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 1>as the Committee has said, there's nothing wrong with pushing

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 1>legitimate lawsuits to make sure that the presidents that any

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 1>candidates case gets made in court if they think that

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 1>there's something going on that they have rights to what

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Trump did with something else, and it would be very

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>helpful to know who was on the side of things

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>that really should not be involved in mainstream politics anymore. Well,

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the only thing that we heard this week is that

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>we heard from some members of some of these groups,

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>like the Old Keepers for example. Does it take away

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 1>some of their perceived power or their self perceived power

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>that lives being shared on how they operate. Yeah, I

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 1>think that it's very helpful. You know, this is stuff

0:16:57.480 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>that you know, people who follow all these things have

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:05.479
<v Speaker 1>known about for years really, um, but it's very helpful

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 1>for the committee to shine some light on it. As

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>you say, these are dangerous groups. They are extremist groups,

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and one of the things that Donald Trump did that

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:19.400
<v Speaker 1>was so unusual was to treat them as legitimate parts

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:24.159
<v Speaker 1>of the party coalition. And once the president, once the

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>leader of the party does that, it's very hard for

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the party to disengage, especially since there

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 1>are some overlapsing in policy positions or ideas. The Democrats

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 1>have done a very good job on their side of

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 1>keeping their distance from extremist groups. They have. Democrats didn't

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:43.680
<v Speaker 1>always do that. In the seventies, there was there was

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that kind of problem, but that problem is mostly on

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:49.719
<v Speaker 1>the Republican side now that they just find it very

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 1>difficult to exclude people who you know, are not supportive

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:58.479
<v Speaker 1>of democracy and who are giving the party attention. Biden

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>was asked on his middle strip about rematch with the

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 1>former president. Say there is no prosecution and that the

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 1>former sitting president doesn't see any sort of consequences from

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the hearings or the Justice Department doesn't do anything. What

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>do you want again, Well, you know, there's a political

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>scientist who says, we can talk about who is running

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 1>four and then we can talk about who's running in

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>As of right now, Donald Trump is running for president.

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 1>As of right now, Joe Biden is running for a

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:30.960
<v Speaker 1>second term. In both cases, we just can't really predict

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 1>whether that will still in the case, we can say

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 1>with some certainty that if Biden eventually makes it too,

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 1>he would almost certainly win the nomination. If there's such

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>strong opposition to seeking a second term. He'll probably drop

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>out sometime in the next I don't know, ten months

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>or so. As far as Trump is concerned, he's much

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 1>less predictable because he doesn't listen to people. UM. So

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 1>it's it's certainly possible that he could run and win

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the nomination. That's possibly could run and lose the domination.

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 1>It's possible that he could drop out of running entirely.

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 1>There's just no way of really predicting what goes on

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 1>in his head. And you have to wonder about Rhonda Santis.

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 1>What are you hearing behind the scenes, Jonathan, about whether

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Rhonda Santez could overtake Trump as a party favorite. Oh,

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't hear anything. Of What I could say is

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:22.160
<v Speaker 1>that it's very very early, and the Sandals has has

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of support in Republican aligned media. You know,

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>he gets mentioned a lot, which has successfully meant for

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:33.640
<v Speaker 1>him that he now shows up in polls doing double

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 1>digits or better in Republican early polls ofation. But you know,

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>we've seen a lot of candidates, whether it's Rudy Giuliani

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 1>or whoever, UM, have early leads that dissipated once we

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>find out who the actual candidates that are entering the

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:54.680
<v Speaker 1>primaries are and once the candidates get tested by going

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:58.199
<v Speaker 1>through the process. Jonathan Bernstein There, don't forget do get

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 1>in touch via Twitter, I'm at Vanni Quinn or email

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>v Quinn at Bloomberg dot net. Opinions and comments always welcome.

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>By the way. We're also available as a podcast on Apple,

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:11.159
<v Speaker 1>Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Happy to be

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:13.639
<v Speaker 1>joined now by near Caesar to continue our look at

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:16.880
<v Speaker 1>this bear market, what it signifies, how long it may last,

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and what you should know if it's your first So

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:22.640
<v Speaker 1>earlier I spoke with Barrio Riddholes and we were talking

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:25.679
<v Speaker 1>about how robust the economy is. In subsequent hours, suddenly

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 1>one hundred basis points is on the table from the

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:31.879
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve. Is one hundred basis points necessary? Well, I

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:34.440
<v Speaker 1>was curious how the economy is doing. I was looking

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:36.920
<v Speaker 1>at the numbers today and from what I can tell,

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the latest estimate from the Bureau Economic Analysis is that

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:43.360
<v Speaker 1>is that the economy contracted by about one point six

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:46.200
<v Speaker 1>percent in the first quarter, and the latest estimate from

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta said is that it contracted an additional one This

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 1>is all after inflation in the second quarter. If that's

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:55.199
<v Speaker 1>the case, then we have two consecutive quarters of negative

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:58.880
<v Speaker 1>real growth. We're technically in intercession now, but I don't

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:00.639
<v Speaker 1>know that that's the end of the now this because

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to the extent that there's a silver lining in this.

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Even though the inflation number today was bad, there's no

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:07.399
<v Speaker 1>question about that. If you look at what the market

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:10.880
<v Speaker 1>is expecting. The five year break even rate has declined

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:13.399
<v Speaker 1>from rough three and a half percent in the spring

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 1>too close to two and a half percent now, and

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the ten year break even has declined over the same

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 1>period from roughly three percent to two point three percent.

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>So I mean the market at least believes that the

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 1>worst of inflation is over, at least for now, and

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 1>that might mean that whatever the FED has done so

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>far plans to do, which is probably another two d

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 1>basis points between now next year and all the tough

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:41.439
<v Speaker 1>talk in the meantime, might have been enough to uh

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 1>to bring this inflation under control, even though it's not

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 1>apparent in this moment. And if that's the case, we

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>might have escaped with a relatively mild recession, which was

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:53.159
<v Speaker 1>the point I think to begin with. You know, if

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I had told you that that was going to be

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the worst of it, I think we all would have

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 1>been happy with that result. It's too early to say, obviously,

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 1>but as far as I can tell, that's the base case. Well,

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:03.199
<v Speaker 1>and that's the thing. If the fan does go one

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred basis points, is that enough to derail and economy?

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:10.119
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty robust, But as barivit All said earlier, not bulletproof.

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think any more than where it is now,

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>because I think ultimately the question is what are we

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:20.199
<v Speaker 1>digesting in terms of our expectations. I think people are

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 1>pretty morose about inslation. I'm not sure that the print

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:25.639
<v Speaker 1>changed really any of that. And if you look at

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:27.920
<v Speaker 1>expectations in the futures markets, I mean you see that,

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:30.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, markets are expecting a fat funds rate of

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:34.160
<v Speaker 1>roughly three hundred forty basis points this time next year,

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:37.680
<v Speaker 1>roughly let's say June of next year. And so I think,

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, market participants, the economy in general, businesses, I

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 1>think they've all calibrated for that number, and the question

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:47.399
<v Speaker 1>is will there be a surprise from there. All of

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:49.120
<v Speaker 1>that is to say, I don't know that the path

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 1>matters so much of the destination, whether they give us

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:55.160
<v Speaker 1>two hundred more basis points, you know, with to one

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:58.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred basis point hikes, or with four fifty basis point hikes,

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that at her so much. I think

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the question is will they move off the destination, And

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:05.920
<v Speaker 1>in that regard, I think there's a higher probability of

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:08.879
<v Speaker 1>a surprise to the upside than to the downside. So

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>then we get into your column which says that bear

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Marcus at the moment is a first for so many.

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Just give us the synthesized version of your thesis near Well,

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've been reflecting on the fact that, you know,

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 1>we have all these trading apps that didn't several years ago,

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and then millions of new investors has come to markets

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 1>in the pandemic, some of them before the pandemic, but

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:30.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them in the pandemic. There's been a

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:33.159
<v Speaker 1>lot of stories about that, and it seems to me

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of them are navigating a bear market

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 1>for the first time. And I was sort of reflecting

0:23:38.359 --> 0:23:41.120
<v Speaker 1>on my first bare market, which was the dot compas

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 1>from two thousand to two thousand and two, and there

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:45.919
<v Speaker 1>are things that I just didn't, you know, even though

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I was a business student as an undergrad and I

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:50.159
<v Speaker 1>was told these things in the classroom, there are a

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:52.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of things that I just didn't I don't think

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I really realized until I experienced it for the first time.

0:23:55.160 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 1>So give us a little bit of a rundown of

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>a couple of these mistakes that they don't have to

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 1>make that you might have made. Yeah, right, Okay, you

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:04.680
<v Speaker 1>know one is listening to prognosticators one of those things

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that which is what we're hoping they're doing right now. Well, yes, yes,

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and I think we should all acknowledge that, you know,

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>none of us have any ability to know where the

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>market's going. I mean, we're in the seven months of

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 1>this bare market. You know, it's getting long in the tute,

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>but when it ends, how low stocks will go. We

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 1>just have no model economic model to be able to

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 1>say that. The problem is during a bare market, people

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:27.120
<v Speaker 1>want those answers, and so they're inviting that kind of prognostication.

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:28.880
<v Speaker 1>And what I would say to them is it's fine

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to listen to this stuff as entertainment, but just don't

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:33.359
<v Speaker 1>make any financial decisions based on it, because ultimately no

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>one knows where it's going. The second lesson I would

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 1>highlight is that I think when you're a new investor,

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you don't realize how vulnerable companies are in general. I

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 1>was refrecting on the fact that Enron, roll Com disappeared

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 1>to me the dot com bust, that ge never really

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:49.680
<v Speaker 1>reget its luster after that. And so for for folks

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:51.200
<v Speaker 1>who are coming to the market for the first time

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:53.639
<v Speaker 1>and buying their favorite stocks and thinking that it's going

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 1>to you know, it's going to be a sure bed

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:58.479
<v Speaker 1>for them, it's it's nothing. It's nothing even close, right,

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 1>And there's something different about every air market. Obviously, the

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>reasons for the bearer market different depending on you know,

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:06.640
<v Speaker 1>which bearer market we're talking about, But there's really very

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:10.679
<v Speaker 1>little that's the same about one bear market as another. Well,

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the difficulties, right, is that how the

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:15.399
<v Speaker 1>bear market behaves to some extent is going to depend

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>on the input. What are we fighting. You know, the

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:20.680
<v Speaker 1>last bear market was very short. We were fighting a pandemic.

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Um this time we're fighting inflations and selling economy and

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 1>lots of economic challenges, etcetera. And so there are going

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:29.920
<v Speaker 1>to have different tenors. However, I would say that there

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 1>is a common denominator running through them, which is that

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>in general, during a bear market, you have a repricing

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:38.440
<v Speaker 1>of assets, and the more expensive the asset you own,

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:41.359
<v Speaker 1>the more vulnerable you are to repricing. So you know,

0:25:41.480 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 1>during the dot com bust, famously, that was probably the

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:47.880
<v Speaker 1>most expensive U stock market US history. When that recession came,

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and some will say it was even caused by that,

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:52.159
<v Speaker 1>by asset prices being too high, there was a lot

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 1>of room for repricing, and in fact, they did reprice

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>in that regard. This one looks looks it's not exactly

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the same, but this market is still very expensive, and

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of room for a lot of stocks

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to reprice. And in that regard, I think you sort

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:09.359
<v Speaker 1>of have to watch that as a common denominator of

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 1>all bear markets. Well, and that is one interesting thing.

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 1>You do see a lot of growth stocks, a lot

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:15.640
<v Speaker 1>of tech companies that have repriced more than just into

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>a bear market. I mean, some of them are lower

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 1>or more. Is there any conviction out there that they

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:24.400
<v Speaker 1>might reprice back at least a little bit to where

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>they were, you know, I fly this is one of

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the things I touch on in this column for tomorrow

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 1>is that famously, the market has no memory of price.

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:35.159
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't really care what you paid for a stock.

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 1>So for example, if you paid seven hundred dollars, let's

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 1>just say for Netflix, which was the high I believe,

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and now it's down, that doesn't mean it's going to

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 1>come back to seven. So I don't think we can

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 1>look at these stocks and say, just because it's down

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty fifty seven or whatever, it's coming back. I think

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the best that we can say is that in general,

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the broad market is going to recover, it's going to

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 1>regain its previous level, it's going to reach new highs.

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 1>What happens the individu dual companies is anyone's guess, which

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 1>is why I think betting on these individual companies and

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 1>worth hanging on to whatever price you bought is a

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 1>big mistake. So it's very interesting that you point out

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 1>that some of these companies didn't exist, or were defaulting customers,

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:18.680
<v Speaker 1>or just looks different after the last bearer markets. Do

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:21.439
<v Speaker 1>you anticipate that that happens after every parer market, including

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 1>this one. I think investors do tend to pay more

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:28.919
<v Speaker 1>close attention during downturns, which is understandable. You know, when

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:30.639
<v Speaker 1>you're making money, you tend to get lazy and you

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:33.120
<v Speaker 1>tend to not care as much. When you start losing money,

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:35.200
<v Speaker 1>you want to know why, and you start looking under

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:37.919
<v Speaker 1>under the hood, so to speak. And you know, when

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 1>investors do that, I mean, they find that some companies

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>are not exactly above board. And that's invariably another common

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:48.120
<v Speaker 1>denominator in these downturn is that shenanigans come to light.

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 1>The only question is what is the extent of them

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:53.159
<v Speaker 1>and who is committing them. I mean, the bigger the

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:55.399
<v Speaker 1>company that is committing them, the more likely it is

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to end in a catastrophic way for that company and

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the investors. Just nearly on the scale of it. But yeah,

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure that if this goes on any longer, we're

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna we're gonna find out some things we didn't know. Well,

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 1>it's funny, but you've just put crypto into my mind.

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not quite sure why I associate the two, but

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess we have seen some shenanigans in the crypto

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:17.200
<v Speaker 1>space of the market already, and I think we'll more.

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, one of the things that's interesting

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:22.440
<v Speaker 1>about crypto is it comes in the long line of

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 1>new assets, and there's real there's history there, right. I mean,

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:27.639
<v Speaker 1>when junk bonds came to the four in the late

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventies and nineteen eighties and they had their first

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:32.400
<v Speaker 1>wipe out, there were a lot of shenanigans that came

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to light. Any time that a new asset comes to

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the scene, you know, a lot of money is being made.

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I think people are not as careful as they ought

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 1>to be, and that invites all kinds of bad behavior.

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Of course, there's always some correction all that comes to light.

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 1>But I think crypto is just the latest and the

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 1>long tradition of new assets that are gonna have that

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 1>are gonna have to deal with with with behavior that

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 1>is not necessarily above board across you know, all around. Yeah,

0:28:57.040 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 1>near there's some hope here as well for people too, though, right.

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you're going to start investing, investing in

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a bear market is better than nos in some ways.

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Is that always true? I think it's pretty much always true.

0:29:08.880 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that I say his column is

0:29:11.120 --> 0:29:13.600
<v Speaker 1>that you know, in general, when prices are going down

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:15.480
<v Speaker 1>is the time you want to be buying. A lot

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 1>of people their instinct, I think is to hold off

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 1>it's the way or worse to sell what they own

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 1>on the theory that they'll wait until things get better

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:26.240
<v Speaker 1>and then they'll buy back in or resume investing. In

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, that is a big mistake because you won't

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 1>know when the bear market is over until the new

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 1>bull market commences, and in general, the bull market comes

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 1>in with a bank meeting, the market really turns sharply

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 1>higher to announce the new bull market, which means that

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you end up buying at higher prices than you otherwise

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:45.480
<v Speaker 1>would have if you just have to continue buying through

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the bear market. So I view all bear markets as

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:52.000
<v Speaker 1>buying opportunities, assuming that you you invest regularly through it,

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 1>very similar to the way you would do in a

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 1>in a bull market. So you're having already given the

0:29:57.640 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 1>caveat that you shouldn't listen to prognostigators. Is there anything

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 1>else that you would tell people out there, Well, I

0:30:02.600 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 1>would tell them to just focus on the long term

0:30:04.960 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and to just keep in mind that don't matter how

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 1>bad the news gets, no matter how long the bear

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 1>market bear market lasts, and you know it could last

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 1>several years, I mean, it's happened before the end. They

0:30:15.960 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 1>always end and Ultimately, you know, most people are not

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 1>investing for two or three years. They're investing from five, ten,

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty years. Time is on their side. There's really no

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 1>reason for them to be concerned. Assuming that they're investing intelligently,

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 1>they're buying regularly, investing the broad market. There's really no

0:30:31.560 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 1>reason to worry much in my view. Near case are

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 1>is there. We are now choosing to end all conversations,

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 1>not with you, though, as always we love to hear

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 1>from you. I'm at Vanni quent on Twitter, or send

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts to v Quinn at Bloomberg dot net. We're

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 1>produced by Eric mollow Till next time on Themberg Opinion