WEBVTT - FFW Micro - Cam Akers

0:00:01.760 --> 0:00:07.360
<v Speaker 1>You found Fantasy Football Weekly Micro a deep dive on

0:00:07.360 --> 0:00:10.640
<v Speaker 1>one player in just five to ten minutes. Now here's

0:00:10.680 --> 0:00:16.000
<v Speaker 1>your host, Paul Chargian Fantasy Football Weekly Micro Edition. I'm

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Paul Charchian, my co host as usual Tyler cannably usual

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:23.119
<v Speaker 1>for these for the micros. Yep, yeah, you're you're the

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:26.439
<v Speaker 1>micro guy. I am the microphy around town. Now.

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 2>I can't say I've had anybody coming after Robert.

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 1>As the micro guy. Would you sign with your your

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 1>real name or would you sign as the micro guy?

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Maybe maybe a combination of both. Tyler micro Guy. There's

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:41.880
<v Speaker 2>my new Twitter handle.

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I like it. Uh, there might be somebody you'd like

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:46.880
<v Speaker 1>us to break down and one of these micro editions,

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>we encourage you to tweet at us your the players

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you'd like us to break down at Paul charging on

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Tyler canably k n A E B l E.

0:00:57.480 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 2>Soon to be the micro guy.

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>The micro guy, that's you. You should change it to

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the micro guy. It's you know, it's probably gone.

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 2>It probably is. Yeah, Oh you should check.

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if i'd like to know. Today and this

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:14.400
<v Speaker 1>week we're breaking down all non rookies, but sill, these

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:17.760
<v Speaker 1>are all veteran players who are came out winners for

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:21.680
<v Speaker 1>various reasons on draft day. Who do you want to

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>talk about today?

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:24.400
<v Speaker 2>I can't even believe when we're talking about this guy,

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 2>but Cam Akers running back thirty four last year, currently

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 2>going off the board as RB twenty four. Yeah, he

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 2>was a winner because the only running back they drafted

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:35.960
<v Speaker 2>was Zach Evans in the fifth round, who doesn't seem

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:38.680
<v Speaker 2>like a threat right now. And Kyra Williams, the draft

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 2>for last year, didn't do anything with the opportunity he

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 2>was given last year. So cam Akers seems to be

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 2>the RB, the RB one here in the with the

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Rams Rams.

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, exactly, which says plenty you know every I

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>think most of our listeners know. It was a tale

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>of two seasons for Zach. And while we get plenty

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 1>of things wrong on this show, man, did we nail

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>cam Akers. We spent all August begging you not to

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>draft cam Acres and he was brutal through the first

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:15.240
<v Speaker 1>twelve weeks. He was arguably the biggest bust in Fantasy football.

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you know where he finished? Which RB number he

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 1>finished at through twelve weeks? Without looking, No, I don't

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>RB seventy fours.

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 2>So tough, it's so bad. It's so tough.

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Thirty two teams in the league. That means if you

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 1>took the top two running backs off of all thirty

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>two teams, that gets you to sixty four players. Cam

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Akers wasn't better than those guys.

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure you were doing a huge victory lap after

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:44.119
<v Speaker 2>the opening that game where he had maybe two carries

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 2>and everyone was like, what's going on here? What's going on?

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:49.079
<v Speaker 1>There was some of that. I won't lie there. You

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:53.799
<v Speaker 1>know what there was there was some peak docking. I'm

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>not you know, yep, it's it's true. It absolutely happened.

0:02:56.800 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 1>But let's give cam Akers credit. And you know, the

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Rams stuck with him, I think in part just because

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>they have a choice. But week thirteen onward, where did

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>he finish?

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 2>He was the RB three three from weeks thirteen to seventeen.

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 2>That is insane. I can't even believe that's a real stat.

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:16.080
<v Speaker 2>When when I looked it up, I said, that gave

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 2>you right to make sure my settings were right and

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 2>all the right filters. I was like, there's no way

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:23.959
<v Speaker 2>that's possible. But I think when you look at kind

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 2>of what he was working with, this old line was terrible.

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:30.959
<v Speaker 1>It was awful, terrible. Here Pro Football Focus ranked the

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:33.079
<v Speaker 1>run blocking line at nineteenth. I don't think they were

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>nearly that good. Guy had guys in and out all season,

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>lots of injuries, and with the offensive line. They spent

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>their thirty sixth pick on a guard center from TCU

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 1>named Steve Avila. It was viewed as a reach pick,

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>but still, hey, we'll take it. Yeah, offensive line help

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:51.839
<v Speaker 1>always good and returning from injury. They get their big

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>their tackle back, Joe Noteboom, who's very important to that offense.

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>And obviously they get Cooper Cup back. They get Matthew

0:03:57.680 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Stafford back. So offense is going to get better for

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the Rams Tyler, So you know there's reason to believe

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>just the whole offense gets better. You're cam Akers, nobody's

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>stealing a nobody's stealing a goal line carry from Cam Akers.

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>What's his touchdown? Upside his touchdown?

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I feel like we're kind of just fast

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 2>like rewinding to what we were talking about him last

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 2>year because it seemingly is the same situation. I didn't

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:23.039
<v Speaker 2>go as planned for him, but it's the same. It's

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 2>still got McVeigh. He still got Stafford, He's still got

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 2>all these weapons that can be a highest scoring offense.

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 2>His touch onf upside in this offense, assuming Staffords stays healthy,

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 2>Cups stays healthy, you still have all these guys. He

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:37.480
<v Speaker 2>can be like a ten to twelve plus touchdown guy.

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 1>He can be legit, you can't for sure, Yeah, because

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>there's nobody else to steal a goal line carry from him,

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:44.840
<v Speaker 1>which is you know, that's that counts for a lot.

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:47.720
<v Speaker 1>And I made notes of this. We actually did a

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 1>whole Fantasy Football Weekly podcast in February that was things

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to remember for next year. One of them was Cam

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:57.279
<v Speaker 1>Akers look good. He legitimately looked good. It was not

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>a mirage. He looked spry, he is.

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:03.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he's another year removed from that achilles injury

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 2>that he suffered a couple of years back. So he

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:08.279
<v Speaker 2>can only be more explosive than he was last season.

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 2>And when he wasn't like out there, Darryl Henderson was

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 2>a very smash hit in fantasy two seasons ago. Yeah,

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:18.839
<v Speaker 2>when when Akers was out in that offense is rolling Henderson.

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 2>I can't remember off the top of my head, but

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 2>it must be with like a top fifteen to twenty guy. Yeah,

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:25.279
<v Speaker 2>so he was okay, And we like to think camp

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 2>Akers is a lot better than Dale or Henderson, who

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 2>they try to like get rid of a lot of time.

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Try.

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 2>It felt like they tried to get rid of him

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:35.279
<v Speaker 2>and just like give like other guys like Malcolm Brown

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:37.280
<v Speaker 2>a ton of work. It's like Dale Henderson was the

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 2>guy who kind of just took over that backfield.

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:42.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, So you know, let's let's talk about where

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>camp Makers just go. We think he's got double digit

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>touchdown upside for sure. I'm gonna assume he's gonna play

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 1>all the games because I almost always do that unless

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 1>they have some reason I think you won't play all

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the games. I think camp Makers sits it. Like you said,

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>ten to twelve touchdown sounds about right, maybe more if

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you told me he's gonna get a

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>typical team will run the ball from inside the five

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>yard line thirty times in a season, cam Akers is

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:08.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna get almost all thirty. If he converts that into

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>twelve touchdowns just from inside the five, that's all very reasonable.

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>And now he's looking at fifteen touchdown upside, which would

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>be crazy. So let's see if other people have sniffed

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>this thing out, and where where's he going nationally? What's

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:24.159
<v Speaker 1>his where's cam Aker's ADP? Right now?

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:25.599
<v Speaker 2>I save this one because I knew we were going

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:27.840
<v Speaker 2>to talk about it. Isaiah Pacheco, who we just talked

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:28.839
<v Speaker 2>about on a fancy that.

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:32.600
<v Speaker 1>On micro Yeah, he's going at the same spot. Is

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that fail? That's what I'm saying. Yeah, okay, yeah, as Pacheco,

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 1>But he gives cam Akers gives you, in theory, a

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>little more upside, right, Oh.

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:41.279
<v Speaker 2>For sure, Yeah, definitely more. I think a little bit

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 2>more passing work. I mean there's not they don't really

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:46.600
<v Speaker 2>necessarily have a receiving back who you look at and

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 2>be like, that's their receiving back, that's their third down back.

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 2>I think cam Akers could play a role there as well.

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 2>So I think that's the ADP.

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:53.799
<v Speaker 1>What's cam Akers ADP?

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 2>His ADP is RB twenty four, all right.

0:06:57.000 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>So people are so people are kind of onto this.

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 1>The finish is RB three in December, so forward, So

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, twenty four means there's still some hesitancy out there.

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of name website here. Yeah, all right,

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 2>so we got is able to check over the first

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 2>one who'd rather have.

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I think given that cam Akers doesn't really have anybody

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>to compete with him, well, neither's a Pacheco. But as

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>we discussed in the Pacheco thing, this offense just doesn't

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>go through him and he doesn't catch. I think I'm

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 1>taking cam Akers, I think.

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, newly acquired Philadelphia Eagles running back DeAndre Swift.

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm out as he'll just be a committee backfield.

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 2>So you're not swifted out at all.

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Nope.

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 2>I think he's the most explosive running back they have

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 2>on that team.

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and that's why the Lions took Jamier Gibbs with

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>pick twelve. Yeah. I'm just they know, they know everything

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 1>there is to know about Swift and they don't want

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>him on the team.

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 2>But you don't think DeAndre Swift has some similar upside

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 2>that Sanders had last season?

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>No, stylistically totally different guy. Yep, Nope, not interested all right? No.

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Rashad White, Rashad White it all? Why does it always

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>come back to Rashad White Man. We've talked about that

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>guy a lot. Rashad White gives me the PPR upside

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>that Acres does not have. But I don't think he's

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>got the touchdown upside that Acres has got, and at

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, I want touchdowns. Fair enough,

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go Camp Acres.

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm gonna go Camp Akers as well. All right,

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 2>all right, Javonte Williams. Let's say he plays yeah too

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 2>much unknowns with the play twelve games. Let's say he

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:32.199
<v Speaker 2>misses the first four when he plays twelve.

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 1>See, here's just philosophically, Tyler. I don't like drafting guys

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>that have an unknown timetable. And I'm gonna like miss

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 1>September and early October with because now I'm there's too

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:47.200
<v Speaker 1>much risk that I'm one in four and my season

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>is circling the drain, and I'm making desperate moves. I'm

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 1>making bad moves, desperate moves. I gotta win now. I

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 1>hate that stuff. I want to win early. Give me

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:56.840
<v Speaker 1>guys with the early schedule. That's great, Guys that don't

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>have the encumbents of injury and all the other things

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 1>early on, and and then I'll move those guys and

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll sell high when my team's four and one. I

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 1>hate being I hate starting one and four.

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 2>See. The thing is, as I'm totally with you, I

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 2>don't like to draft injured players. Don't draft for injury

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 2>because then injuries are going to come back and find you.

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:15.960
<v Speaker 2>So I'm with you on that, right. But something about

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 2>these Sean Payton running backs that I just I'm just

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 2>getting mark Ingram Kamara, Latavious Murray, all these guys in

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 2>my head and it introduced me, It intrigues me, Javonte Williams.

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 2>But I'll go camp Makers. Okay, last one, Damian Pierce.

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>You know I feel about Damian Peers is not yeah close.

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I love Damian Pierce. They're gonna throw to them more

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:37.679
<v Speaker 1>this year. I just I just I love what they're

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 1>building in Houston.

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 2>I'll go Damian Pierce as well. So kind of we're

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 2>kind of wishy washy on Akers's ADP right now, a

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 2>little bit yep, but.

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm you know, but I'm seeing upside that I would

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>not have expected in cam Akers had we not talked

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 1>this through. And that's the whole purpose.

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 2>So you're not gonna tell you're to all the listeners

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 2>to not draft them no matter what. This easy.

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah that was last year's advice. But you know, hey,

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:01.680
<v Speaker 1>game changes, you gotta do different things, and we're We're

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna move on because we yeah, we get to do

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 1>that here this year.

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 2>It's gonna be trailing burks.

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:11.319
<v Speaker 1>I might, I might, that might, that might be happening.

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>We'll find out. Thank you for listening, everybody. We as

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>always and I'm not sure about the status of next

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 1>week's Fantasy Football Weekly. Micros might have them, might not.

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:24.199
<v Speaker 1>There's vacation time, there's scheduling. We had some things we

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>gotta work through, but we encourage you to obviously subscribe

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and continue listening anyway. No matter what, we will be

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:33.560
<v Speaker 1>here for sure with our regular Fantasy Football weeklies next week.

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly is a production of iHeartRadio. For more

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:43.680
<v Speaker 1>wherever you listen to your favorite shows.