Speaker 1: The volume. The Draymond Green Show is presented by a
Speaker 1: fan duel sports book. There's no better place to bet
Speaker 1: the action than on FanDuel sports Book during the football season.
Speaker 1: It's easy to use, it's safe and secure. You get
Speaker 1: payouts in as fast as two hours. There's so many
Speaker 1: bet types. My favorite same game parlay bets. There's live betting,
Speaker 1: player props, futures. If you're new, just download the FanDuel
Speaker 1: sports Book app to get started. Now sign up. Please
Speaker 1: use the promode code colum c O l I. An
Speaker 1: fan duel sports book makes it easy. What's up, everybody?
Speaker 1: Welcome back to The Draymond Green Show. We are recording
Speaker 1: this Friday morning, which is obviously the morning after a
Speaker 1: one twenty to one oh eight Dubs lost in Game
Speaker 1: one of the finals. UM. I'm here to talk all
Speaker 1: about it. You're here to listen to it. Let's get
Speaker 1: into it. Steph had twenty one first quarter points, finished
Speaker 1: with thirty four UM. So I absolutely love the way
Speaker 1: Steph came out firing. I think we can get to
Speaker 1: more of that UM as the game goes on. I
Speaker 1: thought I thought we start standing quite a bit um there,
Speaker 1: especially in the second half, which obviously made you know it.
Speaker 1: The easiest offense to guard is an offense that stands.
Speaker 1: And I thought we stood around a lot in the
Speaker 1: second half, which obviously makes things tougher on him. And
Speaker 1: so if we around him can continue to move more
Speaker 1: like we were in first half and the third quarter,
Speaker 1: I think that will continue to open things up for
Speaker 1: him and allow him to do what he started off doing.
Speaker 1: I also, um, I can't help but to think you
Speaker 1: come out guns blazing like that, you've heard the noise,
Speaker 1: you you know the talk, and you're responding to that.
Speaker 1: When I looked back at the game, I felt him
Speaker 1: because I didn't play well. And when he comes out
Speaker 1: guns blazing like that, playing the way he's playing, I
Speaker 1: have to make sure that I do my part to
Speaker 1: make sure that equals that ends in a win. And
Speaker 1: so I know I have to play better. But the
Speaker 1: way Steph Curry got out to that start was very promising,
Speaker 1: and I think, you know, we'll start to see more
Speaker 1: of that and and myself and other guys can help
Speaker 1: and make sure that that continues. I Al Horror Marcus
Speaker 1: smart and this was the story of the game. By
Speaker 1: the way, Al Horford Mark is smart and Derek White
Speaker 1: combined from fifty three from three. Now Al Horford has
Speaker 1: been shooting the lights out all playoffs. Um Marcus Smart
Speaker 1: has been shooting the ball extremely well in the playoffs too.
Speaker 1: Derek White hadn't shot the ball from three, I should
Speaker 1: say from three extremely well throughout the playoffs, nor historically
Speaker 1: over his career. What we do know is that he's capable,
Speaker 1: and obviously the world know he's capable. Since watching the
Speaker 1: game last night, we've been knew he was capable. But
Speaker 1: some of the threes he hit last night, like the
Speaker 1: rim just had to be why. I think three of
Speaker 1: the three of the five threes that he made was
Speaker 1: like right over people, right in the stage. When things
Speaker 1: like that happen, you have to live with that. At
Speaker 1: the end of the day, something has to beat you,
Speaker 1: and you're going to pick in an NBA game. What
Speaker 1: is more more are likely to not beat you. You
Speaker 1: know Jayson Tatum can beat you. You know you know
Speaker 1: Jalen Brown can beat you. Jaylen Brown had a good
Speaker 1: game last night, but j t struggled a bit. Now,
Speaker 1: he struggled a bit from the field, three for seventeen
Speaker 1: from the field, twelve points, but he did have thirteen
Speaker 1: and six, which I think is a huge growth, a
Speaker 1: huge area growth in his game. I think you know,
Speaker 1: when you would watch him in the past, if he
Speaker 1: had a three for seventeen night, you lead that game like, man,
Speaker 1: he played like he had a rough, rough, rough night.
Speaker 1: You didn't leave last night's game saying he had a
Speaker 1: rough night. He had a rough shooting night, but not
Speaker 1: so much a rough night now and saying that. Obviously,
Speaker 1: when you win, winning cures all. And so if he's
Speaker 1: three for seventeen with thirteen assists, obviously no one's singing
Speaker 1: the same tune of him not having a rough night.
Speaker 1: If that game doesn't end in a win. It did
Speaker 1: end in a win, So you have to give him
Speaker 1: credit U for the way he was distributing the ball.
Speaker 1: But then obviously that is a direct impact, I mean,
Speaker 1: a direct reflection of those guys making shots like they
Speaker 1: were knocking shots down and and and and it's also
Speaker 1: a direct reflection of email udoka Um and the respect
Speaker 1: that he's commended from this team and what he's taught
Speaker 1: his guys and and how he's helped him grow. I
Speaker 1: think it's a direct reflection to that as well. And
Speaker 1: so what can we do to ensure that that doesn't
Speaker 1: happen again? Well, I think number one, I think a
Speaker 1: lot of our rotations were off. Um, when you have
Speaker 1: dynamic drivers, guys that can put pressure on the rim,
Speaker 1: like a Jayson Tatum, like uh, like a Jaylen Brown
Speaker 1: who put tons put tons of pressure on the rim
Speaker 1: last night, Um, you're going to be in some help
Speaker 1: situations and and being in with with that being said,
Speaker 1: we have to make sure that our rotations are on
Speaker 1: point when we are going to help. And I don't
Speaker 1: think we did that very well last night. I can
Speaker 1: recall maybe four or five of them on my hand
Speaker 1: that just led the one pass pass out three and
Speaker 1: you have to make them make that extra pass. And
Speaker 1: so I think, you know, and just watching the game,
Speaker 1: like you know, I was actually questioned last night and
Speaker 1: like a lot of our hore fers, threes were wide open. Um.
Speaker 1: You know, Marcus Smart had a couple of wide open ones.
Speaker 1: Payton Pritcher had a couple of wide open ones, you know,
Speaker 1: And so you can take those away, you know, and
Speaker 1: all of a sudden, those guys aren't shooting fifteen for
Speaker 1: twenty three from three, they're combining for seven for sixteen
Speaker 1: seven for seventeen whatever. That doesn't necessarily kill you, but
Speaker 1: fifteen three it's hard to overcome that. You know, they
Speaker 1: I think they hit twenty one three is on the night.
Speaker 1: Fifteen of them coming from three guys that are not
Speaker 1: their main three point shooters, another two coming from Peyton Pritchard.
Speaker 1: You know that's seventeen threes coming from guys that are
Speaker 1: not their main guys. Who's really putting the ball in
Speaker 1: the hole now? Marcus Smart has really stepped up his
Speaker 1: scoring here in the playoffs, um And as I said,
Speaker 1: he had been shooting well. But again, as we all know,
Speaker 1: there are two main guys just putting the ball in
Speaker 1: the hold is j B and JT. And we did
Speaker 1: a great job on Jason uh And and making him
Speaker 1: take tough shots. But how do you get those other
Speaker 1: guys under control to where they're not having the impact
Speaker 1: that they had? Now? I leave this game saying, I
Speaker 1: leave this game saying, and I know what, most people
Speaker 1: will leave this game saying most people will leave this
Speaker 1: game saying Jayson Tatum struggle, he won't struggle like that. Again,
Speaker 1: the Warriors are in trouble, blah blah blah, which I
Speaker 1: totally understand, and I'm totally fine with that narrative for
Speaker 1: whatever people are gonna say, because ultimately that was earned.
Speaker 1: So you give them that. I personally leave that game
Speaker 1: saying I won't play as bad as I played again,
Speaker 1: which will affect our team in a positive way. But
Speaker 1: more importantly, I leave that game saying, we stopped the
Speaker 1: guys that we need to stop. Continue, you know, playing
Speaker 1: the defense on their guys that we were playing, but
Speaker 1: stop the guys that we need to stop. They won't
Speaker 1: shoot fifteen for they won't combine for fifteen fore from
Speaker 1: three again. So you take that out the game, make
Speaker 1: a couple of tweaks on the offensive end, and we're
Speaker 1: right back in business. And so I don't make too
Speaker 1: much of the loss. Obviously you're down oh one at home,
Speaker 1: I don't say I don't think it's time to press
Speaker 1: a panic button. At the end of the day, it
Speaker 1: is the first to four, not the first to one,
Speaker 1: two or three, and so we're not pressing the panic button. Um,
Speaker 1: they played a good game. You have to give them credit.
Speaker 1: I thought we played pretty good, all really good at times,
Speaker 1: but then I thought there was some there were some
Speaker 1: things that we could really clean up. Thought on the
Speaker 1: offensive end, we can slow down attack. You know, when
Speaker 1: you're playing against a team that's pressure and pressure and pressure.
Speaker 1: I think for the most part we handled well and
Speaker 1: then we got sped up, and so I thought, you know,
Speaker 1: I think we can handle that a lot better. Um,
Speaker 1: and I think we'll I think we'll respond the right way. Now,
Speaker 1: you know, have to go back to the film and
Speaker 1: see some of the things that see some of the
Speaker 1: things that hurt them on the offensive end for us,
Speaker 1: and then see the things that you know work for them,
Speaker 1: and how can we do those things better? And you know,
Speaker 1: what can we do differently? Uh? And in some of
Speaker 1: those spots. But I think for the most part, offensively,
Speaker 1: we just need to continue to ensure that we don't
Speaker 1: get stagnant. And at times when you are facing a
Speaker 1: defense that's switching a lot, you contend they switch, they switch,
Speaker 1: they switch, and you contend to slow down. And once
Speaker 1: you slow down and you stop and you stop cutting
Speaker 1: and all these then the offense just kind of stalls.
Speaker 1: And so that was I think our remain issuing the
Speaker 1: offensive and fourteen turnovers for twenty three points. This team
Speaker 1: reminds me a lot of the Spurs teams and the
Speaker 1: old you know back and not old days, I wanna
Speaker 1: say old days, but the Spurs teams of the past
Speaker 1: where they don't make a ton of mistakes, and so
Speaker 1: because they don't make a ton of mistakes, um, they're
Speaker 1: going to make you beat them. And because of that,
Speaker 1: they just kind of stayed with them striking this and
Speaker 1: stay with them striking this. State was in striking distance
Speaker 1: as they did last night, and then all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: you know, if they get hot, then you have a
Speaker 1: case like you had last night where in the fourth
Speaker 1: quarter they just got hot. They had missed a shot
Speaker 1: for the first however many minutes of the fourth quarter
Speaker 1: um or at least that's what it felt like. And
Speaker 1: so you can't let the offense stagnate. And then defensively
Speaker 1: got to shut the water off on the team going
Speaker 1: to run. Had to shut the water off. We didn't
Speaker 1: shut the water off last night, and they got to
Speaker 1: go on. So I expect us to come out Game
Speaker 1: two with even a better focus than we came out
Speaker 1: within game one. I thought game one our focus was
Speaker 1: was good. Um again, I think there are some things
Speaker 1: that we can clean up, but I think for the
Speaker 1: most part. Our focus was good, our intentions was good.
Speaker 1: We had fourteen turnover, seven of those came in a
Speaker 1: second quarter, you know, so you clean that up, you
Speaker 1: cut that to four. So there are some things that
Speaker 1: we can clean up, and I know that we will
Speaker 1: clean up. And you know, we expect to one one
Speaker 1: go to Boston. The way I view it is in
Speaker 1: a playoff series, you have to win a game on
Speaker 1: the road anyway. No, you're not just oh, we played
Speaker 1: two games at home, windows two going to roll loose,
Speaker 1: to come back win one. You have to win a
Speaker 1: role game anyway. So that's where we're at. We needed
Speaker 1: to win a role game anyway. And my playoff experience,
Speaker 1: we've always won a road game. It's no different. Now
Speaker 1: you gotta go win a game on the road. But
Speaker 1: first we need to take care of home court, re
Speaker 1: establish our home court. That's our first home court lost
Speaker 1: in these playoffs. So we need to re establish our
Speaker 1: home court, which we will. I like the energy and
Speaker 1: chasing and last night I thought the energy and there
Speaker 1: was amazing um And again that's something that we have
Speaker 1: to capitalize on. And I and I have no doubt
Speaker 1: in my mind that we will capitalize on that. I
Speaker 1: have a question. You don't need to obviously reveal these
Speaker 1: specific tactical adjustments you guys are trying to make. But
Speaker 1: take us a little bit behind the curtain and the process, Like,
Speaker 1: is it you coming out of that game with things
Speaker 1: you already know you want to adjust to? You watching
Speaker 1: film today, You're watching film tomorrow You're going to practice.
Speaker 1: Like what's the process in individually you trying to make
Speaker 1: adjustments as well as the team as a collective. I
Speaker 1: think that process for us is two fold. Um, you
Speaker 1: have coaches watching philm you have player or threefold? Really,
Speaker 1: you have coaches watching film after the game, you have myself, Um,
Speaker 1: Steph Andre was probably watching the film on our own
Speaker 1: and or leaving the game thinking I think we need
Speaker 1: to do this. And so I walked out of the
Speaker 1: game thinking there are a couple of things, for certain
Speaker 1: that I know we could have done better, and that
Speaker 1: a couple of adjustments for certain, offensively and defensively that
Speaker 1: I know I think will help and that we could
Speaker 1: have done better. So now what do you do? You
Speaker 1: take those things will have film today? You take those
Speaker 1: things to the film room. Hey, these were some of
Speaker 1: my thoughts some of the things we can get better
Speaker 1: now at this point in the season. These are also
Speaker 1: conversations side by our conversations that myself steph um Clay Andre.
Speaker 1: These are also side by our conversations that we will
Speaker 1: be having with coach Kerr on the side, you know,
Speaker 1: as as some of the things that we think can help.
Speaker 1: And that's where I always say here, it's a collaborative effort.
Speaker 1: You know. We we go to coach with some of
Speaker 1: the things we think, he comes to us with some
Speaker 1: of the things he thinks. Ultimately, if we get to
Speaker 1: one place like coach, I think we should guard this
Speaker 1: like this, So I think we it's and and even
Speaker 1: more so on the defensive end, less on the offensive, man,
Speaker 1: I think we should guard you know this this way
Speaker 1: or blah blah blah. Normally, if it's not too far
Speaker 1: off the rail, he'll go with what we think because
Speaker 1: he always says, you know, it's important that we are
Speaker 1: comfortable in the game plan, and so if we want
Speaker 1: to do something we saw something that we thought worked
Speaker 1: a little more, you know, he'll usually go that way.
Speaker 1: And so that's kind of the process for us. You know,
Speaker 1: you you walk away from the game just knowing the
Speaker 1: things you know, then you go watch the film and
Speaker 1: sometimes some of those things that you walk away where
Speaker 1: aren't quite what the film shows. And so then it's
Speaker 1: this balance of like, all right, the film show that,
Speaker 1: but if that felt different on the floor, and and
Speaker 1: you have that that have been something at times as well,
Speaker 1: if like you know, a coach could watch something on
Speaker 1: film and be like, ah, this is what I saw
Speaker 1: on film, and I'm like, yeah, coach, I understand that,
Speaker 1: and I saw that same thing on film, but this
Speaker 1: is how it really felt out there. And then maybe
Speaker 1: you're somewhere in the middle of that right or maybe
Speaker 1: you're all the way right or all the way left.
Speaker 1: But it's, um, you know, that's that's just kind of
Speaker 1: the nature of it. And so it's a breakdown over
Speaker 1: the next couple of days, um of really uh digging
Speaker 1: into the film, and then you watch the film over again,
Speaker 1: you catch something else that you didn't necessarily catch the
Speaker 1: last time, and so yeah, this is a couple of
Speaker 1: day processes. Obviously that we have a couple of days.
Speaker 1: If you only have one day, then then that that's
Speaker 1: what you have. But be that we have a couple
Speaker 1: a couple of days to let this digest, to figure
Speaker 1: it out, to make our adjustments and go in the
Speaker 1: game two rolling. You know, then you just start your
Speaker 1: process and you're watching the film and you're recalling plays
Speaker 1: that you can recall, and you kind of move from there.
Speaker 1: So I'm not sure if that's how it is everywhere else.
Speaker 1: Obviously I've only been here, but I know here it
Speaker 1: is a collaborative effort and that's kind of the way
Speaker 1: that it goes. UM. So that is my analysis on
Speaker 1: Game one, my thoughts and other news in the NBA.
Speaker 1: I saw that UM Commissioner Silver mentioned changing the voting process,
Speaker 1: or possibly changing the voting process and taking a look
Speaker 1: at that UM for our NBA teams and and and
Speaker 1: different awards and things like that, which I think is
Speaker 1: it's very important. I saw where he said, UM, it's
Speaker 1: a scenario of and I'm going to miss quotus words
Speaker 1: and I can't remember word for word, but he said
Speaker 1: it's just an area of not so great solutions or
Speaker 1: something of that nature UM and and the media just
Speaker 1: being the best of these solutions. I disagree with that.
Speaker 1: I think, UM, that seems like maybe the more unbiased solution,
Speaker 1: but I don't think that's the best solution. I think,
Speaker 1: I think there are ways that you can go about this,
Speaker 1: and and if you give enough people a voice from
Speaker 1: different sectors, you get more of an honest vote. You know, um,
Speaker 1: like there's a competition committee. Every owner is an on
Speaker 1: a competition committee. But because there's an owner and a
Speaker 1: general manager and possibly some coaches and you know, so
Speaker 1: on and so forth, you get more of an honest
Speaker 1: vote because say, if if two owners are biased right
Speaker 1: then like to this rule because of X y Z.
Speaker 1: But then you have coaches and you have someone over here,
Speaker 1: And I think that's how you can get more of
Speaker 1: an honest vote. And so you you make up a
Speaker 1: committee like yeah, maybe they're possibly there's some media on it,
Speaker 1: but there's some coaches on it, there are some general
Speaker 1: managers on it, blah blah blah, possibly some agents on there.
Speaker 1: Like there are ways to make a vote more even.
Speaker 1: But again, like I said, or you look at the
Speaker 1: whole process and determining what actually affects a contract. If
Speaker 1: you can't figure out the voting for all NBA, then
Speaker 1: you look at the entire process on what can affect
Speaker 1: a contract, because again, as I said before, um no,
Speaker 1: reporter from CNBC has decided whether Jamie Diamond gets his
Speaker 1: bonuses or not, and so it just doesn't make It's
Speaker 1: it's like, it doesn't make sense. You have a scenario
Speaker 1: where guys can work their whole entire lives for something,
Speaker 1: and then it's in a lot of cases, it's then
Speaker 1: decided on someone who has not worked their entire life
Speaker 1: to play basketball. Most people have not played basketball in
Speaker 1: their entire life. And no, playing basketball isn't the marker
Speaker 1: to speak if you can uh to determine if you
Speaker 1: can speak on the game or no, playing basketball, um
Speaker 1: doesn't just validate you to be an analyst, but the
Speaker 1: fact that you could study writing or not, um, that
Speaker 1: you can work your way up by writing articles and
Speaker 1: then decide whether someone makes an extra already seven million
Speaker 1: dollars and not absolutely insane. So I am happy to
Speaker 1: see and see that the league is looking is revisiting that.
Speaker 1: I think that is incredible. I think it's something that
Speaker 1: needs to be happened, that needs to happen. It's of
Speaker 1: one of those old systems that it needs to change. Like,
Speaker 1: it just makes absolutely no sense that someone who's not
Speaker 1: evaluating our game from and objective perspective from an objective
Speaker 1: point of view, with an objective point of view, because
Speaker 1: sometimes media can be subjective. I think it's absolutely insane
Speaker 1: that that's how it will be decided, what's some how
Speaker 1: much some money someone makes or not. So that's great. UM.
Speaker 1: I hope some changes does come there. I also saw
Speaker 1: that Commissioner Silver said that the league is not discussing
Speaker 1: expansion at this time. Um, Vegas and Seattle just doesn't
Speaker 1: come out of nowhere, commission, I don't know. I respect
Speaker 1: the commission, but how did that stuff just fly out
Speaker 1: of nowhere? So I'm interested to see what happens over
Speaker 1: the next couple of years with that, but it'll be interesting. Nonetheless,
Speaker 1: it was great to get kind of the state of
Speaker 1: the Union update um and what's going on behind the scenes.
Speaker 1: That's always cool to catch up on. So hope everyone
Speaker 1: caught that. I hope everyone enjoyed it. Uh, if you
Speaker 1: have not called it, maybe go check it out. It
Speaker 1: is some great stuff there. And you also want to
Speaker 1: keep up with with what's going on in the game,
Speaker 1: at least I do, because again, it affects my livelihood.
Speaker 1: So that's all I got for you from my point
Speaker 1: of view. From my thoughts. Take a couple of male
Speaker 1: bad questions before we get out of here. Jackson, you
Speaker 1: got anything for me? My brother? I do from dom
Speaker 1: Ford splashbro at D five five three. As a professional athlete,
Speaker 1: How sore does the body get during a seven game series?
Speaker 1: Do you ever still feel sore from your previous game?
Speaker 1: You get sore from like game the game for sure,
Speaker 1: because it's you know, you're playing in the series, and
Speaker 1: I mean it's intense. Basketball is the most intense basketball
Speaker 1: are you gonna play? So yeah, from getting like after
Speaker 1: the game, the night after or the next day, you're
Speaker 1: a little you're sure, But when you're really sore, it's
Speaker 1: once the series in because mentally you're kind of in
Speaker 1: this space of like just locked into the moment, uh,
Speaker 1: doing whatever you gotta do to get yourself ready for
Speaker 1: the next game. And so mentally you can't allow your
Speaker 1: like you can't allow your mind to go to a
Speaker 1: place of even thinking like, oh man, I'm just so sore.
Speaker 1: Like mentally it's like as opposed to your mindset being
Speaker 1: I'm so sore, your mindset is more so what do
Speaker 1: I need to do to get my body ready for
Speaker 1: the next game? And that's a totally different mindset, and
Speaker 1: so that's kind of where you're at the moment that
Speaker 1: series ends and you're no longer looking forward to that
Speaker 1: next game. You feel like you got hit by semi truck,
Speaker 1: and it's crazy again. It's one of those things that
Speaker 1: just goes to show the power of the mind, how
Speaker 1: powerful one's mind is. Because the moment we finished a
Speaker 1: series like I go back to like Calves the Cavaliers
Speaker 1: g Uh series, when we swept those guys. After game four,
Speaker 1: I couldn't walk. I knew, but I knew the series
Speaker 1: was over. I don't think the same I would have
Speaker 1: dealt with the same pain that I was dealing with
Speaker 1: after game four if there was a game five. It's
Speaker 1: not like something you know abruptly happened, or like something
Speaker 1: happened where I turned round like but sure enough, sooner
Speaker 1: we were done. I could barely walk for the next
Speaker 1: three days, And I am certain it wouldn't have been
Speaker 1: that same thing if we were going to a game five.
Speaker 1: So it really just shows you how powerful the mind is.
Speaker 1: From san Ja g At sans Re underscore g This
Speaker 1: finals is the longest distance between teams about miles since
Speaker 1: the last Warrior Celtics Finals. How much does cross country
Speaker 1: travel slash fatigue come into play? This is sort of
Speaker 1: an adjacent question to the last one, but it's interesting.
Speaker 1: I think it definitely comes into play because I think,
Speaker 1: you know, you fly anywhere that far and it affects you, um,
Speaker 1: whether you're playing basketball or not. You're not adding the
Speaker 1: fact that you have to play basketball, and it's a
Speaker 1: different story. Now. Hair's where I think, um that where
Speaker 1: you kind to you you hairs where I think you
Speaker 1: kind of eliminate that. Yes, it's still tough, you're getting
Speaker 1: on planes and all of that. But in the NBA Finals,
Speaker 1: due to the way the media is set up, both
Speaker 1: teams have to practice at the same place the day
Speaker 1: before the game. So with such far travel, just like
Speaker 1: the Boston Celtics got here on Tuesday after game after
Speaker 1: Game two on Sunday, we leave Monday, although we don't
Speaker 1: play the Wednesday, we'll leave on Monday so that we
Speaker 1: can be there for practice on Tuesday, for media and
Speaker 1: so on and so forth. So with the NBA Finals,
Speaker 1: you get that extra day in between for travel due
Speaker 1: to the media Situa wahition, so you don't it's not
Speaker 1: as big of it. It's not as big of a
Speaker 1: dilemma that you face normally in the season where it's
Speaker 1: probably only one day or as we saw during the
Speaker 1: Conference finals, it was one day in between all the games.
Speaker 1: So that's travel, that's all of that, you don't you know.
Speaker 1: The NBA Finals they kind of take care of some
Speaker 1: of that with the with the days in between the game,
Speaker 1: Like the only game this series that it's only one
Speaker 1: day in between this games three and four, which both
Speaker 1: are in Boston. So that's kind of how I I
Speaker 1: think that's part of the reason the Lead does it
Speaker 1: the way they do for the NBA Finals, so that
Speaker 1: fatigue isn't playing a part instant in scenarios like this,
Speaker 1: where I mean, that's just just about as far as
Speaker 1: west you can go and all about as far as
Speaker 1: east you can go. So I think, uh, that's why
Speaker 1: it's like that, That's why the scheduling goes like that,
Speaker 1: So it's not it doesn't affect the game as much
Speaker 1: as it could possibly Another another series, last one, we'll
Speaker 1: go a little bit of a lighter note to close
Speaker 1: this out from Andrew pim and Tell At Andrew pim
Speaker 1: and Tell, what was your first big purchase from your
Speaker 1: rookie year. Hey, Andrew, let me tell you something. And
Speaker 1: people can take this with a grain, and so I
Speaker 1: know it's a lot of money, but in theory, when
Speaker 1: I break this down to you, it's not. I was
Speaker 1: the second round pick, Andrew. Now for me, I got
Speaker 1: more money than most second round picks get from my
Speaker 1: first year salary. My first year's salary was a hundred
Speaker 1: and twenty five grand. All right, Andrew, slice that in
Speaker 1: half because I do site that about bout fifty three
Speaker 1: because I do live in the Bay Area, So you
Speaker 1: slice that and no longer let's just call it four
Speaker 1: hundred grand that I take home forty thousand and that
Speaker 1: goes to my apartment complex that I lived in. So
Speaker 1: there's three hundred sixty thousand, Andrew um and uh three
Speaker 1: percent of that or four percent of that, which I
Speaker 1: end up finding out shouldn't have happened on the entire contract.
Speaker 1: But that's a whole another story went to the agent. Um.
Speaker 1: So of eight hundred and twenty five thousand, UM four
Speaker 1: percent is roughly thirty six ish thousand or something. So
Speaker 1: now I'm almost had three hundred thousand, Andrew. Now I
Speaker 1: had to get a car, and I had to get furniture,
Speaker 1: which was, you know, probably I very cheaply went to
Speaker 1: a furniture outlet and furnished my apartment, but that was
Speaker 1: still another thirty thousand dollars. So I met two hundred
Speaker 1: seventy thousand dollars. Andrew. You get where I'm going with this.
Speaker 1: I didn't have enough money for a big rookie purchase.
Speaker 1: It's not a first round pick. Contrary to of my
Speaker 1: resume may say, Andrew, I was not the first round pick.
Speaker 1: So it was a little tight on me with my
Speaker 1: rookie money because I didn't I didn't make the big
Speaker 1: money early on. So there you have it, Andrew, I
Speaker 1: was a little low on cash. There was no big
Speaker 1: purchase for purchases for me, my man. That is a
Speaker 1: rot from this episode of The Draymond Green Show. I
Speaker 1: will check back in with y'all after Game two of
Speaker 1: these NBA Finals. Until there, it's a rap piece.