WEBVTT - The Complexity of the Oil Trade

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Trains.

0:00:06.519 --> 0:00:08.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joel Webber and I'm Eric bel Chernas.

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:16.760
<v Speaker 3>Eric, we had plans for this episode, and then the

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:20.880
<v Speaker 3>situation in the Middle East, specifically around Iran, has continued

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:22.760
<v Speaker 3>to escalate, so we need to talk about energy.

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:24.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Oil.

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 4>What really got me thinking we should call an audible

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 4>this week is USO. This is the oil ETF that

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 4>has come back from the dead. Like three times, I

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 4>swear I've written this thing off. Remember during COVID, it

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 4>actually had futures that were about to go negative because

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 4>nobody wanted oil reverse.

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:42.239
<v Speaker 2>Now you've got this things up.

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:46.160
<v Speaker 4>At least it was up twelve percent on this particular day,

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:48.520
<v Speaker 4>and before that I had gone forty percent in a month,

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:52.479
<v Speaker 4>and the volume was massive, twenty two billion dollars in

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:55.639
<v Speaker 4>a week, and it's been in the top five most

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 4>traded ETF. So it's come out of its sort of

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 4>grave to come back and take over. This is the

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 4>kind of ETF that my friends from college will text

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 4>me about, like, oh, I want to buy oil. USO

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 4>looks like the one, and it's the ETF we really

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 4>made the whole traffic light system on because it's holding

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 4>futures and they roll and it can be hidden costs

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 4>in there and people it's like a wolf in sheep's clothing.

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 4>But when it goes up, man, it really works. I

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 4>think we should go over that, and then also alternative

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 4>ways to play energy, because if you don't want to

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:30.119
<v Speaker 4>mess with derivatives, you got to go to the equity market.

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:31.679
<v Speaker 2>So there's like XL XOP.

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:35.119
<v Speaker 4>So when you want to play oil or invest in oil,

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 4>or feel like you want more exposure to it, this

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 4>is a perfect thing to cover on this podcast because

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 4>there's multiple options and each have their trade offs.

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 3>You mentioned your traffic light system at Bloomberg Intelligence. What

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 3>traffic light color are you giving this episode as we

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 3>go into.

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 4>It, it's kind of the whole spectrum because USO is

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 4>read XL and XOP would be green, although XOP gets

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 4>one mark for being not market cap weighted. But yeah,

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 4>I'll flashing everything. Yeah, that's why this is complex investing

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 4>in oil. The bottom line is if you think about

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 4>the thing you want to invest in, say a barrel

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 4>of oil, think to yourself how annoying would this be

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:22.919
<v Speaker 4>to actually invest in directly? You have the bio barrel

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 4>of oil somewhere, put it in your backyard.

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 2>It's toxic.

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 4>The more annoying and exotic it sounds, the more you're

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 4>gonna have to deal with some frictions or things you

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 4>don't like, like costs, and that's the case here.

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 3>So joining us to walk through these options. Vincent Piazza,

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 3>who's the Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Industry analyst for energy, as

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:48.959
<v Speaker 3>well as James Seffert ETF analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence, this

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 3>time on Train's the complexity of the oil trade.

0:02:54.520 --> 0:03:00.239
<v Speaker 1>James Vince Welcome Atrians, Thank you, thanks for having me. James,

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with you.

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 3>Can you break down why USO is, Like Eric said,

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:09.919
<v Speaker 3>it goes up and it comes down. What about how

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 3>does this thing of structure that makes it so volatile

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 3>like that?

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:16.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I don't this wording is going to sound mean,

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 5>but it's called the United States Oil Fund and Eric said,

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:22.639
<v Speaker 5>it's the It's one of the primary reasons we went

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 5>with the traffically because it's kind of like a wolf

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 5>in sheep's clothing, like United States Oil Fund. Like it

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 5>just sounds like, oh, it just holds oil. It's simple,

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 5>and it's so much more complex than that, because, as

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 5>Eric said, you've got to roll futures. It tries to

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 5>stay as much in the front month as it can.

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 5>Typically we can get into what happened when oil went negative,

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 5>which is going to be interesting to what's going on today,

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 5>but it it it can change exactly what it's holding

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 5>and when when when oil went negative, things drastically change

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 5>exactly how the ETF was working. But what ends up

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 5>happening is even if you think oil is going to

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 5>go up over a certain time period, that's not what

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 5>you're investing in. Everyone when oil went negative would would

0:03:57.280 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 5>have taken the bet that oil was going to go

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 5>up from here. But you can't just make that bet

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 5>in the markets, because the markets are smarter than that.

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 5>They know that oil is likely to go up. In

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 5>these contracts end every month. You need to trade each contract,

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 5>so and if you're on the front month, you either

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 5>got to get out of that contract or you have

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 5>to take the delivery of the oil. And all of

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 5>this just gets very complicated. So exactly why we're going

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 5>to call this complexity of the oil trade.

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 4>And let me just paint a visual. If you're picturing

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 4>futures right April, May, June, July, it goes out like.

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 2>A year picture.

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 4>The curve typically slopes up, so like as you roll

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 4>from like April to May, you pay a little more

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 4>for the next month. That is called roll costs. And

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 4>this curve isn't in the state of contango. Now if

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 4>everyone wants oil in an instant, the curve goes the

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:45.720
<v Speaker 4>opposite direction, so you actually pay less when you roll.

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 4>That's where it's're at right now and USO obviously this

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 4>is a good time to use it. But normally that

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 4>roll costs when it's in a state of contango could

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 4>be anywhere from ten to thirty percent a year. So

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 4>you could make a call that oil is going to

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:03.479
<v Speaker 4>go up in January and it goes up forty percent

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 4>or thirty percent, and you basically are flat because of

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 4>all the roll costs. That's why this is a wolf

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:11.840
<v Speaker 4>in sheep's clothing. But because it does hold the near

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:14.840
<v Speaker 4>months right the month's closest to the actual barrel of oil,

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 4>it does have a lot of sensitivity to the price today,

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 4>so it does move very sensitively, and that's why the

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 4>trading crowd likes it so decent trading tool, bad long

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:30.279
<v Speaker 4>term holding. Vince as an energy expert at BI, I

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:32.839
<v Speaker 4>know you cover the equities. Is that a fair assessment

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:34.599
<v Speaker 4>of the future's market in your opinion?

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 6>That is the I couldn't have said it any better.

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:42.720
<v Speaker 6>That is the perfect way of describing the difference between

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 6>a tnentango setup versus a backwardation, which is what we

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 6>have today. And because of the volatility, and also keep

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 6>in mind at the back end is fairly illiquid, so

0:05:57.040 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 6>the front end is more liquid. There's much more volume

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 6>on the front end of the curve the back end.

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:07.479
<v Speaker 6>Because of that ill liquidity or the less liquidity relative liquidity,

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:14.040
<v Speaker 6>you could see very very sharp changes in the underlying

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 6>price of those contracts.

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:18.159
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So, Vince, one of the things that I wanted

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:21.119
<v Speaker 3>to talk to you about was not that long ago,

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:25.720
<v Speaker 3>like weeks, it seemed like the world was in an

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 3>oil glut, like there was more oil on ships than

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 3>ever before. The price had been dropping. We were talking

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:37.720
<v Speaker 3>fifty dollars a barrel. Now it's like the reverse. How

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 3>sensitive is the oil market to just disruptions and why

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 3>is that?

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>So?

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 6>We have several significant choke points in the world, and

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:53.280
<v Speaker 6>the Shadehorn moves is probably one of the more significant

0:06:53.360 --> 0:07:00.919
<v Speaker 6>choke points. Roughly twenty percent of LNG roughly eighteen nineteen

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 6>called twenty million barrels of crude run through that particular

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 6>very narrow passage, So a delay in transporting those molecules

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 6>has a significant ripple effect across several other of the

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 6>choke points. That choke point, that very narrow choke point

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 6>marries European supply, European capacity with Asian demand, so Middle

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 6>Eastern supply running through that up to Europe down to Asia.

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 6>That's a very significant choke point that could have considerable

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 6>impact on balances, both in the short term and also

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 6>in the long term.

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 4>One more follow Vince, because you're following this very closely

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 4>and from a like you're looking at the investment side

0:07:57.400 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 4>of it.

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 2>How long can this last?

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 4>Like is this something that it just seems like they're

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 4>going to try to get the choke point opened as

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 4>fast as possible. I mean, I'm sure, I'm sure that

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 4>the pressure, especially if it hits you know, a price

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 4>of gallon of gas, is going to be intense. So

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 4>is this something that could last for a long time,

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 4>or like I guess in this trade, is it kind

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 4>of like one of those things that could reverse pretty quickly.

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 6>So the analog here that we have. The closest analog

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:37.079
<v Speaker 6>is twenty twenty two Russia Ukraine where Brent. Let's use

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 6>Brent right. Brent is considered the global seaborn benchmark. Yeah,

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 6>So we had Brent in February of twenty twenty two,

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 6>spike to a peak in March and retrace by early

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 6>two Q So it retraced that gain, that peak of

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 6>flee from ninety to eighty to one twenty and then

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 6>back down again to a ninety handle some time in April.

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 6>So it retraced very quickly. Now, in the case of

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:17.079
<v Speaker 6>the Strait of Hormuz and Iran in general, we want

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 6>to look at three things. Right, I call it a delay,

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 6>I call it disruption and destruction. Delay is the hydrocarbons

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 6>get to their destination a few days later, we're not here.

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 6>Disruption is I shut down a well, I shut down

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 6>capacity because I fear that these barrels, these molecules can't

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 6>get to their final destination. That's where we are now.

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 6>The destruction phase, where all bets are off global economies

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 6>are severely impacted, is if assets are taken off the

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 6>chessboard because of destruction, so that there is significant capital

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 6>that needs to be invested to bring these facilities and

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 6>bring this back up to snuff. So supply chain delays,

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 6>maritime logistical delays, those are days. We're now in the

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 6>case where we could see significant barrels off the market

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 6>for significant periods of time, causing a collapse of the

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 6>global economy. Because we're staring at you know, not long

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 6>ago it was one hundred and twenty being bid before

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 6>the US market opened. We're staring at over one hundred dollars.

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 6>That volatility is significant.

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 4>Let's say you know, we were college roommates. This is

0:10:57.000 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 4>a cruise story, and I text you and I say,

0:10:59.880 --> 0:11:02.840
<v Speaker 4>n listen, I'm not selling my Vanguard funds, but I

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 4>want a little piece of this oil action. I want

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 4>to make sure that I'm participating in all this craziness.

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 4>I was looking at USO, but I don't know. I

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 4>know you cover the stocks. What should I do? How

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 4>would you answer that question to them?

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 1>You can start with this is not investment advice.

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, No, definitely that's true.

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm not trying to because we can't give investment advice.

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:29.320
<v Speaker 4>But I guess maybe as somebody who knows as much

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 4>as you, just be interested to hear what you would

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 4>say in terms of just somebody who wants to get

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 4>more exposure to this market.

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 6>Yeah. So if you think about from a broader perspective,

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 6>you have the ETF complex. The xl E is probably

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 6>the broadest, the most liquid, the cheapest form of exposure

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 6>across the equity energy space. But that exposure encompasses not

0:11:57.200 --> 0:12:00.960
<v Speaker 6>only the upstream but also the downstream the extream components,

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:04.439
<v Speaker 6>so it gives you what I call the energy value chain.

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 3>So you you like that vehicle as just like a

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 3>proxy for.

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 6>The energy exactly exactly because within within that ETF as

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 6>both James and Eric No. Three names make up the

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:22.680
<v Speaker 6>bulk of that exposure. And those are the integrateds. You

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 6>have Exxon, Chevron, and you have what I call a

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 6>mega independent like Conicgo. They make up the bulk of

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 6>that exposure. So they have exposure across not only the

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 6>upstream side of the business so the extractives right the EMPs,

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 6>but also have downstream downstream refining and also petrech chemicals.

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:49.080
<v Speaker 6>So that provides you with the value chain exposure. As

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 6>you get more granular and you think about the EMP space,

0:12:55.480 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 6>the XOP is an area that that we've discussed in

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 6>the past. But the XOP or the US Oil and

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 6>Gas e M P ETF, which I think is I EO,

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 6>they're not pure proxies for the upstream exposure because they

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 6>too have much more broader exposure to the downstream and

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:30.200
<v Speaker 6>also some LNG components. Really, when you think about the

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 6>exposure and what tends to do well in instances like this,

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 6>it tends to be that downstream side, right, because as

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:45.199
<v Speaker 6>prices go up, the refiner's reprice to the consumer at

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 6>the retail level the gas and diesel that go into

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 6>on road vehicles, and so that price tends to come

0:13:55.280 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 6>across pretty instantly. But when price is revert at the

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 6>wholesale level at the crude level, prices at the pump

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 6>don't correlate as quickly. So in the refining space, in

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 6>the downstream space, you have probably one of my favorite

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 6>ticker symbols of all time. C R a K. You

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 6>guys can pronounce it for me.

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 4>Vince wrote a which is basically an introduction to stocks.

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 4>Usually he wrote one for xl E and in it

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 4>I'm reading it and I could tell he he loves

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 4>crack Joel, because I'm like I'm like, Vince, why don't

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 4>you just why don't you just say you love crack

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 4>in the headline.

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's really what's going on here.

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So talk to us about about the ETF crack. Vince.

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So it provides you with pure play downstream exposure.

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 6>When I mean downstream exposure, the upstream side are the

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 6>companies that extract the hydrocarbon. The downstream the refiners are

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 6>the companies that refine the product, the raw material, the

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 6>feedstock into the things that we use. So the gasoline

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 6>and diesel that cars and trucks and vans used in

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 6>there every day. Now, as spreads widen, there is an

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 6>outside its profitability that ends up in the hands of

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 6>the refining companies and most likely for longer, even after

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 6>the price reverts. So it is a pure play exposure

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 6>to the downstream. The reasoning being that you have margin

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 6>expansion and higher profitability for longer as this crisis persists

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 6>for longer, you also most likely have what I would

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 6>call a geopolitical risk premium that remains in the commodity

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 6>for longer as well.

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 3>Eric, to bring in just a little bit of flows

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 3>and comp between the ETFs, we've talked about so far,

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 3>like what's the action look like for this suite of

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 3>ETFs in the energy space.

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so he went over I think four of the

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 4>big ones, maybe five, but XALE is the king. It

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 4>sounds like from what Vince is saying and what I

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 4>would you know.

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 2>Also, Echo is like.

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 4>You can't really get too hurt with XL. It holds

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 4>a lot of stocks, it's diversified. The only thing is

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 4>just it's not going to have the sensitivity to short

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 4>term moves and oil Like if you look over the

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 4>short term, USO is blowing away XL in the past

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 4>like week or month, but XLE is up like one

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 4>hundred and sixty eight percent in the past ten years

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 4>something like that, and USO is like down. So it's

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 4>that rolling of the futures that makes USO almost like

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 4>a hot potato. You cannot hold it for longer, We'll

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 4>just eat you alive. XLE you can hold for longer.

0:16:58.040 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 4>So I think that's the main takeaway. And then x

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 4>XCS they're going to have like more specific parts of

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:07.479
<v Speaker 4>the oil industry, so it's like almost like a subsector.

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Like a specific niche bet.

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 4>But if we look at this year, the number one

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 4>ETF by flows as xl E with five billion. Number

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:14.439
<v Speaker 4>two isn't even a billion.

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 2>I funny.

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 4>Number two is u ur a uranium jool even though

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 4>that's t energy. Vd XOP is fourth. Oi H is

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:26.920
<v Speaker 4>another one. So I guess you know this is part

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:31.479
<v Speaker 4>of the dilemma. I'm want to go to James on USO. James,

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 4>obviously holding these equity ETFs is monitored. You know, That's

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 4>why these equity tfs get a green lightner system. They're diversified,

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 4>they hold equities. They have obviously some sensitivity to oil,

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 4>but not like USO. Now, can you go over USO

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 4>a little bit here? It came out in like twenty

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:53.679
<v Speaker 4>years ago. It rolls futures, and then during COVID futures

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:56.160
<v Speaker 4>were about to go negative, and I think it had

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 4>to like it was going to owe people money or something,

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 4>so it had to like switch strategy to holding all

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:05.679
<v Speaker 4>of these different futures across the curve so that it

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 4>wasn't like just holding the near month. And then I

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 4>guess it switched back. Can you go through the story

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 4>of USO, because honestly I wrote it off I thought

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 4>it had become neutered by holding all these months, which

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:21.679
<v Speaker 4>gives it less teeth and less sensitivity to oil. But

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 4>I guess it went back to its front month exposure.

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's exactly right. So what happened Oil went negative

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 5>or was going negative. Things were going bad because the

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 5>government the world was shut down due to COVID And

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 5>what ended up happening really there was a few big drivers. One,

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 5>they were heavily in the front month and second month contracts,

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 5>which is what this product does, and they were not

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:45.360
<v Speaker 5>doing well. The other problem was the ETF was this

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 5>was a case sometimes ETF's like there are a fish

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:50.399
<v Speaker 5>that gets too big for the pond that they're in,

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 5>and in this case, USO owned like well over thirty

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 5>percent of the contracts with the open interests of the

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 5>futures that were getting exposure to the oil contracts. It

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 5>was basically the tail wagging the dog, and the SEC

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:05.159
<v Speaker 5>was getting concerned, the CFTC was getting concerned. They had

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 5>to go in and break, like bake the rules that

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 5>they basically had and are in their perspectives saying what

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 5>the fund would do, because all of a sudden, you

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:13.919
<v Speaker 5>have all this money in this fund that's holding this

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:16.439
<v Speaker 5>contract and it's all gonna flow out because it rolls

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:19.439
<v Speaker 5>to the next month contract like it's set to keep rolling,

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 5>and all of a sudden, you're gonna have a ton

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:23.160
<v Speaker 5>of money pour out towards the end of this contract.

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:25.919
<v Speaker 5>It's already heading negative, so they're gonna dump more of

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 5>these contracts onto the market as it's negative. ETF can't

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 5>go negative. All these problems were happening. So what they

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 5>did is, as you said, they went to all these

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 5>other months. They went out twelve months essentially, so they

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 5>went from we have high octane exposure to what's going

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:42.119
<v Speaker 5>on in oil right now, to we own the entire curve. Essentially,

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 5>we own the curve out one year and so one

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 5>a lot of investors who were trying to bet on

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 5>oil rebounding all of a sudden didn't have a bet

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 5>on oil rebounding because they were just bet across the curve.

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:53.919
<v Speaker 5>And the funny thing is the Unit US Commodity Funds

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 5>actually has another fund that does this already. It's called

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:59.879
<v Speaker 5>USL and it holds the twelve month contracts. So essentially

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:04.120
<v Speaker 5>the USO started mirroring its it's sibling of USL, and

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:06.719
<v Speaker 5>it wasn't great. It took a few years. But in

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty three, I believe they started moving back from

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:13.360
<v Speaker 5>the twelve month contracts just to the front two months,

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:16.160
<v Speaker 5>and I yeah, so this all happened. It was kind

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 5>of crazy in twenty twenty three time range, but they

0:20:20.040 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 5>got back. By January twenty twenty four, they were in

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:23.439
<v Speaker 5>the front and second month contracts.

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So change in strategy there. That brings us back

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 3>to basically being like this thing was originally right. So

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 3>we'll be curious to see how this one plays out

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:35.359
<v Speaker 3>since it's so volatile.

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, looking you're to date, USO's up fifty

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 4>seven percent, UNL is up two percent. So but if

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:46.200
<v Speaker 4>you went back, UNL would have probably gone down less.

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 4>It also doesn't have as much role costs. But honestly,

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:52.439
<v Speaker 4>here's my take. If you're looking for quick sensitivity and

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 4>a short term trade, I mean, USO will do the job,

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:59.120
<v Speaker 4>but you can't hold it. You just you can't hold

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 4>two things long term. You can't hold anything that rolls futures,

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 4>and you can't hold anything has leverage.

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 2>You have to treat it like a chainsaw.

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Or juggling the chainsaw.

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 2>Yes, XL XOP.

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 4>These are diversified ETFs that you can sort of bolt

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:14.680
<v Speaker 4>onto your portfolio as if you're you know, one of

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 4>long term overweight to this sector.

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:19.920
<v Speaker 3>I notice you didn't mention crack when I asked you about,

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, Tom Screen, but you want.

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 4>To talk about there's also frack. You want to like

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 4>siblings crack and crack. So yeah, I mean, look, crack

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 4>is a very specific oil refiners. Vince's case is good

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 4>to me because you you can go out and speculate

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:38.199
<v Speaker 4>and try to drill the oil, but you have to

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:40.159
<v Speaker 4>refine it. So the refiners are kind of like in

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:41.880
<v Speaker 4>a sweet spot of like you have to come through

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 4>us anyway, and that's a good spot to be in.

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:48.120
<v Speaker 4>I guess it just depends on and also, I think

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 4>the more you get to subsector ETFs outside of xl E,

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 4>the more you are not overlapping your regular portfolio because

0:21:57.080 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 4>a lot of people own VOO and a lot of

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:02.919
<v Speaker 4>XL's top holdings are in VOO already or IVV or SPY.

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:04.920
<v Speaker 4>The more you go to subsectors, the more you're getting

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 4>unique exposure that we call portfolio completion. So I think

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 4>crack is a you know, a good novel choice for

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 4>something that's like, you know, not the obvious one. We

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 4>try to do that when we write our notes too,

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 4>is like here's the big one, here's the cheapest one,

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 4>and here's sort of like a wild card you might

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 4>not have thought of.

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 3>Okay, another wild card that I wanted to bring.

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Up, the Breakwater ETF.

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, talk about that one.

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:37.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because Vin, you know, Vince, we're talking about stuff

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 3>that's industry specific. But then there's gonna be the stuff

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:42.680
<v Speaker 3>that's sort of like peripheral.

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Right, so on the I didn't even know this existed.

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:49.160
<v Speaker 4>Sometimes, I you know, there's forty eight hundred.

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I was, you got to know these.

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:53.360
<v Speaker 4>So this is called the Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF.

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh it said breakwater, Breakwave, breakwave.

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and the ticker is be WET. And the day

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 4>after the Iran do you.

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Know this one? Do you know what it holds? No?

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 1>He says no, James, you know, of course, you know?

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 5>Well he was I do know, now, Yeah, okay, I

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 5>knew what be dry was, but I didn't know what

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 5>the UT was until this till the last couple of weeks.

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:15.959
<v Speaker 4>The day after the Iran strikes, which would be Monday,

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:18.719
<v Speaker 4>the second of March, it went up twenty eight percent.

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:22.440
<v Speaker 4>That is insane for a non leveraged DTF. I mean

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 4>that is unbelievable. One day, Chang, Yeah, it went up

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:27.439
<v Speaker 4>more than USO, went up more than anything I could see.

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 2>It was perfectly positioned. Okay, what does it hold.

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 4>It basically holds these tanker futures that are linked to

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 4>shipping oil from the Middle East to Asia and Europe.

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 4>So I'm like, this is it's like they literally made

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 4>it for this situation. It's a little dark thinking something's

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 4>going to benefit from war. I don't want to go

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 4>too heavy into this, but this was custom made for this.

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 4>Now it is so crazy sounding. Though the volume was

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 4>nowhere near what we saw in USO, it did trade

0:23:56.720 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 4>about fifteen million dollars, which is pretty good for a

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:03.600
<v Speaker 4>real exotic ETF like this, But the average Joe Degen

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 4>is going to use us so this is just probably

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 4>even a little too crazy for them. James, what can

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 4>you tell us about this that we might not know?

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:15.199
<v Speaker 5>You hit most of it. I mean, the way to

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 5>think about this is its futures contracts. So like you said,

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 5>on shipping to Europe, Middle East, it's really basically the

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 5>futures contracts on those actual tankers, think those massive, massive

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 5>ships that are holding the oil and whatever other hydrocarbons

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 5>as Fins talked about. And then the flip side, the

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 5>bee dry one was one that we talked a lot

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 5>about with Russia and Ukraine, and that's going to be

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:40.120
<v Speaker 5>holding you know, dry goods, whether that's commodities like agriculture

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:42.920
<v Speaker 5>and mining materials and things like that. So they're kind

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 5>of like twins or same side, different sides of the

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 5>same coin. But b wet is these futures contracts on

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 5>these massive shipping oil tankers, most of which are sitting

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 5>right now in that canal waiting to go by in

0:24:55.840 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 5>the strait of her moves.

0:24:56.800 --> 0:24:59.400
<v Speaker 4>And by the way, you know this idea that like polymarkets,

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 4>like oh all these degens can bet onto it's too crazy.

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:05.640
<v Speaker 4>I mean the honestly this future is called Middle East

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 4>Gulf to China.

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:09.879
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry. The institutional world is pretty degen.

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:11.400
<v Speaker 4>When it comes to betting on stuff. I didn't even

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 4>know there were futures.

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:14.120
<v Speaker 5>I mean a lot of it is like they're using

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:16.119
<v Speaker 5>it for hedging purposes, like a lot of these ships.

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:18.360
<v Speaker 5>One of the huge things that happened is like their

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 5>war insurance stopped, and basically because anybody who's offering that

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:24.000
<v Speaker 5>insurance can give a notice of like a certain days

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 5>beforehand and they can pick up insurance again and then

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 5>they have to pay more for it. So war insurance

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 5>now is like five x what it used to be

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 5>just before everything happened here. So all these things are

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:36.639
<v Speaker 5>just hedging insurance. It's this is all it is, and

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 5>you can everything is financialized.

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:41.440
<v Speaker 2>Vince. I know Vince.

0:25:41.480 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 4>I work with him a lot, and his out is

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:47.920
<v Speaker 4>filled with earnings calls, like literally from like six am

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 4>to like six pm of all these energy companies. So

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 4>you clearly have your ear to the ground in terms

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 4>of what they're talking about. What do they think of

0:25:57.600 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 4>something like this, Like if you're in the energy industry,

0:25:59.840 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 4>is good, bad, and different?

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 2>What's the vibe there?

0:26:04.560 --> 0:26:09.679
<v Speaker 6>So I can tell you from our conversations with the

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 6>management teams that they look at this with a great

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 6>deal of caution, right, because you're now at a point

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:22.160
<v Speaker 6>where you're in the realm of demand destruction and that

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 6>is very bad. Okay, when you sell a product whose

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:30.679
<v Speaker 6>price is so high that it reduces the amount of

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 6>consumption or it creates that inflationary pressure across the value chain.

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 6>That's bad when you think about prices along this curve. Right,

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 6>we've seen the front end of this curve pop. The

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 6>back end of the curve, let's call it the second

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 6>half of the year, that's averaging somewhere around eighty bucks

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 6>or so. What you're likely to see from operators over

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 6>the course of call the next earning season is layering

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 6>on additional hedges. And what's a hedge. It's risk protection.

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 6>I am selling my output forward, I am receiving a price,

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 6>a confirmed price. It creates transparency for me, it creates

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:21.879
<v Speaker 6>cash flow, It protects my drilling program. Okay, and I

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 6>think that's what the operators are looking for because the

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:28.639
<v Speaker 6>investor base, what you all have told them is I

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:31.680
<v Speaker 6>do not want to see production. I do not want

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:35.399
<v Speaker 6>to see capital being invested to grow output. What I

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:38.399
<v Speaker 6>want is the return of free cash flow. What I

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:42.400
<v Speaker 6>want to see is better balance sheets. So the operators

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 6>have right size, there are balance sheets in this environment.

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:51.160
<v Speaker 6>Since twenty twenty two, they've gotten their financial leverage down.

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:55.400
<v Speaker 6>Free cash flow is relatively robust now, and so you're

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 6>seeing distributions. You're seeing distributions of what we consider based

0:27:59.840 --> 0:28:04.359
<v Speaker 6>it ends, and on top of that supplemental distributions, so

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 6>the capital is coming back to the investors. That's what

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 6>you all have said. You all wanted, we don't want

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 6>a production So I do not see any I shouldn't

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 6>say any. I would be surprised if we were to

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 6>see an acceleration of production growth in this environment. What

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 6>I will see, what is likely to occur, is an

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 6>increase in the amount of hedging over the year twenty

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 6>twenty six because of a way not only the front

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 6>of the curve has responded, but also the back end

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 6>of the curve, most recently, granting these operators an opportunity

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 6>to slap some additional hedges on, protect their chilling programs,

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 6>and grant them some incremental free cash flow to give

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 6>back to all of you.

0:28:57.080 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 3>A hedge feels like the perfect way to end this episode.

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 3>Thanks James, thanks so much for.

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 7>Your time, Thank you, thank you for having me, Thanks

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 7>for listening to trillions.

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 3>Until next time. You can find us on the Bloomberg Terminal,

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg dot com, Apple Podcasts, Spotify.

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Or wherever else you'd like to listen. Good love to

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:21.600
<v Speaker 1>hear from you.

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 3>Hit us up on social I'm at Joel Weber Show

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 3>He's at Eric Balcino's Trillions is produced by Magnus Hendrickson