WEBVTT - Top 5 Superhero-Director Combos (We'd Like To See) | Archive

0:00:21.244 --> 0:00:24.604
<v Speaker 1>Film Spotting is presented by Regal Unlimited, the all you

0:00:24.605 --> 0:00:27.605
<v Speaker 1>can watch movie subscription pass that pays for itself in

0:00:27.685 --> 0:00:31.365
<v Speaker 1>just two visits. See any standard two D movie anytime

0:00:31.725 --> 0:00:34.845
<v Speaker 1>with no blackoutdates or restrictions. Sign up now on the

0:00:34.885 --> 0:00:37.284
<v Speaker 1>Regal app or at the link in our description and

0:00:37.445 --> 0:00:41.685
<v Speaker 1>use code film spot twenty six to receive fifteen percent off.

0:00:45.845 --> 0:00:48.325
<v Speaker 2>What kind of a show you guys putting on here today?

0:00:48.445 --> 0:00:49.885
<v Speaker 2>You're not interested in armed now?

0:00:50.045 --> 0:00:51.364
<v Speaker 1>No, Look, we're going to do this thing.

0:00:51.364 --> 0:00:52.044
<v Speaker 3>We're going to have a.

0:00:52.004 --> 0:00:58.245
<v Speaker 2>Conversation with this week's archive drop Josh and Spider Man

0:00:58.485 --> 0:01:01.525
<v Speaker 2>having just been released in theaters. We're keeping the superhero

0:01:01.804 --> 0:01:04.485
<v Speaker 2>theme going a little bit. We're going back to twenty

0:01:04.525 --> 0:01:08.365
<v Speaker 2>eighteen when Ryan Coogler's Black Panther came out and we

0:01:08.444 --> 0:01:12.045
<v Speaker 2>did a corresponding top five that I remember thinking was

0:01:12.084 --> 0:01:13.685
<v Speaker 2>a lot of fun. I like it when we have

0:01:13.804 --> 0:01:20.044
<v Speaker 2>to get imaginative like this, and looking back at my list,

0:01:20.645 --> 0:01:23.925
<v Speaker 2>I have to say I'm still proud of this. I mean,

0:01:23.965 --> 0:01:26.604
<v Speaker 2>we'll see, Okay, if people listen to this and they think,

0:01:27.005 --> 0:01:29.324
<v Speaker 2>I don't know why you're proud of this, this list sucks,

0:01:29.565 --> 0:01:32.125
<v Speaker 2>But I want to see these movies. I'm not so

0:01:32.205 --> 0:01:35.524
<v Speaker 2>sure about my number five. This filmmaker has been kind

0:01:35.524 --> 0:01:38.285
<v Speaker 2>of off the radar since twenty eighteen. But those top

0:01:38.324 --> 0:01:42.164
<v Speaker 2>four I want to see these movies. What about you

0:01:42.205 --> 0:01:42.764
<v Speaker 2>in your list?

0:01:42.804 --> 0:01:45.565
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm glad you feel that way. I'm looking at

0:01:45.604 --> 0:01:49.485
<v Speaker 1>mine and a little confused. I'm thinking my number five

0:01:49.645 --> 0:01:53.045
<v Speaker 1>is possibly a joke or at least a riff on

0:01:53.245 --> 0:01:56.805
<v Speaker 1>a long running yes Baby on the show that might be.

0:01:56.885 --> 0:02:01.684
<v Speaker 1>And here, while we're talking, I'm not sure I even

0:02:01.845 --> 0:02:06.205
<v Speaker 1>know who the superhero is in my number four. I

0:02:06.285 --> 0:02:08.605
<v Speaker 1>have an idea. Let me google it real quick. My

0:02:08.725 --> 0:02:13.925
<v Speaker 1>number four pick. Let's see here, is this the guy

0:02:14.045 --> 0:02:17.765
<v Speaker 1>i'm thinking of? Yes, it is okay, good, So I

0:02:17.845 --> 0:02:22.044
<v Speaker 1>do still remember my number four pick. My number one

0:02:22.045 --> 0:02:26.525
<v Speaker 1>through three though really strong. I feel really good about those.

0:02:26.605 --> 0:02:30.525
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I think plane producer. I think we should

0:02:30.565 --> 0:02:32.725
<v Speaker 1>be hired. I think you know, a studio at this

0:02:32.845 --> 0:02:36.245
<v Speaker 1>point honestly should hire us. Yeah.

0:02:36.325 --> 0:02:39.565
<v Speaker 2>If any producers are out there listening, give this archive

0:02:39.644 --> 0:02:43.285
<v Speaker 2>drop a listen and let us know. You can find

0:02:43.325 --> 0:02:47.725
<v Speaker 2>us feedback at filmspotting dot net. If you are considering

0:02:47.764 --> 0:02:51.524
<v Speaker 2>being a film Spotting family member, where you get access

0:02:51.725 --> 0:02:54.885
<v Speaker 2>to the film Spotting Archive at any time. You get

0:02:54.924 --> 0:02:58.165
<v Speaker 2>access to top fives like this whenever you would like.

0:02:58.605 --> 0:03:01.125
<v Speaker 2>You can do that by joining the film Spotting Family.

0:03:01.125 --> 0:03:04.645
<v Speaker 2>At film spottingfamily dot com you get not only access

0:03:04.685 --> 0:03:07.924
<v Speaker 2>to the archive, but monthly bonus shows and a whole

0:03:07.965 --> 0:03:11.325
<v Speaker 2>lot more. Film spotting Family dot com is where you

0:03:11.365 --> 0:03:14.965
<v Speaker 2>can learn more. From February twenty eighteen, here are the

0:03:15.005 --> 0:03:19.565
<v Speaker 2>top five superhero director combos that we would like to see.

0:03:20.005 --> 0:03:22.845
<v Speaker 4>Dear mister Duig, as it has come to my attention

0:03:23.005 --> 0:03:26.845
<v Speaker 4>that your mutant abilities have recently emerged, I am extending

0:03:26.845 --> 0:03:29.885
<v Speaker 4>to you an invitation to join the Charles Xavier School

0:03:29.965 --> 0:03:33.605
<v Speaker 4>for Gifted Youngsters. Here you will join our small but

0:03:33.725 --> 0:03:35.725
<v Speaker 4>extremely talented student body.

0:03:36.045 --> 0:03:37.244
<v Speaker 5>So you're the new guy.

0:03:37.645 --> 0:03:38.245
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I guess.

0:03:38.245 --> 0:03:42.805
<v Speaker 2>So that was what if? Wes Anderson directed The X

0:03:42.885 --> 0:03:45.925
<v Speaker 2>Men by Patrick H. Williams, a video you can find

0:03:45.965 --> 0:03:48.125
<v Speaker 2>on YouTube, or you can go to our show notes

0:03:48.125 --> 0:03:50.845
<v Speaker 2>at filmspotting dot net for this episode and find a

0:03:50.885 --> 0:03:53.525
<v Speaker 2>link there. Now you and Sam behind the scenes here,

0:03:53.645 --> 0:03:58.605
<v Speaker 2>you you upiteat Wes Anderson fanatics had to say it

0:03:58.645 --> 0:04:01.684
<v Speaker 2>was just okay, but you have to admit it's inspired.

0:04:01.765 --> 0:04:04.525
<v Speaker 2>It's basically it's the Royal Tenen bombs. But if it

0:04:04.565 --> 0:04:05.765
<v Speaker 2>was an X Men movie.

0:04:05.605 --> 0:04:09.925
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. And I think it's it's interesting that Anderson

0:04:10.045 --> 0:04:11.965
<v Speaker 1>is one of the first people that come to mind

0:04:11.965 --> 0:04:14.485
<v Speaker 1>when you throw this question out there, because he does

0:04:14.525 --> 0:04:16.605
<v Speaker 1>have such a distinctive style. You'll also see what if

0:04:16.645 --> 0:04:18.565
<v Speaker 1>Wes Anderson did a horror movie or what if he

0:04:18.605 --> 0:04:20.605
<v Speaker 1>did this? You know. So he's just one of those

0:04:20.645 --> 0:04:24.645
<v Speaker 1>filmmas people would like to see thrown at something completely

0:04:24.645 --> 0:04:27.085
<v Speaker 1>different from what they've been doing. I don't know if

0:04:27.685 --> 0:04:30.805
<v Speaker 1>I quite approached this top five that way.

0:04:30.605 --> 0:04:33.005
<v Speaker 2>Though, really I was sure Wes Anderson was your one.

0:04:33.045 --> 0:04:35.885
<v Speaker 2>Though he's not variations on a theme.

0:04:36.165 --> 0:04:39.724
<v Speaker 1>It's weird because I think I just love his stuff

0:04:39.765 --> 0:04:42.365
<v Speaker 1>so much. I kind of don't And this doesn't to

0:04:42.525 --> 0:04:45.604
<v Speaker 1>mean that I consider it slumming to take on a

0:04:45.645 --> 0:04:49.245
<v Speaker 1>superhero franchise, but I just don't want him to do that.

0:04:50.045 --> 0:04:52.165
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's talk about that a little bit here. The

0:04:52.485 --> 0:04:54.805
<v Speaker 2>impetus behind this. I mean, obviously we were looking for

0:04:54.844 --> 0:04:57.805
<v Speaker 2>a tie in with Black Panther, and it's a good

0:04:57.805 --> 0:05:00.445
<v Speaker 2>one for reasons we touched on during that review in

0:05:00.485 --> 0:05:02.845
<v Speaker 2>that you would not think probably that the guy who

0:05:02.844 --> 0:05:05.565
<v Speaker 2>made fruit Vale station just going off that movie would

0:05:05.645 --> 0:05:09.525
<v Speaker 2>eventually make this Marvel Cinematic Universe movie. But we're glad

0:05:09.565 --> 0:05:12.325
<v Speaker 2>he did. And there are other examples of this coming

0:05:12.365 --> 0:05:15.725
<v Speaker 2>up too. I just only a day or two ago,

0:05:15.964 --> 0:05:19.645
<v Speaker 2>working on this list, googled the Captain Marvel movie that's

0:05:19.685 --> 0:05:22.364
<v Speaker 2>coming out with Bree Larson as Captain Marvel. Do you

0:05:22.445 --> 0:05:23.724
<v Speaker 2>know who's directing that movie?

0:05:23.725 --> 0:05:24.765
<v Speaker 1>I knew it, but I forgot.

0:05:24.885 --> 0:05:27.885
<v Speaker 2>It's Anna Boden and Ryan Fleck. That's right, the people

0:05:27.885 --> 0:05:29.685
<v Speaker 2>who made It's kind of a funny story in Sugar

0:05:29.725 --> 0:05:32.844
<v Speaker 2>and Half Nelson. These indeed directors who you would never

0:05:32.885 --> 0:05:36.645
<v Speaker 2>imagine making a tent pole franchise movie, but the kind

0:05:36.685 --> 0:05:39.885
<v Speaker 2>of directors that we would put up and hope would

0:05:40.005 --> 0:05:42.045
<v Speaker 2>maybe one day make that kind of movie and bring

0:05:42.085 --> 0:05:44.484
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of a different personality to it. So

0:05:44.525 --> 0:05:46.925
<v Speaker 2>that's kind of where we're going with this list.

0:05:47.085 --> 0:05:49.685
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and we should also note that this was first

0:05:49.725 --> 0:05:53.885
<v Speaker 1>suggested by a Film Spotting Advisory Board member, Corn Dog. Yes.

0:05:55.125 --> 0:05:56.485
<v Speaker 2>I don't know why are you laughing if.

0:05:56.404 --> 0:05:59.285
<v Speaker 1>Corn Dog wants to change that name now that we're

0:05:59.365 --> 0:06:02.284
<v Speaker 1>using it on the air, But it was a fun idea.

0:06:02.365 --> 0:06:06.325
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a promising idea, especially if you think

0:06:06.365 --> 0:06:09.044
<v Speaker 1>about approaching it not just from the curiosity factor, but

0:06:09.165 --> 0:06:13.924
<v Speaker 1>really trying to match a director's sensibility with the sensibility

0:06:13.964 --> 0:06:16.205
<v Speaker 1>of the comic book or maybe of the character that's it.

0:06:16.245 --> 0:06:17.965
<v Speaker 1>And once I started doing that, it was kind of

0:06:18.005 --> 0:06:20.445
<v Speaker 1>a fun thought experiment to engage in.

0:06:20.485 --> 0:06:22.125
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you said this last week when we were

0:06:22.125 --> 0:06:24.205
<v Speaker 2>teasing this top five, This was as much fun as

0:06:24.205 --> 0:06:27.125
<v Speaker 2>I've had putting together any recent top five list. And

0:06:27.404 --> 0:06:30.085
<v Speaker 2>we'll see if the results speak to that. But just

0:06:30.125 --> 0:06:31.964
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more set up, and I think I

0:06:32.045 --> 0:06:35.085
<v Speaker 2>expressed these concerns a little last week. I was worried

0:06:35.125 --> 0:06:37.525
<v Speaker 2>at first when we were kicking this around that we

0:06:37.605 --> 0:06:40.325
<v Speaker 2>both didn't have enough geek cred to really go down

0:06:40.365 --> 0:06:42.924
<v Speaker 2>this path that will reveal itself. You will see that

0:06:42.964 --> 0:06:45.085
<v Speaker 2>we are limited, I think, or I'm just going to

0:06:45.125 --> 0:06:47.645
<v Speaker 2>speak for myself, I'm limited when it comes to knowing

0:06:47.685 --> 0:06:51.045
<v Speaker 2>the vocabulary around some of these superheroes and their origins

0:06:51.085 --> 0:06:54.964
<v Speaker 2>and their powers and all of the legacy that's in

0:06:55.005 --> 0:06:57.205
<v Speaker 2>place with them. So bear with us and be patient

0:06:57.245 --> 0:06:59.525
<v Speaker 2>a little bit. Also, it's not as if you and

0:06:59.605 --> 0:07:02.285
<v Speaker 2>I are sitting around all the time talking about our

0:07:02.325 --> 0:07:05.205
<v Speaker 2>love and fascination with superhero movies, nor do we think

0:07:05.245 --> 0:07:08.445
<v Speaker 2>that this is the end all, be all trajectory for

0:07:08.725 --> 0:07:10.885
<v Speaker 2>our favorite director. Correct, they don't need to make a

0:07:10.925 --> 0:07:14.405
<v Speaker 2>superhero movie in order for us to appreciate them or

0:07:14.445 --> 0:07:17.125
<v Speaker 2>really to be taken seriously. I don't think. Probably I

0:07:17.125 --> 0:07:19.205
<v Speaker 2>could be wrong, but I don't think Sean Baker from

0:07:19.245 --> 0:07:21.685
<v Speaker 2>the Florida Project is probably sitting around pining for his

0:07:21.765 --> 0:07:25.605
<v Speaker 2>opportunity to make a Marvel or DC movie. But maybe

0:07:25.645 --> 0:07:28.525
<v Speaker 2>he is. I do understand that it reflects to a

0:07:28.565 --> 0:07:32.245
<v Speaker 2>certain extent standing in the industry, and not only that,

0:07:32.365 --> 0:07:36.085
<v Speaker 2>maybe more importantly, Josh, the opportunity for different voices to

0:07:36.205 --> 0:07:39.525
<v Speaker 2>take on these works, right, that's really what's most important.

0:07:39.525 --> 0:07:41.885
<v Speaker 2>I was just trying to get to get some new

0:07:42.125 --> 0:07:45.725
<v Speaker 2>perspective and a new vision. So it is about that

0:07:46.325 --> 0:07:50.205
<v Speaker 2>marriage of the material, the director, and the superhero and

0:07:50.405 --> 0:07:52.725
<v Speaker 2>maybe the star. One other example of this, just a

0:07:52.765 --> 0:07:56.565
<v Speaker 2>few days ago, Slash Film had an article about Alex Garland,

0:07:56.725 --> 0:07:59.045
<v Speaker 2>the director of Annihilation. We're going to discuss that here

0:07:59.045 --> 0:08:02.285
<v Speaker 2>on an upcoming episode. And he has some history with

0:08:02.365 --> 0:08:06.325
<v Speaker 2>comic book movies because before Annihilation and ex Machina as

0:08:06.325 --> 0:08:10.645
<v Speaker 2>a screenwriter he did write the comic book adaptation for Dread,

0:08:11.005 --> 0:08:13.765
<v Speaker 2>and he was asked in a Reddit ama, I think

0:08:13.845 --> 0:08:16.965
<v Speaker 2>just recently what comic book movie he would make if

0:08:17.005 --> 0:08:19.885
<v Speaker 2>he could, and his answer was swamp Thing. He didn't

0:08:19.885 --> 0:08:22.045
<v Speaker 2>go into a lot of detail, but I'm just quoting

0:08:22.085 --> 0:08:24.405
<v Speaker 2>here from the slash Film article. It says, judging by

0:08:24.405 --> 0:08:27.205
<v Speaker 2>his talent for approaching pulpy sci fi elements through a

0:08:27.245 --> 0:08:31.085
<v Speaker 2>restrained humanistic lens, he could be a fantastic fit. His

0:08:31.125 --> 0:08:33.485
<v Speaker 2>work behind the camera with X Makana and Annihilation, as

0:08:33.525 --> 0:08:35.245
<v Speaker 2>well as his work on scripts for Never Let Me

0:08:35.285 --> 0:08:38.285
<v Speaker 2>Go in Sunshine, prove him to be a challenging, ambitious

0:08:38.285 --> 0:08:41.045
<v Speaker 2>sci fi filmmaker who seeks to explore the meaning of

0:08:41.165 --> 0:08:44.325
<v Speaker 2>human identity. So if you go with that background, matching

0:08:44.405 --> 0:08:46.804
<v Speaker 2>him with something like swamp Thing makes sense. I think

0:08:46.805 --> 0:08:49.445
<v Speaker 2>that's kind of where we were both going with these lists, right.

0:08:49.365 --> 0:08:52.525
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely, And speaking of swamp Thing, I'll share one

0:08:52.605 --> 0:08:55.285
<v Speaker 1>listener suggestion right off the top here, because we got

0:08:55.325 --> 0:08:57.204
<v Speaker 1>a ton of them on social media. But Jason Knight

0:08:57.485 --> 0:09:01.405
<v Speaker 1>suggested for swamp Thing Jeff Nichols, which I also think

0:09:01.445 --> 0:09:04.165
<v Speaker 1>is intriguing. Okay, we got it. We'll share some more

0:09:04.205 --> 0:09:05.405
<v Speaker 1>of these listeners.

0:09:05.045 --> 0:09:06.684
<v Speaker 2>Is that like a sootype.

0:09:07.085 --> 0:09:10.084
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, it's kind of a Southern Gothic vibe.

0:09:10.205 --> 0:09:13.165
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it maybe it'll work. Okay, let's see if you

0:09:13.205 --> 0:09:16.045
<v Speaker 1>think my number five might work. I can't wait Sophia

0:09:16.085 --> 0:09:20.725
<v Speaker 1>Coppola making Aqua Woman. Now you know where I'm going

0:09:20.725 --> 0:09:24.085
<v Speaker 1>with this. I do the movie made up so disappointed

0:09:24.684 --> 0:09:28.045
<v Speaker 1>that Sophia Coppola's live action Little Mermaid movie never came

0:09:28.085 --> 0:09:30.085
<v Speaker 1>to pass. It did exist at one point, Adam, it

0:09:30.165 --> 0:09:34.405
<v Speaker 1>did exist. Well, maybe this could be the next best thing.

0:09:34.845 --> 0:09:38.085
<v Speaker 1>I'll admit, speaking to our cred. Aqua Woman is not

0:09:38.205 --> 0:09:41.045
<v Speaker 1>one of those comic book characters that I'm very familiar with.

0:09:41.205 --> 0:09:44.485
<v Speaker 1>From what I could tell, she's relatively new, first introduced

0:09:44.485 --> 0:09:47.405
<v Speaker 1>around twenty fourteen, I think, as part of DC's Earth

0:09:47.405 --> 0:09:51.085
<v Speaker 1>two series. So there aren't really decades of mythology to

0:09:51.165 --> 0:09:53.365
<v Speaker 1>deal with here. And I think that's okay, because I

0:09:53.445 --> 0:09:57.885
<v Speaker 1>basically want Copola to take this basic framework and aquatic

0:09:58.005 --> 0:10:02.245
<v Speaker 1>superheroin and use that canvas to offer you know what

0:10:02.285 --> 0:10:05.525
<v Speaker 1>she usually does, a portrait of a very specific sort

0:10:05.645 --> 0:10:08.845
<v Speaker 1>of femininity. Now, if that sounds far fetched, keep in

0:10:08.885 --> 0:10:11.765
<v Speaker 1>mind that most of Copola's movies seem to be taking

0:10:11.804 --> 0:10:15.445
<v Speaker 1>place underwater anyway, when you think about how they're described,

0:10:15.525 --> 0:10:20.324
<v Speaker 1>like words like languid come up. There's slow movements within them.

0:10:20.525 --> 0:10:24.845
<v Speaker 1>There's just a a flow. The characters flow in Coppola's movies.

0:10:24.885 --> 0:10:27.645
<v Speaker 1>So I think in some ways this would be something

0:10:27.684 --> 0:10:31.165
<v Speaker 1>of a natural fit from an esthetic standpoint. Now, you

0:10:31.325 --> 0:10:35.804
<v Speaker 1>mentioned earlier that you thought about casting these films as well,

0:10:36.005 --> 0:10:39.045
<v Speaker 1>So I've been thinking about who might be able to

0:10:39.125 --> 0:10:41.565
<v Speaker 1>play Aqua woman, and I'm just going to go back

0:10:41.605 --> 0:10:44.445
<v Speaker 1>to someone who's worked with Coppola about the right age.

0:10:44.485 --> 0:10:46.725
<v Speaker 1>I would expect El Fanning, who was in The Beguiled

0:10:46.765 --> 0:10:50.005
<v Speaker 1>with her. I could see she's kind of watery. I

0:10:50.045 --> 0:10:52.605
<v Speaker 1>think when I think of El Fanning, that word comes

0:10:52.605 --> 0:10:55.845
<v Speaker 1>to mind. So maybe maybe that would work. Okay, I'm

0:10:55.845 --> 0:10:58.525
<v Speaker 1>not too stoked about this year's Aquaman movie. Speaking of

0:10:58.564 --> 0:11:02.405
<v Speaker 1>superhero exhaustion, I think stoked is maybe the right word

0:11:02.445 --> 0:11:04.725
<v Speaker 1>to use. Jason Momoa, you seem to be going for

0:11:04.765 --> 0:11:08.125
<v Speaker 1>aqua dude more than anything else. But if Sophia Coppola

0:11:08.325 --> 0:11:10.645
<v Speaker 1>had Aqua woman coming out, I would be into it.

0:11:10.725 --> 0:11:14.045
<v Speaker 2>Okay. I would be intrigued as well. And Jason Momoa

0:11:14.085 --> 0:11:16.525
<v Speaker 2>a nice transition into my number five because my director

0:11:17.005 --> 0:11:20.885
<v Speaker 2>last directed Momoa in her recent film. I'm going to

0:11:21.045 --> 0:11:22.645
<v Speaker 2>give this to you. I'm gonna give my choices to

0:11:22.725 --> 0:11:24.885
<v Speaker 2>you as if you are the studio head and I'm

0:11:24.925 --> 0:11:26.765
<v Speaker 2>pitching it okay to you. So I'm gonna give you

0:11:26.804 --> 0:11:30.725
<v Speaker 2>the director and the title and the actor and see

0:11:30.725 --> 0:11:32.485
<v Speaker 2>how you react. Now, this one may stump you a

0:11:32.485 --> 0:11:34.445
<v Speaker 2>little bit because I don't think you're as familiar with

0:11:34.485 --> 0:11:37.085
<v Speaker 2>this director's work, and I don't think you'll place the

0:11:37.125 --> 0:11:39.405
<v Speaker 2>actress's name either. I could be wrong. This is the

0:11:39.445 --> 0:11:41.885
<v Speaker 2>only one rejected. It will do that. So you're already

0:11:41.885 --> 0:11:45.645
<v Speaker 2>it's like she's not a big enoughisode. It's over. Okay, Sorry,

0:11:46.285 --> 0:11:49.444
<v Speaker 2>Next my number five superhero director Combo I'd like to

0:11:49.485 --> 0:11:58.684
<v Speaker 2>see is Anna Lily ahmerpors Ms Marvel starring goal shifta Farahni. Okay,

0:11:58.845 --> 0:12:01.605
<v Speaker 2>go shifta Farahni, and I'll get to a reason why

0:12:01.645 --> 0:12:03.405
<v Speaker 2>in a moment, at least one reason why she's a

0:12:03.405 --> 0:12:08.805
<v Speaker 2>problematic fit. Here is Patterson's wife in the movie Yeah

0:12:08.885 --> 0:12:12.844
<v Speaker 2>Patterson starring opposite Adam Driver and that Jim Jarmish movie.

0:12:12.885 --> 0:12:17.405
<v Speaker 2>She is an Iranian actress, and that dissent is important

0:12:17.645 --> 0:12:21.645
<v Speaker 2>as this is the description of Mis Marvel that Comic Vine,

0:12:21.684 --> 0:12:25.285
<v Speaker 2>a website gives this new Mis Marvel. Anyway, Kamala Khan

0:12:25.684 --> 0:12:29.965
<v Speaker 2>is the girl's name. She is a shape shifting Muslim

0:12:30.005 --> 0:12:34.845
<v Speaker 2>Pakistani American teenager from New Jersey who becomes the newest

0:12:34.845 --> 0:12:37.804
<v Speaker 2>holder of the Mis Marvel identity. So, without knowing all

0:12:37.845 --> 0:12:40.325
<v Speaker 2>the history of this, there have been different Miss Marvels

0:12:40.405 --> 0:12:42.765
<v Speaker 2>over the years. It was a counter to Captain Marvel.

0:12:42.965 --> 0:12:46.084
<v Speaker 2>Carol Danvers was the original Mis Marvel, and that is

0:12:46.125 --> 0:12:49.565
<v Speaker 2>who Brie Larson is playing as I understand it in

0:12:49.645 --> 0:12:52.445
<v Speaker 2>the Captain Marvel movie. So Miss Marvel has been this

0:12:52.564 --> 0:12:55.084
<v Speaker 2>kind of go to figure throughout the Marvel universe over

0:12:55.085 --> 0:12:58.085
<v Speaker 2>the years, and now in its current imagining, she is

0:12:58.445 --> 0:13:01.885
<v Speaker 2>a sixteen year old Pakistani American girl from New Jersey.

0:13:02.205 --> 0:13:05.045
<v Speaker 2>So this was the hardest to cast because I'm going

0:13:05.085 --> 0:13:10.244
<v Speaker 2>to confess I can't think of any Pakistani American teenage

0:13:10.605 --> 0:13:13.045
<v Speaker 2>actresses off the top of my head, and I did

0:13:13.085 --> 0:13:16.165
<v Speaker 2>google a little bit. I found actresses that act in

0:13:16.205 --> 0:13:19.045
<v Speaker 2>movies not here in the United States, not in Hollywood movies,

0:13:19.085 --> 0:13:20.925
<v Speaker 2>So that wouldn't do me much good. Go shift of

0:13:21.564 --> 0:13:24.125
<v Speaker 2>I think is really wonderful in Patterson. She's also in

0:13:24.205 --> 0:13:26.964
<v Speaker 2>Body of Lies. She plays a Jordanian in that film

0:13:26.965 --> 0:13:30.085
<v Speaker 2>opposite Leo DiCaprio. That was the Ridley Scott film from

0:13:30.485 --> 0:13:33.485
<v Speaker 2>a few years back. But she is thirty four. She

0:13:33.525 --> 0:13:36.564
<v Speaker 2>doesn't look thirty four to me. She looks maybe mid

0:13:36.645 --> 0:13:39.165
<v Speaker 2>twenties at best. I don't know that she could pass

0:13:39.405 --> 0:13:42.365
<v Speaker 2>as a sixteen year old. I will open this up

0:13:42.365 --> 0:13:44.765
<v Speaker 2>to other people who might be more enlightened than me

0:13:44.885 --> 0:13:47.925
<v Speaker 2>and can suggest someone who could really play Ms Marvel.

0:13:48.605 --> 0:13:51.125
<v Speaker 2>One of the reasons that I think this character could

0:13:51.125 --> 0:13:53.245
<v Speaker 2>be so fascinating to see on screen, and this goes

0:13:53.285 --> 0:13:55.645
<v Speaker 2>back to something we talked about during Black Panther and

0:13:55.725 --> 0:13:58.605
<v Speaker 2>also our recent conversation where we revisited The Last Jedi.

0:13:58.804 --> 0:14:01.645
<v Speaker 2>The idea of diversity came up and someone challenged it,

0:14:01.725 --> 0:14:03.845
<v Speaker 2>saying it was a weakness of the Last Jedi. I

0:14:03.885 --> 0:14:07.165
<v Speaker 2>took issue with that, and one of the things I

0:14:07.205 --> 0:14:10.445
<v Speaker 2>don't think I pointed out in my argument, even though

0:14:10.485 --> 0:14:13.765
<v Speaker 2>it belonged and is certainly a no brainer, is that

0:14:14.005 --> 0:14:18.485
<v Speaker 2>everybody deserves. Everyone deserves to see themselves represented on screen,

0:14:18.564 --> 0:14:22.525
<v Speaker 2>to see themselves reflected back, whether that's an everyday reflection

0:14:22.645 --> 0:14:25.605
<v Speaker 2>of who they are or it's a fantastic version of

0:14:25.645 --> 0:14:27.965
<v Speaker 2>who they are. And just last night, as I was

0:14:28.005 --> 0:14:30.285
<v Speaker 2>jotting down my notes, I went to Twitter and I

0:14:30.285 --> 0:14:32.685
<v Speaker 2>did a search for mis Marvel just to see if

0:14:32.685 --> 0:14:36.325
<v Speaker 2>anybody is saying anything about her. What's the dialogue around

0:14:36.605 --> 0:14:40.845
<v Speaker 2>this character right now? And a user named at Foxville

0:14:40.965 --> 0:14:44.005
<v Speaker 2>underscore Art who says she's a visual development artist and

0:14:44.085 --> 0:14:48.124
<v Speaker 2>illustrator and she's co host of at the Art Corner podcast.

0:14:48.845 --> 0:14:51.485
<v Speaker 2>She wrote this, growing up, I never saw anyone who

0:14:51.565 --> 0:14:54.685
<v Speaker 2>looked like me, a Pakistani Muslim immigrant in the media

0:14:54.765 --> 0:14:58.565
<v Speaker 2>I consumed, let alone an actual crime fighting superhero. I'm

0:14:58.565 --> 0:15:00.565
<v Speaker 2>so thankful for mis Marvel. I think we'd all be

0:15:00.645 --> 0:15:03.445
<v Speaker 2>thankful to see that character on screen. And I do

0:15:03.605 --> 0:15:06.565
<v Speaker 2>like the meta narrative element to this as well. Josh

0:15:06.605 --> 0:15:09.205
<v Speaker 2>where based on what I read about Kamala Khan, she

0:15:09.365 --> 0:15:13.245
<v Speaker 2>was someone who was obsessed with superheroes and comic books

0:15:13.245 --> 0:15:17.685
<v Speaker 2>and Miss Marvel in particular, and then when she basically

0:15:17.845 --> 0:15:21.325
<v Speaker 2>gained these powers that she gained, she decided to take

0:15:21.365 --> 0:15:25.525
<v Speaker 2>on this persona, which seems so appropriate for this age

0:15:25.565 --> 0:15:28.645
<v Speaker 2>we live in right now, this fanboy and fangirl age

0:15:28.685 --> 0:15:30.725
<v Speaker 2>and just the fact that she is someone who is

0:15:30.765 --> 0:15:33.725
<v Speaker 2>discussed as someone who is an outsider, who always felt different,

0:15:33.805 --> 0:15:36.245
<v Speaker 2>who is cast out a little bit at school, and

0:15:36.325 --> 0:15:38.965
<v Speaker 2>takes on this persona to help people, just to help

0:15:39.005 --> 0:15:43.325
<v Speaker 2>people because she's inherently compassionate. Also seems like a character

0:15:43.445 --> 0:15:44.605
<v Speaker 2>we all need to see right now.

0:15:44.925 --> 0:15:47.885
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I like it. And Armorer was another filmmaker who I.

0:15:47.845 --> 0:15:49.805
<v Speaker 2>Didn't even talk about it a lot, you know, a

0:15:49.845 --> 0:15:51.885
<v Speaker 2>lot all that rambling, and I didn't even talk about

0:15:51.885 --> 0:15:52.845
<v Speaker 2>the director.

0:15:52.845 --> 0:15:54.925
<v Speaker 1>But a lot of listeners pegged her right away as

0:15:54.925 --> 0:15:57.485
<v Speaker 1>someone who could pull off one of these films. Of course, Yeah,

0:15:57.525 --> 0:16:00.365
<v Speaker 1>directed the Bad Batch And a Girl Walks home Alone

0:16:00.405 --> 0:16:00.725
<v Speaker 1>at night?

0:16:00.805 --> 0:16:03.245
<v Speaker 2>Yes, And when I thought of Kamala Khan, and when

0:16:03.245 --> 0:16:05.045
<v Speaker 2>I saw some of the pictures, even though it couldn't

0:16:05.045 --> 0:16:07.405
<v Speaker 2>be more different because they're very colorful, and a girl

0:16:07.405 --> 0:16:09.245
<v Speaker 2>walks home alone at night is in black and white.

0:16:09.365 --> 0:16:12.005
<v Speaker 2>But the first character, the first actress I envisioned, is

0:16:12.005 --> 0:16:15.165
<v Speaker 2>Sheila Vand who is that girl who walks home alone

0:16:15.205 --> 0:16:18.565
<v Speaker 2>at night? And so that sense of being an outsider,

0:16:19.085 --> 0:16:22.445
<v Speaker 2>being different, being alienated from those around you, and yet

0:16:22.445 --> 0:16:26.285
<v Speaker 2>trying to assimilate, that's very much at the core as well.

0:16:26.325 --> 0:16:28.245
<v Speaker 2>Of the bad Batch. Even though it's a very different

0:16:28.325 --> 0:16:30.285
<v Speaker 2>movie than A Girl Walks home alone night, she just

0:16:30.285 --> 0:16:33.365
<v Speaker 2>seems like the right director for that character and material.

0:16:33.525 --> 0:16:35.805
<v Speaker 1>All Right, we're at my number four. I guess I

0:16:35.805 --> 0:16:39.685
<v Speaker 1>would say, Adam, I dabbled in comics more than anything

0:16:39.685 --> 0:16:41.725
<v Speaker 1>else when I was younger. I'd pick them up here

0:16:41.765 --> 0:16:45.125
<v Speaker 1>and there. Probably the age I was most into them

0:16:45.245 --> 0:16:48.645
<v Speaker 1>was middle school. And that's also when I embarked on

0:16:48.925 --> 0:16:52.885
<v Speaker 1>a get rich quick comics scheme that didn't really pan out.

0:16:53.245 --> 0:16:56.405
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen eighty six, Marvel tried to launch a completely

0:16:56.405 --> 0:17:00.045
<v Speaker 1>original series of superheroes under this New Universe banner. I

0:17:00.045 --> 0:17:04.125
<v Speaker 1>think there were about eight made from scratch characters or teams.

0:17:04.805 --> 0:17:07.925
<v Speaker 1>I middle school me saw an investment opportunity, Adam, so

0:17:08.605 --> 0:17:11.244
<v Speaker 1>I shelled out the seventy five cents each. This was

0:17:11.285 --> 0:17:14.805
<v Speaker 1>in eighty six, for the first five issues of each series.

0:17:15.485 --> 0:17:18.205
<v Speaker 1>Guess how much they're worth now? I checked while putting

0:17:18.205 --> 0:17:23.885
<v Speaker 1>together this list. Eighty five cents a dollar seventy each. Atam,

0:17:23.925 --> 0:17:25.725
<v Speaker 1>I thank you very much. According to my math, I

0:17:25.765 --> 0:17:29.525
<v Speaker 1>doubled my money. More than double my money. Some of

0:17:29.565 --> 0:17:33.085
<v Speaker 1>these were really cheesy. I found these in a drawer

0:17:33.605 --> 0:17:37.605
<v Speaker 1>over The Weekend Kickers Ink was a team of former

0:17:37.765 --> 0:17:42.205
<v Speaker 1>football players. Not too cool, but I do remember rejected

0:17:43.405 --> 0:17:46.845
<v Speaker 1>good move. There was one that I liked for more

0:17:46.885 --> 0:17:50.645
<v Speaker 1>than investment purposes called night Mask, a character created by

0:17:50.725 --> 0:17:53.645
<v Speaker 1>Archie Goodwin. This is a team with the ability to

0:17:53.805 --> 0:17:58.165
<v Speaker 1>enter other people's dreams. Now. Night Mask had this goth look.

0:17:58.245 --> 0:18:01.125
<v Speaker 1>There was a black, high colored cape that he wears

0:18:01.165 --> 0:18:04.965
<v Speaker 1>and it ends in these tendrils. And with its dreamscapes,

0:18:05.325 --> 0:18:09.805
<v Speaker 1>the comic gives ample opportunity for really surrealistic flourishes. So

0:18:10.245 --> 0:18:13.765
<v Speaker 1>who do I want to see make the night Mask movie? Well,

0:18:14.325 --> 0:18:16.485
<v Speaker 1>I think Tim Burton still has a great movie in him.

0:18:16.485 --> 0:18:19.125
<v Speaker 1>And before you scoff, here's the Kicker. I want his

0:18:19.245 --> 0:18:22.485
<v Speaker 1>night Mask to be stop motion. There are definitely some

0:18:22.645 --> 0:18:27.565
<v Speaker 1>Jack Skellington touches to night Masks. Look, i'd even here.

0:18:27.685 --> 0:18:29.605
<v Speaker 1>Here's how much I'm committed to this, Adam. I will

0:18:29.645 --> 0:18:33.005
<v Speaker 1>put my earnings from my new Universe collection. I'll sell

0:18:33.005 --> 0:18:34.845
<v Speaker 1>them all and put that towards seed mon.

0:18:34.925 --> 0:18:35.045
<v Speaker 2>Oh.

0:18:35.125 --> 0:18:37.605
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for the night Mask, get it off the ground.

0:18:37.605 --> 0:18:39.965
<v Speaker 2>I don't know anything about night Mask, but Tim Burton's

0:18:40.085 --> 0:18:43.245
<v Speaker 2>night Mask does sound right. Josh so good pick Okay,

0:18:43.885 --> 0:18:47.005
<v Speaker 2>let's see how you take to my number four, obviously

0:18:47.005 --> 0:18:51.205
<v Speaker 2>inspired by a recent discussion here on the show David

0:18:51.245 --> 0:18:58.045
<v Speaker 2>Cronenberg's Angel starring Timothy Shallowmey.

0:18:58.405 --> 0:18:59.845
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna have to fill me an un angel.

0:18:59.965 --> 0:19:02.245
<v Speaker 2>So Angel you have seen on screen before? Because I

0:19:02.325 --> 0:19:06.205
<v Speaker 2>am guessing though you probably skipped X Men Apocalypse as

0:19:06.245 --> 0:19:09.045
<v Speaker 2>I did, the one starring Oscar Isaac, the recent one,

0:19:09.125 --> 0:19:11.845
<v Speaker 2>have not seen that? You did see the Brett Ratner

0:19:11.885 --> 0:19:14.805
<v Speaker 2>directed X Men The Last Stand? Or am I wrong?

0:19:15.765 --> 0:19:17.925
<v Speaker 1>I wish I had that information readily available.

0:19:17.965 --> 0:19:21.445
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Ben Foster, the Great Ben Foster, Yeah, okay, the

0:19:21.565 --> 0:19:26.365
<v Speaker 2>very blonde angel in X Men The Last Stand and

0:19:26.725 --> 0:19:30.965
<v Speaker 2>his namesake. His real name is Kenneth Worthington the Third.

0:19:31.045 --> 0:19:33.285
<v Speaker 2>I'm just going off of Marvel's wikia here. He is

0:19:33.365 --> 0:19:36.245
<v Speaker 2>the mutant son of the wealthy Warren K. Worthington Junior

0:19:36.965 --> 0:19:39.005
<v Speaker 2>and his wife Catherine, neither of whom were aware that

0:19:39.045 --> 0:19:41.485
<v Speaker 2>their son had developed. This is where Cronerberg comes in.

0:19:41.565 --> 0:19:45.805
<v Speaker 2>Josh a pair of large feathered wings extending from his back,

0:19:46.485 --> 0:19:49.485
<v Speaker 2>enabling him to fly. If you go back and watch

0:19:49.565 --> 0:19:52.325
<v Speaker 2>in that scene, can't you the body horror of that?

0:19:52.445 --> 0:19:54.925
<v Speaker 2>If you go back and watch that scene from X

0:19:55.005 --> 0:19:56.725
<v Speaker 2>Men The Last Stand. That's basically what we get. We

0:19:56.725 --> 0:20:00.085
<v Speaker 2>get a flashback to the younger Ben Foster character, the

0:20:00.125 --> 0:20:04.285
<v Speaker 2>younger Warren Worthington, who is actually trying to cut off

0:20:04.525 --> 0:20:07.085
<v Speaker 2>the wings from his back. He's so ashamed of them

0:20:07.325 --> 0:20:10.045
<v Speaker 2>that he's trying to cut them from his body in

0:20:10.165 --> 0:20:12.725
<v Speaker 2>a scene that isn't really that disturbing. It's not what

0:20:13.205 --> 0:20:15.765
<v Speaker 2>David Croneberg would do with it, but you could imagine

0:20:15.885 --> 0:20:17.525
<v Speaker 2>what he might do with it. And then later we

0:20:17.605 --> 0:20:20.765
<v Speaker 2>see when he finally kind of revels in the full

0:20:21.085 --> 0:20:23.485
<v Speaker 2>force of his wings when he does come out to

0:20:23.605 --> 0:20:26.005
<v Speaker 2>his family, and that's one of those metaphors or one

0:20:26.005 --> 0:20:28.525
<v Speaker 2>of those analogies that go with a lot of X

0:20:28.565 --> 0:20:32.285
<v Speaker 2>Men characters, and it certainly ties to Warren Worthington as well. Now,

0:20:32.765 --> 0:20:35.205
<v Speaker 2>depending on the movie and its scope, he could also

0:20:35.245 --> 0:20:39.285
<v Speaker 2>turn into archangel, which he does and apparently this happens

0:20:39.325 --> 0:20:44.005
<v Speaker 2>in X Men Apocalypse. Apocalypse turns him into this dark,

0:20:44.765 --> 0:20:49.605
<v Speaker 2>foreboding character who merges with technology, and those wings go

0:20:49.645 --> 0:20:52.885
<v Speaker 2>from being feathers to these, as they're described in front

0:20:52.885 --> 0:20:56.445
<v Speaker 2>of me, techno organic wings. He can fly higher and

0:20:56.485 --> 0:21:00.365
<v Speaker 2>faster and their razor sharp with feathers that are throne

0:21:00.365 --> 0:21:02.405
<v Speaker 2>as blades with the neurotoxin.

0:21:02.685 --> 0:21:04.685
<v Speaker 1>We're really in video drum territory, are.

0:21:04.645 --> 0:21:07.405
<v Speaker 2>Aren't we. So that's the thing. It's just something about

0:21:06.925 --> 0:21:12.165
<v Speaker 2>that combination of body horror and potentially body and technology

0:21:12.285 --> 0:21:16.165
<v Speaker 2>converging the consequences of that convergence that seems so appropriate

0:21:16.245 --> 0:21:19.845
<v Speaker 2>for Cronenberg and then Chalome. I'm going with Chalome because

0:21:20.125 --> 0:21:23.605
<v Speaker 2>he's probably the actor I'm most curious to see whatever

0:21:23.645 --> 0:21:25.365
<v Speaker 2>he does next. At this point, I feel like he

0:21:25.405 --> 0:21:28.605
<v Speaker 2>can do just about anything. And even though his hair

0:21:28.685 --> 0:21:31.765
<v Speaker 2>is obviously dark, depending on what Angel you go with,

0:21:31.845 --> 0:21:34.645
<v Speaker 2>if you google him, usually you'll find someone who has

0:21:34.685 --> 0:21:40.005
<v Speaker 2>either very long, flowing blonde locks or well quoafed, sort

0:21:40.005 --> 0:21:43.005
<v Speaker 2>of straight up kind of hair, but longish and shallow.

0:21:43.045 --> 0:21:46.165
<v Speaker 2>May I think if you dyed that hair blonde, there's

0:21:46.165 --> 0:21:48.165
<v Speaker 2>just something about that that screams Angel to me. And

0:21:48.205 --> 0:21:51.845
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm also just naturally playing off of the

0:21:51.925 --> 0:21:53.885
<v Speaker 2>character we see and call me by your name too,

0:21:54.245 --> 0:21:57.485
<v Speaker 2>who is a rich kid. He's a little bit entitled,

0:21:57.645 --> 0:22:00.765
<v Speaker 2>but there's also a fundamental goodness to him, and he's

0:22:00.765 --> 0:22:03.405
<v Speaker 2>someone who's determined to discover who he really is, so

0:22:03.685 --> 0:22:06.565
<v Speaker 2>playing off of that Elio character. And call me by

0:22:06.605 --> 0:22:09.445
<v Speaker 2>your name, dye that hair blonde, give him some wings,

0:22:09.685 --> 0:22:10.405
<v Speaker 2>and he's Angel.

0:22:11.205 --> 0:22:14.045
<v Speaker 1>That's good, but you should know I am also considering

0:22:14.045 --> 0:22:20.005
<v Speaker 1>a proposal via Twitter from at Hugh Underscore Goldolphin David Cronenberg's.

0:22:19.405 --> 0:22:22.565
<v Speaker 2>Hulk, So pretty good match. That makes sense, but.

0:22:22.685 --> 0:22:24.685
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he can do both. We'll see maybe, all right.

0:22:24.885 --> 0:22:28.965
<v Speaker 1>My number three is Anna Rose Holmer's Doctor Strange.

0:22:29.125 --> 0:22:29.685
<v Speaker 2>Ooh.

0:22:29.725 --> 0:22:32.365
<v Speaker 1>Now, the winner of the twenty sixteen film Spotting Golden

0:22:32.405 --> 0:22:35.085
<v Speaker 1>Brick Award, has yet to announce her next feature project,

0:22:35.125 --> 0:22:37.005
<v Speaker 1>so I say give her the next installment in the

0:22:37.045 --> 0:22:41.045
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Strange series. We recognized Homer for The Fits, a

0:22:41.165 --> 0:22:44.485
<v Speaker 1>spectral indie in which the members of a competitive girls

0:22:44.565 --> 0:22:47.325
<v Speaker 1>dance team begin to suffer these unexplained seizures, and the

0:22:47.365 --> 0:22:49.885
<v Speaker 1>Fits is very much rooted in reality, but here and

0:22:49.965 --> 0:22:54.045
<v Speaker 1>there Homer offers these subtle cinematic flourishes that flirt with

0:22:54.045 --> 0:22:58.765
<v Speaker 1>the supernatural. And then there's that ending, which launches us

0:22:58.805 --> 0:23:03.165
<v Speaker 1>unexpectedly and really without much explanation, entirely into the realm

0:23:03.165 --> 0:23:05.925
<v Speaker 1>of the metaphysical. I don't want to spoil it because

0:23:06.445 --> 0:23:09.445
<v Speaker 1>some listeners might actually have not seen The Fits yet,

0:23:09.485 --> 0:23:13.005
<v Speaker 1>and you should really see The Fits. Well. Doctor Strange

0:23:13.125 --> 0:23:17.205
<v Speaker 1>takes place almost entirely in the metaphysical, and while I

0:23:17.365 --> 0:23:20.365
<v Speaker 1>like the first film well enough, I do think that,

0:23:20.685 --> 0:23:22.805
<v Speaker 1>like so many of the Marvel movies, it was in

0:23:22.885 --> 0:23:26.405
<v Speaker 1>danger of being swallowed up by the CGI in order

0:23:26.565 --> 0:23:31.125
<v Speaker 1>to depict this metaphysical world. So I'd be really curious

0:23:31.165 --> 0:23:34.405
<v Speaker 1>to see how Homer's low fi approach might shake things up.

0:23:34.405 --> 0:23:39.765
<v Speaker 2>A yeah, great tie into my number three, Josh, because

0:23:40.765 --> 0:23:44.245
<v Speaker 2>initially Anna Rose Holmer was the director I had attached

0:23:44.285 --> 0:23:46.725
<v Speaker 2>to my project. Really, so, okay, she's gonna be very

0:23:46.765 --> 0:23:51.165
<v Speaker 2>busy yes at film spotting studios, but I did back

0:23:51.205 --> 0:23:53.645
<v Speaker 2>her out. I went with another director, even though Holmer

0:23:53.685 --> 0:23:55.285
<v Speaker 2>could do a wonderful job. I think this is going

0:23:55.365 --> 0:23:57.965
<v Speaker 2>to be your favorite of all of my pitches, all right.

0:23:58.845 --> 0:24:06.325
<v Speaker 2>Sarah Paully's Rogue starring Anya Taylor joy Ooh, the actress

0:24:06.325 --> 0:24:09.605
<v Speaker 2>of course from Split recently and The Witch, which is

0:24:09.605 --> 0:24:12.485
<v Speaker 2>where I think we both discovered her. And I'll get

0:24:12.485 --> 0:24:14.405
<v Speaker 2>to why I'm going with Polly in a moment, but

0:24:14.445 --> 0:24:17.725
<v Speaker 2>you probably remember Rogue. Anna Paclan played her in the

0:24:17.885 --> 0:24:21.445
<v Speaker 2>Brian Singer X Men movies. And just based off of appearance,

0:24:21.765 --> 0:24:27.245
<v Speaker 2>there is something otherworldly, immediately otherworldly about Anya Taylor Joy.

0:24:27.285 --> 0:24:29.885
<v Speaker 2>There is just a haunted aspect to her that I

0:24:29.925 --> 0:24:32.845
<v Speaker 2>think is so fitting with the rogue character. But I

0:24:32.885 --> 0:24:36.045
<v Speaker 2>also think she's able to bring the sense of playfulness

0:24:36.045 --> 0:24:38.605
<v Speaker 2>she might need as well being a teen girl or

0:24:38.645 --> 0:24:41.445
<v Speaker 2>a twenty something girl. She does have this dark past

0:24:41.685 --> 0:24:44.125
<v Speaker 2>based on what I've read about Rogues past. She was

0:24:44.205 --> 0:24:48.005
<v Speaker 2>raised by her aunt Carrie after some tragedy involving her parents,

0:24:48.005 --> 0:24:50.365
<v Speaker 2>and she ran away and she's taken in by Mystique,

0:24:50.365 --> 0:24:54.285
<v Speaker 2>who we know from those movies is connected to Magneto

0:24:54.365 --> 0:24:59.445
<v Speaker 2>and her power. Basically, her mutant power is that whenever

0:24:59.565 --> 0:25:05.325
<v Speaker 2>she touches someone, she takes their powers from them. And

0:25:06.205 --> 0:25:08.085
<v Speaker 2>it all started with and this is depicted in those

0:25:08.205 --> 0:25:11.605
<v Speaker 2>X Men movies a Kiss. She has her first teenage

0:25:11.685 --> 0:25:15.325
<v Speaker 2>kiss and her mind fills with all his memories and

0:25:15.365 --> 0:25:18.485
<v Speaker 2>he falls into a permanent coma, and so then she's

0:25:18.525 --> 0:25:21.005
<v Speaker 2>always on the run. She's always haunted by that experience,

0:25:21.045 --> 0:25:23.525
<v Speaker 2>and she doesn't know how she can really engage with

0:25:23.605 --> 0:25:28.405
<v Speaker 2>society with that type of power that she could inflict

0:25:28.485 --> 0:25:31.925
<v Speaker 2>on other people. So I mentioned Taylor Joy. I looked

0:25:32.005 --> 0:25:36.445
<v Speaker 2>up her origin. She's Argentine, British and born in Miami.

0:25:36.525 --> 0:25:39.325
<v Speaker 2>There's just something unconventional about her appearance that I think

0:25:39.365 --> 0:25:43.805
<v Speaker 2>is fitting for the Rogue character. And apparently someone beat

0:25:43.845 --> 0:25:47.045
<v Speaker 2>me to it, because I did discover that she's already

0:25:47.045 --> 0:25:49.965
<v Speaker 2>been cast in a Fox spinoff, The New Mutants. She

0:25:50.325 --> 0:25:53.565
<v Speaker 2>plays Magic, a character named Magic, a girl who has

0:25:53.645 --> 0:25:57.205
<v Speaker 2>learned sorcery and uses teleportation discs to travel. I didn't

0:25:57.205 --> 0:25:59.965
<v Speaker 2>discover that until I'd already cast her in my movie. Though. Yeah,

0:26:00.005 --> 0:26:02.765
<v Speaker 2>I know Marvel's against that you can't play different superheroes,

0:26:02.765 --> 0:26:06.245
<v Speaker 2>but she's gonna be in my version of Rogue, directed

0:26:06.245 --> 0:26:08.485
<v Speaker 2>by Sarah Paully. And here's why I went with Polly.

0:26:08.725 --> 0:26:11.325
<v Speaker 2>You think about take this Waltz. Away from her stories

0:26:11.365 --> 0:26:16.365
<v Speaker 2>we tell they ask questions about origins, where you come from?

0:26:16.725 --> 0:26:19.365
<v Speaker 2>Even to be very literal about it, who are my parents?

0:26:19.685 --> 0:26:22.565
<v Speaker 2>Who do I latch onto as my parents? A movie

0:26:22.645 --> 0:26:24.605
<v Speaker 2>like away from Her, you have characters who are no

0:26:24.645 --> 0:26:27.805
<v Speaker 2>longer in control of themselves. Whether it's your mind or

0:26:27.845 --> 0:26:29.805
<v Speaker 2>your body, you're not in control of it. And then

0:26:30.405 --> 0:26:33.085
<v Speaker 2>even take this Waltz, the movie starring Michelle Williams and

0:26:33.205 --> 0:26:36.805
<v Speaker 2>Seth Rogan. It's all about that physical disconnect and the

0:26:36.845 --> 0:26:41.165
<v Speaker 2>frustration that comes from a lack of intimacy, which obviously

0:26:41.245 --> 0:26:42.605
<v Speaker 2>afflicts this rogue character.

0:26:43.125 --> 0:26:45.605
<v Speaker 1>I have a feeling that of all the directors we're

0:26:45.605 --> 0:26:48.365
<v Speaker 1>talking about, Sarah Polly would be the one to say

0:26:48.485 --> 0:26:51.965
<v Speaker 1>absolutely not probably thinking not a comic book movie, but

0:26:52.045 --> 0:26:54.365
<v Speaker 1>I for one, would be very intrigued to see her

0:26:54.405 --> 0:26:55.005
<v Speaker 1>try to do it.

0:26:55.205 --> 0:26:57.965
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. Let's get to some listener feedback here. We did

0:26:58.005 --> 0:27:01.765
<v Speaker 2>get some great voicemails with their picks for superhero director

0:27:01.805 --> 0:27:03.125
<v Speaker 2>combos they'd like to see.

0:27:03.245 --> 0:27:06.325
<v Speaker 6>Hey, Adam and josh as Ben Howis from North Hellow, California,

0:27:06.365 --> 0:27:09.285
<v Speaker 6>culling in for my choice for who should direct a

0:27:09.565 --> 0:27:12.885
<v Speaker 6>superhero film who has not yet? I guess you could

0:27:12.885 --> 0:27:15.605
<v Speaker 6>consider it a point break a superhero film, But yes,

0:27:15.645 --> 0:27:20.405
<v Speaker 6>I'm picking Catherine Bigelow, who's never acted a true superhero film.

0:27:20.485 --> 0:27:20.925
<v Speaker 1>Let's be on it.

0:27:21.645 --> 0:27:24.605
<v Speaker 6>I think she's a fabulous action director. But even though

0:27:24.605 --> 0:27:27.885
<v Speaker 6>I liked her first two collaborations with Mark Bull, really

0:27:27.885 --> 0:27:29.805
<v Speaker 6>did not like Detroit and I kind of she'd move on,

0:27:30.245 --> 0:27:33.605
<v Speaker 6>and I feel like a superhero movie might be an

0:27:33.645 --> 0:27:36.365
<v Speaker 6>interesting way to do so. Particularly he picks up what interesting.

0:27:36.725 --> 0:27:40.165
<v Speaker 6>I would pick Green Arrow. He has a very popular

0:27:40.165 --> 0:27:43.085
<v Speaker 6>shown CW, which is really unfortunate because it's pretty much

0:27:43.125 --> 0:27:45.005
<v Speaker 6>nothing to do with Green Arrow. It's more about hot

0:27:45.045 --> 0:27:48.445
<v Speaker 6>guys and apps, which has its place. But the actual

0:27:48.445 --> 0:27:52.045
<v Speaker 6>Green Arrow is sort of a rebel, a seventies creation

0:27:52.325 --> 0:27:55.965
<v Speaker 6>who's a guy who fights against corruption and financial abuse

0:27:56.005 --> 0:27:58.285
<v Speaker 6>and in sort of a post two thousand and eight,

0:27:59.405 --> 0:28:01.845
<v Speaker 6>post big Short world, I feel like we could go

0:28:02.645 --> 0:28:05.685
<v Speaker 6>have some interesting discussions about a guy maybe taking down

0:28:05.765 --> 0:28:08.565
<v Speaker 6>corrupt bankers and the like and what does that mean?

0:28:08.765 --> 0:28:11.565
<v Speaker 6>And I think she could sort of go back to

0:28:11.605 --> 0:28:18.285
<v Speaker 6>her old exciting point break era Strange Days style filmmaking,

0:28:18.405 --> 0:28:20.325
<v Speaker 6>but still have some of that political relevance that she

0:28:20.405 --> 0:28:24.085
<v Speaker 6>loves so much in her modern films and create something

0:28:24.125 --> 0:28:26.445
<v Speaker 6>really interesting. I feel like we need a superhero film

0:28:26.685 --> 0:28:30.205
<v Speaker 6>that actually, I don't know, pisses people off and causes

0:28:30.245 --> 0:28:33.125
<v Speaker 6>a little bit of controversy and things like that. I

0:28:33.165 --> 0:28:35.965
<v Speaker 6>think that might be interesting. So Katherine Bigelow, please come

0:28:36.005 --> 0:28:38.365
<v Speaker 6>back and make cool action movies. I miss you doing

0:28:38.485 --> 0:28:40.285
<v Speaker 6>so all right, touch you all later bye.

0:28:40.725 --> 0:28:44.125
<v Speaker 2>I'd pay to see Catherine Bigelow's controversial Green Arrow, wouldn't.

0:28:43.805 --> 0:28:46.685
<v Speaker 1>You you know what? I thought might be along those

0:28:46.725 --> 0:28:49.325
<v Speaker 1>lines controversial for her as well to take on a

0:28:49.365 --> 0:28:51.845
<v Speaker 1>Captain America movie. I mean, think about the ways, as

0:28:51.885 --> 0:28:55.885
<v Speaker 1>Ben was mentioning, she has explored and interrogated the notion

0:28:55.965 --> 0:28:56.565
<v Speaker 1>of patriots.

0:28:56.565 --> 0:28:56.925
<v Speaker 2>Good word.

0:28:57.005 --> 0:28:58.845
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, to let her loose on that might be fun

0:28:58.885 --> 0:28:59.325
<v Speaker 1>as well.

0:28:59.485 --> 0:29:01.005
<v Speaker 2>We're at your number two, Josh.

0:29:01.125 --> 0:29:05.205
<v Speaker 1>Okay for number two, this follows nicely your number three,

0:29:05.365 --> 0:29:08.165
<v Speaker 1>which was a pick of an X Men character who

0:29:08.205 --> 0:29:11.325
<v Speaker 1>hasn't really gotten their full due in some ways. Mine

0:29:11.405 --> 0:29:14.485
<v Speaker 1>is going to be Storm, and the director for that

0:29:14.605 --> 0:29:18.845
<v Speaker 1>character I think should be de Re's now. Storm has

0:29:18.885 --> 0:29:22.245
<v Speaker 1>been played by Halle Berry and alec Xandra Ship. So far,

0:29:22.485 --> 0:29:23.365
<v Speaker 1>I don't think.

0:29:23.165 --> 0:29:27.085
<v Speaker 2>You're going Mary j Blische might be a little on.

0:29:27.085 --> 0:29:30.725
<v Speaker 1>The older end. Okay, do I have someone cast for this?

0:29:30.845 --> 0:29:32.525
<v Speaker 1>Let me think about that. I'll see if I can

0:29:32.565 --> 0:29:35.045
<v Speaker 1>give you some come back to it. But for the

0:29:35.125 --> 0:29:38.765
<v Speaker 1>Storm movie and d Reees, I think there are a

0:29:38.805 --> 0:29:41.925
<v Speaker 1>couple of reasons this is a nice pairing. Reees has obviously,

0:29:41.965 --> 0:29:44.805
<v Speaker 1>as an African American woman, been a boundary breaking filmmaker,

0:29:45.285 --> 0:29:48.845
<v Speaker 1>with twenty eleven's Pariah and last year's Mudbound and Storm

0:29:49.085 --> 0:29:51.725
<v Speaker 1>boundary breaking character from what I could tell the first

0:29:51.725 --> 0:29:55.085
<v Speaker 1>black female superhero. Now, of course, the character was created

0:29:55.085 --> 0:29:58.125
<v Speaker 1>by white guys Okay Lenn Wine and Dave Cockrum in

0:29:58.205 --> 0:30:02.925
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventy five, and she's largely been depicted by white men,

0:30:03.005 --> 0:30:06.525
<v Speaker 1>both on the page and on the screen, so obviously

0:30:06.685 --> 0:30:09.285
<v Speaker 1>there are limitations to that, and I think that's why

0:30:09.365 --> 0:30:12.725
<v Speaker 1>rees could bring such a different and exciting perspective to

0:30:12.845 --> 0:30:15.165
<v Speaker 1>the character beyond the identity politics.

0:30:15.245 --> 0:30:15.525
<v Speaker 2>Though.

0:30:16.165 --> 0:30:18.845
<v Speaker 1>Reeves showed with mud Bound in particular that she has

0:30:18.885 --> 0:30:22.645
<v Speaker 1>an eye for landscape and weather. Think about that rainstorm

0:30:22.685 --> 0:30:25.925
<v Speaker 1>that Mudbound opens with, and Storm's power, of course, is

0:30:25.965 --> 0:30:29.885
<v Speaker 1>the ability to control just those things. I'd suggest that

0:30:30.085 --> 0:30:33.445
<v Speaker 1>Ree's also reteam with Rachel Morrison, who's up for an

0:30:33.485 --> 0:30:36.765
<v Speaker 1>Oscars for her work on mud Bound. Okay, so who

0:30:36.805 --> 0:30:41.805
<v Speaker 1>should play Storm? How about Tiana Parris, who was in

0:30:42.565 --> 0:30:46.645
<v Speaker 1>Dear White People and who I loved in Spike Lee's Shirak.

0:30:46.805 --> 0:30:50.565
<v Speaker 1>The sort of the lead role there really good. She

0:30:51.565 --> 0:30:52.725
<v Speaker 1>might make for a strong Storm.

0:30:52.765 --> 0:30:54.925
<v Speaker 2>I like it, And we're going to go from your pick.

0:30:55.005 --> 0:30:58.685
<v Speaker 2>What did you say, the first black female superhero? I

0:30:58.685 --> 0:31:02.525
<v Speaker 2>think so, Okay, Well, I've got the first black superhero,

0:31:02.565 --> 0:31:06.045
<v Speaker 2>at least in the DC Universe at my number two,

0:31:06.165 --> 0:31:13.325
<v Speaker 2>how about Josh Jordan Peel's Green Lantern starring Daniel Koluja.

0:31:13.485 --> 0:31:16.485
<v Speaker 1>Man, I can see this one happening me too.

0:31:16.565 --> 0:31:20.245
<v Speaker 2>And I don't mean that they're playing Hal Jordan, the

0:31:20.365 --> 0:31:23.765
<v Speaker 2>character that Ryan Reynolds played in the Green Lantern movie,

0:31:23.805 --> 0:31:27.685
<v Speaker 2>but he would play John Stewart, who debuted in Volume two,

0:31:28.085 --> 0:31:31.605
<v Speaker 2>number eighty seven back in December nineteen seventy one. Basically,

0:31:31.685 --> 0:31:34.125
<v Speaker 2>the artist Neil Adams came up with the notion of

0:31:34.165 --> 0:31:38.205
<v Speaker 2>having a substitute Green Lantern, and as it says here

0:31:38.285 --> 0:31:41.125
<v Speaker 2>from I think Wikipedia or maybe a DC site, the

0:31:41.165 --> 0:31:44.005
<v Speaker 2>decision to make the character black resulted from a conversation

0:31:44.125 --> 0:31:47.405
<v Speaker 2>between Adams and editor Julia Schwartz, in which Adams recounts

0:31:47.405 --> 0:31:49.885
<v Speaker 2>saying that given the racial makeup of the world's population,

0:31:50.285 --> 0:31:52.445
<v Speaker 2>we ought to have a black Green Lantern, not because

0:31:52.445 --> 0:31:54.965
<v Speaker 2>we're liberals, but because it just makes sense. And the

0:31:55.045 --> 0:31:58.045
<v Speaker 2>character was DC's first black superhero. So he's been a

0:31:58.085 --> 0:32:02.205
<v Speaker 2>recurring character in the Green Lantern universe ever since nineteen

0:32:02.245 --> 0:32:05.005
<v Speaker 2>seventy one, sometimes stepping in for how Jordan. At one

0:32:05.005 --> 0:32:07.605
<v Speaker 2>point he stepped down as Green Lantern, and I think

0:32:07.885 --> 0:32:10.405
<v Speaker 2>what it is, Josh, is the idea for me of

0:32:10.445 --> 0:32:13.685
<v Speaker 2>seeing a comedic take on the superhero genre. I know

0:32:13.725 --> 0:32:15.325
<v Speaker 2>we've seen it to an extent with some of the

0:32:15.365 --> 0:32:18.925
<v Speaker 2>humor and Guardians of the Galaxy, but really the vision

0:32:19.365 --> 0:32:22.565
<v Speaker 2>and the comedic sense of a director like Jordan Peele.

0:32:23.005 --> 0:32:25.765
<v Speaker 2>And maybe that's partly because I have seen the Ryan

0:32:25.805 --> 0:32:27.765
<v Speaker 2>Reynolds Green Lantern, which I think a lot of us

0:32:27.765 --> 0:32:29.645
<v Speaker 2>would agree was unintentionally funny.

0:32:30.205 --> 0:32:31.685
<v Speaker 1>Are you going to force me to admit that I

0:32:31.805 --> 0:32:32.445
<v Speaker 1>liked that movie?

0:32:32.605 --> 0:32:35.645
<v Speaker 2>God, well, this was worth it, just so you're on

0:32:35.685 --> 0:32:38.165
<v Speaker 2>the record saying you liked that movie.

0:32:38.325 --> 0:32:40.285
<v Speaker 1>But ro Ryan Reynolds Green Lantern.

0:32:40.285 --> 0:32:43.525
<v Speaker 2>See see that movie is unintentionally comic. I'd like to

0:32:43.525 --> 0:32:48.285
<v Speaker 2>see an intentionally comic take on Jon Stewart and Green Lantern.

0:32:48.285 --> 0:32:50.645
<v Speaker 2>And I think, obviously the racial overtones of everything we

0:32:50.885 --> 0:32:54.165
<v Speaker 2>just described, Jordan Peele would be the best person to

0:32:54.325 --> 0:32:59.005
<v Speaker 2>navigate that serious but also potentially hilarious terrain. And it

0:32:59.045 --> 0:33:02.085
<v Speaker 2>turns out I'm not that far off. In doing some research, Josh,

0:33:02.365 --> 0:33:05.005
<v Speaker 2>apparently Warner Brothers, at least I found this on a

0:33:05.005 --> 0:33:07.645
<v Speaker 2>website somewhere. Warner Brothers back in two thousand and four

0:33:08.085 --> 0:33:11.925
<v Speaker 2>hired Robert Smigel to make a Green Lantern comedy starring

0:33:12.005 --> 0:33:14.805
<v Speaker 2>Jack Black. Smigel said an interview that the premise that

0:33:14.845 --> 0:33:17.165
<v Speaker 2>the wrong guy gets the ring and can do all

0:33:17.285 --> 0:33:19.685
<v Speaker 2>kinds of goofy visual jokes because the visuals are so

0:33:19.725 --> 0:33:22.325
<v Speaker 2>potentially ridiculous. What appealed to me about it on a

0:33:22.325 --> 0:33:24.565
<v Speaker 2>comedic level was that in order to be a superhero

0:33:24.805 --> 0:33:27.965
<v Speaker 2>this requires no physical skill or talent. All it requires

0:33:28.045 --> 0:33:32.045
<v Speaker 2>is owning this ring automatically. That's a comedic premise. He's right,

0:33:32.125 --> 0:33:34.925
<v Speaker 2>He articulated way better than I could. The fact that

0:33:35.205 --> 0:33:37.765
<v Speaker 2>Green Lantern has just always struck me as a little

0:33:37.805 --> 0:33:40.685
<v Speaker 2>bit silly, and so bringing someone like Jordan Peele to

0:33:40.725 --> 0:33:44.725
<v Speaker 2>that material makes sense now. I also learned that there

0:33:44.805 --> 0:33:47.125
<v Speaker 2>is a movie that is scheduled to come out part

0:33:47.165 --> 0:33:51.285
<v Speaker 2>of this whole universe of films twenty twenty Green Lantern

0:33:51.405 --> 0:33:56.045
<v Speaker 2>core Man. At this point, there's no director attached. Maybe

0:33:56.045 --> 0:34:00.725
<v Speaker 2>they'll listen. There's no director attached, but it is described as,

0:34:01.005 --> 0:34:06.965
<v Speaker 2>according to one website, lethal weapon in space. So I'm

0:34:06.965 --> 0:34:09.685
<v Speaker 2>just saying that sounds kind of funny to me. You

0:34:09.725 --> 0:34:12.605
<v Speaker 2>take Jordan Peele, you take a guy like Koluja, who

0:34:12.685 --> 0:34:16.044
<v Speaker 2>they were so perfectly matched in Get Out, and that's

0:34:16.045 --> 0:34:18.925
<v Speaker 2>a movie that not only brings lots of different elements

0:34:18.965 --> 0:34:22.645
<v Speaker 2>to it, but the comedic merged with horror, merged with

0:34:22.885 --> 0:34:25.925
<v Speaker 2>some action. I feel like they are the right pairing

0:34:26.245 --> 0:34:27.405
<v Speaker 2>for a Green Lantern film.

0:34:27.485 --> 0:34:28.925
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna move that one to the front of the

0:34:28.965 --> 0:34:31.245
<v Speaker 1>production pipeline. Okay, we'll see if we can beat that

0:34:31.525 --> 0:34:34.645
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty release to theaters. Love it my number one,

0:34:35.405 --> 0:34:37.805
<v Speaker 1>I think, at least from the responses I saw on

0:34:37.845 --> 0:34:40.965
<v Speaker 1>social media, Greta Gerwig was probably the filmmaker who came

0:34:41.045 --> 0:34:44.925
<v Speaker 1>up the most all sorts of good recommendations from listeners.

0:34:45.005 --> 0:34:47.285
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not a surprise. She's riding so high on Ladybird

0:34:47.365 --> 0:34:49.365
<v Speaker 1>right now. She's just at the front of people's minds.

0:34:49.965 --> 0:34:52.884
<v Speaker 1>I knew I had my Gerwig match early on. This

0:34:52.925 --> 0:34:54.645
<v Speaker 1>is probably the first one I thought of and the

0:34:54.645 --> 0:34:57.285
<v Speaker 1>one I really would be the most excited to see. Okay,

0:34:57.325 --> 0:35:03.484
<v Speaker 1>Gretigerwig's Squirrel Girl. I take it you're unfamiliar with squirrel Girl.

0:35:03.525 --> 0:35:06.045
<v Speaker 2>I am I familiar, but already I'm sold.

0:35:06.885 --> 0:35:08.485
<v Speaker 1>All right. I can't blame you. I hadn't heard of

0:35:08.485 --> 0:35:11.645
<v Speaker 1>squirrel Girl either until I think it was Toronto International

0:35:11.725 --> 0:35:14.925
<v Speaker 1>film festal In twenty fifteen. Someone I was with wanted

0:35:14.965 --> 0:35:17.405
<v Speaker 1>to check out a comic shop, so I went in

0:35:17.445 --> 0:35:20.645
<v Speaker 1>looking for souvenirs for my kids and came across this series.

0:35:20.725 --> 0:35:23.005
<v Speaker 1>So I picked up an issue for my daughter. I'm

0:35:23.005 --> 0:35:26.245
<v Speaker 1>just going to share the Wikipedia description. Squirrel Girl is

0:35:26.285 --> 0:35:29.205
<v Speaker 1>a human superhero with a proportional strength and speed of

0:35:29.205 --> 0:35:31.885
<v Speaker 1>a squirrel, as well as the ability to speak with

0:35:32.005 --> 0:35:35.645
<v Speaker 1>squirrels like her sidekick tippy Toe. She can also command

0:35:35.685 --> 0:35:39.245
<v Speaker 1>an army of squirrels, which she typically uses to overwhelm

0:35:39.325 --> 0:35:42.525
<v Speaker 1>her foes. Now Believe it or not, comics legend Steve

0:35:42.565 --> 0:35:45.205
<v Speaker 1>Ditko I found out was actually involved with the character

0:35:45.245 --> 0:35:49.125
<v Speaker 1>when she first appeared in nineteen ninety one. The one

0:35:49.165 --> 0:35:51.645
<v Speaker 1>I picked up is a more recent one. It's from

0:35:51.685 --> 0:35:54.965
<v Speaker 1>her first solo series, The Unbeatable squirrel Girl, written by

0:35:55.045 --> 0:35:59.165
<v Speaker 1>Ryan North and drawn by Erica Henderson. Here in this run,

0:35:59.325 --> 0:36:02.565
<v Speaker 1>Squirrel Girl leaves the Avengers Mansion to pursue college life,

0:36:02.805 --> 0:36:06.285
<v Speaker 1>moving into a dorm and registering to study computer science.

0:36:06.805 --> 0:36:09.885
<v Speaker 1>So this is pretty much picking up where Ladybird left off,

0:36:09.925 --> 0:36:13.965
<v Speaker 1>only you know, with really weird superpowers. The issues I've

0:36:14.005 --> 0:36:17.484
<v Speaker 1>read are really clever. There's a nice appreciation but also

0:36:17.485 --> 0:36:21.485
<v Speaker 1>a tweaking of the Avengers mythology, and underneath it is

0:36:22.085 --> 0:36:24.525
<v Speaker 1>a true affection for this main character, who I should

0:36:24.525 --> 0:36:27.125
<v Speaker 1>probably note goes by the real name of Dorian Green.

0:36:27.965 --> 0:36:30.845
<v Speaker 1>And basically I could see Doreen Green and Ladybird hanging

0:36:30.885 --> 0:36:33.925
<v Speaker 1>out together on campus, which makes me think I'd really

0:36:33.965 --> 0:36:37.445
<v Speaker 1>like to see Gretegerwiggs squirrel girl who should be Doreen.

0:36:37.725 --> 0:36:40.045
<v Speaker 1>How about you know, at first, of course you think,

0:36:40.085 --> 0:36:42.884
<v Speaker 1>well circa Ronan, but that wouldn't quite be right. How

0:36:42.885 --> 0:36:47.165
<v Speaker 1>about Ladybird's best friend in Leading love It, Beanie Feldstein.

0:36:47.205 --> 0:36:51.125
<v Speaker 1>Beanie Feldstein Girl, Okay, got to happen? Sold that that

0:36:51.245 --> 0:36:53.685
<v Speaker 1>is such an inspired choice. I love Beanie Feldstein.

0:36:54.005 --> 0:36:55.725
<v Speaker 2>Okay. I don't know if I can top that with

0:36:55.805 --> 0:36:58.205
<v Speaker 2>my number one. This is the one, though, Josh, where

0:36:58.205 --> 0:37:01.125
<v Speaker 2>I'm just gonna give you the superhero first, because we

0:37:01.125 --> 0:37:03.005
<v Speaker 2>have a special guest who's going to play along with

0:37:03.005 --> 0:37:07.525
<v Speaker 2>our Shenanigans. Here, the character is the Vision and you

0:37:08.005 --> 0:37:12.005
<v Speaker 2>and other listeners may recall that when we reviewed Captain

0:37:12.005 --> 0:37:15.725
<v Speaker 2>America Age of Ultron maybe it was Civil War, where

0:37:16.085 --> 0:37:19.685
<v Speaker 2>I talked about the Vision. But he's born in Age

0:37:19.725 --> 0:37:23.165
<v Speaker 2>of Ultron. I mentioned during one of those reviews that

0:37:23.765 --> 0:37:25.884
<v Speaker 2>he was a fascinating character, and I kind of felt

0:37:25.885 --> 0:37:27.924
<v Speaker 2>like he got sidelined a little bit. He's a very

0:37:27.965 --> 0:37:30.085
<v Speaker 2>powerful character, and they didn't really deal with him maybe

0:37:30.085 --> 0:37:32.045
<v Speaker 2>as well as I would have liked, especially in some

0:37:32.085 --> 0:37:34.045
<v Speaker 2>of those battle scenes. People wrote in they said, if

0:37:34.085 --> 0:37:35.165
<v Speaker 2>you like the vision, or you want to know more

0:37:35.205 --> 0:37:37.725
<v Speaker 2>about the Vision, you have to read the new version

0:37:37.765 --> 0:37:40.925
<v Speaker 2>of the Vision written by Tom King. I did that

0:37:41.605 --> 0:37:44.125
<v Speaker 2>and thought it was brilliant. It also turns out Tom

0:37:44.205 --> 0:37:47.325
<v Speaker 2>King longtime Film Spotting listener. He's left us a voicemailer

0:37:47.365 --> 0:37:50.725
<v Speaker 2>two over the years. And so I thought, if I'm

0:37:50.765 --> 0:37:54.205
<v Speaker 2>going to project onto the Vision the director that I

0:37:54.205 --> 0:37:56.925
<v Speaker 2>think is best for the material, why not go right

0:37:56.965 --> 0:37:59.245
<v Speaker 2>to the guy who wrote the vision and let's have

0:37:59.445 --> 0:38:03.645
<v Speaker 2>him explain who would bring the proper vision to his material.

0:38:03.845 --> 0:38:06.685
<v Speaker 5>Hello Film Spotting Listener, this is Tom King. I'm the

0:38:06.725 --> 0:38:09.405
<v Speaker 5>writer of Batman for DC Comics and The Vision for

0:38:09.445 --> 0:38:11.845
<v Speaker 5>Marvel Comics, and I've been kindly asked you, in my opinion,

0:38:11.845 --> 0:38:15.685
<v Speaker 5>who could be the director of the Vision movie. My

0:38:15.965 --> 0:38:19.445
<v Speaker 5>first instinct, is a loyal Film Spotting listener, is to

0:38:20.205 --> 0:38:24.884
<v Speaker 5>both go arts to cheat maybe resurrect Igmar Bergmann from

0:38:24.925 --> 0:38:27.765
<v Speaker 5>the grave to do a vision with a lot of

0:38:28.205 --> 0:38:32.925
<v Speaker 5>robots staring at mirrors. But then I thought, no, what

0:38:33.125 --> 0:38:36.525
<v Speaker 5>do I really want to get out of a Vision movie?

0:38:36.725 --> 0:38:41.845
<v Speaker 5>And the answer was obvious, and it's money, lots of money.

0:38:43.405 --> 0:38:45.325
<v Speaker 5>So then my mind went to how how can I

0:38:45.325 --> 0:38:51.765
<v Speaker 5>accomplish that noble goal? And I was thinking, well, I mean,

0:38:51.885 --> 0:38:55.765
<v Speaker 5>James Cameron made the biggest money making movie of all time

0:38:55.805 --> 0:38:58.125
<v Speaker 5>with Avatar, and I can't really speak too much of

0:38:58.125 --> 0:39:00.445
<v Speaker 5>the writing of Vision, but I feel it's a it's

0:39:00.445 --> 0:39:04.925
<v Speaker 5>a better basis than Avatar for a movie. So you know,

0:39:05.565 --> 0:39:09.085
<v Speaker 5>Urmader Aliens are pretty good movies. So yeah, if I

0:39:09.125 --> 0:39:11.485
<v Speaker 5>had to pick one person to make a Vision movie,

0:39:12.005 --> 0:39:15.125
<v Speaker 5>I'm going to James Cameron. And I don't have like

0:39:15.285 --> 0:39:17.125
<v Speaker 5>Atom level kids, but I have enough kids to put

0:39:17.125 --> 0:39:21.325
<v Speaker 5>through college that I think that would work. Thank you

0:39:21.365 --> 0:39:25.205
<v Speaker 5>Film Spotting, and thank you Adam and Josh. Appreciate the

0:39:25.205 --> 0:39:26.285
<v Speaker 5>show and I'll keep listening.

0:39:27.445 --> 0:39:29.165
<v Speaker 2>Well, who does have Adam level kids?

0:39:29.285 --> 0:39:29.405
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:39:29.485 --> 0:39:33.965
<v Speaker 2>Josh? Okay, thank you so much, Tom King. James Cameron

0:39:34.285 --> 0:39:35.845
<v Speaker 2>a great choice. And here's why. Let me give you

0:39:35.845 --> 0:39:39.085
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of background about the Vision and the

0:39:39.165 --> 0:39:43.245
<v Speaker 2>storyline that Tom King explores in the recent Marvel series.

0:39:43.285 --> 0:39:46.605
<v Speaker 2>This is the little synopsis. The Vision wants to be human,

0:39:46.965 --> 0:39:49.245
<v Speaker 2>and what's more human than family. So he heads back

0:39:49.285 --> 0:39:51.805
<v Speaker 2>to the beginning, to the laboratory where Ultron created him

0:39:51.965 --> 0:39:54.325
<v Speaker 2>and molded him into a weapon, the place where he

0:39:54.365 --> 0:39:56.965
<v Speaker 2>first rebelled against his given destiny and imagined that he

0:39:57.005 --> 0:39:59.485
<v Speaker 2>could be more, that he could be a man. There

0:39:59.525 --> 0:40:03.205
<v Speaker 2>he builds them a wife, Virginia, two teenage twins, Viv

0:40:03.285 --> 0:40:05.765
<v Speaker 2>and Vin. They look like him, they have his powers,

0:40:05.805 --> 0:40:09.005
<v Speaker 2>They share his grandest ambition or is that obsession, the

0:40:09.125 --> 0:40:13.645
<v Speaker 2>unrelenting need to be ordinary? Behold the Visions. So based

0:40:13.685 --> 0:40:15.525
<v Speaker 2>on that, you can see why Cameron, besides just the

0:40:15.525 --> 0:40:17.525
<v Speaker 2>money factor and the fact that he'd probably bring in

0:40:17.605 --> 0:40:20.205
<v Speaker 2>some box office why the guy who did make the

0:40:20.245 --> 0:40:24.125
<v Speaker 2>movies Tom including the Terminator movies and these films about

0:40:24.165 --> 0:40:28.285
<v Speaker 2>these alternate beings, would be a good fit for the Vision.

0:40:28.325 --> 0:40:32.285
<v Speaker 2>But here's my dream scenario for the Vision, And I love, love,

0:40:32.365 --> 0:40:35.605
<v Speaker 2>love Paul Bettany as the Vision. He's an actor I adore,

0:40:35.965 --> 0:40:38.685
<v Speaker 2>so I really don't want to recast him. But if

0:40:38.725 --> 0:40:42.844
<v Speaker 2>I had to recast him, I want to see the

0:40:42.965 --> 0:40:48.365
<v Speaker 2>Cone Brothers, The Vision oh Man starring Leonardo DiCaprio.

0:40:48.605 --> 0:40:49.525
<v Speaker 1>Oh my goodness.

0:40:50.565 --> 0:40:53.765
<v Speaker 2>Part of it is just wanting to see Leo work

0:40:53.805 --> 0:40:56.245
<v Speaker 2>with the Cone Brothers. He worked with that, I think

0:40:56.245 --> 0:40:59.605
<v Speaker 2>he could. He has worked with everybody, all the big directors.

0:40:59.645 --> 0:41:02.485
<v Speaker 2>The Cone Brothers are maybe the biggest name on the

0:41:02.525 --> 0:41:05.485
<v Speaker 2>list that he still hasn't collaborated with. And he doesn't

0:41:05.525 --> 0:41:10.685
<v Speaker 2>have maybe the mannered style of acting that Paul Bettany brings,

0:41:10.725 --> 0:41:12.805
<v Speaker 2>the kind of technique we don't think of him that

0:41:12.885 --> 0:41:17.965
<v Speaker 2>way as he plays this synthetic character, this robot character.

0:41:18.485 --> 0:41:21.285
<v Speaker 2>But I think DiCaprio could do it. And I also

0:41:21.365 --> 0:41:22.844
<v Speaker 2>think that he could sort of bring to it that

0:41:22.885 --> 0:41:27.685
<v Speaker 2>bubbling underneath angst where he's always trying to restrain himself

0:41:27.725 --> 0:41:32.805
<v Speaker 2>and play that perfectly composed character, that machine that doesn't

0:41:32.805 --> 0:41:35.725
<v Speaker 2>overreact to scenarios, and yet with DiCaprio, it would just

0:41:35.805 --> 0:41:38.125
<v Speaker 2>be there. It couldn't help, but be there under the surface.

0:41:38.325 --> 0:41:41.045
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that would definitely make it more of a satire.

0:41:41.165 --> 0:41:43.165
<v Speaker 1>I think if the Cohen's got their hands on it,

0:41:43.205 --> 0:41:47.485
<v Speaker 1>and having read this series, that's definitely there, you know,

0:41:47.525 --> 0:41:51.325
<v Speaker 1>there are, Yeah, there are satirical elements. So I see

0:41:51.325 --> 0:41:54.525
<v Speaker 1>how that could go Yes, it's also a very like

0:41:54.805 --> 0:41:56.485
<v Speaker 1>loneliness comes to mind.

0:41:56.805 --> 0:41:58.685
<v Speaker 2>That's a big part of it. Josh and I think

0:41:58.805 --> 0:42:02.725
<v Speaker 2>this series, the vision is about this family in the suburbs,

0:42:02.765 --> 0:42:05.005
<v Speaker 2>and so even though we didn't even see it, we

0:42:05.085 --> 0:42:07.325
<v Speaker 2>know they wrote Suburbicon, but it's not that because I

0:42:07.365 --> 0:42:09.725
<v Speaker 2>didn't see it. What I'm really thinking of more and

0:42:09.805 --> 0:42:12.525
<v Speaker 2>there are other examples, certainly from their filmography that fit

0:42:12.725 --> 0:42:15.005
<v Speaker 2>with the vision. But A Serious Man a movie that

0:42:15.045 --> 0:42:17.805
<v Speaker 2>does take place in the suburbs where everything is supposed

0:42:17.845 --> 0:42:20.805
<v Speaker 2>to be perfect, and yet within each house, certainly the

0:42:20.805 --> 0:42:24.165
<v Speaker 2>house that we look into, the Gopnik house, we see

0:42:24.205 --> 0:42:27.285
<v Speaker 2>all those secrets and all the things that are under

0:42:27.405 --> 0:42:30.805
<v Speaker 2>the surface. And also we see a character where his

0:42:30.925 --> 0:42:35.045
<v Speaker 2>reality and dogma, the ideals, the things he subscribes to,

0:42:35.165 --> 0:42:39.645
<v Speaker 2>or let's say, his programming, when those are challenged and destroyed,

0:42:40.005 --> 0:42:43.645
<v Speaker 2>how do you react in that scenario? And at its core,

0:42:43.765 --> 0:42:47.325
<v Speaker 2>the vision is about what makes us human, what makes

0:42:47.405 --> 0:42:51.045
<v Speaker 2>a man? These big existential questions that I have always

0:42:51.045 --> 0:42:54.125
<v Speaker 2>ascribed to the Coen Brothers' work, even some of their

0:42:54.245 --> 0:42:58.365
<v Speaker 2>most specific genre work. Those questions are being asked throughout

0:42:58.445 --> 0:43:01.125
<v Speaker 2>questions about what our destiny is the notion of fate,

0:43:01.285 --> 0:43:03.805
<v Speaker 2>how in control we are of our actions. I don't

0:43:03.805 --> 0:43:07.045
<v Speaker 2>think anybody explores that material better than the Cones, and

0:43:07.085 --> 0:43:10.325
<v Speaker 2>they also, Josh explore it with humor. You brought in

0:43:10.365 --> 0:43:12.725
<v Speaker 2>the notion of satire. I think that's there in the

0:43:12.845 --> 0:43:16.685
<v Speaker 2>vision amidst all that darkness and bloodshed and those elements

0:43:16.725 --> 0:43:20.885
<v Speaker 2>are in the vision. There's a comic absurdity to just

0:43:21.125 --> 0:43:24.805
<v Speaker 2>existence that they always draw out. So that's my dream project.

0:43:25.045 --> 0:43:27.765
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, when I was thinking about the vision, this is

0:43:27.845 --> 0:43:30.605
<v Speaker 1>not going to get Tom King any money this version

0:43:30.645 --> 0:43:32.965
<v Speaker 1>of it. Okay, this goes back to the loneliness idea

0:43:33.365 --> 0:43:35.245
<v Speaker 1>after seeing a ghost story. I won't know what David

0:43:35.245 --> 0:43:37.285
<v Speaker 1>Lowry would do with it. Good luck that would zero in,

0:43:37.325 --> 0:43:39.205
<v Speaker 1>maybe on a little bit of a different angle, but

0:43:39.525 --> 0:43:42.404
<v Speaker 1>would definitely capture some of the essence of what's going

0:43:42.445 --> 0:43:43.245
<v Speaker 1>on in King's work.

0:43:43.405 --> 0:43:47.285
<v Speaker 2>Okay, those are our top five superhero director combos we'd

0:43:47.365 --> 0:43:49.045
<v Speaker 2>like to see. We think you have your work cut

0:43:49.045 --> 0:43:50.925
<v Speaker 2>out for you. If you're going to challenge those or

0:43:51.005 --> 0:43:53.085
<v Speaker 2>come up with better ones, you can email us feedback

0:43:53.085 --> 0:43:56.725
<v Speaker 2>at filmspotting dot net. Before we get to any honorable mentions,

0:43:56.725 --> 0:43:59.685
<v Speaker 2>we do have one more listener pick we want to play.

0:43:59.885 --> 0:44:03.605
<v Speaker 3>Hey guys, this is Eric Hill from Frederick tan your Brotherswick, Canada.

0:44:04.365 --> 0:44:07.845
<v Speaker 3>I think maybe my suggestion is David Lynch, as I

0:44:07.885 --> 0:44:10.845
<v Speaker 3>would like to probably suggest David Lynch almost anything, but

0:44:11.645 --> 0:44:14.125
<v Speaker 3>my initial desire would be to see him do something

0:44:14.165 --> 0:44:16.965
<v Speaker 3>with the Hulk. But since there's so many Hulk movies already,

0:44:17.405 --> 0:44:19.805
<v Speaker 3>the next logical step would be a she Hulk movie.

0:44:19.805 --> 0:44:22.845
<v Speaker 3>You no she Hulk in Marvel Comics is the cousin,

0:44:22.925 --> 0:44:27.445
<v Speaker 3>of course of Hulk also irradiated, And I thought Lynch,

0:44:27.605 --> 0:44:31.085
<v Speaker 3>with his way of dealing with externalized depictions of multiple

0:44:31.085 --> 0:44:34.404
<v Speaker 3>personalities and women in trouble, would be a natural thing.

0:44:34.925 --> 0:44:37.045
<v Speaker 3>But to put a Lynch spin on it, perhaps he

0:44:37.125 --> 0:44:40.925
<v Speaker 3>could ditch the whole CGI angle and just cast two

0:44:41.005 --> 0:44:45.045
<v Speaker 3>different actresses to play the same part. Perhaps maybe Naomi

0:44:45.165 --> 0:44:49.245
<v Speaker 3>Watts playing Jennifer Walters the lawyer part of the duo,

0:44:49.325 --> 0:44:52.725
<v Speaker 3>and Uma Thurman playing sort of an angrier lawyer part

0:44:52.765 --> 0:44:56.325
<v Speaker 3>of the duo. And I don't know beyond that, what

0:44:56.325 --> 0:44:58.845
<v Speaker 3>would they fight, what would they battle? Some sort of

0:44:59.085 --> 0:45:02.325
<v Speaker 3>microwave planet. I don't know, So long as maybe the

0:45:02.445 --> 0:45:05.525
<v Speaker 3>villain at the end was a mutated version of Bobby

0:45:05.525 --> 0:45:09.085
<v Speaker 3>Peru from Wild at Heart. Anyway, it's a loose idea

0:45:09.125 --> 0:45:11.285
<v Speaker 3>for now, but you kind of get where it's going.

0:45:11.645 --> 0:45:13.645
<v Speaker 3>Thanks a lot and have a great show.

0:45:14.165 --> 0:45:15.925
<v Speaker 2>Well, if he didn't have me at David Lynch, and

0:45:15.965 --> 0:45:18.325
<v Speaker 2>he did, he certainly had me when he added Naomi

0:45:18.365 --> 0:45:21.885
<v Speaker 2>Watson Uma Thurman, and then it was really sold. Bobby Perue,

0:45:22.165 --> 0:45:23.565
<v Speaker 2>I thought you had you at she Hulk.

0:45:23.805 --> 0:45:24.925
<v Speaker 1>I beg you for a big.

0:45:24.765 --> 0:45:26.605
<v Speaker 2>She Hulk guy. No nostalage.

0:45:27.085 --> 0:45:28.125
<v Speaker 1>Your credibility ends there.

0:45:28.165 --> 0:45:28.525
<v Speaker 6>Indeed.

0:45:28.725 --> 0:45:30.884
<v Speaker 1>All right, so my honorable mentions, I'm just gonna list

0:45:30.925 --> 0:45:33.965
<v Speaker 1>a few others from listeners because, as I said, Gretg

0:45:33.965 --> 0:45:37.325
<v Speaker 1>Gerwig was so popular. Here are four Gerwig options I

0:45:37.325 --> 0:45:40.885
<v Speaker 1>heard from Taylor s Cole, Kitty Pride from Aaron Schaeffer,

0:45:41.205 --> 0:45:44.965
<v Speaker 1>Dazzler from Dave Enna Batman, and then at film Guy

0:45:45.045 --> 0:45:47.285
<v Speaker 1>six one nine went with Batgirl.

0:45:47.365 --> 0:45:49.685
<v Speaker 2>You made that up Film Guy six one nine.

0:45:49.725 --> 0:45:51.725
<v Speaker 1>No, you'll find him there on Twitter.

0:45:52.045 --> 0:45:54.605
<v Speaker 2>Well, speaking of Twitter, we do have to give some

0:45:54.685 --> 0:45:57.885
<v Speaker 2>credit here, I think to Robert Lewis, the Reverend Robert Lewis,

0:45:58.085 --> 0:46:00.285
<v Speaker 2>who wrote in going back to the very start of

0:46:00.325 --> 0:46:03.165
<v Speaker 2>this segment with Wes Anderson directing a reboot of the

0:46:03.165 --> 0:46:06.245
<v Speaker 2>original X Men in their original yellow and blue uniforms.

0:46:06.525 --> 0:46:08.565
<v Speaker 2>He would do a great job with properly weaving their

0:46:08.565 --> 0:46:11.565
<v Speaker 2>intricate stories together, his focusing on characters, his use of

0:46:11.565 --> 0:46:15.645
<v Speaker 2>detailed sets, and exploration of emotions. So I'm guessing I'm

0:46:15.645 --> 0:46:17.045
<v Speaker 2>going to give Robert the credit that he has not

0:46:17.165 --> 0:46:20.525
<v Speaker 2>seen that YouTube video and instead was just going off

0:46:20.525 --> 0:46:22.205
<v Speaker 2>of what you would like to see you but write

0:46:22.205 --> 0:46:26.125
<v Speaker 2>in line with that YouTube video. Certainly, I was so

0:46:27.085 --> 0:46:30.205
<v Speaker 2>worn out I expended all my creative juices Josh on

0:46:30.285 --> 0:46:32.525
<v Speaker 2>those top five, and I love my top five. So

0:46:32.605 --> 0:46:35.445
<v Speaker 2>I don't have any more pitches to give you. I

0:46:35.485 --> 0:46:37.924
<v Speaker 2>do have just a few names. I jotted down two

0:46:37.965 --> 0:46:41.125
<v Speaker 2>of them. You mentioned de Reese and Greta Gerwig. What

0:46:41.205 --> 0:46:46.325
<v Speaker 2>about Barry Jenkins, Sean Baker, Jeremy sonje Spike Lee doing

0:46:46.365 --> 0:46:49.045
<v Speaker 2>a superhero movie? And then a lot of people wrote

0:46:49.085 --> 0:46:51.085
<v Speaker 2>in and said, well, you know, Edgar Wright could just

0:46:51.125 --> 0:46:53.325
<v Speaker 2>make ant Man, Yes, and that would be great.

0:46:53.365 --> 0:46:55.005
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot of ant Man angst relives.

0:46:55.045 --> 0:46:57.525
<v Speaker 2>So those are some directors I'd like to see a

0:46:57.565 --> 0:47:02.325
<v Speaker 2>couple other superheroes. Batgirl. We haven't gotten the Batgirl movie yet,

0:47:02.365 --> 0:47:05.605
<v Speaker 2>so a take on that could be intriguing. One of

0:47:05.605 --> 0:47:08.404
<v Speaker 2>our favorite villains came up on a recent top five

0:47:08.485 --> 0:47:10.965
<v Speaker 2>superhero costumes. We did we really are the show about

0:47:10.965 --> 0:47:13.844
<v Speaker 2>superhero pretty much? Maybe maybe we really do have geek cred.

0:47:13.925 --> 0:47:16.845
<v Speaker 2>What am I talking about? Rorshak? Let's give Roschak his

0:47:16.925 --> 0:47:19.045
<v Speaker 2>own movie, right and find a director who knows how

0:47:19.045 --> 0:47:22.844
<v Speaker 2>to make those kind of great, pulpy noir stories. And

0:47:22.885 --> 0:47:28.605
<v Speaker 2>then we need someone to do justice to Daredevil because

0:47:29.125 --> 0:47:32.285
<v Speaker 2>the ben Affleck Daredevil. I know the there's a series.

0:47:32.325 --> 0:47:33.765
<v Speaker 2>I think it was a Netflix series. I have not

0:47:33.885 --> 0:47:36.725
<v Speaker 2>watched that series. I'm just saying for the big screen,

0:47:37.285 --> 0:47:40.205
<v Speaker 2>we need to redeem the ben Affleck Daredevil. I don't

0:47:40.205 --> 0:47:42.245
<v Speaker 2>know who the best director is for that. Maybe one

0:47:42.285 --> 0:47:44.964
<v Speaker 2>of the names I mentioned, maybe a Jeremy Sonier would

0:47:45.005 --> 0:47:46.365
<v Speaker 2>be great for Daredevil.

0:47:46.445 --> 0:47:49.725
<v Speaker 1>This is going to shock you also mildly positive. I'm

0:47:49.805 --> 0:47:54.165
<v Speaker 1>the ben Affleck Daredevil. Did do I get any credit

0:47:54.285 --> 0:47:54.605
<v Speaker 1>for that?

0:47:54.885 --> 0:47:55.205
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:47:55.325 --> 0:47:56.485
<v Speaker 1>Or did I know? Actually?

0:47:56.645 --> 0:47:58.885
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, now you're your whole list has been stricken from

0:47:58.925 --> 0:47:59.365
<v Speaker 2>the record.

0:48:00.045 --> 0:48:06.725
<v Speaker 6>He can hear it before it makes a sound, he

0:48:06.805 --> 0:48:09.325
<v Speaker 6>can sense it before it happens.

0:48:09.485 --> 0:48:12.645
<v Speaker 2>So those are the superhero director combos that we'd like

0:48:12.725 --> 0:48:15.005
<v Speaker 2>to see. We'd love to hear. We know it's an

0:48:15.005 --> 0:48:16.845
<v Speaker 2>old top five, but we'd love to hear whether or

0:48:16.845 --> 0:48:19.485
<v Speaker 2>not you'd like to see those combos, or if you

0:48:19.645 --> 0:48:23.685
<v Speaker 2>have better producer vision than we do, you can let

0:48:23.765 --> 0:48:24.005
<v Speaker 2>us know.

0:48:24.085 --> 0:48:28.325
<v Speaker 1>It's been eight years and another years have been greenlit.

0:48:29.765 --> 0:48:32.045
<v Speaker 2>I don't not that, not that we're aware, unless someone

0:48:32.405 --> 0:48:34.725
<v Speaker 2>maybe it's in development, Maybe someone took our ideas.

0:48:34.805 --> 0:48:37.645
<v Speaker 1>Let's say that, Yeah, yeah, they're all in development.

0:48:38.965 --> 0:48:44.964
<v Speaker 2>Yes, in our minds they're all in development. Thanks for listening, everyone.

0:48:45.045 --> 0:48:48.005
<v Speaker 3>This conversation can serve no purpose anymore.

0:48:48.885 --> 0:48:49.365
<v Speaker 2>The fine