WEBVTT - Big Take: Cathie Wood Bad Spring Only A Blip 

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Well in financial markets,

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the rise of Kathy Wood and her ARC Funds has

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>just been extraordinary, and it's been predicated in large part

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>upon the cool new technologies that are out there that

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:34.480
<v Speaker 1>they've really embraced in terms of investments, think no further

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:37.199
<v Speaker 1>uh than Tesla. But the recent months have been a

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:39.559
<v Speaker 1>little bit challenging. Let's dig into it. We can do

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:42.200
<v Speaker 1>that with Ben Stepherman. He's a pronounce personal finance editor

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg News. Ben, thanks so much for joining us here.

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 1>The big take story here's Kathy Wood's bad spring is

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>a blip when the future is so magnificent. Tell us

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>what you found about Kathy Wood and the ARC Funds. Yeah,

0:00:56.720 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>so this story looks at She's been such a phenomenon

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>over the last year. You know, she's sort of perfectly

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>captured the mood of the market last year UM, when

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, we were also a lot of people were

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:14.400
<v Speaker 1>stuck inside and UM people wanted nothing more to than

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to look forward to the future, to this too, in

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:19.479
<v Speaker 1>this beautiful future that Kathy Would is talking about, which

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:24.400
<v Speaker 1>is one of rapid technological change and UM one where

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>investors can make a lot of money by betting on

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 1>innovative companies. So those companies just really soared through up

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>until about February and then they kind of turned over

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and she's had a really rough spring. So so the

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 1>story looks at her, and it really looks at her

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:41.959
<v Speaker 1>vision of the world and and how she sees she

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>what basically what what the vision that she's selling to

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 1>investors than the one that she thinks she can make

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>money on if you're patient. I always think UM the

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>timing is perfect for Kathy Would and E T S

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>as well, right, because I've been following UM these exchange

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>traded funds for a good decade. I always try and

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>get Eric Balcunas on the show. He's like our resident

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>UM genius on E T F. There's never been a

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:14.239
<v Speaker 1>breakout manager with the kind of fame that Cathy Wood

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>has in this sector of finance. And it's like the

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 1>generational um timing is perfect, right because the kids are

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>now investing and they're doing it through E t S

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and this is an e t F that speaks to

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>them because they hear about it on their social media platforms.

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>She's such a throwback in some ways, not just an

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 1>E t S but just in investing generally. Like who

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>is the last person who really appealed to read? Who's

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:47.959
<v Speaker 1>the last manager that really appealed to the retail investor?

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 1>You have to go back to, like you know, like

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 1>you guess Warren Buffett is is some in some ways

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:55.239
<v Speaker 1>or around the two thousand's, but we've had this long

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>period where people have been really really all about the

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>index funds and passive past of investment, and we haven't

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:05.559
<v Speaker 1>had a big star come along and capture retail investors imagination.

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 1>And and here she comes along and she's UM. Not

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>only not in the mutual fund world, she's in the

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>E t F world. That she's a woman, you know,

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>is very male dominated UM industry. UM. I think she's

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:21.079
<v Speaker 1>That's that's just a fascinating phenomenon. Ben, Is there anyone

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 1>else in E T S? Is there any other a

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>t S manager that we all know. No, I don't

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>think so, otherwise Ben would have written a story on them. Um, yeah, Ben,

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>what is uh what is the thinking here? I mean,

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>what is Cathy Wood saying now about her her strategies here,

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>given that her performance has lagged over the last uh

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 1>you know quarter or so. What she says is you

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>gotta gotta keep the faith. That's what she says. And

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>she's a religious person and I really think that that

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 1>her views about technology and in religion and kind of

0:03:58.160 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>they kind of aligned a little bit. But but she

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>say to people is, um, we were like, the this

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 1>sell off and the innovative stocks just means that we

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>have we're going to make more money over the long term.

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>They think that that their portfolio can triple over the

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>next five years. They have these very bullish um estimates

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>for what's going to happen to say, electric vehicles or

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:23.839
<v Speaker 1>DNA sequencing or artificial intelligence, and a lot of the

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 1>traditional analysts on the street are just like, think, these

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 1>these things are completely crazy and a little delusional. But um,

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 1>she has been proved and right, I mean in terms

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 1>of at least Bitcoin and Tesla when she made targets,

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 1>price targets for them a couple few years ago. Um,

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:43.039
<v Speaker 1>they eventually were hit, um and what they were huge.

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>There was a huge amount of skepticism at the time.

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:48.720
<v Speaker 1>But but you know, basically, for for her to be

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:52.280
<v Speaker 1>proven right, technological change really has to accelerate coming out

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 1>of this pandemic and and you know it may but

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll see if that actually makes our money. It's so

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>weird that that that um, you know, the read it

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:05.920
<v Speaker 1>uh phenomenon has boosted her along with these really um,

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean bitcoin is in some ways I read it

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon as well. Now it's kind of moved to Twitter.

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 1>But um, she's got this millennial draw even though, as

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:19.920
<v Speaker 1>you point out, her mentor is Art Laugher, who is

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 1>like a psion of the eighties. And right now as

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 1>we're going through this real shift from reagan Omics over

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the last forty years too, now the era of six

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:35.279
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollar big government budgets, um from President Biden. She

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 1>still she's she's now coming on and reigning Supreme Yeah,

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 1>she's a really contradiction. I mean, she's sixty five years old.

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess she's capturing the attention of all these young

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>investors and she's politically conservative, but yet she's also huge

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>investor in green investments and she doesn't use the word

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 1>climate change a lot, but she's she's been a champion

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>of Tesla and other kind of and the investors are

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>sticking with our aren't they been? I mean there, I

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:04.359
<v Speaker 1>mean there's just been some redemptions, but not that much. No,

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>like fairly a billion dollars has come out of the

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:12.600
<v Speaker 1>funds um since February. And she's she's really people are

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 1>really sticking with her, and she does a good she

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:17.719
<v Speaker 1>goes on she she really wouldn't have an in depth

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:20.840
<v Speaker 1>interview with us for this long profile, but she's been

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>on the on the records so much, so many times

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>she comes on TV. She does conferences once a week

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>she's on Yeah, and and that really helped that communication strategy.

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 1>She really gets out there and tells a story to

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>people about about what they can get. They just a

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>patient and stick with her. I mean, in some ways,

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 1>she's really going to benefit from this new era of

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:45.799
<v Speaker 1>big spending as well, right because um, as we build

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:49.160
<v Speaker 1>out the infrastructure and invest in this in that country,

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 1>this country is well. Here in Germany, we're helping out

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Tesla and you know the electronic vehicles. Yeah, her vision

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>for where the economy is headed is is pretty interesting.

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, do you think that inflation is not going

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:06.160
<v Speaker 1>to be a problem because he's an innovation these because

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 1>these technologies really are guys. The cost of a lot

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of these technologies is going to fall as they become

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>more popular. And all right, he's not worried about the

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 1>economy overheating at all. Ben, congratulations to you and Annie

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and Claire on this Bloomberg Business We cover story as well.

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>It's an awesome cover. I recommend our listeners check it out.

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>If you have a Bloomberg terminal sitting in front of you,

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 1>just type NI big take go to see this story.

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Cathy Wood's bad spring is a blip when the future

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>is so magnificent. This is Bloomberg. Well. One of the

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 1>areas of the economy that really got a boost during

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic was sports betting online and gaming. People were

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>stuck at home, and the more and more states are

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 1>allowing sports betting off site, electronic sports betting, it's been

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 1>a big growth driver. Mike Tavarrella, he's Chamber of the

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Board of LLIS Game Technolo logies. He joins us to

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 1>talk about this business pre pandemic, post pandemic. Mike, thanks

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us here. I love for you

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>to just talk to us a little bit, just give

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>us a brief description of what LS game Technology is.

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 1>What do you guys do? Sure? Well, great, good good morning, gentlemen.

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Um So just l L Game Technology has been in

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the leisure sports betting business for about twenty years, primarily

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 1>in the Italian market, which is a hugely competitive market

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>in Europe. In Italy were UH we're customer facing, would

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 1>beat the sea licenses, both online and land based. And

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>we own our own technology stack and that text stack

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 1>that we own we developed it only a few years ago,

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:41.319
<v Speaker 1>so it's considered one of the newest betting platforms in

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the world. And if I got put an analogy to

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 1>building buildings and real estate, it's kind of like a

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:50.680
<v Speaker 1>design build where we, you know, took time to understand

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the behavior of betters, what our clients were driving for.

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>And we uniquely designed this platform to specifically work in

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:02.199
<v Speaker 1>the sports betting UH world, and that's our current business

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and and in one we're looking at coming into the

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>US and capitalize them on the brilliant growth opportunity here,

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>since possible is repealing. So what how does this work? Then?

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Can I bet on Buckeyes football? Do I bet on

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 1>um Paul Sweeney's knicks in the NBA? UM? Can I

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>bet on no hitters in in Major League Baseball? What? What? What? What?

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Betting goes? Sure? So so I guess the first point

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:32.680
<v Speaker 1>about that is that sport, any any h sports bet

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 1>that you are permitted to do in any regional jurisdiction,

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>if you will, is always dependent upon the regulation in

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:42.199
<v Speaker 1>the area. So for example, in Italy, we're our our

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 1>clients are able to bet on just about anything under

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the sun, as you would imagine, and we as an

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 1>operator get a full feed from our data providers and

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:52.959
<v Speaker 1>we use a variety of them UH and and then

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:56.679
<v Speaker 1>we distribute it. And of course the primary UH products

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 1>like say in Europe and saw in Italy it'll be

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>soccer right song in US like that will differ on

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>state to state basis. And obviously, but if you want

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:11.439
<v Speaker 1>to bet on the Buckeyes, UH, certainly, if our feed

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>provides it, then we'll be able to allow you to

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>bet on it, depending on the area that you're in.

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>So it just seems Mike that sports betting. I live

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>in New Jersey where it's been legal for some time. Um,

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 1>it's just all over the place. It's all over sports

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:29.560
<v Speaker 1>or radio. In terms of the ads for you know,

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>as this economy reopens, one of the key areas is

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:36.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of restaurants and entertainment venues. Do you expect sports

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:40.719
<v Speaker 1>betting to be integrated into that kind of experience? Well,

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:42.559
<v Speaker 1>let me just say this way. UM. You know, the

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>European market is more or less a leading indicator. And

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 1>when you look at, um, at what where people are

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>able to uh to bet in those jurisdictions, Like they

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>can go to a local coffee shop or a sports

0:10:56.880 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>betting Uh, you know outfit so easy ag when you

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>walk into like an agency where you can bet on

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:07.439
<v Speaker 1>on anything. Um. That model there has been active in

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Europe for the better part of twenty years. And we

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 1>see that ultimately in the United States, after the repeal

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 1>have passed a couple of years ago, a lot of

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the states sort of took out the opportunity and get started. Uh.

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I see that they tethered certain licenses. The large casinos

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>are single operators. However, I think that that dynamic is

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:30.679
<v Speaker 1>going to change over time simply because um, you know,

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the sports betting is a is a product that needs

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 1>to be uh well actually should not be monopolized because

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 1>sports vetters need the variety, They need the variation at

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>odds because the ultimate outcome of the game, uh is

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the same. They're regardless of what what who's playing and

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>who the who the athletes is like in a golf tournament,

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>so the outcome is the same. So sports vetters need

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>a variety of operators to be able to compete because

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the secret sauce between operators is the odds, and you,

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:05.560
<v Speaker 1>as a sports vettor are shopping odds. And if there's

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 1>a monopoly in the area, then obviously uh sports vettors

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 1>will go offshore and keep it in the dark. And

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that's not the purpose of being regulated. So what what

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>our model does is it takes aim at the entrepreneurial

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>engine of economy in America and if you could think

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>about it the restaurant economy in places like New York

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 1>or Washington. You have millions of people that visit these

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 1>places throughout the year, like if there's a Super Bowl

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 1>or a NBA finals, santy cop and you know March madness.

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, these establishments are flocked by LSU fantas during

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:43.960
<v Speaker 1>championship games, so it really becomes a supercharge and social

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:47.200
<v Speaker 1>environment where sports and sports betting is already consumed the most.

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>So our model even though we're able to do everything

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 1>that say, for example, New Jersey requires like requires from

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>a licensing perspective, be it online or land base. Our

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 1>technology because of the this a bit a model that

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>we use in the Italian market and all these small shops,

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 1>it is able to scale down as opposed to just

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:08.840
<v Speaker 1>only scale up. It's able to scale right down to

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the smallest denominator and we're able to service these restaurants

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and bars and allow them the opportunity to do that.

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>But again it's always predicated on regulations. So in New Jersey,

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 1>for example, they would need to permit restaurants and bars

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:26.840
<v Speaker 1>or small entities to be able to get a license

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>to process a sports bet as an axillary product to

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:34.440
<v Speaker 1>their core business, and that really has to happen. We

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:37.200
<v Speaker 1>hope to see that, we see that that trend is occurring,

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 1>and it started in d C and and that really

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 1>would be a cool trend. And I think that that's

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>uh that's gonna be a differentiator in the US as

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 1>we brought alright, Mike, Well, we hope to get you

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>back on as we learn more. As you know, this

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 1>progresses post um legislation, post regulation. Mike Chavarella is the

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:58.199
<v Speaker 1>chairman of the board at l S Game Technology, talking

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to us about sports betting and um how it could

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>look as the economy reopens and as these businesses start

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to really get going. He's betting on l s U.

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm betting on the buck Eyes. This is Bloomberg Now.

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring in Kim Bussing. He is a

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>US luxury reporter for Bloomberg News. He's got a news

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>story on the terminal. Macy's needs another miracle on thirty

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>fourth Street to secure its future. But Kim, I gotta

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 1>start out with some props. Man. I first started following

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you after I saw that two sixty million dollar park

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 1>that you posted about in New York, and then I

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>started reading through your stories, and I think you have

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 1>an incredible unique eye and picking out some trends in

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 1>some social trends that are really carrying through to the markets.

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I read your story on Another Lane that the sneaker

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>seller that I thought was great, UM about the the

0:14:56.800 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>pot users that are spending eight hundred dollars on bong

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>say stigmas fade here in Canada's becomes more mainstream, and

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's so cool that you're able to

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 1>piece these things together that are are kind of trendy

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>among a new generation UM that is now getting more

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and more money to spend, but also tie in so

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 1>well to to markets and the growth areas that we're seeing. Well,

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>thank you. I really appreciate that. It's really important to

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 1>look at at cultural things and how they're influencing companies

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and what they do and and the products they sell

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 1>it and what people buy. Alright, So Macy's, you talk

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 1>about a pillar of New York City and New York

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 1>City retail sits smack there that in the middle of

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Manhattan at thirty fourth Street and sixth Avenue. But it's

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>a department store and that's a tough business. Talk to

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>us about how they're boring. Is looking to reinvigorate the company. Yeah,

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Macy's wants to build a skyscraper on top of the

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>biggest department store in America. So this would be an

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>office tower, UM at somewhere around nine feet, which is

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>a bit shorter than the Empire State Building nearby, uh,

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 1>just a couple blocks away, and Macy's Herald Square. That

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 1>store is their flagship. It's their most important store in

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the country. It's their most valuable real estate. Their headquarters

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 1>are there. UH, it's their most productive store. It's the

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 1>overwhelming center of gravity for this business. So it makes

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>sense that they would want to double down on that.

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 1>But of course there's questions here right whether it's something

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 1>like that would work, what's the business situation with Macy's,

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 1>because you know, I'd prefer to go to Bloomingdale's, which

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>is also there's up across street from our les headquarters.

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather go to Birdworf Goodman UM to look around

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>stuff that I probably can't afford. Um. You know, there's

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 1>so many other choices UM in London, in New York,

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>around the world. Macy's just seems kind of like Sears

0:16:57.480 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 1>in terms of how exciting it is to walk through.

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Macy's had just embarked on a their latest turnaround plan

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>in February twenties. Line that up with the pandemic, and

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:10.880
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot of that was derailed and they went

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 1>into emergency mode, just like just like everyone else out there, um,

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and they're there, everyone's still in it. So the department

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 1>stores have been on the decline for for so very long,

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 1>but that there have been glimmers of hope. You know.

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Macy's has been closing stores to to have less square

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>footage out there, and while investing in digital commerce, e commerce,

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 1>online sales and all of that, and so they've been

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 1>making those steps, but it's still just seems like an

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:42.879
<v Speaker 1>eternal struggle for for department stores. Can they get New

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 1>York City approval to build a skyscraper on top of Macy's. Yeah,

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:49.919
<v Speaker 1>so where that that's at right now? Is the latest

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>thing they've done is submit a proposal to invest two

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty five million dollars in the area surrounding the Macy's

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:59.160
<v Speaker 1>store that's Harold Square itself. That means pumping money into

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the neighborhood and order to secure those rights to build

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the skyscraper. Um. These plans will turn that plaza, the

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:11.879
<v Speaker 1>Herald Square Plaza, into a more pedestrian friendly area with

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:14.720
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of new transit entrances because it's on top

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of a subway station that nobody likes. I use every day,

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>by the way, every single day, and that proposals now

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>public and will will be set to go through the

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 1>city's review procedure that involves the community Board, local leaders,

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:33.120
<v Speaker 1>city council and everything. Alright, just real quick, Kim, any

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:34.879
<v Speaker 1>sense of timing and whether we're gonna get some clarity

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>here whether they can do this. Uh, We're just gonna

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:40.679
<v Speaker 1>have to see what they think about about these plans. Uh,

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 1>something like this will take many years anyway, and they're

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:46.880
<v Speaker 1>currently in preliminary talks with developers to try to find

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>some some partners for it. All right, that's an aggressive

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>move by Macy's to try to add some value to

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>a company that's really in a challenging space up in

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the department store of business, Kim, to see maybe it

0:18:57.760 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>plays in though, you know, to the way the city

0:18:59.880 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 1>is gonna change post pandemic. It's gonna be really interesting.

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:05.399
<v Speaker 1>And Kempstone some reporting on like the new look of

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:09.399
<v Speaker 1>New York and with the impetus of massive spending that

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get across the country, maybe we do see

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:13.639
<v Speaker 1>a change. Yeah, maybe it's it's really interesting, but it

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>would be great for that area as I walk past

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>it every day, can passing us luxury reporter for Bloomberg News.

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:21.679
<v Speaker 1>He joins us here in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio.

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Is so good to have folks coming in live. I

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:28.439
<v Speaker 1>want to bring in Dave King right now. He's senior

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:32.640
<v Speaker 1>portfolio manager and head of Income and Growth Strategies over

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 1>at Columbia thread Needle Investments. They have five hundred sixty

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:41.360
<v Speaker 1>four billion dollars in assets under management. Dave um, we're

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 1>seeing today more growth for I noticed this morning cyclicals

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:50.120
<v Speaker 1>again are rising Ford and General Motors. We got games

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 1>in General Electric and Boeing, and there's some clear catalyst

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 1>there um as our stocks. Thattor told us earlier with

0:19:57.200 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, airbuses announcement yesterday and GM's plant openings forwards investments.

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>But it seems like this whole reopening m reflation respending

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>trade is really getting back on track. Is it something

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 1>you're betting on as well? Well? I think that that's true.

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 1>But I also think the reason to bet on it

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:25.400
<v Speaker 1>is last year's market favored quality bonds and disruptive growth stocks.

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>So not only are you benefiting from the strength in

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:33.359
<v Speaker 1>the economy, which at some point was predictable, but also

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 1>good starting valuations on the kind of companies that you're

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 1>you're referencing um Ford Motors having a great day, but

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the stock price is lower than when I joined Columbio

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:48.800
<v Speaker 1>eleven years ago for Examp. So you're you're, you're really

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>have that combination and um, as I've said too many

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 1>people for several months now, I think the play is

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the dogs of the Dadao or revenge of the nerds,

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, by the by the big companies that people

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:07.680
<v Speaker 1>thought were boring. And as the economy recovers and perhaps

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 1>you see some price inflation, make money. All right, give

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:15.959
<v Speaker 1>us some name some of those dogs, would you. Well,

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the dogs of the Tao for people that don't know

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:23.159
<v Speaker 1>the procedure, are simply the ten highest yielding stocks in

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the Dow, and at the moment that's Chevron, IBM, Verizon,

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Dow Chemical, no relation, um Walgreens, Merk, Coca Cola, am

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Gen three M, and Ciscose do no. I know. I

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>try try getting through a day without using the products

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:46.719
<v Speaker 1>and services with those companies, and you know, imagine that

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 1>those stocks were woefully out of favor last year, and

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I think you get the investment opportunity. It's it's not

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:55.439
<v Speaker 1>something you need a master's degree to figure out. But

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not on Reddit, and it's not you know, um,

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Cathy Wood isn't investing in these companies. Well, you know,

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:04.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the second point for a fact. The

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 1>first point, I'm sure you're right. Um, it's it's really

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>old fashioned. You know, I'm just sitting here staring at

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:14.160
<v Speaker 1>one monitor with my sleeves rolled up and buying stocks

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:19.200
<v Speaker 1>like this. And I'm clearly not in vogue. But we're

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>up between fifteen and and Dividend Opportunity Fund this year,

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>so it's it's not crazy. There's something going on here, David.

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think investors, certainly since the financial crisis,

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 1>they've been pretty comfortable with some of the big tech,

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:35.440
<v Speaker 1>big cap tech names, you know, an Apple or Amazon.

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I can buy those things, put them in my four

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:39.359
<v Speaker 1>one K and really not have to think about them

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 1>for a long time. Now. This rotation play has been

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 1>working so well for you know, value investors and in

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:50.119
<v Speaker 1>and even small cap investors. Give us a sense of

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:51.920
<v Speaker 1>how long you think this thing can work? Is this

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:53.440
<v Speaker 1>something I can just put away? It will be a

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:58.919
<v Speaker 1>multi year trade. Well, there there's variants in in the

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 1>value sector with that, and it's a great question. Um.

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, among the dogs that I've mentioned here, I

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:09.159
<v Speaker 1>have a feeling that that would be fine to do

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:13.439
<v Speaker 1>with Merk. I already mentioned an auto company that was

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 1>highly cyclical, So I don't know that you would necessarily

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:19.439
<v Speaker 1>take that approach with every one of these stocks. But

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 1>you know that being said, the investments that Berkshire Hathaway

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:28.760
<v Speaker 1>made last year and they have special dispensation to not

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:33.680
<v Speaker 1>reveal them for six months. We're in Chevron and Um

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 1>as well in Verizon, two of these dogs, and UM,

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I think people were like sort of shrugging their shoulders

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>when they heard that, and then all of a sudden,

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>oil prices went back to normal levels, and Buffett's probably

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>up thirty percent in the Chevron already. Verizon hasn't done

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:55.200
<v Speaker 1>much yet, but you know, he's got time. We've got time.

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:58.679
<v Speaker 1>So UM. There is, in other words, a need to

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 1>sell some of these stuff box at some point. But

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 1>given people's predilection to trading so rapidly these days, I'm

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:08.399
<v Speaker 1>talking about, you know, take a look at it in

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 1>a year or two, and if it's doubled or tripled

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and doesn't have a good yield and isn't a dog

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:15.679
<v Speaker 1>of the doo, maybe you should, you know, take a

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>big profit then. I mean, I absolutely love that UM

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the idea, and obviously you've made a ton of money

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>on it. What are your biggest worries though, What are

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the headwinds that you watch out for. Well, I do

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 1>think there's a huge question whether the inflation we're seeing

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 1>today is temporary dislocation coming out of one of the

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 1>strangest recessions ever UM, or whether it's going to prevail

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:46.199
<v Speaker 1>to that. I'd say if we have prevalent inflation for

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a while, it'll be bad for all financial assets, but

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 1>for income seekers. Twenty of the thirty stocks in the

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>TAO yield more than the tenure treasury, and if we

0:24:57.560 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>have inflation, you won't get more coupon from the government,

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and you'll only get a hundred dollars back, whereas the

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:07.359
<v Speaker 1>nominal dividend in most of those twenty companies will grow

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 1>over time. So I really still see it as a

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>clear alternative for an income oriented investor. They were gonna

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 1>have to leave it there just because of time, but

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 1>we really appreciate your time. Dave King, Senior portfolio manager

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and Head of Income and Growth Strategies at Columbia thread

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Needle Investments. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast.

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:33.360
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Matt Miller three. Pet Ball Sweeney I'm

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio