WEBVTT - Robert Fripp

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome, Welcome, Welcome back to the Bob Leftsetts Podcast. Today

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:17.799
<v Speaker 1>our guest is the one and only Robert frim Robert,

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>did you practice today?

0:00:21.000 --> 0:00:23.800
<v Speaker 2>I have not yet strapped on a guitar today, Bob.

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 2>But may I also say you have a second guest,

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 2>David Singleton, who is my business business partner, King Crimson Producer,

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 2>and we've been engaged in various forms of musical and

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 2>professional activities since about nineteen eighty nine. I say this

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:47.279
<v Speaker 2>because David has a far greater intelligence than mine. And

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:52.279
<v Speaker 2>there's also a philosophy graduate from Cambridge University, one of

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 2>the two press these universities in England, whereas I am

0:00:57.200 --> 0:01:01.959
<v Speaker 2>from working class stock and grammar school education and has

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 2>really been educated by the life of a professional musician.

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, since you mentioned David, you're both on the call

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>here today. The two of you are going on tour

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>imminently on the West coast of California. Can you tell

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>me about that. Why David's involved in what you're going

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 1>to do?

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, David's involved because he has a superior intellect of mine.

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:34.399
<v Speaker 2>He's also has a far greater overview of my affairs

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:38.680
<v Speaker 2>than I do, because I tend to be more specifically

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 2>focused in the moment with what I'm doing. For example,

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 2>a working musician walks on stage, plugs in, and begins

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 2>to play, and their focus tends to be very specifically

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 2>located in that moment during the performance. Now, when I

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 2>walk off stage age, my recall tends to be better.

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 2>If the gig has been really bad. If the gig sucks,

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 2>you remember more of it. If it takes off and

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 2>flies away, you're in a different place, and when you

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:22.359
<v Speaker 2>land on earth you don't quite have access to that

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 2>same place until you take off and fly again. However, David,

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:31.639
<v Speaker 2>who maybe for example, watching from the auditorium, has a

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 2>better distance and overview of what has gone on, and

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:41.959
<v Speaker 2>also a far better skill set in terms of analysis

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 2>than I do, so his opinion is infinitely more reliable

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 2>than mine. So he's coming along when I stumbled. He

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 2>will tell people what I meant to say had I

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 2>been a younger, more intelligent man.

0:02:56.960 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 3>Our talks grew out of talks that we used to

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:02.640
<v Speaker 3>give the all the King Crimson shows. So before the

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 3>King Crimson Shows, we used to do a thing called

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 3>the Royal Package, where some fans could come in early

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 3>and I recall when we were originally planning what we

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 3>might do before the shows. I said, well, somebody should

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 3>talk to the fans, you know, for the hour before

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:19.800
<v Speaker 3>the show, And I remember distinctly Robert saying to me, David,

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 3>you should talk to the fans. I love it when

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 3>you do the work and I earn the money, which

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 3>wasn't true, by the way, because he shares the money.

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 3>But anyway, so I began talking to fans before Robert

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 3>joined me, one of the band members join me, and

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 3>so to some extent, we're now doing those talks without

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 3>the show.

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Robert, you're a man who has very distinct opinions,

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>So it's funny that you talk about trusting Dave. Is

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Dave unique or you're more trusting than your image.

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 2>David is one of two people who I trusted to

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 2>give me objective and accurate feedback on anything that was

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 2>particularly a rising in my life, or shall we saying

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:19.479
<v Speaker 2>King Crimson the fis Bill Reeflin and David Singleton were

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 2>the two characters who if anyone in the band felt

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 2>that Robert needed to be told a particular something but

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 2>maybe they were afraid to tell him, then they would

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 2>go to either Bill Reeflin, who was our drummer and

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 2>keyboard player in the twenty fourteen twenty eighteen incarnations. They

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 2>would go to Bill Rieflin or to David Singleton, both

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 2>of whom I trust to be entirely impartial and give

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 2>me the good, bad news, or whatever it might have been.

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:58.240
<v Speaker 2>There were very few people, very very few people who

0:04:58.279 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 2>were like this.

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>But you seem so warm and friendly right now? Is

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>this your normal demeanor? Because your reputation is not that.

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 2>It's true, my reputation is appalling, and it's interesting as

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 2>an older man to look back consider why why this

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 2>might be. And I'm beginning to come up with a

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:30.160
<v Speaker 2>few clues is to why my reputation is appalling. But

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 2>since I trust David, David, why do you think my

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:34.480
<v Speaker 2>reputation is appalling?

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'll answer that in two ways. Firstly, the very

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:41.280
<v Speaker 3>first time Robertson and I went out doing a speaking tour,

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 3>it had a subtitle that awful Man and his manager

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 3>We didn't, which wasn't a tagline that we added. Somebody else,

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:52.040
<v Speaker 3>some wit came up with it when we were about

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 3>to go on tour and said, oh, this is what

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:56.039
<v Speaker 3>you should call it. That awful man and his manager.

0:05:56.760 --> 0:06:01.480
<v Speaker 3>And the main reason I think Robert has that reputation

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 3>is because he prioritizes the music in all situations. So

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 3>if you have a show or you're recording, Robert prioritizes

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:13.720
<v Speaker 3>the music, not the social or And for some people,

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 3>I think that probably irks them.

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:22.599
<v Speaker 1>Okay, but Robert, let's say, in this hypothetical you walk

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:26.359
<v Speaker 1>into a coffee shop, are you the warmest guy or

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 1>do you'd say, hey, this is exactly what I want

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and you're happy if it's not perfect. Would someone encounter

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 1>this so called appalling reputation if you were just in

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:39.159
<v Speaker 1>everyday life.

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:45.279
<v Speaker 2>Probably I find that if you'd like a buy and

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:50.239
<v Speaker 2>large overview. If someone comes to me with a flea

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 2>in their ear, they tend to leave with two a

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 2>flea in each year. If someone comes to me with

0:06:57.240 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 2>an attitude, they tend to leave with more of the

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 2>same attitude. For example, if they come up to me

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 2>with an open heart, they tend to find a person

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 2>with an open heart. There are exceptions to this, and

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 2>I can recall a few of them. For example, if

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 2>I go into a coffee shop and I'm reading, for

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 2>someone to come up and say excuse me, mister Fripp.

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 2>I didn't want to interrupt you. My response might be

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 2>to actually quote Jimmy Hendrix in the same situation. Then

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 2>why are you so If a person comes up knowing

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 2>they're interrupting me, I might remind them that they know better,

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 2>or on some cases I've simply ignored them.

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you're in your home right now. I don't want

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the specific address, but where is it?

0:07:55.720 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 2>Generally it's in Middle England. It's about thirty miles south

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 2>of Birmingham. It's geographically middle England. It's in the County

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 2>of Worcester, and it's what is called a Georgian market town.

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 2>That most of the buildings on the high street, Bridge Street,

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 2>and where we are right in the center of town

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 2>for the market square. It's Georgian. That is approximately mid

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 2>eighteenth century. However, David, who lives in the old vicarage

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 2>in town, looks out his window and sees the abbey.

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 2>I look out our front windows and see the abbey

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 2>about two hundred yards away as the crowflies. So we're

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 2>looking at the site of Christian worship in this town

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 2>since about seven hundred a d. Now, to an American

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 2>this is maybe kind of astonishing, since the colonies were

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 2>only set up, as we know, in the early seventeenth century.

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:07.679
<v Speaker 2>To have an ongoing site of worship in any religion

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 2>for a period of what thirteen hundred years thirteen hundred

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 2>and twenty years is quite astonishing. At the end of

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 2>our garden, I live here with my wonderful wife Toy.

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 2>We walk down to the garden. At the end of

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 2>the garden is the River Avon. You turn left and

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:31.199
<v Speaker 2>go up twenty miles you'll pass William Shakespeare's old cottage

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 2>old house. If you turn right and go down about

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 2>one hundred miles you will pass Sting's House just outside Salisbury.

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 2>So at the River Avon here the Vikings used to

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:50.559
<v Speaker 2>come up river and beat people up in our town

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 2>and beastly characters that they were. They would burn down

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 2>the wooden Christian Church in town, so eventually it was

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 2>rebuilt in I think early twentieth century of Stone and

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 2>the local Worthy, tough guy, the alpha male of the time,

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 2>the local Worthy Night saw the Vikings off in a

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:18.679
<v Speaker 2>big punch up up the hill here. He saw them

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 2>offer I think about ten seventy five, and they never

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 2>came back. So we've had relative peace in town through

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 2>about thousand years. So, David, would you add to this

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 2>what am I missing?

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 3>No? I thought that was wonderful. I was gonna say

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 3>when you said relative piece in town, that's obviously until

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 3>Robert moved in.

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 1>So Robert, why this general location in England?

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 3>All right?

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 2>When I first met my wife in nineteen eighty three,

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 2>but we met again in nineteen eighty five working on

0:10:55.280 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 2>a charity record for to raise money for children's schooled

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 2>in West Virginia, associated with the charity of which I

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:08.640
<v Speaker 2>was at that time the president. I met my wife

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 2>and proposed. In a week. We had a date on

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 2>the Friday, she went back to London, returned for our

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 2>second date Friday one week later, and I proposed. At

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 2>that time, my little elderly mother was alive, So my

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:29.719
<v Speaker 2>wife moved to my part of the world because we

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 2>knew that maybe not too far down the road, one

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 2>day the phone would go and the voice would say,

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 2>you need to come now. Well, after my wonderful little

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:46.839
<v Speaker 2>mother died in nineteen ninety three, we could then be anywhere.

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 2>And in nineteen ninety nine my wife's parents retired. She

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 2>bought them a cottage just half a mile up river

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:01.680
<v Speaker 2>where there is a boat club that Toya essentially throughout

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 2>her youth, about age I think two or three onwards.

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:12.680
<v Speaker 2>My wife became associated with this specific location. She moved

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 2>her parents into retirement to this location, and at that

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:23.320
<v Speaker 2>point it became obvious that we should change from Wiltshire, Wiltshire,

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Dorset up to Worcestershire here to be in near them.

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 2>So that's why we're here.

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Why did you know or how did you know she

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:34.679
<v Speaker 1>was the one so quickly?

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 2>How could you not know that you've just met your wife?

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:43.840
<v Speaker 1>How old were you when you met your wife?

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 2>At thirty nine? Was when we had our first date.

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:52.079
<v Speaker 1>And I proposed, okay, they are all these rock stars

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>who do drugs sleep with a lot of women, but

0:12:56.920 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 1>not all of them. Iani Anderson told me, you know

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that he was living a more conventional life while the

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:05.679
<v Speaker 1>members of his men were partying. You'd already had a

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:08.959
<v Speaker 1>lot of success, not to riet he'd been on the road.

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Had you partaken so called of the fruits of the

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>road or were you in your hotel room practicing? What

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>was your life like before you met to it?

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, I never took drugs, Yes, I practiced in my

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 2>hotel room for hours and hours and hours. Did I

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:34.679
<v Speaker 2>socialize from time to time, Yes, But in nineteen sixty nine,

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 2>Peter Simfield, the lyricist for the first King Crimson, who

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 2>wrote some astonishing words, he commented that Robert practiced in

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:49.440
<v Speaker 2>his hotel room for eight hours a day. Now, from

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:53.199
<v Speaker 2>my position today, looking at Peter and looking at Robert,

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 2>and asked to take a decision on these two young

0:13:56.559 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 2>men's future, I would be inclined to say that guitarist

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 2>is likely to succeed. And in terms of being a nasty, horrible,

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 2>creepy person. To come back to what David said, and

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 2>since we're talking about nineteen sixty nine King Crimson, Michael

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Jarles the drummer, astonishing drummer, probably the drummer of his

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 2>generation in rock music. He said, there are three three

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 2>areas for a band, the music, the money, and the

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 2>social life. Any two of those you will have a

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 2>successful band. And I would say any three of those

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 2>and you have an astonishingly successful band. But going back

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 2>to it, my priority working as a professional musician is

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 2>the music. There are some professionals who take an alternative

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 2>style of alternative you and that's entirely legitimate, which is

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 2>this is a lifestyle that I would like, the socializing

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 2>with the other members of the band, the life on

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 2>the road, and so on. If that's congenial for them, fine,

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 2>that is not my primary concern, and a life on

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 2>the road has been distinctly non congenial for me as

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 2>a person. In terms of the money, my attitude has

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 2>been this is coming from the background of the nineteen

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 2>sixties and King Crimson began essentially as a cooperative venture.

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Share the money, and after the dissolution of the first

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 2>King Crimson and the subsequent incarnations, then I've kept to this.

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 2>If you ask a person in the band to make

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 2>the commitment that you were making, you share the money

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 2>with them, and if you don't share the money with them,

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 2>you can't legitimately ask them to make the commitment that

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 2>you are. So for me, I've worked with the musicians

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 2>that personally were exceptionally difficult for me to work with

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 2>if I felt that these were the musicians needed to

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 2>make this music available. So, in other words, the social

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 2>aspects of working within a group have not been a

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 2>priority for me personally. The money neither. Particularly it comes

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 2>down to the music.

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So you mentioned not taking drugs. Is that a philosophy?

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Did you just stumble into that and you didn't take drugs?

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Tell me more about that.

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 2>It was always very clear to me that this was

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 2>not a way for me, Just that clear.

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>What about alcohol?

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I've pushed the boat out a young man of

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 2>my generation that didn't take drugs, and we were now

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 2>looking at the early nineteen sixties. What he might do, however,

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 2>is have a pint of cider on the Saturday night

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 2>even too, and it would be rough cider, and why roughsider?

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 2>Because it was one shilling and one pence and on

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:28.199
<v Speaker 2>a Saturday night. If you're only getting five shillings a

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:32.880
<v Speaker 2>week for your earnings, or even five pounds a week

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:36.679
<v Speaker 2>for your earnings, that was all you could afford. So

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 2>age sixteen or seventeen, I would go down to the

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Cellar Club in Pool to see the rock groups playing

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:47.439
<v Speaker 2>in the Cellar Club. Greg Lake and his band was

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:50.920
<v Speaker 2>one of them. And for two shillings and two pence

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:54.199
<v Speaker 2>and the price of a bus ride there, which is

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:59.440
<v Speaker 2>about a shilling, you could have a relatively straightforward and

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:04.919
<v Speaker 2>enjoy full Saturday night out. It was affordable. Did I

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 2>grow older? And develop a taste in something finer than

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 2>rough sided. Yes, I quite like sparkling wine. Champagne is fine,

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 2>but I'm not snobbish about it. I'm very happy to

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 2>have prosecco, and I have learned to drink margaritas. My

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 2>wife makes astonishing monster margaritas, so I have also enjoyed

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 2>monster margaritas on many occasions with Adrian Blue, we would

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 2>go out to some modest Mexican restaurants and have the

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 2>monster margaritas. But I do not drink when I'm working.

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:51.359
<v Speaker 1>So other than your wife, where's the best margarita you've had?

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:56.640
<v Speaker 2>Now you have me, I tell you what. I had

0:18:56.680 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 2>a really good margarita at Daryl's house in not October

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:06.680
<v Speaker 2>of twenty twenty two. We did our live at Daryl's house,

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:10.640
<v Speaker 2>and then afterwards I wasn't anticipating drinking, but it did

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:13.679
<v Speaker 2>feel like an appropriate moment. So I had a margarita

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 2>and it was very, very good.

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 1>And you know, traditionally margarita's come with salt on the rim.

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Are you a traditionalist or do you say? No salt?

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 2>Classic salt margarita on the rocks, preferably crushed ized, no doubt,

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 2>fresh line fresh line, and.

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Does it matter whether it's Quervo eighteen hundred or just

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 1>whatever tequila's on hand.

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm not snobbish. I prefer white tequila. Blue a garth

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 2>goes down very nicely, indeed. But now here's the one.

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 2>I was in Mexico in Cernavaca with my pal Leo,

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 2>who organized guitar craft and guitar circle courses at to Potsdam,

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 2>and we were in the restaurant, which was formerly the

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 2>house of Diego Rivera, and we were having lunch together

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 2>and I thought, well, I'm not working, I'll pus shake

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 2>the boat. I'll have a margarita. And Leah explained to me,

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 2>you don't get margaritas in Mexico any more than you

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 2>used to get pizzas in Italy. He said, we drink mescal.

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 2>I thought, all right, I'll give this a chop and

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:35.880
<v Speaker 2>I took my first sip and I thought, oh, that

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 2>tastes nice. I'll have a second one. Once I got

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 2>to the end of my first mescal, I realized, now,

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 2>now a second one is really a step too far.

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay, what kind of kid were you growing up? Were

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 1>you a member of the group, were you under sports?

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Were you that odd kid. It was always by themselves.

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 2>Probably all of those. I think it changed when I

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 2>was about age nine or ten and my reading skills

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 2>had developed, and at that point I would tend to

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 2>stay in more evenings than not reading. When I became

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 2>a guitarist at eight eleven, this was a very good,

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 2>natural and developing tendency. Because if you are a musician,

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 2>an Aspen musician, and or a composer or writer, you

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:53.440
<v Speaker 2>have to have what Professor John Slaboda in his Psychology

0:21:53.520 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 2>for Musicians refers to as the capacity of strong interestpect.

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 2>If you are a serious practicer, this is four to

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:09.640
<v Speaker 2>eight hours of your life at least, and if you're

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 2>a young concert pianist it might be twelve sixteen hours

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 2>a day now to sit on a chair mostly on

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 2>your own, focusing on your practicing or your writing. That

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:28.479
<v Speaker 2>much time on your own for most inverted comrasordinary people

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 2>would be a struggle. If, however, you have an innate

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 2>or developed capacity for introspection, which is healthy, this is

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:46.639
<v Speaker 2>what Professor Roboda refers to. This is a strong and

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 2>healthy capacity for introspection, not not somehow a failing to

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 2>engage socially.

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, is like your wife. As soon as you started

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:05.440
<v Speaker 1>playing the guitar, you said, this is it. How did

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 1>you make the transition from a non player to a player?

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:15.159
<v Speaker 2>When I met my wife, I practiced less than hitherto.

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Ok, let me rephrase this question. How did you first

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>get an instrument? And was guitar your first instrument?

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it was December twenty fourth, nineteen fifty seven, Christmas

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 2>Eve and my mother, who had bought me all my

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 2>Christmas presents. But I believe the day before I said

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:42.239
<v Speaker 2>I want a guitar for Christmas. So my mother and

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:47.159
<v Speaker 2>I went out shopping into Bournemouth, which was nine miles

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 2>from Wimborne, where we lived. And this area in Dorset

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 2>based around actually just four miles north of Wimburne is

0:23:56.600 --> 0:24:00.360
<v Speaker 2>the Fripp family village where the Trips have gone back

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 2>father to father for four hundred years. For example, in

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 2>the village where Toya and myself had our first datum

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 2>where we got married. My great great great great great

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 2>grandfather Robert Fripp died in seventeen fifty four, but my

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 2>father took the geniality back a little further actually to

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 2>fifteen ninety in Edmonsham, which is five miles north of that,

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 2>so that's a slight distraction. Now back we went from

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 2>Wimborne into Bournemouth. We went round all the music shops

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 2>in Bournemouth, finding nothing appropriate until write about five o'clock

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 2>at the end of our shopping day, to Min's Music

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 2>of Westbourne. And as we were there in the shop,

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 2>a woman came in with this guitar and she said,

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:58.119
<v Speaker 2>I would like to return this to you. We're getting

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 2>a better guitar for my So we stepped forward and

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 2>said we will buy this, and the Eggermann Freys instrument

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:13.400
<v Speaker 2>bought for six guineas, is now in the cellar directly

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 2>below the study were speaking. It was an appalling instrument,

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:23.160
<v Speaker 2>a really, really terrible instrument which creppled my left hand

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 2>action for years. Even in nineteen seventy I remember having

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:35.119
<v Speaker 2>to practice to develop a more relaxed left hand grip

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 2>after learning to play this instrument. You'd need players to

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:45.120
<v Speaker 2>put the strings down above the seventh threat. The action

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:48.119
<v Speaker 2>was so bad. But anyway, that was my first guitar

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 2>and was in three months. I knew this was my life.

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you take the guitar home, what do you do?

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>First of all, there's the issue of tuning it. You

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know how to read music? What were your steps?

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:10.680
<v Speaker 2>All right? Well, the man in men's music obviously knew

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:13.440
<v Speaker 2>three or four chords to persuade people that this was

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 2>an instrument worth playing, and he tuned it up for us.

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 2>So I took it home and there was the guitar

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:28.800
<v Speaker 2>tutor of the day. Was actually an appalling tutor, hugely

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 2>successful called play in a Day by Bert Whedon, which

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:39.200
<v Speaker 2>many of the leading guitarists of the time looked back

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:42.640
<v Speaker 2>on and refer to it as the first tutor. It

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 2>was an appalling tutor. Nevertheless, this was where one began

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 2>at the time until we received better information. So about

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 2>three months after having the guitar, I went for my

0:26:57.200 --> 0:27:02.159
<v Speaker 2>first guitar lessons with Missus cah Felleen Gartel of the

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 2>kauf Mullen School of Music, kauf Mullen being three miles

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:09.920
<v Speaker 2>down the road from Wimborne and where I grew up,

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:13.679
<v Speaker 2>spending the first three years of my life in kauf Mullen.

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 2>Missus Gartel was a very good Salvation Army lady who

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:26.920
<v Speaker 2>saw it as her work in life as educating children

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:32.679
<v Speaker 2>in music. She was primarily a piano teacher, not an

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 2>awfully good guitar teacher, which she knew, and after my

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 2>first course of I believed ten or twelve lessons I

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:43.879
<v Speaker 2>was her star student. So she sent me on to

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 2>a proper guitar teacher, Don Strike of Westbourne Arcade, who

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 2>was actually only two hundred yards from Min's Music where

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:59.160
<v Speaker 2>I bought the guitar but had not quite discovered him.

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:03.200
<v Speaker 2>I wish i'd governed him earlier, and under Don Strike

0:28:03.880 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 2>I began to develop seriously and find my own way forward.

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 2>When I was seventeen, I visited Don Strike's music shop

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:24.159
<v Speaker 2>on that particular Saturday afternoon. This is what young guitarists

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 2>would do. There were two shops in town. You go

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:31.199
<v Speaker 2>to Don Strike's in Westbourne Arcade and then maybe you

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 2>go to Eddie Moore's Music in not Westbourne it was.

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 2>It was before christ Church anyway, it was East Bournemouth,

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 2>and in between two shops there would be movement. I

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:57.880
<v Speaker 2>went in one Saturday and Don Strike shook my hand

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 2>and acknowledged me as the better get guitarist. At the

0:29:02.920 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 2>time it didn't strike me particularly, but as I've got

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 2>older and from where I am now, I recognize this

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:21.720
<v Speaker 2>as a very generous compliment from an older generation player

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 2>acknowledging a younger generation player.

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, when you take lessons, they teach you how to

0:29:29.640 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 1>read music. Do you read music today? Do you write

0:29:33.560 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 1>out charts?

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:39.280
<v Speaker 2>Do I read music today? Yes, but slowly because it's

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 2>not part of my daily activity. Historically, when I became

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 2>a professional in nineteen sixty seven and moved to London,

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 2>way up until about two thousand and eight, I would

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 2>I would write, we might say compose with charts, but

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 2>within members of King Crimson, I would not give them charts.

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 2>I understand Charles Mingus didn't either, So what I would

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:16.480
<v Speaker 2>do is show the music to the other members of

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 2>the band and invite their responses in return. But yes,

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 2>the quick answer is, Bob, I read music and wrote

0:30:25.920 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 2>music in the for bo that period of forty odd

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 2>years in my professional life.

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, paint the picture of what it's like in the

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 1>fifties growing up. I'm a little younger than you. I'm

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 1>growing up in the United States. We always hear about

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 1>a war hangover sort of life being in black and white.

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Was that what it's like or is that an inaccurate description?

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:56.520
<v Speaker 2>The quick answer is that's accurate to paint a broader picture.

0:30:57.160 --> 0:31:03.280
<v Speaker 2>I was born in nineteen forty six. My grandfather was

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 2>in the Marines and in Gallipoli. My uncle Bill was

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:11.560
<v Speaker 2>in the Air Force and was shot down in October

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:15.080
<v Speaker 2>nineteen thirty nine and spent the next five years and

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 2>seven months in a twelve German prisoner of war camps,

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:26.360
<v Speaker 2>including Stalagluff three, where he was one of the logistics

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 2>people planning the Great Escape. He was a navigator. His

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 2>pilot was one of those who escaped and was caught

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:42.080
<v Speaker 2>and shot. So Uncle Bill refused to speak about his

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 2>war years for fifty years, and then fifty years later

0:31:49.480 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 2>he would begin to respond. Uncle Bill was a close

0:31:55.280 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 2>presence in my life growing up and that was a

0:32:03.720 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 2>real time for me. One generation removed, but growing up

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 2>in England, it was the time of austerity. For example,

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 2>in when I was three in nineteen forty nine, sweet

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 2>rationing was abandoned for three months and then it was reinstituted.

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 2>And I remember on a Saturday when we go to

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 2>the cinema with my father, my sister and myself, we

0:32:33.680 --> 0:32:36.480
<v Speaker 2>would stuff off and buy a shillings worst of sweets

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 2>on the way to the cinema, but it would be

0:32:39.440 --> 0:32:44.440
<v Speaker 2>ration based. And I remember the first time rationing came

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 2>off in nineteen forty nine. I was three and running

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 2>around in the attic of our home in corf Mullen

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 2>and I ran over the open trap door and fell

0:32:56.480 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 2>down from the attic with a big crump on the

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 2>landing below. And I was in bed when my sister

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 2>went to have her ration free suites for the first time.

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:13.680
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, growing up in the fifties, not that at

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:20.239
<v Speaker 2>that age I was aware of any constructions. It was

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 2>the life we had. But after the event I could

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 2>look back and say austerity and my parents working class

0:33:31.760 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 2>lives continued, and to some extent today continues on. My

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:45.520
<v Speaker 2>mother was the daughter of a Welsh miner who died

0:33:46.200 --> 0:33:49.520
<v Speaker 2>one long night at his age of fifty nine I

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:55.160
<v Speaker 2>believe it was I believe it was nineteen forty eight

0:33:55.280 --> 0:33:59.760
<v Speaker 2>or nine. He died one long night, wheezing his life

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 2>of way from his punctured lungs. He had a wooden

0:34:04.560 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 2>leg because working down the mine at the Six Bells Colliery,

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 2>he'd got trapped on the pulley taking coal into the

0:34:15.080 --> 0:34:18.600
<v Speaker 2>crusher and one of his legs went into the coal

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:23.319
<v Speaker 2>crusher and one of his mining pals pulled him off,

0:34:25.000 --> 0:34:32.840
<v Speaker 2>and my grandmother, Gladys Louise Green, her hair turned white

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 2>in a week, not knowing whether her husband would live

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:41.840
<v Speaker 2>or die. My father, at age sixteen, was told to

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 2>leave school because he needed to help bring money into

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:50.440
<v Speaker 2>the family to help support his five brothers and sisters.

0:34:50.840 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 2>So that's my background. I was brought up with complete

0:34:55.719 --> 0:35:01.760
<v Speaker 2>confidence that I would succeed. Why because both my sister

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:06.880
<v Speaker 2>and myself knew that we would succeed because we would work.

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:11.000
<v Speaker 2>We would work until we would succeed. In other words,

0:35:11.520 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 2>this is a classic Protestant work ethic inculcated into us

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:21.120
<v Speaker 2>by our parents who had done the same. We were

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:24.839
<v Speaker 2>brought up to be independent and to work. So when

0:35:24.920 --> 0:35:30.440
<v Speaker 2>I went to London in September nineteen sixty seven, I

0:35:30.520 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 2>knew I would succeed because I would work. However, I

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:42.759
<v Speaker 2>did not anticipate that my professional success would be a

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:46.319
<v Speaker 2>public success. I thought it more likely that I would,

0:35:46.360 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 2>for example, end up in sessions. It never occurred to

0:35:50.040 --> 0:35:52.839
<v Speaker 2>me that I would personally become well known.

0:35:54.160 --> 0:35:57.759
<v Speaker 1>Okay, in the US, we had the folk boom of

0:35:57.920 --> 0:36:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the early sixties and a lot of people got nylon

0:36:01.880 --> 0:36:05.240
<v Speaker 1>string guitars, and then the Beatles hit in the beginning

0:36:05.280 --> 0:36:10.480
<v Speaker 1>of sixty four and seemingly everybody got an electric guitar.

0:36:11.960 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Why was everybody picking up the guitar in England in

0:36:15.719 --> 0:36:19.239
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifty seven, Because it's not only you, there are

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other legendary players. What was going on

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:24.960
<v Speaker 1>was the guitar hip. It's like, why did you want

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 1>to play the guitar? Wor other people playing the guitar,

0:36:27.320 --> 0:36:29.440
<v Speaker 1>or what you heard on the radio? What was the motivation?

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:35.879
<v Speaker 2>All right, you're explaining, you're asking me to explain the zeitgeist.

0:36:36.080 --> 0:36:40.279
<v Speaker 2>I can't quite do that. Why music would reach over

0:36:41.400 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 2>and express itself through popular culture in such a way

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:50.759
<v Speaker 2>that it brought a generation together with the conviction that

0:36:51.400 --> 0:36:56.719
<v Speaker 2>music will change the world. The cultural context would be

0:36:56.960 --> 0:37:01.280
<v Speaker 2>In the mid nineteen fifties is a movement in England

0:37:01.320 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 2>called skiffle. One of the pivotal characters, very important character,

0:37:06.120 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 2>was Chris Barber. And you would have a skiffle group

0:37:13.719 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 2>which was probably derived from Woody Guthrie and other American

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:23.640
<v Speaker 2>folk heroes through an English perspective, but you would have

0:37:24.840 --> 0:37:29.080
<v Speaker 2>a tea chest and a broom poll and a piece

0:37:29.080 --> 0:37:31.920
<v Speaker 2>of string that would be your base. You would have

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:36.759
<v Speaker 2>a scrubbing board for rhythm, played with thumbnail what is it,

0:37:36.880 --> 0:37:42.440
<v Speaker 2>David thumbnails from sewing, yes, finger finger protectors from sewing,

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:46.080
<v Speaker 2>and you would have perhaps number three guitarists thimbles, Thank

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:52.400
<v Speaker 2>you thimbles, And that was the basic. Then Lonnie Donoghan

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 2>was a character who also came out of this same background,

0:37:58.120 --> 0:38:01.879
<v Speaker 2>very popular, and then it became more sophisticated as Bob

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Dylan became more familiar in England, and then it moved

0:38:06.640 --> 0:38:15.960
<v Speaker 2>on to electricity. Electricity for me nineteen fifty seven, fifty

0:38:16.000 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 2>six fifty seven, Elvis, I mean, Scottymore what a player.

0:38:23.280 --> 0:38:25.919
<v Speaker 2>He was the first guitarist who made me think, yeah,

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:33.759
<v Speaker 2>Chuck Berry, Yeah, But we shouldn't forget Muddy Waters in Chicago,

0:38:34.080 --> 0:38:37.920
<v Speaker 2>Plugging in a Bank nineteen forty seven, forty eight, which

0:38:37.960 --> 0:38:42.719
<v Speaker 2>was the precursor to all of this. Would you go

0:38:42.840 --> 0:38:47.600
<v Speaker 2>back much further than that, I'm sure you could, but

0:38:47.800 --> 0:38:50.560
<v Speaker 2>really I think the beginning of it would probably be

0:38:50.719 --> 0:38:55.279
<v Speaker 2>forty seven forty eight were Muddy Rocks a in Chicago?

0:38:56.280 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 2>Then move forward to the Beatles, who are also looking

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:07.399
<v Speaker 2>primarily in American direction. When they begin. But something else

0:39:07.600 --> 0:39:12.719
<v Speaker 2>was going on with Beatles For me, the last example

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:20.560
<v Speaker 2>of communal genius in popular music. Something astonishing. And when

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:25.359
<v Speaker 2>I heard A Day in the Life in nineteen sixty six,

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:31.840
<v Speaker 2>sixty seven, sixty seven, that reunt he had reoriented the

0:39:31.960 --> 0:39:36.120
<v Speaker 2>direction of my life. Instead of going onto university in

0:39:36.200 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 2>taking a degree in the state management to become a

0:39:39.600 --> 0:39:44.320
<v Speaker 2>partner in my father's auctioneering and the state agency firm

0:39:44.360 --> 0:39:48.840
<v Speaker 2>in Wimborne, Dorset, I had to go to music. Why

0:39:49.239 --> 0:39:52.600
<v Speaker 2>in the same way that I recognized my wife, At

0:39:52.640 --> 0:39:56.600
<v Speaker 2>these pivotal moments in our life, we recognize this is

0:39:56.640 --> 0:39:59.160
<v Speaker 2>for me, it has to be and if we can't

0:39:59.200 --> 0:40:03.840
<v Speaker 2>recognize it, then something's off. Why can't we recognize what

0:40:03.960 --> 0:40:08.120
<v Speaker 2>is obvious? Well, fortunately, I think my instincts were good.

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you're in the UK. The Beatles hit in the

0:40:12.800 --> 0:40:16.040
<v Speaker 1>UK in sixty two, needless to say, they're playing in

0:40:16.080 --> 0:40:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the late fifties. Do you feel a burgeoning rock and

0:40:20.520 --> 0:40:24.800
<v Speaker 1>roll scene? You know, Liverpool was revered in the US,

0:40:24.880 --> 0:40:29.800
<v Speaker 1>but it's not a super classy looked upon finally city

0:40:29.880 --> 0:40:32.800
<v Speaker 1>in the UK to what the gwed Did you feel

0:40:32.800 --> 0:40:34.880
<v Speaker 1>a burgeoning scene or did you just turn on the

0:40:34.960 --> 0:40:37.080
<v Speaker 1>radio one day and heard love Me Do.

0:40:39.040 --> 0:40:42.400
<v Speaker 2>Well. I remember hearing Love Me Do on the radio

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:46.959
<v Speaker 2>about sixty two three, and it didn't it didn't quite

0:40:47.120 --> 0:40:50.000
<v Speaker 2>do it for me. For me, it wasn't the strongest song.

0:40:50.760 --> 0:40:53.720
<v Speaker 2>I was in what were called bait groups at the time.

0:40:53.960 --> 0:40:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Well a little bit, a little bit slower, a little

0:40:55.680 --> 0:40:59.800
<v Speaker 1>bit slower. You get a guitar, you're going for lessons,

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:03.120
<v Speaker 1>what point do you decide to join a band and

0:41:03.280 --> 0:41:04.880
<v Speaker 1>play out? And how does that happen?

0:41:05.800 --> 0:41:10.879
<v Speaker 2>Fourteen stroke fifteen and why? Because my guitar teacher, Don

0:41:10.920 --> 0:41:14.360
<v Speaker 2>Strike said, you're at the point where you need to

0:41:14.400 --> 0:41:17.240
<v Speaker 2>be in a band, you need to work with other musicians.

0:41:17.880 --> 0:41:21.160
<v Speaker 2>So age fourteen turning fifteen, I was in my first

0:41:21.200 --> 0:41:30.560
<v Speaker 2>beat group called the Ravens, and Gordon Haskell was another

0:41:30.719 --> 0:41:34.720
<v Speaker 2>one of those players. I remember on the grammar school

0:41:34.760 --> 0:41:38.640
<v Speaker 2>playing field while we would throw in discus, he turned

0:41:38.640 --> 0:41:41.399
<v Speaker 2>to me and said, hey, mush, if I bear buy

0:41:41.440 --> 0:41:45.359
<v Speaker 2>a bass, can I join your band? And I said yes.

0:41:45.560 --> 0:41:49.920
<v Speaker 2>So that was our first band. And then that stopped

0:41:50.160 --> 0:41:53.759
<v Speaker 2>because I was taking my school examinations which were then

0:41:53.800 --> 0:41:57.920
<v Speaker 2>called O levels, and then at a seventeen beginning eighteen,

0:41:58.000 --> 0:42:00.880
<v Speaker 2>I was in my second beat group also with Gordon

0:42:00.960 --> 0:42:04.600
<v Speaker 2>House School, called the League of Gentlemen, and that was

0:42:04.640 --> 0:42:09.600
<v Speaker 2>a more mature expression. We would do covers for example,

0:42:09.640 --> 0:42:13.840
<v Speaker 2>we would do Beatles covers for Seasons covers. We would

0:42:13.840 --> 0:42:19.800
<v Speaker 2>do guitar instrumentals of the day like Orange Blossom Special

0:42:19.880 --> 0:42:24.239
<v Speaker 2>for example. Because I was quite to developed guitarist for

0:42:24.360 --> 0:42:30.520
<v Speaker 2>my age, we could take on guitar guitar pieces that

0:42:30.600 --> 0:42:34.040
<v Speaker 2>not many semi pro bands could do. That went on

0:42:34.200 --> 0:42:39.520
<v Speaker 2>until I was about eighteen nineteen, and at that point

0:42:39.880 --> 0:42:41.960
<v Speaker 2>I needed to take a levels to go on to

0:42:42.160 --> 0:42:46.160
<v Speaker 2>university so I could become a partner my father's firm,

0:42:46.880 --> 0:42:51.360
<v Speaker 2>and I paid my way through college by being a

0:42:51.400 --> 0:42:57.320
<v Speaker 2>guitarist in the Majestic Hotel Jewish Hotel on Born's East Coast,

0:42:58.080 --> 0:43:03.480
<v Speaker 2>where a young guitarist called Andy Summers went on to

0:43:03.680 --> 0:43:08.359
<v Speaker 2>London with Zoot Money's Big Role band that became the

0:43:08.400 --> 0:43:14.080
<v Speaker 2>citedentlic Dantallion's Chariot before Andy went off to the West

0:43:14.120 --> 0:43:19.359
<v Speaker 2>Coast with Eric Burden and the Animals. So Andy went

0:43:19.400 --> 0:43:22.759
<v Speaker 2>off to London and I took over the guitar chair

0:43:23.600 --> 0:43:26.600
<v Speaker 2>for the next two and a half three years until

0:43:26.600 --> 0:43:30.520
<v Speaker 2>I went to London and moved to it Monee and

0:43:30.680 --> 0:43:35.840
<v Speaker 2>failure for a couple of years.

0:43:40.280 --> 0:43:45.480
<v Speaker 1>So you're going to university. Did you finish university?

0:43:46.160 --> 0:43:50.560
<v Speaker 2>I didn't even begin. I went up to university and

0:43:51.160 --> 0:43:56.799
<v Speaker 2>took my interview. I took my A levels, the next

0:43:56.880 --> 0:44:04.080
<v Speaker 2>standard in school examinations at two weeks notice, and had

0:44:04.120 --> 0:44:07.839
<v Speaker 2>a nay in economics being economic history, which was sufficiently

0:44:07.880 --> 0:44:12.719
<v Speaker 2>good to get me accepted. I even have my digs booked.

0:44:14.280 --> 0:44:19.040
<v Speaker 2>And then I heard A Day in the Life and Hendrix,

0:44:19.120 --> 0:44:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Foxy Lady, Purple Hayes, Eric Clapton with the Blues Breakers,

0:44:25.680 --> 0:44:32.440
<v Speaker 2>the Bartok String Quartets, Stravinsky, Wright of Spring, and I

0:44:32.520 --> 0:44:36.560
<v Speaker 2>could no longer be the dutiful son. I was being

0:44:36.640 --> 0:44:39.600
<v Speaker 2>redirected in life. I went with it.

0:44:40.600 --> 0:44:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So you decide to go to London. Do you

0:44:43.600 --> 0:44:46.120
<v Speaker 1>know somebody in London? Where are you gonna stay? Do

0:44:46.160 --> 0:44:47.840
<v Speaker 1>you have any work opportunities?

0:44:48.640 --> 0:44:53.160
<v Speaker 2>The quick answer to all of those questions is no. However,

0:44:53.280 --> 0:44:57.640
<v Speaker 2>in Bournemouth there were the Giles brothers, Michael and Peter

0:44:57.800 --> 0:45:02.439
<v Speaker 2>Giles and the They had just left a band called

0:45:02.440 --> 0:45:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Trendsetters Limited. They were professionals. Peter was two years older

0:45:07.360 --> 0:45:09.600
<v Speaker 2>than me, Michael was four years older than me, and

0:45:09.640 --> 0:45:14.160
<v Speaker 2>when you're twenty one, that's very big. I became a

0:45:14.200 --> 0:45:18.319
<v Speaker 2>professional musician on May the sixteenth, nineteen sixty seven, my

0:45:18.440 --> 0:45:23.759
<v Speaker 2>twenty first birthday, and then became available for work. And

0:45:23.960 --> 0:45:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Michael and Peter Giles were advertising for a singing organist.

0:45:29.600 --> 0:45:32.560
<v Speaker 2>I was tipped off to this by a local agent

0:45:33.080 --> 0:45:37.719
<v Speaker 2>in Bournemouth, so I went an auditioned, and although I

0:45:37.880 --> 0:45:43.360
<v Speaker 2>can't sing and don't play organ I spent a month

0:45:43.440 --> 0:45:45.719
<v Speaker 2>rehearsing with them. And after a month I said to

0:45:45.760 --> 0:45:52.360
<v Speaker 2>Michael Giles, and I thought humorously, I said, have I

0:45:52.440 --> 0:45:56.360
<v Speaker 2>passed the audition? Well, I mean the answer to that

0:45:56.480 --> 0:45:59.640
<v Speaker 2>is clearly yes, but not if you're asking Michael Giles,

0:45:59.680 --> 0:46:04.160
<v Speaker 2>because Michael's key characteristic is that Michael could never commit himself.

0:46:05.200 --> 0:46:10.239
<v Speaker 2>So Michael rolled himself a cigarette and looked down and

0:46:10.880 --> 0:46:13.439
<v Speaker 2>put the cigarette in his mouth and writ it and said,

0:46:14.560 --> 0:46:16.840
<v Speaker 2>let's not be in too great a hurry to commit

0:46:16.920 --> 0:46:20.760
<v Speaker 2>ourselves to each other. So, although I never learned whether

0:46:20.800 --> 0:46:24.480
<v Speaker 2>I passed the audition or not, we moved to London

0:46:24.760 --> 0:46:28.920
<v Speaker 2>in September. September, I think we might have moved a

0:46:28.960 --> 0:46:32.279
<v Speaker 2>month or two earlier because I had got US a

0:46:32.440 --> 0:46:40.719
<v Speaker 2>job working in La Dulta, not an Italian restaurant with

0:46:40.880 --> 0:46:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Douglas Ward, a cord of Vox accordion player backing an

0:46:46.600 --> 0:46:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Italian singer called Moreno. But we're now shooting off on

0:46:51.960 --> 0:46:57.319
<v Speaker 2>entirely tangential situations. But yes, I moved to London with

0:46:57.400 --> 0:47:00.560
<v Speaker 2>two people who had more experience than me. We moved

0:47:00.640 --> 0:47:04.839
<v Speaker 2>up to essentially unemployment inignoranty for a year or two.

0:47:06.280 --> 0:47:10.240
<v Speaker 2>We did have employment. We began, I believe, on the Monday,

0:47:10.280 --> 0:47:16.640
<v Speaker 2>and on the Thursday, we discovered that the agent was

0:47:16.719 --> 0:47:21.480
<v Speaker 2>ripping off ten pounds a week from our pay packet,

0:47:21.640 --> 0:47:24.360
<v Speaker 2>and we went on strike on the Friday in protest,

0:47:24.800 --> 0:47:28.880
<v Speaker 2>and we were sacked on the Saturday. And I was

0:47:28.960 --> 0:47:32.000
<v Speaker 2>unemployed for the next year or so.

0:47:32.160 --> 0:47:35.759
<v Speaker 1>Okay, but one can, because this is something we're not

0:47:35.880 --> 0:47:39.120
<v Speaker 1>familiar with in the US, but one can live on

0:47:39.160 --> 0:47:42.319
<v Speaker 1>the doll on unemployment and exist for that year.

0:47:44.200 --> 0:47:46.360
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it's the quick answer. I lived on what was

0:47:46.400 --> 0:47:51.160
<v Speaker 2>called supplementary benefit, which meant on a Friday I would

0:47:51.280 --> 0:47:56.320
<v Speaker 2>drive with Peter Giles in his nineteen fifty two Daimler.

0:47:57.040 --> 0:47:59.319
<v Speaker 2>It was a heap, but nevertheless, it would take us

0:47:59.360 --> 0:48:03.759
<v Speaker 2>as far as the Supplementary Benefits Office at Downshall Hill

0:48:04.360 --> 0:48:08.120
<v Speaker 2>in Hampstead, where we would get opelieve it was five pounds,

0:48:08.920 --> 0:48:13.200
<v Speaker 2>which would decounter fairly modest, not to say miserable existence.

0:48:14.120 --> 0:48:18.840
<v Speaker 2>So on a Monday I had the choice of whether

0:48:19.000 --> 0:48:23.400
<v Speaker 2>to buy an extra can of peas or half an

0:48:23.480 --> 0:48:28.640
<v Speaker 2>ounce of Golden Virginia rolling tobacco or old Holbury rolling tobacco,

0:48:29.000 --> 0:48:33.239
<v Speaker 2>or go up to Kilburn State Cinema where I could

0:48:33.239 --> 0:48:36.319
<v Speaker 2>see a film. So this was my choice on a

0:48:36.400 --> 0:48:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Monday evening, can of peas and eat more golden Holburn,

0:48:42.760 --> 0:48:48.120
<v Speaker 2>roll some more cigarettes or two or three see a film.

0:48:48.440 --> 0:48:50.000
<v Speaker 2>That was my life for about a year.

0:48:51.160 --> 0:48:52.799
<v Speaker 1>So then what happened after that year?

0:48:53.760 --> 0:49:01.120
<v Speaker 2>After that Ian McDonald came together with Charles J and Frip.

0:49:01.560 --> 0:49:05.160
<v Speaker 2>One of the giants fell out and another person called

0:49:05.239 --> 0:49:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Greg Lake came in. And Ian McDonald had an uncle

0:49:10.200 --> 0:49:17.360
<v Speaker 2>called Angus Hunking, who was a retired very successful industrialist

0:49:18.600 --> 0:49:22.640
<v Speaker 2>from the North of England, very good man who to

0:49:22.800 --> 0:49:28.760
<v Speaker 2>keep his second wife happy, he invested seven thousand pounds

0:49:28.800 --> 0:49:34.480
<v Speaker 2>in his wife's nephew in McDonald's band, which enabled us

0:49:34.520 --> 0:49:36.840
<v Speaker 2>to stay afloat for a period of time and to

0:49:36.880 --> 0:49:41.279
<v Speaker 2>buy equipment, which is what we did, and this was

0:49:41.320 --> 0:49:42.640
<v Speaker 2>the beginning of King Crimson.

0:49:43.239 --> 0:49:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, during the year that you're on the doll, what

0:49:47.640 --> 0:49:50.640
<v Speaker 1>is your musical situation? Is that when this band is

0:49:50.760 --> 0:49:54.000
<v Speaker 1>forming or you playing other bands, what's going on during

0:49:54.040 --> 0:49:54.439
<v Speaker 1>that year?

0:49:57.160 --> 0:50:01.239
<v Speaker 2>During that year I practiced two for six, eight, ten

0:50:01.360 --> 0:50:06.600
<v Speaker 2>twelve hours a day. Why because a sessional, professional musician

0:50:06.760 --> 0:50:10.799
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have the time to practice. May I say that

0:50:10.960 --> 0:50:14.319
<v Speaker 2>I have been mostly an exception to that, but that's

0:50:14.360 --> 0:50:20.040
<v Speaker 2>another story. During the time Charles, Charles and Fritt were

0:50:20.080 --> 0:50:23.960
<v Speaker 2>living in Ignominy from the late sixty seven into nineteen

0:50:24.040 --> 0:50:30.080
<v Speaker 2>sixty eight, we made demos in our modest accommodations at

0:50:30.160 --> 0:50:34.920
<v Speaker 2>ninety three A Brondersbury Road, Kilburn, and we secured a

0:50:34.960 --> 0:50:38.880
<v Speaker 2>record deal with d RAM that's a branch of Decca Records.

0:50:39.480 --> 0:50:42.040
<v Speaker 2>And the person we spoke to at Decca Records is

0:50:42.080 --> 0:50:46.799
<v Speaker 2>a famous character who turned down the Beatles, Dick Rowe.

0:50:47.600 --> 0:50:51.080
<v Speaker 2>That was the man we met at d RAM. He's

0:50:51.160 --> 0:50:54.320
<v Speaker 2>also the A and R man that persuaded Leta Rosa

0:50:54.840 --> 0:50:57.600
<v Speaker 2>to record how Much is that Doggie in the Window?

0:50:58.800 --> 0:51:02.560
<v Speaker 2>Which she hated and was bullied and pushed into doing it,

0:51:04.280 --> 0:51:08.799
<v Speaker 2>and only ever sung at once the one take of

0:51:08.840 --> 0:51:11.120
<v Speaker 2>how Much is that Doggie in the Window, which was

0:51:11.160 --> 0:51:16.120
<v Speaker 2>a massive hit for her that she refused ever to

0:51:16.200 --> 0:51:19.800
<v Speaker 2>sing live now in case you think I'm just witchering

0:51:19.840 --> 0:51:24.839
<v Speaker 2>on bob Leta Rosa was a cabaret at the Majestic

0:51:24.920 --> 0:51:31.319
<v Speaker 2>Hotel and at age nineteen, I accompanied her. Wow, so well,

0:51:31.719 --> 0:51:35.520
<v Speaker 2>we recognize life is a circle. We cannot escape our

0:51:35.520 --> 0:51:39.280
<v Speaker 2>circle anyway. Coming back, so the one year of Charles

0:51:39.400 --> 0:51:43.840
<v Speaker 2>charleson Tripp Poverty Enigma. Andy was essentially getting a record

0:51:43.880 --> 0:51:47.120
<v Speaker 2>deal and making a record which in its first year

0:51:47.160 --> 0:51:51.320
<v Speaker 2>of relief worldwide attracted I believe four hundred seals.

0:51:53.360 --> 0:51:57.839
<v Speaker 1>Okay, a raging success. So how does that evolve into

0:51:57.920 --> 0:51:58.719
<v Speaker 1>King Crimson?

0:52:00.080 --> 0:52:07.680
<v Speaker 2>That's an interesting one. Probably Charles Jars and Fripp's only

0:52:07.960 --> 0:52:13.479
<v Speaker 2>public I'm not sure is that success. But meanwhile Ian

0:52:13.640 --> 0:52:19.000
<v Speaker 2>McDonald had joined Charles, Charles and Fripp. I'll cut straight in.

0:52:19.480 --> 0:52:24.000
<v Speaker 2>So Charles Jarsonphrip was now a four piece. We through

0:52:24.280 --> 0:52:28.479
<v Speaker 2>a professional connection that the Charles brothers had, we did

0:52:28.600 --> 0:52:32.400
<v Speaker 2>a thirty minute television show called Color Me Pop on

0:52:32.560 --> 0:52:36.760
<v Speaker 2>BBC two television in England, which would broadcast I believe

0:52:36.800 --> 0:52:41.440
<v Speaker 2>in November nineteen sixty eight, Charles Jons Fripp kind of

0:52:41.440 --> 0:52:45.840
<v Speaker 2>broke up on the same day or night of release.

0:52:46.760 --> 0:52:49.319
<v Speaker 2>It was fairly obvious to me that Charles Charson Frip

0:52:49.360 --> 0:52:53.640
<v Speaker 2>and Ian McDonald had no chance whatsoever a professional success.

0:52:55.440 --> 0:52:58.480
<v Speaker 2>So I put it to the other members of the band. Look,

0:53:00.800 --> 0:53:05.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't feel I can continue working with Peter, but

0:53:06.080 --> 0:53:11.120
<v Speaker 2>I have a pal in Bournemouth who sings, plays guitar

0:53:11.800 --> 0:53:18.040
<v Speaker 2>and plays bass, Greg Lake, and he can replace either

0:53:18.120 --> 0:53:24.200
<v Speaker 2>myself or Peter, whatever you feel. And Ian MacDonald and

0:53:24.239 --> 0:53:28.440
<v Speaker 2>Michael Giles figured that no, it was probably better moving

0:53:28.480 --> 0:53:32.640
<v Speaker 2>forward that I stay in Peter leave, which is what happened.

0:53:33.680 --> 0:53:38.040
<v Speaker 2>And Greg Lake moved from Bournemouth to London and had

0:53:38.080 --> 0:53:41.440
<v Speaker 2>nowhere to live. And for the first three days of

0:53:41.520 --> 0:53:45.279
<v Speaker 2>Greg being in London he slept in bed with me,

0:53:45.480 --> 0:53:50.400
<v Speaker 2>my four foot six modest bed in our modest accommodations.

0:53:50.800 --> 0:53:54.839
<v Speaker 2>Before we got an apartment or pad as it would

0:53:54.840 --> 0:53:59.240
<v Speaker 2>be called back then, be caught a pad together off

0:54:00.560 --> 0:54:02.839
<v Speaker 2>off West Point Grove.

0:54:04.160 --> 0:54:07.399
<v Speaker 1>How did you know Greg Lake and what was his

0:54:07.600 --> 0:54:10.440
<v Speaker 1>status and how much hunger did he have before you

0:54:10.600 --> 0:54:11.919
<v Speaker 1>picked him from obscurity?

0:54:13.440 --> 0:54:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, Greg was at that time probably more successful than

0:54:18.120 --> 0:54:24.319
<v Speaker 2>we were. But to go back, Greg was one of

0:54:24.360 --> 0:54:28.040
<v Speaker 2>the young players on the Bournemouth pool music scene as

0:54:28.080 --> 0:54:31.239
<v Speaker 2>I was. He was a couple of years younger than me.

0:54:31.960 --> 0:54:35.440
<v Speaker 2>And I've mentioned the Seller Club earlier. Well, I would

0:54:35.440 --> 0:54:38.640
<v Speaker 2>climb over the wall of the Cellar Club and get in,

0:54:38.680 --> 0:54:44.920
<v Speaker 2>which I did, and I was at Greg Lake's band.

0:54:49.560 --> 0:54:52.920
<v Speaker 2>The name currently escapes me because I'm talking too much,

0:54:53.239 --> 0:54:56.560
<v Speaker 2>but I saw them doing. An addition, we were young

0:54:56.640 --> 0:55:00.920
<v Speaker 2>characters the same age, young teenage boys with g and music.

0:55:01.520 --> 0:55:05.719
<v Speaker 2>We became very very close, as young young characters do.

0:55:07.480 --> 0:55:10.200
<v Speaker 2>I went to London, I stayed in touch with Greg.

0:55:10.320 --> 0:55:14.760
<v Speaker 2>Greg joined the bank called the Gods, who had Ken Hensley,

0:55:14.800 --> 0:55:19.480
<v Speaker 2>who went on to Uriah, and we stayed in touch,

0:55:19.640 --> 0:55:24.160
<v Speaker 2>good pals, And when Peter was leaving, I was in

0:55:24.200 --> 0:55:26.319
<v Speaker 2>touch with Greg and said would you like to come

0:55:26.320 --> 0:55:30.719
<v Speaker 2>to London. It was fairly obvious that Greg was a

0:55:30.800 --> 0:55:35.240
<v Speaker 2>lifer in music. You know, you recognize each other. We're

0:55:35.280 --> 0:55:40.319
<v Speaker 2>not here as a lifestyle, We're here because this is

0:55:40.360 --> 0:55:44.520
<v Speaker 2>what we do. And it was fairly obvious to anyone

0:55:44.520 --> 0:55:46.960
<v Speaker 2>in Bonemouth at the time that Greg was one of

0:55:47.000 --> 0:55:48.480
<v Speaker 2>those characters who would succeed.

0:55:49.760 --> 0:55:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, how do you get a manager and a record

0:55:52.200 --> 0:55:53.440
<v Speaker 1>deal for King Crimson.

0:55:58.560 --> 0:56:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Through the connection with d Ram. They knew Noel Gay.

0:56:06.000 --> 0:56:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Noel Gay's background was in publishing, but they also had management.

0:56:11.160 --> 0:56:14.919
<v Speaker 2>Since Charles, Charles and Fripp were a new artist on

0:56:14.960 --> 0:56:20.239
<v Speaker 2>the d RAM label, we needed management. So they were

0:56:20.239 --> 0:56:23.800
<v Speaker 2>in touch with Noel Gay, who took on Charles, Charles

0:56:23.880 --> 0:56:28.640
<v Speaker 2>and Fripp. And two young characters working at Noel Gay

0:56:28.680 --> 0:56:33.360
<v Speaker 2>were David Anthoven and John Gayden who were just about

0:56:33.440 --> 0:56:41.200
<v Speaker 2>to go independent. So this was EG Management who split

0:56:41.280 --> 0:56:46.000
<v Speaker 2>off from Noel Gay and took King Crimson Charles, Charles

0:56:46.040 --> 0:56:50.520
<v Speaker 2>and Fripp, becoming King Crimson with them, which became a

0:56:50.600 --> 0:56:55.200
<v Speaker 2>legal issue because Noel Gay. When King Crimson suddenly had

0:56:55.239 --> 0:57:00.200
<v Speaker 2>this remarkably successful first album, Noel Gay said, but hey,

0:57:01.160 --> 0:57:06.360
<v Speaker 2>Noel Gay manages King Crimson, not EG Management. So a

0:57:06.480 --> 0:57:10.480
<v Speaker 2>settlement was made by Wichie. Noel Gay received I think

0:57:10.560 --> 0:57:13.759
<v Speaker 2>two percent in the court of Crimson King for a

0:57:13.840 --> 0:57:17.360
<v Speaker 2>year or two. So you had Entoven and Gayden, a

0:57:17.400 --> 0:57:23.440
<v Speaker 2>new generation management firm managing King Crimson, who were therefore

0:57:23.560 --> 0:57:25.880
<v Speaker 2>available for a new record deal.

0:57:26.920 --> 0:57:28.160
<v Speaker 3>I was going to say, and I think if I

0:57:28.200 --> 0:57:32.600
<v Speaker 3>remember rightly, they became excited because they saw the TV

0:57:32.720 --> 0:57:36.960
<v Speaker 3>show that you mentioned earlier. I believe so, yes, because

0:57:37.000 --> 0:57:40.000
<v Speaker 3>they weren't aware really of what Charles Jars and Fripp

0:57:40.040 --> 0:57:42.640
<v Speaker 3>were doing, and they saw that TV shows that the

0:57:42.720 --> 0:57:44.920
<v Speaker 3>main thing that served was that those who saw it

0:57:45.000 --> 0:57:47.120
<v Speaker 3>and then decided they wanted to manage you.

0:57:47.880 --> 0:57:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes, well. On January the thirteenth, nineteen sixty nine, King Crimson,

0:57:54.040 --> 0:57:59.680
<v Speaker 2>who then didn't quite have a name, nevertheless began began

0:57:59.800 --> 0:58:02.840
<v Speaker 2>rehearsing in the basement of the Fulham Palace Cafe in

0:58:02.920 --> 0:58:07.720
<v Speaker 2>Fulham Fulham Palace Road. Why because we had taken of

0:58:07.800 --> 0:58:12.120
<v Speaker 2>the seven thousand pounds which Angers Hunking had generously lent us.

0:58:12.160 --> 0:58:15.760
<v Speaker 2>It wasn't a gift, it was alone that he never

0:58:16.080 --> 0:58:21.080
<v Speaker 2>ever believed in his wildest dreams we would repay. But nevertheless,

0:58:21.080 --> 0:58:23.240
<v Speaker 2>if it kept his wife happy, then he'd do it.

0:58:23.960 --> 0:58:27.479
<v Speaker 2>So armed with our new equipment and money to pay

0:58:27.520 --> 0:58:32.520
<v Speaker 2>rent on our rehearsal room, we began rehearsing. And what

0:58:32.560 --> 0:58:34.880
<v Speaker 2>we would do is invite people down to see us.

0:58:35.840 --> 0:58:38.440
<v Speaker 2>And of the two of the first people to come

0:58:38.480 --> 0:58:41.960
<v Speaker 2>down to see us, after I believe ten days rehearsal

0:58:42.400 --> 0:58:44.760
<v Speaker 2>ent over in the Gaden, and they thought, yeah, this

0:58:44.960 --> 0:58:47.960
<v Speaker 2>is good. And they went away and they came back,

0:58:49.040 --> 0:58:52.920
<v Speaker 2>and the second time they came back, they realized this

0:58:52.960 --> 0:58:57.600
<v Speaker 2>isn't a good band, this is something else. And we

0:58:57.800 --> 0:59:03.040
<v Speaker 2>established the convention of inviting people down to see us.

0:59:03.040 --> 0:59:05.800
<v Speaker 2>For example, the Moody Blues came down to see us

0:59:06.560 --> 0:59:10.280
<v Speaker 2>and we played for them, and Tony Clark, their record producer,

0:59:12.960 --> 0:59:20.240
<v Speaker 2>and then with various record companies taking an interest, Chris

0:59:20.280 --> 0:59:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Blackwell of Island Records sent down Muff Winwood to see us.

0:59:27.440 --> 0:59:31.280
<v Speaker 2>And Muff Winwood was the brother of Steve Winwood, who

0:59:31.400 --> 0:59:38.840
<v Speaker 2>I believe we probably know well. And Muff Windwood was

0:59:39.120 --> 0:59:42.360
<v Speaker 2>utterly unable to see what was in front of him,

0:59:43.240 --> 0:59:46.640
<v Speaker 2>and he remarked, went over and Gaydon, they're like the Tremlers,

0:59:47.880 --> 0:59:50.920
<v Speaker 2>who were an excellent band, but very unlike King Crimson.

0:59:51.880 --> 0:59:57.680
<v Speaker 2>And he said to us, you have no image. You

0:59:57.720 --> 0:59:59.880
<v Speaker 2>won't be able to work live unless you have a

1:00:00.080 --> 1:00:04.680
<v Speaker 2>hit single. So he went back to Chris Blackwell and

1:00:04.760 --> 1:00:11.479
<v Speaker 2>said what I've just said, and Chris Blackwell, I wasn't

1:00:11.520 --> 1:00:13.959
<v Speaker 2>in the room, but I think the response that I've

1:00:13.960 --> 1:00:18.600
<v Speaker 2>received is something like you said what And for me,

1:00:19.400 --> 1:00:23.920
<v Speaker 2>I have all always taken After that, Muff Windwood is

1:00:24.080 --> 1:00:27.840
<v Speaker 2>a reliable direction to the way to move in life.

1:00:28.080 --> 1:00:33.040
<v Speaker 2>So if Muff points that way, I go that way.

1:00:33.800 --> 1:00:37.880
<v Speaker 2>He established a standard for me, so anyway other characters

1:00:37.920 --> 1:00:44.080
<v Speaker 2>would come down and essentially on the basis of those

1:00:44.120 --> 1:00:50.160
<v Speaker 2>performances in a very small basement of a Fulham Palace cafe,

1:00:52.400 --> 1:00:57.080
<v Speaker 2>that established our beginning. From this the connections were made.

1:00:57.280 --> 1:01:02.040
<v Speaker 2>We did a week in Changes, a club in Newcastle

1:01:02.120 --> 1:01:06.160
<v Speaker 2>had just opened a Bank February of nineteen sixty nine,

1:01:06.200 --> 1:01:09.320
<v Speaker 2>which had been booked on the basis of Charles Charles

1:01:09.440 --> 1:01:14.640
<v Speaker 2>and Fripp Calumy Pop Show. But the first King Crimson

1:01:14.760 --> 1:01:18.720
<v Speaker 2>live performance was in April nineteen sixty nine at the

1:01:18.800 --> 1:01:22.640
<v Speaker 2>Speakeasy Club, which was something of a defining performance.

1:01:24.000 --> 1:01:27.720
<v Speaker 1>But how do you ultimately get a record deal and

1:01:27.800 --> 1:01:28.640
<v Speaker 1>make that record.

1:01:32.160 --> 1:01:41.360
<v Speaker 2>Different record companies made different offers. Mercury Records, I believe,

1:01:41.400 --> 1:01:44.120
<v Speaker 2>offered three hundred and fifty thousand pounds at the time,

1:01:44.120 --> 1:01:51.000
<v Speaker 2>which was huge Island Records in England because Entopen and

1:01:51.080 --> 1:01:54.640
<v Speaker 2>Gayden and the band felt this was the right the

1:01:54.760 --> 1:01:59.680
<v Speaker 2>right label, young generation label for US and in America

1:01:59.800 --> 1:02:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Atlantic Records Arma Ertigan Arma Ertigan flew to London, I

1:02:06.640 --> 1:02:11.840
<v Speaker 2>believe it may have been the second or third Speakeasy performance.

1:02:12.600 --> 1:02:16.000
<v Speaker 2>He flew to England to see the band and make

1:02:16.040 --> 1:02:22.920
<v Speaker 2>a personal connection to get us for Atlantic respect mister Ertigan,

1:02:23.400 --> 1:02:27.160
<v Speaker 2>which he did. So we had the record, the record

1:02:27.160 --> 1:02:33.760
<v Speaker 2>deal Island Records in England, Atlantic in America, and we

1:02:33.880 --> 1:02:42.080
<v Speaker 2>made the record in seven days and one for final mixing. Ah,

1:02:42.160 --> 1:02:44.480
<v Speaker 2>I'd have to check the timeline, but that was probably

1:02:44.520 --> 1:02:48.240
<v Speaker 2>around July August. We had a week in Morgan Studios

1:02:48.280 --> 1:02:52.200
<v Speaker 2>which didn't work at all with Tony Clark, the Moody

1:02:52.240 --> 1:02:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Blues producer. He he didn't see or hear us quite

1:02:58.840 --> 1:03:03.520
<v Speaker 2>So the band make made a choice in principle that

1:03:03.600 --> 1:03:07.800
<v Speaker 2>we would rather make our own mistakes and produce ourselves

1:03:08.280 --> 1:03:12.840
<v Speaker 2>than have a successful, well known, established producer who couldn't

1:03:12.880 --> 1:03:17.200
<v Speaker 2>quite see what we were. So those tapes were abandoned

1:03:17.200 --> 1:03:21.880
<v Speaker 2>and then we moved into Wessex Studios in North London,

1:03:21.960 --> 1:03:26.120
<v Speaker 2>near Islington, where we made in the Court of the

1:03:26.160 --> 1:03:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Crimson King very quickly.

1:03:28.480 --> 1:03:31.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, very quickly. It's interesting because it actually happened the

1:03:31.240 --> 1:03:33.920
<v Speaker 3>other way around. They made the record first, because in

1:03:33.960 --> 1:03:37.840
<v Speaker 3>fact David Entoven funded the record and if I'm right, Roberts, yes,

1:03:37.880 --> 1:03:41.120
<v Speaker 3>he did so that rather than getting the record deal

1:03:41.160 --> 1:03:44.120
<v Speaker 3>and then then paying for the record, the management actually

1:03:44.200 --> 1:03:48.280
<v Speaker 3>paid for the record and then licensed the record to

1:03:48.320 --> 1:03:49.840
<v Speaker 3>the various record labels.

1:03:50.160 --> 1:03:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes, David Entaven took out a mortgage on his news

1:03:54.080 --> 1:03:57.959
<v Speaker 2>property twenty two peters from place I believe, in order

1:03:58.040 --> 1:04:02.720
<v Speaker 2>to get in order to get funds. So I tell

1:04:02.800 --> 1:04:05.640
<v Speaker 2>you this is this is a long story. But what

1:04:05.800 --> 1:04:07.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to do, Bob, is leave you talking to

1:04:07.720 --> 1:04:11.040
<v Speaker 2>David while I take a quick bathroom break and I'll

1:04:11.080 --> 1:04:11.600
<v Speaker 2>be right there.

1:04:18.920 --> 1:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, let me ask you this I was going to

1:04:20.480 --> 1:04:23.600
<v Speaker 1>ask Kim. I mean, at first with the Tony Clark

1:04:23.720 --> 1:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>usually when a label makes a record, it's very hard

1:04:27.880 --> 1:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>to convince him to throw that project away. But I

1:04:30.680 --> 1:04:34.160
<v Speaker 1>guess since the managers were selling the record, they didn't

1:04:34.200 --> 1:04:35.840
<v Speaker 1>really you know, they needed to get it right.

1:04:36.800 --> 1:04:41.520
<v Speaker 3>So yes, the as I said, the record fortunately in fact,

1:04:41.640 --> 1:04:44.400
<v Speaker 3>was funded by the by the management, not by the

1:04:44.440 --> 1:04:47.800
<v Speaker 3>record label. When Tony Clark produced it, they thought they

1:04:47.800 --> 1:04:49.640
<v Speaker 3>were going to put it out on the Moody Blues label.

1:04:49.760 --> 1:04:52.400
<v Speaker 3>They just started a label, and the Moody Blues were

1:04:52.440 --> 1:04:55.840
<v Speaker 3>thinking of putting out the record as produced by Tony Clark.

1:04:56.280 --> 1:05:01.640
<v Speaker 3>They went into Morgan Studios with Tony Clark, and there

1:05:01.680 --> 1:05:03.520
<v Speaker 3>was at least a week of that they recorded most

1:05:03.560 --> 1:05:07.480
<v Speaker 3>of the same pieces, and then the band decided this

1:05:07.680 --> 1:05:11.760
<v Speaker 3>wasn't going anywhere. We've actually released, fortunately because the management

1:05:11.800 --> 1:05:14.480
<v Speaker 3>paid for we have subsequently released those recordings that they

1:05:14.480 --> 1:05:19.880
<v Speaker 3>were owned by King Crimson. But I have the diaries

1:05:19.920 --> 1:05:23.200
<v Speaker 3>of David Enthoven and it was a huge shock because

1:05:23.240 --> 1:05:28.360
<v Speaker 3>they were funding this record. I think these were these

1:05:28.400 --> 1:05:31.360
<v Speaker 3>were people with astonishing belief in the band they had

1:05:31.600 --> 1:05:33.680
<v Speaker 3>because literally, you know, the band came along and said,

1:05:33.680 --> 1:05:35.520
<v Speaker 3>we want to throw away this recording that we just

1:05:35.600 --> 1:05:38.760
<v Speaker 3>made with this very reputable producer because we don't like

1:05:38.840 --> 1:05:41.360
<v Speaker 3>it and we'd like to do it again. And David

1:05:41.400 --> 1:05:44.240
<v Speaker 3>had to go and then mortgage his house in order

1:05:44.280 --> 1:05:46.840
<v Speaker 3>to throw away those recordings and say, okay, we're going

1:05:46.920 --> 1:05:49.680
<v Speaker 3>to do it again and even work well, it's maybe

1:05:49.720 --> 1:05:51.240
<v Speaker 3>worse from his point of view on the band, and

1:05:51.240 --> 1:05:53.560
<v Speaker 3>we're now going to produce ourselves because we don't think

1:05:53.600 --> 1:05:58.760
<v Speaker 3>anybody can produce it properly. Astonishing faith he showed. And

1:05:58.880 --> 1:06:02.520
<v Speaker 3>therefore and they went back into the studio producing themselves,

1:06:02.520 --> 1:06:05.600
<v Speaker 3>and that's the record that everybody now knows.

1:06:05.840 --> 1:06:11.120
<v Speaker 1>So with hindsight, do you believe the Tony Clark record

1:06:11.160 --> 1:06:12.280
<v Speaker 1>would have been successful.

1:06:13.960 --> 1:06:18.400
<v Speaker 3>It wouldn't have been King Crimson. So if you listen

1:06:18.480 --> 1:06:22.360
<v Speaker 3>to it, it doesn't sound it doesn't really sound like

1:06:22.440 --> 1:06:28.600
<v Speaker 3>King Crimson. It sounds like some strange morephing of King

1:06:28.640 --> 1:06:32.400
<v Speaker 3>Crimson and the Moody Blues. It's much softer around the edges,

1:06:32.480 --> 1:06:33.280
<v Speaker 3>much more.

1:06:34.880 --> 1:06:34.960
<v Speaker 2>So.

1:06:36.240 --> 1:06:39.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it might have been successful. It wouldn't

1:06:39.000 --> 1:06:44.160
<v Speaker 3>have been the astonishing success that the final record was.

1:06:44.200 --> 1:06:46.520
<v Speaker 3>It wouldn't have been iconic. It wouldn't have been iconic and

1:06:47.160 --> 1:06:50.640
<v Speaker 3>hugely different in the same way that in the course

1:06:50.640 --> 1:06:52.760
<v Speaker 3>of Crimson King is. It would have been much more

1:06:52.800 --> 1:06:56.680
<v Speaker 3>of a something that was perfectly pleasant. But I don't

1:06:56.680 --> 1:06:58.240
<v Speaker 3>think it would have changed the world in the same

1:06:58.280 --> 1:07:07.080
<v Speaker 3>way the Robert always records it was that the piece

1:07:07.120 --> 1:07:09.919
<v Speaker 3>I talked to the wind. I think he was made

1:07:09.920 --> 1:07:12.840
<v Speaker 3>to sit there and play that guitar part about twenty times.

1:07:13.360 --> 1:07:16.880
<v Speaker 3>And oddly enough, I'd done an interview with Robert and

1:07:17.040 --> 1:07:18.160
<v Speaker 3>he had told me this story.

1:07:18.160 --> 1:07:18.479
<v Speaker 1>I didn't.

1:07:18.520 --> 1:07:20.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure if I believe it bout we were

1:07:20.200 --> 1:07:22.240
<v Speaker 3>there all night, David. I was going on and on

1:07:22.280 --> 1:07:24.439
<v Speaker 3>and on, and he was saying, play it again, play

1:07:24.480 --> 1:07:26.480
<v Speaker 3>it again. I don't like it, Yes, play it again,

1:07:26.560 --> 1:07:28.760
<v Speaker 3>play it again, and he said. We began to get

1:07:28.760 --> 1:07:30.400
<v Speaker 3>more and more fractious, and we were more and more

1:07:30.480 --> 1:07:34.760
<v Speaker 3>rude back down the talk back to this producer, and

1:07:34.800 --> 1:07:40.360
<v Speaker 3>oddly enough I then found some tapes quite recently, only

1:07:40.360 --> 1:07:42.240
<v Speaker 3>a couple of years ago. I found some tapes, and

1:07:42.240 --> 1:07:45.360
<v Speaker 3>I was listening to these tapes, not knowing what they were,

1:07:45.880 --> 1:07:48.440
<v Speaker 3>and I heard this take of I talked to the

1:07:48.480 --> 1:07:52.560
<v Speaker 3>Wind going on and on, and then I heard Robert

1:07:52.560 --> 1:07:56.480
<v Speaker 3>and Ian McDonald getting rather direct with the producer, and

1:07:56.520 --> 1:07:59.360
<v Speaker 3>I realized that I had found this recording that Robert

1:07:59.400 --> 1:08:01.400
<v Speaker 3>had been telling me out for years, and here it was,

1:08:01.680 --> 1:08:04.000
<v Speaker 3>and I finally had found it and could listen to it,

1:08:04.040 --> 1:08:11.240
<v Speaker 3>and so we released it in for the fiftieth anniversary

1:08:11.280 --> 1:08:13.840
<v Speaker 3>of in the course of the Crimson King. I don't

1:08:13.840 --> 1:08:16.040
<v Speaker 3>know if you know, but recordings that are unreleased fall

1:08:16.080 --> 1:08:19.000
<v Speaker 3>out of copyright if they've not been released within fifty.

1:08:18.760 --> 1:08:21.439
<v Speaker 1>Years in the UK anyway, Yeah.

1:08:21.000 --> 1:08:24.479
<v Speaker 3>Yes, So when we found those recordings, we realized that

1:08:25.000 --> 1:08:27.479
<v Speaker 3>we needed to release them all with the fiftieth years.

1:08:27.479 --> 1:08:30.439
<v Speaker 3>So for the fiftieth anniversary of the album, we put

1:08:30.479 --> 1:08:35.759
<v Speaker 3>out all the sessions, including these rather the endless Morgan

1:08:35.800 --> 1:08:37.680
<v Speaker 3>Studios recordings. If I talked to the.

1:08:37.640 --> 1:08:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Wind from the perspective of the consumer, the listener in

1:08:43.000 --> 1:08:47.599
<v Speaker 1>the court of the Crimson King was an instant smash.

1:08:47.880 --> 1:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Was that your perception or what were your feelings of time?

1:08:52.560 --> 1:08:55.519
<v Speaker 2>Oh? Right? Firstly, if I may, I would draw a

1:08:55.560 --> 1:09:00.680
<v Speaker 2>distinction between a listener or audience or auditor and the

1:09:00.760 --> 1:09:10.560
<v Speaker 2>consumer or customer. Going right back. Then, the band immediately

1:09:11.280 --> 1:09:16.720
<v Speaker 2>was hugely successful live, hugely. It became the band of

1:09:16.760 --> 1:09:25.000
<v Speaker 2>the time, and the only band that Ian McDonald considered

1:09:25.240 --> 1:09:29.599
<v Speaker 2>Blue King Crimson Off the stage was Free. We worked

1:09:29.680 --> 1:09:35.040
<v Speaker 2>with them in Red Car in the middle nineteen sixty nine.

1:09:35.160 --> 1:09:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Free were phenomenal. Coss Off what a player, Rogers, what

1:09:38.680 --> 1:09:42.760
<v Speaker 2>a singer. But essentially when we came on stage it

1:09:42.800 --> 1:09:46.599
<v Speaker 2>was almost impossible to follow us. We were an astonishing band,

1:09:47.479 --> 1:09:56.080
<v Speaker 2>astonishing band, and the album when it was released, it

1:09:56.120 --> 1:10:01.400
<v Speaker 2>was already primed. The word was on the street. The

1:10:01.439 --> 1:10:05.720
<v Speaker 2>turning point in terms of numbers and public attention was

1:10:05.840 --> 1:10:09.720
<v Speaker 2>probably the Hyde Park Festival with the Rolling Stones in

1:10:09.800 --> 1:10:14.240
<v Speaker 2>nineteen sixty nine. They were about six hundred and fifty

1:10:14.320 --> 1:10:20.439
<v Speaker 2>thousand people there. So at the time, if you're not

1:10:20.479 --> 1:10:24.720
<v Speaker 2>going to have success through mainstream media, television and radio,

1:10:25.200 --> 1:10:28.200
<v Speaker 2>how will you reach a huge number of people. Well,

1:10:28.240 --> 1:10:32.360
<v Speaker 2>the answer was live festivals, which are often free festivals,

1:10:33.040 --> 1:10:37.080
<v Speaker 2>and Hyde Park in July nineteen sixty nine was the

1:10:37.160 --> 1:10:40.719
<v Speaker 2>opportunity for the Rolling Stones to come back into live

1:10:40.760 --> 1:10:46.320
<v Speaker 2>performance after a break. And the story of EG getting

1:10:46.400 --> 1:10:51.080
<v Speaker 2>us onto the roster is a story in itself, but

1:10:51.800 --> 1:10:58.720
<v Speaker 2>we were probably the hit of that particular show and

1:10:59.479 --> 1:11:03.640
<v Speaker 2>what was known within the industry and club level grassroots

1:11:04.280 --> 1:11:08.200
<v Speaker 2>suddenly moved out. All the young Americans in Hyde Park

1:11:08.800 --> 1:11:14.360
<v Speaker 2>went back to America with the word, young hippies from

1:11:14.400 --> 1:11:18.800
<v Speaker 2>Europe went back to Europe with the word. And then

1:11:19.200 --> 1:11:23.120
<v Speaker 2>in the end of November nineteen sixty nine in America,

1:11:23.200 --> 1:11:27.200
<v Speaker 2>we played the West Palm Beach Festival three day festival,

1:11:27.280 --> 1:11:31.679
<v Speaker 2>also with the Stones. It broke King Crimson and Grand

1:11:31.760 --> 1:11:36.360
<v Speaker 2>Funk Railroad in America. So at that point that the

1:11:36.400 --> 1:11:38.960
<v Speaker 2>grassroots the word has moved out big time.

1:11:39.479 --> 1:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So coming from England, what was your personal experience

1:11:43.160 --> 1:11:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of being in the US.

1:11:47.200 --> 1:11:57.479
<v Speaker 2>One of liberation England was poor. America was wide open.

1:11:58.080 --> 1:12:02.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean America in the fifties and sixties. This was

1:12:02.080 --> 1:12:07.000
<v Speaker 2>the American time. It changed into the seventies and onwards.

1:12:07.120 --> 1:12:13.559
<v Speaker 2>The particular change from America from sixty nine to seventy

1:12:13.680 --> 1:12:19.920
<v Speaker 2>seventy one was probably the huge success of rock music

1:12:22.360 --> 1:12:26.439
<v Speaker 2>and records. The growth industry in America from sixty eight

1:12:26.479 --> 1:12:30.320
<v Speaker 2>to seventy eight was in the record industry, with I

1:12:30.360 --> 1:12:34.519
<v Speaker 2>think four billion dollars generated, which now wouldn't say much,

1:12:34.560 --> 1:12:38.320
<v Speaker 2>but that back then was quite considerable. And when the

1:12:38.360 --> 1:12:42.240
<v Speaker 2>young English bands began touring America essentially about sixty eight

1:12:43.360 --> 1:12:47.920
<v Speaker 2>and into sixty nine, the music industry, certainly in its

1:12:47.960 --> 1:12:53.879
<v Speaker 2>live aspects was not quite professional. For example, King Crimson

1:12:53.920 --> 1:12:57.000
<v Speaker 2>would land in America in October nineteen sixty nine and

1:12:57.080 --> 1:13:00.680
<v Speaker 2>the tool wasn't set up. Why well, you had a

1:13:00.720 --> 1:13:04.759
<v Speaker 2>few club gigs here there, and Frank Barcelona, a key

1:13:04.840 --> 1:13:10.719
<v Speaker 2>figure in establishing English rock music in America, premiere talent

1:13:11.439 --> 1:13:15.720
<v Speaker 2>hid fillin shows along the way, so Hendricks would. But

1:13:16.400 --> 1:13:19.439
<v Speaker 2>nineteen six to eight land in America, play New York

1:13:19.479 --> 1:13:24.640
<v Speaker 2>one night, Los Angeles the next. I'm exaggerating, but in

1:13:24.760 --> 1:13:28.760
<v Speaker 2>principal too, David Bowie, the same King Crimson. We had

1:13:28.760 --> 1:13:32.760
<v Speaker 2>a more measured progression, but it certainly wasn't set up.

1:13:33.240 --> 1:13:35.640
<v Speaker 2>But then when the money began to come in, you

1:13:36.200 --> 1:13:39.439
<v Speaker 2>moved from clubs and you move from the film alls

1:13:39.439 --> 1:13:47.479
<v Speaker 2>into sports stadium. And with the shift in commerce, there

1:13:47.600 --> 1:13:53.000
<v Speaker 2>was a shift in the attitude towards the musician, so

1:13:53.720 --> 1:14:01.160
<v Speaker 2>speaking in general terms, from say sixty nine to seventy seven.

1:14:01.680 --> 1:14:04.599
<v Speaker 2>When I moved to New York in February seventy seven.

1:14:05.560 --> 1:14:11.360
<v Speaker 2>In nineteen sixty nine, the differential, the separation between audience

1:14:12.160 --> 1:14:16.639
<v Speaker 2>and musician, there wasn't one. For me, it was fluid.

1:14:16.680 --> 1:14:19.519
<v Speaker 2>We were all on the same side. We were all

1:14:19.640 --> 1:14:24.519
<v Speaker 2>there to be part of this changing the world with music.

1:14:24.640 --> 1:14:29.400
<v Speaker 2>That was my perspective. And I don't believe Peter Simfield

1:14:29.439 --> 1:14:32.720
<v Speaker 2>said to me as a criticism, you were never a hippie,

1:14:33.000 --> 1:14:37.840
<v Speaker 2>So this isn't an old hippie wittering on. This is

1:14:37.920 --> 1:14:44.200
<v Speaker 2>my experience. But increasingly, and this began to change around

1:14:44.320 --> 1:14:49.600
<v Speaker 2>seventy four, the young roppers at person on stage is

1:14:49.680 --> 1:14:53.920
<v Speaker 2>now separated from a member of the audience and from

1:14:53.960 --> 1:14:58.320
<v Speaker 2>the young music writers who began to develop an attitude

1:14:58.360 --> 1:15:04.640
<v Speaker 2>which in America was reflect perhaps with Lester Bangs for example,

1:15:05.360 --> 1:15:09.719
<v Speaker 2>but in England in nineteen seventy six or seventy seven.

1:15:11.400 --> 1:15:16.040
<v Speaker 2>My sense of being on stage was who the fuck

1:15:16.120 --> 1:15:21.439
<v Speaker 2>do you think you are? Very English attitude, whereas walking

1:15:21.520 --> 1:15:24.559
<v Speaker 2>on the street newly arrived in New York in nineteen

1:15:24.600 --> 1:15:28.240
<v Speaker 2>seventy seven, the young character will come up and say, hey,

1:15:28.360 --> 1:15:31.840
<v Speaker 2>frip what you're doing? There was one of the couragement

1:15:31.960 --> 1:15:39.160
<v Speaker 2>and support which I found lacking in England. So increasingly

1:15:40.400 --> 1:15:47.240
<v Speaker 2>my orientation in terms of a geographical area which has

1:15:47.320 --> 1:15:51.880
<v Speaker 2>my focus from nineteen seventy three, switched to the US

1:15:52.720 --> 1:16:00.640
<v Speaker 2>from England, stroke England Europe. Why because it was possible

1:16:00.840 --> 1:16:05.960
<v Speaker 2>and supported by the audience and the industry, and the

1:16:06.040 --> 1:16:12.760
<v Speaker 2>industry because money was involved in the audience, because there

1:16:12.840 --> 1:16:18.320
<v Speaker 2>was something real in the music, that's my perception. And

1:16:18.439 --> 1:16:23.599
<v Speaker 2>King Crimson at this time didn't quite fit in. We

1:16:23.680 --> 1:16:33.600
<v Speaker 2>weren't mainstream rock. We we played with Zzy Top in Denver,

1:16:34.240 --> 1:16:40.360
<v Speaker 2>I believe in nineteen seventy four, and someone pulled the

1:16:40.400 --> 1:16:43.559
<v Speaker 2>plug on us, pulled the power on us, and twenty

1:16:43.680 --> 1:16:48.640
<v Speaker 2>minutes into our set we went blank. Someone didn't like

1:16:48.720 --> 1:16:52.439
<v Speaker 2>what we were doing. Recent press has suggested that I've

1:16:52.479 --> 1:16:56.479
<v Speaker 2>been blaming Billy Gibbons for this nonsense. Billy Gibbons has

1:16:56.520 --> 1:16:59.880
<v Speaker 2>my full respect and easy top for a fabulous band,

1:17:00.240 --> 1:17:05.240
<v Speaker 2>But nevertheless, what became known as progressive rock and progue

1:17:08.360 --> 1:17:10.160
<v Speaker 2>did have some antipathy.

1:17:12.160 --> 1:17:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's talk business for a minute. The record is

1:17:16.400 --> 1:17:22.559
<v Speaker 1>licensed to Island in Atlantic. Who owns all that stuff today?

1:17:24.200 --> 1:17:24.519
<v Speaker 3>I do?

1:17:25.560 --> 1:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>How did you end up owning it.

1:17:28.600 --> 1:17:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Twenty one years of litigation and dispute which is ongoing?

1:17:33.760 --> 1:17:35.479
<v Speaker 1>What is still ongoing.

1:17:36.160 --> 1:17:40.840
<v Speaker 2>Litigation and dispute over who owns the copyrights and who

1:17:40.880 --> 1:17:45.080
<v Speaker 2>is therefore entitled to assign them to whomever they dispose?

1:17:46.280 --> 1:17:52.479
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you've had a fifty plus year career. What do

1:17:52.600 --> 1:17:55.920
<v Speaker 1>you not own recording wise? Or what is in litigation

1:17:56.200 --> 1:17:57.439
<v Speaker 1>recordings wise?

1:17:58.640 --> 1:18:01.120
<v Speaker 2>Let's speak about this in June of this year.

1:18:03.280 --> 1:18:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let me change the question. The business is much

1:18:07.960 --> 1:18:13.200
<v Speaker 1>more sophisticated with a much more information today, irrelevant of

1:18:13.200 --> 1:18:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the ownership of the copyrights in the recordings, in the

1:18:17.439 --> 1:18:24.599
<v Speaker 1>songs you're busy rehearsing performing. I can't believe your eye

1:18:24.720 --> 1:18:27.640
<v Speaker 1>was on business that much. Do you feel that you

1:18:27.680 --> 1:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>were ripped off in these rough and tumble years.

1:18:32.120 --> 1:18:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, the answer has to be yes, and I can

1:18:34.080 --> 1:18:38.960
<v Speaker 2>give you a detailed analysis virtually month by month, week

1:18:39.040 --> 1:18:41.400
<v Speaker 2>by week, and day by day. Why because I still

1:18:41.479 --> 1:18:45.200
<v Speaker 2>have the correspondence. But if we go back to nineteen

1:18:45.280 --> 1:18:51.360
<v Speaker 2>sixty nine when we began our relationship with Entoven, Gayden,

1:18:51.840 --> 1:18:55.880
<v Speaker 2>John and Gaydon as a YouTube interview where he is

1:18:55.920 --> 1:19:00.519
<v Speaker 2>describing how the young Robert Fripp explained to him upon

1:19:00.600 --> 1:19:04.320
<v Speaker 2>which the relationship between EG and King Crimson would develop,

1:19:05.720 --> 1:19:15.960
<v Speaker 2>which was shared interest seventy thirty copyright ownership between King

1:19:16.040 --> 1:19:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Crimson and EG Management. And this was all fine and

1:19:19.439 --> 1:19:25.599
<v Speaker 2>went on until I believe it was February the twenty sixth,

1:19:25.720 --> 1:19:33.760
<v Speaker 2>nineteen seventy six, when Enthoven and Sam Alder, who went

1:19:33.800 --> 1:19:40.280
<v Speaker 2>into EG towards about October November nineteen seventy chartered accountant

1:19:41.080 --> 1:19:45.840
<v Speaker 2>as a backroom boy to take care of the accountancy

1:19:46.400 --> 1:19:58.280
<v Speaker 2>and the stuff stuff. But Sam Older lied, He came

1:19:58.320 --> 1:20:01.640
<v Speaker 2>and he lied, and he said that the members of

1:20:01.760 --> 1:20:06.679
<v Speaker 2>King Crimson had to assign the copyright interest to EG

1:20:08.640 --> 1:20:11.200
<v Speaker 2>so that we could get our money. Essentially, this was

1:20:11.240 --> 1:20:14.800
<v Speaker 2>a lie, and it was a lie which had to

1:20:14.800 --> 1:20:21.599
<v Speaker 2>be challenged in nineteen ninety one when the obfuscation came

1:20:21.640 --> 1:20:27.400
<v Speaker 2>to a head when EG sold King Crimson copyrights to

1:20:27.479 --> 1:20:33.880
<v Speaker 2>BMG Music Publishing and Virgin Records. At that point, the

1:20:33.920 --> 1:20:37.880
<v Speaker 2>beginning of my first major involvement in litigation and dispute

1:20:38.280 --> 1:20:43.040
<v Speaker 2>for six years and seven months from ninety one to

1:20:43.280 --> 1:20:51.439
<v Speaker 2>ninety seven began. It's been ongoing to date and has

1:20:51.640 --> 1:20:59.720
<v Speaker 2>been probably more attracting of my attention than my musical life,

1:21:00.000 --> 1:21:04.400
<v Speaker 2>and even more of that has fallen on David and

1:21:04.560 --> 1:21:09.360
<v Speaker 2>decland Colgan of Panegyric Records are distributor. But back in

1:21:09.400 --> 1:21:11.680
<v Speaker 2>the early days, what I did was set up the

1:21:11.720 --> 1:21:16.160
<v Speaker 2>structure and left it to management I trusted and should

1:21:16.200 --> 1:21:19.200
<v Speaker 2>not have done. And that's another story as to why

1:21:19.240 --> 1:21:24.960
<v Speaker 2>I did and should not have and when finally it

1:21:25.040 --> 1:21:28.760
<v Speaker 2>went off course for various reasons, I had to give

1:21:28.800 --> 1:21:29.719
<v Speaker 2>it my full attention.

1:21:30.800 --> 1:21:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay, litigation is very expensive and it takes time and

1:21:35.920 --> 1:21:40.200
<v Speaker 1>its heartache. Is this about the money or is this

1:21:40.320 --> 1:21:42.400
<v Speaker 1>about equity? What is right.

1:21:45.080 --> 1:21:52.879
<v Speaker 2>Both? For example, two members of the original King Crimson

1:21:52.960 --> 1:22:00.080
<v Speaker 2>have died not being paid the money there owed. There

1:22:00.080 --> 1:22:02.439
<v Speaker 2>are two more members of their first King Crimson, and

1:22:02.560 --> 1:22:06.799
<v Speaker 2>not in great health. I certainly hope they're paid before

1:22:06.800 --> 1:22:09.120
<v Speaker 2>eventity they do fly away.

1:22:09.400 --> 1:22:09.479
<v Speaker 3>Me.

1:22:10.200 --> 1:22:14.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm in great health. I do dead weights of one

1:22:14.240 --> 1:22:17.320
<v Speaker 2>hundred kilograms, which from men of seventy seven isn't bad.

1:22:17.840 --> 1:22:20.200
<v Speaker 2>And I am going to live long enough to make

1:22:20.240 --> 1:22:23.880
<v Speaker 2>sure these fuck wits in the music industry hand over

1:22:24.040 --> 1:22:24.760
<v Speaker 2>what we're out.

1:22:25.960 --> 1:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's say, hypothetically you're victorious across the board. Let's say

1:22:30.920 --> 1:22:33.920
<v Speaker 1>you end up owning all of these rights.

1:22:34.160 --> 1:22:37.160
<v Speaker 2>No, I already own them. Let's say we're being a

1:22:37.240 --> 1:22:38.960
<v Speaker 2>paid for the David over to ye.

1:22:39.080 --> 1:22:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Yes, so the ownership is not in dispute. So following

1:22:43.560 --> 1:22:46.320
<v Speaker 3>the dispute that Robert has talked about in the early nineties,

1:22:47.080 --> 1:22:52.400
<v Speaker 3>certainly in terms of the recordings, it was finally agreed that,

1:22:52.800 --> 1:22:55.280
<v Speaker 3>in fact, what was agreed was that the rights that

1:22:55.360 --> 1:22:58.760
<v Speaker 3>Virgin Records thought they had obtained they would keep for

1:22:58.800 --> 1:23:02.080
<v Speaker 3>ten years and then they return them to Robert. So

1:23:03.320 --> 1:23:06.480
<v Speaker 3>in the early two thousands, the rights and the recordings

1:23:07.680 --> 1:23:13.479
<v Speaker 3>were definitively assigned to Robert. The problem has been that

1:23:13.920 --> 1:23:17.759
<v Speaker 3>periodically things get licensed in by major labels in various

1:23:17.760 --> 1:23:22.080
<v Speaker 3>different ways, and you don't get always get it paid

1:23:22.080 --> 1:23:24.640
<v Speaker 3>according to those contracts. That is ongoing.

1:23:25.600 --> 1:23:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So the lawsuit that we read about about placing

1:23:29.160 --> 1:23:33.040
<v Speaker 1>certain songs on streaming services, those are the lawsuits we're

1:23:33.080 --> 1:23:33.640
<v Speaker 1>referring to.

1:23:33.720 --> 1:23:36.720
<v Speaker 3>That's a lidic yes, yes, and that one is that

1:23:36.800 --> 1:23:39.920
<v Speaker 3>one unfortunately is sub judices. So until May, we're not

1:23:40.120 --> 1:23:41.400
<v Speaker 3>talking a lot about that one.

1:23:41.520 --> 1:23:45.799
<v Speaker 1>Yes, okay. So going back, you're Robert, you own this stuff?

1:23:47.000 --> 1:23:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Would you ever sell it yourself?

1:23:51.280 --> 1:23:51.360
<v Speaker 3>No?

1:23:53.720 --> 1:23:54.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay?

1:23:54.760 --> 1:24:00.200
<v Speaker 1>You have nowhears and some may say, well, Robert not

1:24:00.280 --> 1:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>going to live forever if they pay you twenty Actually

1:24:03.160 --> 1:24:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the money would be here today. What would you say

1:24:05.160 --> 1:24:05.439
<v Speaker 1>to that?

1:24:06.439 --> 1:24:12.120
<v Speaker 2>I'd saying, my inheritor in all the copyrights is David Singleton.

1:24:12.600 --> 1:24:17.719
<v Speaker 2>That's in my will. Why because I trust David to

1:24:17.760 --> 1:24:22.200
<v Speaker 2>execute his responsibilities towards the catalog as I trust that

1:24:22.280 --> 1:24:22.760
<v Speaker 2>I have done.

1:24:24.240 --> 1:24:28.960
<v Speaker 3>And I think our view is that Robert owns those

1:24:29.000 --> 1:24:31.320
<v Speaker 3>copyright He does in fact own them personally, but I

1:24:31.320 --> 1:24:34.400
<v Speaker 3>think Robert owns those copyrights on behalf of all the musicians.

1:24:34.880 --> 1:24:44.320
<v Speaker 2>That is correct, Yes, okay.

1:24:44.800 --> 1:24:49.480
<v Speaker 1>In the film about King Crimson, one of the players

1:24:49.520 --> 1:24:53.639
<v Speaker 1>mentions that you wash your hands twenty times a day.

1:24:54.640 --> 1:24:55.720
<v Speaker 1>What would you say to that?

1:24:58.400 --> 1:25:01.760
<v Speaker 2>I was surprised when I heard that. Going back to

1:25:01.760 --> 1:25:04.960
<v Speaker 2>when I was working with Jamie Mirror in nineteen seventy

1:25:05.000 --> 1:25:09.000
<v Speaker 2>two into early seventy three. I don't believe I had

1:25:09.000 --> 1:25:13.320
<v Speaker 2>a hand washing fetish. However, what I've always been very

1:25:13.360 --> 1:25:16.559
<v Speaker 2>careful to do when I put a guitar on and

1:25:16.600 --> 1:25:23.080
<v Speaker 2>I play guitar, I must have clean hands. I don't want.

1:25:24.080 --> 1:25:27.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't want stickiness from picking up cakes, for example,

1:25:28.600 --> 1:25:33.200
<v Speaker 2>or buttered toast to be transferred to the strings. So

1:25:34.080 --> 1:25:37.479
<v Speaker 2>at that particular time, would I wash my hands before

1:25:37.479 --> 1:25:41.559
<v Speaker 2>playing guitar. Yes, I didn't recognize that I have a

1:25:41.600 --> 1:25:46.760
<v Speaker 2>hand washing fetish, which I certainly don't today. But nevertheless,

1:25:46.880 --> 1:25:50.519
<v Speaker 2>Jamie Muhror is a person I respect and I trust

1:25:50.560 --> 1:25:54.200
<v Speaker 2>his opinion, and if Jamie felt that I was an

1:25:54.200 --> 1:25:57.599
<v Speaker 2>annual fetishist of some kind, then I would certainly give

1:25:57.800 --> 1:26:01.759
<v Speaker 2>some credence to his opinion. Actually, if I am convinced

1:26:01.800 --> 1:26:04.439
<v Speaker 2>there's no date most people in the world are, is

1:26:04.479 --> 1:26:07.519
<v Speaker 2>that FIP is very very fucked up in the creepy person.

1:26:08.640 --> 1:26:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's say I say, Robert, we'll go into the

1:26:11.920 --> 1:26:15.120
<v Speaker 1>airport and we go, we get in the car, we've

1:26:15.200 --> 1:26:17.880
<v Speaker 1>left your house. Are you going to say, fuck, I

1:26:17.960 --> 1:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>forgot to lock the front door or I left the

1:26:20.920 --> 1:26:24.160
<v Speaker 1>stove on. Is that part of your personality or those

1:26:24.160 --> 1:26:25.200
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't even occur to you.

1:26:26.439 --> 1:26:29.720
<v Speaker 2>They might occur to me, but I am not obsessive compulsive.

1:26:30.280 --> 1:26:32.960
<v Speaker 2>That's my view. We'd have to ask my wife, and

1:26:33.120 --> 1:26:34.519
<v Speaker 2>my wife wife say, yes.

1:26:34.360 --> 1:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>He is.

1:26:34.760 --> 1:26:39.760
<v Speaker 2>He's really he's very strange person. Well, actually he does

1:26:39.800 --> 1:26:43.200
<v Speaker 2>say that. What I would do if I felt is

1:26:43.240 --> 1:26:46.559
<v Speaker 2>there a likely chance that I've left my front door unlocked?

1:26:47.160 --> 1:26:50.840
<v Speaker 2>I would check the keys in my purse. I would

1:26:50.880 --> 1:26:54.439
<v Speaker 2>then if I couldn't find them, I would found my

1:26:54.560 --> 1:26:58.559
<v Speaker 2>wife and say, ah, have is the front door lock?

1:26:58.800 --> 1:27:02.559
<v Speaker 2>Or I would say our personal secretary to say if

1:27:02.600 --> 1:27:06.200
<v Speaker 2>she would check the front door, I called Mark Axel

1:27:06.320 --> 1:27:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Powell are superb building person and ask him to check it.

1:27:10.960 --> 1:27:14.439
<v Speaker 2>What I would not do is throw a moody fit

1:27:14.680 --> 1:27:16.960
<v Speaker 2>and in sayst we drive back thirty miles to the

1:27:16.960 --> 1:27:17.439
<v Speaker 2>front door.

1:27:18.479 --> 1:27:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay. OCD can be very debilitating emotionally. One can be

1:27:24.880 --> 1:27:31.360
<v Speaker 1>tortured by these thoughts and repetitions. So would your wife

1:27:31.439 --> 1:27:35.080
<v Speaker 1>say that your need to rehearse every day and to

1:27:35.160 --> 1:27:39.320
<v Speaker 1>get certain things right or excessive or she would say, no,

1:27:39.439 --> 1:27:40.440
<v Speaker 1>that's not excessive.

1:27:42.200 --> 1:27:46.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, my wife is an actress, musician, and performer and

1:27:46.560 --> 1:27:52.280
<v Speaker 2>understands partecular on the stage. Play, for example, the amount

1:27:52.320 --> 1:27:57.040
<v Speaker 2>of rehearsing you have to do. So my wife might

1:27:57.120 --> 1:28:03.280
<v Speaker 2>say here, very strange, but I don't think she would

1:28:03.400 --> 1:28:08.640
<v Speaker 2>query my need to know. I'm walking on stage with

1:28:08.800 --> 1:28:14.800
<v Speaker 2>musicians who were rehearsed and practiced to play, except the

1:28:14.800 --> 1:28:17.439
<v Speaker 2>play Olympics standard challenges for a musician.

1:28:18.479 --> 1:28:19.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to say she might.

1:28:19.760 --> 1:28:20.160
<v Speaker 2>She might.

1:28:20.280 --> 1:28:22.759
<v Speaker 3>She might ask you to practice Fracture where she doesn't

1:28:22.760 --> 1:28:23.639
<v Speaker 3>have to listen to it.

1:28:24.400 --> 1:28:30.040
<v Speaker 2>Oh yes, Now, when King Crimson were reforming in twenty

1:28:30.120 --> 1:28:34.439
<v Speaker 2>thirteen for twenty fourteen the Final Incarnation, ID go into

1:28:34.479 --> 1:28:37.920
<v Speaker 2>the cellar of our home and I would practice and

1:28:38.080 --> 1:28:41.200
<v Speaker 2>practice and practice to play this piece called Fracture, which

1:28:41.240 --> 1:28:46.000
<v Speaker 2>is unplayable. It's technically of such a standard is taken

1:28:47.080 --> 1:28:52.320
<v Speaker 2>fifty years really for other guitarists to approach. It's horrible.

1:28:53.760 --> 1:28:57.040
<v Speaker 2>And my wife had enough of this, and I used

1:28:57.080 --> 1:29:00.240
<v Speaker 2>to have to go down to the cellar and lock

1:29:00.320 --> 1:29:02.840
<v Speaker 2>the door of the cellar because it's a very old door,

1:29:02.880 --> 1:29:06.719
<v Speaker 2>and would fly open and turn my guitar amp little,

1:29:07.360 --> 1:29:10.679
<v Speaker 2>very small practice, turn it down so she could no

1:29:10.760 --> 1:29:15.599
<v Speaker 2>longer hear this motor perpetro going on for two hours.

1:29:15.600 --> 1:29:16.960
<v Speaker 2>As I we'd come up to speed.

1:29:17.960 --> 1:29:21.720
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, okay, tell us a little bit more specifically

1:29:22.479 --> 1:29:27.040
<v Speaker 1>what the practice entails at.

1:29:26.960 --> 1:29:34.479
<v Speaker 2>Different parts in our musical life. The emphasis changes. If

1:29:34.520 --> 1:29:37.320
<v Speaker 2>I can quote Charlie Parker, and frankly, I think all

1:29:37.360 --> 1:29:41.799
<v Speaker 2>of us should accept Parker's advice. You learn your instrument,

1:29:41.920 --> 1:29:46.360
<v Speaker 2>you learn the music, and then you forget all this

1:29:46.760 --> 1:29:50.080
<v Speaker 2>Parker said, chit and then you just play. So at

1:29:50.120 --> 1:29:53.920
<v Speaker 2>different parts of our musical life, to begin with, we're

1:29:53.960 --> 1:29:58.519
<v Speaker 2>practicing the instrument, how to play the instrument, how on

1:29:58.600 --> 1:30:01.519
<v Speaker 2>the guitar, the left and the ro hand work together,

1:30:03.120 --> 1:30:14.160
<v Speaker 2>fingerboard knowledge, musical knowledge, then harmony, rhythm, how the hands

1:30:14.240 --> 1:30:18.479
<v Speaker 2>come together with fingerboard and musical knowledge, and then learning

1:30:18.600 --> 1:30:25.560
<v Speaker 2>the repertoire that we're engaging with. In terms of practicing improvisation,

1:30:26.360 --> 1:30:29.960
<v Speaker 2>throw it away, sit down, without thought, play, have fun,

1:30:30.320 --> 1:30:34.360
<v Speaker 2>and a very good professional musician often needs to be reminded.

1:30:34.920 --> 1:30:39.679
<v Speaker 2>Have fun, abandoned concern for right, wrong or anything else.

1:30:40.160 --> 1:30:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Let's remember the bird, play, just play. So in the

1:30:49.080 --> 1:30:55.680
<v Speaker 2>in the incarnation period twenty fourteen twenty one, my primary

1:30:56.920 --> 1:31:04.120
<v Speaker 2>address for practicing is the Calisenic side of it. We'll

1:31:04.160 --> 1:31:09.160
<v Speaker 2>assume that I've learned the rudiments of music assume that

1:31:09.320 --> 1:31:12.920
<v Speaker 2>I know that I'm learned the repertoire, which is King

1:31:12.960 --> 1:31:17.320
<v Speaker 2>crimson repertoire. The challenge is, as a man in his

1:31:17.520 --> 1:31:22.679
<v Speaker 2>late sixties and early seventies, is he able to perform

1:31:22.960 --> 1:31:27.280
<v Speaker 2>at an athletic level at the degree of a man

1:31:27.320 --> 1:31:32.200
<v Speaker 2>of twenty five? And the answer is no. So my

1:31:32.400 --> 1:31:38.280
<v Speaker 2>primary practicing area for the final incarnation of King Crimson

1:31:39.200 --> 1:31:48.519
<v Speaker 2>was how to be calisenically reliable. If you take the

1:31:48.600 --> 1:31:54.080
<v Speaker 2>analogy of an athlete, an Olympic quality athlete, these are

1:31:54.120 --> 1:32:01.200
<v Speaker 2>the challenges. Can you expect an Olympic athlete age seventy

1:32:02.560 --> 1:32:04.680
<v Speaker 2>to do what they were doing at twenty three or

1:32:04.680 --> 1:32:09.680
<v Speaker 2>twenty five? And if the answer is reliably no, what

1:32:09.920 --> 1:32:14.040
<v Speaker 2>does that athlete at that age have to do in

1:32:14.160 --> 1:32:17.759
<v Speaker 2>order to meet the challenge? And that was my question

1:32:18.600 --> 1:32:22.840
<v Speaker 2>and my response was constant calisenic practicing.

1:32:24.520 --> 1:32:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you don't have the athleticism of a younger man,

1:32:28.800 --> 1:32:32.360
<v Speaker 1>but do you believe the end quality of what you're

1:32:32.520 --> 1:32:36.920
<v Speaker 1>producing is improved with age for some reason because of

1:32:37.000 --> 1:32:39.320
<v Speaker 1>wisdom and the other stylistic elements.

1:32:40.600 --> 1:32:44.559
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't claim wisdom, but I am happy to say

1:32:44.600 --> 1:32:52.360
<v Speaker 2>I have a lot more experience and does that support

1:32:52.400 --> 1:32:54.840
<v Speaker 2>me when I walk on stage, And I would say yes,

1:32:54.880 --> 1:32:59.600
<v Speaker 2>and why because when I walk on stage, I know,

1:33:00.560 --> 1:33:07.480
<v Speaker 2>without any doubt whatsoever, music is there and it is available.

1:33:08.600 --> 1:33:12.360
<v Speaker 2>It never ever goes away. Do I know that for

1:33:12.360 --> 1:33:15.799
<v Speaker 2>a fact? Yes? Do I know that for certainty? Yes?

1:33:16.400 --> 1:33:20.000
<v Speaker 2>How because I've paid my joes as a professional musician

1:33:20.840 --> 1:33:26.600
<v Speaker 2>now for fifty seven years. What I also know is

1:33:27.160 --> 1:33:30.400
<v Speaker 2>music doesn't go away. Music is always present. But I

1:33:30.439 --> 1:33:34.000
<v Speaker 2>am not. So my focus is not on the music,

1:33:34.040 --> 1:33:39.759
<v Speaker 2>which I trust. My focus on whether I can be present.

1:33:39.960 --> 1:33:43.920
<v Speaker 2>That is, can I rely upon myself to walk on

1:33:44.080 --> 1:33:49.400
<v Speaker 2>stage and whatever horseshit is thrown at me? Can I

1:33:49.560 --> 1:33:53.639
<v Speaker 2>hold myself in the place for at least the duration

1:33:53.800 --> 1:33:58.000
<v Speaker 2>of the performance. And the answer to that is mostly yes.

1:33:58.880 --> 1:34:05.240
<v Speaker 2>But they are except situations that defeat me even today.

1:34:06.880 --> 1:34:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, what is your opinion of live versus recordings? Recordings

1:34:12.080 --> 1:34:15.760
<v Speaker 1>are permanent in performances or evanescent.

1:34:17.000 --> 1:34:25.040
<v Speaker 2>For me, music is in life. It's like gardening. If

1:34:25.080 --> 1:34:28.839
<v Speaker 2>you're not there when the rose blossoms, it's gone.

1:34:29.280 --> 1:34:29.519
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:34:29.560 --> 1:34:31.200
<v Speaker 2>I can take a photo of it and put it

1:34:31.200 --> 1:34:33.040
<v Speaker 2>out on my computer. I think, Oh, wasn't that a

1:34:33.120 --> 1:34:37.040
<v Speaker 2>nice rose? But it's not there and the scent when

1:34:37.080 --> 1:34:40.760
<v Speaker 2>you're there in the moment and it's real, but it

1:34:40.800 --> 1:34:45.840
<v Speaker 2>won't stay. What might stay is the quality of my

1:34:46.040 --> 1:34:51.680
<v Speaker 2>experiencing in such a way that I may return to

1:34:51.840 --> 1:34:56.400
<v Speaker 2>that moment in my experience and access it again. And

1:34:56.439 --> 1:35:00.639
<v Speaker 2>that only is possible if I am present. I'm present

1:35:00.920 --> 1:35:06.280
<v Speaker 2>here now, inside my body, my experiencing, my feelings and

1:35:06.400 --> 1:35:11.000
<v Speaker 2>with the rose. So for me, live performance is a

1:35:11.040 --> 1:35:15.880
<v Speaker 2>hot date and a record is a love letter. Now,

1:35:16.000 --> 1:35:18.559
<v Speaker 2>I love getting letters from my wife, but I would

1:35:18.640 --> 1:35:20.360
<v Speaker 2>rather take her in a tight embrace.

1:35:22.080 --> 1:35:26.120
<v Speaker 1>So recordings, in even recordings of live performances, are what

1:35:26.200 --> 1:35:30.200
<v Speaker 1>you leave behind. To what degree are you concerned with legacy?

1:35:32.680 --> 1:35:36.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, if I said, off the top of my head,

1:35:36.080 --> 1:35:39.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't give a flying fuck, I would then have

1:35:39.400 --> 1:35:44.640
<v Speaker 2>to say, then, why is it that DGM from approximately

1:35:44.760 --> 1:35:49.320
<v Speaker 2>nineteen ninety five to twenty fifteen made the focal point

1:35:49.400 --> 1:35:59.240
<v Speaker 2>of its existence in securing the archive? And why then

1:35:59.400 --> 1:36:03.519
<v Speaker 2>will we release as close definitive editions of all King

1:36:03.560 --> 1:36:08.479
<v Speaker 2>Crimson's life recorded music as we possibly can. Well, I'd

1:36:08.479 --> 1:36:14.200
<v Speaker 2>have to say that I keep my wife's love letters.

1:36:16.040 --> 1:36:18.679
<v Speaker 2>I would still rather have a hot date with her,

1:36:19.240 --> 1:36:23.040
<v Speaker 2>But I still keep the love letters. So we still

1:36:23.080 --> 1:36:25.800
<v Speaker 2>have love letters from King Crimson to any members of

1:36:25.840 --> 1:36:31.200
<v Speaker 2>the audience, for those who didn't manage to get on

1:36:31.240 --> 1:36:34.160
<v Speaker 2>a hot day and for those that did.

1:36:34.880 --> 1:36:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's say you're performing live and we started with this.

1:36:38.280 --> 1:36:42.479
<v Speaker 1>I have sat with acts very depressed after a show,

1:36:42.720 --> 1:36:46.519
<v Speaker 1>feeling they gave a bad performance when the audience has

1:36:47.439 --> 1:36:51.880
<v Speaker 1>loved it with raaging response. What is the goal of

1:36:52.040 --> 1:36:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the gig? Is it about the communication with the audience

1:36:55.439 --> 1:36:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and the response in the audience or is the audience

1:36:58.040 --> 1:37:02.360
<v Speaker 1>separate and is it about getting the music performed perfectly.

1:37:04.720 --> 1:37:09.880
<v Speaker 2>I'll respond to that tangentially. Bob the musician can only

1:37:10.080 --> 1:37:13.320
<v Speaker 2>ever say I felt that was a good show. I

1:37:13.400 --> 1:37:16.360
<v Speaker 2>felt that was a bad show. It's entirely subjective. It

1:37:16.400 --> 1:37:23.320
<v Speaker 2>has no relevance. Listening to King Crimson's live recordings, there

1:37:23.360 --> 1:37:30.320
<v Speaker 2>are performances which sound terrible but which I recall in

1:37:30.479 --> 1:37:36.240
<v Speaker 2>the moment were astonishing for the band members the audience.

1:37:36.360 --> 1:37:41.160
<v Speaker 2>This was an event, but the quality of that event

1:37:41.880 --> 1:37:47.160
<v Speaker 2>did not allow itself to be contained or captured by

1:37:47.160 --> 1:37:52.240
<v Speaker 2>the recording of it. I have also heard live recordings

1:37:52.280 --> 1:37:56.760
<v Speaker 2>that are stunning that from a position on stage, I

1:37:56.840 --> 1:38:01.599
<v Speaker 2>thought this.

1:37:59.400 --> 1:37:59.880
<v Speaker 1>This was.

1:38:01.560 --> 1:38:06.920
<v Speaker 2>So in the live performance, what are the factors that

1:38:07.040 --> 1:38:12.440
<v Speaker 2>make the event? Primarily three factors, the music, the musician,

1:38:12.800 --> 1:38:17.559
<v Speaker 2>and the audience. If the three come together, something can happen.

1:38:18.400 --> 1:38:23.920
<v Speaker 2>There is a fourth term which nevertheless has to be included,

1:38:23.960 --> 1:38:27.719
<v Speaker 2>and that is the music industry, because if the music

1:38:27.840 --> 1:38:33.320
<v Speaker 2>industry will not accept what you're doing, it's an extreme.

1:38:33.400 --> 1:38:39.439
<v Speaker 2>It will bury you, as I believe English punk music

1:38:39.560 --> 1:38:42.479
<v Speaker 2>was essentially buried in the American music industry in the

1:38:42.520 --> 1:38:47.759
<v Speaker 2>late seventies. But in the live event itself, you have music,

1:38:48.240 --> 1:38:52.559
<v Speaker 2>musicians and the audience. If the music is a live

1:38:52.760 --> 1:38:57.600
<v Speaker 2>and vibrant the audience might miss it and the musicians

1:38:57.680 --> 1:39:02.320
<v Speaker 2>might miss it, but perhap perhaps it manages to squeeze

1:39:02.400 --> 1:39:07.320
<v Speaker 2>its way onto tape and going back there you have it.

1:39:07.479 --> 1:39:12.600
<v Speaker 2>I will now have an example of David Singleton completely

1:39:12.800 --> 1:39:18.240
<v Speaker 2>failing to understand a musical event that was going on. David,

1:39:18.640 --> 1:39:23.640
<v Speaker 2>which broad short Church, Oh yeah, live live soundscapes? Was

1:39:23.680 --> 1:39:29.400
<v Speaker 2>it two thousand and eight lunchtime performance in this church

1:39:29.520 --> 1:39:35.080
<v Speaker 2>of soundscapes? And when I listened back to the music,

1:39:36.640 --> 1:39:39.920
<v Speaker 2>there was some remarkable stuff going on. And yet at

1:39:39.960 --> 1:39:43.040
<v Speaker 2>the time David was having a terrible time and thought

1:39:43.040 --> 1:39:44.599
<v Speaker 2>it sucked. Is this true, David?

1:39:44.840 --> 1:39:48.080
<v Speaker 3>It is true, and it's exactly the reverse of what

1:39:48.200 --> 1:39:54.000
<v Speaker 3>you originally described. When I'm always surprised when going through

1:39:54.040 --> 1:39:57.080
<v Speaker 3>the tapes listening and I say, this is what this

1:39:57.160 --> 1:39:59.639
<v Speaker 3>is the show, this is a wonderful show, And many

1:39:59.640 --> 1:40:03.400
<v Speaker 3>of the B members will say you must be completely wrong.

1:40:03.439 --> 1:40:06.680
<v Speaker 3>That was a horrible gig. And exactly Robert's quite right

1:40:06.800 --> 1:40:09.000
<v Speaker 3>that there I was in Broadchalk. It's a home gig

1:40:09.040 --> 1:40:12.120
<v Speaker 3>for me. So this was in my local church, and

1:40:12.200 --> 1:40:17.439
<v Speaker 3>I was surrounded there for by numerous other pressures, and

1:40:17.479 --> 1:40:21.360
<v Speaker 3>so I wasn't present. And if you'd ask me afterwards,

1:40:21.400 --> 1:40:23.559
<v Speaker 3>I remember thinking, oh god, that was a horrible event.

1:40:24.479 --> 1:40:28.519
<v Speaker 3>And you listen back and the music was fabulous, all right.

1:40:28.600 --> 1:40:32.800
<v Speaker 2>I have another example here too, which was at Church

1:40:32.880 --> 1:40:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Escapes live in Estonia, which I believe in two thousand

1:40:35.920 --> 1:40:40.280
<v Speaker 2>and six live performances there where I would walk on

1:40:40.400 --> 1:40:44.880
<v Speaker 2>stage with no idea what to play, and even while

1:40:45.000 --> 1:40:48.559
<v Speaker 2>playing it, having no idea what to play, and then

1:40:48.720 --> 1:40:52.840
<v Speaker 2>forty minutes lating later, having no idea what to play,

1:40:54.240 --> 1:41:02.040
<v Speaker 2>but holding myself in place, force myself to remain in place,

1:41:02.320 --> 1:41:08.599
<v Speaker 2>and engaged with no joy whatsoever. But trusting the event,

1:41:09.280 --> 1:41:13.719
<v Speaker 2>trusting the music, trusting the audience and continuing to play.

1:41:14.960 --> 1:41:18.559
<v Speaker 2>And from the church scapes in Estonia, I'm thinking of

1:41:18.680 --> 1:41:25.840
<v Speaker 2>even Song, particularly the performance. The performances had something of

1:41:25.880 --> 1:41:31.320
<v Speaker 2>which at the time I was oblivious, but long experience

1:41:31.640 --> 1:41:38.480
<v Speaker 2>and the developed practice and discipline the solo guitarist improvising

1:41:38.479 --> 1:41:41.320
<v Speaker 2>away was able to keep himself plugged in and sitting

1:41:41.360 --> 1:41:41.920
<v Speaker 2>on a guitar.

1:41:41.960 --> 1:41:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Still, Okay, you did during lockdown. You're continuing this YouTube

1:41:48.400 --> 1:41:52.639
<v Speaker 1>series with your wife, and I was looking at them,

1:41:52.920 --> 1:41:57.439
<v Speaker 1>and you did a cover of Golden Earrings Radar Love.

1:41:58.320 --> 1:42:01.599
<v Speaker 1>I always liked that song. If you'd ask me before

1:42:01.640 --> 1:42:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I saw it, what I would say, What are the

1:42:03.920 --> 1:42:08.599
<v Speaker 1>odds that Robert Trupp even knows that record? Okay? Now

1:42:08.640 --> 1:42:12.800
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned not only English punk and how that attitude

1:42:12.840 --> 1:42:17.200
<v Speaker 1>poop uh look down on the old players, say show

1:42:17.280 --> 1:42:19.639
<v Speaker 1>me something, but you all say it was killed by

1:42:19.680 --> 1:42:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the US record business. To what degree and you mentioned

1:42:24.400 --> 1:42:28.000
<v Speaker 1>sting earlier? To what degree are you a student of

1:42:28.040 --> 1:42:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the game? To what degree do you marinate in this?

1:42:30.960 --> 1:42:33.280
<v Speaker 1>To what degree do you know this? Do you only

1:42:33.360 --> 1:42:36.679
<v Speaker 1>do it for business purposes? Do you like this music?

1:42:37.040 --> 1:42:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Tell me about this all right, well you don't now

1:42:40.280 --> 1:42:45.639
<v Speaker 2>he saw on King Crimson's final performance in Central Park

1:42:45.680 --> 1:42:48.840
<v Speaker 2>and New York. Was it July the first? Nineteen seventy four,

1:42:48.920 --> 1:42:54.840
<v Speaker 2>David Yep. King Crimson's support act was Callden Ahring. No,

1:42:54.960 --> 1:42:58.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that at there you are, and the

1:42:58.080 --> 1:43:02.880
<v Speaker 2>drama would reliably leap out his kit at the big finale. Now,

1:43:04.200 --> 1:43:09.920
<v Speaker 2>going back to Frank Barcelona of Premier Talent, what Frank

1:43:10.040 --> 1:43:15.600
<v Speaker 2>would do. Frank Barcelona would do is put together astonishing

1:43:15.800 --> 1:43:20.760
<v Speaker 2>combinations of acts that no one would believe would fit

1:43:20.840 --> 1:43:27.920
<v Speaker 2>together on the same stage. So King Crimson Film nor

1:43:27.920 --> 1:43:34.479
<v Speaker 2>Reast nineteen sixty nine, was it October November? Top of

1:43:34.520 --> 1:43:37.400
<v Speaker 2>their bill. Joe Corker and the Grease Band second on

1:43:37.520 --> 1:43:40.800
<v Speaker 2>the bill, Peter Green's Fleetwood Mac third on the bill,

1:43:41.200 --> 1:43:44.400
<v Speaker 2>King Crimson fourth on the bill, Voices of East Tarlan.

1:43:45.120 --> 1:43:49.439
<v Speaker 2>They're moving into seventy one and seventy two and seventy

1:43:49.520 --> 1:43:52.519
<v Speaker 2>three and seventy four other acts on the bill Black

1:43:52.600 --> 1:43:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Oak Arkansas. Now you can kind of understand just King Crimson,

1:43:59.080 --> 1:44:03.599
<v Speaker 2>Black Sabbath Joint Heading or King Crimson and Slade because

1:44:03.640 --> 1:44:10.680
<v Speaker 2>they're both English bands, lackocarkinsall. I love them, Jim Dandy,

1:44:11.479 --> 1:44:15.280
<v Speaker 2>what a great band, But not in the media. You

1:44:15.400 --> 1:44:19.759
<v Speaker 2>think these two characters would be honest. Well, Golden Earing,

1:44:19.800 --> 1:44:22.000
<v Speaker 2>where did that come from? I have no idea, but

1:44:22.040 --> 1:44:25.400
<v Speaker 2>they were a great band in the field. Now, Golden

1:44:25.560 --> 1:44:30.040
<v Speaker 2>Earrings manager was a man called Freddie Hine who went

1:44:30.120 --> 1:44:34.839
<v Speaker 2>to take over Polydor Records in New York about nineteen

1:44:34.960 --> 1:44:42.120
<v Speaker 2>seventy seven, at the time the EG Music left their

1:44:42.200 --> 1:44:48.160
<v Speaker 2>licensees and moved to Polydor. So once again you have

1:44:48.280 --> 1:44:51.160
<v Speaker 2>this remarkable circle of people you can't take out of

1:44:51.200 --> 1:44:54.600
<v Speaker 2>your circle. So the manager of Golden ear Ring that

1:44:54.720 --> 1:44:58.160
<v Speaker 2>was supporting King Crimson on our last performance in nineteen

1:44:58.200 --> 1:45:03.120
<v Speaker 2>seventy four with Radar Love and so on, Toy and

1:45:03.200 --> 1:45:08.320
<v Speaker 2>Robert cover Radar Love. Years later. There are a number

1:45:08.360 --> 1:45:14.000
<v Speaker 2>of King Crimson fans who have publicly expressed some dissatisfaction

1:45:14.960 --> 1:45:20.479
<v Speaker 2>with me performing with Toyer, and my comment to Mojo

1:45:20.960 --> 1:45:26.479
<v Speaker 2>or Q magazine in twenty twenty two was I don't

1:45:26.600 --> 1:45:29.439
<v Speaker 2>give a fuck. I am seventy six and this is

1:45:29.520 --> 1:45:34.120
<v Speaker 2>my life now with my wife. My wife when Lockdown

1:45:34.200 --> 1:45:42.200
<v Speaker 2>began was very insistent. Lockdown in Iowa Town in England

1:45:42.320 --> 1:45:48.120
<v Speaker 2>at the time was terrifying, Bob, the fear was palpable.

1:45:50.600 --> 1:45:52.920
<v Speaker 2>The only time we'd really come out on the street

1:45:53.000 --> 1:45:57.040
<v Speaker 2>would be on a Thursday evening at six o'clock, when

1:45:57.840 --> 1:46:00.720
<v Speaker 2>people would come out of their houses and on the

1:46:00.720 --> 1:46:05.760
<v Speaker 2>step of the front door and clap and applaud to

1:46:05.840 --> 1:46:10.280
<v Speaker 2>give acknowledgment, recognition and gratitude to first responders and the

1:46:10.320 --> 1:46:14.800
<v Speaker 2>health services. So we'd look down the street and there

1:46:14.840 --> 1:46:18.799
<v Speaker 2>would be our neighbors down the street and we would

1:46:18.840 --> 1:46:21.880
<v Speaker 2>wave to them and across the square and back, and

1:46:21.960 --> 1:46:25.759
<v Speaker 2>this was the only contact we had with our neighbors.

1:46:26.400 --> 1:46:30.760
<v Speaker 2>And on occasion, because we're on the main route to

1:46:30.920 --> 1:46:36.080
<v Speaker 2>ambulances six o'clock, an ambulance would come by by all

1:46:36.160 --> 1:46:38.080
<v Speaker 2>the people on the street replauding them.

1:46:38.520 --> 1:46:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Very moving.

1:46:40.080 --> 1:46:44.040
<v Speaker 2>But it was a time of palpable fear. And my

1:46:44.200 --> 1:46:49.559
<v Speaker 2>wife said to me, we're performers. We have a responsibility

1:46:49.640 --> 1:46:54.439
<v Speaker 2>to people. We have a responsibility to keep the spirits up.

1:46:55.680 --> 1:46:57.920
<v Speaker 2>So when my wife then gave me a two to

1:46:58.000 --> 1:47:01.920
<v Speaker 2>two and point out down the garden to the river's

1:47:02.040 --> 1:47:04.840
<v Speaker 2>edge at the end of our garden and said we

1:47:04.880 --> 1:47:09.559
<v Speaker 2>are going to be dancing to Swan Lake, I took

1:47:09.680 --> 1:47:13.000
<v Speaker 2>the tights. My wife's tights were a bit small on me.

1:47:13.320 --> 1:47:16.760
<v Speaker 2>I can I can put in gently between frenzy. The

1:47:16.880 --> 1:47:20.160
<v Speaker 2>tights were not comfortable, but my discomfiture was covered by

1:47:20.200 --> 1:47:22.960
<v Speaker 2>the tutu. And we went down and we danced a

1:47:23.040 --> 1:47:24.840
<v Speaker 2>swan lake and it moved.

1:47:24.560 --> 1:47:25.240
<v Speaker 1>On from there.

1:47:26.240 --> 1:47:32.160
<v Speaker 2>We began filming. I suppose you would call them covers. Uh.

1:47:33.720 --> 1:47:39.520
<v Speaker 2>I think maybe some people think we were taking the piss,

1:47:39.560 --> 1:47:40.360
<v Speaker 2>not at all.

1:47:41.400 --> 1:47:41.960
<v Speaker 1>We are.

1:47:45.080 --> 1:47:51.200
<v Speaker 2>Very respectful of the artists here who've generated these songs.

1:47:52.120 --> 1:47:56.200
<v Speaker 2>And here I am playing a smoke on the water

1:47:56.560 --> 1:48:03.320
<v Speaker 2>mister Blackmore's famous riff. I I am very respectful of this.

1:48:03.680 --> 1:48:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Let's face, it's a classic riff. So when we move

1:48:07.240 --> 1:48:11.080
<v Speaker 2>on to increasing numbers of covers and then in live

1:48:11.120 --> 1:48:17.080
<v Speaker 2>performances this past year of classics, are you going to

1:48:17.160 --> 1:48:21.439
<v Speaker 2>go my way? I mean the classic riff stunning and

1:48:21.479 --> 1:48:26.240
<v Speaker 2>the solo breath taking, and then you move on to

1:48:26.320 --> 1:48:29.920
<v Speaker 2>the newer artists. I mean, these are challenges for me

1:48:30.920 --> 1:48:34.920
<v Speaker 2>to learn a repertoire with which I am not mostly familiar.

1:48:36.439 --> 1:48:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Why because I was developing a King Crimson repertoire which

1:48:40.479 --> 1:48:44.920
<v Speaker 2>eventually I became locked into. So here I was learning

1:48:45.000 --> 1:48:47.679
<v Speaker 2>rock songs in the tuning I haven't used for thirty

1:48:47.720 --> 1:48:52.880
<v Speaker 2>five years, doing my best to honor the original performers

1:48:52.920 --> 1:48:55.799
<v Speaker 2>and the original intentions that gave live to the music,

1:48:56.800 --> 1:49:02.120
<v Speaker 2>and much to our surprise, it took off. It was

1:49:02.280 --> 1:49:06.760
<v Speaker 2>one of the two so called Internet sensations in the

1:49:06.880 --> 1:49:13.759
<v Speaker 2>United Kingdom from Lockdown. The other one was Sophie Sophie Aspects,

1:49:15.360 --> 1:49:22.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah Kitchen Disco. She was the other one that really

1:49:23.680 --> 1:49:28.240
<v Speaker 2>kicked in. So we eventually began to find something of

1:49:28.280 --> 1:49:34.639
<v Speaker 2>another approach, which we we're maintaining. We do one We

1:49:34.680 --> 1:49:38.920
<v Speaker 2>do one new song a month at the moment, plus

1:49:38.960 --> 1:49:43.200
<v Speaker 2>access to our archive. I can't even remember all the

1:49:43.280 --> 1:49:48.960
<v Speaker 2>songs we've covered, and we do our upbeat moments and

1:49:49.040 --> 1:49:53.920
<v Speaker 2>the brief and the aim remains the same. We have

1:49:54.080 --> 1:50:00.960
<v Speaker 2>a responsibility in challenging times to do what we can

1:50:01.080 --> 1:50:05.200
<v Speaker 2>to support the spirits of our audience, good people out there.

1:50:05.880 --> 1:50:10.799
<v Speaker 2>And some of the personal messages, some public, some personal

1:50:10.880 --> 1:50:14.960
<v Speaker 2>we've received from people at their heartbreaking, the conditions of

1:50:15.040 --> 1:50:21.200
<v Speaker 2>people locked up in small studio apartments in high rises

1:50:21.800 --> 1:50:25.479
<v Speaker 2>while their mother is dying in hospital and they can't

1:50:25.520 --> 1:50:27.680
<v Speaker 2>see them, and then they can't even get to the

1:50:27.760 --> 1:50:32.160
<v Speaker 2>funeral while our prime minister in Downing Street is having parties.

1:50:33.400 --> 1:50:41.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this is profoundly offensive, but we can't. We

1:50:41.160 --> 1:50:44.040
<v Speaker 2>can only address what we can address, so we continue

1:50:44.080 --> 1:50:44.559
<v Speaker 2>to do so.

1:50:45.680 --> 1:50:49.519
<v Speaker 1>Okay, just diving a little deeper. You're a player and

1:50:49.560 --> 1:50:55.040
<v Speaker 1>a composer. Are you also a fan? Like if I started,

1:50:55.080 --> 1:50:57.639
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you an example. There was this being Charlie

1:50:58.240 --> 1:51:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Terry Thomas who became a record Is this all the

1:51:01.240 --> 1:51:04.519
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff you know? Or these are just certain

1:51:04.640 --> 1:51:05.680
<v Speaker 1>records that you know.

1:51:11.920 --> 1:51:15.519
<v Speaker 2>Well, when I was on the road, it was flat

1:51:15.560 --> 1:51:19.320
<v Speaker 2>out on the road, and the music we would get

1:51:19.360 --> 1:51:22.320
<v Speaker 2>to hear would essentially be the other artist we're working with.

1:51:23.960 --> 1:51:27.960
<v Speaker 2>And whereas when I first moved to London, you would

1:51:28.040 --> 1:51:31.559
<v Speaker 2>have gatekeepers who would say you need to listen to this,

1:51:32.840 --> 1:51:37.280
<v Speaker 2>and we still get this. My wife says you should

1:51:37.320 --> 1:51:41.759
<v Speaker 2>listen to this, because my wife that keeps her fingers

1:51:41.880 --> 1:51:44.679
<v Speaker 2>very much on the pulse of things. So my wife

1:51:44.720 --> 1:51:46.920
<v Speaker 2>would say, listen to this and see if you think

1:51:47.000 --> 1:51:50.840
<v Speaker 2>we can do a good thing with this. But I

1:51:50.880 --> 1:51:58.200
<v Speaker 2>think probably our determining musical direction is really when we're younger,

1:51:58.520 --> 1:52:03.639
<v Speaker 2>and for me, although I have been profoundly touched by

1:52:03.760 --> 1:52:10.439
<v Speaker 2>recorded music, I still tend to be more attached to

1:52:10.560 --> 1:52:14.920
<v Speaker 2>music I've seen live. Some exceptions obviously Beatles Day and

1:52:15.000 --> 1:52:17.920
<v Speaker 2>The Life Hendrix. I didn't get to see Hendrix Life,

1:52:18.040 --> 1:52:20.439
<v Speaker 2>although he did get to see King Crimson Life. Now

1:52:20.600 --> 1:52:28.880
<v Speaker 2>say so, yes, I am connected to music through records,

1:52:30.439 --> 1:52:34.080
<v Speaker 2>but for me, once again, really it's live. I have,

1:52:34.280 --> 1:52:38.240
<v Speaker 2>for example, in our abbey over here, which has been

1:52:38.320 --> 1:52:44.720
<v Speaker 2>standing since about eleven forty, I have been there listening

1:52:44.840 --> 1:52:53.680
<v Speaker 2>to appalling concerts of semi pro symphony orchestras, watching the

1:52:53.720 --> 1:52:57.760
<v Speaker 2>beat move outwards from the conductor to the edge of

1:52:57.800 --> 1:53:02.679
<v Speaker 2>the large symphony orchestra, the tuning wavering as it went.

1:53:04.439 --> 1:53:08.120
<v Speaker 2>But nevertheless, it has a power in the moment if

1:53:08.120 --> 1:53:13.479
<v Speaker 2>we're able to be open to it. So yeah, not

1:53:13.680 --> 1:53:20.920
<v Speaker 2>many leading rock bands come through our town, so I

1:53:21.080 --> 1:53:26.560
<v Speaker 2>have to rely increasingly on YouTube and Spotify. But it's secondhand.

1:53:27.520 --> 1:53:30.200
<v Speaker 2>So my wife makes her suggestions and I follow them.

1:53:30.520 --> 1:53:31.400
<v Speaker 2>Is the quick answer.

1:53:32.000 --> 1:53:35.599
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you reference the Prime Minister needless.

1:53:36.360 --> 1:53:39.519
<v Speaker 2>Oh I'm I'm going to need a piss before we

1:53:39.560 --> 1:53:42.479
<v Speaker 2>get into that one. All right, all right, back.

1:53:42.439 --> 1:53:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Take another take another piss. So, David, you certainly know

1:53:49.960 --> 1:53:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Robert extremely well. Is his talking and demeanor today typical

1:53:56.439 --> 1:53:59.160
<v Speaker 1>of him? Or is it a typical.

1:54:00.920 --> 1:54:04.559
<v Speaker 3>No, that's the man I know. Oddly enough, when I

1:54:04.600 --> 1:54:08.679
<v Speaker 3>do interviews, the most common question is, I've been working

1:54:08.680 --> 1:54:11.400
<v Speaker 3>with Robertsons nineteen eighty nine, I think, and you know,

1:54:11.520 --> 1:54:15.000
<v Speaker 3>how have you spent that long working with this awful

1:54:15.479 --> 1:54:18.639
<v Speaker 3>whatever perception they have of this man? And I always

1:54:18.640 --> 1:54:20.800
<v Speaker 3>give the same answer, which is that I've never met

1:54:20.800 --> 1:54:26.160
<v Speaker 3>that man. You know, I've never met the horrible man

1:54:26.200 --> 1:54:33.240
<v Speaker 3>that people suggest. So I think because we have a

1:54:33.320 --> 1:54:37.960
<v Speaker 3>very common aim, Robert and I think we we certainly

1:54:37.960 --> 1:54:40.320
<v Speaker 3>in business together. We have a common aime. The music

1:54:40.360 --> 1:54:46.480
<v Speaker 3>comes first, the art comes first. So I've never really

1:54:46.520 --> 1:54:49.680
<v Speaker 3>met the irascable person that everybody talks about.

1:54:50.040 --> 1:54:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you believe it's a misperception or you're in No.

1:54:53.560 --> 1:54:56.560
<v Speaker 3>I know I've met enough people to know that it's

1:54:56.600 --> 1:54:59.640
<v Speaker 3>not a misperception. And as Robert himself said, I think

1:54:59.680 --> 1:55:01.600
<v Speaker 3>that when he said, I think if someone comes to

1:55:01.640 --> 1:55:03.680
<v Speaker 3>him with a flea and in their ear, he'll send

1:55:03.680 --> 1:55:05.680
<v Speaker 3>them back with two. I think that was where that

1:55:05.880 --> 1:55:10.920
<v Speaker 3>was where this started, you know, several hours ago. So

1:55:10.920 --> 1:55:14.160
<v Speaker 3>so I think if people have an attitude, you know,

1:55:14.920 --> 1:55:19.640
<v Speaker 3>he will respond in kind. So no, I'm sure it's very,

1:55:19.760 --> 1:55:26.200
<v Speaker 3>very real. But I've enjoyed working with him. We've been

1:55:26.200 --> 1:55:28.000
<v Speaker 3>I said, We've been at it since nineteen eighty nine

1:55:28.040 --> 1:55:31.280
<v Speaker 3>in various different ways, and we're still at it.

1:55:32.680 --> 1:55:33.760
<v Speaker 1>And how did you meet him?

1:55:35.960 --> 1:55:38.480
<v Speaker 3>I was working at a studio. I was producing a

1:55:38.520 --> 1:55:41.520
<v Speaker 3>record in the studio in the town that he referred

1:55:41.560 --> 1:55:43.720
<v Speaker 3>to at the beginning of twan Cranbourne in Dorset, that

1:55:43.880 --> 1:55:48.200
<v Speaker 3>he'd used for working on King Crimson tracks, and Roberts

1:55:48.240 --> 1:55:52.120
<v Speaker 3>sacked his sound engineer halfway through the tour and phoned

1:55:52.200 --> 1:55:54.680
<v Speaker 3>up the studio owner to say, do you know someone

1:55:54.680 --> 1:55:56.480
<v Speaker 3>who could step in at short notice? Who might be

1:55:56.520 --> 1:55:59.680
<v Speaker 3>able to come out? And the studio owner came through

1:55:59.720 --> 1:56:01.720
<v Speaker 3>and said, David, what are you doing in two weeks time?

1:56:02.560 --> 1:56:03.960
<v Speaker 3>And I said, but I'm free, and he said, what

1:56:03.960 --> 1:56:07.840
<v Speaker 3>do you fancy going out to America? So I flew

1:56:07.880 --> 1:56:12.360
<v Speaker 3>out to Seattle to join Robert halfway through that tour,

1:56:13.400 --> 1:56:17.160
<v Speaker 3>and I think I've worked on every single King Crimson

1:56:17.200 --> 1:56:21.240
<v Speaker 3>release since then. So we literally we got on very

1:56:21.240 --> 1:56:23.800
<v Speaker 3>well and have carried on ever since.

1:56:25.440 --> 1:56:28.920
<v Speaker 1>So was it an instant bonding or did you have

1:56:28.960 --> 1:56:30.440
<v Speaker 1>to earn his trust?

1:56:30.800 --> 1:56:33.840
<v Speaker 3>No, it was it wasn't an instant bonding. I think

1:56:33.920 --> 1:56:40.080
<v Speaker 3>I was. I was evidently instantly competent, so that side

1:56:40.120 --> 1:56:45.000
<v Speaker 3>I think I was, because but you know, it works

1:56:45.040 --> 1:56:47.560
<v Speaker 3>in stages. So the first at the first age, I

1:56:47.640 --> 1:56:50.960
<v Speaker 3>was just a live sound engineer. He was actually recording

1:56:51.000 --> 1:56:53.200
<v Speaker 3>Sunday all over the world with Toyer at the time.

1:56:53.800 --> 1:56:55.960
<v Speaker 3>So immediately after that he asked me if i'd come

1:56:55.960 --> 1:56:58.880
<v Speaker 3>and record Toyer's vocals on that record, which I did.

1:57:00.040 --> 1:57:03.160
<v Speaker 3>We assembled the record, and I can remember at the

1:57:03.160 --> 1:57:06.640
<v Speaker 3>time they were discussing running orders, saying, oh, well haven't

1:57:06.680 --> 1:57:09.120
<v Speaker 3>you thought of this running order? It might work, and

1:57:09.880 --> 1:57:14.080
<v Speaker 3>which was probably the beginning of when Robert someone begins

1:57:14.080 --> 1:57:16.120
<v Speaker 3>to think, well your tastes, you know, trust your taste

1:57:16.160 --> 1:57:20.440
<v Speaker 3>as opposed to simply your competence. And so no, it's

1:57:20.440 --> 1:57:24.680
<v Speaker 3>a gradual process that went on over time, over years.

1:57:25.200 --> 1:57:26.040
<v Speaker 2>What have I missed?

1:57:26.080 --> 1:57:30.400
<v Speaker 3>David? He was asking how we came to work together.

1:57:31.760 --> 1:57:35.120
<v Speaker 3>I was telling him about nineteen eighty nine flying out

1:57:35.240 --> 1:57:39.120
<v Speaker 3>to do a Guitar Craft Court tour, and then I

1:57:39.160 --> 1:57:41.520
<v Speaker 3>think I've worked on every recording that followed that. Immediately

1:57:41.560 --> 1:57:44.080
<v Speaker 3>after that, I recorded Toyers vocals on Sunday all over

1:57:44.120 --> 1:57:51.160
<v Speaker 3>the world, and then we did frame by frame, and

1:57:51.840 --> 1:57:53.560
<v Speaker 3>in fact, I can tell you Robert's sense of humor

1:57:53.720 --> 1:57:58.000
<v Speaker 3>doing frame by frame. I can recall this was the

1:57:58.080 --> 1:58:00.960
<v Speaker 3>very first It was a four CD action of King Crimson,

1:58:01.480 --> 1:58:04.760
<v Speaker 3>and Virgin Records phoned up Robert and said that they

1:58:04.800 --> 1:58:08.040
<v Speaker 3>wanted a radio edit of twenty first century Schizoid Man.

1:58:08.880 --> 1:58:10.720
<v Speaker 3>And I heard Robert on the phone saying, well, there

1:58:10.720 --> 1:58:14.040
<v Speaker 3>isn't a three minute version of that track. And I

1:58:14.080 --> 1:58:17.240
<v Speaker 3>said to Robert, of course there is, and he said why,

1:58:17.280 --> 1:58:20.120
<v Speaker 3>and I said, well, I can remember what I thought

1:58:20.160 --> 1:58:23.200
<v Speaker 3>when I very first heard that track, which was I

1:58:23.320 --> 1:58:25.960
<v Speaker 3>like the first verse, I like the second verse, not

1:58:26.000 --> 1:58:27.800
<v Speaker 3>sure what's happening in the middle, and I quite like

1:58:27.840 --> 1:58:31.120
<v Speaker 3>the third verse, and a man with a sense of humor.

1:58:31.200 --> 1:58:33.760
<v Speaker 3>Robert allowed me to make that edit and it got released,

1:58:36.080 --> 1:58:39.520
<v Speaker 3>and I then learned that from Robert's perspective, I was hearing,

1:58:39.680 --> 1:58:43.520
<v Speaker 3>in a sense, hearing the track completely upside down, because

1:58:43.520 --> 1:58:46.760
<v Speaker 3>I think Robert would regard in many of these tracks,

1:58:46.760 --> 1:58:49.480
<v Speaker 3>is you know that the beginning is a jumping off

1:58:49.480 --> 1:58:52.880
<v Speaker 3>point for the middle in a sense, in a sense,

1:58:52.920 --> 1:58:54.760
<v Speaker 3>that's the core of the track, Whereas I was hearing

1:58:54.800 --> 1:58:56.240
<v Speaker 3>it completely the other way around.

1:58:57.760 --> 1:58:59.960
<v Speaker 2>I trust David's sense of things above my own.

1:59:01.840 --> 1:59:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you were going to give us a reading on

1:59:03.880 --> 1:59:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the UK today.

1:59:06.280 --> 1:59:09.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure that was what I was intending to do, Bob.

1:59:10.360 --> 1:59:13.040
<v Speaker 2>What I would say is, at the moment, they would

1:59:13.120 --> 1:59:18.280
<v Speaker 2>seem to be a lack of confidence in the power

1:59:18.360 --> 1:59:23.160
<v Speaker 2>possessors and those who stand above us and nominally serve

1:59:23.280 --> 1:59:35.280
<v Speaker 2>the interests of the populace. There seems to be a

1:59:35.440 --> 1:59:41.480
<v Speaker 2>lack of accountability on behalf of those who have power

1:59:41.600 --> 1:59:47.560
<v Speaker 2>in our lives. There's a huge structural breakdown, and part

1:59:47.600 --> 1:59:54.120
<v Speaker 2>of that is utterly terrifying, and part of it is

1:59:54.240 --> 2:00:00.000
<v Speaker 2>remarkably heartening, because if we believe that going back fifties

2:00:00.120 --> 2:00:05.720
<v Speaker 2>sixty years, that our interest is in making a new world,

2:00:06.320 --> 2:00:08.880
<v Speaker 2>then the old world has to give way for that

2:00:08.960 --> 2:00:13.640
<v Speaker 2>to be possible. So what we're seeing as a structural

2:00:13.720 --> 2:00:19.200
<v Speaker 2>breakdown might actually be a necessary precondition for a new

2:00:19.240 --> 2:00:23.840
<v Speaker 2>world appearing. Nevertheless, along the way, let's face it is

2:00:23.920 --> 2:00:35.360
<v Speaker 2>pretty bumpy. DGM has its statement the Ethical Business. The

2:00:35.480 --> 2:00:40.120
<v Speaker 2>four pillars of the ethical business Honesty, responsibility, equity, goodwill.

2:00:40.720 --> 2:00:46.040
<v Speaker 2>These are four very simple criteria for making a value

2:00:46.120 --> 2:00:50.440
<v Speaker 2>judgment in terms of for example, our dealings with a

2:00:50.480 --> 2:00:57.480
<v Speaker 2>record company. Are they honest? Are they responsible? Do they

2:00:57.600 --> 2:01:01.920
<v Speaker 2>view us equitably? The good will involve? Then the answer

2:01:01.960 --> 2:01:05.600
<v Speaker 2>to all four is now. But at least it gives

2:01:05.640 --> 2:01:10.000
<v Speaker 2>us criteria that we can base a course of action upon.

2:01:11.440 --> 2:01:15.200
<v Speaker 2>I think two thousand and eight and the rescue of

2:01:15.240 --> 2:01:23.600
<v Speaker 2>the world's financial system exacerbated the profound inequality of which

2:01:23.640 --> 2:01:29.160
<v Speaker 2>we're all pretty much aware nowadays. Was it necessary? Well,

2:01:29.200 --> 2:01:34.440
<v Speaker 2>I think it was at least inevitable. So what do

2:01:34.560 --> 2:01:40.160
<v Speaker 2>we do? In nineteen seventy four, after five or six

2:01:40.240 --> 2:01:43.240
<v Speaker 2>years on the road as a professional working musician, I

2:01:43.280 --> 2:01:48.280
<v Speaker 2>was in despair, sitting there in Putney, London, in despair

2:01:48.400 --> 2:01:49.840
<v Speaker 2>at the madness.

2:01:49.320 --> 2:01:49.880
<v Speaker 3>Of the world.

2:01:49.920 --> 2:01:54.720
<v Speaker 2>The world is mad. Nowadays I sit here in my

2:01:54.880 --> 2:02:00.720
<v Speaker 2>study in Middle England, and I think the world is mad.

2:02:02.040 --> 2:02:05.280
<v Speaker 2>And I suppose if I lave myself, I could become

2:02:05.360 --> 2:02:14.200
<v Speaker 2>despairing in strange and uncertain times. Sometimes a reasonable person

2:02:14.320 --> 2:02:19.600
<v Speaker 2>might despair. But hope is unreasonable, and love is greater

2:02:19.800 --> 2:02:24.120
<v Speaker 2>even than this. So where can I find hope? Well,

2:02:24.200 --> 2:02:29.080
<v Speaker 2>for me, one primary element, if you like, proof of

2:02:29.120 --> 2:02:34.480
<v Speaker 2>hope is that I know that music never goes away

2:02:35.120 --> 2:02:40.360
<v Speaker 2>despite the best efforts of the music industry. Music survives

2:02:40.440 --> 2:02:44.160
<v Speaker 2>the music industry, well, that's hope. So what I do

2:02:44.280 --> 2:02:46.760
<v Speaker 2>is I strap on and I rock out. I walk

2:02:46.800 --> 2:02:50.440
<v Speaker 2>on stage with my wonderful little wife and play rock

2:02:50.480 --> 2:02:53.640
<v Speaker 2>classics with classic riffs that get people on their feet,

2:02:53.760 --> 2:02:58.960
<v Speaker 2>cheering and shouting and punching the air. The music is

2:02:59.080 --> 2:03:03.480
<v Speaker 2>not constrained and by players in the music industry. For me,

2:03:03.560 --> 2:03:08.760
<v Speaker 2>that's hope. Love well known and again perhaps, but hope

2:03:08.840 --> 2:03:10.120
<v Speaker 2>is more readily available.

2:03:11.400 --> 2:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>And tell us a little bit about mister Bennett.

2:03:15.200 --> 2:03:23.240
<v Speaker 2>Mister Bennett was a brilliant and flawed man, intellectual powerhouse.

2:03:23.840 --> 2:03:29.240
<v Speaker 2>For example, as a mental discipline, he would he would

2:03:29.240 --> 2:03:38.280
<v Speaker 2>play a game of three dimensional chess through visualization. That's yeah.

2:03:38.680 --> 2:03:43.840
<v Speaker 2>He was a polymath, multi linguist. I think as a

2:03:43.880 --> 2:03:49.400
<v Speaker 2>younger man, probably very arrogant, which tends to come with

2:03:50.400 --> 2:03:53.960
<v Speaker 2>extraordinary intellectual powers.

2:03:54.200 --> 2:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>He was.

2:03:57.600 --> 2:04:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Nineteen twenty one. He was British Intelligence in Turkey and

2:04:04.040 --> 2:04:08.160
<v Speaker 2>I believe signed the visa allowed kimel outa Turk to

2:04:08.280 --> 2:04:12.600
<v Speaker 2>move into Turkey, for which he still is respected in

2:04:12.680 --> 2:04:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Turkey to this day. I understand mister Bennett worked hard

2:04:20.560 --> 2:04:25.240
<v Speaker 2>and upset lots of people, but after nineteen sixty nine,

2:04:25.280 --> 2:04:30.040
<v Speaker 2>something changed for him. In my view, he came to

2:04:30.640 --> 2:04:42.040
<v Speaker 2>a realization that after that everything was different, and he

2:04:44.240 --> 2:04:48.960
<v Speaker 2>was a voice for young people that were looking for

2:04:50.000 --> 2:04:54.640
<v Speaker 2>a figure with experience and authority. And when I came

2:04:54.680 --> 2:04:59.200
<v Speaker 2>across him, this was very clear. Young people at the

2:04:59.240 --> 2:05:02.440
<v Speaker 2>time were maybe go to the East, or go on pilgrimages,

2:05:06.240 --> 2:05:11.920
<v Speaker 2>put on blue robes, or various forms of other cultures.

2:05:12.840 --> 2:05:17.440
<v Speaker 2>But for me, I found mister Bennett. This was an

2:05:17.440 --> 2:05:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Englishman who wore English, those that I understood, spoke the

2:05:22.640 --> 2:05:25.040
<v Speaker 2>language that I understood, and he was only one hundred

2:05:25.080 --> 2:05:31.160
<v Speaker 2>miles down the road. So this was it for me,

2:05:32.800 --> 2:05:35.360
<v Speaker 2>and I met him a month before he died. So

2:05:35.400 --> 2:05:38.720
<v Speaker 2>this is a very powerful experience for me, which funnily

2:05:38.840 --> 2:05:43.480
<v Speaker 2>enough increases in power the older I get as I

2:05:43.560 --> 2:05:48.720
<v Speaker 2>recognize that connections can be made in a moment that

2:05:48.840 --> 2:05:51.600
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have to be an extended moment in clock time.

2:05:51.640 --> 2:05:55.320
<v Speaker 2>But nevertheless, the contact and connection can be made that

2:05:55.680 --> 2:06:00.480
<v Speaker 2>enjuers and persists through time. It's like hearing a particular

2:06:00.520 --> 2:06:04.400
<v Speaker 2>piece of music. It stays with you forever. Why because

2:06:04.440 --> 2:06:07.120
<v Speaker 2>it's spoken to you, It's made a connection with you.

2:06:09.240 --> 2:06:13.160
<v Speaker 2>And for those who feel that these experiences maybe it's

2:06:13.400 --> 2:06:18.000
<v Speaker 2>a cosmic Witterer wittering on, I suggest that pretty well

2:06:18.800 --> 2:06:25.880
<v Speaker 2>most of us at least have these experiences which are

2:06:26.000 --> 2:06:31.480
<v Speaker 2>very direct for us, and we don't necessarily have to

2:06:31.560 --> 2:06:34.760
<v Speaker 2>explain them. We accept that they're real. So this was

2:06:34.840 --> 2:06:42.000
<v Speaker 2>mister Bennett who had the rare capacity to express complex

2:06:42.200 --> 2:06:48.440
<v Speaker 2>notions in straightforward English. Why because what he was talking

2:06:48.480 --> 2:06:53.160
<v Speaker 2>about was in his experience in nineteen sixty nine. In

2:06:53.200 --> 2:06:56.480
<v Speaker 2>my view, he went somewhere and then he came back.

2:07:00.240 --> 2:07:06.800
<v Speaker 2>Quote Hassan Schussud, very important figure in Turkish Sufism. And

2:07:06.960 --> 2:07:11.879
<v Speaker 2>mister Bennett knows more about the mechanisms of the spirit,

2:07:12.080 --> 2:07:15.680
<v Speaker 2>the mechanics of the spiritual life, than any person in

2:07:15.720 --> 2:07:19.960
<v Speaker 2>the West since mister Eckart. Now, what do I know

2:07:20.080 --> 2:07:23.720
<v Speaker 2>about that? I can't possibly comment on that. What I

2:07:23.800 --> 2:07:27.400
<v Speaker 2>can say is mister Bennett spoke with authority which spoke

2:07:27.440 --> 2:07:32.680
<v Speaker 2>to me in a language which persuaded me that I

2:07:32.720 --> 2:07:36.400
<v Speaker 2>actually knew what mister Bennett was talking about. How could I?

2:07:37.160 --> 2:07:41.080
<v Speaker 2>But nevertheless he persuaded me that I could in such

2:07:41.120 --> 2:07:45.040
<v Speaker 2>a way that I've persisted ever since. And mister Bennett

2:07:45.080 --> 2:07:50.720
<v Speaker 2>and missus Bennett uh part of my everyday life every day?

2:07:52.520 --> 2:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Can you give us just a little more depth for

2:07:54.640 --> 2:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>those who are unfamiliar with the man. What one might

2:07:58.720 --> 2:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>say his lessons are and what you took from his words.

2:08:04.040 --> 2:08:09.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, mister Bennett said, I teach I teach you how

2:08:09.080 --> 2:08:13.800
<v Speaker 2>to cook, not what to cook. So what mister Bennett

2:08:13.800 --> 2:08:15.880
<v Speaker 2>would do is teach you how to walk into a kitchen,

2:08:15.960 --> 2:08:20.320
<v Speaker 2>pick up the implements, pick up the recipe, and make

2:08:20.360 --> 2:08:23.320
<v Speaker 2>the mail. The recipe you chose was up to you.

2:08:23.880 --> 2:08:28.520
<v Speaker 2>So another is very practical. What are the mechanics of

2:08:28.560 --> 2:08:31.840
<v Speaker 2>the musical life? I can tell you that. What are

2:08:31.840 --> 2:08:34.640
<v Speaker 2>the mechanics of the spiritual life? Mister Bennett could tell

2:08:34.680 --> 2:08:37.400
<v Speaker 2>you that too. What I can say now at age

2:08:37.440 --> 2:08:42.240
<v Speaker 2>seventy seven, they're exactly the same. I'm not sure that

2:08:42.360 --> 2:08:45.440
<v Speaker 2>helps you at all, Bob doesn't. No, I can take

2:08:45.560 --> 2:08:49.000
<v Speaker 2>that and grove from that. But let me put it

2:08:49.080 --> 2:08:49.920
<v Speaker 2>a different way.

2:08:50.480 --> 2:08:55.240
<v Speaker 1>You say he's part of your life every day, and

2:08:55.400 --> 2:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>he was playing on your computer in the background. What

2:08:58.240 --> 2:09:07.760
<v Speaker 1>is your everyday interact action or lesson like, well.

2:09:06.320 --> 2:09:09.760
<v Speaker 2>Every day I'm cooking, So my lessons in how to

2:09:09.840 --> 2:09:13.680
<v Speaker 2>cook are ongoing every day. My father and my mother,

2:09:13.840 --> 2:09:16.560
<v Speaker 2>my biological father and mother are with me every day

2:09:16.560 --> 2:09:20.360
<v Speaker 2>as well. My spiritual father and my spiritual mother are

2:09:20.400 --> 2:09:21.640
<v Speaker 2>with me every day as well.

2:09:23.200 --> 2:09:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, going from the sublime to the ridiculous, we're here.

2:09:28.760 --> 2:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>It's just as you're wearing a tie. When did this

2:09:32.080 --> 2:09:37.240
<v Speaker 1>sartorial change happen? In what is behind it?

2:09:37.240 --> 2:09:46.160
<v Speaker 2>It began around twenty twelve. Now, in terms of why

2:09:46.240 --> 2:09:50.280
<v Speaker 2>this is an interesting one, I trust my feet when

2:09:50.280 --> 2:09:53.080
<v Speaker 2>they go walking. When my feet go walking, I follow

2:09:53.120 --> 2:09:58.560
<v Speaker 2>where they go. And when my feet have taken me

2:09:58.640 --> 2:10:03.000
<v Speaker 2>to a place at which i've I recognize, ah, I

2:10:03.120 --> 2:10:06.920
<v Speaker 2>need to be here. My feet brought me here. So

2:10:07.200 --> 2:10:09.960
<v Speaker 2>trusting my feet where they go walking, that is my

2:10:10.120 --> 2:10:14.480
<v Speaker 2>sense of direction, which is internal. I don't have to

2:10:14.600 --> 2:10:19.720
<v Speaker 2>rationalize to myself where I'm going. But once I'm there,

2:10:19.880 --> 2:10:23.360
<v Speaker 2>I might do that. I might look back and say

2:10:24.680 --> 2:10:31.160
<v Speaker 2>why has my external appearance changed? And the answer might

2:10:31.240 --> 2:10:35.040
<v Speaker 2>be something on the inside has changed. So at that

2:10:35.200 --> 2:10:40.920
<v Speaker 2>point I monitor my experience to see how my experience

2:10:41.280 --> 2:10:45.040
<v Speaker 2>of how I experience my experience and lived my life

2:10:45.800 --> 2:10:50.680
<v Speaker 2>might have changed. In other words, I seek to better

2:10:50.840 --> 2:10:52.560
<v Speaker 2>understand where I am now.

2:10:53.720 --> 2:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>So your exterior is evidence of your injury?

2:10:58.520 --> 2:11:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I think that's true. What would you say, bomb, Oh.

2:11:03.240 --> 2:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>We you know this goes to my next question. We've

2:11:05.520 --> 2:11:08.760
<v Speaker 1>been around a long time, you know. I remember when

2:11:08.800 --> 2:11:13.760
<v Speaker 1>long hair was a significant signifier, after the Beatles came out.

2:11:13.800 --> 2:11:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I remember the turn of the decade of the seventies,

2:11:16.560 --> 2:11:19.879
<v Speaker 1>when it became an affectation. You could not judge somebody

2:11:19.920 --> 2:11:22.280
<v Speaker 1>based on their long hair, which is when I cut

2:11:22.280 --> 2:11:25.240
<v Speaker 1>my hair off. We live in an era, you know.

2:11:25.280 --> 2:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>You grew up to talk about the sixties in the seventies,

2:11:27.400 --> 2:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>where it was internal, whereas now there's so much external

2:11:31.760 --> 2:11:33.960
<v Speaker 1>with the trappings. Let me show you how much money

2:11:34.000 --> 2:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I have, et cetera. We're all looking for points of

2:11:38.320 --> 2:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>uniqueness in a standardized world. We all have the same phone,

2:11:42.480 --> 2:11:45.560
<v Speaker 1>we have the same watch. We have this, so on

2:11:45.720 --> 2:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>some level it does send a message. In your particular case,

2:11:52.680 --> 2:11:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you are dressing in a way a typical of people

2:11:58.320 --> 2:12:01.960
<v Speaker 1>from your background, generation, walk of life. OI. So therefore

2:12:02.040 --> 2:12:04.560
<v Speaker 1>it stands out to the point that I comment on it,

2:12:05.160 --> 2:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure that you know that this will have

2:12:09.320 --> 2:12:12.480
<v Speaker 1>an effect on people who look at you. Whatever they

2:12:12.560 --> 2:12:15.480
<v Speaker 1>might say. They might say, this is a serious guy,

2:12:16.320 --> 2:12:19.960
<v Speaker 1>this guy is it's an act. Maybe he's all, I mean,

2:12:20.440 --> 2:12:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you're aware of all that.

2:12:22.920 --> 2:12:28.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh right, Well, couple of comments at first, the going

2:12:28.200 --> 2:12:32.920
<v Speaker 2>back to twenty twelve, I noticed that people on the

2:12:32.960 --> 2:12:36.560
<v Speaker 2>street were dressing in a shall we say, relaxed fashion,

2:12:37.680 --> 2:12:42.160
<v Speaker 2>People of my age, old geezers, even older than me.

2:12:42.760 --> 2:12:47.640
<v Speaker 2>This town has the highest average age of any town

2:12:47.680 --> 2:12:51.720
<v Speaker 2>in England. And there are old people I see shopping

2:12:51.800 --> 2:12:54.880
<v Speaker 2>on the older than me Bob, shopping on the street today,

2:12:54.920 --> 2:12:58.680
<v Speaker 2>and they've put on the suit to go out shopping.

2:13:00.080 --> 2:13:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Now I understand this from my youth. What you wore

2:13:04.280 --> 2:13:07.160
<v Speaker 2>in your house was not what you wore to go

2:13:07.240 --> 2:13:10.720
<v Speaker 2>out in public. You would change to go out in public.

2:13:11.360 --> 2:13:15.080
<v Speaker 2>And still in people much older than me, and there

2:13:15.080 --> 2:13:17.560
<v Speaker 2>are a few of them in town go out shopping

2:13:17.560 --> 2:13:20.760
<v Speaker 2>in a suit and tie. And I can tell because

2:13:20.760 --> 2:13:24.520
<v Speaker 2>the suit is too big, because the man of eighty

2:13:24.560 --> 2:13:27.760
<v Speaker 2>odd has shrunk within the suit which may or may

2:13:27.760 --> 2:13:30.440
<v Speaker 2>not have fitted him sixty years ago when he first

2:13:30.480 --> 2:13:33.320
<v Speaker 2>had it. It was his marriage suit, his funeral suit,

2:13:34.080 --> 2:13:38.200
<v Speaker 2>and his Sunday suit. So part of it was seeing

2:13:39.040 --> 2:13:41.560
<v Speaker 2>a new generation of people on our street who were

2:13:41.680 --> 2:13:46.160
<v Speaker 2>dressing in a relaxed fashion. And for me it was

2:13:46.200 --> 2:13:49.880
<v Speaker 2>a little too relaxed in some cases. I'm not going

2:13:49.960 --> 2:13:55.400
<v Speaker 2>to use the word scruffy. Shall we say it was

2:13:55.440 --> 2:13:59.240
<v Speaker 2>exception he relaxed. I wished to go another way now,

2:13:59.360 --> 2:14:03.360
<v Speaker 2>also in twenty twelve, looking back, I would say that

2:14:03.520 --> 2:14:07.240
<v Speaker 2>I had myself been scruffy for a number of years. Why,

2:14:08.000 --> 2:14:11.440
<v Speaker 2>because I lived my life on the road, going away

2:14:11.480 --> 2:14:15.040
<v Speaker 2>for six or eight weeks, even three weeks. What do

2:14:15.120 --> 2:14:21.280
<v Speaker 2>you do? My answer was, I wear black? Why? Because

2:14:21.320 --> 2:14:25.440
<v Speaker 2>everything's black. If it gets dirty, you don't see it

2:14:25.520 --> 2:14:28.880
<v Speaker 2>so much. You have the same black jeans, black socks,

2:14:29.080 --> 2:14:32.920
<v Speaker 2>black knickers, black t shirts black, but all the rest

2:14:32.920 --> 2:14:36.400
<v Speaker 2>of it is all black. It's very, very straightforward and

2:14:36.560 --> 2:14:40.760
<v Speaker 2>requires no thought whatsoever. And having come off the road

2:14:40.800 --> 2:14:45.000
<v Speaker 2>in twenty ten with the intention never ever to work

2:14:45.240 --> 2:14:50.880
<v Speaker 2>live again, I was making a sea change. I changed

2:14:50.920 --> 2:14:51.640
<v Speaker 2>now I dressed.

2:14:52.040 --> 2:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you're not recognized everywhere, so I'm sure there are

2:14:57.400 --> 2:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>places you go that are public, places where are not recognized.

2:15:00.880 --> 2:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Maybe an airplane, maybe a restaurant. Do you find that

2:15:04.800 --> 2:15:09.760
<v Speaker 1>people tweat you differently when you're dressed with a tie,

2:15:09.840 --> 2:15:10.400
<v Speaker 1>et cetera.

2:15:11.880 --> 2:15:15.000
<v Speaker 2>All right, one or two things on this Since Toy

2:15:15.080 --> 2:15:19.560
<v Speaker 2>and Robert have become an Internet sensation in England. It

2:15:19.920 --> 2:15:23.400
<v Speaker 2>used to be that wherever I go anywhere with my wife,

2:15:23.440 --> 2:15:28.280
<v Speaker 2>my wife was recognized and I was overlooked. However, with

2:15:28.400 --> 2:15:33.520
<v Speaker 2>our Internet sensation, we go over the road to our

2:15:33.560 --> 2:15:35.880
<v Speaker 2>wonderful coffee shop in Pain and we're sitting in the

2:15:35.880 --> 2:15:38.960
<v Speaker 2>window and people come in and speak to us that

2:15:39.320 --> 2:15:43.920
<v Speaker 2>we'd never seen before, So not so much. There is

2:15:44.040 --> 2:15:49.760
<v Speaker 2>also a situation I was in Venice with my wife.

2:15:49.880 --> 2:15:52.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to think when this was about two thousand

2:15:52.480 --> 2:15:56.760
<v Speaker 2>and six, and we were there in April, which is

2:15:56.840 --> 2:15:59.840
<v Speaker 2>the beginning of tourist season. So to get away from

2:15:59.840 --> 2:16:04.120
<v Speaker 2>the buld burgeon in crowds, we walked to the very

2:16:04.240 --> 2:16:08.440
<v Speaker 2>very further test quietest place over there in Venice, and

2:16:08.520 --> 2:16:12.440
<v Speaker 2>we were completely alone on a street in Venice until

2:16:12.480 --> 2:16:18.160
<v Speaker 2>a solitary Italian gentleman appeared and he said, freep, freep, freep,

2:16:18.600 --> 2:16:24.880
<v Speaker 2>you are freep, and my wife was astonished. My wife

2:16:24.920 --> 2:16:29.880
<v Speaker 2>was astonished, the only person in this deserted part of Venice.

2:16:30.200 --> 2:16:36.800
<v Speaker 2>No srip. So anyway, moving on to am I universally recognized, No,

2:16:37.000 --> 2:16:41.200
<v Speaker 2>of course not. However in King Crimson contexts mostly so,

2:16:43.720 --> 2:16:49.080
<v Speaker 2>and in context where I am known or not. Does

2:16:49.400 --> 2:16:54.600
<v Speaker 2>how I dress have an effect? The answer is yes,

2:16:54.720 --> 2:16:59.840
<v Speaker 2>without any doubt whatsoever. Why because here is a character

2:17:01.680 --> 2:17:07.800
<v Speaker 2>who was very intentionally chosen his suit, what he's wearing,

2:17:08.520 --> 2:17:12.240
<v Speaker 2>his tie. If they check out the socks, they will

2:17:12.280 --> 2:17:16.000
<v Speaker 2>see the socks of those not conventionally chosen, and the

2:17:16.120 --> 2:17:20.039
<v Speaker 2>tie is mostly not conventionally chosen neither. Here at the

2:17:20.120 --> 2:17:25.680
<v Speaker 2>moment I'm dressed, I'm dressed down comfortably, but I still

2:17:25.720 --> 2:17:28.920
<v Speaker 2>have my rather nice silk tie, which I acquired from

2:17:28.959 --> 2:17:34.640
<v Speaker 2>the charity shop down the street for ten pounds. So yes,

2:17:35.080 --> 2:17:39.040
<v Speaker 2>if you walk into the first class British airwayte lounge,

2:17:39.600 --> 2:17:43.840
<v Speaker 2>he throw Why because Daryl Hall sent me a first

2:17:43.840 --> 2:17:47.960
<v Speaker 2>class ticket to fly to live at Daryl's house. Most

2:17:48.000 --> 2:17:50.240
<v Speaker 2>of the people in the first class lounge and in

2:17:50.320 --> 2:17:56.720
<v Speaker 2>first class are dressed in a very relaxed fashion, not

2:17:56.840 --> 2:18:01.280
<v Speaker 2>to say scruffy. Why Because they're so rich they don't

2:18:01.360 --> 2:18:06.199
<v Speaker 2>give a hoot. So first class people are scruffy. People

2:18:06.360 --> 2:18:10.200
<v Speaker 2>in business class tend to be smart, more smartly dressed.

2:18:10.640 --> 2:18:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Why because a first class concier's pal of mine said,

2:18:16.040 --> 2:18:21.080
<v Speaker 2>people in first class know who they are. People in

2:18:21.200 --> 2:18:25.000
<v Speaker 2>cattle class knew who they are. But people in business

2:18:25.040 --> 2:18:30.280
<v Speaker 2>class are aspirational. They want to move to the front.

2:18:31.040 --> 2:18:35.720
<v Speaker 2>So people in business class tend to be more smartly dressed. Me,

2:18:36.520 --> 2:18:40.720
<v Speaker 2>wherever I sit nowadays, it will be more smartly dressed.

2:18:41.160 --> 2:18:47.119
<v Speaker 2>Why primarily to put a demand upon myself. And secondly,

2:18:47.240 --> 2:18:51.240
<v Speaker 2>if there's a likelihood for you to be upgraded, if

2:18:51.280 --> 2:18:55.600
<v Speaker 2>you look impeccably smart, your chances have just gone up.

2:18:57.959 --> 2:19:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay at your age, having seen so much. We live

2:19:03.320 --> 2:19:08.200
<v Speaker 1>in a music business is completely different in that the

2:19:08.320 --> 2:19:11.040
<v Speaker 1>era of in the court of the Crimson King doesn't

2:19:11.080 --> 2:19:14.760
<v Speaker 1>happen for anybody anymore. You cannot have that level of

2:19:14.879 --> 2:19:20.160
<v Speaker 1>ubiquity no matter who you are. How do you soldier forward?

2:19:20.240 --> 2:19:22.519
<v Speaker 1>And how do you keep your optimism?

2:19:24.720 --> 2:19:28.279
<v Speaker 2>Two questions, Bob, would you choose one of them first? Please?

2:19:28.600 --> 2:19:30.519
<v Speaker 1>How do you soldier forward?

2:19:32.240 --> 2:19:37.080
<v Speaker 2>It's part of my discipline to keep going, so I

2:19:37.200 --> 2:19:41.560
<v Speaker 2>decide keep going. So the question is then am I

2:19:41.640 --> 2:19:45.320
<v Speaker 2>able to rely upon myself? So what I do in

2:19:45.360 --> 2:19:48.560
<v Speaker 2>the morning when I get up, say hello God and

2:19:48.600 --> 2:19:52.119
<v Speaker 2>send out my good thoughts the immediate family and friends

2:19:52.760 --> 2:19:56.560
<v Speaker 2>and distant family and friends. From there, I moved to

2:19:56.640 --> 2:20:01.400
<v Speaker 2>my physical regime of physical exercises and the I get

2:20:01.440 --> 2:20:06.680
<v Speaker 2>in the cold shower. Why because my body doesn't want

2:20:06.920 --> 2:20:09.680
<v Speaker 2>to get into the cold shower any more than it

2:20:09.720 --> 2:20:14.320
<v Speaker 2>wants to do its exercises. But this is the animal

2:20:14.360 --> 2:20:16.720
<v Speaker 2>that carries me round life, and it will not tell

2:20:16.760 --> 2:20:19.760
<v Speaker 2>me what I do. I tell my body what to do,

2:20:20.480 --> 2:20:22.800
<v Speaker 2>and then I move from this to my morning sitting,

2:20:23.520 --> 2:20:26.840
<v Speaker 2>and then from that I enter my day having told

2:20:26.879 --> 2:20:32.240
<v Speaker 2>myself that I will you will keep going. And in

2:20:32.360 --> 2:20:35.480
<v Speaker 2>terms of optimism, why am I optimistic? Because I have

2:20:35.640 --> 2:20:39.920
<v Speaker 2>decided to be optimistic. I'm a reasonable person. And if

2:20:40.160 --> 2:20:45.920
<v Speaker 2>a good reason, a reasonable person would despair. So reason

2:20:46.000 --> 2:20:51.280
<v Speaker 2>isn't sufficient. I have to trump reason, and I trump it,

2:20:51.360 --> 2:20:56.960
<v Speaker 2>first of all with hope, which we've just discussed. I

2:20:57.000 --> 2:21:00.920
<v Speaker 2>trump this with hope and with discipline. I am unable

2:21:01.000 --> 2:21:02.440
<v Speaker 2>to hold myself on course.

2:21:04.080 --> 2:21:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Let me go just a little bit thread the needle,

2:21:06.920 --> 2:21:09.880
<v Speaker 1>which may not be what you're literally doing right now,

2:21:09.879 --> 2:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>but you're familiar with You have these very dedicated fans.

2:21:14.800 --> 2:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>You could pick one of the albums from your catalog,

2:21:18.800 --> 2:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, Islands Lizard Red, and you could say I

2:21:22.640 --> 2:21:26.680
<v Speaker 1>am going to play this album for a year live

2:21:27.400 --> 2:21:32.640
<v Speaker 1>because the audience will love this. Okay, would that be

2:21:33.320 --> 2:21:37.480
<v Speaker 1>emotional and intellectual death for you? Do you have to

2:21:37.560 --> 2:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>keep pushing the envelope to make it interesting to you.

2:21:43.800 --> 2:21:49.200
<v Speaker 2>I continue to challenge myself. An example of that well,

2:21:49.360 --> 2:21:52.840
<v Speaker 2>going on the road with David for two weeks, for example,

2:21:53.400 --> 2:21:57.600
<v Speaker 2>or having a guitar course between one hundred and one

2:21:57.720 --> 2:22:02.119
<v Speaker 2>hundred and twenty people and to near Mendoza in Argentina

2:22:02.240 --> 2:22:07.720
<v Speaker 2>this late April, and then doing festival performances and live

2:22:07.760 --> 2:22:10.160
<v Speaker 2>shows with Toy later in the year. These are all

2:22:10.280 --> 2:22:16.440
<v Speaker 2>challenges for me. Is are they intellectual challenges? Yep, certainly

2:22:16.480 --> 2:22:22.000
<v Speaker 2>going on the road with David it is Are they

2:22:22.160 --> 2:22:23.320
<v Speaker 2>personal challenges?

2:22:23.440 --> 2:22:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

2:22:23.760 --> 2:22:26.280
<v Speaker 2>You have one hundred people come along and they look

2:22:26.360 --> 2:22:30.480
<v Speaker 2>to me to give them advice. Yes, that a challenge, certainly.

2:22:31.080 --> 2:22:35.119
<v Speaker 2>Is that an intersectional intellectual challenge? Not as much as

2:22:35.160 --> 2:22:39.199
<v Speaker 2>it is a challenge to my feelings how to engage

2:22:39.200 --> 2:22:43.680
<v Speaker 2>on a feeling level with these people. Am I likely

2:22:43.800 --> 2:22:47.400
<v Speaker 2>to go on the road and play a particular King

2:22:47.480 --> 2:22:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Crimson album for one year to keep people happy? I

2:22:51.760 --> 2:22:59.640
<v Speaker 2>think that's unlikely. I think if I were to choose

2:22:59.640 --> 2:23:03.720
<v Speaker 2>as Pacific repertoire to play live for period of time,

2:23:05.280 --> 2:23:12.600
<v Speaker 2>I would have to choose that repertoire. I really, really

2:23:12.800 --> 2:23:17.000
<v Speaker 2>really would like to play this, and it is within

2:23:17.280 --> 2:23:22.880
<v Speaker 2>the current athletic and calisonic standards, which I can ask

2:23:23.040 --> 2:23:27.680
<v Speaker 2>myself to honor. But do I believe that I will

2:23:28.440 --> 2:23:31.040
<v Speaker 2>invite a number of other players to set off on

2:23:31.080 --> 2:23:34.240
<v Speaker 2>the road to do that with me? I think that's unlikely.

2:23:36.440 --> 2:23:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So if we brought your wife in right now,

2:23:40.160 --> 2:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>would your demeanor and style of speech be the same

2:23:44.400 --> 2:23:48.160
<v Speaker 1>or would it be more colloquial and less measured.

2:23:49.680 --> 2:23:52.640
<v Speaker 2>The latter And we'll leave it at that.

2:23:52.959 --> 2:23:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Robert, Oh god, I can't get you guys enough. This

2:23:59.360 --> 2:24:03.039
<v Speaker 1>has been very stimulating and I'm sure it will be

2:24:03.160 --> 2:24:07.879
<v Speaker 1>that way for my audience. Thanks so much for doing this.

2:24:08.720 --> 2:24:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Till next time.

2:24:10.120 --> 2:24:11.640
<v Speaker 1>This is Bob Left sets