WEBVTT - Carl Sagan and the Samurai Crabs

0:00:05.160 --> 0:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Dressed in a dove gray robe, his hair now done

0:00:08.160 --> 0:00:12.320
<v Speaker 1>in boyish loops, one either side of his head. The child,

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 1>his face bathed in tears, pressed his small hands together,

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:21.159
<v Speaker 1>knelt down and bowed first towards the east, taking his

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>leave of the deity of the shrine. Then he turned

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:29.480
<v Speaker 1>towards the west began chanting the Nimbootsu, the invocation of

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Amida's name. The nun then took him in her arms.

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Confronting him, she said, there's another capital down there beneath

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the waves. So they plunged to the bottom of the

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand fathomed sea. Welcome to Stuff to blow your mind

0:00:54.160 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>from housework dot Com. Hey, you wasn't a stuff to

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>blow your mind. My name is Robert Lamb and I'm

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Joe McCormick and Robert what was that? A reading from?

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>That was a reading from a work that is sometimes

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>referred to as the Japanese Iliad, The Tale of the

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Haka fourteenth century epic Japanese poem that recounts the struggles

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 1>between the Haka and the Genji families for control of

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:27.680
<v Speaker 1>medieval Japan. It's a tale of Samurai heroes, war and

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the tragic fall of the hak family with every everything

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>coming to a bloody climax in the sea Battle of

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Dana Lura in five Okay, so that's the sea battle

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>that was said to take place in the twelfth century

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 1>a d r. A long time ago, at the end

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>of the courtier era. And this would be, I guess,

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>sending us into another era of Japanese history, right, the

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>heir of the shogunate, the rule of the military class.

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Now we should say there are multiple translations of this

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>of this classic epic. This is from the translation by

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Burton Watson. That's right, yeah, and you know, different translate.

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I looked at a few different ones and they all

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>add a little something different to it. For instance, sometimes

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the words are there's another kingdom beneath the waves, and

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I kind of like that one a little more. But

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:19.839
<v Speaker 1>this seems to be one of the more popular translations

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>out there. So we're stuck with it. So why did

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>these why did this child leader and the people around

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>him have to plunge into the ocean? Well because they

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>were on the losing side. They were on the what

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>turned out to be the wrong side of of of

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 1>history at the time. So this again comes at the

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 1>end of the Hayan period seven through eleven eighty five,

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:44.919
<v Speaker 1>and it was largely a peaceful period. Uh the Genj

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>were weakened in the eleven fifties following two key power

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 1>struggles in the court, and the Genji leaders involved were executed,

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>but two young boys were spared. You're a Tomo and

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>yoshiot Suni, and they and these guys they've ended up

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>plotting vene it's twenty years of Genj dominance followed. But

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>you had all these factions that were plotting against the

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:10.639
<v Speaker 1>hey K rule, leading to revolt in eleven eighty five

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>years later they would finish the Hayk, bringing an end

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>to the court aristocracy and again beginning this age of

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the shogun to hate the rule of the warrior class.

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:23.679
<v Speaker 1>And this particular heartbreaking read here, which seriously every time

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>i've I've read it in preparation for this podcast, it

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 1>gives me chill bumps, um. It takes us to the

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 1>very end. So the Haka battle fleet has been annihilated,

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>So the Genji have completely defeated them. Right, the few survivors,

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the warriors and sailors have thrown themselves into the sea

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>to drown instead of being captured and in this reading,

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the lady knee grandmother of the emperor, which in this

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>in this translation she's just she's described as a nun,

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 1>but that is the grandmother. She takes the seven year

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>old emperor a Toku out on a boat and sees

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>that he is not captured by the victor, so they

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>drowned themselves in their defeat, and she consoles him with

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>this line, there is another capital beneath the waves. Yeah,

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>it's it's haunting and tragic and heartbreaking. Well, but but

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>it seeds this idea that at least in the boy

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>emperor's mind, that he wasn't killing himself, but he was

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 1>like transitioning to another like stage of rule. Yeah, it's

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's a heartbreaking passage for a number of reasons,

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>because on one hand they're describing the boy is very

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>regal and king like, you know, almost kind of a

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:39.479
<v Speaker 1>holy child emperor, which on one hand makes his decision

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:43.839
<v Speaker 1>to h or or at least acceptance of his fate

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>like a little more beautiful and noble. But at the

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 1>same time, you can't help it. Read that, and and

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and and imagine the alternate view where it's just as

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:57.719
<v Speaker 1>noble as the child's birth. Maybe it's just a child.

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>He's just a child, and he is about to to

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>die beneath the waves instead of being captured by the enemy.

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 1>And then there is also this idea that the world,

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:13.599
<v Speaker 1>that the actual kingdom is just so rife with violence

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and horror at this point that the kingdom beneath the waves,

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the kingdom of death, is ultimately the better choice, just

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>complete annihilation over trying to live in this sort of

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>world anymore. Yeah, that sadness does come through, But also

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:34.279
<v Speaker 1>there is this interesting suggestion of a hierarchy even after

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>they have drowned, because what like his servants, that the

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>samurai who have survived come with him, right, and they

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>all they drowned themselves as well. You can imagine them

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:46.719
<v Speaker 1>and maybe heavy armor drowning in the waves with their master,

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>and the boy drowns with them. And the suggestion of

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned that there are a couple of different translations

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:54.280
<v Speaker 1>of that line. There's another kingdom beneath the waves, or

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>another capital beneath the waves. The idea of a capital

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>suggests there's a whole society in a hierarchy within the society,

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and that you will be in this capital here like

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>we're going to the We're going to the big boss,

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:10.039
<v Speaker 1>and maybe you will be the big boss. Who knows? Yeah,

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, especially after our recent episodes about myths of

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 1>my people and beings that live beneath the sea, Like

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the magical uh ramifications of this are pretty obvious. The

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:25.840
<v Speaker 1>idea that the fallen ruler and his followers will continue

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>to to to live and thrive in another magical place. Now,

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be the bridge to our actual

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:34.719
<v Speaker 1>topic today. How are we going to get from this

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>beautiful and sad medieval Japanese epic to some crab biology.

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>So members of the hey K family did survive, mostly

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:46.839
<v Speaker 1>they were women, and they descended still remember the Battle

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of Donna Lura. According to legend, however, the waters near

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the battle or home to the ghosts of the drowned

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:58.160
<v Speaker 1>hey K warriors, and those ghosts take the form of crabs.

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:01.719
<v Speaker 1>And indeed there is a variety of crabs to be

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:04.840
<v Speaker 1>found in these waters with a curious arrangement of ridges

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 1>on its back, ridges that seem to form the drastic

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>lines of a grimacing samurai warface is depicted in medieval

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Japanese art. Yes, and I would say not just the

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>faces depicted in medieval art. But it also somewhat depicts

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the Samurai masks you will sometimes see, like uh, where

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a Samurai armor suit might have a helmet that would

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>have a mask that partially covers the face and the

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 1>backs of these crabs. The carapace of the crab looks

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>an awful lot like some of these masks. You have

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>these kind of highly stylized oh a faces, these sort

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>of demonic war grimaces that you see on the face

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 1>plates of the armor. Yeah. So the idea here would

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>be the samurais transformed into crabs, or their spirits transformed

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>into crabs, and that if you if you see one

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 1>of these scuttling along, then you are seeing this. Uh.

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>This this this remnant a fall in Samurai Warrior, a

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:04.559
<v Speaker 1>pair of ragged claws scuttling across the floor of silent

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>seas exactly. Now, of course, before we go too much further,

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>we should let you know this is not the case.

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>This is the magical, mythic, legendary connotation of the story

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>because certainly, as marine biologist Joe W. Martin points out

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>in his three article The Samurai Crab published in Tara, Uh,

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the myth of crab people off the coast of Japan

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 1>likely predates the Battle of Donna, or going back at

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 1>least as far as the thirteenth century, maybe even before,

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and is as as is often the case with myths

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:40.599
<v Speaker 1>and legends, it was merely adapted to the hey k

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 1>after the battle. Okay, so you've got these crabs that

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>you can pull up off the floor of the Silent

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:49.199
<v Speaker 1>Sea in this area, and they look like faces. And

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>so he's saying that probably before this battle, people were

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 1>pulling up these crabs and saying, I see a face,

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>But after the battle people started to say not just

0:08:57.520 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 1>I see a face, but look, it's the face of

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 1>those Samurai warriors who drowned in these waters. Yeah, and

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>it makes makes perfect sense. Right. You can apply additional

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 1>narrative to the to the myth, to the legend here

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and it it brings it to new life. But of course,

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the reality is you can find these crabs. These crabs

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>are an actual species. They exist. They have nothing to

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 1>do with ghosts, but they exist, and they really really

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>do look like faces like a lot. Yeah, we'll try

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 1>to include some photos of these crabs on the landing

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 1>page for this episode. Stuff toblew your mind dot com.

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:30.959
<v Speaker 1>There is an awesome painting that has included along with

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:34.319
<v Speaker 1>Joel Martin's article from nineteen nine. It's a painting by

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Utagawa Kuniyoshi, and it depicts these these drowned rulers down

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:42.079
<v Speaker 1>at the bottom of the ocean, and they've got this

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 1>this phalanx of crabs coming towards them with those samurai

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 1>warrior faces on the backs of them. But they're lining

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>up almost as if to serve their new leaders. And

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:56.840
<v Speaker 1>this painting is awesome. We've got to include this if

0:09:56.880 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>we can on the landing page because it has this

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:07.199
<v Speaker 1>this manic, hyperactive, hallucinatory, hieronymous bosh kind of energy blasting

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>out of it. This is such a good painting. Yeah,

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>it's it's dramatic with its human elements within the crabs.

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Add this additional scuttling horror to the whole piece. I

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>love it. And it captures the inherent irony of the

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 1>legend of ghosts of samurai warriors becoming becoming crabs, because

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 1>such a legend is both haunting and scary and also funny.

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:34.719
<v Speaker 1>Crabs are funny, right, I mean, it's not just me

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 1>right like other people probably look at crabs and think

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a kind of funny animal. The way they move,

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 1>they're they're they're walking styles, the way they wave their

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>their claws around like it is funny, right, Yeah, yeah,

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>crabs are inherently funny. I mean, the word crab is

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>inherently funny because of the kr sound in English. But

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:55.199
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, the crabs are fun to look at and

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and chase and to catch if you if you can

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>catch them, crabs are tremendous fun and they're delicious or

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 1>them are delicious. Yeah, but like you you can't take

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 1>a crab ghost or a crab monster too seriously, I think,

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Maybe maybe in Japanese culture it's different,

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>but at least for me, it's impossible. Like I think

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 1>of one of my favorite old horror movies from the

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:23.679
<v Speaker 1>fifties is Attack of the Crab Monsters, the Roger Corman movie, Uh,

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>which just proves you know, if you're talking about killer crabs,

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 1>it's inherently funny, even if they don't look funny. Well,

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:34.440
<v Speaker 1>they have to be gigantic to be perceived as a threat,

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:36.079
<v Speaker 1>and so maybe that's part of the horror of the

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 1>legend here, is that the ghosts of the samurais are

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>trapped in this lesser form. They're they're all bluster. You know.

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:46.719
<v Speaker 1>A crab will will wave its claws at you, but

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:48.959
<v Speaker 1>all that can really do is run away or maybe

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:52.559
<v Speaker 1>pinch you a little bit. It's not an actual mortal threat.

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>But let's take a look at what this crab species

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>actually is, the one with the supposed samurai face on

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 1>its carapacet. The scientific name of this crab would be

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Hakia japonica a formerly known as the Dora pay crab

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>until it was officially granted. It's older and more traditional

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>name of Hakia in. And so it's got these ridges

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 1>on its back. That's the thing that captures everybody's it's attention.

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 1>You look on its back. It's got this carapace shell

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>on the top of it, and it looks a lot

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 1>like a face. What are these ridges that form the face?

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:28.959
<v Speaker 1>Are they purely decorative wells Joe W. Martin points out

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:32.440
<v Speaker 1>in that article sent the Samurai crab, they do serve

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:37.679
<v Speaker 1>a purpose. Their external indicators of supportive ridges or epodems

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>inside the creatures carapacet, these are the places where muscles attached.

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 1>He points out that these features are subject to natural selection,

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 1>but they occur in nearly all members of the crab

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:52.559
<v Speaker 1>family uh doripiday all over the world. At least seventeen

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 1>crab species in two families in the Indo West Pacific

0:12:56.520 --> 0:13:00.439
<v Speaker 1>are similar enough to be called Haika ghani by locals.

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>This also includes a variety of Chinese crab is known

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 1>as the ghost or demon face crab. Right, and Hayka

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>ghani that that would be the more common name for

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 1>this crab haka from the story we told, and ghani

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the Japanese word for crab ghani or khani. Al Right,

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 1>so we've established the legend, We've established the biological reality

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>of the crab species. But the lingering question is is

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:29.200
<v Speaker 1>there any connection between the two? And remarkably, uh, there's one,

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 1>or at least a couple of very famous arguments for

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 1>a connection here in actual connection between the perceived faces

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>on the crabs backs and the legend of the samurai crabs. Yeah. Right,

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:44.559
<v Speaker 1>So the question is we've established what the crab is

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:46.679
<v Speaker 1>and and what it looks like, but why does it

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 1>look that way? How did it come to resemble a

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 1>samurai mask so strongly? Or rather, maybe maybe we should

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>ask instead why do. We so strongly believe we see

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>a samurai mask when we see the crab. So to

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>sort those quests, Jen's out, We're gonna have to go

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to our friend Carl Sagan. That's right. We're gonna take

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:05.959
<v Speaker 1>a quick break and when we come back we will

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>introduce Sagan. Than alright, we're back, So, Robert, I think

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a shame that we're never going to get to

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>have Carl Sagan on the podcast. It's such a loss

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that he's gone. Yeah, I mean, Carl Sagan was one

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 1>of the most important science communicators of his time. For

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 1>anyone who's not familiar, he lived or n American astronomer, becausmologist, astrophysicist, astrobiologist,

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 1>and uh an, author of several books, host of the

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 1>wonderful TV series Cosmos. Sagan was one of those those

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>great rare people who was actually a great working scientist himself.

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, he was an astronomer, he worked with NASA,

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 1>He did lots of interesting space research astrophysics, and at

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the same time was a great science communicator. And those

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 1>are very different skills. One other name that comes to

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 1>mind when I think of that pairing is Darwin, Right,

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Darwin was both a great scientist and a great science communicator.

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>But you don't always have those same two skills in

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>one person. Yeah, I mean he was. He was intelligent, charismatic,

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>he had the scientific pedigree, but he also had this uh,

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>this this this outward passion. He was able to to

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 1>appear on these television shows and you were just instantly

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 1>enraptured by what he had to say. Yeah, so let's

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 1>turn to Cosmos. I want to set the scene. It's

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the fall of nineteen eighty. You are settling in to

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 1>watch episode two of this magnificent new PBS science show Cosmos.

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>It's hosted by Sagan. Whether or not you know Sagan

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 1>by now, if you've seen the first episode, you're already enraptured. Uh,

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>you want to hear what he has to say next.

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>And so episode two of the cot in the original

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Cosmos series in nineteen eighty starts with Sagan telling the

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>story we started with today. He starts to tell the

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:56.119
<v Speaker 1>story of the Battle of dano Ura and its legendary aftermath.

0:15:56.480 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 1>And not only does he tell it, but there is

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a dramatic reenactment of anything. It's it's beautiful to watch.

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Will include a link to this episode of Cosmos on

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the landing page of this episode. Right, So we're going

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to quote from Carl Sagan's explanation of what's going on

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 1>with the crab and the legends. So he says, quote,

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>this legend raises a lovely problem. How does it come

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>about that the face of a warrior is cut on

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the carapace of a Japanese crab? How could it be?

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 1>The answer seems to be that humans made this face.

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>But how like many other features, the patterns on the

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>back or carapasts of this crab are inherited. But among crabs,

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>as among humans, there are many different hereditary lines. Now suppose,

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>purely by chance, among the distant ancestors of this crab,

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>there came to be one that looked just a little

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>bit like a human face. Long before the Battle of

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Danna or he's talking about, fishermen may have been reluctant

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>to eat a crab with a human face and throwing

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 1>it back into the sea. They were setting into motion

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a process of selection. If you're a crab and your

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 1>carapist is just ordinary, the humans are going to eat you,

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 1>But if it looked like a face, they'll throw you

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>back and you'll be able to have lots of nice

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 1>little baby crabs that all look just like you. As

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:24.680
<v Speaker 1>many generations passed of crabs and fisher folk alike, the

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>crabs with patterns that looked most like a samurai face

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 1>preferentially survived, until eventually there was produced not just a

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>human face, not just a Japanese face, but the face

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 1>of a Samurai warrior. Now that's that's an incredible idea. Yeah,

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 1>it's it's the idea of artificial selection. Sagan was saying

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>that by accident, the fisher folk of Japan for many

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>generations had been breeding crabs that looked like samurai in

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the same way that we breed agricultural crops or agricultural

0:17:56.760 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 1>animals for desired traits. You might breed cows or pigs

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:03.119
<v Speaker 1>to produce more milk or to have more meat. You

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:05.680
<v Speaker 1>might breed dogs to look a certain way or to

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 1>be more friendly or tow herd sheep. It would be

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 1>like if we bread pugs because we didn't want to

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 1>eat them, like, we just don't eat any of the

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:17.440
<v Speaker 1>dogs that look kind of like grotesque human babies. And

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 1>then you just have pugs running all over the place

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 1>because they they may be delicious, but they look too

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>much like babies. Right. Well, there's a lot of thought

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:27.679
<v Speaker 1>about how we began to breed dogs, right How did

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>domestic dogs become separated from their wolf like ancestors. And

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of the thinking about that is

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>that the process did not begin intentionally, That we started

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>breeding dogs by accident, selecting for certain traits by accident,

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 1>before we started breeding for certain traits on purpose. For example,

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 1>we might have been breeding for the wolf like ancestor

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:55.640
<v Speaker 1>of a dog that had more approach behaviors toward humans

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>because if this if it had more approach behaviors toward humans,

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:01.879
<v Speaker 1>it would come closer, would be more likely to get

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 1>some scraps from our campsite or something like that. And

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:08.479
<v Speaker 1>the dogs that had less approach behaviors towards humans, who

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 1>were more wary and wanted to stay farther away would

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:13.680
<v Speaker 1>not get that extra food, would be less likely to survive.

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:18.200
<v Speaker 1>And over time we were accidentally artificially selecting for dogs

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 1>that like getting close to bipedal primates. And then when

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:25.239
<v Speaker 1>we actually begin involving ourselves and the decisions that when

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:27.920
<v Speaker 1>we that's when we start saying, well, let's Let's use

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 1>these dogs at a little smaller so they can get

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>through the wall and eat the rodents that are disturbing

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:35.440
<v Speaker 1>our grain crops. That sort of thing, Yeah, or just

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it can be purely aesthetic. You might say,

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 1>this dog is very cute. I really like the way

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 1>it looks. I I want to see more dogs like it.

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's breathe this dog and make it have lots of babies,

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and then things get out of control and you wind

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 1>up with the pug anyway, Right, if only you could

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:55.479
<v Speaker 1>see the pug equivalent of of what our agricultural crops

0:19:55.600 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 1>look like genetically, the crazy breeding process is that have

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>gone into creating the bananas and the corn and all

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the stuff we eat. It's one of the funny things

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>about people's complaints about genetically modified organisms and food crops

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 1>is that the food crops we eat today are so

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:18.439
<v Speaker 1>amazingly genetically modified from their ancestral natural variants. Yeah, it's

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 1>a little late in the game in any respects to

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:22.719
<v Speaker 1>start saying, oh, we don't want to we don't want

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to control or dictate what these organisms, uh manifest as

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>like we've been doing that throughout recorded history and before

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:33.119
<v Speaker 1>recorded history. Yeah, but anyway, we need to get back

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:35.880
<v Speaker 1>to the crabs. So Sagan is talking about the fact

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:38.920
<v Speaker 1>that this is this is an idea, it's a hypothesis

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to explain why the carapace of this crab looks so

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:44.879
<v Speaker 1>much like a human face, and specifically so much like

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 1>a samurai face, that it's not just a coincidence, but

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>that it has been artificially selected for by human sorting

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:56.680
<v Speaker 1>practices in fishing. Now, Sagan was not the originator of

0:20:56.760 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 1>this idea. No. Sagan's idea apparently comes a originally from

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:05.119
<v Speaker 1>the British zoologist Sir Julian Huxley, of the of the

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 1>famous Huxley family. That's right, he was the grandson of T. H. Huxley,

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:12.200
<v Speaker 1>also known as Darwin's Bulldog. Right, And so Huxley wrote

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>an article that was actually believed it or not published

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:19.920
<v Speaker 1>in Life magazine and on June nineteen fifty two. And

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>reading the words of Julian Huxley in Life magazine in

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:26.119
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifty two is really funny because I found a

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 1>scan of the original magazine and it's got all these

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 1>like carnation instant milk ads right across from him, and

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:36.679
<v Speaker 1>the like pard dog food ads and weird, weird recipes

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:40.920
<v Speaker 1>of the fifties that involved what cooking cooking tuna with

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>with with carnation instant milk. It's like the only carnation

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>instant milk will make this amazing tunic casserole. Anyway, So

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:50.920
<v Speaker 1>he's writing in life and he writes the same idea

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and an article that's more generally about imitation in nature.

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 1>But he writes, quote the resemblance of Dora Pay and

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:00.200
<v Speaker 1>remember that was the original, that was the name Sam

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:03.119
<v Speaker 1>they were using for this crab back then. The resemblance

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>of Dora Pay to an angry Japanese warrior is far

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 1>too specific and far too detailed to be accidental. It

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:14.640
<v Speaker 1>came about because those crabs with a more perfect resemblance

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to a warrior's face were less frequently eaten than the others.

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 1>So again, this is an elegant theory, you know, it

0:22:23.240 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>makes a certain amount of logical sense. We can all

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 1>envision the scenario taking place, even without a dramatic reinterpretation

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 1>from Cosmos. We can we can see the fisher folk

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:39.119
<v Speaker 1>pulling up these crabs, looking at him and going, oh,

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that one's that's a little bit too much like a face.

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 1>For me to eat it. I'm just gonna throw it

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 1>back and we'll just see what the next one looks like. Right,

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can imagine that any food animal that

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 1>looked unnaturally human probably would end up getting selected for

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:57.880
<v Speaker 1>in this way, Right, But is it really true? Does

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 1>it stand the test of time, time, and the test

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 1>of additional inquiry into the the origins of the crabs

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 1>weird samurai face? Right? So for the rest of the episode,

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 1>we're going to try to address this question. Is the

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Sagan Huxley hypothesis correct? Was it actually artificial selection by

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 1>fisher folk being creeped out by faces that made the

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:25.400
<v Speaker 1>crabs look like this? Or is it just a coincidence?

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>And if it's just a coincidence, what explains this striking resemblance. Well,

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 1>I've already mentioned marine biologist Joe W. Martin's article, and

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>he drops one fact that I think definitely uh is

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 1>an argument against the idea that that humans were were

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:45.359
<v Speaker 1>artificially selecting for these these faces and the crabs, And

0:23:45.400 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that's that we have fossils of directed crabs or closely

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 1>related crab species. They date back to times before the

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>emergence of humans. Oh okay, So if these crabs were,

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:59.400
<v Speaker 1>or if some related crabs were looking like human faces

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:03.160
<v Speaker 1>before humans could have been selecting for them, that's definitely

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be a mark against the artificial selection hypothesis, right,

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 1>unless you take you have to go through, you know,

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 1>jump through elaborate hoops to say, well, what if an

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:16.160
<v Speaker 1>alien species came down saw the faces of existing prominides,

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 1>or perhaps they had hominid uh facial features themselves, and

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:24.120
<v Speaker 1>then they engineered it into the backs of the crab, etcetera.

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:26.159
<v Speaker 1>You have to have some sort of elaborate explanation like

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>that that that that breaks the multiple rules of the

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 1>natural world. Then again, this doesn't necessarily kill the hypothesis,

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 1>because you could say that those some related crabs in

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:40.920
<v Speaker 1>this family have some features on their backs that do

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 1>look kind of like faces. The striking resemblance of the

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Hakia crabs, specifically to a samurai warrior face could have

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:53.119
<v Speaker 1>been honed by artificial selection over time, right, There might

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 1>have been an initial resemblance that was sharpened by artificial

0:24:56.520 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 1>selection exactly. Now. Another huge detail considering, though, according to Martin,

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:05.200
<v Speaker 1>is that this one's really hard to shake. Fisher Folk

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:07.919
<v Speaker 1>are not in the habit of catching these crabs at

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:11.399
<v Speaker 1>all because they only reach a size of about thirty

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:13.920
<v Speaker 1>one millimeters or one point two inches. I want to

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>come back to that point when I get into another

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 1>criticism in a bit. Yes, yeah, I have some I

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 1>have some additional notes on that as well. But the

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>idea here is that they're not really worth the trouble

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>with retrieving from the nets, uh, let alone sorting through

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to see which ones resemble a face or not, because

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:32.160
<v Speaker 1>ultimately you don't care because you you have no culinary

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:34.959
<v Speaker 1>used for them. I mean, my very brief argument against

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 1>this is how about popcorn shrimp? All right, we'll return

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:40.639
<v Speaker 1>to this in a minute, the idea of eating the

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 1>samurai crabs? But well, what does what does Richard Dawkins

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:46.920
<v Speaker 1>have to say? What does Papa Dawkins have to share

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 1>on this topic? Well, Dawkins has an interesting take on it.

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:54.159
<v Speaker 1>So Dawkins has a section on Hakia Jeponica in his

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nine book The Greatest Show on Earth, which

0:25:57.080 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I would recommend. That's a really good That's like after

0:25:59.840 --> 0:26:02.720
<v Speaker 1>he got done talking about religion for a while and

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 1>went back to writing awesome biology books. So when Dawkins

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:08.920
<v Speaker 1>brings up the theory. He mentions first that he says

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:11.880
<v Speaker 1>it's quote a lovely theory, too good to easily die.

0:26:12.600 --> 0:26:14.440
<v Speaker 1>But then he goes on to undercut it. So he

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 1>describes coming across an online poll which allows you to

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>say which of the following you believe? Now, Robert, you

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:24.679
<v Speaker 1>think about the options here? First option, the Sagan Huxley

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>theory is correct. Of respondents agreed with that. The next is,

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the photos of the crabs resembling Samurai are fakes said

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 1>that that's obviously not true. There are tons of these high.

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the photos don't look particularly faked. Maybe they're

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 1>thinking they're creations. I don't know. Maybe there maybe there

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:50.320
<v Speaker 1>was some particular photo that was faked or enhanced. I've

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>never heard of this, But no, there are tons of

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:56.159
<v Speaker 1>these photos and they're they're obviously not fakes. Uh. Next answer,

0:26:56.680 --> 0:26:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the shells have been carved to look that way. Six

0:26:59.480 --> 0:27:02.680
<v Speaker 1>percent of respondents said this. I think that's obviously not true.

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:06.679
<v Speaker 1>The next one is it's just a coincidence. Thirty eight

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 1>percent said this, So it does look like a face,

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:12.960
<v Speaker 1>but it's just a coincidence. There was no selection going

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:16.639
<v Speaker 1>on for that. And then finally, the crabs really are

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 1>drowned Samurai warriors said this. I love how that that scored.

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 1>There was a higher score for that than for carved

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:27.960
<v Speaker 1>crab shells, which, granted, I don't buy the car I

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 1>don't see the the argument for this being a carving,

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>But that makes far more logical sense than the idea

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 1>that these are actual ghosts. I don't know, I mean,

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:41.400
<v Speaker 1>you know which is more likely. No, wait a minute,

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess you're right. Maybe or maybe maybe people who

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 1>took the pot were just angry at the end of

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:47.720
<v Speaker 1>it and they're like, I can't believe I wasted my

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 1>time in this. I'll tell you what, I'm going to

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 1>vote for the ghosts. Right, So, Dawkins writes, quote, I'm

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:55.159
<v Speaker 1>afraid I voted with the kill joys. I think, on

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:59.439
<v Speaker 1>balance that the resemblance is probably a coincidence. And Dawkins

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 1>cites some reasons for saying this. First of all, he

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:05.240
<v Speaker 1>a couple that he cites as weaker minor reasons. First

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:07.440
<v Speaker 1>of all, as we said, Martin pointed out in the

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 1>article we mentioned earlier, the face like ridges and grooves

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:15.399
<v Speaker 1>on the crabs carapists actually correspond directly to underlying muscle

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 1>attachments Now, this wouldn't mean that they can't have been

0:28:19.760 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 1>sharpened by artificial selection, but it does show that they're

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 1>not merely meaningless decorations that serve no purpose of their

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:29.640
<v Speaker 1>own and could be you know, selected for in any direction.

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:33.440
<v Speaker 1>They're actually just a byproduct of a necessary part of

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:36.879
<v Speaker 1>the crabs muscle anatomy. Right, And and we also have

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:40.960
<v Speaker 1>to remember that there is nothing inherently holy or divine

0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>about the human face. It is just it is just

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 1>This's just what our our frontal century array looks like.

0:28:49.840 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's kind of an overstatement of the obvious,

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's easy to miss that. I think that that

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 1>this is not the face of a primordial god who

0:28:56.480 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 1>then created people in his image. This is just what

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 1>our particular species of primate happens to have on the

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 1>front of its skull. Yeah, you need some light sensitive organs,

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you've got two of them for depth perception, and then

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 1>you need something that can chew up stuff. It's achieving

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:15.480
<v Speaker 1>one set of goals the back of a crab. This

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 1>crab is achieving another set of goals. And if those

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 1>solutions should look vaguely familiar or remind or remind you

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 1>of the other then Uh, then, yeah, that's that's coincidence. Well,

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the things you're pointing out here

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 1>is that the things that q to us as faces

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 1>can be incredibly simple and don't have to depart from

0:29:36.480 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 1>randomness all that much. Like two dots in a line

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 1>queues us as face. Right, Yeah, it's we We create

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 1>faces all the time and we see them in everything. Yeah,

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and this will be a big point we'll come back

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to in just a minute. The next point that Dawkins

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 1>makes is that the Hackia crabs are too small to

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 1>keep right. This is another thing that Martin was sort

0:29:57.400 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 1>of alluding to. They're too small to keep in. Crab

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 1>catch would simply throw them back, regardless of what designs

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:05.920
<v Speaker 1>they had on their backs, simply because they don't have

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 1>enough meat. So, first of all, I was thinking, Okay,

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 1>is this true. We don't know how big they get.

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 1>But there was a photo that Martin included with his

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 1>article from nineteen three. It's of a male specimen caught

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 1>in Ariaki Bay off Kyushu in Japan in nineteen sixty eight,

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and you can definitely see the samurai face. It looks

0:30:25.160 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 1>like a samurai, But how big is it? The total

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 1>width of the crabs back is at the widest point

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty point four millimeters or zero point eight inches. Now,

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 1>that's less wide than you mentioned earlier. It sounds like

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 1>it could get up to a little over an inch

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 1>or about thirty millimeters. Uh, that's that's not a very

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 1>big crab. I was like trying to imagine, like cracking

0:30:47.640 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the shell to get the meat out of a crab

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 1>that's about an inch wide. Yeah, even a fair sized crab.

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 1>If you're if you're, if you're, you're cracking open enough

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:57.920
<v Speaker 1>of them, it begins to feel like an awful lot

0:30:58.000 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 1>of work for the meatia return that you're getting. Yeah,

0:31:01.160 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 1>So would they keep a crab like that? I'm not sure?

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 1>It seems pretty small. Then again, I can't pretend to

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:09.960
<v Speaker 1>know the fishing practices of historical Japan. Well I I

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 1>can't either, but I do have an illuminating fact on

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 1>just how inedible a small crab can be. Uh. In

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:18.920
<v Speaker 1>this case, we need to consider the plight of the

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 1>green crab. Take me to the green crab, all right.

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:24.280
<v Speaker 1>This is a native of the Northeast Atlantic Ocean in

0:31:24.400 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Baltic Sea, but it's an invasive species everywhere else. Including

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 1>New England. So these guys are roughly ninety millimeters or

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 1>three point five inches in size. And while it's tempting

0:31:36.120 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to say, well, let's just eat these things, they're the enemy,

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 1>they're invasive, let's just eat them up in the same

0:31:40.480 --> 0:31:44.920
<v Speaker 1>way that we've, for instance, promoted the consumption um of

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:48.960
<v Speaker 1>lion fish, which are also invasive in many areas. But

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 1>they're simply too small to get any meat off of

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 1>through traditional methods. But since there's a I'm just imagining

0:31:56.360 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 1>it like a scene in a comedy movie where somebody

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 1>brings you tiny crabs and the little cracker things and

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 1>you're working the nutcracker on something you can barely keep

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 1>in your fingers. Yeah, you you would like have to

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 1>use tweezers or something, right, But of course, since there's

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a reason to wage hungry war on the green crabs,

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 1>some chefs have started turning them into stock. So that's

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that's one potential approach there. And then there's also a

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Canadian startup called can Chine that has experimented with using

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a prototype machine to suck the meat out green crafts

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:33.720
<v Speaker 1>h now an industrial meat production that's always the best

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:36.440
<v Speaker 1>thing to learn the details of that industrial is key,

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:40.720
<v Speaker 1>like we're talking about modern advancements that would be necessary

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>like that, this was this is all these details from

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 1>a two thousand fifteen article Green crabs are multiplying? Should

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>We Eat Them? By Roger Warner for the Boston Globe.

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:51.280
<v Speaker 1>But you know, and it's been a few years, but

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:54.320
<v Speaker 1>it still paints a picture of our ability to consume

0:32:54.400 --> 0:32:57.800
<v Speaker 1>these small crabs still depends on technology that we haven't

0:32:57.880 --> 0:33:01.200
<v Speaker 1>quite yet developed. He points out in another another solution

0:33:01.240 --> 0:33:04.080
<v Speaker 1>here would be to catch the crabs molting, essentially have

0:33:04.320 --> 0:33:07.440
<v Speaker 1>soft shell green crab that you could indeed fry up

0:33:07.520 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 1>in the same way that you fry up a soft

0:33:09.720 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 1>sheld crab. This, of course the molten face. You'd have

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 1>to catch them in the multip You have to catch

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 1>them at just the right moment and u as of

0:33:17.360 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 1>two thousand fifteen, they were only experiencing a fifty six

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 1>to sixty one percent success rate, and Warner says that

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 1>we would definitely have to improve that success rate before

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 1>this would be a like a feasible source of crab meat.

0:33:30.600 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, the point you made that's actually sticking with

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 1>me the most is just the idea of using them

0:33:34.720 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 1>for stock I don't know why I didn't even think that,

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 1>like you, you don't necessarily have to be able to

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 1>get the meat out of it for it to provide

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 1>some kind of culinary usage. I mean, people could use

0:33:44.280 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 1>a in the same way that people use a whole

0:33:46.520 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 1>bunch of seafood products that are not really themselves edible

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 1>to create stock, like bones and stuff like that. You

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:55.160
<v Speaker 1>make the stock, you strain them out. You could put

0:33:55.200 --> 0:33:58.280
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of tiny crabs in a pot, make some stock,

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 1>and then strain them out. I assume, like if they

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't have some kind of bad taste or or mess

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 1>up the water somehow. Yeah, but still with the green crab,

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:09.240
<v Speaker 1>it seems that this is a case where certain chefs

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:12.400
<v Speaker 1>who are trying to solve the problem that are they're saying, hey,

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 1>what can we do with this invasive creature? They have

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:17.719
<v Speaker 1>turned to making stock out of them, and it's supposedly delicious.

0:34:18.200 --> 0:34:20.960
<v Speaker 1>But I suppose it is not a great reason in

0:34:21.040 --> 0:34:26.200
<v Speaker 1>and of itself, certainly for Japanese fisher folk of yr

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:28.799
<v Speaker 1>to go out there and catch them. Then again, I've

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:31.359
<v Speaker 1>got to come back at you. I was wondering how

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:35.239
<v Speaker 1>small of a crab people would normally eat in Japan. First,

0:34:35.360 --> 0:34:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I actually did try to look up fishing practices of

0:34:38.120 --> 0:34:41.040
<v Speaker 1>medieval Japan, and I couldn't find any details about anything,

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 1>or at least nothing about how small of a crab

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:47.320
<v Speaker 1>people would keep. But I did find a Japan Times

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:50.279
<v Speaker 1>Food and Drink article from two thousand two called in

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:54.840
<v Speaker 1>a pinch, these will do just fine by Rick la point.

0:34:55.600 --> 0:34:59.440
<v Speaker 1>It's about the culinary uses of fresh water crab species

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 1>called sawa ghani meaning marsh crab or river crab, and

0:35:03.640 --> 0:35:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the mokuzu ghani or the mitten crab. Now Sawaghani in

0:35:07.440 --> 0:35:11.760
<v Speaker 1>particular is tiny, barely three centimeters long as an adult,

0:35:12.120 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and the point rights quote sawaghani ranging color from deep

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:18.480
<v Speaker 1>purple to blue to bright crimson. They are a treat

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:22.279
<v Speaker 1>all summer long, usually available from late May. Not often

0:35:22.360 --> 0:35:25.440
<v Speaker 1>seen in local supermarkets, sawa ghani are sold in larger

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:29.480
<v Speaker 1>retail food markets and at any good fish purveyor. As

0:35:29.560 --> 0:35:33.960
<v Speaker 1>with makuzu ghani, sawaghani must be cooked thoroughly before being served.

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:36.840
<v Speaker 1>These little crab are eaten whole as a rule, and

0:35:36.960 --> 0:35:39.920
<v Speaker 1>are usually fried briefly, so the crisp shell and all

0:35:40.000 --> 0:35:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the legs may be eaten so so they fry, they

0:35:43.239 --> 0:35:45.400
<v Speaker 1>fry them or braise them, eat them whole, eat the

0:35:45.440 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 1>whole shell. Oh wow, so they're just they're small enough

0:35:48.200 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 1>to wear their shell is just not that thick. Or

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:53.400
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of because normally only hear this with with

0:35:53.520 --> 0:35:56.880
<v Speaker 1>soft shell crab where the shell the new shell has

0:35:56.960 --> 0:35:59.840
<v Speaker 1>not yet developed. And so this article ends with a

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:05.120
<v Speaker 1>recipe actually for brays sweet, sweet and salty sabaghani with sake, soy, sauce, sugar,

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:07.239
<v Speaker 1>and chili powder. It sounds kind of good, it does.

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm suddenly hungry for crab. Now. I don't know

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:12.880
<v Speaker 1>if it's possible to eat hay ka ghani in the

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:16.200
<v Speaker 1>same way the samurai crab. Maybe the taste or the

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:18.120
<v Speaker 1>texture would be different in a way that would make

0:36:18.160 --> 0:36:21.080
<v Speaker 1>this impossible. Maybe the shells too hard or something. I

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:24.480
<v Speaker 1>looked all over the place for recipes or similar stories

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 1>featuring Hayka gani, and I couldn't find anything. There were

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 1>no results I could find for hayka ghani recipes or

0:36:31.719 --> 0:36:35.359
<v Speaker 1>ways of preparing them culinary traditions. So I guess it's

0:36:35.400 --> 0:36:38.279
<v Speaker 1>possible that this could be for cultural reasons, rather than

0:36:38.320 --> 0:36:41.040
<v Speaker 1>there being some problem with their bodies making them inedible.

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 1>But I found nothing. All right, let's take another break,

0:36:44.160 --> 0:36:46.920
<v Speaker 1>and when we come back we will continue to explore

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the the mystery of the samurai crab. Alright, we're back, Okay,

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:57.360
<v Speaker 1>so we finally are going to get to what dawkinsites

0:36:57.400 --> 0:37:01.479
<v Speaker 1>as his main reason for rejecting the Huxley Sagan theory.

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Are you ready, Robert Dawkins writes, quote, My main reason

0:37:05.719 --> 0:37:08.840
<v Speaker 1>for skepticism about the Huxley Sagan theory is that the

0:37:09.000 --> 0:37:13.400
<v Speaker 1>human brain is demonstrably eager to see faces in random patterns,

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:16.520
<v Speaker 1>as we know from scientific evidence. On top of the

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:19.840
<v Speaker 1>numerous legends about the faces of Jesus or the Virgin

0:37:19.960 --> 0:37:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Mary or Mother Teresa being seen on slices of toast,

0:37:23.880 --> 0:37:27.440
<v Speaker 1>or pizzas, or patches of damp on a wall. This

0:37:27.640 --> 0:37:31.040
<v Speaker 1>eagerness is enhanced if the pattern departs from randomness in

0:37:31.120 --> 0:37:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the specific direction of being symmetrical. All crabs except hermit

0:37:35.920 --> 0:37:40.799
<v Speaker 1>crabs are symmetrical anyway, I reluctantly suspect that the resemblance

0:37:40.840 --> 0:37:43.759
<v Speaker 1>of Hakia to a Samurai warrior is no more than

0:37:43.840 --> 0:37:46.440
<v Speaker 1>an accident, much as I would like to believe that

0:37:46.600 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 1>it has been enhanced by natural selection. This phenomenon that

0:37:50.920 --> 0:37:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Dawkins is talking about is called paradolia, and it is

0:37:55.200 --> 0:38:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the tendency that humans have to see information in random noise.

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:04.360
<v Speaker 1>So when you see a face in the side of

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:07.560
<v Speaker 1>a tree, or you see the shape of an animal

0:38:07.719 --> 0:38:09.960
<v Speaker 1>in the clouds or anything like that, things that are

0:38:10.040 --> 0:38:13.560
<v Speaker 1>actually just random patterns in nature and have no top

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:16.880
<v Speaker 1>down control or no information encoded to them still read

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:20.920
<v Speaker 1>as information to us. Yeah. An example of this, too,

0:38:21.000 --> 0:38:23.320
<v Speaker 1>of the animal realm goes back to our recent Animal

0:38:23.400 --> 0:38:26.439
<v Speaker 1>Lives episode where we talked about the death the death

0:38:26.480 --> 0:38:30.239
<v Speaker 1>head moth that said hawk moth, where we just can't

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:33.320
<v Speaker 1>get over this skull on its back but there's not

0:38:33.520 --> 0:38:35.320
<v Speaker 1>really there's not really there aren't really a lot of

0:38:35.360 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 1>great arguments as do why it is there. Yeah, So

0:38:38.239 --> 0:38:41.960
<v Speaker 1>para idolia would be the theory that says, okay, there

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:44.359
<v Speaker 1>is no it's not actually a skull on its back

0:38:44.480 --> 0:38:46.840
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been selected to look like a skull in in

0:38:46.920 --> 0:38:50.080
<v Speaker 1>any way. We're just reading information that's not really there

0:38:50.520 --> 0:38:53.040
<v Speaker 1>because we're primed to look for that kind of stuff

0:38:53.760 --> 0:38:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and obsessed about it. And so dawkins argument here is

0:38:57.719 --> 0:39:01.440
<v Speaker 1>essentially that para idolia is so wrong that the departure

0:39:01.560 --> 0:39:06.959
<v Speaker 1>from randomness need not be especially unlikely before we start

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:09.640
<v Speaker 1>seeing faces in it. I want to phrase the argument

0:39:09.719 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 1>another way to try to make it more more specific

0:39:12.320 --> 0:39:16.799
<v Speaker 1>and measurable. Imagine two different scenarios. Scenario one, if these

0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:21.560
<v Speaker 1>crabs were being born with a nearly one photo realistic

0:39:21.680 --> 0:39:25.480
<v Speaker 1>image of Toshiro Mifune's character from yo Jimbo on their backs.

0:39:25.920 --> 0:39:27.879
<v Speaker 1>Try to imagine that. Right, if you pull a crab

0:39:27.960 --> 0:39:30.200
<v Speaker 1>out of the ocean and it has a photo real

0:39:30.800 --> 0:39:33.320
<v Speaker 1>copy of a samurai face on it, that would be

0:39:33.480 --> 0:39:36.680
<v Speaker 1>so unlikely to happen naturally or by coincidence. You would

0:39:36.719 --> 0:39:40.799
<v Speaker 1>have to invoke some kind of special, narrow type of selection, right,

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Like you'd have to say, okay, somebody three D printed

0:39:43.680 --> 0:39:45.920
<v Speaker 1>this crab carapist and put it back in the ocean,

0:39:46.120 --> 0:39:49.040
<v Speaker 1>or there's some kind of crazy genetic engineering of crabs

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 1>going on. It has to be artificial. And the reason

0:39:52.160 --> 0:39:54.200
<v Speaker 1>it has to be artificial is that it is such

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a strong departure from randomness. Right, There's no way a

0:39:58.400 --> 0:40:01.759
<v Speaker 1>photo realistic image like that had happen by chance. Right,

0:40:01.840 --> 0:40:03.600
<v Speaker 1>it must be the work of the gods or the

0:40:03.719 --> 0:40:07.239
<v Speaker 1>humans that they're both big samurai film buffs. So you know,

0:40:08.840 --> 0:40:12.840
<v Speaker 1>another scenario, if a crab just had two dots positioned

0:40:13.120 --> 0:40:16.440
<v Speaker 1>above a curved line, making a crude approximation of like

0:40:16.520 --> 0:40:19.800
<v Speaker 1>a stick figure smiley face, you would not think that

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:21.880
<v Speaker 1>this needed to be selected for, right, it would be.

0:40:22.000 --> 0:40:25.960
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's so close to random that you wouldn't

0:40:26.000 --> 0:40:28.960
<v Speaker 1>need to invoke any special selection to explain it. Now,

0:40:29.040 --> 0:40:32.960
<v Speaker 1>we're obviously with the Hey Kagani crab, we're somewhere between

0:40:33.200 --> 0:40:36.480
<v Speaker 1>those two scenarios. It's not a photo realistic image of

0:40:36.600 --> 0:40:39.759
<v Speaker 1>famous samurai character, but it's also not just two dots

0:40:39.840 --> 0:40:42.080
<v Speaker 1>with a line or a smiley face. And so the

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:45.600
<v Speaker 1>question is which of the scenarios is it closer to.

0:40:45.920 --> 0:40:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Is it closer to randomness than we're giving it credit for,

0:40:49.120 --> 0:40:52.719
<v Speaker 1>or is it closer to a real departure from randomness

0:40:52.760 --> 0:40:55.600
<v Speaker 1>than we're giving it credit for. Interesting this, right, of course,

0:40:55.640 --> 0:40:59.319
<v Speaker 1>reminds me of a various conspiracy theories that are out there,

0:40:59.400 --> 0:41:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, like it falls into this area where if

0:41:01.680 --> 0:41:04.640
<v Speaker 1>you if you squint, or if you just you turn

0:41:04.719 --> 0:41:09.160
<v Speaker 1>off certain logicum toggles in your brain, then it then

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:11.600
<v Speaker 1>it can begin to make a perfect kind of sense.

0:41:12.040 --> 0:41:15.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, but there's something about the the ambiguity of

0:41:15.120 --> 0:41:17.840
<v Speaker 1>it that gives it power. Yeah. Now, of course, in

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:20.800
<v Speaker 1>dawkins argument, we'd have to notice that in both of

0:41:20.920 --> 0:41:23.920
<v Speaker 1>these scenarios I just mentioned, the crude smiley face or

0:41:23.960 --> 0:41:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the photorealistic image, in both of them we see a face.

0:41:27.600 --> 0:41:31.120
<v Speaker 1>So we're simply wired to see faces in random designs.

0:41:31.480 --> 0:41:34.239
<v Speaker 1>And so Dawkins thinks that the crabs carapaces closer to

0:41:34.360 --> 0:41:37.920
<v Speaker 1>scenario to the almost random smiley face than it is

0:41:38.000 --> 0:41:41.480
<v Speaker 1>to Scenario one, the photorealistic face. It's not actually all

0:41:41.560 --> 0:41:43.879
<v Speaker 1>that strong a departure from randomness, and yet we see

0:41:43.920 --> 0:41:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the face anyway, because that's what we do, it's what

0:41:46.600 --> 0:41:51.319
<v Speaker 1>we're wired for. But then again, remember Huxley's claim. Huxley said, specifically,

0:41:51.560 --> 0:41:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the resemblance of Dora Pay to an angry Japanese warrior

0:41:54.680 --> 0:41:59.080
<v Speaker 1>is far too specific and too detailed to be accidental.

0:41:59.200 --> 0:42:02.120
<v Speaker 1>So we've got we've at Dawkins and Huxley at odds here.

0:42:02.560 --> 0:42:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Huxley says it's too specific to be a coincidence. Dawkins

0:42:05.640 --> 0:42:08.840
<v Speaker 1>says it's probably a coincidence, and we're just over interpreting it.

0:42:09.320 --> 0:42:11.719
<v Speaker 1>How do we know who's right here. Well, certainly we can.

0:42:12.120 --> 0:42:13.680
<v Speaker 1>We can go back to some of the other facts

0:42:13.719 --> 0:42:17.120
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about, sort of the time frame, the brief

0:42:17.600 --> 0:42:21.359
<v Speaker 1>period in which samurai art is a thing or even

0:42:21.440 --> 0:42:24.240
<v Speaker 1>human faces or a thing versus the larger time scale

0:42:24.600 --> 0:42:27.279
<v Speaker 1>of crab evolution. But then also we can look to

0:42:27.440 --> 0:42:32.360
<v Speaker 1>this particular to our particular propensity to see faces and

0:42:32.520 --> 0:42:34.960
<v Speaker 1>things like how strong is this effect exactly? So we

0:42:35.040 --> 0:42:36.879
<v Speaker 1>can come at it from both angles. We can look

0:42:36.920 --> 0:42:39.320
<v Speaker 1>at what's the chance of the crab would look like

0:42:39.440 --> 0:42:42.440
<v Speaker 1>that anyway from biological perspective, and we can look at

0:42:42.600 --> 0:42:45.319
<v Speaker 1>what's the chance that humans would see faces and things

0:42:45.400 --> 0:42:48.239
<v Speaker 1>that really don't have hardly a face at all on them.

0:42:48.800 --> 0:42:50.600
<v Speaker 1>And so let's look at the letter. Let's look at

0:42:50.640 --> 0:42:54.239
<v Speaker 1>this idea of paraidolia. How strong and prevalent is the

0:42:54.280 --> 0:42:57.359
<v Speaker 1>paraidolia effect. I want to consult a few studies. There

0:42:57.360 --> 0:43:00.880
<v Speaker 1>are some that don't quite fee it because they've got

0:43:01.080 --> 0:43:04.480
<v Speaker 1>odd methodology, But a lot of the paraidolia studies will

0:43:04.560 --> 0:43:07.160
<v Speaker 1>work like this, like you've got a image on a

0:43:07.239 --> 0:43:11.719
<v Speaker 1>screen that has a that has pure noise on it,

0:43:11.840 --> 0:43:15.799
<v Speaker 1>just like random snow static or randomly generated static by

0:43:15.880 --> 0:43:19.480
<v Speaker 1>some algorithm, and you ask people do you see a

0:43:19.640 --> 0:43:22.680
<v Speaker 1>letter in the encoded in the static or do you

0:43:22.800 --> 0:43:26.000
<v Speaker 1>see a face? And sometimes the people who are doing

0:43:26.040 --> 0:43:28.320
<v Speaker 1>these experiments will prime you. In fact, in all the

0:43:28.440 --> 0:43:31.879
<v Speaker 1>examples I could find, they were priming people saying, if

0:43:31.920 --> 0:43:34.719
<v Speaker 1>you see a face in these pictures, tell us when

0:43:34.760 --> 0:43:36.520
<v Speaker 1>you see a face, or tell us what kind of

0:43:36.600 --> 0:43:39.720
<v Speaker 1>face you see. Like one of the studies had faces

0:43:39.840 --> 0:43:43.160
<v Speaker 1>encoded in the in the static, but the faces didn't

0:43:43.200 --> 0:43:45.480
<v Speaker 1>have any mouths, and they were asking people do you

0:43:45.480 --> 0:43:49.520
<v Speaker 1>see a smiling face or a not smiling face. So

0:43:49.680 --> 0:43:52.560
<v Speaker 1>one story, for example, was by Corey Reeth at All

0:43:52.880 --> 0:43:56.040
<v Speaker 1>in Perception in two thousand eleven called Faces in the

0:43:56.120 --> 0:43:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Mist Illusory Face and Letter Detection. This had hundreds of

0:44:00.000 --> 0:44:02.719
<v Speaker 1>participants and the study looked at, among other things, what

0:44:03.000 --> 0:44:07.360
<v Speaker 1>features of random noise images tended to suggest faces and letters.

0:44:07.880 --> 0:44:10.200
<v Speaker 1>And in this study, after a training period with different

0:44:10.239 --> 0:44:13.000
<v Speaker 1>types of images, participants were asked to look at whether

0:44:13.160 --> 0:44:16.319
<v Speaker 1>images had letters or faces embedded in them. And there

0:44:16.360 --> 0:44:19.919
<v Speaker 1>were three experiments with pure noise images and participants thought

0:44:20.000 --> 0:44:22.719
<v Speaker 1>that there were letters embedded in thirty six percent of

0:44:22.760 --> 0:44:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the images when they were suggested that was a possibility

0:44:25.719 --> 0:44:29.280
<v Speaker 1>and participants thought there were faces embedded in between thirty

0:44:29.320 --> 0:44:32.720
<v Speaker 1>two and thirty six percent of pure noise images, depending

0:44:32.760 --> 0:44:34.480
<v Speaker 1>on whether or not there was an oval in the

0:44:34.560 --> 0:44:37.200
<v Speaker 1>middle of the image bounding where the face was supposed

0:44:37.239 --> 0:44:40.240
<v Speaker 1>to appear. So it looks like there you're showing people

0:44:40.320 --> 0:44:43.200
<v Speaker 1>pure noise. There's nothing encoded in it, and at least

0:44:43.280 --> 0:44:46.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty two percent of the time if there's a suggestion

0:44:46.160 --> 0:44:48.279
<v Speaker 1>that there could be a face, people think they see

0:44:48.280 --> 0:44:53.120
<v Speaker 1>a face. Another study from fourteen by jianng Liu at

0:44:53.160 --> 0:44:57.160
<v Speaker 1>All called Seeing Jesus and Toast Neural and Behavioral Correlates

0:44:57.200 --> 0:45:00.120
<v Speaker 1>of Face paara idolia. The purpose of the study is

0:45:00.160 --> 0:45:04.439
<v Speaker 1>to quote explore face specific behavioral and neural responses during

0:45:04.480 --> 0:45:08.000
<v Speaker 1>illusory face processing. In other words, they were trying to see, Okay,

0:45:08.080 --> 0:45:10.759
<v Speaker 1>we know people sometimes see faces that aren't there. What's

0:45:10.760 --> 0:45:13.879
<v Speaker 1>happening in their brains when they see faces that aren't there?

0:45:14.480 --> 0:45:17.400
<v Speaker 1>And so the participants were twenty healthy Chinese adults and

0:45:17.440 --> 0:45:20.400
<v Speaker 1>they were showing images composed of pure noise like random

0:45:20.480 --> 0:45:23.840
<v Speaker 1>gray scale pattern ngs. The researchers led them to believe

0:45:24.040 --> 0:45:26.799
<v Speaker 1>that fifty percent of the pure noise images they were

0:45:26.840 --> 0:45:30.840
<v Speaker 1>seeing contained either images of letters or of faces, and

0:45:31.000 --> 0:45:34.440
<v Speaker 1>under these conditions, looking at pure randomness but being told

0:45:34.520 --> 0:45:37.960
<v Speaker 1>it might contain a face, participants said they saw letters

0:45:38.200 --> 0:45:40.560
<v Speaker 1>in thirty eight percent of the images and faces in

0:45:40.680 --> 0:45:42.880
<v Speaker 1>thirty four percent of the images. So that's really close

0:45:42.920 --> 0:45:45.320
<v Speaker 1>to the figures in the last study, right, It's like

0:45:45.480 --> 0:45:48.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty something percent of the time if you're told a

0:45:48.520 --> 0:45:51.359
<v Speaker 1>face might be there and there's nothing there, you will

0:45:51.400 --> 0:45:54.160
<v Speaker 1>see a face anyway. There's a lot of interesting stuff

0:45:54.200 --> 0:45:56.640
<v Speaker 1>explored in the research apart from just whether we detect

0:45:56.719 --> 0:45:58.520
<v Speaker 1>faces and randomness, and I think it might be worth

0:45:58.600 --> 0:46:00.919
<v Speaker 1>coming back to do a whole episode on the neuroscience

0:46:00.960 --> 0:46:03.839
<v Speaker 1>of paraidolia in the future. In the past, I've thought

0:46:03.880 --> 0:46:07.000
<v Speaker 1>about this in terms of, say, staring into a dark wood,

0:46:07.640 --> 0:46:10.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, where the one thing you don't want to

0:46:10.280 --> 0:46:12.760
<v Speaker 1>see is a creepy witch face or troll face staring

0:46:12.800 --> 0:46:14.279
<v Speaker 1>out at you from the dark. What if you do

0:46:14.360 --> 0:46:17.120
<v Speaker 1>want to see that, well, then my advice is to

0:46:17.239 --> 0:46:21.040
<v Speaker 1>keep staring, because I'll often have that effect where I'm

0:46:21.120 --> 0:46:23.080
<v Speaker 1>staring into the into the woods. I mean not often.

0:46:23.160 --> 0:46:25.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't go out every night and staring into the woods,

0:46:25.280 --> 0:46:27.799
<v Speaker 1>but there are times when I've I've done that where

0:46:27.800 --> 0:46:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm staring into the woods sort of checking it out,

0:46:29.800 --> 0:46:31.399
<v Speaker 1>and I'll think, what if I see a witch face,

0:46:31.719 --> 0:46:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and then I'll I'll know intrinsically, if I keep looking,

0:46:35.520 --> 0:46:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to see something that I could interpret as

0:46:37.880 --> 0:46:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a witch face, and it's going to spiral out of control.

0:46:41.000 --> 0:46:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I need to stop staring into the into the darkness

0:46:44.239 --> 0:46:48.320
<v Speaker 1>of the woods. Yeah, yeah, Yeah. There's an interesting theory

0:46:48.880 --> 0:46:51.080
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of these Paraidolia studies are based on,

0:46:51.600 --> 0:46:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's the idea of studying a black box through

0:46:56.080 --> 0:46:59.439
<v Speaker 1>random noise, using noise to study what's inside a black box.

0:46:59.480 --> 0:47:02.280
<v Speaker 1>So if there's some like a brain or a computer

0:47:02.440 --> 0:47:05.719
<v Speaker 1>that we don't understand the programming of and you want

0:47:05.760 --> 0:47:08.520
<v Speaker 1>to understand how it works, you can't like get inside

0:47:08.560 --> 0:47:10.520
<v Speaker 1>it and cut it up and understand how it works.

0:47:11.040 --> 0:47:15.239
<v Speaker 1>But what you could do is that you can stimulate

0:47:15.360 --> 0:47:19.759
<v Speaker 1>it with nothing and see what it generates on its own,

0:47:19.880 --> 0:47:23.440
<v Speaker 1>to sort of like understand what the base level algorithm generating,

0:47:23.719 --> 0:47:26.600
<v Speaker 1>what the base level algorithms are, what they generate when

0:47:26.640 --> 0:47:29.719
<v Speaker 1>there's no real input. So one example of using of

0:47:29.800 --> 0:47:31.840
<v Speaker 1>studying the human mind like this would be the sensory

0:47:31.880 --> 0:47:35.080
<v Speaker 1>deprivation tank you put a human in a sensory deprivation

0:47:35.160 --> 0:47:37.719
<v Speaker 1>tank to see where the mind goes when there's no

0:47:38.040 --> 0:47:42.520
<v Speaker 1>input to base output on. Because we have evolved to

0:47:42.640 --> 0:47:47.160
<v Speaker 1>thrive in a world of of of stimuli, of changing stimuli,

0:47:47.239 --> 0:47:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and if you take that out of the equation, then

0:47:50.239 --> 0:47:53.400
<v Speaker 1>all of our sensory feelers are just pawing around it nothing,

0:47:53.960 --> 0:47:57.560
<v Speaker 1>but they're going to they can still interpret a form

0:47:57.960 --> 0:48:00.840
<v Speaker 1>in the nothing. Yeah, but that's an interesting way of

0:48:00.960 --> 0:48:02.920
<v Speaker 1>learning about the nature of the mind. Right when you

0:48:03.000 --> 0:48:05.719
<v Speaker 1>take away all stimuli, you start to learn, well, what's

0:48:05.760 --> 0:48:08.040
<v Speaker 1>going on at the base level in my mind? What?

0:48:08.239 --> 0:48:10.239
<v Speaker 1>What it? What will it churn up when there's nothing

0:48:10.320 --> 0:48:13.000
<v Speaker 1>coming in? And so a similar thing would be showing

0:48:13.120 --> 0:48:17.399
<v Speaker 1>somebody randomness. Now, these studies aren't exactly pure randomness. They're

0:48:17.400 --> 0:48:20.719
<v Speaker 1>not totally black boxes because they're always priming the participants.

0:48:20.719 --> 0:48:23.160
<v Speaker 1>They're always saying, like, you might see a face, tell

0:48:23.239 --> 0:48:25.440
<v Speaker 1>me if you see a face in this image, And

0:48:25.600 --> 0:48:27.919
<v Speaker 1>under those conditions, it looks like when you show people

0:48:28.200 --> 0:48:30.920
<v Speaker 1>random noise that has no information in it and tell

0:48:31.000 --> 0:48:33.279
<v Speaker 1>them there might be a face, thirty something percent of

0:48:33.360 --> 0:48:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the time people tend to see a face that sounds

0:48:36.040 --> 0:48:40.359
<v Speaker 1>like paradolia is naturally pretty strong under people even who

0:48:40.400 --> 0:48:43.160
<v Speaker 1>are not like prone to hallucinations or anything. So I

0:48:43.239 --> 0:48:45.239
<v Speaker 1>think that's probably a point in in the favor of

0:48:45.320 --> 0:48:47.719
<v Speaker 1>dawkins explanation. Yeah, I mean, if you think about it

0:48:47.800 --> 0:48:50.719
<v Speaker 1>in terms of human evolution and what and what is

0:48:50.840 --> 0:48:54.840
<v Speaker 1>valuable environmental information, Uh, you know, a few things are

0:48:54.880 --> 0:48:57.840
<v Speaker 1>more important than the presence of another organism, because it

0:48:57.880 --> 0:48:59.680
<v Speaker 1>could be a prey organism, it could be a predator

0:48:59.800 --> 0:49:01.160
<v Speaker 1>organ as that it could be a member of your

0:49:01.200 --> 0:49:03.680
<v Speaker 1>own species, which brings with it a number of different

0:49:03.719 --> 0:49:06.960
<v Speaker 1>possibilities that tie into your survival, right, especially if it's

0:49:07.000 --> 0:49:08.719
<v Speaker 1>a member of your own species and you are a

0:49:08.920 --> 0:49:12.640
<v Speaker 1>social animal like we are. Like, I'm very convinced by

0:49:13.120 --> 0:49:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the idea that social behavior and managing social relationships is

0:49:17.640 --> 0:49:20.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the primary factors that shaped the evolution of

0:49:20.640 --> 0:49:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the anatomically modern human brain. Right, And I mentioned earlier

0:49:24.320 --> 0:49:26.960
<v Speaker 1>referred to the human face as a sensory array, and

0:49:27.320 --> 0:49:29.759
<v Speaker 1>part of that goes beyond just because just beyond the

0:49:29.840 --> 0:49:34.080
<v Speaker 1>fact that it is where our sense organs are our

0:49:34.200 --> 0:49:38.759
<v Speaker 1>group together, we also use facial expressions and micro expressions

0:49:38.840 --> 0:49:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to communicate with one another. It's and and we depend

0:49:41.719 --> 0:49:46.080
<v Speaker 1>on it far more than than other primates that have, say,

0:49:46.160 --> 0:49:51.160
<v Speaker 1>more uniform facial features. Our faces are have evolved to

0:49:51.600 --> 0:49:56.360
<v Speaker 1>to help convey meaning to other members of our species, yes, totally.

0:49:56.800 --> 0:49:59.720
<v Speaker 1>But also our brains have evolved to be on hyper

0:50:00.280 --> 0:50:03.240
<v Speaker 1>for faces. So it's not I mean, para idolia appears

0:50:03.320 --> 0:50:06.160
<v Speaker 1>to be strong for all kinds of things, but faces

0:50:06.239 --> 0:50:08.800
<v Speaker 1>are one of these things that were especially looking for

0:50:09.120 --> 0:50:12.719
<v Speaker 1>their dedicated pathways and structures within the brain that are

0:50:12.880 --> 0:50:16.040
<v Speaker 1>on alert to see a face and to start interpreting

0:50:16.120 --> 0:50:18.319
<v Speaker 1>what's up with the face when you see it? Yes,

0:50:18.400 --> 0:50:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and then what kind of intent is behind it? So

0:50:20.239 --> 0:50:23.920
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not that irrational really to imagine plucking a

0:50:24.000 --> 0:50:26.520
<v Speaker 1>crab out of the sea, looking at it and saying, Oh,

0:50:26.680 --> 0:50:28.239
<v Speaker 1>this crab has a face on its back, and I

0:50:28.280 --> 0:50:31.480
<v Speaker 1>think it's angry at me. Yea. Now, one last point

0:50:31.520 --> 0:50:34.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about against the artificial selection hypothesis

0:50:35.000 --> 0:50:37.320
<v Speaker 1>that I thought it was very interesting and very straightforward

0:50:37.320 --> 0:50:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and simple. I came across this one in a short

0:50:39.800 --> 0:50:43.279
<v Speaker 1>two thousand ten blog post by an invertebrate biologist named

0:50:43.320 --> 0:50:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Michael Bach, and we've been talking about the Haika Gani

0:50:46.400 --> 0:50:49.920
<v Speaker 1>crab specifically, but the Haika Ghani crab is a member

0:50:50.080 --> 0:50:53.319
<v Speaker 1>of a whole family of crabs called Diripida. We might

0:50:53.440 --> 0:50:55.600
<v Speaker 1>we might have mentioned Diripida earlier, but we need to

0:50:55.680 --> 0:50:58.799
<v Speaker 1>remember they're all kinds of related crabs. And what Boch

0:50:58.880 --> 0:51:01.840
<v Speaker 1>pointed out is variety of crabs from the diripid A

0:51:01.920 --> 0:51:05.680
<v Speaker 1>family all have human looking faces on their backs, and

0:51:05.800 --> 0:51:08.960
<v Speaker 1>lots of these crabs don't even exist in human fisheries,

0:51:09.560 --> 0:51:14.040
<v Speaker 1>so there's no tradition of humans catching them and potentially

0:51:14.520 --> 0:51:17.640
<v Speaker 1>keeping or releasing them based on the designs on their backs, right,

0:51:17.680 --> 0:51:20.560
<v Speaker 1>there's no way they could have been shaped by artificial selection,

0:51:20.640 --> 0:51:23.879
<v Speaker 1>and yet they look like faces anyway. So to test

0:51:23.960 --> 0:51:25.879
<v Speaker 1>this out for myself, I wanted to look up other

0:51:25.960 --> 0:51:28.000
<v Speaker 1>crabs in the diripid A family. It is. It does

0:51:28.040 --> 0:51:30.480
<v Speaker 1>appear to be a pretty obscure crab family. It's not

0:51:30.640 --> 0:51:34.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff that has you know, like really storied species lots

0:51:34.160 --> 0:51:37.200
<v Speaker 1>of articles about them. But I did discover, to my delight,

0:51:37.320 --> 0:51:41.040
<v Speaker 1>there is an Internet crab database. Thank the Gods for

0:51:41.160 --> 0:51:44.200
<v Speaker 1>such a thing. Internet crab database, and some of the

0:51:44.480 --> 0:51:47.520
<v Speaker 1>entries have images with them. So I wanted before we

0:51:47.600 --> 0:51:49.840
<v Speaker 1>wrap up, to look at a little more para Idoli

0:51:49.920 --> 0:51:53.440
<v Speaker 1>a bait from Family diripid A. So first I've included

0:51:53.440 --> 0:51:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a picture for us to look at of do rip

0:51:55.680 --> 0:51:59.640
<v Speaker 1>A Quadridon's what does this look like? This one looks

0:51:59.719 --> 0:52:02.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of Darth Maul or like a giraffe. Yeah, it

0:52:02.400 --> 0:52:04.759
<v Speaker 1>looks like Darth Maul. It also kind of looks like

0:52:04.840 --> 0:52:07.279
<v Speaker 1>a spider face. Do you see that? Yeah? Well, I

0:52:07.320 --> 0:52:09.160
<v Speaker 1>mean it's hard not to look at a crab and

0:52:09.200 --> 0:52:12.719
<v Speaker 1>get a certain certain arachnid feel for them. Right, well,

0:52:12.760 --> 0:52:14.960
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at a crab top down, but it looks

0:52:15.040 --> 0:52:18.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of like she lab faced on. Yeah, it does.

0:52:19.680 --> 0:52:24.000
<v Speaker 1>How about dripoides fashiono. What does this look like? All right, well,

0:52:24.080 --> 0:52:26.640
<v Speaker 1>this one definitely has kind of a samurai mask will

0:52:26.680 --> 0:52:29.200
<v Speaker 1>look to it. But also it reminded me a lot

0:52:29.320 --> 0:52:34.200
<v Speaker 1>of the character Ponda Baba from Star Wars, walrus looking

0:52:34.320 --> 0:52:37.719
<v Speaker 1>character in the Cantina. Oh yeah, the bug eyes. Yeah,

0:52:37.880 --> 0:52:41.279
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't like you, that guy, that one. That's what

0:52:41.400 --> 0:52:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I see. I see like a stylised samurai version of

0:52:44.000 --> 0:52:48.359
<v Speaker 1>that character. In this crab, I see straight up predator mask. Yeah. Yeah,

0:52:49.920 --> 0:52:51.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, a lot of this reminds me of that

0:52:52.200 --> 0:52:55.279
<v Speaker 1>that that common scenario where you're looking up at the

0:52:55.360 --> 0:52:58.440
<v Speaker 1>clouds with a friend, and one person sees this animal

0:52:58.719 --> 0:53:00.960
<v Speaker 1>or this face or this object, and then you see

0:53:00.960 --> 0:53:04.200
<v Speaker 1>another one. And when you when you present the data

0:53:04.280 --> 0:53:05.800
<v Speaker 1>to someone, they're like, oh, yeah, I can see that.

0:53:05.840 --> 0:53:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I can see a unicorn. I was seeing uh, I

0:53:07.920 --> 0:53:10.280
<v Speaker 1>was seeing a whale, but now I can see the unicorn.

0:53:10.320 --> 0:53:12.760
<v Speaker 1>And now I can't unsee the unicorn. So I've primed

0:53:12.760 --> 0:53:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you for predators. Now yeah, okay, Now we got to

0:53:15.600 --> 0:53:18.520
<v Speaker 1>look at a couple of pictures of Medora pe lenata.

0:53:18.920 --> 0:53:21.800
<v Speaker 1>What do you see here, Robert? This one reminds me

0:53:21.920 --> 0:53:24.880
<v Speaker 1>of some of the creatures in the movie The Diiver.

0:53:25.080 --> 0:53:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Did you ever see that? No, I've never seen that.

0:53:27.440 --> 0:53:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Which so we've got two pictures. One it's sort of

0:53:29.560 --> 0:53:32.520
<v Speaker 1>standing up and it's it looks like a face to me,

0:53:32.680 --> 0:53:35.279
<v Speaker 1>but it's got its swimming legs hanging off the back

0:53:35.719 --> 0:53:38.879
<v Speaker 1>and they're sort of hairy looking, so it actually looks

0:53:38.960 --> 0:53:41.120
<v Speaker 1>like a person with like a foo man chew mustache.

0:53:41.440 --> 0:53:43.719
<v Speaker 1>Oh see, well, when I looked at this picture, I

0:53:44.040 --> 0:53:46.280
<v Speaker 1>saw it looked like it's flipping. It's giving the bird

0:53:46.440 --> 0:53:49.000
<v Speaker 1>like double birds. Oh, it's got the fingers coming up

0:53:49.000 --> 0:53:50.680
<v Speaker 1>in the air. So yeah, it's somebody with a big,

0:53:50.760 --> 0:53:53.279
<v Speaker 1>long food man chew mustache, but it's also flipping the

0:53:53.320 --> 0:53:55.040
<v Speaker 1>birds up in the air. See. I mainly saw a

0:53:55.080 --> 0:53:57.080
<v Speaker 1>stone called Steve Auston when I looked at it because

0:53:57.120 --> 0:53:59.480
<v Speaker 1>of the fingers. But then the next one that you shared,

0:53:59.640 --> 0:54:01.560
<v Speaker 1>this one, the one that reminds me of the guy

0:54:01.560 --> 0:54:03.319
<v Speaker 1>every one, it's more of a picture of its face.

0:54:04.360 --> 0:54:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Bringing it all back home to me. That looks like

0:54:06.560 --> 0:54:09.319
<v Speaker 1>the villain the Giant Crab in Attack of the Crab

0:54:09.400 --> 0:54:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Monsters because it has these kind of sad, droopy human eyes.

0:54:13.360 --> 0:54:15.360
<v Speaker 1>It does look like that. Yeah, it reminds me a

0:54:15.440 --> 0:54:18.319
<v Speaker 1>lot of of this movie that has come up before. Um,

0:54:18.680 --> 0:54:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I think on the podcast, but definitely on the Trailer

0:54:21.280 --> 0:54:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Talk video series that we did for a while. Well. Anyway,

0:54:23.719 --> 0:54:26.480
<v Speaker 1>as as Box points out in his blog post, all

0:54:26.560 --> 0:54:29.160
<v Speaker 1>these crabs to some extent look like human faces, not

0:54:29.320 --> 0:54:31.520
<v Speaker 1>all of them could have been shaped by fisher folk.

0:54:31.840 --> 0:54:35.400
<v Speaker 1>So while I would not rule out the possibility that

0:54:35.719 --> 0:54:39.399
<v Speaker 1>certain species of crabs with you know, symmetry on their

0:54:39.400 --> 0:54:41.560
<v Speaker 1>backs and things that look kind of like faces could

0:54:41.600 --> 0:54:44.880
<v Speaker 1>have been honed by artificial selection, it's it's possible that

0:54:45.320 --> 0:54:49.480
<v Speaker 1>fishing practices and throwing things back could have maybe sharpened

0:54:49.600 --> 0:54:53.279
<v Speaker 1>the features. I wouldn't use that to explain the emergence

0:54:53.360 --> 0:54:57.040
<v Speaker 1>of the features themselves, right, Yeah, that's that's pretty much

0:54:57.440 --> 0:55:00.440
<v Speaker 1>my read on it too. Like the situa wation that

0:55:00.600 --> 0:55:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that's Sagan especially is laying out here is not at

0:55:03.560 --> 0:55:07.839
<v Speaker 1>all unbelievable or or or unscientific. It's just not necessary. Yeah,

0:55:08.000 --> 0:55:11.360
<v Speaker 1>in the in the the evidence against it seems a

0:55:11.440 --> 0:55:14.960
<v Speaker 1>little too strong. Yeah, And it's not necessary. And if

0:55:15.000 --> 0:55:17.719
<v Speaker 1>it's not necessary in science, that means it doesn't pass

0:55:17.760 --> 0:55:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the test of parsimony. Right. It's it's you don't need

0:55:20.120 --> 0:55:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to invoke explanations that are not required. Right. It's like

0:55:23.239 --> 0:55:26.520
<v Speaker 1>again involving an alien species visiting the earth and and

0:55:26.880 --> 0:55:29.920
<v Speaker 1>doodling faces on the backs of the craft. Right, It's

0:55:29.960 --> 0:55:33.080
<v Speaker 1>more plausible than that, but it's still just as unnecessary.

0:55:34.000 --> 0:55:35.879
<v Speaker 1>I now, I also need to point out again though,

0:55:35.920 --> 0:55:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that artificial selection is definitely a thing. We already discussed

0:55:40.280 --> 0:55:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the selective breeding of various organisms for human purposes, everything

0:55:44.440 --> 0:55:47.280
<v Speaker 1>from horses and cattle to crops to domestic dog breeds.

0:55:47.520 --> 0:55:50.880
<v Speaker 1>There's also some evidence for the artificial selection of tustless

0:55:51.040 --> 0:55:54.560
<v Speaker 1>elephants due to human poaching. Yeah, Oh, artificial selection is

0:55:54.800 --> 0:55:58.000
<v Speaker 1>absolutely something that happens all the time. And so that

0:55:58.120 --> 0:55:59.960
<v Speaker 1>feeds into another thing I want to say, which is

0:56:00.120 --> 0:56:03.560
<v Speaker 1>that I feel really disappointed to lose this theory. It

0:56:03.719 --> 0:56:08.640
<v Speaker 1>feels sad, it's such it's a wonderful, beautiful explanation of

0:56:08.760 --> 0:56:12.320
<v Speaker 1>an actual scientific reality. Yeah, and I know we're not alone.

0:56:12.400 --> 0:56:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Like Dawkins commented that the Huxley slash Sagan story was

0:56:15.600 --> 0:56:18.640
<v Speaker 1>quote lovely, and he hated that he had to disagree

0:56:18.680 --> 0:56:20.759
<v Speaker 1>with it. And I see other writers and scientists around

0:56:20.800 --> 0:56:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the web expressing similar feelings. They're like, it's probably not correct,

0:56:24.520 --> 0:56:26.640
<v Speaker 1>but I hate to say that. I really want it

0:56:26.719 --> 0:56:30.080
<v Speaker 1>to be true. Why do we hate to lose this

0:56:30.239 --> 0:56:35.200
<v Speaker 1>explanatory story about artificial selection? Like it's not necessary to

0:56:35.360 --> 0:56:39.280
<v Speaker 1>provide an example of anything. We have a million examples

0:56:39.320 --> 0:56:42.200
<v Speaker 1>of artificial selection without it, So why can't we bear

0:56:42.280 --> 0:56:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to let it go? Because I think I think it's that,

0:56:44.760 --> 0:56:47.040
<v Speaker 1>First of all, it's the accidental aspect of it, the

0:56:47.200 --> 0:56:49.279
<v Speaker 1>idea that we're just we're doing it. We're not even

0:56:49.360 --> 0:56:53.319
<v Speaker 1>realizing we're doing it, that we're we're behaving as mad gods. Yeah,

0:56:53.520 --> 0:56:57.960
<v Speaker 1>without realizing it. It's artificial selection working without the knowledge

0:56:58.040 --> 0:57:01.040
<v Speaker 1>of the breeders, Like all of the magic of intention

0:57:01.200 --> 0:57:03.880
<v Speaker 1>is removed. And this actually does called call into question

0:57:04.239 --> 0:57:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the very concept of artificial selection. Right, Why do we

0:57:09.040 --> 0:57:13.239
<v Speaker 1>have a different category for changes that we make to

0:57:13.400 --> 0:57:18.720
<v Speaker 1>organisms on purpose over time versus changes that happen to organisms,

0:57:19.280 --> 0:57:22.520
<v Speaker 1>uh due to pressures from different organisms over time. Like

0:57:22.800 --> 0:57:25.840
<v Speaker 1>so if a dog or if a if a dog

0:57:25.920 --> 0:57:28.840
<v Speaker 1>ancestor and you know, some kind of ancestral wolf is

0:57:29.000 --> 0:57:32.120
<v Speaker 1>shaped by the evolution of a different species. So one

0:57:32.120 --> 0:57:34.760
<v Speaker 1>of its prey animals or some animal that could hurt

0:57:34.880 --> 0:57:38.959
<v Speaker 1>it ends up shaping the evolution of this candid over time.

0:57:39.200 --> 0:57:42.280
<v Speaker 1>You wouldn't call that artificial, you'd call it natural. But

0:57:42.480 --> 0:57:47.560
<v Speaker 1>if another organism, that is a relatively smooth bipedal primate

0:57:47.960 --> 0:57:50.600
<v Speaker 1>shapes the evolution of that dog for some reason, that's

0:57:50.640 --> 0:57:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the one exception we make, and we call that artificial

0:57:53.120 --> 0:57:57.160
<v Speaker 1>selection instead of natural. Maybe it's all natural selection. We

0:57:57.280 --> 0:58:00.600
<v Speaker 1>are animals too, and then the selection ussures that we

0:58:00.760 --> 0:58:03.800
<v Speaker 1>exert on the natural world are an outgrowth of our

0:58:03.920 --> 0:58:06.920
<v Speaker 1>genotype and our phenotype. Well, you know, there's there's one

0:58:07.000 --> 0:58:10.360
<v Speaker 1>example from the natural world especially that we should consider

0:58:10.480 --> 0:58:13.520
<v Speaker 1>coming back to and that is, uh, that of leaf

0:58:13.600 --> 0:58:16.920
<v Speaker 1>cutter ants. You have a creature here with essentially an

0:58:16.920 --> 0:58:21.200
<v Speaker 1>agricultural product. Yeah, absolutely so is the agricultural product that

0:58:21.400 --> 0:58:25.000
<v Speaker 1>is farmed by the ant an example of artificial selection?

0:58:25.240 --> 0:58:28.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so, Right, You'd still say that that's natural.

0:58:28.400 --> 0:58:31.360
<v Speaker 1>So if that's natural, why aren't all the things that

0:58:31.520 --> 0:58:35.439
<v Speaker 1>we breed, whether intentionally or unintentionally, natural as well? Well?

0:58:35.640 --> 0:58:38.760
<v Speaker 1>I think on one level it's there's the there's the

0:58:38.880 --> 0:58:42.560
<v Speaker 1>fact that humans can do things to an extreme level

0:58:43.200 --> 0:58:46.920
<v Speaker 1>that other species cannot do. You know, we can. Well,

0:58:46.960 --> 0:58:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if i'd agree with you there, because

0:58:49.160 --> 0:58:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the I mean, other species can shape the animals and

0:58:53.520 --> 0:58:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the organisms they interact with in really extreme and strange ways. Right, Yeah,

0:58:58.600 --> 0:59:02.680
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, certainly organism other organisms can cause other

0:59:02.880 --> 0:59:06.120
<v Speaker 1>organisms to go extinct. They can, they can and do

0:59:06.360 --> 0:59:10.000
<v Speaker 1>change their natural habitat. But can you think I mean,

0:59:10.240 --> 0:59:13.240
<v Speaker 1>but but the sheer scope of human change, I mean,

0:59:13.600 --> 0:59:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the sheer amount of change that we have brought about

0:59:17.080 --> 0:59:19.280
<v Speaker 1>in the world during our brief time on this on

0:59:19.360 --> 0:59:24.160
<v Speaker 1>this Earth, we probably shape the evolution of other organisms,

0:59:24.320 --> 0:59:28.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe more than does any other organism on Earth outside

0:59:28.800 --> 0:59:31.920
<v Speaker 1>of microbes. And then there's also the added level that

0:59:32.040 --> 0:59:36.360
<v Speaker 1>we do so we we we achieve this change via

0:59:36.520 --> 0:59:40.040
<v Speaker 1>our conscious understanding of the world. I guess consciousness is

0:59:40.080 --> 0:59:43.200
<v Speaker 1>what's key here. And in that sense, then if the

0:59:43.280 --> 0:59:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Sagan Huxley theory were correct, then then it wouldn't be

0:59:47.240 --> 0:59:51.200
<v Speaker 1>artificial selection, would it, because they weren't doing it on purpose. Yeah.

0:59:51.240 --> 0:59:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a strong argument. I guess that probably

0:59:53.360 --> 0:59:55.400
<v Speaker 1>does it for today. But I'm disappointed we don't get

0:59:55.440 --> 0:59:57.360
<v Speaker 1>to spend another twenty minutes talking about attack of the

0:59:57.400 --> 0:59:59.840
<v Speaker 1>crab monsters. Well, this is why we have to bring

1:00:00.000 --> 1:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>at trailer talk at least in an audio form, so

1:00:02.840 --> 1:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that we will have space for our movie references to breathe.

1:00:07.800 --> 1:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait, all right, So hey, in the meantime,

1:00:09.920 --> 1:00:11.640
<v Speaker 1>you want to check out other episodes of Stuff to

1:00:11.680 --> 1:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Blow Your Mind. Heading over to stuff to Blow your

1:00:13.600 --> 1:00:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Mind dot com, you'll find all of the episodes there.

1:00:15.800 --> 1:00:18.880
<v Speaker 1>You also find blog posts some other content links out

1:00:18.880 --> 1:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>to our various social media accounts such as Facebook, Twitter, Tumbler,

1:00:21.720 --> 1:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>and Instagram. Great big thank you as always to our

1:00:24.440 --> 1:00:28.120
<v Speaker 1>awesome audio producers Alex Williams and Arry Harrison. And if

1:00:28.160 --> 1:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>you want to get in touch with us directly. It'll

1:00:30.040 --> 1:00:32.440
<v Speaker 1>let us know feedback on this episode or any other,

1:00:32.920 --> 1:00:35.480
<v Speaker 1>or to request an episode for the future, or just

1:00:35.600 --> 1:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>to say hi and see what's up. You can email

1:00:37.880 --> 1:00:40.840
<v Speaker 1>us at blow the Mind at how stuff works dot

1:00:40.920 --> 1:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>com for more on this and thousands of other topics.

1:00:53.160 --> 1:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Does it how stuff works dot com points four point

1:01:10.720 --> 1:01:11.960
<v Speaker 1>four per