WEBVTT - The Nature of the Diamond, Part 2

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. My

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:15.240
<v Speaker 2>name is Robert.

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 3>Lamb and I am Joe McCormick, and we're back with

0:00:18.160 --> 0:00:22.439
<v Speaker 3>part two in our series on diamonds Now. In the

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:28.320
<v Speaker 3>previous episode we focused specifically on one strange question about diamonds,

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 3>which was our diamonds in one form or another poisonous.

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 3>This was the question that originally got me interested in

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:40.879
<v Speaker 3>the subject of diamonds, and brief recap I came across

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:45.560
<v Speaker 3>it because of a passage in the absolutely bonkers autobiography

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 3>of the sixteenth century Italian sculptor named Benvenudo Cellini, who

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 3>told a story, among many other wild and probably heavily

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 3>embellished tales, about his enemies trying to poison him with

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 3>the powder of a hounded diamond while he was in prison.

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 3>And then from there we examined some other sources from history,

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 3>documenting the documenting and examining the belief that diamonds or

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 3>diamond powder could be used as a lethal poison, and

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 3>in the end it seemed that the actual evidence of

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 3>diamonds being reliably poisonous when swallowed was sort of weak,

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 3>but not weak enough that I'd just like down a

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 3>pixie stick full of it. Basically, it seems there's sort

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 3>of a dearth of high quality modern evidence one way

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:35.119
<v Speaker 3>or the other. Seems kind of doubtful that diamonds are poisonous,

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 3>but not doubtful enough that I would advise eating them.

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 3>I'd avoid it. But we are back today with part

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 3>two to talk some more about diamonds.

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 2>That's right, And as we mentioned in the last episode,

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 2>we figured it would be essential to talk a little

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 2>bit about like what diamonds are and roll through some

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 2>material you may be familiar with, you may may not,

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 2>you may have forgotten about it, but where diamonds come

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 2>from and what some of their major properties are. Right,

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 2>we'll start with the obvious, and this is highly subjective,

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 2>of course, but it's a popular view on diamonds, and

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 2>that is they're beautiful. A diamond receives white light, breaks

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 2>that white light like a prism, and then these resulting

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 2>colors hit the various facets of the diamond. What's more,

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 2>light that enters a faceted diamond, which you can do

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:27.800
<v Speaker 2>from all sides, may bounce around in there several times

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 2>before shining back out again.

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 3>You know, it actually was making me wonder why sparkling

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 3>is sort of a general stand in for something that

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 3>is beautiful or something that catches the attention. You know.

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:44.079
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think part of it is just that we've

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 2>all really drunk the kool aid on how beautiful diamonds are,

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 2>not only in our lifetimes, but the over centuries and

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 2>centuries of pro diamond propaganda. Because it is interesting to

0:02:57.600 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 2>We'll get into this in a bit, like trying to

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:04.119
<v Speaker 2>figure out out when in history diamonds start becoming gems,

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Like there's definitely definitely seems to be a point in

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:11.359
<v Speaker 2>ancient cultures where like a diamond's not a gem. It's

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:13.920
<v Speaker 2>useful for cutting gems, but it's not a gem, and

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 2>then that shifts over time. So we'll get into that

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 2>more in a bit. But in terms of light entering

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 2>the diamond and what it does in there, here's another

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 2>interesting fact. This is one that I was reading about

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:29.080
<v Speaker 2>in an excellent Nova article titled The Science behind the

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:34.520
<v Speaker 2>Sparkle by Robert Hazen. A diamond actually slows down light

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 2>inside of itself and does so like no other known

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 2>colorless substance. So compared to things like ice and water.

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 2>For example, the author here writes that a diamond slows

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 2>light down to less than eighty thousand miles per second,

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 2>and that's more than one hundred thousand miles per second

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 2>slower than in air. The slow down, Hayzan rites is

0:03:57.200 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 2>complex and has to do with electron interactions and the

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 2>substances traveling through and it occurs with any matter, including

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 2>air and glass. And to put it all in context,

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 2>the speed of light in a vacuum is of course

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and eighty six thousand miles per second. So anyway,

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 2>you can crunch the numbers, and I think crunching numbers

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:16.040
<v Speaker 2>makes it actually feel a little more special when you

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 2>observed the sparkle here. But yeah, they do sparkle with

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 2>an almost otherworldly brilliance. There's a surreal dance of colors.

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:28.119
<v Speaker 2>And even if you don't desire diamonds for yourself, again,

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 2>the desire for them is just so entrenched in our

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 2>culture that it's a part of our language. You know,

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:36.280
<v Speaker 2>you're just referencing, like talking about something sparkling, even if

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 2>it's not a diamond, you're talking about something else, but

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 2>you're talking about it as if it were a diamond

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 2>We talk about things like diamonds in the rough and

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 2>so forth. Now here's another thing you definitely already know

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 2>about diamonds. They're not only beautiful, they're very hard. Diamonds

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:52.039
<v Speaker 2>are the hardest naturally occurring substance that we know of,

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:55.599
<v Speaker 2>so hard in fact, that they have numerous industrial applications.

0:04:55.920 --> 0:05:00.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's right. And one thing that has confused in

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 3>the past is like the different terminology we use for

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 3>the strength or resilience of materials, because if we of

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:10.040
<v Speaker 3>course used terms like hard and tough and all that

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 3>in an informal way where they all kind of mean

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 3>the same thing, but they also have some more specific

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 3>kind of scientific definitions or definitions in industrial uses. And

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 3>it's i think illuminating to look at the difference. So

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 3>what is toughness versus hardness? As usually understood, toughness is

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 3>the ability of a material to absorb energy without breaking

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 3>or fracturing, whereas hardness is the ability of a material

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 3>to resist what's called plastic deformation, in other words, to

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 3>resist local changes to its shape from friction. So to

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 3>imagine concrete examples, these changes could be things like cutting, denting,

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:57.279
<v Speaker 3>or scratching. So the harder a material is, the more

0:05:57.400 --> 0:06:00.279
<v Speaker 3>difficult it is to make a scratch or a dent

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:03.839
<v Speaker 3>in its surface. Hard materials don't scratch easily. In fact,

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:07.119
<v Speaker 3>they scratch other things, and you can usually tell which

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 3>material is harder by rubbing them together and seeing which

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 3>one scratches the other. Meanwhile, to come back to toughness,

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 3>brittleness is the opposite of toughness. The tougher material is

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 3>the more energy it can absorb before it cracks. So

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 3>rubber is not hard, but it is tough. You might

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:29.359
<v Speaker 3>be able to scratch it easily with a knife, but

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 3>you can also hit it really hard and it won't fracture. Meanwhile,

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 3>like you said, rob a diamond is the hardest and

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 3>naturally occurring substance on Earth, so you can't scratch its

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 3>surface with a knife or any other normal material apart

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 3>from another diamond. It is going to be really, really

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 3>difficult to make a scratch or a cut in a diamond.

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 3>We need special apparatus for doing so. But while it's

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 3>the hardest natural material on Earth, it is not the toughest.

0:06:57.120 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 3>In fact, believe it or not, you can break a

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 3>diamond with a regular steel hammer and anvil in fact,

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:07.600
<v Speaker 3>before we I just wanted to gut check myself on

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 3>this and be like, okay, well, assuming you can do that,

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 3>I want to see it. I bet there are videos

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 3>of people doing it, like on YouTube, and yep, you

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 3>can look them up. People put a diamond on an

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 3>anvil and smash it with a hammer. It breaks to pieces.

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 3>It's not necessarily easy to do, but with the regular

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 3>steel tools and enough force you can do it. That's right.

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 2>And we'll get into some specific examples of diamonds being

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 2>shattered as we proceed here. So yeah, they are not indestructible,

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 2>even though at times our linguistic treatment of diamond and

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 2>related terms ends up bleeding into that area. And in fact,

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 2>I have a pretty i think amusing comic book example

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 2>of that here in a.

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 3>Bit oh nice. But just to reinforce the shorthand on

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 3>toughness versus hardness, a hard material, it's going to be

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 3>difficult to cut, dent or scratch. A tough material, it's

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 3>going to be difficult to break.

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 2>Now here's another thing about diamonds that I think everyone

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 2>either you know this or you've heard it before, or

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 2>you're going to say, oh yeah, yeah, that's right. Now

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 2>I remember, okay, we're all carbon based organisms here in

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 2>a billion year old carbon if you will. And another

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:19.239
<v Speaker 2>interesting thing to remember about diamonds is that a diamond

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 2>is actually pure carbon. What we know of as a

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 2>diamond is actually a crystalline form of carbon, a fact

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 2>that was discovered for the first time in seventeen seventy

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:34.199
<v Speaker 2>two by French chemist Anthony Lavosier, an individual who made

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 2>numerous contributions to the advancement of chemical and biological sciences

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 2>before he was executed at the age of fifty on

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 2>charges of tax fraud and tobacco adulteration. That's adding water

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 2>to tobacco before sale. By the way, I had to look

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 2>that up. I was like, what was this guy allegedly

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 2>doing to his tobacco. These were charges that he was

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:56.439
<v Speaker 2>exonerated of a year and a half later, but by

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:58.680
<v Speaker 2>that point he was of course already dead.

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 3>Adding tobacco, I would think of normally watering down a

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 3>liquid to adulterate it. I could maybe tobacco gets soggy,

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 3>so you can like bulk up the weight by getting

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 3>water in it. I don't know, I guess though.

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 2>Holding the thumb on the scales one way or another.

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but you're saying they found that he didn't do

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 3>it after they killed him.

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, after and pretty soon after they're like, actually

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 2>are bad on that one. A lot has was written

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 2>and has been written about how this was maybe not

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 2>a great move, because even in his short life that

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 2>was obviously cut short by execution, he did make a

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 2>number of contributions to the advancement of science. Now, speaking

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 2>of liquids, though, I have to throw in in one

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:46.199
<v Speaker 2>of our primary sources for this series diamonds in Early

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 2>History of the King of Gems by Jack Ogden. Ogden

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 2>points out that during the Renaissance, various philosophers believe that

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 2>diamonds must be some form of congealed juice or quote

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 2>most pure juice juice. So of what I was a

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 2>little unclear.

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 3>On that juice of carbon, juice of carb.

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 2>That gets us to where do diamonds come from. Naturally

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 2>occurring diamonds are formed under intense pressure and temperature deep

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 2>within the Earth and then brought to the surface via

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 2>volcanic action. And diamonds are found in three types of deposits.

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 2>First of all, you have kimberlight pipes. These are formed

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 2>by intrusions of magma into the Earth's crust, bringing in diamonds,

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 2>among other things, from the Earth's mantle. The pipes themselves

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 2>tend to be only one hundred million years old, while

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 2>the diamonds they bring up may be anywhere between like

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 2>one and three point three billion years old. And then

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 2>you also have alluvial gravels and glacial tills. So in

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 2>these diamonds are released by either fluvial or river based

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 2>or glacial erosion of the kimber light matrix, and then

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:57.679
<v Speaker 2>they're redeposited in rivers or in a glacial till. This

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 2>is the sediment moved by a glacier as it moves

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 2>over the course of time.

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:06.680
<v Speaker 3>Right, So we need these mechanisms to explain diamonds being

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 3>brought near to the surface of the Earth because they

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 3>have to be formed way deep down in the Earth's mantle.

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 2>Or they used to be before Superman, of course, But

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 2>more truthfully, since around the nineteen fifties, we have been

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 2>able to make synthetic diamonds that are chemically and physically

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 2>identical to naturally occurring diamonds. But for the longest yeah,

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 2>diamonds had to be mined from the Earth. And while

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 2>diamonds occur naturally on every continent and have been mined

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 2>around the world historically, and we'll come back to this,

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 2>there was one place to gather your diamonds, and it

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 2>was India. M Yeah, Now I mentioned that I would

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 2>get into comic books a little bit, because the connection

0:11:57.679 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 2>here is that we should also mention that the word

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 2>diamonds and is actually linked directly to x Man Wolverine's

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 2>claws and skeleton, because I don't have to tell most

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 2>of you that Logan's retractable claws and bones are said

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:14.079
<v Speaker 2>to be coated with the fictional indestructible Sci fi metal

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 2>known as adamantium. Now, the authors and artists of Marvel

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 2>Comics did not invent the idea of adamantium. It apparently

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 2>pops up in earlier fictional works, a natural extrapolation of

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 2>the adjective adamantine, which means unyielding or unbreakable, related to

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 2>the word adamant as well, which this was all widely

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 2>used in pre Marvel fiction. And of course all of

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 2>this extends back to the ancient world as well, with

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 2>writings in Greek and Latin that utilize atom ass either

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:49.719
<v Speaker 2>Once again, figuratively or in reference to some sort of

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 2>legendary unbreakable stone or gym, such as in some tellings,

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 2>the substance used to construct the chains that bound Cerberus,

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:00.199
<v Speaker 2>the great three headed hound of Hades.

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so this is worth flagging because it leads to

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 3>a confusion that could arise from some ancient sources. Because

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:12.680
<v Speaker 3>in some ancient sources people talk about something that seems

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 3>like it could be a diamond, but we're not necessarily

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 3>positive that's what they're referring to. And in some of

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 3>these cases, these Latin or Greek writers are using this

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 3>term adamas. The Latin word adamas derived from the Greek. Now,

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:31.440
<v Speaker 3>I was also reading about this in Ogden in Diamonds

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 3>in Early History of the King of Gems, and Ogden

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 3>talks about how the English word diamond is derived from

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 3>this Latin word adamas, which in turn came from the Greek.

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 3>And there's an interesting etymology here. So in Greek the

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 3>word dama itself, dama meant something like conquer or tame.

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 3>Elsewhere I've read that it had the sense of break,

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 3>as in the way you would break a horse like

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 3>you would tame it. So with the negative prefix ah

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 3>in front of it. That means kind of like un

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:14.079
<v Speaker 3>ah dema ademas meant unconquerable, untameable, unbreakable, unalterable. But Ogden says,

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 3>in medieval European sources, the prefix ah starts to disappear

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 3>from this Latin term adomas, and then we're just left

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 3>with terms like damon or Damon's, which in English eventually

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 3>became diamond. But by losing the ah prefix ahead of it,

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 3>this would mean that according to Greek word logic, it's

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 3>sort of losing the un in unbreakable, so it's kind

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 3>of meaning tameable or breakable again. But of course that

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 3>meaning was lost at this point, just came to mean

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 3>the gem. But in its usage in ancient Greek and

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 3>Roman sources, the term adomas may sometimes refer to diamonds,

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 3>but it also clearly refers to other materials that were

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 3>considered especially hard or strong, and Ogden calls out things

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 3>like maybe maybe some sort of early proto steel or

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 3>special naturally occurring alloys and grains found alongside gold and

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 3>ore or other gems.

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 2>That's right, that's right. Now. To come back to Marvel,

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 2>I was wondering, because again, you know, Marvel's been around

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 2>long enough that there's so many characters and creatures that

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 2>everything's been done at least once. Surely. I was like, well,

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 2>there's got to be a character that has either diamond

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 2>claws or a diamond skeleton, and in fact, there does

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 2>seem to be such a creature. There is apparently an

0:15:34.600 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 2>alternate timeline where you have a fusion of two characters.

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 2>This apparently occurs throughout I think DC and Marvel both

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 2>get into this, where not only do you have variants

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 2>of different characters and different alternate realities, but you also

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 2>have fusions of different individuals. So there's one alternate timeline,

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 2>one alternate Earth or whatever, where you have a single

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 2>entity that is merg urged out of Emma Frost aka

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 2>the White Queen, who has I think this ability to

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 2>like shape shift into a diamond form that grants her

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 2>immunity and invulnerability, especially from like psychic attacks. And then Wolverine,

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 2>who are just talking about this single entity who ends

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 2>up looking like a really posh wolverine with blonde hair

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 2>and an eye patch. His name is Diamond Patch apparently,

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 2>or that is his code name, and he has claws

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 2>and presumably a skeleton made out of diamond, and if

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 2>he stabs you with his diamond clause, he can read

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 2>your mind.

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 3>Why is he called diamond patch? He does have an

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 3>eye patch. Is the eyepatch made of diamond?

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 2>Ah?

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 3>Maybe?

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I mean, if you if your claws

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 2>are diamond, maybe you don't want to accessorize with diamonds

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 2>too much. I'm not sure. I'm not an expert on

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 2>diamond patch here. We'll have to hear from our more

0:16:57.480 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 2>devoted comic readers out there. But it does raise all

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 2>sorts of questions about what it would be like to

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 2>have a skeleton made out of diamond. It doesn't sound

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 2>particularly great if you're going to potentially get into a

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, some sort of a throwdown with the Hulk

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 2>or something.

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 3>I wonder if there's a plot line where he pounds

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 3>his claws into a powder and then feeds it as

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 3>poisoned to somebody.

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, I would hope so, I mean, but

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 2>then I guess he has the healing factor too, So

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:28.360
<v Speaker 2>what does that mean? Does like his powderized bones then

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 2>reheal into a solid diamond once more? I'm not sure.

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:36.200
<v Speaker 3>They really do do everything in comic books, don't they

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:37.920
<v Speaker 3>what you were just saying a minute ago, is right.

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:40.399
<v Speaker 3>Like anytime you imagine, I wonder if somebody's done this.

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:42.719
<v Speaker 3>There's like a comic book where somebody did that.

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, it's been done and it was it was

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:47.680
<v Speaker 2>maybe done decades ago, and it's been done a second time.

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:50.199
<v Speaker 2>They've revisited it. But that's one of the things I

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 2>love about diving into the world of comics.

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 3>There's so much variety, a world where all possible elevator

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:01.400
<v Speaker 3>pitches have been realized. That's right, he made of diamond.

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, at this point, let's turn our attention

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:10.400
<v Speaker 2>back to the real world and back specifically to India

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 2>and ancient India.

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:12.400
<v Speaker 3>Again.

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 2>India is extremely important in the history of diamonds, as

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Ogden points out in the book, until the sixteen hundreds

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 2>it was the most important, if not the only, source

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:27.360
<v Speaker 2>of diamonds in the Mediterranean, in European worlds, and Ogden

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 2>mentions has a lot to share about diamonds in this book.

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 2>This is a terrific book. Highly recommend it. At one

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 2>point he mentions some of the protective aspects of the

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 2>diamond that you see appearing in Indian lore at different

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 2>points that they may have provided protection against quote serpents, tigers,

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 2>and thieves. That one gave me a lot of pause there,

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:54.120
<v Speaker 2>because I'm trying to imagine, first of all, our diamond's

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 2>going to protect you from thieves. That doesn't seem like

0:18:56.880 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 2>a very logical idea tigers. That it made me think about, well, okay,

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 2>a tiger is a you know, an ambush predator that

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 2>wants to make sure it has the most advantageous attack conditions.

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:13.920
<v Speaker 2>And you and I have seen, you know, some compelling

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:18.159
<v Speaker 2>evidence about, say, weighing ways to deter a tiger attack

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 2>by having like a fake eyes on the back of

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:22.399
<v Speaker 2>your head and so forth, wearing like a mask on

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 2>the back of your head, and to whatever extent that

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:28.119
<v Speaker 2>is useful or not. You could think, well, okay, a

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 2>diamond glitters. Maybe a diamond does something optical that in

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:34.919
<v Speaker 2>some way might make a tiger think twice about attacking you.

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:39.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure that's interesting. Yeah, I wonder the sparkling

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 3>could function kind of like eye spots or just in

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 3>some other way could disrupt a tiger an ambush predator

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:48.360
<v Speaker 3>since that attack is now appropriate.

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, so I don't know. I didn't look too

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:55.640
<v Speaker 2>hard into that, but it came to mind. Ogden also

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 2>mentions that that for the most part, these diamonds were

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 2>for me and only, and they were thought to make

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 2>women quote sterile and unhappy. And he points out that

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 2>while this notion runs against the general modern marketing trend

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 2>with diamonds, which has European roots, you know, for the longest,

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:17.680
<v Speaker 2>the durable diamond was considered the perfect gem to symbolize

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 2>the masculine might of kings. Ah.

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So it's like, oh, because the diamond is invincible,

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:25.959
<v Speaker 3>it makes people think that I'm invincible, I'm so strong,

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm so tough.

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Yes, just ignore the part about how you can smash

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:33.440
<v Speaker 2>it with a hammer, and it just becomes a million almost.

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 2>It almost becomes almost invisible when you break it. Right now,

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 2>A quick note on jim stones in general, because we

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:44.400
<v Speaker 2>get into this whole half like gems and then diamonds.

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 2>I decided to look this up in Brian M. Fagan's

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 2>seventy Great Inventions of the Ancient World. Guess who has

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 2>co author is in the section on gemstones. It's Jack Ogden.

0:20:56.160 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 2>Oh okay, so once more, at least partially said Ogden. Here,

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:04.680
<v Speaker 2>gems have factored into human jewelry since the earliest times,

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 2>though the setting of colored stones which were the preference

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:13.639
<v Speaker 2>for the longest, with the move toward transparent gemstones not

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 2>occurring un till the first millennium BC with the rise

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 2>of the Persian Empire. The setting of colored stones was

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 2>only possible once a fairly sophisticated metal working industry was established.

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:27.679
<v Speaker 2>So they point out that for the longest, colored stones

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 2>were used as quote, blocks of pigment, and this would

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 2>be inlaid in a metal form. The stones were usually

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 2>cut to fit a particular setting, and it wasn't until

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:41.399
<v Speaker 2>later that the reverse would become the fad.

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 3>Oh okay, So if I'm understanding this right, it would

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 3>mean like that originally gems were more like just sort

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:51.200
<v Speaker 3>of a tool. They were one piece of artistic filler

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 3>to fill out whatever it is you're designing. But later

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 3>on they would come to be more of the focus

0:21:57.040 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 3>and whatever you're designing would be based around the gym

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:01.199
<v Speaker 3>inn it correct.

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:03.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's that's the point I was taking from all

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:05.919
<v Speaker 2>of this. And in addition to the rise of the

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 2>Persian Empire, you also had other factors influencing the shift

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 2>towards transparent gemstones. I mean, not that you completely abandoned

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:16.159
<v Speaker 2>color gyms, but like sort of the opening of the

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:18.480
<v Speaker 2>mind to the idea that, hey, these are beautiful. As well,

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 2>you have things like the conquest of Alexander the Great,

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 2>which we'll come back to, and a number of other

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 2>factors that Ogden gets into more depth about in the book,

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, with various trade routes opening up and so forth. Now,

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:33.439
<v Speaker 2>according to Ogden, the earliest known use of diamonds in

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 2>jewelry and you know, of course enormous caveat with all this.

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:40.159
<v Speaker 2>You know, this is based on surviving written records, This

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 2>is based on surviving artifacts and so forth. The earliest

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 2>known use of diamonds and jewelry dates back to after

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 2>three twenty five BCE in northern India and Afghanistan, following

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Alexander the Great's military conquest in this area, and the

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:59.119
<v Speaker 2>earliest diamond rings come from this region as well. Again,

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:01.159
<v Speaker 2>going we have to go by to the caveat about

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 2>metallurgy and metal working having to reach a certain point

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:08.119
<v Speaker 2>before you could really make much in the way of

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 2>diamond rings and so forth. But the earliest diamond rings

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:13.680
<v Speaker 2>come from this region as well. And this all leads

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 2>to an influx of diamonds and diamond lore into the

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 2>Mediterranean world, though their initial use in the Mediterranean region

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:25.119
<v Speaker 2>was for drilling and engraving other gems. So this touches

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:27.879
<v Speaker 2>on a topic that Ogden considers at length. You know,

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:31.199
<v Speaker 2>when do diamonds start becoming more than stones to be

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:35.119
<v Speaker 2>used in cutting gems, When do they become gems themselves?

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:38.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, that's an interesting question, and I would wonder

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:43.879
<v Speaker 3>if it has anything like what is the economic intersection

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:48.240
<v Speaker 3>between the value of a gym as a decorative item

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:51.440
<v Speaker 3>or something that's prized just for its own sake versus

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 3>the value of a gym that it has specific utility

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:57.360
<v Speaker 3>as a tool, because as we know about the diamond

0:23:57.440 --> 0:24:01.400
<v Speaker 3>being the hardest of all these gems, as a real utility,

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:04.640
<v Speaker 3>it has a real direct use value.

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I mean again, like not all forms of

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 2>carbon have the same value other forms of carbon. You

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 2>can't bring them into a diamond dealer and be like, hey,

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 2>how much for this lump of carbon? How much for me?

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm carbon? What's the going rate now? And then likewise,

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:26.120
<v Speaker 2>not all forms of crystal are going to command vast

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 2>sums of money either, So Ogden points out that early

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 2>written evidence for diamonds as gems again considered gems is

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 2>a you can be found in a Northern Indian text,

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 2>often dated with some disagreement to three hundred BCE. Other

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:43.159
<v Speaker 2>dating of the text may push the reference to the

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:46.360
<v Speaker 2>second millennium BCE, or possibly to the fourth century CE.

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:50.680
<v Speaker 2>The text is called the Athha Sastra or the Lesson

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 2>of Profit, and it points out a few interesting ideas

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:57.880
<v Speaker 2>of the time period, again depending on exactly when this

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 2>would have been, but a few of the ideas that

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 2>were put forth regarding the value of a diamond. Ogden writes,

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 2>quote the list of diamond colors given in the Athisostra

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:16.920
<v Speaker 2>include cat's eye, Sirisa flower, cow's urine, cows fat, clear crystal,

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:21.440
<v Speaker 2>mulatti flower, and then adds any other gem color which

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 2>is little help to us.

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 3>Cows urine.

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, it's a humorous book as well. It's again

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 2>again very fun read. But also other aspects of the

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:37.639
<v Speaker 2>diamond mentioned this text. It's stressed that large, heavy, and

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 2>hard diamonds are best. The best diamonds have symmetrical points.

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 2>The best diamonds can scratch a vessel, and not only

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 2>do they sparkle, but they spin like a top. These

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 2>are the various not on their own obviously, but you know,

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:55.640
<v Speaker 2>win wind spun by the human looking at them. These

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:58.879
<v Speaker 2>are all aspects of a suitable diamond, ones that are

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:02.119
<v Speaker 2>true gems and not something that you need to just

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 2>break down and use for your gym working and so forth.

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 3>That is interesting, And I wonder where criteria like this

0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:11.399
<v Speaker 3>are originally derived from. I guess some of it is

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 3>just like intuitive preferences about anything that, like, you know,

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:19.879
<v Speaker 3>bigger is better, heavier is better. I guess a harder

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:23.119
<v Speaker 3>diamond or a harder thing called a diamond is going

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:25.639
<v Speaker 3>to be more durable, it will last longer. But I wonder,

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 3>like it spins like a top, why is that preferred?

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I guess it just comes down to

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 2>just the the you know, the structural completeness of the thing,

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 2>in the in the symmetry of the thing, right, but

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:42.120
<v Speaker 2>in general, Yeah, it also you can't help but think

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 2>about the idea of like just branding. Like someone's like, hey,

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:47.639
<v Speaker 2>we got to move some diamonds here, we got to

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:50.119
<v Speaker 2>move something. Why don't we start selling these diamonds? So

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:52.160
<v Speaker 2>let's just start start talking about just how pretty these

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 2>things are and how how you know? Then figure out

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:57.119
<v Speaker 2>like what is the what are the best candidates to

0:26:57.119 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 2>push forward? Is the new King of Gems. Now at

0:27:10.800 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 2>this point I thought we'd talked about one of the

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:21.359
<v Speaker 2>most wonderful, uh collection of falsehoods concerning the origin of

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:26.119
<v Speaker 2>diamonds and the gathering of diamonds, and that is, of course,

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 2>the Valley of the Gems.

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 3>I think this is where we come back to Alexander

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 3>the Great.

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 2>That's right, Alexander the Great does factor into all of this.

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:40.119
<v Speaker 2>This myth is heavily associated with him. But but also

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:43.719
<v Speaker 2>to be clear, it seems to predate him and also

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:49.480
<v Speaker 2>would be retold many more times in various formats, involving

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Marco Polo. It also pops up as a story about

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:58.359
<v Speaker 2>about the the hero Sinbad the Sailor. So it isn't

0:27:58.480 --> 0:28:00.919
<v Speaker 2>just an Alexander the Great thing, but he becomes associated

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 2>with the story.

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:02.880
<v Speaker 3>Okay, what's the story?

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:08.639
<v Speaker 2>Okay? So, and it mainly becomes associated with Alexander the

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:14.200
<v Speaker 2>Great through the writings of the Greek philosopher Theophrastus, who

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:17.520
<v Speaker 2>lived three seventy two more or less to around two

0:28:17.560 --> 0:28:21.159
<v Speaker 2>eighty seven BCE. Who wrote of the valley in his

0:28:21.240 --> 0:28:25.199
<v Speaker 2>work De Lapidibus, or on Gems, and this is the

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:28.360
<v Speaker 2>one that throws Alexander the Great into the story, makes

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 2>him the hero of the tale, and also seemingly canonizes

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 2>the involvement of snakes within the story, a story that,

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 2>according to Ogden, seems to have pre existed this writing

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 2>by many centuries as a folk narrative about this mystical

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 2>valley of the Gems. However, Ogden also notes it wouldn't

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 2>really become like cemented as like part of the quote

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 2>romance of Alexander till the nineteenth century. Right, So, Ogden

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 2>tees is a part the different versions of the myth.

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 2>But it basically goes down like this. Okay, there's a

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 2>valley out there in the wilds of India, and guess what,

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 2>It's full of diamonds. Now, Joe, wouldn't you like to

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 2>get into that that valley and get those diamonds.

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 3>I want to get in that valley like a ballpit,

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 3>just swim around in it, Scrooge, Scrooge mcducket.

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:20.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, that that's understandable. They are diamonds, after all.

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:24.640
<v Speaker 2>But here's the thing. Uh, these diamonds are inaccessible by

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:30.040
<v Speaker 2>normal means, due either to the terrifying cliffs, but also

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 2>because there's there's there are even worse things down there.

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 2>There are a whole bunch of snakes, venomous snakes, in

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 2>some cases, giant venomous snakes, and you don't want to

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 2>mess with those. Do you still want the diamonds.

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:46.680
<v Speaker 3>Let's assume that I am absolutely mad with greed, so yes, okay.

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 2>In order to get these diamonds out, here's what you

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:52.280
<v Speaker 2>need to do. First. You need to get yourself some meat,

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of big strips of meat, giant strips of meat,

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:58.720
<v Speaker 2>as much meat as you can get together, okay, all right,

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 2>and then you're gonna throw that meat down into the pit,

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:01.960
<v Speaker 2>down into the valley.

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 3>Do you stand on top of the cliffs and throw

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 3>it down.

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:07.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah, you'd want to throw it down from above.

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 2>You don't want to get down there because that's where

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 2>the snakes are. So throw that meat into the into

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 2>the valley, into the pit, because guess what those diamonds

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 2>are just laying about down there on the surface, on

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 2>the floor of the pit, on the floor of the valley.

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 2>And if you throw the meat down you know what's

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:24.200
<v Speaker 2>going to happen. The diamonds are going to stick to

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 2>the meat.

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 3>Perfect.

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 2>This is raw meat, by the way, is it's not cooked?

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Don't You don't want to throw like well done meat

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:32.560
<v Speaker 2>into the valley of gems.

0:30:33.000 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 3>No, it'll be stickier if it's raw.

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:38.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Now at this point you're wondering, Okay, I want

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 2>the diamonds, but now I just spend all this money

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:42.440
<v Speaker 2>on meat. I just literally threw it away. Well, this

0:30:42.520 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 2>is where the birds come in. The birds are going

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:47.400
<v Speaker 2>to swoop down and they're kind of collect that meat,

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 2>that free meal, from the bottom of the valley and

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:52.800
<v Speaker 2>bring it back up to the top of the cliffs

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 2>to eat. That meat, I will remind you still has

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 2>diamonds stuck to it all over brilliant. Now, at this point,

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 2>many of the tellings indicate that what you need to

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:05.200
<v Speaker 2>do is scare the birds away from that meat long

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 2>enough to peel off all the diamonds, and then you're

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 2>gonna leave the meat. The birds will leave you alone

0:31:10.520 --> 0:31:12.400
<v Speaker 2>at that point. They don't actually want the diamonds, they

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 2>want the meat. And then once you have the diamonds,

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:16.720
<v Speaker 2>you can run off and do what you will with them.

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:21.840
<v Speaker 3>I love this scheme. It's a diamond heist to beat

0:31:21.880 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 3>them all.

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 2>There are also versions of the story in which you

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 2>have to kill the birds to get the diamonds out

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 2>of their stomach, but really, I mean, who wants to

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:31.920
<v Speaker 2>go through with that? It seems much easier to just

0:31:31.960 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 2>scare them away long enough to get the diamonds off

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 2>the meat and then cash in. Interestingly, in cases in

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 2>retellings of the story where snakes are involved, this is

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 2>also sometimes used to explain why you should never put

0:31:44.520 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 2>diamonds in your mouth because there may be lingering snake venom,

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 2>and in some way like that snake venom never completely

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 2>leaves the diamonds, and therefore to eat them would be

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 2>to invite death.

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 3>Oh okay, so this would be a different explanation of

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 3>the supposedly lethal mechanism of the diamonds, because if you

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 3>didn't listen to the last episode, the main explanation given

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 3>by at least by Benvenuto Chillini was that the diamond

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 3>it's not actually chemically poisonous. It's that pounded up diamonds

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:20.720
<v Speaker 3>have all these little sharp edges in them, and because

0:32:20.760 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 3>they're so hard, nothing can like dull their edges. They

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 3>will just go down into your guts and end up

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 3>cutting you up from the inside. But this would be

0:32:29.200 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 3>a totally different folk logic for why they are allegedly poisonous.

0:32:32.320 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 3>They have snake venom on them.

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:37.520
<v Speaker 2>That's right now. In the second Voyage of Sindbad, he

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 2>actually escapes from the pit by strapping one of the

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 2>pieces of meat to his own back. This telling involves

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:48.080
<v Speaker 2>the giant mythic rock bird, and the snakes are also

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:51.240
<v Speaker 2>giants that swallow elephants. Diamonds are also present.

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:53.600
<v Speaker 3>Is Sinbad trying to get the diamonds or are they

0:32:53.680 --> 0:32:54.400
<v Speaker 3>just incidental?

0:32:56.280 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 2>He is mainly just trying to escape at this point,

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:01.920
<v Speaker 2>so it's just kind of a clever escape scheme, I believe.

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:05.400
<v Speaker 2>But you know, the voyages of Sindbad and so forth,

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 2>I feel like those are stories I need to properly revisit.

0:33:08.880 --> 0:33:10.760
<v Speaker 2>Maybe we can find a way to explore them in

0:33:10.800 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 2>a future episode. But again, this story is widely told

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 2>and retold plenty of The Elder of course, also repeats

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 2>the myth at some point. But at the end of it,

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:23.640
<v Speaker 2>I was wondering, like, well, what does it mean? Like,

0:33:23.680 --> 0:33:25.280
<v Speaker 2>where does the story come from?

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 3>You?

0:33:26.120 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 2>Know, we will get into another story later on, another

0:33:29.880 --> 0:33:34.480
<v Speaker 2>seemingly fantastical bit of folklore and myth that involves sticky

0:33:34.520 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 2>things and diamonds. So I was wondering if that would

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:39.200
<v Speaker 2>have anything to do with it, but I ended up

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 2>turning to an article by S. Tolanski from nineteen sixty

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:46.160
<v Speaker 2>one titled some Folklore in History of diamond and the

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:50.120
<v Speaker 2>author here speculates that the story may have been originally

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 2>circulated in some of its earliest forms by none other

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 2>than Indian diamond miners to cover up the true source

0:33:56.960 --> 0:34:00.400
<v Speaker 2>of their lucrative trade, because again, diamonds are not from

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 2>a valley, They're not just littering on the ground in

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 2>a in a place haunted by venomous snakes. You know,

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:09.360
<v Speaker 2>their their mind from specific locations. You know, we alluded

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:13.239
<v Speaker 2>to the the the sources earlier. So perhaps this is

0:34:13.239 --> 0:34:16.840
<v Speaker 2>a bit of misinformation that was popularized in order to

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 2>throw thieves and would be minors off the scent. But

0:34:21.719 --> 0:34:25.360
<v Speaker 2>it also raises the question like, even in ancient times,

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:31.160
<v Speaker 2>it feels like someone's you know, BS sensor would go

0:34:31.200 --> 0:34:33.960
<v Speaker 2>off at some point and they might realize, you know,

0:34:34.360 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that's actually where diamonds come from, and

0:34:37.160 --> 0:34:39.080
<v Speaker 2>I know they don't want me to know where they

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 2>come from, but it's something else, and I'm going to

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:46.799
<v Speaker 2>get to the bottom of it. So so anyway that

0:34:46.920 --> 0:34:52.360
<v Speaker 2>that seems like one potentially valid hypothesis, But the author

0:34:52.440 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 2>here also mentions another possibility, something that may or may

0:34:57.120 --> 0:35:00.799
<v Speaker 2>not tie into it. He mentions something that has been

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:06.080
<v Speaker 2>observed in modern South Africa. He wrote quote four. In

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 2>South Africa, where the deep dug mines have heaped around

0:35:09.040 --> 0:35:12.719
<v Speaker 2>them great masses of waste worked out ores. It is

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:16.319
<v Speaker 2>known locally that the crops of fowls which wander and

0:35:16.440 --> 0:35:21.360
<v Speaker 2>peck over this land frequently contain small diamonds. The chickens

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:23.759
<v Speaker 2>seem to have an eye for the shining pebbles, and

0:35:23.840 --> 0:35:26.239
<v Speaker 2>a single fowl has been known to have as much

0:35:26.320 --> 0:35:29.680
<v Speaker 2>as a total of five carrot weight of small diamond

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:30.760
<v Speaker 2>within its crop.

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:34.279
<v Speaker 3>Oh okay, so the crop, of course is it's part

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:38.200
<v Speaker 3>of the chicken's digestive system, which, if I recall correctly,

0:35:38.320 --> 0:35:40.920
<v Speaker 3>is not the stomach. It's sort of like a little

0:35:40.960 --> 0:35:43.799
<v Speaker 3>side pouch. It's got like you know, on the way

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:46.120
<v Speaker 3>to the rest of the digestive system. The chicken can

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:48.360
<v Speaker 3>store stuff in its crop for a while.

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:52.160
<v Speaker 2>And so the idea here would seem that like, okay,

0:35:52.200 --> 0:35:54.759
<v Speaker 2>this would not one hundred percent explain the idea. But

0:35:54.800 --> 0:35:58.600
<v Speaker 2>if something like this had been observed in ancient times,

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:03.839
<v Speaker 2>perhaps it might have influenced the various myth cycles that

0:36:03.960 --> 0:36:06.640
<v Speaker 2>spun out of it. And therefore that's why you have

0:36:06.719 --> 0:36:09.319
<v Speaker 2>birds and giant birds and so forth involved in it.

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:12.120
<v Speaker 2>In some cases you have the birds being killed and

0:36:12.160 --> 0:36:14.319
<v Speaker 2>then opened up, and in other cases it's just like

0:36:14.360 --> 0:36:16.920
<v Speaker 2>we'll get the diamonds off the meat before the birds

0:36:16.960 --> 0:36:19.600
<v Speaker 2>eat it. That's how diamonds wind up in birds.

0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 3>After all, that's an interesting possibility.

0:36:22.400 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Now, another interesting idea that I that I ended up

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:29.280
<v Speaker 2>looking at here concerning the diamond and how the diamond

0:36:29.440 --> 0:36:33.280
<v Speaker 2>is utilized as an idea, as a metaphor and so forth,

0:36:33.920 --> 0:36:39.000
<v Speaker 2>and particularly in parts of India, is the idea of

0:36:39.040 --> 0:36:43.359
<v Speaker 2>the vodra. So in Hindu iconography you'll frequently encounter the

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:48.520
<v Speaker 2>symbol and legendary ritual weapon of the vadra. You'll recognize

0:36:48.560 --> 0:36:51.960
<v Speaker 2>it as appearing almost like a claud talon, with each

0:36:52.000 --> 0:36:55.799
<v Speaker 2>appendage curving out and then touching at the tips, and

0:36:55.840 --> 0:36:59.400
<v Speaker 2>the vodra maybe three four or even five pronged, but

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 2>it's not a The finished symbol or artifact may resemble

0:37:02.640 --> 0:37:06.799
<v Speaker 2>a closed lotus blossom. It is especially common in the

0:37:06.800 --> 0:37:11.759
<v Speaker 2>Tibetan Vadriyana school of Buddhism, and it can be translated

0:37:11.800 --> 0:37:14.480
<v Speaker 2>as thunder vehicle, for indeed, the vadra is in many

0:37:14.480 --> 0:37:18.560
<v Speaker 2>ways a thunderbolt, a divine weapon, and also the metaphoric

0:37:18.880 --> 0:37:23.920
<v Speaker 2>striking of enlightenment. It cleaves through ignorance like lightning. Indeed,

0:37:23.920 --> 0:37:26.880
<v Speaker 2>in Hindu mythology, the vadra is the weapon of Indra,

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 2>king of the Devas, and a god of the sky.

0:37:29.880 --> 0:37:34.520
<v Speaker 2>That may be, I think reasonably compared to other deity traditions,

0:37:34.520 --> 0:37:37.160
<v Speaker 2>such as that of Zeus or that of Odin in

0:37:37.440 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Norse mythology. But vodra also can apparently be translated as diamond,

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:46.719
<v Speaker 2>for the vodra is indestructible, and there is indeed a

0:37:46.800 --> 0:37:49.319
<v Speaker 2>sense of a diamond to the shape of the thing

0:37:49.360 --> 0:37:53.080
<v Speaker 2>as well. Sometimes the vodra appears like a club or

0:37:53.120 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 2>a scepter with a long handle, other times a ritualistic

0:37:57.280 --> 0:38:00.560
<v Speaker 2>item with two vadras, one on either end of the handle.

0:38:01.320 --> 0:38:04.319
<v Speaker 2>And you'll also find vadra's on the handles of a

0:38:04.360 --> 0:38:07.719
<v Speaker 2>symbolic bell, and indeed you also find it as a

0:38:07.719 --> 0:38:11.080
<v Speaker 2>motif on the pommels and or the hilts of highly

0:38:11.120 --> 0:38:14.880
<v Speaker 2>decorative swords. So I found this interesting as well, this

0:38:15.000 --> 0:38:19.760
<v Speaker 2>idea of of this thing going from like indestructible bolt

0:38:19.800 --> 0:38:25.120
<v Speaker 2>of enlightenment to a weapon of war, but involving like

0:38:25.480 --> 0:38:29.000
<v Speaker 2>aspects of thunder and lightning and also aspects of the diamond.

0:38:29.360 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 2>I should also add that in Mahayana Buddhism there's also

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:36.760
<v Speaker 2>an important sutra that is generally referred to in English

0:38:36.800 --> 0:38:37.920
<v Speaker 2>as the Diamond Sutra.

0:38:39.680 --> 0:38:43.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, this seems to connect to the things that

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:45.640
<v Speaker 3>have come up in multiple ways, especially like the idea

0:38:45.680 --> 0:38:48.880
<v Speaker 3>of a diamond being a sort of a symbol of

0:38:48.920 --> 0:38:51.520
<v Speaker 3>the power of kings. Here if there is a diamond

0:38:51.520 --> 0:38:56.400
<v Speaker 3>association with the the mythical weapon of Indra.

0:38:56.640 --> 0:38:59.759
<v Speaker 2>That's right, yeah, so yeah. And also I love that

0:38:59.840 --> 0:39:02.080
<v Speaker 2>in this we get this more spiritual idea of the

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:06.960
<v Speaker 2>diamond as opposed to certainly the sort of the modern,

0:39:07.680 --> 0:39:11.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, western popular idea of the diamond. That's very y.

0:39:11.280 --> 0:39:13.800
<v Speaker 2>I guess it does get aligned with ideas of love,

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:16.279
<v Speaker 2>but I don't know, I don't get a very spiritual

0:39:16.360 --> 0:39:19.320
<v Speaker 2>idea of the diamond. When I'm watching a diamond commercial

0:39:19.360 --> 0:39:22.080
<v Speaker 2>on television, like, it doesn't seem like it's clearly not

0:39:22.200 --> 0:39:26.120
<v Speaker 2>something that's coming from from the realm of the gods.

0:39:26.120 --> 0:39:29.120
<v Speaker 2>It's something that's coming from the diamond store across town.

0:39:29.520 --> 0:39:32.040
<v Speaker 3>Think how much more interesting those commercials would be if

0:39:32.120 --> 0:39:34.919
<v Speaker 3>they did the Valley of Gems with the snake and

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:37.839
<v Speaker 3>the meat. You had to get the meat in order

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:40.000
<v Speaker 3>to get the diamond. That's part of the process.

0:39:40.760 --> 0:39:42.799
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yes, I can see it now. They can still

0:39:42.800 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 2>have the you know, the excellent music, the high production values.

0:39:46.560 --> 0:39:50.120
<v Speaker 2>But let's get some diamond studded meat in the game.

0:39:50.200 --> 0:39:53.840
<v Speaker 2>Let's get some giant birds, Let's get some snakes.

0:39:54.320 --> 0:39:55.880
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of fun to be I want to

0:39:55.880 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 3>direct these commercials. Valentine's Day is coming up. You see

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:02.680
<v Speaker 3>a say, like a husband going up to the cliff side.

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:05.480
<v Speaker 3>He's got the meat. It's like, you know, just dripping

0:40:05.520 --> 0:40:07.719
<v Speaker 3>all over his back. I guess he's got to have

0:40:07.760 --> 0:40:11.080
<v Speaker 3>something to fight the birds with. Later. It's all coming

0:40:11.120 --> 0:40:11.920
<v Speaker 3>together in my mind.

0:40:12.239 --> 0:40:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh, man, steak restaurants get in on this. This is great,

0:40:16.600 --> 0:40:19.560
<v Speaker 2>great advertising for your Valentine's Day meals as well. Your

0:40:19.640 --> 0:40:22.360
<v Speaker 2>Validaine's Day specials, you know, get people into that steak

0:40:22.360 --> 0:40:25.400
<v Speaker 2>dinner with the diamonds. Have the diamond stuck to the steak.

0:40:25.880 --> 0:40:31.640
<v Speaker 3>Oh, we call this a binvenudo special. I felt it

0:40:31.840 --> 0:40:33.280
<v Speaker 3>crash beneath my teeth.

0:40:35.040 --> 0:40:36.880
<v Speaker 2>All right, on that note, we're gonna ahead and close

0:40:36.880 --> 0:40:38.759
<v Speaker 2>out those episode, but we will be back with a

0:40:39.000 --> 0:40:41.600
<v Speaker 2>with at least a third Diamond episode because all there's

0:40:41.640 --> 0:40:43.759
<v Speaker 2>more stuff we didn't even have time for. There's more

0:40:43.800 --> 0:40:49.600
<v Speaker 2>stuff involving various bodily fluids. There's we'll definitely get into

0:40:49.600 --> 0:40:55.320
<v Speaker 2>some more myths. We'll get into some other topics, cosmic, spiritual.

0:40:54.840 --> 0:40:55.319
<v Speaker 3>You name it.

0:40:56.160 --> 0:40:58.719
<v Speaker 2>We will return to it in the next episode. In

0:40:58.760 --> 0:41:01.319
<v Speaker 2>the meantime, Yeah, we'd love to hear from all of you.

0:41:01.840 --> 0:41:03.640
<v Speaker 2>We have a couple of episodes on diamonds already. You

0:41:03.719 --> 0:41:06.839
<v Speaker 2>might have some thoughts, some feedback on anything we've discussed here.

0:41:07.120 --> 0:41:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Maybe you're a diamond fan and maybe you hate diamonds.

0:41:10.200 --> 0:41:12.160
<v Speaker 2>Maybe you have some sort of cultural connection with diamonds.

0:41:12.200 --> 0:41:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Maybe you yourself work with diamonds. Write in we'd love

0:41:16.120 --> 0:41:18.800
<v Speaker 2>to hear from you. Just a reminder that core episodes

0:41:18.840 --> 0:41:21.280
<v Speaker 2>of stuff to blow your mind publish on Tuesdays and Thursdays,

0:41:21.280 --> 0:41:23.840
<v Speaker 2>and the Stuff to Blow Your Mind podcast feed short

0:41:23.840 --> 0:41:26.480
<v Speaker 2>forum episodes go out on Wednesday, listener mail on Mondays,

0:41:26.480 --> 0:41:28.680
<v Speaker 2>and on Fridays. We set aside most serious concerns to

0:41:28.760 --> 0:41:31.440
<v Speaker 2>just talk about a weird movie on Weird House Cinema.

0:41:31.880 --> 0:41:35.800
<v Speaker 3>Huge thanks as always to our excellent audio producer JJ Posway.

0:41:35.880 --> 0:41:37.799
<v Speaker 3>If you would like to get in touch with us

0:41:37.840 --> 0:41:40.400
<v Speaker 3>with feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest

0:41:40.440 --> 0:41:42.399
<v Speaker 3>a topic for the future, or just to say hello,

0:41:42.800 --> 0:41:45.480
<v Speaker 3>you can email us at contact at stuff to Blow

0:41:45.480 --> 0:41:54.000
<v Speaker 3>your Mind dot com.

0:41:54.120 --> 0:41:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:41:57.160 --> 0:41:59.919
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.