Speaker 1: Let not your heart be troubled. You are listening to
Speaker 1: the Sean Hannity Radio Show podcast. If you're like me
Speaker 1: and suffer from insomnia, you know what, that's not fun.
Speaker 1: You know I tried everything I couldn't get a good
Speaker 1: night's sleep. And this is neither drug nor alcohol induced.
Speaker 1: That's right. It is my pillow. Mike Lindell invented it
Speaker 1: and he fitted me for my first my pillow, and
Speaker 1: it's changed my life. I fall asleep faster, stay asleep longer,
Speaker 1: and the good news you can too. Let go to
Speaker 1: my pillow dot com promo code Sean and take advantage
Speaker 1: of one of Mike Glendell's best offers, his special four pack.
Speaker 1: You get fifty percent off to my Pillow Premium Pillows
Speaker 1: to go Anywhere Pillows. My Pillows made in the USA,
Speaker 1: has a sixty day unconditional money back guaranteed no risk
Speaker 1: to you, and attend you warranty. You don't want to
Speaker 1: spend more sleepless nights on a pillow tossing interney that's
Speaker 1: not working for you. Just go to my pillow dot
Speaker 1: com right now, use the promo code Sean and you
Speaker 1: get Mike Glendell's special four pack. You get to my
Speaker 1: Pillow Premium Pillows to Go Anywhere pillows fifty percent off,
Speaker 1: and you'll start getting the kind of peaceful and RESTful
Speaker 1: and comfortable and deep, peeling and recruitative sleep you've been
Speaker 1: craving and deserve. My pillow dot Com promo coach on
Speaker 1: I glad you with us on this Friday. A lot
Speaker 1: of news breaking out now. By the way, Rick Gates
Speaker 1: has pled guilty in his case against the Special Counsel,
Speaker 1: and no people always want to read into what these
Speaker 1: guilty please are. I'm gonna tell you half of it.
Speaker 1: Half of it is you've got a choice. You go
Speaker 1: for the really easy okay, not so bad. Maybe facing
Speaker 1: a year in prison or thirty years in life. It's
Speaker 1: gonna go on six or seven years of your life.
Speaker 1: You're gonna pay a fortune even if you think you're innocent.
Speaker 1: It's not as cut and dry as everybody always thinks.
Speaker 1: But yeah, I know the media thinks this is the
Speaker 1: biggest deal ever, and that's probably all you'll hear about.
Speaker 1: Most people don't even know who Rick Gates is, which
Speaker 1: is fairly amazing. Uh, we have some good news for
Speaker 1: the president today. We'll tell you about that. We have
Speaker 1: a lot of really big nuggets, is the way I
Speaker 1: would explain development as it relates to deep state, Gaate,
Speaker 1: Obama Gate, whatever term you preferred to use. Um, we
Speaker 1: have a lot of new information as it relates to
Speaker 1: the Florida shooter and in this case, and signs that
Speaker 1: were missed that we're gonna get to. The President announces
Speaker 1: today some the toughest sanctions ever against North Korea, gave
Speaker 1: a great speech at Seedpact. He seemed like he was
Speaker 1: just having I don't think it or remember where he's
Speaker 1: gone an hour and fifteen minutes like he did today. Well,
Speaker 1: we're actually gonna air part of it coming up later
Speaker 1: in the program. Let you hear it yourself in case
Speaker 1: you might have missed all of that. Um. You know,
Speaker 1: this will drive the media nuts. The media has tried
Speaker 1: everything they could possibly do, um too to bring this
Speaker 1: president down to really the word is well this credit,
Speaker 1: I don't know, sabotage. They don't want him to be successful.
Speaker 1: There's his success is bad for people on the left.
Speaker 1: If Donald Trump is successful and getting people back to work,
Speaker 1: making America more secure, if making America energy independent, protecting
Speaker 1: on board, if he's successful. Thing about this from the standpoint,
Speaker 1: if you're a liberal and you want power more than
Speaker 1: anything else, why would you want the president to succeed.
Speaker 1: The president succeeds, the country succeeds. That means an entire
Speaker 1: generation now of people will realize that that his brand
Speaker 1: of conservatism works. And that's not good for those that
Speaker 1: prefer to be in power at all times. Is something
Speaker 1: intoxicating about power, and these guys want to be empowered
Speaker 1: at all times, and they think they deserve power. They
Speaker 1: think they know better. Anyway, thirteen months now into the
Speaker 1: Trump president, so you've got a brand new gallipole showing
Speaker 1: the American people are feeling great again. Now do you
Speaker 1: think one of the biggest hallmarks of Ronald Reagan's presidency
Speaker 1: is America began to feel good about itself? Um, and
Speaker 1: that is that that is no small feat, you know,
Speaker 1: if you think when I said all during the election
Speaker 1: year in thirty million more Americans in on food stamps,
Speaker 1: eight million more in poverty, worst recovery since the forties,
Speaker 1: lowest labor participation rate since the seventies, lowest home ownership
Speaker 1: right fifty one years, doubling our debt on and on
Speaker 1: and on. You think about that, it's it's it's demoralizing
Speaker 1: of points. If everything Obama wanted to bring to the
Speaker 1: country and thought his radical and doctrination of acorn O Lynsky,
Speaker 1: Frank Marshall Davis, Reverend right black liberation theology airs endored,
Speaker 1: it never works. It never has worked. And it's almost
Speaker 1: the same principle after four years that Jimmy Carter, America
Speaker 1: was sick and tired of, you know, interest rates, double
Speaker 1: digit inflation, out of control, you know, the the debt,
Speaker 1: the moral of the country was just beginning to sink
Speaker 1: and p poll in this election, the forgotten men and
Speaker 1: forgotten women. Now we've got two point seven million new
Speaker 1: jobs created. We've got the lowest unemployment level for African
Speaker 1: Americans Hispanic Americans since we've been keeping the data. I mean,
Speaker 1: we have virtually full employment in the country, two million
Speaker 1: fewer people on food stamps depending on government. And that's
Speaker 1: a good thing. So as a result of Americans now
Speaker 1: are satisfied with the position of the United States in
Speaker 1: the world. That's a thirteen year high, a thirteen percentage
Speaker 1: point increased from just a year ago. Just after President
Speaker 1: Trump took office and the public is also more likely
Speaker 1: than they were a year ago to think that the
Speaker 1: US rates favorably in the eyes of the rest of
Speaker 1: the world. And Americans are now more likely to be
Speaker 1: satisfied with the United States and their position in the
Speaker 1: world that at any point in the Obama presidency, according
Speaker 1: to Gallop. Now for Democrats that are predicting to satisfied
Speaker 1: Americans are going to retaliate against the geop in the
Speaker 1: mid terms. Well, the results don't bode extraordinarily. Well, think
Speaker 1: Trump is respected by other world leaders. A majority of
Speaker 1: americanscent believe the world rates the US favorably. So you know,
Speaker 1: the high satisfaction rate, I think, well, we'll see. You
Speaker 1: know one thing that is going to be probably the
Speaker 1: biggest factor in this campaign. Do you want Nancy Pelosi
Speaker 1: as your speaker? Do you want Chuck Schumer running the Senate?
Speaker 1: And the one thing the Democrats have going against them
Speaker 1: is they stand for nothing. The only thing they stood
Speaker 1: for is what Obama gave us for eight years, and
Speaker 1: they were complicit in that American decline for that period.
Speaker 1: And if you want to go back to that, I
Speaker 1: know there's an evan flow to political cycles. Then we'll
Speaker 1: get the government that we deserve at that point. But
Speaker 1: I think it's you know, it's too early to tell.
Speaker 1: One other poll out today, the rasp MUSE and Presidential
Speaker 1: Tracking poll shows the pent A likely US voters approve
Speaker 1: of the president's job performance. That's the president's highest job
Speaker 1: approval ratings since mid June of last year, and Obama
Speaker 1: earned approval rating at this time and his presidency in
Speaker 1: the second year of his presidency. So obviously some things
Speaker 1: have changed there. And you know, one thing I think
Speaker 1: um might be happening, Just an observation I have is
Speaker 1: I think people now are kind of getting Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: They're getting the rhythm of Donald Trump. And as as
Speaker 1: the media feigns more shock, indignation and outrage every day,
Speaker 1: I mean, they just try and outdo their outrage. He's
Speaker 1: not no no, no, he's super nuts. No no, no,
Speaker 1: he's demented nuts no no, no, no, he's no. I
Speaker 1: think what the American people see is somebody that rolls
Speaker 1: off up his sleeves and goes out to fight for
Speaker 1: what he believes it and he fights hard, and he
Speaker 1: doesn't like losing, and he doesn't want America to lose.
Speaker 1: And so far, the things that he's been able to accomplish,
Speaker 1: especially as it goes government regulation, and we are now
Speaker 1: he is freed up America to now become energy independent.
Speaker 1: He did keep his promise. He did put a conservative
Speaker 1: on the Supreme Court. You know, you add that to
Speaker 1: all these businesses. Because of the less burdensome regulation and
Speaker 1: the and the better tax code, this is a better country,
Speaker 1: is a better business environment. That's why people are getting hired.
Speaker 1: That's why companies are staying. That's why car companies, manufacturing
Speaker 1: is coming back. That's why big companies are pledging millions
Speaker 1: and billions to be spent inside this country. And that
Speaker 1: is that is good for all of us. And the
Speaker 1: idea that well, we'll have the highest corporate tax rate
Speaker 1: in the industrialized world, it's it's the dumbest thing ever,
Speaker 1: because corporations don't pay taxes. You pay the corporate taxes.
Speaker 1: They just add the cost into the bottom line and
Speaker 1: we end up paying anyway, we end up getting screwed.
Speaker 1: So we're now in the most competitive range. And especially
Speaker 1: the low repatriation of trillions potentially from overseas that have
Speaker 1: been parked that nobody would ever dare you know, bring
Speaker 1: back to this country because of the tax policies. It's
Speaker 1: all good for us. And don't we want to see
Speaker 1: you know, if you're worried about money for schools so
Speaker 1: that we can put in retired um, retired military concealed permit,
Speaker 1: retired police concealed permit and protect our kids, will maybe this,
Speaker 1: this wealth creation and job creation is gonna give school
Speaker 1: districts a little bit more money so that they can
Speaker 1: do the very thing that they need to do, which
Speaker 1: is protect our our students. You know, the Washington I
Speaker 1: went through a number of different places and I got
Speaker 1: some information that nobody else in the media. I think
Speaker 1: we'll tell you about. You have the Washington Post, Washington Times,
Speaker 1: Fox News, the Crime Prevention Research Center, you know, and
Speaker 1: I know the media doesn't like the president's idea of
Speaker 1: allowing qualified teachers. Only those that would like tovoluntarily carry
Speaker 1: firearms with them. Only those that are trained want to
Speaker 1: do it. It's not anybody else with teachers I think
Speaker 1: would probably rather teach and not have to worry about
Speaker 1: these things. That's why I prefer my plan, which is full,
Speaker 1: complete security checklist and and full evaluation of every school
Speaker 1: in the country, and a threat assessment of every school.
Speaker 1: Then you secure the perimeter, you secure the points of entry,
Speaker 1: you secure at least have one armed retired police military
Speaker 1: on every floor and available if God forbid, something happens,
Speaker 1: and you have an I D system to let the
Speaker 1: kids in, and then you have nobody gets in that
Speaker 1: doesn't belong there. And on top of that, you have
Speaker 1: at least a front line of defense because most shootings
Speaker 1: are over in three minutes. Anyway, all these different groups.
Speaker 1: As I look through the information that they put out,
Speaker 1: there's a lot of good information, And it really doesn't
Speaker 1: matter what the media thinks. There are facts. You know,
Speaker 1: the media say if a teacher tried to stop a
Speaker 1: school shooter with his own gun, it would only create
Speaker 1: chaos and probably end up killing even more children. I
Speaker 1: love how they just make these things up. Well, there's
Speaker 1: quite a track record actually of armed civilians, in other words,
Speaker 1: average men and women acting voluntarily who made the decision
Speaker 1: to be trained and carry firearms, who have actually foiled
Speaker 1: mass shooters and saved countless lives. Now, it's happened in schools,
Speaker 1: it's happened in churches. It's happened in malls, that's happened
Speaker 1: in restaurants dozens of times over the last few decades,
Speaker 1: and in no case I could find did any innocent
Speaker 1: bystander get shot by a good guy who was with
Speaker 1: a gun trying to stop a massacre? For example, the
Speaker 1: Washington Post they had a story in student eye witnesses
Speaker 1: and shooting victims at Pearl High School at at the
Speaker 1: rampage used phrases like unreal, like a horror movie, as
Speaker 1: they testified Wednesday about seeing Luke Woodham methodically point his
Speaker 1: dear rifle at them and pull the trigger at least
Speaker 1: six times. Assistant Principal Joel Myrick heard the initial shot.
Speaker 1: He watched Woodham choosing his victims, and when Wouldham appeared
Speaker 1: to be headed for a science wing where early classes
Speaker 1: were already underway, Myrick ran up, ran to his pickup
Speaker 1: truck truck, grabbed his forty five caliber pistol. I had
Speaker 1: my pistol sights on him. I could see the whites
Speaker 1: of his knuckles, he said. He reached into the car,
Speaker 1: he opened the driver's side door. He ordered Wouldham to
Speaker 1: lie on the ground. I put my foot on his
Speaker 1: back area and pointed my pistol right at him. He
Speaker 1: couldn't bring it into the school because it was a
Speaker 1: gun free school zone. Washington Post tells a story April
Speaker 1: Andrew Worst, fourteen, charged with fatally shooting John Gillette, forty eight,
Speaker 1: as science teacher at James Parker Middle School, as Gillette
Speaker 1: was chaperoning a prom for eighth graders in his eighth
Speaker 1: grade class. Anyway, after Worst shot Gillette in the head,
Speaker 1: police said that the teenager entered the banquet hall where
Speaker 1: is dressed up schoolmates were all dancing. He shot and
Speaker 1: wounded to other students and another teacher, and police said
Speaker 1: he began to flee from the hall and as the
Speaker 1: two fifty kids and teachers ran for cover, the owner
Speaker 1: of the hall, guy by the name of James Strand,
Speaker 1: he grabbed a shotgun and he followed this guy out
Speaker 1: the door. He caught up with him, held him until
Speaker 1: authorities arrived. Was that bad? Now? That would be a
Speaker 1: good thing. And there's another case in Colorado Springs, same things,
Speaker 1: another case in California, same thing. I can give you
Speaker 1: one example after another. The media will never give you
Speaker 1: these examples. That's why I asked a simple question, if
Speaker 1: you're ever God forbid and a in some type of
Speaker 1: of public building, and God forbid of shooting breaks out.
Speaker 1: Would you rather have trained, retired, concealed carry military police
Speaker 1: there or not? I'll take them being there. I'd rather
Speaker 1: increase my odds of surviving. It's a simple, simple proposition
Speaker 1: when you really think about it. If you were in
Speaker 1: any type of building that has an active shooter, would
Speaker 1: you rather know that there are trained professionals, retired military,
Speaker 1: retired police in the building with a concealed carry permit
Speaker 1: and a weapon? I think the answer for everybody. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I think. So what about if somebody broke into your house?
Speaker 1: Would you be glad you had trained, took, taken the
Speaker 1: time and trained to use a firearm or not. There's
Speaker 1: another example. Uh, this is in Colorado two thousand and seven.
Speaker 1: Former cop volunteer security worker Genie assum As her name,
Speaker 1: saved the day at New Life Church in Colorado Springs.
Speaker 1: Thousands of people were exiting from mass that day. As
Speaker 1: a shooter Matthew Murphy open fire. Anyway, she ran towards
Speaker 1: the line of fire, killing the shooters, saving countless lives.
Speaker 1: Have you ever noticed the media doesn't ever talk about
Speaker 1: these instances? California, two thousand and one, a student charl
Speaker 1: Andy Williams shot and killed two of his classmates, wounded
Speaker 1: thirteen others before being subdued and held a gunpoint by
Speaker 1: an off duty police officer who was bringing his daughter
Speaker 1: to school. I bet you didn't hear about that case either.
Speaker 1: Or in April, the Seen and Uber driver that had
Speaker 1: a concealed carry permit he had to shoot and wound
Speaker 1: a gunman who had opened fire in a crowd and
Speaker 1: of people in Chicago's Logan Square. I never heard that
Speaker 1: case until I looked it up today. Or an usher
Speaker 1: in Tennessee at a church used his personal firearm to
Speaker 1: subdue a mass gunman September seventeen, would already killed one
Speaker 1: woman in the church's parking lot and injured six others inside.
Speaker 1: And you have a Fox News report. This is from
Speaker 1: Sutherland Springs, Texas, November. Armed civilian using his assault rifle
Speaker 1: to stop Sunday Sunday mass murderer of twenty six church goers.
Speaker 1: Stephen Wildford, been heralded as a hero, is a former
Speaker 1: National Rifle Association instructor. Lives next door to the First
Speaker 1: Baptist Church of Southerland Spring, Texas. He grabbed his A
Speaker 1: R fifteen after hearing the gunfire, went over to investigate.
Speaker 1: He confront of the shooter, shot him in the leg
Speaker 1: and torso before the guy dropped his weapon and fled
Speaker 1: the scene in his suv. Would you rather have that
Speaker 1: person there or not? Pretty simple, fundamental question. Alright, A
Speaker 1: lot to get to today. Um as we bring this
Speaker 1: up with one New Jersey school district voted for armed
Speaker 1: security guards. That's interesting. From New Jersey and Ohio school
Speaker 1: is arming and training teachers to foil massacres. And in
Speaker 1: New York, Comrade de Blasio was ordering metal detectors for schools.
Speaker 1: He took him out by the way in alright, to
Speaker 1: the top of the hour. Alright, Olympics. Why did any
Speaker 1: of you like and watch much of the Olympics. I
Speaker 1: was proud of the women's hockey team. They won the
Speaker 1: gold and they beat Canada. That was pretty cool. I've
Speaker 1: seen virtually none of it. You've seen virtually didn't now.
Speaker 1: I did want to see the us UH women's hockey
Speaker 1: team finally beat Canada, but it was on it't like
Speaker 1: what MPM and end it two am. Yeah it was
Speaker 1: a shootout. Was because I never sleep, of course I
Speaker 1: saw it, but I thought that was pretty cool anyone
Speaker 1: else uh any of it. But I'm just surprised that
Speaker 1: everyone loves uh curling so much. I guess it's like
Speaker 1: the sport that everyone thinks they can do because it
Speaker 1: doesn't really require much athletic ability. ME tell you something,
Speaker 1: if you watch the people that are doing that and
Speaker 1: they move it so quickly to clear the ice to
Speaker 1: get that little extra it's it's an amazing I don't
Speaker 1: know why. It's fascinating. My favorite is ski jumping in
Speaker 1: I have no idea how these kids on those snowboards
Speaker 1: do the stuff that they do and don't die. How
Speaker 1: about them? How about the moguls that they go on?
Speaker 1: Those moguls at high speed? It's it. Listen, it's nuts
Speaker 1: your knees. I can't believe that everyone doesn't need a
Speaker 1: new knee after, you know, five years of banging their
Speaker 1: knees on on those moguls. I never like mobiles moguls
Speaker 1: when I was a big skier. But I'm watching the
Speaker 1: name Shan the kid um Sean White I was. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's like he almost has a hang time that defies gravity.
Speaker 1: If you watch the way he does a hundred years.
Speaker 1: I mean, Sean White was doing this in the nineties. Yeah,
Speaker 1: but the thing is he gets better and better and
Speaker 1: better every single time. And the number of twists and
Speaker 1: flips and whatever the hell they're doing up there, How
Speaker 1: could you be a parent and watch your kid do
Speaker 1: this without going insane. I remember when my kids were
Speaker 1: young and we're on a playground, I'd go insane, you know,
Speaker 1: twitching all around because you know, they are fearless, they
Speaker 1: don't know any better, and they're at the top of
Speaker 1: the monkey bars and they're holding on for dear life,
Speaker 1: and then they dropped down. Ah, you're just thinking the
Speaker 1: worst's gonna happen. Nothing usually does, but occasionally it does.
Speaker 1: And I could not live through my kids doing that
Speaker 1: type of twisting and turning and hanging in the air
Speaker 1: and just imagining what happens if don't land right. I
Speaker 1: don't know how they do it. I mean, I guess
Speaker 1: that's why. It's sort of like the old wide world
Speaker 1: of sports, just different sports. The thrill of victory, the
Speaker 1: agony of defeat, the drama of human competition. Remember that
Speaker 1: dating yourself? You know, I'm totally dating myself. Why are
Speaker 1: you so quiet there, miss Linda? Why are you? Well?
Speaker 1: Everybody was having such a nice little, you know, rendezvous
Speaker 1: here on the Era. But you you don't like sports anyway,
Speaker 1: you don't even touch down it. I I don't. I
Speaker 1: don't understand any of it. The only sport I like
Speaker 1: is hockey, and I have been watching the hockey and
Speaker 1: I have been watching the Skiers. It's actually really fun
Speaker 1: because I watch it with Liam, and Liam just gets
Speaker 1: the biggest kick out of like the hockey teams and
Speaker 1: we're screaming, we're screaming, and we're maybe he's a hockey player.
Speaker 1: Little this morning, this morning we saw a little bit
Speaker 1: of Germany and Canada and Canada got spanked and uh
Speaker 1: that was amazing, and like the German like, where's this
Speaker 1: hatred from Canada if you guys coming? Well, they got Trudeau,
Speaker 1: so you know, Trudeau is having a lovely week as well,
Speaker 1: so it's just fun to bash Canada. Well, we just
Speaker 1: had the Australian Prime minister in town with the president.
Speaker 1: They did a joint pressure together, right. That has nothing
Speaker 1: to do with my story at all. See, because you're
Speaker 1: about Australia's anybody in there like Australia. I was talking,
Speaker 1: you asked me to talk. I'm telling you my time.
Speaker 1: I reclaim my time. I want to reclaiming claiming time.
Speaker 1: Why are you so cranky. I'll pretend to be vaccine
Speaker 1: and you be Minutian, And why don't you just stop
Speaker 1: being cranky. I'm reclaiming my time. I'm reclaiming my time.
Speaker 1: Vaccine Waters doesn't have that thick New York accident. My
Speaker 1: mine is so much better. Okay, well what would you
Speaker 1: like to say? I just thought it was so it's
Speaker 1: it's exciting, like when you see these big tough like
Speaker 1: you know, these manly men's, you know, they're skating around,
Speaker 1: they're beating the crap out of each other. And then
Speaker 1: they went and they all start crying. And so Liam
Speaker 1: Liam this morning is like they're all crying and Liam goes, oh,
Speaker 1: he got an auchi. He's crying. I said, no, he
Speaker 1: didn't get an auchy. He got a gold medal. And
Speaker 1: he goes, gold medal Auchie, Mommy, I said no, no,
Speaker 1: it was just dying left. You don't It is amazing though,
Speaker 1: um think of what was the swimmer's name, the guy
Speaker 1: that won all the gold medals recently? What Michael Phelps
Speaker 1: Michael Phelps or going back years I'll date myself marks
Speaker 1: fits back in the day and uh, you know remember
Speaker 1: diving Greg lugainis how good he was. And I don't
Speaker 1: get Lindsay Van. I know she didn't have a good
Speaker 1: year this year, and I know people are mad at
Speaker 1: her because she said I'm about going to the White
Speaker 1: House if I win and all that nonsense. But you
Speaker 1: think about you spend all these years training and unless
Speaker 1: it's a sport that somebody really cares about, and maybe
Speaker 1: you have one shot at it one and that's even
Speaker 1: if you get to the finals. You get one shot
Speaker 1: at the gold and then maybe you'll get the Wheaties
Speaker 1: box cover or some type of endorsement deal. But then
Speaker 1: after the Olympics, what do you do next? I know
Speaker 1: a lot of people start training again and prepare for
Speaker 1: the next four years, but you're literally talking about minutes
Speaker 1: in your life in most cases and most of these sports,
Speaker 1: and it's not a lot of time. In the amount
Speaker 1: of effort and energy and training and dedication that goes
Speaker 1: into it. It's phenomenal that they want to do all
Speaker 1: of that, and and the other thing. I only other
Speaker 1: question I am when did Norway become the big medals winner?
Speaker 1: What happened to the US this year when they're saying
Speaker 1: that the US isn't so hot this year? Well, obviously,
Speaker 1: I mean I think they have twice as many medals
Speaker 1: as we do. Well, it's always frozen in Norway. You
Speaker 1: would think that they would be good in the Winter Olympics.
Speaker 1: What you're gonna make a comment from? Like like k
Speaker 1: did you hear the comment Katie Kirk made that people
Speaker 1: skate to work? Oh god, then they don't skate to
Speaker 1: work every day? Uh? She had to and she had
Speaker 1: to apologize because there was an outrage people. My god,
Speaker 1: people are so easily outrage out reached over that. We
Speaker 1: got problems. Um well, I thought I read it somewhere
Speaker 1: and it just came flying out of my mouth that
Speaker 1: people skate to work on these ponds and apparently they
Speaker 1: don't skate to work every day. What you don't have
Speaker 1: roads there or something? I mean, what's the big deal?
Speaker 1: I have no idea. What would you like to skate
Speaker 1: to work? Yeah? I wouldn't mind at all. You know. Look,
Speaker 1: I tried to play hockey a few years back with
Speaker 1: some of my buddies. One of my closest friends, you know, Keith,
Speaker 1: He still plays hockey. He plays does actively. Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: he plays ice hockey. You know it's the old man's league,
Speaker 1: but boomer a sciasin, isn't it. There's a lot of
Speaker 1: teams and really good players, and he's been. But what
Speaker 1: I'll do with my free time, I'll go play female
Speaker 1: ice hockey at night. Listen. I I think if your
Speaker 1: son likes hockey, you should put him. I love hockey,
Speaker 1: He's totally I already got him a little mini baby
Speaker 1: um hockey stick. I'll teach him how to head of
Speaker 1: slap shot. Right now, he's just beating up the dog.
Speaker 1: But other than that, he's doing beating up the doorg.
Speaker 1: Is that what your son is beating up the door?
Speaker 1: It's really funny too, because Winston thinks it's a toy.
Speaker 1: So then he eats, he eats the stick, and Liam's
Speaker 1: running around with the stick. So you mean he uses
Speaker 1: the hockey stick to beat the dogs. He's not really
Speaker 1: beating the dog. He's too, but he doesn't understand what
Speaker 1: it is. I'm like, here, hit the mini baby puck.
Speaker 1: And then he sees the baby puck and he's like
Speaker 1: here Winston, and he chases. They can't wait for someone
Speaker 1: to take this out of context. Two and a half
Speaker 1: year old son to beat the animals more than me,
Speaker 1: and I have a ton of them, so it's all good. Listen,
Speaker 1: you love animals so much that you fed that cat
Speaker 1: so much that it was the fattest cat ever in
Speaker 1: the history of mankind? Could you please pull? First of all, nothing,
Speaker 1: could you take it? You still have pictures of that cat?
Speaker 1: You do You're lying, You're absolutely lying through your teeth. No,
Speaker 1: you do have pictures of the pretty kill was too much.
Speaker 1: I couldn't take it anymore. Well, let's put a picture
Speaker 1: of the cat, because I think you were killing the cat,
Speaker 1: because you're over feeding the cat. You're just not right
Speaker 1: in the head. You know that you're not right. I
Speaker 1: cat on the streets have to put to save the
Speaker 1: cat's life. It was so morbidly obese. This was like
Speaker 1: four cats in one cat that you had to send
Speaker 1: the cat to get like a personal trainer on a
Speaker 1: farm to save the cat's life or the cat wasn't
Speaker 1: gonna make it. Are you doing? Are you done? Are
Speaker 1: you having a good time today? True story? Or yeah?
Speaker 1: I care? Are you body shaming the cat? Your body?
Speaker 1: You're it's not nice. You know, I'm body shaming the
Speaker 1: person that overfed the cat. You're gonna need to issue
Speaker 1: an apology. I'm owner shaming the owner. That owner shaming
Speaker 1: the owner who overfed the fat. Shaming of the cat
Speaker 1: was the side put the cat up on on the
Speaker 1: website and let people decide did you overfeed the cat?
Speaker 1: Will make it our question of the day. God, I
Speaker 1: think you need to put that up. I'll consider it.
Speaker 1: So you do have pictures, which means you just lied
Speaker 1: to me when you said you did not have pictures.
Speaker 1: I will evaluate my photo library, reevaluate, going to reevaluate.
Speaker 1: You have pictures of the cat. It's in your phone
Speaker 1: right now. You could put it up in ten seconds,
Speaker 1: but you're now evaluating. I'm going to evaluate. I'll get
Speaker 1: back to here. Let me get day. You need beers immediately.
Speaker 1: Uh okay, what time I got TV? And I can't? Hey, alright,
Speaker 1: So the Olympics are winding down. President announced the new
Speaker 1: sanction package today against North Korea that's tougher than anything
Speaker 1: that's ever been implemented so far. Good for him, and
Speaker 1: he announced today a new package of sanctions aimed at
Speaker 1: cutting off all the smuggling roots that the regime is
Speaker 1: using to evade a UN embargo to fund its nuclear
Speaker 1: weapons program. And he said, I'm announcing that we are
Speaker 1: launching the largest ever set of new sanctions on the
Speaker 1: North Korean regime. He said that, by the way, according
Speaker 1: a Spack speech, he said that I do want to say,
Speaker 1: because people have asked North Korea, we composed today the
Speaker 1: heaviest sanctions ever imposed on a country before. And frankly,
Speaker 1: hopefully something positive can happen. We will see, but hopefully
Speaker 1: something positive can happen. But that just was announced. And
Speaker 1: I want to let you know we have imposed the
Speaker 1: heaviest sanctions ever imposed. Why didn't he just give him
Speaker 1: billions of dollars like Obama and Clinton did. Where does
Speaker 1: the mindset from somebody come from? Oh, death to America,
Speaker 1: death to Israel, Burn the American flag, burn the Israeli flag,
Speaker 1: and let me let me bring in a few cargo
Speaker 1: planes with a hundred and fifty billion dollars in American
Speaker 1: and foreign currency, and let's pay the Mullahs. And we're saying, please,
Speaker 1: can we bribe you into liking us? Five seconds after
Speaker 1: the money comes in, the next thing that happens is
Speaker 1: they're saying death to America again. It was the same
Speaker 1: thing Bill Clinton tried to bribe Kim Jong ill it
Speaker 1: was Kim Jong UN's father, and that didn't work. With
Speaker 1: trillions of dollars and energy and others. It's insane. This
Speaker 1: is a form of insanity. All right. We have at
Speaker 1: the top of the next hour, we have Sarah Carter,
Speaker 1: and we have Greg Jared. I want to set the
Speaker 1: scene for you, though. Paul Sperry has an amazing column
Speaker 1: ount today in the New York Post, and he's talking
Speaker 1: about that the House Intelligence Committee Chair Devin Newness and
Speaker 1: how he's examining whether the vaunted Obama Intelligence Community assessment
Speaker 1: claiming that Russia mettled in the presidential election was actually
Speaker 1: based on that bogus Hillary Clinton bought and paid for dossier.
Speaker 1: And Newness discovered the findings that the Obama intelligence assessment
Speaker 1: the o I a mirror almost exactly the made up
Speaker 1: crap that Hillary Clinton had her henchmen stick in at dossier.
Speaker 1: So from Sperry's column, he says, suspiciously, Barack Obama's Intelligence
Speaker 1: community assessment, I see a matches the main allegations leveled
Speaker 1: by the Clinton paid for dossier on Trump, which wormed
Speaker 1: its way into the intelligence channels in addition to the FBI,
Speaker 1: Justice Department, and State Department during the campaign. This is important.
Speaker 1: In fact, it looks like the dossier makes the exact
Speaker 1: see claim, and that is into the what the Obamba
Speaker 1: intelligence community is now echoing the dossier. Now, remember the
Speaker 1: dossier was never verified by anybody, not by Fusion, GPS,
Speaker 1: not by anybody in the FBI, d O J, nobody,
Speaker 1: So they're basically mirroring the exact same thing. You know
Speaker 1: that Putin personally ordered the cyber attacks on the Clinton
Speaker 1: campaign and leaked embarrassing emails to bolster Trump. Well, the
Speaker 1: person that quote leaked those emails as a guy. We
Speaker 1: know who it is, Julian Assange of Wiki Leaks, And
Speaker 1: I think we're like the only people in American media
Speaker 1: that have actually taken the time to go to London
Speaker 1: to sit down and ask him. And he denies it
Speaker 1: vehemently that it was Russia or any state. But I'd
Speaker 1: like to know, you know, and he has the answer
Speaker 1: by the way, of who did it. I'd like to
Speaker 1: find out eventually who did anyway, Staff investigators now for
Speaker 1: deva Newness, his Intelligence Committee are now going over every
Speaker 1: word of the I s A, including classified footnotes, to
Speaker 1: see if any of the analysis was pre cooked based
Speaker 1: on the Clinton Boughton paid for dossier. Now James Clapper,
Speaker 1: Obama's Director of National Intelligence, he said in a recentcy
Speaker 1: An interview that the i c A was based on
Speaker 1: quote some of the substantive content of Dacia. Well, nobody
Speaker 1: verified any of it. There's still people now trying to
Speaker 1: verify it, that are being paid to try and verify it.
Speaker 1: And Clapper also admitted that he broke with tradition. He
Speaker 1: didn't put the assessment to all seventeen U S intelligence
Speaker 1: agencies for review. Instead, he says he limited input to
Speaker 1: a couple of dozen handpicked analysts from three agencies, the
Speaker 1: c i A, the n s A, and the FBI,
Speaker 1: and that the report was drafted under the supervision of
Speaker 1: his office, and all three agencies agreed putin hacked and
Speaker 1: lee Clinton's emails. Can you please give us the information
Speaker 1: that proves that, because that's not what the person that
Speaker 1: leaked them says. In the Defense Intelligence Agency, Homeland Secure,
Speaker 1: the State Departments Intelligence Bureau, other agencies with relevant expertise
Speaker 1: on Russia, we're all excluded unbelievable. We'll use it for
Speaker 1: a phoney. Fis a warrant. We'll all tell each other
Speaker 1: it's true, and we'll pat each other on the back.
Speaker 1: Hillary wins, and nobody would know the difference didn't work
Speaker 1: out that way. Actually have friends of mine questioning whether
Speaker 1: or not it's really true if you can lend his
Speaker 1: cat blew up to four times its normal size because
Speaker 1: she overfed the cat. The answers, absolutely, it's true. It's
Speaker 1: true in your mind breaking news. I think I want
Speaker 1: to know why you won't put it online so that
Speaker 1: people can see that what I was talking about, you
Speaker 1: fed the cat to death? The cat find a picture
Speaker 1: and I will put it up there. You don't know
Speaker 1: it's not fine, You're gonna find it. You have it
Speaker 1: in your phone right now, and you're not telling the truth. Well,
Speaker 1: you just said I fed it to death, so I
Speaker 1: guess that you know she's no longer almost to death is?
Speaker 1: By the way, is the cat still around? I have
Speaker 1: no idea. You check in with the new owner. She's
Speaker 1: with my father in law. How much weight has the
Speaker 1: cat lost? I don't know. I guess he feeds are
Speaker 1: does the cat look like it did when Why don't
Speaker 1: you put them before and after pictures after when you
Speaker 1: after you send it to them. He's always beautiful whatever
Speaker 1: her size, of course. But I didn't say she wasn't beautiful.
Speaker 1: I just said that you nearly killed her, all right,
Speaker 1: Sarah Carter, Greg Jarrett next fence Flawyer's perspective, it's a
Speaker 1: perjury trap. I think from the rule of law perspective,
Speaker 1: just tell the truth. If you're under oath, you've got
Speaker 1: to tell the truth. That's what we have. The indictments
Speaker 1: now of General Flynt. I read through that indictment. The
Speaker 1: indictment is a little odd, to be honest, because the
Speaker 1: General was conducting Mike Flynn was conducting foreign policy in
Speaker 1: preparation for the camp. But paragraph five of that nails
Speaker 1: him on failure to register. That had nothing to do
Speaker 1: with collusion. It had everything to do with Turkey, the
Speaker 1: government of Turkey, and so on and so forth. Because
Speaker 1: of argument about the law being too broad with the
Speaker 1: special counsel the parameters by which you or others work, Um, oh,
Speaker 1: that that's correct. And Congress, when we had the law,
Speaker 1: we don't have it a bill. Let me just say this,
Speaker 1: we did not we don't have that law. Now that
Speaker 1: law was allowed to expand, and I think, yeah, and
Speaker 1: I think that's a good thing. When did you first
Speaker 1: learn of the so called Steele dossier and what Christopher
Speaker 1: Steele was doing? Well, it was a not a very
Speaker 1: well kept secret among press circles for several months before
Speaker 1: it came out, and it was in late summer of
Speaker 1: sixteen when there were some individuals from the various US
Speaker 1: news outlets who asked me about my familiarity with it,
Speaker 1: and I had heard just snippets about it. I did
Speaker 1: not know what was in there. I did not see
Speaker 1: it until later in that year. I think it was
Speaker 1: in December. Uh, But I was unaware of the providence
Speaker 1: of it as well as what was in it. And
Speaker 1: it did not play any role whatsoever in the Intel's
Speaker 1: community assessments that was done, that was presented to then
Speaker 1: President Obama and then President Electromp. How was the Steele
Speaker 1: dossier treated? It was, how did you read it? And
Speaker 1: you said you looked at it in December. I assume
Speaker 1: it's been looked at by It was obviously looked at
Speaker 1: by the FBI. We've now learned they've tried to confirm
Speaker 1: some of it and have had some success, some not yet.
Speaker 1: They don't say it's they don't. They say it's unconfirmed.
Speaker 1: But that's about it. Well, there were things in that
Speaker 1: dossier that made me wonder whether or not they would
Speaker 1: they were in fact accurate and true. Uh, And I
Speaker 1: do think it was up to the FBI to see
Speaker 1: whether or not they could verify any of it. I
Speaker 1: think Jim Comey has said that it was contained selatious
Speaker 1: and unverified information. Just because it was unverified didn't mean
Speaker 1: it wasn't true. And if the Russians were involved in
Speaker 1: something like that directed against individuals who are aspiring to
Speaker 1: the highest office in this land, there was an obligation
Speaker 1: of part of the FBI to seek out the truth
Speaker 1: on it, all right. That was Brennan, who we now know,
Speaker 1: along with Clapper, got a letter from Devon Newness ten
Speaker 1: specific questions as it relates to the dossier. Now that
Speaker 1: all of this is making its way up the ladder
Speaker 1: in the Obama administration, one thing Deva Nuness is doing today.
Speaker 1: Paul Sperry had a great column that Nooness is investigating
Speaker 1: whether the Trump tossier was the basis for Obama's Russia
Speaker 1: Gate Intelligence Assessment, which, by the way, we need to
Speaker 1: know because Obama's Intelligence community assessment matches the main allegations
Speaker 1: that were leveled in the Clinton paid dossier that nobody
Speaker 1: had verified, which wormed their way into the intelligence channels
Speaker 1: in addition to the FBI, the Department of Justice, the
Speaker 1: Department of State, all at the beginning of the campaign
Speaker 1: in sixteen. In fact, the shady dossier makes exactly the
Speaker 1: same claim that Putin personally ordered the cyber attacks on
Speaker 1: the Clinton campaign and leaked embarrassing emails to bolster Trump. Now,
Speaker 1: the person that put those emails out in the for
Speaker 1: public review is Julian Assangia Wiki leaks. He's told us
Speaker 1: multiple times on this show and on TV that it
Speaker 1: was not Russia, it was no state agency at all,
Speaker 1: so that would be contradictory to that. Do they have
Speaker 1: any evidence that it came from Putin and staff? Investigators
Speaker 1: for the Newness and the Intelligence Community are now going
Speaker 1: over every single word of the i c A, the
Speaker 1: Intelligence Community assessment, including classified footnotes, to see if any
Speaker 1: of the analysis was pre cooked based on this phony,
Speaker 1: bought and paid for dossier. And we also have Comey agreeing,
Speaker 1: by the way, to his first interview since his firing.
Speaker 1: His book is done, and he's gonna appear with George Stephanopolis. Sure,
Speaker 1: why not go right directly to Clinton's uh number one
Speaker 1: fan in the media. Unbelievable. Joining us now we have
Speaker 1: Sarah Carter, investigative reporter for the Fox News Channel, and
Speaker 1: Greg Jarrett, uh, Fox News Legal analysts. Welcome both of
Speaker 1: you to the program. Well that and uh, now we
Speaker 1: have this investigation into whether or not this judge in
Speaker 1: Michael Flynn's case is looking for exculpatory evidence that could
Speaker 1: have been withheld. But we have a lot going on today.
Speaker 1: Sarah will start with you. What do you make about
Speaker 1: this this piece by Paul Sperry and Newness investigating whether
Speaker 1: the dossier was the basis for the Russian intelligence assessment. Well,
Speaker 1: I since certainly say, with you know, absolute certainty talking
Speaker 1: to sources uh in here in Washington, that they are
Speaker 1: looking very closely at the assessment and that they're looking
Speaker 1: directly at Brennan. Remember John Brennan, He was the same, uh,
Speaker 1: the former chief of the CIA who said in a
Speaker 1: hearing to Trey Gouty that he couldn't exactly recall when
Speaker 1: Trey Gouty asked him directly whether or not there was
Speaker 1: an ambassador that had been unmasking Americans. He said, it
Speaker 1: rings a vague bell, but I can't really remember. And
Speaker 1: you know, so here's the same man who has these denials.
Speaker 1: He's very good at being very careful with his words,
Speaker 1: and paulse Bury is right on when he makes the
Speaker 1: accusation that still there has been no evidence to prove
Speaker 1: that it was the Russians that actually did the hacking,
Speaker 1: and they've never been able to prove that with definitive certainty,
Speaker 1: you know, showing the actual facts. So I think what's
Speaker 1: going to happen here is that the House Intelligence Committee
Speaker 1: is going to look very carefully at this. Remember they
Speaker 1: didn't just ask Clapper and Brennan, they also asked Comy
Speaker 1: the same ten questions, Sean, And this is going to
Speaker 1: be vitally important because they're going to have to answer
Speaker 1: these questions. If they don't, I believe they will be
Speaker 1: subpoena to answer those questions before them, because they know
Speaker 1: now that something went really wrong and that they were
Speaker 1: using this dossier as a means to investigate the president
Speaker 1: um and we know now there's a lot of connections
Speaker 1: with people very close to Hillary Clinton that we're involved
Speaker 1: in this dossier, people like Sydney Blumenthal, others from the
Speaker 1: State Department, that we're feeding Christopher Steel information on what
Speaker 1: they term a second dossier. A lot of people believe
Speaker 1: that that same information was used in the original dossier
Speaker 1: that Christopher Steele had. So there is a mess in
Speaker 1: Washington right now, and I think everybody's trying to sort
Speaker 1: this out. This, to me, greg Is is pretty fascinating
Speaker 1: because you now have Devin Newness of the House Intel
Speaker 1: Committee examining whether the vaunted Obama intelligence community assessment claiming
Speaker 1: that Russia medal did the presidential election. Now we're examining
Speaker 1: whether or not that was based on the Clinton bought
Speaker 1: and paid for phony Russian dossier that nobody had ever verified.
Speaker 1: And because he's looking at these Obama intelligence assessments and
Speaker 1: they mirror exactly what's in the dossier, so nobody checked
Speaker 1: it out. It's used for a fiser warrant, and it's
Speaker 1: used in in the Intelligence community assessment. Right The Intelligence
Speaker 1: community assessment was largely put together by the CIA, the
Speaker 1: n s A, and the FBI, and I would emphasize
Speaker 1: the CIA then run by John Brennan. He appears to
Speaker 1: have played an instrumental role in instigating the Russian hoax
Speaker 1: and disseminating the fictitious dossier. Uh And in fact, the
Speaker 1: House Intelligence Committee, who's been probing Brennan's actions, one of
Speaker 1: their senior aids, and I'll quote here John Brennan did
Speaker 1: more than anyone to promulgate the dirty dossier. He politicized
Speaker 1: and weaponized what was false intelligence against Trump. So what
Speaker 1: did Brennan do well? When he learned of the dossier,
Speaker 1: He allegedly not just gave it to the FBI and
Speaker 1: Democrats on Capitol Hill, but certain members of the media
Speaker 1: were alerted, and according to his testimony before the House
Speaker 1: Intelligence Committee, Brennan seemed to acknowledge that he was among
Speaker 1: the first individuals to have access to this dossier. And
Speaker 1: guess what soon thereafter, the FBI was alerted and opened
Speaker 1: the Trump Russia investigation that was never launched because Papadopoulos
Speaker 1: got drunk in a London pub and started mouthing I mean,
Speaker 1: that was preposterous. The New York Times totally got used
Speaker 1: on that, which just shows a how gullible they are
Speaker 1: and and be how biased they are to buy into
Speaker 1: that canard. No, it was the dossier which was used
Speaker 1: to uh try to frame Trump, launching a false investigation,
Speaker 1: then spying on Trump associates, and continuing to spy after
Speaker 1: the president took office. It's unbelievable. Another very very important
Speaker 1: points that Greg brought up there. And remember, let's go
Speaker 1: back to when they first briefed then President Obama and
Speaker 1: then you know President Trump as well on the dossier.
Speaker 1: When that happened, when the brief President elect Trump and
Speaker 1: President Obama on this dossier, it was John Brennan who
Speaker 1: was there as well. And nobody took this dossier seriously
Speaker 1: in the media, but they were afraid of printing it.
Speaker 1: It was being shopped all around Washington, d C. A
Speaker 1: lot of reporters remember this. Uh, then you had Christopher
Speaker 1: Steel briefing reporters on the background beforehand. Nobody was really
Speaker 1: nobody probably dossier until they made it official, until they
Speaker 1: went and briefed both presidents on this. They briefed President Trump,
Speaker 1: president President elect Trump, then President Obama, and shortly afterwards
Speaker 1: Sean is when BuzzFeed published the entire dossier and everybody
Speaker 1: started to roll with it. They had to make this
Speaker 1: dossier somehow valid. They had to give it some kind
Speaker 1: of credence so they could spread this unverified And Sperry
Speaker 1: makes another point about this, because again I think it's
Speaker 1: very critical that noon As is asking Brennan and Clapper
Speaker 1: what he knows in terms of the dossier, and those
Speaker 1: questions I think will be very revealing if if we
Speaker 1: get answers. But and Sperry's peace. What he's pointing out,
Speaker 1: you know, is that James Clapper, the Director of National
Speaker 1: Intelligence under Obama, conceded in a recency and an interview
Speaker 1: that the i c A was based on some of
Speaker 1: the substantive content of the dossier. And Clapper also admitted
Speaker 1: he broke with tradition and didn't put out the assessment
Speaker 1: to all seventeen U. S. Intelligence agencies for review, and
Speaker 1: instead he limited it to just a couple of h
Speaker 1: of hand picked analysts from three agencies, the c i A,
Speaker 1: the n s A, and the FBI. Interestingly, that the
Speaker 1: report was drafted under the supervision of his office and
Speaker 1: and all three agencies quote agreed but the defense but
Speaker 1: again that that bypassed the normal procedures. Why would that be, well,
Speaker 1: because you know they were pulling a fast one Clapper
Speaker 1: and Brennan. Uh. You know, at the end of the day,
Speaker 1: you're going to find out that Clapper, Brennan and Comy,
Speaker 1: you know, knew this thing was completely absurd, romors, innuendos, supposition,
Speaker 1: wild speculation. That's why reporters who who knew about it
Speaker 1: and read it laughed at it and wouldn't print it. Uh,
Speaker 1: and so, and that frustrated Clapper and Comy and and
Speaker 1: Brennan and so they tried to somehow legitimize it. And
Speaker 1: only when they were able to do that did BuzzFeed finally,
Speaker 1: you know, finally prinative. And you said, you've read it
Speaker 1: so many times that it makes you laugh every time
Speaker 1: you read it, every time it gets old. Right, stay
Speaker 1: right there, we gotta take a break of uh more
Speaker 1: with Greg Jarrett, more with Sarah Carter. One Shaw in
Speaker 1: our number right. As we continue, Greg Jarrett is with
Speaker 1: us along with Sarah Carter, as we continue our investigation
Speaker 1: into deep state Gate, and it gets more interesting by
Speaker 1: the minute. So you got these additional charges, none of
Speaker 1: which surprised me, is related to Paul Maniford. Uh. And
Speaker 1: of course ri Rick Gates is cutting a deal The
Speaker 1: biggest development that I see, though, is this whole issue
Speaker 1: of the judge in the case of General Flynn. Greg
Speaker 1: let's start with you. He's asking for any and all
Speaker 1: exculpatory evidence, and he will decide what is exculpatory. That's right.
Speaker 1: The judges Emmetts Sullivan uh very well known, and he
Speaker 1: was the judge in the Senator Ted Stevens case, the
Speaker 1: Alaska senator prosecuted for corruption. In the end, it was
Speaker 1: all tossed out. Why because prosecutors cheated, as they often do,
Speaker 1: They cheated in a way that is really quite unconscionable.
Speaker 1: They knew that there was exculpatory evidence, evidence that would
Speaker 1: help Stevens, but they deliberately, wilfully withheld it. And so
Speaker 1: you know Sullivan, I don't know him, but what I've
Speaker 1: read of him, he has now this ingrained skepticism towards prosecutors,
Speaker 1: and he has now demanded that these prosecutors, even though
Speaker 1: there's been a Flynn guilty plea entered, I'm demanding that
Speaker 1: you turn over any exculpatory evidence, and I'll tell you
Speaker 1: what's exculpatory. It appears that there's some evidence that the
Speaker 1: FBI officials who actually interviewed Flynn, and by the way,
Speaker 1: they had no business interviewing him. He hadn't done any wrong.
Speaker 1: All right, we'll give you the let's give started the
Speaker 1: last word. Just running out of time, Okay, sorry, well no, absolutely,
Speaker 1: I mean Greg brought up a very good point. I mean,
Speaker 1: I think with General Flynn's case, if you just go
Speaker 1: back to the very beginning and you realize that Komy
Speaker 1: had made the announcement that both of the agents that
Speaker 1: originally interviewed Flynn had actually not believed he had lied,
Speaker 1: and they interviewed him anyways when they shouldn't have interviewed him,
Speaker 1: or they should have shared the transcripts with him. He
Speaker 1: was doing his job. Then you see the pressure of
Speaker 1: the Special Council putting pressure on them, both financially and
Speaker 1: threatening apparently his family, threatening his son, And all of
Speaker 1: a sudden, you see people came into the Special Council. Look,
Speaker 1: without Flynn, without Mueller being able to get guilty, please Flynn, Papadopoulos,
Speaker 1: he can't take the next step forward to go after
Speaker 1: the president. And he used a dossier. This dossier was
Speaker 1: used to open this investigation. It's an unverified, insallacious Jassier
Speaker 1: that has no relevance. And and there's over a year
Speaker 1: we haven't seen any collusion between the President and Russia,
Speaker 1: and they open this Special Council investigation and there are
Speaker 1: a lot of questions here, and they've been strong arming
Speaker 1: people into guilty please, and we've seen that, and we're
Speaker 1: just gonna look and see where the next step is.
Speaker 1: I mean where you played that that clip from the beginning.
Speaker 1: Should the President talk to the Special Counsel? I'm not
Speaker 1: a legal expert here, but I would be very concerned
Speaker 1: about some type of an entrapment. All Right, the guys,
Speaker 1: I gotta let you go. Great workers always, we appreciate it.
Speaker 1: One Shaw And if you want to be a part
Speaker 1: of the program. The President speaking at SPACT this morning,
Speaker 1: he went on an hour and fifteen minutes. We have
Speaker 1: the best of that speech coming up in our news
Speaker 1: round up Information Overload portion of the program. We'll get
Speaker 1: to your calls coming up next as well. Eight nine
Speaker 1: for one Shawn and Phil Robertson of Duck Dynasty. He's
Speaker 1: always a trip and a lot of fun. As we
Speaker 1: continue this Friday, alright, twenty five now till the top
Speaker 1: of the one, Sean President at seat Pack Today. We're
Speaker 1: gonna play some of that speech in our news round
Speaker 1: up information overload and your calls and Phil Robertson coming
Speaker 1: up next hour. But all right, it's been a busy week.
Speaker 1: Let's get to our busy phones, because many of you
Speaker 1: have been very very patient. Mark is in the great
Speaker 1: state of Alabama. What's up, Mark? How are you? Where
Speaker 1: do you live in Alabama? I actually live in the
Speaker 1: South part. I used to the Montgomery Actually no, um,
Speaker 1: small little town called I know, yeah, I know what
Speaker 1: it is. Of course I've heard I lived in Alabama, yes, sir, Okay,
Speaker 1: so I didn't know that. The reason I'm calling as
Speaker 1: a school I went to was actually Northwest Florida, and
Speaker 1: they had a lot of the same security managers you're
Speaker 1: talking about. Um. Make they kept one point entry. All
Speaker 1: the doors were locked other than one point and that
Speaker 1: was to the four year right next office. And they
Speaker 1: had a higher off duty officer that was there at
Speaker 1: all times the school was open. Look, I can tell
Speaker 1: you from my experience when my kids were younger, they
Speaker 1: went to a particular school. I won't say what the
Speaker 1: school is, why embarrass them? That was Hannity kids. Um
Speaker 1: but you did not get into the school except through
Speaker 1: one door, and I look, I didn't. I'm not one
Speaker 1: of these parents that spends a lot of time at
Speaker 1: school unless somebody's getting in trouble or I have to
Speaker 1: go to one of those stupid, boring, monotonous parent teacher meetings.
Speaker 1: But when I would go, I mean I walk in,
Speaker 1: or they if the kids forgot a book or their
Speaker 1: lunch or something, might drop it off. Not very often.
Speaker 1: I walk in. The first thing the guy I would
Speaker 1: say is high, Mr Hannity, and then I'd have to
Speaker 1: give him my license. And it's that is the way.
Speaker 1: Every single entry point needs to be secure. Any other
Speaker 1: place that kids can get in needs to be secure
Speaker 1: as well. And you need to have enough people hired
Speaker 1: that you have enough security. I would say you need
Speaker 1: a retired concealed carry military guy on every floor. You
Speaker 1: definitely have to take care of the perimeter outside the school,
Speaker 1: and you've got to take care of every building inside
Speaker 1: the school. Some of these schools have multiple buildings. You
Speaker 1: can't tell me that it's impossible to do this when
Speaker 1: we do it at football games, baseball games, concerts. And
Speaker 1: I'm not talking about Vegas. The outdoor concert, which was
Speaker 1: I'm talking about arenas and and so on. We can
Speaker 1: do it. We secure our banks. You can't go into
Speaker 1: the bank and rob the bank blind. You're gonna get
Speaker 1: in trouble. You're gonna be facing somebody with a gun.
Speaker 1: And if we just take those precautionary measures, look, evil
Speaker 1: is evil. And I said this last night that the
Speaker 1: Sarnov brothers used a bomb that they made and produced
Speaker 1: with everyday materials that anybody can buy. You can buy
Speaker 1: a pressure cooker, you can buy the nails, and you can,
Speaker 1: you know, set up an explosive sadly, fairly easily. And
Speaker 1: then the worst school shooting was Virginia Tech when they
Speaker 1: used handguns and thirty two people were killed in that shooting.
Speaker 1: And that's it's just not the answer securing the school
Speaker 1: and putting a priority on it. And we're not gonna
Speaker 1: let these kids feel fear, feel this fear. They ought
Speaker 1: to be able to go to school with confidence and
Speaker 1: know that somebody's not going to get into building and
Speaker 1: start shooting him up. And if the kids have ideas
Speaker 1: going in and if they go through metal detectors going in,
Speaker 1: just like we all have to do when we fly
Speaker 1: in an airplane. Uh, it's really not that big a
Speaker 1: deal at the end of the day, is it. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you gotta get to the airport an hour early. Does
Speaker 1: it really make that big a difference. It doesn't. It's
Speaker 1: pretty quick. And you know, the confidence of knowing that
Speaker 1: the guy next to me doesn't have a gun that
Speaker 1: he's gonna pull out midflight is reassuring to me, and
Speaker 1: I think most people, and I think the kids. It's
Speaker 1: it's just the reality, unfortunately, of the world we live in.
Speaker 1: There's evil. Brendan. I'm sorry, Brenda is in Oregon. Brenda,
Speaker 1: how are you glad? You called? Good? And how are
Speaker 1: you doing? I'm great, It's Friday. We made it, I know. Okay.
Speaker 1: So what I wanted to say is when Obama was
Speaker 1: talking about u UM with Romney, how you know what
Speaker 1: he said about Russian trying to interfere and he debunked
Speaker 1: that and then Trump said something and yeah the two
Speaker 1: thousand and eight debate, right, okay, So anyway, but when
Speaker 1: it's been right after the election happened, it was like
Speaker 1: Obama he went a hit and sent like thirty five
Speaker 1: diplomats back like a S A P. So is that
Speaker 1: because he was mad or what do you think the Russians? Maybe?
Speaker 1: I think I think Obama really I for whatever reason,
Speaker 1: Obama believed in his mind and his heart that America
Speaker 1: is this you know, horrible uh superpower, and and that
Speaker 1: we have too much influence in the world. That influence
Speaker 1: is not good for the world, and it doesn't um,
Speaker 1: it doesn't foster diversity, and so on and so forth.
Speaker 1: And I think he's just got everything asked backwards. I mean,
Speaker 1: he is a classic appeaser, and his mindset is that,
Speaker 1: you know, well, if we're nicer to you, and you're
Speaker 1: gonna be nicer to us, and and tell Vladimir or
Speaker 1: tell Vladimir, I'll have more flexibility after the election, after
Speaker 1: my election, all more flexibility. I can't tell the American
Speaker 1: people the truth to what I'm really gonna do. You know,
Speaker 1: think of the mindset. What rational human being would ever
Speaker 1: go along with an idiotic idea of dropping off, you know,
Speaker 1: a hundred and fifty billion dollars in American currency and
Speaker 1: other currencies and give it to the Iranian Mullahs that
Speaker 1: are chanting death to America. There's a particular mindset there
Speaker 1: that I don't I can't relate to in any way
Speaker 1: because that's an appeasement mindset. There are certain of us
Speaker 1: that I think are far more rooted in reality. Neville
Speaker 1: Chamberlain had that appeasing mindset, and he believed that that
Speaker 1: Great Britain could have peace in their time with the Nazis.
Speaker 1: I didn't work out that way. And people in the
Speaker 1: beginning thought somebody like well Winston Churchill was nuts. You know.
Speaker 1: They said about Reagan that he was a California cowboy
Speaker 1: that talked about the evil Empire and that he'd start
Speaker 1: World War three, and he ended up bringing an end
Speaker 1: to the Cold War and he didn't have to fire
Speaker 1: a shot, and he said the now infamous words, Mr Grocho,
Speaker 1: tear down this wall, and he did it. Clinton had
Speaker 1: an appease or mindset to Bill Clinton gave Kim Jong Un,
Speaker 1: Kim Kim Jong, I'm sorry, Kim Jong Ill, Kim Jong
Speaker 1: UN's father gave him, you know, three billion dollars in
Speaker 1: energy and all sorts of subsidies. Well that with with
Speaker 1: a promise that they're never going to build a nuclear weapon. Well,
Speaker 1: how did that work out for the world? Not too good.
Speaker 1: So I really don't for the life of me, understand
Speaker 1: the mindset of of so many people. But I do
Speaker 1: think that, yeah, I think that both Secretary Clinton at
Speaker 1: the time and Barack Obama were naive. Let's say hi
Speaker 1: to Anthony is in Annapolis in Maryland. What's up, Anthony?
Speaker 1: How are you, sir? Hey Sean, thanks for taking my call.
Speaker 1: The reason that I called is because I've I've actually
Speaker 1: come up. I'm I'm a wounded warrior and disabled combat
Speaker 1: that from oh f no, I s I've actually come
Speaker 1: up with a very unique solution to this whole gun
Speaker 1: issue that we're facing them today. Um, we're not doing
Speaker 1: the army. The day that I showed the basic trained,
Speaker 1: they didn't just give me a rifle and go here,
Speaker 1: go to send your country. They trained me. Okay, my
Speaker 1: proposed My proposal is this. I think that if you're
Speaker 1: under the age of and you want to purchase a firearm,
Speaker 1: you should have to go through a state certified or
Speaker 1: federally certified training program for for firearms. So you go
Speaker 1: and you sign up for a class, and let's say
Speaker 1: it's four saturdays out of a month. UKA feed to
Speaker 1: the state. You go take this class that licensed certified
Speaker 1: weapons expert. We didn't have a prolomed interaction with that
Speaker 1: prospective gun owner to determine whether or not they're confident
Speaker 1: with a firearms and whether they or not there mentally. Well,
Speaker 1: let me tell you what I recently went through in Florida,
Speaker 1: because I want to get my carry permitting Florida. Okay,
Speaker 1: and and I've I've been a pistol marksman since I'm
Speaker 1: twelve years old. I've been trained since I'm eleven. And
Speaker 1: so to get a carry permit, you have to go
Speaker 1: and take a safety course. And I went and I
Speaker 1: took the safety course, and I was the only one
Speaker 1: in the class. And the guy starts asking me a
Speaker 1: few questions, and I gave him my background, my knowledge
Speaker 1: and firearms, etcetera. And uh, he went through every bit
Speaker 1: of the curriculum anyway, and I and he did the
Speaker 1: right thing. And then he brought me to the range.
Speaker 1: I hit the bulls eye like six straight times, and
Speaker 1: he goes, Okay, I think you're set, and here's your certificate.
Speaker 1: Get out of here. But you know, I don't have
Speaker 1: a problem with that. Anybody that asked me that doesn't
Speaker 1: have a gun what kind of gun they should get?
Speaker 1: My advice is just just go go, go get training,
Speaker 1: go to a range. These guys that these ranges are
Speaker 1: the most giving people you'll ever meet. They, you know,
Speaker 1: don't be embarrassed that you don't know. Um. I don't
Speaker 1: know why there's a pride associated with with individuals that
Speaker 1: we don't want to ask other people sometimes for help.
Speaker 1: I was at a range recently in Florida and over Christmas,
Speaker 1: and I went down there and I was shooting and
Speaker 1: there was a particular gun I had no familiarity with,
Speaker 1: and I went and I got the guy because my
Speaker 1: son's friend was actually firing, and I said, would you
Speaker 1: mind show me you know how to use this particular firearm.
Speaker 1: I didn't want to pick it up. I didn't want
Speaker 1: to touch it until I understood it. And that's just
Speaker 1: my training and working its way into into you know,
Speaker 1: me being on the range. The guy was great, came over,
Speaker 1: explained the entire weapon to me, went through it three
Speaker 1: times on his own, watch me do it once, then
Speaker 1: said okay, y'all set, yes, sir, thank you, and that
Speaker 1: was it. Well, I'm not ashamed to ask if I
Speaker 1: don't know something in particular. I don't know everything, but
Speaker 1: the people that I know that are that love firearms,
Speaker 1: they're more than happy to teach, They're more than happy
Speaker 1: to tell, They're more than happy to guide you and
Speaker 1: help you. And you know, if you're a woman and
Speaker 1: you want a lighter gun and one that doesn't have
Speaker 1: a lot of kick, you know they'll they'll help you
Speaker 1: find the weapon you're most comfortable with. I mean, some
Speaker 1: of these ranges down in in Florida are just amazing
Speaker 1: because you can actually rent any weapon that they've got
Speaker 1: on the premises, and they'll show you how to use it,
Speaker 1: and you know it just then it becomes like a
Speaker 1: fun experience. It's like you know, going bowling or going
Speaker 1: to a movie. You go shooting with your friends and
Speaker 1: you have a good time. It's a lot of fun um.
Speaker 1: Although my kids don't seem to be too interested in it,
Speaker 1: which is fine with me too. I've taken him to
Speaker 1: the rains. We're like, okay, can we go now? Uh.
Speaker 1: I was very different when I was eleven years old,
Speaker 1: and every kid has their own area of interest. But
Speaker 1: you raised a good point. I had no problem sitting
Speaker 1: in that class, no problem with the curriculum. It frankly
Speaker 1: was a good reminder. There was nothing I didn't know,
Speaker 1: but it was a good reminder for me, a good
Speaker 1: refresher for me, and I was glad that that they
Speaker 1: do that down in Florida. It's not gonna it's not
Speaker 1: gonna challenge your ability or the time frame in which
Speaker 1: you can purchase a firearm. C Ann went on. They said,
Speaker 1: Donald Trump wants all teachers. Okay, fake news, fo fake news, fakeness.
Speaker 1: I don't want a person that's never handled a gun,
Speaker 1: that wouldn't know what a gun looks like to be armed.
Speaker 1: But out of your teaching population, you have a very
Speaker 1: gun adept people, military people, law enforcement people. They teach,
Speaker 1: they teach, and and something I thought of this morning,
Speaker 1: you know what else? And I thought of it since
Speaker 1: I found and watched Peterson, the deputy who didn't go
Speaker 1: into the school because he didn't want to go into
Speaker 1: the school. Okay, he was tested under fire and that
Speaker 1: wasn't a good result. But you know what I thought
Speaker 1: of as soon as I saw that, these teachers, and
Speaker 1: I've seen them at a lot of schools where they
Speaker 1: had problems. These teachers love their students, and the students
Speaker 1: love their teachers. In many cases, these teachers love their
Speaker 1: students and these teachers are talented with weaponry and with guns,
Speaker 1: and that's they feel safe. And I'd rather have somebody
Speaker 1: that loves their students and wants to protect their students
Speaker 1: then somebody standing outside that doesn't know anybody and doesn't
Speaker 1: know the students. And frankly, for whatever reason, decided not
Speaker 1: to go in, even though we heard lots of shots
Speaker 1: being fired inside. All right back to our phones we go, John,
Speaker 1: a liberal from Alabama. What's up, John, the liberal from Alabama?
Speaker 1: How are you? How are you doing? Sure? I'm good?
Speaker 1: What's going on? I was saying, I listened to your
Speaker 1: regular for the last couple of years, and you know
Speaker 1: testully this year ago. You're a big Trump supporter. I
Speaker 1: was saying, if you feel that he's so innocent, why
Speaker 1: your case is not being tried on the mainstream is
Speaker 1: just like you're just on your radio show, on your
Speaker 1: TV show saying things why it doesn't care to hit
Speaker 1: him in the process, they're going to get it over
Speaker 1: with that on I'm not understanding your questions. Say it
Speaker 1: a little differently. I said, you are every day you
Speaker 1: get on the radio, you say he did include he
Speaker 1: didn't calude. I'm saying, why is it so hard for
Speaker 1: you to convince the government, the FBHI merely and all
Speaker 1: of them that why they're not listening to you? Well,
Speaker 1: you look, they have they have an agenda that's number one,
Speaker 1: number two, beyond anybody's imagination. If you really pay close attention,
Speaker 1: you'll notice that they're not talking about Trump Russia collusion anymore.
Speaker 1: And even if you watch the Sunday shows, you know,
Speaker 1: things we've been talking about for months, like the dossier
Speaker 1: that's now part of everyday Sunday programming. And as much
Speaker 1: as they have tried their hardest to avoid it all,
Speaker 1: they have not been successful. So yeah, it takes a
Speaker 1: little while for the media to catch up with us.
Speaker 1: And uh, yeah, I was right about Obama, and yeah,
Speaker 1: I predicted what would happen in Baltimore, and I predicted
Speaker 1: what would happen in Ferguson, and I predicted you know,
Speaker 1: a lot of different things. They all get wrong because
Speaker 1: they're kind of a bunch of sheep and a bunch
Speaker 1: of followers. But where you know, truth and facts are
Speaker 1: now dragging them into the arena where they never wanted
Speaker 1: to go. And it's only gonna get more pronounced than
Speaker 1: the days to come, but they do their level best
Speaker 1: to avoid covering it, and they're angry that, you know,
Speaker 1: there hasn't been an indictment of Donald Trump and they're
Speaker 1: still waiting for it. Anyway, thanks for the call. All
Speaker 1: Right News Round Up Information Overload hour here on this Friday.
Speaker 1: By the way, Phil Robertson at the bottom of the
Speaker 1: hour is going to check in with us. He's always
Speaker 1: a lot of fun. Nine for one, Shawn is a number.
Speaker 1: We'll get to some calls here in just a minute.
Speaker 1: So we were at sea Pack the last couple of days.
Speaker 1: I love seapack because these are kids, many of them
Speaker 1: from colleges all around the country, and you see, it's just,
Speaker 1: you know, we only see on television those kids that
Speaker 1: um only seem to like love and worship at the
Speaker 1: altar of all things liberal, leftist status, Obama, etcetera. And
Speaker 1: you almost think when you see any scene in a
Speaker 1: college campus that there aren't young conservatives. I have no
Speaker 1: idea why my parents were not overly political, but when
Speaker 1: I was young, I was drawn to conservative thought and
Speaker 1: talk radio, and I would listen and i'd follow, and
Speaker 1: I was interested in the Cold War, and I followed
Speaker 1: every minute of Reagan's presidency anyway, So the president goes
Speaker 1: there today and he speaks to this crowd of young people.
Speaker 1: He just pretty much through a lot of the speech
Speaker 1: by the side, did a lot of ad libbing, had
Speaker 1: a lot of fun, and was just being his fun,
Speaker 1: combative self. And the crowd absolutely loved it. Here's part
Speaker 1: of it because you know, I kept trying to say,
Speaker 1: why is this, but it's it's just there. So the
Speaker 1: great enthusiasm. You know, you're sitting back, you watching television.
Speaker 1: Maybe I don't have to vote today. We just won
Speaker 1: the presidency, and then we get Claubert, and we can't
Speaker 1: let that happen. We get Claubert in eighteen and we
Speaker 1: can't let that happen. Only because we are so happy.
Speaker 1: We passed so many things. Honestly, and I say, I'll
Speaker 1: use the word my administration as opposed to me. My administration,
Speaker 1: I think has had the most successful first year in
Speaker 1: the history of the presidency. I really believe, I really
Speaker 1: go over. We've ended the war in American energy. We
Speaker 1: were in war, and we've ended the war on beautiful,
Speaker 1: clean coal, one of our great natural resources. I'm very
Speaker 1: important for our defense, call very important for our defense
Speaker 1: because we have it, we don't have to send it
Speaker 1: through pipes, we don't have to get it from foreign countries.
Speaker 1: We have more than anybody, and they wanted to end it.
Speaker 1: And our miners have been mistreated, and they're not being
Speaker 1: mistreated anymore. We're doing tremendous business. I was in Vietnam
Speaker 1: and the Prime Minister and the President of Vietnam were there,
Speaker 1: and we have a massive deficit with them, like we
Speaker 1: do with everybody else, because these presidents have just let
Speaker 1: it go to hell. We have the worst trade deals
Speaker 1: you've ever seen it. So we're changing it. So I said,
Speaker 1: we have too big a deficit with Vietnam. I'm not happy.
Speaker 1: He said, well, but we're going to I said, bike call, mikel.
Speaker 1: They used a lot of called bike call, and he said,
Speaker 1: you know, we have book call from West Virginia and
Speaker 1: other places, and it's the finest call we've ever is.
Speaker 1: It's interesting, and West Virginia now is doing great. You
Speaker 1: look at what's happening in West Virginia, you look at
Speaker 1: what's happening in Pennsylvania, you look at what's happening in Ohio,
Speaker 1: and you look at what's happening in Wyoming. You look
Speaker 1: at what's happening all over, it's like it's like a
Speaker 1: different world. And remember this, Virtually as soon as I
Speaker 1: got into office, we approved the Keystone XL pipeline and
Speaker 1: the Dakota Access Pipe bloods which would never have been
Speaker 1: appro and we announced our withdrawal from the totally disastrous
Speaker 1: job killing wealth, knocking out you know, it knocked out
Speaker 1: our wealth, or it would have. They basically wanted to
Speaker 1: take our wealth away. They didn't want us to use
Speaker 1: our wealth power. We knocked out the Paris Climate Accord,
Speaker 1: would have been a vest. We're doing record business. We're
Speaker 1: doing business, and you have to look at the fundamentals.
Speaker 1: Companies are pouring back into this country. They're pouring back,
Speaker 1: not like I mean, when did you hear about car
Speaker 1: companies coming back into Michigan and coming to Ohio and expanded.
Speaker 1: When do you hear You never heard that? Do you
Speaker 1: hear they're leaving? I've been talking about it for twenty years.
Speaker 1: I was a private sector guy, but for whatever reason,
Speaker 1: I always had these guys always covered me much more
Speaker 1: than anybody else. I always got a lot of these characters.
Speaker 1: They used to treat me so good too. Until I
Speaker 1: ran for office, I used to get the greatest publicity
Speaker 1: trend of mine. Said, you know, you used to be
Speaker 1: the king of getting great publicity. What happened? I said, Well,
Speaker 1: I have some views that they're opposed to for a
Speaker 1: lot of bad reasons, a lot of bad reasons. But
Speaker 1: but when you look at what's happening to our country,
Speaker 1: it's incredible, and the fundamentals are so strong. The stock
Speaker 1: market I just see, with all of the ups and
Speaker 1: down since election day, is up thirty seven percent from
Speaker 1: election thirty seven percent. It did a little bit of
Speaker 1: a correction. In fact, I saw it. You know, is
Speaker 1: in it for like thirteen fourteen months from election? I say,
Speaker 1: is this sucker ever going down a little bit? This
Speaker 1: is a little embarrassing. It was up up a hundred, up,
Speaker 1: two hundred, up huft up sixty three. That's a good
Speaker 1: that's better. Hey, we've got seven years to go, folks,
Speaker 1: you know we got we got a long time to go.
Speaker 1: Somebody got onto television recently and they said, actually, this
Speaker 1: is the first time I can remember Trump made campaign promises.
Speaker 1: He may be the only person that actually fulfilled more
Speaker 1: promises that he made. I think that's true. I fulfill
Speaker 1: more promising, But we have a very crooked media. We
Speaker 1: had a crooked Candiday too, by the way, but we
Speaker 1: have we have a very we have a very very
Speaker 1: crooked medium. Somebody got into television recently and they said, actually,
Speaker 1: this is the first time I can remember Trump made
Speaker 1: campaign promises. He may be the only person that actually
Speaker 1: fulfilled more promises that he made. I think that's true.
Speaker 1: I fulfill more promising. But we have a very crooked media.
Speaker 1: We had a must have strong borders. We celebrate our
Speaker 1: history and our heroes, and we believe young Americans should
Speaker 1: be taught to love their country and to respect its traditions.
Speaker 1: Don't worry, you're getting the wall. Don't worry. Okay, he said.
Speaker 1: I had a couple of these characters in the back say, oh,
Speaker 1: he really doesn't want the wall. He just used that
Speaker 1: for campaigning. I said, are you can you believe it?
Speaker 1: You know I say, every time I hear that, the
Speaker 1: will gets ten feet higher. You know that, every time,
Speaker 1: every single time. Okay, now we're gonna have the wall,
Speaker 1: or they're not gonna have what they want. It's time
Speaker 1: to make our schools a much harder target for attackers.
Speaker 1: We don't want them in our schools. We don't. We
Speaker 1: don't want them. When we declare our schools to be
Speaker 1: gun free zones, it just puts our students in far
Speaker 1: more danger far more dangerous. Well trained gun adept teachers
Speaker 1: and coaches and people that work in those buildings, people
Speaker 1: that were in the Marines for twenty years and retired
Speaker 1: people into the Army, the Navy, the Air Force, the
Speaker 1: Coast Guard, people that are adept at dept with weaponry
Speaker 1: and with guns they teach. I mean, I don't want
Speaker 1: to have a hundred guards standing with rifles all over
Speaker 1: the school. You do a concealed carry hermit, and this
Speaker 1: would be a major deterrent because these people are inherently cowards.
Speaker 1: If they thought, like if this guy thought that other
Speaker 1: people would be shooting bullets back at him, he wouldn't
Speaker 1: have gone to that school. He wouldn't have gone there.
Speaker 1: It's a gun free zone. It says, this is a
Speaker 1: gun free zone. Please check your guns way far away.
Speaker 1: And what happens is they feel safe. There's nobody gonna
Speaker 1: come at him this way. You may have and remember,
Speaker 1: if you use the school as an example, this is
Speaker 1: a very big school with tremendous floor area and a
Speaker 1: lot of acreage. It's a big, big school, good school.
Speaker 1: A big big school. You'd have to have a hundred
Speaker 1: and fifty real gun. It's looking at one guard. He
Speaker 1: didn't turn out to be too good. I will tell
Speaker 1: you that he turned out to be not good. He
Speaker 1: was not a credit to law enforcement. That I can
Speaker 1: tell you. That I can tell you. But as I've
Speaker 1: been talking about this idea, and I feel it's a
Speaker 1: great idea, but some people that are good people are
Speaker 1: opposed to it. They don't like the idea of teachers
Speaker 1: doing it. But I'm not talking about teachers, you know.
Speaker 1: C Ann went on. They said, Donald Trump wants all teachers. Okay,
Speaker 1: fake news, folks, fake news, fake news. I don't want
Speaker 1: a person that's never handled a gun, that wouldn't know
Speaker 1: what a gun looks like to be armed. But out
Speaker 1: of your teaching population, out of your teaching population, you
Speaker 1: have a very gun adept People, military people, law enforcement people.
Speaker 1: They teach, they teach, and and something I thought of
Speaker 1: this morning, you know what else? And I thought of
Speaker 1: it since I found and watch Peterson, the deputy who
Speaker 1: didn't go into the school because he didn't want to
Speaker 1: go into the school. Okay, he was tested under fire
Speaker 1: and that wasn't a good result. But you know what
Speaker 1: I thought of as soon as I saw that these teachers,
Speaker 1: and I've seen them at a lot of schools where
Speaker 1: they had problems, These teachers love their students, and the
Speaker 1: students love their teachers. In many cases, these teachers love
Speaker 1: their students, and these teachers are talented with weaponry and
Speaker 1: with guns, and that's they feel safe. And I'd rather
Speaker 1: have somebody that loves their students and wants to protect
Speaker 1: their students then somebody standing outside that doesn't know anybody
Speaker 1: and doesn't know the students. And Frankly, for whatever reason,
Speaker 1: decided not to go in, even though we heard lots
Speaker 1: of shots being fired inside and a teacher would have
Speaker 1: shot the hell out of him before he knew what happened. Right,
Speaker 1: So the President earlier today at Seepack, and I will
Speaker 1: tell you it's one of the events that I really
Speaker 1: enjoy going to every year. Been there now, how many
Speaker 1: years we've done at least three years in a row.
Speaker 1: We did it many years ago. We went through a
Speaker 1: period where we didn't go, and it was just fun
Speaker 1: to get back there and see a lot of people
Speaker 1: and and do the television program from there. Two nights
Speaker 1: in a row is so fun. All Right, let's send
Speaker 1: our busy telephone as I've been promising. All right, let's
Speaker 1: go to Kurt Is in St. George out in Utah. Kurt,
Speaker 1: how are you happy Friday? Welcome to the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 1: Thank you, Sean, Thank you for taking my call. Yes, sir,
Speaker 1: what can I do for you? Hey? I just wanted
Speaker 1: to point out that with all this controversy and everything
Speaker 1: going on, and everybody bad, not from the n r A. UM.
Speaker 1: I am a member of the n r A, and
Speaker 1: the number one thing that the promote it's safety, gun safety,
Speaker 1: And that's what they're leaving all that out. You know. Yeah,
Speaker 1: we promote you know, the Second Amendment, of course we do,
Speaker 1: but gun safety is the number one I gotta tell
Speaker 1: you something. I've had a lifetime of experience dealing with
Speaker 1: people in the n r A and people a unarranges
Speaker 1: and and people that are that are trained in the
Speaker 1: use of firearms the n r A. Yeah they are.
Speaker 1: They are noted for their gun safety at courses and
Speaker 1: self defense courses. And the first thing they teach is
Speaker 1: gun safety. The thing about every time I've ever been
Speaker 1: to a gun range, every single time, the thing that
Speaker 1: stands out the most is that if there's ever anybody
Speaker 1: there that ever needs any help, maybe a novice or
Speaker 1: maybe they want to try a different weapon out or something.
Speaker 1: The level of assistance that people with with a lot
Speaker 1: of knowledge are willing to give to others is unprecedented.
Speaker 1: You know, there's and and every single person understands the
Speaker 1: safety issue. The safest people with guns are people that
Speaker 1: are trained in the use of them. And the n
Speaker 1: r A promotes this more than anybody. The U s
Speaker 1: c c A, that's another group that promotes it gun safety,
Speaker 1: gun responsibility, and it it's never gonna get discussed in
Speaker 1: the media. People don't care about it. And I can
Speaker 1: only say that my experience with the n r A
Speaker 1: is one that they take great pride and pleasure in
Speaker 1: helping people understand the safety aspects of the firearm. So
Speaker 1: I think you're dead on right all right, back to
Speaker 1: our phones. Lead is in the Bronx of New York.
Speaker 1: Lead how are you the all new seven ten w
Speaker 1: O R What's going on? High shown great show. You're
Speaker 1: in the bronx. I can hear the accent. What's going on? Yes, Um,
Speaker 1: I just wanted to make a point that I have
Speaker 1: a ten year old daughter that goes to Catholic school,
Speaker 1: and you know, I take it to school every morning,
Speaker 1: and when I drop her off, I feel very satisfied
Speaker 1: knowing that I have a good feeling that nothing is
Speaker 1: going to happen to her. And for the simple reason
Speaker 1: is that as a parent in that school, we actually
Speaker 1: pay extra money for security guard that is a retired
Speaker 1: police source and carries a nine millimeter gun. And I
Speaker 1: feel very safe bringing my daughter to that school and
Speaker 1: leave her there all day. Listen, if we if we
Speaker 1: would universally do a complete threat security assessment on every school,
Speaker 1: put in the number of retired or concealed carry military,
Speaker 1: concealed carry police retired in these schools, we have a
Speaker 1: line of defense. We we would have the ability to
Speaker 1: step in. They would have the ability to step in
Speaker 1: and save lives. The idea that that is even viewed
Speaker 1: as controversial to anybody is mine numbing to me. And
Speaker 1: I know the President said, well, teachers, if they want
Speaker 1: to train, I'm not don't want to put all the
Speaker 1: responsibility on the teachers. If they do, that's fine. I
Speaker 1: don't have any problem with it. But trained, concealed carry,
Speaker 1: former military, former police, and and a full threat assessment.
Speaker 1: Everybody has an I D. Metal detectors were needed. And
Speaker 1: yet you've got security in our schools. We could do it.
Speaker 1: We do it everywhere else we want to do it.
Speaker 1: Why couldn't we do it there? Uh? Johnny was now
Speaker 1: by the way, buddy Philip Robertson, one of the huge
Speaker 1: rock and roll stars of duck Dynasty, is a news
Speaker 1: show by the way himself on CRTV. It's called Into
Speaker 1: the Woods with Phil and he has a contest going
Speaker 1: on right now and he wants you to know about it.
Speaker 1: What's the contest, Mr Robertson, how are you, sir? Well,
Speaker 1: the contest he is. Whoever wins it will get some
Speaker 1: of Miss Kay's cooking and I will give them a
Speaker 1: ride through the woods and do a little as we go.
Speaker 1: Wait a minute, you never took me duck hunting, not once. Now,
Speaker 1: I did get to go to Miss Kay's kitchen and
Speaker 1: but except we were outside, we were grilling steaks, and uh,
Speaker 1: I had a great time when I was down there
Speaker 1: in West Monroe, Louisiana. Sir, well, you gotta remember, uh
Speaker 1: when they whoever wins this thing and they're able to
Speaker 1: come down here. I was talking to that Rick and
Speaker 1: Bubba show over in Alabama's well, my buddy Rick and Bubba.
Speaker 1: I love those guys. I told him, I said, boys,
Speaker 1: always remember whoever wins is saying it comes down in here.
Speaker 1: If they're not converted to Jesus yet, they will be
Speaker 1: all right. Now, that brings us to the old story.
Speaker 1: So I'm down there interviewing you and and basically your
Speaker 1: home as a trailer. And yet you build this, you know,
Speaker 1: majestic kitchen, you know, building for your wife that you
Speaker 1: don't even live in. And I'm like, and then you're
Speaker 1: you're the chair you sit in, the actual chair that
Speaker 1: Phil Robertson sits in, looks like it's a hundred years old.
Speaker 1: And I'm thinking, always remember this, whether it's my household
Speaker 1: or yours. Kennedy, money always the money always gravitates towards
Speaker 1: the women's purses, you know. Yeah, good luck in this
Speaker 1: day and age. You're you're you're on your own when
Speaker 1: you're get in trouble. Next time, miss kast Misk is
Speaker 1: gonna be. Miss Cay is gonna be a little annoyed.
Speaker 1: But I by the size of hard kitchen, and besides
Speaker 1: the size of that building. Now, I just want to
Speaker 1: know this. So you never asked me to go duck hunting?
Speaker 1: Why don't invite me on the trip I want to go?
Speaker 1: How do I win? You are invited to go, and
Speaker 1: you'll win by me just saying, hennedy, come on down here,
Speaker 1: let's go duck hunting. Load up, get out of New
Speaker 1: York for a while. Get out there and relax, my man.
Speaker 1: I will give you this. I commend you for standing
Speaker 1: for the truth when you're dealing with all these people
Speaker 1: what I'm here to do. I'm glad you called me
Speaker 1: in because if I'm able to talk to you, that
Speaker 1: means desperation is setting in. So I just want to
Speaker 1: remind you what you do every night. Jesus and John
Speaker 1: chapter eight said that the devil is the source, source
Speaker 1: and calls of all murder, and he is also Jesus
Speaker 1: said John Ate read that when you get off the phone,
Speaker 1: he is the source and the father of lies. So, Sean,
Speaker 1: what you're doing may be even not realized it all together.
Speaker 1: You go so far as to say, it's just this
Speaker 1: is how come people, this is just evil what hitary
Speaker 1: Clinton did and all the stuff with the with her
Speaker 1: computers and all this and steal and the dossier. You've
Speaker 1: got to remember you're dealing with human beings who are
Speaker 1: controlled by the Father shown of lies. Believe it's not
Speaker 1: so hard to wait through it because you're thinking, how
Speaker 1: could people lie this? Well, they are getting their instructions
Speaker 1: from the Evil One, according to John chapter eight, which
Speaker 1: is a daunting task you have undertaken because you're really
Speaker 1: dealing with the power of the Evil One, whether it
Speaker 1: be the shooters and the schools, are the people that
Speaker 1: you're dealing with that just lies come forth from them
Speaker 1: like it's Jesus said, telling lies. He speaks his native language,
Speaker 1: the Evil One does. I just wanted to give you
Speaker 1: that information to know you know something. I want to
Speaker 1: ask you something because I think at heart you are
Speaker 1: and I've had the honor of getting to know you
Speaker 1: and your family, and I really I love your family.
Speaker 1: You have a wonderful family. And um but I do
Speaker 1: see good and evil. And I actually wrote a book
Speaker 1: one's called Deliver Us from Evil. And what's so amazing
Speaker 1: to me is is that. You know, in the last century,
Speaker 1: fill over a hundred million human souls were destroyed in
Speaker 1: the name of of communism, fascism, Nazism. Uh, you just see, well,
Speaker 1: you see man's in humanity to man. Look at the
Speaker 1: Look at what happened in the school shooting this kid.
Speaker 1: You know, there's evil. No normal, good hearted human being
Speaker 1: with a soul could ever go in there and coldly
Speaker 1: kill innocent children or people that listen to this John
Speaker 1: the Apostle, this is the message you heard from the beginning.
Speaker 1: He's talking about Jesus. We should love one another because
Speaker 1: that's the answer and the solution to these gun dance
Speaker 1: and all this other stuff. But everybody says love, love, love.
Speaker 1: I don't think anybody has a clue what love is.
Speaker 1: Well they don't and because they don't have God. But
Speaker 1: the bottom line is he said, do not be lack Kane.
Speaker 1: He goes all the way back to creation Adam and
Speaker 1: Eve Kane enabled they're not before I'm on the earth shone. Listen,
Speaker 1: don't be lack Caine. Remember he murdered his brother who
Speaker 1: belonged to the evil One, and murdered his brother. Now listen,
Speaker 1: and why did he murder him because his own actions
Speaker 1: were evil and his brothers were righteous. That's all he needed.
Speaker 1: Let me ask you this because I think that you know,
Speaker 1: and it's it's a very interesting story for people who
Speaker 1: don't know. So I'm doing this interview down on West Monroe,
Speaker 1: Louisiana with Phil Robertson, who joins us. Now he's now
Speaker 1: on CRTV and he's got a contest. If you want
Speaker 1: to go duck hunting with him, I'll tell you about
Speaker 1: that minute. And so you're literally Hannity, you want to
Speaker 1: get them ratings up, come on out in the swamp. Now,
Speaker 1: I've watched your show enough to know that they are
Speaker 1: alligators in that swamp. And you wanted to dunk my
Speaker 1: head where where amongst the alligators swim head? But your
Speaker 1: whole person, my whole person. Well, if you build a pool,
Speaker 1: I'll do it in a pool, but I'm not doing
Speaker 1: it in a swamp with alligators. Remember, the Lord will
Speaker 1: protect you, my man. So you say you have actually
Speaker 1: baptized people in that swamp, you're telling me thousands? Are
Speaker 1: you serious? Thousands of people? Thousands? If you sew the
Speaker 1: throne that we've not walked down into the river during
Speaker 1: a thundershome, I feel like a w and we walked
Speaker 1: out there in the river. If you had seen the
Speaker 1: throng that have my faith obeyed the death Barlin resurrection
Speaker 1: of Jeeves died of seeing their old person is being
Speaker 1: very and the new one comes forward. All right, I
Speaker 1: have a question, then, why do why do people that
Speaker 1: are saved? Because I believe in Jesus like you do,
Speaker 1: and I believe that he's the Son of God and
Speaker 1: our personal Lord and savior, and he suffered, died, and
Speaker 1: was murdered and beaten and humiliated for our sins. I
Speaker 1: believe all that. But my question is, then why does
Speaker 1: everyone keep sitting? And I'll start with myself, Probably because, uh,
Speaker 1: knowing your history, they probably sprinkle a little water on
Speaker 1: you before you Yeah, they did around a little bit.
Speaker 1: Well you wait a minute, are you saying you don't
Speaker 1: send this to this day? You don't say, Hey, we
Speaker 1: all make mistakes. That's why Jesus is at the right
Speaker 1: hand of the Father constant, mediating for us to keep
Speaker 1: what's cleans of any future sn He's covered the whole thing.
Speaker 1: Past one was removed at the cross, future sins. He's
Speaker 1: there to not hold him against us. But you're a
Speaker 1: changed person. You don't send like you used to. Oh,
Speaker 1: not nearly as much. All right, well, all right, so Phil,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, we're just out of time. Listen. So if
Speaker 1: people want to go hunting with you, um and win
Speaker 1: a special hunting trip and enjoy ms Kay's food and
Speaker 1: cooking at which you can't beat, you can just go
Speaker 1: travel accommodations two days, one night, West Monroe, Louisiana, home
Speaker 1: cooked meal with ms K, a tour of the Duck
Speaker 1: Commander facility, and gets to go hunting with you. How
Speaker 1: do you do that? Well, that's a good question. I've
Speaker 1: never turned on the internet, never clicked on to anything.
Speaker 1: I don't have a telephone. Wait a minute, I got
Speaker 1: I'll get your own the internet. And I said on
Speaker 1: the internet have to say, but they'll have to go
Speaker 1: to CRTV to find out all the all you gotta do.
Speaker 1: I got it right here, crtv dot com, slash Phil
Speaker 1: and use the promo code Phil and and you get
Speaker 1: to watch the show as well. All right, Thank you
Speaker 1: so much, Phil Robertson. We love you the best of
Speaker 1: the family. And uh, I will I'll go in the pool.
Speaker 1: Buy a pool for me. Hey, I got it Land up,
Speaker 1: come duck hunting. Women will do the whole deal. All right,
Speaker 1: my friend, I blush you. We appreciate an eight nine
Speaker 1: for one Shawn Tolfrey telephone number. Alright, Hannity tonight, nine eastern.
Speaker 1: We hope you'll sell you DVR, Fox News Channel. The
Speaker 1: President at Seepac today. If you missed this out, this
Speaker 1: speech went on an hour and fifteen minutes. We'll show
Speaker 1: you some of the highlights of that speech. We'll get
Speaker 1: full complete reaction among our many guests judged and impio
Speaker 1: and much much more. And that's tonight nine Eastern on
Speaker 1: Hannity on the Fox News Channel. Fair and balanced. We're
Speaker 1: not the destroyed Trump media anyway. Otherwise, have a great weekend.
Speaker 1: Thank you for being with us. We'll see you back
Speaker 1: here Monday, and we'll see you tonight at nine. Hope
Speaker 1: you have a lot of fun this weekend.